Inrad Optics, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
transition period from
to
Commission
file number 0-11668
PHOTONIC PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Jersey
|
22-2003247
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
or
organization)
|
|
Identification
Number)
|
181 Legrand Avenue, Northvale, NJ 07647
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(Zip
Code)
(201) 767-1910
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and formal fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
Yes x No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No
¨ The
Registrant is not yet subject to this requirement.
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange act).
Yes ¨
No x
Common
shares of stock outstanding as of May 10, 2009:
11,297,866
shares
Photonic
Products Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
INDEX
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|
Consolidated
balance sheets as of March 31, 2009 (unaudited) and December
31, 2008 (audited)
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
statements of operations for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008 (unaudited)
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
statements of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 (unaudited)
|
3
|
|
Notes
to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
12
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
17
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
17
|
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
18 |
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
18
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
18
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
18
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
18
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
18
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
18
|
Signatures
|
19
|
PHOTONIC
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 2,941,545 | $ | 2,672,087 | ||||
Certificates
of deposit
|
807,738 | 800,000 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $15,000
in 2009 and 2008)
|
1,796,072 | 2,810,602 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
2,639,186 | 2,732,336 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
259,153 | 188,084 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
8,443,694 | 9,203,109 | ||||||
Plant
and equipment:
|
||||||||
Plant
and equipment, at cost
|
14,482,251 | 14,445,027 | ||||||
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(11,372,620 | ) | (11,139,771 | ) | ||||
Total
plant and equipment
|
3,109,631 | 3,305,526 | ||||||
Precious
Metals
|
157,443 | 112,851 | ||||||
Deferred
Income Taxes
|
644,000 | 408,000 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
1,869,646 | 1,869,646 | ||||||
Intangible
Assets, net
|
731,939 | 751,580 | ||||||
Other
Assets
|
47,852 | 81,707 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 15,004,205 | $ | 15,732,149 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’
Equity
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Current
portion of notes payable –other
|
$ | 135,165 | $ | 136,892 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
1,674,821 | 2,160,665 | ||||||
Customer
advances
|
331,309 | 456,754 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
2,141,295 | 2,754,311 | ||||||
Related
Party Convertible Notes Payable
|
2,500,000 | 2,500,000 | ||||||
Other
Long Term Notes
|
351,467 | 353,663 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
4,992,762 | 5,607,974 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
— | — | ||||||
Shareholders’
Equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock: $.01 par value; 60,000,000 authorized shares; 11,302,466 shares
issued at March 31, 2009 and 11,230,678 issued at December 31,
2008
|
113,023 | 112,306 | ||||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
16,823,426 | 16,622,466 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(6,910,056 | ) | (6,595,647 | ) | ||||
10,026,393 | 10,139,125 | |||||||
Less
- Common stock in treasury, at cost (4,600 shares
respectively)
|
(14,950 | ) | (14,950 | ) | ||||
Total
Shareholders’ Equity
|
10,011,443 | 10,124,175 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$ | 15,004,205 | $ | 15,732,149 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1
PHOTONIC
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Total
Revenue
|
$ | 2,815,097 | $ | 4,164,248 | ||||
Cost
and Expenses:
|
||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
2,433,410 | 2,662,655 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
907,079 | 986,813 | ||||||
3,340,489 | 3,649,468 | |||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(525,392 | ) | 514,780 | |||||
Other
income (expense):
|
||||||||
Interest
expense—net
|
(32,388 | ) | (75,580) | |||||
Gain
on sale of precious metals
|
7,371 | — | ||||||
(25,017 | ) | (75,580) | ||||||
Net
(loss) income before income taxes
|
(550,409 | ) | 439,200 | |||||
Benefit
from income taxes
|
236,000 | 52,000 | ||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (314,409 | ) | $ | 491,200 | |||
Net
(loss) income per common share — basic
|
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||
Net
(loss) income per common share — diluted
|
$ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.03 | |||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding— basic
|
11,260,199 | 10,535,075 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding— diluted
|
11,260,199 | 15,862,817 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
2
PHOTONIC
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (314,409 | ) | $ | 491,200 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
252,490 | 270,188 | ||||||
401(K)
common stock contribution
|
179,068 | 160,181 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of precious metals
|
(7,371 | ) | — | |||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(236,000 | ) | (102,000 | ) | ||||
Stock
based compensation
|
23,595 | 18,573 | ||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
1,014,530 | (184,226 | ) | |||||
Inventories,
net
|
93,150 | (363,989 | ) | |||||
Other
current assets
|
(71,069 | ) | (32,326 | ) | ||||
Other
assets
|
33,855 | 36,721 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(485,844 | ) | (217,335 | ) | ||||
Customer
advances
|
(125,445 | ) | (300,011 | ) | ||||
Total
adjustments
|
670,959 | (714,224 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
356,550 | (223,024 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(37,224 | ) | (186,363 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of precious metals
|
(53,538 | ) | — | |||||
Purchase
of certificate of deposit, net
|
(7,738 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds
from sale of precious metals
|
16,317 | — | ||||||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(82,183 | ) | (186,363 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Redemption
of restricted stock units
|
(986 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
— | 139,580 | ||||||
Exercise
of warrants
|
— | 591,587 | ||||||
Principal
payment of convertible note payable
|
— | (1,700,000 | ) | |||||
Principal
payments of other notes payable
|
(3,923 | ) | (3,699 | ) | ||||
Principal
payments of capital lease obligations
|
— | (22,006 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(4,909 | ) | (994,538 | ) | ||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
269,458 | (1,403,925 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,672,087 | 4,395,945 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 2,941,545 | $ | 2,992,020 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ | 3,596 | $ | 482,860 | ||||
Income
taxes paid
|
$ | 50,000 | $ | 10,000 |
See Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
3
PHOTONIC
PRODUCTS GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 -SUMMARY OF
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Photonic
Products Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") reflect all adjustments,
which are of a normal recurring nature, and disclosures which, in the opinion of
management, are necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim
periods. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements
be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years then ended and notes thereto
included in the Company’s report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Cash
and cash equivalents
The
Company considers cash-on-hand and highly liquid investments with original
maturity dates of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash and
cash equivalents. Investments with original maturity dates exceeding
three months are separately disclosed on the consolidated balance sheets and as
cash flows from investing activities on the consolidated statements of cash
flows.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (first-in-first-out basis) or
market. Cost of manufactured goods includes material, labor and
overhead. The Company records a reserve for slow moving inventory as
a charge against earnings for all products identified as surplus, slow-moving or
discontinued. Excess work-in-process costs are charged against
earnings whenever estimated costs-of-completion exceed unbilled
revenues.
Inventories
are comprised of the following and are shown net of inventory
reserves:
March 31,
2009
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 1,027 | $ | 1,169 | ||||
Work
in process, including manufactured parts and components
|
1,117 | 1,117 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
495 | 446 | ||||||
$ | 2,639 | $ | 2,732 |
Income
Taxes
In
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), the Company recognizes
deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax
returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on
the difference between the financial statements carrying amounts and the tax
basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years
in which the differences are expected to reverse.
The
Company recorded a current provision of $53,000 for estimated state
and federal alternative minimum tax, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. In addition, the company reduced
its deferred tax asset valuation allowance and recognized a deferred tax benefit
of $289,000. This resulted in a net benefit of $236,000 after
offsetting the tax benefit against the deferred tax liability.
4
For the
three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded a current tax provision
of $50,000 for estimated state and federal alternative minimum tax
liabilities. In addition, the company recognized a deferred tax
benefit of $102,000. This resulted in a net benefit of $52,000 after
offsetting the tax benefit against the current tax provision.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, and
interpretation of SFAS No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements and requires that a tax position must be more likely than not to be
sustained before being recognized in the financial statements. The
tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are
measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of
being realized upon ultimate resolution. Under FIN 48, the Company
must also assess whether uncertain tax positions, as filed, could result in the
recognition of a liability for possible interest and penalties which the Company
would include as a component of income tax expense. For the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not recognize any tax
liabilities related to uncertain tax positions.
Net
(Loss) Income per Common Share
The basic
net (loss) income per common share is computed using the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the applicable period. The diluted
income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares
plus potential common equivalent shares outstanding, including the additional
dilution related to the conversion of stock options, unvested restricted stock
grants, warrants, convertible preferred shares, and potential common shares
issuable upon conversion of outstanding convertible notes, except if the effect
on the per share amounts is anti-dilutive. For the three month
periods ended March 31, 2009, the potential dilutive effect of all common
equivalent shares outstanding have been excluded from the diluted computation
because their effect is anti-dilutive.
The
following is the reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per share
computations required by Statement of Financial Standards (“SFAS”) No. 128
(“Earnings per Share’):
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2009
|
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Income(Loss)
(Numerator)
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
Per Share
Amount
|
Income(Loss)
(Numerator)
|
Shares
(Denominator)
|
Per Share
Amount
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Basic Earnings Per
Share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
(Loss) Income Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
$ | (314,409 | ) | 11,260,199 | $ | (0.03 | ) ) | $ | 491,200 | 10,535,075 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
Debt
|
— | — | 37,500 | 2,500,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
|
— | — | — | 2,089,502 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Options
and stock grants
|
— | — | — | 738,240 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
Earnings Per Share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
(Loss) Income Applicable to Common Shareholders
|
$ | (314,409 | ) | 11,260,199 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 528,700 | 15,862,817 | $ | 0.03 |
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the recognition
and measurement provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
5
Under the
fair value recognition provision of SFAS 123(R), stock-based compensation cost
is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the
award. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options granted
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of
restricted stock units granted is based on the closing market price of the
Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. The fair value of
these awards, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, is amortized over the
requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting
period.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements and Updates
In
December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) will significantly change
the accounting for business combinations. Under SFAS 141(R), an
acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with
limited exceptions. SFAS 141(R) will change the accounting treatment
for certain specific items, including:
· Non-controlling interests (formerly
known as “minority interests”) will be recorded at fair value at the acquisition
date;
· Acquired contingent liabilities will be
recorded at fair value at the acquisition date and subsequently measured at
either the higher of such amount or the amount determined under existing
guidance for non-acquired contingencies;
· In-process research and development
will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the
acquisition date;
· Restructuring costs associated with a
business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition
date; and
· Changes in deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally
will affect income tax expense.
SFAS
141(R) also includes a substantial number of new disclosure
requirements. Company adopted SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009
and will apply it prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after this date. The adoption of SFAS
141(R) will have an impact on the Company’s accounting for future business
combinations, but the effect is dependent upon the type and structure of any
acquisitions that it may make in the future.
The FASB
issued FASB Statement No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements - An Amendment of ARB No. 51” in December 2007 (“SFAS
160”). SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and reporting standards
for the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement requires the recognition
of a non-controlling interest (minority interest) as equity in the consolidated
financial statements. The amount of net income attributable to the
non-controlling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the face
of the income statement. Statement 160 clarifies that changes in a
parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in
deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling
financial interest. In addition, this statement requires that a
parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be measured using the fair
value of the non-controlling equity investment on the deconsolidation
date. Statement 160 also includes expanded disclosure requirements
regarding the interests of the parent and its non-controlling
interest. Statement 160 is effective for the Company as of January 1,
2009. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS
No. 160 but the information regarding non-controlling interests in a
subsidiary is immaterial to the 2009 consolidated financial
statements.
6
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-1, Application of FASB Statement
No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements
That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13, and FSP No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157. FSP No. 157-1 amends SFAS No. 157 to
exclude SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, and
its related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address leasing
transactions. FSP No. 157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS
No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except
those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements
on a recurring basis (at least annually), until the beginning of the first
quarter of 2009 for the Company. The Company adopted SFAS
No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities but it is not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s 2009 consolidated financial
statements. However, the determination of fair value for purposes of
accounting for business combinations and for conducting periodic
assessments of goodwill and other long-lived assets for impairment will be made
using the definition of fair value prescribed by SFAS No. 157.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities-An Amendment of SFAS
No. 133. The new standard is intended to improve
financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by
requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to better understand their
effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. It is effective for periods beginning after November 15,
2008, with early application encouraged. The Company adopted SFAS
No. 161 on January 1, 2009 but does not expect it to have a material impact
on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets. FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that
should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognizable intangible asset under SFAS
No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. The intent of FSP No. 142-3 is
to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognizable intangible
asset under SFAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141(R), and other
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company
adopted FSP No. 142-3 on January 1, 2009 but does not expect it to have a
material impact on its 2009 consolidated financial statements.
In June
2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 03-6-1,
“Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are
Participating Securities” (“FSP EITF 03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1
provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are
participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings
per share pursuant to the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Upon adoption, companies are required to retrospectively
adjust earnings per share data (including any amounts related to interim
periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to conform to
provisions of FSP EITF 03-6-1. The Company determined the adoption of
FSP EITF 03-6-1 will not have a material impact on its 2009 consolidated
financial statements.
In
June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue 07-5, “Determining Whether an
Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF
07-5”). Paragraph 11(a) of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No 133, Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 133”) specifies
that a contract that would otherwise meet the definition of a derivative, but is
both (a) indexed our own stock and (b) classified in stockholders’
equity in the statement of financial position would not be considered a
derivative financial instrument. EITF 07-5 provides a new two-step
model to be applied in determining whether a financial instrument or an embedded
feature is indexed to an issuer’s own stock, including evaluating the
instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions, and thus able to
qualify for the SFAS 133 paragraph 11(a) scope exception. It also
clarifies the impact of foreign-currency-denominated strike prices and
market-based employee stock option valuation instruments on the
evaluation. The Company adopted EITF issue 07-5 in the first quarter
of 2009. The adoption of EITF 07-5 did not have a material impact on
the Company’s 2009 consolidated financial statements.
7
In April
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff
Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS 157-4”). FSP FAS 157-4
provides additional guidance for determining the fair value of assets and
liabilities when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability
have significantly decreased. FSP FAS 157-4 also provides guidance on
identifying circumstances that indicate an observed transaction used to
determine fair value is not orderly and, therefore, is not indicative of fair
value. FSP FAS 157-4 is effective for interim and annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does not anticipate the
adoption of this FSP will have a material impact on its results of operations,
cash flows or financial condition.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments” (“FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2”). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 changes the method for
determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists for debt
securities by requiring a company to assess whether it is probable that it will
not be able to recover the cost basis of a security utilizing several factors,
including the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less
than the cost basis, adverse conditions related to a particular security and
volatility of a particular security. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 also
requires that an other-than-temporary impairment charge for debt securities be
recorded in earnings if it is more-likely-than-not that the entity will sell or
be required to sell a security before anticipated recovery of the cost
basis. In addition, if any portion of a decline in fair value below
the cost basis of a security is related to credit losses, such amount should be
recorded in earnings. Lastly, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 expands and
increases the frequency of existing disclosures about other-than-temporary
impairments for debt and equity securities to all interim and annual
periods. FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 are effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that the adoption of FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 will have
on its results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1”). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 increases the frequency of certain
fair value disclosures from annual to quarterly. Such disclosures
include the fair value of all financial instruments within the scope of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 107, “Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” as well as the methods and significant
assumptions used to estimate fair value. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1
is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company does
not anticipate the adoption of these statements to materially affect the current
disclosures.
8
NOTE
2- EQUITY COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
a)
|
2000
Equity Compensation Program
|
The
Company’s 2000 Equity Compensation Program provides for grants of options, stock
appreciation rights and performance shares to employees, officers, directors,
and others who render services to the Company. The program consists
of four plans including: (i) the Incentive Equity Compensation
Program which provide for grants of “Incentive Stock Options”, (ii) the
Supplemental Program which provide for grants of stock options to non-employees,
(iii) the SAR Program which allows the granting of stock appreciation rights
and, (iv) the Performance Share Program under which eligible participants may
receive stock awards, including restricted stock and restricted stock
units. The plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors. Under these plans, an aggregate of up to
6,000,000 shares of common stock may be granted. The 2000 Equity
Compensation plan expires in August 2010.
b)
|
Stock
Option Expense
|
The
Company's results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 include
share-based compensation expense for stock option grants, as required by SFAS
123(R), totaling $12,487 and $8,733, respectively. Such amounts have
been included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations within
cost of goods sold in the amount of $1,440 ($2,076 for 2008), and selling,
general and administrative expenses in the amount of $11,047 ($6,657 for
2008).
As of
March 31, 2009 and 2008, there were $117,695 and $26,088 of unrecognized
compensation costs, net of estimated forfeitures, related to non-vested stock
options, which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 2.8 years and 1.3 years, respectively.
The fair
value of option grants used to determine the stock option expense is estimated
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, as of the date of the
grant. The Company follows guidance under SFAS 123(R) when reviewing
and updating its assumptions. Expected volatility is based upon the
historical volatility of the Company’s stock and other contributing
factors. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury
yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
The
following range of weighted-average assumptions were used to determine the fair
value of stock option grants during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively:
Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Expected
Dividend yield
|
0.00 | % | — | % | ||||
Expected
Volatility
|
180 | % | — | % | ||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.5 | % | — | % | ||||
Expected
term
|
8
-10 years
|
— |
The
Company did not grant any stock options during the three months ended March 31,
2008.
c.
|
Stock
Option Activity
|
For the
three month period ended March 31, 2009, there were 72,584 options granted with
a weighted average estimated fair value of $1.72 and a weighted average exercise
price of $1.75, which was equal to the closing market price on the date of the
grant. Of these grants, 7,742 stock options had a term of 3 years and
vested as of the grant date.
9
The
following table represents our stock options granted, exercised, and forfeited
during the three month period ended March 31, 2009.
Stock
Options
|
Number of
Options
|
Weighted Average
Exercise
Price per Option
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2009
|
1,030,139 | $ | 1.50 | 3.9 | $ | 161,000 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
72,584 | 1.75 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | — | ||||||||||||||
Expired
|
(25,000 | ) | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2009
|
1,077,723 | $ | 1.53 | 3.5 | $ | 349,987 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2009
|
1,003,212 | $ | 1.51 | 3.0 | $ | 340,118 |
The
following table represents non-vested stock options granted, vested, and
forfeited for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Non-vested Options
|
Options
|
Weighted-Average Grant-Date
Fair Value
|
||||||
Non-vested -
January 1, 2009
|
33,220 | $ | 1.48 | |||||
Granted
|
72,584 | $ | 1.72 | |||||
Vested
|
31,293 | $ | 1.50 | |||||
Expired
|
— | — | ||||||
Non-vested
– March 31, 2009
|
74,511 | $ | 1.70 |
The total
fair value of options vested during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 was $46,900 and $35,000, respectively.
d.
|
Restricted
Stock Unit Awards
|
The
Company's results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 include stock-based
compensation expense of $11,108 for restricted stock unit grants under the
Company’s 2000 Performance Share Program. Such amounts have been
included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations within cost
of goods sold in the amount of $1,333 and in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the amount of $9,775. There were no grants of restricted
stock units under this plan during the three months ended March 31,
2009.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company’s results include stock-based
compensation expense of $9,840 for restricted stock unit grants under the
Company’s 2000 Performance Share Program. Such amounts have been
included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations within cost
of goods sold in the amount of $1,340 and in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the amount of $8,500. In the corresponding period, the
Company granted 17,500 restricted stock unit awards with a fair value of $70,000
based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock, on the grant
date.
10
Restricted
stock unit awards vest over a three year period contingent on continued
employment or service over the vesting period.
A summary
of the Company’s non-vested restricted stock units at March 31, 2009 is
presented below:
Restricted Stock
Units
|
Weighted-Average Grant-
Date Fair Value
|
|||||||
Non-vested
- January 1, 2009
|
31,500 | $ | 3.72 | |||||
Granted
|
— | — | ||||||
Vested
|
5,838 | $ | 4.00 | |||||
Forfeited
|
— | — | ||||||
Non-vested
– March 31, 2009
|
25,662 | $ | 3.66 |
NOTE
3- WORK-FORCE REDUCTION
During
the three month period ended March 31, 2009, the Company reduced its combined
work-force by 24 employees or approximately 23%, to reduce costs and align
PPGI’s workforce with current business requirements while ensuring the Company
would continue to meet its customers’ needs. The reductions affected
both the Company’s Northvale, NJ and the Sarasota, FL operations.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s severance expense, including cash
payments during the first quarter of 2009 and accrued severance expense
included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance
sheet as of March 31, 2009 (in thousands).
Severance
expense recorded in the first quarter of 2009
|
$ | 140 | ||
Cash
payments made in the first quarter of 2009
|
(86 | ) | ||
Accrued
severance expense as of March 31, 2009
|
$ | 54 |
Severance
expense, net of related payroll savings, did not significantly affect the
Company’s operating results for the first quarter.
11
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Caution
Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This
Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in
the federal securities laws. The Company wishes to insure that any
forward-looking statements are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements
in order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor provided by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The events described in the
forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report may not
occur. Generally, these statements relate to business plans or
strategies, projected or anticipated benefits or other consequences of the
Company’s plans or strategies, projected or anticipated benefits of acquisitions
made by the Company, projections involving anticipated revenues, earnings, or
other aspects of the Company’s operating results. The words “may”,
“will”, “expect”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “project”, “plan”, “intend”,
“estimate”, and “continue”, and their opposites and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company cautions
you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance or events and
are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks, and other influences, many of
which are beyond the Company’s control, that may influence the accuracy of the
statements and the projections upon which the statements are
based. Factors which may affect the Company’s results include, but
are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed in Items 7 and 7A of
the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009. Any one or more
of these uncertainties, risks, and other influences could materially affect the
Company’s results of operations and whether forward-looking statements made by
the Company ultimately prove to be accurate. Readers are further
cautioned that the Company’s financial results can vary from quarter to quarter,
and the financial results for any period may not necessarily be indicative of
future results. The foregoing is not intended to be an exhaustive
list of all factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in forward-looking statements made by the
Company. The Company’s actual results, performance and achievements
could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking
statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update
or revise any forward looking statements, whether from new information, future
events, or otherwise.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and further discussed in our annual financial
statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K. In preparing
our consolidated financial statements, we made estimates and judgments that
affect the results of our operations and the value of assets and liabilities we
report. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
For
additional information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates,
see the section entitled “Managements’ Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
Results
of Operations
Photonic
Products Group, Inc.’s business falls into two product categories: Optical
Components (including standard and custom optical components and assemblies,
crystals, and crystal components), and Laser Accessories (including wavelength
conversion instruments that employ nonlinear or electro-optical crystals to
perform the function of wavelength conversion, or optical switching, and optical
Q-switches). Its optical components product lines and services are
brought to market through three business units: INRAD, Laser Optics, and MRC
Optics (“MRC”). Laser accessories are manufactured and sold by
INRAD.
12
Revenues
Consolidated
sales for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $2,815,000 compared with
consolidated sales of $4,164,000 in the first quarter of 2008, down
32.4%.
Sales of
custom optical components fell approximately 31.6% in the first quarter of 2009,
attributable to decreased sales at both Laser Optics and Inrad. At
MRC, Sales of custom optical components increased by approximately
14%.
Sales of
laser accessories decreased by approximately 51% in this first quarter as
compared to the first quarter of last year, reflecting reduced demand for laser
systems and related components.
Overall,
first quarter sales to major customers who represent more than 10% of period
sales fell significantly. One large OEM customer in 2008, in the
process control and metrology sector, who represented 18% of first quarter 2008
sales, pushed out scheduled delivers and had no shipments in the first quarter
of 2009.
Sales to
the top three customers in the three month period ended March 31, 2009
represented 42% of the sales volume, down from 46% in the comparable 2008
period. This represents an overall drop of approximately 37% in sales
revenue.
Product
backlog at March 31, 2009 was $4.9 million compared to the record level backlog
of $12.4 million at March 31, 2008. The current period backlog levels
reflect lower new order activity throughout the fourth quarter of 2008 and the
first quarter of 2009. This was primarily attributable to the current
economic slowdown and its impact on our customers’ who experienced a decline in
business activity and reduced demand for our products.
By
comparison, March 31, 2008 backlog for optical components was especially strong
for Laser Optics due to the timing of the release of two major OEM
customers. Our backlog levels typically vary based on the timing of
such large OEM customers who place orders for their annual requirements at
irregular intervals during the year.
Cost
of Goods Sold
For the
three-months ended March 31, 2009, cost of goods sold was $2,433,000 or 86.4% of
sales compared to $2,663,000 or 64.0% of sales, for the same period last
year.
Overall,
material costs, labor costs and manufacturing expenses were lower than the
previous year but relative to reduced sales revenues in the 2009 period, each
cost component increased, as a percentage of sales.
Material
costs decreased by $65,000, in the first quarter of 2009. However,
material costs as a percentage of sales increased by approximately 13%,
reflecting a higher percentage of systems and components in the total sales mix,
as compared to the first quarter of last year.
In
addition, total manufacturing labor decreased by approximately 4.8% in dollar
terms from the comparable period last year, but as a percentage of sales,
increased by approximately 40% on lower sales volumes in the
period. The impact of management’s work-force reduction plan in the
first quarter of 2009 was affected by both the timing of the layoffs and
termination expense which totaled $65,000, and, net of related payroll savings
in the same period, did not materially affect this quarter’s operating
results. We expect the full savings from personnel reductions, in the
manufacturing area, to take effect starting in the second quarter of this
year.
13
Manufacturing
overheads, excluding labor, decreased by 2.0% from the comparable period in
2008, but reflect a large percentage of fixed or semi-fixed costs which are
relatively unaffected by changes in sales volumes. As a result
manufacturing expenses, as a percentage of sales were up 31.0% in the period on
a sales decrease of 32.4%.
Gross
margin in the first quarter was $382,000 or 13.6%, compared with a gross margin
of $1,502,000 or 36.0% in the comparable period of 2008, reflecting the factors
discussed above.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (“SG&A” expenses) in the first quarter
of 2009 were $907,000 or 32.2% of sales compared to $987,000 or 23.7% of sales
for the three months ended March 31, 2008. This represents a decrease
of approximately $80,000 or 8.1%. Legal fees and consulting fees were
down $16,000 and $15,000, respectively from the first quarter of
2008. In addition, the Company incurred recruiting fees of $16,000
related to the hiring of new personnel in MRC, in the first quarter of 2008 and
did not have any recruiting fees in the first quarter of 2009.
Overall,
SG&A wages and salaries expense were comparable to last years’ level and
included expense savings from personnel reductions, net of termination payments
of $74,000 in connection with the Company’s employee reduction plan, as well as,
corporate staff changes during the quarter. The impact of SG&A
personnel reductions will take full effect in subsequent period. In
addition, the Company plans to closely monitor and manage discretionary SG&A
expenses, to identify opportunities for future cost reductions.
Operating
(Loss) Income
The
Company had an operating loss of $(525,000) in the three months ended March 31,
2009, primarily reflecting the decrease in sales and the impact of the Company’s
relatively fixed overhead and SG&A expenses, as discussed
above. This compares to operating income of $515,000 or 12.4% of
sales for the first quarter of 2008.
Other
Income and Expense
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009, net interest expense was $32,000, a decrease
from net interest expense of $76,000 in the first quarter of last
year.
Lower
interest expense resulted from reduced balances of fixed interest debt which
primarily reflected the Company’s payment of a $1.7 million Secured Promissory
Note in the first quarter of 2008. In addition, interest payments
were lower on reduced balances of other notes and capital leases.
Interest
expense for the first quarter of 2008, included the amortization of warrant
costs in the amount of $37,000.
Interest
income was $11,000 this year to date, compared to $25,000 in the three months
ended March 31, 2008 as a result of reduced balances in, and lower interest
rates and on short term certificates of deposit.
In the
first quarter of 2009, the Company sold surplus precious metal tools and
recorded a gain of $7,371 on the sale.
Income
Taxes
In
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), the Company recognizes
deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax
returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on
the difference between the financial statements carrying amounts and the tax
basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years
in which the differences are expected to reverse.
14
The
Company recorded a current provision of $53,000 for estimated state
and federal alternative minimum tax, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. In addition, the company reduced
its deferred tax asset valuation allowance and recognized a deferred tax benefit
of $289,000. This resulted in a net benefit of $236,000 after
offsetting the tax benefit against the deferred tax liability.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company recorded a current tax provision
of $50,000 for estimated state and federal alternative minimum tax
liabilities. In addition, the company recognized a deferred tax
benefit of $102,000. This resulted in a net benefit of $52,000 after
offsetting the tax benefit against the current tax provision.
Effective
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, and
interpretation of SFAS No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements and requires that a tax position must be more likely than not to be
sustained before being recognized in the financial statements. The
tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are
measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of
being realized upon ultimate resolution. Under FIN 48, the Company
must also assess whether uncertain tax positions, as filed, could result in the
recognition of a liability for possible interest and penalties which the Company
would include as a component of income tax expense. For the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not recognize any tax
liabilities related to uncertain tax positions.
Net
Income
The
Company had a net loss of $(314,000) for the three months ended March 31, 2009
as compared to net income of $491,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008,
mainly as a result of lower sales and reduced profit margins in the current
period, as discussed above.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
In the
first quarter of 2009, management implemented an employee reduction plan to
align the Company’s workforce with business activity while maintaining customer
service levels. In connection with this, the Company recorded a
termination payment expense of $140,000 of which, approximately $54,000, will be
paid in the second and third quarter of 2009. In addition, a total of
$61,000 was paid for accrued vacation benefits to affected employees. Annualized
savings from the reductions are expected to be approximately $1.1
million.
Net cash
flow provided by operating activities was $357,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009, compared with net cash flow used in operating activities of
$(223,000) in the three months ended March 31, 2008
In the
first quarter of 2009, a reduction in accounts receivable balances provided
$1,014,000 of cash flow primarily as a result of the sales volume decline in the
first quarter. Accounts receivable balances fell from $2,811,000 at
December 31, 2008 to $1,796,000 at the end of the current quarter compared to an
increase in accounts receivable the amount of $184,000 in the first quarter of
2008.
Inventory
levels fell by $93,000 to $1,796,000 at March 31, 2009 compared to an increase
of $364,000 in the three month period ended March 31, 2008. The
decrease in inventory from the comparable period last year is primarily
attributable to the relative decline in booking levels and shipping activity in
the first three months of 2009. In addition, production problems in
the first quarter of 2008 slowed and delayed shipments at MRC and led to an
increase in inventory levels in that period.
15
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities decreased by $486,000 to $1,675,000 during the
first quarter of 2009, compared to a reduction of $217,000 during the first
quarter of 2008. The reduction in the total balance this year
primarily reflects a decrease in purchasing activity during the quarter in
response to decreased sales activity which affected trade
payables. Trade payables were $339,000, down by $237,000 or 41% from
December 31, 2008. In addition, accrued liabilities were affected by
accrued vacation balances which fell by $88,000 or 22.6% reflecting payouts to
terminated employees in the first quarter of 2009. The Company also
paid out $81,000 in accrued bonuses in the first quarter of 2009 related to 2008
fiscal year performance, as well as, accrued 401K expense of
$179,000. Offsetting these reductions, the Company recorded an
accrual for termination expenses of $54,000 which had been expensed but not paid
out during the period.
In the
first quarter of 2008, trade payables increased by $365,000 but were offset by
payment of $477,000 in accrued interest related to the early retirement of
$1,700,000 in senior secured debt in March, 2008. In addition the
Company paid out $177,000 in accrued bonus in the first quarter of 2008 related
to the 2007 fiscal year performance and $160,000 in accrued 401k
expenses.
Customer
advances decreased by $125,000 to $331,000 in the first quarter of 2009 compared
to a decrease of $300,000 in the comparable period last year to
$571,000.
Cash
flows used in investing activities were $82,000 in the first quarter of
2009. Capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2009
were $37,000 down from $ 186,000, in the three months ended March 31,
2008. Management has instituted a program of ongoing review of
planned capital expenditures for deferral, where practical, to minimize the
impact on the Company’s cash flows over the balance of the year. In
addition, the Company purchased platinum in the form of a crucible used in the
production of high-temperature crystals. The purchase price of
$54,000 was offset by the proceeds of surplus platinum that was sold by the
Company for $16,000 in the same period. The Company recorded a gain
on the sale of $7,000.
Net cash
used in financing activities during the first quarter of 2009 totaled $5,000 and
consisted primarily of principal payments of $4,000 on Other Long Term
Notes. In the first quarter of 2008, net cash used in financing
activities was $995,000 reflecting the payment of a secured promissory note for
$1,700,000, plus accrued interest of $477,000, to Clarex Limited, a major
shareholder. This was offset by proceeds received from the exercise
of warrants and stock options. During the first three months of 2008,
proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $140,000, with 77,500 stock
options exercised at a weighted average price of approximately $1.80 per share
and converted into an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s common
stock. In addition, a total of 497,890 warrants issued pursuant to a
private placement of the Company’s common stock, in 2004, were
exercised. This included the exercise of 375,250 warrants with a
total exercise price of $507,000, in exchange for the issuance of 375,250 shares
of the Company’s common stock. An additional 122,640 warrants were
exercised using a cashless feature available for warrants originally issued to
the placement agent, in exchange for 79,565 shares of the Company’s common
stock.
On March
28, 2008, Clarex Limited exercised 200,000 warrants for a total exercise price
of $85,000 and the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock on the same
date.
In total,
697,890 warrants were exercised in the first quarter of 2008 for proceeds of
$592,000 and in exchange for the issuance of 654,815 shares of PPGI common
stock.
16
The
Company had a net increase in cash and cash equivalents in the first quarter of
2009 of $269,000. In the corresponding period, last year the Company
had a net decrease of cash and cash equivalents of $1,404,000.
Cash and
cash equivalents at March 31, 2009 were $2,942,000 compared to $2,672,000 at
December 31, 2008. The Company also had $808,000 in certificates of
deposit at March 31, 2009, relatively unchanged from $800,000 at the end of
2008. The certificates of deposit have original maturity terms
between three and five months and are readily convertible to cash without
significant penalty.
In March
2009, the maturity dates of two notes were extended to April 1,
2011. One note was a $1,000,000 Subordinated Convertible Promissory
Note to Clarex Limited (“Clarex”), a major shareholder and debt
holder. The other note was a $1,500,000 Subordinated Convertible
Promissory Note due to an affiliate of Clarex. The notes bear
interest at 6%. The Notes are convertible into 2,500,000 Units
consisting of 2,500,000 shares of common stock and warrants to acquire 1,875,000
shares of common stock at a price of $1.35 per share. The expiration
date of the warrants has been extended to April 1, 2014, at the same
terms.
The
Company’s management expects that future cash flow from operations and existing
cash reserves will provide adequate liquidity for the Company’s operations over
the balance of 2009.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
Company believes that it has limited exposure to changes in interest rates from
investments in certain money market accounts. The Company does not
utilize derivative instruments or other market risk sensitive instruments to
manage exposure to interest rate changes.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
a.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, our management, including the principal
executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934) related to the recording, processing,
summarization and reporting of information in the reports that we file with the
SEC. These disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to
ensure that material information relating to us, including our subsidiaries, is
made known to our management, including these officers and that this information
is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable,
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Due
to inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be
detected. Our controls and procedures can only provide reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have been met.
Based
upon their evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as
of March 31, 2009 to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
b.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
17
PART
II.
OTHER
INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM
1A. RISK
FACTORS
There
were no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in the
Company’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 which was
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31,
2009.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UNDER SENIOR
SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A
VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On April
20, 2009, the Company provided Notice of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to
be held on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 for the purposes of electing four directors
to hold office for a term of one year and to transact such other business as may
properly com before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.
Only
shareholders of record at the close of business on April 3, 2009, the record
date fixed by the Board of Directors, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the Annual Meeting.
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
11.
|
An
exhibit showing the computation of per-share earnings is omitted because
the computation can be clearly determined from the material contained in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
31.1
|
Certificate
of the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer, Joseph J. Rutherford,
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2
|
Certificate
of the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer, William J. Foote, pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.1
|
Certificate
of the Registrant’s Chief Executive Officer, Joseph J. Rutherford,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.2
|
Certificate
of the Registrant’s Chief Financial Officer, William J. Foote, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
18
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Photonic
Products Group, Inc.
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Joseph J.
Rutherford
|
Joseph
J. Rutherford
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
By:
|
/s/ William J.
Foote
|
William
J. Foote
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer and
Secretary
|
Date: May
12, 2009
19