Iveda Solutions, Inc. - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-K
x
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 For the fiscal year ended January 31,
2009
|
Commission
file number 000-53285
CHARMED
HOMES INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
60
Mt Kidd Point SE
Calgary,
Alberta
Canada
T2Z 3C5
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code.)
(403)
831-2202
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
o No
x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act:
Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed all reports required by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 day. Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulations S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 if the Exchange Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer
|
o
|
Accelerated
Filer
|
o
|
|
Non-accelerated
Filer
|
o
|
Smaller
Reporting Company
|
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No
o
State the
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was
sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of January 31, 2009: $0.
00
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
||
Special
Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
|
3
|
|
PART
I
|
||
Item
1.
|
Business.
|
4
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors.
|
6
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments.
|
6
|
Item
2.
|
Properties.
|
6
|
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
6
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
|
6
|
PART
II
|
||
Item
5.
|
Market
Price for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
|
7
|
Item
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data.
|
8
|
Item
7.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation.
|
8
|
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
12
|
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
|
12
|
Item
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure.
|
23
|
Item
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
23
|
Item
9B.
|
Other
Information.
|
25
|
PART
III
|
||
Item
10.
|
Directors
and Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons.
|
25
|
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation.
|
27
|
Item
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
|
28
|
Item
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
|
29
|
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services.
|
29
|
PART
IV
|
||
Item
15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
30
|
-2-
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except for statements of historical
fact, certain information contained herein constitutes “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Forward looking statements are usually identified by our use
of certain terminology, including “will”, “believes”, “may”, “expects”,
“should”, “seeks”, “anticipates” or “intends” or by discussions of strategy or
intentions. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results or
achievements to be materially different from any future results or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors
include, among others, our history of operating losses and uncertainty of future
profitability; our lack of working capital and uncertainty regarding our ability
to continue as a going concern; uncertainty of access to additional capital;
risks inherent in mineral exploration; environmental liability claims and
insurance; dependence on consultants and third parties as well as those factors
discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors”, “Business” and “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations”.
If one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materializes, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our
actual results may vary materially from those expected, estimated or
projected. Forward looking statements in this document are not a
prediction of future events or circumstances, and those future events or
circumstances may not occur. Given these uncertainties, users of the
information included herein, including investors and prospective investors are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements. We do not assume responsibility for the accuracy and
completeness of these statements.
The United States Securities and
Exchange Commission permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the
SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and
legally extract or produce. The Company is an exploration stage
company and its properties have no known body of ore. U.S. investors
are cautioned not to assume that the Company has any mineralization that is
economically or legally mineable.
All references in this Report on Form
10-K to the terms “we”, “our”, “us”, and “the Company” refer to Charmed Homes
Inc.
-3-
PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
General
We were incorporated in the state of
Nevada on June 27, 2006. We have started operations. We have generated very
limited revenues from operations, but must be considered a start-up business.
Our statutory registered agent in Nevada is The Corporation Trust Company of
Nevada, 6100 Neil Road, Suite 500, Reno, Nevada 89511. Our administrative office
is located at 60 Mt. Kidd Point S.E., Calgary, Alberta, T2Z 3C5. Our
telephone number is (403) 831-2202.
Because of the change in the economy,
we believed that it was in the best interests of our shareholders to change our
business course. We previously engaged in the construction and
marketing of custom homes in the Calgary area in Alberta,
Canada. During 2008, we completed construction of our first such home
and sold this home. Due to downturns in the housing market in Calgary
and a lack of available funding, we decided to cease operations following the
sale of this single home.
Our
Merger
On November 12, 2008, we entered into a
letter of intent with IntelaSight, Inc., a Washington corporation d/b/a Iveda
Solutions (“Iveda”). Under the Letter of Intent (“LOI”), we have agreed to
merger with Iveda whereby Iveda will become our wholly-owned subsidiary and
Iveda’s shareholders will receive approximately 10 million shares of our common
stock. Prior to the Merger, we will engage in a 2-for-1 reverse split
to reduce the number of outstanding shares of its common stock, and the our two
major shareholders will sell 5 million pre-reverse split shares of our common
stock to Iveda.
As part of the merger, we have agreed
to change our name to “Iveda Corporation.” After the filing of the
amended articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of
Nevada, we will cease using the corporate name “Charmed Homes Inc.” and do
business as “Iveda Corporation.”
The primary reason for the proposed
name change was to comply with the terms of the Corporation's Merger
Agreement (the "Merger Agreement"), dated January 8, 2009 with IntelaSight,
Inc., a Washington corporation d/b/a Iveda Solutions ("Iveda"), Charmed Homes
Subsidiary, Inc., a Nevada corporation and our wholly owned subsidiary ("Merger
Sub"), and our two major shareholders.
Under the Merger Agreement, our company
and Iveda have agreed, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the closing
conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, to engage in a merger (the
"Merger") whereby the Merger Sub will merge with and into Iveda, and as a result
Iveda will become our wholly-owned subsidiary. As part of the Merger,
Iveda's stock and derivative securities will be exchanged for stock and our
derivative securities at a ratio of one share of our common stock for each one
share held in Iveda immediately prior to the Merger closing.
-4-
The parties have until March 31, 2009
to close the proposed Merger, at which time either party may terminate the
Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement may also be terminated in the
event it fails to receive the approval of holders of a majority of the
outstanding Iveda voting stock when submitted to the shareholders for approval,
or if greater than 1% of the outstanding Iveda voting stock dissents from the
Merger.
Following the Merger, the Merger Sub
will cease to exist, and Iveda will be our direct, wholly-owned
subsidiary. Our current officers and directors will resign as
of the closing, and our directors will be David Ly, Greg Omi, Jody Bisson, and
one additional director to be appointed by Iveda and our officers will be David
Ly, President and CEO, Bob Brilon, CFO and Treasurer, and Luz Berg, Secretary
and Senior VP of Operations & Marketing – each of these individuals is a
current officer and/or director of Iveda. The closing will not occur
until our corporation and Iveda file Articles of Merger with the States of
Washington and Nevada, which will not occur until after the approval of the
Iveda shareholders has been obtained and following applicable waiting periods
required by SEC regulations (for the reverse split and name change) and
Washington law (as Iveda intends to solicit consents in lieu of holding a
special meeting of its shareholders to approve the Merger).
As part of the Merger, we have agreed
to change our name to "Iveda Corporation" and the Amended Articles will
accomplish this. We intend to wait until the closing of the Merger to
file the Amended Articles, and in the event the Merger does not close, we will
keep our existing name.
Iveda
Corporation
Iveda provides remote video monitoring
services and currently has clients in Arizona and California. Iveda offers a
proactive security solution using network cameras, real-time Internet-based
surveillance system, and a remote monitoring facility with trained intervention
specialists. Based in Mesa, Arizona, Iveda’s core monitoring service offers
private and public entities what Iveda management believes to be a more
affordable, reliable, and effective security solution than either security
guards or closed circuit television on-site monitoring.
Iveda
IntelaSight, Inc. was incorporated in
Washington in January 2005, and began operations at that time. It
conducts business under the name Iveda Solutions.
Iveda provides remote video monitoring
services and currently has clients in Arizona and California. Iveda
offers a proactive security solution using network cameras, a real-time
Internet-based surveillance system, and a remote monitoring facility with
trained intervention specialists. Based in Mesa, Arizona, Iveda's
core monitoring service offers private and public entities what management
believes to be a more affordable, reliable, and effective security solution than
either security guards or closed circuit television ("CCTV") on-site
monitoring. Iveda has provided security solutions to 27 customers,
with over 248 cameras installed, 75 of which are being monitored and 4 hosted by
Iveda in 15 properties.
Iveda has recently opened its reseller
distribution channel. Without active solicitation, Iveda has already signed a
net eight resellers and six independent agents in 2008 and expects to partner
with more in 2009. These resellers and agents will assist Iveda in
its marketing and customer service activities.
-5-
Management projects a 3-year window of
opportunity to get a first mover's advantage in the real-time video surveillance
market. Management believes that Iveda remains the only company
providing real-time video surveillance in the United States. Integrators and
central monitoring companies, Iveda's closest competitors, provide monitoring
services based on electronic alarm triggers which generate a response time of
often 6-10 minutes or more. Iveda's real-time monitoring provides
immediate response capabilities. Iveda has already received local publicity for
stopping crimes in progress. Since January 2005, Iveda has raised
approximately $3.2 million, which has been used to initiate and fund
operations. As Iveda has high fixed capital and operating costs that
can be moderated only through increases in its customer monitoring services,
Iveda needs to continue to raise capital to increase its marketing budget and
obtain significant additional customers to offset its fixed costs.
Our
Office
Our office is located at 60 Mt Kidd
Point S.E., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2Z 3C5. Our phone number is (403)
831-2202.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
We are a smaller reporting company as
defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the
information required under this item.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
The company has no
properties.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The company has no legal
proceedings.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A
VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
On November 21, 2008, those
shareholders of Charmed entitled to vote at least a majority of the aggregate
shares of Charmed’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (the “Common
Stock”), outstanding on such date, approved two corporate actions by written
consent in lieu of a special meeting. Shareholders holding in the aggregate
5,000,000 shares of Common Stock or 74.74% of the voting stock outstanding as of
November 21, 2008 (the “Consenting Shareholders”) approved (1) Charmed’s
Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation (the “Amended Articles”), to change
Charmed’s name to “Iveda Corporation” and (2) a reverse split of the
Corporation’s common stock whereby each two shares of issued and outstanding
common stock as of December 5, 2008 shall be exchanged for one share of common
stock. These actions cannot take effect until at least 20 days have
elapsed from the date on which the Company mails an information statement to its
shareholders informing them of these corporate actions.
-6-
PART
II
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Our
shares are traded on the Bulletin Board operated by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority under the symbol “CHDH.”A summary of trading by quarter for
2009 and 2008 fiscal years is as follows:
Fiscal
Year
|
High
Bid
|
Low
Bid
|
||
2009
|
||||
Fourth
Quarter:
|
11-1-08
to 01-31-09
|
$1.50
|
$0.0
|
|
Third
Quarter:
|
08-1-08
to 10-31-08
|
$0.0
|
$0.0
|
|
Second
Quarter:
|
05-1-08
to 07-31-08
|
$0.0
|
$0.0
|
|
First
Quarter:
|
02-1-08
to 04-30-08
|
$0.0
|
$0.0
|
|
2008
|
||||
Fourth
Quarter:
|
11-1-07
to 01-31-08
|
$0.0
|
$0.0
|
|
Third
Quarter:
|
08-1-07
to 10-31-07
|
$0.0
|
$0.0
|
|
Second
Quarter:
|
05-1-07
to 07-31-07
|
$0.0
|
$0.0
|
|
First
Quarter:
|
02-1-07
to 04-30-07
|
$0.0
|
$0.0
|
We issued 5,000,000 shares of common
stock pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in section 4(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933. This was accounted for as a sale of common stock. In
August 2007, we also issued 1,690,000 shares of common stock to 54 individuals.
This was also accounted for as a sale of common stock.
Dividends
We have not declared any cash
dividends, nor do we intend to do so. We are not subject to any legal
restrictions respecting the payment of dividends, except that they may not be
paid to render us insolvent. Dividend policy will be based on our cash resources
and needs and it is anticipated that all available cash will be needed for our
operations in the foreseeable future.
Section
15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Our shares are covered by section 15(g)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that imposes additional sales
practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell such securities to persons
other than established customers and accredited investors (generally
institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth
in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly
with their spouses). For transactions covered by the Rule, the broker/dealer
must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and have received
the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale.
Consequently, the Rule may affect the ability of broker/dealers to sell our
securities and also may affect your ability to sell your shares in the secondary
market.
-7-
Section 15(g) also imposes additional
sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell penny securities. These
rules require a one page summary of certain essential items. The items include
the risk of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary
marketing; terms important to in understanding of the function of the penny
stock market, such as id and offer quotes, a dealers spread and
broker/dealer compensation; the broker/dealer compensation, the broker/dealers’
duties to its customers, including the disclosures required by any other penny
stock disclosure rules; the customers’ rights and remedies in cases of fraud in
penny stock transactions; and, the FINRA’s toll free telephone number and the
central number of the North American Administrators Association, for information
on the disciplinary history of broker/dealers and their associated
persons.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
We have no equity compensation plans
and accordingly we have no shares authorized for issuance under an equity
compensation plan.
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
We are a smaller reporting company as
defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the
information under this item.
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
This section of the report includes a
number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect
to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often
identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project
and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future
events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking
statements, which apply only as of the date of this report. These
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that
could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our
predictions.
We are a development-stage corporation
and at this point we have realized a nominal profit on our first
project.
Our auditors have issued a going
concern opinion. This means that our auditors believe there is substantial doubt
that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless
we obtain additional capital to pay our bills. This is because we have not
purchased any contracts and only generated nominal revenues from the first
development. We must raise cash from operations. Our only other source for cash
at this time is investments by others in our company. We must raise cash to
implement our project and begin our operations. Even with the money we raised
from our public offering, we do not know how long the money will last, however,
we do believe it will last twelve months. Operations are now under
way since we raised the money from our public offering.
To meet our need for cash, we have
raised money through the public offering. We cannot guarantee that once we begin
operations we will stay in business after operations have commenced. Further, if
we are unable to attract enough clients to utilize our services, we may quickly
use up the proceeds from the minimum amount of money from our public offering
and will need to find
-8-
alternative
sources, like a second public offering, a private placement of securities, or
loans from our officers or others in order for us to maintain our operations. At
the present time, we have not made any arrangements to raise additional cash,
other than through our public offering.
If we need additional cash and cannot
raise it, we will either have to suspend operations until we do raise the cash,
or cease operations entirely. We believe the amount raised from our public
offering will last a year but with limited funds available to develop growth
strategy. If at some point we need more money, we will have to
revert to obtaining additional money as described in this paragraph. Other than
as described in this paragraph, we have no other financing plans.
Operation
to Date
With the success of our offering, we
were able to begin our operations. We established our office and
acquired the equipment we needed to begin. We did not hire any
employees up to this point and our officers and directors are handling the
administrative duties.
We located a suitable piece of land in
order to start our first project. The lot was acquired in the
community of Lake Chaparral.
Once the land was located, we chose a
home plan which best suited the property. The blueprints were drawn
up, specifications outlined and decisions on materials made.
Initial financing through the bank was
avoided by obtaining an interest free loan of $25,000 from our President Ian
Quinn. The plot plan and blueprint were submitted to the developer of
the subdivision and approvals were received.
The process of tendering out for
construction was avoided by working with Shane Homes, who have all the suppliers
and trades people in place. Construction of the home was completed at
the end of December, approximately three months earlier than
expected.
The home was listed as soon as it was
completed as it was decided that with the slowing in the market it would be best
to market the home once it was showing its best.
The home is now sold, but with the
significantly slower market in Calgary and area, it took much longer that
expected to sell and we did not realize the profit we had anticipated. The sale
of the home was just on June 3, 2008.
Due to the state of the Calgary housing
market, there is a tremendous amount of new home inventory available and house
prices are dropping significantly. Therefore we have discontinued our operations
in home building.
Future
Operations
Because of the change in the economy,
we believed that it was in the best interests of our shareholders to change our
business course.
-9-
On November 12, 2008, we entered into a
letter of intent with IntelaSight, Inc., a Washington corporation d/b/a Iveda
Solutions ("Iveda"). Under the Letter of Intent (“LOI”), we have agreed to
merger with Iveda whereby Iveda will become our wholly-owned subsidiary and
Iveda's shareholders will receive approximately 10 million shares of our common
stock. Prior to the merger, we will engage in a 1-for-2 reverse stock split to
reduce the number of our outstanding shares.
Iveda provides remote video monitoring
services and currently has clients in Arizona and California. Iveda offers a
proactive security solution using network cameras, real-time Internet-based
surveillance system, and a remote monitoring facility with trained intervention
specialists. Based in Mesa, Arizona, Iveda’s core monitoring service offers
private and public entities what Iveda management believes to be a more
affordable, reliable, and effective security solution than either security
guards or closed circuit television on-site monitoring.
As part of the merger, we have agreed
to change our name to "Iveda Corporation.” After the filing of the
amended articles of incorporation with the Secretary of State of the
State of Nevada, we will cease using the corporate name “Charmed Homes Inc.” and
do business as “Iveda Corporation.”
Limited
operating history; need for additional capital
There is limited historical financial
information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We are
in start-up stage operations and have not generated any revenues. We cannot
guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is
subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise,
including limited capital resources and possible cost overruns due to price and
cost increases in services and products.
We have no assurance that future
financing will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not
available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop or expand
our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing
shareholders.
Results
of operations
From
Inception on June 27, 2006 to January 31, 2009
During this period we incorporated the
company, hired the attorney, and hired the auditor for the preparation of our
registration statement. We have also completed and sold our first house. Our
loss since inception is $105,956 of which $88,371 is for professional fees;
$15,500 is for donated rent and services; $3,456 is for filing fees and general
office costs; $1,320 is for property tax and utilities and $12,376 is for
foreign exchange loss. We have changed our proposed business operations and will
continue to complete the merger with Iveda Corporation.
Since inception, we have issued
5,000,000 shares of common stock to our officers and directors for cash proceeds
of $5,000. On August 2007, we completed our public offering by
selling 1,690,000 shares of common stock and raising $169,000.
-10-
Liquidity
and capital resources
On June 15, 2006, we issued 5,000,000
shares of common stock pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in
section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. This was accounted for as a sale of
common stock. In August, 2007, we also issued 1,690,000 shares of common stock
to 54 individuals. This was also accounted for as a sale of common
stock.
As of January 31, 2009, our total
assets were $86,957 comprised of $86,957 in cash and our total liabilities were
$3,413, comprised of accounts payable of $3,413.
On June 3, 2008, we sold our real
property for consideration of CDN$510,000.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
In May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 163,
“Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts – An interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 60”. SFAS No. 163 requires that an insurance enterprise
recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default when there is evidence
that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. It
also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for
premium revenue and claim liabilities, and requires expanded disclosures about
financial guarantee insurance contracts. It is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, except for
some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities.
SFAS No. 163 requires that disclosures about the risk-management activities of
the insurance enterprise be effective for the first period beginning after
issuance. Except for those disclosures, earlier application is not permitted.
The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the
Company’s financial statements.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles”. SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of non-governmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. It is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles”. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material
effect on the Company’s financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities – an amendment to FASB Statement No. 133”. SFAS No. 161
is intended to improve financial standards for derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to
better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. Entities are required to provide enhanced
disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
Statement 133 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption
encouraged. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material
effect on the Company’s financial statements.
-11-
In
December 2007, the FASB issued No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No.51”. SFAS No. 160
requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the
amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also
requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the
amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 also requires that a parent recognize a
gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160
also requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that
clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent’s owners
and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a
material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations”. This statement replaces SFAS No. 141 and defines the acquirer in
a business combination as the entity that obtains control of one or more
businesses in a business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the
date that the acquirer achieves control. SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) requires an
acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at
their fair values as of that date. SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) also requires the
acquirer to recognize contingent consideration at the acquisition date, measured
at its fair value at that date. This statement is effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December
15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement is not
expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial
statements.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We are a smaller reporting company as
defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the
information under this item.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
January
31, 2009
Index
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F–1
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
F–2
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
F–3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
F–4
|
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
|
F–5
|
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F–6
|
-12-
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the
Directors and Stockholders
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Charmed Homes Inc. (A
Development Stage Company) as of January 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity for
the years then ended and accumulated for the period from June 27, 2006 (Date of
Inception) to January 31, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. The Company is not required to have, nor were we
engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.
An audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as
a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Charmed Homes Inc. (A
Development Stage Company) as of January 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of
its operations, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the years then ended and
accumulated for the period from June 27, 2006 (Date of Inception) to January 31,
2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will
continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements,
the Company has incurred operating losses since inception. This factor raises
substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty.
MANNING ELLIOTT
LLP
CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS
Vancouver,
Canada
April 14,
2009
F-1
-13-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(Expressed
in US dollars)
January
31,
|
January
31,
|
|
2009
$
|
2008
$
|
|
ASSETS
|
||
Current
Assets
|
||
Cash
|
86,957
|
22,748
|
Inventory
(Note 3)
|
–
|
489,844
|
Total
Assets
|
86,957
|
512,592
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
||
Current
Liabilities
|
||
Accounts
payable
|
3,413
|
2,796
|
Due
to related party (Note 4(a))
|
–
|
395,751
|
Total
Liabilities
|
3,413
|
398,547
|
Contingency
(Note 1)
|
||
Subsequent
Event (Note 7)
|
||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
||
Common
Stock, 200,000,000 shares authorized, $0.00001 par value;
6,690,000
shares issued and outstanding (Note 5)
|
67
|
67
|
Additional
Paid-in Capital
|
173,933
|
173,933
|
Donated
Capital (Note 4(b))
|
15,500
|
9,500
|
Deficit
Accumulated During the Development Stage
|
(105,956)
|
(69,455)
|
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
83,544
|
114,045
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
86,957
|
512,592
|
(The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements)
F-2
-14-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Expressed
in US dollars)
Accumulated
from
|
For
the Year
|
For
the Year
|
|
June
27, 2006
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
|
(Date
of Inception)
|
January
31,
|
January
31,
|
|
to
January 31, 2009
|
2009
|
2008
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
|
Revenue
|
505,665
|
505,665
|
–
|
|
|||
Cost
of Goods Sold
|
490,598
|
490,598
|
–
|
Gross
Profit
|
15,067
|
15,067
|
–
|
Expenses
|
|||
Donated
services and rent (Note 4(b))
|
15,500
|
6,000
|
6,000
|
Foreign
exchange loss
|
12,376
|
5,300
|
7,076
|
General
and administrative
|
3,456
|
360
|
2,710
|
Professional
fees
|
88,371
|
38,588
|
34,783
|
Property
taxes and utilities
|
1,320
|
1,320
|
–
|
Total
Expenses
|
121,023
|
51,568
|
50,569
|
Net
Loss For the Period
|
105,956
|
36,501
|
50,569
|
Net
Loss Per Share – Basic and Diluted
|
(0.01)
|
(0.01)
|
|
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding
|
6,690,000
|
5,972,000
|
|
(The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements)
F-3
-15-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed
in US dollars)
Accumulated
from June 27, 2006 (Date of Inception) to January
31,
2009
|
For
the Year
Ended
January
31,
2009
|
For
the Year
Ended
January
31,
2008
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
|
Operating
Activities
|
|||
Net
loss for the period
|
(105,956)
|
(36,501)
|
(50,569)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
|||
Donated
services and rent
|
15,500
|
6,000
|
6,000
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|||
Inventory
|
–
|
489,844
|
(489,844)
|
Accounts
payable
|
3,413
|
617
|
2,416
|
Net
Cash Provided By (Used In) Operating Activities
|
(87,043)
|
459,960
|
(531,997)
|
Financing
Activities
|
|||
Advances
from a related party
|
–
|
–
|
380,751
|
Repayment
of related party advances
|
–
|
(395,751)
|
–
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
174,000
|
–
|
169,000
|
Net
Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing Activities
|
174,000
|
(395,751)
|
549,751
|
Increase
in Cash
|
86,957
|
64,209
|
17,754
|
|
|||
Cash
- Beginning of Period
|
–
|
22,748
|
4,994
|
Cash
- End of Period
|
86,957
|
86,957
|
22,748
|
Supplemental
Disclosures
|
|||
Interest
paid
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Income
taxes paid
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements)
F-4
-16-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
For the
Period from June 27, 2006 (Date of Inception) to January 31, 2009
(Expressed
in US dollars)
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
|
Donated
|
Deficit
Accumulated
During
the
Development
|
|||
Number
|
Par
Value
|
Capital
|
Capital
|
Stage
|
Total
|
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
$
|
||
Balance
- June 27, 2006 (Date of Inception)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Common
stock issued for cash at $0.001 per share
|
5,000,000
|
50
|
4,950
|
-
|
-
|
5,000
|
Donated
services and rent
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,500
|
-
|
3,500
|
Net
loss for the period
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(18,886)
|
(18,886)
|
Balance
– January 31, 2007
|
5,000,000
|
50
|
4,950
|
3,500
|
(18,886)
|
(10,386)
|
Common
stock issued for cash at $0.10 per share
|
1,690,000
|
17
|
168,983
|
-
|
-
|
169,000
|
Donated
services and rent
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,000
|
-
|
6,000
|
Net
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(50,569)
|
(50,569)
|
Balance
– January 31, 2008
|
6,690,000
|
67
|
168,983
|
9,500
|
(69,455)
|
114,045
|
Donated
services and rent
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,000
|
-
|
6,000
|
Net
loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(36,501)
|
(36,501)
|
Balance
– January 31, 2009
|
6,690,000
|
67
|
173,933
|
15,550
|
(105,956)
|
83,544
|
(The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements)
F-5
-17-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements
January
31, 2009
(Expressed
in US dollars)
1. Nature
of Operations and Continuance of Business
Charmed
Homes Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 27,
2006. The Company is a Development Stage Company, as defined by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No.7, “Accounting and Reporting by
Development Stage Enterprises”. The Company’s principal business is the sale of
constructed or purchased homes.
These
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis,
which implies the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its
liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has generated revenues
of $505,665 since inception and has never paid any dividends and is unlikely to
pay dividends or generate earnings in the immediate or foreseeable future. The
continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued
financial support from its shareholders, the ability of the Company to obtain
necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of
profitable operations. As at January 31, 2009, the Company has accumulated
losses of $105,956. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do
not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded
asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should
the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
2. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
a)
|
Basis
of Presentation
|
These
financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, are expressed in
US dollars and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Charmed Homes Subsidiary, Inc., which was incorporated on November
26, 2008. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon
consolidation. The Company’s fiscal year-end is January
31.
b)
|
Use
of Estimates
|
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with US generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The
Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to donated
expenses, valuation of inventory and deferred income tax asset valuations. The
Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical
experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and
expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results
experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the
Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the
estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be
affected.
c)
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
The
Company computes earnings (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
"Earnings per Share". SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and
diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic
EPS is computed by dividing earnings (loss) available to common shareholders
(numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator)
during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common
shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and
convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted
EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of
shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants.
Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti
dilutive.
d)
|
Comprehensive
Loss
|
SFAS No.
130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” establishes standards for the reporting
and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial
statements. As at January 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company has no items that
represent a comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of
comprehensive loss in the financial statements.
F-6
-18-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements
January
31, 2009
(Expressed
in US dollars)
2. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
e)
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
The
Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or
less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.
f)
|
Inventory
|
Inventory
consists of real estate purchased for resale and is valued at the lower of cost
and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the specific identification
method.
g)
|
Financial
Instruments
|
Financial
instruments, which include cash and accounts payable, were estimated to
approximate their carrying values due to the immediate or short-term maturity of
these financial instruments. The Company’s operations are in Canada, which
results in exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The
financial risk is the risk to the Company’s operations that arise from
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these
rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its
exposure to foreign currency risk.
h)
|
Income
Taxes
|
|
The
Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. The
asset and liability method provides that deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities, and for operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the
currently enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the
differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation
allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is believed
more likely than not to be
realized.
|
i)
|
Foreign
Currency Translation
|
The
Company’s functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar.
Significant transactions may occur in Canadian dollars and management has
adopted SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation”. Monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange
rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities
denominated in foreign currencies are translated at rates of exchange in effect
at the date of the transaction. Average monthly rates are used to translate
revenues and expenses. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of
foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the
determination of income.
j)
|
Revenue
Recognition
|
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SFAS No. 66, ”Accounting for Sales
of Real Estate”. The sale of constructed or purchased houses will be recognized
in full once the real estate property has been sold, the profit is determinable,
collectibility of the sales price is reasonably assured, and the earnings
process is virtually complete whereas the Company is no longer further obligated
to perform significant activities after the sale to earn the
profit.
k)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In May
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 163,
“Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contracts – An interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 60”. SFAS No. 163 requires that an insurance enterprise
recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default when there is evidence
that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. It
also clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for
premium revenue and claim liabilities, and requires expanded disclosures about
financial guarantee insurance contracts. It is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, except for
some disclosures about the insurance enterprise’s risk-management activities.
SFAS No. 163 requires that disclosures about the risk-management activities of
the insurance enterprise be effective for the first period beginning after
issuance. Except for those disclosures, earlier application is not permitted.
The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the
Company’s financial statements.
F-7
-19-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements
January
31, 2009
(Expressed
in US dollars)
2. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
k)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
(continued)
|
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles”. SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting
principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements of non-governmental entities that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. It is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles”. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material
effect on the Company’s financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities – an amendment to FASB Statement No. 133”. SFAS No. 161
is intended to improve financial standards for derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to
better understand their effects on an entity's financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. Entities are required to provide enhanced
disclosures about: (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (b)
how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under
Statement 133 and its related interpretations; and (c) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position,
financial performance, and cash flows. It is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption
encouraged. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material
effect on the Company’s financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No.51”. SFAS No. 160
requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the
amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also
requires disclosure, on the face of the consolidated statement of income, of the
amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 also requires that a parent recognize a
gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160
also requires expanded disclosures in the consolidated financial statements that
clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent’s owners
and the interests of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a
material effect on the Company’s financial statements.
l) Recent
Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations”. This statement replaces SFAS No. 141 and defines the acquirer in
a business combination as the entity that obtains control of one or more
businesses in a business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the
date that the acquirer achieves control. SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) requires an
acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at
their fair values as of that date. SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) also requires the
acquirer to recognize contingent consideration at the acquisition date, measured
at its fair value at that date. This statement is effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December
15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. The adoption of this statement is not
expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial
statements.
m)
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value, and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. In
October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3 “Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP 157-3”). FSP
157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is not
active, and provides guidance on the key considerations in determining the fair
value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not
active. Effective February 1, 2008, the Company adopted the measurement and
disclosure requirements related to financial assets and financial liabilities.
The adoption of SFAS 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities did not
have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or the fair values
of its financial assets and liabilities.
F-8
-20-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements
January
31, 2009
(Expressed
in US dollars)
2. Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
m) Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
FASB
Staff Position 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” (“FSP
157-2”) delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually),
until the beginning of fiscal 2010. The Company is currently assessing the
impact that the application of SFAS 157 to nonfinancial assets and liabilities
will have on its results of operations and financial position.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). Under SFAS 159, a company may choose, at
specified election dates, to measure eligible items at fair value and report
unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. Effective February 1,
2008, the Company adopted SFAS 159, but the Company has not elected the fair
value option for any eligible financial instruments as of January 31,
2009.
3. Inventory
January
31,
2009
$
|
January
31,
2008
$
|
||
Land
|
–
|
153,653
|
|
Building
|
–
|
311,844
|
|
Other
|
–
|
24,347
|
|
–
|
489,844
|
4. Related
Party Transactions
a)
|
As
at January 31, 2008 the Company owed $395,751 to the president of the
Company. During the year ended January 31, 2009, this amount was repaid.
The amount owing was unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on
demand.
|
b)
|
Commencing
July 1, 2006, the president of the Company has provided management
services and office space to the Company with an estimated fair value of
$300 and $200 per month, respectively. During the year ended January 31,
2009, the Company recorded donated services of $3,600 (2007 - $3,600) and
donated rent of $2,400 (2007 -
$2,400).
|
5. Common
Stock
|
a)
|
In
July 2007, the Company issued 1,690,000 common shares of the Company at a
price of $0.10 per common share for proceeds of $169,000 pursuant to an
SB-2 Registration Statement.
|
|
b)
|
On
July 15, 2006, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock to
officers and directors at a price of $0.001 per share for cash proceeds of
$5,000.
|
6. Income
Taxes
The
Company is subject to United States income taxes at a rate of 35%. The
reconciliation of the provision for income taxes at the United States statutory
rate compared to the Company’s income tax expense as reported is as
follows:
January
31,
2009
$
|
January
31,
2008
$
|
||
Expected
income tax recovery at statutory rate
|
(12,776)
|
(17,699)
|
|
Non-deductible
expenses
|
2,100
|
2,100
|
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
10,676
|
15,599
|
|
Income
tax recovery
|
–
|
–
|
F-9
-21-
Charmed
Homes Inc.
(A
Development Stage Company)
Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements
January
31, 2009
(Expressed
in US dollars)
6. Income
Taxes
The
significant components of net deferred tax assets at January 31, 2009 and 2008
are as follows:
January
31,
2009
$
|
January
31,
2008
$
|
||
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|||
Cumulative
net operating losses
|
31,660
|
20,984
|
|
Less
valuation allowance
|
(31,660)
|
(20,984)
|
|
Net
deferred tax asset
|
–
|
–
|
The
Company has incurred net operating losses of $90,456 which, if unutilized, will
expire as follows:
Year
Incurred
|
Amount
$
|
Year
of Expiry
|
|
2007
|
15,386
|
2027
|
|
2008
|
44,569
|
2028
|
|
2009
|
30,501
|
2029
|
|
90,456
|
7. Subsequent
Event
On
January 8, 2009, the Company entered into a merger agreement (the “Agreement”)
with IntelaSight, Inc. (“IntelaSight”). Under the Agreement, the Company will
engage in a 1 for 2 reverse stock split and IntelaSight’s stock and derivative
securities will be exchanged for stock and derivative securities of the Company
at a ratio of one share of the Company’s common stock for one share of
IntelaSight. IntelaSight will merge with the Company’s subsidiary, Charmed Homes
Subsidiary, Inc. The Agreement is subject to the satisfaction of closing
conditions and shareholder approval.
F-10
-22-
ITEM
9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
There have been no disagreements on
accounting and financial disclosures from the inception of our company through
the date of this Form 10-K. Our financial statements for the period from
inception to January 31, 2009, included in this report have been audited by
Manning Elliott LLC, Chartered Accountants, 701 West Georgia Street, Suite 1400,
Vancouver, British Columbia V7Y 1C6, as set forth in this annual
report.
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain “disclosure controls and
procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation (the “Evaluation”),
under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”)
as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of
the Exchange Act. Based on this Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our
Disclosure Controls were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and
CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will
prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived
and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if
any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally,
controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management or board override of the
control.
The design of any system of controls
also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving
its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
-23-
CEO and CFO
Certifications
Appearing immediately following the
Signatures section of this report there are Certifications of the CEO and the
CFO. The Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this
report, which you are currently reading is the information concerning the
Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information
should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more
complete understanding of the topics presented.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting,
as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
Our internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and
expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations,
internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have
inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the
circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even effective internal
control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of January 31,
2009. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of January 31,
2009, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective
based on those criteria.
This annual report does not include an
attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal
control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to
attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only
management’s report in this annual report.
-24-
Changes
in Internal Controls
We have also evaluated our internal
controls for financial reporting, and there have been no significant changes in
our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect those
controls subsequent to the date of their last evaluation.
ITEM
9B. OTHER
INFORMATION
None.
PART
III
ITEM
10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
|
Officers and
Directors
Each of our directors serves until his
or her successor is elected and qualified. Each of our officers is elected by
the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his or her
successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she is removed from
office. The board of directors has no nominating, auditing or compensation
committees.
The name, address, age and position of
our present officers and directors are set forth below:
Name
and Address
|
Age
|
Position(s)
|
Ian
Quinn
|
36
|
President,
chief executive officer, treasurer, chief
|
60
Mt Kidd Pt SE
|
financial
officer, chief accounting officer, and
|
|
Calgary,
Alberta T2Z 3C5
|
a
member of the board of directors
|
|
Kevin
Liggins
|
42
|
secretary
and a member of the board of directors
|
1308
Bayside Ave. SW
|
||
Airdrie,
Alberta T4B 2X4
|
The persons named above has held their
offices/positions since inception of our company and are expected to hold their
offices/positions until the next annual meeting of our
stockholders.
Background of officers and
directors
Ian Quinn has been our president, chief
executive officer, treasurer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer,
and a member of our board of directors since our inception on June 27, 2006.
Since July 2003, Mr. Quinn has been a real estate agent associated with Remax
specializing in the sale of residential, rural and commercial real estate in the
Calgary, Alberta area. From February 2001 to July 2003, Mr. Quinn was a member
of the management team of Outlaws Nightclub in Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. Mr. Quinn holds a diploma in General Arts and Sciences from
Mount Royal College in Calgary, Alberta.
-25-
Kevin Liggins has been secretary and a
member of our board of directors since our inception on June 27,
2006. Since February, 2003, Mr. Liggins has worked as a contractor
specializing in residential renovations. From August 2000 to February
2003, Mr. Liggins was a team leader at All New Manufacturing, which engaged in
the business powder coating steel products.
Audit
Committee and Charter
We have a separately-designated audit
committee of the board. Audit committee functions are performed by
our board of directors. None of our directors are deemed independent. All
directors also hold positions as our officers. Our audit committee is
responsible for: (1) selection and oversight of our independent accountant; (2)
establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints
regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; (3) establishing
procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of
concerns regarding accounting and auditing matters; (4) engaging outside
advisors; and, (5) funding for the outside auditory and any outside advisors
engagement by the audit committee.
Audit
Committee Financial Expert
None of our directors or officers have
the qualifications or experience to be considered a financial expert. We believe
the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive.
Further, because of our limited operations, we believe the services of a
financial expert are not warranted.
Code
of Ethics
We have adopted a corporate code of
ethics. We believe our code of ethics is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing
and promote honest and ethical conduct; provide full, fair, accurate, timely and
understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with applicable laws; ensure
prompt internal reporting of code violations; and provide accountability for
adherence to the code.
Disclosure
Committee and Charter
We have a disclosure committee and
disclosure committee charter. Our disclosure committee is comprised of all of
our officers and directors. The purpose of the committee is to provide
assistance to the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer in
fulfilling their responsibilities regarding the identification and disclosure of
material information about us and the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of
our financial reports.
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Section 16(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 require our officer, directors and persons who own more
than 10% of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership of our common stock. Based solely upon our review and
representations by our officers, directors and 10% owners of our common stock
filed all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
-26-
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the
compensation paid by us for the last three fiscal years ending January 31, 2009
for each or our officers. This information includes the dollar value of base
salaries, bonus awards and number of stock options granted, and certain other
compensation, if any. The compensation discussed addresses all
compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid or named executive
officers.
Executive
Officer Compensation Table
Non-
|
Nonqualified
|
||||||||
Equity
|
Deferred
|
All
|
|||||||
Name
|
Incentive
|
Compensa-
|
Other
|
||||||
And
|
Stock
|
Option
|
Plan
|
tion
|
Compen-
|
||||
Principal
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Awards
|
Awards
|
Compensation
|
Earnings
|
sation
|
Total
|
|
Position
|
Year
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
Ian
Quinn
|
2009
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
President
|
2008
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2007
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Kevin
Liggins
|
2009
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Secretary
|
2008
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2007
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
We have no employment agreements with
any of our officers. We do not contemplate entering into any employment
agreements until such time as we begin profitable operations.
The compensation discussed herein
addresses all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive
officers.
There are no other stock option plans,
retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of our officers and
directors other than as described herein.
Compensation
of Directors
The member of our board of directors is
not compensated for his services as a director. The board has not implemented a
plan to award options to any directors. There are no contractual arrangements
with any member of the board of directors. We have no director's service
contracts.
Director’s
Compensation Table
Fees
|
|||||||
Earned
|
Nonqualified
|
||||||
or
|
Non-Equity
|
Deferred
|
|||||
Paid
in
|
Stock
|
Option
|
Incentive
Plan
|
Compensation
|
All
Other
|
||
Cash
|
Awards
|
Awards
|
Compensation
|
Earnings
|
Compensation
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(US$)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
Ian
Quinn
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Kevin
Liggins
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-27-
Option/SAR
Grants
There are no stock option, retirement,
pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of our officers and
directors.
Long-Term
Incentive Plan Awards
We do not have any long-term incentive
plans.
Indemnification
Under our Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws of the corporation, we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a
party to any proceeding, including a lawsuit, because of his position, if he
acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in our best
interest. We may advance expenses incurred in defending a
proceeding. To the extent that the officer or director is successful
on the merits in a proceeding as to which he is to be indemnified, we must
indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorney's fees. With
respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually
and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer or
director is judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is
intended to be to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of
Nevada.
Regarding indemnification for
liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, which may be permitted to
directors or officers under Nevada law, we are informed that, in the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification is against public
policy, as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
|
The following table sets forth, as of
the date of this 10-K report, the total number of shares owned beneficially by
each of our directors, officers and key employees, individually and as a group,
and the present owners of 5% or more of our total outstanding shares. The table
also reflects what their ownership is since the sale of our offering. The
stockholder listed below has direct ownership of his shares and possesses sole
voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares.
Name
and Address
Beneficial
Owner [1]
|
Number
of Shares
|
Percentage
of
Ownership
|
Ian
Quinn
|
2,500,000
|
37.37%
|
60
Mt Kidd Pt SE
|
||
Calgary,
Alberta
|
||
Canada
T2Z 3C5
|
||
Kevin
Liggins
|
2,500,000
|
37.37%
|
1308
Bayside Ave. SW
|
||
Airdrie,
Alberta
|
||
Canada
T4B 2X4
|
||
All
officers and directors as a group
(2
Individuals)
|
5,000,000
|
74.74%
|
|
-28-
|
[1]
|
The
persons named above may be deemed to be a “parent” and “promoter” of our
company, within the meaning of such terms under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, by virtue of his/its direct and indirect stock holdings.
Messrs Quinn and Liggins are our only
“promoters”.
|
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
In July 2006, we issued a total of
2,500,000 shares of restricted common stock to Ian Quinn, one of our officers
and directors in consideration of $2,500 and 2,500,000 shares of restricted
common stock to Kevin Liggins, one of our officers and directors in
consideration of $2,500.
Ian
Quinn, our president, loaned us the sum of $395,751 to pay for legal,
accounting, building costs and other expenses. The amount due Mr. Quinn has been
repaid.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND
SERVICES
(1)
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed for each of
the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal
accountant for our audit of annual financial statements and review of financial
statements included in our Form 10-Qs or services that are normally provided by
the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements for those fiscal years was:
2009
|
$
|
14,962
|
Manning
Elliott LLP
|
|
2008
|
$
|
10,900
|
Manning
Elliott LLP
|
(2)
Audit-Related Fees
The aggregate fees billed in each of
the last two fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal
accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or
review of our financial statements and are not reported in the preceding
paragraph:
2009
|
$
|
0
|
Manning
Elliott LLP
|
|
2008
|
$
|
0
|
Manning
Elliott LLP
|
(3)
Tax Fees
The aggregate fees billed in each of
the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal
accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning was:
2009
|
$
|
0
|
Manning
Elliott LLP
|
|
2008
|
$
|
0
|
Manning
Elliott LLP
|
(4)
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed in each of
the last two fiscal years for the products and services provided by the
principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (1), (2),
and (3) was:
-29-
2009
|
$
|
0
|
Manning
Elliott LLP
|
|
2008
|
$
|
0
|
Manning
Elliott LLP
|
(5) Our audit committee’s pre-approval
policies and procedures described in paragraph (c)(7)(i) of Rule 2-01 of
Regulation S-X were that the audit committee pre-approve all accounting related
activities prior to the performance of any services by any accountant or
auditor.
(6) The percentage of hours expended on
the principal accountant’s engagement to audit our financial statements for the
most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other
than the principal accountant’s full time, permanent employees was
0%.
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT
SCHEDULES.
Incorporated
by reference
|
|||||
Exhibit
|
Document
Description
|
Form
|
Date
|
Number
|
Filed
herewith
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation.
|
SB-2
|
04/20/07
|
3.1
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws.
|
SB-2
|
04/20/07
|
3.2
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Stock Certificate.
|
SB-2
|
04/20/07
|
4.1
|
|
14.1
|
Code
of Ethics.
|
10-K
|
04/30/08
|
14.1
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
X
|
|||
32.1
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Office and Chief Financial
Officer).
|
X
|
|||
99.1
|
Subscription
Agreement.
|
SB-2
|
04/20/07
|
99.1
|
|
99.2
|
Audit
Committee Charter.
|
10-K
|
4/30/08
|
99.2
|
|
99.3
|
Disclosure
Committee Charter.
|
10-K
|
4/30/08
|
99.3
|
-30-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds
to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing of this Form 10-K
and has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized on this 28th day of
April, 2009.
CHARMED
HOMES INC.
|
||
BY:
|
IAN QUINN
|
|
Ian
Quinn
|
||
President,
Principal Executive Officer, Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer, and a member of the Board of
Directors
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following person on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
IAN QUINN
|
President,
Principal Executive Officer,
|
April
28, 2009
|
Ian
Quinn
|
Treasurer,
Principal Financial Officer,
|
|
Principal
Accounting Officer, and a
|
||
member
of the Board of Directors
|
||
KEVIN LIGGINS |
Secretary
and a member of the Board of
|
April
____, 2009
|
Kevin
Liggins
|
Directors.
|
-31-
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Incorporated
by reference
|
|||||
Exhibit
|
Document
Description
|
Form
|
Date
|
Number
|
Filed
herewith
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation.
|
SB-2
|
04/20/07
|
3.1
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws.
|
SB-2
|
04/20/07
|
3.2
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Stock Certificate.
|
SB-2
|
04/20/07
|
4.1
|
|
14.1
|
Code
of Ethics.
|
10-K
|
04/30/08
|
14.1
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
15d-15(e), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
X
|
|||
32.1
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Office and Chief Financial
Officer).
|
X
|
|||
99.1
|
Subscription
Agreement.
|
SB-2
|
04/20/07
|
99.1
|
|
99.2
|
Audit
Committee Charter.
|
10-K
|
4/30/08
|
99.2
|
|
99.3
|
Disclosure
Committee Charter.
|
10-K
|
4/30/08
|
99.3
|
-32-