INNOVATIVE MEDTECH, INC. - Quarter Report: 2011 July (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2011

Or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission File Number: 000-51390

Fresh Harvest Products, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(917) 652-8030

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   x   Yes  ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  ¨ Yes  ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) ¨  Yes  x   No

As of September 14, 2011, the registrant had 200,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding.

1

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS.

Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “Fresh Harvest” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q collectively refers to Fresh Harvest Products, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the “Parent Company”), and its subsidiaries. The information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” relating to the Company. These “forward looking statements” represent the Company’s current expectations or beliefs including, but not limited to, statements concerning the Company’s operations, performance, financial condition and growth. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” “would” or the negative or other comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, such as our ability to obtain additional working capital, the affect of general economic and business conditions, our ability to implement our business and acquisition strategy, our ability to effectively integrate our acquisitions, competition, availability of key personnel, changes in, or the failure to comply with government regulations, and other risks detailed from time-to-time in the Company’s reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should the underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes and results could differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

2

FRESH HARVEST PRODUCTS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

PART I  - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

4

Item 1.  Financial Statements

4

Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations

20

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

27

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

27

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

28

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings.

28

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

28

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

33

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

33

Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved)

33

Item 5.  Other Information.

33

Item 6.  Exhibits.

33

3

PART I  - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

4

5

6

FRESH HARVEST PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

July 31, 2011

NOTE 1.  GENERAL ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Fresh Harvest Products, Inc., a New Jersey corporation (the “Parent Company”), and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”), are engaged in the proprietary development, sales and marketing of organic and natural food products.  

 On December 16, 2005, the Parent Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Acquisition and Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Fresh Harvest Products, Inc., a New York corporation (“New York FHP”), Michael Friedman, Marcia Roberts and Illuminate, Inc.  The Merger Agreement contemplates the merger of the Parent Company and New York FHP (the “Merger”).  Although the Parent Company has operated as if the Merger was consummated in December 2005, it has come to the Company’s attention that certain required filings were not made in the State of New Jersey and the State of New York to properly consummate the Merger.  As a result, as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Parent Company and New York FHP had not completed the Merger.  In order to complete the Merger, the Parent Company and New York FHP plan to take the following steps:

1.

Pay all taxes owed by New York FHP to the State of New York.  As of July 31, 2011, New York FHP owed New York State payroll related taxes in the amount of approximately $30,145 plus applicable interest and penalties.

2.

File an application on behalf of the Parent Company for authority to do business in the State of New York with the Secretary of State of the State of New York, which application requires the consent of the New York State Tax Commission, and pay any applicable late filing penalties.   

3.

File a final franchise tax return with the State of New York with respect to New York FHP.

4.

File a Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey.

5.

File a Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of New York.

The Parent Company intends to take the steps required to complete the Merger, however, the Parent Company cannot forecast when it will pay the amounts owed to the State of New York, make the indicated filings or otherwise complete the Merger.  In addition, there is a risk that the State of New York and the State of New Jersey may require the Parent Company and New York FHP to take additional actions that the Company is not presently contemplating.  If the Parent Company and New York FHP are unable to complete the above described steps and to consummate the Merger, then there is a risk that the Parent Company’s acquisition of New York FHP could be challenged which could seriously harm the Parent Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.  If the Parent Company and New York FHP are unable to consummate the Merger, the value of the Parent Company’s shares held by the Parent Company’s shareholders could significantly decline.

The Company sells its products to consumers through local, regional and national supermarkets, retailers, distributors, brokers, wholesalers and an online web-store.  In August 2009, the Parent Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Wings of Nature, LLC. In April 2010, the Parent Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, New A.C. LaRocco, for the purpose of implementing its new pizza business.

The Company continues to have limited capital resources and has experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations and expects these conditions to continue for the foreseeable future.  As of July 31, 2011, the Company has limited cash available for operations and has an accumulated deficit of $7,255,129. Management believes that cash on hand as of July 31, 2011 is not sufficient to fund operations through July 31, 2012.  The Company will be required to raise additional funds to meet its short and long-term planned goals. There can be no assurance that such funds, if available at all, can be obtained on terms reasonable to the Company.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has limited revenue and without realization of additional capital, it would be highly unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.

7

Material Agreements

On March 2, 2010, the Parent Company simultaneously entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) dated March 2, 2010 among the Parent Company, Take and Bake, Inc., doing business as A.C. LaRocco Pizza Company (the “Seller”), Clarence Scott and Karen Leffler and, the Company believes, acquired certain assets and liabilities of the Seller (as further described below) (the “Asset Acquisition”). The Seller was in the business of marketing and distributing all natural and organic, whole grain, heart healthy pizzas, including organic thin pizzas with sprouted grain crust.  The purchase price for the assets acquired by the Parent Company pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement is 15,000,000 shares of common stock (the “Share Consideration”) and monthly payments of $1,800 for a 60 month period.  In April 2010, the Parent Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, A.C. LaRocco, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for the purpose of implementing its new pizza business.  We refer to this subsidiary as “New A.C. LaRocco.”

The assets acquired by the Company in the Asset Acquisition, included all of the assets of Seller constituting or used in connection with its business, except for certain excluded assets.  The assets excluded from the Asset Acquisition, included, among others: (i) receivables due to the Seller on March 2, 2010, (ii) cash and cash equivalents items on hand at the close of business on the closing date, (iii) accounts receivable earned from the operations of the business during the period beginning 60 days prior to the closing date and ending on the closing date, (iv) accounts receivable as to litigation commenced prior to the closing date against a debtor, (v) all judgments in favor of Seller in connection with the collection of accounts receivable and (vi) all  checkbooks,  stubs,  books of account , ledgers  and journals related to the prior operation of the Seller’s business.

On March 2, 2010, the parties to the Asset Purchase Agreement also entered into an Asset Acquisition Memorandum (the “Memorandum” which we refer to together with the Asset Purchase Agreement, as the “Transaction Documents”).  The Memorandum provides, among other things, that the Parent Company is required to invest a minimum of $500,000 within six months of the closing date of the Asset Acquisition into New A.C. LaRocco, which payments may be made directly to New A.C. LaRocco or to anyone that the Seller and New A.C. LaRocco deem necessary.

On March 2, 2011, in lieu of the 15,000,000 shares of common stock described in the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Parent Company issued 150,000 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to the Seller..  

Settlement Agreement

On May 4, 2011, the Parent Company, New York FHP, New A.C. LaRocco, the Seller, Clarence Scott and Karen Leffler entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”), which was effective on May 11, 2011.  

The terms of the Settlement Agreement include, among others:

(i)

The Parent Company shall issue an additional 150,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to the Seller (the “Share Payment”), which shares have been issued;

(ii)

during the 90 day period following the effective date of the Settlement Agreement, Fresh Harvest would pay to the Seller an aggregate of $23,000, which amount has been paid;

(iii)

neither Mr. Scott nor Ms. Leffler would be restricted from accepting employment with, consulting with or investing in any business in competition with Fresh Harvest or its subsidiaries;

(iv)

each of the Seller, Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler acknowledged and agreed that upon receipt of the Share Payment by the Parent Company and compliance by New A.C. LaRocco with the provisions of Section 2(b) of the Settlement Agreement (i.e., payment of $23,000 to the Seller), all amounts owed by Fresh Harvest and/or New A.C. LaRocco to the Seller, Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler in connection with the Asset Acquisition, pursuant to the Transaction Documents (including the employment agreements between Fresh Harvest and each of Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler) or otherwise shall be deemed satisfied and paid in full;

(v)

each of the Seller, Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler acknowledged and agreed that on March 2, 2010, the Parent Company acquired all right, title and interest in (collectively, the “Acquired Assets”) all of the property and assets, real, personal or mixed, tangible and intangible, of every kind and description of the Seller, except for: (1) receivables due to the Seller on March 2, 2010, (2) cash and cash equivalent items on hand at the close of business on March 2, 2010, (3) accounts receivable earned from the operation of the Seller’s business during the period beginning sixty (60) days prior to March 2, 2010 and ending on March 2, 2010, (4) accounts receivable as to litigation commenced prior to March 2, 2010 against a debtor for purposes of collection, (5) all judgments in favor of the Seller in connection with the collection of accounts receivable as of March 2, 2010 and (6) all  checkbooks,  stubs,  books of account, ledgers  and journals related to the prior operation of the Seller’s business prior to March 2, 2010;

8

(vi)

each of the Seller, Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler further acknowledged and agreed that the only liability assumed by Fresh Harvest from the Seller pursuant to the Transaction Documents was the assumption of that certain Secured Promissory Note dated July 6, 2007 in the original principal amount of $218,356.94 (and with a principal balance of $129,384.59 on March 2, 2010) owed by the Seller to a specified creditor;

(vii)

New A.C. LaRocco agreed to transfer to the Seller certain specified assets and any rights and obligations of New A.C. LaRocco and/or Fresh Harvest with respect to the facility located in Spokane, Washington; and,

(viii)

subject to certain conditions, the domain name healthypizzarevolution.com, will be the property of Mr. Scott.

The Settlement Agreement also provides for a mutual release of claims by the parties.

PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION

The acquisition of the assets of Take and Bake, Inc. on March 2, 2010, including the settlement agreement of May 4, 2011, was accounted for as a business combination as defined under ASC 805.  The purchase price allocation is as follows:

Explanation:

(1)

The valuation of the inventory was based on cost and was being maintained by a third-party warehouse that maintained perpetual inventory records.

(2)

The valuation of the equipment was based on a third-party appraisal as of March 2, 2010.

(3)

The management of the Company determined that based on market conditions that existed as of March 2, 2010, the Company’s principal supplier had a perfected security interest in all assets of Take and Bake, Inc. and that Take and Bake, Inc. operated at a loss for several years prior to March 2, 2010, therefore the trade name, logo and trade secrets were valued at zero.

(4)

The assumption of liabilities includes a term note payable to Rose & Shore, Inc., the Company’s principal supplier.

(5)

The consideration paid included a term note payable to Take and Bake, Inc.

(6)

Since there was no methodology set forth in the Agreement dated March 2, 2010 as to how the 15,000,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company were to be valued, management of the Company determined the value of the common stock to be the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $.03 without taking into consideration any discounts for the restrictions, the lack of trading volume to sell the shares if they were free trading and that the 15,000,000 shares represented approximately 11% of the outstanding shares as of March 2, 2010.

(7)

Management of the Company determined the Goodwill, defined as Total Consideration Paid less Identifiable Assets, to be $666,512.

(8)

Assets located in the Spokane, Washington office that were released in the Settlement Agreement dated May 4, 2011.

(9)

Balance of the Note Payable owed to Take and Bake, Inc. that was released in the Settlement Agreement dated May 4, 2011.

(10)

150,000 shares of convertible preferred stock (15,000,000 shares of common stock) at a per common share price of $.012; per share price of the common stock was determined to be the closing price of the shares on the date of issuance.

(11)

150,000 shares of convertible preferred stock (15,000,000 shares of common stock) at a per common share price of $.010; per share price of the common stock was determined to be the closing price of the shares on the date of issuance.

(12)

Adjustment for Fair Value of the common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible preferred stock.

9

Letter Agreement – Mercury Equity Group

On May 17, 2011, the Parent Company entered into a letter agreement with Mercury Equity Group, LLC (“Mercury”) to, among other things, retain Mercury on an exclusive basis to provide general financial advisory and investment banking services to the Company. The agreement provides, among other things, for the issuance to Mercury of up to a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 5% of the total issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock on a fully diluted basis upon the happening of certain events.

NOTE  2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING PRACTICES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which management believes are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods presented.  The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or the year as a whole. The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A as filed with the SEC on July 5, 2011.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts in the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of July 31, 2010 have been reclassified by the Company to conform to the July 31, 2011 presentation primarily with accounts payable, accrued interest and notes payable.  These reclassifications had no effect on the previously reported net loss.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results may differ significantly from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company maintains cash balances in a non-interest bearing account that currently does not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of July 31, 2011.

As of July 31, 2011, the bank account located in Spokane, Washington that the Parent Company is using for the operations of the New A.C. LaRocco is in the name of Take and Bake, Inc. dba AC LaRocco Pizza.

As of July 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company’s cash balances were $954 and $25,525, respectively.

Net Loss Per Share Calculation

Basic net loss per common share ("EPS") is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.   Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding, assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued.  

For the three months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for computing basic EPS were 200,000,000 and 160,079,843, respectively.

10

Revenue Recognition and Sales Incentives

Sales are recognized when the earnings process is complete, which occurs when products are shipped in accordance with terms of agreements, title and risk of loss transfer to customers, collection is probable and pricing is fixed or determinable. Sales are reported net of sales incentives, which include trade discounts and promotions and certain coupon costs. Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are included in reported sales. Allowances for cash discounts are recorded in the period in which the related sale is recognized.

Accounts Receivable

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations on existing and new customers daily. When it is determined that an amount included in accounts receivable is uncollectible it is written off as uncollectible.

As of July 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $136,396 and $31,139, respectively.  

Inventory

Inventory is valued at the lower of actual cost or market, utilizing the first-in, first-out method.  The Company provides write-downs for finished goods expected to become non-saleable due to age and specifically identifies and provides for slow moving products and packaging.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is carried at cost and depreciated or amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The Company believes the asset lives assigned to its property and equipment is within the ranges/guidelines generally used in food manufacturing and distribution businesses.  Depreciation is provided for on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the assets of five years. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.  

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, depreciation expense was $3,018 and $9,173, respectively.

Dividends

The Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends. No dividends have been paid during the nine months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes is the total of the current taxes payable and the net of the change in the deferred income taxes. Provision is made for the deferred income taxes where differences exist between the period in which transactions affect current taxable income and the period in which they enter into the determination of net income in the financial statements.

Advertising

Advertising is expensed when incurred. For the nine months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, advertising expense was $60,669 and zero, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable are reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at carrying value, which approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets such as property and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

11

Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized a loss of $597 and $9,173 on the disposal of assets.

Share-based compensation

The Company accounts for common stock issued to employees, directors, and consultants in accordance with the provisions of FAS 123r - Stock Compensation. The compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions will be recognized in the consolidated financial statements.  The cost associated with common stock issued to employees, directors and consultants will be recognized, at fair value, on the date issued. Awards granted to non-employee consultants will be subsequently re-measured to current fair value until performance is completed or a performance commitment exists.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $642,670 and $180,956, respectively, for stock issued for services.  

NOTE 3.  ACCOUNTS PAYABLE

As of July 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010, the accounts payable was as follows:

12

NOTE 4.  NOTES PAYABLE -  RELATED PARTIES

As of July 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010, the notes payable – related parties were as follows:

In March 2011, the Parent Company issued 260,670 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in exchange for the outstanding balance of $181,426 of Notes Payable – Related Parties.

13

NOTE 5.  NOTES PAYABLE

As of July 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010, the notes payable were as follows:  

14

(1)  As of July 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010, the CEO of the Parent Company has personally guaranteed $244,400 and $261,726, respectively of the outstanding notes payable.

15

NOTE 6.  STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Series A Preferred Stock

Certificate of Designations

On February 23, 2011, the Parent Company filed a Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”) with the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey.  The Certificate of Designations, subject to the requirements of New Jersey law,  states the designation, number of shares, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the Parent Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”).  In summary, the Certificate of Designations provides:

Number

5,000,000 shares of the Parent Company’s Preferred Stock are designated as shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

Dividends

Any dividends (other than dividends on common stock payable solely in common stock or dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock payable solely in Series A Preferred Stock) declared or paid in any fiscal year will be declared or paid among the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and common stock then outstanding in proportion to the greatest whole number of shares of common stock which would be held by each such holder if all shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Designations.  The Parent Company’s Board of Directors is under no obligation to declare dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock.

Conversion

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is generally convertible (subject to an increase in the number of shares of the Parent Company’s authorized common stock (the “Conversion Amendment”)) into 100 shares of the Parent Company’s common stock (the “Conversion Rate”).  

Subject to the prior increase in the number of the Parent Company’s authorized shares of common stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock will automatically be converted into shares of common stock at the then effective Conversion Rate for such share immediately upon the election of the Parent Company.  The Parent Company intends to make such election promptly following such increase in its authorized common stock.  On September 6, 2011, the authorized number of shares of the Parent Company’s common stock was increased to 2,000,000,000 shares.

Liquidation

In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Parent Company, the assets of the Parent Company legally available for distribution by the Parent Company will be distributed with equal priority and pro rata among the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and common stock in proportion to the number of shares of common stock held by them, with the shares of Series A Preferred Stock being treated for this purpose as if they had been converted to shares of common stock at the then applicable Conversion Rate.

Voting

On any matter presented to the stockholders of the Parent Company for their action or consideration at any meeting of stockholders of the Parent Company (or by written consent of stockholders in lieu of meeting), each holder of outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock would be entitled to cast the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of common stock into which the shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by such holder are convertible as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote on such matter.  For purposes of the foregoing sentence, the Conversion Amendment shall be deemed to be in full force and all shares of Series A Preferred Stock would be considered to be fully convertible into shares of Common Stock without restriction.  Except as provided by law or by the other provisions of the Parent Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, holders of Series A Preferred Stock vote together with the holders of common stock as a single class.

16

Issuance to Take and Bake, Inc.

On March 2, 2011, in lieu of the 15,000,000 shares of common stock described in the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Parent Company issued 150,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the Seller, which shares are convertible into 15,000,000 shares of the Parent Company’s common stock.  On May 27, 2011, the Parent Company issued an additional 150,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the Seller pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

Other Issuances of Series A Preferred Stock

On March 4, 2011, the Parent Company entered into a letter agreement with Michael J. Friedman, the Parent Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which the Parent Company and Mr. Friedman agreed that an aggregate of $228,008 of accrued but unpaid compensation would be converted into 268,244 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  

On March 4, 2011, the Parent Company issued 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to each of Michael Friedman, Jay Odintz and Dominick Cingari as a fee for their service on the Parent Company’s Board of Directors.

On March 8, 2011, the Parent Company and Jumpstart Marketing, Inc. (“Jumpstart”) entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which the Parent Company and Jumpstart agreed that that all amounts owed by the Parent Company to Jumpstart under the Marketing Agreement dated November 20, 2009 (the “Marketing Agreement”) between the Parent Company and Jumpstart (pursuant to which Jumpstart provided certain marketing services to the Parent Company) would be converted into 99,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Jumpstart Shares”) and that the Parent Company would not have any further obligations to Jumpstart under the Marketing Agreement or otherwise.

On March 8, 2011, the Parent Company and 5W Public Relations, LLC (“5W”) entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which the Parent Company and 5W agreed that that all amounts owed by the Parent Company to 5W under the letter agreement dated May 25, 2010  (the “5W Agreement”) between the Parent Company and 5W (pursuant to which 5W provided certain public relations services to the Parent Company) would be converted into 90,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “5W Shares”) and that the Parent Company would not have any further obligations to 5W under the 5W Agreement or otherwise.

Between March 3, 2011 and March 8, 2011, the Parent Company entered into letter agreements with certain creditors of the Parent Company pursuant to which such creditors agreed to convert an aggregate debt of approximately $686,914 into an aggregate of approximately 1,232,759 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

On May 4, 2011, the Parent Company issued 60,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for consulting services rendered on behalf of the Company.

As of July 31, 2011, the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock were issued for the following:

Common Stock

As of July 31, 2011 and October 31, 2010, the Parent Company had authorized and issued 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock at par value of $0.0001 per share.  On September 6, 2011, the authorized number of shares of the Parent Company’s common stock was increased to 2,000,000,000 shares.

17

NOTE 7.  UNPAID PAYROLL TAXES

As of July 31, 2011, the Company owed the Internal Revenue Service and New York State payroll related taxes in the amounts of $118,101 and $30,145, respectively, plus applicable interest and penalties.  The total amount due to both taxing authorities including penalties and interest as of July 31, 2011 was approximately $217,000 subject to further penalties and interest plus accruals on unpaid wages for a total of approximately $300,000.  

The Internal Revenue Service has placed a federal tax lien on all of the assets of the Company and has designated the balance owed as uncollectible at this time. The Company is currently negotiating a payment plan with the State of New York  

As of July 31, 2011, the New A.C. LaRocco had filed to do business in the State of Washington and had unpaid payroll taxes payable to the Internal Revenue Service and the State of Washington of approximately $35,000 including estimated penalties and interest for non-filing and non-payment.  The New A.C. LaRocco has filed all of the 2010 quarterly unemployment reports and has not made the requisite tax payments to the State of Washington.  As of January 1, 2011, the New A.C. LaRocco does not have any payroll as all employees have been terminated.

NOTE 8.  OPERATING LEASES

Rent

As of July 31, 2011, the Parent Company maintains its office in New York, New York.   There is no written office lease; however, the rent is approximately $750 per month.  The Company maintains a limited amount of office equipment and does not lease any vehicles.  

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010, rent expense was $8,193 and $11,700, respectively.

NOTE  9.  THE EFFECT OF RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

As of and for the nine months ended July 31, 2011, the Company does not expect any of the recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

NOTE 10.  LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND GOING CONCERN

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going-concern basis, which contemplates the continuation of operations, realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the ordinary course of business.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, the Company reported a net loss of $649,414.  

As of July 31, 2011, the Company maintained total assets of $56,632; total liabilities of $2,427,093 including long-term debt of $17,412 along with an accumulated deficit of $7,255,129.

Management believes that additional capital will be required to fund operations through the year ending October 31, 2011 and beyond, as it attempts to generate increasing revenue, and develop new products. Management intends to attempt to raise capital through additional equity offerings and debt obligations. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in obtaining financing at the level needed or on terms acceptable to the Company. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying interim financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The Company’s operations are subject to certain additional risks and uncertainties including, among others, dependence on outside suppliers and manufacturers, competition, dependence on its exclusive license and relationship with the licensor, uncertainties regarding patents and proprietary rights, dependence on key personnel, and other business risks. In addition, there is no assurance, assuming the Company is successful in raising additional capital that the Company will be successful in achieving profitability or positive cash flow.

18

NOTE 11.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Special Meeting

The Parent Company held a special meeting of shareholders on September 2, 2011.  Two proposals were submitted to the Parent Company’s shareholders and approved at the special meeting.  The proposals are described in detail in the Parent Company’s previously filed proxy statement for the special meeting.  The following is a brief description of each matter voted upon at the special meeting, as well as the number of votes cast for or against each matter and the number of abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to each matter, both in person and by proxy.

Increase of Authorized Shares.  The holders of the Parent Company’s common stock and Series A Preferred Stock voted, as a single class, to approve an increase in the number of authorized shares of the Parent Company’s common stock from 200,000,000 shares to 2,000,000,000 shares and to authorize the filing of an amendment to the Parent Company’s Certificate of Incorporation with respect to such change as follows:

FOR  316,127,584  AGAINST  27,809,996   ABSTAIN 383,876  BROKER NON-VOTES 0

Ratification.  The holders of the Parent Company’s common stock and Series A Preferred Stock voted, as a single class, to ratify the Certificate of Designations as follows:

FOR  241,950,066 AGAINST  4,762,135   ABSTAIN 778,295  BROKER NON-VOTES 96,830,960

Certificate of Amendment

On September 6, 2011, the Parent Company filed, with the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey, a Certificate of Amendment to the Parent Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of the Company’s common stock to 2,000,000,000 shares.

19

Item 2.  Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations

Overview

We were formed in New Jersey as a blank check company on April 21, 2005 with no operations, assets or purpose other than the purpose of seeking a privately held operating company as an acquisition or merger candidate.

 On December 16, 2005, the Parent Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Acquisition and Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Fresh Harvest Products, Inc., a New York corporation (“New York FHP”), Michael Friedman, Marcia Roberts and Illuminate, Inc.  The Merger Agreement contemplates the merger of the Parent Company and New York FHP (the “Merger”).  Although the Parent Company has operated as if the Merger was consummated in December 2005, it has come to the Company’s attention that certain required filings were not made in the State of New Jersey and the State of New York to properly consummate the Merger.  As a result, as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Parent Company and New York FHP had not completed the Merger.  In order to complete the Merger, the Parent Company and New York FHP plan to take the following steps:

1.

Pay all taxes owed by New York FHP to the State of New York.  As of July 31, 2011, New York FHP owed New York State payroll related taxes in the amount of approximately $30,145 plus applicable interest and penalties.

2.

File an application on behalf of the Parent Company for authority to do business in the State of New York with the Secretary of State of the State of New York, which application requires the consent of the New York State Tax Commission, and pay any applicable late filing penalties.   

3.

File a final franchise tax return with the State of New York with respect to New York FHP.

4.

File a Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey.

5.

File a Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of New York.

The Parent Company intends to take the steps required to complete the Merger, however, the Parent Company cannot forecast when it will pay the amounts owed to the State of New York, make the indicated filings or otherwise complete the Merger.  In addition, there is a risk that the State of New York and the State of New Jersey may require the Parent Company and New York FHP to take additional actions that the Company is not presently contemplating.  If the Parent Company and New York FHP are unable to complete the above described steps and to consummate the Merger, then there is a risk that the Parent Company’s acquisition of New York FHP could be challenged which could seriously harm the Parent Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.  If the Parent Company and New York FHP are unable to consummate the Merger, the value of the Parent Company’s shares held by the Parent Company’s shareholders could significantly decline.

The Company sells its products to consumers through local, regional and national supermarkets, retailers, distributors, brokers, wholesalers and an online web-store.  In August 2009, the Parent Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, Wings of Nature, LLC. In April 2010, the Parent Company formed a wholly-owned subsidiary, New A.C. LaRocco, for the purpose of implementing its new pizza business.

The Company continues to have limited capital resources and has experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations and expects these conditions to continue for the foreseeable future.  As of July 31, 2010, the Company has limited cash available for operations and has an accumulated deficit of $7,255,129. Management believes that cash on hand as of July 31, 2011 is not sufficient to fund operations through July 31, 2012.  The Company will be required to raise additional funds to meet its short and long-term planned goals. There can be no assurance that such funds, if available at all, can be obtained on terms reasonable to the Company.

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has limited revenue and without realization of additional capital, it would be highly unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern.

We began realizing revenues from operations during the quarter ending July 31, 2006, and, as of November 1, 2007 we were no longer a development stage company.  

20

Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010

For the three months ended July 31, 2011, we recorded net revenues of $100,335 versus $282,427 for a decrease of $182,092 or 64.5% over the three months ended July 31, 2010. The Company believes that the decrease is primarily due to the cyclical nature of the revenues of the New AC LaRocco and that Wings of Nature did not sell any of it products.  The three months ending July 31 are typically the slowest revenue generating quarter for New AC LaRocco, because, the Company believes, that many consumers tend to be on vacation and traveling, and are not home cooking or preparing meals as often as during the other three quarters of the year.  

For the three months ended July 31, 2011, gross profit was $17,361 versus $72,466 for a decrease of $55,105 or 76.01% over the three months ended July 31, 2010.  The decrease is primarily due to increase in product costs of the New AC LaRocco.

For the three months ended July 31, 2011, gross profit in percentages was 17.3% versus 25.7% over the three months ended July 31, 2010.  The change in gross profit is primarily due to change in product mix from our organic food lines to include the organic food sold under the brand name of Wings-of Nature and the organic pizza sold under the brand name of AC LaRocco.

For the three months ended July 31, 2011, operating expenses decreased to $181,526 from $385,830 or 53.0% over the three months ended July 31, 2010.  The decrease is primarily due to decrease in salaries and wages, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses.

For the three months ended July 31, 2011, interest expense on our convertible notes payable decreased to $23,056 from $33,413, or 31.0% over the three months ended July 31, 2010.  This decrease is primarily due to the notes payable that were converted to Series A Preferred Stock during the three months ended July 31, 2011.  

In addition, our inability to cause the conversion of certain of the outstanding convertible notes payable into shares of common stock due to a lack of available authorized shares to be issued upon such conversions has limited our ability to reduce such debt.

For the three months ended July 31, 2011, we realized a net profit of $40,901 as compared to a net loss of $349,780 for the three months ended July 31, 2010.  The increase of $390,681 is primarily due to a one-time fair value adjustment for the preferred stock issued in the settlement with Take and Bake and certain of its shareholders in May 2011.

Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2011 and July 31, 2010

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, we recorded net revenues of $503,063 versus $463,085 for an increase of $39,978 or 8.6% over the nine months ended July 31, 2010. The increase is primarily due to revenues of the New AC LaRocco.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, gross profit was $117,154 versus $85,298 for an increase of $31,856 or 37.3% over the nine months ended July 31, 2010.  The increase is primarily due to revenues of the New AC LaRocco.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, gross profit in percentages was 23.3% versus 18.4% over the nine months ended July 31, 2010.  The change in gross profit is primarily due to change in product mix from our organic food lines to include the organic food sold under the brand name of Wings-of Nature and the organic pizza sold under the brand name of AC LaRocco.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, operating expenses decreased to $922,481 from $1,425,866 or 35.3% over the nine months ended July 31, 2010.  The decrease is primarily due to increases in salaries and wages, sales and marketing and general and administrative expenses due to the Asset Acquisition along with an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts and the continuing costs related to the Parent Company’s SEC reporting requirements.  The nine months ended July 31, 2011, includes the impairment of the goodwill of $666,512 for the Asset Acquisition that took place on March 2, 2010.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, interest expense on our convertible notes payable decreased to $70,386 from $96,534, or 27.1% over the nine months ended July 31, 2010.  This decrease is primarily due to the notes payable that were converted to Series A Preferred Stock during the nine months ended July 31, 2011.  

In addition, our inability to cause the conversion of certain of the outstanding convertible notes payable into shares of common stock due to a lack of available authorized shares to be issued upon such conversions has limited our abilty to reduce such debt.

For the nine months ended July 31, 2011, we realized a net loss of $649,414 as compared to $1,446,275 for the nine months ended July 31, 2010. The decrease is primarily due to a one-time fair value adjustment for the preferred stock issued in the

21

settlement with Take and Bake and certain of its shareholders in May 2011, as well as, the impairment of the goodwill of $666,512 for the asset acquisition that took place on March 2, 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since inception, we have not been able to finance our business from cash flows from operations and have been reliant upon loans and proceeds from the sale of equity which may not be available to us in the future, or if available, on reasonable terms. Accordingly, if we are unable to obtain funding from loans and the sale of our equity, it is unlikely that we will be able to continue as a going concern.  

As of July 31, 2011, we had current assets of $54,088 including $954 cash, inventory of $20,126 and net accounts receivable of $33,008.  We had fixed assets with a net book value of $2,544 and we had total liabilities of $2,427,093.

Currently, we do not have sufficient financial resources to implement or complete our business plan. We anticipate that we will need a minimum of approximately $600,000 to satisfy our cash requirements over the next 12 months.  We cannot be assured that revenue from operations will be sufficient to fund our activities during the next 12 months. Accordingly, we will have to seek alternate sources of capital. We can offer no assurance that we will be able to raise such funds on acceptable terms to us or otherwise. If we are unsuccessful in our attempts to raise sufficient capital, we may have to cease operations or postpone our plans to initiate or complete our business plan.

If we are unable to raise the required financing, we may have to cease operations. Currently, we have a limited credit history with vendors, suppliers, manufacturers, packagers and food producers; we must pay for our purchases “up front” and are not granted credit terms. This will continue until we have established a satisfactory credit history. We cannot estimate, with any certainty, how long this may take, or if it will occur at all. Our inability to obtain credit from such providers has a significant impact upon our liquidity and our ability to utilize funds for other purposes. Similarly, if and when we hire additional personnel, including management and sales personnel, the cost related to such hiring will have a significant impact on our liquidity and deployment of funds.

The food producer of our organic pizza line under the brand name of AC LaRocco has a lock box agreement on the cash collected from accounts receivable.  After they are paid for their invoices and the monthly payment requirement on the outstanding note payable owed to them, we receive the balance of the cash collections.  This will continue until we are able to satisfy the balance of the note and negotiate an alternative acceptable payment arrangement with them.

Since March 2, 2010 through July 31, 2011, the food producer of our organic pizza line has been paid approximately $60,000 of principal on the note payable we assumed in the Asset Acquisition.

As of July 31, 2011, the Company owed the Internal Revenue Service and New York State payroll related taxes in the amounts of $118,101 and $30,145, respectively, plus applicable interest and penalties.  The total amount due to both taxing authorities including penalties and interest as of July 31, 2011 was approximately $217,000 subject to further penalties and interest plus accruals on unpaid wages for approximately $300,000.  The Internal Revenue Service has placed a federal tax lien on all of the assets of the Company and has designated the balance owed as uncollectible at this time. The Company is currently negotiating a payment plan with the State of New York.

As of July 31, 2011, the New A.C. LaRocco had filed to do business in the State of Washington and had unpaid payroll taxes payable to the Internal Revenue Service and the State of Washington in an approximate amount of $35,000 including estimated penalties and interest for non-filing and non-payment.  The New A.C. LaRocco has filed all of the 2010 quarterly unemployment reports and has not made the requisite tax payments to the State of Washington.

22

Material Agreements

On March 2, 2010, the Parent Company simultaneously entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) dated March 2, 2010 among the Parent Company, Take and Bake, Inc., doing business as A.C. LaRocco Pizza Company (the “Seller”), Clarence Scott and Karen Leffler and, the Company believes, acquired certain assets and liabilities of the Seller (as further described below) (the “Asset Acquisition”). The Seller was in the business of marketing and distributing all natural and organic, whole grain, heart healthy pizzas, including organic thin pizzas with sprouted grain crust.  The purchase price for the assets acquired by the Parent Company pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement is 15,000,000 shares of common stock (the “Share Consideration”) and monthly payments of $1,800 for a 60 month period.  In April 2010, the Parent Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, A.C. LaRocco, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for the purpose of implementing its new pizza business.  We refer to this subsidiary as “New A.C. LaRocco.”

The assets acquired by the Company in the Asset Acquisition, included all of the assets of Seller constituting or used in connection with its business, except for certain excluded assets.  The assets excluded from the Asset Acquisition, included, among others: (i) receivables due to the Seller on March 2, 2010, (ii) cash and cash equivalent items on hand at the close of business on the closing date, (iii) accounts receivable earned from the operations of the business during the period beginning 60 days prior to the closing date and ending on the closing date, (iv) accounts receivable as to litigation commenced prior to the closing date against a debtor, (v) all judgments in favor of Seller in connection with the collection of accounts receivable and (vi) all  checkbooks,  stubs,  books of account , ledgers and journals related to the prior operation of the Seller’s business.

On March 2, 2010, the parties to the Asset Purchase Agreement also entered into an Asset Acquisition Memorandum (the “Memorandum” which we refer to together with the Asset Purchase Agreement, as the “Transaction Documents”).  The Memorandum provides, among other things, that the Parent Company is required to invest a minimum of $500,000 within six months of the closing date of the Asset Acquisition into New A.C. LaRocco, which payments may be made directly to New A.C. LaRocco or to anyone that the Seller and New A.C. LaRocco deem necessary.  

On March 2, 2011, in lieu of the 15,000,000 shares of common stock described in the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Parent Company issued 150,000 shares of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to the Seller.  

Settlement Agreement

On May 4, 2011, the Parent Company, New York FHP, New A.C. LaRocco, the Seller, Clarence Scott and Karen Leffler entered into a Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”), which was effective on May 11, 2011.  

The terms of the Settlement Agreement include, among others:

(i)

The Parent Company shall issue an additional 150,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to the Seller (the “Share Payment”), which shares have been issued;

(ii)

during the 90 day period following the effective date of the Settlement Agreement, Fresh Harvest would pay to the Seller an aggregate of $23,000, which amount has been paid;

(iii)

neither Mr. Scott nor Ms. Leffler would be restricted from accepting employment with, consulting with or investing in any business in competition with Fresh Harvest or its subsidiaries;

(iv)

each of the Seller, Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler acknowledged and agreed that upon receipt of the Share Payment by the Parent Company and compliance by New A.C. LaRocco with the provisions of Section 2(b) of the Settlement Agreement (i.e., payment of $23,000 to the Seller), all amounts owed by Fresh Harvest and/or New A.C. LaRocco to the Seller, Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler in connection with the Asset Acquisition, pursuant to the Transaction Documents (including the employment agreements between Fresh Harvest and each of Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler) or otherwise shall be deemed satisfied and paid in full;

(v)

each of the Seller, Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler acknowledged and agreed that on March 2, 2010, the Parent Company acquired all right, title and interest in (collectively, the “Acquired Assets”) all of the property and assets, real, personal or mixed, tangible and intangible, of every kind and description of the Seller, except for: (1) receivables due to the Seller on March 2, 2010, (2) cash and cash equivalent items on hand at the close of business on March 2, 2010, (3) accounts receivable earned from the operation of the Seller’s business during the period beginning sixty (60) days prior to March 2, 2010 and ending on March 2, 2010, (4) accounts receivable as to litigation commenced prior to March 2, 2010 against a debtor for purposes of collection, (5) all judgments in favor of the Seller in connection with the collection of accounts receivable as of March 2, 2010 and (6) all  checkbooks,  stubs,  books of account, ledgers  and journals related to the prior operation of the Seller’s business prior to March 2, 2010;

23

(vi)

each of the Seller, Mr. Scott and Ms. Leffler further acknowledged and agreed that the only liability assumed by Fresh Harvest from the Seller pursuant to the Transaction Documents was the assumption of that certain Secured Promissory Note dated July 6, 2007 in the original principal amount of $218,356.94 (and with a principal balance of $129,384.59 on March 2, 2010) owed by the Seller to a specified creditor;

(vii)

New A.C. LaRocco agreed to transfer to the Seller certain specified assets and any rights and obligations of New A.C. LaRocco and/or Fresh Harvest with respect to the facility located in Spokane, Washington; and,

(viii)

subject to certain conditions, the domain name healthypizzarevolution.com, will be the property of Mr. Scott.

The Settlement Agreement also provides for a mutual release of claims by the parties.

PURCHASE PRICE ALLOCATION

The acquisition of the assets of Take and Bake, Inc. on March 2, 2010, including the settlement agreement of May 4, 2011, was accounted for as a business combination as defined under ASC 805.  The purchase price allocation is as follows:

Explanation:

(1)

The valuation of the inventory was based on cost and was being maintained by a third-party warehouse that maintained perpetual inventory records.

(2)

The valuation of the equipment was based on a third-party appraisal as of March 2, 2010.

(3)

The management of the Company determined that based on market conditions that existed as of March 2, 2010, the Company’s principal supplier had a perfected security interest in all assets of Take and Bake, Inc. and that Take and Bake, Inc. operated at a loss for several years prior to March 2, 2010, therefore the trade name, logo and trade secrets were valued at zero.

(4)

The assumption of liabilities includes a term note payable to Rose & Shore, Inc., the Company’s principal supplier.

(5)

The consideration paid included a term note payable to Take and Bake, Inc.

(6)

Since there was no methodology set forth in the Agreement dated March 2, 2010 as to how the 15,000,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company were to be valued, management of the Company determined the value of the common stock to be the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $.03 without taking into consideration any discounts for the restrictions, the lack of trading volume to sell the shares if they were free trading and that the 15,000,000 shares represented approximately 11% of the outstanding shares as of March 2, 2010.

(7)

Management of the Company determined the Goodwill, defined as Total Consideration Paid less Identifiable Assets, to be $666,512.

(8)

Assets located in the Spokane, Washington office that were released in the Settlement Agreement dated May 4, 2011.

(9)

Balance of the Note Payable owed to Take and Bake, Inc. that was released in the Settlement Agreement dated May 4, 2011.

(10)

150,000 shares of convertible preferred stock (15,000,000 shares of common stock) at a per common share price of $.012; per share price of the common stock was determined to be the closing price of the shares on the date of issuance.

(11)

150,000 shares of convertible preferred stock (15,000,000 shares of common stock) at a per common share price of $.010; per share price of the common stock was determined to be the closing price of the shares on the date of issuance.

(12)

Adjustment for Fair Value of the common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible preferred stock.

24

Certificate of Designations

On February 23, 2011, the Parent Company filed a Certificate of Designations of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”) with the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey.  The Certificate of Designations, subject to the requirements of New Jersey law, states the designation, number of shares, powers, preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and restrictions of the Parent Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Series A Preferred Stock”).  In summary, the Certificate of Designations provides:

Number

5,000,000 shares of the Parent Company’s Preferred Stock are designated as shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

Dividends

Any dividends (other than dividends on common stock payable solely in common stock or dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock payable solely in Series A Preferred Stock) declared or paid in any fiscal year will be declared or paid among the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and common stock then outstanding in proportion to the greatest whole number of shares of common stock which would be held by each such holder if all shares of Series A Preferred Stock were converted into shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Designations.  The Parent Company’s Board of Directors is under no obligation to declare dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock.

Conversion

Each share of Series A Preferred Stock is generally convertible (subject to an increase in the number of shares of the Parent Company’s authorized common stock (the “Conversion Amendment”)) into 100 shares of the Parent Company’s common stock (the “Conversion Rate”).  

Subject to the prior increase in the number of the Parent Company’s authorized shares of common stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock will automatically be converted into shares of common stock at the then effective Conversion Rate for such share immediately upon the election of the Parent Company.  The Parent Company intends to make such election promptly following such increase in its authorized common stock. On September 6, 2011, the authorized number of shares of the Parent Company’s common stock was increased to 2,000,000,000 shares.

Liquidation

In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Parent Company, the assets of the Parent Company legally available for distribution by the Parent Company will be distributed with equal priority and pro rata among the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and common stock in proportion to the number of shares of common stock held by them, with the shares of Series A Preferred Stock being treated for this purpose as if they had been converted to shares of common stock at the then applicable Conversion Rate.

Voting

On any matter presented to the stockholders of the Parent Company for their action or consideration at any meeting of stockholders of the Parent Company (or by written consent of stockholders in lieu of meeting), each holder of outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock would be entitled to cast the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of common stock into which the shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by such holder are convertible as of the record date for determining stockholders entitled to vote on such matter.  For purposes of the foregoing sentence, the Conversion Amendment shall be deemed to be in full force and all shares of Series A Preferred Stock would be considered to be fully convertible into shares of Common Stock without restriction.  Except as provided by law or by the other provisions of the Parent Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, holders of Series A Preferred Stock vote together with the holders of common stock as a single class.

Issuance to Take and Bake, Inc.

On March 2, 2011, in lieu of the 15,000,000 shares of common stock described in the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Parent Company issued 150,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the Seller, which shares are convertible into 15,000,000 shares of the Parent Company’s common stock.  On May 27, 2011, the Parent Company issued an additional 150,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to the Seller pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

25

Other Issuances of Series A Preferred Stock

On March 4, 2011, the Parent Company entered into a letter agreement with Michael J. Friedman, the Parent Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which the Parent Company and Mr. Friedman agreed that an aggregate of $228,008 of accrued but unpaid compensation would be converted into 268,244 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.  On March 4, 2011, the Parent Company issued 100,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to each of Michael Friedman, Jay Odintz and Dominick Cingari as a fee for their service on the Parent Company’s Board of Directors.  

On March 8, 2011, the Parent Company and Jumpstart Marketing, Inc. (“Jumpstart”) entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which the Parent Company and Jumpstart agreed that that all amounts owed by the Parent Company to Jumpstart under the Marketing Agreement dated November 20, 2009 (the “Marketing Agreement”) between the Parent Company and Jumpstart (pursuant to which Jumpstart provided certain marketing services to the Parent Company) would be converted into 99,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “Jumpstart Shares”) and that the Parent Company would not have any further obligations to Jumpstart under the Marketing Agreement or otherwise.

On March 8, 2011, the Parent Company and 5W Public Relations, LLC (“5W”) entered into a letter agreement pursuant to which the Parent Company and 5W agreed that that all amounts owed by the Parent Company to 5W under the letter agreement dated May 25, 2010  (the “5W Agreement”) between the Parent Company and 5W (pursuant to which 5W provided certain public relations services to the Parent Company) would be converted into 90,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the “5W Shares”) and that the Parent Company would not have any further obligations to 5W under the 5W Agreement or otherwise.  

Between March 3, 2011 and March 8, 2011, the Parent Company entered into letter agreements with certain creditors of the Parent Company pursuant to which such creditors agreed to convert an aggregate debt of approximately $686,914 into an aggregate of approximately 1,232,759 shares of Series A Preferred Stock.

On May 4, 2011, the Parent Company issued 60,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for consulting services rendered on behalf of the Company.

As of July 31, 2011, the outstanding Series A Preferred Stock were issued for the following:

Letter Agreement – Mercury Equity Group

On May 17, 2011, the Parent Company entered into a letter agreement with Mercury Equity Group, LLC (“Mercury”) to, among other things, retain Mercury on an exclusive basis to provide general financial advisory and investment banking services to the Company.  The agreement provides, among other things, for the issuance to Mercury of up to a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 5% of the total issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock on a fully diluted basis upon the happening of certain events.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

Principal Commitments

As of July 31, 2011, we did not have any material commitments that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

26

Critical Accounting Policies

Our interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of July 31, 2011 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, including the recoverability of tangible and intangible assets, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of expenses during the periods covered.

A summary of accounting policies that have been applied to the interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements can be found in Note No. 2 to our interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. The most significant estimates relate to accounts receivable and the fair value of financial instruments. We base our estimates on historical company and industry experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which, form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ materially from those estimates.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation had a significant impact on our results of operations for the periods presented.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by the Company’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)) as of July 31, 2011. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information was not accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Material Weakness in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

As previously reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, the Company’s management has identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness is a control deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that creates a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting had the following deficiency:

27

To the extent reasonably possible, given our limited resources, our goal is, upon sufficient operating cash flow and/or capital, to separate the responsibilities of principal executive officer and principal financial officer, intending to rely on two or more individuals. We will also seek to expand our current board of directors to include additional individuals willing to perform directorial functions. Since the recited remedial actions will require that we hire or engage additional personnel, this material weakness may not be overcome in the near term due to our limited financial resources. Until such remedial actions can be realized, we will continue to rely on the advice of outside professionals and consultants.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended July 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.

We are subject to various risks that may materially harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. An investor should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q before deciding to purchase our common stock. If any of these risks or uncertainties actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline or we may be forced to cease operations.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We have limited capital resources and have experienced net losses and negative cash flows and we expect these conditions to continue for the foreseeable future, as such we expect that we will need to obtain additional financing to continue to operate our business. Such financing may be unavailable or available only on disadvantageous terms, which could cause the Company to curtail its business operations and delay the execution of its business plan.

To date, we have not generated significant revenues.  Our net losses for the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 were $2,015,518 and $756,425 respectively, and our net loss for the nine months ended July 31, 2011 was $649,414.  As of July 31, 2011, we realized an accumulated deficit of $7,255,129.  Our revenues have not been sufficient to sustain our operations and we expect that our revenues will not be sufficient to sustain our operations for the foreseeable future.  As such, we expect that we will continue to need significant financing to operate our business. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that additional financing will be available or that the terms of such additional financing, if available, will be acceptable to us. If additional financing is not available or not available on terms acceptable to us, our ability to fund our operations or otherwise respond to competitive pressures may be significantly impaired. We could also be forced to curtail our business operations, reduce our investments, decrease or eliminate capital expenditures and delay the execution of our business plan, including, without limitation, all aspects of our operations, which would have a material adverse affect on our business.  The items discussed above raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  We cannot assure you that we can achieve or sustain profitability in the future. Our operations are subject to the risks and competition inherent in the establishment of a business enterprise. There can be no assurance that future operations will be profitable. Revenues and profits, if any, will depend upon various factors, including whether our products achieve market acceptance and whether we obtain additional financing. We may not achieve our business objectives and the failure to achieve such goals would have a materially adverse impact on us.

We are currently in default with respect to various outstanding debt obligations, which if we fail to repay, could result in foreclosure upon our assets.

We are currently in default with respect to a number of our debt obligations.  In the event we are unable to repay such debt obligations, we could lose all of our assets and be forced to cease our operations.

28

The Certificate of Designations provides that each share of Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, upon the happening of certain events, into 100 shares of common stock, which may result in dilution.

As of July 31, 2011 there were 2,350,003 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding.  The Certificate of Designations provides that following an increase in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock would be convertible into 100 shares of common stock.  In addition, following an increase in the Company’s authorized shares of common stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock will automatically be converted into 100 shares of common stock immediately upon the election of the Parent Company.  On September 6, 2011, the authorized number of shares of the Parent Company’s common stock were increased to 2,000,000,000 shares.  The conversion of outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock into shares of common stock could cause substantial dilution to the ownership interests of our shareholders.

We may be required to raise additional financing by issuing new securities with terms or rights superior to those of our shares of common stock, which could adversely affect the market price of our shares of common stock and our business.

We will require additional financing to fund future operations. We may not be able to obtain financing on favorable terms, if at all. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, the percentage ownership of our current stockholders will be reduced, and the holders of the new equity securities may have rights superior to those of the holders of shares of common stock, which could adversely affect the market price and the voting power of shares of our common stock. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt securities, the holders of these debt securities may similarly have some rights senior to those of the holders of shares of common stock, and the terms of these debt securities could impose restrictions on operations and create a significant interest expense for us which could have a materially adverse affect on our business.

Accrued and Unpaid Payroll Taxes

As of July 31, 2011, the Company owed the Internal Revenue Service and New York State payroll related taxes in the amounts of $118,101 and $30,145, respectively, plus applicable interest and penalties.  The total amount due to both taxing authorities, including penalties and interest as of July 31, 2011, was approximately $217,000 subject to further penalties and interest plus accruals on unpaid wages for a total of approximately $300,000.

The Internal Revenue Service has placed a federal tax lien on all of the assets of the Company and has designated the balance owed as uncollectible at this time. The Company is currently negotiating a payment plan with the State of New York.  

As of July 31, 2011, the New A.C. LaRocco had filed to do business in the State of Washington and had unpaid payroll taxes payable to the Internal Revenue Service and the State of Washington of approximately $35,000 including estimated penalties and interest for non-filing and non-payment.  The New A.C. LaRocco has filed all of the 2010 quarterly unemployment reports and has not made the requisite tax payments to the State of Washington.

As of July 31, 2011, New A.C. LaRocco continued to have unpaid payroll taxes payable to the Internal Revenue Service. As of January 1, 2011, the New A.C. LaRocco does not have any payroll as all employees have been terminated. If we are unable to resolve these tax liabilities such failure could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity

We have not yet completed our merger with New York FHP.

On December 16, 2005, the Parent Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Acquisition and Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Fresh Harvest Products, Inc., a New York corporation (“New York FHP”), Michael Friedman, Marcia Roberts and Illuminate, Inc.  The Merger Agreement contemplates the merger of the Parent Company and New York FHP (the “Merger”).  Although the Parent Company has operated as if the Merger was consummated in December 2005, it has come to the Parent Company’s attention that certain required filings were not made in the State of New Jersey and the State of New York to properly consummate the Merger.   As a result, as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Parent Company and New York FHP had not completed the Merger.  In order to complete the Merger, the Parent Company and New York FHP plan to take the following steps:

1.

Pay all taxes owed by New York FHP to the State of New York.  As of July 31, 2011, New York FHP owed New York State payroll related taxes in the amount of approximately $30,145 plus applicable interest and penalties.

29

2.

File an application on behalf of the Parent Company for authority to do business in the State of New York with the Secretary of State of the State of New York, which application requires the consent of the New York State Tax Commission, and pay any applicable late filing penalties.   

3.

File a final franchise tax return with the State of New York with respect to New York FHP.

4.

File a Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of New Jersey.

5.

File a Certificate of Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of New York.

The Parent Company intends to take the steps required to complete the Merger, however, the Parent Company cannot forecast when it will pay the amounts owed to the State of New York, make the indicated filings or otherwise complete the Merger.  In addition, there is a risk that the State of New York and the State of New Jersey may require the Parent Company and New York FHP to take additional actions that the Company is not presently contemplating.  If the Parent Company and New York FHP are unable to complete the above described steps and to consummate the Merger, then there is a risk that the Parent Company’s acquisition of New York FHP could be challenged which could seriously harm the Parent Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.  If the Parent Company and New York FHP are unable to consummate the Merger, the value of the Parent Company’s shares held by the Parent Company’s shareholders could significantly decline.

There is no assurance that the market will continue to accept our products which could have an adverse affect on our business.

There can be no assurance that our food products will be perceived as being superior to existing products or new products being developed by competing companies or that such products will otherwise be accepted by consumers. The market prices for our products may exceed the prices of competitive products. There can be no assurance that the prices of our products will be perceived by consumers as cost-effective or that the prices of such products will be competitive with existing or new competing products. If consumers do not accept our products, we may be unable to achieve profitability.  

Other companies, many of which have greater resources than we have, may develop competing products which may cause our products to become noncompetitive which could have an adverse affect on our business.

We will be competing with firms that sell organic food products. In addition, additional potential competitors may enter the market in the future. Some of these current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, access to larger customer bases, well-established business organizations and product lines and significantly greater resources. There can be no assurance that one or more such companies will not succeed in developing or marketing products that will render our products noncompetitive. If we fail to compete successfully, our business would suffer.

We may suffer the loss of key personnel or may be unable to attract and retain qualified personnel to maintain and expand our business which have a material adverse affect on our business.

Our success is highly dependent on the continued services of certain skilled management and personnel. The loss of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, our success will depend upon, among other factors, the recruitment and retention of additional highly skilled and experienced management and personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be able to retain existing employees or to attract and retain additional personnel on acceptable terms given the competition for such personnel and our limited financial resources.  In addition, we are highly dependent on the services of our President and Chief Executive Officer, Michael Friedman, and Mr. Friedman devotes a portion of his time to unrelated business interests.

Our common stock is considered a “penny stock” and as a result, related broker-dealer requirements may hamper its trading and liquidity.

Our common stock is considered to be a “penny stock” since it meets one or more of the definitions in Rules 15g-2 through 15g-6 promulgated under Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act. These include but are not limited to the following: (i) the common stock trades at a price less than $5.00 per share; (ii) the common stock is not traded on a “recognized” national exchange; or (iii) the common stock is issued by a company with average revenues of less than $6.0 million for the past three (3) years. The principal result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is that securities broker-dealers cannot recommend our common stock to investors, thus hampering its liquidity.

Section 15(g) and Rule 15g-2 require broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with documentation disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the documents before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Potential investors in our common stock are urged to obtain and read such disclosure carefully before purchasing any of our shares.

30

Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor’s financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives.

We may have difficulty raising necessary capital to fund operations as a result of market price volatility for our shares of common stock.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

•  new products by us or our competitors;

•  additions or departures of key personnel;

•  sales of our common stock;

•  our ability to integrate operations and products;

•  our ability to execute our business plan;

•  operating results below expectations;

•  industry developments;

•  economic and other external factors; and 

•  period-to-period fluctuations in our financial results.

Because we have limited revenues to date, you may consider any one of these factors to be material. Our stock price may fluctuate widely as a result of any of the above listed factors.  In recent years, the securities markets in the U.S. have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies have experienced wide fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to the operations, performances, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. For these reasons, our shares of common stock can also be expected to be subject to volatility resulting from purely market forces over which we will have no control. If our business development plans are successful, we may require additional financing to continue to develop our products and to expand into new markets. The success of our products may, therefore, be dependent upon our ability to obtain financing through debt and equity or other means.

We will not pay cash dividends and investors may have to sell their shares in order to realize their investment.

We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings, if any, for reinvestment in the development and marketing of our products. As a result, investors may have to sell their shares of common stock to realize their investment.

Our business and future operating results may be adversely affected by events that are outside of our control.

Our business and operating results are vulnerable to interruption by events outside of our control, such as earthquakes, fire, power loss, telecommunications failures and uncertainties arising out of terrorist attacks throughout the world, the economic consequences of military action and the associated political instability, and the effect of heightened security concerns on domestic and international travel and commerce.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR INDUSTRY

We may be subject to significant liability which could materially harm our business should the consumption of any of our products cause illness or physical harm.

The sale of food products for human consumption involves the risk of injury or illness to consumers. Such injuries may result from inadvertent mislabeling, tampering by unauthorized third parties or product contamination or spoilage. Under certain circumstances, we may be required to recall or withdraw products, which may lead to a material adverse effect on our business. Even if a situation does not necessitate a recall or market withdrawal, product liability claims might be asserted against us. While we are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and believe our facilities and those of our co-packers comply in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations, if the consumption of any of our products causes, or is alleged to have caused, a health-related illness in the future we may become subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our

31

products caused illness or physical harm could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and consumers and our corporate and brand image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this sort might not be covered by insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others. A product liability judgment against us or a product recall could have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

We rely on independent certification for a number of our food products, the loss of which could materially harm our business.

We rely on independent certification, such as certifications of our products as “organic”, to differentiate our products from others. The loss of any independent certifications could adversely affect our market position as a natural and organic food company, which could harm our business.

We must comply with the requirements of independent organizations or certification authorities in order to label our products as certified. For example, we can lose our “organic” certification if a manufacturing plant becomes contaminated with non-organic materials, or if it is not properly cleaned after a production run. In addition, all raw materials must be certified organic.

Consumer concern regarding the safety and quality of food products or health concerns could adversely affect sales of certain of our products.

If consumers in our principal markets lose confidence in the safety and quality of our food products, even without a product liability claim or a product recall, our business could be adversely affected. Consumers have been increasingly focused on food safety and health and wellness with respect to the food products that they buy. The food industry is also subject to scrutiny relating to genetically modified organisms and the health implications of obesity. We have been and will continue to be impacted by publicity concerning the health implications of food products generally, which could negatively influence consumer perception and acceptance of our products and marketing programs. Developments in any of these areas could cause our results to differ materially from results that are reflected in forward-looking statements herein.

The cost of compliance with organic regulations may adversely impact our profitability.

Our products are organic and are required to meet the standards set forth in the Organic Foods Production Act and the regulations adopted by the National Organic Standards Board. These regulations require strict methods of production for organic food products and limit the ability of food processors to use non-organic or synthetic materials in the production of organic foods or in the raising of organic livestock. Compliance with these regulations will increase our cost of product, which we may be unable to offset with price increases.  Accordingly, compliance with these regulations may adversely affect our profitability.

Sales of our products will depend, in part, on the performance of local, regional and national supermarkets, retailers, distributors, brokers and wholesalers, and should they perform poorly or give higher priority to other brands or products, our business could be adversely affected.

In addition to our online web-store, we sell our products to consumers principally through local, regional and national supermarkets, retailers, distributors, brokers and wholesalers. There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain such distribution outlets.  The poor performance by such distributors, or our inability to collect accounts receivable from them, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, such distributors offer branded and private label products that compete directly with our products for retail shelf space and consumer purchases. Accordingly, there is a risk that our distributors may give higher priority to their own products or to the products of our competitors. In the future, our customers may not continue to purchase our products or provide our products with adequate levels of promotional support.

Our co-packers are subject to numerous laws and governmental regulations, exposing them to potential claims and compliance costs that could adversely affect our business

Our co-packers are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other national, state and local authorities. For example, our co-packers are subject to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgated by the FDA. This comprehensive regulatory program governs, among other things, the manufacturing, composition and ingredients, packaging and safety of foods. Under this program the FDA regulates manufacturing practices for foods through our current "good manufacturing practices" regulations and specifies the recipes for certain foods. Furthermore, our co-packers’ processing facilities and products are subject to periodic inspection by federal, state and local authorities. Any changes in these laws and regulations could increase the cost of developing and distributing our products and otherwise increase the cost of conducting our business, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, failure by our co-packers to comply with applicable laws and regulations, including future

32

laws and regulations, could subject them to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our supply of products, our business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the three months ended July 31, 2011, the Company (i) sold promissory notes convertible into shares of its common stock (or Series A Preferred Stock, if the common shares were not available at the maturity date) in the principal amount of $15,000 to certain investors, such promissory notes have an annual interest rate of 12%, are convertible at a price of $0.005 per share, and have a maturity date of November 19, 2011; and (ii) on May 4, 2011, the Parent Company issued 60,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock to a consultant for consulting services rendered on behalf of the Company. The exemption from registration for the issuance of such promissory notes and such shares of Series A Preferred Stock was based on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

See the disclosure under Notes Nos. 4 and 5 to the Company's interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements with respect to the Company's past due loans.

Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5.  Other Information.

None.

Item 6.  Exhibits.

33

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Fresh Harvest Products, Inc.

(Registrant)

/s/ Michael Jordan Friedman

_______________________________________

Michael Jordan Friedman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: September 14 2011

34