InfuSystem Holdings, Inc - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

or

Commission File Number: 000-51902

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

350 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10017

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including zip code)

(212) 418-5070

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Include Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one).

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨    Accelerated Filer  x    Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of November 13, 2007, 16,824,295 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

Index to Form 10-Q

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(formerly HAPC, INC.)

(a corporation in the development stage)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(formerly HAPC, INC.)

(a corporation in the development stage)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(formerly HAPC, INC.)

(a corporation in the development stage)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

For the period August 15, 2005 (inception) to December 31, 2005,

the year ended December 31, 2006 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2007

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(formerly HAPC, INC.)

(a corporation in the development stage)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

(formerly HAPC, INC.)

(a corporation in the development stage)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The information in this Report on Form 10-Q includes the financial position of InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (formerly HAPC, INC.) and its consolidated subsidiary, Iceland Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”) as of September 30, 2007 and the results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 and stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The financial statements of all entities are consolidated and all intercompany accounts are eliminated upon consolidation. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) have been made that are necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2007 and the results of its operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2007 and stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The Company was incorporated in Delaware on August 15, 2005 as a blank check company whose objective is to acquire through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination, one or more operating businesses primarily in the healthcare sector. The transaction was consummated on October 25, 2007. See Note 11.

Substantially all activity through September 30, 2007 relates to the Company’s formation, the IPO and efforts related to the acquisition of InfuSystem described below. The Company has selected December 31 as its fiscal year end. The registration statement for the Company’s IPO was declared effective on April 11, 2006. The Company consummated the IPO on April 18, 2006 and received gross proceeds of $100,000,000. Legal fees totaling $497,000 and underwriting costs totaling $2,600,000 have been paid from these proceeds. Substantially all of the net proceeds of the IPO were applied toward acquiring InfuSystem.

Of the proceeds of the IPO, $96,214,793 was deposited and is being held in a trust account (“Trust Account”) and invested in a money market fund, fully collateralized by U.S. government securities until the earlier of (i) the consummation of the acquisition of InfuSystem or (ii) the distribution of the Trust Account as described below. The amount in the Trust Account includes $5,467,581 of contingent underwriting compensation (the “Discount”) which will be paid to the underwriters if the acquisition of InfuSystem is consummated, but which will be forfeited if public stockholders vote against the proposed acquisition and elect to have their shares redeemed for cash if the acquisition of InfuSystem is not consummated. Pro rata decreases in the Discount will occur if the acquisition of InfuSystem is consummated but there are up to 19.99% dissenting stockholders who vote against the acquisition proposal and elect to have their shares redeemed for cash. The remaining amount of the proceeds were used to pay business, legal, accounting, due diligence on prospective acquisitions and continuing general and administrative expenses. The Company funded its working capital requirements by issuing warrants on December 28, 2006 for $437,000, on April 12, 2007 for $313,000, and on September 12, 2007 for $200,400 as discussed in Note 8.

5

Table of Contents

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Investments Held in Trust

The Company invests amounts held in trust in a United States Treasury money market account. Under the terms of the trust agreement, these amounts are restricted to the funding of an acquisition and to the payment of income taxes on the trust’s taxable income.

Share Based Payment

FASB Statement No. 123 (R), “Share Based Payment” requires all entities to recognize compensation expense in an amount equal to the fair value of share based payments made to employees, among other requirements. Under the fair value based method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the award vesting period.

Accordingly, share based payments issued to officers, directors and vendors are measured at fair value and recognized as expense over the related vesting periods.

The compensation expense recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $263,595 and $14,192,236, respectively. The compensation expense recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was $1,489,793 and $18,573,753 respectively. The compensation expense recognized for the period from August 15, 2005 (inception) to September 30, 2007 was $21,224,335.

Accounting for Warrants and Derivative Instruments

On April 18, 2006, the Company consummated its IPO of 16,666,667 units. Each unit consists of one share of common stock and two redeemable common stock purchase warrants. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one share of its common stock at an exercise price of $5.00. On May 18, 2006, the Company sold an additional 208,584 units to FTN Midwest Securities Corp., the underwriter of its IPO, pursuant to a partial exercise by FTN Midwest Securities Corp. of its overallotment option. The Warrant Agreement provides for the Company to register the shares underlying the warrants in the absence of the Company’s ability to deliver registered shares to the warrant holders upon warrant exercise.

In September 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF 00-19, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock,” (“EITF 00-19”) which requires freestanding derivative contracts that are settled in a company’s own stock, including common stock warrants, to be designated as equity instruments, assets or liabilities. Under the provisions of EITF 00-19, a contract designated as an asset or a liability must be carried at its fair value on a company’s balance sheet, with any changes in fair value recorded in the company’s results of operations. A contract designated as an equity instrument must be included within equity, and no fair value adjustments are required from period to period.

In accordance with EITF 00-19, the 33,750,502 warrants issued in connection with the IPO and overallotment to purchase stock must be settled in registered shares and are separately accounted for as liabilities as discussed in Note 5. The fair value of these warrants is shown on the Company’s balance sheet and the unrealized changes in the value of these warrants are shown in the Company’s statement of operations as “Gain (loss) on warrant liabilities.” These warrants are freely traded on the “Over The Counter

6

Table of Contents

Bulletin Board.” Consequently, the fair value of these warrants is estimated as the market price of the warrant at each period end. To the extent the market price increases or decreases, the Company’s warrant liabilities will also increase or decrease with a corresponding impact on the Company’s statement of operations.

Sales of warrants that can be settled in unregistered shares of common stock are treated as equity and included in additional paid in capital as discussed in Note 8. The total warrants issued to date that can be settled in unregistered shares of common stock are 1,357,717 at an issue price of $.70 per warrant or a total issue price of $950,402.

Income taxes

The Company uses the liability method for reporting income taxes, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Under the liability method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. Future tax benefits are recognized when it is more likely than not that such benefits will be realized.

The Company has a total deferred tax asset of $4,436,999 related to the compensation expense associated with the reserve of certain shares of its common stock currently held as treasury stock for two directors and other expenses. The Company has established a valuation allowance for the full amount of the benefit based on the uncertainty that the benefit will be fully utilized.

Earnings Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share assumes the issuance of potentially dilutive shares of common stock during the periods related to the stock options and warrants. The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share computations for net income (loss) for the following periods:

Potential shares of common stock related to options and warrants were not included as the impact would be anti-dilutive. The calculated diluted shares outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were 23,098,027 and 21,125,289 and 22,828,349 and 14,372,085, respectively. The calculated diluted outstanding shares for the period from August 15, 2006 (inception) to September 30, 2007 was 16,996,617.

7

Table of Contents

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (“FIN 48”) an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which provides criteria for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax positions. A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable on its technical merits. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007, which had no impact on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We classify interest on tax deficiencies as interest expense and income tax penalties as penalties expense. At January 1, 2007 (date of adoption) and at September 30, 2007, no liabilities have been recorded for uncertain tax positions pursuant to FIN 48, as the Company determined that all previously determined tax positions are highly certain. In addition, the Company did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of FIN 48.

As of January 1, 2007 (date of adoption) and September 30, 2007, the tax years 2005 and 2006 remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions.

In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“FASB No. 157”) which relates to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of FASB No. 157 are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company has not yet completed its analysis of the impact of adopting FASB No. 157.

In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” (“FASB No. 159”) which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. FASB No. 159 is expected to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the Board’s long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. FASB No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. FASB No. 159 does not affect any existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value. FASB No. 159 does not establish requirements for recognizing and measuring dividend income, interest income, or interest expense. FASB No. 159 does not eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards, including requirements for disclosures about fair value measurements, included in FASB Statements No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements, and No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” FASB No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company has not yet completed its assessment of the impact upon adoption of FASB No. 159 on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Cash concentration of credit risk

The Company maintains cash balances with financial institutions, which, at times, may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limit. The Company has not experienced any losses to date as a result of this policy, and management believes there is little risk of loss.

On April 18, 2006, the Company sold 16,666,667 units (“Units”) to the public at a price of $6.00 per unit. Each Unit consists of one share of the Company’s common stock, $.0001 par value, and two redeemable common stock purchase warrants. Each warrant will entitle the holder to purchase from the Company one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 commencing on the later of the completion of a business combination or one year from the effective date of the IPO and expiring five years from the effective date of the IPO. The Company may call the warrants for redemption in whole and not in part at a price of $.01 per warrant at

8

Table of Contents

any time after the warrants become exercisable. They cannot be redeemed unless the warrant holders receive written notice not less than 30 days prior to the redemption; and, if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the common stock equals or exceeds $8.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third business day prior to the notice of redemption to warrant holders. In connection with the IPO, the Company paid to FTN Midwest Securities Corp. an underwriting discount of 7% of the IPO price and a non–accountable expense allowance of 1% of the IPO price.

In addition, on April 18, 2006, the Company issued to FTN Midwest Securities Corp., for $100, an option to purchase up to a total of 833,333 units. The units issuable upon exercise of this option are identical to those offered in the IPO, except that each of the warrants underlying this option entitles the holder to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at a price of $6.25. This option is exercisable at $7.50 per unit commencing on the later of the consummation of a business combination or one year from the date of the initial public offering prospectus dated April 11, 2006 and expiring five years from the date of the initial public offering prospectus dated April 11, 2006. The option may only be exercised or converted by the option holder. The Company received payment of $100 for this option in the first quarter of 2007.

The sale of the option was accounted for as an equity transaction. Accordingly, there was no net impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations, except for the recording of the $100 proceeds from the sale. The Company determined that the fair value of the option on the date of sale was $2.36 per unit, or $1,966,666 total, using an expected life of five years, volatility of 47% and a risk-free interest rate of 3.98%. Accordingly, this amount was recorded as an expense of the offering resulting in a charge directly to stockholders’ equity during 2006.

The volatility calculation of 47% is based on the 180 day average volatility of a representative sample of 41 healthcare industry companies (the “Sample Companies”) with market capitalization under $200 million. Because it does not have a long trading history, the Company needed to estimate the potential volatility of its common stock price. The Company referred to the 180 day average volatility of the Sample Companies because Management believes that the average volatility of such companies is a reasonable benchmark to use in estimating the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock post-business combination. Although an expected life of five years was taken into account for purposes of assigning a fair value to the options, if the Company does not consummate a business combination within the prescribed time period and liquidates, the options would become worthless.

On May 18, 2006, the Company sold 208,584 Units (the “Overallotment Units”) to FTN Midwest Securities Corp. pursuant to a partial exercise by FTN Midwest Securities Corp. of its overallotment option. The Overallotment Units were sold at the offering price of $6.00 per Unit, less FTN Midwest Securities Corp.’s 7% underwriting discount.

Investments held in trust at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, consist of a United States Treasury money market account with a carrying value of $101,257,050 and $98,151,128, respectively. The fair value of the investments approximate the carrying value.

The warrants will be exercisable only if at the time of exercise (i) a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), with respect to the common stock underlying the warrants issuable upon exercise of the option is effective, or (ii) in the opinion of counsel to the Company or counsel to the option holder reasonably satisfactory to the Company, the exercise of the warrants is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and such securities are qualified for sale or exempt from qualification under applicable securities laws of the states or other jurisdictions in which the registered holders reside. The warrants may not be exercised by, or securities issued to, any registered holder in any state in which such exercise or issuance would be unlawful. The option holder is not entitled to receive a net cash settlement or other settlement in lieu of physical settlement if the common stock underlying the warrants, or securities underlying the option, as applicable, are not covered by an effective registration statement.

9

Table of Contents

The Company has determined that the warrants issued in connection with the IPO including the overallotment shares issued on May 18, 2006 are classified as liabilities in accordance with EITF 00-19. Therefore, the fair value of each instrument must be recorded as a liability on the Company’s balance sheet. Changes in the fair values of these instruments will result in adjustments to the amount of the recorded liabilities, and the corresponding gain or loss will be recorded in the Company’s statement of operations. At the date of the conversion of each warrant or portion thereof (or exercise of the warrants or portion thereof, as the case may be), the corresponding liability will be reclassified as equity.

The fair values of the Company’s 33,750,502 warrants issued in connection with the IPO outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 were $9,787,646 or $0.29 per warrant and $9,112,636 or $0.27 per warrant, respectively.

Two of the Company’s directors were former Managing Directors of FTN Midwest Securities Corp. Mr. McDevitt resigned from his position as Managing Director of FTN Midwest Securities Corp. effective January 19, 2007 and Mr. LaVecchia resigned from his position as Managing Director of FTN Midwest Securities Corp. effective February 2, 2007. FTN Midwest Securities Corp., who was the underwriter in the Company’s IPO, received an underwriting discount of 7%, a non-accountable expense allowance of 1% and an option to purchase 833,333 shares for a fee of $100. The Company reserved in its treasury 2,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance to Sean McDevitt and 416,666 shares of common stock for issuance to Pat LaVecchia on the date that is the later of six months after the completion of the acquisition of InfuSystem, or another business combination or April 11, 2007.

The Company currently utilizes and will continue to utilize certain administrative, technological and secretarial services, as well as certain limited office space provided by FTN Midwest Securities Corp. until the consummation of a business combination by the Company. The Company has agreed to pay $1 per year for such services commencing on the effective date of the IPO and continuing monthly thereafter.

Refer to Note 10 for discussion of the Termination and Break Up Fee and the related Continuing Guaranty.

As disclosed in Note 10, the Company is paying a ticking fee to I-Flow in consideration of its acquisition of InfuSystem. The Company incurred $191,666 and $543,749 related to the ticking fee during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, which was recorded in other income (expenses).

The major components of deferred tax assets at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows:

At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, a 100% valuation allowance is provided, as it is uncertain if the deferred tax assets will provide any future benefits because of the uncertainty that the benefit will be fully utilized.

The Company’s chief executive officer receives annual compensation of $50,000 for serving as an officer and $50,000 for serving as a director. The Company’s chief financial officer receives annual compensation of $50,000 and the Company’s independent directors each receive annual compensation of $50,000.

10

Table of Contents

Certain of the Company’s officers and directors have committed to purchase up to $1,000,000 of the Company’s warrants from the Company in a private placement at a price of $.70 per warrant subsequent to the filing of the preliminary proxy statement seeking stockholder approval of the acquisition of InfuSystem. Such officers and directors have agreed not to sell or transfer the warrants until after the Company has consummated a business combination. On December 28, 2006, the Company issued 624,286 warrants to purchase common stock to Sean McDevitt, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, at a purchase price of $0.70 per warrant for an aggregate purchase price of $437,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $5.00 per share of common stock and are exercisable commencing on the Company’s completion of a business combination and expire April 11, 2011 or earlier upon redemption by the Company. The Company may call the warrants for redemption in whole and not in part at a price of $0.01 per warrant at anytime after the warrant becomes exercisable. The warrants cannot be redeemed unless the holder receives written notice not less than 30 days prior to the redemption and if and only if, the reported last price of the common stock equals or exceeds $8.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 day period ending on the third day of business prior to the notice of redemption to warrant holder. The Company has fully reserved these shares as authorized but not issued. The Company issued to Mr. McDevitt an additional 447,143 warrants to purchase common stock at a purchase price of $0.70 per warrant for an aggregate purchase price of $313,000 on April 12, 2007. In addition, on September 12, 2007 an additional 286,288 warrants to purchase common stock were issued to Sean McDevitt, John Voris, Wayne Yetter, Erin Enright and Jean Pierre Millon at a purchase price of $0.70 per warrant for an aggregate purchase price of $200,400. The warrants issued to Mr. McDevitt on April 12, 2007 and the warrants issued to Sean McDevitt, John Voris, Wayne Yetter, Erin Enright and Jean Pierre Millon on September 12, 2007, are subject to the same terms and conditions as the warrants issued to Mr. McDevitt in December 2006. Mr. McDevitt and the other warrant purchasers, have agreed not to sell or transfer their warrant purchases until after the Company has consummated a business combination. The warrants issued and sold in December 2006, April 2007 and September 2007 were not registered under the Securities Act. As a result, the warrants and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants may not be sold unless they have been registered pursuant to a registration statement filed under the Securities Act or pursuant to an available exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act as evidenced by an opinion of counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Company.

The initial stockholders, who received shares prior to the IPO, are entitled to demand that we register the resale of their shares of common stock at any time six months following the consummation of the acquisition, pursuant to the terms of their respective lock-up agreements.

The Company has agreed to reimburse its initial stockholders for (a) any income tax liability incurred by the Company’s initial stockholders as a result of the award of their shares and/or the vesting of such shares (other than tax liability due as a result of their sale of such shares) and (b) all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the initial stockholders in connection with their activities on the Company’s behalf.

The Company and FTN executed an engagement letter dated April 27, 2007, in which FTN will provide advisory services for a fee of $1,000,000. FTN will provide the Company with financial advice and assistance in connection with possible transactions involving InfuSystem, Inc. The services may include performing valuation analysis, assisting the Company in performing its due diligence, coordinating visits with InfuSystem, Inc. and assisting the Company in negotiating financial terms. Per the engagement letter, the $1 million fee is not payable until the Company consummates a business combination. As of September 30, 2007, the Company has not recorded a liability related to FTN’s services. The $1,000,000 was paid on October 31, 2007, after the October 25, 2007 closing. The $1,000,000 fee paid to FTN is also discussed in Note 11.

Effective December 30, 2005, Healthcare Acquisition Partners Holdings, LLC sold the 4,166,667 shares of common stock that it had received upon formation of the Company back to the Company. The shares were purchased for a $25,000 note payable. Simultaneously, the Company transferred 1,750,001 of these shares of common stock to certain members of its management team resulting in compensation of $8,435,005 to them, computed at $4.82 per share, which will be charged to expense ratably over the forfeiture period. Of this amount, $263,595 and $1,142,241 were charged to expense for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 the amounts charged to expense were $1,489,793 and $5,523,756 respectively. The amount charged to expense for the period from August 15, 2005 (inception) to September 30, 2007

11

Table of Contents

was $8,174,341. The Company will recognize the remaining $260,664 of compensation as an expense ratably over the forfeiture period of the shares. Each individual receiving shares has agreed to forfeit a portion of their shares if they cease to be an officer or director prior to the following dates (other than as a result of (i) disability, (ii) death, (iii) removal by the Company without cause, or (iv) resignation for good reason) the portion of the shares to be forfeited is as follows:

The remaining 2,416,666 shares of the Company’s common stock transferred back to the Company and not transferred to members of the Company’s management team on December 30, 2005 are being held as treasury shares and reserved for transfer by the Company’s board of directors to present or future officers, directors or employees.

On July 24, 2006, the Company reserved for grant to two of the Company’s directors 2,416,666 shares of the Company’s common stock. These shares were originally held as treasury shares and reserved for transfer to present or future officers, directors or employees. The directors are entitled to receive the shares on the date that is the later of six months after completion of business combination or April 11, 2007. The grants may not be transferred prior to the date that is the later of six months after the completion of a business combination or April 11, 2007.

As a result of the above, the Company recorded compensation expense of $13,049,996 in its quarter ended September 30, 2006 which is based upon the number of shares reserved of 2,416,666 at the July 24, 2006 closing stock price of $5.40 per share.

The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such designations, voting and other rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors.

Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement

On September 29, 2006, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with I-Flow Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“I-Flow”), Iceland Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Acquisition Sub”) and InfuSystem, Inc. (“InfuSystem”), a California corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of I-Flow. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, Acquisition Sub will purchase all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of InfuSystem. Concurrently with the acquisition, Acquisition Sub will merge with and into InfuSystem. After the merger, Acquisition Sub will cease to exist as an independent entity and InfuSystem, as the surviving corporation, will continue its corporate existence under the laws of the State of California. The name of the surviving corporation will be InfuSystem, Inc. The Stock Purchase Agreement originally provided that in the event the acquisition of InfuSystem was not consummated by April 30, 2007, the Stock Purchase Agreement was terminable by the Company or I-Flow. On April 30, 2007, the Company, I-Flow, InfuSystem and Acquisition Sub entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Stock Purchase Agreement extending the termination date from April 30, 2007 to June 29, 2007. On June 29, 2007, the Company, I-Flow, InfuSystem and Acquisition Sub entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Stock Purchase Agreement extending the termination date from June 29, 2007 to July 31, 2007. On July 31, 2007, the Company, I-Flow, InfuSystem and Acquisition Sub entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Stock Purchase Agreement extending the termination date from July 31, 2007 to October 1, 2007.

On September 18, 2007, the Company, I-Flow, InfuSystem and Acquisition Sub entered into Amendment No. 4 to the Stock Purchase Agreement extending the termination date from October 1, 2007 to October 22, 2007. The agreement also amended/added other provisions including a decrease in the purchase price from $140,000,000 to $100,000,000 as well as an Earn-out provision and other provisions.

12

Table of Contents

The Earn-out provision provides for a potential additional payment of up to $12,000,000 to be paid to I-Flow in 2011, provided that certain consolidated net revenue growth targets related to the Company’s future operations are met. The contingent consideration is based upon the compound growth rate or “CAGR” of the Company’s consolidated net revenues over the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 as compared to InfuSystem’s 2007 net revenues, excluding certain revenues not part of InfuSystem’s core business. The additional payment would be paid in 2011. No additional payment will be made unless the Company achieves a consolidated net revenue CAGR of at least 40% over the three-year period. The additional payment will range from $3,000,000 to $12,000,000 depending upon the extent to which consolidated net revenue CAGR for the three year period exceeds 40%. The maximum potential amount of the contingent consideration is $12,000,000 and would be payable to I-Flow if the Company achieves a consolidated net revenue CAGR of 50% over the three-year period. The Company has agreed to guarantee the obligations of Acquisition Sub under the Credit Agreement.

On October 17, 2007, the Company, I-Flow, InfuSystem and Acquisition Sub entered into a Further Agreement Regarding Project Iceland (the Company’s acquisition of InfuSystem from I-Flow) in which the termination date will be extended to November 1, 2007, the Company agrees to pay the termination fee of $3,000,000 unconditionally, and I-Flow may purchase shares of the Company’s stock at its discretion from the third parties in privately negotiated or market transactions in order to increase the likelihood of shareholder approval.

The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the “Certificate of Incorporation”) requires that the acquisition must be approved by the holders of a majority of the shares of its common stock sold in the Company’s April 2006 IPO. The acquisition cannot be completed if holders of 20% or more of the shares of the Company’s common stock sold in the IPO vote against the acquisition and, as permitted by the Certificate of Incorporation, demand that their shares be converted (the “Conversion Rights”) into the right to receive a pro rata portion of the net proceeds of the IPO held in a trust account established for this purpose at the time of the IPO. If the holders of less than 20% of the shares of the Company’s common stock exercise their Conversion Rights and the transaction closes, such holders will receive their pro rata share of the trust proceeds.

Purchase Price

In consideration for the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of InfuSystem, the Company or Acquisition Sub will pay to I-Flow a purchase price of $100,000,000, subject to certain working capital adjustments as set forth in the Stock Purchase Agreement. The purchase price will be paid by the Company or Acquisition Sub through a combination of (i) a secured promissory note (the “Promissory Note”) payable to I-Flow in a principal amount equal to $15,000,000 plus the amount actually paid to the Company’s stockholders who exercise their Conversion Rights but not to exceed $35,000,000 (the “Maximum Amount”) and (ii) an amount of cash purchase price equal to $65,000,000 plus the difference between the Maximum Amount and the actual principal amount of the Promissory Note. In connection with I-Flow’s commitment to accept the Promissory Note, a $100,000 delivery fee was paid by the Company to I-Flow on October 4, 2006 and a “Ticking Fee” (between 0.50% and 1.0% per annum of the Maximum Amount) is payable from September 29, 2006 until the earlier of the closing under the Stock Purchase Agreement, termination of the Stock Purchase Agreement or the Company’s notice that, because alternative financing has been secured, the Promissory Note to I-Flow will no longer be required. On October 4, 2006, the Company paid $100,000 to I-Flow representing the delivery fee.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants

The Stock Purchase Agreement contains representations and warranties of each of the Company, I-Flow, Acquisition Sub and InfuSystem, as applicable, relating to, among other matters, (i) corporate organization and similar corporate matters, (ii) title to stock, (iii) capitalization, (iv) the authorization, performance and enforceability of the Stock Purchase Agreement, (v) taxes, (vi) financial statements and the absence of undisclosed liabilities, (vii) material contracts, (viii) absence of certain changes, (ix) compliance with applicable laws, (x) absence of litigation, (xi) insurance, (xii) consents, (xiii) licenses and permits, (xiv) validity of leases, (xv) title to assets, (xvi) employer and employee benefit matters, (xvii) environmental matters and (xviii) intellectual property matters.

InfuSystem has agreed to continue to operate its business in the ordinary course prior to the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement and each of the parties has agreed (i) not to take any action to cause its representations and warranties to become untrue and (ii) to use all commercially reasonable efforts to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement in accordance with the terms set forth therein. Each party has also agreed to maintain the confidentiality of the other’s proprietary information.

13

Table of Contents

Indemnification

Under the Stock Purchase Agreement, each of the Company and I-Flow have agreed to indemnify the other and its affiliates, subject to certain limitations, against certain losses arising from, among other matters, such party’s breach of the Stock Purchase Agreement.

Termination and Break Up Fee

Payment of the break up fee has been guaranteed to I-Flow by Messrs. Sean McDevitt and Philip B. Harris (the “Guarantors”) pursuant to a continuing guaranty (the “Continuing Guaranty”) provided by the Guarantors in favor of I-Flow and delivered concurrently with the execution of the Stock Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of a guarantee fee and reimbursement agreement (the “Guarantee Fee and Reimbursement Agreement”) entered into by the Company and the Guarantors on September 29, 2006, the Company has agreed to pay the Guarantors a fee of $100,000 upon delivery of the Continuing Guaranty and $300,000 upon closing of the transactions contemplated by, or the termination of, the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Company has also agreed to immediately reimburse the Guarantors for any payments actually made by them in connection with the Continuing Guaranty. The Guarantors have waived any rights they may have to bring claims against the trust account to satisfy reimbursements owed to them under the Guaranty Fee and Reimbursement Agreement. Messrs. McDevitt and Harris have delivered to I-Flow a $3,000,000 letter of credit issued by JPMorgan for the benefit of I-Flow which I-Flow may draw upon in the event that the break up fees are not paid when due and payable. During 2006, the Company incurred a charge to operating expenses for $100,000 related to the Guaranty Fee and Reimbursement Agreement. The Company paid the termination fee on October 25, 2007 and the letter of credit issued by JPMorgan for the benefit of I-Flow was subsequently cancelled.

Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets

On October 25, 2007, the Company consummated the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Acquisition Sub acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Infusystem from I-Flow. Prior to the acquisition, the Company was a blank check company with no operations, formed as a vehicle for an acquisition of an operating business in the healthcare industry. Concurrently with the acquisition, Acquisition Sub merged with and into InfuSystem, as a result of which InfuSystem became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company paid $100,000,000 to I-Flow for all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of InfuSystem, $67,297,000 of which was paid in cash and the remaining $32,703,000 was paid in the form of a loan from I-Flow. In addition, the Company paid the $3,000,000 termination fee as discussed in Note 10. The allocation of the purchase price, which will include deferred acquisition and closing costs, has not yet been completed.

As of October 25, 2007, the Company is no longer a development stage company and has ceased being a shell company.

The Stock Purchase Agreement also provides for a potential additional payment of up to $12,000,000 to be paid to I-Flow in 2011, provided that certain consolidated net revenue growth targets related to the Company's future operations are met as described in Note 10.

Holders of 2,726,488 shares of the Company's common stock elected to convert their shares to cash at a conversion price of $6.00 per share for a total of $16,358,928 which was paid on October 25, 2007.

At October 25, 2007, the date of the completion of the acquisition, the following amounts included in the September 30, 2007 financial statements will change significantly, which are not reflected in the September 30, 2007 balances. The common stock subject to conversion will reflect the 2,726,488 actual shares converted which will reduce this balance by approximately $3,882,356. The stockholders who elected to convert their 2,726,488 shares were paid $6.00 per share or $16,358,928 and their respective shares were cancelled. The contingent advisory service fee of $1,000,000 will be

14

Table of Contents

accrued and paid. The deferred underwriting fees will be reduced by $883,395 to reflect the required pro rata reduction based on actual shares converted and the subsequent change in the warrant value will cause the warrant liability to increase, which, based on the November 13, 2007 value, will be an increase of approximately $4,400,000. The approximate $4,400,000 increase in warrant liability will result in a corresponding charge to other expense on the statement of operations.

The share based payments agreement discussed in Note 2 and Note 9 in which stock compensation has been charged to expense over the forfeiture period will end on the business combination date, which is October 25, 2007. As a result, the balance of the deferred compensation of $260,664 as of September 30, 2007 will be expensed on October 25, 2007.

The balance in the trust account was disbursed as follows:

The balance owed to FTN Midwest Securities Corp. of $6,405,026 was paid on October 31, 2007 out of the operating account. The balance owed consists of:

As a result of 90,000 less shares ultimately converted by shareholders voting against the acquisition, an additional underwriting fee of $29,160 will be paid to FTN Midwest Securities Corp.

The remaining cash of approximately $2,200,000, adjusted to include the refund due from Mellon Investor Services, LLC and the additional amount due to FTN Midwest Securities Corp., will be used for general corporate purposes.

Board Representation Agreement

On October 12, 2007, the Company and Great Point Partners, LLC (“Great Point”) entered into a Board Representation Agreement (the “Agreement”) in connection with the sale by certain of the Company’s founding stockholders of an option to Great Point pursuant to which Great Point may purchase up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock from such stockholders. Pursuant to its terms, the Agreement becomes effective upon the closing of the acquisition. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company agreed that upon request, the Company would increase the size of its Board of Directors by one and use its best efforts to cause the vacancy created thereby to be filled by an individual designated by Great Point (the “Great Point Director”). Great Point has the option, but not the obligation, to designate a director.

The Agreement provides that so long as Great Point and any of its affiliated funds own at least 10% of the Company outstanding securities entitled to vote for the election of directors of the Company (the “Voting Securities”), the Company will use its best efforts to cause (i) the Board of Directors or its Nominating Committee to recommend a Great Point Director for election each year and (ii) the Board of Directors to designate the Great Point Director to serve on committees of the Board of Directors to the same extent, and on the same basis, as other members of the Board of Directors. Additionally, so long as Great Point or any of its affiliated funds own at least 10% of the Company’s Voting Securities, the Company will, at the option of the Great Point Director, cause the Great Point Director to be a member of the board of directors of each subsidiary of the Company.

15

Table of Contents

In the event that there is a vacancy on the Board caused by the resignation or removal of a Great Point Director or the failure of Great Point to designate a Great Point Director, Great Point shall have the right to participate as an observer at each meeting of the Board of Directors or any committee thereof.

In the event that at any time Great Point and any of its affiliated funds own less than 10% of the Company’s Voting Securities, Great Point shall cause the Great Point Director to resign from the Board of Directors and from the board of directors of any subsidiary of the Company.

Share Issuance

As discussed in Note 6, on October 25, 2007, 765,956 and 159,575 shares of common stock were issued to Sean McDevitt and Pat LaVecchia, respectively. The balance of 1,234,044 and 257,091 shares will be issued six months from the date of the closing of the Company’s acquisition of InfuSystem, resulting in the issuance of a total of 2,000,000 and 416,666 shares of common stock to Sean McDevitt and Pat LaVecchia, respectively.

Name Change

Upon completing its acquisition of InfuSystem, Inc. from I-Flow Corporation, the Company has changed its name to InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. It will remain a Delaware Corporation.

Amended and Restated Services Agreement

I-Flow and InfuSystem entered into an Amended and Restated Services Agreement (“Services Agreement”) pursuant to which InfuSystem agreed to continue to provide I-Flow, from and after the closing of the acquisition, the billing and collection services and management services that InfuSystem had been providing to I-Flow prior to the date of the closing of the acquisition. Under the Services Agreement, I-Flow agreed to retain InfuSystem, as an independent contractor, on a non-exclusive basis, to provide third-party billing and certain management services in connection with the manufacturing, marketing, distribution and sale by I-Flow of its medical equipment and supplies. In return, InfuSystem agreed to furnish I-Flow certain billing and collection services, including the billing of services and/or products to, and collection of payments and reimbursements from, patients and applicable third parties.

Under the Services Agreement, I-Flow agreed to pay InfuSystem a monthly service fee equal to the greater of (i) the monthly expenses for those InfuSystem employees devoted to the billing and collection and management services provided to I-Flow which expenses consist of (a) salaries and wages, (b) payroll taxes and (c) group insurance, in addition to an amount equal to 40% of the sums of items (a) through (c) or (ii) a performance-based fee equal to 25% of the total actual net cash collections (net of adjustments) received during such month on behalf of I-Flow.

The initial term of the Services Agreement is 3 years, and will be automatically renewed for succeeding 1 year terms unless terminated pursuant to its provisions. The Services Agreement may be terminated by I-Flow at any time upon giving 180 calendar days prior written notice to InfuSystem, and may be terminated by InfuSystem after the first anniversary upon giving 180 calendar days prior written notice to I-Flow.

License Agreement

InfuSystem entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with I-Flow, pursuant to which InfuSystem granted to I-Flow a license to use InfuSystem’s intellectual property related to the third-party billing and collection services and management services provided by InfuSystem to I-Flow prior to the closing of the acquisition. Specifically, InfuSystem granted to I-Flow (i) an unrestricted, perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, assignable, royalty-free and exclusive license to use and/or sublicense InfuSystem’s intellectual property with respect to acute post-operative pain management treatments, and (ii) an unrestricted, perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, assignable, royalty-free and non-exclusive license to use and/or sublicense InfuSystem’s intellectual property with respect to all fields other than post-operative pain management treatments, including, without limitation, the fields of wound site management and post-operative surgical treatments.

16

Table of Contents

The term of the License Agreement is perpetual, but may be terminated by I-Flow following the third anniversary of the effective date of the License Agreement. Upon the later of the third anniversary of the effective date or the termination of the Services Agreement for any reason, the exclusive license described in (i) above will be deemed amended to become a non-exclusive license. The License Agreement may not be terminated by InfuSystem.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “could”, “would”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “continue”, or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those described in our other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the Audited Financials included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis addresses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Management believes the following critical accounting policies involve its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments including those related to intangible assets, income taxes, share-based payment and contingencies.

Share-Based Payments

Management uses certain assumptions to determine the value of share-based payments based on fair value. These can include, as appropriate, relevant modeling techniques such as the Black-Scholes model and analyses of the valuation of various derivative securities of other comparable publicly traded companies, including the prices of publicly traded securities of other blank check companies.

Valuation of Warrants

Fair values for traded securities and derivatives are based on quoted market prices. Where market prices are not readily available, as in the case of our warrants as of the date of issuance, fair values are determined using methods requiring judgment and estimates. This policy only relates to warrants that can be settled in registered shares. Before the warrants were publicly traded, we allocated the unit price between the share of common stock and the warrants issued based upon relative fair value determined, among other things, by reference to comparative companies. The warrants included in the units sold in our initial public offering and the

17

Table of Contents

underwriter’s over allotment option began to be publicly traded on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board on June 15, 2006, and consequently the market value of the warrants is reflected as the fair value of the warrants at each period end. To the extent that the market prices of our warrants increase or decrease, our derivative liabilities will also increase or decrease with a corresponding impact on our statement of operations.

Overview

We were formed in Delaware on August 15, 2005. We were formed specifically as a vehicle to acquire, through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business combination, one or more operating businesses primarily in the healthcare sector. The initial business combination entered into by us must be with a target business or businesses whose fair market value is at least equal to 80% of net assets at the time of such acquisition.

Prior to entering into the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2006, with I-Flow Corporation (“I-Flow”), InfuSystem, Inc. (“InfuSystem”) and Iceland Acquisition Subsidiary, Inc. (“Iceland Acquisition Subsidiary”), we were engaged in sourcing a suitable business combination candidate. We had met with target companies, service professionals and other intermediaries to discuss with them the background of our management and combination preferences. In the course of these discussions, we also spent time explaining the capital structure of the initial public offering, the combination approval process, and the timeline under which we were operating before the proceeds of the offering are returned to investors.

Overall, we would conclude that the environment for target companies has been competitive and believe that private equity firms and strategic buyers represent our biggest competition. Our management believes that many of the fundamental drivers of alternative investment vehicles like our company are becoming more accepted by investors and potential business combination targets. These drivers include a difficult environment for initial public offerings, a cash-rich investment community looking for differentiated opportunities for incremental yield and business owners seeking new ways to maximize their stockholder value while remaining invested in the business.

From August 2005 (inception) until December 31, 2005, we had net losses of $24,783.

On April 18, 2006, we consummated our initial public offering of 16,666,667 units at a price of $6.00 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of our common stock, $.0001 par value, and two redeemable common stock purchase warrants. The common stock and warrants started trading separately on the OTC Bulletin Board as of June 15, 2006.

Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 commencing the later of the completion of a business combination or one year from the effective date of the initial public offering and expiring five years from the effective date of the initial public offering. Our net proceeds from the sale of the units were $98,011,000 which includes a contingent underwriting fee of $5,468,000. Of this amount, $96,215,000 was deposited in trust. The remaining $1,780,000 was held outside of the trust for use to provide for business, legal and accounting due diligence on prospective acquisitions and continuing general and administrative expenses. The $1,780,000 of net proceeds of the initial public offering held outside the trust were exhausted at December 31, 2006, however, the sale of warrants on December 28, 2006 for $437,000, on April 12, 2007 for $313,000, and on September 12, 2007 for $200,400 replenished the cash held outside of the trust account.

As of September 30, 2007, we had (i) $27,000 in cash outside the trust and (ii) $3,347,000 in current liabilities including accrued legal fees, due diligence expenses and related transaction expenses and taxes. The consideration of $100,000,000 to be paid to I-Flow in connection with the acquisition of InfuSystem will be funded using cash held in the trust account and by a promissory note payable to I-Flow in the initial principal amount of $15,000,000 to be increased up to $35,000,000 depending on the number of our stockholders who exercise their conversion rights. Accordingly, we believe that we have adequate funds to complete the proposed acquisition of InfuSystem. In the event the business combination was not completed, we would have tried to raise any required funds via a private offering of debt or equity securities to continue searching for an acquisition candidate. However, the acquisition closed on October 25, 2007.

18

Table of Contents

We received net proceeds of approximately $98,011,000. Of the net proceeds, $5,468,000 is payable to FTN Midwest Securities Corp. (“FTN”) as an underwriting fee upon our consummation of a business combination. At the time of the initial public offering, we estimated that we would deposit proceeds of $95,000,000 or $109,560,000 (if the underwriter’s overallotment option was exercised in full) into the trust account. FTN partially exercised its overallotment option of 2,500,000 units by purchasing 208,584 units from us. As a result, we deposited $96,215,000 of net proceeds from the initial public offering into the trust account. Set forth below are our estimated uses of the net proceeds of $1,780,000 held outside the trust account as determined at the time of the initial public offering. On October 25, 2007, the Company consummated the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement pursuant to which Acquisition Sub acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of InfuSystem from I-Flow.

Set forth below are our expenses incurred as of October 25, 2007 in connection with the acquisition.

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared with September 30, 2006

During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we had not yet consummated the business combination for which we had signed a material definitive agreement in September of 2006 (see Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

The amortization of stock based compensation of $263,595 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was lower than the amount for the three months ended September 30, 2006 of $14,192,236 due to a two year vesting schedule which provides for greater amortization in the earlier months as follows: 25% over six months, 25% over 12 months, 25% over eighteen months and 25% over 24 months as discussed in Note 9 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as a one time charge to stock compensation expense of $13,049,996 in the quarter ended September 30, 2006, also discussed in Note 9.

General and administrative expenses increased for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared with the three months ended September 30, 2006 from $143,568 to $243,788. The increase primarily relates to professional fees related to the preparation and review of our financial statements and filings with the SEC incurred during 2007 that were incurred to a lesser extent during 2006.

During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized a non-cash loss on warrant liabilities of $675,010 compared to a non-cash loss on warrant liabilities of $337,505 recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2006. This was the result of the change in the market value of the outstanding warrants at the end of each period.

19

Table of Contents

We incurred a ticking fee in the amount of $191,666 during the three months ended September 30, 2007 in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement we entered into with I-Flow, InfuSystem and Acquisition Sub to purchase InfuSystem. There was no ticking fee payable for the three months ended September 30, 2006, as we were not subject to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement until the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006

During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we had not yet consummated the business combination for which we had signed a material definitive agreement in September of 2006 (see Note 10 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements).

The amortization of stock based compensation of $1,489,793 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was lower than the amount for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 of $18,573,753 due to a two year vesting schedule which provides for greater amortization in the earlier months as follows: 25% over six months, 25% over 12 months, 25% over eighteen months and 25% over 24 months, as discussed in Note 9 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as well as a one time charge to stock compensation expense of $13,049,996 in the quarter ended September 30, 2006, also discussed in Note 9.

General and administrative expenses increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from $322,021 to $967,969. The increase primarily relates to professional fees related to the preparation and review of our financial statements and filings with the SEC incurred during 2007 that were incurred to a lesser extent during 2006.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized a non-cash loss on warrant liabilities of $675,010. In the comparable nine month period ended September 30, 2006, we recognized a non-cash gain on warrant liabilities of $9,450,140. This year over year change was the result of the change in the market value of the outstanding warrants at the end of each period, as well as the non-recurrence of the one time gain associated with the initial public trading of the warrants in June 2006.

We incurred a ticking fee in the amount of $543,749 during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement we entered into with I-Flow, InfuSystem and Acquisition Sub to purchase InfuSystem. There was no ticking fee payable for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, as we were not subject to the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement until the quarter ended September 30, 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we experienced negative cash flows. The Company financed its operations primarily from existing cash and the sale of warrants on April 12, 2007 for $313,000 and on September 12, 2007 for $200,400. As of September 30, 2007, we had $27,181 of cash and cash equivalents, a decrease of $400,191 from the $427,372 balance at December 31, 2006, which relates primarily to the payment of expenses and acquisition-related costs, consisting mainly of legal, professional and printing costs related to due diligence and proxy filings with the SEC.

Net cash used by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $661,886. This amount includes a net loss of $928,475, and an adjustment to exclude interest income on the trust account (as the trust account and related interest are excluded from the Company’s operating cash). These were partially offset by a decrease in prepaid expenses of $439,095, an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses and taxes payable of $768,612 and withdrawal from the trust account of $422,000. In addition, we had non-cash charges of $1,489,793, representing stock based compensation and non-cash compensation.

20

Table of Contents

Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 amounted to $251,805, the result of the payment of acquisition-related costs.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was the result of proceeds of $100 received by us from the issuance of an option to purchase 833,333 units to FTN on April 18, 2006, and the proceeds of $513,400 from sale of warrants on April 12, 2007 and in September 2007.

On April 18, 2006, we consummated our initial public offering of 16,666,667 units sold to the public at a price of $6.00 per unit. Each unit consists of one share of our common stock, $.0001 par value, and two redeemable common stock purchase warrants. Each warrant will entitle the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 commencing on the later of the completion of a business combination or one year from the effective date of the initial public offering and expiring five years from the effective date of the initial public offering. We may call the warrants for redemption in whole, but not in part, at a price of $.01 per warrant at any time after the warrants become exercisable. The warrants cannot be redeemed unless the warrant holders receive written notice not less than 30 days prior to the redemption; and if, and only if, the reported last sale price of the common stock equals or exceeds $8.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third business day prior to the notice of redemption to warrant holders.

On May 18, 2006, we sold an additional 208,584 units (the “Overallotment”) pursuant to a partial exercise by FTN of its Overallotment option.

Net proceeds (including the Overallotment) after underwriting, legal, accounting, and printing costs amounted to $98,134,319 which includes a contingent underwriting fee of $5,467,581. $101,257,050, which includes interest earned thereon, is being held in a trust account as of September 30, 2007. We will use substantially all of the net proceeds of the initial public offering to acquire a target business, including identifying and evaluating prospective acquisition candidates, selecting the target business, and structuring, negotiating and consummating the business combination.

We granted a purchase option to FTN at the closing of the initial public offering on April 18, 2006 to acquire 833,333 units for $100. Similar to the units issued in connection with the Initial public offering, the units issuable upon exercise of the purchase option consist of one share of common stock and one warrant. Each of the warrants underlying the purchase option, however, entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of $6.25 per share. Additionally, the terms of the purchase option provide that: (i) we are not obligated to deliver any securities pursuant to the exercise of the purchase option unless a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants which are issuable upon exercise of the purchase option is effective; and (ii) FTN is not entitled to receive a net-cash settlement or other consideration in lieu of physical settlement in securities if the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants is not covered by an effective registration statement. The purchase option is exercisable at $7.50 per unit commencing on the later of the consummation of a business combination or one year from the date of the initial public offering prospectus dated April 11, 2006 and expiring five years from the date of the initial offering prospectus dated April 11, 2006. The option may only be exercised or converted by the option holder. We received payment for this option in the first quarter of 2007.

The sale of the option was accounted for as an equity transaction. Accordingly, there was no net impact on our financial position or results of operations, except for the recording of the $100 proceeds from the sale. We have determined that the fair value of the option on the date of sale was $2.36 per unit, or approximately $1,966,666, using an expected life of five years, volatility of 47% and a risk-free interest rate of 3.98%. Accordingly, this amount was recorded as an expense of the offering resulting in a charge directly to the stockholders’ equity.

On December 28, 2006, we issued and sold to Sean McDevitt 624,286 warrants to purchase common stock at a purchase price of $0.70 per warrant for an aggregate purchase price of $437,000. Each warrant represents the right to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share. The warrants are exercisable commencing on the later of our completion of a business combination or April 11, 2007, and expire on April 11, 2011 or earlier upon our redemption of the warrants. We may redeem the warrants in whole, and not in part, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, at any time after the warrants become exercisable, provided that Mr. McDevitt receives no less than 30 days written notice prior to the redemption and the last reported sale price of the common stock

21

Table of Contents

equals or exceeds $8.50 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third business day prior to the notice of redemption to Mr. McDevitt. The exercise price and number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants will be subject to future adjustments in the event that we subdivide or combine our outstanding shares of common stock or issue a stock dividend. We issued and sold to Mr. McDevitt an additional 447,143 warrants to purchase common stock at a purchase price of $0.70 per warrant for an aggregate purchase price of $313,000 on April 12, 2007. In addition, on September 12, 2007 an additional 286,288 warrants to purchase Common Stock were issued to various officers and directors at a purchase price of $0.70 per warrant for an aggregate purchase price of $200,400. The warrants issued in April 2007 and September 2007 are subject to the same terms and conditions as the warrants purchased by Mr. McDevitt in December 2006.

We funded the acquisition and related expenses associated with the acquisition of InfuSystem from the release of investments held in trust upon the completion of the acquisition. Taxes will be paid out of the investments held in trust from the interest earned on the funds held in the account.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the event that the Stock Purchase Agreement that we entered into with I-Flow, Iceland Acquisition and InfuSystem on September 29, 2006 is terminated (i) because of our failure to obtain stockholder approval of the acquisition of InfuSystem by April 30, 2007 for any reason or (ii) because the Company or its subsidiary, Iceland Acquisition Sub, are unwilling or unable to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Stock Purchase Agreement notwithstanding the fact that all conditions precedent to the Stock Purchase Agreement to be satisfied by I-Flow and InfuSystem (and the receipt of stockholder approval) have been satisfied or are capable of fulfillment, we must pay I-Flow a break up fee. On April 30, 2007, we entered into an amendment to the Stock Purchase Agreement with I-Flow, Iceland Acquisition and InfuSystem which extends the date by which we must obtain stockholder approval of the acquisition of InfuSystem to June 29, 2007. This date has been further extended from July 31, 2007 and then to October 1, 2007 and then to October 22, 2007 with Amendment No. 4 to the Stock Purchase Agreement. On October 17, 2007 the parties entered into a further agreement extending the termination agreement to November 1, 2007 as well as the Company agreeing to pay the $3,000,000 termination fee unconditionally to the seller.

As discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, our payment of the break up fee has been guaranteed to I-Flow by Sean McDevitt, Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, and Philip B. Harris pursuant to a Continuing Guaranty provided by the guarantors in favor of I-Flow and delivered concurrently with the execution of the Stock Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of a Guarantee Fee and Reimbursement Agreement entered into by us and the guarantors on September 29, 2006, we have agreed to pay the guarantors a fee of $100,000 upon delivery of the Continuing Guaranty and $300,000 upon closing of the transactions contemplated by, or the termination of, the Stock Purchase Agreement. We have also agreed to reimburse the guarantors for any payments actually made by them in connection with the Continuing Guaranty. Messrs. McDevitt and Harris have delivered to I-Flow a $3,000,000 letter of credit issued by JPMorgan for the benefit of I-Flow which I-Flow may draw upon in the event that the break up fees are not paid when due and payable. The Company paid the termination fee on October 25, 2007 and the Letter of Credit was subsequently cancelled.

Contractual Obligations

As of September 30, 2007, we did not have any contractual obligations.

As of September 30, 2007, we had accrued liabilities of (i) $1,893,652 consisting of accrued professional fees and (ii) $5,467,581 in underwriting fees payable to FTN. The underwriting fee of $5,467,581 is payable to FTN upon the completion of our initial business combination. Each of our auditors and accountants, as well as FTN, have executed waivers against any claims to the trust account for fees payable to them by us. We believe that these waivers are valid and enforceable against our auditors, accountants and FTN. Our auditors are being paid timely. The Company paid $4,555,026 to FTN on October 31, 2007 representing a reduction in the amount due as a result of the 2,726,488 shares voted against the acquisition of InfuSystem and requesting conversion as discussed in Note 11.

22

Table of Contents

To date, our efforts have been limited to organizational activities and activities relating to our initial public offering and the identification of a target business; we have neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues. As the proceeds from our initial public offering held in trust have been invested in short term investments, our only market risk exposure relates to fluctuations in interest rates.

As of September 30, 2007, $101,257,050 of the net proceeds of our initial public offering plus earned interest were held in trust for the purposes of consummating a business combination. As of September 30, 2007, the proceeds held in trust plus earned interest have been invested in a United States Treasury money market account. As of September 30, 2007, the effective annualized interest rate payable on our investment was approximately 4.53%. Assuming no other changes to our holdings as of September 30, 2007, a 1% decrease in the underlying interest rate earned on our investments as of September 30, 2007 would result in a decrease of $249,675 in the interest earned on our investments for the following 90-day period. In contrast, a 1% increase in the interest rate earned on our investments would increase our interest income by $249,675 for the following 90 day period.

We have not engaged in any hedging activities since our inception on August 15, 2005. We do not expect to engage in any hedging activities with respect to the market risk to which we are exposed.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure material information required to be disclosed in our reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with a company have been detected.

As of the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Audit Committee and management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer originally concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to a material weakness. A material weakness, as defined by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, is a significant deficiency, or a combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management determined that a material weakness existed in our financial closing and reporting process as of September 30, 2007. Specifically, we do not have sufficient resources with the appropriate expertise to adequately evaluate complex transactions entered into by the Company and determine the appropriate application of generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). This material weakness resulted in the error in accounting for the effects of our warrants issued to purchase common stock.

In light of the material weakness, we performed additional procedures to ensure that the consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. These procedures have included increased reliance upon outside accountants to review our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements to ensure that they are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The outside accountants are not our external auditors. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this Form 10-Q fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operation and cash flows for the periods presented.

23

Table of Contents

Change in Internal Control

We are in the process of implementing improved procedures and controls designed to increase our ability to evaluate complex transactions and determine the appropriate application of GAAP. These procedures include a review of the resources and personnel dedicated to the preparation of our financial statements. There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2007, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. However, subsequently we have begun to take the remedial actions described above. It is expected that these remedial actions will be completed by the end of our 2007 fiscal year.

24

Table of Contents

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

25

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

26