J&J SNACK FOODS CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For the
period ended June 27, 2009
or
o Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Commission
File
Number: 0-14616
J & J
SNACK FOODS CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New
Jersey
|
22-1935537
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
6000
Central Highway, Pennsauken, NJ 08109
(Address
of principal executive offices)
Telephone
(856) 665-9533
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large
accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large Accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated
filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller
reporting company ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
o Yes x No
As of July 20, 2009, there were
18,445,787 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.
INDEX
Page
|
||||
Number
|
||||
Part
I. Financial Information
|
||||
Item
l. Consolidated Financial Statements
|
||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets – June 27, 2009 (unaudited) and September 27,
2008
|
3 | |||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings (unaudited) – Three Months and Nine Months Ended
June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008
|
5 | |||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) – Nine Months Ended June 27, 2009 and
June 28, 2008
|
6 | |||
Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
7 | |||
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
|
25 | |||
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
29 | |||
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
30 | |||
Part
II. Other Information
|
||||
Item
6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
|
31 |
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Consolidated
Financial Statements
J & J
SNACK FOODS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands)
June
27,
|
September 27,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 59,116 | $ | 44,265 | ||||
Marketable
securities held to maturity
|
22,047 | 2,470 | ||||||
Auction
market preferred stock
|
- | 14,000 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
59,954 | 61,853 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
52,244 | 49,095 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
2,292 | 1,962 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,677 | 3,555 | ||||||
199,330 | 177,200 | |||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, at cost
|
||||||||
Land
|
1,416 | 1,416 | ||||||
Buildings
|
8,672 | 8,672 | ||||||
Plant
machinery and equipment
|
130,489 | 124,591 | ||||||
Marketing
equipment
|
199,793 | 195,878 | ||||||
Transportation
equipment
|
2,729 | 2,878 | ||||||
Office
equipment
|
11,256 | 10,820 | ||||||
Improvements
|
18,297 | 17,694 | ||||||
Construction
in progress
|
2,522 | 2,215 | ||||||
375,174 | 364,164 | |||||||
Less
accumulated deprecia-tion and amortization
|
281,653 | 271,100 | ||||||
93,521 | 93,064 | |||||||
Other
assets
|
||||||||
Goodwill
|
60,314 | 60,314 | ||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
50,252 | 53,633 | ||||||
Marketable
securities held to maturity
|
20,402 | - | ||||||
Auction
market preferred stock
|
- | 21,200 | ||||||
Other
|
2,342 | 2,997 | ||||||
133,310 | 138,144 | |||||||
$ | 426,161 | $ | 408,408 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
J & J
SNACK FOODS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS – Continued
(in
thousands)
|
June
27,
|
September 27,
|
||||||
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Current
obligations under capital leases
|
$ | 95 | $ | 93 | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
51,223 | 48,580 | ||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
11,780 | 5,557 | ||||||
Accrued
compensation expense
|
9,081 | 10,232 | ||||||
Dividends
payable
|
1,798 | 1,732 | ||||||
73,977 | 66,194 | |||||||
Long-term
obligations under capital leases
|
309 | 381 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
23,056 | 23,056 | ||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
1,999 | 1,999 | ||||||
25,364 | 25,436 | |||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
||||||||
Capital
stock
|
||||||||
Preferred,
$1 par value; authorized, 10,000 shares; none issued
|
- | - | ||||||
Common,
no par value; authorized 50,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 18,433 and
18,748 shares, respectively
|
38,705 | 48,415 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehen-sive loss
|
(3,368 | ) | (2,003 | ) | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
291,483 | 270,366 | ||||||
326,820 | 316,778 | |||||||
$ | 426,161 | $ | 408,408 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
J & J
SNACK FOODS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$ | 179,761 | $ | 176,839 | $ | 470,255 | $ | 451,966 | ||||||||
Cost
of goods sold(1)
|
118,727 | 121,087 | 323,162 | 320,427 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
61,034 | 55,752 | 147,093 | 131,539 | ||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Marketing(2)
|
18,226 | 18,993 | 50,804 | 51,479 | ||||||||||||
Distribution(3)
|
12,829 | 14,072 | 36,403 | 39,051 | ||||||||||||
Administrative(4)
|
5,609 | 5,442 | 16,789 | 15,910 | ||||||||||||
Other
general (income)expense
|
(10 | ) | (209 | ) | 6 | (371 | ) | |||||||||
36,654 | 38,298 | 104,002 | 106,069 | |||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
24,380 | 17,454 | 43,091 | 25,470 | ||||||||||||
Other
income(expenses)
|
||||||||||||||||
Investment
income
|
290 | 552 | 1,049 | 2,055 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense and other
|
(27 | ) | (20 | ) | (84 | ) | (86 | ) | ||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
24,643 | 17,986 | 44,056 | 27,439 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
9,714 | 7,166 | 17,564 | 10,724 | ||||||||||||
NET
EARNINGS
|
$ | 14,929 | $ | 10,820 | $ | 26,492 | $ | 16,715 | ||||||||
Earnings
per diluted share
|
$ | .80 | $ | .57 | $ | 1.42 | $ | .88 | ||||||||
Weighted
average number of diluted shares
|
18,698 | 18,981 | 18,697 | 19,013 | ||||||||||||
Earnings
per basic share
|
$ | .81 | $ | .58 | $ | 1.43 | $ | .89 | ||||||||
Weighted
average number of basic shares
|
18,480 | 18,762 | 18,507 | 18,772 |
(1)
|
Includes
share-based compensation expense of $44 and $168 for the three and nine
months ended June 27, 2009, respectively and $59 and $170 for the three
and nine months ended June 28, 2008,
respectively.
|
(2)
|
Includes
share-based compensation expense of $158 and $583 for the three and nine
months ended June 27, 2009, respectively and $204 and $595 for the three
and nine months ended June 28, 2008,
respectively.
|
(3)
|
Includes
share-based compensation expense and $5 and $17 for the three and nine
months ended June 27, 2009, respectively and $6 and $17 for the three and
nine months
ended June 28, 2008,
respectively.
|
(4)
|
Includes
share-based compensation expense of $168 and $591 for the three and nine
months ended June 27, 2009, respectively and $204 and $595 for the three
and nine months ended June 28, 2008,
respectively.
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
5
J & J
SNACK FOODS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
Nine
months ended
|
||||||||
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 26,492 | $ | 16,715 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization of fixed assets
|
16,796 | 16,560 | ||||||
Amortization
of intangibles and deferred costs
|
3,817 | 4,010 | ||||||
Share-based
compensation
|
1,359 | 1,377 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(154 | ) | (225 | ) | ||||
Gain
from disposals and impairment of property, plant and
equipment
|
(19 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities, net of effects from purchase of
companies
|
||||||||
Decrease
(increase) in accounts receivable
|
1,727 | (12,219 | ) | |||||
Increase
in inventories
|
(3,343 | ) | (5,749 | ) | ||||
Increase
in prepaid expenses
|
(344 | ) | (453 | ) | ||||
Increase
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
8,199 | 10,059 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
54,530 | 30,012 | ||||||
Investing
activities:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of property, plant and equipment
|
(17,524 | ) | (18,401 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of marketable securities
|
(46,408 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from redemption and sales of marketable securities
|
6,430 | - | ||||||
Purchase
of auction market preferred stock
|
- | (10,500 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from redemption and sales of auction market preferred
stock
|
35,200 | 16,500 | ||||||
Proceeds
from disposal of property and equipment
|
189 | 700 | ||||||
Other
|
18 | (364 | ) | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(22,095 | ) | (12,065 | ) | ||||
Financing
activities:
|
||||||||
Payments
to repurchase common stock
|
(12,510 | ) | (3,539 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from issuance of stock
|
1,258 | 908 | ||||||
Payments
on capitalized lease obligations
|
(70 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||
Payments
of cash dividend
|
(5,310 | ) | (5,049 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(16,632 | ) | (7,748 | ) | ||||
Effect
of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents
|
(952 | ) | 371 | |||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
14,851 | 10,570 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
44,265 | 15,819 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 59,116 | $ | 26,389 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
6
J & J
SNACK FOODS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note
1
|
In
the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal
recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position
and the results of operations and cash flows. Certain prior
period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported
net earnings.
|
The
results of operations for the three months and nine months ended June 27, 2009
and June 28, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
Sales of our frozen beverages and frozen juice bars and ices are generally
higher in the third and fourth quarters due to warmer weather.
While we
believe that the disclosures presented are adequate to make the information not
misleading, it is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
27, 2008.
Note
2
|
We
recognize revenue from Food Service, Retail Supermarkets, The Restaurant
Group and Frozen Beverage products at the time the products are shipped to
third parties. When we perform services under service contracts
for frozen beverage dispenser machines, revenue is recognized upon the
completion of the services on specified machines. We provide an
allowance for doubtful receivables after taking into consideration
historical experience and other factors. The allowance for
doubtful receivables was $1,141,000 and $926,000 at June 27, 2009 and
September 27, 2008, respectively.
|
Note
3
|
Depreciation
of equipment and buildings is provided for
by the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives.
Amortization of improvements is provided for by the straight-line method
over the term of the lease or the assets’ estimated useful lives,
whichever is shorter. Licenses and rights, customer relationships and non
compete agreements arising from acquisitions are amortized by the
straight-line method over periods ranging from 3 to 20
years.
|
7
Note
4
|
Our
calculation of earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
“Earnings Per Share,” is as
follows:
|
Three
Months Ended June 27, 2009
|
||||||||||||
Income
|
Shares
|
Per
Share
|
||||||||||
(Numerator)
|
(Denominator)
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings available to common stockholders
|
$ | 14,929 | 18,480 | $ | .81 | |||||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||||
Options
|
- | 218 | (.01 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings available to common stockholders plus assumed
conversions
|
$ | 14,929 | 18,698 | $ | .80 |
107,000
anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS
because the options’ exercise price is greater than the average market price of
the common stock.
Nine
Months Ended June 27, 2009
|
||||||||||||
Income
|
Shares
|
Per
Share
|
||||||||||
(Numerator)
|
(Denominator)
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings available to common stockholders
|
$ | 26,492 | 18,507 | $ | 1.43 | |||||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||||
Options
|
- | 190 | (.01 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings available to common stockholders plus assumed
conversions
|
$ | 26,492 | 18,697 | $ | 1.42 |
8
261,595
anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS
because the options’ exercise price is greater than the average market price of
the common stock.
Three
Months Ended June 28, 2008
|
||||||||||||
Income
|
Shares
|
Per
Share
|
||||||||||
(Numerator)
|
(Denominator)
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings available to common stockholders
|
$ | 10,820 | 18,762 | $ | .58 | |||||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||||
Options
|
- | 219 | (.01 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings available to common stockholders plus assumed
conversions
|
$ | 10,820 | 18,981 | $ | .57 |
393,166
anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS
because the options’ exercise price is greater than the average market price of
the common stock.
Nine
Months Ended June 28, 2008
|
||||||||||||
Income
|
Shares
|
Per
Share
|
||||||||||
(Numerator)
|
(Denominator)
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings available to common stockholders
|
$ | 16,715 | 18,772 | $ | .89 | |||||||
Effect
of Dilutive Securities
|
||||||||||||
Options
|
- | 241 | (.01 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted
EPS
|
||||||||||||
Net
Earnings available to common stockholders plus assumed
conversions
|
$ | 16,715 | 19,013 | $ | .88 |
415,316
anti-dilutive shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS
because the options’ exercise price is greater than the average market price of
the common stock.
9
Note
5
|
Our
calculation of comprehensive income is as
follows:
|
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 14,929 | $ | 10,820 | $ | 26,492 | $ | 16,715 | ||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
516 | 225 | (1,365 | ) | 371 | |||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$ | 15,445 | $ | 11,045 | $ | 25,127 | $ | 17,086 |
Note
6
|
The
Company follows FASB Statement No. 123(R), “Share-Based
Payment”. Statement 123(R) requires that the compensation cost
relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in financial
statements. That cost is measured based on the fair value of
the equity or liability instruments
issued.
|
|
Statement
123(R) covers a wide range of share-based compensation
arrangements including share options, restricted share plans,
performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and employee share
purchase plans.
|
|
In
addition to the accounting standard that sets forth the financial
reporting objectives and related accounting principles, Statement 123(R)
includes an appendix of implementation guidance that provides expanded
guidance on measuring the fair value of share-based payment
awards.
|
|
At
June 27, 2009, the Company has three stock-based employee compensation
plans. Share-based compensation was recognized as
follows:
|
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock
Options
|
$ | 109 | $ | 280 | $ | 597 | $ | 812 | ||||||||
Stock
purchase plan
|
32 | 28 | 206 | 104 | ||||||||||||
Deferred
stock issued to outside directors
|
34 | 34 | 103 | 103 | ||||||||||||
Restricted
stock issued to an employee
|
22 | 25 | 72 | 75 | ||||||||||||
$ | 197 | $ | 367 | $ | 978 | $ | 1,094 | |||||||||
Per
diluted share
|
$ | .01 | $ | .02 | $ | .05 | $ | .06 | ||||||||
The
above compensation is net of tax benefits
|
$ | 178 | $ | 106 | $ | 381 | $ | 283 |
10
The
Company anticipates that share-based compensation will not exceed $1,300,000,
net of tax benefits, or approximately $.07 per share for the fiscal year ending
September 26, 2009.
The fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes options-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions used for grants in fiscal 2009 and 2008: expected volatility of 23%
and 25%; risk-free interest rates of 2.70% and 3.60%; dividend rate of 1.2% and
1.1% and expected lives ranging between 5 and 10 years.
During
the 2009 and 2008 nine month periods, the Company granted 4,500 and 96,345 stock
options, respectively. The weighted-average grant date fair value of these
options was $7.13 and $7.98, respectively. 1,500 options were granted in
the third quarter of 2009 and none were granted in the third quarter of
2008.
Expected
volatility for both years is based on the historical volatility of the price of
our common shares over the past 50 to 51 months for 5 year options and 10 years
for 10 year options. We use historical information to estimate
expected life and forfeitures within the valuation
model. The expected term of awards represents the period
of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The
risk-free rate for periods within the expected life of the option is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Compensation cost is
recognized using a straight-line method over the vesting or service period and
is net of estimated forfeitures.
Note
7
|
In
June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”
(SFAS 109).
|
FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an
entity’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS
109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and
measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure and transition.
11
FIN 48
also provides guidance on financial reporting and classification of differences
between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the
financial statements.
We
adopted FIN 48 on September 30, 2007, the first day of the 2008 fiscal
year, and, as a result, recognized a $925,000 decrease to opening retained
earnings from the cumulative effect of adoption. The total amount of gross
unrecognized tax benefits is $1,830,000 and $1,735,000 on June 27, 2009 and
September 27, 2008, respectively. We recognize interest and penalties
related to income tax matters as a part of the provision for income
taxes. As of June 27, 2009 and September 27, 2008, respectively, the
Company has $676,000 and $588,000 of accrued interest and
penalties.
In
addition to our federal tax return and tax returns for Mexico and Canada,
we file tax returns in all states that have a corporate income tax with
virtually all open for examination for three to four years.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (FAS 157). This Statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement
applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value
measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those accounting
pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute.
Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements.
However, for some entities, the application of this Statement will change
current practice. In February, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-1,
“Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement 13 and Other
Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair value Measurements for Purposes of
Lease Classification and Measurement under Statement 13” (FSP FAS 157-1) and
FASB Staff
12
Position
157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (FSP FAS 157-2).
FSP FAS 157-1 amends FAS 157 to remove certain leasing transactions from its
scope. FSP FAS 157-2 defers the effective date of FAS No. 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring
basis. We adopted the guidance of FAS 157 as it applies to our financial
instruments on September 28, 2008. The adoption of FAS 157 did not have a
material impact on the company’s financial statements.
SFAS No.
157 defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be
determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS No. 157
establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair
value:
Level
1
|
Observable
inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities and FDIC insurance on Certificates of Deposit placed through
the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry
Service;
|
Level
2
|
Observable
inputs, other than Level 1 inputs in active markets, that are observable
either directly or indirectly; and
|
Level
3
|
Unobservable
inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the
reporting entity to develop its own
assumptions.
|
Marketable
securities (see Note 11) are all classified as held to maturity and values are
derived solely from level 1 inputs. In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (FSP FAS 157-3). FSP
FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of FAS 157 in a market that is not active
and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair
value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset
is not active. FSP FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including for
prior periods for which financial statements have not been
issued. FSP FAS 157-3 did not impact our financial reporting as we do not
hold any such assets.
13
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosure
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (FSF FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amend SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments” and APB Opinion Number 28,
“Interim Financial Reporting” to require disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies
as well as in annual financial statements and to require those disclosures in
summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. The
adoption of this FSP and amended Opinion in our quarter ended June 27, 2009
did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements. The
following standards, which did not have an impact on our financial statements,
were also adopted in our quarter ended June 2009: FSP FAS 157-4,
“Determining Whether a Market Is Not Active and a Transaction Is Not
Distressed”, and FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation
of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.”
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R) expands the definition of abusiness
combination and requires the fair value of the purchase price of an acquisition,
including the issuance of equity securities, to be determined on the acquisition
date. SFAS 141(R) also requires that all assets, liabilities, contingent
considerations, and contingencies of an acquired business be recorded at fair
value at the acquisition date. In addition, SFAS 141(R) requires that
acquisition costs generally be expensed in the period incurred and changes in
accounting for deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax
uncertainties after the measurement period to impact income tax expense. SFAS
141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2008 with early adoption prohibited. SFAS 141(R) will be applicable
to the Company during the first quarter of Fiscal 2010. The Company is
evaluating the effect the implementation to SFAS 141(R) will have on the
consolidated financial statements.
14
In August
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3, “Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” The FSP revises the factors that a
company should consider to develop renewal or extension assumptions used in
estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset. The new
guidance will apply to all intangible assets acquired after the FSP’s effective
date. The FSP also requires new disclosures for all intangible assets
recognized as of, and subsequent to, the FSP’s effective date.
The
underlying purpose of the FSP is to improve the consistency between the period
of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of a recognized intangible
asset and the useful life of an intangible asset as determined under FASB
Statement 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”
FSP FAS
142-3 is effective for our 2010 fiscal year. Early adoption is
prohibited. The Company is evaluating the effect the implementation
to FSP FAS 142-3 will have on the consolidated financial
statements.
In May
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (FASB
165). The standard does not require significant changes regarding
recognition or disclosure of subsequent events, but does require disclosure of
the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated for disclosure and
recognition. The standard is effective for financial statements
issued after June 15, 2009. The implementation of this standard did
not have a significant impact on the financial statements of the
Company. Subsequent events through the filing date of this Form 10-Q
have been evaluated for disclosure and recognition.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 141R-1 “Accounting for Assets Acquired and
Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from
15
Contingencies”
(FSP 141R-1). FSP 141R-1 amends the provisions in Statement 141R for
the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting,
and disclosures for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in
business combinations. The FSP eliminates the distinction between contractual
and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and
measurement criteria in Statement 141R and instead carries forward most of the
provisions in SFAS 141 for acquired contingencies. FSP 141R-1 is
effective for contingent assets and contingent liabilities acquired in business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The
effect of adopting FSP 141R-1 will depend upon the nature, terms and size of any
acquired contingencies consummated after the effective date.
Note
8
|
Inventories
consist of the following:
|
June
27,
|
September
27,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Finished
goods
|
$ | 25,134 | $ | 23,512 | ||||
Raw
materials
|
8,884 | 7,658 | ||||||
Packaging
materials
|
5,545 | 5,405 | ||||||
Equipment
parts & other
|
12,681 | 12,520 | ||||||
$ | 52,244 | $ | 49,095 | |||||
The
above inventories are net of reserves
|
$ | 4,087 | $ | 3,817 |
Note
9
|
We
principally sell our products to the food service and retail supermarket
industries. We also distribute our products directly to the
consumer through our chain of retail stores referred to as The Restaurant
Group. Sales and results of our frozen beverages business are
monitored separately from the balance of our food service business and
restaurant group because of different distribution and capital
requirements. We maintain separate and discrete financial
information for the four operating segments mentioned above which is
available to our Chief Operating Decision Makers. We have
applied no aggregate criteria to any of these operating segments in order
to determine reportable segments. Our four reportable segments
are Food Service, Retail Supermarkets, The Restaurant Group and Frozen
Beverages. All inter-segment net sales and expenses have been
eliminated in computing net sales and operating income
(loss). These segments are described
below.
|
16
Food Service
The
primary products sold to the food service group are soft pretzels, frozen juice
treats and desserts, churros and baked goods. Our customers in the
food service industry include snack bars and food stands in chain, department
and discount stores; malls and shopping centers; fast food outlets; stadiums and
sports arenas; leisure and theme parks; convenience
stores; movie theatres; warehouse club stores; schools, colleges and other
institutions. Within the food service industry, our products are
purchased by the consumer primarily for consumption at the
point-of-sale.
Retail Supermarkets
The
primary products sold to the retail supermarket industry are soft pretzel
products, including SUPERPRETZEL, LUIGI’S Real Italian Ice, MINUTE MAID Juice
Bars and Soft Frozen Lemonade, WHOLE FRUIT Sorbet, FRUIT-A-FREEZE frozen fruit
bars, ICEE frozen novelties and TIO PEPE’S Churros. Within the retail
supermarket industry, our frozen and prepackaged products are purchased by the
consumer for consumption at home.
The Restaurant Group
We sell
direct to the consumer through our Restaurant Group, which operates BAVARIAN
PRETZEL BAKERY and PRETZEL GOURMET, our chain of specialty snack food retail
outlets.
Frozen Beverages
We sell
frozen beverages to the food service industry, including our restaurant group,
primarily under the names ICEE, SLUSH PUPPIE and ARCTIC BLAST in the United
States, Mexico and Canada.
17
The Chief
Operating Decision Maker for Food Service, Retail
Supermarkets and The Restaurant Group and the Chief Operating Decision Maker for
Frozen Beverages monthly review and evaluate operating income and sales in order
to assess performance and allocate resources to each individual segment. In
addition, the Chief Operating Decision Makers review and evaluate depreciation,
capital spending and assets of each segment on a quarterly basis to monitor cash
flow and asset needs of each segment. Information
regarding the operations in these four reportable segments is as
follows:
18
As
of and For the
|
As
of and For the
|
|||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
June
27,
|
June
28,
|
|||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
to External Customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Food
Service
|
$ | 109,363 | $ | 106,854 | $ | 306,812 | $ | 291,146 | ||||||||
Retail
Supermarket
|
20,939 | 17,165 | 44,501 | 40,819 | ||||||||||||
The
Restaurant Group
|
260 | 343 | 1,012 | 1,314 | ||||||||||||
Frozen
Beverages
|
49,199 | 52,477 | 117,930 | 118,687 | ||||||||||||
$ | 179,761 | $ | 176,839 | $ | 470,255 | $ | 451,966 | |||||||||
Depreciation
and Amortization:
|
||||||||||||||||
Food
Service
|
$ | 4,140 | $ | 4,154 | $ | 12,297 | $ | 12,543 | ||||||||
Retail
Supermarket
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
The
Restaurant Group
|
8 | 21 | 25 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Frozen
Beverages
|
2,850 | 2,852 | 8,291 | 7,983 | ||||||||||||
$ | 6,998 | $ | 7,027 | $ | 20,613 | $ | 20,570 | |||||||||
Operating
Income(Loss):
|
||||||||||||||||
Food
Service
|
$ | 14,444 | $ | 6,878 | $ | 32,571 | $ | 16,523 | ||||||||
Retail
Supermarket
|
2,330 | 1,649 | 4,419 | 2,496 | ||||||||||||
The
Restaurant Group
|
(51 | ) | (74 | ) | (31 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||||||
Frozen
Beverages
|
7,657 | 9,001 | 6,132 | 6,521 | ||||||||||||
$ | 24,380 | $ | 17,454 | $ | 43,091 | $ | 25,470 | |||||||||
Capital
Expenditures:
|
||||||||||||||||
Food
Service
|
$ | 3,007 | $ | 3,063 | $ | 8,884 | $ | 9,582 | ||||||||
Retail
Supermarket
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
The
Restaurant Group
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Frozen
Beverages
|
4,447 | 3,443 | 8,640 | 8,819 | ||||||||||||
$ | 7,454 | $ | 6,506 | $ | 17,524 | $ | 18,401 | |||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Food
Service
|
$ | 294,772 | $ | 262,312 | $ | 294,772 | $ | 262,312 | ||||||||
Retail
Supermarket
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
The
Restaurant Group
|
574 | 660 | 574 | 660 | ||||||||||||
Frozen
Beverages
|
130,815 | 138,089 | 130,815 | 138,089 | ||||||||||||
$ | 426,161 | $ | 401,061 | $ | 426,161 | $ | 401,061 |
19
Note
10
|
We
follow SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”. SFAS No.
142 includes requirements to test goodwill and indefinite lived intangible
assets for impairment rather than amortize them; accordingly, we do not
amortize goodwill.
|
Our four
reporting units, which are also reportable segments,
are Food Service, Retail Supermarkets, The Restaurant Group and Frozen
Beverages.
The
carrying amount of acquired intangible assets for the Food Service, Retail
Supermarkets, The Restaurant Group and Frozen Beverage segments as of June 27,
2009 are as follows:
20
Gross
|
Net
|
|||||||||||
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
Carrying
|
||||||||||
Amount
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
FOOD
SERVICE
|
||||||||||||
Indefinite
lived intangible assets
|
||||||||||||
Trade
Names
|
$ | 8,180 | $ | - | $ | 8,180 | ||||||
Amortized
intangible assets
|
||||||||||||
Non
compete agreements
|
435 | 266 | 169 | |||||||||
Customer
relationships
|
33,287 | 10,666 | 22,621 | |||||||||
Licenses
and rights
|
3,606 | 2,004 | 1,602 | |||||||||
$ | 45,508 | $ | 12,936 | $ | 32,572 | |||||||
RETAIL
SUPERMARKETS
|
||||||||||||
Indefinite
lived intangible assets
|
||||||||||||
Trade
Names
|
$ | 2,731 | $ | - | $ | 2,731 | ||||||
THE
RESTAURANT GROUP
|
||||||||||||
Amortized
Intangible Assets Licenses and rights
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
FROZEN
BEVERAGES
|
||||||||||||
Indefinite
lived intangible assets
|
||||||||||||
Trade
Names
|
$ | 9,315 | $ | - | $ | 9,315 | ||||||
Amortized
intangible assets
|
||||||||||||
Non
compete agreements
|
148 | 130 | 18 | |||||||||
Customer
relationships
|
6,478 | 2,046 | 4,432 | |||||||||
Licenses
and rights
|
1,601 | 417 | 1,184 | |||||||||
$ | 17,542 | $ | 2,593 | $ | 14,949 |
Amortized
intangible assets are being amortized by the straight-line method over periods
ranging from 3 to 20 years and amortization expense is reflected throughout
operating expenses. There were no changes in the gross carrying
amount of intangible assets for the three months ended June 27,
2009. Aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets for the
three months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008 was $1,127,000 and
$1,183,000, respectively and for the nine months ended June 27, 2009 and June
28, 2008 was $3,381,000 and $3,567,000, respectively.
21
Estimated
amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is approximately $4,500,000
in 2009 and 2010, $4,100,000 in 2011, $3,800,000 in 2012 and $3,700,000 in
2013. The weighted average amortization period of the intangible
assets is 10.3 years.
Goodwill
The carrying amounts of goodwill for
the Food Service, Restaurant Group and Frozen Beverage segments are as
follows:
Food
|
Retail
|
Restaurant
|
Frozen
|
|||||||||||||||||
Service
|
Supermarket
|
Group
|
Beverages
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at June 27, 2009
|
$ | 23,988 | $ | - | $ | 386 | $ | 35,940 | $ | 60,314 |
There
were no changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the three months ended
June 27, 2009.
Note
11
|
We
have classified our investment securities as marketable securities held to
maturity and auction market preferred stock (AMPS). Marketable
securities held to maturity values are derived solely from level 1
inputs. We have no holdings of AMPS at June 27,
2009.
|
The
amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair market values of our
investment securities held to maturity at June 27, 2009 are summarized as
follows:
Gross
|
Gross
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Market
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
US
Government Agency Debt
|
$ | 6,011 | $ | 23 | $ | - | $ | 6,034 | ||||||||
FDIC
Backed Corporate Debt
|
13,239 | 163 | 4 | 13,398 | ||||||||||||
Certificates
of Deposit
|
23,199 | 55 | 5 | 23,249 | ||||||||||||
$ | 42,449 | $ | 241 | $ | 9 | $ | 42,681 |
All of
the certificates of deposit are within the FDIC limits for insurance
coverage.
The
amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair market values of our
investment securities held to maturity at September 27, 2008 are summarized as
follows:
22
Certificates
of Deposit
|
$ | 2,470 | $ | - | $ | 6 | $ | 2,464 | ||||||||
$ | 2,470 | $ | - | $ | 6 | $ | 2,464 |
All of
the certificates of deposit are within the FDIC limits for insurance
coverage.
The
amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s held to maturity securities by
contractual maturity at June 27, 2009 and September 27, 2008 are summarized as
follows:
June 27, 2009
|
September 27, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Fair
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Market
|
Amortized
|
Market
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
Value
|
Cost
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Due
in one year or less
|
$ | 22,047 | $ | 22,096 | $ | 2,470 | $ | 2,464 | ||||||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
20,402 | 20,585 | - | - | ||||||||||||
Total
held to maturity securities
|
$ | 42,449 | $ | 42,681 | $ | 2,470 | $ | 2,464 | ||||||||
Less
current portion
|
22,047 | 22,096 | 2,470 | 2,464 | ||||||||||||
Long
term held to maturity securities
|
$ | 20,402 | $ | 20,585 | $ | - | $ | - |
The
amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair market values of our
auction market preferred stock at September 27, 2008 are summarized as
follows:
Gross
|
Gross
|
Fair
|
||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
Unrealized
|
Unrealized
|
Market
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
|
Gains
|
Losses
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Auction
Market Preferred Stock Equity Securities
|
$ | 35,200 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 35,200 | ||||||||
$ | 35,200 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 35,200 |
The AMPS
we owned at September 27, 2008 are senior equity securities of closed-end funds
and have priority over the fund’s common shares as to distribution of assets and
dividends, as described in each fund’s prospectus.
Under
normal auction market conditions, dividends on the AMPS for each dividend period
(generally 7 to 49 days) are set at a rate determined through an auction process
that brings together bidders who seek to buy AMPS and holders of AMPS who seek
to sell. Investors and potential investors typically had purchased the
AMPS in an auction by submitting orders to a broker-dealer, typically, an
investment bank. However, beginning in mid February, the auction process
has not been supported by broker-dealers and auctions have failed and continue
to fail. In the case of a failed auction, the dividends continue to be
paid at the applicable “failure” rate for each security until an auction can
establish a market clearing rate. For most of the funds we own,
the specified “failure” rate is the current applicable LIBOR rate plus 125
basis points or 125% of the rate, whichever is greater. Other of the funds
we own have different formulas which produce comparable dividend
rates.
23
The
assets of closed-end funds, which are valued on a daily basis, serve as the
collateral for issuance of the AMPS. The AMPS must meet certain
specified asset coverage tests, which include a requirement set forth under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 that closed-end funds maintain asset coverage of
at least 200% with respect to the AMPS and any other outstanding senior
securities; i.e. closed-end funds must have at least $2 of collateral for every
$1 of AMPS issued. If the funds don’t meet the asset coverage tests, then
the fund must redeem them. All the $35.2 million of securities held by J
& J is AAA rated. The collateral held by the funds are generally
municipal securities or common and preferred stock of public
corporations.
On August
21, 2008, Merrill Lynch announced a plan to purchase, at par, AMPS held by J
& J and other of its clients.
Redemption
of our AMPS subsequent to the failure of the auction process was $10,000,000,
our carrying value, in the year ended September 27,2008 and $15,400,000, also
our carrying value, in the nine months ended June 27, 2009. In
January 2009, we sold $19,800,000 of our AMPS to Merrill Lynch at our carrying
value.
Proceeds
from the sale and redemption of AMPS were $0 and $35,200,000 in the three and
nine months ended June 27, 2009, respectively, with no gain or loss
recorded. Proceeds from the sale and redemption of AMPS were
$10,000,000 and $16,500,000 in the three and nine months ended June 28, 2008,
respectively, with no gain or loss recorded. We use the specific
identification method to determine the cost of securities sold.
Proceeds
from the sale and redemption of marketable securities were $3,355,000 and
$6,430,000 in the three and nine months ended June 27, 2009, respectively, and
none in the prior year, with no gain or loss recorded. We use the
specific identification method to determine the cost of securities
sold.
24
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our current cash and cash equivalents
balances and cash expected to be provided by future operations are our primary
sources of liquidity. We believe that these sources, along with our
borrowing capacity and investment securities, are sufficient to fund future
growth and expansion. See Note 11 to these financial statements for a
discussion of our investment securities.
The
Company’s Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of
$.0975 per share of its common stock payable on July 7, 2009 to shareholders of
record as of the close of business on June 17, 2009.
In the nine months ended June 27, 2009,
we purchased and retired 450,597 shares of our common stock at a cost of
$12,510,000 under a million share buyback authorization approved by the
Company’s Board of Directors in February 2008 leaving 414,279 as the number of
shares that may yet be purchased under the share buyback
authorization. We did not purchase any shares in the three months
ended June 27, 2009. We purchased and retired 135,124 shares at a
cost of $3,539,000 in our fiscal year ended September 27, 2008. Of
the shares purchased and retired in this year’s nine months, 400,000 shares were
purchased at the purchase price of $27.90 per share from Gerald B.
Shreiber, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Company.
In the
three months ended June 27, 2009 and June 28, 2008, fluctuations in the
valuation of the Mexican and Canadian currencies and the resulting translation
of the net assets of our Mexican and Canadian subsidiaries caused a decrease of
$516,000 and a decrease of $225,000, respectively, in accumulated other
comprehensive loss. In the nine month periods, there was an increase
of $1,365,000 in fiscal year 2009 and a decrease of $371,000 in fiscal year
2008.
On
January 9, 2007 we acquired the assets of Hom/Ade Foods, Inc., a manufacturer
and distributor of biscuits and dumplings sold under the MARY B’S and private
label store brands to the supermarket industry. Hom/Ade,
headquartered in Pensacola, Florida, had annual sales of approximately $30
million.
25
On
January 31, 2007 we acquired the assets of Radar Inc., a manufacturer and seller
of fig and fruit bars selling its products under the brand DADDY RAY’S.
Headquartered and with its manufacturing facility in Moscow Mills, MO (outside
of St. Louis), Radar, Inc. had annual sales of approximately $23 million selling
to the retail grocery segment and mass merchandisers, both branded
and private label.
On April 2, 2007, we acquired the WHOLE
FRUIT Sorbet and FRUIT-A-FREEZE Fruit Bar brands, along with related
assets. Selling primarily to the supermarket industry, sales for 2007
were less than $2 million.
On June 25, 2007, we acquired the
assets of an ICEE distributor in Kansas with annual sales of less than $1
million.
These acquisitions were accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting, and their operations
are included in the consolidated financial statements from their respective
acquisition dates.
Our general-purpose bank credit line
which expires in December 2011 provides for up to a $50,000,000 revolving credit
facility. The agreement contains restrictive covenants and requires
commitment fees in accordance with standard banking practice. There were no
outstanding balances under this facility at June 27, 2009.
Results
of Operations
Net sales increased $2,922,000 or 2%
for the three months to $179,761,000 and $18,289,000 or 4% to $470,255,000 for
the nine months ended June 27, 2009 compared to the three and nine months ended
June 28, 2008.
26
FOOD
SERVICE
Sales to
food service customers increased $2,509,000 or 2% in the third quarter to
$109,363,000 and increased $15,666,000 or 5% for the nine months. Soft pretzel
sales to the food service market were essentially unchanged at $25,171,000 in
the third quarter and increased less than 1% to $74,259,000 in the nine months.
Unit sales of soft pretzels were essentially unchanged in the quarter and down
5% in the nine months. Italian ice and frozen juice treat and dessert sales
decreased 3% to $16,434,000 in the three months and were essentially unchanged
at $35,690,000 in the nine months. Churro sales to food service
customers increased 11% to $7,494,000 in the third quarter and increased 19% to
$22,258,000 in the nine months with all of the increase in the third quarter and
over 80% in the nine months coming from sales to one customer. Sales
of bakery products, excluding biscuit and dumpling sales and fruit and fig bar
sales, decreased $1,104,000 or 3% in the third quarter to $42,080,000 due
entirely to lower sales to two customers and increased $4,356,000 or 4% for the
nine months due primarily to increased sales to other private label
customers. Biscuit and dumpling sales were up 27% in the quarter to
$7,156,000 and were up 8% to $24,815,000 for the nine months due to increased
distribution and new product offerings. Sales of fig and fruit bars
increased 9% in the third quarter to $7,696,000 and increased 18% in the nine
months to $22,139,000 due to strong volume growth spread across our customer
base. Sales of our funnel cake products were up 64% to $3,152,000 in the quarter
and 54% to $6,158,000 for the nine months with sales to one customer accounting
for over 50% of the increase. The changes in sales throughout the
food service segment were from a combination of volume changes and price
increases.
RETAIL
SUPERMARKETS
Sales of products to retail
supermarkets increased $3,774,000 or 22% to $20,939,000 in the third quarter and
increased $3,682,000, or 9%, in the nine months. Soft pretzel sales increased
18% to $7,517,000 for the quarter and increased 6% to $22,600,000 for the nine
months on a unit volume increase of 6% for the quarter and a decline of 7% for
the nine months. Sales of frozen juices and ices increased $3,160,000
or 28% to $14,338,000 in the third quarter and increased $2,867,000 or 14% to
$23,666,000 in the nine months. Case sales of frozen novelties were
up 41% in the quarter and 21% for the nine months. Increased trade
spending of $466,000 for the quarter and $1.1 million for the nine months for
the introduction of new frozen novelty items and a shift in product mix reduced
sales dollars in relation to the unit volume increases. Coupon
expense, a reduction of sales, doubled to $1.0 million in the quarter and was
down $400,000 or 23% for the nine months.
THE
RESTAURANT GROUP
Sales of our Restaurant Group decreased
24% to $260,000 in the third quarter and 23% to $1,012,000 for the nine month
period. The sales decreases were caused primarily by the closing of
stores in the past year. Sales of stores open for both year’s nine months were
down about 7% from last year.
27
FROZEN
BEVERAGES
Frozen beverage and related product
sales decreased 6% to $49,199,000 in the third quarter and $757,000 or less than
1% to $117,930,000 in the nine month period. Beverage sales alone
decreased 2% to $34,669,000 in the third quarter and were up 1% to $76,892,000
in the nine months. Without a change in a customer program resulting in higher
revenues and higher costs, beverage sales alone would have been down 1% for the
nine months. Gallon sales were down 3% for the quarter and 2% for the
nine months. Service revenue decreased 7% to $11,201,000 in the third
quarter and increased 9% to $31,561,000 for the nine months. The
decrease in the third quarter was because last year’s third quarter included
significant one time machine installation revenue. Sales of frozen
carbonated beverage machines were $1,385,000 lower this year than last in the
three month period and for the nine months, sales of machines were lower by
$3,117,000.
CONSOLIDATED
Gross profit as a percentage of sales
increased to 33.95% in the three month period from 31.53% last year and
increased to 31.28% in the nine month period from 29.10% a year
ago. Lower commodity costs in excess of $6,000,000 for the quarter
and $5,000,000 for the nine months, higher pricing and increased efficiencies
due to volume in some of our product lines partially offset by higher workers’
compensation and group health insurance expense were the primary drivers causing
the gross profit percentage increase for the quarter and nine
months.
Total operating expenses decreased
$1,644,000 in the third quarter and as a percentage of sales decreased to 20%
from 22% last year. For the nine months, operating expenses decreased
$2,067,000 and as a percentage of sales decreased about 1 percentage point to
22%. Marketing expenses decreased to 10% this year from 11% in last
year’s three month period and decreased about .6 of a percentage point remaining
at 11% in both year’s nine month periods. Lower spending in our food
service and frozen beverages segments accounted for the decline in both periods.
Distribution expenses declined to 8% of sales from 9% in the nine month periods
and from 8% of sales to 7% in the three month periods due to lower fuel and
freight costs. Administrative expenses were 4% of sales in both
year’s nine month period and 3% of sales in both year’s three month
period.
28
Operating income increased $6,926,000
or 40% to $24,380,000 in the third quarter and $17,621,000 or 69% to $43,091,000
in the nine months as a result of the aforementioned. Operating
income was impacted by higher workers’ compensation and group health insurance
expense of about $1.5 million in the third quarter and $2.3 million in the nine
months.
Investment income decreased by $262,000
and $1,006,000 in the third quarter and nine months, respectively, due to a
general decline in the level of interest rates and the movement of our
investments to lower risk securities. We expect this trend to
continue for the foreseeable future.
The effective income tax rate has been
estimated at 39% for the third quarter, down from 40% last year, and at 40% for
the nine months compared to 39% in the year ago nine months.
Net earnings increased $4,109,000 or
38% in the three month period to $14,929,000 and increased 58% or $9,777,000 to
$26,492,000 in the nine months this year from $16,715,000 last
year.
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
There has
been no material change in the Company’s assessment of its sensitivity to market
risk since its presentation set forth, in item 7a. “Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk,” in its 2008 annual report on Form 10-K filed
with the SEC.
29
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
The
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the Company
(its principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
respectively) have concluded, based on their evaluation as of June 27,
2009, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports filed or submitted by it under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and include
controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by the Company in such reports is accumulated and communicated
to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
|
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting or
in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to
the date of such evaluation.
30
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
and Reports on Form
8-K
|
a)
|
Exhibits
|
|||
31.1
&
|
Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of
|
|||
31.2
|
the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|||
99.5
&
|
Certification
Pursuant to the 18 U.S.C.
|
|||
99.6
|
Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|||
b)
|
Reports on Form 8-K – Reports on Form 8-K were filed on April 23, 2009 and June 4, 2009 |
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
J
& J SNACK FOODS CORP.
|
||
Dated: July
23, 2009
|
/s/ Gerald B. Shreiber
|
|
Gerald
B. Shreiber
|
||
Chairman
of the Board,
|
||
President,
Chief Executive
|
||
Officer
and Director
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
Dated: July
23, 2009
|
/s/ Dennis G. Moore
|
|
Dennis
G. Moore, Senior Vice
|
||
President,
Chief Financial
|
||
Officer
and Director
|
||
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
||
(Principal
Accounting
Officer)
|
32