INVESTORS TITLE CO - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
[ ]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from _____________________
to ________________________
Commission
File Number: 0-11774
INVESTORS
TITLE COMPANY
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
North Carolina
|
56-1110199
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification
No.)
|
121 North Columbia Street,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip Code)
(919)
968-2200
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes X No
___
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to submit and post such files). Yes ___ No
___
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large
accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer
___ Accelerated filer _X
Non-accelerated filer _ Smaller
reporting company ___
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes ___ No X
As of April 24, 2009, there were
2,295,118 common shares of the registrant outstanding.
INVESTORS
TITLE COMPANY
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
||
1 | |||
2
|
|||
3
|
|||
4
|
|||
5 | |||
Item
2.
|
15 | ||
Item
3.
|
24 | ||
Item
4.
|
25 | ||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
2.
|
26 | ||
Item
6.
|
26 | ||
27 |
Item
1. Financial
Statements
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
||||||||
As
of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
March
31, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Investments
in securities:
|
||||||||
Fixed
maturities:
|
||||||||
Held-to-maturity,
at amortized cost (fair value: 2009: $457,559; 2008:
$462,580)
|
$ | 446,793 | $ | 451,681 | ||||
Available-for-sale,
at fair value (amortized cost: 2009: $84,509,877; 2008:
$89,228,010)
|
87,187,255 | 87,708,500 | ||||||
Equity
securities, available-for-sale, at fair value (cost: 2009: $8,673,948;
2008: $9,158,785)
|
8,923,089 | 9,965,297 | ||||||
Short-term
investments
|
15,701,808 | 15,725,513 | ||||||
Other
investments
|
2,101,894 | 2,040,962 | ||||||
Total
investments
|
114,360,839 | 115,891,953 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
4,822,641 | 5,155,046 | ||||||
Premiums
and fees receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
of
|
||||||||
$1,534,000
and $1,297,000 for 2009 and 2008, respectively
|
6,614,428 | 4,933,797 | ||||||
Accrued
interest and dividends
|
1,046,637 | 1,225,070 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
1,213,560 | 1,215,146 | ||||||
Property
acquired in settlement of claims
|
414,413 | 395,734 | ||||||
Property,
net
|
4,200,366 | 4,422,318 | ||||||
Current
income taxes receivable
|
2,546,849 | 2,777,829 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes, net
|
2,801,536 | 3,841,295 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 138,021,269 | $ | 139,858,188 | ||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Reserves
for claims
|
$ | 38,988,000 | $ | 39,238,000 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
7,514,108 | 10,762,300 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
46,502,108 | 50,000,300 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
||||||||
Class
A Junior Participating preferred stock (shares authorized 100,000; no
shares issued)
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock-no par value (shares authorized 10,000,000;
|
||||||||
2,294,118
and 2,293,268 shares issued and outstanding 2009 and 2008,
|
||||||||
respectively,
excluding 291,676 shares for 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
of
common stock held by the Company's subsidiary)
|
1 | 1 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
89,692,794 | 88,248,452 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,826,366 | 1,609,435 | ||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
91,519,161 | 89,857,888 | ||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
$ | 138,021,269 | $ | 139,858,188 |
See
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
||||||||
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Revenues:
|
||||||||
Underwriting
income:
|
||||||||
Premiums
written
|
$ | 16,410,597 | $ | 17,903,762 | ||||
Less-premiums
for reinsurance ceded
|
777 | 90,402 | ||||||
Net
premiums written
|
16,409,820 | 17,813,360 | ||||||
Investment
income - interest and dividends
|
989,635 | 1,279,359 | ||||||
Net
realized (loss) gain on investments
|
(299,937 | ) | 118,569 | |||||
Exchange
services revenue
|
323,764 | 404,698 | ||||||
Other
|
1,259,127 | 1,244,933 | ||||||
Total
Revenues
|
18,682,409 | 20,860,919 | ||||||
Operating
Expenses:
|
||||||||
Commissions
to agents
|
7,532,209 | 7,319,270 | ||||||
Provision
for claims
|
2,047,126 | 2,048,596 | ||||||
Salaries,
employee benefits and payroll taxes
|
5,138,176 | 5,497,936 | ||||||
Office
occupancy and operations
|
1,098,582 | 1,366,373 | ||||||
Business
development
|
262,817 | 485,451 | ||||||
Filing
fees and taxes, other than payroll and income
|
157,051 | 192,629 | ||||||
Premium
and retaliatory taxes
|
367,262 | 367,337 | ||||||
Professional
and contract labor fees
|
302,013 | 521,409 | ||||||
Other
|
(1,790 | ) | 236,538 | |||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
16,903,446 | 18,035,539 | ||||||
Income
Before Income Taxes
|
1,778,963 | 2,825,380 | ||||||
Provision
For Income Taxes
|
344,000 | 701,000 | ||||||
Net
Income
|
$ | 1,434,963 | $ | 2,124,380 | ||||
Basic
Earnings Per Common Share
|
$ | 0.63 | $ | 0.88 | ||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding - Basic
|
2,293,951 | 2,412,499 | ||||||
Diluted
Earnings Per Common Share
|
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.87 | ||||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding - Diluted
|
2,296,041 | 2,437,195 | ||||||
Cash
Dividends Paid Per Common Share
|
$ | 0.07 | $ | 0.07 |
See
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
2,411,318 | $ | 1 | $ | 95,739,827 | $ | 3,536,012 | $ | 99,275,840 | |||||||||||
Net
income
|
2,124,380 | 2,124,380 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($.07 per share)
|
(169,134 | ) | (169,134 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Shares
of common stock repurchased and retired
|
(4,148 | ) | (183,444 | ) | (183,444 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in payment of bonuses
|
||||||||||||||||||||
and
fees
|
40 | 1,946 | 1,946 | |||||||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
7,810 | 142,865 | 142,865 | |||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
24,506 | 24,506 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
related to FASB Statement No. 158
|
3,364 | 3,364 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized loss on investments, net of tax
|
(617,725 | ) | (617,725 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2008
|
2,415,020 | $ | 1 | $ | 97,680,946 | $ | 2,921,651 | $ | 100,602,598 | |||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
2,293,268 | $ | 1 | $ | 88,248,452 | $ | 1,609,435 | $ | 89,857,888 | |||||||||||
Net
income
|
1,434,963 | 1,434,963 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends
($.07 per share)
|
(160,588 | ) | (160,588 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
850 | 10,606 | 10,606 | |||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation expense
|
159,361 | 159,361 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
related to FASB Statement No. 158
|
3,695 | 3,695 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
unrealized gain on investments, net of tax
|
213,236 | 213,236 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2009
|
2,294,118 | $ | 1 | $ | 89,692,794 | $ | 1,826,366 | $ | 91,519,161 |
See
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
||||||||
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Operating
Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 1,434,963 | $ | 2,124,380 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
||||||||
used
in operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
210,916 | 277,325 | ||||||
Amortization
on investments, net
|
72,070 | 79,731 | ||||||
Amortization
of prior service cost
|
5,599 | 5,097 | ||||||
Issuance
of common stock in payment of bonuses and fees
|
- | 1,946 | ||||||
Share-based
compensation expense related to stock options
|
159,361 | 24,506 | ||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts on premiums receivable
|
237,000 | (316,000 | ) | |||||
Net
loss on disposals of property
|
11,536 | 1,999 | ||||||
Net
realized loss (gain) on investments
|
299,937 | (118,569 | ) | |||||
Net
earnings from other investments
|
(424,470 | ) | (273,135 | ) | ||||
Provision
for claims
|
2,047,126 | 2,048,596 | ||||||
Provision
for deferred income taxes
|
916,000 | 389,000 | ||||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Increase
in receivables and other assets
|
(1,756,291 | ) | (43,930 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in current income taxes receivable
|
230,980 | - | ||||||
Decrease
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(3,248,192 | ) | (2,022,952 | ) | ||||
Decrease
in current income taxes payable
|
- | (1,168,000 | ) | |||||
Payments
of claims, net of recoveries
|
(2,297,126 | ) | (1,944,596 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(2,100,591 | ) | (934,602 | ) | ||||
Investing
Activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale securities
|
(2,280,404 | ) | (1,612,212 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of short-term securities
|
(616,196 | ) | (9,226,978 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of other investments
|
(96,255 | ) | (393,607 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
3,977,480 | 11,195,611 | ||||||
Proceeds
from maturities of held-to-maturity securities
|
5,000 | 505,000 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sales and maturities of short-term securities
|
639,901 | 873,472 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sales and distributions of other investments
|
289,142 | 78,958 | ||||||
Purchases
of property
|
(500 | ) | (67,269 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
1,918,168 | 1,352,975 | ||||||
Financing
Activities:
|
||||||||
Repurchases
of common stock, net
|
- | (183,444 | ) | |||||
Exercise
of options
|
10,606 | 142,865 | ||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(160,588 | ) | (169,134 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(149,982 | ) | (209,713 | ) | ||||
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(332,405 | ) | 208,660 | |||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
|
5,155,046 | 3,000,762 | ||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
|
$ | 4,822,641 | $ | 3,209,422 | ||||
Supplemental
Disclosures:
|
||||||||
Cash
(Received) Paid During the Period for:
|
||||||||
Income
Taxes, net of refunds
|
$ | (803,000 | ) | $ | 1,480,000 | |||
Non
cash net unrealized (loss) gain on investments, net of deferred
tax
|
||||||||
(benefit)
provision of ($121,855) and $316,351 for 2009 and
2008,
|
||||||||
respectively
|
$ | (213,236 | ) | $ | 617,725 |
See
notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
March 31,
2009
(Unaudited)
Note 1 - Basis of
Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
Reference
should be made to the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" of Investors
Title Company’s (“the Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 for a complete description of the Company’s significant
accounting policies.
Principles of Consolidation –
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the
accounts and operations of Investors Title Company and its subsidiaries
(Investors Title Insurance Company, Northeast Investors Title Insurance Company,
Investors Title Exchange Corporation, Investors Title Accommodation Corporation,
Investors Title Management Services, Inc., Investors Title Commercial Agency,
LLC, Investors Capital Management Company, and Investors Trust Company), and
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and
footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been
condensed or omitted. All intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
In the
opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in
the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been
included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. Operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
Use of Estimates and
Assumptions – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates and assumptions used.
Reclassification - Certain
2008 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009
classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on net income
or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
– In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 160,
“Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of
Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 amends ARB
51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This
Statement requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (previously
known as a minority interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements
and separate from the parent’s equity. The amount of net income attributable to
the noncontrolling interest will be included in consolidated net income on the
face of the income statement. It also amends certain of ARB No. 51’s
consolidation procedures for consistency with the requirements of SFAS 141(R).
SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008, with earlier adoption
prohibited. The Company has adopted this new Statement effective January 1,
2009, with no significant impact on the reporting of the Company’s statements of
financial position or results of operations.
5
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). This Statement identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the
preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are
presented in accordance with GAAP. With the issuance of this Statement, the FASB
concluded that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed toward the entity and not
its auditor, and, reside in the accounting literature established by the FASB,
as opposed to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”)
Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This Statement is
effective 60 days following the Securities & Exchange Commission’s approval
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to Audit Standards
AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company is currently evaluating the effect
of adopting this new Statement and anticipates that the Statement will not have
a significant impact on the reporting of the Company’s results of
operations.
In January
2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Emerging Issues Task Force
(“EITF”) 99-20-1, “Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No.
99-20.” This Position amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue No. 99-20,
“Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests
and Beneficial Interests That Continue To Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized
Financial Assets,” to achieve more consistent determination of whether an
other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also retains
and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary impairment assessment
and the related disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” and other related
guidance. This Position is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after December 15, 2008 and shall be applied
prospectively. Retrospective application to a prior interim or annual
reporting period is not permitted. Adoption of this Position did not
have a significant impact on the reporting of the Company’s results of
operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the
Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions
That Are Not Orderly.” This FSP provides for additional guidance for estimating
fair value in accordance with SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly
decreased. This Position is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and shall be applied
prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of
adopting this new Position in the second quarter of 2009 and anticipates that
the Position will not have a significant impact on the reporting of the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments.” The objective of an other-than-temporary impairment analysis under
U.S. GAAP is to determine whether the holder of an investment in a debt or
equity security for which changes in fair value are not regularly recognized in
earnings, such as securities classified as held-to-maturity or
available-for-sale, should recognize a loss in earnings when the investment is
impaired. This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment
guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational
and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary
impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and
measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. This Position is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending
after March 15, 2009. Earlier adoption for periods ending before
March 15, 2009 is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating
the effect of adopting this new Position in the second quarter of 2009 and
anticipates that the Position will not have a significant impact on the
reporting of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
6
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No.
FAS 107-1 and APB Opinion 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments.” This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28 to require
disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.
This Position is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15,
2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of adopting this
new Position in the second quarter of 2009 and anticipates that the Position
will not have a significant impact on the reporting of the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 - Reserves for
Claims
Transactions in the reserves for claims
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008
are summarized as follows:
March
31, 2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
|||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 39,238,000 | $ | 36,975,000 | ||||
Provision,
charged to operations
|
2,047,126 | 15,206,637 | ||||||
Payments
of claims, net of recoveries
|
(2,297,126 | ) | (12,943,637 | ) | ||||
Ending
balance
|
$ | 38,988,000 | $ | 39,238,000 |
The total
reserve for all reported and unreported losses the Company incurred through
March 31, 2009 is represented by the reserves for claims. The Company's reserves
for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses are established using estimated
amounts required to settle claims for which notice has been received (reported)
and the amount estimated to be required to satisfy incurred claims of
policyholders which may be reported in the future. Despite the variability of
such estimates, management believes that the reserves are adequate to cover
claim losses which might result from pending and future claims for policies
issued through March 31, 2009. The Company continually reviews and
adjusts its reserve estimates to reflect its loss experience and any new
information that becomes available. Adjustments resulting from such
reviews may be significant.
Claims and
losses paid are charged to the reserves for claims. Although claims losses are
typically paid in cash, occasionally claims are settled by purchasing the
interest of the insured or the claimant in the real property. When this event
occurs, the acquiring company carries assets at the lower of cost or estimated
realizable value, net of any indebtedness on the property.
7
Note 3 - Comprehensive
Income
Total
comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$1,651,894 and $1,510,019, respectively. Other comprehensive income
is comprised of unrealized gains or losses on the Company’s available-for-sale
securities, net of tax and amortization of prior service cost and unrealized
gains and losses in net periodic benefit costs related to postretirement
liabilities, net of tax.
Note 4 - Earnings Per Common
Share and Share Awards
Basic
earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting
period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing net
income by the combination of dilutive potential common stock, comprised of
shares issuable under the Company’s share-based compensation plans and the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting
period. Dilutive common share equivalents includes the dilutive
effect of in-the-money share-based awards, which are calculated based on the
average share price for each period using the treasury stock
method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of a
share-based award, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for future service
that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of estimated tax
benefits that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital, if any, when the
share-based awards are exercised are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in
the current period. The incremental dilutive potential common shares,
calculated using the treasury stock method were 2,090, and 24,696 for March 31,
2009, and 2008, respectively.
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share for the three months ended March 31:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 1,434,963 | $ | 2,124,380 | ||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - Basic
|
2,293,951 | 2,412,499 | ||||||
Incremental
shares outstanding assuming
|
||||||||
the
exercise of dilutive stock options and SARs (share
settled)
|
2,090 | 24,696 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - Diluted
|
2,296,041 | 2,437,195 | ||||||
Basic
earnings per common share
|
$ | .63 | $ | .88 | ||||
Diluted
earnings per common share
|
$ | .62 | $ | .87 |
There were
14,200 and 3,000 shares excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per
share for the period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, because these
shares were anti-dilutive.
The
Company has adopted employee stock award plans (the "Plans") under which
restricted stock, and options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) to purchase
shares (not to exceed 250,000 shares) of the Company's stock may be granted to
key employees or directors of the Company at a price not less than the market
value on the date of grant. SARs and options (which have
predominantly been incentive stock options) awarded under the Plans thus far are
exercisable and vest immediately or within one year or at 10% to 20% per year
beginning on the date of grant and generally expire in five to ten
years. All SARs issued to date have been share settled
only. There have not been any SARs exercised in 2009, 2008 or
2007.
8
A summary
of share-based award transactions for all share-based award plans
follows:
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||
Number
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||||
Of
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
(years)
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of January 1, 2007
|
74,051 | $ | 21.82 | 4.34 | $ | 2,338,246 | ||||||||||
SARs
granted
|
3,000 | 49.04 | ||||||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(15,390 | ) | 23.74 | |||||||||||||
Options
cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
(1,181 | ) | 17.38 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2007
|
60,480 | $ | 22.77 | 4.11 | $ | 1,377,390 | ||||||||||
SARs
granted
|
3,000 | 47.88 | ||||||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(12,360 | ) | 18.67 | |||||||||||||
Options/SARs
cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
(4,050 | ) | 29.96 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2008
|
47,070 | $ | 24.83 | 3.67 | $ | 666,079 | ||||||||||
SARs
granted
|
75,000 | 27.97 | ||||||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(850 | ) | 12.48 | |||||||||||||
Options/SARs
cancelled/forfeited/expired
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding
as of March 31, 2009
|
121,220 | $ | 26.86 | 5.61 | $ | 429,142 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
as of March 31, 2009
|
53,094 | $ | 26.81 | 4.58 | $ | 283,390 | ||||||||||
Unvested
as of March 31, 2009
|
68,126 | $ | 26.90 | 6.41 | $ | 145,752 |
During the
first quarter of 2009, the Company issued 75,000 share settled SARs to officers
of the Company. SARs give the holder the right to receive stock in
the appreciation in the value of shares of stock from the grant date for a
specified period of time, and as a result, are accounted for as equity
instruments. As such, these were valued using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. The fair value of each award is estimated on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the
weighted-average assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities
are based on both the implied and historical volatility of the Company’s stock.
The Company uses historical data to estimate SAR exercise and employee
termination within the valuation model. The expected term of awards represents
the period of time that SARs granted are expected to be outstanding. The
interest rate for periods during the expected life of the award is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the
grant. The weighted-average fair value for the SARs issued was $8.41
and was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
2009
|
|
Expected
Life in Years
|
5.0
|
Volatility
|
34.26%
|
Interest
Rate
|
1.86%
|
Yield
Rate
|
0.92%
|
9
The fair
value of each SAR granted is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing method with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
2009
|
2008
|
2007
|
|
Expected
Life in Years
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
5.0
|
Volatility
|
34%
|
24%
|
25%
|
Interest
Rate
|
1.9%
|
3.1%
|
4.6%
|
Yield
Rate
|
0.9%
|
0.6%
|
0.5%
|
There was
approximately $159,000 of compensation expense relating to SARs or options
vesting on or before March 31, 2009 included in salaries, employee benefits and
payroll taxes of the consolidated statements of income. As of March
31, 2009, there was approximately $626,000 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the
Company’s stock awards plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 1.3 years.
There have
been no stock options or SARs granted where the exercise price was less than the
market price on the date of grant.
Note 5 – Segment
Information
Consistent with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company has aggregated
its operating segments into two reportable segments: 1) title insurance
services; and 2) tax-deferred exchange services. The remaining
immaterial segments have been combined into a group called All
Other.
The title insurance segment primarily
issues title insurance policies through approved attorneys from underwriting
offices and through independent issuing agents. Title insurance
policies insure titles to residential, institutional, commercial and industrial
properties.
The tax-deferred exchange services
segment acts as an intermediary in tax-deferred exchanges of property held for
productive use in a trade or business or for investing and serves as the
exchange accommodation titleholder, holding property for exchangers in reverse
exchange transactions. Revenues are derived from fees for handling
exchange transactions.
10
Provided
below is selected financial information about the Company’s operations by
segment:
Three
Months Ended
March 31, 2009
|
Title
Insurance
|
Exchange
Services
|
All
Other
|
Intersegment
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$ | 17,062,638 | $ | 323,764 | $ | 798,138 | $ | (191,829 | ) | $ | 17,992,711 | |||||||||
Investment
income
|
808,519 | 98 | 201,435 | (20,417 | ) | 989,635 | ||||||||||||||
Net
realized loss on investments
|
(126,295 | ) | - | (173,642 | ) | - | (299,937 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ | 17,744,862 | $ | 323,862 | $ | 825,931 | $ | (212,246 | ) | $ | 18,682,409 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
16,177,299 | 50,959 | 867,017 | (191,829 | ) | 16,903,446 | ||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income
taxes
|
$ | 1,567,563 | $ | 272,903 | $ | (41,086 | ) | $ | (20,417 | ) | $ | 1,778,963 | ||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 100,578,468 | $ | 460,437 | $ | 36,982,364 | $ | - | $ | 138,021,269 | ||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
March 31, 2008
|
Title
Insurance
|
Exchange
Services
|
All
Other
|
Intersegment
Eliminations
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
revenues
|
$ | 18,369,966 | $ | 404,698 | $ | 880,338 | $ | (192,011 | ) | $ | 19,462,991 | |||||||||
Investment
income
|
949,459 | 8,009 | 342,308 | (20,417 | ) | 1,279,359 | ||||||||||||||
Net
realized gain on investments
|
118,382 | 99 | 88 | - | 118,569 | |||||||||||||||
Total
revenues
|
$ | 19,437,807 | $ | 412,806 | $ | 1,222,734 | $ | (212,428 | ) | $ | 20,860,919 | |||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
16,831,105 | 313,088 | 1,083,357 | (192,011 | ) | 18,035,539 | ||||||||||||||
Income
before income
taxes
|
$ | 2,606,702 | $ | 99,718 | $ | 139,377 | $ | (20,417 | ) | $ | 2,825,380 | |||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 110,965,278 | $ | 1,362,970 | $ | 35,553,978 | $ | - | $ | 147,882,226 |
Operating revenues
represent net premiums written and other revenues.
Note 6 – Retirement
Agreements and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan
On
November 17, 2003, Investors Title Insurance Company entered into employment
agreements with key executives that provide for the continuation of certain
employee benefits upon retirement. The executive employee benefits
include health insurance, dental, vision and life insurance. The benefits
provided for under the agreements are unfunded. The following sets
forth the net periodic benefits cost for the executive benefits for the quarters
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
For
the Three
Months
Ended
March
31, 2009
|
For
the Three
Months
Ended
March
31, 2008
|
|||||||
Service
cost – benefits earned during the year
|
$ | 5,958 | $ | 4,334 | ||||
Interest
cost on the projected benefit obligation
|
6,743 | 4,761 | ||||||
Amortization
of unrecognized prior service cost
|
5,097 | 5,097 | ||||||
Amortization
of unrecognized loss
|
502 | - | ||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 18,300 | $ | 14,192 |
Note 7 - Fair Value
Measurement
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,”
which was effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
for interim periods within those years. This Statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands the related
disclosure requirements. Relative to SFAS 157, the FASB recently
issued FSP 157-1, 157-2 and 157-3. FSP 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to
exclude SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases,” and its related interpretive
accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions, while FSP 157-2
delays the effective date of the application of SFAS 157 to fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008 for all nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. FSP 157-3
clarifies the principles in SFAS 157 on the fair value measurement of
liabilities. The Company adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1,
2008.
11
Valuation
Hierarchy. SFAS 157 establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the
inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the
inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs to the
valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs to the valuation
methodology are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either
directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full
term of the financial instrument. Level 3 inputs are unobservable
inputs based on the Company’s own assumptions used to measure assets and
liabilities at fair value.
The
following table presents the assets carried at fair value measured on a
recurring basis as of March 31, 2009:
Available-for-sale
securities
|
Carrying Balance
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||||
Fixed
maturities
|
$ | 87,187,255 | $ | - | $ | 79,653,110 | $ | 7,534,145 | ||||||||
Equity
|
8,923,089 | 8,923,089 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 96,110,344 | $ | 8,923,089 | $ | 79,653,110 | $ | 7,534,145 |
The
following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in SFAS 157 at March 31,
2009:
Changes in fair value during the period ended
March 31, 2009:
|
Level 3
|
|||
Beginning
balance at January 1, 2009
|
$ | 7,596,920 | ||
Transfers
into Level 3
|
- | |||
Unrealized
(loss) gain - included in other comprehensive income
|
(62,775 | ) | ||
Ending
balance at March 31, 2009
|
$ | 7,534,145 |
Valuation
Techniques. A financial instrument’s classification within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement.
Equity
securities are measured at fair value using quoted active market prices and are
classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The fair value
of fixed maturity investments included in the Level 2 category was based on the
market values obtained from pricing services.
The Level
2 category generally includes corporate bonds, U.S. government corporations and
agency bonds and municipal bonds. A number of the Company’s
investment grade corporate bonds are frequently traded in active markets and
traded market prices for these securities existed at March 31,
2009. However, these securities were classified as Level 2 at March
31, 2009, because third party pricing services also use valuation models, which
use observable market inputs, in addition to traded
prices. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the
marketplace or can be derived or supported by observable market
data.
The
Company’s investments in student loan auction rate securities (“ARS”) are its
only Level 3 assets, and were transferred from Level 2 in 2008 because quoted
prices from broker-dealers were unavailable due to the failure of
auctions. Valuations using discounted cash flow models were used to
determine the estimated fair value of these investments as of March 31,
2009. Some of the inputs to this model are unobservable in the market
and are significant.
12
ARS were
structured to provide purchase and sale liquidity through a Dutch auction
process. Due to the increasingly stressed and liquidity-constrained
environment in money markets, the auction process for ARS began failing in
February 2008 as broker-dealers ceased supporting auctions with their own
capital. All of the Company’s ARS are rated investment grade,
comprised entirely of student loan ARS and are substantially guaranteed by
government-sponsored enterprises, and the Company continues to receive interest
income.
Note 8 – Investments in
Securities
The following table presents the gross
unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related
securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous loss position at March 31,
2009.
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or Longer
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
Fair
|
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Value
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Losses
|
Value
|
Losses
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Auction
rate securities
|
$ | 7,534,145 | $ | (915,855 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 7,534,145 | $ | (915,855 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations
of states and political subdivisions
|
4,790,875 | $ | (85,657 | ) | 1,427,371 | (51,876 | ) | 6,218,246 | (137,533 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total
Fixed Income Securities
|
$ | 12,325,020 | $ | (1,001,512 | ) | $ | 1,427,371 | $ | (51,876 | ) | $ | 13,752,391 | $ | (1,053,388 | ) | |||||||||
Equity
Securities
|
5,089,993 | (1,144,207 | ) | 248,683 | (71,320 | ) | 5,338,676 | (1,215,527 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
temporarily impaired securities
|
$ | 17,415,013 | $ | (2,145,719 | ) | $ | 1,676,054 | $ | (123,196 | ) | $ | 19,091,067 | $ | (2,268,915 | ) |
The
Company saw an increase in unrealized losses in its securities portfolio due to
the disruptions in 2008 and 2009. Unrealized losses related to
holdings of equity securities were caused by market changes that the Company
considers to be temporary; however, during the first quarter of 2009, the
Company recorded an other than temporary impairment charge in the amount of
approximately $345,000 related to several of its equity and equity method
investments. Unrealized losses related to holdings of fixed income
securities can be attributed primarily to changes in market interest rates and
changes in spreads over treasury securities. Since the decline in
fair value was mostly attributable to changes in interest rates and temporary
market changes, and not credit quality, and because the Company has the intent
and ability to hold these equity and fixed income securities until a recovery of
fair value, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these
investments other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009.
Factors
considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the length of time
and extent to which fair value has been below cost, the financial condition and
prospects of the issuer (including credit ratings and analyst reports) and
macro-economic changes. Reviews of the values of securities are
inherently uncertain, and the value of the investment may not fully recover, or
may decline in future periods resulting in a realized loss.
Note 9 – Commitments and
Contingencies
The
Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings that are
incidental to their business. In the Company’s opinion, based on the
present status of these proceedings, any potential liability of the Company or
its subsidiaries with respect to these legal proceedings will not, in the
aggregate, be material to the Company’s consolidated financial condition or
operations.
13
In
administering tax-deferred property exchanges, the Company’s subsidiary,
Investors Title Exchange Corporation (“ITEC”), serves as a qualified
intermediary for exchanges, holding the net proceeds from sales transactions
from relinquished property to be used for purchase of replacement
property. Another Company subsidiary, Investors Title Accommodation
Corporation (“ITAC”), serves as exchange accommodation titleholder and, through
limited liability companies that are wholly owned subsidiaries of ITAC, holds
property for exchangers in reverse exchange transactions. Like-kind
exchange deposits and reverse exchange property totaled approximately
$21,249,000 and $88,124,000 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. These amounts are not considered the Company’s assets
and, therefore, are excluded from the accompanying consolidated balance sheets;
however, the Company remains contingently liable for the disposition of these
deposits and for the transfers of property, disbursements of proceeds and the
return on the proceeds at the agreed upon rate. These like-kind
exchange funds are primarily invested in money market and other short-term
investments, including $4.5 million of ARS, at March 31, 2009. The
Company does not believe the current illiquidity of these securities will impact
its operations, as it believes it has sufficient capital to provide continuous
and immediate liquidity as necessary.
Note 10 – Related Party
Transactions
The
Company does business with unconsolidated limited liability companies that it
has investments in that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
The following table sets forth the approximate values by period found
within each financial statement classification:
Financial
Statement Classification,
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||||||
Other
investments
|
$ | 1,239,000 | $ | 1,146,000 | ||||
Premium
and fees receivable
|
671,000 | 432,000 | ||||||
Financial
Statement Classification,
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
March
31,
2009
|
March
31,
2008
|
||||||
Other
income
|
$ | 551,000 | $ | 392,000 |
14
The
Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with the
following discussion since they contain important information for evaluating the
Company's operating results and financial condition.
Overview
Investors Title Company
(the "Company") is a holding company that engages primarily in two segments of
business: title insurance and exchange services. These segments are
described below.
Title Insurance: Its primary
business activity is the issuance of title insurance through two subsidiaries,
Investors Title Insurance Company ("ITIC") and Northeast Investors Title
Insurance Company ("NE-ITIC"), which accounted for 94.8% of the Company’s
operating revenues in the first quarter of 2009. Through ITIC and NE-ITIC, the
Company underwrites land title insurance for owners and mortgagees as a primary
insurer. Title insurance protects against loss or damage resulting from title
defects that affect real property.
There are
two basic types of title insurance policies - one for the mortgage lender and
one for the real estate owner. A lender often requires property
owners to purchase title insurance to protect its position as a holder of a
mortgage loan, but the lender's title insurance policy does not protect the
property owner. The property owner has to purchase a separate owner's
title insurance policy to protect their investment. When real
property is conveyed from one party to another, occasionally there is an
undisclosed defect in the title or a mistake or omission in a prior deed, will
or mortgage that may give a third party a legal claim against such
property. If a claim is made against real property, title insurance
provides indemnification against insured defects.
ITIC
issues title insurance policies through issuing agencies and also directly
through home and branch offices. Issuing agents are typically real
estate attorneys or subsidiaries of community and regional mortgage lending
institutions, depending on local customs and regulations and the Company’s
marketing strategy in a particular territory. The ability to attract
and retain issuing agents is a key determinant of the Company’s growth in
premiums written.
Revenues
for this segment result from purchases of new and existing residential and
commercial real estate, refinance activity and certain other types of mortgage
lending such as home equity lines of credit.
Volume is
a factor in the Company's profitability due to the existence of fixed operating
costs. These expenses will be incurred by the Company regardless of
the level of premiums written. The resulting operating leverage has historically
tended to amplify the impact of changes in volume on the Company’s
profitability. The Company’s profitability also depends, in part,
upon its ability to manage its investment portfolio to maximize investment
returns and minimize risks such as interest rate changes or defaults or
impairments of assets.
The
Company's volume of title insurance premiums is affected by the overall level of
residential and commercial real estate activity. In turn, real estate
activity is generally affected by a number of factors, including the
availability of mortgage credit, the cost of real estate, consumer confidence,
employment and family income levels and general United States economic
conditions.
15
Another
important factor in the level of residential and commercial real estate activity
is the effect of changes in interest rates. According to data
published by Freddie Mac, the quarterly average 30-year fixed mortgage interest
rates in the United States decreased to 5.06% for the quarter ended March 31,
2009, compared with 5.88% for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
The
cyclical nature of the residential and commercial real estate markets – and
consequently, the land title industry - has historically caused fluctuations in
revenues and profitability, and it is expected to continue to do so in the
future. Additionally, there are seasonal influences in real estate activity and
accordingly in revenue levels for title insurers.
Exchange
Services: The Company's second business segment provides
customer services in connection with tax-deferred real property exchanges
through its subsidiaries, Investors Title Exchange Corporation ("ITEC") and
Investors Title Accommodation Corporation ("ITAC"). ITEC serves as a
qualified intermediary in like-kind exchanges of real or personal property under
Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In its
role as qualified intermediary, ITEC coordinates the exchange aspects of the
real estate transaction, and its duties include drafting standard exchange
documents, holding the exchange funds between the sale of the old property and
the purchase of the new property, and accepting the formal identification of the
replacement property within the required identification period. ITAC
serves as exchange accommodation titleholder in reverse exchanges. As
exchange accommodation titleholder, ITAC offers a vehicle for accommodating a
reverse exchange when the taxpayer must acquire replacement property before
selling the relinquished property.
Factors
that influence the title insurance industry will also generally affect the
exchange services industry. In addition, the services provided by the
Company’s exchange services segment are pursuant to provisions in the Internal
Revenue Code. From time to time, these exchange provisions are
subject to review and changes, which may negatively affect the demand for
tax-deferred exchanges in general, and consequently the revenues and
profitability of the Company’s exchange segment.
Other
Services: Other operating business segments not required to be
reported separately are reported in a category called All
Other. Other services include those offered by the parent holding
company and by its wholly owned subsidiaries, Investors Trust Company
("Investors Trust"), Investors Capital Management Company (“ICMC”) and Investors
Title Management Services, Inc. (“ITMS”). In conjunction with
Investors Trust, ICMC provides investment management and trust services to
individuals, companies, banks and trusts. ITMS offers consulting
services to clients.
Business Trends and Recent
Conditions
The
continued downturn in U.S. economic activity and the ongoing decline in real
estate transactions were primary drivers behind the lower premiums written in
the title industry during 2008 and in the first quarter of 2009.
16
During the
real estate boom, many lenders loosened their underwriting guidelines,
particularly in the sub prime loan market. These lower underwriting
standards, when combined with new methods of financing loans created a supply of
inexpensive credit which led to a build up in mortgage loans to high risk
borrowers. As a result, there has been a substantial increase in loan
defaults and mortgage foreclosures. Lenders are now returning to
stricter loan underwriting standards, which results in lower overall loan
volume. This lower loan volume has, in turn, resulted in a lower
level of title premiums generated in the marketplace. In addition,
the downturn in housing and related mortgage finance industries has contributed
to higher claims costs. An increase in property foreclosures tends to
reveal title defects. A slowing pace of real estate activity also
triggers the likelihood of certain types of title claims, such as mechanics’
liens on newly constructed property. These factors have historically
caused title claims to increase in past real estate market cyclical downturns
and the Company has experienced such increases during the current
downturn.
Historically,
activity in real estate markets has varied over the course of market cycles in
response to evolving economic factors. The Company anticipates that
current market conditions, including the sub prime lending crisis, rising
foreclosures, weakening home sales and falling home prices, will be primary
influences on the Company’s operations until some stabilization
occurs. Operating results can vary from year to year based on
cyclical market conditions and do not necessarily indicate the Company's future
operating results and cash flows.
Critical Accounting
Estimates and Policies
The
preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of certain assets,
liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures surrounding contingencies
and commitments. Actual results could differ from these
estimates. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company made
no material changes in its critical accounting policies as previously disclosed
in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Results of
Operations
For the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, net premiums written decreased 7.9% to
$16,409,820, investment income decreased 22.6% to $989,635, total revenues
decreased 10.4% to $18,682,409 and net income decreased 32.5% to $1,434,963, all
compared with the same quarter in 2008. Net income per basic and
diluted common share decreased 28.4% and 28.7% to $0.63 and $0.62, respectively,
compared with the same prior year period.
Total
revenues decreased from the prior year period primarily due to decreases in net
premiums written and investment income, and an increase in realized investment
losses.
Operating revenues: Operating
revenues include net premiums written plus other fee income and exchange
services segment income. Investment income and realized investment gains and
losses are not included in operating revenues and are discussed separately
following operating revenues.
Although
net premiums written in the first quarter of 2009 decreased over the same period
in 2008, the volume or total number of title orders issued increased in the
first quarter of 2009 to 59,370, which is an increase of 6.2% compared with
55,908 title orders in the same period in 2008. The Company believes
volume received a boost from an increase in mortgage refinancing during the
first quarter. The Company believes that the weak housing market and
ongoing general decline in real estate activity was the primary reason for the
decline in net premiums written.
17
Following
is a breakdown between branch and agency premiums for the quarter ended March
31:
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Branch
|
$ | 6,043,004 | 37 | $ | 7,364,830 | 41 | ||||||||||
Agency
|
10,366,816 | 63 | 10,448,530 | 59 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 16,409,820 | 100 | $ | 17,813,360 | 100 |
Title
insurance premiums decreased 7.9% to $16,409,820 in the first quarter of 2009
compared with the comparable period in 2008. Total premiums written
were negatively impacted primarily by a decrease in the Company’s branch
premiums and the downturn in the real estate market in particular, the economy
in general.
The
decreases in branch office net premiums written as a percentage of total net
premiums written was due primarily to an expansion of the Company’s agency
relationships. Net premiums written from branch operations decreased
17.9% and increased 3.1% for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, as compared with the same period in the prior years. Of
the Company’s 29 branch locations that underwrite title insurance policies, 27
are located in North Carolina and, as a result, branch net premiums written
primarily represent North Carolina business.
Agency net
premiums written decreased 0.8% and increased 8.3% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, compared with the prior
years. Additional business was written by the Company’s agencies in
2008.
Following
is a schedule of net premiums written for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 in all states in which the Company’s two insurance subsidiaries ITIC
and NE-ITIC currently underwrite insurance:
State
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Illinois
|
$ | 1,091,590 | $ | 589,969 | ||||
Kentucky
|
870,303 | 816,810 | ||||||
Michigan
|
852,273 | 1,045,827 | ||||||
New
York
|
955,437 | 512,198 | ||||||
North
Carolina
|
7,564,207 | 8,948,667 | ||||||
Pennsylvania
|
609,185 | 443,129 | ||||||
South
Carolina
|
1,185,930 | 1,903,380 | ||||||
Tennessee
|
565,768 | 541,674 | ||||||
Virginia
|
1,227,764 | 1,521,794 | ||||||
West
Virginia
|
547,581 | 470,898 | ||||||
Other
States
|
939,759 | 1,013,072 | ||||||
Direct
Premiums
|
16,409,797 | 17,807,418 | ||||||
Reinsurance
Assumed
|
800 | 96,344 | ||||||
Reinsurance
Ceded
|
(777 | ) | (90,402 | ) | ||||
Net
Premiums
|
$ | 16,409,820 | $ | 17,813,360 |
18
Operating
revenues from the Company’s two subsidiaries that provide tax-deferred exchange
services (ITEC and ITAC) decreased 20.0% in the first quarter of 2009 compared
with the first quarter of 2008. Demand for tax-deferred exchange
services has declined significantly due to weak appreciation or actual declines
in value for many types of investment property. The decrease in 2009
revenues compared with 2008 resulted primarily from decreases in transaction
volume and related lower levels of interest-spread income earned on exchange
fund deposits held by the Company due to declines in the average balances of
deposits held and declines in interest rates.
In July
2008, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) finalized its proposed regulations
regarding treatment of funds held by qualified intermediaries. As
originally proposed, these rules would have negatively affected the ability of
qualified intermediaries to retain a portion of the interest income earned on
exchange fund deposits held by the Company during exchange transactions, which
could have had a material adverse effect upon the profitability of
the Company’s exchange segment. As adopted however, the new
regulations apply only to individual exchange account balances over $2
million. The regulations have only recently been adopted, and
therefore the Company has had only limited experience under this new regime; it
is possible that these new regulations may have unanticipated consequences on
the revenues and profitability of the Company’s exchange services
segment.
Other
revenues primarily include investment management fee income, income related to
the Company’s equity method investments and agency service fees, as well as
search fee and other ancillary fees. Other revenues were $1,259,127
for the first quarter of 2009 compared with $1,244,933 in the prior year
quarter.
Nonoperating revenues:
Investment income and realized gains and losses from investments are
included in nonoperating revenues.
The
Company derives a substantial portion of its income from investments in bonds
(municipal and corporate) and equity securities. The Company’s title
insurance subsidiaries are required by statute to maintain minimum levels of
investments in order to protect the interests of policyholders. In
formulating its investment strategy, the Company has emphasized after-tax
income. The investments are primarily in fixed maturity securities
and, to a lesser extent, equity securities.
As new funds become available, they are
invested in accordance with the Company’s investment policy and corporate
goals. Securities purchased may include a combination of taxable
fixed-income securities, tax-exempt securities and equities. The
Company strives to maintain a high quality investment
portfolio. Interest and investment income levels are primarily a
function of general market performance, interest rates and the amount of cash
available for investment.
Investment income decreased 22.6% to
$989,635 in the first quarter of 2009, compared with $1,279,359 in the same
period in 2008. The decline in investment income in 2009 was due
primarily to lower levels of interest earned on short-term funds, as the capital
markets experienced significant distress beginning in the second quarter of
2008.
19
The
Company’s investment policies have been designed to balance multiple investment
goals, including, to assure a stable source of income from interest and
dividends, protect capital, provide sufficient liquidity to meet insurance
underwriting and other obligations as they become payable in the future and
capital appreciation. Dispositions of equity securities at a realized
gain or loss reflect such factors as industry sector allocation decisions,
ongoing assessments of issuers’ business prospects and tax planning
considerations. Additionally, the amount of net realized investment
gains and losses are affected by assessments of securities’ valuation for
other-than-temporary impairment. As a result of the interaction of
these factors and considerations, net realized investment gains or losses can
vary significantly from period to period. The Company generally
intends to hold securities in unrealized loss positions until they mature or
recover. However, the Company does sell securities under certain
circumstances, such as when it has evidence of a significant deterioration in
the issuer’s creditworthiness.
Net realized loss on investment
securities totaled $299,937 for the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared
with net realized gain of $118,569 for the corresponding period in 2008. The
2009 net loss, which included impairment charges totaling $344,578 on certain
equity and equity method investments in the Company’s portfolio that were deemed
to be other than temporarily impaired, and was partially offset by
net realized gains on sales of investments of $44,641. Management has
determined that the unrealized losses from remaining fixed income and equity
securities at March 31, 2009 are temporary in nature. The net
realized gains in 2008 resulted primarily from the sale of equity securities and
other investments in the Company’s investment portfolio.
Operating
Expenses: The Company’s operating expenses consist primarily
of commissions to agents, salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes,
provisions for claims and office occupancy and operations. Total
operating expenses decreased 6.3% for the three-month period ended March 31,
2009 compared with the same period in 2008. The total decrease in
operating expenses resulted primarily from decreases in salaries, employee
benefits and payroll taxes, office occupancy and operations and other
expenses. Following is a summary of the Company’s operating expenses.
Intersegment eliminations have been netted with each segment; therefore, the
individual segment amounts will not agree to Note 5 in the accompanying
Consolidated Financial Statements.
2009
|
%
|
2008
|
%
|
|||||||||||||
Title
insurance
|
$ | 16,008,849 | 95 | $ | 16,663,993 | 92 | ||||||||||
Exchange
services
|
39,293 | - | 299,167 | 2 | ||||||||||||
All
other
|
855,304 | 5 | 1,072,379 | 6 | ||||||||||||
$ | 16,903,446 | 100 | $ | 18,035,539 | 100 |
On a combined basis, profit margins
were 7.7% and 10.2% in the first quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. Total
revenues decreased 10.4% in 2009, while operating expenses decreased 6.3%,
contributing to a less favorable combined profit margin for the March 31, 2009
quarter.
Agent commissions represent the portion
of premiums retained by agents pursuant to the terms of their respective agency
contracts. Commissions to agents increased 2.9% from the prior year
first quarter. Commission expense as a percentage of net premiums
written by agents was 72.7% and 70.1% for the first quarter 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Commission rates vary by the geographic area in which
the commission is paid and may be influenced by state regulations.
20
The
provision for claims as a percentage of net premiums written was 12.5% for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, versus 11.5% for the same period in
2008. Loss provision ratios are subject to variability and are
reviewed and adjusted as experience develops. Declining economic
conditions and/or declines in transaction volumes have historically been drivers
of increased claim expenses due to increased mechanics liens, defalcations and
other matters which may be discovered during property
foreclosures. The increase in the loss provision for the first
quarter of 2009 from the 2008 level resulted in approximately $160,000 more in
reserves than would have been recorded at the lower 2008 level. If
material occurrences of mortgage-related fraud, mechanic lien claims and other
similar types of claims continue, the Company’s ultimate loss estimates for
recent policy years could increase, which could result in an increase in the
provision for claims in current operations.
Paid claims and specific case reserves
were greater than expected during the first quarter of 2009. The
unfavorable loss emergence in the first quarter of 2009 is concentrated in the
2008 and 2006 policy years. Management considers the loss provision
ratios for the first quarter of 2009 and 2008 to be appropriate given the
long-tail nature of title insurance claims, the small volume of large claims and
the inherent uncertainty in title insurance claims emergence
patterns.
Title claims are typically reported and
paid within the first several years of policy issuance. The provision
for claims reflects actual payments of claims, net of recovery amounts, plus
adjustments to the specific and incurred but not reported claims reserves, the
latter of which are actuarially determined based on historical claims
experience, among other factors. Actual payments of claims, net of
recoveries, were $2,297,126 and $1,944,596 in the first quarter of 2009 and
2008, respectively.
At March 31, 2009, the total reserves
for claims were $38,988,000. Of that total, $6,452,644 was reserved
for specific claims, and $32,535,356 was reserved for claims for which the
Company had no notice. Because of the uncertainty of future claims,
changes in economic conditions and the fact that many claims do not materialize
for several years, reserve estimates are subject to variability.
Changes in the expected liability for
claims for prior periods reflect the uncertainty of the claims environment, as
well as the limited predicting power of historical data. The Company
continually updates and refines its reserve estimates as current experience
develops and credible data emerges. Adjustments may be required as
new information develops which often varies from past
experience. Movements in the reserves related to prior periods were
primarily the result of changes to estimates to better reflect the latest
reported loss data, rather than as a result of material changes to underlying
key actuarial assumptions or methodologies. Such changes include
payments on claims closed during the quarter, new details that emerge on
still-open cases that cause claims adjusters to increase or decrease the case
reserve and the impact that these types of changes have on the Company's total
loss provision.
Salaries, employee benefits and payroll
taxes were $5,138,176 and $5,497,936 for the first quarters of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Salaries and related costs decreased about $360,000 for
the March 31, 2009 quarter. On a consolidated basis, salaries,
employee benefits and payroll taxes as a percentage of total revenues were 27.5%
and 26.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
title insurance segment’s total salaries, employee benefits and payroll taxes
accounted for 85.7% and 84.0% of the total consolidated amount for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
21
Overall office occupancy and operations
as a percentage of total revenues was 5.9% and 6.5% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in office
occupancy and operations expense in 2009 compared with 2008 was due to a
decrease in various items, including maintenance, depreciation, postage,
telecommunications and printing costs.
Title insurance companies are generally
not subject to state income or franchise taxes. However, in most
states they are subject to premium and retaliatory taxes. Tax rates
and bases vary from state to state. Premium and retaliatory taxes as
a percentage of net premiums written were 2.2% and 2.1% for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Professional and contract labor fees
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008
decreased about $219,000, primarily due to decreases in contract labor fees
incurred, associated with investments in infrastructure and technology in the
first quarter 2008.
Other operating expenses primarily
include miscellaneous operating expenses of the trust division and other
miscellaneous expenses of the title segment. These amounts typically
fluctuate in relation with transaction volume of the title segment and the trust
division.
Income Taxes: The
provision for income taxes was 19.3% and 24.8% of income before income taxes for
the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
effective tax rates for the quarters were below the U.S. federal statutory
income tax rate (34%) primarily due to a change in the proportion of tax-exempt
investment income to pre-tax income.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
For a description of the Company’s
recent accounting pronouncements, please refer to Note 1 to the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
Liquidity: Due to
the Company’s historical consistent ability to generate positive cash flows from
its consolidated operations and investment income, management believes that
funds generated from operations will enable the Company to adequately meet its
current operating cash needs for the foreseeable future. However,
there can be no assurance that future experience will be similar to historical
experience, since they are influenced by such factors as the interest rate
environment, the Company’s claims-paying ability and its financial strength
ratings. The Company is unaware of any trend that is likely to result
in material adverse liquidity changes, but continually assesses its capital
allocation strategy. The Company’s cash requirements include general
operating expenses, income taxes, capital expenditures, dividends on its common
stock declared by the Board of Directors and share repurchases. In
addition to operational liquidity, the Company maintains a high degree of
liquidity within its investment portfolio in the form of short-term investments
and other readily marketable securities.
22
The majority of the Company’s
investment portfolio is considered as available-for-sale. The Company
reviews the status of each of its securities quarterly to determine whether an
other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The Company’s criteria
generally includes the degree to which the fair value of a security is less than
80% of its amortized cost and the investment grade of the security, as well as
how long the security has been in an unrealized loss position. The
Company’s securities that have had an unrealized loss in excess of one year are
primarily investment-grade, long-term bonds and equities that the Company has
the ability and intent to hold until a recovery of fair value, which may be
until maturity for fixed income securities.
Cash Flows: Cash
flow used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2009
amounted to $2,100,591, compared with $934,602 for the same three-month period
of 2008. The increase in net cash used in operating activities was
primarily the result of the timing of payments for accounts payable compared
with the prior year period and an increase in receivables.
Payment of
Dividends: The Company believes that all anticipated cash
requirements for current operations will be met from internally generated funds,
through cash dividends and distributions from subsidiaries and cash generated by
investment securities. The Company’s significant sources of funds are
dividends and distributions from its subsidiaries. The holding
company receives cash from its subsidiaries in the form of dividends and as
reimbursements for operating and other administrative expenses. The
reimbursements are executed within the guidelines of management agreements
between the holding company and its subsidiaries. The ability of the
Company’s insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends to the Company is subject to
regulation in the states where the subsidiaries do business. These
regulations, among other things, require prior regulatory approval of the
payment of dividends and other intercompany transfers. The Company
believes that amounts available for transfer from the insurance subsidiaries are
adequate to meet the Company’s operating needs.
Capital Expenditures: During
2009, the Company has plans for various capital improvement projects, including
hardware purchases and several software development projects and are anticipated
to be funded via cash flows from operations. All anticipated capital
expenditures are subject to periodic review and may vary depending on a number
of factors.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and
Contractual Obligations: It is not the general practice of the
Company to enter into off-balance sheet arrangements; nor is it the policy of
the Company to issue guarantees to third parties. Off-balance sheet
arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under noncancelable
operating leases, payments due under various agreements with third party service
providers, and unaccrued obligations pursuant to certain executive employment
agreements.
The total reserve for all reported and
unreported losses the Company incurred through March 31, 2009 is represented by
the reserves for claims. Information regarding the claims reserves can be found
in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form
10-Q. Further information on contractual obligations related to the
reserves for claims can be found in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC.
23
Safe
Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as information included in future filings
by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and information
contained in written material, press releases and oral statements issued by or
on behalf of the Company, contains, or may contain, “forward-looking statements”
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that
reflect management’s current outlook for future periods. These
statements may be identified by the use of words such as "plan," "expect,"
"aim," "believe," "project," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "should,"
"could" and other expressions that indicate future events and trends. All
statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including
statements about the Company's strategy for growth, product and service
development, market share position, claims, expenditures, financial results and
cash requirements, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events that are
subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual future results and trends
may differ materially from historical results or those projected in any such
forward-looking statements depending on a variety of factors, including, the
following:
·
|
the
level of real estate transactions, the level of mortgage origination
volumes (including refinancing) and changes to the insurance requirements
of the participants in the secondary mortgage market, and the effect of
these factors on the demand for title
insurance;
|
·
|
changes
in general economic conditions, including the performance of the capital,
credit and real estate markets;
|
·
|
significant
changes to applicable government
regulations;
|
·
|
the
possible inadequacy of provisions for claims to cover actual claim
losses;
|
·
|
the
incidence of fraud-related losses;
|
·
|
heightened
regulatory scrutiny;
|
·
|
unanticipated
adverse changes in securities markets, including interest rates, resulting
in material losses on the Company’s
investments;
|
·
|
the
Company’s dependence on key management personnel, the loss of whom could
have a material adverse affect on the Company’s
business;
|
·
|
the
Company’s ability to develop and offer products and services that meet
changing industry standards in a timely and cost-effective
manner;
|
·
|
statutory
requirements applicable to the Company’s insurance subsidiaries which
require them to maintain minimum levels of capital, surplus and reserves
and restrict the amount of dividends that they may pay to the Company
without prior regulatory approval
and
|
·
|
the
concentration of key accounting and information systems in a few
locations.
|
These and
other risks and uncertainties may be described from time to time in the
Company's other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). For more details on factors that could affect expectations, see the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking
statements to reflect circumstances or events that occur after the date the
forward-looking statements are made.
No
material changes in the Company’s market risk or market strategy occurred during
the current period. A detailed discussion of market risk is provided
in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2008.
24
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The Company's disclosure controls and
procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated
and communicated to the Company’s management as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
No system of controls, no matter how
well designed and operated, can provide absolute assurance that the objectives
of the system of controls are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that the system of controls has operated effectively in all
cases. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, however, are
designed to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of disclosure
controls and procedures are met.
Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the
Exchange Act, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the
Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31,
2009, to provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of disclosure controls
and procedures are met.
Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended March 31,
2009, there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
25
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
(a)
None
(b)
None
(c)
None
|
31(i)
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
31(ii)
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
26
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.
INVESTORS
TITLE COMPANY
|
||
By:
|
/s/ James A. Fine, Jr.
|
|
James
A. Fine, Jr.
|
||
President,
Principal Financial Officer and
|
||
Principal
Accounting
Officer
|
Dated: May 5,
2009
27