INNODATA INC - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
|
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
|
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from ________________ to ________________
Commission
file number: 0-22196
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3475943
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
Three
University Plaza
|
07601
|
|
Hackensack,
New Jersey
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(201)
371-8000
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
[None]
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No
þ
The
number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value,
as of October 25, 2010 was 25,281,333.
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For
the Quarter Ended September 30, 2010
INDEX
Page
No.
|
|||
Part
I – Financial Information
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009
|
1
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months
ended
|
2
|
||
September
30, 2010 and 2009
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months
ended
|
3
|
||
September
30, 2010 and 2009
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months
ended
September
30, 2010 and 2009
|
4
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
5
|
||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
15
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
23
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
|
Part
II – Other Information
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
25
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
25
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
25
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
25
|
|
Item
4.
|
Reserved
|
25
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
25
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
|
Signatures
|
27
|
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share
data)
September 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009 |
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 16,917 | $ | 26,480 | ||||
Short
term investments - other
|
7,168 | - | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
9,676 | 11,741 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
3,674 | 3,899 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,685 | 1,763 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
39,120 | 43,883 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
4,583 | 5,559 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
2,545 | 2,505 | ||||||
Long
term investments - other
|
4,500 | - | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
987 | 943 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
675 | 675 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 52,410 | $ | 53,565 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 743 | $ | 1,261 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
2,696 | 2,293 | ||||||
Accrued
salaries, wages and related benefits
|
5,810 | 5,022 | ||||||
Income
and other taxes
|
1,384 | 1,339 | ||||||
Current
portion of long term obligations
|
471 | 892 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
416 | 487 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
11,520 | 11,294 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
87 | 87 | ||||||
Income
and other taxes – long term
|
420 | - | ||||||
Long
term obligations
|
1,416 | 1,199 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Serial
preferred stock; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 26,207,000 shares
issued
|
||||||||
and
25,281,000 outstanding at September 30, 2010; 26,167,000 shares issued
and
|
||||||||
25,379,000
outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
262 | 262 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
20,754 | 20,267 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
19,194 | 21,159 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,339 | 1,486 | ||||||
41,549 | 43,174 | |||||||
Less:
treasury stock, 926,000 shares at cost
|
(2,582 | ) | (2,189 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
38,967 | 40,985 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 52,410 | $ | 53,565 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 15,763 | $ | 18,510 | ||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
||||||||
Direct
operating costs
|
11,272 | 12,801 | ||||||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
4,018 | 3,752 | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
(49 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Totals
|
15,241 | 16,547 | ||||||
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
522 | 1,963 | ||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
209 | 667 | ||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 313 | $ | 1,296 | ||||
Income
per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$ | .01 | $ | .05 | ||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
25,400 | 24,670 | ||||||
Diluted
|
25,582 | 26,039 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 46,623 | $ | 60,527 | ||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
||||||||
Direct
operating costs
|
35,651 | 38,677 | ||||||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
11,923 | 10,422 | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
(84 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Totals
|
47,490 | 49,074 | ||||||
Income
(loss) before provision for income taxes
|
(867 | ) | 11,453 | |||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
1,098 | 3,372 | ||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (1,965 | ) | $ | 8,081 | |||
Income
(loss) per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .33 | |||
Diluted
|
$ | (.08 | ) | $ | .32 | |||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
25,400 | 24,354 | ||||||
Diluted
|
25,400 | 25,401 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (1,965 | ) | $ | 8,081 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
|
||||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
2,832 | 2,767 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
175 | 197 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
(312 | ) | - | |||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
44 | 2,557 | ||||||
Pension
costs
|
326 | 125 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
2,065 | 1,106 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
6 | (1,119 | ) | |||||
Other
assets
|
(457 | ) | (322 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(115 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||
Accrued
salaries, wages and related benefits
|
788 | 73 | ||||||
Income
and other taxes
|
777 | (426 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
4,164 | 12,905 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(1,439 | ) | (1,736 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of investments - other
|
(11,668 | ) | - | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(13,107 | ) | (1,736 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Payment
of long term obligations
|
(539 | ) | (624 | ) | ||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
312 | - | ||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(393 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
- | 3,447 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(620 | ) | 2,823 | |||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(9,563 | ) | 13,992 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
26,480 | 13,875 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 16,917 | $ | 27,867 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 7 | $ | 25 | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | 281 | $ | 2,013 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Treasury
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Stock
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
January
1, 2010
|
25,379 | $ | 262 | $ | 20,267 | $ | 21,159 | $ | 1,486 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 40,985 | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (1,965 | ) | - | - | (1,965 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
40 | - | 175 | - | - | - | 175 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
- | - | 312 | - | - | - | 312 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pension
liability adjustments, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (9 | ) | - | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (138 | ) | (138 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(138 | ) | - | - | - | - | (393 | ) | (393 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
September
30, 2010
|
25,281 | $ | 262 | $ | 20,754 | $ | 19,194 | $ | 1,339 | $ | (2,582 | ) | $ | 38,967 | ||||||||||||||
January
1, 2009
|
24,119 | $ | 249 | $ | 16,614 | $ | 14,772 | $ | 742 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 30,188 | ||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 8,081 | - | - | 8,081 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
1,256 | 13 | 3,434 | - | - | - | 3,447 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
- | - | 197 | - | - | - | 197 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pension
liability adjustments, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (27 | ) | - | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | 330 | - | 330 | |||||||||||||||||||||
September
30, 2009
|
25,375 | $ | 262 | $ | 20,245 | $ | 22,853 | $ | 1,045 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 42,216 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Description
of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Description of
Business-Innodata Isogen, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a
leading provider of knowledge process outsourcing (“KPO”) services as well as
publishing and related information technology (“IT”) services that help leading
media, publishing and information service companies create, manage, use and
maintain their products. Our publishing services include digitization,
conversion, composition, data modeling and XML encoding, and our KPO services
include research and analysis, authoring, copy-editing, abstracting, indexing
and other content creation activities. The Company’s staff of IT systems
professionals designs, implements, integrates and deploys systems and
technologies used to improve the efficiency of authoring, managing and
distributing content.
Basis of Presentation-The condensed
consolidated financial statements for the interim periods included herein are
unaudited; however, they contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal
recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to
present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company as of
September 30, 2010, and the results of its operations, cash flows and
stockholders’ equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for
the full year.
These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless
otherwise noted, the accounting policies used in preparing these condensed
consolidated financial statements are the same as those described in the
December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements.
Principles of
Consolidation-The condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Innodata Isogen, Inc. and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly
owned. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates-In preparing
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include those related to revenue recognition, allowance
for doubtful accounts and billing adjustments, long-lived assets, goodwill,
valuation of deferred tax assets, valuation of securities underlying stock-based
compensation, litigation accruals, pension benefits, valuation of derivative
instruments and estimated accruals for various tax exposures.
Reclassifications-Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ condensed consolidated
financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued an
amendment to its accounting guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple
deliverables. This new accounting guidance addresses the unit of accounting for
arrangements involving multiple deliverables and how consideration should be
allocated to separate units of accounting, when applicable. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an
impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
In
January 2010, FASB issued an amendment regarding improving disclosures about
fair value measurements. This new guidance requires some new disclosures and
clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement.
The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009,
except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the
roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures
are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2.
|
Income
taxes
|
The Company had unrecognized tax
benefits of approximately $1.8 million and $1.3 million at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively. The portion of unrecognized tax benefits
relating to interest and penalties was approximately $0.4 million at both
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The unrecognized tax benefits as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, if recognized, would have an impact on
the Company’s effective tax rate.
The
following presents a roll-forward of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits and
associated interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (amounts in
thousands):
Unrecognized tax
benefits |
||||
Balance -
January 1, 2010
|
$
|
1,303
|
||
Increases
for tax position in current period
|
420
|
|||
Interest
accrual
|
43
|
|||
Balance
– September 30, 2010
|
$
|
1,766
|
The Company is subject to U.S. federal
income tax, as well as income tax in various states and foreign jurisdictions.
The Company is no longer subject to examination by federal and New Jersey taxing
authorities for years prior to 2006. Various foreign subsidiaries currently have
open tax years ranging from 2004 through 2009.
Pursuant
to an income tax audit by the Indian Bureau of Taxation in March 2006, one of
the Company’s Indian subsidiaries received a tax assessment approximating
$339,000, including interest, through September 30, 2010, for the fiscal tax
year ended March 31, 2003. Management disagreed with the basis of the
tax assessment and filed an appeal with the Appeal Officer against the
assessment. In October 2010, the matter was resolved with a judgment in the
Company’s favor. Under the Indian Income Tax Act, the income tax assessing
officer has a right to appeal against the judgment passed by the Appeal Officer.
In the event, the income tax assessing officer exercises his rights, the Company
will file an application to defend the case and it will contest it
vigorously. The Indian Bureau of Taxation has also completed an audit of the
Company’s Indian subsidiary’s income tax return for the fiscal tax year ended
March 31, 2004. The ultimate outcome was favorable, and there was no
tax assessment imposed for the fiscal tax year ended March 31, 2004.
In December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Indian subsidiary received a final tax
assessment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and 2006 from the Indian
Bureau of Taxation approximating $340,000 and $313,000, respectively, including
interest through September 30, 2010. Management disagrees with the basis of
these tax assessments, and has filed an appeal against the assessments, which it
will contest vigorously. As the Company is continually subject to tax audits by
the Indian Bureau of Taxation, the Company assessed the likelihood of an
unfavorable assessment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2007, and years
subsequent to the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 for this subsidiary, and
recorded an additional tax provision amounting to approximately $767,000
including interest through September 30, 2010. The Indian Bureau of Taxation
commenced an audit of this subsidiary’s income tax return for the fiscal years
ended March 31, 2008 and 2009. The ultimate outcome cannot be determined at this
time.
7
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
3.
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
Line of Credit-The Company has
a $7.0 million line of credit pursuant to which it may borrow up to 80% of
eligible accounts receivable. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at
the bank’s alternate base rate plus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 2.5%. The line, which
expires in June 2011, is collateralized by the Company’s accounts receivable.
The Company has no outstanding obligations under this credit line as of
September 30, 2010.
Litigation-The Supreme Court
of the Republic of the Philippines has refused to review a decision of the Court
of Appeals in Manila against a Philippine subsidiary of the Company that is
inactive and has no material assets, and purportedly also against Innodata
Isogen, Inc., that orders the reinstatement of certain former employees of the
subsidiary to their former positions and also orders the payment of back wages
and benefits that aggregate approximately $7.5 million. Based on consultation
with legal counsel, the Company believes that recovery against the Company is
nevertheless unlikely.
The
Company is also subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in
the ordinary course of business.
While
management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or
overall trends in results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties. Substantial recovery against the Company in the above referenced
Philippines actions could have a material adverse impact on the Company, and
unfavorable rulings or recoveries in the other proceedings could have a material
adverse impact on the operating results of the period in which the ruling or
recovery occurs. In addition, the Company’s estimate of the potential impact on
the Company’s financial position or overall results of operations for the above
legal proceedings could change in the future.
8
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
4.
|
Stock
options
|
A summary of option activity under the
Company’s stock option plans as of September 30, 2010, and changes during the
nine month period then ended, is presented below:
Number of Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price |
Weighted-Average Remaining
Contractual Term (years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2010
|
1,846,780 | $ | 2.63 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
250,000 | $ | 4.33 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Expired
|
— | — | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2010
|
2,096,780 | $ | 2.83 | 4.29 | $ | 814,000 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2010
|
1,835,530 | $ | 2.62 | 3.55 | $ | 814,000 |
The fair value of stock options is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
weighted-average fair values of the options granted and weighted average
assumptions are as follows:
Nine months ended
|
||||||||
September 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009 (1)
|
|||||||
Weighted
average fair value of options granted
|
$ | 3.04 | $ | — | ||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.50%-3.20 | % | — | |||||
Expected
life (years)
|
8.00 | — | ||||||
Expected
volatility factor
|
90 | % | — | |||||
Expected
dividends
|
None
|
— |
(1) There were no options granted during
the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
No
options were exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The
total intrinsic value of options exercised for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 was approximately $3.7 million. The total fair value of stock options
vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $0.1
million.
In March
2010, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved
the issuance of 40,000 restricted shares to the Chief Financial Officer, which
vest over four years. No restricted shares vested as of September 30, 2010. The
weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted shares was $0.2
million.
In July
2010, Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved the
issuance of 100,000 performance-based stock option awards. These awards vest
upon attainment of certain financial performance targets for 2010, as
established by management. As of September 30, 2010, no stock-based compensation
expense was recorded associated with such grant, as the performance targets are
not likely to be met.
The total
compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards not yet recognized as of
September 30, 2010 totaled approximately $1.0 million. The weighted-average
period over which these costs will be recognized is forty months.
9
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
The
stock-based compensation expense related to the Company’s various stock awards
was allocated as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30,
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Direct
operating costs
|
$ | 4 | $ | 4 | $ | 10 | $ | 10 | ||||||||
Selling
and adminstrative expenses
|
79 | 27 | 165 | 187 | ||||||||||||
Total
stock-based compensation
|
$ | 83 | $ | 31 | $ | 175 | $ | 197 |
5.
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
The
components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in
thousands):
Three months ended
|
Nine months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 313 | $ | 1,296 | $ | (1,965 | ) | $ | 8,081 | |||||||
Pension
liability adjustment
|
(3 | ) | (9 | ) | (9 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) from derivatives
|
612 | 468 | (138 | ) | 330 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ | 922 | $ | 1,755 | $ | (2,112 | ) | $ | 8,384 |
Accumulated other comprehensive
income as reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets consists of
changes in pension liability adjustments, net of taxes and changes in fair value
of derivatives, net of taxes. The components of accumulated other comprehensive
income as of September 30, 2010, and changes during the period then ended, is
presented below (in thousands):
Pension Liability
Adjustment
|
Fair value of
Derivatives
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
|
||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2010
|
$ | 667 | $ | 819 | $ | 1,486 | ||||||
Current-period
change
|
(9 | ) | (138 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2010
|
$ | 658 | $ | 681 | $ | 1,339 |
6.
|
Segment
reporting and concentrations
|
The
Company operates in one reportable segment.
10
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
The following table
summarizes revenues by geographic region (determined based upon customer’s
domicile) (in thousands):
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Unites
States
|
$ | 11,120 | $ | 14,361 | $ | 31,432 | $ | 49,134 | ||||||||
United
Kingdom
|
1,831 | 1,764 | 6,315 | $ | 4,544 | |||||||||||
The
Netherlands
|
2,081 | 1,580 | 5,764 | 4,510 | ||||||||||||
Others
- principally Europe
|
731 | 805 | 3,112 | 2,339 | ||||||||||||
$ | 15,763 | $ | 18,510 | $ | 46,623 | $ | 60,527 |
Long-lived assets as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, by geographic regions are comprised of
(in thousands):
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$ | 1,074 | $ | 1,152 | ||||
Foreign
countries:
|
||||||||
Philippines
|
2,612 | 2,927 | ||||||
India
|
946 | 1,284 | ||||||
Sri
Lanka
|
428 | 592 | ||||||
Israel
|
198 | 279 | ||||||
Total
foreign
|
4,184 | 5,082 | ||||||
$ | 5,258 | $ | 6,234 |
The
Company’s top two clients generated approximately 28% and 42% of our revenues
for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. One other
client generated approximately 10.3% of our revenues for the three months ended
September 30, 2010. No other client accounted for 10% or more of revenues during
these periods. Further, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
revenues from non-U.S. clients accounted for 29% and 22%, respectively, of the
Company's revenues.
The
Company’s top two clients generated approximately 29% and 51% of our revenues
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. No other
client accounted for 10% or more of revenues during these periods. Further, for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, revenues from non-U.S.
clients accounted for 33% and 19%, respectively, of the Company's
revenues.
A
significant amount of the Company's revenues is derived from clients in the
publishing industry. Accordingly, the Company's accounts receivable generally
include significant amounts due from such clients. In addition, as of September
30, 2010, approximately 40% of the Company's accounts receivable was from
foreign (principally European) clients and 40% of accounts receivable was due
from three clients in the publishing industry. As of December 31,
2009, approximately 37% of the Company's accounts receivable was from foreign
(principally European) clients and 31% of accounts receivable was due from two
clients in the publishing industry.
11
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
7.
Income (loss) per share
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 313 | $ | 1,296 | $ | (1,965 | ) | $ | 8,081 | |||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
25,400 | 24,670 | 25,400 | 24,354 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
effect of outstanding options
|
182 | 1,369 | — | 1,047 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted
for dilution computation
|
25,582 | 26,039 | 25,400 | 25,401 |
Basic income (loss) per share is
computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during
the year. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed by considering the impact
of the potential issuance of common shares, using the treasury stock method, on
the weighted-average number of shares outstanding.
Options to purchase 1.3 million shares
of common stock for the three months ended September 30, 2010 were outstanding
but not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share because
the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the
common shares and, therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive. All
options outstanding were included in the computation of diluted income (loss)
per share for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as the exercise price
was lower than the average market price.
Options
to purchase 0.3 million shares of common stock were outstanding but not included
in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share because the options’
exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares
and, therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive. In addition, diluted
net loss per share does not include 1.9 million potential common shares derived
from the exercise of stock options and for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 because as a result of the Company incurring losses, their effect would
have been antidilutive. All options outstanding were included in the computation
of diluted income (loss) per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
as the exercise price was lower than the average market price.
8.
Derivatives
The
Company has a large portion of its operations in international markets that
subject it to foreign currency fluctuations. The most significant foreign
currency exposures occur when revenue and associated accounts receivable are
collected in one currency and expenses incurred in order to generate that
revenue are accounted for in another currency. The Company’s primary exchange
rate exposure relates to payroll, other payroll costs and operating expenses in
the Philippines, India and Israel.
To manage
its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company
entered into foreign currency forward contracts, authorized under Company
policies, with counterparties that were highly rated financial institutions. The
Company utilized non-deliverable forward contracts expiring within twelve months
to reduce its foreign currency risk.
12
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
The
Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and
hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategy for
undertaking hedge transactions. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives
for trading purposes. All derivatives are recognized at their fair value and are
classified based on the instrument’s maturity date. The total notional amount of
outstanding derivatives as of September 30, 2010 was $27 million, which is
comprised of cash flow hedges denominated in U.S. dollars. The total notional
amount outstanding is net of offsetting forward contracts entered by the Company
in the third quarter of 2010, which have a total notional amount of $6 million.
These forward contracts were entered by the Company primarily to protect the
future cash flows from any adverse movements in the currency.
The
following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments included
within the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Balance sheet Location
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||
Derivatives
designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||
Foreign currency forward contracts |
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
$ | 1,082 | $ | 1,300 |
The
effect of foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges on
our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in
thousands):
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
gain recognized in OCI (1)
|
$ | 1,584 | $ | 676 | $ | 1,594 | $ | 538 | ||||||||
Net
gain reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (2)
|
$ | 612 | $ | (45 | ) | $ | 1,812 | $ | (45 | ) | ||||||
Net
gain (loss) recognized in income (3)
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
(1) Net
change in the fair value of the effective portion classified in other
comprehensive income ("OCI").
(2)
Effective portion classfied as direct operating costs.
(3) There
were no ineffective portions for the periods presented.
9.
Financial
Instruments
The
carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, short term investments and long term investments, consist
of certificates of deposit, and accounts payable approximating their fair value
as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, because of the relative short
maturity of these instruments.
“Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures” defines fair value as the price that would be received for
an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants on the measurement date.
13
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
The
accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
inputs used to measure fair value into three levels. The three levels are
defined as follows:
|
·
|
Level 1: Unadjusted
quoted price in active market for identical assets and
liabilities.
|
|
·
|
Level 2: Observable
inputs other than those included in Level
1.
|
|
·
|
Level 3: Unobservable
inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in
pricing the asset or liability.
|
The
following table sets forth the financial assets and liabilities as of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, that the Company measured at fair value, on a
recurring basis by level, within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands). As
required by the standard, assets and liabilities measured at fair value are
classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to their fair value measurement.
September
30, 2010
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
$ | — | $ | 1,082 | $ | — | ||||||
December
31, 2009
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
|||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
$ | — | $ | 1,300 | $ | — |
The Level
2 assets contain foreign currency forward contracts. Fair value is determined
based on the observable market transactions of spot and forward rates. The fair
value of these contracts as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is
included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
14
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Disclosures in this Form 10-Q
contain certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation,
statements concerning our operations, economic performance, and financial
condition. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the
safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995, Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The words “estimate,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate” and other similar
expressions generally identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as
of their dates.
These
forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations and are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation,
the primarily at-will nature of the contracts with our customers and
the ability of customers to reduce, delay or cancel projects, including projects
that we regard as recurring; continuing revenue concentration in a limited
number of clients, continuing reliance on project-based work; inability to
replace projects that are completed, cancelled or reduced; depressed market
conditions; changes in external market factors; the ability and willingness of
our clients and prospective clients to execute business plans which give rise to
requirements for digital content and professional services in knowledge
processing; difficulty in integrating and deriving synergies from acquisitions;
potential undiscovered liabilities of companies that we acquire; changes in our
business or growth strategy; the emergence of new or growing competitors;
various other competitive and technological factors; and other risks and
uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Our
actual results could differ materially from the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements. In light of these risks and
uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements contained in this release will occur.
We
undertake no obligation to update or review any guidance or other
forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future
developments or otherwise.
Business
Overview
We
provide knowledge process outsourcing (“KPO”) services, as well as publishing
and related information technology (“IT”) services, that help leading media,
publishing and information services companies create, manage and maintain their
products. We also provide our services to companies in other
information-intensive industries, such as information technology, manufacturing,
aerospace, defense, government, law and intelligence.
We help
our clients lower costs, realize productivity gains and improve operations,
enabling them to compete more effectively in demanding global
markets.
Our
publishing services include digitization, conversion, composition, data modeling
and XML encoding. Our KPO services include research and analysis,
authoring, copy-editing, abstracting, indexing and other content creation
activities. We often combine publishing services and KPO services within a
single client engagement, providing an end-to-end content supply chain
solution.
Our staff
of IT systems professionals designs, implements, integrates and deploys systems
and technologies used to improve the efficiency of authoring, managing and
distributing content.
We use a
distributed global resource model. Our onshore workforce works from our North
American and European offices, as well as from client sites. Our distributed
global workforce delivers services from our ten offshore facilities in India,
the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Israel.
15
Services
that are ongoing in nature generate what we regard as recurring revenues.
Services that terminate upon completion of a defined task generate what we
regard as project, or non-recurring, revenues.
Our business is organized and managed
around three vectors: a vertical industry focus, a horizontal service/process
focus, and a focus on supportive operations.
Our vertically-aligned groups
understand our clients’ businesses and strategic initiatives and are able to
help them meet their goals. With respect to media, publishing and information
services, for example, we have continued to hire experts out of that sector to
establish solutions and services tailored to companies in that sector. They work
with many of the world’s leading media, publishing and information services
companies, dealing with challenges involving new product creation, product
maintenance, digitization, content management and content creation.
Our service/process-aligned groups are
comprised of engineering and delivery personnel responsible for creating the
most efficient and cost-effective custom workflows. These workflows integrate
proprietary and third-party technologies, while harnessing the benefits of a
globally distributed workforce. They are responsible for executing our client
engagements in accordance with our service-level agreements and ensuring client
satisfaction.
Our support groups are responsible for
managing a diverse group of enabling functions, including human resources and
recruiting, global technology infrastructure and physical infrastructure and
facilities.
Revenues
Our publishing services include
digitization, conversion, composition, data modeling and XML encoding, and our
KPO services include research and analysis, authoring, copy-editing,
abstracting, indexing and other content creation activities. Our staff of IT
systems professionals focuses on the design, implementation, integration and
deployment of digital systems used to author, manage and distribute content. We
price our publishing services and KPO services based on the quantity delivered
or resources utilized and generally recognize revenue in the period in which the
services are performed and delivered. A substantial majority of our IT
professional services is provided on a project basis that generates
non-recurring revenues. We price our IT professional services on an hourly basis
for actual time and expense incurred, or on a fixed-fee, turn-key basis.
Revenues for contracts billed on a time-and-materials basis are recognized as
services are performed. Revenues under fixed-fee contracts, which are not
significant to the overall revenues, are recognized on a
percentage-of-completion method of accounting as services are performed or
milestones are achieved.
We consider the criteria of reporting
revenue “gross as a principal” versus “net as an agent”. Factors
considered in determining whether we are the principal in the transaction
include whether we are the primary obligor, have risks and rewards of ownership,
and we bear the risk that the customer may not pay for the services
performed. If there are circumstances where the above criteria are
not met and therefore we are not the principal in providing services, amounts
received from customers are presented net of payments in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
Revenue includes reimbursement of
out-of-pocket expenses, with the corresponding out-of-pocket expenses included
in direct operating costs.
16
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct operating costs consist of
direct payroll, occupancy costs, depreciation and amortization, travel,
telecommunications, computer services and supplies, and other direct expenses
that are incurred in providing services to our clients.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses
consist of management and administrative salaries, sales and marketing costs,
new services research and related software development, professional fees and
consultant costs, and other administrative overhead costs.
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
Revenues
Revenues were $15.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $18.5 million for the similar
period in 2009, a decline of approximately 15%. The $2.7 million
decline in revenues was principally attributable to a $4.1 million decline in
revenue from one of our top two clients. The decline was partially
offset by a $1.4 million increase in revenues from our other
clients. The $4.1 million year-over-year decline in revenues from one
of our top two clients follows significant declines in revenues from this client
in the second half of 2009 and first quarter of 2010. We cannot
determine whether this pattern will continue in the next several quarters, but
in any event we consider it unlikely that revenues from this client will, in the
near term, resume at the levels that prevailed in the first half of
2009.
Our top
two clients generated $4.4 million or 28% and $7.8 million or 42% of our
revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
One other client accounted for 10.3% of our revenue for the three months ended
September 30, 2010. No other client accounted for 10% or more of our total
revenues for these periods. Revenues from clients located in foreign countries
(principally in Europe) amounted to $4.6 million or 29% and $4.1 million or
22% of our total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 72% or $11.3 million of our
revenues were recurring and 28% or $4.5 million were non-recurring, compared
with 70% or $13.0 million and 30% or $5.5 million, respectively, for the three
months ended September 30, 2009.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct operating costs were
$11.3 million and $12.8 million for the three months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, a decline of approximately 12%.
The decrease in direct operating costs
was principally attributable to a decrease in compensation and benefit costs as
the number of production employees was scaled down due to a decline in revenues
from one of our top two clients. The decline in direct operating costs was
partially offset by annual increases in compensation costs of existing employees
and other miscellaneous operating costs.
In addition, for the three month period
ended September 30, 2010, foreign exchange rate fluctuations caused by a
strengthening Philippine peso and Indian rupee against the U.S. dollar increased
direct operating costs by $0.4 million, which was more than offset by gains from
the settlement of foreign currency forward contracts of approximately $0.7
million.
17
Changes in direct operating expenses
and revenues, as mentioned above, resulted in an increase in direct operating
costs as a percentage of revenues to 72% for the three months ended September
30, 2010 from 69% for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses were $4.0 million and $3.8 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of
approximately 7%.
The
increase in selling and administrative expenses principally reflects
compensation costs of new personnel hired for sales and consulting services and
unfavorable foreign exchange rates.
Changes
in selling and administrative costs and revenues, as mentioned above, resulted
in an increase in selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of
revenues to approximately 25% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from
20% for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
Income
Taxes
Provision
for income taxes was $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2010, the provision for income taxes was
primarily comprised of the provision we recorded for the U.S. entity and certain
of our foreign subsidiaries. In addition, the provision for income tax also
includes the provision we recorded for one of our Indian subsidiaries for
uncertain tax positions. As this subsidiary has been continually subject to tax
audits by the Indian Bureau of Taxation, we assessed the likelihood of an
unfavorable assessment for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and
recorded a provision of $60,000. Certain overseas income is not subject to tax
in the U.S. unless repatriated.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a provision for income taxes
for the U.S. entity and certain, but not all of our foreign subsidiaries, as
certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to tax holidays or preferential tax
rates. In addition, certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S.
unless repatriated.
Net
Income
We generated net income of $0.3 million
in the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared with net income of $1.3
million in the comparable period in 2009. The change was principally
attributable to a decrease in gross margins resulting from a decline in
revenues, unfavorable foreign exchange rates, and annual increases in
compensation costs of existing employees, partially offset by a favorable impact
on the settlement of foreign currency forward contracts. The change was also
attributable to an increase in selling and administrative expenses primarily due
to the hiring of new sales executives, offset by a decrease in the provision for
income taxes.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
Revenues
Revenues were $46.6 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $60.5 million for the similar
period in 2009, a decline of approximately 23%. The $13.9 million
decline in revenues was principally attributable to a $19.7 million decline in
revenue from one of our top two clients. The decline was partially
offset by a $5.8 million increase in revenues from our other
clients. The $19.7 million year-over-year decline in revenues from
one of our top two clients follows significant declines in revenues from this
client in the second half of 2009 and first quarter of 2010. We
cannot determine whether this pattern will continue in the next several
quarters, but in any event we consider it unlikely that revenues from this
client will, in the near term, resume at the levels that prevailed in the first
half of 2009.
18
Our top
two clients generated $13.4 million or 29% and $30.8 million or 51% of our
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. No
other client accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues for these periods.
Revenues from clients located in foreign countries (principally in Europe)
amounted to $15.2 million or 33% and $11.4 million or 19% of our total
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, approximately 72% or $33.7 million of our
revenues were recurring and 28% or $12.9 million were non-recurring, compared
with 63% or $38.0 million and 37% or $22.5 million, respectively, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct operating costs were
$35.7 million and $38.7 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, a decline of approximately 8%.
The decrease in direct operating costs
was principally attributable to a decrease in compensation and benefit costs as
the number of production employees was scaled down due to a decline in revenues
from one of our top two clients. The decline in direct operating costs was
partially offset by annual increases in compensation costs of existing
employees, compensation costs of new hires in our consulting and technology
group and other operating costs primarily the consultancy fee related to project
delivery and the costs associated towards giving management training to our
employees.
In addition, for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2010, foreign exchange rate fluctuations caused by a
strengthening Philippine peso and Indian rupee against the U.S. dollar increased
direct operating costs by $1.1 million, which was more than offset by gains from
the settlement of foreign currency forward contracts of approximately $1.9
million.
Changes in direct operating expenses
and revenues, as mentioned above, resulted in an increase in direct operating
costs as a percentage of revenues to 76% for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 from 64% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses were $11.9 million and $10.4 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of
approximately 14%.
The
increase in selling and administrative expenses principally reflects
compensation costs of new personnel hired for sales and consulting services and
unfavorable foreign exchange rates.
Changes
in selling and administrative costs and revenues, as mentioned above, resulted
in an increase selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues
to 26% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 17% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009.
19
Income
Taxes
Provision
for income taxes was $1.1 million and $3.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, the provision for income taxes was
primarily comprised of the provision we recorded for one of our Indian
subsidiaries for uncertain tax positions. As this subsidiary has been
continually subject to tax audits by the Indian Bureau of Taxation, we assessed
the likelihood of an unfavorable assessment for the fiscal year ended March 31,
2010 and for the six months ended September 30, 2010, and recorded a provision
of $420,000. In addition, the provision for income taxes also includes the
provision we recorded for the U.S. entity and certain of our foreign
subsidiaries. Certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless
repatriated.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded a provision for income taxes
for the U.S. entity and certain, but not all of our foreign subsidiaries, as
certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to tax holidays or preferential tax
rates. In addition, certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S.
unless repatriated.
Net
Income (Loss)
We generated net loss of $2.0 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared with net income of $8.1
million in the comparable period in 2009. The change was principally
attributable to a decrease in gross margins resulting from a decline in
revenues, unfavorable foreign exchange rates, annual increases in compensation
costs of existing employees and increased compensation costs due to new hires in
our consulting and technology group, partially offset by a favorable impact on
the settlement of foreign currency forward contracts. The change was also
attributable to an increase in selling and administrative expenses primarily due
to the hiring of new sales executives, offset by a decrease in the provision for
income taxes.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Selected measures of liquidity and
capital resources, expressed in thousands, are as follows:
September 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 16,917 | $ | 26,480 | ||||
Short
term and long term investments - other
|
11,668 | - | ||||||
Working
capital
|
27,600 | 32,589 |
At September 30, 2010, we had cash and
cash equivalents of $16.9 million and short term and long term investments of
$11.7 million. We have used, and plan to use, such cash for (i) expansion of
existing operations; (ii) general corporate purposes, including working capital;
and (iii) possible business acquisitions. As of September 30, 2010, we had
working capital of approximately $27.6 million as compared to working capital of
approximately $32.6 million as of December 31, 2009. The reduction is working
capital is primarily due to purchases of long term investments amounting to $5
million in 2010. We do not anticipate any near-term liquidity
issues.
Net
Cash Provided By Operating Activities
Cash provided by our operating
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $4.2 million
resulting from a net loss of $2.0 million, adjustments for non-cash items of
$3.1 million and $3.1 million provided by changes in working capital.
Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $2.8 million for
depreciation and amortization and $0.3 million for pension costs. Working
capital activities primarily consisted of a source of cash of $2.8 million as a
result of collections of accounts receivable, a source of cash of $0.8 million
for an increase in accrued salaries and wages, primarily on account of accruals
and timing of payments, and a source of cash of $0.8 million related to income
and other taxes.
20
Cash provided by our operating
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $12.9 million,
resulting from a net income of $8.1 million, adjustments for non-cash items of
$5.6 million and $0.8 million used for working capital. Adjustments for non-cash
items primarily consisted of $2.8 million for depreciation and amortization and
$2.6 million for deferred income taxes. Working capital activities primarily
consisted of a source of cash of $1.1 million for a decrease in accounts
receivable, due to timing of collection, a use of cash of $1.1 million for an
increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets representing various
prepayments made, and the timing of payment, and a use of cash of $0.4 million
in income and other taxes.
At September 30, 2010, our days’ sales
outstanding were approximately 63 days as compared to 60 days as of December 31,
2009.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
The net cash used in investing
activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is primarily comprised
of purchases of investments amounting to $11.7 million, which represents
investments in certificates of deposit. Also included in the investing
activities is $1.4 million for capital expenditures, compared to approximately
$1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Capital spending in
2010, as well as in 2009, related principally to the purchasing of routine
technology equipment and software. During the next twelve months, we anticipate
that capital expenditures for ongoing technology, hardware, equipment and
infrastructure upgrades will approximate $2.5 to $3.5 million, a portion of
which we may finance.
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Total payments of long term obligations
approximated $0.5 million and $0.6 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash proceeds received from the exercise of
stock options amounted to approximately $3.4 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. There were no option exercises in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Also, included in financing activities is the tax benefit
arising from the stock-based compensation amounting to $0.3
million.
In June 2010, we announced that our
Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $2.1 million of our common
stock. In September 2010, we acquired 138,000 shares of our common stock for
approximately $0.4 million at a volume weighted average price of $2.82 per
share. No shares were repurchased for the similar period in 2009.
Future
Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements
We have a $7.0 million line of
credit pursuant to which we may borrow up to 80% of eligible accounts
receivable. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at the bank’s
alternate base rate plus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 2.5%. The line, which expires in
June 2011, is collateralized by our accounts receivable. We have no outstanding
obligations under this credit line as of September 30, 2010.
We believe that our existing cash and
cash equivalents, funds generated from our operating activities and funds
available under our credit facility will provide sufficient sources of liquidity
to satisfy our financial needs for the next twelve months. However, if
circumstances change, we may need to raise debt or additional equity capital in
the future.
21
Contractual
Obligations
The table below summarizes our
contractual obligations (in thousands) at September 30, 2010 and the effects
that those obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in
future periods.
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
4-5 years
|
After
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
$ | 62 | $ | 42 | $ | 20 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Non-cancelable
operating leases
|
6,420 | 1,352 | 2,688 | 2,380 | - | |||||||||||||||
Vendor
obligations
|
137 | 137 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total
contractual cash obligations
|
$ | 6,619 | $ | 1,531 | $ | 2,708 | $ | 2,380 | $ | - |
Future expected obligations under our
pension benefit plan have not been included in the contractual cash obligations
table above.
Inflation,
Seasonality and Prevailing Economic Conditions
Our most significant costs are the
salaries and related benefits of our employees in Asia. We are exposed to higher
inflation in wage rates in the countries in which we operate. We
generally perform work for our clients under project-specific contracts,
requirements-based contracts or long-term contracts. We must adequately
anticipate wage increases, particularly on our fixed-price contracts. There can
be no assurance that we will be able to recover cost increases through increases
in the prices that we charge for our services to our clients.
Our quarterly operating results are
subject to certain fluctuations. We experience fluctuations in our
revenue and earnings as we replace and begin new projects, which may have some
normal start-up delays, or we may be unable to replace a project entirely. These
and other factors may contribute to fluctuations in our operating results from
quarter to quarter. In addition, as some of our Asian facilities are closed
during holidays in the fourth quarter, we typically incur higher wages, due to
overtime, that reduce our margins.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our
results of operations, liquidity and capital resources is based on our
consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The
preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On
an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and billing
adjustments, long-lived assets, goodwill, valuation of deferred tax assets,
value of securities underlying stock-based compensation, litigation accruals,
pension benefits, valuation of derivative instruments and estimated accruals for
various tax exposures. We base our estimates on historical and anticipated
results and trends and on various other assumptions that we believe are
reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events.
These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By
their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual
results may differ from our estimates and could have a significant adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial position. For a discussion of
our critical accounting policies see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no
material changes to our critical accounting policies during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010.
22
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued an
amendment to its accounting guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple
deliverables. This new accounting guidance addresses the unit of accounting for
arrangements involving multiple deliverables and how consideration should be
allocated to separate units of accounting, when applicable. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an
impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2010, FASB issued an amendment regarding improving disclosures about
fair value measurements. This new guidance requires some new disclosures and
clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement.
The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009,
except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in
the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this
guidance is not expected to have an impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Interest
rate risk
We are exposed to market risk due to
interest rate fluctuations with respect to our credit line with a financial
institution which is priced based on the bank’s alternate base rate (3.25% at
September 30, 2010) plus 0.5% or LIBOR (0.25% at September 30, 2010) plus
2.5%. We have no outstanding obligations under this
line. We plan on renewing the line of credit in the second quarter of
2011. To the extent we utilize all or a portion of this line of credit, changes
in the interest rate will have a positive or negative effect on our interest
expense.
Foreign
currency risk
We have operations in several
international markets that subject us to foreign currency fluctuations. Although
the majority of our contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars, a substantial
portion of the costs incurred to render services under these contracts is
incurred in the local currencies of several international markets where we carry
on our operations. Our significant operations are based in the Philippines,
India and Israel where revenues are generated in U.S. dollars, and the
corresponding expenses are generated in Philippine pesos, Indian rupees and
Israeli shekels.
23
To
mitigate the exposure of fluctuating future cash flows due to changes in foreign
exchange rates, we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts. These
foreign currency forward contracts were entered into with a maximum term of
twelve months and have an aggregate notional amount of approximately $27 million
as of September 30, 2010. The total notional amount outstanding is net of
offsetting forward contracts entered by the Company in the third quarter of
2010, which has a total notional amount of $6 million. These forward contracts
were entered into by the Company primarily to protect the future cash flows from
any adverse movements in the currency. We may continue to enter into such
instruments, or other instruments, in the future to reduce foreign currency
exposure to appreciation or depreciation in the value of these foreign
currencies.
The
impact of foreign currency fluctuations will continue to present economic
challenges to us and could negatively impact our overall results of operations.
A 10% appreciation in the U.S. dollar’s value relating to hedged currencies
would decrease the forward contracts’ fair value by approximately $2.6 million
as of September 30, 2010. Similarly, a 10% depreciation in the U.S. dollar’s
value relative to hedged currencies would increase the forward contracts’ fair
value by approximately $3.1 million. Any increase or decrease in the fair value
of our currency exchange rate sensitive forward contracts, if utilized, would be
substantially offset by a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value
of the hedged underlying cash flows.
Other
than the aforementioned forward contracts, we have not engaged in any hedging
activities nor have we entered into off-balance sheet transactions or
arrangements.
As of September 30, 2010, our foreign
locations held cash and short term and long term investments totaling
approximately $13.6 million.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by
this report, we performed an evaluation under the supervision, and with the
participation of, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates, that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
24
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
There
were no material changes from the legal proceedings previously disclosed in Part
I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I,
Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
We
purchased approximately 138,000 shares of our common stock for a total cost of
approximately $0.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2010, as
shown in the table below:
Period
|
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average Price Paid
per Share
|
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
|
Maximum Value of
Shares Available for
Repurchase
|
||||||||||||
July
1-31, 2010
|
— | — | — | $ | 2,100,000 | |||||||||||
August
1-31, 2010
|
— | — | — | $ | 2,100,000 | |||||||||||
September
1-30, 2010
|
137,913 | $ | 2.82 | 137,913 | $ | 1,707,000 |
In June 2010, we announced that our
Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $2.1 million of our common
stock of which approximately $1.7 million remains available for repurchase under
the program as of September 30, 2010. There is no expiration date associated
with the program.
This authorization replaced a prior
authorization made in May 2008.
We did not have any sales of
unregistered equity securities during the three months ended September 30,
2010.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Reserved
Item
5. Other Information
None.
25
Item
6. Exhibits
31.1 Certificate
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
31.2 Certificate
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
32.1 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
26
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC.
Date: October 26,
2010
|
/s/ Jack
Abuhoff
|
|
Jack
Abuhoff
|
||
Chairman of the
Board,
|
||
Chief Executive Officer and
President
|
||
Date: October 26,
2010
|
/s/ O’Neil
Nalavadi
|
|
O’Neil
Nalavadi
|
||
Senior
Vice President
Chief
Financial Officer
and
Principal Accounting
Officer
|
27