INNODATA INC - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
|
|
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
||
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
|
||
OR
|
||
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
|
|
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
||
For
the transition period from ________________ to
________________
|
Commission
file number: 0-22196
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3475943
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
Three
University Plaza
|
07601
|
|
Hackensack,
New Jersey
|
(Zip
Code)
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(201)
371-8000
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
[None]
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer ¨ Smaller
reporting company ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No
þ
The
number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value,
as of July 23, 2010 was 25,419,246.
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
For
the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
INDEX
Page
No.
|
||
Part I – Financial
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited):
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009
|
1
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009
|
2
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009
|
3
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June
30, 2010 and 2009
|
4
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
5
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
15
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
23
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
Part
II – Other Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
25
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
25
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
25
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
25
|
Item
4.
|
Reserved
|
25
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
25
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
Signatures
|
27
|
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share
data)
June
30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 19,448 | $ | 26,480 | ||||
Short
term investments - other
|
5,557 | - | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
10,140 | 11,741 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
2,554 | 3,899 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,677 | 1,763 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
39,376 | 43,883 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
5,130 | 5,559 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
2,303 | 2,505 | ||||||
Long
term investments - other
|
2,000 | - | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
909 | 943 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
675 | 675 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 50,393 | $ | 53,565 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 1,045 | $ | 1,261 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
2,128 | 2,293 | ||||||
Accrued
salaries, wages and related benefits
|
5,274 | 5,022 | ||||||
Income
and other taxes
|
1,354 | 1,339 | ||||||
Current
portion of long term obligations
|
572 | 892 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
42 | 487 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
10,415 | 11,294 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
87 | 87 | ||||||
Income
and other taxes – long term
|
360 | - | ||||||
Long
term obligations
|
1,325 | 1,199 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Serial
preferred stock; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 26,207,000 shares
issued and 25,419,000 outstanding at June 30, 2010; 26,167,000 shares
issued and 25,379,000 outstanding at December 31,
2009
|
262 | 262 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
20,522 | 20,267 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
18,881 | 21,159 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
730 | 1,486 | ||||||
40,395 | 43,174 | |||||||
Less:
treasury stock, 788,000 shares at cost
|
(2,189 | ) | (2,189 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
38,206 | 40,985 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 50,393 | $ | 53,565 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||
June
30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 15,386 | $ | 20,905 | ||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
||||||||
Direct
operating costs
|
12,107 | 13,469 | ||||||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
3,770 | 3,063 | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
(33 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Totals
|
15,844 | 16,526 | ||||||
Income
(loss) before provision for income taxes
|
(458 | ) | 4,379 | |||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
416 | 1,175 | ||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (874 | ) | $ | 3,204 | |||
Income
(loss) per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
$ | (.03 | ) | $ | .13 | |||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
25,419 | 24,249 | ||||||
Diluted
|
25,419 | 25,373 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands, except per share amounts)
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||
June
30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 30,860 | $ | 42,017 | ||||
Operating
costs and expenses:
|
||||||||
Direct
operating costs
|
24,379 | 25,876 | ||||||
Selling
and administrative expenses
|
7,905 | 6,670 | ||||||
Interest
income, net
|
(35 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
Totals
|
32,249 | 32,527 | ||||||
Income
(loss) before provision for income taxes
|
(1,389 | ) | 9,490 | |||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
889 | 2,705 | ||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (2,278 | ) | $ | 6,785 | |||
Income
(loss) per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (.09 | ) | $ | .28 | |||
Diluted
|
$ | (.09 | ) | $ | .27 | |||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
|
25,400 | 24,194 | ||||||
Diluted
|
25,400 | 24,912 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||
June 30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (2,278 | ) | $ | 6,785 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,914 | 1,816 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
92 | 166 | ||||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
(163 | ) | - | |||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
114 | 1,781 | ||||||
Pension
cost
|
208 | 85 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
1,601 | (160 | ) | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
155 | (431 | ) | |||||
Other
assets
|
(76 | ) | (117 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(381 | ) | 227 | |||||
Accrued
salaries, wages and related benefits
|
252 | 192 | ||||||
Income
and other taxes
|
538 | (290 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
1,976 | 10,054 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(1,207 | ) | (975 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of investments - other
|
(7,557 | ) | - | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(8,764 | ) | (975 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Payment
of long term obligations
|
(407 | ) | (471 | ) | ||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
163 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
- | 635 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
(244 | ) | 164 | |||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(7,032 | ) | 9,243 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
26,480 | 13,875 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 19,448 | $ | 23,118 | ||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 5 | $ | 18 | ||||
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$ | 236 | $ | 1,522 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
(In
thousands)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Treasury
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Stock
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
January
1, 2010
|
25,379 | $ | 262 | $ | 20,267 | $ | 21,159 | $ | 1,486 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 40,985 | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
- | - | - | (2,278 | ) | - | - | (2,278 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
40 | - | 92 | - | - | - | 92 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Excess
tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
- | - | 163 | - | - | - | 163 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pension
liability adjustments, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (6 | ) | - | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (750 | ) | - | (750 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2010
|
25,419 | $ | 262 | $ | 20,522 | $ | 18,881 | $ | 730 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 38,206 | ||||||||||||||
January
1, 2009
|
24,119 | $ | 249 | $ | 16,614 | $ | 14,772 | $ | 742 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 30,188 | ||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | 6,785 | - | - | 6,785 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
291 | 3 | 826 | - | - | - | 829 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
- | - | 166 | - | - | - | 166 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pension
liability adjustments, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (18 | ) | - | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes
|
- | - | - | - | (138 | ) | - | (138 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2009
|
24,410 | $ | 252 | $ | 17,606 | $ | 21,557 | $ | 586 | $ | (2,189 | ) | $ | 37,812 |
See notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
1.
|
Description
of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Description of
Business-Innodata Isogen, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is a
leading provider of knowledge process outsourcing (“KPO”) services as well as
publishing and related information technology (“IT”) services that help leading
media, publishing and information service companies create, manage, use and
maintain their products. Our publishing services include digitization,
conversion, composition, data modeling and XML encoding, and our KPO services
include research and analysis, authoring, copy-editing, abstracting, indexing
and other content creation activities. The Company’s staff of IT systems
professionals designs, implements, integrates and deploys systems and
technologies used to improve the efficiency of authoring, managing and
distributing content.
Basis of Presentation-The condensed
consolidated financial statements for the interim periods included herein are
unaudited; however, they contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal
recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to
present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30,
2010, and the results of its operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. The results of operations
for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be
expected for any other interim period or for the full year.
These
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless
otherwise noted, the accounting policies used in preparing these condensed
consolidated financial statements are the same as those described in the
December 31, 2009 consolidated financial statements.
Principles of
Consolidation-The condensed consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Innodata Isogen, Inc. and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly
owned. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates-In preparing
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include those related to revenue recognition, allowance
for doubtful accounts and billing adjustments, long-lived assets, goodwill,
valuation of deferred tax assets, valuation of securities underlying stock-based
compensation, litigation accruals, pension benefits, valuation of derivative
instruments and estimated accruals for various tax exposures.
Reclassifications-Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior periods’ consolidated condensed
financial statements to conform to the current period’s presentation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued an
amendment to its accounting guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple
deliverables. This new accounting guidance addresses the unit of accounting for
arrangements involving multiple deliverables and how consideration should be
allocated to separate units of accounting, when applicable. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an
impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
In
January 2010, FASB issued an amendment regarding improving disclosures about
fair value measurements. This new guidance requires some new disclosures and
clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement.
The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009,
except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the
roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures
are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements.
2.
|
Income
taxes
|
The Company had unrecognized tax
benefits of approximately $1.7 million and $1.3 million at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. The portion of unrecognized tax benefits
relating to interest and penalties was approximately $0.4 million at both June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, if recognized, would have an impact on the Company’s
effective tax rate.
The
following presents a roll-forward of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits and
associated interest for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (amounts in
thousands):
Unrecognized
tax
benefits
|
||||
Balance
- January 1, 2010
|
$ | 1,303 | ||
Increases
for tax position in current period
|
360 | |||
Interest
accrual
|
29 | |||
Balance
– June 30, 2010
|
$ | 1,692 |
The Company is subject to U.S. federal
income tax, as well as income tax in various states and foreign jurisdictions.
The Company is no longer subject to examination by federal and New Jersey taxing
authorities for years prior to 2006. Various foreign subsidiaries currently have
open tax years ranging from 2004 through 2009.
Pursuant
to an income tax audit by the Indian Bureau of Taxation in March 2006, one of
the Company’s Indian subsidiaries received a tax assessment approximating
$339,000, including interest, through June 30, 2010, for the fiscal tax year
ended March 31, 2003. Management disagrees with the basis of the tax
assessment and has filed an appeal against the assessment, which it will
contest vigorously. The Indian Bureau of Taxation has also completed an
audit of the Company’s Indian subsidiary’s income tax return for the fiscal tax
year ended March 31, 2004. The ultimate outcome was favorable, and
there was no tax assessment imposed for the fiscal tax year ended
March 31, 2004. In December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Indian subsidiary
received a final tax assessment for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005 and
2006 from the Indian Bureau of Taxation approximating $340,000 and $307,000,
respectively, including interest through June 30, 2010. Management disagrees
with the basis of these tax assessments, and has filed an appeal against the
assessments, which it will contest vigorously. As the Company is continually
subject to tax audits by the Indian Bureau of Taxation, the Company assessed the
likelihood of an unfavorable assessment for the fiscal years ended March 31,
2007, and years subsequent to the fiscal year March 31, 2007 for this
subsidiary, and recorded an additional tax provision amounting to approximately
$700,000 including interest through June 30, 2010. In 2009, the Indian Bureau of
Taxation commenced an audit of this subsidiary’s income tax return for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2008. The ultimate outcome cannot be determined at
this time.
7
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
3.
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
Line of Credit-The Company has
a $7.0 million line of credit pursuant to which it may borrow up to 80% of
eligible accounts receivable. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at
the bank’s alternate base rate plus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 2.5%. The line, which
expires in June 2011, is collateralized by the Company’s accounts receivable.
The Company has no outstanding obligations under this credit line as of June 30,
2010. The Company plans on renewing the line of credit in the second quarter of
2011.
Litigation-The Supreme Court
of the Republic of the Philippines has refused to review a decision of the Court
of Appeals in Manila against a Philippine subsidiary of the Company that is
inactive and has no material assets, and purportedly also against Innodata
Isogen, Inc., that orders the reinstatement of certain former employees of the
subsidiary to their former positions and also orders the payment of back wages
and benefits that aggregate approximately $7.5 million. Based on consultation
with legal counsel, the Company believes that recovery against the Company is
nevertheless unlikely.
The
Company is also subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in
the ordinary course of business.
While
management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or
overall trends in results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties. Substantial recovery against the Company in the above referenced
Philippines actions could have a material adverse impact on the Company, and
unfavorable rulings or recoveries in the other proceedings could have a material
adverse impact on the operating results of the period in which the ruling or
recovery occurs. In addition, the Company’s estimate of the potential impact on
the Company’s financial position or overall results of operations for the above
legal proceedings could change in the future.
8
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
4.
|
Stock
options
|
A summary of option activity under the
Company’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2010, and changes during the six
month period then ended, is presented below:
Number
of Shares
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2010
|
1,846,780 | $ | 2.63 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
150,000 | $ | 5.20 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Expired
|
— | — | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2010
|
1,996,780 | $ | 2.82 | 4.26 | $ | 710,000 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2010
|
1,835,530 | $ | 2.62 | 3.80 | $ | 710,000 |
The fair value of stock options is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
weighted-average fair values of the options granted and weighted average
assumptions are as follows:
Six
months ended
|
||||||||
June
30,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009 (1)
|
|||||||
Weighted
average fair value of options granted
|
$ | 3.54 | $ | — | ||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
3.19 | % | — | |||||
Expected
term (years)
|
8.00 | — | ||||||
Expected
volatility factor
|
90 | % | — | |||||
Expected
dividends
|
None
|
— |
(1) There were no options granted during
the six months ended June 30, 2009.
No
options were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The total
intrinsic value of options exercised for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was
approximately $0.3 million. The total fair value of stock options vested during
the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $0.1 million.
In March
2010, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved
the issuance of 40,000 restricted shares to the Chief Financial Officer, which
vest over four years. No restricted shares vested as of June 30, 2010. The
weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted shares was $0.2
million.
The total
compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards not yet recognized as of
June 30, 2010 totaled approximately $0.7 million. The weighted-average period
over which these costs will be recognized is twenty-seven months.
The
stock-based compensation expense related to the Company’s various stock awards
was allocated as follows (in thousands):
9
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended June 30,
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
$ | 3 | $ | 3 | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | ||||||||
Selling
and adminstrative expenses
|
68 | 80 | 86 | 160 | ||||||||||||
Total
stock-based compensation
|
$ | 71 | $ | 83 | $ | 92 | $ | 166 |
5.
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
The
components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in
thousands):
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (874 | ) | $ | 3,204 | $ | (2,278 | ) | $ | 6,785 | ||||||
Pension
liability adjustment, net of taxes
|
(3 | ) | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized
loss from derivatives, net of taxes
|
(1,055 | ) | (138 | ) | (750 | ) | (138 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ | (1,932 | ) | $ | 3,058 | $ | (3,034 | ) | $ | 6,629 |
Accumulated other comprehensive
income as reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets consists of
changes in pension liability adjustments, net of taxes and changes in fair value
of derivatives, net of taxes. The components of accumulated other comprehensive
income as of June 30, 2010, and changes during the period then ended, is
presented below (in thousands):
Pension
Liability
|
Fair
value of
|
Accumulated
Other
|
||||||||||
Adjustment
|
Derivatives
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
||||||||||
Balance
at January 1, 2010
|
$ | 667 | $ | 819 | $ | 1,486 | ||||||
Current-period
change
|
(6 | ) | (750 | ) | (756 | ) | ||||||
Balance
at June 30, 2010
|
$ | 661 | $ | 69 | $ | 730 |
6.
|
Segment
reporting and concentrations
|
The
Company operates in one reportable segment.
The
following table summarizes revenues by geographic region (determined based upon
customer’s domicile) (in thousands):
10
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Unites
States
|
$ | 9,755 | $ | 17,456 | $ | 20,312 | $ | 34,773 | ||||||||
United
Kingdom
|
2,537 | 1,548 | 4,484 | $ | 2,780 | |||||||||||
The
Netherlands
|
1,813 | 1,257 | 3,683 | 2,930 | ||||||||||||
Other
- principally Europe
|
1,281 | 644 | 2,381 | 1,534 | ||||||||||||
$ | 15,386 | $ | 20,905 | $ | 30,860 | $ | 42,017 |
Long-lived
assets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, by geographic
regions are comprised of (in thousands):
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$ | 1,114 | $ | 1,152 | ||||
Foreign
countries:
|
||||||||
Philippines
|
2,888 | 2,927 | ||||||
India
|
1,094 | 1,284 | ||||||
Sri
Lanka
|
484 | 592 | ||||||
Israel
|
225 | 279 | ||||||
Total
foreign
|
4,691 | 5,082 | ||||||
$ | 5,805 | $ | 6,234 |
The
Company’s top two clients generated approximately 29% and 52% of our revenues
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. No other client
accounted for 10% or more of revenues during these periods. Further, for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, revenues from non-US clients
accounted for 37% and 16%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.
The
Company’s top two clients generated approximately 29% and 55% of our revenues
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. No other client
accounted for 10% or more of revenues during these periods. Further, for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, revenues from non-US clients accounted for
34% and 17%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.
A
significant amount of the Company's revenues is derived from clients in the
publishing industry. Accordingly, the Company's accounts receivable generally
include significant amounts due from such clients. In addition, as of June 30,
2010, approximately 39% of the Company's accounts receivable was from foreign
(principally European) clients and 47% of accounts receivable were due from
three clients in the publishing industry. As of December 31, 2009,
approximately 37% of the Company's accounts receivable was from foreign
(principally European) clients and 31% of accounts receivable were due from two
clients in the publishing industry.
11
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
7.
|
Income (loss) per
share
|
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (874 | ) | $ | 3,204 | $ | (2,278 | ) | $ | 6,785 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
25,419 | 24,249 | 25,400 | 24,194 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
effect of outstanding options
|
— | 1,124 | — | 718 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted
for dilution computation
|
25,419 | 25,373 | 25,400 | 24,912 |
Basic
income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the year. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed
by considering the impact of the potential issuance of common shares, using the
treasury stock method, on the weighted-average number of shares
outstanding.
Options
to purchase 1.0 million shares of common stock for the three months ended June
30, 2010 were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted income
(loss) per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the
average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would have
been antidilutive. In addition, diluted net loss per share does not include 1.0
million potential common shares derived from the exercise of stock options for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 because as a result of the Company
incurring losses, their effect would have been antidilutive. All options
outstanding were included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as the exercise price was lower than
the average market price.
Options
to purchase 0.2 million shares of common stock and 0.3 million shares of common
stock for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively were
outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per
share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market
price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would have been
antidilutive. In addition, diluted net loss per share does not include 1.8
million potential common shares derived from the exercise of stock options and
unvested restricted shares for the six months ended June 30, 2010 because as a
result of the Company incurring losses, their effect would have been
antidilutive.
8.
|
Derivatives
|
The
Company has a large portion of its operations in international markets that
subject it to foreign currency fluctuations. The most significant foreign
currency exposures occur when revenue and associated accounts receivable are
collected in one currency and expenses incurred in order to generate that
revenue are accounted for in another currency. The Company’s primary exchange
rate exposure relates to payroll, other payroll costs and operating expenses in
the Philippines, India and Israel.
To manage
its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company
entered into foreign currency forward contracts, authorized under Company
policies, with counterparties that were highly rated financial institutions. The
Company utilized non-deliverable forward contracts expiring within twelve months
to reduce its foreign currency risk.
12
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
The
Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and
hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategy for
undertaking hedge transactions. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives
for trading purposes. All derivatives are recognized at their fair value and are
classified based on the instrument’s maturity date. The total notional amount
for outstanding derivatives as of June 30, 2010 was $34 million, which is
comprised of cash flow hedges denominated in U.S. dollars.
The
following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments included
within the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009 (in thousands):
Balance
Sheet Location
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||
Derivatives
designated as hedging instruments:
|
|||||||||
Foreign
currency forward contracts
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
$ | 110 | $ | 1,300 |
The
effect of foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges on
our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
(4)
|
2010
|
2009
(4)
|
|||||||||||||
Net
gain recognized in OCI (1)
|
$ | (952 | ) | $ | — | $ | 10 | $ | — | |||||||
Net
gain reclassified from accumulated OCI into income (2)
|
$ | 688 | $ | — | $ | 1,200 | $ | — | ||||||||
Net
gain (loss) recognized in income (3)
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
(1)
Net change in the fair value of the effective portion classified in other
comprehensive income ("OCI").
(2)
Effective portion classfied as direct operating costs.
(3)
There were no ineffective portions for the periods presented.
(4)
No foreign currency forward contracts at June 30, 2009.
9.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The
carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, short term investments and long term investments, consist
of certificates of deposit, and accounts payable approximating their fair value
as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, because of the relative short
maturity of these instruments.
“Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures” defines fair value as the price that would be received for
an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants on the measurement date.
13
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009
(Unaudited)
The
accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
inputs used to measure fair value into three levels. The three levels are
defined as follows:
·
|
Level 1: Unadjusted
quoted price in active market for identical assets and
liabilities.
|
·
|
Level 2: Observable
inputs other than those included in Level
1.
|
|
·
|
Level 3: Unobservable
inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in
pricing the asset or liability.
|
The
following table sets forth the financial assets and liabilities as of June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, that the Company measured at fair value, on a
recurring basis by level, within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands). As
required by the standard, assets and liabilities measured at fair value are
classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to their fair value measurement.
June
30, 2010
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
|||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
$ | — | $ | 110 | $ | — | ||||||
December
31, 2009
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
|||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
$ | — | $ | 1,300 | $ | — |
The Level
2 assets contain foreign currency forward contracts. Fair value is determined
based on the observable market transactions of spot and forward rates. The fair
value of these contracts as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is included
in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheets.
14
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Disclosures in this Form 10-Q
contain certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation,
statements concerning our operations, economic performance, and financial
condition. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the
safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995, Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. The words “estimate,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate” and other similar
expressions generally identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as
of their dates.
These
forward-looking statements are based largely on our current
expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including
without limitation, the primarily at-will nature of the contracts
with our customers and the ability of customers to reduce, delay or cancel
projects, including projects that we regard as recurring; continuing revenue
concentration in a limited number of clients, continuing reliance on
project-based work; inability to replace projects that are completed, cancelled
or reduced; depressed market conditions; changes in external market factors; the
ability and willingness of our clients and prospective clients to execute
business plans which give rise to requirements for digital content and
professional services in knowledge processing; difficulty in integrating and
deriving synergies from acquisitions; potential undiscovered liabilities of
companies that we acquire; changes in our business or growth strategy; the
emergence of new or growing competitors; various other competitive and
technological factors; and other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to
time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our
actual results could differ materially from the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements. In light of these risks and
uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the results referred to in the
forward-looking statements contained in this release will occur.
We
undertake no obligation to update or review any guidance or other
forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future
developments or otherwise.
Business
Overview
We
provide knowledge process outsourcing (“KPO”) services, as well as publishing
and related information technology (“IT”) services, that help leading media,
publishing and information services companies create, manage and maintain their
products. We also provide our services to companies in other
information-intensive industries, such as information technology, manufacturing,
aerospace, defense, government, law and intelligence.
We help
our clients lower costs, realize productivity gains and improve operations,
enabling them to compete more effectively in demanding global
markets.
Our
publishing services include digitization, conversion, composition, data modeling
and XML encoding. Our KPO services include research and analysis,
authoring, copy-editing, abstracting, indexing and other content creation
activities. We often combine publishing services and KPO services within a
single client engagement, providing an end-to-end content supply chain
solution.
Our staff
of IT systems professionals designs, implements, integrates and deploys systems
and technologies used to improve the efficiency of authoring, managing and
distributing content.
15
We use a
distributed global resource model. Our onshore workforce works from our North
American and European offices, as well as from client sites. Our distributed
global workforce delivers services from our ten offshore facilities in India,
the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Israel.
Services
that are ongoing in nature generate what we regard as recurring revenues.
Services that terminate upon completion of a defined task generate what we
regard as project, or non-recurring, revenues.
Our
business is organized and managed around three vectors: a vertical industry
focus, a horizontal service/process focus, and a focus on supportive
operations.
Our
vertically-aligned groups understand our clients’ businesses and strategic
initiatives and are able to help them meet their goals. With respect to media,
publishing and information services, for example, we have continued to hire
experts out of that sector to establish solutions and services tailored to
companies in that sector. They work with many of the world’s leading media,
publishing and information services companies, dealing with challenges involving
new product creation, product maintenance, digitization, content management and
content creation.
Our
service/process-aligned groups are comprised of engineering and delivery
personnel responsible for creating the most efficient and cost-effective custom
workflows. These workflows integrate proprietary and third-party technologies,
while harnessing the benefits of a globally distributed workforce. They are
responsible for executing our client engagements in accordance with our
service-level agreements and ensuring client satisfaction.
Our
support groups are responsible for managing a diverse group of enabling
functions, including human resources and recruiting, global technology
infrastructure and physical infrastructure and facilities.
Revenues
Our
publishing services include digitization, conversion, composition, data modeling
and XML encoding, and our KPO services include research and analysis, authoring,
copy-editing, abstracting, indexing and other content creation activities. Our
staff of IT systems professionals focuses on the design, implementation,
integration and deployment of digital systems used to author, manage and
distribute content. We price our publishing services and KPO services based on
the quantity delivered or resources utilized and generally recognize revenue in
the period in which the services are performed and delivered. A substantial
majority of our IT professional services is provided on a project basis that
generates non-recurring revenues. We price our IT professional services on an
hourly basis for actual time and expense incurred, or on a fixed-fee, turn-key
basis. Revenues for contracts billed on a time-and-materials basis are
recognized as services are performed. Revenues under fixed-fee contracts, which
are not significant to the overall revenues, are recognized on a
percentage-of-completion method of accounting as services are performed or
milestones are achieved.
We
consider the criteria of reporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an
agent. Factors considered in determining whether we are the principal
in the transaction include whether we are the primary obligor, have risks and
rewards of ownership, and we bear the risk that the customer may not pay for the
services performed. If there are circumstances where the above
criteria are not met and therefore we are not the principal in providing
services, amounts received from customers are presented net of payments in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Revenue
includes reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, with the corresponding
out-of-pocket expenses included in direct operating costs.
16
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct
operating costs consist of direct payroll, occupancy costs, depreciation and
amortization, travel, telecommunications, computer services and supplies, and
other direct expenses that are incurred in providing services to our
clients.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses consist of management and administrative salaries,
sales and marketing costs, new services research and related software
development, professional fees and consultant costs, and other administrative
overhead costs.
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Revenues
Revenues
were $15.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $20.9
million for the similar period in 2009, a decline of approximately
26%. The $5.5 million decline in revenues was principally
attributable to a $7.3 million decline in revenue from one of our top two
clients. The decline was partially offset by a $1.8 million increase
in revenues from our other clients. The $7.3 million year-over-year
decline in revenues from one of our top two clients follows significant declines
in revenues from these clients in the second half of 2009 and first quarter of
2010. We cannot determine whether this pattern will continue in the
next several quarters, but in any event we consider it unlikely that revenues
from these clients will, in the near term, resume at the levels that prevailed
in the first half of 2009.
Our top
two clients generated $4.5 million or 29% and $10.8 million or 52% of our
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. No
other client accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues for these periods.
Revenues from clients located in foreign countries (principally in Europe)
amounted to $5.6 million or 37% and $3.5 million or 17% of our total
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 73% or $11.2 million of our
revenues were recurring and 27% or $4.2 million were non-recurring, compared
with 61% or $12.7 million and 39% or $8.2 million, respectively, for the three
months ended June 30, 2009.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct
operating costs were $12.1 million and $13.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, a decline of approximately
10%.
The
decrease in direct operating costs was principally attributable to a decrease in
compensation and benefit costs as the number of production employees was scaled
down due to a decline in revenues from one of our top two clients. The decline
in direct operating costs was partially offset by annual increases in
compensation costs of existing employees and other miscellaneous operating
costs.
In
addition, for the three month period ended June 30, 2010, foreign exchange rate
fluctuations caused by a strengthening Philippine peso and Indian rupee against
the U.S. dollar increased direct operating costs by $0.6 million, which was
completely offset by gains from the settlement of foreign currency forward
contracts of approximately $0.7 million.
17
Changes
in direct operating expenses and revenues, as mentioned above resulted in
an increase in direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues to 79% for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 from 64% for the three months ended June 30,
2009.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses were $3.8 million and $3.1 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of
approximately 23%.
The
increase in selling and administrative expenses principally reflects
compensation costs of new personnel hired for sales and consulting services and
unfavorable foreign exchange rates.
Changes
in selling and administrative costs and revenues, as mentioned above resulted in
increased selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues to
approximately 25% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from 15% for the
three months ended June 30, 2009.
Income
Taxes
For the
three months ended June 30, 2010, the provision for income taxes was primarily
comprised of the provision we recorded for the U.S. Parent and certain of our
foreign subsidiaries. In addition, the provision for income tax also includes
the provision we recorded for one of our Indian subsidiaries for uncertain tax
positions. As this subsidiary has been continually subject to tax audits by the
Indian Bureau of Taxation, we assessed the likelihood of an unfavorable
assessment for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and recorded a provision of
$60,000. Certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless
repatriated.
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a provision for income taxes for
the U.S. entity and certain, but not all of our foreign subsidiaries, as certain
foreign subsidiaries are subject to tax holidays or preferential tax rates. In
addition, certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless
repatriated.
Net
Income (Loss)
We
generated a net loss of $0.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010
compared with net income of $3.2 million in the comparable period in
2009. The change was principally attributable to a decrease in gross
margins resulting from a decline in revenues, unfavorable foreign exchange
rates, and annual increases in compensation costs of existing employees,
partially offset by a favorable impact on the settlement of foreign currency
forward contracts. The change was also attributable to an increase in selling
and administrative expenses primarily due to the hiring of new sales executives,
offset by a decrease in the provision for income taxes.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Revenues
Revenues
were $30.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $42.0
million for the similar period in 2009, a decline of approximately
27%. The $11.1 million decline in revenues was principally
attributable to a $15.7 million decline in revenue from one of our top two
clients. The decline was partially offset by a $4.6 million increase
in revenues from our other clients. The $15.7 million year-over-year
decline in revenues from one of our top two clients follows significant
declines in revenues from these clients in the second half of 2009 and the first
half of 2010. We cannot determine whether this pattern will continue
in the next several quarters, but in any event we consider it unlikely that
revenues from these clients will, in the near term, resume at the levels that
prevailed in the first half of 2009.
18
Our top
two clients generated $9.0 million or 29% and $23.0 million or 55% of our
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. No other
client accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues for these periods.
Revenues from clients located in foreign countries (principally in Europe)
amounted to $10.5 million or 34% and $7.2 million or 17% of our total
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 72% or $22.3 million of our
revenues were recurring and 28% or $8.6 million were non-recurring, compared
with 60% or $25.3 million and 40% or $16.7 million, respectively, for the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
Direct
Operating Costs
Direct
operating costs were $24.4 million and $25.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, a decline of 6%.
The
decrease in direct operating costs was principally attributable to a decrease in
compensation and benefit costs as the number of production employees was scaled
down due to a decline in revenues from one of our top two clients. The decline
in direct operating costs was partially offset by annual increases in
compensation costs of existing employees, other operating costs and compensation
costs of new hires in our consulting and technology group.
In
addition, for the six month period ended June 30, 2010, foreign exchange rate
fluctuations caused by a strengthening Philippine peso and Indian rupee against
the U.S. dollar increased direct operating costs by $1.5 million, which was
partially offset by gains from the settlement of foreign currency forward
contracts of approximately $1.2 million.
Changes
in direct operating expenses and revenues, as mentioned above resulted in
an increase in direct operating costs as a percentage of revenues to 79% for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 from 62% for the six months ended June 30,
2009.
Selling
and Administrative Expenses
Selling
and administrative expenses were $7.9 million and $6.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, an increase of approximately
19%.
The
increase in selling and administrative expenses principally reflects
compensation costs of new personnel hired for sales and consulting services and
unfavorable foreign exchange rates.
Changes
in selling and administrative costs and revenues, as mentioned above resulted in
increased selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues to 26%
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from 16% for the six months ended
2009.
19
Income
Taxes
For the
six months ended June 30, 2010, the provision for income taxes was primarily
comprised of the provision we recorded for one of our Indian subsidiaries for
uncertain tax positions. As this subsidiary has been continually subject to tax
audits by the Indian Bureau of Taxation, we assessed the likelihood of an
unfavorable assessment for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010 and for the
three months ended June 30, 2010, and recorded a provision of $360,000. In
addition, the provision for income taxes also includes the provision we recorded
for the U.S. Parent and certain of our foreign subsidiaries. Certain overseas
income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless repatriated.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded a provision for income taxes for the
U.S. entity and certain, but not all of our foreign subsidiaries, as certain
foreign subsidiaries are subject to tax holidays or preferential tax rates. In
addition, certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless
repatriated.
Net
Income (Loss)
We
generated a net loss of $2.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010
compared with net income of $6.8 million in the comparable period in
2009. The change was principally attributable to a decrease in gross
margins resulting from a decline in revenues, unfavorable foreign exchange
rates, annual increases in compensation costs of existing employees and
increased compensation costs due to new hires in our consulting and technology
group, partially offset by a favorable impact on the settlement of foreign
currency forward contracts. The change was also attributable to an increase in
selling and administrative expenses primarily due to the hiring of new sales
executives, offset by a decrease in the provision for income taxes.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Selected
measures of liquidity and capital resources, expressed in thousands, are as
follows:
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 19,448 | $ | 26,480 | ||||
Short
term and long term investments - other
|
7,557 | - | ||||||
Working
capital
|
28,961 | 32,589 |
At June
30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents of $19.4 million and short term and
long term investments of $7.6 million. We have used, and plan to use, such cash
for (i) expansion of existing operations; (ii) general corporate purposes,
including working capital; and (iii) possible business acquisitions. As of June
30, 2010, we had working capital of approximately $29.0 million as compared to
working capital of approximately $32.6 million as of December 31, 2009.
Accordingly, we do not anticipate any near-term liquidity issues.
Net
Cash Provided By Operating Activities
Cash
provided by our operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was
$2.0 million resulting from a net loss of $2.3 million, adjustments for non-cash
items of $2.2 million and $2.1 million provided by changes in working capital.
Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $1.9 million for
depreciation and amortization and $0.2 million for pension costs. Working
capital activities primarily consisted of a source of cash of $1.6 million as a
result of collections of accounts receivable, a use of cash of $0.4 million for
accounts payable and accrued expenses representing payments made to vendors and
suppliers and a source of cash of $0.5 million related to income and other
taxes.
20
Cash
provided by our operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was
$10.1 million resulting from a net income of $6.8 million, adjustments for
non-cash items of $3.9 million and $0.6 million used for working capital.
Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $1.8 million for
depreciation and amortization and $1.8 million for deferred income taxes.
Working capital activities primarily consisted of a use of cash of $0.4 million
for an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and a use of cash
of $0.3 million in income and other taxes representing payments made to
regulatory agencies, partially offset by a source of cash of $0.2 million from
an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses due to the timing of
payment.
At June
30, 2010, our days’ sales outstanding were approximately 64 days as compared to
60 days as of December 31, 2009.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
The net
cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is
primarily comprised of purchases of investments amounting to $7.6 million, which
represents investments in certificates of deposit. Also included in the
investing activities is $1.2 million for capital expenditures, compared to
approximately $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Capital
spending in 2010, as well as in 2009, related principally to the purchasing of
routine technology equipment and software. During the next twelve months, we
anticipate that capital expenditures for ongoing technology, hardware, equipment
and infrastructure upgrades will approximate $3.0 to $4.0 million, a portion of
which we may finance.
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Total
payments of long term obligations approximated $0.4 million and $0.5 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash proceeds
received from the exercise of stock options amounted to approximately $0.6
million in the six months ended June 30, 2009. There were no option exercises in
the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Future
Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements
We have a
$7.0 million line of credit pursuant to which we may borrow up to 80% of
eligible accounts receivable. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at
the bank’s alternate base rate plus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 2.5%. The line, which
expires in June 2011, is collateralized by our accounts receivable. We have no
outstanding obligations under this credit line as of June 30, 2010. We plan on
renewing the line of credit in the second quarter of 2011.
We
believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, funds generated from our
operating activities and funds available under our credit facility will provide
sufficient sources of liquidity to satisfy our financial needs for the next
twelve months. However, if circumstances change, we may need to raise debt or
additional equity capital in the future.
Contractual
Obligations
The table
below summarizes our contractual obligations (in thousands) at June 30, 2010 and
the effects that those obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and
cash flows in future periods.
21
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
Less than
1 year
|
1-3 years
|
4-5 years
|
After
5 years
|
|||||||||||||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
$ | 75 | $ | 49 | $ | 26 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Non-cancelable
operating leases
|
2,333 | 717 | 977 | 639 | - | |||||||||||||||
Vendor
obligations
|
275 | 275 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Total
contractual cash obligations
|
$ | 2,683 | $ | 1,041 | $ | 1,003 | $ | 639 | $ | - |
Future
expected obligations under our pension benefit plan have not been included in
the contractual cash obligations table above.
Inflation,
Seasonality and Prevailing Economic Conditions
Our most
significant costs are the salaries and related benefits of our employees in
Asia. We are exposed to higher inflation in wage rates in the countries in which
we operate. We generally perform work for our clients under
project-specific contracts, requirements-based contracts or long-term contracts.
We must adequately anticipate wage increases, particularly on our fixed-price
contracts. There can be no assurance that we will be able to recover cost
increases through increases in the prices that we charge for our services to our
clients.
Our
quarterly operating results are subject to certain fluctuations. We
experience fluctuations in our revenue and earnings as we replace and begin new
projects, which may have some normal start-up delays, or we may be unable to
replace a project entirely. These and other factors may contribute to
fluctuations in our operating results from quarter to quarter. In addition, as
some of our Asian facilities are closed during holidays in the fourth quarter,
we typically incur higher wages, due to overtime, that reduce our
margins.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
discussion and analysis of our results of operations, liquidity and capital
resources is based on our consolidated financial statements which have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our
estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition,
allowance for doubtful accounts and billing adjustments, long-lived assets,
goodwill, valuation of deferred tax assets, value of securities underlying
stock-based compensation, litigation accruals, pension benefits, valuation of
derivative instruments and estimated accruals for various tax exposures. We base
our estimates on historical and anticipated results and trends and on various
other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances,
including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are
not readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimates are subject
to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results may differ from our
estimates and could have a significant adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial position. For a discussion of our critical accounting
policies see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no material changes to our
critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30,
2010.
22
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued an
amendment to its accounting guidance on revenue arrangements with multiple
deliverables. This new accounting guidance addresses the unit of accounting for
arrangements involving multiple deliverables and how consideration should be
allocated to separate units of accounting, when applicable. This guidance is
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early
adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have an
impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2010, FASB issued an amendment regarding improving disclosures about
fair value measurements. This new guidance requires some new disclosures and
clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement.
The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009,
except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in
the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those
disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this
guidance is not expected to have an impact on our condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Interest
rate risk
We are exposed to market risk due to
interest rate fluctuations with respect to our credit line with a financial
institution which is priced based on the bank’s alternate base rate (3.25% at
June 30, 2010) plus 0.5% or LIBOR (0.35% at June 30, 2010) plus
2.5%. We have no outstanding obligations under this
line. We plan on renewing the line of credit in the second quarter of
2011. To the extent we utilize all or a portion of this line of credit, changes
in the interest rate will have a positive or negative effect on our interest
expense.
Foreign
currency risk
We have operations in several
international markets that subject us to foreign currency fluctuations. Although
the majority of our contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars, a substantial
portion of the costs incurred to render services under these contracts is
incurred in the local currencies of several international markets where we carry
on our operations. Our significant operations are based in the Philippines,
India and Israel where revenues are generated in U.S. dollars, and the
corresponding expenses are generated in Philippine pesos, Indian rupees and
Israeli shekels.
To
mitigate the exposure of fluctuating future cash flows due to changes in foreign
exchange rates, we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts. These
foreign currency forward contracts were entered into with a maximum term of
twelve months and have an aggregate notional amount of approximately $34 million
as of June 30, 2010. We may continue to enter into such instruments, or other
instruments, in the future to reduce foreign currency exposure to appreciation
or depreciation in the value of these foreign currencies.
The
impact of foreign currency fluctuations will continue to present economic
challenges to us and could negatively impact our overall results of operations.
A 10% appreciation in the U.S. dollar’s value relating to hedged currencies
would decrease the forward contracts’ fair value by approximately $3.1 million
as of June 30, 2010. Similarly, a 10% depreciation in the U.S. dollar’s value
relative to hedged currencies would increase the forward contracts’ fair value
by approximately $3.7 million. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of our
currency exchange rate sensitive forward contracts, if utilized, would be
substantially offset by a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value
of the hedged underlying cash flows.
23
Other
than the aforementioned forward contracts, we have not engaged in any hedging
activities nor have we entered into off-balance sheet transactions or
arrangements.
As of June 30, 2010, our foreign
locations held cash totaling approximately $10.8 million.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by
this report, we performed an evaluation under the supervision, and with the
participation of, management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) under the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates, that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
24
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
There
were no material changes from the legal proceedings previously disclosed in Part
I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I,
Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
None.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Reserved
Item
5. Other Information
None.
25
Item
6. Exhibits
31.1 Certificate
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
31.2 Certificate
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
32.1 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
26
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
INNODATA
ISOGEN, INC.
Date: July
27, 2010
|
/s/
Jack Abuhoff
|
Jack
Abuhoff
|
|
Chairman
of the Board,
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
|
Date: July
27, 2010
|
/s/
O’Neil Nalavadi
|
O’Neil
Nalavadi
|
|
Senior
Vice President
Chief
Financial Officer
and
Principal Accounting Officer
|
27