INTERPACE BIOSCIENCES, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
|
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission
File Number: 0-24249
|
PDI,
Inc.
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
|
22-2919486
|
||||||||
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
||||||||
Saddle
River Executive Centre
1
Route 17 South
Saddle
River, New Jersey 07458
|
|||||||||
(Address
of principal executive offices and zip code)
|
|||||||||
(201)
258-8450
|
|||||||||
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes Q No £
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (check one):
Large
accelerated filer £
|
Accelerated
filer £
|
Non-accelerated
filer Q
|
Smaller
reporting company£
|
(Do
not check if a smaller
reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class
|
Shares
Outstanding
November
3, 2008
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value
|
14,188,374
|
PDI,
Inc.
|
|||
Form
10-Q for Period Ended September 30, 2008
|
|||
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|||
Page No.
|
|||
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
at
September 30, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007
|
3
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
for
the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(unaudited)
|
4
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(unaudited)
|
5
|
||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition
and Results of Operations
|
13
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
22
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
23
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
23
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
25
|
|
Signatures
|
25
|
2
PDI,
INC.
|
||||||||
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||||
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
||||||||
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 94,310 | $ | 99,185 | ||||
Short-term
investments
|
5,616 | 7,800 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
11,721 | 22,751 | ||||||
Unbilled
costs and accrued profits on contracts in progress
|
3,264 | 3,481 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
5,089 | 7,558 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
120,000 | 140,775 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
5,985 | 8,348 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
13,612 | 13,612 | ||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
13,708 | 14,669 | ||||||
Other
long-term assets
|
3,500 | 2,150 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 156,805 | $ | 179,554 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 2,628 | $ | 2,792 | ||||
Unearned
contract revenue
|
2,122 | 8,459 | ||||||
Accrued
salary and bonus
|
6,343 | 7,136 | ||||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
11,559 | 10,801 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
22,652 | 29,188 | ||||||
Long-term
liabilities
|
10,584 | 10,177 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
33,236 | 39,365 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 7)
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized, no
|
||||||||
shares
issued and outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||||||||
15,236,194
and 15,222,715 shares issued, at September 30, 2008 and
|
||||||||
December
31, 2007, respectively; 14,190,619 and 14,183,236 shares
|
||||||||
outstanding,
at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively
|
152 | 152 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
121,426 | 120,422 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
15,477 | 33,018 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive (loss) income
|
(7 | ) | 30 | |||||
Treasury
stock, at cost - 1,045,575 shares
|
(13,479 | ) | (13,433 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
123,569 | 140,189 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 156,805 | $ | 179,554 | ||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
3
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||||||||||||||
(unaudited,
in thousands, except for per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue,
net
|
$ | 24,496 | $ | 23,969 | $ | 87,124 | $ | 84,555 | ||||||||
Cost
of services
|
24,084 | 18,203 | 74,423 | 62,664 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
412 | 5,766 | 12,701 | 21,891 | ||||||||||||
Compensation
expense
|
5,696 | 5,861 | 19,006 | 18,287 | ||||||||||||
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses
|
4,305 | 5,155 | 12,892 | 14,985 | ||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
10,001 | 11,016 | 31,898 | 33,272 | ||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(9,589 | ) | (5,250 | ) | (19,197 | ) | (11,381 | ) | ||||||||
Other
income, net
|
629 | 1,488 | 2,579 | 4,425 | ||||||||||||
Loss
before income tax
|
(8,960 | ) | (3,762 | ) | (16,618 | ) | (6,956 | ) | ||||||||
Provision
for income tax
|
44 | 295 | 923 | 1,499 | ||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (9,004 | ) | $ | (4,057 | ) | $ | (17,541 | ) | $ | (8,455 | ) | ||||
Loss
per share of common stock:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.64 | ) | $ | (0.29 | ) | $ | (1.25 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | ||||
Diluted
|
(0.64 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (1.25 | ) | (0.61 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares and
|
||||||||||||||||
common
share equivalents outstanding:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
14,026 | 13,956 | 13,994 | 13,932 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
14,026 | 13,956 | 13,994 | 13,932 | ||||||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
4
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
(unaudited,
in thousands)
|
||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
September
30,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
|
||||||||
Net
loss from operations
|
$ | (17,541 | ) | $ | (8,455 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3,730 | 4,251 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
254 | 774 | ||||||
Provision
for bad debt
|
23 | (16 | ) | |||||
Recovery
of doubtful notes
|
- | (150 | ) | |||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
1,004 | 901 | ||||||
Other
(gains), losses and expenses, net
|
(19 | ) | 67 | |||||
Other
changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Decrease
in accounts receivable
|
11,030 | 18,414 | ||||||
Decrease
in unbilled costs
|
217 | 410 | ||||||
Decrease
in other current assets
|
956 | 1,705 | ||||||
Decrease
in other long-term assets
|
175 | 175 | ||||||
Decrease
in accounts payable
|
(164 | ) | (2,391 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in unearned contract revenue
|
(6,337 | ) | (6,972 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in accrued salaries and bonus
|
(793 | ) | (3,653 | ) | ||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued liabilities
|
1,002 | (1,357 | ) | |||||
Increase
(decrease) in long-term liabilities
|
143 | (311 | ) | |||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(6,320 | ) | 3,392 | |||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities
|
||||||||
Purchase
of available-for-sale investments
|
- | (11,700 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from sales of available-for-sale investments
|
- | 44,285 | ||||||
Purchase
of held-to-maturity investments
|
(15,161 | ) | (11,317 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from maturities of held-to-maturity investments
|
17,050 | 41,766 | ||||||
Loan
repayments
|
- | 150 | ||||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(398 | ) | (768 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
1,491 | 62,416 | ||||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for repurchase of restricted shares
|
(46 | ) | (207 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(46 | ) | (207 | ) | ||||
Net
(decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(4,875 | ) | 65,601 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents – beginning
|
99,185 | 45,221 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents – ending
|
$ | 94,310 | $ | 110,822 | ||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
|
5
PDI,
Inc.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
1.
|
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION:
|
The
accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and
related notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements of PDI, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company or PDI) and related
notes as included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC). The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial reporting and the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The
unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that, in the judgment
of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of such financial
statements. Certain significant customers engage the Company’s
services on a seasonal basis and therefore, operating results for the three and
nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of
the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31,
2008.
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
|
Accounting
Estimates
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of
assets and liabilities reported and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management's
estimates are based on historical experience, facts and circumstances available
at the time, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Significant estimates include incentives
earned or penalties incurred on contracts, valuation allowances related to
deferred income taxes, self-insurance loss accruals, allowances for doubtful
accounts and notes, fair value of assets, income tax accruals, and facilities
realignment accruals. The Company periodically reviews these matters
and reflects changes in estimates as appropriate. Actual results
could materially differ from those estimates.
Basic
and Diluted Net Income per Share
A
reconciliation of the number of shares of common stock used in the calculation
of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
Basic
weighted average number of
|
14,026 | 13,956 | 13,994 | 13,932 | |||||||||||
of
common shares
|
|||||||||||||||
Dilutive
effect of stock options, SARs,
|
|||||||||||||||
and
restricted stock
|
- | - | - | - | |||||||||||
Diluted
weighted average number
|
|||||||||||||||
of
common shares
|
14,026 | 13,956 | 13,994 | 13,932 |
Outstanding
options to purchase 333,707 shares of common stock and 256,115 stock-settled
stock appreciation rights (SARs) at September 30, 2008 were not included in the
computation of loss per share as they would be
anti-dilutive. Outstanding options to purchase 373,508 shares of
common stock and 300,105 SARs at September 30, 2007 were not included in the
computation of loss per share as they would be anti-dilutive.
Investments
in Marketable Securities
As part
of its cash management program, the Company maintains a portfolio of marketable
investment securities. The fair values for marketable securities are
based on publicly available market prices. Available-for-sale
securities are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains or losses, net of
tax, included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in
stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to
be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are included in other
income (expense), net. Held-to-maturity investments are stated at amortized
cost. Interest income is accrued as earned. Realized gains
and losses are computed based upon specific identification and included in other
income, net in the consolidated statement of operations. The Company
does not have any investments classified as “trading.”
6
PDI,
Inc.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company considers carrying amounts of cash, accounts receivable, accounts
payable and accrued expenses to approximate fair value due to the short-term
nature of these financial instruments. Marketable securities
classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair
value. Marketable securities classified as held-to-maturity are
carried at amortized cost which approximates fair value. The fair
value of letters of credit is determined to be $0 as management does not expect
any material losses to result from these instruments because performance is not
expected to be required.
Recently
Issued Standards
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
141 (Revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (FAS 141R). FAS 141R continues to require the
purchase method of accounting to be applied to all business combinations, but it
significantly changes the accounting for certain aspects of business
combinations. Under FAS 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to
recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at
the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. FAS 141R will change
the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition related items
including: (1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing
noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and (3)
expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired
business. FAS 141R also includes a substantial number of new
disclosure requirements. FAS 141R is to be applied prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1,
2009. The Company expects FAS 141R will have an impact on its
accounting for any future business combinations once adopted but the effect is
dependent upon the nature and timing of any acquisitions that may be made in the
future.
Recently
Adopted Standards
SFAS No.
157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(FAS 157) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This standard is
to be applied when other standards require or permit the use of fair value
measurement of an asset or liability. SFAS 157 was adopted on January
1, 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value in the Company’s consolidated
financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). For all other
nonfinancial assets and liabilities, SFAS 157 is effective on January 1,
2009. The initial adoption of FAS 157 had no impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of operations; however, the Company
is now required to provide additional disclosures as part of its financial
statements. See Note 6, Fair Value Measurements. The
Company is still in the process of evaluating this standard with respect to its
effect on nonfinancial assets and liabilities and, therefore, has not yet
determined the impact that it will have on the Company’s financial statements
upon full adoption in 2009. Nonfinancial assets and liabilities for
which the Company has not applied the provisions of FAS 157 include those
measured at fair value in impairment testing and those initially measured at
fair value in a business combination.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities-including an amendment of FASB Statement No.
115” (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits entities to elect to measure
eligible financial instruments at fair value. The Company would
report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has
been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date, and recognize
upfront costs and fees related to those items in earnings as incurred and not
deferred. The Company adopted FAS 159 as of January 1,
2008. The Company did not apply the fair value option to any of its
outstanding instruments and, therefore, the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an
impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of
operations.
3.
|
INVESTMENTS
IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES:
|
The
Company’s available-for-sale investments are carried at fair value and consist
of assets in a rabbi trust associated with its deferred compensation plan at
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Marketable securities
classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value. At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the carrying value of
available-for-sale securities was approximately $164,000 and $459,000,
respectively, which are included in short-term investments. The
available-for-sale securities within the Company’s deferred compensation plan at
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 consisted of approximately $94,000 and
$198,000 respectively, in money market accounts, and approximately $70,000 and
$261,000, respectively, in mutual funds. At September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, included in accumulated other comprehensive income were gross
unrealized gains of approximately $0 and $51,000, respectively, and gross
unrealized losses of approximately $12,000 and $2,000,
respectively. In the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, included in other income, net were gross realized gains of approximately
$29,000 and $20,000, respectively, and no gross realized losses.
7
PDI,
Inc.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
The
Company’s other marketable securities consist of investment grade debt
instruments such as obligations of U.S. Treasury and U.S. Federal Government
agencies and corporate debt securities. These investments are
categorized as held-to-maturity because the Company’s management has the intent
and ability to hold these securities to maturity. Marketable
securities classified as held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost which
approximates fair value.
The
Company has standby letters of credit of approximately $5.9 million and $7.3
million at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, as collateral
for its existing insurance policies and its facility leases. Certain
held-to-maturity investments are maintained in separate accounts to support
these letters of credit.
At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, held-to-maturity investments were
included in short-term investments (approximately $5.5 million and $7.3 million,
respectively), other current assets (approximately $2.3 million and $5.1
million, respectively) and other long-term assets (approximately $3.5 million
and $2.2 million, respectively). At September 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, held-to-maturity investments included:
September
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Maturing
|
Maturing
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
after
1 year
|
after
1 year
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
within
|
through
|
Carrying
|
within
|
through
|
||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
1
year
|
3
years
|
Amount
|
1
year
|
3
years
|
||||||||||||||||||
Short-term
investments:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
$ | 5,341 | $ | 5,341 | $ | - | $ | 7,340 | $ | 7,340 | $ | - | |||||||||||
US
Treasury securities
|
111 | 111 | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
5,452 | 5,452 | - | 7,340 | 7,340 | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments
supporting letters of credit:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash/money
accounts
|
- | - | - | 2,390 | 2,390 | - | |||||||||||||||||
US
Treasury securities
|
1,363 | 1,363 | - | 1,498 | 500 | 998 | |||||||||||||||||
Government
agency securities
|
4,500 | 1,000 | 3,500 | 3,400 | 1,400 | 2,000 | |||||||||||||||||
5,863 | 2,363 | 3,500 | 7,288 | 4,290 | 2,998 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 11,315 | $ | 7,704 | $ | 3,500 | $ | 14,628 | $ | 11,630 | $ | 2,998 | |||||||||||
4.
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, there were no changes to the carrying
amount of goodwill as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007.
All
identifiable intangible assets recorded as of September 30, 2008 are being
amortized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the intangibles, which
range from 5 to 15 years.
As
of September 30, 2008
|
As
of December 31, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Amortization
|
Net
|
Amount
|
Amortization
|
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||
Covenant
not to compete
|
$ | 140 | $ | 114 | $ | 26 | $ | 140 | $ | 93 | $ | 47 | |||||||||||
Customer
relationships
|
16,300 | 4,437 | 11,863 | 16,300 | 3,622 | 12,678 | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate
tradename
|
2,500 | 681 | 1,819 | 2,500 | 556 | 1,944 | |||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 18,940 | $ | 5,232 | $ | 13,708 | $ | 18,940 | $ | 4,271 | $ | 14,669 |
Amortization
expense for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $320,000.
Amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$961,000. Estimated amortization expense for the current year and the
next four years is as follows:
2008
|
2009
|
2010
|
2011
|
2012
|
||||
$ 1,281
|
$ 1,272
|
$ 1,253
|
$ 1,253
|
$ 1,253
|
||||
8
PDI,
Inc.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
5.
|
FACILITIES
REALIGNMENT:
|
The
Company recorded facility realignment charges totaling approximately $1.0
million, $2.0 million and $2.4 million during 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. These charges were for costs related to excess leased
office space the Company had at its Saddle River, New Jersey and Dresher,
Pennsylvania facilities. The Company has real estate lease contracts
for these spaces and is required to make payments over the remaining lease term
(January 2016 and November 2016 for the Saddle River, New Jersey facility and
for the Dresher, Pennsylvania facility, respectively). All lease
termination amounts are shown net of projected sublease income. The
expenses are reported in other selling, general and administrative expenses
within the reporting segment that it resides in and the accrual balance is
reported in other accrued expenses and long-term liabilities on the balance
sheet. In 2007, the Company sublet the excess office space at its
Saddle River location and two of the three vacant spaces at its Dresher
location. The Company is currently seeking to sublease the remaining
excess space at its Dresher location. A rollforward of the activity
for the facility realignment plan is as follows:
Sales
|
Marketing
|
|||||||||||
Services
|
Services
|
Total
|
||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
$ | 274 | $ | 401 | $ | 675 | ||||||
Accretion
|
4 | 6 | 10 | |||||||||
Payments
|
(72 | ) | (89 | ) | (161 | ) | ||||||
Balance
as of September 30, 2008
|
$ | 206 | $ | 318 | $ | 524 |
6.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
|
As
discussed in Note 2, the Company adopted FAS 157 for all financial assets and
liabilities and for nonfinancial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed
at fair value in the Company’s consolidated financial statements on a recurring
basis (at least annually). Broadly, the FAS 157 framework requires
fair value to be determined based on the exchange price that would be received
for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or
most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants. FAS 157 establishes market or observable
inputs as the preferred source of values, followed by assumptions based on
hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. The
valuation techniques required by FAS 157 are based upon observable and
unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from
independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market
assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following three-tier fair
value hierarchy: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in
active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active
markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined
as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore,
requiring the Company to develop its own assumptions.
The
Company’s adoption of FAS 157 was limited to its investment in marketable
securities. See Note 3, Investments in Marketable Securities, for
additional information. The fair values for these securities are
based on quoted market prices.
The
following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value
at September 30, 2008:
Fair
Market
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Fair
|
Measurements
at September 30, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||||
Amount
|
Value
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
|||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
$ | 164 | $ | 164 | $ | 164 | $ | - | $ | - | |||||||||
Held-to-maturity
securities
|
11,315 | 11,315 | 11,315 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 11,479 | $ | 11,479 | $ | 11,479 | $ | - | $ | - |
9
PDI,
Inc.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
7.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
Due to
the nature of the businesses in which the Company is engaged, such as product
detailing and in the past, the distribution of pharmaceutical and other
healthcare products, it could be exposed to certain risks. Such risks include,
among others, risk of liability for personal injury or death to persons using
products the Company promotes or distributes. There can be no assurance that
substantial claims or liabilities will not arise in the future due to the nature
of the Company’s business activities and recent increases in litigation related
to healthcare products, including pharmaceuticals. The Company seeks to reduce
its potential liability under its service agreements through measures such as
contractual indemnification provisions with clients (the scope of which may vary
from client to client, and the performances of which are not secured) and
insurance. The Company could, however, also be held liable for errors and
omissions of its employees in connection with the services it performs that are
outside the scope of any indemnity or insurance policy. The Company could be
materially adversely affected if it were required to pay damages or incur
defense costs in connection with a claim that is outside the scope of an
indemnification agreement; if the indemnity, although applicable, is not
performed in accordance with its terms; or if the Company’s liability exceeds
the amount of applicable insurance or indemnity.
Bayer-Baycol
Litigation
The
Company has been named as a defendant in numerous lawsuits, including two class
action matters, alleging claims arising from the use of Baycol, a prescription
cholesterol-lowering medication. Baycol was distributed, promoted and
sold by Bayer AG (Bayer) in the U.S. through early August 2001, at which time
Bayer voluntarily withdrew Baycol from the U.S. market. Bayer had
retained certain companies, such as the Company, to provide detailing services
on its behalf pursuant to contract sales force agreements. The
Company may be named in additional similar lawsuits. To date, the
Company has defended these actions vigorously and has asserted a contractual
right of defense and indemnification against Bayer for all costs and expenses
that it incurs relating to these proceedings. In February 2003, the
Company entered into a joint defense and indemnification agreement with Bayer,
pursuant to which Bayer has agreed to assume substantially all of the Company’s
defense costs in pending and prospective proceedings and to indemnify the
Company in these lawsuits, subject to certain limited
exceptions. Further, Bayer agreed to reimburse the Company for all
reasonable costs and expenses incurred through such date in defending these
proceedings. The Company has not incurred any costs or expenses
relating to these matters since 2003.
Letters
of Credit
As of
September 30, 2008, the Company has $5.9 million in letters of credit
outstanding as required by its existing insurance policies and as required by
its facility leases. These letters of credit are supported by
investments in held-to-maturity securities. See Note 3 for additional
information.
8.
|
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:
|
A
reconciliation of net loss as reported in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations to other comprehensive loss is presented in the table
below.
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (9,004 | ) | $ | (4,057 | ) | $ | (17,541 | ) | $ | (8,455 | ) | ||||
Other
comprehensive income
|
||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for
|
||||||||||||||||
realized
gains
|
- | - | (18 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gain/(loss) on
|
||||||||||||||||
available-for-sale
securities
|
(5 | ) | 12 | (19 | ) | 22 | ||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss
|
$ | (9,009 | ) | $ | (4,045 | ) | $ | (17,578 | ) | $ | (8,433 | ) |
10
PDI,
Inc.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
9.
|
PRODUCT
COMMERCIALIZATION CONTRACT:
|
On April
11, 2008, the Company issued a press release announcing the signing of a
promotion agreement with Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
(Novartis). Pursuant to the agreement, the Company has the
co-exclusive right to promote on behalf of Novartis the pharmaceutical product
Elidel® (pimecrolimus) Cream 1% (Elidel) to physicians in the United States.
Under terms of the agreement, the Company is providing sales representatives to
promote Elidel to physicians. In addition, the Company is obligated
under the agreement to spend at least $7.0 million per year during the term on
promotional activities relating to Elidel. The Company currently
intends to make expenditures of approximately $20 to $21 million during the
initial 12 months of the agreement in connection with its sales force activities
and the promotion of Elidel. During the second quarter of 2008, the
Company paid an up-front nonrefundable fee of $1.0 million that is required
under accounting guidance to be shown as a reduction of revenue. To
date, the Company has not achieved the required sales levels as measured by
increases in prescriptions over the pre-determined baseline. Under the
terms of the contract, any shortfall from a previous quarter is added to the
current quarter’s baseline amount that the Company must achieve in order to
generate revenue.
In
exchange for its promotional and sales force activities, the Company will be
compensated each quarter based on a specified formula set forth in the agreement
relating to Elidel sales for the quarter. The term of the agreement
is approximately four years, extending through March 31, 2012, and it may be
extended for an additional year upon the mutual consent of the
parties. It is possible that the Company may not receive any
compensation if Elidel sales are below certain thresholds set forth in the
agreement. In addition, if the agreement is not terminated prior to
its scheduled expiration on March 31, 2012, if due under the terms of the
agreement, Novartis will provide the Company with two residual payments in
accordance with specified formulas set forth in the agreement, which are payable
12 and 24 months after the expiration of the term of the
agreement. The agreement provides that if one or more major market
events occur during the term that significantly affects Elidel, in certain cases
either party will have the right to terminate the agreement. Either
party may terminate the agreement if the other party materially breaches or
fails to perform its obligations under the agreement. In addition,
either party may terminate the agreement, effective no earlier than February
2010, upon three months prior notice to the other party if the number of
prescriptions for Elidel generated in a specified period is less than a
predetermined level for that period. Novartis may terminate the
agreement, effective no earlier than January 2010, without cause upon three
months prior notice to the Company subject to the payment of an early
termination fee based in part on a fixed amount and in part on a specified
formula set forth in the agreement.
10.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
On
February 27, 2008, under the terms of the stockholder-approved PDI, Inc. 2004
Stock Award Incentive Plan (the 2004 Plan), the Compensation and Management
Development Committee (the Compensation Committee) of the Board of Directors of
the Company approved grants of SARs, restricted stock and restricted stock units
(RSUs) to certain executive officers and members of senior management of the
Company. In approving grants under this plan, the Compensation
Committee considered, among other things, the overall performance of the Company
and the business unit of the Company for which the executive has responsibility,
the individual contribution and performance level of the executive, and the need
to retain key management personnel. There were 110,610 shares of
restricted stock issued with a grant date fair value of $7.73 per share and
194,538 SARs issued with a grant price of $7.73 in the first quarter of
2008. In June the Company issued 44,440 RSUs with a grant date fair
value of $8.10 per unit to the non-employee independent members of the Company’s
Board of Directors on the date of its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders.
The
compensation cost associated with the granting of SARs is based on the estimated
grant date fair value of the award determined using a Black-Scholes pricing
model. Assumptions utilized in the model are evaluated and revised,
as necessary, to reflect market conditions and experience. The
compensation cost associated with the granting of restricted stock and RSUs is
based on the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The
Company recognizes the compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, over the
vesting term. The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense
totaling $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively and $1.0 million and $0.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
11.
|
INCOME
TAXES:
|
On a
quarterly basis, the Company estimates its effective tax rate for the full year
and records a quarterly income tax provision based on the anticipated rate. As
the year progresses, the Company refines its estimate based on the facts and
circumstances by each tax jurisdiction. The following table
summarizes income tax expense and the effective tax rate for the three and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
11
PDI,
Inc.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
$ | 44 | $ | 295 | $ | 923 | $ | 1,499 | ||||||||
Effective
income tax rate
|
0.5 | % | 7.8 | % | 5.6 | % | 21.5 | % |
Income
tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily due to
state taxes as the Company and its subsidiaries file separate income tax returns
in numerous state and local jurisdictions. Income taxes for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 were impacted by an increase of $0.9 million in
the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. The Company performs
an analysis each year to determine whether the expected future income will more
likely than not be sufficient to realize net deferred tax assets. The
Company’s recent operating results and projections of future income weighed
heavily in the Company’s overall assessment. As a result, the Company
maintained a full federal and state valuation allowance for the net deferred tax
assets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 because the Company
determined that it was more likely than not that these assets would not be
realized.
There
have been no material changes to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits
reported at December 31, 2007. The Company does not anticipate a significant
change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12
months.
12.
|
SEGMENT
INFORMATION:
|
The
accounting policies of the segments are described in Note 1 of the Company’s
audited consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007. There was approximately $0.1 and
$0.4 million of sales between segments in the three and nine-month periods ended
September 30, 2008, respectively and $0.1 million in the three and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2007, respectively. In 2008, the Product
Commercialization segment (formerly the PPG segment) had activity; there was no
activity in this segment during 2007. Corporate charges are allocated
to each of the operating segments on the basis of total salary
costs. Corporate charges include corporate headquarter costs and
certain depreciation expense. Certain corporate capital expenditures have not
been allocated from the sales services segment to the other reporting segments
since it is impracticable to do so.
Sales
|
Marketing
|
Product
|
||||||||||||||
Services
|
Services
|
Commercialization
|
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended September 30, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 19,979 | $ | 4,517 | $ | - | $ | 24,496 | ||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(3,228 | ) | (1,576 | ) | (4,785 | ) | (9,589 | ) | ||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
43 | - | - | 43 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
549 | 147 | 27 | 723 | ||||||||||||
Three
months ended September 30, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 16,890 | $ | 7,079 | $ | - | $ | 23,969 | ||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(4,822 | ) | (428 | ) | - | (5,250 | ) | |||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
163 | 39 | - | 202 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
843 | 243 | - | 1,086 | ||||||||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 68,636 | $ | 19,488 | $ | (1,000 | ) | $ | 87,124 | |||||||
Operating
loss
|
(6,482 | ) | (1,389 | ) | (11,326 | ) | (19,197 | ) | ||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
339 | 59 | - | 398 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
2,171 | 519 | 69 | 2,759 | ||||||||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 62,595 | $ | 21,960 | $ | - | $ | 84,555 | ||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(11,252 | ) | (129 | ) | - | (11,381 | ) | |||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
635 | 133 | - | 768 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation
expense
|
2,639 | 635 | - | 3,274 |
12
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). Statements that are not historical facts, including statements
about our plans, objectives, beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded
by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,”
“plans,” “estimates,” “intends,” “projects,” “should,” “may,” “will” or similar
words and expressions. These forward-looking statements are contained
throughout this Form 10-Q.
Forward-looking
statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of future
performance. These statements are based on current expectations and
assumptions involving judgments about, among other things, future economic,
competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which
are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond
our control. These statements also involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results to be
materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking
statement. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or
predict. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the
following:
·
|
Changes
in outsourcing trends or a reduction in promotional, marketing and sales
expenditures in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and life sciences
industries;
|
·
|
Loss
of one or more of our significant customers or a material reduction in
service revenues from such
customers;
|
·
|
Our
ability to fund and successfully implement our long-term strategic
plan;
|
·
|
Our
ability to generate sufficient revenue from product commercialization
opportunities that we pursue to offset the costs and expenses associated
with implementing and maintaining these types of
programs;
|
·
|
Our
ability to successfully identify, complete and integrate any future
acquisitions and the effects of any such acquisitions on our ongoing
business;
|
·
|
Our
ability to meet performance goals in incentive-based and revenue sharing
arrangements with customers;
|
·
|
Competition
in our industry;
|
·
|
Our
ability to attract and retain qualified sales representatives and other
key employees and management
personnel;
|
·
|
Product
liability claims against us;
|
·
|
Changes
in laws and healthcare regulations applicable to our industry or our, or
our customers’ failure to comply with such laws and
regulations;
|
·
|
Volatility
of our stock price and fluctuations in our quarterly revenues and
earnings;
|
·
|
Potential
liabilities associated with insurance claims;
and
|
·
|
Failure
of, or significant interruption to, the operation of our information
technology and communications
systems.
|
Please
see Part II – Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q and Part I – Item 1A –
“Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007, as well as other documents we file or furnish with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) from time to time, for other
important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from
our current expectations and from the forward-looking statements discussed in
this Form 10-Q. Because of these and other risks, uncertainties and
assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. In addition, these statements speak only as of the date of the
report in which they are set forth, and, except as required by applicable law,
we undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking
statements for any reason.
OVERVIEW
We are a
leading provider of contract sales teams in the United States to pharmaceutical
companies. Additionally, we provide marketing research, physician
interaction and medical education programs. Our services offer
customers a range of promotional and educational options for the
commercialization of their products throughout their lifecycles, from
development through maturity. Due to recent changes surrounding the certified
medical education (CME) requirements, our subsidiary, Vital Issues in Medicine
(VIM) will no longer be able to provide CME beginning in 2009. We are
currently evaluating alternatives for this business. VIM had revenues
of approximately $2.6 million and an operating loss of approximately $0.5
million in 2007, which includes corporate allocations.
13
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Our
business depends in large part on demand from the pharmaceutical and life
sciences industries for outsourced sales and marketing services. In
recent years, this demand has been adversely impacted by certain industry-wide
factors affecting pharmaceutical companies in recent years, including, among
other things, pressures on pricing and access, successful challenges to
intellectual property rights (including the introduction of competitive generic
products), a strict regulatory environment and decreased pipeline
productivity. Recently, there has been a slow-down in the rate of
approval of new products by the FDA and this trend may
continue. Additionally, a number of pharmaceutical companies have
recently made changes to their commercial models by reducing the number of sales
representatives employed internally and through outside organizations like
us. A very significant source of our revenue is derived from our
sales force arrangements with large pharmaceutical companies, and we have
therefore been significantly impacted by cost control measures implemented by
these companies, including a substantial reduction in the number of sales
representatives deployed. This has culminated in the expiration and
termination of a number of our significant sales force contracts during 2006 and
2007, including our sales force engagements with AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline,
sanofi-aventis and another large pharmaceutical company
customer. These four customers accounted for approximately $150.9
million in revenue during 2006 and $15.9 million in revenue during
2007. In addition, a significant sales force program for one of our
clients was terminated, effective September 30, 2008, due to generic product
competition. We anticipate that the termination of this sales force
contract will reduce revenue by approximately $3.5 million during the fourth
quarter of 2008. This reduction in demand for outsourced
pharmaceutical sales and marketing services could be further exacerbated to the
extent that the business and financial condition of our pharmaceutical company
clients are adversely impacted by the recent worldwide macroeconomic downturn
resulting from the subprime lending crisis, general credit market crisis and the
related effects on the banking and financial industries. If the
market for outsourced pharmaceutical services significantly deteriorates due to
these macroeconomic effects, our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely
impacted.
While we
recognize that there is currently significant volatility in the markets in which
we provide services, we believe there are opportunities for growth of our sales
and marketing services businesses, which provide our pharmaceutical company
clients with the flexibility to successfully respond to a constantly changing
market and a means of controlling costs through outsourcing. In
response to recent market conditions, we are in the process of implementing a
five-year strategic plan that is intended to drive revenue growth, diversify the
sources of our revenue, increase profit margins and enhance our competitiveness
in the markets we serve. Our strategic plan has been formulated to
address the changes in the pharmaceutical sales environment while simultaneously
capitalizing on our core strengths in pharmaceutical sales and marketing
services. The primary goals of this strategic plan include the
following:
Recapture
our position as the leading contract sales organization in the United
States
While the
total number of sales representatives in the United States has decreased over
the past few years, we still believe that there are opportunities for increased
penetration of this market by contract sales organizations in the near and
long-term. In an attempt to capitalize on the opportunities for
further market penetration that we have identified, we have taken measures to
strengthen our business development capabilities, including a focus on alternate
business development channels, and we have focused on creating new and
differentiated contract sales service offerings, including the introduction
during 2007 of our “PDI ON DEMAND” suite of flexible service offerings designed
to meet our customers’ evolving needs. These efforts have culminated
in a number of new sales force engagements entered into during 2007 and 2008,
which have partially offset the lost revenues from the significant sales force
contracts that expired and were terminated during 2006, 2007 and
2008.
Leverage
our sales and marketing expertise to capitalize on product commercialization
opportunities
The
decrease in the number of sales representatives utilized and other cost cutting
measures within the pharmaceutical industry described above have led to a
reduction in the revenue generated by our typical fee for service contract sales
arrangements and have the potential to place additional pressures on profit
margins for our traditional sales services offerings. In response, we
recently implemented a product commercialization strategic initiative in which
we utilize sales analytics capabilities to identify what we believe to be
attractive opportunities and seek to enter into arrangements with pharmaceutical
companies to provide sales and marketing support services in connection with the
promotion of pharmaceutical products in exchange for a percentage of product
sales. While these arrangements involve significantly more risk than
our typical fee for service contracts with respect to a return on our investment
and are likely to result in losses for us during the early stages of the
initiative as program ramp-up occurs, these opportunities are intended to
provide us with the ability to extend our revenue streams through multi-year
arrangements and with potentially higher profit margins over the term of the
initiative. In April 2008, we announced the signing of our first
agreement under this initiative with Novartis. As of September 30,
2008, we had not recognized any revenue from our product commercialization
initiative with Novartis. During the launch period in the second and
third quarters of 2008, promotional response was slower than originally
anticipated. Due to the extended launch period for this program, we
currently expect that no revenue will be recognized from this product
commercialization initiative in the fourth quarter of 2008.
14
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Enhance
our commercialization capabilities in order to provide a broader base of
services and more diversified sources of revenue
We
believe that it is critical to the growth of our business to identify and build
internally, through partnerships and/or acquire complementary commercialization
services to the sales and marketing services that we currently provide to our
customers. We intend to focus our efforts on adding services that
strengthen our core business, expand the scope of our current service offerings
and/or provide our customers with alternate methods for physician and healthcare
professional engagement. During 2007, our TVG business unit launched
three new decision support products that are being utilized by our
clients.
DESCRIPTION
OF REPORTING SEGMENTS AND NATURE OF CONTRACTS
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, our three reporting segments were as
follows:
|
¨
|
Sales
Services, which is comprised of the following business
units:
|
|
·
|
Performance
Sales Teams; and
|
|
·
|
Select
Access.
|
|
¨
|
Marketing
Services, which is comprised of the following business
units:
|
|
·
|
Pharmakon;
|
|
·
|
TVG
Marketing Research and Consulting (TVG);
and
|
|
·
|
Vital
Issues in Medicine (VIM)®.
|
|
¨
|
Product
Commercialization (formally PDI Products
Group).
|
Selected
financial information for each of these segments is contained in Note 12 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements and in the discussion under “Consolidated Results of
Operations.”
Nature
of Contracts by Segment
Sales
Services
Our sales
services contracts are nearly all fee for service arrangements, and certain
contracts include incentive payments that may be earned if our activities
generate results that meet or exceed agreed upon performance
targets. Certain of our contracts also contain financial penalties
that we may incur if we fail to meet agreed upon performance or operational
benchmarks. In addition, we occasionally enter into sales services
contracts in which the majority of our anticipated revenue is based on a
variable fee that is directly tied to the achievement of certain performance and
sales goals. Our sales services contracts are generally for terms of
one to two years and may be renewed or extended. The majority of
these contracts, however, are terminable by the client for any reason upon 30 to
90 days’ notice. Certain contracts provide for termination payments
if the client terminates the contract without cause. Typically,
however, these penalties do not offset the revenue we could have earned under
the contract or the costs we may incur as a result of its
termination. The loss or termination of a large contract or the loss
of multiple contracts could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.
Marketing
Services
Our
marketing services contracts are typically fee for service arrangements and
generally take the form of either master service agreements with a term of one
to three years, or contracts specifically related to particular projects with
terms for the duration of the project, typically lasting from two to six
months. These contracts are generally terminable by the customer for
any reason. Upon termination, the customer is generally responsible
for payment for all work completed to date, plus the cost of any nonrefundable
commitments made on behalf of the customer. There is significant
customer concentration in our Pharmakon business, and the loss or termination of
one or more of Pharmakon’s large master service agreements could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flow. Due to the typical size of most of TVG’s and VIM’s
contracts, it is unlikely the loss or termination of any individual TVG or VIM
contract would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations or cash flow.
Product
Commercialization
We
currently expect that these contracts will typically be multi-year arrangements
with limited termination rights in which we are responsible for the sales force
and potentially other marketing costs relating to the promotion of the
pharmaceutical product. We currently expect that we will receive
revenues under the agreement only if and when product sales or prescriptions
exceed certain pre-determined thresholds. We also expect that these
contracts will likely involve significant upfront investment of our resources
with no guaranteed return on investment and are likely to generate losses during
the initial periods of the contract as program ramp up occurs.
15
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
In April
2008, we entered into our first contract under our product commercialization
initiative with Novartis. See Note 9 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements and “Critical Accounting Policies – Revenue Recognition and
Associated Costs” below for additional information.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
For a
summary of all of our critical accounting policies, see ”Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and results of Operations – Critical
Accounting Policies” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The accounting policy discussed below has been
updated due to the new promotional program included in the product
commercialization segment.
Revenue
Recognition and Associated Costs
Under our
promotional program included in the commercialization segment, we currently
recognize revenue quarterly based on three factors:
|
·
|
the
number of prescriptions filled in excess of the pre-established baseline
per the agreement, which is based on information supplied by a
major independent supplier of industry prescription
data;
|
|
·
|
the
average net sales value per unit of the product as reported to us by the
customer; and
|
|
·
|
the
revenue sharing percentage in the
agreement.
|
Our
actual revenue recognized each quarter is calculated by multiplying the result
of the above three factors. Accordingly, the revenues recognized (if any) under
this contract will be directly impacted by prescription data provided to us, the
customer’s revenue recognition policy and other accounting policies used to
determine average net sales value per unit (which include reductions for
estimates of sales returns, credits and allowances, normal trade and cash
discounts, managed cared sales rebates and other allocated costs as identified
in the agreement).
Additionally,
we must perform a minimum number of sales calls to designated physicians each
year, and the failure to satisfy this requirement could result in penalties
being imposed on us or provide the customer with the ability to terminate the
agreement. We will not receive any compensation during any quarter in
which product sales are below certain thresholds established for that quarter as
set forth in the agreement.
Consolidated
Results of Operations
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain statements of
operations data as a percentage of revenue. The trends illustrated in this table
may not be indicative of future results.
Three
Months Ended September 30,
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
data
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||||
Revenue,
net
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost
of services
|
98.3 | % | 75.9 | % | 85.4 | % | 74.1 | % | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
1.7 | % | 24.1 | % | 14.6 | % | 25.9 | % | ||||||||
Compensation
expense
|
23.3 | % | 24.5 | % | 21.8 | % | 21.6 | % | ||||||||
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses
|
17.6 | % | 21.5 | % | 14.8 | % | 17.7 | % | ||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
40.8 | % | 46.0 | % | 36.6 | % | 39.3 | % | ||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(39.1 | %) | (21.9 | %) | (22.0 | %) | (13.5 | %) | ||||||||
Other
income, net
|
2.6 | % | 6.2 | % | 3.0 | % | 5.2 | % | ||||||||
Loss
before income tax
|
(36.6 | %) | (15.7 | %) | (19.1 | %) | (8.2 | %) | ||||||||
Provision
for income tax
|
0.2 | % | 1.2 | % | 1.1 | % | 1.8 | % | ||||||||
Net
loss
|
(36.8 | %) | (16.9 | %) | (20.1 | %) | (10.0 | %) |
16
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30,
2007
Revenue
Quarter
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
($)
|
Change
(%)
|
|||||||||||||
Sales
services
|
$ | 19,979 | $ | 16,890 | $ | 3,089 | 18.3 | % | ||||||||
Marketing
services
|
4,517 | 7,079 | (2,562 | ) | (36.2 | %) | ||||||||||
Product
commercialization
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 24,496 | $ | 23,969 | $ | 527 | 2.2 | % |
Revenue
from the sales services segment for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
increased by approximately $3.1 million primarily due to an increase of $1.8
million, or 40.7%, within our Select Access business unit as a result of new
sales force engagements. Revenue for the marketing services segment
decreased from the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the quarter
ended September 30, 2007. Revenue for all three business units within
the marketing services segment was lower due in part to a decrease in new
projects as well as the curtailment or postponement of certain existing projects
within these business units. The product commercialization segment
did not have any revenue for either the quarter ended September 30, 2008 or
2007.
Cost
of services
Quarter
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
($)
|
Change
(%)
|
|||||||||||||
Sales
services
|
$ | 17,148 | $ | 13,990 | $ | 3,158 | 22.6 | % | ||||||||
Marketing
services
|
2,807 | 4,213 | (1,406 | ) | (33.4 | %) | ||||||||||
Product
commercialization
|
4,129 | - | 4,129 | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 24,084 | $ | 18,203 | $ | 5,881 | 32.3 | % |
The
increase of approximately $5.9 million in costs of services was primarily
attributed to the $4.1 million associated with our promotional program within
the product commercialization segment for the quarter ended September 30,
2008. Cost of services within the sales services segment
increased by approximately $3.2 million which was primarily a function of the
increase in revenue. Cost of services within the marketing services
segment decreased by approximately $1.4 million which was a function of the
decrease in revenue.
Gross
Profit
Quarter
Ended
|
Sales
|
%
of
|
Marketing
|
%
of
|
Product
|
%
of
|
%
of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
services
|
sales
|
services
|
sales
|
commercialization
|
sales
|
Total
|
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
$ | 2,831 | 14.2 | % | $ | 1,710 | 37.9 | % | $ | (4,129 | ) | - | $ | 412 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2,900 | 17.2 | % | 2,866 | 40.5 | % | - | - | 5,766 | 24.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change
($)
|
$ | (69 | ) | $ | (1,156 | ) | $ | (4,129 | ) | $ | (5,354 | ) |
Gross
profit in the sales services segment decreased slightly on higher revenue for
the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the quarter ended September
30, 2007. For the quarter ended September 30, 2007, we recognized
$0.6 million in revenue associated with a contract with a former emerging
pharmaceutical client for services performed in 2006. Because of the
uncertainty surrounding collections, we recognized revenue from this client on a
cash basis and all costs associated with this contract were recognized in
2006.
The
decrease of approximately $1.2 million in gross profit for the marketing
services segment was attributable to a reduction in revenue as discussed
above.
The
product commercialization segment’s negative gross profit was entirely
attributable to our sales force and promotional costs associated with this
program.
17
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Compensation
expense
Quarter
Ended
|
Sales
|
%
of
|
Marketing
|
%
of
|
Product
|
%
of
|
%
of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
services
|
sales
|
services
|
sales
|
commercialization
|
sales
|
Total
|
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
$ | 3,092 | 15.5 | % | $ | 2,239 | 49.6 | % | $ | 365 | - | $ | 5,696 | 23.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2007
|
3,902 | 23.1 | % | 1,959 | 27.7 | % | - | - | 5,861 | 24.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change
($)
|
$ | (810 | ) | $ | 280 | $ | 365 | $ | (165 | ) |
Compensation
expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was slightly lower when
compared to the prior year period. Compensation expense for the sales
services segments decreased for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 when
compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2007. This was primarily
a result of a reduction in incentive compensation accrued for 2008 due to our
financial performance for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 relative to
the financial targets established for 2008 under our incentive compensation
plan. Compensation expense for the marketing services segment
increased by approximately $0.3 million which was primarily due to the costs
associated with an executive departure. The product commercialization
segment had compensation costs of approximately $0.4 million which was primarily
attributable to employee and sales services support costs. There was
no compensation expense attributable to this segment in 2007.
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses
Quarter
Ended
|
Sales
|
%
of
|
Marketing
|
%
of
|
Product
|
%
of
|
%
of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
services
|
sales
|
services
|
sales
|
commercialization
|
sales
|
Total
|
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
$ | 2,967 | 14.9 | % | $ | 1,047 | 23.2 | % | $ | 291 | - | $ | 4,305 | 17.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2007
|
3,821 | 22.6 | % | 1,334 | 18.8 | % | - | - | 5,155 | 21.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change
($)
|
$ | (854 | ) | $ | (287 | ) | $ | 291 | $ | (850 | ) |
Total
other selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by approximately
$0.9 million due primarily to a decrease in corporate marketing costs of
approximately $0.4 million due to a large increase in expenditures for certain
marketing initiatives in the third quarter of 2007, and a decrease in
depreciation expense of approximately $0.3 million primarily due to the
conversion to a new financial reporting system which was at a much lower
capitalized cost than our previous system.
The
decrease in other selling, general and administrative expenses attributable to
both the sales services and marketing services segment can be attributed to the
reasons discussed above. Other selling, general and administrative
expenses attributable to the product commercialization segment for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 were approximately $0.3 million. There were
no expenses attributable to this segment in 2007.
Operating
loss
There was
an operating loss of approximately $9.6 million for the quarter ended September
30, 2008 as compared to an operating loss for the quarter ended September 30,
2007 of approximately $5.3 million. This increased loss is primarily
attributable to the $4.8 million in expenses associated with our promotional
program within the product commercialization segment.
Other
income, net
Other
income, net, for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $0.6 million
and $1.5 million, respectively, and consisted primarily of interest
income. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to lower
interest rates and lower cash balances for the quarter ended September 30,
2008.
Income
tax expense
The
federal and state corporate income tax expense was approximately $44,000 for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008, compared to income tax expense of
approximately $0.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. The
effective tax rate for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 was 0.5%, compared
to an effective tax rate of 7.8% for the quarter ended September 30,
2007. The tax expense for the three-month period ended September 30,
2008 is attributable to state and local taxes.
18
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30,
2007
Revenue
Nine
Months Ended,
|
||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
($)
|
Change
(%)
|
|||||||||||||
Sales
services
|
$ | 68,636 | $ | 62,595 | $ | 6,041 | 9.7 | % | ||||||||
Marketing
services
|
19,488 | 21,960 | (2,472 | ) | (11.3 | %) | ||||||||||
Product
commercialization
|
(1,000 | ) | - | (1,000 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 87,124 | $ | 84,555 | $ | 2,569 | 3.0 | % |
The
increase in revenue of approximately $6.0 million in the sales services segment
is attributable to an increase in revenue within our Select Access business unit
which included nine months of revenue from a significant client in 2008 as
compared to approximately six months of revenue from this client through
September 30, 2007 as well as the addition of some new clients in
2008. Revenue from our marketing services segment for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 decreased by approximately $2.5 million as a result of
decreases at TVG and Pharmakon when compared with the prior
period. In particular, revenue from our Pharmakon business unit
decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to a reduction in
business from its two largest clients, which is expected to continue through the
remainder of 2008. The product commercialization segment had negative
revenue of $1.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 which
pertained to a non-refundable upfront payment we made to Novartis as per the
terms of our promotion agreement which has been recognized as negative revenue
pursuant to EITF 01-09, "Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer or a Reseller of the Vendor's Product." This segment had no
revenue in 2007.
Cost
of services
Nine
Months Ended,
|
||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
Change
($)
|
Change
(%)
|
|||||||||||||
Sales
services
|
$ | 54,760 | $ | 50,707 | $ | 4,053 | 8.0 | % | ||||||||
Marketing
services
|
11,047 | 11,957 | (910 | ) | (7.6 | %) | ||||||||||
Product
commercialization
|
8,616 | - | 8,616 | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 74,423 | $ | 62,664 | $ | 11,759 | 18.8 | % |
The
increase of approximately $11.8 million in costs of services was primarily due
to the $8.6 million associated with our promotional program within the product
commercialization segment for the nine months ended September 30,
2008. Cost of services within the sales services segment increased by
approximately $4.1 million which was primarily a function of the increase in
revenue. Cost of services within the marketing services segment
decreased by approximately $0.9 million which was a function of the decrease in
revenue.
Gross
Profit
Nine
Months Ended,
|
Sales
|
%
of
|
Marketing
|
%
of
|
Product
|
%
of
|
%
of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
services
|
sales
|
services
|
sales
|
commercialization
|
sales
|
Total
|
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
$ | 13,876 | 20.2 | % | $ | 8,441 | 43.3 | % | $ | (9,616 | ) | - | $ | 12,701 | 14.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2007
|
11,888 | 19.0 | % | 10,003 | 45.6 | % | - | - | 21,891 | 25.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change
($)
|
$ | 1,988 | $ | (1,562 | ) | $ | (9,616 | ) | $ | (9,190 | ) |
The gross
profit percentage in the sales services segment was comparable for both the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
The
decrease in gross profit percentage for the marketing services segment is
primarily attributable to a significant decrease at our TVG business unit, where
margins are being impacted by increased competition for marketing research
projects and cost-reduction initiatives within the pharmaceutical
industry.
The
product commercialization segment had negative gross profit of approximately
$9.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. There was
no activity in 2007.
19
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Compensation
expense
Nine
Months Ended,
|
Sales
|
%
of
|
Marketing
|
%
of
|
Product
|
%
of
|
%
of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
services
|
sales
|
services
|
sales
|
commercialization
|
sales
|
Total
|
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
$ | 11,144 | 16.2 | % | $ | 6,847 | 35.1 | % | $ | 1,015 | - | $ | 19,006 | 21.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2007
|
11,766 | 18.8 | % | 6,521 | 29.7 | % | - | - | 18,287 | 21.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change
($)
|
$ | (622 | ) | $ | 326 | $ | 1,015 | $ | 719 |
The
increase in compensation expense of approximately $0.7 million was primarily due
to the retirement of our CEO on June 20, 2008 and the subsequent expense of
approximately $0.7 million associated with his
departure. Compensation expense for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 attributable to the sales services segment decreased primarily due to a
reduction in incentive compensation costs accrued for in 2008. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compensation expense associated with
the marketing services segment increased by approximately $0.3 million which was
attributable to the marketing services executive departure discussed
previously. Compensation expense for the product commercialization
segment was primarily attributable to employee and sales services support
costs. There was no compensation expense attributable to this segment
in 2007.
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses
Nine
Months Ended,
|
Sales
|
%
of
|
Marketing
|
%
of
|
Product
|
%
of
|
%
of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
services
|
sales
|
services
|
sales
|
commercialization
|
sales
|
Total
|
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
$ | 9,214 | 13.4 | % | $ | 2,983 | 15.3 | % | $ | 695 | - | $ | 12,892 | 14.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2007
|
11,374 | 18.2 | % | 3,611 | 16.4 | % | - | - | 14,985 | 17.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Change
($)
|
$ | (2,160 | ) | $ | (628 | ) | $ | 695 | $ | (2,093 | ) |
Total
other selling, general and administrative expenses were $2.1 million less for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 than other selling, general and
administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The decrease can be attributed to: 1) a decrease in executive
consulting costs of approximately $1.0 million; 2) lower facility and
depreciation expense of approximately $0.6 million due to the sublease of office
space in our corporate facilities and the subsequent write-offs of assets
associated with the space; and 3) lower business insurance costs of
approximately $0.4 million, primarily as a result of the reduction in the size
of our business; and 4) the nine months ended September 30, 2007 had an accrual
of $0.3 million for the settlement of a claim which resided in the marketing
services segment.
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses attributable to the sales services
segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased approximately
$2.2 million when compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2007. Other selling, general and administrative expenses within the
marketing services segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
decreased approximately $0.6 million when compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease in both segments is due to the
reasons discussed above.
Other
selling, general and administrative expenses within the product
commercialization segment for the nine month period ended September 30, 2008
were $0.7 million and consisted primarily of consulting, legal and other costs
associated with our new promotional program. There were no other
selling, general and administrative expenses attributable to this segment for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Operating
loss
There was
an operating loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of approximately
$19.2 million compared to an operating loss of $11.4 million in the comparable
prior year period. The increased loss is due to the operating loss associated
with our product commercialization segment of $11.3 million. This was
partially offset by a $4.8 million reduction in the operating loss of the sales
services segment due to reduced operating expenses and increased gross profit as
discussed above.
Other
income, net
Other
income, net, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $2.6
million and $4.4 million, respectively, and consisted primarily of interest
income. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to lower
interest rates and lower average cash balances for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
20
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Income
tax expense
The
federal and state corporate income tax expense was approximately $0.9 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to income tax expense of
$1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The effective tax
rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 5.6%, compared to an
effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 of
21.5%. Income taxes for the nine month period ended September 30,
2007 included an increase of $0.9 million in the valuation allowance on deferred
tax asset. Tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
was primarily due to state taxes as we file separate income tax returns in
numerous state and local jurisdictions.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
of approximately $99.9 million and working capital of $97.3 million, compared to
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of approximately $107.0
million and working capital of approximately $111.6 million at December 31,
2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash used in
operating activities was $6.3 million, compared to $3.4 million net cash
provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The main component of cash used in operating activities during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was a net loss of $17.5
million. This was partially offset by a reduction in accounts
receivable of $11.0 million.
As of
September 30, 2008, we had $3.3 million of unbilled costs and accrued profits on
contracts in progress. When services are performed in advance of
billing, the value of such services is recorded as unbilled costs and accrued
profits on contracts in progress. Normally all unbilled costs and
accrued profits are earned and billed within 12 months from the end of the
respective period. As of September 30, 2008, we had $2.1 million of
unearned contract revenue. When we bill clients for services before
they have been completed, billed amounts are recorded as unearned contract
revenue, and are recorded as income when earned.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash provided by investing activities
was $1.5 million as compared to net cash provided by investing activities of
$62.4 million for the comparable prior year period. The significant
change during the period was reflective of our change in strategy to investments
that had greater liquidity and shorter-term maturities. The net
change of $62.4 million reflected a movement from short-term investments to cash
and cash equivalents. We had approximately $0.4 million and $0.8
million of capital expenditures primarily for computer equipment and software
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. For both periods, all capital expenditures were funded
out of available cash. The cash flows used in financing activities
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 represent shares that were
delivered back to us and included in treasury stock for the payment of taxes
resulting from the vesting of restricted stock.
Our
revenue and profitability depend to a great extent on our relationships with a
limited number of large pharmaceutical companies. On September 30,
2008, a significant sales force program for one of our clients was terminated
due to generic product competition. This sales force program
accounted for 12.0% of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 10.2% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007. We
anticipate that the termination of this sales force contract will reduce revenue
by approximately $3.5 million during the fourth quarter of 2008. We
are likely to continue to experience a high degree of client concentration,
particularly if there is further consolidation within the pharmaceutical
industry. The loss or a significant reduction of business from any of our major
clients, or a decrease in demand for our services, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations. In addition, Select Access’ services to a significant
customer are seasonal in nature, occurring primarily in the winter
season.
In April
2008, we signed a promotion agreement with Novartis in connection with our
product commercialization initiative. See Note 9 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements for additional information. Under terms of the
agreement, we are providing sales representatives, at our own cost and expense,
to promote a pharmaceutical product to physicians. In addition, we
are obligated to spend at least $7.0 million per year during the term on
promotional activities relating to this product. We currently intend
to make expenditures of approximately $20 to $21 million during the initial 12
months of the agreement in connection with our sales force activities and the
promotion of this product. In addition, we provided a $1.0 million
upfront payment to Novartis in the second quarter of 2008 as per the terms of
the agreement. Under this arrangement, we will be compensated each
quarter based on a specified formula set forth in the contract relating to
product sales during the quarter. Therefore, if we are unable to
increase the sales of the product above a pre-determined quarterly baseline, it
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations. In addition, we currently expect to incur net
losses on this product commercialization arrangement during fiscal year 2008 due
to the costs associated with implementing the program and our expectation that
an extended ramp up period will be necessary before any meaningful increase in
product prescriptions can be achieved.
21
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Although
we expect to incur a net loss for the year ending December 31, 2008, we believe
that our existing cash balances and expected cash flows generated from
operations will be sufficient to meet our operating requirements for at least
the next 12 months. However, we may require alternative forms of financing if
and when we make acquisitions, which are currently a component of our strategic
plan.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
We are
exposed to market risk for changes in the market values of some of our
investments (investment risk) and the effect of interest rate changes (interest
rate risk). Our financial instruments are not currently subject to
foreign currency risk or commodity price risk. We have no financial
instruments held for trading purposes and we have no interest bearing long term
or short term debt. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 we did not hold
any derivative financial instruments.
The
objectives of our investment activities are to preserve capital, maintain
liquidity and maximize returns without significantly increasing
risk. In accordance with our investment policy, we attempt to achieve
these objectives by investing our cash in a variety of financial
instruments. These investments are principally restricted to
government sponsored enterprises and obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S.
Federal Government Agencies.
Investments
in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning instruments carry a degree
of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair
market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating
rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates
fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may
fall short of expectations due to changes in interest rates or we may suffer
losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have seen a decline in
market value due to changes in interest rates. Our cash and cash
equivalents and short term investments at September 30, 2008 were composed of
the instruments described in the preceding paragraph and all of those
investments mature by December 2008. If interest rates were to
increase or decrease by one percent, the fair value of our investments would
have an insignificant increase or decrease primarily due to the quality of the
investments and the near term maturity.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of disclosure controls and procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls
and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Form
10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the
time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and
communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Changes
in internal controls
There has
been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
22
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
Bayer-Baycol
Litigation
We have
been named as a defendant in numerous lawsuits, including two class action
matters, alleging claims arising from the use of Baycol, a prescription
cholesterol-lowering medication. Baycol was distributed, promoted and
sold by Bayer in the United States until early August 2001, at which time Bayer
voluntarily withdrew Baycol from the U.S. market. Bayer had retained
certain companies, such as us, to provide detailing services on its behalf
pursuant to contract sales force agreements. We may be named in
additional similar lawsuits. To date, we have defended these actions
vigorously and have asserted a contractual right of defense and indemnification
against Bayer for all costs and expenses we incur relating to these
proceedings. In February 2003, we entered into a joint defense and
indemnification agreement with Bayer, pursuant to which Bayer has agreed to
assume substantially all of our defense costs in pending and prospective
proceedings and to indemnify us in these lawsuits, subject to certain limited
exceptions. Further, Bayer agreed to reimburse us for all reasonable
costs and expenses incurred through such date in defending these
proceedings. We have not incurred any costs or expenses relating to
these matters since 2003.
Other
Legal Proceedings
We are
currently a party to other legal proceedings incidental to our
business. As required, we have accrued our estimate of the probable
costs for the resolution of these claims. While management currently believes
that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, individually and in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations, litigation is subject to inherent
uncertainties. Were we to settle a proceeding for a material amount
or were an unfavorable ruling to occur, there exists the possibility of a
material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of
operations. Legal fees are expensed as incurred.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
In
addition to the factors generally affecting the economic and competitive
conditions in our markets, you should carefully consider the additional risk
factors that could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial
condition or results of operations, which are set forth in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Other
than as described below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
If
companies in the life sciences industries significantly reduce their
promotional, marketing and sales expenditures or significantly reduce or
eliminate the role of pharmaceutical sales representatives in the promotion of
their products, our business, financial condition and results of operations
would be materially and adversely affected.
Our
revenues depend on promotional, marketing and sales expenditures by companies in
the life sciences industries, including the pharmaceutical and biotechnology
industries. Promotional, marketing and sales expenditures by
pharmaceutical manufacturers have in the past been, and could in the future be,
negatively impacted by, among other things, governmental reform or private
market initiatives intended to reduce the cost of pharmaceutical products or by
governmental, medical association or pharmaceutical industry initiatives
designed to regulate the manner in which pharmaceutical manufacturers promote
their products. Furthermore, the trend in the life sciences industries toward
consolidation may result in a reduction in overall sales and marketing
expenditures and, potentially, a reduction in the use of contract sales and
marketing services providers. This reduction in demand for outsourced
pharmaceutical sales and marketing services could be further exacerbated to the
extent that the business and financial condition of our pharmaceutical company
clients are adversely impacted by the recent worldwide macroeconomic downturn
resulting from the subprime lending crisis, general credit market crisis and the
related effects on the banking and financial industries. If companies in the life
sciences industries significantly reduce their promotional, marketing and sales
expenditures or significantly reduce or eliminate the role of pharmaceutical
sales representatives in the promotion of their products, our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely
affected.
Our
business may suffer if we are unable to hire and retain key management personnel
to fill critical vacancies.
The
success of our business also depends on our ability to attract and retain
qualified senior management who are in high demand and who often have
competitive employment options. We are currently conducting a search for a
CEO. Our failure to attract and retain qualified individuals could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
23
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Most
of our revenue is derived from a limited number of customers, the loss of any
one of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Our
revenue and profitability depend to a great extent on our relationships with a
limited number of large pharmaceutical companies. As of September 30, 2008, our
two largest customers accounted for approximately 26.7% and 13.3%, respectively,
or approximately 40.0% in the aggregate, of our revenue for the nine-month
period ended September 30, 2008. For the year ended December 31,
2007, our three largest customers accounted for approximately 13.7%, 12.9% and
11.3% respectively, or approximately 37.9% in the aggregate, of our revenue for
the year ended December 31, 2007. For the year ended December 31,
2006, our three largest customers accounted for 28.5%, 18.3% and 9.9%,
respectively, or approximately 56.7% in the aggregate, of our
revenue. We are likely to continue to experience a high degree of
customer concentration, particularly if there is further consolidation within
the pharmaceutical industry.
The loss
or a significant reduction of business from any of our major customers could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results
of operations. For example, during 2006 and 2007, we announced the
termination and expiration of a number of significant service contracts,
including our sales force engagements with AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK),
sanofi-aventis and another large pharmaceutical company
customer. These four customers accounted for approximately $150.9
million in revenue during 2006 and $15.9 million in revenue during
2007. In addition, on July 31, 2008, we received notification from
the client that accounted for 12.7% of our revenue during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 that, due to generic competition, it will be terminating a
significant sales force program effective September 30, 2008. This
sales force program accounted for 12.0% of our revenue for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. We anticipate that the termination of this sales
force contract will reduce revenue by approximately $3.5 million during the
fourth quarter of 2008.
If
we are unable to generate sufficient revenue from product commercialization
opportunities that we pursue to offset the costs and expenses associated with
implementing and maintaining these types of programs, our business, financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and
adversely affected.
On April
11, 2008, we announced that we had entered into our first arrangement under our
product commercialization strategic initiative to provide sales and marketing
support services in connection with the promotion of a pharmaceutical product on
behalf of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Novartis) in exchange for a
percentage of revenue from product sales in excess of certain
thresholds. We currently intend to make expenditures of approximately
$20 to $21 million during the initial 12 months of the agreement in connection
with our sales force activities and promotion of the product. In
addition, we currently intend to explore additional opportunities to enter into
similar types of arrangements with pharmaceutical companies under this strategic
initiative. These types of arrangements typically require us to make a
significant upfront investment of our resources and are likely to generate
losses in the early stages as program ramp up occurs. In addition,
any compensation we will receive is expected to be dependent on sales of the
product, and in certain arrangements, including our arrangement with Novartis,
we will not receive any compensation unless product sales exceed certain
thresholds. There can be no assurance that we can generate sufficient
product sales for these arrangements to be profitable for us. To
date, we have not achieved the required sales levels necessary to receive
revenue under this contract as measured by increases in prescriptions over the
pre-determined baseline. Under the terms of the contract, any shortfall
from a previous quarter is added to the current quarter’s baseline amount that
we must achieve in order to generate revenue. In addition, there are
a number of factors that could negatively impact product sales during the term
of a product commercialization contract, many of which are beyond our control,
including the level of promotional response to the
product, withdrawal of the product from the market, the launch of a
therapeutically equivalent generic version of the product, the introduction of a
competing product, loss of managed care covered lives, a significant disruption
in the manufacture or supply of the product as well as other significant events
that could affect sales of the product or the prescription market for the
product. Therefore, the revenue we receive, if any, from product
sales under these types of arrangements may not be sufficient to offset the
costs incurred by us implementing and maintaining these programs. In
addition, our agreement with Novartis provides, and any agreements we enter into
in the future may provide, certain early termination rights. If our
agreement with Novartis, or a similar arrangement we may enter into in the
future, were to be terminated prior to its scheduled expiration, our expected
revenue and profitability could be materially and adversely affected due to our
significant upfront investment of sales force and other promotional resources
during the ramp up period for these types of programs.
24
PDI,
Inc.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
(Tabular
information in thousands, except per share amounts)
Item
6. Exhibits
New
exhibits, listed as follows, are attached:
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, filed herewith as Exhibit 31.1.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, filed herewith as Exhibit 31.2.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith
as Exhibit 32.1.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith
as Exhibit 32.2.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Date: November
6, 2008
|
PDI,
Inc.
|
||
(Registrant)
|
|||
/s/
Jeffrey E. Smith
|
|||
Jeffrey
E. Smith
|
|||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|||
/s/
James G. Farrell
|
|||
James
G. Farrell
|
|||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
25