INNODATA INC - Quarter Report: 2012 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Commission file number: 0-22196

INNODATA INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(201) 371-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

[None]

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨         Accelerated filer þ         Non-accelerated filer ¨         Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ¨ No þ

The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, as of July 20, 2012 was 24,859,165.

INNODATA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2012

INDEX

INNODATA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except share data)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

INNODATA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

INNODATA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

INNODATA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

INNODATA INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 AND 2011

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

Description of Business-Innodata Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) provide services, products and solutions that our clients use to create, manage, use and distribute digital information.  Our clients include leading media, publishing and information services companies, as well as enterprises that are prominent in information technology, manufacturing, aerospace, defense, financial services, government, healthcare and law.

The Company operates in two reportable segments.

The Company’s Content Services (CS) segment provides business process, technology and consulting services to assist clients in creating, managing, using and distributing digital content.

In the second quarter of 2011, the Company launched Innodata Advanced Data Solutions (IADS) as a separate segment to perform advanced data analysis.  IADS operates through two subsidiaries: Synodex and docGenix. Synodex offers a range of data analysis services in the healthcare, medical and insurance areas.  docGenix provides software products and services that facilitate the generation and analysis of standardized and non-standardized documents for swaps, derivatives, repos, securities lending, prime brokerage, investment management and clearing.  Synodex is a limited liability company that is 77% owned by the Company and docGenix is a limited liability company that is 78% owned by the Company.  

Basis of Presentation-The condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods included herein are unaudited; however, they contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2012, and the results of its operations and comprehensive income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless otherwise noted, the accounting policies used in preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements are the same as those described in the December 31, 2011 consolidated financial statements.

Principles of Consolidation-The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Innodata Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and the Synodex and docGenix limited liability companies that are majority-owned by the Company. The non-controlling interests in the Synodex and docGenix limited liability companies are accounted for in accordance with the non-controlling interest guidance. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates-In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates include those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and billing adjustments, long-lived assets, goodwill, valuation of deferred tax assets, valuation of securities underlying stock-based compensation, litigation accruals, pension benefits, valuation of derivative instruments and estimated accruals for various tax exposures.

The Company had unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $2.3 million at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The portion of unrecognized tax benefits relating to interest and penalties was approximately $0.5 million at both June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, if recognized, would have an impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.

The following presents a roll-forward of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits and associated interest for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (amounts in thousands):

The Company is subject to U.S. Federal income tax, as well as income tax in various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to examination by Federal and New Jersey taxing authorities for years prior to 2006. Various foreign subsidiaries currently have open tax years from 2004 through 2010.

Pursuant to an income tax audit by the Indian Bureau of Taxation in March 2006, one of the Company’s Indian subsidiaries received a tax assessment approximating $339,000, including interest, through June 30, 2012, for the fiscal tax year ended June 30, 2003. Management disagreed with the basis of the tax assessment and filed an appeal with the Appeal Officer against the assessment. In October 2010, the matter was resolved with a judgment in the Company’s favor. Under the Indian Income Tax Act, however, the income tax assessing officer has a right to appeal against the judgment passed by the Appeal Officer. In December 2010, the income tax assessing officer exercised this right, against which the Company has filed an application to defend the case, and the Company intends to contest it vigorously. The Indian Bureau of Taxation has also completed an audit of the Company’s Indian subsidiary’s income tax return for the fiscal tax year ended June 30, 2004. The ultimate outcome was favorable, and there was no tax assessment imposed for the fiscal tax year ended June 30, 2004. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Indian subsidiary received a final tax assessment for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2005 and 2006 from the Indian Bureau of Taxation, approximating $340,000 and $345,000, respectively, including interest, through June 30, 2012. Management disagreed with the basis of these tax assessments, and filed an appeal against the assessment which it is contesting vigorously. In January 2012, the Indian subsidiary received a final tax assessment of approximately $1.1 million, including interest, through June 30, 2012, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 from the Indian Bureau of Taxation. Management disagrees with the basis of this tax assessment, and has filed an appeal against the assessment. Due to this assessment, the Company recorded a tax provision amounting to $309,000, including interest, through June 30, 2012. Based on recent experience and current developments, management believes that the tax provision of $309,000, including interest, is adequate. As the Company is continually subject to tax audits by the Indian Bureau of Taxation, the Company assessed the likelihood of an unfavorable assessment for all fiscal years where the Company is not subject to a final tax assessment as of June 30, 2012, and recorded an additional tax provision amounting to approximately $0.9 million in the prior quarters, including interest through June 30, 2012. The Indian Bureau of Taxation commenced an audit of this subsidiary’s income tax return for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The ultimate outcome cannot be determined at this time.

Line of Credit-The Company has a $15.0 million line of credit pursuant to which it may borrow up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at the bank’s alternate base rate plus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 2.5%. The line, which expires in June 2013, is collateralized by the Company’s accounts receivable. The Company had no outstanding obligations under this credit line as of June 30, 2012.

Litigation-In 2008, the Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines refused to review a decision of the Court of Appeals in Manila against a Philippines subsidiary of the Company that is inactive and has no material assets, and purportedly also against Innodata Inc., that orders the reinstatement of certain former employees of the subsidiary to their former positions and also orders the payment of back wages and benefits that aggregate approximately $7.5 million. Based on consultation with legal counsel, the Company believes that recovery against the Company is unlikely.

The Company is also subject to various legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business. 

While management currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or overall trends in results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. Substantial recovery against the Company in the above-referenced Philippines actions could have a material adverse impact on the Company, and unfavorable rulings or recoveries in the other proceedings could have a material adverse impact on the operating results of the period in which the ruling or recovery occurs. In addition, the Company’s estimate of the potential impact on the Company’s financial position or overall results of operations for the above legal proceedings could change in the future.

The Company adopted, with stockholder approval, the Innodata Inc. 2009 Stock Plan, as amended and restated (the “2009 Plan”). The maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2009 Plan is 2,270,118 shares, less one share for every share that becomes subject to an Option or Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) granted after June 30, 2011, and two shares for every share that becomes subject to an Award other than an Option or SAR granted after June 30, 2011. If (i) any shares subject to an award or portion of any award under the 2001 and 2002 Stock Option Plans (collectively, the “Prior Plans”) that expires or terminates unexercised, becomes unexercisable, or is forfeited, or is otherwise terminated, surrendered or canceled as to any shares without the delivery of shares of Stock or (ii) shares subject to any Award or portion of an Award under the Plan that expires or terminates unexercised, becomes unexercisable, or is forfeited, or is otherwise terminated, surrendered or canceled as to any shares without the delivery of shares of Stock, the applicable shares subject to such award under the Prior Plans or the Award shall thereafter be available for further Awards under the Plan.  Shares that become available for Awards shall be added back as (i) one share for each such share subject to an option under the Prior Plans or an Option or SAR under the Plan, and (ii) as two shares for each such share subject to awards other than Options or SAR under the Plan.

A summary of option activity under the Company’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2012, and changes during the period then ended, is presented below:

The fair value of stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average fair values of the options granted and weighted average assumptions are as follows:

No options were exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

On May 31, 2012, the Company’s Chairman and CEO (the “CEO”) exercised 44,000 stock options at a total exercise price of $113,960. The CEO paid the exercise price by surrendering to the Company 20,758 of the shares of common stock he would have otherwise received on the option exercise. In addition, the CEO surrendered 8,937 shares to the Company in consideration of the payment by the Company on his behalf of $49,062 of the Company’s minimum withholding tax requirement payable in respect of the option exercise. Because the payment value attributable to the surrendered shares upon settlement does not exceed the fair value of the option, no compensation cost was recognized at the date of settlement. In connection with this transaction, the Company issued a net total of 14,305 shares of common stock to the CEO.

A summary of restricted shares under the Company’s stock option plans as of June 30, 2012, and changes during the period then ended, are presented below:

The total compensation cost related to non-vested stock awards not yet recognized as of June 30, 2012, totaled approximately $1.7 million. The weighted-average period over which these costs will be recognized is twenty-five months.

The stock-based compensation expense related to the Company’s various stock awards was allocated as follows (in thousands):

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, as reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, consists of pension liability adjustments, net of taxes, and changes in fair value of derivatives, net of taxes. The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of June 30, 2012, and changes during the period then ended, are presented below (in thousands):

For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company’s operations are classified into two reportable segments: Content Services and IADS.

The Content Services segment provides business process, technology and consulting services to assist clients in creating, managing, using and distributing digital content.

In the second quarter of 2011, the Company launched its IADS segment to perform advanced data analysis.  IADS operates through two subsidiaries: Synodex and docGenix. Synodex offers a range of data analysis services in the healthcare, medical and insurance areas.  docGenix provides software products and services that facilitate the generation and analysis of standardized and non-standardized documents for swaps, derivatives, repos, securities lending, prime brokerage, investment management and clearing.

A significant portion of the Company’s revenues are generated from its production facilities in the Philippines, India, Sri Lanka and Israel.

Revenues from external clients, segment operating profit, and other reportable segment information are as follows (in thousands):

⁽¹⁾ Before elimination of any inter-segment profits.

Income (loss) before provision for income taxes for Content Service and IADS were $3.7 million and $(1.7) million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012, after eliminating inter-segment profits. Income (loss) before provision for income taxes for Content Service and IADS were $8.9 million and $(3.2) million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2012, after eliminating inter-segment profits.

The following table summarizes revenues by geographic region (determined based upon clients’s domicile) (in thousands):

Long-lived assets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, by geographic regions are comprised of (in thousands):

Two clients generated approximately 47% and 20% of our revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Another client accounted for less than 10% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and for 18% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011. No other client accounted for 10% or more of revenues in either period. Further, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, revenues from non-US clients accounted for 22% and 32%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.

Two clients generated approximately 48% and 28% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Another client accounted for less than 10% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and for 17% of our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011. No other client accounted for 10% or more of revenues in either period. Further, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, revenues from non-US clients accounted for 21% and 34%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.

A significant amount of the Company's revenues is derived from clients in the publishing industry. Accordingly, the Company's accounts receivable generally include significant amounts due from such clients. In addition, as of June 30, 2012, approximately 23% of the Company's accounts receivable were from foreign (principally European) clients and 58% of accounts receivable were due from two clients. As of December 31, 2011, approximately 20% of the Company's accounts receivable were from foreign (principally European) clients and 62% of accounts receivable were due from two clients.

Basic income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per share is computed by considering the impact of the potential issuance of common shares, using the treasury stock method, on the weighted average number of shares outstanding. For those securities that are not convertible into a class of common stock, the “two class” method of computing income per share is used.

Options to purchase 2.9 million shares of common stock for the three months ended June, 2011 were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted income per share, because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares, and therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive. All options outstanding were included in the computation of diluted net income per share for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as the exercise price was lower than the average market price.

Options to purchase 0.1 million shares and 1.2 million shares of common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted income per share, because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares, and therefore, the effect would have been antidilutive.

The Company conducts a large portion of its operations in international markets that subject it to foreign currency fluctuations. The most significant foreign currency exposures occur when revenue and associated accounts receivable are collected in one currency and expenses to generate that revenue are incurred in another currency. The Company’s primary exchange rate exposure relates to payroll, other payroll costs and operating expenses in the Philippines, India, Sri Lanka and Israel.

To manage its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, the Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts, authorized under Company policies, with counterparties that were highly rated financial institutions. The Company utilized non-deliverable forward contracts expiring within twelve months to reduce its foreign currency risk.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking hedge transactions. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes. All derivatives are recognized at their fair value and classified based on the instrument’s maturity date. The total notional amount for outstanding derivatives as of June 30, 2012 was $19 million, which is comprised of cash flow hedges denominated in U.S. dollars.

The following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments included within the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

The effect of foreign currency forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges on our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, were as follows (in thousands):

⁽¹⁾ Net change in the fair value of the effective portion classified in other comprehensive income ("OCI").

⁽²⁾ Effective portion classified as direct operating costs.

⁽³⁾ There were no ineffective portions for the periods presented.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximated their fair value as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, because of the relative short maturity of these instruments.

“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

The accounting standard establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels. The three levels are defined as follows:

·      Level 1: Unadjusted quoted price in active market for identical assets and liabilities.

·      Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1.

·      Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table sets forth the liabilities as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 that the Company measured at fair value, on a recurring basis by level, within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands). As required by the standard, assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement.

The Level 2 liabilities contain foreign currency forward contracts. Fair value is determined based on the observable market transactions of spot and forward rates. The fair value of these contracts as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is included in accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Disclosures in this Form 10-Q contain certain forward-looking statements, including without limitation, statements concerning our operations, economic performance, and financial condition. These forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The words “estimate,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend” and other similar expressions generally identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates.

These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations, and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation, that our Innodata Advanced Data Solutions segment is subject to the risks and uncertainties of early-stage companies; the primarily at-will nature of the Company’s contracts with its Content Services segment clients and the ability of the clients to reduce, delay or cancel projects; continuing Content Services segment revenue concentration in a limited number of clients; continuing Content Services segment reliance on project-based work; inability to replace projects that are completed, cancelled or reduced; depressed market conditions; changes in external market factors; the ability and willingness of our clients and prospective clients to execute business plans which give rise to requirements for digital content and professional services in knowledge processing; difficulty in integrating and deriving synergies from acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic investments; potential undiscovered liabilities of companies that we acquire; changes in our business or growth strategy; the emergence of new or growing competitors; various other competitive and technological factors; and other risks and uncertainties indicated from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our actual results could differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the results referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q will occur.

We undertake no obligation to update or review any guidance or other forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

Business Overview

Innodata Inc. (NASDAQ: INOD) is a leading provider of business process, technology and consulting services, as well as products and solutions, that help our valued clients create, manage, use and distribute digital information. Propelled by a culture that emphasizes quality, service and innovation, we have developed a client base that includes many of the world’s preeminent media, publishing and information services companies, as well as leading enterprises in information-intensive industries such as aerospace, defense, financial services, government, healthcare, high technology, insurance, intelligence, manufacturing and law. 

We operate in two reporting segments.

Our Content Services (CS) segment provides services that support the creation, enhancement, and repurposing of digital content. These services include high-accuracy conversion to digital text; data analysis and enhancement of legal, financial, medical and technical information; information technology services related to digital content management and products; and consulting services to help clients with strategic and tactical aspects of digital content operations.

Our clients include legal and business information providers; scientific, technical and medical publishers; providers of mobile computing devices and digital content distribution platforms; enterprises that create and manage large volumes of product support content; and governmental agencies that manage large volumes of content in support of mission.

Most of our business information and publishing clients are in the process of transforming from print publishing to online publishing; from online publishing to multiple-channel distribution that includes web as well as mobile, tablet and eReading devices; or from search-based information products to workflow-based information products. These transformations require the adoption of new strategies, technologies and processes. We help our clients set digital content production and product strategies; integrate new technologies and processes; improve the quality and efficiency of content creation, enrichment and transformation; publish through multiple channels (including portable devices); and build new digital products. 

In the second quarter of 2011, we launched Innodata Advanced Data Solutions (IADS) as a separate segment to perform advanced data analysis. IADS operates through two subsidiaries: Synodex and docGenix. Synodex offers a range of document and data analysis services that are tailored to healthcare, medical and insurance companies. docGenix provides financial services institutions with software products and services that facilitate the analysis and management of legal documentation relating primarily to derivatives. We presently own 77% of Synodex and 78% of docGenix, both limited liability companies.

Total operating costs for the IADS segment from inception in the second quarter of 2011 through June 30, 2012, including direct operating costs and selling and administrative costs, were $6.1 million net of intersegment profits. During the same period we invested approximately $3.1 million in capital expenditures for this segment.

Each of our segments is organized and managed around three vectors: a vertical industry focus, a horizontal service/process focus, and a supportive operations focus.

The vertically-aligned groups understand our clients’ businesses and strategic initiatives. The vertical group for each particular industry includes experts hired from that industry.

Our service/process-aligned groups include engineering personnel and delivery personnel. Our engineering teams are responsible for creating secure and efficient custom workflows and integrating proprietary and third-party technologies to automate manual processes and improve the consistency and quality of our work product. These tools include categorization engines that utilize pattern recognition algorithms based on comprehensive rule sets and related heuristics, data extraction tools that automatically retrieve specific types of information from large data sources, and workflow systems that enable various tasks and activities to be performed across our multiple facilities. 

Our globally distributed delivery personnel are responsible for executing our client engagements in accordance with service-level agreements. We deliver services from facilities in the United States, India, the Philippines, Sri Lanka and Israel.

Other support groups are responsible for managing diverse enabling functions including human resources, organizational development, network and communications technology infrastructure support and physical infrastructure and facilities management. 

Our sales staff, program managers and consultants operate primarily from our North American offices, European locations, as well as from client sites.

Revenues

We are a leading provider of business process, technology and consulting services, as well as products and solutions. We operate in two reporting segments. Within our content segment, we provide services that support the creation, enhancement, and repurposing of digital content. We price our services based on the quantity delivered or resources utilized and we recognize revenue in the period in which the services are performed and delivered. A substantial majority of our technology and consulting services are provided on a project basis. We price such services on an hourly basis for actual time and expense incurred, or on a fixed-fee, turn-key basis. Revenues for contracts billed on a time-and-materials basis are recognized as services are performed. Revenues under fixed-fee contracts, which are not significant to the overall revenues, are recognized on the percentage of completion method of accounting, as services are performed or milestones are achieved.

We consider standard accounting criteria for determining whether to report revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent.  Factors considered include whether we are the primary obligor, have risks and rewards of ownership, and bear the risk that the client may not pay for the services performed.  If there are circumstances where the above criteria are not met and therefore we are not the principal in providing services, amounts received from client are presented net of payments in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Revenues include reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses, with the corresponding out-of-pocket expenses included in direct operating costs.

Direct Operating Costs

Direct operating costs consist of direct payroll, occupancy costs, depreciation and amortization, travel, telecommunications, computer services and supplies, and other direct expenses that are incurred in providing services to our clients.

Selling and Administrative Expenses

Selling and administrative expenses consist of management and administrative salaries, sales and marketing costs, new services research and related software development, professional fees and consultant costs, and other administrative overhead costs.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

Total revenues were $22.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, a 40% increase from $16.3 million in the second quarter of 2011, and a 9% sequential decrease from $25.1 million in the first quarter of 2012. Revenues for the Content Services segment were $22.7 million, $16.3 million and $24.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2012, respectively. Revenues from the IADS segment were $0.1 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, respectively. There were no revenues from the IADS segment for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

The $6.4 million increase in Content Services segment revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011 is principally attributable to revenue from eBook-related services that we performed for one of our significant clients, and the 9% decrease in revenues compared to the first quarter of 2012 reflects a sequential decline in revenues from this client for such services. We expect that revenues from this client will continue to decline during the second half of 2012.

Two clients generated approximately 47% and 20% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Another client accounted for less than 10% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2012, and for 18% of our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011. No other client accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues in either period. Further, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, revenues from non-US clients accounted for 22% and 32%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.

Direct Operating Costs

Direct operating costs were $14.7 million and $11.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $3.3 million or approximately 29%. Direct operating costs for the Content Services segment were $13.8 million and $11.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $2.5 million or approximately 22%. Direct operating costs for the IADS segment were $0.9 million and $0.1 million for the respective periods.

The increase in direct operating costs for the Content Services segment was principally attributable to an increase in production headcount and other operating costs in support of increased revenues. The increase in direct operating costs was partially offset by a decrease in direct labor costs achieved primarily from productivity gains. The productivity gains were principally the result of increased efficiency, improvements in our processes and innovation in our technology. The increase in direct operating costs for the IADS segment represents additional start-up costs.

Direct operating costs as a percentage of total revenues declined to 64% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 70% for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Direct operating costs for the Content Services segment as a percentage of Content Services segment revenues were 61% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 70% for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

Selling and Administrative Expenses

Selling and administrative expenses were $6.2 million, or approximately 27% as a percentage of total revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2012, and $4.1 million, or approximately 25% as a percentage of total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Selling and administrative expenses for the Content Services segment were $5.3 million and $3.9 million in these respective periods. Selling and administrative expenses for the IADS segment for the respective periods were $0.9 million and $0.2 million.

The increase in selling and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 is principally attributable to compensation costs of new personnel hired for sales and marketing and an increase in other administrative costs including $0.7 million of other administrative costs for the IADS segment. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded approximately $0.2 million from the recovery of bad debts from a previously fully reserved account receivable.

Selling and administrative expenses for the Content Services segment as a percentage of Content Services segment revenues were 23% for both the three months ended June 30, 2012 and the corresponding period in 2011.

Income Taxes

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the provision for income taxes primarily relates to provisions made for some but not all of our foreign subsidiaries, as certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to tax holidays or preferential tax rates, thereby lowering our overall effective tax rate compared to the U.S. statutory tax rate. In addition, certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless repatriated.

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the provision for income taxes was primarily comprised of the provision we recorded for our foreign subsidiaries. The provision was partially offset by the tax benefit recorded for the U.S. entity. The benefit from income tax recorded by the U.S. entity resulted primarily from losses incurred by the U.S. entity during the three months ended June 30, 2011. One of our foreign subsidiaries enjoyed a tax holiday in 2011. In addition, certain of our foreign subsidiaries enjoy preferential tax rates. Certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless repatriated.

The effective tax rate was lower for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011 as the income attributable to our higher tax jurisdiction was lower.

Net Income

We generated net income of $2.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $0.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $3.4 million in the three months ended March 31, 2012. Net income for the Content Services segment was $3.5 million, $6.2 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively. The increase in net income for the Content Services segment during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to an increase in gross margins resulting from higher revenues, and an increase in productivity due to improvements in processes and technology. This increase was partly offset by an increase in selling and administrative expenses primarily due to the hiring of new sales and marketing personnel, and an increase in other administrative costs. The decline in net income for the Content Services segment during the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the first three months of 2012 was primarily due to a sequential decline in revenues. Net loss for the IADS segment was $1.4 million, $2.8 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, March 31, 2012 and June 30, 2011, respectively.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

Total revenues were $47.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, a 55% increase from $30.9 million for the similar period in 2011. Revenues from the Content Services segment were $47.2 million and $30.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenues from the IADS segment were $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. There were no revenues from the IADS segment for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

The $16.3 million increase in Content Services segment is principally attributable to higher revenues from eBook-related services that we performed for one of our significant clients.. We experienced a sequential decline in revenue from this customer in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to the first quarter of 2012 and we expect that revenues from this client will continue to decline during the second half of 2012.

Two clients generated approximately 48% and 28% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Another client accounted for less than 10% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and for 17% of our total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011. No other client accounted for 10% or more of our total revenues in either period. Further, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, revenues from non-US clients accounted for 21% and 34%, respectively, of the Company's revenues.

Direct Operating Costs

Direct operating costs were $30.8 million and $22.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $ 8.8 million or approximately 40%. Direct operating costs for the Content Services segment were $28.3 million and $21.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $6.4 million or approximately 29%. Direct operating costs for the IADS segment were approximately $2.5 million and $0.1 million for the respective periods.

The increase in direct operating costs for the Content Services segment was principally attributable to an increase in production headcount and other operating costs in support of increased revenues. The increase in direct operating costs was partially offset by a decrease in direct labor costs achieved primarily from productivity gains. The productivity gains were principally the result of increased efficiency, improvements in our processes and innovation in our technology. The increase in direct operating costs for the IADS segment represents additional start-up costs.

Direct operating costs as a percentage of total revenues declined to 64% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 71% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Direct operating costs for the Content Services segment as a percentage of Content Services segment revenues were 60% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 71% for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Selling and Administrative Expenses

Selling and administrative expenses were $11.6 million, or approximately 24% as a percentage of total revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2012, and $8.1 million or approximately 26% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30 2011. Selling and administrative costs for the Content Services segment were $10.2 million and $7.9 million in these respective periods. Selling and administrative expenses for the IADS segment for the respective periods were $1.4 million and $0.2 million.

The increase in selling and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is principally attributable to compensation costs of new personnel hired for sales and marketing and an increase in other administrative costs including $1.2 million of other administrative costs for the IADS segment. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded approximately $0.5 million from the recovery of bad debts from a previously fully reserved account receivable.

Selling and administrative expenses for the Content Services segment, as a percentage of Content Services segment revenues, were 21% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 25% for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Income Taxes

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded a provision for income taxes for the U.S. entity and certain but not all of our foreign subsidiaries, as certain foreign subsidiaries are subject to tax holidays or preferential tax rates, thereby lowering our overall effective tax rate compared to the U.S. statutory tax rate. In addition, certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless repatriated.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the provision for income taxes was primarily comprised of the provision we recorded for the U.S. entity and certain of our foreign subsidiaries, which included a tax benefit recorded by one of our foreign subsidiaries. The provision was partially offset by the tax benefit recorded for the U.S. entity. The benefit from income tax recorded by the U.S. entity resulted primarily from losses incurred by the U.S. entity during the six months ended June 30, 2011. One of our foreign subsidiaries enjoyed a tax holiday in 2011. In addition, certain of our foreign subsidiaries enjoy preferential tax rates. Certain overseas income is not subject to tax in the U.S. unless repatriated.

The effective tax rate was lower for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011 as the income attributable to our higher tax jurisdiction was lower.

Net Income

We generated net income of $5.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $0.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011. Net income for the Content Services segment was $9.7 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in net income for the Content Services segment was primarily due to an increase in gross margins resulting from higher revenues, and an increase in productivity due to improvements in processes and technology. This increase was partly offset by an increase in selling and administrative expenses primarily due to the hiring of new sales and marketing personnel, and an increase in other administrative costs. Net loss for the IADS segment was $4.2 million and $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Selected measures of liquidity and capital resources, expressed in thousands, are as follows:

At June 30, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $20.7 million and short term investments of $2.6 million. We have used, and plan to use, such cash for (i) expansion of existing operations; (ii) general corporate purposes, including working capital; and (iii) possible business acquisitions. As of June 30, 2012, we had working capital of approximately $32 million as compared to working capital of approximately $28.1 million as of December 31, 2011. Accordingly, we do not anticipate any near-term liquidity issues.

Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities

Cash provided by our operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $10.2 million, resulting from net income of $4.5 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $3 million and $2.7 million provided by working capital changes. Adjustment for non-cash items primarily consisted of $1.9 million for depreciation and amortization and $0.6 million for stock-based compensation expense. Working capital activities primarily consisted of a source of cash of $2.8 million as a result of net collections of accounts receivable.

Cash provided by our operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $1.3 million resulting from a net income of $0.8 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $1.7 million and $1.2 million used in working capital changes. Adjustments for non-cash items primarily consisted of $1.6 million for depreciation and amortization and $(0.4) million for deferred income taxes. Working capital activities primarily consisted of a use of cash of $1.2 million for an increase in accounts receivable primarily related to an increase in revenue, and a source of cash of $0.1 million for accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued salaries, wages and related benefits representing the timing of expenditures and payments.

At June 30, 2012, our days’ sales outstanding were approximately 76 days as compared to 66 days as of December 31, 2011. The increase is on account of higher revenues from one of our significant clients and a correspondingly high concentration of accounts receivable balances.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, cash used in our investing activities for capital expenditures were $4.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively. Capital spending in 2012 principally consisted of the purchase of technology equipment including workstations, computer software, and leasehold improvements. Also included within capital expenditures are costs incurred to develop computer software for the IADS segment, amounting to $1.2 million, and to establish delivery centers in Asia. Capital spending in 2011 related principally to the purchase of technology equipment and computer software. During the next twelve months, we anticipate that capital expenditures for ongoing technology, hardware, software, leasehold improvements, fittings, equipment and infrastructure upgrades, development of proprietary tools and technologies for the IADS segment and establishment of new delivery centers will approximate $5.0 to $6.0 million, a portion of which we may finance. Also included in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is the sale of short-term investments primarily representing proceeds on the maturity of $3.2 million of certificates of deposit, and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is the purchase of short term investments consisting of $1.3 million of certificates of deposit.

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

Total payments of long-term obligations approximated $0.1 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Proceeds from the exercise of stock options amounted to $0.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012. There were no stock option exercises during the three months ended June 30, 2011.

During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we repurchased 342,000 shares of our common stock at a cost of approximately $0.9 million, at a volume-weighted average price of $2.57 per share. No shares were repurchased during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Future Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements

We have a $15.0 million line of credit pursuant to which we may borrow up to 80% of eligible accounts receivable. Borrowings under the credit line bear interest at the bank’s alternate base rate plus 0.5% or LIBOR plus 2.5%. The line, which expires in June 2013, is collateralized by our accounts receivable. We have no outstanding obligations under this credit line as of June 30, 2012.

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, funds generated from our operating activities and funds available under our credit facility will provide sufficient sources of liquidity to satisfy our financial needs for the next twelve months. However, if circumstances change, we may need to raise debt or additional equity capital in the future. We have historically funded our foreign expenditures from our U.S. Corporate headquarters on an as-needed basis.

In the second quarter of 2012, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which will give us the ability to offer from time to time up to an aggregate of $70 million of securities, which may consist of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, or units consisting of any of the foregoing. The registration is intended to give us flexibility should financing opportunities arise.

Contractual Obligations

The table below summarizes our contractual obligations (in thousands) at June 30, 2012 and the effects that those obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.

Future expected obligations under our pension benefit plan have not been included in the contractual cash obligations table above.

Inflation, Seasonality and Prevailing Economic Conditions

Our most significant costs are the salaries and related benefits of our employees in Asia. We are exposed to higher inflation in wage rates in the countries in which we operate. We generally perform work for our clients under project-specific contracts, requirements-based contracts or long-term contracts. We must adequately anticipate wage increases, particularly on our fixed-price contracts. There can be no assurance that we will be able to recover cost increases through increases in the prices that we charge for our services to our clients.

Our quarterly operating results are subject to certain fluctuations. We experience fluctuations in our revenue and earnings as we replace and begin new projects, which may have some normal start-up delays, or we may be unable to replace a project entirely. These and other factors may contribute to fluctuations in our operating results from quarter to quarter. In addition, as some of our Asian facilities are closed during holidays in the fourth quarter, we typically incur higher wages, due to overtime, that reduce our margins.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources is based on our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts and billing adjustments, long-lived assets, goodwill, valuation of deferred tax assets, value of securities underlying stock-based compensation, litigation accruals, pension benefits, valuation of derivative instruments and estimated accruals for various tax exposures. We base our estimates on historical and anticipated results and trends and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, including assumptions as to future events. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results may differ from our estimates and could have a significant adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position. For a discussion of our critical accounting policies see Part II, Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2012.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest rate risk

We are exposed to market risk due to interest rate fluctuations with respect to our credit line with a financial institution which is priced based on the bank’s alternate base rate (3.25% at June 30, 2012) plus 0.5% or LIBOR (0.25% at June 30, 2012) plus 2.5%. We have no outstanding obligations under this line. To the extent we utilize all or a portion of this line of credit, changes in the interest rate will have a positive or negative effect on our interest expense.

Foreign currency risk

We have operations in several international markets that subject us to foreign currency fluctuations. Although the majority of our contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars, a substantial portion of the costs incurred to render services under these contracts is incurred in the local currencies of several international markets where we carry on our operations. Our significant operations are based in the Philippines, India, Sri Lanka and Israel where revenues are generated in U.S. dollars and the corresponding expenses are generated in Philippine peso, Indian rupee, Sri Lanka rupee and Israeli shekel.

To mitigate the exposure of fluctuating future cash flows due to changes in foreign exchange rates, we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts. These foreign currency forward contracts were entered into with a maximum term of twelve months and have an aggregate notional amount of approximately $19 million as of June 30, 2012. We may continue to enter into such instruments or other instruments in the future to reduce foreign currency exposure to appreciation or depreciation in the value of these foreign currencies.

The impact of foreign currency fluctuations will continue to present economic challenges to us and could negatively impact our overall results of operations. A 10% appreciation in the U.S. dollar’s value relating to hedged currencies would decrease the forward contracts’ fair value by approximately $2.3 million as of June 30, 2012. Similarly, a 10% depreciation in the U.S. dollar’s value relative to hedged currencies would increase the forward contracts’ fair value by approximately $2.8 million. Any increase or decrease in the fair value of our currency exchange rate sensitive forward contracts, if utilized, would be substantially offset by a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value of the hedged underlying cash flows.

Other than the aforementioned forward contracts, we have not engaged in any hedging activities nor have we entered into off-balance sheet transactions or arrangements.

As of June 30, 2012, our foreign locations held cash and short- and long-term investments totaling approximately $12.3 million.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we performed an evaluation under the supervision, and with the participation, of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There were no material changes from the legal proceedings previously disclosed in Part I, Item 3. “Legal Proceedings” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

3.1 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Innodata Isogen, Inc.

31.1 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101. INS XBRL Instance Document

101. SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101. CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Link base Document

101. DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Link base Document

101. LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Link base Document

101. PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Link base Document

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

INNODATA INC.