Inrad Optics, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended June 30,
2009
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
For the
transition period from to
Commission
file number 0-11668
PHOTONIC PRODUCTS GROUP,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey
|
22-2003247
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
or
organization)
|
Identification
Number)
|
181 Legrand Avenue, Northvale,
NJ 07647
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(Zip
Code)
(201)
767-1910
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
________________________________________________________________________________
(Former
name, former address and formal fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes xNo o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data file required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o The
Registrant is not yet subject to this requirement.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange act).
Yes ¨ No x
Common
shares of stock outstanding as of August 10, 2009:
11,399,032
shares
Photonic
Products Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
INDEX
Part
I. CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
Consolidated
balance sheets as of June 30, 2009 (unaudited) and December 31, 2008
(audited)
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 (unaudited)
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
(unaudited)
|
3 | |
Notes
to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
|
4 | |
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
10 |
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
16 |
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
17 |
Part
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
17 |
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
17 |
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
17 |
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
17 |
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
17 |
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
18 |
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
19 |
Signatures
|
20 |
PHOTONIC
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 3,855,807 | $ | 2,672,087 | ||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
— | 800,000 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15,000
in 2009 and 2008)
|
1,488,892 | 2,810,602 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
2,453,219 | 2,732,336 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
240,519 | 188,084 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
8,038,437 | 9,203,109 | ||||||
Plant
and equipment:
|
||||||||
Plant
and equipment, at cost
|
14,493,477 | 14,445,027 | ||||||
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(11,605,183 | ) | (11,139,771 | ) | ||||
Total
plant and equipment
|
2,888,294 | 3,305,256 | ||||||
Precious
Metals
|
157,443 | 112,851 | ||||||
Deferred
Income Taxes
|
800,000 | 408,000 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
1,869,646 | 1,869,646 | ||||||
Intangible
Assets, net
|
712,298 | 751,580 | ||||||
Other
Assets
|
47,601 | 81,707 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 14,513,719 | $ | 15,732,149 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’
Equity
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Current
portion of other long term notes
|
$ | 9,000 | $ | 136,892 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
1,702,930 | 2,160,665 | ||||||
Customer
advances
|
121,573 | 456,754 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,833,503 | 2,754,311 | ||||||
Related
Party Convertible Notes Payable
|
2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | ||||||
Other
Long Term Notes, net of current portion
|
349,328 | 353,663 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
4,682,831 | 5,607,974 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
— | — | ||||||
Shareholders’
Equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock: $.01 par value; 60,000,000 authorized shares; 11,391,132 shares
issued at June 30, 2009 and 11,230,678 issued at December 31,
2008
|
113,910 | 112,306 | ||||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
16,978,982 | 16,622,466 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(7,247,054 | ) | (6,595,647 | ) | ||||
9,845,838 | 10,139,125 | |||||||
Less
- Common stock in treasury, at cost (4,600 shares
respectively)
|
(14,950 | ) | (14,950 | ) | ||||
Total
Shareholders’ Equity
|
9,830,888 | 10,124,175 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$ | 14,513,719 | $ | 15,732,149 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1
PHOTONIC
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Total
Revenue
|
$ | 2,620,437 | 4,007,412 | $ | 5,435,534 | $ | 8,171,660 | |||||||||
Cost
and Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
2,201,339 | 2,788,210 | 4,634,749 | 5,450,865 | ||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
879,852 | 977,915 | 1,786,931 | 1,964,728 | ||||||||||||
3,081,191 | 3,766,125 | 6,421,680 | 7,415,593 | |||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
(460,754 | ) | 241,287 | (986,146 | ) | 756,067 | ||||||||||
Other
expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense—net
|
(32,244 | ) | (34,383 | ) | (64,632 | ) | (109,963 | ) | ||||||||
Gain
on sale of precious metals
|
— | — | 7,371 | — | ||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
— | 9,113 | — | 9,113 | ||||||||||||
(32,244 | ) | (25,270 | ) | (57,261 | ) | (100,850 | ) | |||||||||
Net
(loss) income before income taxes
|
(492,998 | ) | 216,017 | (1,043,407 | ) | 655,217 | ||||||||||
Benefit
from income taxes
|
156,000 | 78,000 | 392,000 | 130,000 | ||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (336,998 | ) | $ | 294,017 | $ | (651,407 | ) | $ | 785,217 | ||||||
Net
(loss) income per common share—basic
|
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
Net
(loss) income per common share—diluted
|
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 0.06 | ||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding—basic
|
11,333,477 | 11,006,591 | 11,286,263 | 10,706,680 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding—diluted
|
11,333,477 | 16,014,483 | 11,286,263 | 15,766,599 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
2
PHOTONIC
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (651,407 | ) | $ | 785,217 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
504,694 | 537,592 | ||||||
Common
stock contribution to retirement plan
|
179,068 | 160,181 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of fixed assets
|
— | (9,113 | ) | |||||
Gain
on sale of precious metals
|
(7,371 | ) | — | |||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(392,000 | ) | (204,000 | ) | ||||
Stock
based compensation
|
62,586 | 37,146 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,321,710 | (165,978 | ) | |||||
Inventories,
net
|
279,117 | (245,076 | ) | |||||
Other
current assets
|
(52,435 | ) | (72,621 | ) | ||||
Other
assets
|
34,106 | 32,051 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(457,733 | ) | (501,359 | ) | ||||
Customer
advances
|
(335,181 | ) | 204,379 | |||||
Total
adjustments
|
1,136,561 | (226,798 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
485,154 | 558,419 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(48,450 | ) | (366,864 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of precious metals
|
(53,538 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds
from redemption of certificates of deposit
|
800,000 | — | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of fixed assets
|
— | 10,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of precious metals
|
16,317 | — | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
714,329 | (356,864 | ) | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Redemption
of restricted stock units
|
(986 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
66,825 | 244,755 | ||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of warrants
|
50,625 | 807,587 | ||||||
Principal
payment of convertible note payable
|
— | (1,700,000 | ) | |||||
Principal
payments of other notes payable
|
(132,227 | ) | (7,441 | ) | ||||
Principal
payments of capital lease obligations
|
— | (41,158 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(15,763 | ) | (696,257 | ) | ||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
1,183,720 | (494,702 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,672,087 | 4,395,945 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 3,855,807 | $ | 3,901,243 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | ||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ | 11,441 | $ | 482,860 | ||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$ | 25,000 | $ | 360,000 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
3
PHOTONIC
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 -SUMMARY OF
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Photonic
Products Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") have been prepared in
Accordance with Form 10-Q instructions and, in the opinion of management,
reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, and disclosures
which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of
results for the interim periods.
The results have been determined on the
basis of generally accepted accounting principles and practices and applied
consistently with those used in the preparation of the Company's financial
statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed on Form
10-K. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in the financial statements presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or
omitted. These unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements as of December
31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended and notes thereto included in the
Company’s report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (first-in-first-out basis) or
market. Cost of manufactured goods includes material, labor and
overhead. The Company records a reserve for slow moving inventory as
a charge against earnings for all products identified as surplus, slow-moving or
discontinued. Excess work-in-process costs are charged against
earnings whenever estimated costs-of-completion exceed unbilled
revenues.
Inventories
are comprised of the following and are shown net of inventory
reserves:
June
30,
2009
(Unaudited)
|
December
31,
2008
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 1,005 | $ | 1,169 | ||||
Work
in process, including manufactured parts and components
|
903 | 1,117 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
545 | 446 | ||||||
$ | 2,453 | $ | 2,732 |
Income
Taxes
In
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), the Company recognizes
deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax
returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on
the difference between the financial statements carrying amounts and the tax
basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years
in which the differences are expected to reverse.
4
The
Company recorded a current tax benefit of $27,000 and a net current tax
liability of $26,000, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. In addition, the Company
reduced its deferred tax asset valuation allowance and recognized a deferred tax
benefit of $129,000 and $418,000, respectively, for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009. This resulted in a total benefit of $156,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and a net benefit of $392,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 after offsetting the tax benefit against the deferred
tax liability.
For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded a current tax
provision of $24,000 and $74,000, respectively, for estimated state and federal
alternative minimum tax liabilities. In addition, the company
recognized a deferred tax benefit of $102,000 and $204,000, respectively, for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008. This resulted in a net
benefit of $78,000 and $130,000,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 after
offsetting the tax benefit against the current tax provision.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, and
interpretation of SFAS No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements and requires that a tax position must be more likely than not to be
sustained before being recognized in the financial statements. The
tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are
measured based on the largest benefit that has a more likely than not chance of
being realized upon ultimate resolution. Under FIN 48, the Company
must also assess whether uncertain tax positions, as filed, could result in the
recognition of a liability for possible interest and penalties which the Company
would include as a component of income tax expense. For the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, there were no uncertain tax positions which would
give rise to the
recognition of tax liabilities in the Company’s financial
statements.
Net
(Loss) Income per Common Share
The basic
net (loss) income per common share is computed using the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the applicable period. The diluted
income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares
plus potential common equivalent shares outstanding, including the additional
dilution related to the conversion of stock options, unvested restricted stock
grants, warrants, convertible preferred shares, and potential common shares
issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes, except if the effect
on the per share amounts is anti-dilutive. For the three and six
months periods ended June 30, 2009, the potential dilutive effect of all common
equivalent shares outstanding have been excluded from the diluted computation
because their effect is anti-dilutive.
5
The
following is the reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per share
computations required by Statement of Financial Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128
(“Earnings per Share’):
Three Months Ended
June
30, 2009
|
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Income(Loss)
(Numerator)
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
Per Share
Amount
|
Income(Loss)
(Numerator)
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
Per Share
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per
Share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
(Loss) Income Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
$ | (336,998 | ) | 11,333,477 | $ | (0.03 | ) ) | $ | 294,017 | 11,006,591 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
Debt
|
— | — | 37,500 | 2,500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
|
— | — | — | 1,869,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Options
and stock grants
|
— | — | — | 638,794 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
(Loss) Earnings Per Share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
(Loss) Income Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
$ | (336,998 | ) | 11,333,477 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 331,517 | 16,014,483 | $ | 0.02 |
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Income(Loss)
(Numerator)
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
Per Share
Amount
|
Income(Loss)
(Numerator)
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
Per Share
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Basic
(Loss) Earnings Per Share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
(Loss) Income Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
$ | (651,407 | ) | 11,286,263 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 785,217 | 10,706,680 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debt
|
— | — | 75,000 | 2,500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
|
— | — | — | 1,906,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Options
and stock grants
|
— | — | — | 653,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per
Share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
(Loss) Income Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
$ | (651,407 | ) | 11,286,263 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 860,217 | 15,766,599 | $ | 0.06 |
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the recognition
and measurement provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
Under the
fair value recognition provision of SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation cost
is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the
award. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of
restricted stock units granted is based on the closing market price of the
Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. The fair value of
these awards, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, is amortized over the
requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting
period.
6
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”), issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a
replacement of FASB Statement No. 162”
(“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB
Standards Accounting Codification (“Codification”) as the source of
authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”)
recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities and rules and
interpretive releases of the SEC as authoritative GAAP for SEC
registrants. The Codification will supersede all the existing non-SEC
accounting and reporting standards upon its effective date and subsequently, the
FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. SFAS 168 also
replaces FASB Statement No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles” given that once in effect, the Codification will
carry the same level of authority. The Codification will be effective
for interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and will impact
the Company’s financial statement disclosures beginning with the quarter ending
September 30, 2009 as all future references to authoritative accounting
literature will be referenced in accordance with the
Codification. There will be no changes to the content of the
Company’s financial statements or disclosures as a result of implementing the
Codification.
In May
2009, the FASB issued SFAS 165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS
165”). SFAS 165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date
during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or
transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the
financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity should recognize
events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements, and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or
transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is
effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and will be
applied prospectively. The Company has adopted the requirements of
this pronouncement for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. In accordance
with SFAS 165, the Company reviewed events for inclusion in the financial
statements through August 12, 2009, the date that
the accompanying financial statements were issued. The adoption of
SFAS 165 did not impact the Company’s results of operations or financial
position.
NOTE
2- EQUITY COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
a)
|
2000
Equity Compensation Program
|
The
Company’s 2000 Equity Compensation Program provides for grants of options, stock
appreciation rights and performance shares to employees, officers, directors,
and others who render services to the Company. The program consists
of four plans including: (i) the Incentive Equity Compensation
Program which provides for grants of “Incentive Stock Options”, (ii) the
Supplemental Program which provides for grants of stock options to
non-employees, (iii) the SAR Program which allows the granting of stock
appreciation rights and, (iv) the Performance Share Program under which eligible
participants may receive stock awards, including restricted stock and restricted
stock units. The plans are administered by the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors. Under these plans, an aggregate of up to
6,000,000 shares of common stock may be granted. The 2000 Equity
Compensation plan expires in August 2010.
b)
|
Stock
Option Expense
|
The
Company's results for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include
stock-based compensation expense for stock option grants totaling $22,881 and
$8,733, respectively. Such amounts have been included in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations within cost of goods sold in
the amount of $1,829 ($2,076 for 2008), and selling, general and administrative
expenses in the amount of $21,052 ($6,657 for 2008).
The
Company’s results for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 include
stock-based compensation expense for stock option grants totaling $35,366 and
$17,466, respectively. Such amounts have been included in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations within cost of goods sold in
the amount of $3,269 ($4,152 for 2008), and selling, general and administrative
expenses in the amount of $32,099 ($13,314 for 2008).
7
As of
June 30, 2009 and 2008, there were $133,563 and $34,800 of unrecognized
compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested stock
options, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 2.75 years and 2.0 years, respectively.
The fair
value of option grants used to determine the stock option expense is estimated
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, as of the date of the
grant. The Company follows guidance under SFAS 123(R) when reviewing
and updating its assumptions. Expected volatility is based upon the
historical volatility of the Company’s stock and other contributing
factors. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
The
following range of weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the fair
value of stock option grants during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively:
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||
June
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Expected
Dividend yield
|
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Expected
Volatility
|
180 - 218 | % | 144.7 | % | ||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.5 – 3.2 | % | 3.5 | % | ||||
Expected
term
|
8
-10 years
|
10
years
|
c)
|
Stock
Option Activity
|
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, there were 97,584 options granted with a
weighted average estimated fair value of $1.68 and a weighted average exercise
price of $1.70, which was equal to the closing market price on the date of the
grant. Of these grants, 7,742 stock options had a term of 3 years and
vested as of the grant date. There were no stock options granted in
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The
following table represents our stock options granted, exercised, and forfeited
during the six month period ended June 30, 2009.
Stock
Options
|
Number
of
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
per Option
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2009
|
1,030,139 | $ | 1.50 | 3.9 | $ | 161,000 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
97,584 | 1.70 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(49,500 | ) | 1.35 | |||||||||||||
Expired
|
(25,000 | ) | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
at June
30, 2009
|
1,053,223 | $ | 1.53 | 3.2 | $ | – | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at June
30, 2009
|
959,995 | $ | 1.52 | 2.5 | $ | – |
8
The
following table represents non-vested stock options granted, vested, and
forfeited for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Non-vested Options
|
Options
|
Weighted-Average Grant-Date
Fair Value
|
||||||
Non-vested -
January 1, 2009
|
33,220 | $ | 1.48 | |||||
Granted
|
97,584 | $ | 1.68 | |||||
Vested
|
(37,577 | ) | $ | 1.31 | ||||
Expired
|
— | — | ||||||
Non-vested
– June 30, 2009
|
93,228 | $ | 1.67 |
The total
fair value of options vested during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
was $49,000 and $35,000, respectively.
d)
|
Restricted
Stock Unit Awards
|
The
Company's results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 include
stock-based compensation expense of $16,112 and $27,220, respectively, for
restricted stock unit grants under the Company’s 2000 Performance Share
Program. Such amounts have been included in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations within cost of goods sold in the amount of
$1,336 and $2,669, respectively, and in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the amount of $14,776 and $24,551, respectively. There
were no grants of restricted stock units under this plan during the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
The
Company's results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 include
stock-based compensation expense of $9,840 and $19,680, respectively, for
restricted stock unit grants under the Company’s 2000 Performance Share
Program. Such amounts have been included in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations within cost of goods sold in the amount of
$1,335 and $2,670, respectively, and in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the amount of $8,505 and $17,010, respectively. During
the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company granted 17,500 restricted stock
unit awards with a fair value of $70,000 based on the closing market price of
the Company’s common stock, on the grant date.
Restricted
stock unit awards generally vest over a three year period contingent on
continued employment or service over the vesting period.
9
A summary
of the Company’s non-vested restricted stock units at June 30, 2009 is presented
below:
Restricted Stock
Units
|
Weighted-Average Grant-
Date Fair Value
|
|||||||
Non-vested
- January 1, 2009
|
31,500 | $ | 3.72 | |||||
Granted
|
— | — | ||||||
Vested
|
7,504 | $ | 4.00 | |||||
Forfeited
|
— | — | ||||||
Non-vested
– June 30, 2009
|
23,996 | $ | 3.64 |
During
the three month period ended March 31, 2009, the Company reduced its combined
work-force by 24 employees or approximately 23%, to reduce costs and align
PPGI’s workforce with current business requirements while ensuring the Company
would continue to meet its customers’ needs. The reductions affected
both the Company’s Northvale, NJ and the Sarasota, FL operations.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s severance expense, including cash
payments during the first quarter of 2009 and accrued severance expense included
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as
of March 31, 2009 (in thousands).
Severance expense recorded in the
first quarter of 2009
|
$ | 140 | |||
Cash payments made in the first
quarter of 2009
|
(86 | ) | |||
Accrued severance expense as of
March 31, 2009
|
`
|
$ | 54 |
Severance
expense, net of related payroll savings, did not significantly affect the
Company’s operating results for the first quarter. Annualized savings
from the reductions are expected to be approximately $1.1 million.
NOTE
3- Expiration of Warrants
On July
13, 2009, 893,790 outstanding warrants, with a fair value of $1.29 each, expired
in accordance with the terms of the warrant agreement. These warrants
provided the right to the holder to purchase an equivalent number of shares of
the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.35 per share.
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Caution
Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This
Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in
the federal securities laws. The Company wishes to insure that any
forward-looking statements are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements
in order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor provided by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The events described in the
forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report may not
occur. Generally, these statements relate to business plans or
strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of the
Company’s plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits of acquisitions
made by the Company, projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings, or
other aspects of the Company’s operating results. The words “may”,
“will”, “expect”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”,
“estimate”, and “continue”, and their opposites and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company cautions
you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and
are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks, and other influences, many of
which are beyond the Company’s control, that may influence the accuracy of the
statements and the projections upon which the statements are
based. Factors which may affect the Company’s results include, but
are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed in Items 7 and 7A of
the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009. Any one or more
of these uncertainties, risks, and other influences could materially affect the
Company’s results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by
the Company ultimately prove to be accurate. Readers are further
cautioned that the Company’s financial results can vary from quarter to quarter,
and the financial results for any period may not necessarily be indicative of
future results. The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive
list of all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in forward-looking statements made by the
Company. The Company’s actual results, performance and achievements
could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking
statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update
or revise any forward looking statements, whether from new information, future
events, or otherwise.
10
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and further discussed in our annual financial
statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K. In preparing
our consolidated financial statements, we made estimates and judgments that
affect the results of our operations and the value of assets and liabilities we
report. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
For
additional information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates,
see the section entitled “Managements’ Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
Results
of Operations
Photonic
Products Group, Inc.’s business falls into two product categories: Optical
Components (including standard and custom optical components and assemblies,
crystals, and crystal components), and Laser Accessories (including wavelength
conversion instruments that employ nonlinear or electro-optical crystals to
perform the function of wavelength conversion, or optical switching, and optical
Q-switches). Its optical components product lines and services are
brought to market through three business units: INRAD, Laser Optics, and MRC
Optics (“MRC”). Laser accessories are manufactured and sold by
INRAD.
Revenue
Sales for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 were $2,620,000 compared with sales of
$4,007,000 in the second quarter of 2008, down 34.6%. Sales for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 were $5,436,000 compared with sales of $8,172,000
for the six months ended June 30, 2008, down 33.5%.
Sales of
custom optical components fell approximately 31.5% and 31.6% in the second
quarter of 2009 and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the related
periods in 2008. This reflected decreased sales at both the Laser
Optics and Inrad business units, for this product segment. Offsetting
the decline, sales of custom optical components from the MRC Metal Optics
business unit increased by approximately 14.3% and 14.2%, respectively compared
to the second quarter and six month periods in 2008.
11
Sales of
laser accessories decreased by 59.6% in the second quarter this year compared to
the same period last year, as a result of reduced demand for laser systems and
related components. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 sales of
laser accessories were 54.9% lower than 2008.
The decrease in sales
generally reflects the ongoing softness in customer demand, the in-sourcing of
component supply
and the effects of tight management of
inventories through the current economic downturn, by the Company’s major
customers in
both the defense sector and commercial sector.
Sales to major customers,
defined as those who represent more than 10% of period sales, fell
significantly. One major OEM customer in the defense sector showed a
sales decrease of 64% and 43%, respectively in the three month and six month
periods ended June 30, 2009, as compared to the previous year. Another major customer in the
process control and metrology sector, pushed out scheduled deliveries until late
2009 and into 2010 with a resulting
drop in sales of 71% and 85% over the
three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, in comparison to the same
periods last year. Sales to the Company’s top five customers which
represented almost $2.7 million and $5.3 million of sales in the second quarter
and first six months of 2008 fell by approximately $1.2 million
and $2.2 million, respectively.
The
Company has refocused its sales and marketing efforts on expanding its current
markets and adding to its customer base so as to be positioned to take advantage
of new opportunities as economic conditions improve.
Product
backlog was $5.4 million at June 30, 2009 compared to backlog of $10.1 million
at June 30, 2008. The current period backlog level reflects lower new
order activity throughout the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first two quarters
of 2009. This was primarily attributable to the current economic
slowdown and its impact on our customers who experienced a decline in business
activity and reduced demand for our products, as discussed
above.
By
comparison, product backlog was down 11.5% from $6.1 million at December 31,
2008.
Cost
of Goods Sold
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009, cost of goods sold was $2,201,000 or 84.0% of
sales compared to $2,788,000 or 69.6% of sales, for the same period last
year. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, cost of goods sold was
$4,635,000 or 85.3% of sales compared to $2,721,000 or 66.7% for the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
Material
costs in dollar terms were down by 27.3% and 24.7% in the second quarter and six
month period in 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008, primarily as a result
of lower sales volumes this year. As a percentage of sales, however,
material costs were higher in both the second quarter and six months ending June
30, 2009, compared to 2008. Material costs at MRC rose as a result of
a sales mix of products with higher metal cost components. This
offset reductions in material costs in the INRAD business unit which were driven
by lower sales of laser accessories and systems which have a high material cost
component. Overall, raw material commodity prices have remained flat
during the six months ended June 30, 2009, relative to the same period in
2008.
In the
second quarter of 2009, manufacturing wages and salaries fell by 39.7%, year
over year, due to the impact of the Company’s work force reduction plan in the
first quarter of 2009, net of termination costs. For the six months
ended June 30, 2009, manufacturing and wages were down 15.6% compared to the
same period in 2008. Despite the savings, overall labor costs as a
percentage of sales, increased as sales declines outstripped wage and salary
reductions after accounting for related termination costs.
12
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009, manufacturing overheads decreased by $155,000
or 15.5% from the second quarter in 2008 and $170,000 or 8.6% lower for the
comparable six month periods in 2009 and 2008. Lower costs reflect
management’s tight control of expenditures and cost-reduction plans in response
to lower sales levels.
Despite
the decrease in costs, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
manufacturing overheads as a percentage of sales were up 29.3% and 37.5%,
respectively, over the prior year periods. This reflects the large
percentage of fixed or semi-fixed costs which are relatively unaffected by lower
sales volumes which were down 34.6% and 33.5% in the second quarter and six
month periods, respectively.
Gross
margin in the second quarter was $419,000 or 16.0%, compared with a gross margin
of $1,219,000 or 30.4% in the comparable period of 2008, reflecting the factors
discussed above. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the gross
margin was $801,000 or 14.7%, compared with $5,451,000 or 33.3% for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (“SG&A” expenses) in the three months
ended June 30, 2009 were $880,000 or 33.6% of sales compared to $978,000 or
24.4% of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2008. This
represents a decrease of approximately $98,000 or 10.0%. SG&A
salaries and wages were down $86,000 reflecting personnel reductions implemented
in the first quarter. Consulting fees were down $25,000 from the
second quarter of 2008 related mainly to Sarbanes-Oxley implementation and
accounting support in the prior year. Trade show expenses were
$16,000 higher as compared to the second quarter of last year, mainly due to
timing differences in the dates of shows which the Company attended this
year.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009 SG&A expenses were $1,787,000 or 32.9% of
sales compared to $1,965,000 or 24.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2008, a
decrease of $178,000 or 9.1%. SG&A wages and salaries expense
were down by $83,000 in comparison to last year’s levels, as discussed
above. In addition, recruiting and relocation fees were down by
$16,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to last
year. For the six month period, consulting fees were down by $41,000
as Sarbanes-Oxley support and related fees in 2008 were not incurred this
period.
The
Company plans to continue its focus on tight cost control and closely monitor
and manage discretionary SG&A expenses, to identify opportunities for future
cost reductions.
Operating
(Loss) Income
The
Company had an operating loss of $(461,000) in the three months ended June 30,
2009 and an operating loss of $(986,000) in the six months ended June 30, 2009
primarily reflecting the decrease in sales and the impact of the Company’s
relatively fixed overhead expenses, as discussed above. This compares
to operating income of $241,000 and $756,000 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008, respectively.
Other
Income and Expense
For the
three months ended June 30, 2009, net interest expense was $32,000, a slight
decrease from net interest expense of $34,000 in the second quarter of last
year.
For the
six months ended June 30, 2009, net interest expense was $65,000, a decrease
from net interest expense of $110,000 in the comparable period last
year. Lower interest expense resulted from reduced balances of fixed
interest debt which primarily reflected the Company’s re-payment of a $1.7
million Secured Promissory Note in the first quarter of 2008. In
addition, interest payments were lower on reduced balances of other notes and
capital leases.
13
Interest
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008, included the amortization of
warrant costs in the amount of $37,000 related to the $1.7 million note which
was retired in the first quarter of 2008, as discussed above.
Interest
income, which is netted against interest expense on the Consolidated Statements
of Operations was $20,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to
$35,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008 as a result of reduced balances
in, and lower interest rates and on short term certificates of
deposit.
In the
first quarter of 2009, the Company sold surplus tools and recorded a gain of
$7,371 on the sale.
Income
Taxes
In
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), the Company recognizes
deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax
returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on
the difference between the financial statements carrying amounts and the tax
basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years
in which the differences are expected to reverse.
The
Company recorded a current tax benefit of $27,000 and a current tax liability of
$26,000, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, respectively. In addition, the Company reduced its
deferred tax asset valuation allowance and recognized a deferred tax benefit of
$129,000 and $418,000, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009. This resulted in a total benefit of $156,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and a net benefit of $392,000 for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 after offsetting the tax benefit against the deferred tax
liability.
For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded a current tax
provision of $24,000 and $74,000, respectively, for estimated state and federal
alternative minimum tax liabilities. In addition, the company
recognized a deferred tax benefit of $102,000 and $204,000, respectively, for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008. This resulted in a net
benefit of $78,000 and $130,000,
respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 after
offsetting the tax benefit against the current tax provision.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, and
interpretation of SFAS No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements and requires that a tax position must be more likely than not to be
sustained before being recognized in the financial statements. The
tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are
measured based on the largest benefit that has a more likely than not chance of
being realized upon ultimate resolution. Under FIN 48, the Company
must also assess whether uncertain tax positions, as filed, could result in the
recognition of a liability for possible interest and penalties which the Company
would include as a component of income tax expense. For the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008, there were no uncertain tax positions which would
give rise to the
recognition of tax liabilities in the Company’s financial
statements.
14
Net
Income
The
Company had a net loss of $(337,000) and $(651,000), respectively, for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to net income of $294,000 and
$785,000, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, mainly
as a result of lower sales and reduced profit margins, net of the positive
impact of SG&A cost reductions in the current periods, as discussed
above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company’s primary source of cash in recent years has been from operating cash
flows. Other sources of cash include proceeds received from the
exercise of stock options and warrants in return for the issuance of common
stock. The Company’s major uses of cash in the past two years have
been for capital expenditures and for repayment and servicing of outstanding
debt. Based upon the current level of operations we believe our
existing cash resources, as well as cash flows from future operating activities
will be adequate to meet our anticipated cash requirements for principal and
interest payments on our outstanding indebtedness, working capital, new product
development, capital
expenditures, contractual obligations and other operating needs over the balance
of the year. During the first six months of 2009 and 2008, our
primary sources of capital were cash from operating activities. The
following table summarizes the net cash provided and used by operating,
investing and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 (dollars in thousands):
Six months ended June
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
$
|
485
|
$
|
558
|
||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
714
|
(357
|
)
|
|||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(16
|
)
|
(696
|
)
|
||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,184
|
$
|
(495
|
)
|
Net cash
flow provided by operating activities was $485,000 for the six months ended June
30, 2009, compared with net cash flow provided by operating activities of
$558,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2008. The decrease in
operating cash flows was due to several factors, but primarily resulted from the
Company’s net loss of $651,000 compared to net income of $785,000 in the
comparable period last year. This decrease was offset by improved
working capital levels related to reductions in inventory and account receivable
levels, net of lower customer advances, as compared to the six month ended June
30, 2008.
In the
first six months of 2009, a reduction in accounts receivable balances provided
$1,322,000 of cash flow primarily as a result of the sales volume decline during
the period. Accounts receivable balances fell from $2,811,000 at
December 31, 2008 to $1,489,000 at June 30, 2009 compared to an increase in
accounts receivable in the amount of $166,000 in the comparable period in
2008.
Inventory
levels decreased by $279,000 to $2,453,000 at June 30, 2009 compared to an
increase of $245,000 in the six month period ended June 30, 2008. The
decrease in inventory from the comparable period last year is primarily
attributable to a decline in booking levels and lower production levels due to
reduced customer demand in the first six months of 2009. In the first
quarter of 2008 delayed shipments at MRC led to an increase in inventory levels
in that period.
15
Customer
advances decreased by $335,000 to $122,000 in the first six months of 2009,
directly a result of lower booking levels in the first six months of
2009. In the comparable period in 2008, customer advances increased
by $204,000 to $1,075,000.
Cash
flows provided by investing activities were $714,000 in the first six months of
2009, primarily from the redemption of $800,000 of certificates of deposit with
terms classified separately from cash and cash equivalents at December 31,
2008. Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2009
were $48,000 down from $ 367,000, in the six months ended June 30,
2008. Management has instituted a review program for planned capital
expenditures in order to identify and defer expenditures, where practical, to
minimize the impact on the Company’s cash flows over the balance of the
year. In addition, in 2009, the Company purchased a platinum crucible
used in the production of high-temperature crystals in the amount of
$54,000. The purchase price of $54,000 was offset by the proceeds of
surplus platinum sold by the Company to the crucible manufacturer for $16,000,
in the same period.
Net cash
used in financing activities during the first six months of 2009 totaled $16,000
and consisted primarily of principal payments of $132,000 on other long term
notes offset by the proceeds from the exercise of warrants of $51,000 and on the
exercise of stock options in the amount of $67,000. In the first six
months of 2008, net cash used in financing activities was
$696,000. During this period, the Company repaid a secured promissory
note for $1,700,000 (plus accrued interest of $477,000) to Clarex Limited, a
major shareholder. This was offset by proceeds received from the
exercise of warrants and stock options during the first six months of 2008, in
the amount of $808,000 and $245,000, respectively.
The
Company had a net increase in cash and cash equivalents of $1,184,000 in the six
months ended June 30, 2009. In the corresponding period, last year
the Company had a net decrease of cash and cash equivalents of
$495,000.
Cash and
cash equivalents at June 30, 2009 were $3,856,000. At December 31,
2008, the Company had $2,672,000 in cash and cash equivalents and $800,000 in
certificates of deposit with original maturities greater than 90
days,
In March
2009, the maturity dates of two 6% Subordinated Convertible Promissory Notes to
related parties, totaling $2,500,000, were extended to April 1, 2011, at the
same terms. The Notes are convertible into 2,500,000 Units consisting
of 2,500,000 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire 1,875,000 shares of
common stock at a price of $1.35 per share. The expiration date of
the warrants has been extended to April 1, 2014.
On July
13, 2009, 894,000 outstanding warrants each with a fair market value of $1.29
expired in accordance with the terms of the warrant agreement. These
warrants were originally issued in 2004 when the Company entered into an
agreement with an investment banking firm to raise equity through a private
placement of the Company’s common stock. The Company originally
issued 1,581,000 Units consisting of 1,581,000 shares and warrants to acquire an
additional 1,185,750 shares at an exercise price of $1.35 per
share. In addition, 276,675 Warrants were issued to Casimir Capital,
LP, who was the placement agent for the private placement. The issued
shares and shares underlying warrants were subsequently registered under an S-1
Registration filing.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
Company believes that it has limited exposure to changes in interest rates from
investments in certain money market accounts. The Company does not
utilize derivative instruments or other market risk sensitive instruments to
manage exposure to interest rate changes.
16
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
a. Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
During
the three months ended June 30, 2009, our management, including the principal
executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) related to the recording, processing,
summarization and reporting of information in the reports that we file with the
SEC. These disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to
ensure that material information relating to us, including our subsidiaries, is
made known to our management, including these officers and that this information
is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable,
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Due
to inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be
detected. Our controls and procedures can only provide reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have been met.
Based
upon their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of June 30, 2009 to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
b. Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the
quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
Not
applicable
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UNDER SENIOR
SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A
VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
a)
|
On
May 13, 2009, Photonic Products Group, Inc. held its annual meeting of
shareholders.
|
b)
|
At
the annual meeting, the shareholders elected Luke P. LaValle, Jr., Thomas
H. Lenagh, Joseph J. Rutherford and N.E. “Rick” Strandlund as Directors to
serve for a one (1) year term each by a vote for each of 8,741,743 in
favor and with 266,450 votes
withheld.
|
17
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
Following
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 13, 2009, the Board of Directors
unanimously approved the appointment of Mr. Jan M. Winston as Chairman of the
Board of Directors, replacing Mr. John C. Rich who, as previously reported, did
not stand for re-election to the Board.
The Board
also unanimously approved the appointment of Mr. Joseph J. Rutherford as
President and CEO, William J. Foote as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer, William D. Brucker as Vice-President, Human Resources and
Administration, John R. Ryan as Vice-President of Sales and Marketing and Miro
Dosoudil as Vice-President of Operations.
18
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
11.
|
An
exhibit showing the computation of per-share earnings is omitted because
the computation can be clearly determined from the material contained in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
|
31.1
|
Certificate
of the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer, Joseph J. Rutherford,
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certificate
of the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer, William J. Foote, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certificate
of the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer, Joseph J. Rutherford,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Certificate
of the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer, William J. Foote, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
19
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Photonic
Products Group, Inc.
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph
J. Rutherford
|
Joseph
J. Rutherford
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William
J. Foote
|
William
J. Foote
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and
Secretary
|
Date: August
12, 2009
20