JACK IN THE BOX INC - Annual Report: 2022 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| ☑ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||||
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 2, 2022
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||||
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ________ TO ________.
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9390
JACK IN THE BOX INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 95-2698708 | |||||||
| (State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |||||||
9357 Spectrum Center Blvd.
San Diego, California 92123
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (858) 571-2121
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||
| Common Stock, $0.01 par value | JACK | NASDAQ Global Select Market | ||||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ☑ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes ☐ No ☑
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, computed by reference to the closing price reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market — Composite Transactions as of April 15, 2022, was approximately $1.9 billion.
Number of shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of the close of business on November 16, 2022 — 20,782,173.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.
JACK IN THE BOX INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| Page | ||||||||
| PART I | ||||||||
| Item 1. | ||||||||
| Item 1A. | ||||||||
| Item 1B. | ||||||||
| Item 2. | ||||||||
| Item 3. | ||||||||
| Item 4. | ||||||||
| PART II | ||||||||
| Item 5. | ||||||||
| Item 6. | ||||||||
| Item 7. | ||||||||
| Item 7A. | ||||||||
| Item 8. | ||||||||
| Item 9. | ||||||||
| Item 9A. | ||||||||
| Item 9B. | ||||||||
| Item 9C. | ||||||||
| PART III | ||||||||
| Item 10. | ||||||||
| Item 11. | ||||||||
| Item 12. | ||||||||
| Item 13. | ||||||||
| Item 14. | ||||||||
| PART IV | ||||||||
| Item 15. | ||||||||
| Item 16. | ||||||||
1
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
From time to time, we make oral and written forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations regarding future results of operations, economic performance, financial condition, and achievements of Jack in the Box Inc. (the “Company”). A forward-looking statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future events or results. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “goals,” “guidance,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions. Certain forward-looking statements are included in this Form 10-K, principally in the sections captioned “Business,” “Legal Proceedings,” “Consolidated Financial Statements,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” including statements regarding our strategic plans and operating strategies. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such expectations and forward-looking statements may prove to be materially incorrect due to known and unknown risks and uncertainties.
In some cases, information regarding certain important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement appears together with such statement. In addition, the factors described under “Risk Factors” and “Discussion of Critical Accounting Estimates” in this Form 10-K, as well as other possible factors not listed, could cause our actual results, economic performance, financial condition or achievements to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. As a result, investors should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. The Company is under no obligation to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or otherwise.
2
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The Company
Overview. Jack in the Box Inc. (NASDAQ: JACK), founded and headquartered in San Diego, California, is a restaurant company that operates and franchises Jack in the Box®, one of the nation's largest hamburger chains with approximately 2,200 restaurants across 21 states, and Del Taco®, the second largest Mexican-American quick service restaurants (“QSR”) chain by units in the U.S. with approximately 600 restaurants across 15 states.
As previously disclosed, on December 5, 2021, Jack in the Box Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company” or “Jack in the Box”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Del Taco Restaurants, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Del Taco”). On March 8, 2022, Epic Merger Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into Del Taco (the “Merger”), with Del Taco continuing as the surviving corporation. As a result of the Merger, Del Taco became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jack in the Box.
References to the Company throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K are made using the first person notations of “we,”, “us” and “our.”
Restaurant Brands
Jack in the Box. Jack in the Box restaurants offer a broad selection of distinctive products including classic burgers like our Jumbo Jack® and innovative product lines such as Buttery Jack® burgers. We also offer quality products such as breakfast sandwiches with freshly cracked eggs, as well as craveable favorites such as tacos, curly fries, egg rolls, specialty sandwiches and real ice cream shakes, among many other items. We allow our guests to customize meals to their tastes and order any product on the menu when they want it, including breakfast at night, or burgers and chicken in the morning. Our trademark of variety and innovation has led to the development of five true dayparts: breakfast, lunch, snack, dinner, and late night.
Jack in the Box opened its first restaurant in 1951 and has since become one of the nation’s largest hamburger chains. Based on number of restaurants, our top 10 major markets comprise approximately 70% of the total system, and Jack in the Box is at least the second largest QSR hamburger chain in seven of those major markets. As of October 2, 2022, we operated and franchised 2,181 Jack in the Box quick-service restaurants, primarily in the western and southern United States, including two in Guam. Of the 2,181 restaurants at fiscal year-end, 2,035, or 93%, were franchised.
Del Taco. Del Taco offers a unique variety of both Mexican and American favorites such as burritos and fries, prepared fresh in every restaurant's working kitchen with the value and convenience of a drive-thru. Del Taco's menu items taste better because they are made with quality ingredients like freshly grilled chicken and carne asada steak, fresh house-made guacamole, freshly grated cheddar cheese, slow-cooked beans made from scratch, and creamy Queso Blanco.
Founded in 1964, today Del Taco serves more than three million guests each week at its approximately 600 restaurants. Del Taco’s commitment to providing guests with the best quality and value for their money originates from cooking, chopping, shredding, and grilling menu items from scratch. As of October 2, 2022, we operated and franchised 591 Del Taco restaurants across 15 states, including one in Guam. Of the 591 restaurants at fiscal year-end, 301, or 51%, were franchised.
Business Strategy
Our strategies are rooted in two foundational principles:
•Shape a High-Performance Culture - When we serve our people and our franchisees well, we will maximize the guest experience for all who interact with the brand.
•Leverage Innovation and Technology Platforms - Taking our history of strong innovation on menu and operations and placing that same forward thinking on digital and technology development.
We use these principles as a guide while executing on our four strategic pillars:
•Build Brand Loyalty by transforming our restaurant design, improving the image of existing restaurants, and enhancing the digital experience for our guests.
•Drive Operations Excellence by evolving training efforts in our restaurants, execution of our brand standard systems, and improving speed and consistency.
•Grow Restaurant Profits by developing and implementing financial fundamentals, influencing pricing with a dynamic model, and building our data advantage.
•Expand Our Brands Reach by creating modular and flexible restaurant designs, building company-operated stores to help seed growth, fostering growth capital, and increasing franchise candidate and restaurant site lead generations.
3
This strategy builds on our historical strengths with our Jack in the Box and Del Taco differentiated, challenger brands. Those strengths include our uniquely broad menu, operational capabilities, passionate and loyal guests, committed team members and franchisees, and ability to invest in development and innovation that will deliver long term growth.
Del Taco Refranchising Strategy
On November 2, 2022, we announced that we have partnered with a leading restaurant and franchise investment banking firm, to manage the sale of certain company-owned Del Taco restaurants with three main intentions. First, to create a company-wide asset-light model that will benefit from mitigating exposure to macroeconomic pressures; second, to generate incremental development agreements throughout the refranchising process that provide a more robust unit growth pipeline than otherwise achievable; and third, to provide a more efficient capital structure.
Our objective is to be asset light as we navigate market forces in the near term. We will adjust the rate, pace and sequence of refranchising efforts to balance impact to earnings, as we await accelerated new unit openings from incremental development and natural general and administrative reductions. We plan on executing deals with existing Jack in the Box franchisees early in the upcoming year and will provide updates throughout 2023.
Franchising Program
Jack in the Box. The franchise agreement generally provides for an initial franchise fee of $50,000 per restaurant for a 20-year term, and royalty and marketing payments generally set at 5.0% of gross sales. Royalty rates are typically 5.0% of gross sales but may range as high as 15.0% of gross sales. Some existing agreements provide for lower royalties for a limited time and may have variable rates. We may offer development agreements to franchisees (referred to in this context as “Developers”) for construction of one or more new restaurants over a defined period of time and in a defined geographic area. Developers may be required to pay fees for certain company-sourced new sites. Developers may lose their rights to future development if they do not maintain the required opening schedule. To stimulate growth, we have offered an incentive program that provides discounted royalty fees for new franchisees who maintain development compliance and sign at least three franchise agreements by March 2023.
Del Taco. The franchise agreement provides for an initial franchise fee of $35,000 per restaurant for a 20-year term, and royalty and marketing payments generally set at 5.0% and 4.0%, respectively, of gross sales. Some existing agreements provide for lower royalties for a limited time and may have variable rates. We may offer development agreements to franchisees for construction of one or more new restaurants over a defined period of time and in a defined geographic area. Developers may be required to pay fees for certain company-sourced new sites. Developers may lose their rights to future development if they do not maintain the required opening schedule.
Site Selection and Design
Site selection for all new Jack in the Box and Del Taco restaurants is made after an economic analysis and a review of demographic data and other information relating to population density, traffic, competition, restaurant visibility and access, available parking, surrounding businesses, and opportunities for market penetration. New restaurants developed by franchisees are built to brand standards that we have approved.
Jack in the Box. Jack in the Box offers multiple new restaurant prototype designs that feature different configurations and dining room sizes to provide maximum flexibility when considering properties for development. This flexibility enables the Company and franchisees to optimize the layout and configuration of a new restaurant with the property’s specific economic, demographic, geographic, or physical characteristics. In September 2022, we unveiled our new off-premise-only restaurant prototype with the opening of a new location in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The new prototype was designed to meet the continued increasing demand for drive-thru service and digital ordering. At only 1,350 square feet, the restaurant features a double y-lane drive-thru, a walk-up window for ordering, dual assembly kitchens and a dedicated pick-up window for mobile and third-party delivery orders. The goal of the new prototype is to reduce buildout costs by around 20%, while also increasing real estate flexibility. The new model is designed for free-standing locations but can be adapted to fit in a variety of spaces such as C-stores, travel plazas, and end-cap locations.
4
Del Taco. A typical Del Taco restaurant is a free-standing building with drive-thru service that ranges in size from 2,000 to 2,600 square feet. In December 2021, we unveiled the new “Fresh Flex” restaurant prototype with the opening of a new location in Orlando, Florida. The new Fresh Flex design offers multiple buildout options, including small footprint drive-thru only sites with no dining rooms, that range in size from 1,200 to 2,400 square feet. With innovative additions like third-party pick-up stations and double drive-thru lanes with a dedicated lane for mobile orders and delivery pickups, the future-focused model optimizes operational efficiencies and caters to modern consumers' expectations.
Restaurant Management and Operations
Jack in the Box and Del Taco restaurants are operated by a company manager or franchise operator who is directly responsible for the operations of the restaurant, including product quality, service, food safety, cleanliness, inventory, cash control, and the conduct and appearance of employees. We focus on attracting, selecting, engaging, and retaining employees and franchisees who share our passion for creating long-lasting, successful restaurants.
At both brands, company-operated restaurant managers are supervised by district managers, who are overseen by director of operations, who report to vice president of operations.
Jack in the Box. Restaurant managers are required to complete an extensive management training program involving a combination of in-restaurant instruction and on-the-job training in specially designated training restaurants. Restaurant managers and supervisory personnel train other restaurant employees in accordance with detailed procedures and guidelines using training aids available at each location.
Del Taco. On the first day of employment, every team member receives the first of three training modules focused on helping the team member clearly understand the brand and their role. Subsequent modules focus on the specifics of how to provide a consistent customer experience. The training program is a blended learning approach including self-paced reading, hands-on exercises, and written knowledge validation tests.
Food Safety
Our “farm-to-fork” food safety program is designed to maintain high standards for the food products and food preparation procedures used by our vendors and in our restaurants. We maintain product specifications for our ingredients and our Food Safety and Regulatory Compliance Department must approve all suppliers of food products to our restaurants. We use third-party and internal audits to review the food safety management programs of our vendors. We manage food safety in our restaurants through a comprehensive food safety management program that is based on the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) Food Code requirements. The food safety management program includes employee training, ingredient testing, documented restaurant practices, and attention to product safety at each stage of the food preparation cycle. In addition, our food safety management program uses American National Standards Institute certified food safety training programs to train our company and franchise restaurant management employees on food safety practices for our restaurants.
Supply Chain
At both brands, we contract with a single primary foodservice distributor for substantially all of our food and supplies. In fiscal 2022, Jack in the Box entered into a new long-term contract with this distributor. Under the contract, this distributor will provide distribution services to our Jack in the Box restaurants through July 2027. Our Del Taco brand contract with this distributor provides distribution services to our Del Taco restaurants through September 2023.
The primary commodities purchased by Jack in the Box restaurants are beef, poultry, pork, cheese, and produce. Taco meat is the largest commodity purchased by Del Taco. We monitor and purchase commodities in order to minimize the impact of fluctuations in price and supply. Contracts are entered into and commodity market positions may be secured when we consider them to be advantageous. However, certain commodities remain subject to price fluctuations. Most, if not all essential food and beverage products are available or can be made available upon short notice from alternative qualified suppliers.
Information Systems
Our Jack in the Box and Del Taco restaurant software allows for daily polling of sales, inventory, and other data from the restaurants directly. Our company restaurants and traditional-site franchise restaurants use standardized Windows-based touch screen point-of-sale (“POS”) platforms. These platforms allow the restaurants to accept cash, credit cards, and our re-loadable gift cards. The single POS system for all restaurants helps franchisees and brand managers adapt more quickly to meet consumer demands and introduce new products, pricing, promotions, and technologies such as the Jack in the Box and Del Taco mobile apps, third party delivery, or any other business-driving initiative while maintaining a secure, PCI-compliant payment system.
5
We have business intelligence systems that provide us with visibility to the key metrics in the operation of Jack in the Box and Del Taco company and franchise restaurants. These systems play an integral role in enabling us to accumulate and analyze market information. Our restaurants use labor scheduling systems to assist managers in managing labor hours based on forecasted sales volumes. We also have inventory management systems that enable timely and accurate deliveries of food and packaging to our restaurants. To support order accuracy and speed of service, our drive-thru restaurants use order confirmation screens.
Advertising and Promotion
Jack in the Box. At Jack in the Box, we build brand awareness and drive sales through our marketing and advertising programs. These activities are supported primarily by financial contributions to a marketing fund from all company and franchise restaurants based on a percentage of gross sales. Activities to build brand equity, advertise products, and attract customers include, but are not limited to, system-wide and regional campaigns on television, digital and social media, radio, and print media, as well as reaching consumers through our branded mobile app and delivery partnerships. In October 2022, we launched a brand-new ordering website and integrated mobile app featuring a full array of capabilities including full menu ordering, customization options, location finder, product and restaurant information, flexible delivery or pickup options and an integrated loyalty program.
Del Taco. At Del Taco, we run a highly coordinated marketing and advertising campaign to create customer awareness, engage fans, and maximize positive brand associations. These activities are supported primarily by financial contributions to a marketing fund from all company and franchise restaurants based on a percentage of gross sales. We use multiple marketing channels, including television, radio, outdoor and direct mail to broadly drive brand awareness. We advertise on local TV/Cable and local radio in our primary markets, and utilize local radio, print, internet advertising, and billboards for some of the less developed markets. In September 2021, we launched our new Del Taco Mobile App, featuring enhanced marketing capabilities including a loyalty program and targeted promotional offers to drive guest frequency.
Competition and Markets
The restaurant business is highly competitive and is affected by local and national economic conditions, including unemployment levels, population and socioeconomic trends, traffic patterns, local and national competitive changes, changes in consumer dining habits and preferences, and new information regarding diet, nutrition, and health, all of which may affect consumer spending habits. Key elements of competition in the industry are the quality and innovation in the food products offered, price and perceived value, quality of service experience (including technological and other innovations), speed of service, personnel, advertising and other marketing efforts, name identification, restaurant location, and image and attractiveness of the facilities.
Each Jack in the Box and Del Taco restaurant competes directly and indirectly with a large number of national and regional restaurant chains, some of which have significantly greater financial resources, as well as with locally-owned or independent restaurants in the quick-service and the fast-casual segments, and with other consumer options including grocery and specialty stores, catering, and delivery services. In selling franchises, we compete with many other restaurant franchisors, some of whom have substantially greater financial resources than we do.
Human Capital Management
Jack in the Box recognizes and takes care of its employees by offering a wide range of competitive pay, recognition, and benefit programs. We are proud to provide our employees, many who begin their career in our restaurants as their first entry-level job, the opportunity to grow and advance as we invest in their education and career development.
As of October 2, 2022, we had 12,083 employees, of whom 11,448 were restaurant employees, 546 were corporate management and staff, and 89 were field operations management. Most of our employees are paid on an hourly basis, except manager, field operations management, and certain corporate positions. We employ both full-time and part-time restaurant employees in order to provide the flexibility necessary during peak periods of restaurant operations and meet the individual needs of our employees. As of the end of fiscal 2022, approximately 91% of our restaurant employees were part-time. We have not experienced any significant work stoppages.
Our Total Rewards framework includes pay and recognition, health and wellness, financial well-being, work/life happiness, culture and community, and learning and development. We are committed to providing employees with market-competitive pay and benefits and flexibility with respect to benefit choices. For our company-operated restaurant positions nationwide, positions are assigned to a pay range that best reflects market pricing of similar jobs in the restaurant industry and in the geographic location, and employees receive an automatic pay increase each time they work a certain number of hours provided performance is satisfactory. All corporate positions, field operations management, and restaurant management positions, including hourly assistant managers and team leaders, are eligible for performance-based cash incentives. Each incentive plan reinforces and rewards individuals for achievement of specific company and/or restaurant business goals.
6
We regularly review the pay of our female and male employees to ensure pay equity for performing equal or substantially similar work. We share the median pay of our male and female employees in various position classifications with the Board of Directors, and we take remedial action as appropriate to ensure pay equity is maintained.
We are committed to providing market-competitive, high-quality, and affordable benefits to meet the changing needs of our employees. We offer a robust benefits package that includes medical, dental, and vision insurance with health savings account (HSA) employer contributions and an HMO plan; company-paid basic term life insurance; wellness programs; an employee assistance program (EAP); life and disability insurance; flexible spending accounts (FSA); legal services; pet insurance; and a 401(k) with company matching contributions. In addition, we recognize and support the growth and development of our employees and offer opportunities to participate in internal and external learning programs. We also hold regular restaurant level talent and development planning reviews to assist us with growing our internal restaurant teams.
We recognize our responsibility to take the steps necessary to create and maintain a safe and healthy work environment. All of our corporate and restaurant employees may report safety and security issues either through our risk management department or anonymously through our asset protection helpline. Reports are reviewed by our asset protection manager and are addressed appropriately by corporate partners and OSHA, if necessary. All of our corporate and restaurant employees may also report any ethics issues to our ethics hotline. We take every incident and report seriously and have detailed protocols regarding investigation, assessment and correction, safety communications, employee training, and record keeping.
Trademarks and Service Marks
The JACK IN THE BOX® and DEL TACO® names and logos are of material importance to us and are registered trademarks and service marks in the United States and elsewhere. In addition, we have registered or applied to register numerous service marks and trade names for use in our businesses, including the Jack in the Box and Del Taco design marks and various product names and designs. Our policy is to pursue registration of our important service marks and trademarks and to vigorously oppose any infringement of them. Generally, with the appropriate renewal and use, the registration of our service marks and trademarks will continue indefinitely.
Seasonality
Restaurant sales and profitability are subject to seasonal fluctuations because of factors such as vacation and holiday travel, seasonal weather conditions, and weather crises, all of which affect the public’s dining habits.
Government Regulation
Each restaurant is subject to regulation by federal agencies, as well as licensing and regulation by state and local health, sanitation, safety, fire, zoning, building, consumer protection, taxing, and other agencies and departments. Restaurants are also subject to rules and regulations imposed by owners and operators of shopping centers, airports, or other locations where a restaurant is located. Difficulties or failures in obtaining and maintaining any required permits, licenses or approvals, or difficulties in complying with applicable rules and regulations, could result in restricted operations, closures of existing restaurants, delays or cancellations in the opening of new restaurants, increased cost of operations, or the imposition of fines and other penalties.
We are subject to federal, state, and local laws governing restaurant menu labeling, as well as laws restricting the use of, or requiring disclosures about, certain ingredients used in food sold at our restaurants. We are also subject to federal, state, and local laws governing packaging and service ware.
We are also subject to federal and state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises, as well as judicial and administrative interpretations of such laws. Such laws impose registration and disclosure requirements on franchisors in the offer and sale of franchises and may also apply substantive standards to the relationship between franchisor and franchisee, including limitations on the ability of franchisors to terminate franchises and alter franchise arrangements.
We are subject to the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and various state laws governing such matters as minimum wages, exempt status classification, overtime, breaks and other working conditions for company employees. Our franchisees are subject to these same laws. Many of our food service personnel are paid at rates set in relation to the federal and state minimum wage laws and, accordingly, changes in the minimum wage requirements may increase labor costs for us and our franchisees. Federal and state laws may also require us to provide paid and unpaid leave, or healthcare or other employee benefits to our employees, which could result in significant additional expense to us and our franchisees. We are also subject to federal immigration laws requiring compliance with work authorization documentation and verification procedures.
We are subject to certain guidelines under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and various state codes and regulations, which require restaurants and our brands to provide full and equal access to persons with physical disabilities.
Our collection or use of personal information about our employees or our guests is regulated at the federal and state levels, including the California Consumer Privacy Act.
7
Our marketing, advertising, and promotional programs are governed by various federal, state, and local laws and regulations concerning consumer protection, including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
We are also subject to various federal, state, and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment. The cost of complying with these laws increases the cost of operating existing restaurants and developing new restaurants. Additional costs relate primarily to the necessity of obtaining more land, landscaping, storm drainage control, and the cost of more expensive equipment necessary to decrease the amount of effluent emitted into the air, ground, and surface waters.
In addition to laws and regulations governing restaurant businesses directly, there are also regulations, such as the Food Safety Modernization Act, that govern the practices of food manufacturers and distributors, including our suppliers.
We have processes in place to monitor compliance with all applicable laws and regulations governing our company operations.
Available Information
The Company’s corporate website can be found at www.jackintheboxinc.com. We make available free of charge at this website (under the caption “Investors — SEC Filings”) all of our reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports. These reports are made available on the website as soon as reasonably practicable after their filing with, or furnishing to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC also maintains a website with the address of www.sec.gov that contains our reports, proxy and information statements, and other information.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
We caution you that our business and operations are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. The factors listed below are important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results and from projections in the forward-looking statements contained in this report, in our other filings with the SEC, in our news releases, and in oral statements by our representatives. However, other factors that we do not anticipate or that we do not consider material based on currently available information may also have an adverse effect on our results.
Risks Related to Macroeconomic and Industry Conditions
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted and may continue to disrupt our business, which has affected and could continue to materially affect our operations, financial condition, and results of operations for an extended period of time.
The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, federal, state and local government responses to COVID-19 and our responses to the outbreak have all disrupted and may continue to disrupt our business.
Our operating results substantially depend upon our sales volumes, restaurant profitability, and financial stability, and to the extent we and/or our franchisees experience financial distress due to the COVID-19 pandemic, our operating results may be adversely impacted, potentially materially affecting our liquidity, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our business has been disrupted and could be further disrupted to the extent our suppliers, distributors, and/or third-party delivery partners are adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. If our suppliers, distributors, and/or third-party delivery partners experience labor shortages or their employees are unable to work, whether because of illness, quarantine, limitations on travel or other government restrictions in connection with COVID-19, we could face cost increases, shortages of food items, shortages of delivery services, and/or shortages of other supplies across our restaurants, and our results could be adversely impacted by such interruptions.
The COVID-19 outbreak also may have the effect of heightening many other risks disclosed herein, including, but not limited to, those related to consumer confidence, increase in food and commodity costs, supply chain interruptions, labor availability and cost, cybersecurity incidents, increased indebtedness, regulatory and legal complexity, governmental regulations, and our stock price.
8
Changes in the availability of and the cost of labor could adversely affect our business.
Our business could be adversely impacted by increases in labor costs, including those increases triggered by regulatory actions regarding wages, scheduling and benefits; increased health care and workers’ compensation insurance costs; increased wages and costs of other benefits necessary to attract and retain high quality employees with the right skill sets and increased wages, benefits and costs related to the COVID-19 pandemic and inflationary and other pressure on wages now being experienced. The growth of our business can make it increasingly difficult to locate and hire sufficient numbers of employees, to maintain an effective system of internal controls, and to train employees to deliver a consistently high-quality product and customer experience, which could materially harm our business and results of operations. Furthermore, we have experienced, and could continue to experience, a shortage of labor for restaurant positions, including due to concerns around and illnesses arising from COVID-19 and its various novel variants and other factors, which could decrease the pool of available qualified talent for key functions and require restaurants to operate on reduced hours. Such labor shortages could be further exacerbated by expanded federal, state and local COVID-19 vaccination requirements. In addition, our wages and benefits programs may be insufficient to attract and retain the top performing employees especially in a rising wage market.
Changes in consumer confidence and declines in general economic conditions could negatively impact our financial results.
The restaurant industry depends on consumer discretionary spending. We are impacted by consumer confidence, which is, in turn, influenced by general economic conditions and discretionary income levels. A material decline in consumer confidence or a decline in family “food away from home” spending could cause our financial results to decline. If economic conditions worsen, customer traffic could be adversely impacted if our customers choose to dine out less frequently or reduce the amount they spend on meals while dining out, which could cause our company and our franchised average restaurant sales to decline. An economic downturn may be caused by a variety of factors, such as macro-economic changes, increased unemployment rates, increased taxes, interest rates, or other changes in government fiscal policy. High gasoline prices, increased healthcare costs, declining home prices, and political unrest, foreign or domestic, may potentially contribute to an economic downturn, as may regional or local events, including natural disasters or local regulation. The impact of these factors may be exacerbated by the geographic profile of our brand. Specifically, nearly 70% of our restaurants are located in the states of California and Texas. Economic conditions, state and local laws, or government regulations affecting those states may therefore more greatly impact our results than would similar occurrences in other locations.
Increases in food and commodity costs could decrease our profit margins or result in a modified menu, which could adversely affect our financial results.
We and our franchisees are subject to volatility in food and commodity costs and availability. Accordingly, our profitability depends in part on our ability to anticipate and react to changes in food costs and availability. As is true of all companies in the restaurant industry, we are susceptible to increases in food costs that are outside of our control. Factors that can impact food and commodity costs include general economic conditions, inflation, labor shortages, seasonal fluctuations, weather and climate conditions, energy costs, global demand, trade protections and subsidies, food safety issues, infectious diseases, possible terrorist activity, cyberattacks, transportation issues, currency fluctuations, product recalls, and government regulatory schemes. Additionally, some of our produce, meats, and restaurant supplies are sourced from outside the United States. Any new or increased import duties, tariffs, or taxes, or other changes in U.S. trade or tax policy, could result in higher food and commodity costs that would adversely impact our financial results.
Weather and climate related issues, such as freezes or drought, may lead to temporary or even longer-term spikes in the prices of some ingredients such as produce and meats, or of livestock feed. Increasing weather volatility or other long-term changes in global weather patterns, including any changes associated with global climate change, could have a significant impact on the price or availability of some of our ingredients. Any increase in the prices of the ingredients most critical to our menu, such as beef, chicken, pork, tomatoes, lettuce, dairy products, and potatoes could adversely affect our financial results. In the event of cost increases with respect to one or more of our raw ingredients, we may choose to change our pricing or suspend serving a menu item rather than paying the increased cost for the particular ingredient.
We seek to manage food and commodity costs, including through extended fixed price contracts, strong category and commodity management, and purchasing fundamentals. However, certain commodities such as beef and pork do not lend themselves to fixed price contracts. We cannot assure you that we will successfully enter into fixed price contracts on a timely basis or on commercially favorable pricing terms. In addition, although our produce contracts contain predetermined price limits, we are subject to force majeure clauses resulting from weather or acts of God that may result in temporary spikes in costs.
9
Further, we cannot assure you that we or our franchisees will be able to successfully anticipate and react effectively to changing food and commodity costs by adjusting purchasing practices or menu offerings. We and our franchisees also may not be able to pass along price increases to our customers as a result of adverse economic conditions, competitive pricing, or other factors. Therefore, variability of food and other commodity costs could adversely affect our profitability and results of operations.
Failure to receive scheduled deliveries of high-quality food ingredients and other supplies could harm our operations and reputation.
Dependence on frequent deliveries of fresh produce and other food products subjects food service businesses such as ours to the risk that shortages or interruptions in supply could adversely affect the availability, quality or cost of ingredients or require us to incur additional costs to obtain adequate supplies. Deliveries of supplies may be affected by adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, labor shortages, or financial or solvency issues of our distributors or suppliers, product recalls, production disruptions such as mechanical failures, or other issues. Further, increases in fuel prices could result in increased distribution costs. In addition, if any of our distributors, suppliers, vendors, or other contractors fail to meet our quality or safety standards or otherwise do not perform adequately, or if any one or more of them seeks to terminate its agreement or fails to perform as anticipated, or if there is any disruption in any of our distribution or supply relationships or operations for any reason, our business reputation, financial condition, and results of operations may be materially affected.
Risks Related to Human Capital
Inability to attract, train and retain top-performing personnel could adversely impact our financial results or business.
We believe that our continued success will depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain the services of skilled personnel. The loss of the services of, or our inability to attract and retain, such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, including reduced restaurant operating hours. We believe good managers and crew are a key part of our success, and we devote significant resources to recruiting and training our restaurant managers and crew. We aim to reduce turnover among our restaurant crews and managers in an effort to retain top performing employees and better realize our investment in training new employees. Any failure to do so may adversely impact our operating results by increasing training costs and making it more difficult to deliver outstanding customer service, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Our business could be adversely affected by increased labor costs.
Labor is a primary component of our operating costs. Increased labor costs due to factors such as competition for workers, labor shortages, labor market pressures, increased minimum wage requirements, paid sick leave or vacation accrual mandates, or other legal or regulatory changes, such as predictive scheduling, may adversely impact operating costs for us and our franchisees. Additional taxes or requirements to incur additional employee benefit costs, including the requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “Affordable Care Act”) or any new or replacement healthcare requirements, could also adversely impact our operating costs.
The enactment of additional state or local minimum wage increases above federal wage rates or regulations related to non-exempt employees has increased and could continue to increase labor costs for employees across our system-wide operations, especially considering our concentration of restaurants in California. In September 2022, California passed legislation establishing a council to set sector-wide standards on wages, hours and working conditions related to the health, safety, and welfare of fast-food restaurant workers. This law and other labor related laws enacted at the federal, state, provincial or local level could increase our and our franchisees’ labor costs and decrease profitability.
Unionization activities or labor disputes may disrupt our operations and affect our profitability.
Some or all of our employees or our franchisees’ employees may elect to be represented by labor unions in the future. If a significant number of these employees were to become unionized and collective bargaining agreement terms were significantly different from current compensation arrangements, this could adversely affect our business and financial results or the business and financial results of our franchisees. In addition, a labor dispute or organizing effort involving some or all of our employees or our franchisees’ employees may harm our brand and reputation. Resolution of such disputes may be costly and time-consuming, and thus increase our costs and distract management resources.
Our insurance may not provide adequate levels of coverage against claims.
We believe that we maintain insurance policies customary for businesses of our size, type, and experience. Historically, through the use of deductibles or self-insurance retentions, we retained a portion of expected losses for our workers’ compensation, general liability, certain employee medical and dental, employment, property, and other claims. However, there are types of losses that we may incur that cannot be insured against or that we believe are not economically reasonable to insure. Such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
10
Risks Related to the Restaurant Industry
We face significant competition in the food service industry and our inability to compete may adversely affect our business.
The food service industry is highly competitive with respect to price, service, location, product offering, image and attractiveness of the facilities, personnel, advertising, brand identification, and food quality. Our competition includes a large number of national and regional restaurant chains, as well as locally owned and independent businesses. In particular, we operate in the quick service restaurant chain segment, in which we face a number of established competitors, as well as frequent new entrants to the segment nationally and in regional markets. Some of our competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing, technological, personnel, and other resources than we do. In addition, many of our competitors have greater name recognition nationally or in some of the local or regional markets in which we have restaurants.
Additionally, the trend toward convergence in grocery, deli, delivery, and restaurant services is increasing the number of our competitors. For example, competitive pressures can come from deli sections and in-store cafes of major grocery store chains, including those targeted at customers who desire high-quality food and convenience, as well as from convenience stores and other dining outlets. These competitors may have, among other things, a more diverse menu, lower operating costs and prices, better locations, better facilities, more effective marketing, and more efficient operations than we do. Such increased competition could decrease the demand for our products and negatively affect our sales, operating results, profits, business and financial position, and prospects (collectively, our “financial results”).
While we continue to make improvements to our facilities, to implement new service, technology, and training initiatives, and to introduce new products, there can be no assurance that such efforts will generate increased sales or sufficient customer interest. Many of our competitors are remodeling their facilities, implementing service improvements, introducing a variety of new products and service offerings, and advertising that their ingredients are healthier or locally sourced. Such competing products and health- or environmental-focused claims may hurt our competitive positioning as existing or potential customers could seek out other dining options.
Changes in demographic trends and in customer tastes and preferences could cause sales and the royalties that we receive from franchisees to decline.
Changes in customer preferences, demographic trends, and the number, type, and location of competing restaurants have great impact in the restaurant industry. Our sales and the revenue that we receive from franchisees could be impacted by changes in customer preferences related to dietary concerns, such as preferences regarding calories, sodium content, carbohydrates, fat, additives, and sourcing, or in response to environmental and animal welfare concerns. Such preference changes could result in customers favoring other foods to the exclusion of our menu items. If we fail to adapt to changes in customer preferences and trends, we may lose customers and our sales and the rents, royalties, and marketing fees we receive from franchisees may deteriorate.
Negative publicity relating to our business or industry could adversely impact our reputation.
Our business can be materially and adversely affected by widespread negative publicity of any type, particularly regarding food quality, food safety, nutritional content, safety or public health issues (such as outbreaks, pandemics, epidemics, or the prospect of any of these), obesity or other health concerns, animal welfare issues, and employee relations issues, among other things. Adverse publicity in these areas could damage the trust customers place in our brands. The increasingly widespread use of mobile devices and social media platforms has amplified the speed and scope of adverse publicity and could hamper our ability to promptly correct misrepresentations or otherwise respond effectively to negative publicity, whether or not accurate. Any widespread negative publicity regarding the Company, our brands, our vendors and suppliers, and our franchisees, or negative publicity about the restaurant industry in general, whether or not accurate, could cause a decline in restaurant sales, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Additionally, employee or customer claims against us or our franchisees based on, among other things, wage and hour violations, discrimination, harassment, or wrongful termination may also create negative publicity that could adversely affect us and divert financial and management resources that would otherwise be focused on the future performance of our operations. Consumer demand for our products could decrease significantly if any such incidents or other matters create negative publicity or otherwise erode consumer confidence in us, our brands or our products, or in the restaurant industry in general.
We are also subject to the risk of negative publicity associated with animal welfare regulations and campaigns. Our restaurants utilize ingredients manufactured from beef, poultry, and pork. Our policies require that our approved food suppliers and their raw material providers engage in proper animal welfare practices. Despite our policies and efforts, media reports and portrayals of inhumane acts toward animals by participants in the food supply chain, whether by our suppliers or not, can create a negative opinion or perception of the food industry’s animal welfare efforts. Such media reports and negative publicity could impact guest perception of our brands or industry and can have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
11
We may not have the same resources as our competitors for marketing, advertising, and promotion.
Some of our competitors have greater financial resources, which enable them to: invest significantly more than us in advertising, particularly television and radio ads, as well as endorsements and sponsorships; have a presence across more media channels; and support multiple system and regional product launches at one time. Should our competitors increase spending on marketing, advertising, and promotion, or should the cost of advertising increase or our advertising funds decrease for any reason (including reduced sales, implementation of reduced spending strategies, or a decrease in the percentage contribution to our marketing funds for any reason), our results of operations and financial condition may be materially impacted.
In addition, our financial results may be harmed if our marketing, advertising, and promotional programs are less effective than those of our competitors. The growing prevalence and importance of social media platforms, behavioral advertising, and mobile technology also pose challenges and risks for our marketing, advertising, and promotional strategies; and failure to effectively use and gain traction on these platforms or technologies could cause our advertising to be less effective than our competitors. Moreover, improper or damaging use of social media or mobile technology, including by our employees, franchisees, or guests could increase our costs, lead to litigation, or result in negative publicity, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We may be adversely impacted by severe weather conditions, natural disasters, terrorist acts, or civil unrest that could result in property damage, injury to employees and staff, and lost restaurant sales.
Food service businesses such as ours can be materially and adversely affected by severe weather conditions, such as severe storms, hurricanes, flooding, prolonged drought, or protracted heat or cold waves, and by natural disasters, such as earthquakes and wildfires, or “man-made” calamities such as terrorist incidents or civil unrest, and their aftermath. Such occurrences could result in lost restaurant sales, property damage, lost products, interruptions in supply, and increased costs.
If systemic or widespread adverse changes in climate or weather patterns occur, we could experience more severe impact, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. The impact of these factors may be exacerbated by our geographic profile, as nearly 70% of our restaurants are located in the states of California and Texas.
12
Risks Relating to Health and Safety
Food safety and food-borne illness concerns may have an adverse effect on our business by reducing demand and increasing costs.
Food safety is a top priority for our company, and we expend significant resources on food safety programs to ensure that our customers are able to enjoy safe and high-quality food products. These include a daily, structured food safety assessment and documentation process at our restaurants, and periodic third-party and internal audits to review the food safety performance of our vendors, distributors, and restaurants. Nonetheless, food safety risks cannot be completely eliminated, and food safety and food-borne illness issues do occur in the food service industry. Any report or publicity linking us to instances of food-borne illness or other food safety issues, including issues involving food tampering, natural or foreign objects, or other contaminants or adulterants in our food, could adversely affect our reputation, as well as our financial results. Furthermore, our reliance on food suppliers and distributors increases the risk that food-borne illness incidents could be introduced by third-party vendors outside our direct control. Although we test and audit these activities, we cannot guarantee that all food items are safely and properly maintained during transport or distribution throughout the supply chain.
Additionally, past reports linking nationwide or regional incidents of food-borne illnesses such as salmonella, E. coli, and listeria to certain products such as produce and proteins, or human-influenced illness such as hepatitis A or norovirus, have resulted in consumers avoiding certain products and restaurant concepts for a period of time. Similarly, reaction to media-influenced reports of avian flu, incidents of “mad cow” disease, or similar concerns have also caused some consumers to avoid products that are, or are suspected of being, affected and could have an adverse effect on the price and availability of affected ingredients. Further, if we react to these problems by changing our menu or other key aspects of the brand experience, we may lose customers who do not accept those changes, and we may not be able to attract enough new customers to generate sufficient revenue to make our restaurants profitable.
Our restaurants currently have an ingredient mix that can be exposed to one or more food allergens, such as eggs, wheat, milk, fish, shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, and soy. We employ precautionary allergen training steps for food handlers in order to minimize risk of allergen cross contamination and we post allergen information on nutritional posters in our restaurants or otherwise make such information available to guests upon request. Even with such precautionary measures, the potential risk of allergen cross contamination exists in a restaurant environment. A potentially serious allergic reaction by a guest may result in adverse public communication, media coverage, a decline in restaurant sales, and a material decline in our financial results.
Risks Related to Our Business Model and Strategy
We may not achieve our development goals.
We intend to grow Jack in the Box and Del Taco primarily through new restaurant development by franchisees, both in existing markets and in new markets. Development involves substantial risks, including the risk of:
•the inability to identify suitable franchisees;
•limited availability of financing for the Company and for franchisees at acceptable rates and terms;
•development costs exceeding budgeted or contracted amounts;
•the negative impact of any re-imaging strategy if not adopted by franchisees or embraced by guests;
•delays in completion of construction or shortages of any equipment or construction materials;
•the inability to identify, or the unavailability of suitable sites at acceptable cost and other leasing or purchase terms;
•developed properties not achieving desired revenue or cash flow levels once opened;
•the negative impact of a new restaurant upon sales at nearby existing restaurants;
•the challenge of developing in areas where competitors are more established or have greater penetration or access to suitable development sites;
•incurring substantial unrecoverable costs in the event a development project is abandoned prior to completion;
•impairment charges resulting from underperforming restaurants or decisions to curtail or cease investment in certain locations or markets;
•in new geographic markets where we have limited or no existing locations, the inability to successfully expand or acquire critical market presence for our brands, acquire name recognition, successfully market our products, or attract new customers;
•operating cost levels that reduce the demand for, or raise the cost of, developing new restaurants;
•the challenge of identifying, recruiting, and training qualified franchisees or company restaurant management;
Although we manage our growth and development activities to help reduce such risks, we cannot assure that our present or future growth and development activities will perform in accordance with our expectations. Our inability to expand in accordance with our plans or to manage the risks associated with our growth could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
13
Our business and Del Taco’s business may not be integrated successfully, or such integration may be more difficult, time consuming, or costly than expected. Operating costs, customer loss, and business disruption, including difficulties maintaining relationships with employees, customers, suppliers or vendors, may be greater than expected.
The combination of two independent businesses can be complex, costly, and time-consuming, and it may divert significant management attention and resources to combining ours and Del Taco’s business practices and operations. This process may disrupt our business or otherwise impact our ability to compete. The failure to meet the challenges involved in combining ours and Del Taco’s business and to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, our activities and could adversely affect our results of operations.
The overall combination of ours and Del Taco’s business may also result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses and impacts, and loss of customer and other business relationships. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies, include, among others:
•diversion of management attention to integration matters;
•difficulties in integrating operations and systems, including intellectual property and communications systems, administrative and information technology infrastructure, supplier and vendor arrangements and financial reporting and internal control systems;
•challenges in conforming standards, controls, procedures and accounting and other policies, business cultures and compensation structures between the two companies;
•differences in control environments and cultures, and the potential identification of material weaknesses while we work to integrate and align policies, principles and practices;
•alignment of key performance measurements may result in a greater need to communicate and manage clear expectations while we work to integrate and align policies and practices;
•difficulties in integrating employees and attracting and retaining key personnel;
•the transition to a combined management team, and the need to address possible differences in corporate cultures and management philosophies;
•challenges in retaining existing customers and obtaining new customers;
•difficulties in achieving anticipated cost savings, synergies, accretion targets, business opportunities, financing plans and growth prospects from the combination; and
•difficulties in managing the expanded operations of a significantly larger and more complex company.
Additionally, uncertainties over the integration process could cause customers, suppliers, distributors, and others to seek to change or cancel our existing business relationships or to refuse to renew existing relationships. Competitors may also target our existing customers by highlighting potential uncertainties and integration difficulties.
Some of these factors are outside our control, and any one of them could result in lower revenues, higher costs, and diversion of management time and energy, which could materially impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our highly-franchised business model presents a number of risks, and the failure of our franchisees to operate successful and profitable restaurants could negatively impact our business.
As of October 2, 2022, approximately 93% of our Jack in the Box restaurants and 51% of Del Taco restaurants were franchised restaurants; therefore, our success increasingly relies on the financial success and cooperation of our franchisees, yet we have limited influence over their operations. Our income arises from two sources: fees from franchised restaurants (e.g., rent and royalties based on a percentage of sales) and, to a lesser degree, profit from our remaining Company-operated restaurants. Our franchisees manage their businesses independently, and therefore are responsible for the day-to-day operation of their restaurants. The revenues we realize from franchised restaurants are largely dependent on the ability of our franchisees to grow their sales. If our franchisees do not experience sales growth, our revenues and margins could be negatively affected as a result. Also, if sales trends worsen for franchisees, their financial results may deteriorate, which could result in, among other things, franchisee bankruptcies, restaurant closures, or delayed or reduced payments to us. Our success also increasingly depends on the willingness and ability of our independent franchisees to implement shared strategies and major initiatives, which may include financial investment, and to remain aligned with us on operating and promotional plans. Franchisees’ ability to contribute to the achievement of our plans is dependent in large part on the availability to them of funding at reasonable interest rates and may be negatively impacted by the financial markets in general or by the credit worthiness of our franchisees or the Company. As small businesses, some of our franchise operators may be negatively and disproportionately impacted by strategic initiatives, capital requirements, inflation, labor costs, employee relations issues, or other causes. In addition, franchisees’ business obligations may not be limited to the operation of restaurants, making them subject to business and financial risks unrelated to the operation of our restaurants. These unrelated risks could adversely affect a franchisee’s ability to make payments to us or to make payments on a timely basis. We cannot assure you that our franchisees will successfully participate in our strategic or marketing initiatives or operate their restaurants in a manner consistent with our requirements, standards, and
14
expectations. As compared to some of our competitors, our brands have relatively fewer franchisees who, on average, operate more restaurants per franchisee. There are significant risks to our business if a franchisee, particularly one who operates a large number of restaurants, encounters financial difficulties, including bankruptcy, or fails to adhere to our standards, projecting an image inconsistent with our brands or negatively impacting our financial results.
We are subject to financial and regulatory risks associated with our owned and leased properties and real estate development projects.
We own or lease the real properties on which most of our restaurants are located and lease or sublease to the franchisee a majority of our franchised restaurant sites. If we close a restaurant in a leased location, we may remain committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease, which would include, among other things, payment of the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Additionally, the potential losses associated with our inability to cancel leases may result in our keeping open restaurant locations that are performing significantly below targeted levels. As a result, ongoing lease obligations at closed or underperforming restaurant locations could unfavorably impact our results of operations. In addition, at the end of the lease term and expiration of all renewal periods, we may be unable to renew the lease without substantial additional cost, if at all. As a result, we may be required to close or relocate a restaurant, which could subject us to construction and other costs and risks and may have an adverse effect on our operating performance.
We have a limited number of suppliers for our major products and rely on a distribution network with a limited number of distribution partners for the majority of our national distribution program. If our suppliers or distributors are unable to fulfill their obligations under their contracts, it could harm our operations.
We contract with a distribution network with a limited number of distribution partners located throughout the nation to provide the majority of our food distribution services. Through these arrangements, our food supplies are largely distributed through several primary distributors. If any of these relationships are interrupted or terminated, or if one or more supply or distribution partners are unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations for whatever reasons, product availability to our restaurants may be interrupted, and business and financial results may be negatively impacted. Although we believe that alternative supply and distribution sources are available, there can be no assurance that we will be able to identify or negotiate with such sources on terms that are commercially reasonable to us.
Risks Related to Legal and Regulatory Risks
Increasing regulatory and legal complexity may adversely affect restaurant operations and our financial results.
Our regulatory environment exposes us to complex compliance and similar risks that could affect our operations and results in material ways. In many of our markets, we are subject to increasing regulation, which has increased our cost of doing business. We are affected by the cost, compliance and other risks associated with the often conflicting and highly prescriptive regulations, including where inconsistent standards imposed by multiple governmental authorities can adversely affect our business and increase our exposure to litigation or governmental investigations or proceedings.
Our success depends in part on our ability to manage the impact of new, potential or changing regulations that can affect our business plans and operations. These include regulations affecting product packaging, marketing, the nutritional content and safety of our food and other products, labeling and other disclosure practices. Compliance efforts with those regulations may be affected by the need to comply with different, potentially conflicting laws in different jurisdictions, and the need to rely on the accuracy and completeness of information from third-party suppliers (particularly given varying requirements and practices for testing and disclosure).
Regulatory bodies may enact new laws or promulgate new regulations that are adverse to our business, or they may view matters or interpret laws and regulations differently than they have in the past or in a manner adverse to our business. For example, a recently enacted law in California purports to codify an employment classification test set forth by the California Supreme Court that established a new standard for determining employee or independent contractor status. Although we would argue that the law does not change the status of franchisees or their employees, it has been suggested that the law could be read to, for example, make franchisors legally liable for the conduct of franchisee employees. Acceptance of this or similar arguments by the courts in California or elsewhere could impact our financial results or affect restaurant operations.
Governmental regulation, including in one or more of the following areas, may adversely affect our existing and future operations and results, including by harming our ability to profitably operate our restaurants.
Americans with Disabilities Act and Similar State Laws
We are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and similar state laws that give civil rights protections to individuals with disabilities in the context of employment, public accommodations, and other areas. The expenses associated with any modifications we may be required to undertake with respect to our restaurants or services, or any damages, legal fees, and costs associated with litigating or resolving claims under the ADA or similar state laws, could be material.
15
Consumer Protection and Privacy Laws
We are subject to various federal, state, and local laws and regulations concerning consumer protection and privacy as it relates to our marketing, advertising, and promotional programs, including, but not limited to, the California Consumer Privacy Act and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Any damages, legal fees, or costs associated with litigating or resolving claims under any such law could be material.
Food Regulation
The Food Safety Modernization Act granted the FDA new authority regarding the safety of the entire food system, including through increased inspections and mandatory food recalls. Although restaurants are not directly implicated by these requirements, our suppliers may initiate or otherwise be subject to food recalls or other consequences impacting the availability of certain products, which could result in adverse publicity, or require us to take actions that could be costly for us or otherwise impact our business and financial results.
Local Licensure, Zoning, and Other Regulation
Each of our restaurants is subject to state and local licensing and regulation by health, sanitation, food, and workplace safety and other agencies. We may experience material difficulties, delays, or failures in obtaining the necessary licenses or approvals for new restaurants, which could delay planned restaurant openings. In addition, stringent and varied requirements of local regulators with respect to zoning, land use, and environmental factors could delay or prevent development of new restaurants in particular locations.
Environmental Laws
We are subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations concerning the discharge, storage, handling, release, and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances, as well as local ordinances restricting the types of packaging we can use in our restaurants. If and to the extent any hazardous or toxic substances are present on or adjacent to any of our restaurant locations, we believe any such contamination would be the responsibility of one or more third parties and would have been or should be addressed by the responsible party. If the relevant third parties have not or do not address the identified contamination properly or completely, then under certain environmental laws, we could be held liable as an owner or operator to address any remaining contamination, sometimes without regard to whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the release or presence of hazardous or toxic substances. Any such liability could be material. Further, we may not have identified all of the potential environmental liabilities at our properties, and any such liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. We also cannot predict what environmental laws or laws regarding packaging will be enacted in the future, how existing or future environmental or packaging laws will be administered or interpreted, or the amount of future expenditures that we may need to make to comply with, or to satisfy claims relating to, such laws.
Employment and Immigration Laws
We and our franchisees are subject to the federal labor laws, including the Fair Labor Standards Act, as well as various state and local laws governing such matters as minimum wages, exempt status classification, overtime, breaks, schedules, and other working conditions for employees. Federal, state, and local laws may also require us to provide paid and unpaid leave, healthcare, or other benefits to our employees. Changes in the law, or penalties associated with any failure on our part to comply with legal requirements, could increase our labor costs or result in significant additional expense to us and our franchisees.
States in which we operate may adopt new immigration laws or enforcement programs, and the U.S. Congress and the Department of Homeland Security from time to time consider and may implement changes to federal immigration laws, regulations, or enforcement programs. Such changes and enforcement programs may increase our obligations for compliance and oversight, which could subject us to additional costs and make our hiring process more cumbersome. Although we require all workers to provide us with government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our employees may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. All of our Company employees currently participate in the “E-Verify” program, an Internet-based, free program run by the United States government to verify employment eligibility. However, use of the “E-Verify” program does not guarantee that we will successfully identify all applicants who are ineligible for employment. Unauthorized workers are subject to deportation and may subject us to fines or penalties, and if any of our employees or our franchisees’ employees are found to be unauthorized, we could experience adverse publicity that negatively impacts our brands and may make it more difficult to hire and keep qualified employees. Termination of a significant number of employees who are found to be unauthorized workers may disrupt operations, cause temporary increases in labor costs to train new employees, and result in additional adverse publicity. We could also become subject to fines, penalties, and other costs related to claims that we did not fully comply with all record keeping obligations of federal and state immigration compliance laws. These factors could materially adversely affect our financial results.
16
Franchising Activities
Our franchising activities are subject to federal regulations administered by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, laws enacted by a number of states, and rules and regulations promulgated by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. In particular, we are subject to federal and state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises, as well as judicial and administrative interpretations of such laws. Such laws impose registration and disclosure requirements on franchisors in the offer and sale of franchises and may also apply substantive standards to the relationship between franchisor and franchisee, including limitations on the ability of franchisors to terminate franchises and alter franchise arrangements. Failure to comply with new or existing franchise laws, rules, and regulations in any jurisdiction or to obtain required government approvals could negatively affect our ability to grow or expand our franchise business and sell franchises.
The proliferation of federal, state, and local regulations increases our compliance risks, which in turn could adversely affect our business.
The restaurant and retail industries are subject to extensive federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including regulations relating to:
•the preparation, ingredients, labeling, packaging, advertising, and sale of food and beverages;
•building and zoning requirements;
•sanitation and safety standards;
•employee healthcare, including the implementation and legal, regulatory, and cost implications of the Affordable Care Act;
•labor and employment, including minimum wage adjustments, overtime, working conditions, employment eligibility and documentation, sick leave, and other employee benefit and fringe benefit requirements, and changing judicial, administrative, or regulatory interpretations of federal or state labor laws;
•the registration, offer, sale, termination, and renewal of franchises;
•Americans with Disabilities Act;
•payment cards;
•climate change, including regulations related to the potential impact of greenhouse gases, water consumption, or taxes on carbon emissions; and
•consumer protection and privacy obligations, including the California Consumer Privacy Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and other new or proposed federal and state regulations.
The increasing amount and complexity of regulations and their interpretation may increase the costs to us and our franchisees of labor and compliance and increase our exposure to legal and regulatory claims which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business. While we strive to comply with all applicable existing rules and regulations, we cannot predict the effect on our operations from modifications to the language or interpretations of existing requirements, or to the issuance of new or additional requirements in the future.
Legislation and regulations regarding our products and ingredients, including the nutritional content of our products, could impact customer preferences and negatively impact our financial results.
Changes in government regulation and consumer eating habits may impact the ingredients and nutritional content of our menu offerings or require us to disclose the nutritional content of our menu offerings. For example, a number of states, counties, and cities have enacted menu labeling laws requiring multi-unit restaurant operators to disclose certain nutritional information to customers or have enacted legislation restricting the use of certain types of ingredients in restaurants. Furthermore, the Affordable Care Act requires chain restaurants to publish calorie information on their menus and menu boards. These and other requirements may increase our expenses, slow customers’ ordering process, or negatively influence the demand for our offerings; all of which can impact sales and profitability.
Compliance with current and future laws and regulations in a number of areas, including with respect to ingredients, nutritional content of our products, and packaging and service ware may be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, if consumer health regulations change significantly, we may be required to modify our menu offerings or packaging, and as a result, may experience higher costs or reduced demand associated with such changes. Some government authorities are increasing regulations regarding trans-fats and sodium. While we have removed all artificial or “added during manufacturing” trans fats from our ingredients, some ingredients have naturally occurring trans-fats. Future requirements limiting trans-fats or sodium content may require us to change our menu offerings or switch to higher cost ingredients. These actions may hinder our ability to operate in some markets or to offer our full menu in these markets, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. If we fail to comply with such laws and regulations, our business could also experience a material adverse effect.
17
We may not be able to adequately protect our intellectual property, which could harm the value of our brands and adversely affect our business.
Our ability to successfully implement our business strategy depends, in part, on our ability to further build brand recognition using our trademarks, service marks, trade dress, and other proprietary intellectual property, including our name and logos, our strategy, and the ambiance of our restaurants. If our efforts to protect our intellectual property are inadequate, or if any third party misappropriates or infringes our intellectual property, either in print or on the Internet or a social media platform, the value of our brands may be harmed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and might prevent our brands from achieving or maintaining market acceptance.
We franchise our brands to various franchisees. While we try to ensure that the quality of our brands are maintained by all franchisees, we cannot assure that all franchisees will uphold brand standards so as not to harm the value of our intellectual property or our reputation.
We are subject to increasing legal complexity and may be subject to claims or lawsuits that are costly to defend and could result in our payment of substantial damages or settlement costs.
We are subject to complaints or litigation brought by current or former employees, customers, current or former franchisees, vendors, landlords, shareholders, competitors (e.g., intellectual property related claims), government agencies, or others. A judgment that is not covered by insurance or that is significantly in excess of our insurance coverage for any claims could materially adversely affect our financial results. In addition, regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are found to be liable, claims may be expensive to defend, and may divert management’s attention away from our operations and hurt our performance. Further, adverse publicity resulting from claims against us or our franchisees may harm our business or that of our franchisees.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately determine our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, the Company’s stockholders could lose confidence in our financial results, which could harm our business and the value of the Company’s common shares.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to evaluate and report on our internal controls over financial reporting. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in maintaining adequate internal controls over our financial reporting and financial processes in the future. We may in the future discover areas of our internal controls that need improvement. Furthermore, to the extent our business grows or significantly changes, our internal controls may become more complex, and we would require significantly more resources to ensure our internal controls remain effective. If we or our independent auditors discover a material weakness, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, could reduce the market value of the Company’s common stock. Additionally, the existence of any material weakness may require management to devote significant time and incur significant expense to remediate any such material weaknesses and management may not be able to remediate any such material weaknesses in a timely manner.
Changes in tax laws, interpretations of existing tax law, or adverse determinations by tax authorities could adversely affect our income tax expense and income tax payments.
We are subject to income taxation at the federal, state, and local levels in the U.S. Any significant changes in income tax laws, including, but not limited to, income tax rate increases, authoritative interpretations of the tax laws, and/or comprehensive tax reform measures could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations.
We may be subject to risk associated with disagreements with key stakeholders, such as franchisees.
In addition to its shareholders, we have several key stakeholders, including its independent franchise operators. Third parties such as franchisees are not subject to the control of the Company and may take actions or behave in ways that are adverse to the Company. Because the ultimate interests of franchisees and the Company are largely aligned around maximizing restaurant profits, the Company does not believe that any areas of disagreement between the company and franchisees are likely to create material risk to the Company or its shareholders. Nevertheless, it is possible that conflict and disagreements with these or other critical stakeholders could distract management or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business.
18
Actions of activist stockholders could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources, and have an adverse effect on our business.
From time to time, we may be subject to proposals by stockholders urging us to take certain corporate actions. If activist stockholder activities ensue, our business could be adversely affected because responding to proxy contests and reacting to other actions by activist stockholders can be costly and time-consuming, disrupt our operations and divert the attention of management and our employees. For example, we may be required to retain the services of various professionals to advise us on activist stockholder matters, including legal, financial, and communications advisers, the costs of which may negatively impact our future financial results. In addition, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, strategy or leadership created as a consequence of activist stockholder initiatives may result in the loss of potential business opportunities, harm our ability to attract new investors, customers, employees, and joint venture partners, and cause our stock price to experience periods of volatility or stagnation.
Information and Technology Related Risks
We are subject to the risk of cybersecurity breaches, intrusions, data loss, or other data security incidents.
We and our franchisees rely on computer systems and information technology to conduct our business. We have instituted controls, including information security governance controls that are intended to protect our computer systems, our point of sale (“POS”) systems, and our information technology systems and networks; and adhere to payment card industry data security standards and limit third party access for vendors that require access to our restaurant networks. We also have business continuity plans that attempt to anticipate and mitigate failures. However, we cannot control or prevent every cybersecurity risk.
A material failure or interruption of service, or a breach in the security of our computer systems caused by malware, ransomware or other attack, could cause reduced efficiency in operations, or other business interruptions; could negatively impact delivery of food to restaurants, or financial functions such as vendor payment, employee payroll and scheduling, franchise operations reporting, or our ability to receive customer payments through our POS or other systems, or could result in the loss or misappropriation of customer or employee data. Such events could negatively impact cash flows or require significant capital investment to rectify; result in damage to our business or reputation or loss of consumer or employee confidence; and lead to potential costs, fines, and litigation. Damage to our business or reputation or loss of consumer confidence may also result from any failure by our franchisees to implement standard computer systems and information technology, as we are dependent on our franchisees to adopt appropriate safeguards. These risks may be magnified by increased and changing regulations. The costs of compliance and risk mitigation planning, including increased investment in technology or personnel in order to protect valuable business or consumer information, have increased significantly in recent years, and may also negatively impact our financial results.
Restaurants and other retailers have faced, and we could in the future become subject to, claims for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of credit or debit card information or the loss of personally identifiable information, and we may also be subject to lawsuits or other proceedings in the future relating to these types of incidents. Any such proceedings could distract our management from running our business and cause us to incur significant unplanned losses and expenses. Consumer perception of our brands could also be negatively affected by these events, which could further adversely affect our financial results.
We collect and maintain personal information about our employees and our guests and are seeking to provide our guests with new digital experiences. These digital experiences will require us to open up access into our POS systems to allow for capabilities like mobile order and pay, third party delivery, and digital menu boards. The collection and use of personal information are regulated at the federal and state levels; such regulations include the California Consumer Privacy Act. We increasingly rely on cloud computing and other technologies that result in third parties holding significant amounts of customer, employee, and franchisee information on our behalf. There has been an increase over the past several years in the frequency and sophistication of attempts to compromise the security of these types of systems. If the security and information systems that we or our outsourced third-party providers use to store or process such information are compromised or if we, or such third parties, otherwise fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we could face litigation and the imposition of penalties that could adversely affect our financial performance. Our reputation as a brand or as an employer could also be adversely affected by these types of security breaches or regulatory violations, which could impair our ability to attract and retain qualified employees.
19
We are subject to risks associated with our increasing dependence on digital commerce platforms and technologies to maintain and grow sales, and we cannot predict the impact that these digital commerce platforms and technologies, other new or improved technologies or alternative methods of delivery may have on consumer behavior and our financial results.
Advances in technologies, including advances in digital food order and delivery technologies, and changes in consumer behavior driven by such advances could have a negative effect on our business. Technology and consumer offerings continue to develop, and we expect that new and enhanced technologies and consumer offerings will be available in the future, including those with a focus on restaurant modernization, restaurant technology and digital engagement and ordering. We may pursue certain of those technologies and consumer offerings if we believe they offer a sustainable guest proposition and can be successfully integrated into our business model. However, we cannot predict consumer acceptance or our success in implementing these digital platforms, delivery channels or systems or other technologies or their impact on our business.
We are dependent on information technology and digital service providers and any material failure, misuse or interruption of our computer systems, supporting infrastructure, consumer-facing digital capabilities or social media platforms could adversely affect our business.
We are dependent upon information technology and digital service providers to properly conduct our business, including point-of-sale processing in our restaurants, order processing through digital channels, management of our supply chain, collection of cash, payment of obligations and various other processes and procedures. Our ability to efficiently manage our business, service our customers and process digital orders through our mobile application and third-party delivery partnerships depends significantly on the reliability and performance of our systems and those managed by our service providers. The failure of these systems and processes to operate effectively, including an interruption or degradation in such systems or services, could be harmful and cause delays in customer service, loss of digital sales, reduce efficiency or cause delays in operations. Significant capital investments may be required to remediate any such problems. Additionally, the success of certain of our strategic initiatives, including to expand our consumer-facing digital capabilities to connect with customers and drive growth, is highly dependent on our technology systems and digital service providers.
Risks Related to Our Capital Structure
The securitized debt instruments issued by certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries have restrictive terms, and any failure to comply with such terms could result in default, which could harm the value of our brand and adversely affect our business.
The Series 2019-1 and Series 2022-1 Senior Notes (“Senior Notes”) are subject to a series of covenants and restrictions customary for transactions of this type, including (i) that the Master Issuer maintains specified reserve accounts to be used to make required payments in respect of the Senior Notes, (ii) provisions relating to optional and mandatory prepayments and the related payment of specified amounts, including specified make-whole payments in the case of the Class A-2 Notes under certain circumstances, (iii) certain indemnification payments in the event, among other things, the assets pledged as collateral for the Senior Notes are in stated ways defective or ineffective and (iv) covenants relating to record keeping, access to information and similar matters. The Senior Notes are also subject to customary rapid amortization events provided for in the Indenture, including events tied to failure to maintain stated debt service coverage ratios, the sum of gross sales for specified restaurants being below certain levels on certain measurement dates, certain manager termination events, an event of default, and the failure to repay or refinance the Class A-2 Notes on the applicable scheduled maturity date. The Senior Notes are also subject to certain customary events of default, including events relating to non-payment of required interest, principal, or other amounts due on or with respect to the Senior Notes, failure to comply with covenants within certain time frames, certain bankruptcy events, breaches of specified representations and warranties, failure of security interests to be effective, and certain judgments.
In the event that a rapid amortization event occurs under the Indenture (including, without limitation, upon an event of default under the Indenture or the failure to repay the securitized debt at the end of the applicable term) which would require repayment of the Senior Notes, the funds available to us would be reduced or eliminated, which would in turn reduce our ability to operate and/or grow our business. If our subsidiaries are not able to generate sufficient cash flow to service their debt obligations, they may need to refinance or restructure debt, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. If our subsidiaries are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives, they may not be able to meet debt payment and other obligations which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
20
We have a significant amount of debt outstanding. Such indebtedness, along with the other contractual commitments of our Company or its subsidiaries, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to meet debt payment obligations.
Under the Indenture, the Master Issuer has approximately $1.9 billion of outstanding debt as of October 2, 2022.
This level of debt could have certain material adverse effects on the Company, including but not limited to:
•our available cash flow in the future to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and general corporate or other purposes could be impaired, and our ability to obtain additional financing for such purposes is limited;
•a substantial portion of our cash flows could be required for debt service and, as a result, might not be available for our operations or other purposes;
•any substantial decrease in net operating cash flows or any substantial increase in expenses could make it difficult for us to meet our debt service requirements or could force us to modify our operations or sell assets;
•our ability to operate our business and our ability to repurchase stock or pay cash dividends to our stockholders may be restricted by the financial and other covenants set forth in the Indenture.
•our ability to withstand competitive pressures may be decreased; and
•our level of indebtedness may make us more vulnerable to economic downturns and reduce our flexibility in responding to changing business, regulatory, and economic conditions.
In addition, we may incur additional indebtedness in the future. If new debt or other liabilities are added to our current consolidated debt levels, the related risks that it now faces could intensify.
The securitization transaction documents impose certain restrictions on our activities or the activities of our subsidiaries, and the failure to comply with such restrictions could adversely affect our business.
The Indenture and the management agreement entered into between certain of our subsidiaries and the Indenture trustee (the “Management Agreement”) contain various covenants that limit our and our subsidiaries’ ability to engage in specified types of transactions. For example, the Indenture and the Management Agreement contain covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, the ability of certain subsidiaries to:
•incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;
•sell certain assets;
•alter the business conducted by our subsidiaries;
•create or incur liens on certain assets; or
•consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of the assets held within the securitization entities.
As a result of these restrictions, we may not have adequate resources or the flexibility to continue to manage the business and provide for growth of the Jack in the Box system, including product development and marketing for the Jack in the Box brand, which could adversely affect our future growth prospects, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The following table sets forth information about our restaurant locations (by segment, by state) for all restaurants in operation as of October 2, 2022:
21
| Del Taco | Jack in the Box | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company- Operated | Franchise | Total | Company- Operated | Franchise | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alabama | — | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Arizona | — | 39 | 39 | 5 | 170 | 175 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| California | 228 | 135 | 363 | 101 | 843 | 944 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Colorado | — | 20 | 20 | — | 17 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Florida | 1 | 3 | 4 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Georgia | 14 | 10 | 24 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hawaii | — | — | — | — | 28 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Idaho | — | 10 | 10 | — | 34 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Illinois | — | — | — | — | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indiana | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Kansas | — | — | — | 5 | — | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Louisiana | — | — | — | — | 16 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Michigan | — | 10 | 10 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Missouri | — | — | — | 3 | 36 | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Nevada | 37 | 9 | 46 | — | 78 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New Mexico | — | 12 | 12 | — | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| North Carolina | — | — | — | — | 18 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ohio | — | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oklahoma | 10 | — | 10 | 8 | 7 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oregon | — | 9 | 9 | — | 41 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| South Carolina | — | — | — | — | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tennessee | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Texas | — | — | — | 22 | 561 | 583 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Utah | — | 34 | 34 | — | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Washington | — | 5 | 5 | — | 147 | 147 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guam | — | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 290 | 301 | 591 | 146 | 2,035 | 2,181 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Of the total 591 Del Taco and 2,181 Jack in the Box restaurants, our interest in restaurant properties consists of the following:
| Del Taco | Jack in the Box | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company- Operated | Franchise | Total | Company- Operated | Franchise | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company-owned restaurant buildings: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On company-owned land | — | — | — | 10 | 179 | 189 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| On leased land | 1 | — | 1 | 51 | 546 | 597 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subtotal | 1 | — | 1 | 61 | 725 | 786 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company-leased restaurant buildings on leased land | 289 | 50 | 339 | 85 | 996 | 1,081 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Franchise directly-owned or directly-leased restaurant buildings | — | 251 | 251 | — | 314 | 314 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total restaurant buildings | 290 | 301 | 591 | 146 | 2,035 | 2,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Our restaurant leases generally provide for fixed rental payments (with cost-of-living index adjustments) plus real estate taxes, insurance, and other expenses. In addition, approximately 17% of our leases provide for contingent rental payments between 1% and 12% of the restaurant’s gross sales once certain thresholds are met. We have generally been able to renew our restaurant leases as they expire at then-current market rates.
22
In addition to the restaurant locations, we own our corporate headquarters located in San Diego, California, which consists of approximately 70,000 square feet and approximately four acres of undeveloped land directly adjacent to it. We lease our Del Taco office, consisting of approximately 40,000 square feet in Lake Forest, California.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of our legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
Information about our Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age, position, and years with the Company of each person who is an executive officer of Jack in the Box Inc. as of October 2, 2022:
| Name | Age | Positions | Years with the Company | |||||||||||||||||
| Darin Harris | 53 | Chief Executive Officer | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
| Tim Mullany | 47 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| Ryan Ostrom | 47 | Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| Doug Cook | 49 | Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Tony Darden | 52 | Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| Dean Gordon | 60 | Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer | 13 | |||||||||||||||||
| Tim Linderman | 53 | Senior Vice President, Chief Franchise and Corporate Development | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| Steven Piano | 57 | Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| Sarah Super | 46 | Senior Vice President, Chief Legal and Risk Officer | 9 | |||||||||||||||||
The following sets forth the business experience of each executive officer for at least the last five years:
Mr. Harris has been Chief Executive Officer since June 2020. He was previously Chief Executive Officer of North America for flexible working company, IWG PLC, Regus, North America, from April 2018 to May 2020. Prior to that, from August 2013 to January 2018, Mr. Harris served as Chief Executive Officer of CiCi’s Enterprises LP. For just under five years, Mr. Harris also served as Chief Operating Officer for Primrose Schools from November 2008 to July 2013. He previously held franchise leadership roles as Senior Vice President at Arby’s Restaurant Group, Inc, from June 2005 to October 2008 and Vice President, Franchise and Corporate Development at Captain D’s Seafood, Inc., from May 2000 to January 2004. He was also a prior franchise operator of multiple Papa John’s Pizza and Qdoba Mexican Grill restaurants from November 2002 to June 2005. Mr. Harris has more than 25 years of leadership experience in the restaurant industry encompassing operations, franchising, brand strategy and restaurant development.
Mr. Mullany has been Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2021. Mr. Mullany has more than 20 years of experience leading large companies as well as hyper-growth concepts, both public and private. He served as Chief Financial Officer of Body Firm Aerobics Inc d/b/a VASA Fitness from August 2018 until December 2020. Prior to that, Mr. Mullany served as the Chief Financial Officer of RAVE Restaurant Group, Inc., which owns, operates, franchises, and/or licenses Pie Five Pizza Co. and Pizza Inn restaurants and Pizza Inn Express kiosks domestically and internationally, from May 2014 to July 2018. Previously, from October 2011 to April 2014, Mr. Mullany held the Chief Financial Officer role at Restaurants Unlimited, Inc, an American food and beverage firm, and from April 2009 to February 2011, he held the Chief Financial Officer role at Consumer Capital Partners, a private investment, concept development, and strategic advisory firm that franchises and operates Smashburger and Quizno brands, among others. Mr. Mullany received a Master of Business Administration from Columbia Business School and holds a Bachelor of Science from Villanova University.
Mr. Ostrom has been Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer since February 2021. Mr. Ostrom has over 15 years of marketing and branding experience. Previously, from June 2019 until February 2021, he served as the Chief Brand Officer for GNC Holdings, LLC, a health, wellness, and nutrition brand. Prior to that, from June 2015 to June 2019, he served as the Chief Digital Officer of Yum Brands Inc. Mr. Ostrom also has held roles at Kenmore, Craftsman & DieHard at Sears Holding Corporation, and Reebok.
23
Mr. Cook has been Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since October 2021. He has more than 20 years of industry experience leading guest and employee-facing platforms. Mr. Cook served as interim CTO of Jack in the Box from July 2021 to October 2021, leading the technology team and strategy. Prior to that, Mr. Cook served as Chief Information Officer at Pizza Hut from July 2019 to December 2020. From 1999 to June 2019, Mr. Cook held several positions at Sonic, applying leading-edge technologies and analytics to grow the company’s innovation and market position.
Mr. Darden has been Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since June 2021. He has more than 20 years of cross functional executive leadership experience. Most recently, he served as the President of Mooyah, LLC, a privately held American fast casual hamburger restaurant chain headquartered in Plano, TX from April 2019 until June 2021. Prior to that, from May 2017 until April 2019, Mr. Darden served as the Chief Operating Officer of Taco Bueno Restaurants, L.P. (“Taco Bueno”), a privately held quick serve restaurant chain headquartered in Farmers Branch, TX that operates Tex-Mex style restaurants throughout the American South and Southwest. Through its acquisition of Taco Bueno, from December 2018 until April 2019, Mr. Darden also served as the Chief Operating Officer of Sun Holdings, Inc., a multi-concept franchisee based in Dallas, TX which owns and operates restaurants across eight states among different brands including Arby’s, Burger King, CiCi’s Pizza, Golden Corral, Krispy Kreme, Popeyes, and Taco Bueno. From February 2011 to May 2017, he served as the Vice President of Operation of Panera, LLC, an American chain store of bakery-café casual restaurants. Mr. Darden received his Bachelor of Arts, Interpersonal Communications from Azusa Pacific University.
Mr. Gordon has been Senior Vice President, Chief Supply Chain Officer since November 2019. He previously served as its Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer from July 2017 to November 2019. He was previously Vice President of Supply Chain Services since October 2012, and Division Vice President of Purchasing from February 2009 to October 2012. Prior to joining the Company in February 2009, Mr. Gordon was Vice President of Supply Chain Management for Potbelly Sandwich Works from December 2005 to February 2009, and he held various positions with Applebee’s International from August 2000 to December 2005, most recently as Executive Director of Procurement. Mr. Gordon also held a number of positions at Prandium, Inc., an operator of multiple restaurant concepts, from October 1994 to August 2000. Mr. Gordon has over 25 years of Supply Chain Management experience.
Mr. Linderman has been Senior Vice President, Chief Development Officer since April 2022, and previously held the position of Senior Vice President, Chief Franchise and Corporate Development Officer since August 2021. He held the position of Senior Vice President, Franchise and Corporate Development from October 2020 through July 2021. He has over 18 years of experience in the franchise industry. He most recently served as Chief Development Officer of Ascent Hospitality Management, LLC, a restaurant management company, from July 2019 to October 2020. Prior to that, from January 2014 until July 2019, he was the Chief Development Officer at Global Franchise Group, LLC, where he oversaw franchise sales, real estate, and construction for Great American Cookies, Marble Slab Creamery, Pretzelmaker, MaggieMoo’s Ice Cream and Treatery and Hot Dog on a Stick. Before that, he was the Director of Franchise Development for Primrose School Franchising Company and held that same position at Arby’s.
Mr. Piano has been Senior Vice President, Chief People Officer since April 2021. He has over ten years of experience in leadership roles as Chief People Officer and Human Resource Officer. He most recently served as the Chief Human Resources Officer at GNC Holdings, LLC, a health, wellness, and nutrition brand, from January 2018 to April 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Piano was the Chief Human Resource Officer for MoneyGram International Inc., an American cross-border P2P payments and money transfer company, from August 2009 until April 2017. Mr. Piano has also held leadership positions with Lehman Brothers, Citibank, and others.
Ms. Super has been Senior Vice President, Chief Legal and Risk Officer since March 2020, served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel since November 2019, and previously served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel from May 2018 until November 2019. Prior to joining the Company in December 2013, she was a partner at the law firm of Gordon & Rees. Ms. Super has more than 15 years of legal experience.
24
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information. Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “JACK.”
Dividends. In fiscal 2022, the Board of Directors declared four cash dividends of $0.44. Our dividend is subject to the discretion and approval of our Board of Directors and our compliance with applicable law, and depends upon, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, level of indebtedness, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, and other factors that our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Stock Repurchases. The following table sets forth information on our share repurchases of our common stock during the fourth quarter of 2022 (dollars in thousands, except per share data).
| (a) Total number of shares purchased | (b) Average price paid per share | (c) Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced programs | (d) Maximum dollar value that may yet be purchased under these programs | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 200,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| July 11, 2022 - August 7, 2022 | — | $ | — | — | $ | 200,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| August 8, 2022 - September 4, 2022 | 275,746 | $ | 90.66 | 275,746 | $ | 175,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| September 5, 2022 - October 2, 2022 | — | $ | — | — | $ | 175,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | 275,746 | 275,746 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders. As of November 16, 2022, there were 533 stockholders of record.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans. The following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which Company common stock may be issued as of October 2, 2022. Stockholders of the Company have approved all plans requiring such approval.
| (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (1) | (b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options (1) | (c) Number of securities remaining for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |||||||||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (2) | 455,382 | $92.80 | 1,796,504 | ||||||||||||||
________________________
(1)Includes shares issuable in connection with our outstanding stock options, performance share awards, nonvested stock units, and non-management director deferred stock equivalents. The weighted-average exercise price in column (b) includes the weighted-average exercise price of stock options.
(2)For a description of our equity compensation plans, refer to Note 13, Share-Based Employee Compensation, of the notes to the consolidated financial statement
25
Performance Graph. The following graph compares the cumulative return to holders of the Company’s common stock at September 30th of each year to the yearly weighted cumulative return of a Peer Group Index and to the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index for the same period. The below comparison assumes $100 was invested on September 30, 2017 in the Company’s common stock and in the comparison groups and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The Company uses a Peer Group to assess the competitive pay levels of our senior executives, and to evaluate program design elements. In its annual review of the Peer Group Index used to benchmark executive compensation for our executive officers, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, in consultation with its independent compensation consultant, approved changes to the Peer Group Index to include companies that more closely aligned with our financial selection criteria and are highly-franchised.
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |||||||||||||||
| Jack in the Box Inc. | $100 | $84 | $93 | $82 | $102 | $80 | ||||||||||||||
| S&P 500 Index | $100 | $118 | $123 | $142 | $184 | $156 | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 Peer Group (1) | $100 | $135 | $131 | $155 | $194 | $138 | ||||||||||||||
| 2022 Peer Group (2) | $100 | $119 | $144 | $164 | $209 | $166 | ||||||||||||||
________________________
(1)The 2021 Peer Group Index comprises the following companies: BJ's Restaurants Inc.; The Cheesecake Factory Inc.; Chuy's Holdings Inc.; Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.; Denny's Corp.; Dine Brands Global Inc.; Domino's Pizza, Inc.; El Pollo Loco Holdings Inc.; Noodles & Co; Papa John's Int’l Inc.; Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.; Ruth's Hospitality Group Inc.; Shake Shack Inc.; Texas Roadhouse, Inc.; The Wendy’s Company; and Wingstop Inc.
(2)The 2022 Peer Group Index comprises the following companies: BJ's Restaurants Inc.; Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc.; The Cheesecake Factory Inc.; Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.; Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.; Denny's Corp.; Dine Brands Global Inc.; Domino's Pizza, Inc.; El Pollo Loco Holdings Inc.; Krispy Kreme, Inc.; Papa John's Int’l Inc.; Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.; Restaurant Brands Int’l Inc.; Shake Shack Inc.; Texas Roadhouse, Inc.; The Wendy’s Company; and Wingstop Inc.
ITEM 6. RESERVED.
26
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
GENERAL
For an understanding of the significant factors that influenced our performance during the fiscal year, we believe our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report as indexed on page F-1.
Comparisons under this heading refer to the 52-week period ended October 2, 2022 for the fiscal year 2022 and 53-week period ended October 3, 2021 for the fiscal year 2021. A comparison of our results of operations and cash flows for fiscal 2021 compared to fiscal 2020 can be found under Part II, “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2021.
Our MD&A consists of the following sections:
•Overview — a general description of our business.
•Results of Operations — an analysis of our consolidated statements of earnings for fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021.
•Liquidity and Capital Resources — an analysis of our cash flows, including capital expenditures, share repurchase activity, dividends, and known trends that may impact liquidity.
•Critical Accounting Estimates — a discussion of accounting policies that require critical judgments and estimates.
We have included in our MD&A certain performance metrics that management uses to assess company performance and which we believe will be useful in analyzing and understanding our results of operations. These metrics include:
•Changes in sales at restaurants open more than one year (“same-store sales”), system restaurant sales, franchised restaurant sales, and average unit volumes (“AUVs”). Same-store sales, restaurant sales, and AUVs are presented for franchised restaurants. Franchise sales represent sales at franchise restaurants and are revenues of our franchisees. We do not record franchise sales as revenues; however, our royalty revenues and percentage rent revenues are calculated based on a percentage of franchise sales. We believe franchise and system same-store sales, franchised and system-wide sales, and AUV information are useful to investors as they have a direct effect on the Company’s profitability.
•Adjusted EBITDA represents net earnings on a generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) basis excluding income taxes, interest expense, net, gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants, other operating expense (income), net, depreciation and amortization, amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases and subleases, net, and amortization of franchise tenant improvement allowances and incentives. We are presenting Adjusted EBITDA because we believe that it provides a meaningful supplement to net earnings of the Company's core business operating results, as well as a comparison to those of other similar companies. Management believes that Adjusted EBITDA, when viewed with the Company's results of operations in accordance with GAAP and the accompanying reconciliations within MD&A, provides useful information about operating performance and period-over-period change, and provides additional information that is useful for evaluating the operating performance of the Company's core business without regard to potential distortions. Additionally, management believes that Adjusted EBITDA permits investors to gain an understanding of the factors and trends affecting our ongoing cash earnings, from which capital investments are made and debt is serviced.
Same-store sales, system restaurant sales, franchised restaurant sales, AUVs, and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements determined in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered in isolation, or as an alternative to earnings from operations, or other similarly titled measures of other companies.
OVERVIEW
Our Business
Founded in 1951, Jack in the Box Inc. (the “Company”) operates and franchises Jack in the Box® quick-service restaurants. As of October 2, 2022, we operated and franchised 2,181 Jack in the Box quick-service restaurants, primarily in the western and southern United States, including two in Guam. On March 8, 2022, we completed the acquisition of Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. (“Del Taco”), the nation’s second largest Mexican quick service restaurant chain by number of restaurants and as of October 2, 2022 has 591 restaurants across 15 states, including one in Guam.
We derive revenue from retail sales at company-operated restaurants and rental revenue, royalties (based upon a percent of sales), franchise fees and contributions for advertising and other services from franchisees.
27
Impact of COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has continued to have varying degrees of disruption on our business. Our business has continued to be challenged by availability and cost of labor resulting in occasional temporarily closed restaurants and reduced operating hours. We have continued to have limited shortages in our supply chain; however, inflationary pressures have continued to have a significant impact on our business.
We expect these operating margin pressures due to labor and supply chain challenges to continue in fiscal 2023.
Other Developments
As previously announced, a franchisee that operated 68 restaurants in Missouri and Illinois filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in February 2021. On July 18, 2022, the Court approved the franchisee’s plan of reorganization with the same terms we previously agreed to in May 2022. The reorganization plan includes a waiver of a portion of damages associated with the rejected locations, reduced royalties following plan confirmation, and the settlement of the remaining cure costs via a secured note upon emergence from bankruptcy, in addition to deferring all amounts owed under the franchise agreements starting in February through the bankruptcy resolution date. The secured note provides for repayment based on a calculation of net free cash flows generated from the franchisee’s restaurants. To the extent future net free cash flows are insufficient to satisfy the secured note at a future specified date, then we agreed to waive any remaining balance due to the Company.
Based on the events above, we concluded that the collectability of the deferrals starting in February 2022 were doubtful and therefore no revenue has been recognized. Furthermore, we increased our bad debt reserve related to this matter to fully reserve the $3.8 million owed to the Company.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL 2022 AND 2021
The following table summarizes changes in same-store sales for Jack in the Box company-operated, franchised, and system restaurants:
| Jack in the Box: | 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||
| Company | 3.7 | % | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||
| Franchise | 0.6 | % | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||
| System | 0.9 | % | 10.3 | % | ||||||||||
The following table summarizes changes in the number and mix of Jack in the Box company and franchise restaurants:
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Jack in the Box: | Company | Franchise | Total | Company | Franchise | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning of year | 163 | 2,055 | 2,218 | 144 | 2,097 | 2,241 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| New | — | 17 | 17 | — | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acquired from franchisees | 13 | (13) | — | 20 | (20) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Refranchised | (15) | 15 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Closed | (15) | (39) | (54) | (1) | (36) | (37) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| End of year | 146 | 2,035 | 2,181 | 163 | 2,055 | 2,218 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| % of system | 7 | % | 93 | % | 100 | % | 7 | % | 93 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28
The following table summarizes restaurant sales for Jack in the Box company-operated, franchised, and systemwide sales (in thousands):
| Jack in the Box: | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
| Company-operated restaurant sales | $ | 414,225 | $ | 387,766 | |||||||
| Franchised restaurant sales (1) | 3,696,817 | 3,767,574 | |||||||||
| Systemwide sales (1) | $ | 4,111,042 | $ | 4,155,340 | |||||||
________________________
(1)Franchised restaurant sales represent sales at franchised restaurants and are revenues of our franchisees. System sales include company and franchised restaurant sales. We do not record franchised sales as revenues; however, our royalty revenues, marketing fees and percentage rent revenues are calculated based on a percentage of franchised sales. We believe franchised and system restaurant sales information is useful to investors as they have a direct effect on the Company's profitability.
Below is a reconciliation of Non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings (in thousands):
| Consolidated: | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||
| Net earnings - GAAP | $ | 115,781 | $ | 165,755 | |||||||
| Income taxes | 46,111 | 55,852 | |||||||||
| Interest expense, net | 86,075 | 67,458 | |||||||||
| Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants | (3,878) | (4,203) | |||||||||
| Other operating expense (income), net | 889 | (3,382) | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 56,100 | 46,500 | |||||||||
| Amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases and subleases, net | 1,120 | — | |||||||||
| Amortization of franchise tenant improvement allowances and other | 4,446 | 3,450 | |||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA - Non-GAAP | $ | 306,644 | $ | 331,430 | |||||||
Jack in the Box Brand
Company Restaurant Operations
The following table presents company restaurant sales and costs as a percentage of the related sales (dollars in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company restaurant sales | $ | 414,225 | $ | 387,766 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Company restaurant costs: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Food and packaging | $ | 133,815 | 32.3 | % | $ | 113,006 | 29.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Payroll and employee benefits | $ | 138,038 | 33.3 | % | $ | 119,033 | 30.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Occupancy and other | $ | 74,337 | 17.9 | % | $ | 61,743 | 15.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Company restaurant sales increased $26.5 million, or 6.8%, in 2022 as compared with the prior year. In 2022, the increase was primarily menu price increases and an increase in the average number of restaurants, partially offset by the impact of the 53rd week and a decline in traffic and average check. The following table presents the approximate impact of these items on company restaurant sales in 2022 (in millions):
| 2022 vs 2021 | ||||||||
| AUV increase | $ | 22.7 | ||||||
| Increase in the average number of restaurants | 11.1 | |||||||
| 53rd week | (7.3) | |||||||
| Total change in company restaurant sales | $ | 26.5 | ||||||
29
Same-store sales at company-operated restaurants increased 3.7% in 2022 compared to a year ago. The following table summarizes the increases (decreases) in company-operated same-store sales:
| 2022 vs. 2021 | ||||||||
| Transactions | (1.7) | % | ||||||
| Average check (1) | 5.4 | % | ||||||
| Change in same-store sales | 3.7 | % | ||||||
________________________
(1)Includes price increases of 8.4% in 2022.
Food and packaging costs as a percentage of company restaurant sales increased by 3.2% to 32.3% in 2022 from 29.1% a year ago, primarily due to an increase in commodities of 3.5% and unfavorable sales mix of 2.2%; partially offset by a 2.5% menu price increase.
Commodity costs increased in the current fiscal year by approximately 14.4%. The inflation we have experienced is across all categories with the greatest impact seen in proteins, sauces, and oils. For fiscal 2023, we expect annual commodity cost inflation on a company-wide basis to be up 9% to 11% compared with fiscal 2022.
Payroll and employee benefit costs as a percentage of company restaurant sales increased to 33.3% in 2022 compared with 30.7% a year ago primarily due to labor inflation and a change in the mix of restaurants due to franchisee acquisitions. Labor inflation was approximately 12.3% in the current fiscal year. For fiscal 2023, we expect annual wage inflation on a company-wide basis to be up 3% to 6% compared with fiscal 2022.
Occupancy and other costs as a percentage of company restaurant sales increased to 17.9% in 2022 from 15.9% a year ago primarily due to the acquisition of 13 restaurants since a year ago with lower than average sales volumes, and higher costs for maintenance and repair and utilities.
Jack in the Box Franchise Operations
The following table presents franchise revenues and costs in each fiscal year and other information we believe is useful in analyzing the change in franchise operating results (dollars in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Franchise rental revenues | $ | 335,936 | $ | 346,634 | ||||||||||
| Royalties | 188,902 | 193,908 | ||||||||||||
| Franchise fees and other | 14,309 | 10,817 | ||||||||||||
| Franchise royalties and other | 203,211 | 204,725 | ||||||||||||
| Franchise contributions for advertising and other services | 197,816 | 204,545 | ||||||||||||
| Total franchise revenues | $ | 736,963 | $ | 755,904 | ||||||||||
| Franchise occupancy expenses | $ | 211,260 | $ | 214,913 | ||||||||||
| Franchise support and other costs | 15,622 | 13,052 | ||||||||||||
| Franchise advertising and other services expenses | 206,192 | 210,328 | ||||||||||||
| Total franchise costs | $ | 433,074 | $ | 438,293 | ||||||||||
| Franchise costs as a percentage of total franchise revenues | 58.8 | % | 58.0 | % | ||||||||||
| Average number of franchise restaurants | 2,031 | 2,066 | ||||||||||||
| Franchised restaurant sales | $ | 3,696,817 | $ | 3,767,574 | ||||||||||
| Franchise restaurant AUV (1) | $ | 1,820 | $ | 1,790 | ||||||||||
| Royalties as a percentage of total franchise restaurant sales | 5.1 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||||||||
________________________
(1) 2021 AUV is adjusted to exclude the 53rd week for comparison purposes.
Franchise rental revenues decreased $10.7 million, or 3.1%, in 2022 compared to the prior year, primarily due to additional rent revenue of approximately $6.5 million from a 53rd week in the prior year as well as a decrease of $3.3 million in connection with a franchisee in bankruptcy proceedings for which revenue will be recognized upon payment.
30
Franchise royalties and other decreased $1.5 million, or 0.7%, primarily due to additional royalties in the prior year of approximately $3.6 million from a 53rd week and a deferral of $1.0 million in connection with a franchisee bankruptcy matter; partially offset by higher termination fees of $3.9 million in the current year.
Franchise contributions for advertising and other services decreased $6.7 million, or 3.3%, primarily due to higher contributions in the prior year of approximately $3.5 million from a 53rd week, a decrease in the number of franchise restaurants and deferrals in connection with the franchisee bankruptcy matter.
Franchise occupancy expenses, primarily rent, decreased $3.7 million, or 1.7% in 2022, primarily due to higher costs of $4.0 million in the prior year from the 53rd week; partially offset by higher property taxes in the current year.
Franchise support and other costs increased $2.6 million, or 19.7% in 2022, primarily due to an increase in franchise bad debt expense of $4.1 million as a result of two specific franchise matters; partially offset by lower costs for outside services in the current year.
Franchise advertising and other service expenses decreased $4.1 million, or 2.0% in 2022 primarily due to marketing contributions of $4.0 million from the 53rd week in the prior year.
Del Taco Brand
As of October 2, 2022, there were 290 company-operated and 301 franchise-operated Del Taco restaurants. For the periods subsequent to the acquisition that are included in our 2022 results, system same-store sales increased 3.7% and total revenues and segment operating profit were $316.9 million and $28.0 million, respectively.
Company-Wide Results
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $9.6 million in 2022 as compared with the prior year, primarily due to the acquisition of Del Taco, contributing an additional $16.2 million of depreciation in the year; partially offset by lower Jack in the Box depreciation as a result of certain franchise buildings becoming fully depreciated.
Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses
The following table presents the increase (decrease) in SG&A expenses in 2022 compared with the prior year (in thousands):
| 2022 vs. 2021 | ||||||||
| Advertising (excluding 53rd week) | $ | 12,443 | ||||||
| Incentive compensation (including share-based compensation and related payroll taxes) | (2,011) | |||||||
| Cash surrender value of COLI policies, net | 19,053 | |||||||
| Litigation matters | (4,881) | |||||||
| Insurance | 1,963 | |||||||
| 53rd week | (1,844) | |||||||
| Other | 24,141 | |||||||
| $ | 48,864 | |||||||
Advertising costs represent company contributions to our marketing funds and are generally determined as a percentage of company-operated restaurant sales. Advertising costs, on a comparable 52-week basis, increased $12.4 million primarily due to the acquisition of Del Taco which resulted in higher advertising costs of $11.6 million during the year.
Incentive compensation decreased by $2.0 million in 2022 primarily due to a $5.1 million decrease from lower achievement levels compared to the prior year for the Company’s annual incentive plan; partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation of $3.1 million due to a higher number of executive stock awards outstanding compared to the prior year.
The cash surrender value of our Company-owned life insurance (“COLI”) policies, net of changes in our non-qualified deferred compensation obligation supported by these policies, are subject to market fluctuations. The changes in market values had a negative impact of $19.1 million versus the prior year.
Litigation matters decreased by $4.9 million in 2022 primarily due to a $2.6 million favorable settlement received in the current year as well as lower costs on certain employee and other litigation matters compared to the prior year. Refer to Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Insurance costs increased $2.0 million in 2022 versus the prior year primarily due to more favorable trends in the prior year related to expected losses associated with workers’ compensation claims.
31
The increase in other is primarily due to the acquisition of Del Taco in the second quarter which resulted in an increase of additional general and administrative costs of $21.4 million in 2022 compared to the prior year.
Other Operating Expense (Income), Net
Other operating expense (income), net is comprised of the following (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Acquisition, integration, and restructuring costs | 20,081 | 7 | ||||||||||||
| Costs of closed restaurants and other | 4,290 | 1,907 | ||||||||||||
| Restaurant impairment charges | 5,927 | — | ||||||||||||
| Accelerated depreciation | 1,124 | 1,592 | ||||||||||||
| Gains on disposition of property and equipment, net | $ | (30,533) | $ | (6,888) | ||||||||||
| $ | 889 | $ | (3,382) | |||||||||||
Other operating expense (income), net increased $4.3 million in 2022 versus the prior year primarily due to $20.1 million of costs incurred during the year relating to the acquisition and integration of Del Taco, higher restaurant impairment charges of $5.9 million primarily due to closures of certain Jack in the Box company and franchise restaurants; partially offset by higher gains on the disposition of property and equipment of $23.6 million from the sale of Jack in the Box restaurant properties to franchisees. Refer to Note 9, Other Operating Expense (Income), Net, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Gains on the Sale of Company-Operated Restaurants
In 2022, gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants included additional proceeds of $1.4 million related to Jack in the Box restaurants sold in prior year, in addition to gains of $2.5 million on the sale of 15 Jack in the Box restaurants during the year. In 2021, gains recognized pertained to Jack in the Box restaurants sold in a prior year. Refer to Note 4, Summary of Refranchisings and Franchise Acquisitions, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, is comprised of the following (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Interest expense | $ | 86,524 | $ | 67,600 | ||||||||||
| Interest income | (449) | (142) | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense, net | $ | 86,075 | $ | 67,458 | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net, increased $18.6 million in 2022 primarily due to a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $7.7 million recognized during the current year as well as higher average borrowings resulting in higher interest expense of $14.1 million; partially offset by a lower average borrowing rate in the current year resulting in a $3.0 million decrease.
Income Taxes
The income tax provisions reflect effective tax rates of 28.5% and 25.2%, in fiscal years 2022 and 2021, respectively. The major components of the year-over-year change in tax rates were non-deductibles losses in the current year versus non-taxable gains in the prior year from the market performance of insurance products used to fund certain non-qualified retirement plans, a decrease in the impact of excess tax benefit on stock compensation, and an increase in non-deductible transaction costs resulting from the Del Taco acquisition, partially offset by an adjustment related to state taxes recorded in the second quarter of fiscal year 2021.
32
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
General
Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are cash flows from operations and borrowings available under our securitized financing facility. Our cash requirements consist principally of working capital, general corporate needs, capital expenditures, income tax payments, debt service requirements, franchise tenant improvement allowance and incentive distributions, dividend payments, and obligations related to our benefit plans. We generally reinvest available cash flows from operations to invest in our business, service our debt obligations, pay dividends and repurchase shares of our common stock.
Our primary sources of short-term and long-term liquidity are expected to be cash flows from operations and available borrowings under our credit facilities. As of October 2, 2022, the Company had $136.0 million of cash and restricted cash on its consolidated balance sheet and available borrowings of $117.9 million under our $150.0 million Variable Funding Notes and our $75.0 million revolving credit facility.
The Company continually assesses the optimal sources and uses of cash for our business. Since closing the Del Taco acquisition, we have undertaken a process to review our balance sheet for any undervalued assets, and to pursue opportunities for capital sources, including sales of Jack in the Box real estate assets identified in its portfolio, and refranchising, primarily for Del Taco in the near term. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from these transactions to pay down debt, provide additional liquidity and, when market conditions normalize, for other corporate purposes including investments in growth initiatives and potential share repurchases.
Based upon current levels of operations and anticipated growth, we expect that cash flows from operations, combined with our securitized financing facility, will be sufficient to meet our capital expenditure, working capital and debt service requirements for at least the next twelve months and the foreseeable future.
Cash Flows
The table below summarizes our cash flows from continuing operations activities for each of the last two fiscal years (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Total cash provided by (used in): | ||||||||||||||
| Operating activities | $ | 162,882 | $ | 201,122 | ||||||||||
| Investing activities | (578,588) | (20,929) | ||||||||||||
| Financing activities | 478,178 | (343,545) | ||||||||||||
| Net cash flows | $ | 62,472 | $ | (163,352) | ||||||||||
Operating Activities. Operating cash flows decreased $38.2 million compared with a year ago, primarily due to lower net income adjusted for non-cash items of $20.7 million and an unfavorable change in working capital of $17.5 million, primarily due to favorable collections in the prior year from the repayment of franchise marketing and rent payment deferrals provided in 2020 in response to the economic burden associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Pension and Postretirement Contributions — Our policy is to fund our pension plans at or above the minimum required by law. As of the date of our last actuarial funding valuation for our qualified pension plan, there was no minimum contribution funding requirement. In 2022 and 2021, we contributed $6.7 million and $6.1 million, respectively, to our pension and postretirement plans. We do not anticipate making any contributions to our qualified defined benefit pension plan in fiscal 2023. For additional information, refer to Note 12, Retirement Plans, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Investing Activities. Cash flows used in investing activities increased $557.7 million in 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to $580.8 million paid for the acquisition of Del Taco, partially offset by $19.4 million higher proceeds received on the sale of property and equipment, primarily due to the sale of restaurant properties to franchisees in 2022.
33
Capital Expenditures — The composition of capital expenditures in each fiscal year is summarized in the table below (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Restaurants: | ||||||||||||||
| Remodel / refresh programs | $ | 8,823 | $ | 9,018 | ||||||||||
| New restaurants | 2,887 | — | ||||||||||||
| Restaurant facility expenditures | 21,469 | 7,491 | ||||||||||||
| Purchases of assets intended for sale and leaseback | 1,986 | 15,538 | ||||||||||||
| Restaurant information technology | 6,350 | 3,503 | ||||||||||||
| 41,515 | 35,550 | |||||||||||||
| Corporate Services: | ||||||||||||||
| Information technology | 3,524 | 1,485 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate facilities | 1,436 | 3,973 | ||||||||||||
| 4,960 | 5,458 | |||||||||||||
| Total capital expenditures | $ | 46,475 | $ | 41,008 | ||||||||||
In 2022, capital expenditures increased by $5.5 million compared to a year ago, primarily due to Del Taco capital expenditures of $14.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in purchases of assets intended for sale and leaseback of $13.6 million.
Sale and Sale-leaseback Transactions — To optimize our balance sheet and capital structure, we use sales and leaseback financing and provide our franchisees the opportunity to purchase the property that we currently lease to them. In 2022, we completed sales-leaseback transactions involving four restaurant properties with proceeds of $10.8 million and completed the sale of properties to franchisees and other third parties during the year with proceeds of $31.2 million.
Financing Activities. Cash flows provided by financing activities increased by $821.7 million compared with a year ago, primarily as a result of an increase in net borrowings of $650.0 million, driven by the issuance of the 2022 Notes, and lower share repurchases of $175.0 million compared to prior year.
Repurchases of Common Stock — In fiscal 2022, the Company purchased 0.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate cost of $25.0 million. As of October 2, 2022, there was $175.0 million remaining under share repurchase programs authorized by the Board of Directors.
Dividends — In fiscal 2022, the Board of Directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $0.44 per share, totaling $37.2 million. Future dividends are subject to approval by our Board of Directors.
Securitized Refinancing Transaction — On February 11, 2022, the Company completed the sale of $550.0 million of its Series 2022-1 3.445% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I (the “Class A-2-I Notes”) and $550.0 million of its Series 2022-1 4.136% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “Class A-2-II” and, together with the Class A-2-I Notes, the “2022 Notes”). Interest payments on the 2022 Notes are payable on a quarterly basis. The anticipated repayment dates of the Class A-2-I Notes and the Class A-2-II Notes will be February 2027 and February 2032, respectively, unless earlier prepaid to the extent permitted under the indenture that will govern the 2022 Notes.
The Company also entered into a revolving financing facility of Series 2022-1 Variable Funding Senior Secured Notes (the “Variable Funding Notes”), which permits borrowings up to a maximum of $150.0 million, subject to certain borrowing conditions, a portion of which may be used to issue letters of credit. The Company’s existing revolving financing facility of Series 2019-1 Class A-1 Notes was terminated in connection with the transaction. As of October 2, 2022, we had outstanding borrowings of $50.0 million and available borrowing capacity of $58.0 million under our 2022 Variable Funding Notes, net of letters of credits issued of $42.0 million.
The net proceeds from the sale of the 2022 Notes were used to repay in full $570.7 million in aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Company’s Series 2019-1 Class A-2-I Notes, together with the applicable make-whole premium and unpaid interest, and was used to fund a portion of the Company’s acquisition of Del Taco Restaurants, Inc.
34
The 2022 Notes were issued in a privately placed securitization transaction pursuant to which certain of the Company’s revenue-generating assets, consisting principally of franchise-related agreements, real estate assets, and intellectual property and license agreements for the use of intellectual property, are held by the Master Issuer and certain other limited-purpose, bankruptcy remote, wholly owned indirect subsidiaries of the Company that act as Guarantors of the Notes and that have pledged substantially all of their assets, excluding certain real estate assets and subject to certain limitations, to secure the Notes. The 2022 Notes are subject to the same covenants and restrictions as the Series 2019-1 Notes.
The quarterly principal payment on the Class A-2 Notes may be suspended when the specified leverage ratio, which is a measure of outstanding debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted for certain items (as defined in the Indenture), is less than or equal to 5.0x. Exceeding the leverage ratio of 5.0x does not violate any covenant related to the Class A-2 Notes. Subsequent to closing the issuance of the 2022 Notes, the Company has had a leverage ratio of greater than 5.0x and, accordingly, the Company resumed making the scheduled principal payments on its 2022 Notes and Series 2019-1 Notes beginning in the second quarter of 2022.
Restricted Cash — In accordance with the terms of the Indenture, certain cash accounts have been established with the Indenture trustee for the benefit of the note holders and are restricted in their use. As of October 2, 2022, the Master Issuer had restricted cash of $27.2 million, which primarily represented cash collections and cash reserves held by the trustee to be used for payments of interest and commitment fees required for the Class A-2 Notes and Variable Funding Notes.
Covenants and Restrictions — The Notes are subject to a series of covenants and restrictions customary for transactions of this type, including (i) that the Master Issuer maintains specified reserve accounts to be used to make required payments in respect of the Notes, (ii) provisions relating to optional and mandatory prepayments and the related payment of specified amounts, including specified make-whole payments in the case of the Class A-2 Notes under certain circumstances, (iii) certain indemnification payments in the event, among other things, the assets pledged as collateral for the Notes are in stated ways defective or ineffective and (iv) covenants relating to recordkeeping, access to information and similar matters. The Notes are also subject to customary rapid amortization events provided for in the Indenture, including events tied to failure to maintain stated debt service coverage ratios, the sum of gross sales for specified restaurants being below certain levels on certain measurement dates, certain manager termination events, an event of default, and the failure to repay or refinance the Class A-2 Notes on the applicable scheduled maturity date. The Notes are also subject to certain customary events of default, including events relating to non-payment of required interest, principal, or other amounts due on or with respect to the Notes, failure to comply with covenants within certain time frames, certain bankruptcy events, breaches of specified representations and warranties, failure of security interests to be effective, and certain judgments. As of October 2, 2022, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenant requirements and were not subject to any rapid amortization events.
Contractual Obligations
Our cash requirements greater than twelve months from contractual obligations and commitments include:
Debt Obligations and Interest Payments — Refer to Note 7, Indebtedness, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information of our obligations and the timing of expected payments.
Operating and Finance Leases — Refer to Note 8, Leases, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information of our obligations and the timing of expected payments.
Purchase Commitments — Purchase obligations includes non-cancelable purchase commitments related to information technology agreements and volume commitments for beverage products. Refer to Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, for further detail of our obligations and the timing of expected future payments.
Benefit Obligations — Refer to Note 12, Retirement Plans, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our obligations and the timing of expected payments under our non-qualified defined benefit plan and postretirement healthcare plans.
35
DISCUSSION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
We have identified the following as our most critical accounting estimates, which are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and that require management’s most subjective and complex judgments. Information regarding our other significant accounting estimates and policies are disclosed in Note 1, Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Long-lived Assets — We review our long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and operating lease right-of-use assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are grouped for recognition and measurement of impairment at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets. The impairment test for long-lived assets requires us to assess the recoverability of long-lived asset groups by comparing their net carrying value to the sum of undiscounted estimated future cash flows expected to be generated through leases and/or subleases or by our individual company-operated restaurants. If the carrying amount of a long-lived asset group exceeds the sum of related undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss by the amount that the carrying value of the assets exceeds fair value. Our estimates of cash flows used to assess impairment are subject to a high degree of judgment and may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, changes in our business plans, operating performance, and economic conditions.
Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets — We evaluate goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment in the fourth quarter, or more frequently, if indicators of impairment are present. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment by determining whether the fair value of our reporting units exceed their carrying values. Our reporting units are our two restaurant brands, Jack in the Box and Del Taco.
Our impairment analyses first include a qualitative assessment to determine whether events or circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Significant factors considered in this assessment include, but are not limited to, macro-economic conditions, market and industry conditions, cost considerations, the competitive environment, share price fluctuations, overall financial performance, and results of past impairment tests. If the qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, we perform a quantitative impairment test.
In performing a quantitative test for impairment of goodwill, we primarily use the income approach method of valuation that includes the discounted cash flow method and the market approach that includes the guideline public company method to determine the fair value of the reporting unit. Significant assumptions made by management to estimate fair value under the discounted cash flow method include future cash flow assumptions, which may differ from actual cash flows due to, among other things, economic conditions, or changes in operating performance. The discount rate is our estimate of the required rate of return that a third-party buyer would expect to receive when purchasing a business from us that constitutes a reporting unit. We believe the discount rate is commensurate with the risk and uncertainty inherent in the forecasted cash flows. Significant assumptions used to determine fair value under the guideline public company method include the selection of guideline companies and the valuation multiples applied.
In the process of a quantitative test, if necessary, of the Del Taco trademark intangible asset, we primarily use the relief from royalty method under the income approach method of valuation. Significant assumptions used to determine fair value under the relief from royalty method include future trends in sales, a royalty rate, an estimated income tax rate, and a discount rate to be applied to the forecast revenue stream.
In the fourth quarter of 2022, we performed quantitative tests using the approaches described above. The fair value of our Jack in the Box reporting unit was substantially in excess of its respective carrying value as of the testing date. The fair value of our Del Taco reporting unit and indefinite-lived trademarks were in excess of their carrying values by approximately 8% and 7%, respectively, as of the testing date.
Self-Insurance — We are self-insured for a portion of our losses related to workers’ compensation, general liability and other legal claims, and health benefits. In estimating our self-insurance accruals, we utilize independent actuarial estimates of expected losses and assumptions related to the loss development factors, which are based on statistical analysis of historical data. These assumptions are closely monitored and adjusted when warranted by changing circumstances. Should a greater number of claims occur compared to what was estimated, or should medical costs increase beyond what was expected, accruals might not be sufficient, and additional expense may be recorded.
Legal Accruals — The Company is subject to claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of its business. A determination of the amount accrued, if any, for these contingencies is made after analysis of each matter. We continually evaluate such accruals and may increase or decrease accrued amounts as we deem appropriate. Because lawsuits are inherently unpredictable, and unfavorable resolutions could occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgment about future events. As a result, the amount of ultimate loss may differ from those estimates.
36
Business Combinations — The Del Taco acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, or acquisition accounting, in accordance with ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. The acquisition method of accounting involved the allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. This allocation process involves the use of estimates and assumptions made in connection with estimating the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed including cash flows expected to be derived from the use of the asset, the timing of such cash flows, the remaining useful life of assets and applicable discount rates.
In the event that actual results vary from the estimates or assumptions used in the valuation or allocation process, we may be required to record an impairment charge or an increase in depreciation or amortization in future periods, or both. Refer to Note 3, Business Combination, to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional information about accounting for the Del Taco acquisition.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 1, Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, of the notes to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the impact of new accounting pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk — We are exposed to interest rate risk on borrowings under our $150.0 million Variable Funding Notes and our $75.0 million revolving credit facility. As of October 2, 2022, we had outstanding variable rate borrowings of $50.0 million. A 100 basis point increase in the effective interest rate applied to these borrowings would result in additional interest expense of approximately $0.5 million on an annualized basis.
Commodity Price Risk —The Company is also exposed to the impact of commodity and utility price fluctuations. Many of the ingredients we use are commodities or ingredients that are affected by the price of other commodities, weather, seasonality, production, availability, and various other factors outside our control. In order to minimize the impact of fluctuations in price and availability, we monitor the primary commodities we purchase and may enter into purchasing contracts and pricing arrangements when considered to be advantageous. However, certain commodities remain subject to price fluctuations. We are exposed to the impact of utility price fluctuations related to unpredictable factors such as weather and various other market conditions outside our control. Our ability to recover increased costs for commodities and utilities through higher prices is limited by the competitive environment in which we operate.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The consolidated financial statements, related financial information, and the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm required to be filed are indexed on page F-1 and are incorporated herein.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
a.Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), as of the end of the Company’s fiscal year ended October 2, 2022, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively) have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
b.Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
37
c.Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; (2) provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with appropriate authorizations; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
In accordance with guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission, companies are permitted to exclude acquisitions from their first assessment of internal control over financial reporting following the date of acquisition. Based on those guidelines, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting excluded Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. (“Del Taco”), which the Company acquired in the second quarter of 2022. See Note 3, Business Combination, to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the Company’s acquisition of Del Taco. We have included the financial results of this acquisition in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Del Taco represented approximately 39% of consolidated total assets as of October 2, 2022, and 22% of consolidated total revenues for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2022.
Management, under the oversight of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and Audit Committee, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2022. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Management has concluded that, as of October 2, 2022, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective, at a reasonable assurance level, based on these criteria.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, has issued an audit report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, which follows.
38
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Jack in the Box Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Jack in the Box Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the fifty-two week period ended October 2, 2022, for the fifty-three week period ended October 3, 2021, and for the fifty-two week period ended September 27, 2020, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated November 22, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
The Company acquired Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. during 2022, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2022, Del Taco Restaurants Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting associated with 39% of total assets and 22% of total revenues included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended October 2, 2022. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Del Taco Restaurants, Inc.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
San Diego, California
November 22, 2022
39
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
That portion of our definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Director Qualifications and Biographical Information,” and “Committees of the Board” to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after October 2, 2022 and to be used in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
Information regarding our executive officers is set forth in Part I of this Report under the caption “Information about our Executive Officers.”
That portion of our definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Committees of the Board - Audit Committee,” relating to the members of the Company’s Audit Committee and the members of the Audit Committee who qualify as financial experts, is also incorporated herein by reference.
That portion of our definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Stockholder Recommendations and Board Nominations,” relating to the procedures by which stockholders may recommend candidates for director to the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, is also incorporated herein by reference.
We have adopted a Code of Ethics, which applies to all Jack in the Box Inc. directors, officers, and employees, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller, and all of the financial team. The Code of Ethics is posted on the Company’s corporate website, www.jackintheboxinc.com (under the “Investors — Governance — Governance Documents — Code of Conduct” caption) and is available in print free of charge to any stockholder upon request. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or waiver of, a provision of the Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our corporate website. No such waivers have been issued during fiscal 2022.
We have also adopted a set of Corporate Governance Principles and Practices for our Board of Directors and charters for all of our Board Committees, including the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees. The Corporate Governance Principles and Practices and committee charters are available on our corporate website at www.jackintheboxinc.com and in print free of charge to any shareholder who requests them. Written requests for our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Corporate Governance Principles and Practices and committee charters should be addressed to Jack in the Box Inc., 9357 Spectrum Center Blvd., San Diego, California 92123, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
That portion of our definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation and Stock Ownership Requirements,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” and “Compensation Committee Report” to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after October 2, 2022 and to be used in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
That portion of our definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after October 2, 2022 and to be used in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference. Information regarding equity compensation plans under which Company common stock may be issued as of October 2, 2022 is set forth in Item 5 of this Report.
40
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
That portion of our definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Directors’ Independence,” if any, to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after October 2, 2022 and to be used in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
That portion of our definitive Proxy Statement appearing under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accountants Fees and Services” to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after October 2, 2022 and to be used in connection with our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is hereby incorporated by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
ITEM 15(a) (1) Financial Statements. See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this Report.
ITEM 15(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules. None.
ITEM 15(a) (3) Exhibits.
| Number | Description | Form | Filed with SEC | |||||||||||||||||
| 2.1 | 8-K | 12/6/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1 | 8-K | 9/24/2007 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3.1.1 | 10-Q | 5/14/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3.3 | 10-Q | 5/27/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4.1 | 8-K | 7/8/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4.2 | 8-K | 7/8/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4.3 | 8-K | 2/15/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4.4 | 8-K | 2/15/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.1.20 | 8-K | 7/8/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.1.21 | 8-K | 7/8/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.1.22 | 8-K | 7/8/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.1.23 | 8-K | 12/6/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
41
| Number | Description | Form | Filed with SEC | |||||||||||||||||
| 10.1.24 | 8-K | 12/6/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.1.25 | 8-K | 2/3/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.1.26 | 8-K | 2/15/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.1.27 | 8-K | 2/15/2022 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2* | 10-Q | 2/20/2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2.1* | 10-Q | 5/17/2012 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2.2* | 10-K | 11/21/2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2.3* | 10-K | 11/18/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2.20* | 8-K | 12/17/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2.21* | 10-Q | 2/17/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2.22* | 10-Q | 5/12/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2.26* | 8-K | 5/17/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.3* | 10-Q | 2/18/2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.3.1 * | 8-K | 9/22/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.4* | 10-Q | 2/18/2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.4.1 * | 8-K | 9/22/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.5* | 10-K | 11/22/2006 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8* | DEF 14A | 1/25/2017 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.1* | 10-Q | 8/5/2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.2* | 8-K | 11/15/2005 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.3* | _____ | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.4* | 10-Q | 5/14/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.5* | 10-K | 11/22/2013 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.6* | 10-K | 11/22/2013 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.7* | 10-Q | 2/19/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.8* | 10-Q | 2/19/2015 | ||||||||||||||||||
42
| Number | Description | Form | Filed with SEC | |||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.9* | 10-Q | 2/18/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.10* | 10-Q | 2/18/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.11* | 10-Q | 5/12/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.12* | 10-Q | 2/21/2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.13* | 10-Q | 2/20/2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.14* | 10-K | 11/23/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.8.15* | 10-K | 11/23/2021 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.10.2* | DEF 14A | 1/11/2016 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 10.11* | 10-Q | 8/10/2012 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 21.1 | _____ | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||||||||
| 23.1 | _____ | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||||||||
| 31.1 | _____ | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||||||||
| 31.2 | _____ | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||||||||
| 32.1 | _____ | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||||||||
| 32.2 | _____ | Filed herewith | ||||||||||||||||||
| 101.INS | iXBRL Instance Document | |||||||||||||||||||
| 101.SCH | iXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | |||||||||||||||||||
| 101.CAL | iXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |||||||||||||||||||
| 101.DEF | iXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |||||||||||||||||||
| 101.LAB | iXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |||||||||||||||||||
| 101.PRE | iXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |||||||||||||||||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File formatted in iXBRL | |||||||||||||||||||
* Management contract or compensatory plan
1 Certain of the exhibits and schedules in this Exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) and 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibits and schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.
ITEM 15(b) All required exhibits are filed herein or incorporated by reference as described in Item 15(a)(3).
ITEM 15(c) All schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable, immaterial or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Not applicable.
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| JACK IN THE BOX INC. | ||||||||
| By: | /s/ TIM MULLANY | |||||||
| Tim Mullany Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) | ||||||||
| November 22, 2022 | ||||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Darin Harris and Tim Mullany, jointly and severally, his or her attorneys-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||||||||||||
| /s/ DARIN HARRIS | Chief Executive Officer and Director (principal executive officer) | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Darin Harris | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ TIM MULLANY | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Tim Mullany | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ DAVID L. GOEBEL | Director and Chairman of the Board | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| David L. Goebel | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ GUILLERMO DIAZ, JR. | Director | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Guillermo Diaz, Jr. | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ SHARON P. JOHN | Director | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Sharon P. John | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ MADELEINE A. KLEINER | Director | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Madeleine A. Kleiner | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ MICHAEL W. MURPHY | Director | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Michael W. Murphy | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ JAMES M. MYERS | Director | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| James M. Myers | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ DAVID M. TEHLE | Director | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| David M. Tehle | ||||||||||||||
| /s/ VIVIEN M. YEUNG | Director | November 22, 2022 | ||||||||||||
| Vivien M. Yeung | ||||||||||||||
44
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Page | ||||||||
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP, San Diego, CA, Auditor Firm ID: 185) | F-2 | |||||||
F-4 | ||||||||
F-5 | ||||||||
F-6 | ||||||||
F-7 | ||||||||
F-8 | ||||||||
F-9 | ||||||||
Schedules not filed: All schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable, immaterial, or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Jack in the Box Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Jack in the Box Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021, the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the fifty-two week period ended October 2, 2022, the fifty-three week period ended October 3, 2021, and the fifty-two week period ended September 27, 2020 and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the fifty-two week period ended October 2, 2022, for the fifty-three week period ended October 3, 2021, and for the fifty-two week period ended September 27, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 2, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated November 22, 2022 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Fair Value of the Del Taco Trademarks
As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on March 8, 2022, the Company acquired Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. (Del Taco) in a business combination. The purchase price was allocated to the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the excess recorded as goodwill. For the trademarks specifically, the Company used the relief from royalty method of the income approach, which involved the use of key inputs and assumptions such as estimates of projected systemwide sales. As a result of the transaction, the Company recorded trademarks with an acquisition-date fair value of $283.5 million.
We identified the evaluation of the acquisition-date fair value of the Del Taco trademarks as a critical audit matter. A high degree of subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate the revenue growth rates used to value the trademarks. Changes in this assumption could have a significant impact on the acquisition-date fair value of the trademarks.
F-2
The following are the primary audit procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s acquisition-date valuation process, including controls related to the development of the revenue growth rates. We evaluated the Company’s revenue growth rates by comparing forecasted growth assumptions to those of Del Taco’s peers and industry reports, as well as historical results of Del Taco. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in evaluating the terminal growth rate. In addition, we performed sensitivity analyses over the Company’s revenue growth rates to assess the impact of the changes in those assumptions on the Company’s determination of fair value of the trademarks.
Identification of Potential Impairment Events of the Del Taco Long-Lived Assets
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluates long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and operating lease right-of-use assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values may not be recoverable. As of October 2, 2022, the Company had consolidated property and equipment, net and operating lease right of use assets of $418.2 million and $1,332.1 million, respectively, inclusive of the Del Taco long-lived assets.
We identified the identification of potential impairment events associated with the Del Taco brand restaurants long-lived assets as a critical audit matter. A high degree of subjective auditor judgment was required to evaluate management’s identification of indicators of potential impairment including restaurant level operating results as well as other events or changes in circumstances of the restaurant.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design of an internal control related to the Company’s identification of impairment events of the Del Taco brand long-lived assets. We assessed the Company’s identification of impairment indicators by:
•Inspecting operating results by restaurant to identify operating losses
•Testing the underlying restaurant-level operating results used in the impairment indicator assessment for a selection of restaurants
•Considering market conditions and economic trends
•Reading the board of directors meeting minutes for changes to the Company’s current operations and future operating plans.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1986.
San Diego, California
November 22, 2022
F-3
JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | |||||||||||||
| ASSETS | ||||||||||||||
| Current assets: | ||||||||||||||
| Cash | $ | 108,890 | $ | 55,346 | ||||||||||
| Restricted cash | 27,150 | 18,222 | ||||||||||||
| Accounts and other receivables, net | 103,803 | 74,335 | ||||||||||||
| Inventories | 5,264 | 2,335 | ||||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | 16,095 | 12,682 | ||||||||||||
| Current assets held for sale | 17,019 | 1,692 | ||||||||||||
| Other current assets | 4,772 | 4,346 | ||||||||||||
| Total current assets | 282,993 | 168,958 | ||||||||||||
| Property and equipment, at cost: | ||||||||||||||
| Land | 86,134 | 105,393 | ||||||||||||
| Buildings | 960,984 | 907,792 | ||||||||||||
| Restaurant and other equipment | 163,527 | 112,959 | ||||||||||||
| Construction in progress | 18,271 | 6,894 | ||||||||||||
| 1,228,916 | 1,133,038 | |||||||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (810,752) | (810,124) | ||||||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 418,164 | 322,914 | ||||||||||||
| Other assets: | ||||||||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 1,332,135 | 934,066 | ||||||||||||
| Intangible assets, net | 12,324 | 470 | ||||||||||||
| Trademarks | 283,500 | — | ||||||||||||
| Goodwill | 366,821 | 47,774 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets | — | 51,517 | ||||||||||||
| Other assets, net | 226,569 | 224,438 | ||||||||||||
| Total other assets | 2,221,349 | 1,258,265 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 2,922,506 | $ | 1,750,137 | |||||||||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | ||||||||||||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | 30,169 | $ | 894 | ||||||||||
| Current operating lease liabilities | 171,311 | 150,636 | ||||||||||||
| Accounts payable | 66,271 | 29,119 | ||||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | 253,932 | 148,417 | ||||||||||||
| Total current liabilities | 521,683 | 329,066 | ||||||||||||
| Long-term liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current maturities | 1,799,540 | 1,273,420 | ||||||||||||
| Long-term operating lease liabilities, net of current portion | 1,165,097 | 809,191 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | 37,684 | — | ||||||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 134,694 | 156,342 | ||||||||||||
| Total long-term liabilities | 3,137,015 | 2,238,953 | ||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ deficit: | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock $0.01 par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized, none issued | — | — | ||||||||||||
Common stock $0.01 par value, 175,000,000 shares authorized, 82,580,599 and 82,536,059 issued, respectively | 826 | 825 | ||||||||||||
| Capital in excess of par value | 508,323 | 500,441 | ||||||||||||
| Retained earnings | 1,842,947 | 1,764,412 | ||||||||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (53,982) | (74,254) | ||||||||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 61,799,221 and 61,523,475 shares, respectively | (3,034,306) | (3,009,306) | ||||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ deficit | (736,192) | (817,882) | ||||||||||||
| $ | 2,922,506 | $ | 1,750,137 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share data)
| Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Company restaurant sales | $ | 701,070 | $ | 387,766 | $ | 348,987 | ||||||||||||||
| Franchise rental revenues | 340,391 | 346,634 | 320,647 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise royalties and other | 216,821 | 204,725 | 178,319 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise contributions for advertising and other services | 209,801 | 204,545 | 173,553 | |||||||||||||||||
| 1,468,083 | 1,143,670 | 1,021,506 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Operating costs and expenses, net: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Food and packaging | 216,345 | 113,006 | 102,449 | |||||||||||||||||
| Payroll and employee benefits | 232,250 | 119,033 | 106,540 | |||||||||||||||||
| Occupancy and other | 135,803 | 61,743 | 54,157 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise occupancy expenses | 215,609 | 214,913 | 210,038 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise support and other costs | 16,490 | 13,052 | 13,059 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise advertising and other services expenses | 218,272 | 210,328 | 180,794 | |||||||||||||||||
| Selling, general, and administrative expenses | 130,823 | 81,959 | 80,675 | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 56,100 | 46,500 | 52,798 | |||||||||||||||||
| Pre-opening costs | 1,110 | 775 | 166 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other operating expense (income), net | 889 | (3,382) | (6,493) | |||||||||||||||||
| Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants | (3,878) | (4,203) | (3,261) | |||||||||||||||||
| 1,219,813 | 853,724 | 790,922 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from operations | 248,270 | 289,946 | 230,584 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other pension and post-retirement expenses, net | 303 | 881 | 41,720 | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense, net | 86,075 | 67,458 | 66,743 | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from continuing operations and before income taxes | 161,892 | 221,607 | 122,121 | |||||||||||||||||
| Income taxes | 46,111 | 55,852 | 32,727 | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from continuing operations | 115,781 | 165,755 | 89,394 | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | — | — | 370 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 115,781 | $ | 165,755 | $ | 89,764 | ||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per share — basic: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 5.46 | $ | 7.40 | $ | 3.87 | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings from discontinued operations | — | — | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per share (1) | $ | 5.46 | $ | 7.40 | $ | 3.88 | ||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per share — diluted: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from continuing operations | $ | 5.45 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 3.84 | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings from discontinued operations | — | — | 0.02 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings per share (1) | $ | 5.45 | $ | 7.37 | $ | 3.86 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | 1.76 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 1.20 | ||||||||||||||
________________________
(1) Earnings per share may not add due to rounding.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
| Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 115,781 | $ | 165,755 | $ | 89,764 | ||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Actuarial gains (losses) arising during the period | 24,249 | 44,134 | (4,875) | |||||||||||||||||
| Actuarial losses and prior service cost reclassified to earnings | 3,238 | 4,931 | 44,616 | |||||||||||||||||
| 27,487 | 49,065 | 39,741 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Tax effect | (7,215) | (12,714) | (10,340) | |||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income, net of taxes | 20,272 | 36,351 | 29,401 | |||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income | $ | 136,053 | $ | 202,106 | $ | 119,165 | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
| Fiscal Year | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | $ | 115,781 | $ | 165,755 | $ | 89,764 | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings from discontinued operations | — | — | 370 | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnings from continuing operations | 115,781 | 165,755 | 89,394 | |||||||||||||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 56,100 | 46,500 | 52,798 | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of franchise tenant improvement allowances and incentives | 4,446 | 3,450 | 3,028 | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | 5,496 | 5,595 | 5,628 | |||||||||||||||||
| Loss on extinguishment of debt | 7,700 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Tax deficiency (excess tax benefits) from share-based compensation arrangements | 123 | (1,160) | (449) | |||||||||||||||||
| Deferred income taxes | 7,857 | 8,008 | 5,162 | |||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation expense | 7,122 | 4,048 | 4,394 | |||||||||||||||||
| Pension and postretirement expense | 303 | 881 | 41,720 | |||||||||||||||||
Losses (gains) on cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance | 12,668 | (12,753) | (4,262) | |||||||||||||||||
Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants | (3,878) | (4,203) | (3,261) | |||||||||||||||||
| Gains on the disposition of property and equipment | (30,533) | (6,888) | (9,768) | |||||||||||||||||
| Impairment charges and other | 8,219 | 2,889 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities, excluding acquisitions and dispositions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Accounts and other receivables | (18,143) | 5,072 | (27,865) | |||||||||||||||||
| Inventories | 304 | (269) | 41 | |||||||||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (3,275) | (2,766) | (2,780) | |||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities | 2,593 | (24,784) | 490 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable | 16,243 | (3,091) | 2,018 | |||||||||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | (9,081) | 28,990 | 4,222 | |||||||||||||||||
| Pension and postretirement contributions | (6,690) | (6,084) | (6,243) | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise tenant improvement allowance and incentive disbursements | (2,989) | (8,568) | (10,239) | |||||||||||||||||
| Other | (7,484) | 500 | (825) | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash flows provided by operating activities | 162,882 | 201,122 | 143,525 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of property and equipment | (46,475) | (41,008) | (19,528) | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale and leaseback of assets | 10,768 | 3,884 | 19,828 | |||||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of Del Taco, net of cash acquired | (580,793) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of company-operated restaurants | 6,391 | 1,827 | 3,395 | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment | 31,161 | 11,742 | 22,774 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other | 360 | 2,626 | 2,654 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities | (578,588) | (20,929) | 29,123 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Borrowings on revolving credit facilities | 68,000 | — | 114,376 | |||||||||||||||||
| Repayments of borrowings on revolving credit facilities | (18,000) | (107,875) | (6,500) | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of debt | 1,100,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Principal repayments on debt | (588,064) | (829) | (10,536) | |||||||||||||||||
| Debt issuance costs | (20,599) | — | (216) | |||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid on common stock | (36,987) | (37,322) | (27,538) | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 51 | 6,647 | 4,647 | |||||||||||||||||
| Repurchases of common stock | (25,000) | (200,000) | (155,576) | |||||||||||||||||
| Payroll tax payments for equity award issuances | (1,223) | (4,166) | (5,946) | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities | 478,178 | (343,545) | (87,289) | |||||||||||||||||
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash | 62,472 | (163,352) | 85,359 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash and restricted cash at beginning of year | 73,568 | 236,920 | 151,561 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash and restricted cash at end of year | $ | 136,040 | $ | 73,568 | $ | 236,920 | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
(Dollars in thousands)
| Number of Shares | Amount | Capital in Excess of Par Value | Retained Earnings | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Treasury Stock | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at September 29, 2019 | 82,159,002 | $ | 822 | $ | 480,322 | $ | 1,577,034 | $ | (140,006) | $ | (2,655,756) | $ | (737,584) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued under stock plans, including tax benefit | 210,712 | 2 | 4,645 | — | — | — | 4,647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | — | — | 4,394 | — | — | — | 4,394 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared | — | — | 154 | (27,717) | — | — | (27,563) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of treasury stock | — | — | — | — | — | (153,550) | (153,550) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | — | — | — | 89,764 | — | — | 89,764 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | 29,401 | — | 29,401 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| — | — | — | (2,870) | — | — | (2,870) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at September 27, 2020 | 82,369,714 | 824 | 489,515 | 1,636,211 | (110,605) | (2,809,306) | (793,361) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued under stock plans, including tax benefit | 166,345 | 1 | 6,646 | — | — | — | 6,647 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | — | — | 4,048 | — | — | — | 4,048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared | — | — | 232 | (37,554) | — | — | (37,322) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of treasury stock | — | — | — | — | — | (200,000) | (200,000) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | — | — | — | 165,755 | — | — | 165,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | 36,351 | — | 36,351 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at October 3, 2021 | 82,536,059 | 825 | 500,441 | 1,764,412 | (74,254) | (3,009,306) | (817,882) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares issued under stock plans, including tax benefit | 44,540 | 1 | 50 | — | — | — | 51 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | — | — | 7,122 | — | — | — | 7,122 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends declared | — | — | 261 | (37,246) | — | — | (36,985) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchases of treasury stock | — | — | — | — | — | (25,000) | (25,000) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value of assumed Del Taco RSAs attributable to pre-combination service | — | — | 449 | — | — | — | 449 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net earnings | — | — | — | 115,781 | — | — | 115,781 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income | — | — | — | — | 20,272 | — | 20,272 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at October 2, 2022 | 82,580,599 | $ | 826 | $ | 508,323 | $ | 1,842,947 | $ | (53,982) | $ | (3,034,306) | $ | (736,192) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
JACK IN THE BOX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of operations — Jack in the Box Inc. (the “Company”), together with its consolidated subsidiaries, develops, operates, and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Jack in the Box® and Del Taco® restaurant brands.
On March 8, 2022, the Company acquired Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. (“Del Taco”) for cash according to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 5, 2021. Del Taco is a nationwide operator and franchisor of restaurants featuring fresh and fast Mexican and American inspired cuisines. Refer to Note 3, Business Combination, for further details.
As of October 2, 2022, there were 146 company-operated and 2,035 franchise-operated Jack in the Box restaurants and 290 company-operated and 301 franchise-operated Del Taco restaurants.
References to the Company throughout these notes to the consolidated financial statements are made using the first-person notations of “we,” “us,” and “our.”
Basis of presentation — The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
Certain prior period information on the consolidated statement of earnings has been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
Fiscal year — The Company’s fiscal year is 52 or 53 weeks ending the Sunday closest to September 30. Our Del Taco subsidiary operates on a fiscal year ending the Tuesday closest to September 30. Comparisons throughout these notes to the consolidated financial statements refer to the 52-week period ended October 2, 2022 for the fiscal year 2022, and the 53-week and 52-week periods ended October 3, 2021 and September 27, 2020 for fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Principles of consolidation — The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Jack in the Box Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Use of estimates — In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management is required to make certain assumptions and estimates that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and the disclosure of contingencies. In making these assumptions and estimates, management may from time to time seek advice and consider information provided by actuaries and other experts in a particular area. Actual amounts could differ materially from these estimates.
Restricted cash — In accordance with the terms of our securitized financing facility, certain cash balances are required to be held in trust. Such restricted cash primarily represents cash collections and cash reserves held by the trustee to be used for payments of quarterly interest and commitment fees required for the Class A-2 Notes and Variable Funding Notes. As of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021, restricted cash balances were $27.2 million and $18.2 million, respectively.
Accounts and other receivables, net — Our accounts and other receivables, net is primarily comprised of receivables from franchisees, tenants, credit card processors, and insurance receivables. Franchisee receivables primarily include rents, property taxes, royalties, marketing, sourcing and technology support fees associated with lease and franchise agreements, and notes from certain of our franchisees. Tenant receivables relate to subleased properties where we are on the master lease agreement. We accrue interest on notes receivable based on the contractual terms.
The Company closely monitors the financial condition of our franchisees and estimates the allowance for credit losses based on the lifetime expected loss on receivables. These estimates are based on historical collection experience with our franchisees as well as other factors, including current market conditions and events. Credit quality is monitored through the timing of payments compared to predefined aging criteria and known facts regarding the financial condition of the franchisee or customer. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after recovery efforts have ceased. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts has not historically been material. The following table summarizes the activity in our allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Balance as of beginning of period | $ | (6,292) | $ | (5,541) | |||||||
| Provision for expected credit losses | (4,744) | (770) | |||||||||
| Write-offs charged against the allowance | 5,061 | 19 | |||||||||
| Balance as of end of period | $ | (5,975) | $ | (6,292) | |||||||
F-9
Inventories — Our inventories consist principally of food, packaging, and supplies, and are valued at the lower of cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis.
Assets held for sale — Our assets held for sale typically includes property we plan to sell within the next year. If the determination is made that we no longer expect to sell an asset within the next year, the asset is reclassified out of assets held for sale. Long-lived assets that meet the held for sale criteria are reported at the lower of their carrying value or fair value, less estimated costs to sell.
Property and equipment, net — Expenditures for new facilities and equipment, and those that substantially increase the useful lives of the property, are capitalized. Facilities leased under finance leases are stated at the present value of minimum lease payments at the beginning of the lease term, not to exceed fair value. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and gains or losses on the dispositions are included in “Other operating expense (income), net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings.
Buildings, equipment, and leasehold improvements are generally depreciated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets, over the initial lease term for certain assets acquired in conjunction with the lease commencement for leased properties, or the remaining lease term for certain assets acquired after the commencement of the lease for leased properties. In certain situations, one or more option periods may be used in determining the depreciable life of assets related to leased properties if we deem that an economic penalty would be incurred otherwise. In either circumstance, our policy requires lease term consistency when calculating the depreciation period, in classifying the lease and in computing straight-line rent expense. Building, leasehold improvement assets and equipment are assigned lives that range from 1 to 35 years. Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was $55.8 million, $46.5 million, and $52.8 million in fiscal year 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
Impairment of long-lived assets — We evaluate long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and operating lease right-of-use assets, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. Long-lived assets are grouped for recognition and measurement of impairment at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets. The impairment test for long-lived assets requires us to assess the recoverability of long-lived assets by comparing their net carrying value to the sum of undiscounted estimated future cash flows directly associated with and arising from our use and eventual disposition of the assets. If the carrying amount of a long-lived asset group exceeds the sum of related undiscounted future cash flows, we recognize an impairment loss by the amount that the carrying value of the assets exceeds fair value. Refer to Note 9, Other Operating Expense (Income), Net, for additional information.
Goodwill and trademarks — Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired, if any. We generally record goodwill in connection with the acquisition of restaurants from franchisees or the acquisition of another business. Likewise, upon the sale of restaurants to franchisees, goodwill is decremented. The amount of goodwill written-off is determined as the fair value of the business disposed of as a percentage of the fair value of the reporting unit retained. If the business disposed of was never fully integrated into the reporting unit after its acquisition, and thus the benefits of the acquired goodwill were never realized, the current carrying amount of the acquired goodwill is written off. Goodwill is not amortized and has been assigned to reporting units for purposes of impairment testing. Our two restaurant brands, Jack in the Box and Del Taco, are both operating segments and reporting units.
Goodwill is evaluated for impairment annually during the fourth quarter, or more frequently if indicators of impairment are present. We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances lead to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived asset is less than its carrying amount. If the qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying amount, we perform a single-step impairment test. To perform our impairment analysis, we estimate the fair value of the reporting unit and compare it to the carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the excess.
We evaluate our indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis or more often if an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate impairments might exist. We perform our annual test for impairment of our indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarter. We may elect to perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset is greater than its carrying value. If a qualitative assessment is not performed, or if as a result of a qualitative assessment it is not more likely than not that the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its carrying value, then the asset's fair value is compared to its carrying value. Fair value is an estimate of the price a willing buyer would pay for the intangible asset and is estimated by discounting the expected future after-tax cash flows associated with the intangible asset.
F-10
Intangible assets, net — Intangible assets primarily include franchise contracts, reacquired franchise rights and sublease assets. Franchise contracts, which represent the fair value of franchise agreements based on the projected royalty revenue stream as of the acquisition date, are amortized on a straight-line basis to “Depreciation and amortization expense” in the consolidated statements of earnings over the remaining term of the franchise agreements. Reacquired franchise rights are recorded in connection with our acquisition of franchised restaurants and are amortized on a straight-line basis to “Depreciation and amortization expense” in the consolidated statements of earnings over the term of the former franchise agreement. Sublease assets, which represent subleases with stated rent above comparable market rents, are amortized on a straight-line basis to “Franchise rental revenues” in the consolidated statements of earnings over the term of the related sublease.
Company-owned life insurance — We have purchased company-owned life insurance (“COLI”) policies to support our non-qualified benefit plans. The cash surrender values of these policies were $108.9 million and $123.6 million as of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021, respectively, and are included in “Other assets, net”, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Changes in cash surrender values are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings. These policies reside in an umbrella trust for use only to pay plan benefits to participants or to pay creditors if the Company becomes insolvent.
Leases — We evaluate the contracts entered into by the Company to determine whether such contracts contain leases. A contract contains a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of identified property, plant, and equipment for a period of time in exchange for consideration. At commencement, contracts containing a lease are further evaluated for classification as an operating or finance lease where the Company is a lessee, or as an operating, sales-type, or direct financing lease where the Company is a lessor, based on their terms.
The lease term and incremental borrowing rate for each lease requires judgement by management and can impact the classification of our leases as well as the value of our lease assets and liabilities. When determining the lease term, we consider option periods available, and include option periods in the measurement of the lease right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and lease liability where the exercise is reasonably certain to occur. As our leases do not provide an implicit discount rate, we have determined it is appropriate to use our estimated collateralized incremental borrowing rate, based on the yield curve for the respective lease terms, in calculating our lease liabilities.
Revenue recognition — “Company restaurant sales” include revenue recognized upon delivery of food and beverages to the customer at company-operated restaurants, which is when our obligation to perform is satisfied. Company restaurant sales exclude taxes collected from the Company’s customers. Gift cards, upon customer purchase, are recorded as deferred income and are recognized in revenue as they are redeemed.
The Company operates loyalty programs in which members earn points primarily for food purchases. Points can then be redeemed for special reward offers. The Company allocates the consideration received on loyalty orders between the food purchased and the loyalty points earned, taking into consideration the expected redemption rate of loyalty points. The consideration allocated to the food is recognized as revenue at the time of sale. The consideration allocated to the loyalty points earned is deferred until the loyalty points are redeemed or expire.
“Franchise rental revenues” received from franchised restaurants based on fixed rental payments are recognized as revenue over the term of the lease. Rental revenue from properties owned and leased by the Company and leased or subleased to franchisees is recognized on a straight-line basis over the respective term of the lease. Certain franchise rents, which are contingent upon sales levels, are recognized in the period in which the contingency is met.
“Franchise royalties and other” primarily includes royalties and franchise fees received from our franchisees. Royalties are based upon a percentage of sales of the franchised restaurant and are recognized as earned. Franchise royalties are billed on a monthly or weekly basis. Franchise fees when a new restaurant opens or at the start of a new franchise term are recorded as deferred revenue when received and recognized as revenue over the term of the franchise agreement.
“Franchise contributions for advertising and other services” includes franchisee contributions to our marketing funds billed on a monthly or weekly basis and sourcing and technology fees, as required under the franchise agreements. Contributions to our marketing funds are based on a percentage of sales and recognized as earned. Sourcing and technology services are recognized when the goods or services are transferred to the franchisee.
Gift cards — We sell gift cards to our customers in our restaurants and through selected third parties. The gift cards sold to our customers have no stated expiration dates and are subject to actual or potential escheatment rights in several of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We recognize income from gift cards when redeemed by the customer. Deferred gift card income totaled $4.1 million and $2.2 million as of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021, respectively, and are included in “Accrued liabilities”, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
F-11
While we will continue to honor all gift cards presented for payment, we may determine the likelihood of redemption to be remote for certain card balances due to, among other things, long periods of inactivity. In these circumstances, to the extent we determine there is no requirement for remitting balances to government agencies under unclaimed property laws, card balances may be recognized as income in our consolidated statements of earnings. Amounts recognized on unredeemed gift card balances were $0.7 million, $0.6 million, and $0.5 million in fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
Pre-opening costs — Pre-opening costs associated with the opening of a new restaurant or the remodeling of an existing restaurant consist primarily of property rent and employee training costs. Pre-opening costs associated with the opening of a restaurant that was closed upon acquisition consist of labor costs, maintenance and repair costs, and property rent.
Self-insurance — We are self-insured for a portion of our workers’ compensation, general liability, employee medical and dental, and automotive claims. We utilize a paid-loss plan for our workers’ compensation, general liability, and automotive programs, which have predetermined loss limits per occurrence and in the aggregate. We establish our undiscounted insurance liability and reserves using independent actuarial estimates of expected losses based on a statistical analysis of historical claims data. As of October 2, 2022, our estimated self-insurance liability was $31.9 million, and is included in “Accrued liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Advertising costs — We administer marketing funds at each of our restaurant brands that include contractual contributions. In 2022, 2021 and 2020, marketing fund contributions from Jack in the Box franchise and company-operated restaurants were approximately 5.0% of sales with the exception of our March 2020 and April 2020 marketing fees, which were temporarily reduced to 2% to 4%, respectively, in response to the economic burden associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2022, marketing fund contributions from Del Taco franchise and company-operated restaurants were approximately 4.0% of sales.
Production costs of commercials, programming, and other marketing activities are charged to the marketing funds when the advertising is first used for its intended purpose, and the costs of advertising are charged to operations as incurred. When contributions to the marketing fund exceed the related advertising expenses, advertising costs are accrued up to the amount of revenues on an annual basis since we are contractually obligated to spend these funds. As of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021, additional amounts accrued were $3.5 million and $9.5 million, respectively, for this requirement. Total contributions made by the Company are included in “Selling, general, and administrative expenses” in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings. In fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020 advertising costs were $32.6 million, $19.6 million, and $17.1 million, respectively.
Share-based compensation — We account for our share-based compensation under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance on stock compensation, which generally requires, among other things, that all employee share-based compensation be measured using a fair value method and that the resulting compensation cost be recognized in the financial statements. Compensation expense for our share-based compensation awards is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the vesting period or the period from the date of grant to the date the employee becomes eligible to retire. Refer to Note 13, Share-based Employee Compensation, for additional information.
Income taxes — Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, as well as tax loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We recognize interest and, when applicable, penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of our income tax provision.
Authoritative guidance issued by the FASB prescribes a minimum probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial statement benefit is recognized. The minimum threshold is defined as a tax position that is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. Refer to Note 11, Income Taxes, for additional information.
Contingencies — We recognize liabilities for contingencies when we have an exposure that indicates it is probable that an asset has been impaired or that a liability has been incurred and the amount of impairment or loss can be reasonably estimated. Our ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to such matters cannot be estimated with certainty and requires the use of estimates. When the reasonable estimate is a range, the recorded loss will be the best estimate within the range. We record legal settlement costs when those costs are probable and reasonably estimable. Refer to Note 16, Commitments and Contingencies, for additional information.
Business combinations — We account for acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired, including the amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets, is recorded as goodwill.
F-12
Effect of new accounting pronouncements adopted in fiscal 2022 — In October 2021 the FASB issued ASU 2021-08, Business Combinations - Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers (Topic 805). This standard requires an acquirer in a business combination to recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities from acquired contracts using the revenue recognition guidance under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606 in order to align the recognition of a contract liability with the definition of a performance obligation. This approach differs from the current requirement to measure contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination at fair value. We elected to early adopt this standard in the second quarter of 2022. The adoption of ASU 2021-08 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Effect of new accounting pronouncements to be adopted in future periods — We reviewed all other recently issued accounting pronouncements and concluded that they were either not applicable or not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
2.REVENUE
Nature of products and services — We derive revenue from retail sales at Jack in the Box and Del Taco company-operated restaurants and rental revenue, royalties, advertising, and franchise and other fees from franchise-operated restaurants.
Our franchise arrangements generally provide for an initial franchise fee per restaurant for a 20-year term, and generally require that franchisees pay royalty and marketing fees based upon a percentage of gross sales. The agreements also require franchisees to pay technology fees, as well as sourcing fees for Jack in the Box franchise agreements.
Disaggregation of revenue — The following table disaggregates revenue by segment and primary source for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2022 (in thousands):
| Jack in the Box | Del Taco | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Company restaurant sales | $ | 414,225 | $ | 286,845 | $ | 701,070 | ||||||||||||||
| Franchise rental revenues | 335,936 | 4,455 | 340,391 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise royalties | 188,902 | 13,414 | 202,316 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise advertising contributions | 183,076 | 10,907 | 193,983 | |||||||||||||||||
| Technology and sourcing fees | 14,740 | 1,078 | 15,818 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise fees and other services | 14,309 | 196 | 14,505 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 1,151,188 | $ | 316,895 | $ | 1,468,083 | ||||||||||||||
The following table disaggregates revenue by segment and primary source for the fiscal year ended October 3, 2021 (in thousands):
| Jack in the Box | Del Taco | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Company restaurant sales | $ | 387,766 | $ | — | $ | 387,766 | ||||||||||||||
| Franchise rental revenues | 346,634 | — | 346,634 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise royalties | 193,908 | — | 193,908 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise advertising contributions | 188,184 | — | 188,184 | |||||||||||||||||
| Technology and sourcing fees | 16,361 | — | 16,361 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise fees and other services | 10,817 | — | 10,817 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 1,143,670 | $ | — | $ | 1,143,670 | ||||||||||||||
F-13
The following table disaggregates revenue by segment and primary source for the fiscal ended September 27, 2020 (in thousands):
| Jack in the Box | Del Taco | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Company restaurant sales | $ | 348,987 | $ | — | $ | 348,987 | ||||||||||||||
| Franchise rental revenues | 320,647 | — | 320,647 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise royalties | 171,407 | — | 171,407 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise advertising contributions | 158,258 | — | 158,258 | |||||||||||||||||
| Technology and sourcing fees | 15,295 | — | 15,295 | |||||||||||||||||
| Franchise fees and other services | 6,912 | — | 6,912 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 1,021,506 | $ | — | $ | 1,021,506 | ||||||||||||||
Contract liabilities — Our contract liabilities consist of deferred revenue resulting from initial fees received from franchisees for new restaurant openings or new franchise terms, which are generally recognized over the franchise term. We classify these contract liabilities within “Accrued liabilities” and “Other long-term liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets.
A summary of significant changes in our contract liabilities is presented below (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Deferred franchise and development fees at beginning of period | $ | 41,520 | $ | 43,816 | ||||||||||
| Changes due to business combinations | 6,193 | — | ||||||||||||
| Revenue recognized during the period | (5,891) | (6,014) | ||||||||||||
| Additions during the period | 4,627 | 3,718 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred franchise and development fees at end of period | $ | 46,449 | $ | 41,520 | ||||||||||
As of October 2, 2022, approximately $5.5 million of development fees related to unopened stores are included in deferred revenue. Timing of revenue recognition is dependent upon the timing of store openings and are recognized over the franchise term at the date of opening.
The following table reflects the estimated franchise fees to be recognized in the future related to performance obligations that are unsatisfied at the end of the period (in thousands):
| 2023 | $ | 5,013 | ||||||
| 2024 | $ | 4,806 | ||||||
| 2025 | $ | 4,570 | ||||||
| 2026 | $ | 4,245 | ||||||
| 2027 | $ | 3,886 | ||||||
| Thereafter | $ | 18,427 | ||||||
| $ | 40,947 | |||||||
We have applied the optional exemption, as provided for under ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which allows us to not disclose the transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations when the transaction price is a sales-based royalty.
3.BUSINESS COMBINATION
On March 8, 2022 (the “Closing Date”), the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding equity interest of Del Taco for cash according to the terms and conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 5, 2021 (the “Merger Agreement”). The acquisition of Del Taco has been accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, with the Company treated as the accounting acquirer, which requires, among other things, that the assets acquired, and liabilities assumed be recognized at their acquisition date fair value. Jack in the Box acquired Del Taco as a part of the Company’s goal to gain greater scale and accelerate growth.
In connection with the transaction, the Company repaid Del Taco's existing debt of $115.2 million related to a syndicated credit facility and Del Taco entered into a new syndicated credit facility.
F-14
The total purchase consideration for Del Taco was $593.3 million. Each share of Del Taco common stock issued and outstanding was converted into the right to receive $12.51 in cash without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes (“Merger Consideration”). Additionally, in connection with the transaction, each Del Taco equity award granted under Del Taco’s equity compensation plans was either (i) converted into the right to receive Merger Consideration or (ii) converted into equity awards with respect to Jack in the Box common stock. Other components of purchase consideration include cash paid to settle Del Taco’s existing debt and $7.1 million of seller transaction costs funded by Jack in the Box.
As part of the Merger Agreement, on the Closing Date, the Company assumed Del Taco’s historical equity compensation plans. The awards under Del Taco’s historical equity compensation plans that were not subject to accelerated vesting were exchanged for replacement awards of the Company, which included Del Taco’s non-accelerating restricted stock awards (“non-accelerating RSAs”). Immediately following the Merger, these replacement awards were modified to accelerate the remaining vesting period to be one year following the Closing Date, other than the awards already scheduled to vest on June 30, 2022. The portion of the fair value of the replacement awards associated with pre-acquisition service of Del Taco’s employees represented a component of the total purchase consideration. The remaining fair value of these replacement awards are subject to the recipients’ continued service and thus were excluded from the purchase price. The awards which are subject to continued service will be recognized ratably as stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period.
The acquisition of Del Taco was funded by cash on hand and borrowings under our 2022 Class A-2 Notes and 2022 Variable Funding Notes. The Company recognized transaction costs of $12.3 million in fiscal 2022. These costs were associated with advisory, legal, and consulting services and are presented in “Other operating expense (income), net” in the consolidated statement of earnings.
Purchase consideration — The following summarizes the purchase consideration paid to Del Taco shareholders (in thousands, except per share data):
| Amount | |||||
| Del Taco shares outstanding as of March 8, 2022 | 36,442 | ||||
| Del Taco RSAs subject to accelerated vesting | 805 | ||||
| Del Taco RSUs subject to accelerated vesting | 70 | ||||
| Del Taco options subject to accelerated vesting | 292 | ||||
| Total Del Taco shares outstanding | 37,610 | ||||
| Merger Consideration (per Del Taco share) | $ | 12.51 | |||
| Total cash consideration paid to selling shareholders | $ | 470,500 | |||
| Del Taco transaction costs paid by Jack in the Box (1) | 7,141 | ||||
| Del Taco closing indebtedness settled by Jack in the Box (2) | 115,219 | ||||
| Replacement share-based payment awards pre-combination vesting expense | 449 | ||||
| Total aggregate purchase consideration | $ | 593,309 | |||
____________________________
(1)Represents the portion of Del Taco merger-related transaction costs that were paid at the Closing Date by the Company.
(2)Represents the closing indebtedness of Del Taco’s existing debt that was paid at the Closing Date by the Company.
F-15
Purchase price allocation — During the fourth quarter, we completed the accounting for the acquisition and recorded measurement period adjustments of $0.3 million attributable to new information obtained surrounding tax-related matters, certain tangible assets, and the settlement of a litigation matter that existed as of the acquisition date. The final allocation of the purchase consideration, which includes measurement-period adjustments recorded in our third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2022, is as follows (in thousands):
| Initial Allocation of Consideration | Measurement Period Adjustments | October 2, 2022 | |||||||||||||||
Total aggregate purchase consideration, net of $12,068 cash acquired | $ | 581,241 | $ | — | $ | 581,241 | |||||||||||
| Assets: | |||||||||||||||||
| Accounts and other receivables | 3,809 | 774 | 4,583 | ||||||||||||||
| Inventories | 3,233 | — | 3,233 | ||||||||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | 2,950 | — | 2,950 | ||||||||||||||
| Other current assets | 105 | — | 105 | ||||||||||||||
| Property and equipment | 150,826 | (5,794) | 145,032 | ||||||||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 349,489 | 800 | 350,289 | ||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets | 12,371 | — | 12,371 | ||||||||||||||
| Trademarks | 283,500 | — | 283,500 | ||||||||||||||
| Other assets | 5,128 | — | 5,128 | ||||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Current maturities of long-term debt | 22 | — | 22 | ||||||||||||||
| Current operating lease liabilities | 21,991 | — | 21,991 | ||||||||||||||
| Accounts payable | 18,808 | — | 18,808 | ||||||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities | 66,739 | 45,840 | 112,579 | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term debt, net of current maturities | 349 | — | 349 | ||||||||||||||
| Long-term operating lease liabilities, net of current portion | 302,688 | 800 | 303,488 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities | 88,203 | (12,848) | 75,355 | ||||||||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities | 13,080 | — | 13,080 | ||||||||||||||
| Net assets acquired, excluding goodwill | $ | 299,531 | $ | (38,012) | $ | 261,519 | |||||||||||
| Goodwill | $ | 281,710 | $ | 38,012 | $ | 319,722 | |||||||||||
The excess of the total consideration over the tangible assets, identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities is recorded as goodwill. The goodwill of $319.7 million arising from the acquisition is primarily attributable to the market position and future growth potential of Del Taco for both company-operated and franchised restaurants related to future store openings, expansion into new markets, and expected synergies. None of the goodwill resulting from the acquisition is deductible for tax purposes. The goodwill arising from the Del Taco acquisition has been allocated to the Company’s reporting units as follows (in thousands):
| Del Taco brand | $ | 230,722 | ||||||
| Jack in the Box brand | 89,000 | |||||||
| Total acquisition date goodwill | $ | 319,722 | ||||||
Identifiable intangible assets — The identifiable intangible assets acquired consist of trademarks, franchise and development agreements, and favorable subleases. The Company amortizes the fair value of the franchise and development agreements and favorable and unfavorable sublease assets and liabilities on a straight-line basis over their respective useful lives.
The trademarks were valued using the relief from royalty method of the income approach, which was applied by discounting the after-tax royalties avoided by owning the trademark to present value. The key inputs and assumptions included the Company's estimates of the projected system wide sales, royalty rate and discount rate applicable to the trademark.
F-16
The franchise and development agreements were valued using the income approach, which was applied by discounting the projected after-tax cash flows associated with the agreements to present value. The key inputs and assumptions included the Company's estimates of the projected royalties received under the existing franchise and development agreements (including the impact of franchise churn) and the applicable discount rate.
The favorable and unfavorable sublease assets and liabilities were valued using the income approach, which was applied by discounting the differential between the market rent and contract rent to present value. The key inputs and assumptions included the Company's estimates of the market rent, contract rent and discount rate applicable to the favorable and unfavorable subleases.
The values allocated to intangible assets and the useful lives are as follows (in thousands):
| Amount | Weighted Average Useful Life (Years) | |||||||||||||
| Trademarks | $ | 283,500 | Indefinite | |||||||||||
| Franchise contracts | 9,700 | 18 | ||||||||||||
| Sublease assets | 2,671 | 13 | ||||||||||||
| Estimated fair value of acquired intangible assets | $ | 295,871 | ||||||||||||
The estimated values of sublease liabilities totaled approximately $6.0 million. These liabilities have an estimated weighted-average useful life of approximately 15 years and are included in “Other long-term liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Unaudited pro forma results — The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information presents the Company’s results as though Del Taco and the Company had been combined as the beginning of fiscal year 2021 (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
Total revenue | $ | 1,686,160 | $ | 1,665,660 | ||||||||||
Net earnings | $ | 118,000 | $ | 133,485 | ||||||||||
The unaudited pro forma financial information for all periods presented includes the business combination accounting effects resulting from this acquisition, mainly including adjustments to reflect additional amortization expense from acquired intangibles, incremental depreciation expense from the fair value property and equipment, elimination of historical interest expense associated with both Del Taco’s and the Company’s historical indebtedness, additional interest expense associated with the new Del Taco revolving credit facility and the Company’s new borrowings as part of the refinancing to fund the acquisition, adjusted rent expense reflecting the acquired right-of-use assets and liabilities to their estimated acquisition-date values based upon valuation of related lease intangibles and remaining payments, as well as the fair value adjustments made to leasehold improvements, certain material non-recurring adjustments and the tax-related effects as though Del Taco was combined as of the beginning of fiscal 2021. The unaudited pro forma financial information as presented above is for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of fiscal 2021, nor is it necessarily an indication of trends in future results for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, differences between the assumptions used to prepare the pro forma information, cost savings from operating efficiencies, potential synergies, and the impact of incremental costs incurred in integrating the two brands.
For the periods subsequent to the acquisition that are included in 2022, Del Taco had total revenues of $316.9 million and net earnings of $6.5 million.
F-17
4.SUMMARY OF REFRANCHISINGS AND FRANCHISE ACQUISITIONS
Refranchisings — The following table summarizes the number of restaurants sold to franchisees and gains recognized in each fiscal year (dollars in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Restaurants sold to Jack in the Box franchisees | 15 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of company-operated restaurants (1) | $ | 6,391 | $ | 1,827 | $ | 3,395 | |||||||||||
| Net assets sold (primarily property and equipment) | (1,565) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill related to the sale of company-operated restaurants | (948) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Other (2) | — | 2,376 | (134) | ||||||||||||||
| Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants | $ | 3,878 | $ | 4,203 | $ | 3,261 | |||||||||||
________________________
(1)Amounts in 2022, 2021, and 2020 include additional proceeds of $1.4 million, $1.8 million, and $3.4 million, respectively, related to the extension of the underlying franchise and lease agreements from the sale of restaurants in prior years.
(2)Amounts in 2021 and 2020 relate to adjustments to contingencies that were included in underlying franchise and lease agreements from the sale of restaurants in prior years.
Franchise acquisitions — In 2022, 2021, and 2020, we acquired thirteen, twenty, and eight franchise restaurants, respectively. We account for the acquisition of franchised restaurants using the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. The purchase price allocations were based on fair value estimates determined using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The goodwill recorded primarily relates to the sales growth potential of the market acquired and is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
The following table provides detail of the combined acquisitions in 2022, 2021, and 2020 (dollars in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Restaurants acquired from franchisees | 13 | 20 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
| Inventory | $ | — | $ | 258 | $ | 73 | |||||||||||
| Property and equipment | 540 | 1,136 | 903 | ||||||||||||||
| Intangible assets | 66 | 245 | 263 | ||||||||||||||
| Other assets | — | 10 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
| Goodwill | — | 613 | 414 | ||||||||||||||
| Gains on the acquisition of franchise-operated restaurants | (309) | (340) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Liabilities assumed | — | (277) | (800) | ||||||||||||||
| Total consideration | $ | 297 | $ | 1,645 | $ | 859 | |||||||||||
The total consideration of $0.3 million for the restaurants acquired in 2022 was comprised of franchise receivables owed to the Company as of the acquisition date. During the first quarter of 2022, we finalized certain estimates impacting total purchase consideration for the 2021 restaurant acquisitions and recorded the resulting measurement period adjustments which increased goodwill by $0.3 million.
Assets held for sale — Assets classified as held for sale consisted of the following at each fiscal year-end (in thousands):
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Jack in the Box restaurant properties held for sale (1) | $ | 14,151 | $ | — | |||||||
| Other property and equipment held for sale (2) | 2,868 | 1,692 | |||||||||
| Assets held for sale | $ | 17,019 | $ | 1,692 | |||||||
________________________
(1)Consists of properties that are currently leased to franchisees which we intend to sell the underlying real estate directly to the franchisee and/or sell and leaseback with a third party within the next twelve months.
(2)Consists primarily of owned properties of closed restaurants which we are actively marketing for sale.
Discontinued operations — There were no discontinued operations during 2022 and 2021. The results of discontinued operations in 2020 pertain to the resolution of certain contingencies relating to our former Qdoba business which we sold in 2018.
F-18
5.GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during fiscal 2022 and 2021 were as follows (in thousands):
| Jack in the Box | Del Taco | Total | |||||||||||||||
| Balance at September 27, 2020 | $ | 47,161 | $ | — | $ | 47,161 | |||||||||||
| Acquisition of Jack in the Box franchise-operated restaurants | 613 | — | 613 | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at October 3, 2021 | 47,774 | — | 47,774 | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. | 89,000 | 230,722 | 319,722 | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisition of Jack in the Box franchise-operated restaurants | 273 | — | 273 | ||||||||||||||
| Sale of Jack in the Box company-operated restaurants to franchisees | (948) | — | (948) | ||||||||||||||
| Balance at October 2, 2022 | $ | 136,099 | $ | 230,722 | $ | 366,821 | |||||||||||
The net carrying amounts of intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Amount | Gross Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Definite-lived intangible assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sublease assets | $ | 2,671 | $ | (139) | $ | 2,532 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Franchise contracts | 9,700 | (311) | 9,389 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reacquired franchise rights | 530 | (127) | 403 | 542 | (72) | 470 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 12,901 | $ | (577) | $ | 12,324 | $ | 542 | $ | (72) | $ | 470 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Del Taco trademark | $ | 283,500 | $ | — | $ | 283,500 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 283,500 | $ | — | $ | 283,500 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table summarizes, as of October 2, 2022, the estimated amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years (in thousands):
| 2023 | $ | 823 | |||
| 2024 | $ | 820 | |||
| 2025 | $ | 820 | |||
| 2026 | $ | 818 | |||
| 2027 | $ | 813 | |||
F-19
6.FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Financial assets and liabilities — The following table presents the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
| Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (2) (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (2) (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (2) (Level 3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value measurements as of October 2, 2022: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-qualified deferred compensation plan (1) | $ | 13,820 | $ | 13,820 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 13,820 | $ | 13,820 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value measurements as of October 3, 2021: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-qualified deferred compensation plan (1) | $ | 18,555 | $ | 18,555 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 18,555 | $ | 18,555 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
________________________
(1)We maintain an unfunded defined contribution plan for key executives and other members of management. The fair value of this obligation is based on the closing market prices of the participants’ elected investments. The obligation is included in “Accrued liabilities” and “Other long-term liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheets.
(2)We did not have any transfers in or out of Level 1, 2, or 3.
The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of our Class A-2 Notes as of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021 (in thousands):
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Series 2019 Class A-2 Notes | $ | 714,125 | $ | 641,851 | $ | 1,290,251 | $ | 1,351,057 | |||||||||||||||
| Series 2022 Class A-2 Notes | $ | 1,089,000 | $ | 917,428 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
The fair value of the Class A-2 Notes was estimated using Level 2 inputs based on quoted market prices in markets that are not considered active markets. As of October 2, 2022, we had $50.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our Variable Funding Notes. The fair value of these loans approximates their carrying value due to the variable rate nature of these borrowings.
Non-financial assets and liabilities — Our non-financial instruments, which primarily consist of property and equipment, operating lease right-of-use assets, goodwill, and intangible assets, are reported at carrying value and are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. However, on an annual basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable, non-financial instruments are assessed for impairment. If applicable, the carrying values are written down to fair value. Refer to Note 9, Other Operating Expenses (Income), Net, for details on impairment charges recognized in 2022.
F-20
7. INDEBTEDNESS
The detail of our long-term debt at the end of each fiscal year is as follows (in thousands):
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | |||||||||||||
Series 2019-1 3.982% Fixed Rate Class A-2-I Notes | $ | — | $ | 570,688 | ||||||||||
Series 2019-1 4.476% Fixed Rate Class A-2-II Notes | 270,875 | 272,938 | ||||||||||||
Series 2019-1 4.970% Fixed Rate Class A-2-III Notes | 443,250 | 446,625 | ||||||||||||
Series 2022-1 3.445% Fixed Rate Class A-2-I Notes | 544,500 | — | ||||||||||||
Series 2022-1 4.136% Fixed Rate Class A-2-II Notes | 544,500 | — | ||||||||||||
Series 2022-1 Variable Funding Notes, variable interest rate of 5.341% at October 2, 2022 | 50,000 | — | ||||||||||||
| Finance lease obligations and other debt | 1,690 | 2,275 | ||||||||||||
| Total debt | 1,854,815 | 1,292,526 | ||||||||||||
| Less current maturities of long-term debt | (30,169) | (894) | ||||||||||||
| Less unamortized debt issuance costs | (25,106) | (18,212) | ||||||||||||
| Long-term debt | $ | 1,799,540 | $ | 1,273,420 | ||||||||||
Securitization refinancing transaction — On February 11, 2022, the Company completed the sale of $550.0 million of its Series 2022-1 3.445% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I (the “Class A-2-I Notes”) and $550.0 million of its Series 2022-1 4.136% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “Class A-2-II” and, together with the Class A-2-I Notes, the “2022 Notes”). Interest payments on the 2022 Notes are payable on a quarterly basis. The anticipated repayment dates of the 2022 Class A-2-I Notes and the Class A-2-II Notes are February 2027 and February 2032, respectively (the “Anticipated Repayment Dates”), unless earlier prepaid to the extent permitted under the indenture that will govern the 2022 Notes. The anticipated repayment dates of the existing 2019-1 Class A-2-II Notes and the Class A-2-III Notes are August 2026 and August 2029, respectively.
The Company also entered into a revolving financing facility of Series 2022-1 Variable Funding Senior Secured Notes (the “Variable Funding Notes”), which permits borrowings up to a maximum of $150.0 million, subject to certain borrowing conditions, a portion of which may be used to issue letters of credit. The Company’s existing revolving financing facility of Series 2019-1 Class A-1 Notes was terminated in connection with the transaction. As of October 2, 2022, we had outstanding borrowings of $50.0 million and available borrowing capacity of $58.0 million under our 2022 Variable Funding Notes, net of letters of credits issued of $42.0 million.
The net proceeds of the sale of the 2022 Notes were used to repay in full of $570.7 million in aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Company’s Series 2019-1 Class A-2-I Notes, together with the applicable make-whole premium and unpaid interest, and was used to fund a portion of the Company’s acquisition of Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $5.6 million during the second quarter of 2022, which was comprised of the write-off of certain deferred financing costs and a specified make-whole premium payment, and is presented in “Interest expense, net” in the consolidated statement of earnings. Additionally, in connection with the 2022 Notes, the Company capitalized $17.4 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized into interest expense over the Anticipated Repayment Dates, utilizing the effective interest rate method. The costs related to our Variable Funding Notes are presented within “Other assets, net” and are being amortized over the Anticipated Repayment Date of February 2027 using the straight-line method. As of October 2, 2022, the effective interest rates, including the amortization of debt issuance costs, were 4.851%, 5.258%, 2.430%, and 2.783% for the Series 2019-1 Class A-2-II Notes, Series 2019-1 Class A-2-III Notes, Series 2022-1 Class A-2-I Notes, and Series 2022-1 Class A-2-II Notes, respectively.
The 2022 Notes were issued in a privately placed securitization transaction pursuant to which certain of the Company’s revenue-generating assets, consisting principally of franchise-related agreements, real estate assets, and intellectual property and license agreements for the use of intellectual property, are held by the Master Issuer and certain other limited-purpose, bankruptcy remote, wholly owned indirect subsidiaries of the Company that act as Guarantors of the Notes and that have pledged substantially all of their assets, excluding certain real estate assets and subject to certain limitations, to secure the Notes.
The quarterly principal payment on the Class A-2 Notes may be suspended when the specified leverage ratio, which is a measure of outstanding debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted for certain items (as defined in the Indenture), is less than or equal to 5.0x. Exceeding the leverage ratio of 5.0x does not violate any covenant related to the Class A-2 Notes. Subsequent to closing the issuance of the 2022 Notes, the Company has had a leverage ratio of greater than 5.0x and, accordingly, the Company resumed making the scheduled principal payments on its 2022 Notes and Series 2019-1 Notes beginning in the second quarter of 2022.
F-21
Variable Funding Notes — Depending on the type of borrowing under the Variable Funding Notes, interest on the Variable Funding Notes will be based on (i) the prime rate, (ii) overnight federal funds rates, (iii) the London interbank offered rate for U.S. Dollars or (iv) the lenders’ commercial paper funding rate plus any applicable margin, as set forth in the Variable Funding Note Purchase Agreement. There is a scaled commitment fee on the unused portion of the Variable Funding Notes facility of between 50 and 100 basis points. It is anticipated that the principal and interest on the Variable Funding Notes will be repaid in full on or prior to August 2027, subject to two one-year extensions at the option of the Company. Following the anticipated repayment date (and any extensions thereof), additional interest will accrue equal to 5.00% per annum.
Guarantees and collateral — Pursuant to the Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated July 8, 2019 (the “Guarantee and Collateral Agreement”), among the Guarantors, in favor of the trustee, the Guarantors guarantee the obligations of the Master Issuer under the Indenture and related documents and secure the guarantee by granting a security interest in substantially all of their assets. The Notes are secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Master Issuer and the Guarantors (collectively, the “Securitization Entities”). The assets of the Securitization Entities include most of the revenue-generating assets of the Company and its subsidiaries, which principally consist of franchise-related agreements, certain company-operated restaurants, intellectual property and license agreements for the use of intellectual property. Upon certain trigger events, mortgages will be required to be prepared and recorded on the real estate assets.
Revolving credit facility — In connection with the Del Taco acquisition, Del Taco’s existing debt of $115.2 million related to a Syndicated Credit Facility dated August 5, 2015, was repaid and extinguished on the Closing Date. On the Closing Date, Del Taco entered into a new syndicated credit facility with an aggregate principal amount of up to $75.0 million, maturing on March 7, 2023. The revolving credit facility, as amended, includes a limit of $20.0 million for letters of credit. As of October 2, 2022, we had no outstanding borrowings and available borrowing capacity of $59.9 million under the facility, net of letters of credit of $15.1 million. The Company capitalized $0.3 million of debt issuance costs, which are being amortized into interest expense over the expected term of the credit facility.
Bridge commitment letter — In connection with the Merger Agreement, the Company secured commitments for a bridge financing facility in an amount of up to $600.0 million (the “Bridge Facility”). No amounts were drawn under the Bridge Facility, which was terminated as a result of our securitization refinancing transaction. The Company expensed approximately $2.1 million for the unamortized issuance costs associated with this commitment which is presented in “Interest expense, net” in the consolidated statement of earnings.
Maturities of long-term debt — Assuming repayment by the Anticipated Repayment Dates and based on the leverage ratio as of October 2, 2022, principal payments on our long-term debt outstanding at October 2, 2022 for each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):
| 2023 | $ | 30,169 | ||||||
| 2024 | 29,623 | |||||||
| 2025 | 29,315 | |||||||
| 2026 | 289,183 | |||||||
| 2027 | 516,045 | |||||||
| Thereafter | 960,480 | |||||||
| $ | 1,854,815 | |||||||
8. LEASES
Nature of leases — We own restaurant sites and we also lease restaurant sites from third parties. Some of these owned or leased sites are leased and/or subleased to franchisees. Initial terms of our real estate leases are generally 20 years, exclusive of options to renew, which are generally exercisable at our sole discretion for 1 to 20 years. In some instances, our leases have provisions for contingent rentals based upon a percentage of defined revenues. Many of our restaurants also have rent escalation clauses and require the payment of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs. Variable lease costs include contingent rent, cost-of-living index adjustments, and payments for additional rent such as real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance, which are excluded from the measurement of the lease liability. We also lease certain restaurant and office equipment with initial terms generally ranging from 3 to 8 years. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
As lessor, our leases and subleases primarily consist of restaurants that have been leased to franchisees subsequent to refranchising transactions. The lease descriptions, terms, variable lease payments and renewal options are generally the same as the lessee leases described above. Revenues from leasing arrangements with our franchisees are presented in “Franchise rental revenues” in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings, and the related expenses are presented in “Franchise occupancy expenses.”
F-22
Company as lessee — Leased assets and liabilities consisted of the following as of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021 (in thousands):
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Assets: | |||||||||||
| Operating lease ROU assets | $ | 1,332,135 | $ | 934,066 | |||||||
| 854 | 1,698 | ||||||||||
| Total ROU assets | $ | 1,332,989 | $ | 935,764 | |||||||
| Liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Current operating lease liabilities | $ | 171,311 | $ | 150,636 | |||||||
| 896 | 894 | ||||||||||
| Long-term operating lease liabilities | 1,165,097 | 809,191 | |||||||||
| 435 | 1,381 | ||||||||||
| Total lease liabilities | $ | 1,337,739 | $ | 962,102 | |||||||
________________________
(1)Included in “Property and equipment, net” on our consolidated balance sheets.
(2)Included in “Current maturities of long-term debt” and “Long-term debt, net of current maturities” on our consolidated balance sheets.
The following table presents the components of our lease costs in fiscal 2022, 2021, and 2020 (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Lease costs: | |||||||||||||||||
| Finance lease cost: | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of ROU assets (1) | $ | 827 | $ | 807 | $ | 767 | |||||||||||
| Interest on lease liabilities (2) | 67 | 89 | 110 | ||||||||||||||
| Operating lease cost (3) | 218,837 | 194,149 | 190,461 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term lease cost (3) | 824 | 427 | 175 | ||||||||||||||
| Variable lease cost (3)(4) | 48,872 | 43,498 | 40,798 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 269,427 | $ | 238,970 | $ | 232,311 | ||||||||||||
(1)Included in “Depreciation and amortization” in our consolidated statements of earnings.
(2)Included in “Interest expense, net” in our consolidated statements of earnings.
(3)Operating lease, short-term and variable lease costs associated with franchisees and company-operated restaurants are included in “Franchise occupancy expenses” and “Occupancy and other,” respectively, in our consolidated statements of earnings. For our closed restaurants, these costs are included in “Other operating expense (income), net” and all other costs are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses.”
(4)Includes $38.2 million, $38.0 million, and $37.4 million in 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively, of property taxes and common area maintenance costs which are reimbursed by sub-lessees.
The following table presents supplemental information related to leases:
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years): | |||||||||||
| Finance leases | 1.5 | 2.4 | |||||||||
| Operating leases | 10.0 | 9.0 | |||||||||
| Weighted-average discount rate: | |||||||||||
| Finance leases | 3.8 | % | 3.6 | % | |||||||
| Operating leases | 4.6 | % | 4.1 | % | |||||||
F-23
The following table presents as of October 2, 2022, the annual maturities of our lease liabilities (in thousands):
| Finance Leases | Operating Leases | ||||||||||
| Fiscal year: | |||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 932 | $ | 231,670 | |||||||
| 2024 | 372 | 196,702 | |||||||||
| 2025 | 40 | 191,507 | |||||||||
| 2026 | 27 | 174,068 | |||||||||
| 2027 | 14 | 159,219 | |||||||||
| Thereafter | 13 | 758,184 | |||||||||
| Total future lease payments (1) | $ | 1,398 | $ | 1,711,350 | |||||||
| Less: imputed interest | (67) | (374,942) | |||||||||
| Present value of lease liabilities | $ | 1,331 | $ | 1,336,408 | |||||||
| Less current portion | (896) | (171,311) | |||||||||
| Long-term lease obligations | $ | 435 | $ | 1,165,097 | |||||||
________________________
(1)Total future lease payments include non-cancellable commitments of $1.4 million for finance leases and $1,366.5 million for operating leases.
Assets recorded under finance leases are included in property and equipment, and consisted of the following at each fiscal year-end (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Buildings | $ | 1,342 | $ | 1,342 | |||||||
| Equipment | 5,559 | 5,869 | |||||||||
| Less accumulated amortization | (6,047) | (5,513) | |||||||||
| $ | 854 | $ | 1,698 | ||||||||
The following table includes supplemental cash flow and non-cash information related to our lessee leases (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Operating cash flows from operating leases | $ | 218,605 | $ | 218,570 | |||||||
| Operating cash flows from financing leases | $ | 67 | $ | 89 | |||||||
| Financing cash flows from financing leases | $ | 907 | $ | 829 | |||||||
| Supplemental noncash information on lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets: | |||||||||||
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease obligations | $ | 221,466 | $ | 186,621 | |||||||
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new financing lease obligations | $ | 45 | $ | 184 | |||||||
Sale and leaseback transactions — In fiscal 2022, we sold four restaurant properties in sale and leaseback transactions for net proceeds of $10.8 million and recorded total losses of $0.2 million. The leases have been accounted for as operating leases and contain initial terms of 16 years and 20 years.
In fiscal 2021, we sold two restaurant properties in sale and leaseback transactions for net proceeds of $3.9 million and recorded total gains of less than $0.1 million. The leases have been accounted for as operating leases and contain an initial term of 20 years.
In fiscal 2020, we completed two sale and leaseback transactions of our restaurant properties with one occurring during the first quarter of 2020 and the other occurring during the third quarter of 2020. In the first quarter of 2020, we completed a sale leaseback transaction of a multi-tenant commercial property in Los Angeles, California and leased back the parcel on which a company-operated restaurant is located. The Company received net proceeds of $17.4 million and recognized a $0.2 million loss on the sale. The initial term on the lease is 20 years and the lease has been accounted for as an operating lease. Under the other arrangement, we received net proceeds of $2.4 million on a restaurant property sold and recognized a loss of less than $0.1 million on the sale. The initial term of the lease is 17 years and has been accounted for as an operating lease.
F-24
In fiscal 2020, we also completed the sale of one of our corporate office buildings as we moved forward with our previously announced consolidation of our headquarters. We entered into a lease with the buyer to leaseback the property for up to 18 months with an option to terminate earlier without penalty, upon providing a 90-day notice. The net proceeds received on the sale were $20.6 million and the lease has been accounted for as an operating lease. A gain on the sale of $10.8 million was recognized and is presented within “Other operating expenses (income), net” in our consolidated statement of earnings.
Company as lessor — The following table presents rental income (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Owned Properties | Leased Properties | Total | Owned Properties | Leased Properties | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease income - franchise | $ | 19,221 | $ | 212,552 | $ | 231,773 | $ | 20,132 | $ | 218,028 | $ | 238,160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Variable lease income - franchise | 12,418 | 96,002 | 108,420 | 12,363 | 96,111 | 108,474 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of favorable and unfavorable lease contracts, net | — | 198 | 198 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 31,639 | $ | 308,752 | $ | 340,391 | $ | 32,495 | $ | 314,139 | $ | 346,634 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease income - closed restaurants and other (1) | $ | 60 | $ | 6,347 | $ | 6,407 | $ | — | $ | 6,027 | $ | 6,027 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
________________________
(1)Primarily relates to closed restaurant properties included in “Other operating expense (income), net” in our consolidated statements of earnings.
The following table presents as of October 2, 2022, future minimum rental receipts for non-cancellable leases and subleases (in thousands):
| October 2, 2022 | |||||
| Fiscal year: | |||||
| 2023 | $ | 243,929 | |||
| 2024 | 217,567 | ||||
| 2025 | 225,542 | ||||
| 2026 | 211,507 | ||||
| 2027 | 204,685 | ||||
| Thereafter | 879,829 | ||||
| Total minimum rental receipts | $ | 1,983,059 | |||
Assets held for lease and included in property and equipment consisted of the following at each fiscal year-end (in thousands):
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | ||||||||||
| Land | $ | 75,967 | $ | 89,791 | |||||||
| Buildings | 771,567 | 782,450 | |||||||||
| Equipment | 2,750 | 223 | |||||||||
| 850,284 | 872,464 | ||||||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation | (663,109) | (657,030) | |||||||||
| $ | 187,175 | $ | 215,434 | ||||||||
F-25
9. OTHER OPERATING EXPENSE (INCOME), NET
Other operating expense (income), net, in the accompanying consolidated statements of earnings is comprised of the following in each fiscal year (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Acquisition, integration, and restructuring costs | $ | 20,081 | $ | 7 | $ | 1,168 | |||||||||||
| Costs of closed restaurants and other | 4,290 | 1,907 | 1,872 | ||||||||||||||
| Restaurant impairment charges | 5,927 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Accelerated depreciation | 1,124 | 1,592 | 235 | ||||||||||||||
| Gains on disposition of property and equipment, net | (30,533) | (6,888) | (9,768) | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 889 | $ | (3,382) | $ | (6,493) | ||||||||||||
Acquisition, integration, and restructuring costs — In 2022, costs incurred are related to the acquisition and integration of Del Taco, primarily associated with advisory, legal, and consulting services. In 2020, costs incurred relate to a restructuring plan that management initiated to reduce our general and administrative costs, which was completed in 2020.
Restaurant closing costs — Cost of closed restaurants primarily include ongoing costs associated with closed restaurants and cancelled project costs.
Restaurant impairment charges — In 2022, impairment charges included $3.2 million related to nine Jack in the Box company-operated restaurants that were closed in connection with the sale of the related markets and $2.7 million related to Jack in the Box restaurants leased or subleased to franchisees for which the lease and franchise agreements were early terminated during the year.
Accelerated depreciation — When a long-lived asset will be replaced or otherwise disposed of prior to the end of its estimated useful life, the useful life of the asset is adjusted based on the estimated disposal date and accelerated depreciation is recognized. In 2022, 2021, and 2020 accelerated depreciation primarily related to facility improvements, restaurant remodels, and information technology assets.
Gains on disposition of property and equipment, net — In 2022, gains primarily relate to the sale of Jack in the Box restaurant properties to franchisees who were leasing the properties from us prior to the sale. In 2021, gains primarily relate to the sale of closed restaurant properties. In 2020, gains primarily relate to the sale of one of our corporate buildings.
10. SEGMENT REPORTING
Our principal business consists of developing, operating and franchising our Jack in the Box and Del Taco restaurant brands, each of which we consider a reportable operating segment. This segment reporting structure reflects our current management structure, internal reporting method and financial information used in deciding how to allocate our resources. Based upon certain quantitative thresholds, each operating segment is considered a reportable segment.
We measure and evaluate our segments based on segment revenues and segment profit. Our measure of segment profit excludes depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation, company-owned life insurance (“COLI”) gains/losses, net of changes in our non-qualified deferred compensation obligation supported by these policies, acquisition, integration, and restructuring expenses, gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants, and amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases and subleases, net. The following table provides information related to our operating segments in each period (in thousands):
F-26
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Revenues by segment: | |||||||||||||||||
| Jack in the Box | $ | 1,151,188 | $ | 1,143,670 | $ | 1,021,506 | |||||||||||
| Del Taco | 316,895 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Consolidated revenues | $ | 1,468,083 | $ | 1,143,670 | $ | 1,021,506 | |||||||||||
| Segment operating profit: | |||||||||||||||||
| Jack in the Box | $ | 310,745 | $ | 327,157 | $ | 282,748 | |||||||||||
| Del Taco | 27,981 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total segment operating profit | $ | 338,726 | $ | 327,157 | $ | 282,748 | |||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 56,100 | 46,500 | 52,798 | ||||||||||||||
| Acquisition, integration, and restructuring costs | 20,081 | 7 | 1,168 | ||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation | 7,122 | 4,048 | 4,394 | ||||||||||||||
| Net COLI losses (gains) | 9,911 | (9,141) | (2,935) | ||||||||||||||
| Gains on the sale of company-operated restaurants | (3,878) | (4,203) | (3,261) | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases and subleases, net | 1,120 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings from operations | $ | 248,270 | $ | 289,946 | $ | 230,584 | |||||||||||
| Total capital expenditures by segment: | |||||||||||||||||
| Jack in the Box | $ | 31,601 | $ | 41,008 | $ | 19,528 | |||||||||||
| Del Taco | 14,874 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total capital expenditures | $ | 46,475 | $ | 41,008 | $ | 19,528 | |||||||||||
| Total depreciation and amortization by segment: | |||||||||||||||||
| Jack in the Box | $ | 39,895 | $ | 46,500 | $ | 52,798 | |||||||||||
| Del Taco | 16,205 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total depreciation and amortization | $ | 56,100 | $ | 46,500 | $ | 52,798 | |||||||||||
We do not evaluate, manage or measure performance of segments using asset, interest income and expense, or income tax information; accordingly, this information by segment is not prepared or disclosed.
11. INCOME TAXES
Income taxes consist of the following in each fiscal year (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Current: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | 28,934 | $ | 36,051 | $ | 19,721 | ||||||||||||||
| State | 9,320 | 11,793 | 7,844 | |||||||||||||||||
| 38,254 | 47,844 | 27,565 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal | 5,344 | 4,440 | 4,625 | |||||||||||||||||
| State | 2,513 | 3,568 | 537 | |||||||||||||||||
| 7,857 | 8,008 | 5,162 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense from continuing operations | $ | 46,111 | $ | 55,852 | $ | 32,727 | ||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 144 | ||||||||||||||
F-27
A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to our effective tax rate for continuing operations is as follows:
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense at federal statutory rate | 21.0 | % | 21.0 | % | 21.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
| State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit | 5.2 | % | 5.1 | % | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation tax deficiency (excess tax benefit) | 0.1 | % | (0.5) | % | (0.4) | % | ||||||||||||||
| Benefit of jobs tax credits, net of valuation allowance | (0.6) | % | (0.1) | % | (0.5) | % | ||||||||||||||
| Adjustment to state tax provision | — | % | 0.7 | % | — | % | ||||||||||||||
| Nondeductible transaction costs | 0.6 | % | — | % | — | % | ||||||||||||||
| Expense (benefit) related to COLIs | 2.1 | % | (1.5) | % | (0.9) | % | ||||||||||||||
| Officers’ compensation limitation | 0.4 | % | 0.5 | % | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Other, net | (0.3) | % | — | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
| 28.5 | % | 25.2 | % | 26.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at each fiscal year-end are presented below (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | ||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||||
| Operating and finance lease liabilities | $ | 340,317 | $ | 237,509 | |||||||
| Accrued defined benefit pension and postretirement benefits | 19,090 | 28,837 | |||||||||
| Accrued legal settlements | 15,158 | 2,378 | |||||||||
| Deferred income | 13,524 | 12,083 | |||||||||
| Accrued insurance | 8,339 | 5,389 | |||||||||
| Share-based compensation | 5,094 | 4,039 | |||||||||
| Tax loss and tax credit carryforwards | 4,399 | 3,129 | |||||||||
| Accrued incentive compensation | 2,402 | 3,455 | |||||||||
| Other reserves and allowances | 1,627 | 1,672 | |||||||||
| Accrued compensation expense | 1,329 | 710 | |||||||||
| Property and equipment, net of impairment | — | 5,922 | |||||||||
| Other, net | 2,319 | 3,424 | |||||||||
| Total gross deferred tax assets | 413,598 | 308,547 | |||||||||
| Valuation allowance | (1,140) | (1,349) | |||||||||
| Total net deferred tax assets | 412,458 | 307,198 | |||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Operating and finance lease ROU assets | (349,903) | (242,038) | |||||||||
| Intangible assets | (87,165) | (11,349) | |||||||||
| Property and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation | (5,656) | — | |||||||||
| Investment basis limitation | (6,010) | — | |||||||||
| Other | (1,408) | (2,294) | |||||||||
| Total gross deferred tax liabilities | (450,142) | (255,681) | |||||||||
| Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets | $ | (37,684) | $ | 51,517 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets as of October 2, 2022 include federal and state gross net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $24.6 million, of which $19.2 million has an indefinite carryforward. The remainder will expire at various times between 2023 and 2042. At October 2, 2022, we recorded a valuation allowance of $1.1 million related to state tax credits, which decreased from the $1.3 million at October 3, 2021 due to the release of the valuation allowance on California Enterprise Zone Credits. We believe it is more likely than not that these credit carryforwards will not be realized and that all other deferred tax assets will be realized through future taxable income or alternative tax strategies.
The major jurisdictions in which the Company files income tax returns includes the United States and states in which we operate that impose an income tax. The federal statutes of limitations have not expired for fiscal year 2019 and forward. The statutes of limitations for California and Texas, which constitutes the Company's major state tax jurisdictions, have not expired for fiscal years 2018 and forward.
F-28
12. RETIREMENT PLANS
We sponsor programs that provide retirement benefits to our employees. These programs include defined contribution plans, defined benefit pension plans, and postretirement healthcare plans.
Defined contribution plans — We maintain two qualified savings plans pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”). The plans allows all employees who meet certain age and minimum service requirements to defer a percentage of their pay on a pre-tax basis. Our contributions under these plans were $2.1 million in fiscal 2022, and $1.6 million in fiscal years 2021 and 2020, respectively.
We also maintain an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan for key executives and other members of management whose compensation deferrals or company matching contributions to the qualified savings plan are limited due to IRC rules. Effective January 1, 2016, this non-qualified plan was amended to replace the company matching contribution with an annual restoration match that is intended to “restore” up to the full match for participants whose elective deferrals (and related company matching contributions) to the qualified savings plan were limited due to IRC rules. A participant’s right to the Company restoration match vests immediately. This plan allows participants to defer up to 50% of their salary and 85% of their bonus, on a pre-tax basis. Our contributions under the non-qualified deferred compensation plan were less than $0.1 million in fiscal years 2022, and 2021, respectively and $0.3 million in 2020.
Defined benefit pension plans — We sponsor two defined benefit pension plans, a “Qualified Plan” covering substantially all full-time employees hired prior to January 1, 2011, and an unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”) which provides certain employees additional pension benefits and was closed to new participants effective January 1, 2007. In fiscal 2011, the Board of Directors approved changes to our Qualified Plan whereby participants will no longer accrue benefits effective December 31, 2015. Benefits under both plans are based on the employees’ years of service and compensation over defined periods of employment.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company amended its Qualified Plan to add a limited lump sum payment window whereby certain terminated participants with a vested pension benefit could elect to receive either an immediate lump sum or a monthly annuity payment of their accrued benefit. As a result of the offering, the Company’s Qualified Plan paid $122.3 million from its plan assets to those who accepted the offer, thereby reducing the plan’s pension benefit obligation (“PBO”). The transaction had no cash impact to the Company but did result in a of $38.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. Routine lump sum payments made in the second, third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2020 resulted in additional non-cash settlement charges totaling $0.6 million.
Postretirement healthcare plans — We also sponsor two healthcare plans, closed to new participants, that provide postretirement medical benefits to certain employees who have met minimum age and service requirements. The plans are contributory, with retiree contributions adjusted annually, and contain other cost-sharing features such as deductibles and coinsurance.
F-29
Obligations and funded status — The following table provides a reconciliation of the changes in benefit obligations, plan assets, and funded status of our retirement plans for each fiscal year (in thousands):
| Qualified Plan | SERP | Postretirement Health Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in benefit obligation: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Obligation at beginning of year | $ | 410,053 | $ | 412,573 | $ | 75,225 | $ | 78,971 | $ | 17,162 | $ | 20,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest cost | 12,506 | 12,558 | 2,173 | 2,169 | 489 | 563 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Participant contributions | — | — | — | — | 92 | 112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actuarial (gain) loss | (114,999) | (785) | (14,830) | (672) | (4,062) | (3,525) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benefits paid | (14,218) | (14,293) | (5,677) | (5,243) | (1,204) | (1,044) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | 100 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Obligation at end of year | $ | 293,342 | $ | 410,053 | $ | 56,891 | $ | 75,225 | $ | 12,577 | $ | 17,162 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in plan assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value at beginning of year | $ | 409,708 | $ | 365,510 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Actual (loss) return on plan assets | (91,539) | 58,491 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Participant contributions | — | — | — | — | 92 | 112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Employer contributions | — | — | 5,677 | 5,243 | 1,012 | 841 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Benefits paid | (14,218) | (14,293) | (5,677) | (5,243) | (1,204) | (1,044) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other | — | — | — | — | 100 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value at end of year | $ | 303,951 | $ | 409,708 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Funded (unfunded) status at end of year | $ | 10,609 | $ | (345) | $ | (56,891) | $ | (75,225) | $ | (12,577) | $ | (17,162) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amounts recognized on the balance sheet: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noncurrent assets | $ | 10,609 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current liabilities | — | — | (5,213) | (5,216) | (1,081) | (1,115) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Noncurrent liabilities | — | (345) | (51,678) | (70,009) | (11,496) | (16,047) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total asset (liability) recognized | $ | 10,609 | $ | (345) | $ | (56,891) | $ | (75,225) | $ | (12,577) | $ | (17,162) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amounts in AOCI not yet reflected in net periodic benefit cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unamortized actuarial loss (gain), net | $ | 101,372 | $ | 108,922 | $ | 15,979 | $ | 32,475 | $ | (10,781) | $ | (7,359) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unamortized prior service cost | — | — | 34 | 53 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 101,372 | $ | 108,922 | $ | 16,013 | $ | 32,528 | $ | (10,781) | $ | (7,359) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net actuarial gain | $ | (5,357) | $ | (39,936) | $ | (14,830) | $ | (672) | $ | (4,062) | $ | (3,526) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of actuarial (loss) gain | (2,193) | (3,510) | (1,666) | (1,743) | 640 | 341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of prior service cost | — | — | (19) | (19) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total recognized in OCI | (7,550) | (43,446) | (16,515) | (2,434) | (3,422) | (3,185) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net periodic benefit (credit) cost | (3,404) | (3,272) | 3,858 | 3,931 | (151) | 222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total recognized in comprehensive income | $ | (10,954) | $ | (46,718) | $ | (12,657) | $ | 1,497 | $ | (3,573) | $ | (2,963) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amounts in AOCI expected to be amortized in fiscal 2023 net periodic benefit cost: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | $ | 2,349 | $ | 718 | $ | (932) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prior service cost | — | 19 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 2,349 | $ | 737 | $ | (932) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional year-end pension plan information — The PBO is the actuarial present value of benefits attributable to employee service rendered to date, including the effects of estimated future pay increases. The accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) also reflects the actuarial present value of benefits attributable to employee service rendered to date but does not include the effects of estimated future pay increases. Therefore, the ABO as compared to plan assets is an indication of the assets currently available to fund vested and nonvested benefits accrued through the end of the fiscal year. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of a plan’s assets and its PBO.
F-30
As of October 2, 2022 the Qualified Plan’s ABO was less than the fair value of its plan assets whereas as of October 3, 2021, the Qualified Plan’s ABO exceeded the fair value of its plan assets. The SERP is an unfunded plan and, as such, had no plan assets as of October 2, 2022 and October 3, 2021. The following sets forth the PBO, ABO, and fair value of plan assets of our pension plans as of the measurement date in each fiscal year (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Qualified Plan: | ||||||||||||||
| Projected benefit obligation | $ | 293,342 | $ | 410,053 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 293,342 | $ | 410,053 | ||||||||||
| Fair value of plan assets | $ | 303,951 | $ | 409,708 | ||||||||||
| SERP: | ||||||||||||||
| Projected benefit obligation | $ | 56,891 | $ | 75,225 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated benefit obligation | $ | 56,891 | $ | 75,225 | ||||||||||
| Fair value of plan assets | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost — The components of the fiscal year net periodic benefit cost were as follows (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Qualified Plan: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 12,506 | $ | 12,558 | $ | 13,377 | |||||||||||||||
| (18,103) | (19,340) | (19,578) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Pension settlements | — | — | 39,218 | |||||||||||||||||
| 2,193 | 3,510 | 3,644 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net periodic benefit (credit) cost | $ | (3,404) | $ | (3,272) | $ | 36,661 | ||||||||||||||
| SERP: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest cost | $ | 2,173 | $ | 2,169 | $ | 2,499 | ||||||||||||||
| Actuarial loss | 1,666 | 1,743 | 1,652 | |||||||||||||||||
| 19 | 19 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net periodic benefit cost | $ | 3,858 | $ | 3,931 | $ | 4,236 | ||||||||||||||
| Postretirement health plans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest cost | $ | 489 | $ | 563 | $ | 807 | ||||||||||||||
| Actuarial (gain) loss | (640) | (341) | 18 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net periodic benefit (credit) cost | $ | (151) | $ | 222 | $ | 825 | ||||||||||||||
Prior service costs are amortized on a straight-line basis from date of participation to full eligibility. Unrecognized gains or losses are amortized using the “corridor approach” under which the net gain or loss in excess of 10% of the greater of the PBO or the market-related value of the assets, if applicable, is amortized. For our Qualified Plan, actuarial losses are amortized over the average future expected lifetime of all participants expected to receive benefits. For our SERP, actuarial losses are amortized over the expected remaining future lifetime for inactive participants, and for our postretirement health plans, actuarial losses are amortized over the expected remaining future lifetime of inactive participants expected to receive benefits.
F-31
Assumptions — We determine our actuarial assumptions on an annual basis. In determining the present values of our benefit obligations and net periodic benefit costs as of and for the fiscal years ended October 2, 2022, October 3, 2021, and September 27, 2020, we used the following weighted-average assumptions:
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations (1): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Qualified Plan: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Discount rate | 5.63% | 3.11% | 3.10% | |||||||||||||||||
| SERP: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Discount rate | 5.80% | 2.99% | 2.84% | |||||||||||||||||
| Rate of future pay increases (2) | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
| Postretirement health plans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Discount rate | 5.82% | 2.95% | 2.77% | |||||||||||||||||
| Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost (3): | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Qualified Plan: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Discount rate (4) | 3.11% | 3.10% | 3.36% | |||||||||||||||||
| Long-term rate of return on assets (5) | 4.50% | 5.40% | 5.80% | |||||||||||||||||
| SERP: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Discount rate | 2.99% | 2.84% | 3.24% | |||||||||||||||||
| Rate of future pay increases (2) | N/A | N/A | 3.50% | |||||||||||||||||
| Postretirement health plans: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Discount rate | 2.95% | 2.77% | 3.24% | |||||||||||||||||
________________________
(1)Determined as of end of year.
(2)Rate is not applicable as there are no active employees as of fiscal year end 2020, 2021 and 2022.
(3)Determined as of beginning of year.
(4)Remeasurements were performed in the first, second, and third quarters of fiscal 2020 using 3.61%, 3.38%, and 3.13% respectively.
(5)Remeasurements were performed in the first, second, and third quarters of fiscal 2020 using 5.9%, 5.2%, and 5.4% respectively.
The assumed discount rates were determined by considering the average of pension yield curves constructed of a population of high-quality bonds with a Moody’s or Standard and Poor’s rating of “AA” or better whose cash flow from coupons and maturities match the year-by-year projected benefit payments from the plans. As benefit payments typically extend beyond the date of the longest maturing bond, cash flows beyond 30 years were discounted back to the 30th year and then matched like any other payment.
The assumed expected long-term rate of return on assets is the weighted-average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for the pension obligations. The long-term rate of return on assets was determined taking into consideration our projected asset allocation and economic forecasts prepared with the assistance of our actuarial consultants.
The assumed discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on assets have a significant effect on amounts reported for our pension and postretirement plans. If the discount rate and long-term rate of return used were decreased by a quarter percentage point, fiscal 2022 earnings before income taxes would have decreased by $0.1 million and decreased by $1.0 million, respectively.
For measurement purposes, the weighted-average assumed health care cost trend rates for our postretirement health plans were as follows for each fiscal year:
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Healthcare cost trend rate for next year: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Participants under age 65 | 6.25% | 6.50% | 6.75% | |||||||||||||||||
| Participants age 65 or older | 5.75% | 6.00% | 6.25% | |||||||||||||||||
| Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Participants under age 65 | 4.50% | 4.50% | 4.50% | |||||||||||||||||
| Participants age 65 or older | 4.50% | 4.50% | 4.50% | |||||||||||||||||
| Year the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Participants under age 65 | 2030 | 2030 | 2030 | |||||||||||||||||
| Participants age 65 or older | 2028 | 2028 | 2028 | |||||||||||||||||
F-32
The assumed healthcare cost trend rate represents our estimate of the annual rates of change in the costs of the healthcare benefits currently provided by our postretirement plans. The healthcare cost trend rate implicitly considers estimates of healthcare inflation, changes in healthcare utilization and delivery patterns, technological advances and changes in the health status of the plan participants. The healthcare cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the amounts reported.
Plan assets — Our investment philosophy is to (1) protect the corpus of the fund; (2) establish investment objectives that will allow the market value to exceed the present value of the vested and unvested liabilities over time; while (3) obtaining adequate investment returns to protect benefits promised to the participants and their beneficiaries. Our asset allocation strategy utilizes multiple investment managers in order to maximize the plan’s return while minimizing risk. We regularly monitor our asset allocation, and senior financial management and the Finance Committee of the Board of Directors review performance results quarterly. We continually review our target asset allocation for our Qualified Plan and when changes are made, we reallocate our plan assets over a period of time, as deemed appropriate by senior financial management, to achieve our target asset allocation. Our plan asset allocation at the end of fiscal 2022 and target allocations were as follows:
| 2022 | Target | Minimum | Maximum | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash & cash equivalents | 1% | 1% | —% | —% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Domestic equities | 11% | 11% | 5% | 17% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| International equities | 11% | 11% | 5% | 17% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Core fixed funds | 57% | 64% | 57% | 71% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| High yield | 2% | 2% | —% | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alternative investments | 4% | 4% | —% | 8% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate | 7% | —% | —% | 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real return bonds | 7% | 7% | —% | 14% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 100% | 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
F-33
The Company measures its defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the month-end date closest to its fiscal year end, which is a practical expedient under FASB authoritative guidance. The fair values of the Qualified Plan’s assets by asset category are as follows (in thousands):
| Total | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Items Measured at Fair Value at September 30, 2022: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset Category: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | (1) | $ | 2,267 | $ | — | $ | 2,267 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. | (2) | 33,659 | 33,659 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | (3),(4) | 32,807 | 16,557 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment grade | (5) | 193,426 | 20,138 | 173,288 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| High yield | (6) | 6,970 | 6,970 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alternatives | (4),(7) | 12,061 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate | (4),(8) | 22,761 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 303,951 | $ | 77,324 | $ | 175,555 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Items Measured at Fair Value at September 30, 2021: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Asset Category: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | (1) | $ | 1,969 | $ | — | $ | 1,969 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Equity: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. | (2) | 66,921 | 66,921 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| International | (3),(4) | 63,087 | 31,128 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fixed income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investment grade | (5) | 219,295 | 20,701 | 198,594 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| High yield | (6) | 10,156 | 10,156 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Alternatives | (4),(7) | 26,519 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate | (4),(8) | 21,761 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 409,708 | $ | 128,906 | $ | 200,563 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
________________________
(1)Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of commercial paper, short-term bills and notes, and short-term investment funds, which are valued at quoted prices in active markets for similar securities.
(2)U.S. equity securities are comprised of investments in common stock of U.S. companies for total return purposes. These investments are valued by the trustee at closing prices from national exchanges on the valuation date.
(3)International equity securities are comprised of investments in common stock of companies located outside of the U.S. for total return purposes. These investments are valued by the trustee at closing prices from national exchanges on the valuation date, or the values are adjusted as a result of market movements following the close of local trading using inputs to models that are observable either directly or indirectly. The portion of these investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient (see note 4 below) can be redeemed on a monthly basis.
(4)Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts presented in this table are intended to permit reconciliation of the fair value hierarchy to the amounts presented in the statement of financial position.
(5)Investment grade fixed income consists of debt obligations either issued by the U.S. government or have a rating of BBB- / Baa or higher assigned by a major credit rating agency. These investments are valued based on unadjusted quoted market prices (Level 1), or based on quoted prices in inactive markets, or whose values are based on models, but the inputs to those models are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2).
(6)High yield fixed income consists primarily of debt obligations that have a rating of below BBB- / Baa or lower assigned by a major credit rating agency. These investments are valued based on unadjusted quoted market prices.
(7)Alternative investments consist primarily of an investment in asset classes other than stocks, bonds, and cash. Alternative investments can include commodities, hedge funds, private equity, managed futures, and derivatives. These investments are valued based on unadjusted quoted market prices and can be redeemed on a bi-monthly basis.
(8)Real estate is investments in a real estate collective trust for purposes of total return. These investments are valued based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These investments can be redeemed on a quarterly basis.
F-34
Future cash flows — Our policy is to fund our plans at or above the minimum required by law. As of the date of our last actuarial funding valuation, there was no minimum requirement. We do not anticipate making any contributions to our Qualified Plan in fiscal 2023. Contributions expected to be paid in the next fiscal year, the projected benefit payments for each of the next five fiscal years, and the total aggregate amount for the subsequent five fiscal years are as follows (in thousands):
| Defined Benefit Plans | Postretirement Health Plans | |||||||||||||
| Estimated net contributions during fiscal 2023 | $ | 5,213 | $ | 1,112 | ||||||||||
| Estimated future year benefit payments during fiscal years: | ||||||||||||||
| 2023 | $ | 20,784 | $ | 1,112 | ||||||||||
| 2024 | $ | 20,868 | $ | 1,127 | ||||||||||
| 2025 | $ | 21,185 | $ | 1,137 | ||||||||||
| 2026 | $ | 21,685 | $ | 1,139 | ||||||||||
| 2027 | $ | 22,190 | $ | 1,135 | ||||||||||
| 2028-2032 | $ | 117,216 | $ | 5,383 | ||||||||||
We will continue to evaluate contributions to our Qualified Plan based on changes in pension assets as a result of asset performance in the current market and economic environment. Expected benefit payments are based on the same assumptions used to measure our benefit obligations at October 2, 2022 and include estimated future employee service, if applicable.
13. SHARE-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Stock incentive plans — We offer share-based compensation plans to attract, retain, and motivate key officers, employees, and non-employee directors to work toward the financial success of the Company.
Our stock incentive plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and have been approved by the stockholders of the Company. The terms and conditions of our share-based awards are determined by the Compensation Committee for each award date and may include provisions for the exercise price, expirations, vesting, restriction on sales, and forfeitures, as applicable. We issue new shares to satisfy stock issuances under our stock incentive plans.
Our Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 11,600,000 common shares in connection with the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase rights, restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, or performance units to our employees and directors. There were 1,479,033 shares of common stock available for future issuance under this plan as of October 2, 2022.
In connection with the Merger Agreement, on the Closing Date, the Company assumed the Del Taco Restaurants, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan which authorized the issuance of common shares in connection with the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, or performance awards to their employees, directors, and consultants. There were 174,553 shares of common stock available for future issuance under this plan as of October 2, 2022.
We also maintain a deferred compensation plan for non-management directors under which those who are eligible to receive fees or retainers may choose to defer receipt of their compensation. The deferred amounts are converted to stock equivalents. The plan requires settlement in shares of our common stock based on the number of stock equivalents and dividend equivalents at the time of a participant’s separation from the Board of Directors. This plan provides for the issuance of up to 350,000 shares of common stock in connection with the crediting of stock equivalents. There were 142,918 shares of common stock available for future issuance under this plan as of October 2, 2022.
Compensation expense — The components of share-based compensation expense, included within “Selling, general, and administrative expenses” in our consolidated statements of earnings, in each fiscal year are as follows (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Nonvested stock units | $ | 4,544 | $ | 2,969 | $ | 3,526 | ||||||||||||||
| Stock options | 19 | 25 | 351 | |||||||||||||||||
| Performance share awards | 1,835 | 830 | 254 | |||||||||||||||||
| Nonvested restricted stock awards | 434 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-management directors’ deferred compensation | 290 | 224 | 263 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total share-based compensation expense | $ | 7,122 | $ | 4,048 | $ | 4,394 | ||||||||||||||
F-35
Nonvested restricted stock units — Nonvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) are generally issued to employees and non-employee directors. Grants to executive officers of time-vesting RSUs vest ratably over four years and are subject to a stock holding requirement of 50% of after-tax net shares resulting from the vesting of RSUs and must be held until the multiple of base salary stock ownership is met. There were 75,791 of such RSUs outstanding as of October 2, 2022. RSUs issued to non-management directors vest 12 months from the date of grant, or upon termination of board service, including RSUs for which the director elected to defer receipt until termination of board service, and totaled 74,830 units outstanding as of October 2, 2022. RSUs issued to certain other employees either cliff vest or vest ratably over three years and totaled 85,985 units outstanding as of October 2, 2022. These awards are amortized to compensation expense over the estimated vesting period based upon the fair value of our common stock on the award date discounted by the present value of the expected dividend stream over the vesting period.
The following is a summary of RSU activity for fiscal 2022:
| Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||||||||||
| RSUs outstanding at October 3, 2021 | 141,197 | $ | 76.84 | |||||||||||
| Granted | 130,862 | $ | 78.28 | |||||||||||
| Released | (28,600) | $ | 89.02 | |||||||||||
| Forfeited | (6,853) | $ | 83.34 | |||||||||||
| RSUs outstanding at October 2, 2022 | 236,606 | $ | 75.98 | |||||||||||
As of October 2, 2022, there was approximately $9.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of awards granted was $78.28, $95.44, and $73.94 in fiscal years 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. In fiscal years 2022, 2021, and 2020, the total fair value of RSUs that vested and were released was $2.5 million, $4.3 million, and $8.7 million, respectively.
Modification of RSU awards — In fiscal 2020, we entered into a Retention, Transition and Separation Agreement with our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, which sets forth the terms of his transition and certain benefits he is eligible to receive, pro-rated through the duration of the transition period, which included vesting of his final tranche of unvested restricted stock units remaining under his November 2015 restricted stock unit award scheduled to vest in November 2020. Consequently, 23,128 shares vested on his last day of employment on July 31, 2020. This was accounted for as an equity award modification under ASC Topic 718, and as the fair value of the modified award was less than previously recognized compensation, no incremental compensation costs were recorded by the Company.
Stock options — Option grants have contractual terms of seven years and employee options vest over a three-year period. Options may vest sooner upon retirement from the Company for employees meeting certain age and years of service thresholds. All option grants provide for an option exercise price equal to the closing market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
The following is a summary of stock option activity for fiscal 2022:
| Shares | Weighted- Average Exercise Price | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding at October 3, 2021 | 33,117 | $ | 92.44 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Granted | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Exercised | (667) | $ | 75.23 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Forfeited | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Expired | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Options outstanding at October 2, 2022 | 32,450 | $ | 92.80 | 2.33 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Options exercisable at October 2, 2022 | 29,446 | $ | 94.59 | 2.14 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is the amount by which the current market price of our stock on October 2, 2022 exceeds the weighted-average exercise price.
F-36
We use a valuation model to determine the fair value of options granted that requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected volatility of the stock price. The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used for stock option grants in each fiscal year, along with the related weighted-average grant date fair value:
2022 (1) | 2021 (1) | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate | N/A | N/A | 1.7% | ||||||||||||||
| Expected dividends yield | N/A | N/A | 2.1% | ||||||||||||||
| Expected stock price volatility | N/A | N/A | 28.1% | ||||||||||||||
| Expected life of options (in years) | N/A | N/A | 3.47 | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted-average grant date fair value | N/A | N/A | $13.97 | ||||||||||||||
________________________
(1)No stock option awards were granted in fiscal 2022 or fiscal 2021.
The risk-free interest rate was determined by a yield curve of risk-free rates based on published U.S. Treasury spot rates in effect at the time of grant and has a term equal to the expected life of the related options. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectations of dividend payouts at the grant date. The expected stock price volatility in all years represents the Company’s historical volatility. The expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and is based on historical trends.
As of October 2, 2022, there was less than $0.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options grants that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.2 years. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was less than $0.1 million, $1.6 million, and $0.7 million in fiscal years 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
Performance share awards — Performance share awards, granted in the form of stock units, represent a right to receive a certain number of shares of common stock based on the achievement of corporate performance goals and continued employment during the vesting period. Performance share awards issued to executives vest at the end of a three-year period and vested amounts may range from 0% to a maximum of 150% of targeted amounts depending on the achievement of performance measures at the end of a three-year period. If the awardee ceases to be employed by the Company prior to the last day of the performance period due to retirement, disability, or death, the performance share awards become vested pro-rata based on the number of full accounting periods the awardee was continuously employed by the Company during the performance period. The expected cost of the shares is based on the fair value of our stock on the date of grant and is reflected over the vesting period with a reduction for estimated forfeitures. These awards may be settled in cash or shares of common stock at the election of the Company on the date of grant. It is our intent to settle these awards with shares of common stock.
The following is a summary of performance share award activity for fiscal 2022:
| Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
| Performance share awards outstanding at October 3, 2021 | 35,097 | $ | 79.92 | ||||||||
| Granted | 37,822 | $ | 78.95 | ||||||||
| Issued | (6,905) | $ | 82.80 | ||||||||
| Forfeited | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Performance adjustments | (632) | $ | 70.56 | ||||||||
| Performance share awards outstanding at October 2, 2022 | 65,382 | $ | 79.14 | ||||||||
As of October 2, 2022, there was approximately $2.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to performance share awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of awards granted was $78.95, $88.88, and $81.02 in fiscal years 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. The total fair value of awards that became fully vested during fiscal years 2022, 2021, and 2020 was $0.1 million, $0.6 million, and $0.5 million, respectively.
Nonvested restricted stock awards — As part of the Merger Agreement, on the Closing Date, the Company assumed Del Taco’s historical equity compensation plans. The awards under Del Taco’s historical equity compensation plans that were not subject to accelerated vesting were exchanged for replacement awards of the Company, which included Del Taco’s non-accelerating restricted stock awards. Immediately following the Merger, these replacement awards were modified to accelerate the remaining vesting period to be one year following the Closing Date, other than the awards already scheduled to vest on June 30, 2022.
F-37
The following is a summary of nonvested restricted stock awards for fiscal 2022:
| Shares | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
| Restricted stock awards outstanding at October 3, 2021 | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Granted | 21,152 | $ | 82.33 | ||||||||
| Issued | (8,368) | $ | 82.33 | ||||||||
| Forfeited | (8,114) | $ | 82.33 | ||||||||
| Restricted stock awards outstanding at October 2, 2022 | 4,670 | $ | 82.33 | ||||||||
As of October 2, 2022, there was approximately $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.4 years. The weighted-average grant date fair value of awards granted was $82.33 in fiscal 2022. The total fair value of awards that vested and were released during fiscal 2022 was $0.7 million.
Non-management directors’ deferred compensation — All awards outstanding under our directors’ deferred compensation plan are accounted for as equity-based awards and deferred amounts are converted into stock equivalents based on a per share price equal to the average of the closing price of our common stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding the date the deferred compensation is credited to the director’s account. During fiscal 2022 and 2021, no shares of common stock were issued in connection with director retirements. During fiscal 2020, 204 shares of common stock were issued in connection with director retirements with a fair value of less than $0.1 million.
The following is a summary of the stock equivalent activity for fiscal 2022:
| Stock Equivalents | Weighted- Average Grant Date Fair Value | ||||||||||
| Stock equivalents outstanding at October 3, 2021 | 109,463 | $ | 43.06 | ||||||||
| Deferred directors’ compensation | 3,438 | $ | 84.35 | ||||||||
| Dividend equivalents | 3,373 | $ | 77.44 | ||||||||
| Stock equivalents outstanding at October 2, 2022 | 116,274 | $ | 45.28 | ||||||||
14. STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Repurchases of common stock — In fiscal 2022, the Company purchased 0.3 million shares of its common stock for an aggregate cost of $25.0 million. As of October 2, 2022, there was $175.0 million remaining amount under share repurchase programs authorized by the Board of Directors which expires in November 2023.
Dividends — In fiscal 2022, the Board of Directors declared four cash dividends of $0.44, respectively, totaling $37.2 million. Future dividends are subject to approval by our Board of Directors.
15. AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
Our basic earnings per share calculation is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Our diluted earnings per share calculation is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding adjusted by the number of additional shares that would have been outstanding had the potentially dilutive common shares been issued. Potentially dilutive common shares include nonvested stock awards and units, stock options, and non-management director stock equivalents. Performance share awards are included in the average diluted shares outstanding each period if the performance criteria have been met at the end of the respective periods.
F-38
The following table reconciles basic weighted-average shares outstanding to diluted weighted-average shares outstanding in each fiscal year (in thousands):
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||
| Weighted-average shares outstanding — basic | 21,195 | 22,402 | 23,125 | ||||||||||||||
| Effect of potentially dilutive securities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Nonvested stock awards and units | 47 | 62 | 137 | ||||||||||||||
| Stock options | 1 | 9 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Performance share awards | 2 | 5 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted-average shares outstanding — diluted | 21,245 | 22,478 | 23,269 | ||||||||||||||
| Excluded from diluted weighted-average shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||||||
| Antidilutive | 23 | 29 | 318 | ||||||||||||||
| Performance conditions not satisfied at the end of the period | 61 | 25 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Purchase commitments — Jack in the Box and Del Taco have long-term beverage supply agreements with certain major beverage vendors, which provide fountain products and marketing support funding to the Company and its franchisees. These agreements require minimum purchases of fountain beverage syrup by the Company and its franchisees at agreed upon prices until the total volume commitments have been reached. Based on current pricing and ratio of usage at company-operated to franchised restaurants as of October 2, 2022, total beverage purchase requirements under these agreements is estimated to be approximately $75.2 million over the next seven years.
We also have entered into various arrangements with vendors providing information technology services with no early termination fees. The Company’s unconditional purchase obligations on these contracts total approximately $6.7 million over the next four years.
Legal matters — We assess contingencies, including litigation contingencies, to determine the degree of probability and range of possible loss for potential accrual in our financial statements. An estimated loss contingency is accrued in the financial statements if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. As of October 2, 2022, the Company had accruals of $59.2 million for all of its legal matters in aggregate, presented within “Accrued liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheet. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. When evaluating litigation contingencies, we may be unable to provide a meaningful estimate due to a number of factors, including the procedural status of the matter in question, the availability of appellate remedies, insurance coverage related to the claim or claims in question, the presence of complex or novel legal theories, and the ongoing discovery and development of information important to the matter. In addition, damage amounts claimed in litigation against us may be unsupported, exaggerated, or unrelated to possible outcomes, and as such are not meaningful indicators of our potential liability or financial exposure. We regularly review contingencies to determine the adequacy of the accruals and related disclosures. The ultimate amount of loss may differ from these estimates. As of October 2, 2022, we estimate the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of amounts accrued for these matters as of such date, to be up to approximately $6.5 million, excluding interest and attorney fees. Any estimate is not an indication of expected loss, if any, or of the Company’s maximum possible loss exposure and the ultimate amount of loss may differ materially from these estimates in the near term.
Gessele v. Jack in the Box Inc. — In August 2010, five former Jack in the Box employees instituted litigation in federal court in Oregon alleging claims under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and Oregon wage and hour laws. The plaintiffs alleged that Jack in the Box failed to pay non-exempt employees for certain meal breaks and improperly made payroll deductions for shoe purchases and for workers’ compensation expenses, and later added additional claims relating to timing of final pay and related wage and hour claims involving employees of a franchisee. In 2016, the court dismissed the federal claims and those relating to franchise employees. In June 2017, the court granted class certification with respect to state law claims of improper deductions and late payment of final wages. The parties participated in a voluntary mediation on March 16, 2020, but the matter did not settle. On October 24, 2022, a jury awarded plaintiffs approximately $6.4 million in damages and penalties, in addition to interest and attorney fees to be determined by the court at a later date. The Company continues to dispute liability and the damage award and will defend against both through post-trial motions and all other available appellate remedies.
F-39
Torrez — In March 2014, a former Del Taco employee filed a purported Private Attorneys General Act claim and class action alleging various causes of action under California’s labor, wage, and hour laws. The plaintiff generally alleges Del Taco did not appropriately provide meal and rest breaks and failed to pay wages and reimburse business expenses to its California non-exempt employees. On November 12, 2021, the court granted, in part, the plaintiff's motion for class certification. The parties participated in a voluntary mediation on May 24, 2022 and June 3, 2022. On June 4, 2022, we entered into a Settlement Memorandum of Understanding (the “Agreement”) which obligates the Company to pay a gross settlement amount of $50.0 million, for which in exchange we will be released from all claims by the parties. The Agreement contains no admission of wrongdoing and is contingent upon various conditions, including, but not limited to, court approvals. There can be no assurance that the Agreement will be approved by the court nor upheld if challenged on appeal. As of October 2, 2022, the Company has accrued the settlement amount, included within “Accrued liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheet.
J&D Restaurant Group — On April 17, 2019, the trustee for a bankrupt former franchisee filed a complaint seeking to recover assets in the form of actual and exemplary damages for the bankruptcy trust and generally alleging the Company wrongfully terminated the franchise agreements and unreasonably denied two perspective purchasers that the former franchisee presented. The parties participated in a mediation in April 2021, but the matter did not settle. Trial in this matter is currently set for January 2023, with the parties scheduled to participate in another court ordered mediation in December 2022.
Other legal matters — In addition to the matters described above, we are subject to normal and routine litigation brought by former or current employees, customers, franchisees, vendors, landlords, shareholders, or others. We intend to defend ourselves in any such matters. Some of these matters may be covered, at least in part, by insurance or other third-party indemnity obligation. We record receivables from third party insurers when recovery has been determined to be probable.
Lease guarantees — We remain contingently liable for certain leases relating to our former Qdoba business which we sold in fiscal 2018. Under the Qdoba Purchase Agreement, the buyer has indemnified the Company of all claims related to these guarantees. As of October 2, 2022, the maximum potential liability of future undiscounted payments under these leases is approximately $23.5 million. The lease terms extend for a maximum of approximately 15 more years and we would remain a guarantor of the leases in the event the leases are extended for any established renewal periods. In the event of default, we believe the exposure is limited due to contractual protections and recourse available in the lease agreements, as well as the Qdoba Purchase Agreement, including a requirement of the landlord to mitigate damages by re-letting the properties in default, and indemnity from the Buyer. The Company has not recorded a liability for these guarantees as we believe the likelihood of making any future payments is remote.
17. SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW INFORMATION (in thousands)
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Cash paid during the year for: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Income tax payments | $ | 33,819 | $ | 48,200 | $ | 29,360 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest, net of amounts capitalized | $ | 70,475 | $ | 60,413 | $ | 68,612 | ||||||||||||||
| Non-cash investing and financing transactions: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase in notes and accounts receivable from the sale of restaurant properties | $ | 10,001 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
| Increase in dividends accrued or converted to common stock equivalents | $ | 275 | $ | 232 | $ | 117 | ||||||||||||||
| Consideration for franchise acquisitions | $ | 297 | $ | 1,305 | $ | 859 | ||||||||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in obligations for purchases of property and equipment | $ | 1,637 | $ | 1,755 | $ | (2,696) | ||||||||||||||
| Decrease in obligations for treasury stock repurchases | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (2,025) | ||||||||||||||
F-40
18. SUPPLEMENTAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION (in thousands)
| October 2, 2022 | October 3, 2021 | |||||||||||||
| Accounts and other receivables, net: | ||||||||||||||
| Trade | $ | 90,105 | $ | 75,273 | ||||||||||
| Notes receivable, current portion | 8,643 | 1,467 | ||||||||||||
| Income tax receivable | 878 | 1,157 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 10,152 | 2,730 | ||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | (5,975) | (6,292) | ||||||||||||
| $ | 103,803 | $ | 74,335 | |||||||||||
| Other assets, net: | ||||||||||||||
| Company-owned life insurance policies | $ | 108,924 | $ | 123,566 | ||||||||||
| Deferred rent receivable | 43,891 | 46,234 | ||||||||||||
| Franchise tenant improvement allowances | 32,429 | 34,124 | ||||||||||||
| Notes receivable, less current portion | 11,624 | 4,544 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 29,701 | 15,970 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 226,569 | $ | 224,438 | |||||||||||
| Accrued liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
| Legal accruals | $ | 59,165 | $ | 7,540 | ||||||||||
| Payroll and related taxes | 43,837 | 34,649 | ||||||||||||
| Sales and property taxes | 30,947 | 23,174 | ||||||||||||
| Insurance | 32,272 | 21,218 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred rent income | 18,525 | 17,892 | ||||||||||||
| Advertising | 11,028 | 13,097 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred franchise fees and development fees | 5,647 | 4,949 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 52,511 | 25,898 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 253,932 | $ | 148,417 | |||||||||||
| Other long-term liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
| Defined benefit pension plans | $ | 51,679 | $ | 70,354 | ||||||||||
| Deferred franchise and development fees | 40,802 | 36,571 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 42,213 | 49,417 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 134,694 | $ | 156,342 | |||||||||||
19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 18, 2022, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.44 per share, to be paid on December 22, 2022 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 7, 2022. Future dividends will be subject to approval by our Board of Directors.
F-41