INNODATA INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from ________________ to
________________
Commission
file number: 0-22196
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3475943
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
Three
University Plaza
|
07601
|
|
Hackensack,
New Jersey
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(201)
371-8000
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
[None]
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer ¨ Smaller reporting
company ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No
þ
The
number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value,
as of July 31, 2009 was 24,474,099.
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For
the Quarter Ended June 30. 2009
INDEX
Page
No.
|
||||
Part
I – Financial Information
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008
|
1
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
|
2
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
|
3
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
|
4
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
5
|
|||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
16
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
24
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
||
|
||||
Part
II – Other Information
|
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
26
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
26
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
26
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
26
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
26
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
27
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
27
|
||
|
||||
Signatures
|
28
|
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except share data)
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 23,118 | $ | 13,875 | ||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
14,177 | 14,017 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
2,949 | 2,246 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,282 | 4,115 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
42,526 | 34,253 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
6,133 | 6,726 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
2,694 | 2,825 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
948 | 906 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
675 | 675 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 52,976 | $ | 45,385 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 1,185 | $ | 1,053 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
2,773 | 2,540 | ||||||
Accrued
salaries, wages and related benefits
|
5,481 | 5,289 | ||||||
Income
and other taxes
|
1,437 | 1,649 | ||||||
Current
portion of long term obligations
|
865 | 915 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
11,741 | 11,446 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,075 | 2,080 | ||||||
Long
term obligations
|
1,348 | 1,671 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Serial
preferred stock; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 25,198,000 issued
and
|
||||||||
24,410,000
outstanding at June 30, 2009; and 24,907,000 issued and
|
||||||||
24,119,000
outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
252 | 249 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
17,606 | 16,614 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
21,557 | 14,772 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
586 | 742 | ||||||
40,001 | 32,377 | |||||||
Less:
treasury stock, 788,000 shares at cost
|
(2,189 | ) | (2,189 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
37,812 | 30,188 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 52,976 | $ | 45,385 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 21,635 | $ | 17,870 | ||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
||||||||
Direct
operating costs
|
14,199 | 13,738 | ||||||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
3,063 | 4,074 | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
(6 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||
Totals
|
17,256 | 17,762 | ||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
4,379 | 108 | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
1,175 | 72 | ||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,204 | $ | 36 | ||||
Income
per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$ | .13 | $ | - | ||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
24,249 | 24,600 | ||||||
Diluted
|
25,373 | 25,408 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 43,450 | $ | 36,270 | ||||
Operating
costs and expenses
|
||||||||
Direct
operating costs
|
27,309 | 27,067 | ||||||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
6,670 | 8,391 | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
(19 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||
Total
|
33,960 | 35,352 | ||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
9,490 | 918 | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
2,705 | 49 | ||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 6,785 | $ | 869 | ||||
Income
per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | .28 | $ | .04 | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | .27 | $ | .03 | ||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
24,194 | 24,662 | ||||||
Diluted
|
24,912 | 25,807 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
Six Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flow from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 6,785 | $ | 869 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
||||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,816 | 1,836 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
166 | 73 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,781 | 197 | ||||||
Pension
cost
|
85 | 345 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(160 | ) | 1,880 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(431 | ) | (279 | ) | ||||
Other
assets
|
(117 | ) | (88 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
227 | (533 | ) | |||||
Accrued
salaries, wages and related benefits
|
192 | (65 | ) | |||||
Income
and other taxes
|
(290 | ) | (288 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
10,054 | 3,947 | ||||||
Cash
flow from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(975 | ) | (1,622 | ) | ||||
Cash
flow from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Payment
of long term obligations
|
(471 | ) | (517 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
- | (1,367 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
635 | 71 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
164 | (1,813 | ) | |||||
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
9,243 | 512 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
13,875 | 14,751 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 23,118 | $ | 15,263 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 18 | $ | 33 | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | 1,522 | $ | 552 | ||||
Non-cash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Vendor
financed software licenses acquired
|
$ | - | $ | 1,650 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
4
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Treasury
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income (Loss)
|
Stock
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
January 1, 2009
|
24,119 | $ | 249 | $ | 16,614 | $ | 14,772 | $ | 742 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 30,188 | ||||||||||||||
Net income
|
- | - | - | 6,785 | - | - | 6,785 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
291 | 3 | 826 | - | - | - | 829 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation
|
- | - | 166 | - | - | - | 166 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in transitional projected benefit obligation, net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (18 | ) | - | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (138 | ) | - | (138 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009
|
24,410 | $ | 252 | $ | 17,606 | $ | 21,557 | $ | 586 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 37,812 | ||||||||||||||
January 1, 2008
|
24,699 | $ | 249 | $ | 16,323 | $ | 7,188 | $ | (211 | ) | $ | (319 | ) | $ | 23,230 | |||||||||||||
Net income
|
- | - | - | 869 | - | - | 869 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
26 | - | 71 | - | - | - | 71 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
(430 | ) | - | - | - | - | (1,367 | ) | (1,367 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation
|
- | - | 73 | - | - | - | 73 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in transitional projected benefit obligation, net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | 41 | - | 41 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (949 | ) | - | (949 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008
|
24,295 | $ | 249 | $ | 16,467 | $ | 8,057 | $ | (1,119 | ) | $ | (1,686 | ) | $ | 21,968 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Description
of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Description of
Business-Innodata Isogen, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”), is
a leading provider of knowledge process outsourcing (“KPO”) services as well as
publishing and related information technology (“IT”) services that help leading
media, publishing and information service companies create, manage, use and
maintain their products. Our publishing services include digitization,
conversion, composition, data modeling and XML encoding, and our KPO services
include research and analysis, authoring, copy-editing, abstracting, indexing
and other content creation activities. Our staff of IT systems
professionals design, implement, integrate and deploy systems and
technologies used to improve the efficiency of authoring, managing and
distributing content.
Basis of Presentation-The condensed
consolidated financial statements for the interim periods included herein are
unaudited; however, they contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal
recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to
present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June
30, 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The results of
operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results
that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full
year.
These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2008 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K. Unless otherwise noted, the accounting policies used in
preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements are the same as
those described in the December 31, 2008 consolidated financial
statements.
In
May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS
165”), which established general accounting standards and disclosure for
subsequent events. The Company adopted SFAS 165 during the second quarter
of 2009. In accordance with SFAS No. 165, the Company has evaluated
subsequent events through the date and time the financial statements were issued
on August 6, 2009. No material subsequent events have occurred since
June 30, 2009 that would require recognition or disclosure in these
condensed consolidated financial statements.
Principles of
Consolidation-The condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Innodata Isogen, Inc. and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly
owned. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates-In preparing
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include those related to revenue recognition, allowance
for doubtful accounts and billing adjustments, long-lived assets, goodwill,
valuation of deferred tax assets, valuation of securities underlying stock-based
compensation, litigation accruals, pension benefits, valuation of derivative
instruments and estimated accruals for various tax exposures.
6
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
Foreign Currency-The functional
currency for the Company’s production operations located in the Philippines,
India, Sri Lanka and Israel is U.S. dollars. As such, transactions
denominated in Philippines pesos, Indian and Sri Lankan rupees and Israeli
shekels were translated to U.S. dollars at rates which approximate those in
effect on the transaction dates. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies at June 30, 2009 and 2008 were translated at the exchange
rate in effect as of those dates. Nonmonetary assets, liabilities, and
stockholders’ equity were translated at the appropriate historical rates.
Included in direct operating costs are exchange losses resulting from such
transactions in the amounts of $228,000 in the three months ended
June 30, 2009. Exchange gains and losses resulting from such
transactions were not material in the three months ended June 30, 2008. Exchange
gains and losses resulting from such transactions were not material in the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Reclassifications-Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior year’s condensed consolidated
financial statements to conform to the current period presentation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 141(R)-1,
“Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies” (“FSP 141(R)-1”), to amend SFAS 141(R).
FSP 141(R)-1 addresses the initial recognition, measurement and subsequent
accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business
combination, and requires that such assets acquired or liabilities assumed be
initially recognized at fair value at the acquisition date if fair value can be
determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value
cannot be determined, the asset acquired or liability assumed arising from a
contingency is recognized only if certain criteria are met. This FSP also
requires that a systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and
accounting for the assets or liabilities be developed depending on their nature.
Absent any material business combinations, the adoption of the FSP did not have
any impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS
157-4”). This FSP provides additional guidance on estimating fair value when the
volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have significantly
decreased in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. The
FSP also provides additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a
transaction is not orderly. The adoption of the FSP did not have any impact on
the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to be applied by
nongovernmental entities, except for the rules and interpretive releases of the
SEC under authority of federal securities laws which are sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the
Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification does not
change GAAP. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or
after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 168 is not expected to have
any impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial
position.
7
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
2.
|
Long term
obligations
|
Total
long term obligations as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consist of the
following (amounts in thousands):
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Vendor
obligations:
|
||||||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
$ | 297 | $ | 453 | ||||
Deferred
lease payments
|
68 | 89 | ||||||
Microsoft
license
|
825 | 1,100 | ||||||
Pension
obligations:
|
||||||||
Accrued
pension liability
|
1,023 | 944 | ||||||
2,213 | 2,586 | |||||||
Less:
current portion of long term obligations
|
865 | 915 | ||||||
Totals
|
$ | 1,348 | $ | 1,671 |
3.
|
Income
taxes
|
The Company had unrecognized tax
benefits of $854,000 and $840,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. The portion of unrecognized tax benefits relating to interest and
penalties were $267,000 and $253,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. $678,000 and $664,000 of the unrecognized tax benefits as of June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, if recognized, would have an
impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.
The
following presents a roll forward of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits and
associated interest for the six months ended June 30, 2009 (amounts in
thousands):
Unrecognized tax
benefits
|
||||
Balance
- January 1, 2009
|
$
|
840
|
||
Interest
accrual
|
14
|
|||
Balance
– June 30, 2009
|
$
|
854
|
The Company is subject to US federal
income tax as well as income tax in various states and foreign jurisdictions.
The Company is no longer subject to examination by federal and New Jersey taxing
authorities for years prior to 2006. Various foreign subsidiaries currently have
open tax years ranging from 2004 through 2008.
Pursuant
to an income tax audit by the Indian Bureau of Taxation in March 2006, one of
the Company’s Indian subsidiaries received a tax assessment approximating
$339,000, including interest through June 30, 2009, for the fiscal tax year
ended March 31, 2003. Management disagrees with the basis of the tax
assessment, and has filed an appeal against the assessment, which it will
contest vigorously. The Indian Bureau of Taxation has also completed an
audit of the Company’s Indian subsidiary’s income tax return for the fiscal tax
year ended March 31, 2004. The ultimate outcome was favorable, and
there was no tax assessment imposed for the fiscal tax year ended
March 31, 2004. In December 2008, the Company received a final tax
assessment for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005 from the Indian Bureau of
Taxation approximating $333,000, including interest through June 30, 2009.
Management disagrees with the basis of the tax assessment, has filed an appeal
against the assessment and will contest it vigorously. In 2008, the Indian
Bureau of Taxation commenced an audit of the subsidiary’s income tax return for
the fiscal year ended 2006. The ultimate outcome cannot be determined at this
time.
8
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
4.
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
Line of Credit-The Company has
a $7.0 million line of credit pursuant to which it may borrow up to 80% of
eligible accounts receivable. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at
the bank’s alternate base rate plus ½% or LIBOR plus 3%. The line, which expires
in August 2009, is collateralized by the Company’s accounts receivable. The
Company has no outstanding obligations under this credit line as of June 30,
2009. The Company plans on renewing the line of credit in the third quarter of
2009.
Litigation– The Supreme Court
of the Republic of the Philippines has refused to review a decision of the Court
of Appeals in Manila against a Philippines subsidiary of the Company that is
inactive and has no material assets, and purportedly also against Innodata
Isogen, Inc., that orders the reinstatement of certain former employees of the
subsidiary to their former positions and also orders the payment of back wages
and benefits that aggregate approximately $7.5 million. Complainants have moved
for execution of this decision before the Department of Labor and Employment
National Labor Relations Commission, Republic of the Philippines, and the
Department of Labor and Employment Office of the Secretary of Labor and
Employment, Republic of the Philippines. Based on consultation with legal
counsel, the Company believes that recovery against the Company is nevertheless
unlikely.
The
Company is also subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in
the ordinary course of business. While management currently believes that
the ultimate outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or overall trends in
results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties.
Substantial recovery against the Company in the above referenced Philippines
actions could have a material adverse impact on the Company, and unfavorable
rulings or recoveries in the other proceedings could have a material adverse
impact on the operating results of the period in which the ruling or recovery
occurs. In addition, the Company’s estimate of the potential impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial position or overall results of operations for
the above legal proceedings could change in the future.
5.
|
Stock
options
|
The
Company adopted, with stockholder approval, the Innodata Isogen, Inc. 2009 Stock
Plan (the “2009 Plan”). The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be
delivered under the 2009 Plan is (i) 1,000,000 shares of common stock, plus (ii)
835,834, shares of common stock that were available for issuance under the
Company’s 2001 and 2002 Stock Option Plans (the “Prior Plans”) as of the
effective date of the 2009 Plan, plus (iii) any shares subject to an award or
portion of any award under the Prior Plans that were outstanding as of the
effective date of the 2009 Plan that expire or terminate unexercised, become
unexercisable or are forfeited or otherwise terminated, surrendered or canceled
as to any shares without the delivery of shares of common stock or other
consideration, subject to adjustment for certain specified
changes to the Company's capital structure. No further grants may be made under
the Prior Plans.
9
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
All
directors, officers and other employees and other persons who provide services
to the Company are eligible to participate in the 2009 Plan. The 2009 Plan
provides for the grants of stock option (which may be incentive stock options
within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or
non-qualified stock options). The stock options granted may have a maximum term
of up to ten years. The 2009 Plan also provides for awards of stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock awards, stock units and performance
grants.
The
Company’s board of directors may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or
terminate the 2009 Plan or any portion thereof at any time; provided that no
such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or termination shall be
made without stockholder approval if such approval is necessary to comply with
any tax or regulatory requirement applicable to the 2009 Plan ; and provided
further that any such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance or
termination that would impair the rights of any participant or any holder or
beneficiary of any award theretofore granted shall not to that extent be
effective without the consent of the affected participant, holder or
beneficiary. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the board of directors may
unilaterally amend the 2009 Plan and outstanding awards without participant
consent as it deems necessary or appropriate to ensure compliance with
applicable securities laws and provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986.
A summary of option activity under the
Company’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2009, and changes during the period
then ended is presented below:
Number of Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Weighted-Average Remaining
Contractual Term (years)
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2009
|
3,173,111 | $ | 2.68 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(291,197 | ) | 2.85 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited/Expired
|
(51,000 | ) | 2.54 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2009
|
2,830,914 | $ | 2.66 | 4.22 | $ | 5,430,702 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2009
|
2,782,246 | $ | 2.65 | 4.15 | $ | 5,365,478 |
The fair value of stock options is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
There were no options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 or
2008.
The total
compensation cost related to non-vested stock options not yet recognized as of
June 30, 2009 totaled approximately $115,000. The weighted-average period
over which these costs will be recognized is fourteen months.
The total
intrinsic value of options exercised for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 was approximately $330,000 and $88,000, respectively. The
total fair value of stock options vested during the six months ended June 30,
2009 was $176,000.
The
stock-based compensation expense related to the Company’s various stock option
plans were allocated as follows (in thousands):
10
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
Three months ended June 30,
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Direct
operating costs
|
$ | 3 | $ | 17 | $ | 6 | $ | 31 | ||||||||
Selling
and adminstrative expenses
|
80 | 17 | 160 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Total
stock-based compensation
|
$ | 83 | $ | 34 | $ | 166 | $ | 73 |
6.
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
The
components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in
thousands):
Three months ended
June 30,
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,204 | $ | 36 | $ | 6,785 | $ | 869 | ||||||||
Pension
liability adjustment
|
(8 | ) | 20 | (18 | ) | 41 | ||||||||||
Unrealized
loss from derivatives
|
(138 | ) | (858 | ) | (138 | ) | (949 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ | 3,058 | $ | (802 | ) | $ | 6,629 | $ | (39 | ) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive income as reflected in the consolidated balance sheets
consists of changes in transitional projected benefit obligation, net of taxes
and changes in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes.
7.
|
Restructuring
charges
|
As part
of the overall cost reduction plan to reduce operating costs, in December 2008,
the Company announced a restructuring plan to reduce its global work force by
approximately 260 employees, the majority of whom were based in Asia. The
termination date for most of the affected employees was December 31,
2008.
As of
December 31, 2008, accrued salaries, wages and related benefits included
approximately $210,000 related to restructuring costs charged in 2008. During
the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company paid these severance
costs.
8.
|
Segment
reporting and concentrations
|
The
Company operates in one reportable segment.
The
following table summarizes revenues by geographic region (determined based upon
customer’s domicile) (in thousands):
11
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
Three months ended
June 30,
|
Six months ended
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Unites
States
|
$ | 18,186 | $ | 13,769 | $ | 36,389 | $ | 28,452 | ||||||||
The
Netherlands
|
1,257 | 1,857 | 2,876 | 3,841 | ||||||||||||
Other
- principally Europe
|
2,192 | 2,244 | 4,185 | 3,977 | ||||||||||||
$ | 21,635 | $ | 17,870 | $ | 43,450 | $ | 36,270 |
Long-lived assets as of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively, by geographic regions are comprised of (in
thousands):
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$ | 1,290 | $ | 1,372 | ||||
Foreign
countries:
|
||||||||
Philippines
|
3,091 | 3,379 | ||||||
India
|
1,554 | 1,675 | ||||||
Sri
Lanka
|
555 | 654 | ||||||
Israel
|
318 | 321 | ||||||
Total
foreign
|
5,518 | 6,029 | ||||||
$ | 6,808 | $ | 7,401 |
The
Company’s top two clients generated approximately 50% and 44% of our revenues
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No other client
accounted for 10% or more of revenues during these periods. Further, for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, revenues from non-US clients
accounted for 16% and 23%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.
The
Company’s top two clients generated approximately 53% and 47% of our revenues
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No other client
accounted for 10% or more of revenues during these periods. Further, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, revenues from non-US clients accounted
for 16% and 22%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.
A
significant amount of the Company's revenues are derived from clients in the
publishing industry. Accordingly, the Company's accounts receivable generally
includes significant amounts due from such clients. In addition, as of
June 30, 2009, approximately 18% of the Company's accounts receivable was
from foreign (principally European) clients and 44% of accounts receivable was
due from one client. As of December 31, 2008, approximately 22% of
the Company's accounts receivable was from foreign (principally European)
clients and 51% of accounts receivable was due from two
clients.
12
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
9.
|
Income per
share
|
Three months ended
June 30,
|
Six
months ended
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,204 | $ | 36 | $ | 6,785 | $ | 869 | ||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
24,249 | 24,600 | 24,194 | 24,662 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
effect of outstanding options
|
1,124 | 808 | 718 | 1,145 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted
for dilution computation
|
25,373 | 25,408 | 24,912 | 25,807 | ||||||||||||
Basic
net income per share
|
$ | .13 | $ | - | $ | .28 | $ | .04 | ||||||||
Diluted
net income per share
|
$ | .13 | $ | - | $ | .27 | $ | .03 |
Basic income per share is computed
using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year.
Diluted income per share is computed by considering the impact of the potential
issuance of common shares, using the treasury stock method, on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding.
All options outstanding were included
in the computation of diluted income per share for the three months ended June
30, 2009, as the exercise price was lower than the average market price. Options
to purchase 340,000 shares of common stock for the three months ended June 30,
2008 were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted income per
share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market
price of the common shares and therefore, the effect would have been
antidilutive.
Options to purchase 297,000 shares of
common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were outstanding but not
included in the computation of diluted income per share because the options’
exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares
and therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive. For the six months ended
June 30, 2008, all options outstanding were included in the computation of
diluted income per share as the exercise price was lower than the average market
price.
10.
|
Derivatives
|
In
the first quarter of 2009, the Company adopted SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”
(“SFAS 161”), which requires enhanced qualitative disclosures about
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about
the fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements.
The
Company has a large portion of its operations in international markets that are
subject to foreign currency fluctuations. The most significant foreign currency
exposures occur when revenue and associated accounts receivable are collected in
one currency and expenses incurred in order to generate that revenue in another
currency. The Company’s primary exchange rate exposure relates to payroll, other
payroll costs and operating expenses in the Philippines, India and
Israel.
13
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
To manage
its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company
entered into foreign currency forward contracts, authorized under Company
policies, with counterparties that were highly rated financial institutions. The
Company utilized non-deliverable forward contracts expiring within twelve months
to reduce its foreign currency risk.
The
Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and
hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for
undertaking hedge transactions. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives
for trading purposes. All derivatives are recognized at their fair value and
classified based on the instrument’s maturity date. The total notional amount
for outstanding derivatives as of June 30, 2009 was $12.1 million, which is
comprised of cash flow hedges denominated in U.S. Dollars.
As of
December 31, 2008, there were no outstanding foreign currency forward contracts
or other derivative instruments.
The
following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments included
within the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 (in
thousands):
Asset Derivative
|
Liability Derivative
|
||||||||||
Balance Sheet Location
|
Fair Value
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||
Derivative
designated as hedging
|
|||||||||||
instruments
under SFAS 133:
|
|||||||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|||||||||||
Foreign
currency forward contracts
|
current
assets
|
$ | — |
Accrued
expenses
|
$ | 138 | |||||
Total
derivative
|
$ | — | $ | 138 |
The
effect of foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges on
our condensed consolidated statements of operations were as follows (in
thousands):
Three months ended
June 30, 2009
|
Six months ended
June 30, 2009
|
|||||||
Net gain (loss) recognized in
AOCI (1)
|
$ | (138 | ) | $ | (138 | ) | ||
Net
gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated AOCI into income
|
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
Net
gain (loss) recognized in income
|
$ | — | $ | — |
(1)
Net change in the fair value of the effective portion classified in accumulated
other comprehensive income ("AOCI").
11.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The
carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated fair value as of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, because of the relative short maturity of these
instruments. The carrying amounts of long term obligations
approximated their fair value as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, based
upon rates currently available to the Company.
14
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited)
SFAS No.
157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) defines fair value as the price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the
principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
The
Company adopted FASB Staff Position No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157” (“FSP 157-2”) on January 1, 2009, which delayed
the effective date of SFAS 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on
a recurring basis (at least annually). FSP 157-2 did not have any impact on the
Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure
fair value into three levels. The three levels are defined as
follows:
·
|
Level 1: Unadjusted
quoted price in active market for identical assets and
liabilities.
|
·
|
Level 2: Observable
inputs other than those included in Level
1.
|
·
|
Level 3: Unobservable
inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in
pricing the asset or
liability.
|
The
following table sets forth the financial assets and liabilities as of June 30,
2009 that the Company measured at fair value, on a recurring basis by level,
within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands). As required by SFAS 157, assets
and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on
the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value
measurement.
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
$ | — | $ | 138 | $ | — |
The Level
2 liabilities contain foreign currency forward contracts. Fair value is
determined based on the observable market transactions of spot and forward
rates. The fair value of these contracts as of June 30, 2009 is included in
accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
15
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Disclosures in this Form 10-Q
contain certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation,
statements concerning our operations, economic performance, and financial
condition. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the
safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995, Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The words “estimate,” “believe,” “expect,” and “anticipate” and other
similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of their dates.
These
forward-looking statements are based largely on our current
expectations, and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including
without limitation, the primarily at-will nature of the Company’s contracts with
its customers and the ability of customers to reduce, delay or cancel projects,
including projects that the Company regards as recurring, continuing revenue
concentration in a limited number of clients, continuing reliance on
project-based work, inability to replace projects that are completed, cancelled
or reduced, depressed market conditions, changes in external market factors, the
ability and willingness of our clients and prospective clients to execute
business plans which give rise to requirements for digital content and
professional services in knowledge processing, difficulty in integrating and
deriving synergies from acquisitions, potential undiscovered liabilities of
companies that we acquire, changes in our business or growth strategy, the
emergence of new or growing competitors, various other competitive and
technological factors, and other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to
time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our
actual results could differ materially from the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements. In light of these risks and
uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements contained in this release will occur.
We
undertake no obligation to update or review any guidance or other
forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future
developments or otherwise.
Business
Overview
We
provide knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) services, as well as publishing and
related information technology (IT) services, that help leading media,
publishing and information services companies create, manage and maintain their
products. We also provide our services to companies in other
information-intensive industries, such as information technology, manufacturing,
aerospace, defense, government, law and intelligence.
We help
our clients lower costs, realize productivity gains and improve operations,
enabling them to compete more effectively in demanding global
markets.
Our
publishing services include digitization, conversion, composition, data modeling
and XML encoding. Our KPO services include research and analysis,
authoring, copy-editing, abstracting, indexing and other content creation
activities. We often combine publishing services and KPO services within a
single client engagement, providing an end-to-end content supply chain
solution.
Our staff
of IT systems professionals design, implement, integrate and deploy systems and
technologies used to improve the efficiency of authoring, managing and
distributing content.
16
We use a
distributed global resource model. Our onshore workforce works from our North
American and European offices, as well as from client sites. Our distributed
global workforce delivers services from our ten offshore facilities in India,
the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Israel.
Services
that we anticipate a client will require for an indefinite period generate what
we regard as recurring revenues. Services that terminate upon completion of a
defined task generate what we regard as project, or non-recurring,
revenues.
Our business is organized and managed
around three vectors: a vertical industry focus, a horizontal service/process
focus, and a focus on supportive operations.
Our vertically-aligned groups
understand our clients’ businesses and strategic initiatives and are able to
help them meet their goals. With respect to media, publishing and information
services, for example, we have continued to hire experts out of that sector to
establish solutions and services tailored to companies in that sector. They work
with many of the world’s leading media, publishing and information services
companies, dealing with challenges involving new product creation, product
maintenance, digitization, content management and content creation.
Our service/process-aligned groups are
comprised of engineering and delivery personnel responsible for creating the
most efficient and cost-effective custom workflows. These workflows integrate
proprietary and third-party technologies, while harnessing the benefits of a
globally distributed workforce. They are responsible for executing our client
engagements in accordance with our service-level agreements and ensuring client
satisfaction.
Our support groups are responsible for
managing a diverse group of enabling functions, including human resources and
recruiting, global technology infrastructure and physical infrastructure and
facilities.
Revenues
Our publishing services include
digitization, conversion, composition, data modeling and XML encoding and our
KPO services include research and analysis, authoring, copy-editing,
abstracting, indexing and other content creation activities. Our staff of IT
systems professionals focus on the design, implementation, integration and
deployment of digital systems used to author, manage and distribute content. We
price our publishing services and KPO services based on the quantity delivered
or resources utilized and generally recognize revenue in the period in which the
services are performed and delivered. A substantial majority of our IT
professional services is provided on a project basis that generates
non-recurring revenues. We price our IT professional services on an hourly basis
for actual time and expense incurred, or on a fixed-fee turn-key
basis. Revenues for contracts billed on a time-and-materials basis
are recognized as services are performed. Revenues under fixed-fee
contracts, which are not significant to the overall revenues, are recognized on
the percentage of completion method of accounting as services are performed or
as portions of projects are completed.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct operating costs consist of
direct payroll, occupancy costs, depreciation, telecommunications, computer
services and supplies.
17
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses
consist of management and administrative salaries, sales and marketing costs,
new services research and related software development, professional fees and
consultant costs, and other administrative overhead.
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
Revenues
were $21.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
$17.9 million for the similar period in 2008, an increase of approximately
21%. The $3.7 million increase in revenues, which is principally
attributable to one client, reflects a $0.1 million increase from recurring
revenue and $3.6 million from non-recurring project revenue.
Our top
two clients generated approximately 50% and 44% of our revenues for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No other client accounted for
10% of more of our total revenues for these periods. Further, for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, revenues from clients located in foreign
countries (principally in Europe) accounted for 16% and 23% respectively, of our
total revenues.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009, approximately 59% of our revenue was recurring
and 41% was non-recurring, compared with 71% and 29%, respectively, for the
three months ended June 30, 2008.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct operating costs were
$14.2 million and $13.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively, an increase of approximately 3%. Direct
operating costs as a percentage of revenues for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 were 66% and 77% respectively.
The increase in direct operating costs
was principally attributable to an increase in variable labor (management and
production personnel) and other operating costs in support of increased revenue.
The increase in direct operating costs was partially offset by cost savings from
the restructuring activity undertaken in December 2008 and a favorable impact of
foreign exchange rates of approximately $1.4 million in direct operating costs
resulting from a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Philippine peso
and Indian rupee. The direct operating expenses as a percentage of revenues was
lower in the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the corresponding
2008 period, principally due to higher revenues with less than proportional
increases in fixed costs.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses were $3.1 million and $4.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, a decline of
approximately 25%. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenues was 14% and 23% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The lower percentage reflects reduced operating cost levels on a
higher revenue base.
The
decrease in selling and administrative expenses principally reflects cost
reductions resulting from the restructuring program undertaken in December 2008,
favorable impact of foreign exchange rates and reduction in payroll and other
administrative costs.
18
Income
Taxes
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a provision for income taxes for
the U.S. entity and certain other foreign subsidiaries, as certain foreign
subsidiaries are subject to tax holidays or preferential tax rates. In addition,
certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless
repatriated.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2008, no provision for income taxes, other than
alternative minimum tax, was recorded for our U.S. entity primarily due to
utilization of net operating losses for which a valuation allowance was
previously recorded against the corresponding deferred tax assets. In addition,
certain overseas income is neither subject to foreign income taxes because of
tax holidays granted to us, nor subject to tax in the U.S. unless
repatriated.
Net
Income
We generated net income of $3.2 million
in the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with net income of $36,000 in
the comparable period in 2008. The change was principally
attributable to an increase in gross margin resulting from increased revenues
and favorable foreign exchange rates, lower selling and administrative expenses
as a percentage of revenues, partially offset by an increase in the provision
for income taxes.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues
Revenues
were $43.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
$36.3 million for the similar period in 2008, an increase of approximately
20%. The $7.2 million increase in revenues, which is principally attributable to
one client, reflects a $0.5 million increase from recurring revenue and $6.7
million from non-recurring project revenue.
Our top
two clients generated approximately 53% and 47% of our revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. No other client
accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues for these periods. Further, for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, revenues from clients located in
foreign countries (principally in Europe) accounted for 16% and 22%,
respectively, of our total revenues.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, approximately 58% of our revenue was recurring
and 42% was non-recurring, compared with 68% and 32%, respectively, for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct operating costs were
$27.3 million and $27.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively, an increase of 1%. Direct operating costs as
a percentage of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were
63% and 75% respectively.
The increase in direct operating costs
was principally attributable to an increase in variable labor (management and
production personnel) and other operating costs in support of increased revenue.
The increase in direct operating costs was partially offset by cost savings from
the restructuring activity undertaken in December 2008 and a favorable impact of
foreign exchange rates of approximately $3.2 million in direct operating costs
resulting from a strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Philippine peso
and Indian rupee. The direct operating expenses as a percentage of revenues was
lower in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the corresponding 2008
period, principally due to higher revenues with less than proportional increases
in fixed costs.
19
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses were $6.7 million and $8.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, representing a decline of
approximately 21%. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenues was 15% and 23% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The lower percentage reflects reduced operating cost levels on a
higher revenue base.
The
decrease in selling and administrative expenses principally reflects cost
reductions resulting from the restructuring program undertaken in December 2008,
favorable impact of foreign exchange rates and reduction in payroll and other
administrative costs.
Income
Taxes
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a provision for income taxes for the
U.S. entity and certain other foreign subsidiaries, as certain foreign
subsidiaries are subject to tax holidays or preferential tax rates. In addition,
certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless
repatriated.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2008, no provision for income taxes, other than
alternative minimum tax, was recorded for our U.S. entity primarily due to
utilization of net operating losses for which a valuation allowance was
previously recorded against the corresponding deferred tax assets. In addition,
certain overseas income is neither subject to foreign income taxes because of
tax holidays granted to us, nor subject to tax in the U.S. unless
repatriated.
Net
Income
We generated net income of $6.8 million
in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with a net income of
approximately $0.9 million in the comparable period in 2008. The change was
principally attributable to an increase in gross margin resulting from increased
revenues and favorable foreign exchange rates, lower selling and administrative
expenses as a percentage of revenues, partially offset by an increase in the
provision for income taxes.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Selected measures of liquidity and
capital resources, expressed in thousands, are as follows:
June 30, 2009
|
December 31, 2008
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 23,118 | $ | 13,875 | ||||
Working
capital
|
30,785 | 22,807 |
At June 30, 2009, we had cash and cash
equivalents of $23.1 million, representing a significant increase of $9.2
million from December 31, 2008. We have used, and plan to use, such cash for (i)
expansion of existing operations; (ii) general corporate purposes, including
working capital; and (iii) possible acquisitions of related businesses. As of
June 30, 2009, we had working capital of approximately $30.8 million as compared
to working capital of approximately $22.8 million as of December 31, 2008.
Accordingly, we do not anticipate any near-term liquidity
issues.
20
Net
Cash Provided By Operating Activities
Cash provided by our operating
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $10.1 million,
representing a significant increase from $3.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
Cash provided by our operating
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $10.1 million resulting
from a net income of $6.8 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $3.9
million and $0.6 million used for working capital. Adjustments for non-cash
items primarily consisted of $1.8 million for depreciation and amortization and
$1.8 million for deferred income taxes. Working capital activities primarily
consisted of a use of cash of $0.4 million for an increase in prepaid expenses
and other current assets and a use of cash of $0.3 million in income and other
taxes representing payments made to regulatory agencies, partially offset by a
source of cash of $0.2 million from an increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses due to the timing of payment.
Cash provided by our operating
activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $4.0 million resulting
from a net income of $0.9 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $2.5
million and $0.6 million provided by working capital. Adjustments for non-cash
items primarily consisted of $1.8 million for depreciation and amortization and
$0.3 million for pension cost. Working capital activities primarily consisted of
a source of cash of $1.9 million for a decrease in accounts receivable due to
timing of collection and a slight reduction in revenue, a use of cash of $0.5
million for a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses representing
payments to vendors and a use of cash of $0.3 million in income and other taxes
representing payments made to regulatory agencies.
At June 30, 2009, our days’ sales
outstanding were approximately 58 days as compared to 62 days as of December 31,
2008.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
For the six months ended June 30, 2009,
we spent cash approximating $1.0 million for capital expenditures, compared to
approximately $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. Capital
spending in 2009 related principally to purchasing of routine technology
equipment and software. Capital spending in 2008 related principally to
purchasing of routine technology equipment and facility upgrades. During the
next twelve months, we anticipate that capital expenditures for ongoing
technology, hardware, equipment and infrastructure upgrades will approximate
$4.0 to $4.5 million, a portion of which we may finance.
Net
Cash Used In Financing Activities
Cash proceeds received from the
exercise of stock options amounted to approximately $0.6 million and $0.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In
addition, total payments of long term obligations approximated $0.5 million, in
each of the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
In March 2008, we renewed a vendor
agreement, which had expired in February 2008, to acquire certain additional
software licenses and to receive support and subsequent software upgrades on
these and other currently owned software licenses through February 2011, for a
total cost of approximately $1.7 million, representing a non-cash investing and
financing activity. In conjunction with this agreement, we paid approximately
$0.3 million, in each of the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008.
21
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we announced that the Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to $2 million of its common stock. As of June
30, 2008, we had acquired approximately 430,000 shares of its common stock
for $1.4 million at a volume weighted average price of $3.13 per
share.
Future
Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements
We have a $7.0 million line of
credit pursuant to which we may borrow up to 80% of eligible accounts
receivable. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at the bank’s
alternate base rate plus ½% or LIBOR plus 3%. The line, which expires in August
2009, is collateralized by our accounts receivable. We have no outstanding
obligations under this credit line as of June 30, 2009. We plan on renewing the
line of credit in the third quarter of 2009.
We believe that our existing cash and
cash equivalents, funds generated from our operating activities and funds
available under our credit facility will provide sufficient sources of liquidity
to satisfy our financial needs for the next twelve months. However, if
circumstances change, we may need to raise debt or additional equity capital in
the future.
Contractual
Obligations
The table below summarizes our
contractual obligations (in thousands) at June 30, 2009 and the effects that
those obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future
periods.
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
4-5 years
|
After
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
$ | 297 | $ | 242 | $ | 55 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Non-cancelable
operating leases
|
1,551 | 675 | 839 | 37 | - | |||||||||||||||
Long
term vendor obligation
|
825 | 275 | 550 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total
contractual cash obligations
|
$ | 2,673 | $ | 1,192 | $ | 1,444 | $ | 37 | $ | - |
Future expected obligations under our
pension benefit plan have not been included in the contractual cash obligations
table above.
Inflation,
Seasonality and Prevailing Economic Conditions
To date, inflation has not had a
significant impact on our operations. We generally perform work for
our clients under project-specific contracts, requirements-based contracts or
long term contracts. Contracts are typically subject to numerous
termination provisions.
Our quarterly operating results are
subject to certain fluctuations. We experience fluctuations in our revenue and
earnings as we replace and begin new projects, which may have some normal
start-up delays, or we may be unable to replace a project entirely. These and
other factors may contribute to fluctuations in our operating results from
quarter to quarter.
22
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our
results of operations, liquidity and capital resources is based on our
consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On
an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and billing
adjustments, long-lived assets, goodwill, valuation of deferred tax assets,
value of securities underlying stock-based compensation, litigation accruals,
pension benefits, valuation of derivative instruments and estimated accruals for
various tax exposures. We base our estimates on historical and anticipated
results and trends and on various other assumptions that we believe are
reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events.
These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By
their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual
results may differ from our estimates and could have a significant adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial position. For a discussion of
our critical accounting policies see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no
material changes to our critical accounting policies during the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In April
2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 141(R)-1, “Accounting for Assets Acquired and
Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
Contingencies” (“FSP 141(R)-1”), to amend SFAS 141(R).
FSP 141(R)-1 addresses the initial recognition, measurement and subsequent
accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business
combination, and requires that such assets acquired or liabilities assumed be
initially recognized at fair value at the acquisition date if fair value can be
determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value
cannot be determined, the asset acquired or liability assumed arising from a
contingency is recognized only if certain criteria are met. This FSP also
requires that a systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and
accounting for the assets or liabilities be developed depending on their nature.
Absent any material business combinations, the adoption of this FSP did not have
any impact on our condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS
157-4”). This FSP
provides additional guidance on estimating fair value when the volume and level
of activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in relation
to normal market activity for the asset or liability. The FSP also provides
additional guidance on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not
orderly. The adoption of the FSP did not have any impact on our condensed
consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification, (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative
generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to be applied by
nongovernmental entities, except for the rules and interpretive releases of the
SEC under authority of federal securities laws, which are sources of
authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the
Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification does not
change GAAP. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or
after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 168 is not expected to have
any impact on our consolidated results of operations and financial
position.
23
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Interest
rate risk
We are exposed to interest rate change
market risk with respect to our credit line with a financial institution which
is priced based on the bank’s alternate base rate (3.25% at June 30, 2009) plus
½% or LIBOR (0.31% at June 30, 2009) plus 3%. We have no outstanding
obligations under this line. To the extent we utilize all or a
portion of this line of credit, changes in the interest rate will have a
positive or negative effect on our interest expense.
Foreign
currency risk
We have operations in several
international markets that are subject to foreign currency fluctuations.
Although the majority of our contracts are denominated in U.S. Dollars, a
substantial portion of the costs incurred to render services under these
contracts is incurred in the local currencies of several international markets
where we carry on our operations. Our significant operations are based in the
Philippines, India and Israel where revenues are generated in U.S. Dollars and
the corresponding expenses are generated in Philippine pesos, Indian rupees and
Israeli shekels.
To
mitigate the exposure of fluctuating future cash flows due to changes in foreign
exchange rates, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts. These
foreign currency forward contracts were entered into with a maximum term of
twelve months and have an aggregate notional amount of approximately $12.1
million as of June 30, 2009. We may continue to enter into such instruments or
other instruments in the future to reduce foreign currency exposure to
appreciation or depreciation in the value of these foreign
currencies.
The
impact of foreign currency will continue to present economic challenges to us
and could negatively impact our overall results of operations. A 1% appreciation
in the U.S. Dollar’s value relating to the hedge currencies would decrease the
forward contracts’ fair value by approximately $120,000 as of June 30, 2009.
Similarly, a 1% depreciation in the U.S. Dollar’s value relative to the hedge
currencies would increase the forward contracts’ fair value by approximately
$120,000. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of our currency exchange
rate sensitive forward contracts, if utilized, would be substantially offset by
a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value of the hedged underlying
cash flows.
Other
than the aforementioned forward contracts, we have not engaged in any hedging
activities nor have we entered into off-balance sheet transactions or
arrangements.
As of June 30, 2009, our foreign
locations held cash totaling approximately $11.2 million.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by
this report, we performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as
of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
24
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
25
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
There
were no material changes from the legal proceedings previously disclosed in Part
I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I,
Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales
of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds - None
Item 3. Defaults Upon
Senior Securities - None
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The
following matters were voted on at the June 12, 2009 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. The total shares voted were 21,784,296.
Election
of Directors:
Nominee
|
For
|
Withheld
|
|||
Jack
Abuhoff
|
20,401,813
|
1,382,483
|
|||
Haig
Bagerdjian
|
19,942,811
|
1,841,485
|
|||
Louise
Forlenza
|
20,214,519
|
1,569,777
|
|||
Stewart
Massey
|
20,941,740
|
842,556
|
|||
Todd
Solomon
|
21,127,966
|
656,330
|
|||
Anthea
Stratigos
|
20,966,212
|
818,084
|
To ratify
the selection and appointment by the Company’s Board of Directors of J.H. Cohn
LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as auditors for the Company
for the year ending December 31, 2009.
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|||||||
Auditors
|
21,551,444
|
159,348
|
73,504
|
To
approve the Innodata Isogen, Inc. 2009 Stock Plan.
For
|
|
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
Broker Non-Vote
|
||||
Stock
Plan
|
7,683,756
|
2,062,856
|
189,570
|
11,848,114
|
Item 5. Other Information
- None
26
Item
6. Exhibits
31.1 Certificate
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of
2002.
31.2 Certificate
of Interim Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley
Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
27
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC.
Date:
August 6, 2009
|
/s/ Jack Abuhoff
|
Jack
Abuhoff
|
|
Chairman
of the Board,
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
Date:
August 6, 2009
|
/s/ Jurgen C. Tanpho
|
Jurgen
C. Tanpho
|
|
Interim
Chief Financial Officer
and
Principal Accounting Officer
|
28