INNODATA INC - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
ý
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
|
For
the quarterly period ended June
30, 2006
|
|
OR
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For
the transition period from ________________ to
________________
|
Commission
file number: 0-22196
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3475943
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
Three
University Plaza
|
07601
|
|
Hackensack,
New Jersey
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(201)
488-1200
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
[None]
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes þ
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer þ |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common
Stock
|
Outstanding
at July 31, 2006
|
|
$.01
par value per share
|
24,086,603
shares
|
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Page
No.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
2
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three
|
||
Months
Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
3
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six
|
||
Months
Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
4
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six
|
||
Months
Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Six
|
||
Months
Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
6
|
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
||
Results
of Operations
|
15
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
26
|
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
26
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
27
|
1
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars
in Thousands)
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Unaudited
|
Derived
from
audited
financial
statements
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|||||||
Cash
and equivalents
|
$
|
18,026
|
$
|
20,059
|
|||
Accounts
receivable-net
|
5,902
|
7,169
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,826
|
1,543
|
|||||
Refundable
income taxes
|
1,215
|
1,215
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
133
|
338
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
27,102
|
30,324
|
|||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT - NET
|
5,140
|
4,823
|
|||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
1,819
|
1,789
|
|||||
GOODWILL
|
675
|
675
|
|||||
TOTAL
|
$
|
34,736
|
$
|
37,611
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
4,154
|
$
|
3,299
|
|||
Accrued
salaries, wages and related benefits
|
4,135
|
3,567
|
|||||
Income
and other taxes
|
1,329
|
1,363
|
|||||
Current
portion of long term obligations
|
663
|
663
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
10,281
|
8,892
|
|||||
DEFERRED
INCOME TAXES
|
1,152
|
1,357
|
|||||
LONG
TERM OBLIGATIONS
|
314
|
548
|
|||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
|
|||||||
Serial
preferred stock; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none
outstanding
|
|||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|||||||
24,087,000
and 23,669,000 shares issued and outstanding at
|
|||||||
June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively
|
241
|
237
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
17,101
|
16,632
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
5,647
|
9,945
|
|||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
22,989
|
26,814
|
|||||
TOTAL
|
$
|
34,736
|
$
|
37,611
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
2
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
REVENUES
|
$
|
9,721
|
$
|
10,110
|
|||
OPERATING
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|||||||
Direct
operating expenses
|
8,545
|
7,497
|
|||||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
4,167
|
3,406
|
|||||
Interest
(income) - net
|
(161
|
)
|
(114
|
)
|
|||
Total
|
12,551
|
10,789
|
|||||
LOSS
BEFORE PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM)
|
|||||||
INCOME
TAXES
|
(2,830
|
)
|
(679
|
)
|
|||
PROVISION
FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES
|
122
|
(162
|
)
|
||||
NET
LOSS
|
$
|
(2,952
|
)
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
BASIC
AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
|
$
|
(.12
|
)
|
$
|
(.02
|
)
|
|
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
24,087
|
22,903
|
|||||
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
3
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
REVENUES
|
$
|
20,006
|
$
|
21,300
|
|||
OPERATING
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|||||||
Direct
operating expenses
|
16,898
|
15,700
|
|||||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
7,553
|
6,090
|
|||||
Interest
(income) expense - net
|
(312
|
)
|
(195
|
)
|
|||
Total
|
24,139
|
21,595
|
|||||
LOSS
BEFORE PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM)
|
|||||||
INCOME
TAXES
|
(4,133
|
)
|
(295
|
)
|
|||
PROVISION
FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES
|
165
|
(77
|
)
|
||||
NET
LOSS
|
$
|
(4,298
|
)
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
|
BASIC
AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
|
$
|
(.18
|
)
|
$
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
24,060
|
22,798
|
|||||
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 and 2005
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,298
|
)
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
|
|||||||
operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,772
|
1,583
|
|||||
Non-cash
compensation
|
117
|
12
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
-
|
243
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,267
|
2,040
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(586
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
|||
Other
assets
|
(63
|
)
|
(141
|
)
|
|||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
855
|
(164
|
)
|
||||
Accrued
salaries and wages
|
568
|
(616
|
)
|
||||
Income
and other taxes
|
(34
|
)
|
(356
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(402
|
)
|
2,333
|
||||
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(1,589
|
)
|
(729
|
)
|
|||
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Payment
of long-term obligations
|
(398
|
)
|
(85
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
356
|
763
|
|||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(42
|
)
|
678
|
||||
(DECREASE)
INCREASE IN CASH
|
(2,033
|
)
|
2,282
|
||||
CASH
AND EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
20,059
|
20,663
|
|||||
CASH
AND EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$
|
18,026
|
$
|
22,945
|
|||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
4
|
$
|
10
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
166
|
$
|
499
|
|||
NON-CASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Software
licenses and support to be vendor financed
|
$
|
164
|
$
|
1,583
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005
(Unaudited)
1. |
Innodata
Isogen, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a leading provider
of business services that help organizations create, manage, use
and
distribute information more effectively and economically. The Company
provides outsourced content services and content-related information
technology (IT) professional services. The Company’s outsourced content
services focus on fabrication services and knowledge services. Fabrication
services include digitization and data conversion services, content
creation and XML services. Knowledge services include content enhancement,
hyperlinking, indexing and general editorial services. The Company’s IT
professional services focus on the design, implementation, integration
and
deployment of systems used to author, manage and distribute content.
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Innodata
Isogen,
Inc. and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
In
the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting
of
only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial
position as of June 30, 2006, the results of operations for the three
and
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and the cash flows for the
six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. The results of operations for
the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are not necessarily
indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim
period or
for the full year.
These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2005
included
in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than as described
in
Note 4 to the Financial Statements, the accounting policies used
in
preparing these financial statements are the same as those described
in
the December 31, 2005 financial
statements.
|
6
2.
|
An
analysis of the changes in each caption of stockholders' equity for
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands) is as
follows.
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Retained
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
January
1, 2006
|
23,669
|
$
|
237
|
$
|
16,632
|
$
|
9,945
|
$
|
26,814
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(4,298
|
)
|
(4,298
|
)
|
|||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
||||||||||||||||
upon
exercise of stock options
|
418
|
4
|
352
|
-
|
356
|
|||||||||||
Non-cash
equity compensation
|
-
|
-
|
117
|
-
|
117
|
June
30, 2006
|
24,087
|
$
|
241
|
$
|
17,101
|
$
|
5,647
|
$
|
22,989
|
|||||||
January
1, 2005
|
22,679
|
$
|
227
|
$
|
14,914
|
$
|
11,596
|
$
|
26,737
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(218
|
)
|
(218
|
)
|
|||||||||
Issuance
of common stock
|
||||||||||||||||
upon
exercise of stock options
|
478
|
5
|
758
|
-
|
763
|
|||||||||||
Tax
benefit from exercise
|
||||||||||||||||
of
options
|
-
|
-
|
138
|
-
|
138
|
|||||||||||
Non-cash
equity compensation
|
-
|
-
|
12
|
- |
12
|
June
30, 2005
|
23,157
|
$
|
232
|
$
|
15,822
|
$
|
11,378
|
$
|
27,432
|
3.
|
Basic
income (loss) per share is computed by dividing income (loss) available
to
common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is
computed
by dividing income (loss) available to common shareholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period
increased to include the number of additional common shares that
would
have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had
been
issued. The dilutive effect of the outstanding options is reflected
in
diluted income (loss) per share by application of the treasury stock
method. Options to purchase 3.0 million shares of common stock in
2006 and
2.5 million shares of common stock in 2005 were outstanding but not
included in the computation of diluted income per share because the
options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the
common shares and therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive.
In
addition, diluted net loss per share does not include 795,000
and 1,700,000 potential common shares for the three months ended
June 30,
2006 and 2005, respectively, and 905,000
and 2,103,000 potential common shares derived from stock options
for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, because
as a result of the Company incurring losses, their effect would have
been
antidilutive.
|
7
4.
|
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (“SFAS 123(R)”),
“Share-Based Payments,” which requires the measurement and recognition of
compensation expense for all share-based payment awards to employees
and
directors based on estimated fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes
the
Company’s previous accounting methodology using the intrinsic value method
under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”),
“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Under the intrinsic value
method, no share-based compensation expense had been recognized at
the
time stock option awards were granted because the awards had an exercise
price equal to or greater than the market value of the Company’s stock on
the date of the grant. However, at times, compensation expense had
been
recognized upon
the modifications of stock option grants.
The
Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective transition
method. Under this transition method, compensation expense recognized
during the six months ended June 30, 2006 included compensation
expense
for all share-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested,
as of
December 31, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123. There were
no share
based payment awards granted during the three and six months ended
June
30, 2006. In accordance with the modified prospective transition
method,
the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for prior periods have not
been restated to reflect the impact of SFAS 123(R). The Company
recognized compensation expense of approximately $58,000 and $117,000
in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. There
was no
material impact as a result of adopting SFAS 123(R) on basic and
diluted
loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006.
Because
of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards, no tax benefits
resulting from the exercise of stock options have been recorded,
thus
there was no effect on cash flows from operating or financing activities.
For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, share-based compensation
expense related to the company’s various stock option plans was allocated
as follows (in thousands):
|
Three
months ended
June
30, 2006
|
Six
months ended
June
30, 2006
|
||||||
Cost
of sales
|
$
|
20
|
$
|
39
|
|||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
38
|
78
|
|||||
Total
share based compensation
|
$
|
58
|
$
|
117
|
SFAS
No.
123(R) requires the Company to present pro forma information for the periods
prior to adoption as if the Company had accounted for all stock-based
compensation under the fair value method of that statement. For purposes of
pro
forma disclosure, the estimated fair value of the options at the date of grant
is amortized over the requisite service period, which generally equals the
vesting period.
8
The
following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005 (in thousands, except per share
amounts) if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R) to stock-based employee compensation.
Three
months ended
June
30, 2005
|
Six
months ended
June
30, 2005
|
||||||
Net
loss as reported
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
$
|
(218
|
)
|
|
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee
|
|||||||
compensation
determined under fair value
|
|||||||
based
method, net of related tax effects
|
(2,519
|
)
|
(2,785
|
)
|
|||
Pro
forma net loss
|
$
|
(3,036
|
)
|
$
|
(3,003
|
)
|
|
Loss
per share:
|
|||||||
Basic
- as reported
|
$
|
(
.02
|
)
|
$
|
(
.01
|
)
|
|
Basic
- pro forma
|
$
|
(.13
|
)
|
$
|
(.13
|
)
|
|
Diluted
- as reported
|
$
|
(.02
|
)
|
$
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
Diluted
- pro forma
|
$
|
(.13
|
)
|
$
|
(.13
|
)
|
The
following table presents information related to stock options for the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance-12/31/05
|
6,570,270
|
$
|
2.72
|
6,372,254
|
$
|
2.68
|
|||||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(1,285,200
|
)
|
$
|
5.24
|
|||||||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(417,220
|
)
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
||||||||||||||
Balance-6/30/06
|
4,867,850
|
$
|
2.22
|
4,765,737
|
$
|
2.19
|
|||||||||||||
|
Per
Share
Range
of
Exercise
Prices
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|||||||||||||
Balance-6/30/06
|
$
|
0.25
- 0.47
|
130,668
|
1
|
$
|
0.26
|
130,668
|
$
|
0.26
|
||||||||||
|
$
|
0.50
- 0.67
|
1,205,196
|
4
|
$
|
0.57
|
1,205,196
|
$
|
0.57
|
||||||||||
$
|
1.29
|
399,996
|
1
|
$
|
1.29
|
399,996
|
$
|
1.29
|
|||||||||||
$
|
2.00
|
104,644
|
8
|
$
|
2.00
|
104,644
|
$
|
2.00
|
|||||||||||
$
|
2.59
|
1,214,346
|
5
|
$
|
2.59
|
1,214,346
|
$
|
2.59
|
|||||||||||
|
$ |
3.00
- 4.60
|
1,813,000
|
8
|
$
|
3.42
|
1,710,887
|
$
|
3.41
|
||||||||||
4,867,850
|
$
|
2.22
|
4,765,737
|
$
|
2.19
|
9
5.
|
The
Company’s operations are classified into two reporting segments: (1)
outsourced content services and (2) IT professional services. The
outsourced content services segment focuses on fabrication services
and
knowledge services. Fabrication services include digitization and
data
conversion services, content creation and XML services. Knowledge
services
include content enhancement, hyperlinking, indexing and general editorial
services. The IT professional services segment focuses on the design,
implementation, integration and deployment of systems used to author,
manage and distribute content. The Company’s outsourced content services
revenues are generated principally from its production facilities
located
in the Philippines, India and Sri Lanka. The Company does not depend
on
revenues from sources internal to the countries in which the Company
operates; nevertheless, the Company is subject to certain adverse
economic
and political risks relating to overseas economies in general, such
as
inflation, currency fluctuations and regulatory
burdens.
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
|||||||||||||
Outsourced
content services
|
$
|
8,411
|
$
|
8,293
|
$
|
17,669
|
$
|
18,300
|
|||||
IT
professional services
|
1,310
|
1,817
|
2,337
|
3,000
|
|||||||||
Total
consolidated
|
$
|
9,721
|
$
|
10,110
|
$
|
20,006
|
$
|
21,300
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization:
|
|||||||||||||
Outsourced
client services
|
$
|
765
|
$
|
665
|
$
|
1,503
|
$
|
1,391
|
|||||
IT
professional services
|
32
|
20
|
62
|
47
|
|||||||||
Selling
and corporate administration
|
119
|
74
|
207
|
145
|
|||||||||
Total
consolidated
|
$
|
916
|
$
|
759
|
$
|
1,772
|
$
|
1,583
|
|||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
|||||||||||||
Outsourced
client services
|
$
|
753
|
$
|
1,699
|
$
|
2,405
|
$
|
4,525
|
|||||
IT
professional services
|
281
|
700
|
342
|
607
|
|||||||||
Selling
and corporate administration
|
(3,864
|
)
|
(3,078
|
)
|
(6,880
|
)
|
(5,427
|
)
|
|||||
Total
consolidated
|
$
|
(2,830
|
)
|
$
|
(679
|
)
|
$
|
(4,133
|
)
|
$
|
(295
|
)
|
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Total
assets
|
||||||||
Outsourced
content services
|
$
|
13,245
|
$
|
15,436
|
||||
IT
professional services
|
3,149
|
3,140
|
||||||
Corporate
(includes corporate cash)
|
18,342
|
19,035
|
||||||
Total
consolidated
|
$
|
34,736
|
$
|
37,611
|
One
client accounted for 24% and 25% of the Company's revenues in the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. A second client accounted for 15%
of
revenues for three months period ended June 30, 2006. No other client accounted
for 10% or more of the total revenues for these periods. Further, in the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, revenues to non-US clients accounted for
34% and 35%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.
10
One
client accounted for 27% and 22% of our total revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Two clients accounted for 13% and 11%
of
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and another client accounted
for
20% of revenues for the same period in 2005. No other client accounted for
10%
or more of the total revenues for these periods. Further, in the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, revenues to non-US clients accounted for 36%
and
31%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.
A
significant amount of the Company’s revenues are derived from clients in the
publishing industry. Accordingly, the Company’s accounts receivable generally
include significant amounts due from such clients. In addition, as of June
30,
2006, approximately 38% of the Company’s accounts receivable was from foreign
(principally European) clients and 42% of accounts receivable was due from
two
clients.
6. |
Long
term obligations at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 consist of
the
following (amounts in thousands):
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Long
term vendor obligations for software licenses
|
$
|
915
|
$
|
1,056
|
|||
Capital
lease obligations
|
62
|
155
|
|||||
977
|
1,211
|
||||||
Less:
current portion
|
663
|
663
|
|||||
Long
term portion
|
$
|
314
|
$
|
548
|
7. |
In
April 2006, the Company’s subsidiary in Sri Lanka entered into a new
facility lease agreement, to replace its existing lease agreement,
which
expires September 2006. The new lease has an initial term of six
years
commencing October 1, 2006, with an option to renew for an additional
six
year term. In addition, the Company can terminate the lease at anytime
after the first three years of the lease term, upon giving four months’
advance notice.
Pursuant to lease terms, advance
rent paid
by the Company, totaling approximately $130,000 will be amortized
over the
six year term of the lease. Rental payments, which approximate $10,800
per
month during the first year, are subject to increase at a rate of
five
percent per annum.
|
8. |
In
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, the provision for income
taxes is principally comprised of foreign income taxes attributable
to
certain overseas subsidiaries which generated taxable income, and
to a
$90,000 provision for foreign tax assessments. In addition, the Company
did not recognize a tax benefit on U.S. net operating losses generated
during the period. In the three months ended June 30, 2005, the
benefit from income taxes as a percentage of loss before income taxes
was
24% which is lower than the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate, principally
due to losses attributable to certain overseas subsidiaries not subject
to
income taxes.
|
11
In assessing the realization
of deferred
tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not
that
all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The
ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the
generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary
differences are deductible and net operating losses are utilized.
Based on
a consideration of these factors, the Company has established a valuation
allowance of approximately $4.2 million and $1.1 million at
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively.
|
9. |
Included
in selling and administrative expenses are research and development
costs
approximating $267,000 and $552,000 for the three and six months
ended
June 30, 2006 as compared with approximately $200,000 for both the
three
and six months ended June 30, 2005.
In addition, for the six months
ended June
30, 2006, selling and administrative expenses were reduced by $246,000
received from a lessor as compensation for vacating leased premises
prior
to the expiry of the stipulated lease
term.
|
10. |
U.S.
Defined Contribution Pension Plan -The
Company has a defined contribution plan qualified under Section 401(k)
of
the Internal Revenue Code, pursuant to which substantially
all of its U.S. employees are eligible to participate after completing
six
months of service. Participants may elect to contribute a portion
of their
compensation to the plan. Under the plan, the Company has the discretion
to match a portion of participants’ contributions.
Non-U.S.
Pension benefits - Most
of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries provide for government mandated,
defined pension benefits. For certain of these subsidiaries, vested
eligible employees are provided a lump sum payment upon retiring
from the
Company at a defined age. The lump sum amount is based on the salary
and
tenure as of retirement date. Other non-U.S subsidiaries provide
for a
lump sum payment to vested employees on retirement, death, incapacitation
or termination of employment, based upon the salary and tenure
as of the
date employment ceases.
The
net periodic pension cost for the non U.S. defined pension plans, for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 (in thousands), consists
of
the following:
|
Three
months ended
June
30, 2006
|
Six
months ended
June
30, 2006
|
||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
39
|
$
|
83
|
|||
Interest
cost
|
14
|
27
|
|||||
Actuarial
loss
|
11
|
24
|
|||||
$
|
64
|
$
|
134
|
Amounts
for 2005 are not significant and as such, have been excluded from the
presentation above.
12
11. |
The
Company has a $5 million line of credit pursuant to which it may
borrow up
to 80% of eligible accounts receivable at the bank’s alternate base rate
plus ½% or LIBOR plus 3%. The line, which expires in May 2007, is secured
by the company’s accounts receivable. The Company has not borrowed against
its credit line in 2006.
|
12. |
In
connection with the cessation of all operations at certain foreign
subsidiaries, certain former employees have filed various actions
against
one of the Company’s Philippine subsidiaries, and have purported to also
sue the Company and certain of its officers and directors, seeking
to
require reinstatement of employment and to recover back wages for
an
allegedly illegal facility closing on June 7, 2002 based on the terms
of a
collective bargaining agreement with this subsidiary. If the complainants’
claims have merit, they could be entitled to back wages of up to
$5.0
million for the period from June 7, 2002 to June 6, 2005, consistent
with
prevailing jurisprudence. Based upon consultation with legal counsel,
management believes the claims are without merit and is defending
against
them vigorously.
Pursuant
to an income tax audit by the Indian bureau of taxation, on March
27, 2006
one of the Company’s Indian subsidiaries has received a tax assessment
approximating $350,000, including interest, for the fiscal tax
year ended
March 31, 2003. Management disagrees with the basis of the tax
assessment,
and has filed an appeal against the assessment, which it will fight
vigorously. The Indian bureau of taxation has also commenced an
audit of
the Company’s Indian subsidiary’s income tax return for the fiscal tax
year ended March 31, 2004. The ultimate outcome cannot be determined
at
this time.
In
addition, the
Company’s U.S. federal income tax return for 2004 is currently undergoing
audit by the I.R.S; furthermore, the State of New Jersey will audit its
income and sales tax returns for various periods through 2006.
The Company
has no basis at this time for determining the amount of any potential
tax
adjustments that might result from such audits.
Further,
the Company is subject to various legal proceedings, tax audits
and claims
which arise in the ordinary course of business.
While
management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of all
these
proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
financial position or overall trends in results of operations,
litigation
is subject to inherent uncertainties. Were an unfavorable ruling
to occur,
there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the
operating
results of the period in which the ruling occurs. In addition,
the
estimate of potential impact on the Company’s financial position or
overall results of operations for the above legal proceedings could
change
in the future.
|
13. |
The
Company's production facilities are located in the Philippines, India
and
Sri Lanka. To the extent that the currencies of these countries fluctuate,
the Company is subject to risks of changing costs of production after
pricing is established for certain customer projects. However, most
significant contracts contain provisions for price
renegotiation.
|
13
14. |
On
April 26, 2006, the Company entered into a three year employment
agreement
with its Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). The agreement, which has an
effective date of February 1, 2006, provides for: annual base compensation
of $369,000 subject to cost of living adjustments and annual discretionary
increases as determined by the Company's Board of Directors; additional
cash incentive or bonus compensation for each calendar year determined
by
the compensation committee of the Board of Directors in its discretion
and
conditioned on the attainment of certain quantitative objectives
to be
established by the compensation committee with a target bonus of
not less
than 50% of base salary for the year; and equity-based incentive
compensation in such amounts as shall be determined by the compensation
committee, which, if granted, shall have an exercise price equal
to the
fair market value of the shares at the time of the grant. The agreement
also provides for insurance and other fringe benefits, and contains
confidentiality and non-compete and non-interference provisions.
In the
event the CEO is terminated without cause (as defined) or, if upon
expiration of the term of the agreement the Company does not offer
to
enter into a successor agreement on substantially similar terms,
the CEO
is entitled to receive payments in an amount equal to the greater
of (i)
his then base salary for 24 months or (ii) the number of months remaining
in the term of the agreement; the continuation of his health, life,
disability and non-qualified retirement plan benefits for the greater
of
(i) 24 months or (ii) the number of months remaining in the term
of the
agreement; twice the CEO’s then bonus target; and the removal of any
vesting, transfer, lock up, performance or other restrictions or
requirements on his stock options or other equity-based compensation.
In
the event the CEO resigns after the 6-month anniversary of a change
of
control (as defined), the CEO is entitled to receive severance payments
in
an amount equal to the greater of (i) his then base salary for 36
months
or (ii) the number of months remaining in the term of the agreement;
the
continuation of his health, life, disability and non-qualified retirement
plan benefits for the greater of (i) 36 months or (ii) the number
of
months remaining in the term of the agreement; three times his then
bonus
target; and the removal of any vesting, transfer, lock up, performance
or
other restrictions or requirements on his stock options or other
equity-based compensation. The agreement also provides for potential
tax
gross-up payments in respect of income taxes and penalties that may
be
imposed on the CEO under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code,
and in
respect of excise taxes and penalties that may be imposed on the
CEO under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue
Code.
|
15. |
An
executive vice president of the Company was provided a separation
agreement in connection with the termination of his employment with
the
Company effective as of May 26, 2006. Pursuant to the separation
agreement, the Company will continue to pay his base salary for a
period
of twelve months, as provided for in his employment agreement. Included
in
selling and administrative expenses for the three and six months
ended
June 30, 2006 is accrued severance costs of approximately
$275,000.
|
16. |
The
Company is obligated under certain circumstances to indemnify directors
and certain officers against costs and liabilities incurred in actions
or
threatened actions brought against such individual because such individual
acted in the capacity of director and/or officer of the Company.
In
addition, the Company has contracts with certain clients pursuant
to which
the Company has agreed to indemnify the client for certain specified
and
limited claims. These indemnification obligations are in the ordinary
course of business and, in many cases, do not include a limit on
maximum
potential future payments. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has not
recorded liability for any obligations arising as a result of these
indemnifications.
|
14
17. |
In
July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48)
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” which prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement process for recording in
the
financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected
to be taken
in a tax return. Furthermore, FIN 48 provides guidance on the
recognition,
classification, accounting in interim periods and disclosure
requirements
for uncertain tax positions. The accounting provisions of FIN
48 are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The
Company is in the process of determining the effect of FIN 48, if
any, on its financial
statements.
|
15
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Disclosures
in this Form 10-Q contain certain forward-looking statements, including without
limitation, statements concerning our operations, economic performance, and
financial condition. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to
the
safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The words “estimate,” “believe,” “expect,” and “anticipate” and other similar
expressions generally identify forward-looking statements, which speak only
as
of their dates.
These
forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations, and
are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including without
limitation, continuing revenue concentration in a limited number of clients,
continuing reliance on project-based work, worsening of market conditions,
changes in external market factors, the ability and willingness of our clients
and prospective clients to execute business plans which give rise to
requirements for digital content and professional services in knowledge
processing, difficulty in integrating and deriving synergies from acquisitions,
potential undiscovered liabilities of companies that we acquire, changes in
our
business or growth strategy, the emergence of new or growing competitors,
various other competitive and technological factors, and other risks and
uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities
and
Exchange Commission.
Our
actual results could differ materially from the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there
can
be no assurance that the results referred to in the forward-looking statements
contained in this release will occur.
We
undertake no obligation to update or review any guidance or other
forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future
developments or otherwise.
The
Company
Innodata
Isogen, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), is a leading provider of
business services that help organizations create, manage, use and distribute
information more effectively and economically. The Company provides outsourced
content services and content-related information technology (IT) professional
services.
The
Company’s outsourced content services focus on fabrication services and
knowledge services. Fabrication services include digitization and data
conversion services, content creation and XML services. Knowledge services
include content enhancement, hyperlinking, indexing and general editorial
services.
The
Company’s IT professional services focus on the design, implementation,
integration and deployment of systems used to author, manage and distribute
content.
16
Outsourced
content services for business processes that we anticipate a client will require
for an indefinite period generate what we regard as recurring revenues.
Outsourced content services for a specific project generate revenues that we
regard as non-recurring. A substantial majority of our IT professional
services is provided on a project basis that generates non-recurring revenues.
We
have
experienced, and expect to continue to experience, significant fluctuations
in
our quarterly revenues and results of operations. While we seek, wherever
possible, to counterbalance periodic declines in revenues on completion of
large
projects with new arrangements to provide services to the same client or others,
we have at times been unable to avoid declines in revenues when large projects
are completed, and we may continue to encounter this difficulty in the future.
Our inability in any period to obtain sufficient new projects to counterbalance
any decreases in such work adversely affects our revenues and results of
operations for the period.
We
have
historically relied on a very limited number of clients that have accounted
for
a significant portion of our revenues. We may lose any of these or any of our
other major clients as a result of our failure to meet or satisfy our clients’
requirements; the completion, termination or reduction of a project or
engagement; or the selection of another service provider. Our revenues and
results of operations are adversely affected when these events
occur.
Our
services are typically subject to client requirements, and in many cases are
terminable by the client upon 30 to 90 days’ notice.
Other
factors, some of which are beyond our control, that may also affect our
quarterly results include the size, mix, timing and terms and conditions of
client projects; variations in the duration, size and scope of our projects
or
engagements; market acceptance of our clients’ new products and services; our
ability to manage costs; local factors and events that affect our production
volume, such as local holidays; unforeseen events, such as earthquakes, storms
and civil unrest; currency exchange fluctuations; changes in pricing policies
by
us or our competitors; the introduction of new services by us or our
competitors; and acquisition and integration costs related to possible
acquisitions of other businesses.
The
Company's production facilities are located in the Philippines, India and Sri
Lanka. To the extent that the currencies of these countries fluctuate, the
Company is subject to risks of changing costs of production after pricing is
established for certain customer projects. However, the majority of our
contracts contain provisions for price adjustment.
Direct
operating costs for both our outsourced content services and IT professional
services consist of direct payroll, occupancy costs, depreciation,
telecommunications, computer services and supplies.
Selling
and administrative expenses for both our outsourced content services and IT
professional services consist of management and administrative salaries, selling
and marketing costs and administrative overhead.
17
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Revenues
Revenues
were $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
$10.1 million for the similar period in 2005, a decrease of 4%.
Revenues
from outsourced content services decreased 1% to $8.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from $8.3 million for the similar period in
2005.
Revenues
from IT professional services decreased 28% from $1.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2005 to $1.3 million for the similar period in 2006.
The
$500,000 decrease in revenue primarily reflects lower value project engagements
from certain existing clients.
One
client accounted for 24% and 25% of our revenues in the three months ended
June
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. A second client accounted for 15% of our
revenues for three months period ended June 30, 2006. No other client accounted
for 10% or more of our total revenues for these periods.
For
the
three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, revenues from clients located in
non-US countries (principally in Europe) accounted for 34% and 35%,
respectively, of our total revenues.
For
the
three months ended June 30, 2006 approximately 61% of our revenue
was
recurring and 39% was non-recurring, compared with 57% and 43%, respectively,
for the three months ended June 30, 2005.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct
operating costs were $8.5 million and $7.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an increase of 14%. Direct
operating costs as a percentage of revenues for the three months ended June
30,
2006 and 2005, were 88% and 74% respectively.
Direct
operating costs for outsourced content services were $7.5 million and $6.4
million in the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an
increase of 18%. Direct operating costs of outsourced content services as a
percentage of revenues from outsourced content services were 89% and 77% for
the
three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in direct
operating costs of outsourced content services principally results from annual
pay rate increases for both management and production personnel and from growth
in our engineering technology department.
18
Direct
operating costs for IT professional services were $1.0 million and
$1.1 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, a decrease
of
8%. Direct operating costs of IT professional services as a percentage of
revenues from IT professional services were 79% and 61% for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in direct operating
costs of IT professional services for the 2006 period was principally due to
a
reduction in personnel. The increase in direct operating costs for IT
professional services as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable
to
decreased revenues in the 2006 period without a corresponding decrease in labor
costs.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses were $4.2 million and $3.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an increase of 22%.
Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 43% and
34%
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included
in selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30,
2006
are accrued severance costs of approximately $275,000 related to the termination
of an executive’s employment. In addition, in the 2006 period, we spent
approximately $267,000 in new services research and development, compared to
approximately $200,000 in the comparable 2005 period. The
remainder of the increase is principally comprised of various increases in
administrative costs.
Provision
for (Benefit from) Income Taxes:
In
the
three months ended June
30,
2006,
our provision for income taxes is principally comprised of foreign income taxes
attributable to certain of our overseas subsidiaries which generated taxable
income, and to a $90,000 provision for foreign tax assessments. In addition,
we
did not recognize a tax benefit on U.S. net operating losses generated during
the period. In the three months ended June 30, 2005, our benefit from
income taxes as a percentage of loss before income taxes was 24%, which is
lower
than the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate, principally due to losses attributable
to certain of our overseas subsidiaries not subject to income taxes.
In
assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is
more
likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not
be
realized. Our ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent
upon
our generating future taxable income during the periods in which temporary
differences are deductible and net operating losses are utilized. Based on
a
consideration of these factors, we have established a valuation allowance of
approximately $4.2 million at June 30, 2006.
Net
Loss / Income:
We
recorded a net loss of $3.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2006
compared with a net loss of approximately $500,000 in the comparable period
in
2005. The principal reasons for the decrease in 2006 were the decline in
revenues and the increase in direct operating, selling and administrative
costs.
19
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
Revenues
Revenues
were $20 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to
$21.3 million for the similar period in 2005, a decrease of 6%.
Revenues
from outsourced content services decreased 3% to $17.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 from $18.3 million for the similar period in
2005. This decrease primarily reflects a $3.6 million decline in revenues from
a
major outsourced content services project that was terminated late in the first
quarter of 2005. The impact from this project termination was in part offset
by
increased revenues from various other projects.
Revenues
from IT professional services decreased 22% to $2.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 from $3.0 million for the similar period in
2005. The decline in revenues in 2006 primarily reflects lower value project
engagements from certain existing clients.
One
client accounted for 27% and 22% of our total revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Two clients accounted for 13% and 11%
of
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006, and one other client accounted
for 20% of the revenues for the same period in 2005.
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, revenues from clients located in non-US
countries (principally in Europe) accounted for 36% and 31%, respectively,
of
our total revenues.
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2006,
approximately 60% of our revenue was recurring and 40% was non-recurring,
compared with 58% and 42%, respectively, for the six months ended June 30,
2005.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct
operating costs were $16.9 million and $15.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Direct operating costs
as a percentage of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
were 84% and 74% respectively.
Direct
operating costs for outsourced content services were $14.9 million and $13.3
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an
increase of 12%. Direct operating costs of outsourced content services as a
percentage of revenues from outsourced content services were 84% and 73% for
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in direct
operating costs of outsourced content services principally results from annual
pay rate increases for both management and production personnel and from growth
in our engineering technology department.
20
Direct
operating costs for IT professional services were $2.0 million and
$2.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, a decrease of
17%. Direct operating costs of IT professional services as a percentage of
revenues from IT professional services were 85% and 80% for the six months
ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The decrease in direct operating costs
of
IT professional services for the 2006 period was principally due to a reduction
in personnel. The increase in direct operating costs of IT professional services
as a percentage of revenues was primarily attributable to decreased revenues
in
the 2006 period without a corresponding decrease in labor costs.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses were $7.6 million and $6.1 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an increase of 24%.
Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues were 38% and
29%
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Included as
a
reduction of selling and administrative expenses in 2006 is approximately
$246,000 received as inducement to terminate our Dallas office lease prior
to
its contractual expiration date. Selling
and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 also includes
accrued severance costs of approximately $275,000 related to the termination
of
an executive’s employment. In addition, in the 2006 period, we
spent
approximately $552,000 in new services research and development compared to
$200,000 in the comparable 2005 period.
The
remainder of the increase is comprised of various increases in both selling
and
administrative costs.
Provision
for (Benefit from) Income Taxes:
In
the
six months ended June 30, 2006, our provision for income taxes is principally
comprised of foreign income taxes attributable to certain of our overseas
subsidiaries which generated taxable income, and to a $90,000 provision for
foreign tax assessments. In addition, we did not recognize a tax benefit on
U.S.
net operating losses generated during the period. In the six months ended June
30, 2005, our benefit from income taxes as a percentage of loss before income
taxes was 26% which is lower than the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate,
principally due to losses attributable to certain of our overseas subsidiaries
not subject to income taxes.
In
assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, we consider whether it is
more
likely than not that all or some portion of our deferred tax assets will not
be
realized. Our ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent
upon
our generating future taxable income during the periods in which temporary
differences are deductible and net operating losses are utilized. Based on
a
consideration of these factors, we have established a valuation allowance of
approximately $4.2 million at June 30, 2006.
Net
Loss:
We
recorded a net loss of $4.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared with a net loss of approximately $218,000 in the comparable period
in
2005. The principal reasons for the increase in net loss in 2006 were the
decline in revenues and the increase in operating costs and
expenses.
21
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Net
Cash (Used In) Provided By Operating Activities
Net
cash
used in operating activities was $402,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2006 compared to $2.3 million provided by operating activities for the six
months ended June 30, 2005, a decrease of approximately $2.7 million.
The $2.7 million decrease in net cash provided by operating activities is
principally due to a $4.1 million reduction in net income, partially offset
by a $1.3 million change in other net operating assets and liabilities.
Accounts
receivable totaled approximately $5.9 million at June 30, 2006,
representing approximately 53 days of sales outstanding compared to
$7.2 million, or 55 days, at December 31, 2005.
A
significant amount of the Company’s revenues are derived from clients in the
publishing industry. Accordingly, the Company’s accounts receivable generally
include significant amounts due from such clients. In addition, as of
June 30,
2006,
approximately 38% of the Company’s accounts receivable was from foreign
(principally European) clients, and 42% of accounts receivable was due from
two
clients.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2006, we spent cash approximating $1.6 million
for capital expenditures, compared to approximately $729,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2005. Capital spending in 2006 related principally to
normal ongoing equipment upgrades, office improvements, and to the relocation
of
one of our Asian facilities. Capital spending in the six months ended
June 30, 2005 related principally to normal ongoing equipment upgrades and
improvements in infrastructure. Furthermore, during the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, we financed the purchase of software licenses
totaling approximately $164,000 and $488,000, respectively. During the next
twelve months, we anticipate that capital expenditures for ongoing technology,
hardware, equipment and infrastructure upgrades will approximate $3.0 to $4.0
million, a portion of which we may consider financing. In addition, in the
next
twelve months, we anticipate spending between $500,000 and $1 million on the
relocation of two of our Asian facilities. Such anticipated expenditures are
in
additional to potential capital expenditures for new services
offerings.
Net
Cash (Used In) Provided by Financing Activities
Proceeds
from the exercise of stock options provided cash approximating $356,000 and
$763,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In
addition, payments of long-term obligations approximated $400,000 and $85,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, an
increase of $315,000. The increase is principally due to payments on financing
of certain software licenses, which we commenced during the second quarter
of
2005.
22
Availability
of Funds
We
have a
$5.0 million line of credit pursuant to which we may borrow up to 80% of
eligible accounts receivable at the bank’s alternate base rate plus ½% or LIBOR
plus 3%. The line is secured by our accounts receivable. There are no amounts
outstanding under this facility. The line currently expires on May 31,
2007.
We
believe that existing cash and internally generated funds will be sufficient
for
our reasonably anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements
during the next 12 months. We fund our foreign expenditures from our U.S.
corporate headquarters on an as-needed basis.
Inflation,
Seasonality and Prevailing Economic Conditions
To
date,
inflation has not had a significant impact on our operations. We generally
perform work for our clients under project-specific contracts,
requirements-based contracts or long-term contracts. Contracts are typically
subject to various termination provisions.
Our
quarterly operating results are also subject to seasonal fluctuations. Our
fourth and first quarters include the months of December and January, when
billable services activity by professional staff, as well as engagement
decisions by clients, may be reduced due to client budget planning cycles.
In
addition, demand for our services may be lower in the fourth quarter due to
reduced activity during the holiday season and fewer working days during this
period.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Basis
of Presentation and Use of Estimates
Management’s
discussion and analysis of its results of operations and financial condition
is
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared
in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to accounts receivable. Management bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We
establish credit terms for new clients based upon management’s review of their
credit information and project terms, and perform ongoing credit evaluations
of
our customers, adjusting credit terms when management believes appropriate
based
upon payment history and an assessment of their current credit worthiness.
We
record an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from
the inability of our clients to make required payments. We determine this
allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time
trade
accounts receivable are past due, our previous loss history, our estimate of
the
client’s current ability to pay its obligation to us, and the condition of the
general economy and the industry as a whole. While credit losses have generally
been within expectations and the provisions established, we cannot guarantee
that credit loss rates in the future will be consistent with those experienced
in the past. In addition, we have credit exposure if the financial condition
of
one of our major clients were to deteriorate. In the event that the financial
condition of our clients were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of
their ability to make payments, additional allowances might be necessary.
23
Revenue
Recognition
We
recognize revenue for content manufacturing and outsourcing services in the
period in which we perform services and deliver in accordance with Staff
Accounting Bulletin 104.
We
recognize IT professional services revenue from custom application and systems
integration development which requires significant production, modification
or
customization of software in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”)
No. 97-2 “Software
Revenue Recognition”
and in a
manner similar to SOP No. 81-1 “Accounting
for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type
Contracts”.
We
recognize revenue for such services billed under fixed fee arrangements in
a
manner similar to the percentage-of-completion method under contract accounting
as we perform services or reach output milestones. We measure the percentage
completed either by the percentage of labor hours incurred to date in relation
to estimated total labor hours or in consideration of achievement of certain
output milestones, depending on the specific nature of each contract. For
arrangements in which percentage-of completion accounting is used, we record
cash receipts from customers and billed amounts due from customers in excess
of
recognized revenue as billings in excess of revenues earned on contracts in
progress (which is included in accounts receivable), and we record revenues
recognized in excess cash receipts and billed amounts due from customers as
revenues earned in excess of billings (which is included in accounts payable
and
accrued expenses). Revenues from fixed-fee projects accounted for less than
10%
of our total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively We recognize revenue billed on a time and materials basis
as
we perform the services.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment is stated at cost and is depreciated on the straight-line method
over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets, which is generally two to five
years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
shorter of their estimated useful lives or the lives of the leases.
24
Long-lived
Assets
We
account for long lived assets under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets. We
assess the recoverability of our long-lived assets, which consists primarily
of
fixed assets and intangible assets with finite useful lives, whenever events
or
changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
The following factors, if present, may trigger an impairment review:
(i) significant underperformance relative to
expected historical or projected future operating
results; (ii) significant negative industry or economic
trends; (iii) significant decline in our stock price for a
sustained period; and (iv) a change in our
market capitalization relative to net book value. If the recoverability of
these
assets is unlikely because of the existence of one or more
of the above-mentioned factors, we perform an impairment analysis using a
projected discounted cash flow method. We must make assumptions
regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair
value of these respective assets. If these estimates or related assumptions
change in the future, we may be required to record an impairment charge.
Impairment charges would be included in general and administrative expenses
in
our statements of operations, and would result in reduced carrying amounts
of
the related assets on our balance sheets.
Income
Taxes
We
determine our deferred taxes based on the difference between the financial
statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates,
as
well as any net operating loss or tax credit carryforwards expected to reduce
taxes payable in future years. We provide a valuation allowance when it is
more
likely than not that some or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries have been included in the
consolidated financial statements without giving effect to the United States
taxes that may be payable on distribution to the United States to the extent
such earnings are not anticipated to be remitted to the United States.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
SFAS
142
requires that we test goodwill for impairment using a two-step fair value based
test. The first step of the annual goodwill impairment test, used to identify
potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its
carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting
unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test
must be performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any. If
impairment is determined, we will recognize additional charges to operating
expenses in the period in which they are identified, which would result in
a
reduction of operating results and a reduction in the amount of
goodwill.
Significant
New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In
July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48)
“Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” which prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement process for recording in the financial statements
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.
Furthermore, FIN 48 provides guidance on the recognition, classification,
accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax
positions. The accounting provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. We are in the process of determining the
effect of FIN 48, if any, on our financial statements.
25
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
We
are
exposed to interest rate change market risk with respect to our credit line
with
a financial institution which is priced based on the bank’s alternate base rate
(8.25% at June 30, 2006) plus ½% or LIBOR (5.375% at June 30,
2006) plus 3%. We have not borrowed under this line in 2006. To the extent
we
utilize all or a portion of this line of credit, changes in the interest rate
will have a positive or negative effect on our interest expense.
We
have
operations in foreign countries. While we are exposed to foreign currency
fluctuations, we presently have no financial instruments in foreign currency
and
do not maintain significant funds in foreign currency beyond those necessary
for
operations.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
An
evaluation has been carried out under the supervision and with the participation
of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and the operation of our “disclosure
controls and procedures” (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30,
2006
(“Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the
disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed and effective to
ensure that (i) information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms, and (ii) such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There
were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting in connection
with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 under
the Exchange Act that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the internal controls
over financial reporting.
26
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
Not Applicable
|
||||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors.
Not Applicable
|
||||
Item
2.
|
Changes
in Securities.
Not Applicable
|
||||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities.
Not Applicable
|
||||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
||||
The
following matters were voted on at the June 7, 2006 Annual Meeting
of
Stockholders. The total shares voted were 18,867,098.
|
|||||
Election
of Directors:
|
|||||
Nominee
|
For
|
Withheld
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
Jack
Abuhoff
|
18,081,286
|
785,812
|
0
|
0
|
|
Haig
Bagerdjian
|
17,931,476
|
935,622
|
0
|
0
|
|
Louise
Forlenza
|
17,938,541
|
928,557
|
0
|
0
|
|
John
Marozsan
|
17,933,476
|
933,622
|
0
|
0
|
|
To
ratify the selection and appointment by the Company’s Board of Directors
of Grant Thornton LLP, independent auditors, as auditors for the
Company
for the year ending December 31, 2006:
|
|||||
Auditors
|
18,406,812
|
0
|
376,606
|
83,680
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information.
Not Applicable
|
||||
Item
6.
|
(a)
Exhibits.
|
31.1
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
27
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC.
Date:
|
August
14, 2006
|
/s/
Jack Abuhoff
|
|
Jack
Abuhoff
|
|||
Chairman
of the Board of Directors,
|
|||
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|||
Date:
|
August
14, 2006
|
/s/
Steven L. Ford
|
|
Steven
L. Ford
|
|||
Executive
Vice President,
|
|||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
28