InfuSystem Holdings, Inc - Quarter Report: 2016 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016

or

for the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-35020

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

31700 Research Park Drive

Madison Heights, Michigan 48071

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(248) 291-1210

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

As of November 25, 2016, 22,669,675 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

EXPLANATORY NOTE

On November 1, 2016, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) concluded, after review and discussion with management, that the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, and the Company’s unaudited financial statements for each of the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2015 through June 30, 2016 should no longer be relied upon. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 (the “Form 10-Q”), restates the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and amends the related Notes and disclosures thereto, including the Company’s controls and procedures. The impact on the Company’s financial statements would be to increase the provision for contractual allowance (thereby reducing accounts receivable as shown on the balance sheet) and other items as follows:

The impact of these amounts are included in the following items on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015:

As of December 31, 2015, management determined that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting due to the existence of a material weakness that resulted in the errors identified. As of September 30, 2016, due to the existence of this material weakness, management has concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. See Item 4 of this Form 10-Q and Item 9A of the 2015 Form 10-K/A for further information. See the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on November 7, 2016, Item 4 of this Form 10-Q and Item 9A of Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on December 12, 2016 for additional details.

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Index to Form 10-Q

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

INFUSYSTEM HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The terms “InfuSystem”, “the Company”, “we”, “our” and “us” are used herein to refer to InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries. InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. is a leading provider of infusion pumps and related services. The Company services hospitals, oncology practices and other alternative site healthcare providers. Headquartered in Madison Heights, Michigan, the Company delivers local, field-based customer support, and also operates pump repair Centers of Excellence in Michigan, Kansas, California, Texas, Georgia and Ontario, Canada.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, composed of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary by management to fairly state the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The operating results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the SEC.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with GAAP, which requires the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities at the reporting date and the amounts of revenue and expenses in the periods presented. The Company believes that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, due to the inherent uncertainties in making estimates, actual results could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to these balances in future periods.

Management identified historical accounting errors principally related to a calculation error resulting in an overstatement of estimated accounts receivable collections. Due to the nature of the industry and the reimbursement environment in which the Company operates, certain estimates are required to record net revenues and accounts receivable at their net realizable value. Accounts receivable are reported at the estimated net realizable amounts from patients, third-party payors and other direct pay customers for goods provided and services rendered. The Company performs periodic analyses to assess the accounts receivable balances. The Company records an allowance for doubtful accounts and contractual allowance (to reduce gross billed charges to a contractual or estimated net realizable value from third-party payors) based on management’s assessment of historical and expected estimated collectability of the accounts such that the recorded amounts reflect estimated net realizable value. Upon determination that an account is uncollectible, the account is written-off and charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts for patients or the contractual allowance for third-party payors. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and contractual allowance are a reduction to accounts receivable on the Company’s consolidated financial position. Additions to the contractual allowance each period offset gross billed charges, which are not publicly reported in the Company’s filings, to arrive at net revenue, which is publicly reported in the Company’s consolidated results of operations. Additions to the allowance for doubtful accounts, however, impact the bad debt expense line item of the Company’s consolidated results of operations. The Company discovered that it has been applying an incorrect cash collection percentage due to a calculation error when calculating the historical collection percentage from certain billings to third-parties. This calculation error resulted in an overstatement of historical cash collection percentages from this revenue, which was then used to estimate future cash collections relative to an outstanding accounts receivable balance.

The calculation error affects only the Company’s rentals of infusion pumps to patients, which are paid for by third-party insurance payors. Revenue resulting from sales, service and rentals directly billed to health care providers is not impacted by this calculation error.

The impact on the Company’s financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 is to increase the provision for contractual allowance (thereby reducing accounts receivable as shown on the balance sheet), as follows:

6

Table of Contents

The impact of these amounts were included in the following items on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015:

The following tables present the effect of the correction discussed above and other adjustments on selected line items of our previously reported consolidated statement of operations the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.

7

Table of Contents

The following tables present the effect of the correction discussed above and other adjustments on selected line items of our previously reported consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2015.

On April 20, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Ciscura Holding Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Ciscura”) for $6.2 million in cash, based on the final number of pumps acquired and the associated treatments, which were generated during the 90-day period post-closing from the approximately 100 medical facility relationships Ciscura had prior to the acquisition. The Company acquired approximately 1,800 infusion pumps, its four-person field sales team, as well as its facilities management personnel, which have become the foundation of the Company’s new Southeast facility. Ciscura, based in Alpharetta, GA, was a privately-held Southeastern regional provider of ambulatory infusion pumps and services to medical facilities and provides the Company with a new regional warehouse and service facility that are in close proximity to a number of our largest existing customers, in addition to new customers previously serviced by Ciscura, enabling same day service for equipment and supplies to much of the Southeast region. The Company used available borrowings under its Credit Facility to finance the acquisition and associated expenses.

Final Purchase Price Allocation

Pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations, the final purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their fair values as of the Closing Date. The final purchase price allocation was primarily based upon a valuation using income and cost approaches and management’s estimates and assumptions. The allocation of the final purchase price to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the Closing Date is presented below (in thousands):

Acquired property and equipment are being depreciated on a straight-line basis with estimated remaining lives ranging from 1 year to 7 years.

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information

The unaudited pro forma financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the Company and Ciscura as though the companies had been combined as of the beginning of the three and nine month periods ended

8

Table of Contents

September 30, 2015. The pro forma financial information is presented for informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the period presented nor is it indicative of future results. The Company did not disclose the revenue and income of Ciscura separately as it is not practical due to the fact that the operations are substantially integrated. The following pro forma financial information presented also includes the pro forma depreciation and amortization charges from acquired tangible and intangible assets, and related tax effects for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 (in thousands):

Medical equipment consisted of the following as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Depreciation expense for medical equipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $1.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively, compared to $1.3 million and $3.4 million for the same prior year periods, which was recorded in cost of revenues – pump depreciation and disposals, for each period.

Depreciation expense for property and equipment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, compared to $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the same prior year periods. This expense was recorded in general and administrative expenses.

9

Table of Contents

The carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, are as follows (in thousands):

Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $1.0 million and $2.8 million, respectively, compared to $0.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. Expected annual amortization expense for intangible assets recorded as of September 30, 2016, is as follows (in thousands):

On March 23, 2015, the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”) entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender (the “Lender”). The Credit Agreement consists of a $27.0 million Term Loan A, up to an $8.0 million Term Loan B and a $10.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”), all of which mature on March 23, 2020 (collectively, the “Credit Facility”).

On March 23, 2015, the Borrowers drew $27.0 million under the Term Loan A to repay and terminate the previously existing credit facility under the credit agreement dated November 30, 2012, as amended, by and among the Company, its direct and indirect subsidiaries, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and certain lenders party thereto (the “WF Facility”). As of September 30, 2016, Term Loan B had a balance of $5.9 million. As of September 30, 2016, interest on the Credit Facility is

10

Table of Contents

payable at the Borrower’s choice as a (i) Eurodollar Loan, which bears interest at a per annum rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2.00% to 2.50% or (ii) CBFR Loan, which bears interest at a per annum rate equal to (a) the Lender’s prime rate or (b) LIBOR for a 30-day interest period plus 2.50%, in each case, plus a margin ranging from -0.75% to -0.25%. The actual rate at September 30, 2016 was 3.02% (LIBOR of 0.52% plus 2.50%) on both Term Loan A and B and 3.25% (JPM Chase Prime Rate of 3.5% less 0.25%) on the Revolver.

The availability under the Revolver is based upon the Borrowers’ eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory and is comprised as follows (in thousands):

To secure repayment of the obligations of the Borrowers, each Borrower has granted to the Lender, for the benefit of various secured parties, a first priority security interest in substantially all of the personal property assets of each of the Borrowers. In addition, the Company has pledged the shares of InfuSystem Holdings USA, Inc. (“Holdings USA”) and Holdings USA has pledged the shares of each of InfuSystem, Inc. and First Biomedical, Inc. and the equity interests of IFC, LLC to the Lender, for the benefit of the secured parties, to further secure the obligations under the Credit Agreement.

In addition, the Credit Agreement requires the Borrowers to maintain the following financial covenant obligations:

The restatement error and the Company’s decision to prepay debt, would have resulted in the Company being non-compliant with its fixed charge coverage ratio covenant as of March 31, 2016, however, as of June 30, 2016, the Company would have been in compliance. As a result of the Company’s restatement of prior consolidated financial statements described herein, the following Events of Default occurred:

In order to cure these violations, the Company entered into the First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver on December 5, 2016. This First Amendment amends the Credit Agreement in the following material respects:

11

Table of Contents

As a result of the waivers of Events of Default contained within the First Amendment to Credit and Waiver Agreement described herein, as of September 30, 2016, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.

The Company occasionally enters into capital leases to finance the purchase of ambulatory infusion pumps. The pumps are capitalized into medical equipment in rental service at their fair market value, which equals the value of the future minimum lease payments and are depreciated over the useful life of the pumps.

12

Table of Contents

The Company had approximate future maturities of loans and capital leases as of September 30, 2016 as follows (in thousands):

The following is a breakdown of the Company’s current and long-term debt (including capital leases) as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded income tax expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded income tax expense of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively. During the quarter, the Company recognized a benefit from research and development credits (“R&D Credits”) of $0.3 million pertaining to its development of software that enables third parties to interact, initiate functions or review data on the Company’s system. In computing its income tax provision, the Company estimates its effective tax rate for the full year and applies that rate to income earned through the reporting period. The Company’s effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 42.3% compared to 28.7% for the same prior year period.

13

Table of Contents

From time to time in the ordinary course of its business, the Company may be involved in legal proceedings, the outcomes of which may not be determinable. The Company has insurance policies covering potential losses where such coverage is cost effective. The Company is aware of a putative securities class action complaint filed on November 8, 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (the “Complaint”) against the Company, Eric Steen, our CEO, and Jonathan Foster, our former CFO in connection with the Company’s financial restatements. To date, neither the Company nor Messrs. Steen and Foster have been served with the Complaint. The Company cannot, at this time, estimate the potential impact of the Complaint or similar threatened investigations or complaints. The Company believes we have adequate insurance coverage to defend against the Complaint should a class action be certified. The Company is not, at this time, involved in any other legal proceedings that the Company believes could have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Basic income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share assumes the issuance of potentially dilutive shares of common stock during the period. The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income per share computations:

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, less than 0.1 million of stock options were not included in the calculation because they would have an anti-dilutive effect, compared to 0.1 million for the same prior year periods.

The Company entered into the First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver on December 5, 2016. See note 6 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the changes contained therein.

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-15 Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The amendments in this ASU introduce clarifications to the presentation of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. The primary updates include additions and clarifications of the classification of cash flows related to certain debt repayment activities, contingent consideration payments related to business combinations, proceeds from insurance policies, distributions from equity method investees and cash flows related to securitized receivables. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of this ASU is permitted, including in interim periods. The ASU requires retrospective application to all prior periods presented upon adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this guidance will have on its cash flows and/or disclosures, however, the Company does not anticipate that the new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments (Topic 326) Credit Losses.” ASU 2016-13 changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments. Under the new standard, entities holding financial assets and net investment in leases that are not accounted for at fair value through net income are to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. An allowance for credit losses will be a valuation account that will be deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. ASU 2016-13 is effective as of January 1, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-13. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements or footnote disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”), and, in August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting (“ASU 2015-15”). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. ASU 2015-15 then clarified that debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement can be presented as an asset on the balance sheet, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. These ASUs are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this guidance as of January 1, 2016, and as a result, has recast the December 31, 2015 consolidated balance sheet to conform to the current period presentation. The adoption of this standard reduced previously presented other assets and long-term debt by $0.1 million, based upon the balance of unamortized debt issuance costs relating to its Credit Facility as of December 31, 2015.

14

Table of Contents

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. ASU 2014-09 will supersede the existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either a retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, deferring the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year, from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2018. The Company plans to adopt ASU 2014-09 on January 1, 2018. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and/or disclosures and has not yet selected a transition method.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”). Under ASU 2016-02, an entity will be required to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 offers specific accounting guidance for a lessee, a lessor and sale and leaseback transactions. Lessees and lessors are required to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For public companies, ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, and requires a modified retrospective adoption, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of this guidance will have on its financial position, results of operations, cash flows and/or disclosures.

15

Table of Contents

The terms “InfuSystem”, “the Company”, “we”, “our” and “us” used herein refer to InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “expect,” “strategy,” “future,” “likely,” variations of such words, and other similar expressions, as they relate to the Company, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, the absence of these words or similar expressions does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company is identifying certain factors that could cause actual results to differ, perhaps materially, from those indicated by these forward-looking statements. Those factors, risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, potential changes in overall healthcare reimbursement, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) competitive bidding and fee schedule reductions, sequestration, concentration of customers, increased focus on early detection of cancer, competitive treatments, dependency on Medicare Supplier Number, availability of chemotherapy drugs, global financial conditions, changes and enforcement of state and federal laws, natural forces, competition, dependency on suppliers, risks in acquisitions & joint ventures, U.S. Healthcare Reform, relationships with healthcare professionals and organizations, technological changes related to infusion therapy, the Company’s ability to implement information technology improvements and to respond to technological changes, the ability of the Company to successfully integrate acquired businesses, dependency on key personnel, dependency on banking relations and the ability to comply with Credit Facility (as defined below) covenants, and other risks associated with its common stock, as well as any litigation to which the Company may be involved in from time to time; and other risk factors as discussed in Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in other filings made by the Company from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A is available on the SEC’s EDGAR website at www.sec.gov, and a copy may also be obtained by contacting the Company. All forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of this report. We do not intend, and do not undertake any obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements, except as required by law.

All of the financial information presented in this Item 2 has been revised to reflect the restatement of our consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, as more fully described in note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, included in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q

Overview

We are a leading provider of infusion pumps and related services. We service hospitals, oncology practices and other alternative site healthcare providers. Headquartered in Madison Heights, Michigan, we deliver local, field-based customer support, and also operate Centers of Excellence in Michigan, Kansas, California, Texas, Georgia and Ontario, Canada.

We supply electronic ambulatory infusion pumps and associated disposable supply kits to oncology practices, infusion clinics and hospital outpatient chemotherapy clinics. These pumps and supplies are utilized mostly by colorectal cancer patients who receive a standard of care treatment that utilizes continuous chemotherapy infusions delivered via electronic ambulatory infusion pumps. Our products and services are also utilized by patients in other disease states such as pancreatic, esophageal, stomach, and other head and neck and gastro intestinal tract cancers, as well as in the management of post-operative pain. We obtain an assignment of insurance benefits from the patient, bill the insurance company or patient accordingly, and collect payment. We provide pump management services for the pumps and associated disposable supply kits to over 1,700 cancer therapy sites in the United States, and except in rare circumstances where the patient has met a payment cap, retain title to the pumps during this process.

We sell or rent new and pre-owned pole mounted and ambulatory infusion pumps to, and provide biomedical recertification, maintenance and repair services for, oncology practices as well as other alternative site settings including home care and home infusion providers, skilled nursing facilities, pain centers and others.

Additionally, we sell, rent, service and repair new and pre-owned infusion pumps and other medical equipment. We also sell a variety of primary and secondary tubing, cassettes, catheters and other disposable items that are utilized with infusion pumps. Our rental and sales revenues come from three different revenue streams: provider to patient, supplier to supplier, and supplier to provider.

Since 2013, we have made significant investments in our Information Technology (“IT”). These efforts have primarily been focused on increasing electronic connectivity with our customers via electronic medical integration, pump portal, and asset tracking. Since 2014, we have invested in supporting uses of our ambulatory pumps in pain management for outpatient orthopedic surgeries utilizing continuous peripheral nerve block and collecting patient pain scores.

16

Table of Contents

Recent Developments

CMS

On April 25, 2016, CMS released the Medical Learning Network (“MLN”) Matters Number SE1609 “Medicare Policy Clarified for Prolonged Drug and Biological Infusions Started Incident to a Physician’s Service Using an External Pump” clarification article (“SE1609”). This clarification article is intended for all physicians and hospital outpatient departments submitting claims to Medicare Administrative Contractors (“MACs”) for prolonged drug and biological infusions started incident to a physician’s service using an external pump. It should be noted that this article does not apply to suppliers’ claims submitted to Durable Medical Equipment (“DME”) MACs.

We interpret SE1609 as no longer permitting DME suppliers to submit billings to the DME MACs for the infusion pumps and supplies provided to Medicare patients in the circumstances described in SE1609. More particularly, SE1609 provides that when a drug is provided “incident to” physicians’ services rendered to patients while in the physician’s office or hospital outpatient department, the external pump is not separately billable as DME. This applies to any DME supplier, home infusion company, hospital outpatient clinic or physician office that provides ambulatory infusion pumps in a setting where treatment is initiated in the infusion setting prior to the patient being sent home for long term infusion. SE1609 states that an ambulatory infusion pump and supplies are not separately reimbursable as DME when a Medicare patient leaves an infusion setting and goes home with a pump. SE1609 indicates that the administration of the drug billed to the local Medicare Contractor should also include payment for the DME used in furnishing the service. Under existing laws, in order for Medicare to cover the cost of the drug and external pump, a physician, hospital, clinic, home infusion therapy company or DME supplier must incur a cost for the drug and pump.

We have historically submitted billings directly to DME MACs for our infusion pumps and portfolio of related services in the circumstances described above. In this regard, Medicare accounted for 15% and 19% of our total revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2016 and fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, respectively, and 6% and 23% of our consolidated accounts receivable, net as of September 30, 2016 and as of December 31, 2015, respectively. As a result of SE1609, we will now submit these billings, effective July 1, 2016, directly to physicians or hospitals who, in turn, will seek reimbursement from Medicare. In these cases, the providing physicians or hospitals, rather than Medicare, will be the primary obligor to us for payments for our infusion pumps and portfolio of related services.

It is important to note that SE1609 applies only to Medicare patients and, therefore, we currently expect that SE1609 will have no direct material impact on the majority of patients of our customers who are insured by private commercial carriers. In these cases, which currently represent a substantial majority of our revenues, we already submit billings directly to these private commercial carriers.

We estimate that the transition to the alternative direct billing arrangement and other recent announcements regarding commercial billing will in aggregate have a gross reduction to our net revenue due exclusively to the pricing impact of approximately $1.3 million per quarter. However, our response to this change as well as the expected changes in the competitive dynamics in the marketplace stemming from this change could mitigate this decline in revenue. These include:

17

Table of Contents

The ultimate impact of SE1609 will vary as we make internal changes in the short-term and as the market is reshaped in the long term. We believe that the reduction in revenue resulting from the pricing decrease could ultimately be mitigated by 2018 through our response as well as potential benefits gained from the competitive changes in the marketplace.

In addition to restoring profitability, we are committed to achieving the accelerated reduction of debt outstanding through dramatically reduced capital investment in both IT systems and pump fleet.

Finally, however, there can be no assurance that SE1609 and the associated competitive dynamics in the marketplace will not further impact future revenues and net income or implicate other risks referred to in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for 2015. The estimates provided above are our best estimates of future events that may or may not be obtainable and there can be no assurance that we will achieve such results.

InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

Net Revenues

Our net revenues for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 were $17.2 million, a decrease of $1.1 million, or 6%, compared to $18.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. During the period, net revenues from rentals decreased $1.8 million, or 11%, compared to the same prior year period. Net revenues from product sales were $2.6 million, an increase of $0.7 million compared to the same prior year period. During the three-month period ended September 30, 2016, we experienced a transition to an alternative billing arrangement due to SE1609 that resulted in a decrease in pricing of approximately $1.3 million.

Our net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $53.6 million, an increase of $1.8 million over the same prior year period. The increase in net revenues can be attributed to greater rental volume with new and existing sites of therapy, partially offset by a higher mix of Medicaid and patient payors in our rental business, which generally have lower net revenue rates than commercial payors; a reduction of revenue for $1.3 million due to SE1609; and a $1.3 million reduction in revenue due to the restatement for our change in estimated accounts receivable collection rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was $10.4 million, a decrease of $2.5 million, or 19%, compared to $12.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. Gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was 60%, down from 70% for the same prior year period. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $34.1 million, a decrease of $2.3 million, or 6%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Gross profit, as a percentage of net revenues, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 64%, down from 70% for the same prior year period. The decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was mainly due to the decrease in rental revenues of $1.3 million for SE1609 for the periods, in addition to a $0.4 million increase in supply costs and $1.0 million in depreciation associated with the deployment of pumps to new therapy sites.

Provision for Doubtful Accounts

Provision for doubtful accounts for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was $1.1 million, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 24%, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The provision for doubtful accounts was 6% of net revenues at September 30, 2016 compared to 8% for the same prior year period. This change is the result of the Company’s increased number of third-party payor contracts that are now being billed at in-network rates with lower rates of bad debt whereby previous insurance billings were billed at higher out-of-network rates with higher rates of bad debt. Bad debt is primarily associated with rental revenues.

Provision for doubtful accounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $3.9 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 3%, compared to $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The provision for doubtful accounts was 7% of net revenues at September 30, 2016, which was consistent with the same prior year period. This increase is due (i) mainly to a change in a payor that was billing the Company as in-network without a contract to out-of-network, thereby resulting in an increase in bad debt and the Company has signed a contract with this payor whereby the billing will resort back to in-network; and (ii) a higher mix of Medicaid and patient payors in our rental business, which generally have higher uncollectible rates than commercial payors.

18

Table of Contents

Amortization of Intangible Assets

Amortization of intangible assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was $1.0 million, an increase of $0.2 million compared to the same prior year period. Amortization of intangible assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $2.8 million, an increase of $0.7 million compared to the same prior year period. These increases were largely attributable to the intangible assets acquired from our Ciscura acquisition and the completion of several IT projects that were placed into service and the resulting amortization.

Selling and Marketing Expenses

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, selling and marketing expenses were $2.5 million, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 6%, compared to $2.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. Selling and marketing expenses, as a percentage of net revenues, for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 was 14%, consistent with the same prior year period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, selling and marketing expenses were $7.6 million, a decrease of $0.5 million, compared to $8.1 million for the same prior year period. Selling and marketing expenses, as a percentage of net revenues, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 14%, a decrease from 16% for the same prior year period. These decreases were largely attributable to reductions in sales and marketing personnel costs. Selling and marketing expenses during these periods consisted of sales personnel salaries, commissions and associated fringe benefit and payroll-related items, marketing, share-based compensation, travel and entertainment and other miscellaneous expenses.

General and Administrative Expenses

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, General and Administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $5.3 million, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 7%, from $5.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in G&A expenses versus the same prior year period was mainly attributable to decreases in stock compensation expense of $0.2 million; salaries and benefits of $0.6 million; and travel expenses of $0.1 million; offset by increases in professional fees and outside services of $0.5 million.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, G&A expenses were $18.3 million, an increase of $0.6 million, or 4%, from $17.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in G&A expense versus the same prior year period was mainly attributable to increases in outside services of $0.8 million; dues and subscriptions of $0.2 million; Information Technology and Pain Management initiatives of $0.2 million; and telephone of $0.1 million offset by decreases in stock compensation expense of $0.5 million and salaries and benefits of $0.2 million.

Other Income and Expenses

During the quarter ended September 30, 2016, we recorded interest expense of $0.4 million, an increase of $0.1 million, or 14%, compared to $0.3 million for the same prior year period, largely due to our increased debt on our revolving credit facility. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded interest expense of $1.0 million, a decrease of $0.4 million, or 27%, compared to $1.4 million for the same prior year period. This is a direct result of the lower interest rates with our new Credit Facility, which we entered into on March 23, 2015. In addition, during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we had other expenses of $1.6 million, primarily related to the write-off of deferred financing costs as a result of the early extinguishment of debt.

Income Taxes

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we recorded income tax expense of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded income tax expense of $0.8 million and $0.5 million, respectively. Our effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 42.3%.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1.1 million and $4.7 million of net availability under the Revolver compared to $0.8 million of cash and cash equivalents and $9.9 million of net availability under our Revolver at December 31, 2015.

As of September 30, 2016, the Company has prepaid its Term Loan A principal payment due on December 31, 2016 in the amount of approximately $1.0 million.

Cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $3.7 million compared to cash provided by operating activities of $5.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This decrease is mainly due to non-cash

19

Table of Contents

items, including a loss on extinguishment of long term debt for $1.6 million recorded in 2015. In addition, during the period, cash proceeds included decreases in accounts receivable of $2.8 million and increases in non-cash items for depreciation and amortization of $2.1 million; offset by decreases in accounts payable and other current liabilities of $2.2 million and $1.0 million less in net income during the period.

Cash used in investing activities was $4.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to cash used of $12.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in cash used was due to $5.9 million of cash used during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 related to our Ciscura asset acquisition, a decrease of $1.4 million related to our spend on Information Technology capital projects for the year, and a decrease of $1.0 million on purchases of medical equipment.

Cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $1.2 million compared to cash provided by financing activities of $7.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This decrease is primarily attributable to the cash proceeds received as a result of our decision to refinance our debt in the first quarter of 2015.

The availability under the Revolver is based upon our eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory and is computed as follows (in thousands):

Our Credit Facility is collateralized by substantially all of our assets and shares of our subsidiaries and requires us to comply with covenants, including but not limited to, financial covenants relating to the satisfaction, on a quarterly and annual basis for the duration of the Credit Facility, of a total leverage ratio, a fixed charge coverage ratio and a net worth level. As a result of the restatement described in Note 6, the following Events of Default occurred:

In order to cure these violations, we entered into the First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Waiver on December 5, 2016. This First Amendment amends the Credit Agreement in the following material respects:

As a result of the waivers of Events of Default contained within the First Amendment to Credit and Waiver Agreement described in Note 6 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, as of September 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all such covenants and expect to remain in compliance for the next 12 months.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which require the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses in the periods presented. We believe that the accounting estimates employed are appropriate and resulting balances are reasonable; however, due to inherent uncertainties in making estimates, actual results could differ from the original estimates, requiring adjustments to these balances in future periods. The critical accounting estimates that affect the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the judgments and assumptions used are consistent with those described in the MD&A section in our annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015.

InfuSystem is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and is not required to provide the information required under this item.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2016. The evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer included a review of the restatement described in the filing of this Form 10-Q and the Amendment No. 2 to our Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, where we restated our consolidated balance sheet, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of cash flows, and notes to our consolidated financial statements. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2016 at the reasonable assurance level, to enable us to record, process, summarize and report information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit within the time periods specified in the SEC rules or forms due to the material weakness described below.

20

Table of Contents

Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A material weakness is defined as a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with the restatement of our condensed consolidated financial statements and revised management’s assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting at December 31, 2015, and evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2016, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting associated with a calculation error in our statistical method of calculating collectible accounts receivable and corresponding revenue.

Specifically, the Company did not design and maintain effective internal control over the assessment of the accounting for significant estimates associated with collections of accounts receivable and corresponding revenue. This material weakness resulted in the restatement described in Note 2 of our prior period financial statements including the years ended December 31, 2015 and the interim periods therein and the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2016, June 30, 2016, and September 30, 2016 (three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 only), which is included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Additionally, this material weakness could result in a misstatement in the financial statements that would result in a material misstatement in the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than the material weakness as set forth above during the quarter ended September 30, 2016, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during the quarter ended September 30, 2016 identified in connection with our evaluation that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. The identification and remediation of the material weakness occurred subsequent to the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2016.

Management’s Remediation Initiatives

We have taken, and continue to take, the actions described below to remediate the identified material weakness. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal controls over financial reporting, our senior management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or modify the remediation efforts described in this section. While the Audit Committee and senior management are closely monitoring the implementation, until the remediation efforts discussed in this section, including any additional remediation efforts that our senior management identifies as necessary, are completed, tested, and determined effective, the material weakness described above will continue to exist.

To address this material weakness, our management has implemented new procedures and internal controls surrounding the use of our statistical method of calculating collections of accounts receivable and corresponding revenue. These include, but are not limited to, simplifying the calculation to reduce potential opportunities for error; establishing a more formalized process of review for the calculation by members of the Company’s senior management, including establishing key controls and control design, and implementing a quarterly review of the estimated receivables collection calculation against other possible quantitative/qualitative methods to validate conclusions.

21

Table of Contents

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

We are, from time to time, a party to legal proceedings that may arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are aware of a putative securities class action complaint filed on November 8, 2016 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (the “Complaint”) against the Company, Eric Steen, our CEO, and Jonathan Foster, our former CFO in connection with our financial restatements. To date, neither we nor Messrs. Steen and Foster have been served with the Complaint. We cannot at this time estimate the potential impact of the Complaint or similar threatened investigations or complaints. We believe we have adequate insurance coverage to defend against the Complaint should a class action be certified. Currently, there are no additional legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

For information regarding factors that could affect our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, refer to the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Except as updated below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the SEC.

We have restated our prior consolidated financial statements, which may lead to additional risks and uncertainties, including loss of investor confidence, stockholder litigation and negative impacts on our stock price.

As discussed in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of our Form 10-K/A, we have restated our consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and for each of the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2015 through June 30, 2016 (the “Restated Periods”). The determination to restate the financial statements for the Restated Periods was made by our Audit Committee upon management’s recommendation following the identification of errors principally related to an overstatement of estimated accounts receivable collections. Due to the errors, our management concluded that the Company’s previously issued financial statements for the Restated Periods should no longer be relied upon.

As a result of these events, we have become subject to a number of additional costs and risks, including unanticipated costs for accounting and legal fees in connection with or related to the restatement. We are also the subject of stockholder litigation that has been filed relating to the restatement. We may incur additional substantial defense costs regardless of the outcome of such litigation. Likewise, such events might cause a diversion of our management’s time and attention. If we do not prevail in any such litigation, we could be required to pay substantial damages or settlement costs. In addition, the restatement may lead to a loss of investor confidence and have negative impacts on the trading price of our common stock.

Our business is substantially dependent on estimates of collectible revenue from third-party reimbursement.

Our revenues are substantially dependent on estimates of collectible revenue from third-party reimbursement. Due to the complex nature of third-party reimbursement for the use of continuous infusion equipment and related disposable supplies provided to patients, we must estimate, based upon historical averages, the amount of collectible revenue that may be derived from each patient treatment. If average reimbursement diverges from historical levels, the estimates of such revenue may diverge from actual collections.

We utilize statistical methods to account for such changes, but there can be no assurance that the revenue reported in any period will ultimately be collected. Any recognized revenue related to third-party reimbursement from prior periods, which remains uncollected until written off from accounts receivable, will negatively impact revenues in the period in which it is written off. Thus, over time, recognized revenue net of bad debt expense will approximate total collections.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting which has and in the future could, if not remediated, result in material misstatements in our financial statements.

We are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over its financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act. As disclosed in Item IV of Part I of this Form 10-Q and Item 9A of Part II in Amendment No. 2 to our Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on December 12, 2016, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to a calculation error in our statistical method of calculating collectible accounts receivable and corresponding revenue. A material weakness is defined as a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal

22

Table of Contents

control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result of this material weakness, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of the last day of the period covered by this Form 10-Q.

We are actively engaged in developing a remediation plan designed to address this material weakness. As disclosed in Item IV of Part I of this Form 10-Q, because of the material weakness identified by the Company, our consolidated financial statements contained material misstatements that required restatement of the Company’s financial results in this report. We have taken, and continue to take, the actions discussed in Item 4 – Controls and Procedures - Management’s Remediation Initiatives of this Form 10-Q. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal controls over financial reporting, our senior management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies or modify the remediation efforts described in this report. While the Audit Committee and senior management are closely monitoring the implementation, until the remediation efforts discussed in this report, including any additional remediation efforts that our senior management identifies as necessary, are completed, tested, and determined effective, the material weakness described in this report could continue to exist. If in the future, the measures are insufficient to address the material weakness or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in the internal control are discovered or occur in the future, the consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements and we could be required to restate our financial results, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations or financial condition, restrict its ability to access the capital markets, require the Company to expend significant resources to correct the weaknesses or deficiencies, subject it to fines, penalties or judgments, harm its reputation or otherwise cause a decline in investor confidence.

Our business is substantially dependent on third-party reimbursement. Any change in the overall health care reimbursement system may adversely impact our business.

Our revenues are substantially dependent on third-party reimbursement. We are paid directly by private insurers and governmental agencies, often on a fixed fee basis, for the use of continuous infusion equipment and related disposable supplies provided to patients. If the average fees allowable by private insurers or governmental agencies were reduced, the negative impact on revenues could have a material effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Also, if amounts owed to us by patients and insurers are reduced or not paid on a timely basis, we may be required to increase our bad debt expense and/or decrease our revenues. Additionally, any regulatory changes that restrict our ability to seek reimbursement for DME, including, but not limited to SE1609, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Changes in the health care reimbursement system often create financial incentives and disincentives that encourage or discourage the use of a particular type of product, therapy or clinical procedure. Such changes may be impacted by the growth in ACOs, reduction of providers by payors, the use of lower cost rental networks and other factors. Market acceptance of continuous infusion therapy may be adversely affected by changes or trends within the health care reimbursement system. Changes to the health care reimbursement system that favor other technologies or treatment regimens that reduce reimbursements to providers or treatment facilities, including increasing competitive pressures from home health care and other companies that use our services, may adversely affect our ability to market our services profitably. Overall, such dependency and potential changes could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

For additional information pertaining to CMS, refer to Item 1 — Business — Significant Customers and Recent Events in Our Business included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Covenants in our current and any future debt agreement restrict our business.

Our Credit Agreement contains, and the agreements that govern our future indebtedness may contain, covenants that restrict our ability to and the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things:

23

Table of Contents

These covenants may restrict our ability to operate our business. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an Event of Default that, if not cured or waived, could result in reduced liquidity for the Company and could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, our ability to pay interest and repay the principal for our indebtedness is dependent upon our ability to manage our business operations, generate sufficient cash flows to service such debt and the other factors discussed in this section. Our Credit Agreement also contains certain financial covenants.

As a result of the restatement described herein, the following Events of Default occurred:

The restatement error disclosed in this Form 10-Q and our decision to prepay our term loan debt, have resulted in the Events of Default described above. With respect to the fixed charge coverage ratio, we were non-compliant for the three months ended March 31, 2016, with a ratio of 1.16:1.00. Excluding our optional prepayment of term loan debt, our fixed charge coverage ratio would have been 1.60:1.00. As a result of the waivers of Events of Default contained within the First Amendment to Credit and Waiver Agreement described in Note 6 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, as of September 30, 2016, we were in compliance with all such covenants and expect to remain in compliance for the next 12 months.

None.

None.

Not applicable.

None.

24

Table of Contents

25

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

26