INVESTORS TITLE CO - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the
Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2009
OR
[
] TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the transition period
from __________________ to
__________________
Commission File
Number: 0-11774
INVESTORS
TITLE COMPANY
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
North
Carolina
|
56-1110199
|
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification
No.)
|
121 North Columbia Street,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices) (Zip Code)
(919)
968-2200
(Registrant's
Telephone Number Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes X No
___
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ___
No ___
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
(Check
one): Large accelerated filer ___
|
Accelerated
filer _X_
|
Non-accelerated
filer ___
|
Smaller
reporting company ___
|
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ___ No _X_
As of July
24, 2009, there were 2,297,132 common shares of the registrant
outstanding.
INVESTORS
TITLE COMPANY
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
1
|
||
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5
|
||
18 | ||
29
|
||
29
|
||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
30
|
||
31
|
||
32
|
||
32
|
||
|
33
|
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
||||||||
Investors
Title Company and Subsidiaries
|
||||||||
As
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
June
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Investments
in securities:
|
||||||||
Fixed
maturities:
|
||||||||
Held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost (fair value: 2009: $457,635; 2008:
$462,580)
|
$ | 446,907 | $ | 451,681 | ||||
Available-for-sale,
at fair value (amortized cost: 2009: $83,291,395; 2008:
$85,923,583)
|
85,803,489 | 87,708,500 | ||||||
Equity
securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost: 2009: $9,034,924;
2008: $9,158,785)
|
10,392,874 | 9,965,297 | ||||||
Short-term
investments
|
15,127,184 | 15,725,513 | ||||||
Other
investments
|
2,400,932 | 2,040,962 | ||||||
Total
investments
|
114,171,386 | 115,891,953 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
8,120,607 | 5,155,046 | ||||||
Premiums
and fees receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
|
||||||||
$1,540,000
and $1,297,000 for 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
7,956,609 | 4,933,797 | ||||||
Accrued
interest and dividends
|
1,151,634 | 1,225,070 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
1,521,707 | 1,215,146 | ||||||
Property
acquired in settlement of claims
|
378,884 | 395,734 | ||||||
Property,
net
|
4,051,221 | 4,422,318 | ||||||
Current
income taxes receivable
|
2,073,410 | 2,777,829 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
2,261,779 | 3,841,295 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 141,687,237 | $ | 139,858,188 | ||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Reserves
for claims
|
$ | 39,583,000 | $ | 39,238,000 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
7,800,818 | 10,762,300 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
47,383,818 | 50,000,300 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
||||||||
Class
A Junior Participating preferred stock (shares authorized 100,000; no
shares issued)
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock-no par value (shares authorized 10,000,000;
|
||||||||
2,297,207
and 2,293,268 shares issued and outstanding 2009 and 2008,
|
||||||||
respectively,
excluding 291,676 shares for 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
of
common stock held by the Company's subsidiary)
|
1 | 1 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
91,859,793 | 88,248,452 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
2,443,625 | 1,609,435 | ||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
94,303,419 | 89,857,888 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$ | 141,687,237 | $ | 139,858,188 | ||||
See
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
1
Investors
Title Company and Subsidiaries
|
||||||||||||||||
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30
|
June
30
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||||||||||
Underwriting
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Premiums
written
|
$ | 18,945,561 | $ | 18,178,892 | $ | 35,356,158 | $ | 36,082,654 | ||||||||
Less-premiums
for reinsurance ceded
|
33,173 | 50,910 | 33,950 | 141,312 | ||||||||||||
Net
premiums written
|
18,912,388 | 18,127,982 | 35,322,208 | 35,941,342 | ||||||||||||
Investment
income - interest and dividends
|
960,454 | 1,112,681 | 1,950,089 | 2,392,040 | ||||||||||||
Net
realized gain (loss) on investments
|
9,995 | (242,272 | ) | (289,942 | ) | (123,703 | ) | |||||||||
Exchange
services revenue
|
300,963 | 66,714 | 624,727 | 471,412 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
1,436,759 | 1,287,695 | 2,695,886 | 2,532,628 | ||||||||||||
Total
Revenues
|
21,620,559 | 20,352,800 | 40,302,968 | 41,213,719 | ||||||||||||
Operating
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Commissions
to agents
|
8,831,742 | 7,949,938 | 16,363,951 | 15,269,208 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for claims
|
2,751,814 | 4,298,414 | 4,798,940 | 6,347,010 | ||||||||||||
Salaries,
employee benefits and payroll taxes
|
4,529,066 | 5,311,626 | 9,667,242 | 10,809,562 | ||||||||||||
Office
occupancy and operations
|
1,208,140 | 1,330,815 | 2,306,722 | 2,697,188 | ||||||||||||
Business
development
|
329,011 | 567,881 | 591,828 | 1,053,332 | ||||||||||||
Filing
fees and taxes, other than payroll and income
|
185,204 | 138,875 | 342,255 | 331,504 | ||||||||||||
Premium
and retaliatory taxes
|
375,510 | 451,728 | 742,772 | 819,065 | ||||||||||||
Professional
and contract labor fees
|
326,673 | 502,531 | 628,686 | 1,023,940 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
214,926 | 301,926 | 213,136 | 538,464 | ||||||||||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
18,752,086 | 20,853,734 | 35,655,532 | 38,889,273 | ||||||||||||
Income
(Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
2,868,473 | (500,934 | ) | 4,647,436 | 2,324,446 | |||||||||||
Provision
(Benefit) For Income Taxes
|
753,000 | (227,000 | ) | 1,097,000 | 474,000 | |||||||||||
Net
Income (Loss)
|
$ | 2,115,473 | $ | (273,934 | ) | $ | 3,550,436 | $ | 1,850,446 | |||||||
Basic
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
|
$ | 0.92 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 1.55 | $ | 0.77 | |||||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding - Basic
|
2,296,644 | 2,409,206 | 2,295,298 | 2,410,852 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
|
$ | 0.92 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 1.54 | $ | 0.76 | |||||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding - Diluted
|
2,296,644 | 2,409,206 | 2,300,017 | 2,434,204 | ||||||||||||
Cash
Dividends Paid Per Common Share
|
$ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.14 | ||||||||
See
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
2
Investors
Title Company and Subsidiaries
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Retained
|
Other
Comprehensive |
Total
Stockholders' |
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
2,411,318 | $ | 1 | $ | 95,739,827 | $ | 3,536,012 | $ | 99,275,840 | |||||||||||
Net
income
|
1,850,446 | 1,850,446 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($.14 per share)
|
(338,080 | ) | (338,080 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Shares
of common stock repurchased and retired
|
(21,326 | ) | (1,002,423 | ) | (1,002,423 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in payment of
|
||||||||||||||||||||
bonuses
and fees
|
40 | 1,946 | 1,946 | |||||||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
10,450 | 204,012 | 204,012 | |||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
47,199 | 47,199 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
related to FASB Statement No. 158
|
6,728 | 6,728 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized loss on investments, net of tax
|
(1,289,888 | ) | (1,289,888 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2008
|
2,400,482 | $ | 1 | $ | 96,502,927 | $ | 2,252,852 | $ | 98,755,780 | |||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
2,293,268 | $ | 1 | $ | 88,248,452 | $ | 1,609,435 | $ | 89,857,888 | |||||||||||
Net
income
|
3,550,436 | 3,550,436 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($.14 per share)
|
(321,385 | ) | (321,385 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Shares
of common stock repurchased and retired
|
(286 | ) | (8,511 | ) | (8,511 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
4,225 | 74,072 | 74,072 | |||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
316,729 | 316,729 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
related to FASB Statement No. 158
|
7,392 | 7,392 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized gain on investments, net of tax
|
826,798 | 826,798 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2009
|
2,297,207 | $ | 1 | $ | 91,859,793 | $ | 2,443,625 | $ | 94,303,419 | |||||||||||
See
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
3
Investors
Title Company and Subsidiaries
|
||||||||
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Operating
Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 3,550,436 | $ | 1,850,446 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
||||||||
used
in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
421,720 | 555,908 | ||||||
Amortization
on investments, net
|
140,438 | 156,259 | ||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
11,200 | 10,194 | ||||||
Issuance
of common stock in payment of bonuses and fees
|
- | 1,946 | ||||||
Share-based
compensation expense related to stock options
|
316,729 | 47,199 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts on premiums receivable
|
243,000 | (241,000 | ) | |||||
Net
loss on disposals of property
|
13,136 | 1,999 | ||||||
Net
realized loss on investments
|
289,942 | 123,703 | ||||||
Net
earnings from other investments
|
(881,715 | ) | (499,924 | ) | ||||
Provision
for claims
|
4,798,940 | 6,347,010 | ||||||
Provision
for deferred income taxes
|
1,117,000 | 592,000 | ||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Increase
in receivables and other assets
|
(3,482,087 | ) | (719,882 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in current income taxes receivable
|
704,419 | - | ||||||
Decrease
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(2,961,482 | ) | (1,392,846 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in current income taxes payable
|
- | (1,747,877 | ) | |||||
Payments
of claims, net of recoveries
|
(4,453,940 | ) | (6,086,010 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(172,264 | ) | (1,000,875 | ) | ||||
Investing
Activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale securities
|
(2,910,021 | ) | (2,293,775 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of short-term securities
|
(2,004,425 | ) | (8,906,105 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of other investments
|
(176,759 | ) | (494,795 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
5,435,206 | 12,999,142 | ||||||
Proceeds
from maturities of held-to-maturity securities
|
5,000 | 505,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sales and maturities of short-term securities
|
2,602,754 | 160,984 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sales and distributions of other investments
|
505,653 | 390,001 | ||||||
Purchases
of property
|
(69,925 | ) | (87,155 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from the sale of property
|
6,166 | - | ||||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
3,393,649 | 2,273,297 | ||||||
Financing
Activities:
|
||||||||
Repurchases
of common stock, net
|
(8,511 | ) | (1,002,423 | ) | ||||
Exercise
of options
|
74,072 | 204,012 | ||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(321,385 | ) | (338,080 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(255,824 | ) | (1,136,491 | ) | ||||
Net
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
2,965,561 | 135,931 | ||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
|
5,155,046 | 3,000,762 | ||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
|
$ | 8,120,607 | $ | 3,136,693 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosures:
|
||||||||
Cash
(Received) Paid During the Period for:
|
||||||||
Income
Taxes, (refunds) payments, net
|
$ | (724,000 | ) | $ | 2,314,400 | |||
Non
cash net unrealized (gain) loss on investments, net of deferred
tax
|
||||||||
(provision)
benefit of ($458,708) and $676,032 for 2009 and 2008,
|
||||||||
respectively
|
$ | (826,798 | ) | $ | 1,289,888 | |||
See
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
4
INVESTORS
TITLE COMPANY
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
June 30,
2009
(Unaudited)
Note 1 - Basis of
Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Reference
should be made to the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" of Investors
Title Company’s (“the Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 for a complete description of the Company’s significant
accounting policies.
Principles of Consolidation –
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the
accounts and operations of Investors Title Company and its subsidiaries
(Investors Title Insurance Company, Northeast Investors Title Insurance Company,
Investors Title Exchange Corporation, Investors Title Accommodation Corporation,
Investors Title Management Services, Inc., Investors Title Commercial Agency,
LLC, Investors Capital Management Company, and Investors Trust Company), and
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been
condensed or omitted. All intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
In the
opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in
the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been
included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. Operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2009.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
– The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates and assumptions used.
Reclassification - Certain
2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009
classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on net income
or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.
Subsequent Events – The
Company has evaluated and concluded that there are no subsequent events through
July 31, 2009, which is the date of financial statement issuance.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
– In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 162.” This Statement replaces Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles,” and establishes the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized as applicable to nongovernmental entities in the
preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. Rules
and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative
GAAP for SEC registrants. This Statement is effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15,
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting this
new Statement and anticipates that the Statement will not have a significant
impact on the reporting of the Company’s results of operations.
5
In April 2009, the FASB issued its
Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume
and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides for
additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS 157, “Fair
Value Measurements,” when the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability have significantly decreased. This Position is effective
for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be
applied prospectively. Adopting this new Position did not have a
significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments.” The objective of an other-than-temporary impairment analysis under
U.S. GAAP is to determine whether the holder of an investment in a debt or
equity security for which changes in fair value are not regularly recognized in
earnings, such as securities classified as held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale, should recognize a loss in earnings when the investment is
impaired. This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment
guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational
and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary
impairments of debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. This Position is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. Adopting this new Position did not have a
significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion 28-1, “Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP also amends APB
Opinion No. 28 to require disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. This Position is effective for interim reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods
ending after March 15, 2009. Adopting this new Position did not have
a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Note 2 - Reserves for
Claims
Transactions
in the reserves for claims for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year
ended December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:
June
30, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 39,238,000 | $ | 36,975,000 | |||||
Provision,
charged to operations
|
4,798,940 | 15,206,637 | |||||||
Payments
of claims, net of recoveries
|
(4,453,940 | ) | (12,943,637 | ) | |||||
Ending
balance
|
$ | 39,583,000 | $ | 39,238,000 |
6
The total reserve for all reported and
unreported losses the Company incurred through June 30, 2009 is represented by
the reserves for claims. The Company's reserves for unpaid losses and loss
adjustment expenses are established using estimated amounts required to settle
claims for which notice has been received (reported) and the amount estimated to
be required to satisfy incurred claims of policyholders which may be reported in
the future. Despite the variability of such estimates, management believes that
the reserves are adequate to cover claim losses which might result from pending
and future claims for policies issued through June 30, 2009. The
Company continually reviews and adjusts its reserve estimates to reflect its
loss experience and any new information that becomes
available. Adjustments resulting from such reviews may be
significant.
Claims and losses paid are charged to
the reserves for claims. Although claims losses are typically paid in cash,
occasionally claims are settled by purchasing the interest of the insured or the
claimant in the real property. When this event occurs, the acquiring company
carries assets at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value, net of any
indebtedness on the property.
Note 3 - Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $2,732,732 and $(942,733),
respectively. Comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 was $4,384,626 and $567,286, respectively. Other
comprehensive income is comprised of unrealized gains or losses on the Company’s
available-for-sale securities, net of tax and amortization of prior service cost
and unrealized gains and losses in net periodic benefit costs related to
postretirement liabilities, net of tax.
Note 4 - Earnings (Loss) Per
Common Share and Share Awards
Basic earnings per common share is
computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per common
share is computed by dividing net income by the combination of dilutive
potential common stock, comprised of shares issuable under the Company’s
share-based compensation plans and the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the reporting period. Dilutive common share
equivalents includes the dilutive effect of in-the-money share-based awards,
which are calculated based on the average share price for each period using the
treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise
price of a share-based award, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for
future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of
estimated tax benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital, if
any, when the share-based awards are exercised are assumed to be used to
repurchase shares in the current period. The incremental dilutive
potential common shares, calculated using the treasury stock method were 4,719
and 23,352 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
7
The following table sets forth the
computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months
ended June 30:
Three
months ended June 30,
|
Six
months ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 2,115,473 | $ | (273,934 | ) | $ | 3,550,436 | $ | 1,850,446 | |||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - Basic
|
2,296,644 | 2,409,206 | 2,295,298 | 2,410,852 | ||||||||||||
Incremental
shares outstanding assuming
|
||||||||||||||||
the
exercise of dilutive stock options and SARs (share
settled)
|
- | - | 4,719 | 23,352 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - Diluted
|
2,296,644 | 2,409,206 | 2,300,017 | 2,434,204 | ||||||||||||
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share
|
$ | 0.92 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 1.55 | $ | 0.77 | |||||||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per common share
|
$ | 0.92 | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 1.54 | $ | 0.76 |
There were 17,200 shares for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 17,200 and 6,000 shares excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively, because these shares were anti-dilutive.
The Company has adopted employee stock
award plans (the "Plans") under which restricted stock, and options or stock
appreciation rights (“SARs”) to purchase shares (not to exceed 500,000 shares)
of the Company's stock may be granted to key employees or directors of the
Company at a price not less than the market value on the date of
grant. SARs and options (which have predominantly been incentive
stock options) awarded under the Plans thus far are exercisable and vest
immediately or within one year or at 10% to 20% per year beginning on the date
of grant and generally expire in five to ten years. All SARs issued
to date have been share settled only. There have not been any SARs
exercised in 2009, 2008 or 2007.
8
A summary of share-based award
transactions for all share-based award plans follows:
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||
Number
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||||
Of
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
(years)
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of January 1, 2007
|
74,051
|
$
|
21.82
|
4.34
|
$
|
2,338,246
|
||||||||||
SARs
granted
|
3,000
|
49.04
|
||||||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(15,390
|
)
|
23.74
|
|||||||||||||
Options/SARs
cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
(1,181
|
)
|
17.38
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2007
|
60,480
|
$
|
22.77
|
4.11
|
$
|
1,377,390
|
||||||||||
SARs
granted
|
3,000
|
47.88
|
||||||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(12,360
|
)
|
18.67
|
|||||||||||||
Options/SARs
cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
(4,050
|
)
|
29.96
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2008
|
47,070
|
$
|
24.83
|
3.67
|
$
|
666,079
|
||||||||||
SARs
granted
|
78,000
|
28.13
|
||||||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(4,225
|
)
|
17.53
|
|||||||||||||
Options/SARs
cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
(2,050
|
)
|
20.61
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of June 30, 2009
|
118,795
|
$
|
27.33
|
5.54
|
$
|
245,718
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
as of June 30, 2009
|
68,025
|
$
|
27.38
|
5.04
|
$
|
200,631
|
||||||||||
Unvested
as of June 30, 2009
|
50,770
|
$
|
27.26
|
6.22
|
$
|
45,087
|
During the second quarter of 2009, the
Company issued 3,000 share settled SARs to the directors of the
Company. SARs give the holder the right to receive stock equal to the
appreciation in the value of shares of stock from the grant date for a specified
period of time, and as a result, are accounted for as equity
instruments. As such, these were valued using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. The fair value of each award is estimated on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the
weighted-average assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities
are based on both the implied and historical volatility of the Company’s stock.
The Company uses historical data to estimate SAR exercise and employee
termination within the valuation model. The expected term of awards represents
the period of time that SARs granted are expected to be outstanding. The
interest rate for periods during the expected life of the award is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the
grant. The weighted-average fair value for the SARs issued was $10.81
and was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
2009
|
|
Expected
Life in Years
|
5.0
|
Volatility
|
38.76%
|
Interest
Rate
|
2.05%
|
Yield
Rate
|
0.93%
|
9
The following table provides the
Black-Scholes weighted-average components for all grants during the respective
years:
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
Expected
Life in Years
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
Volatility
|
34%
|
24%
|
25%
|
Interest
Rate
|
1.9%
|
3.1%
|
4.6%
|
Yield
Rate
|
0.9%
|
0.6%
|
0.5%
|
There was
approximately $317,000 of compensation expense relating to SARs or options
vesting on or before June 30, 2009 included in salaries, employee benefits and
payroll taxes of the consolidated statements of income. As of June
30, 2009, there was approximately $501,000 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
Company’s stock award plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.3 years.
There have been no stock options or
SARs granted where the exercise price was less than the market price on the date
of grant.
Note 5 – Segment
Information
Consistent with SFAS No. 131, “ Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information ,” the Company has aggregated
its operating segments into two reportable segments: 1) title insurance
services; and 2) tax-deferred exchange services. The remaining
immaterial segments have been combined into a group called All
Other.
The title insurance segment primarily
issues title insurance policies through approved attorneys from underwriting
offices and through independent issuing agents. Title insurance
policies insure titles to residential, institutional, commercial and industrial
properties.
The tax-deferred exchange services
segment acts as an intermediary in tax-deferred exchanges of property held for
productive use in a trade or business or for investing and serves as the
exchange accommodation titleholder, holding property for exchangers in reverse
exchange transactions. Revenues are derived from fees for handling
exchange transactions.
Provided below is selected financial
information about the Company’s operations by segment:
Three
Months Ended
June 30,
2009
|
Title
Insurance
|
Exchange
Services
|
All
Other
|
Intersegment
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$ | 19,685,359 | $ | 304,627 | $ | 853,507 | $ | (193,383 | ) | $ | 20,650,110 | |||||||||
Investment
income
|
800,799 | 50 | 180,023 | (20,418 | ) | 960,454 | ||||||||||||||
Net
realized gain (loss)
on
investments
|
35,806 | - | (25,811 | ) | - | 9,995 | ||||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ | 20,521,964 | $ | 304,677 | $ | 1,007,719 | $ | (213,801 | ) | $ | 21,620,559 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
17,786,954 | 193,720 | 964,795 | (193,383 | ) | 18,752,086 | ||||||||||||||
Income
before
income
taxes
|
$ | 2,735,010 | $ | 110,957 | $ | 42,924 | $ | (20,418 | ) | $ | 2,868,473 | |||||||||
Assets,
net
|
$ | 104,029,922 | $ | 465,690 | $ | 37,191,625 | $ | - | $ | 141,687,237 |
10
Three
Months Ended
|
Title
Insurance
|
Exchange
Services
|
All
Other
|
Intersegment
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$ | 18,712,575 | $ | 66,714 | $ | 901,621 | $ | (198,519 | ) | $ | 19,482,391 | |||||||||
Investment
income
|
902,757 | 27,369 | 202,973 | (20,418 | ) | 1,112,681 | ||||||||||||||
Net
realized loss on
investments
|
(233,618 | ) | (99 | ) | (8,555 | ) | - | (242,272 | ) | |||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ | 19,381,714 | $ | 93,984 | $ | 1,096,039 | $ | (218,937 | ) | $ | 20,352,800 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
19,634,063 | 365,876 | 1,052,314 | (198,519 | ) | 20,853,734 | ||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before
income
taxes
|
$ | (252,349 | ) | $ | (271,892 | ) | $ | 43,725 | $ | (20,418 | ) | $ | (500,934 | ) | ||||||
Assets,
net
|
$ | 108,834,556 | $ | 161,240 | $ | 37,246,841 | $ | - | $ | 146,242,637 |
Six
Months Ended
June 30,
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$ | 36,747,997 | $ | 628,391 | $ | 1,651,645 | $ | (385,212 | ) | $ | 38,642,821 | |||||||||
Investment
income
|
1,609,318 | 148 | 381,458 | (40,835 | ) | 1,950,089 | ||||||||||||||
Net
realized loss on
investments
|
(90,489 | ) | - | (199,453 | ) | - | (289,942 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ | 38,266,826 | $ | 628,539 | $ | 1,833,650 | $ | (426,047 | ) | $ | 40,302,968 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
33,964,253 | 244,679 | 1,831,812 | (385,212 | ) | 35,655,532 | ||||||||||||||
Income
before
income
taxes
|
$ | 4,302,573 | $ | 383,860 | $ | 1,838 | $ | (40,835 | ) | $ | 4,647,436 | |||||||||
Assets,
net
|
$ | 104,029,922 | $ | 465,690 | $ | 37,191,625 | $ | - | $ | 141,687,237 |
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$ | 37,082,541 | $ | 471,412 | $ | 1,781,959 | $ | (390,530 | ) | $ | 38,945,382 | |||||||||
Investment
income
|
1,852,216 | 35,378 | 545,281 | (40,835 | ) | 2,392,040 | ||||||||||||||
Net
realized loss on
investments
|
(115,236 | ) | - | (8,467 | ) | - | (123,703 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ | 38,819,521 | $ | 506,790 | $ | 2,318,773 | $ | (431,365 | ) | $ | 41,213,719 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
36,465,168 | 678,964 | 2,135,671 | (390,530 | ) | 38,889,273 | ||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before
income
taxes
|
$ | 2,354,353 | $ | (172,174 | ) | $ | 183,102 | $ | (40,835 | ) | $ | 2,324,446 | ||||||||
Assets,
net
|
$ | 108,834,556 | $ | 161,240 | $ | 37,246,841 | $ | - | $ | 146,242,637 |
Operating
revenues represent net premiums written and other revenues.
Note 6 – Retirement
and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
On November 17, 2003, the Company’s
subsidiary, Investors Title Insurance Company, entered into employment
agreements with key executives that provide for the continuation of certain
employee benefits upon retirement. The executive employee benefits
include health insurance, dental, vision and life insurance. The benefits are
unfunded. The following sets forth the net periodic benefits cost for
the executive benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008:
11
For
the Three
Months
Ended
June 30,
|
For
the Six
Months
Ended
June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Service
cost – benefits earned during the year
|
$ | 5,958 | $ | 4,334 | $ | 11,916 | $ | 8,668 | ||||||||
Interest
cost on the projected benefit obligation
|
6,743 | 4,761 | 13,486 | 9,522 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of unrecognized prior service cost
|
5,098 | 5,097 | 10,195 | 10,194 | ||||||||||||
Amortization
of unrecognized gains
|
503 | - | 1,005 | - | ||||||||||||
Net
periodic benefits costs
|
$ | 18,302 | $ | 14,192 | $ | 36,602 | $ | 28,384 |
Note 7 - Fair Value
Measurement
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,”
which was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
for interim periods within those years. This Statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related
disclosure requirements. Relative to SFAS 157, the FASB recently
issued FASB Staff Positions (“FSP”) 157-1, 157-2 and 157-3. FSP 157-1
amends SFAS 157 to exclude SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and its
related interpretive accounting pronouncements that address leasing
transactions, while FSP 157-2 delays the effective date of the application of
SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis. FSP 157-3 clarifies the principles in SFAS 157 on the fair
value measurement of liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS 157 as of
January 1, 2008.
Valuation
Hierarchy. SFAS 157 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the
inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the
inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs to the
valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs to the valuation
methodology are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full
term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable
inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and
liabilities at fair value.
The
following table presents, by level, the financial assets carried at fair value
measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009. The table
does not include cash on hand and also does not include assets which are
measured at historical cost or any basis other than fair value.
12
Available-for-sale
securities
|
Carrying Balance
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
$ | 71,964,228 | $ | - | $ | 64,181,573 | $ | 7,782,655 | ||||||||
Corporate
debt securities
|
13,839,261 | - | 13,839,261 | - | ||||||||||||
Equity
|
10,392,874 | 10,392,874 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 96,196,363 | $ | 10,392,874 | $ | 78,020,834 | $ | 7,782,655 |
The
following table presents the changes in the Company’s assets measured at fair
value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in SFAS 157 at
June 30, 2009:
Changes in fair value during the period ended June
30, 2009:
|
Level 3
|
|||
Beginning
balance at January 1, 2009
|
$ | 7,596,920 | ||
Unrealized
gains - included in other comprehensive income
|
185,735 | |||
Ending
balance at June 30, 2009
|
$ | 7,782,655 |
Valuation
Techniques. A financial instrument’s classification within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement.
Publicly
traded equity securities are measured at fair value using quoted active market
prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation
hierarchy.
The
Level 2 category generally includes corporate bonds, U.S. government
corporations and agency bonds and municipal bonds. The fair value of
fixed maturity investments included in the Level 2 category was based on the
market values obtained from pricing services. If the inputs used to
measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, a
financial security’s hierarchy level is based upon the lowest level of input
that is significant to the fair value measurement. A number of the
Company’s investment grade corporate bonds are frequently traded in active
markets and traded market prices for these securities existed at June 30,
2009. However, these securities were classified as Level 2 at June
30, 2009, because the third party pricing services from which the Company has
obtained fair values for such instruments also use valuation models, which use
observable market inputs, in addition to traded prices. Substantially
all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace or can be derived or
supported by observable market data.
The
Company’s investments in student loan auction rate securities (“ARS”) are its
only Level 3 assets, and were transferred from Level 2 in 2008 because quoted
prices from broker-dealers were unavailable due to the failure of
auctions. Valuations using discounted cash flow models were used to
determine the estimated fair value of these investments as of June 30, 2009.
Some of the inputs to this model are unobservable in the market and are
significant.
ARS were
structured to provide purchase and sale liquidity through a Dutch auction
process. Due to the increasingly stressed and liquidity-constrained
environment in money markets, the auction process for ARS began failing in
February 2008 as broker-dealers ceased supporting auctions with their own
capital. The credit quality of the ARS the Company holds is high, as
all are rated investment grade and are comprised entirely of student loan ARS,
substantially guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises, and the Company
continues to receive interest income.
13
Note 8 – Investments in
Securities
The
aggregate estimated fair value, gross unrealized holding gains, gross unrealized
holding losses, and cost or amortized cost for securities by major security type
are as follows:
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|
June
30, 2009
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Fixed
Maturities-
|
||||
Held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost-
|
||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
$ 446,907
|
$ 10,728
|
$ -
|
$ 457,635
|
Total
|
$ 446,907
|
$ 10,728
|
$ -
|
$ 457,635
|
Fixed
Maturities-
|
||||
Available-for-sale,
at fair value:
|
||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
$ 83,291,395
|
$ 3,365,516
|
$ 853,422
|
$ 85,803,489
|
Total
|
$ 83,291,395
|
$ 3,365,516
|
$ 853,422
|
$ 85,803,489
|
Equity
Securities, available-for-sale at fair value-
|
||||
Common
stocks and nonredeemable preferred stocks
|
$ 9,034,924
|
$ 1,948,986
|
$ 591,036
|
$ 10,392,874
|
Total
|
$ 9,034,924
|
$ 1,948,986
|
$ 591,036
|
$ 10,392,874
|
Short-term
investments-
|
||||
Certificates
of deposit and other
|
$ 15,127,184
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ 15,127,184
|
Total
|
$ 15,127,184
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ 15,127,184
|
Gross
|
Gross
|
Estimated
|
||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Fixed
Maturities-
|
||||
Held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost-
|
||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
$ 451,681
|
$ 10,899
|
$ -
|
$ 462,580
|
Total
|
$ 451,681
|
$ 10,899
|
$ -
|
$ 462,580
|
Fixed
Maturities-
|
||||
Available-for-sale,
at fair value:
|
||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
$ 72,818,413
|
$ 2,178,686
|
$ 986,503
|
$ 74,010,596
|
Corporate
debt securities
|
13,105,170
|
606,001
|
13,267
|
13,697,904
|
Total
|
$ 85,923,583
|
$ 2,784,687
|
$ 999,770
|
$ 87,708,500
|
Equity
Securities, available-for-sale at fair value-
|
||||
Common
stocks and nonredeemable preferred stocks
|
$ 9,158,785
|
$ 1,446,389
|
$ 639,877
|
$ 9,965,297
|
Total
|
$ 9,158,785
|
$ 1,446,389
|
$ 639,877
|
$ 9,965,297
|
Short-term
investments-
|
||||
Certificates
of deposit and other
|
$ 15,725,513
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ 15,725,513
|
Total
|
$ 15,725,513
|
$ -
|
$ -
|
$ 15,725,513
|
The fair
value of debt and equity securities was determined primarily using estimated
market prices obtained from independent third party pricing services and quoted
market prices.
14
The scheduled
maturities of fixed maturity securities at June 30, 2009 were as
follows:
Available-for-Sale
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Fair
|
Amortized
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
Value
|
Cost
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 6,514,276 | $ | 6,650,375 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 2,097 | ||||||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
25,811,372 | 27,116,280 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Due
five years through ten years
|
37,300,735 | 38,553,618 | 444,907 | 455,538 | ||||||||||||
Due
after ten years
|
13,665,012 | 13,483,216 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 83,291,395 | $ | 85,803,489 | $ | 446,907 | $ | 457,635 |
Proceeds
and gross realized gains and losses on sales of available-for-sale securities
for the six months ended June 30 are summarized as follows:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Proceeds
|
$ | 5,435,206 | $ | 12,999,142 | ||||
Gross
realized gains:
|
||||||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
$ | - | $ | 24,726 | ||||
Common
stocks and nonredeemable preferred stocks
|
253,477 | 239,677 | ||||||
Total
|
253,477 | 264,403 | ||||||
Gross
realized losses:
|
||||||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
- | (460 | ) | |||||
Common
stocks and nonredeemable preferred stocks
|
(33,978 | ) | (158,188 | ) | ||||
Total
|
(33,978 | ) | (158,648 | ) | ||||
Net
realized gain
|
$ | 219,499 | $ | 105,755 |
Realized gains and losses are
determined on the specific identification method. Also included in
net realized gain (loss) on sales of investments in the Consolidated Statements
of income for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is $(41,509) and
$5,600 of (losses) and gains from the sale of other investments.
The
following table presents the gross unrealized losses on investment securities
and the fair value of the related securities, aggregated by investment category
and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position at June 30, 2009.
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or Longer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Value
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Auction
rate securities
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 7,782,655 | $ | (667,345 | ) | $ | 7,782,655 | $ | ( 667,345 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
7,804,463 | ( 130,180 | ) | 1,369,761 | ( 55,897 | ) | 9,174,224 | ( 186,077 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
Fixed Income Securities
|
7,804,463 | ( 130,180 | ) | 9,152,416 | ( 723,242 | ) | 16,956,879 | ( 853,422 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity
Securities
|
2,842,298 | ( 504,284 | ) | 386,768 | ( 86,752 | ) | 3,229,066 | (591,036 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
temporarily impaired securities
|
$ | 10,646,761 | $ | (634,464 | ) | $ | 9,539,184 | $ | ( 809,994 | ) | $ | 20,185,945 | $ | (1,444,458 | ) |
As of June
30, 2009, the majority of the Company’s unrealized losses relate to its
portfolio of fixed income securities. The Company’s unrealized losses
on its fixed income securities were caused by interest rate increases, for the
most part, and widening credit spreads. The unrealized losses related
to holdings of equity securities were caused by market changes that the Company
considers to be temporary. Factors considered in determining whether
a loss is temporary include the length of time and extent to which fair value
has been below cost. A total of 64 securities had unrealized losses
at June 30, 2009. Since the decline in fair value was attributable to
changes in interest rates and temporary market changes, and not credit quality,
and the Company has the intent and ability to hold these securities until a
recovery of fair value, the Company does not consider these investments
other-than-temporarily impaired.
15
Reviews of
the values of securities are inherently uncertain, and the value of the
investment may not fully recover, or may decline in future periods resulting in
a realized loss. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company
recorded impairment charges of approximately $167,000 related to several of its
equity securities that were deemed other-than-temporarily
impaired. Impairment charges relating to the equity securities were
based on the duration of the unrealized loss and inability to predict the time
to recover if the investment continued to be held.
The
current disruptions in the capital and credit markets have resulted in
volatility and disruption in the financial markets. These and other
factors including the tightening of credit markets, failures of significant
financial institutions, uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of governmental
solutions, and a general slowdown in economic activity are contributing to
decreases in the fair value of the investment portfolio as of June 30,
2009. It is expected that any future other than temporary impairments
will depend primarily on these factors. It is possible that future
events or information may lead the Company to determine that a decline in value
is other than temporary and recognize potential future impairment losses on some
securities it owns at June 30, 2009.
Other
investments consist primarily of investments in title insurance agencies
structured as limited liability companies, which are accounted for under the
equity or cost method of accounting. The aggregate cost of the
Company’s cost method investments totaled $828,932 and $821,617 at June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company monitors any events
or changes in circumstances that may have had a significant adverse effect on
the fair value of these investments and makes any necessary
adjustments.
Note 9 – Commitments and
Contingencies
The Company and its subsidiaries are
involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to their
business. In the Company’s opinion, based on the present status of
these proceedings, any potential liability of the Company or its subsidiaries
with respect to these legal proceedings will not, in the aggregate, be material
to the Company’s consolidated financial condition or operations.
In administering tax-deferred property
exchanges, the Company’s subsidiary, Investors Title Exchange Corporation
(“ITEC”), serves as a qualified intermediary for exchanges, holding the net
proceeds from sales transactions from relinquished property to be used for
purchase of replacement property. Another Company subsidiary,
Investors Title Accommodation Corporation (“ITAC”), serves as exchange
accommodation titleholder and, through limited liability companies that are
wholly owned subsidiaries of ITAC, holds property for exchangers in reverse
exchange transactions. Like-kind exchange deposits and reverse
exchange property totaled approximately $20,350,000 and $88,124,000 as of June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. These amounts are not
considered the Company’s assets and, therefore, are excluded from the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets; however, the Company remains
contingently liable for the disposition of these deposits and for the transfers
of property, disbursements of proceeds and the return on the proceeds at the
agreed upon rate. These like-kind exchange funds are primarily
invested in money market and other short-term investments, including $4.6
million of ARS, at June 30, 2009. The Company does not believe the
current illiquidity of these securities will impact its operations, as it
believes it has sufficient capital to provide continuous and immediate liquidity
as necessary.
16
Note 10 – Related Party
Transactions
The
Company does business with unconsolidated limited liability companies that it
has investments in that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
These unconsolidated companies are title insurance agencies. The
following table sets forth the approximate values by period found within
each financial statement classification:
Financial
Statement Classification
|
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Other
investments
|
$ |
1,572,000
|
$
|
1,146,000
|
||||
Premiums
and fees receivable
|
$ |
719,000
|
$
|
432,000
|
Financial
Statement Classification
|
For
the three months ended June 30,
|
For
the six months ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Income (Loss)
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
Other
income
|
$ | 607,000 | $ | 348,000 | $ | 1,158,000 | $ | 740,000 |
17
The
Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with the
following discussion since it contains important information for evaluating the
Company’s operating results and financial condition.
Overview
Investors
Title Company (the “Company”) is a holding company that engages primarily in two
segments of business: title insurance and exchange services. These
segments are described below.
Title
Insurance: Its primary business activity is the issuance of
title insurance through two subsidiaries, Investors Title Insurance Company
(“ITIC”) and Northeast Investors Title Insurance Company (“NE-ITIC”), which
accounted for 95.1% of the Company’s operating revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. Through ITIC and NE-ITIC, the Company underwrites land title
insurance for owners and mortgagees as a primary insurer. Title insurance
protects against loss or damage resulting from title defects that affect real
property.
There are
two basic types of title insurance policies - one for the mortgage lender and
one for the real estate owner. A lender often requires property
owners to purchase title insurance to protect its position as a holder of a
mortgage loan, but the lender’s title insurance policy does not protect the
property owner. The property owner has to purchase a separate owner’s
title insurance policy to protect their investment. When real
property is conveyed from one party to another, occasionally there is an
undisclosed defect in the title or a mistake or omission in a prior deed, will
or mortgage that may give a third party a legal claim against such
property. If a claim is made against real property, title insurance
provides indemnification against insured defects.
ITIC issues title insurance policies
through issuing agencies and also directly through home and branch
offices. Issuing agents are typically real estate attorneys or
subsidiaries of community and regional mortgage lending institutions, depending
on local customs and regulations and the Company’s marketing strategy in a
particular territory. The ability to attract and retain issuing
agents is a key determinant of the Company’s growth in premiums
written.
Revenues
for this segment result from purchases of new and existing residential and
commercial real estate, refinance activity and certain other types of mortgage
lending such as home equity lines of credit.
Volume is
a factor in the Company's profitability due to the existence of fixed operating
costs. These expenses will be incurred by the Company regardless of
the level of premiums written. The resulting operating leverage has historically
tended to amplify the impact of changes in volume on the Company’s
profitability. The Company’s profitability also depends, in part,
upon its ability to manage its investment portfolio to maximize investment
returns and minimize risks such as interest rate changes or defaults or
impairments of assets.
18
The
Company’s volume of title insurance premiums is affected by the overall level of
residential and commercial real estate activity which includes sales, mortgage
financing and mortgage refinancing. In turn, real estate activity is
generally affected by a number of factors, including the availability of
mortgage credit, the cost of real estate, consumer confidence, employment and
family income levels and general United States economic
conditions. Another important factor in the level of residential and
commercial real estate activity is the effect of changes in interest
rates.
The
cyclical nature of the residential and commercial real estate markets – and
consequently, the land title insurance industry - has historically caused
fluctuations in revenues and profitability, and it is expected to continue to do
so in the future. Additionally, there are seasonal influences in real
estate activity and accordingly in revenue levels for title
insurers.
Exchange Services: The
Company’s second business segment provides customer services in connection with
tax-deferred real property exchanges through its subsidiaries, Investors Title
Exchange Corporation (“ITEC”) and Investors Title Accommodation Corporation
(“ITAC”). ITEC serves as a qualified intermediary in like-kind
exchanges of real or personal property under Section 1031 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In its role as qualified intermediary, ITEC
coordinates the exchange aspects of the real estate transaction, and its duties
include drafting standard exchange documents, holding the exchange funds between
the sale of the old property and the purchase of the new property, and accepting
the formal identification of the replacement property within the required
identification period. ITAC serves as exchange accommodation
titleholder in reverse exchanges. As exchange accommodation
titleholder, ITAC offers a vehicle for accommodating a reverse exchange when the
taxpayer must acquire replacement property before selling the relinquished
property.
Factors
that influence the title insurance industry will also generally affect the
exchange services industry. In addition, the services provided by the
Company’s exchange services segment are pursuant to provisions in the Internal
Revenue Code. From time to time, these exchange provisions are
subject to review and changes, which may negatively affect the demand for
tax-deferred exchanges in general, and consequently the revenues and
profitability of the Company’s exchange segment.
Other
Services: Other operating business segments not required to be
reported separately are reported in a category called All
Other. Other services include those offered by the parent holding
company and by its wholly owned subsidiaries, Investors Trust Company
(“Investors Trust”), Investors Capital Management Company (“ICMC”) and Investors
Title Management Services, Inc. (“ITMS”). In conjunction with
Investors Trust, ICMC provides investment management and trust services to
individuals, companies, banks and trusts. ITMS offers consulting
services to clients.
Business Trends and Recent
Conditions
The
continued downturn in U.S. economic activity and the ongoing decline in real
estate transactions were primary drivers behind the lower premiums written in
the title industry during 2008 and in the first six months of 2009.
19
During the
real estate boom, many lenders loosened their underwriting guidelines,
particularly in the sub prime market. These lower underwriting
standards, when combined with new methods of financing loans created a supply of
inexpensive credit which led to a build up in mortgage loans to high risk
borrowers. As a result, there has been a substantial increase in loan
defaults and mortgage foreclosures. Lenders are now returning to
stricter loan underwriting standards, which results in lower overall loan
volume. Moreover, the depressed economy has contributed to lower
levels of new home purchases, which also negatively affects loan
volume. This lower loan volume has, in turn, resulted in a lower
level of title premiums generated in the marketplace. In addition,
the downturn in housing and related mortgage finance industries has contributed
to higher claims costs. An increase in property foreclosures tends to
reveal title defects. A slowing pace of real estate activity also
triggers the likelihood of certain types of title claims, such as mechanics’
liens on newly constructed property. These factors have historically
caused title claims to increase in past real estate market cyclical downturns
and the Company has experienced such increases during the current
downturn.
Steps
taken by the U.S. government to relieve the current economic situation may have
a positive effect on the Company’s sales of title insurance. Under
the administration’s Home Affordable Refinance Program, homeowners with a solid
payment history on an existing mortgage owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, who
would otherwise be unable to get a refinancing loan because of a loss in home
value increasing their loan-to-value ratio above 80%, would be able to get a
refinancing loan. The Treasury Department estimates that many of the
homeowners who fit this description would be eligible to refinance their loans
under this program. In addition, President Obama signed the Economic
Stimulus Bill that included an $8,000 tax credit for first time
homebuyers.
Management
also believes the Company’s premiums written benefited from the very low
mortgage interest rate environment during the first half of the year, which
spurred an increase in mortgage refinancing. According to data
published by Freddie Mac, the six month average 30-year fixed mortgage interest
rates in the United States decreased to 5.05% for the six months ended June 30,
2009, compared with 5.99% for the six months ended June 30,
2008. Management believes the further reduction in rates in the
second quarter of 2009 resulted in an increase in the Company’s refinance order
volumes.
Historically,
activity in real estate markets has varied over the course of market cycles in
response to evolving economic factors. The Company anticipates that
current market conditions, including the sub prime lending crisis, rising
foreclosures, weakening home sales and falling home prices, will be primary
influences on the Company’s operations until some stabilization
occurs. It is too early to predict what impact any government
measures may have on the Company’s business. Operating results can
vary from year to year based on cyclical market conditions and do not
necessarily indicate the Company’s future operating results and cash
flows.
Critical Accounting
Estimates and Policies
The
preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of certain assets,
liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures surrounding contingencies
and commitments. Actual results could differ from these
estimates. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company made
no material changes in its critical accounting policies as previously disclosed
in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
20
Results of
Operations
For the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, net premiums written increased 4.3% to $18,912,388,
investment income decreased 13.7% to $960,454 and total revenues increased 6.2%
to $21,620,559 compared with the prior year period. The Company
reported net income in the second quarter of $2,115,473 compared with a net loss
of $273,934 for the same quarter in 2008. Net income per diluted
share was $0.92, versus net loss per diluted share of $0.11 in the same period
of 2008.
For the
six-month period ended June 30, 2009, net premiums written decreased 1.7% to
$35,322,208, investment income decreased 18.5% to $1,950,089, total revenues
decreased 2.2% to $40,302,968 and net income increased 91.9% to $3,550,436, all
compared with the first six months of 2008. Net income per basic and
diluted common share increased 101.3% and 102.6% to $1.55 and $1.54,
respectively, compared with the six-month period ended June 30,
2008.
Net
operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 were primarily impacted by
a decline in total operating expenses, including a decrease in the provision for
claims of $1.5 million, because the prior year quarter included a $2.4 million
charge resulting from the occurrence of a large fraud-related claim in
2008. The claim during 2008 resulted from the theft of settlement
funds from an attorney’s trust account intended to satisfy prior deeds of
trusts. Total operating expenses also declined due to decreases in salaries and
related costs.
Operating revenues: Operating
revenues include net premiums written plus other fee income and exchange
services segment income. Investment income and realized investment gains and
losses are not included in operating revenues and are discussed separately
following operating revenues.
Although
net premiums written in the first six months of 2009 decreased slightly over the
same period in 2008, the volume or total number of title orders issued increased
in the first six months of 2009 to 123,830, compared with 112,884 policies and
commitments issued in the same period in 2008, with the increase reflecting
growth in mortgage refinancing transactions.
The
average fee per order declined, with the decrease reflecting an increase in the
proportion of title premiums originating from refinance
transactions. The fee per order tends to change as the mix of
refinance and purchase transactions changes, because refinance transactions are
discounted and typically only require a lender’s policy, resulting in a lower
premium.
Following
is a breakdown between branch and agency premiums for the three and six months
ended June 30:
21
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Branch
|
$ | 6,656,374 |
35
|
$ | 6,901,291 |
38
|
$ | 12,699,378 |
36
|
$ | 14,266,121 |
40
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Agency
|
12,256,014 |
65
|
11,226,691 |
62
|
22,622,830 |
64
|
21,675,221 |
60
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 18,912,388 |
100
|
$ | 18,127,982 |
100
|
$ | 35,322,208 |
100
|
$ | 35,941,342 |
100
|
Title insurance premiums increased
4.3% to $18,912,388 in the second quarter of 2009 compared with the comparable
period in 2008. Total premiums written were positively impacted by an
increase in the Company’s agency premiums.
Net premiums written from branch
operations decreased 3.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with
the same period in the prior year. Net premiums written from branch
operations decreased 11.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from the same
period in the prior year, primarily, management believes, due to the downturn in
the real estate market. Of the Company’s 29 branch locations that underwrite
title insurance policies, 27 are located in North Carolina, and as a result,
branch premiums written primarily represent North Carolina
business.
Agency net premiums increased 9.2%
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 compared with the same period in the prior
year, as a result of an increase in refinance activity, growth in the customer
base, increases in the percentage of Company policies originated by established
agencies, as well as the addition of new agencies to the Company’s
network. Agency net premiums increased 4.4% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared with the same period in the prior year.
Following
is a schedule of premiums written for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 in all states in which the Company’s two insurance subsidiaries
ITIC and NE-ITIC currently underwrite insurance:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
State
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
Illinois
|
$ | 765,631 | $ | 564,584 | $ | 1,857,221 | $ | 1,154,553 | ||||||||
Kentucky
|
949,874 | 815,131 | 1,820,177 | 1,631,941 | ||||||||||||
Michigan
|
1,778,422 | 904,735 | 2,630,695 | 1,950,562 | ||||||||||||
New
York
|
880,406 | 685,689 | 1,835,843 | 1,197,887 | ||||||||||||
North
Carolina
|
8,293,158 | 8,767,479 | 15,857,365 | 17,716,146 | ||||||||||||
Pennsylvania
|
876,633 | 522,147 | 1,485,818 | 965,276 | ||||||||||||
South
Carolina
|
1,345,921 | 2,012,755 | 2,531,851 | 3,916,135 | ||||||||||||
Tennessee
|
752,791 | 614,000 | 1,318,559 | 1,155,674 | ||||||||||||
Virginia
|
1,472,687 | 1,686,833 | 2,700,451 | 3,208,627 | ||||||||||||
West
Virginia
|
610,139 | 641,537 | 1,157,720 | 1,112,435 | ||||||||||||
Other
States
|
1,219,899 | 963,802 | 2,159,658 | 1,976,874 | ||||||||||||
Direct
Premiums
|
18,945,561 | 18,178,692 | 35,355,358 | 35,986,110 | ||||||||||||
Reinsurance
Assumed
|
- | 200 | 800 | 96,544 | ||||||||||||
Reinsurance
Ceded
|
(33,173 | ) | (50,910 | ) | (33,950 | ) | (141,312 | ) | ||||||||
Net
Premiums
|
$ | 18,912,388 | $ | 18,127,982 | $ | 35,322,208 | $ | 35,941,342 |
22
Operating revenues from the Company’s
two subsidiaries that provide tax-deferred exchange services (ITEC and ITAC)
increased 351.1% in the second quarter of 2009 compared with the second quarter
of 2008. For the first six months ended June 30, 2009, operating
revenues from ITEC and ITAC increased 32.5% compared with the first six months
of 2008.
In July 2008, the Internal Revenue
Service (“IRS”) finalized its proposed regulations regarding treatment of funds
held by qualified intermediaries. As originally proposed, these rules
would have negatively affected the ability of qualified intermediaries to retain
a portion of the interest income earned on exchange fund deposits held by the
Company during exchange transactions, which could have had a material adverse
effect upon the profitability of the Company’s exchange segment. As
adopted however, the new regulations apply only to individual exchange account
balances over $2 million. The regulations have only recently been
adopted, and therefore the Company has had only limited experience under this
new regime; it is possible that these new regulations may have unanticipated
consequences on the revenues and profitability of the Company’s exchange
services segment.
Other revenues primarily include
investment management fee income, income related to the Company’s other equity
method investments and agency service fees, as well as search fee and other
ancillary fees. Other revenues were $2,695,886 for the first six
months of 2009 compared with $2,532,628 in the prior year
period.
Nonoperating revenues:
Investment income and realized gains and losses from sales and
impairments of investments are included in nonoperating revenues.
The
Company derives a substantial portion of its income from investments in
municipal and corporate bonds and equity securities. The Company’s
title insurance subsidiaries are required by statute to maintain minimum levels
of investments in order to protect the interests of policyholders. In
formulating its investment strategy, the Company has emphasized after-tax
income. The investments are primarily in fixed maturity securities
and, to a lesser extent, equity securities.
As new funds become available, they are
invested in accordance with the Company’s investment policy and corporate
goals. Securities purchased may include a combination of taxable
fixed-income securities, tax-exempt securities and equities. The
Company strives to maintain a high quality investment
portfolio. Interest and investment income levels are primarily a
function of general market performance, interest rates and the amount of cash
available for investment.
Investment
income decreased 18.5% to $1,950,089 in the first six months of 2009, compared
with $2,392,040 in the same period in 2008 and decreased 13.7% to $960,454 from
$1,112,681 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the same
period in 2008. The decline in investment income in 2009 was due
primarily to lower levels of interest earned on short-term funds, as the capital
markets experienced significant distress beginning in the second quarter of
2008. The decline was also due to declines in the average investment
portfolio balance.
The Company’s investment policies have
been designed to balance multiple investment goals, including, to assure a
stable source of income from interest and dividends, protect capital, provide
sufficient liquidity to meet insurance underwriting and other obligations as
they become payable in the future and capital
appreciation. Dispositions of equity securities at a realized gain or
loss reflect such factors as industry sector allocation decisions, ongoing
assessments of issuers’ business prospects and tax planning
considerations. Additionally, the amount of net realized investment
gains and losses are affected by assessments of securities’ valuation for
other-than-temporary impairment. As a result of the interaction of
these factors and considerations, net realized investment gains or losses can
vary significantly from period to period. The Company generally
intends to hold securities in unrealized loss positions until they mature or
recover. However, the Company does sell securities in unrealized loss
positions under certain circumstances, such as when it has evidence of a
significant deterioration in the issuer’s creditworthiness.
23
Net realized loss on investments
totaled $289,942 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared with net
realized loss of $123,703 for the corresponding period in 2008. The
2009 net loss, which included impairment charges totaling $460,203 on certain
equity and equity method investments in the Company’s portfolio that were deemed
to be other-than-temporarily impaired, was partially offset by net
realized gains on sales of investments of $170,261. Management has
determined that the unrealized losses from remaining fixed income and equity
securities at June 30, 2009 are temporary in nature.
Operating
Expenses: The Company’s operating expenses consist primarily
of commissions to agents, salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes,
provisions for claims and office occupancy and operations. Total
operating expenses decreased 10.1% and 8.3% for the three and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2009 compared with the same periods in 2008. The total
decrease in year-to-date operating expenses resulted primarily from decreases in
the provision for claims and salaries, employee benefits and payroll
taxes.
Following
is a summary of the Company’s operating expenses for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Intersegment eliminations have been
netted with each segment; therefore, the individual segment amounts will not
agree to Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Title
insurance
|
$ | 17,616,715 | 94 | $ | 19,463,209 | 93 | $ | 33,625,564 | 94 | $ | 36,127,202 | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange
services
|
182,178 | 1 | 351,185 | 2 | 221,471 | 1 | 650,352 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
All
other
|
953,193 | 5 | 1,039,340 | 5 | 1,808,497 | 5 | 2,111,719 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 18,752,086 | 100 | $ | 20,853,734 | 100 | $ | 35,655,532 | 100 | $ | 38,889,273 | 100 |
On a combined basis, profit margins
were 8.8% and 4.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Total revenues decreased 2.2% in the first six months of 2009 and
operating expenses decreased 8.3%, contributing to a higher combined profit
margin for 2009.
Agent commissions represent the portion
of premiums retained by agents pursuant to the terms of their respective agency
contracts. Commissions to agents increased 11.1% from the prior year
second quarter primarily due to increased premiums from agency operations in
2009 as noted previously. Commission expense as a percentage of net
premiums written by agents was 72.1% and 70.8% for the second quarter 2009 and
2008, respectively. Commission rates vary by the geographic area in
which the commission is paid and may be influenced by state
regulations.
24
The provision for claims as a
percentage of net premiums written (loss provision ratio) was 14.6% for the
second quarter of 2009 versus 23.7% for the same period in 2008. For
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the loss provision ratio was 13.6%
and 17.7%, respectively. The high loss provision ratios in the second
quarter of 2008 reflect the negative impact of large fraud-related claims that
were reported in the prior year period. Loss provision ratios are
subject to variability and are reviewed and adjusted as experience
develops. Declining economic conditions and/or declines in
transaction volumes have historically been drivers of increased claim expenses
due to increased mechanics liens, defalcations and other matters which may be
discovered during property foreclosures. The decrease in the loss
provision ratio for the second quarter of 2009 from the 2008 level resulted in
approximately $1.7 million less in reserves than would have been recorded at the
higher 2008 level. If material occurrences of mortgage-related fraud
and other similar types of claims occur, the Company’s ultimate loss estimates
for recent policy years could increase, which could result in an increase in the
provision for claims in current operations.
Paid claims were higher than expected
during the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to unfavorable claims experience
in policy years 2006, 2008 and 2009. The loss provision ratio
remained elevated relative to historic ranges due in part to the ongoing upward
trend of mortgage foreclosures, but compared favorably to the prior year period
due to a $2.4 million charge for a large fraud-related claim in that
quarter. Management considers the loss provision ratios for the
second quarter and first six months of 2009 to be appropriate given the
long-tail nature of title insurance claims and the inherent uncertainty in title
insurance claims emergence patterns.
Title claims are typically reported and
paid within the first several years of policy issuance. The provision
for claims reflects actual payments of claims, net of recovery amounts, plus
adjustments to the specific and incurred but not reported claims reserves, the
latter of which are actuarially determined based on historical claims
experience, among other factors. Actual payments of claims, net of
recoveries, were $4,453,940 and $6,086,010 in the first six months of 2009 and
2008, respectively. Payments of claims in the second quarter of 2008
were significantly impacted by a $2.1 million payment from the occurrence of the
large fraud claim previously discussed.
At June 30, 2009, the total reserves
for claims were $39,583,000. Of that total, $6,848,311 was reserved
for specific claims, and $32,734,689 was reserved for claims for which the
Company had no notice. Because of the uncertainty of future claims,
changes in economic conditions and the fact that many claims do not materialize
for several years, reserve estimates are subject to variability.
Changes in the expected liability for
claims for prior periods reflect the uncertainty of the claims environment, as
well as the limited predicting power of historical data. The Company
continually updates and refines its reserve estimates as current experience
develops and credible data emerges. Adjustments may be required as
new information develops which often varies from past
experience. Movements in the reserves related to prior periods were
primarily the result of changes to estimates to better reflect the latest
reported loss data, rather than as a result of material changes to underlying
key actuarial assumptions or methodologies. Such changes include
payments on claims closed during the quarter, new details that emerge on
still-open cases that cause claims adjusters to increase or decrease the case
reserve and the impact that these types of changes have on the Company’s total
loss provision.
25
Salaries, employee benefits
and payroll taxes were $9,667,242 and $10,809,562 for the fist six months of
2009 and 2008, respectively. Salaries and related costs decreased
about $1.1 million for the six months ended 2009, partially due to a reduction
in headcount. On a consolidated basis, salaries, employee benefits
and payroll taxes as a percentage of total revenues were 20.9% and 26.1% for the
second quarter ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For the
first six months of the year, salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes as a
percentage of total revenues were 24.0% and 26.2% for 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The title insurance segment’s total salaries, employee benefits
and payroll taxes accounted for 85.0% and 83.9% of the total consolidated amount
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Overall office occupancy and operations
as a percentage of total revenues was 5.6% and 6.5% for the second quarter ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 5.7% and 6.5% for the first six months
of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in office occupancy and
operations expense in 2009 compared with 2008 was due to a decrease in various
items, including maintenance, depreciation, postage and
telecommunications.
Title insurance companies are generally
not subject to state income or franchise taxes. However, in most
states they are subject to premium and retaliatory taxes. Tax rates
and bases vary from state to state. Premium and retaliatory taxes as
a percentage of net premiums written were 2.1% and 2.3% for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Professional and contract labor fees
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared with the same period
in 2008 decreased primarily due to a decrease in contract labor fees associated
with investments in infrastructure and technology compared with the first six
months of 2008.
Other operating expenses primarily
include miscellaneous operating expenses of the trust division and other
miscellaneous expenses of the title segment. These amounts typically
fluctuate in relation with transaction volume of the title segment and the trust
division.
Income Taxes: The
provision for income taxes was 23.6% and 20.4% of income before income taxes for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
effective income tax rates for the quarters were below the U.S. federal
statutory income tax rate (34%), primarily due to a change in the proportion of
tax-exempt investment income to pre-tax income.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Liquidity: Due to
the Company’s historical ability to generate positive cash flows from its
consolidated operations and investment income, management believes that funds
generated from operations will enable the Company to adequately meet its current
operating cash needs for the foreseeable future. However, there can
be no assurance that future experience will be similar to historical experience,
since they are influenced by such factors as the interest rate environment, the
Company’s claims-paying ability and its financial strength
ratings. The Company is unaware of any trend or occurrence that is
likely to result in material adverse liquidity changes, but continually assesses
its capital allocation strategy. The Company’s cash requirements
include general operating expenses, income taxes, capital expenditures and
dividends on its common stock declared by the Board of Directors and share
repurchases. In addition to operational liquidity, the Company
maintains a high degree of liquidity within its investment portfolio in the form
of short-term investments and other readily marketable securities.
26
The majority of the Company’s
investment portfolio is considered as available-for-sale. The Company
reviews the status of each of its securities quarterly to determine whether an
other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The Company’s criteria
generally includes the degree to which the fair value of a security is less than
80% of its amortized cost and the investment rating of the security,
as well as how long the security has been in an unrealized loss
position. The Company’s securities that have had an unrealized loss
in excess of one year are primarily investment-grade, long-term bonds and
equities that the Company has the ability and intent to hold until a recovery of
fair value, which may be until maturity for fixed income
securities.
Cash Flows: Net
cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009
amounted to $172,264, compared with net cash used in operating activities of
$1,000,875 for the same six-month period of 2008. The decrease in net
cash used in operating activities in 2009 was primarily attributable to the
increase in net income in 2009 and decreased claims payments in
2009. These decreases in cash used were partially offset by the
increase in receivables and other assets.
Payment of Dividends from
Subsidiaries: The Company believes that all anticipated cash
requirements for current operations will be met from internally generated funds,
through cash dividends and distributions from subsidiaries and cash generated by
investment securities. The Company’s significant sources of funds are
dividends and distributions from its subsidiaries. The holding
company receives cash from its subsidiaries in the form of dividends and as
reimbursements for operating and other administrative expenses. The
reimbursements are executed within the guidelines of management agreements
between the holding company and its subsidiaries. The ability of the
Company’s insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to the Company is subject to
regulation in the states where the subsidiaries do business. These
regulations, among other things, require prior regulatory approval of the
payment of dividends and other intercompany transfers. The Company
believes amounts available for transfer from the insurance subsidiaries are
adequate to meet the Company’s current operating needs.
Capital Expenditures: During
2009, the Company has plans for various capital improvement projects, including
computer hardware purchases and several software development projects, that are
anticipated to be funded via cash flows from operations. All
anticipated capital expenditures are subject to periodic review and may vary
depending on a number of factors.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and
Contractual Obligations: It is not the general practice of the
Company to enter into off-balance sheet arrangements; nor is it the policy of
the Company to issue guarantees to third parties. Off-balance sheet
arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under noncancelable
operating leases, payments due under various agreements with third party service
providers, and unaccrued obligations pursuant to certain executive employment
agreements.
27
The total reserve for all reported and
unreported losses the Company incurred through June 30, 2009 is represented by
the reserves for claims. Information regarding the claims reserves can be found
in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q and under
“Results of Operations – Operating expenses” above. Further
information on contractual obligations related to the reserves for claims can be
found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 as filed with the SEC.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
For a description of the Company’s
recent accounting pronouncements, please refer to Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.
Safe Harbor
Statement
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as
well as information included in future filings by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and information contained in written
material, press releases and oral statements issued by or on behalf of the
Company, contains, or may contain, “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that reflect
management’s current outlook for future periods. These statements may
be identified by the use of words such as “plan,” “expect,” “aim,” “believe,”
“project,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “should,” “could” and other
expressions that indicate future events and trends. All statements that address
expectations or projections about the future, including statements about the
Company’s strategy for growth, product and service development, market share
position, claims, expenditures, financial results and cash requirements, are
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on certain
assumptions and expectations of future events that are subject to risks and
uncertainties.
Actual future results and trends may
differ materially from historical results or those projected in any such
forward-looking statements depending on a variety of factors, including the
following:
·
|
the
level of real estate transactions, the level of mortgage origination
volumes (including refinancing) and changes to the insurance requirements
of participants in the secondary mortgage market, and the effect of these
factors on the demand for title
insurance;
|
·
|
changes
in general economic conditions, including the performance of the capital,
credit and real estate markets;
|
·
|
significant
changes to applicable government
regulations;
|
·
|
the
possible inadequacy of provisions for claims to cover actual claim
losses;
|
·
|
the
incidence of fraud-related losses;
|
·
|
heightened
regulatory scrutiny;
|
·
|
unanticipated
adverse changes in securities markets including interest rates, which
could result in material losses on the Company’s
investments;
|
·
|
the
Company’s dependence on key management personnel, the loss of whom could
have a material adverse affect on the Company’s
business;
|
·
|
the
Company’s ability to develop and offer products and services that meet
changing industry standards in a timely and cost-effective
manner;
|
·
|
statutory
requirements applicable to the Company’s insurance subsidiaries which
require them to maintain minimum levels of capital, surplus and reserves
and restrict the amount of dividends that they may pay to the Company
without prior regulatory approval
and
|
·
|
the
concentration of key accounting and information systems in a few
locations.
|
28
These and
other risks and uncertainties may be described from time to time in the
Company’s other reports and filings with the SEC. For more details on factors
that could affect expectations, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008. The Company does not undertake to
update any forward-looking statements to reflect circumstances or events that
occur after the date the forward-looking statements are made.
No material changes in the Company’s
market risk or market strategy occurred during the current period. A
detailed discussion of market risk is provided in the Company’s 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated
and communicated to the Company’s management as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
No system of controls, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance that the objectives
of the system of controls are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that the system of controls has operated effectively in all
cases. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, however, are
designed to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of disclosure
controls and procedures are met.
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the
Exchange Act, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that
evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of June 30, 2009, to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of
disclosure controls and procedures are met.
Changes to Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.
29
PART
II. OTHER
INFORMATION
The following should be read in
conjunction with and supplements and amends the factors that may affect the
Company’s business or operations described under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item
1A, of the 2008 Annual Report.
The Company and its subsidiaries are
subject to complex government regulations.
The Company’s title insurance
businesses are subject to extensive state laws and regulations by state
insurance authorities in each state in which they operate. These laws
and regulations are primarily intended for the protection of policyholders and
consumers. The nature and extent of these laws and regulations
typically involve, among other matters, licensing and renewal requirements and
trade and marketing practices, including, but not limited to:
·
|
licensing
of insurers and agents;
|
·
|
capital
and surplus requirements;
|
·
|
approval
of premium rates for insurance;
|
·
|
limitations
on types and amounts of
investments;
|
·
|
restrictions
on the size of risks that may be insured by a single
company;
|
·
|
deposits
of securities for the benefit of policy
holders;
|
·
|
filing
of annual and other reports with respect to financial
condition;
|
·
|
approval
of policy forms; and
|
·
|
regulations
regarding the use of personal
information.
|
These laws
and regulations are subject to change and may restrict the Company’s ability to
implement rate increases or other actions that it may want to take to enhance
its operating results or have a negative impact on its ability to generate
revenue and earnings.
Some of
the Company’s other businesses also operate under specific state and federal
guidelines. Any changes in the applicable regulatory environment or
changes in existing regulations could restrict its existing or future
operations. Revenues from the Company’s exchange services segment are
closely related to the tax rate on capital gains and other provisions in the
Internal Revenue Code. The Company’s revenues in future periods will
continue to be subject to these and other factors which are beyond its
control.
In
addition, the investment management and trust services is regulated by the North
Carolina Commissioner of Banks.
On July 8,
2009, House Resolution 3126 was introduced to enact an Obama Administration
proposal which would establish a new independent federal agency, to be called
the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (“CFPA”). If enacted, CFPA
will be primarily responsible for “promoting transparency, simplicity, fairness,
accountability, and access in the market for consumer financial products and
services.” Regulatory oversight by the CFPA will include title
insurance. The primary mandate under which the CFPA will operate is:
“The Agency shall seek to promote transparency, simplicity, fairness,
accountability and access in the market for consumer financial products or
services.”
30
As House Resolution 3126 is only in the
initial stages of the legislative process, it is premature for the Company to
fully assess the potential impact this legislation may have on the Company’s
principal line of business.
(a)
|
None
|
(b)
|
None
|
(c)
|
The
following table provides information about purchases by the Company (and
all affiliated purchasers) during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of
equity securities that are registered by the Company pursuant to Section
12 of the Exchange Act:
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
Period
|
Total
Number of
Shares Purchased |
Average
Price
Paid per Share |
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part of Publicly Announced
Plan
|
Maximum
Number of Shares
that
May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under
the Plan
|
||||||||||||
Beginning
of period
|
499,468 | |||||||||||||||
04/01/09–
04/30/09
|
- | - | - | 499,468 | ||||||||||||
05/01/09–
05/31/09
|
286 | $ | 29.76 | 286 | 499,182 | |||||||||||
06/01/09–
06/30/09
|
- | - | - | 499,182 | ||||||||||||
Total:
|
286 | $ | 29.76 | 286 | 499,182 |
For the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company purchased an aggregate of 286 shares of
the Company’s common stock pursuant to the purchase plan (the “Plan”) that was
publicly announced on June 5, 2000. On November 10, 2008, the Board
of Directors of the Company approved the purchase of an additional 394,582
shares pursuant to the Plan, such that there was authority remaining under the
Plan to purchase up to an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock pursuant to the Plan immediately after this approval. Unless
terminated earlier by resolution of the Board of Directors, the Plan will expire
when all shares authorized for purchase under the Plan have been
purchased. The Company intends to make further purchases under this
Plan.
31
(a) Investors
Title Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 20,
2009.
(c) (1)
The voting results for the proposal to elect three Directors to the Company’s
Board of Directors, each for a three-year term, are as
follows:
Director
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstentions
|
Withheld
|
Broker
Non-votes
|
|||||||||||||||
James
A. Fine, Jr.
|
1,910,550
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
86,539
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||||
H.
Joe King, Jr.
|
1,901,221
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
95,868
|
N/A
|
|||||||||||||||
James
R. Morton
|
1,768,872
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
228,217
|
N/A
|
(2)
Approval of the 2009 Stock Appreciation Right (“SAR”) Plan
For
|
Against
|
Abstentions
|
Withheld
|
Broker
Non-votes
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
SAR Plan
|
1,461,891
|
274,493
|
5,627
|
0
|
0
|
(a) Exhibits
|
|
10
|
Investors
Title Company 2009 Stock Appreciation Right Plan, incorporated by
reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed on April
17, 2009
|
31(i)
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
31(ii)
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
32
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
INVESTORS
TITLE COMPANY
|
|||
|
By:
|
/s/ James A. Fine, Jr.
|
|
James
A. Fine, Jr.
|
|||
President,
Principal Financial Officer and
|
|||
Principal
Accounting Officer
|
|||
Dated:
July 31, 2009
|
33