JOHNSON OUTDOORS INC - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
[
X ]
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
fiscal year ended October 3, 2008
OR
[____]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from ______
to ______
Commission
file number 0-16255
JOHNSON
OUTDOORS INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin
|
39-1536083
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
555 Main Street, Racine, Wisconsin 53403
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(262) 631-6600
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class
|
Name
of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Class
A Common Stock, $.05 par value per share
|
NASDAQ
Global MarketSM
|
Securities
registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ]
No [ X ]
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes [ ] No [ X ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes [ X ]
No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to
this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definition of "large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer" and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large
Accelerated Filer
|
[ ]
|
Accelerated
Filer
|
[X]
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer
|
[ ]
|
Smaller
Reporting Company
|
[ ]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes [ ]
No [ X ]
As
of
December 5, 2008, 8,007,069 shares of Class A and 1,216,464 shares of Class
B
common stock of the registrant were outstanding. The aggregate market value
of
voting and non-voting Class A common stock of the registrant held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant was approximately $73,917,159 on March 28,
2008
(the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second
quarter) based on approximately 4,386,775 shares of Class A common stock held
by
nonaffiliates. For purposes of this calculation only, shares of all voting
stock
are deemed to have a market value of $16.85 per share, the closing price of
the
Class A common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global MarketSM
on
March 28, 2008. Shares of common
stock held by any executive officer or director of the registrant (including all shares
beneficially owned
by the Johnson Family) have
been excluded from this computation because such persons may be deemed to be
affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not a conclusive
determination for other purposes.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of the
Registrant are incorporated by reference into Part III of this
report.
As
used
in this report, the terms "we," "us," "our," "Johnson Outdoors" and the
"Company" mean Johnson Outdoors Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context
indicates another meaning.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
Business
|
1
|
|
Risk
Factors
|
5
|
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
8
|
|
Properties
|
9
|
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
10
|
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
10
|
|
Market
for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
|
10
|
|
Selected
Consolidated Financial Data
|
12
|
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
14
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
26
|
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
26
|
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
26
|
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
27
|
|
Other
Information
|
28
|
|
Directors,
and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
28
|
|
Executive
Compensation
|
28
|
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
28
|
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
29
|
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
29
|
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
30
|
|
Signatures
|
31
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
32
|
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
F-5
|
Forward
Looking Statements
Certain
matters discussed in this Form 10-K are “forward-looking statements,” and the
Company intends these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe
harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this statement for
purposes of those safe harbor provisions. These forward-looking statements
can
generally be identified as such because the context of the statement includes
phrases such as the Company “expects,” “believes” or other words of similar
meaning. Similarly, statements that describe the Company’s future plans,
objectives or goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking
statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause
actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those currently
anticipated. Factors that could affect actual results or outcomes include the
matters described under the caption "Risk Factors" in Item 1A of this
report and the following: changes in consumer spending patterns; the
Company’s success in implementing its strategic plan, including its focus on
innovation; actions of companies that compete with the Company; the Company’s
success in managing inventory; movements in foreign currencies or interest
rates; unanticipated issues related to the Company’s military tent business; the
success of suppliers and customers; the ability of the Company to deploy its
capital successfully; unanticipated outcomes related to outsourcing certain
manufacturing processes; unanticipated outcomes related to outstanding
litigation matters; successful integration of acquisitions; and adverse weather
conditions. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged to
consider these factors in evaluating the forward-looking statements and are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of
this
filing. The Company assumes no obligation, and disclaims any obligation, to
update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or
circumstances.
Trademarks
We
have
registered the following trademarks, which are used in this report: Minn Kota®,
Cannon®, Humminbird®, Bottom Line®, Fishin' Buddy®, Silva®, Eureka!®, Geonav®,
Old Town®, Ocean Kayak™ Necky®, Escape®,
Lendal™
Extrasport®, Carlisle®, Scubapro®, UWATEC® and Seemann™.
PART
I
ITEM
1.
|
BUSINESS
|
Johnson
Outdoors Inc. (the Company) is a leading global manufacturer and marketer of
branded seasonal, outdoor recreation products used primarily for fishing,
diving, paddling and camping. The Company’s portfolio of well-known consumer
brands have attained leading market positions due to continuous innovation,
marketing excellence, product performance and quality and enjoy a premium
reputation among outdoor recreation enthusiasts and novices
alike. Company values and culture support entrepreneurism in all
areas, promoting and leveraging best practices and synergies within and across
its subsidiaries to advance the Company’s strategic vision set by executive
management and approved by the Board of Directors. The Company is
controlled by Helen P. Johnson-Leipold (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer),
members of her family and related entities.
The
Company was incorporated in Wisconsin in 1987 as successor to various
businesses.
Marine
Electronics
The
Company’s marine electronic segment brands are: Minn Kota battery-powered
fishing motors for quiet trolling or primary propulsion; Humminbird sonar and GPS
equipment for fishfinding and navigation; Cannon downriggers for
controlled-depth fishing; and Geonav chartplotters for
navigation. Marine electronic brands and related accessories are sold
in North America, South America, Europe and the Pacific Basin through large
outdoor specialty retailers, such as Bass Pro Shops and Cabelas, large retail
store chains, marine distributors, international distributors and original
equipment manufacturers, such as Ranger Boats, Skeeter Boats and Stratos
Champion.
Market
share gains have been achieved by emphasizing innovation, quality products
and
marketing. Consumer marketing and promotion includes: product
placements on fishing-related television shows; print advertising and editorial
coverage in outdoor, general interest and sport magazines; professional angler
and tournament sponsorships; packaging and point-of-purchase materials and
offers to increase consumer appeal and sales; branded websites; and, on-line
promotions.
On
November 16, 2007, the Company acquired Geonav S.r.l. (Geonav), a marine
electronics company in Italy for approximately $5.6 million, including
transaction costs. Geonav is a major European
brand of chart plotters based in Viareggio, Italy. Also sold under the Geonav brand are marine
autopilots, VHF radios and fish finders.
1
Outdoor
Equipment
The
Company’s Outdoor Equipment segment brands are: Eureka! tents, sleeping bags
and backpacks; Silva
field compasses and digital instruments; and Tech40
performance measurement
instruments.
Eureka!
consumer tents,
sleeping bags and backpacks are mid- to high-price range products sold in the
U.S. and Canada through independent sales representatives, primarily to sporting
goods stores, catalog and mail order houses and camping and backpacking
specialty stores. Marketing of the Company’s tents, sleeping bags and backpacks
is focused on building the Eureka! brand name and
establishing the Company as a leader in tent design and innovation. Although
the
Company’s camping tents, sleeping bags and backpacks are produced primarily by
third-party manufacturing sources, design and innovation are conducted at the
Company's Binghamton, New York location. Eureka! camping products
are
sold under license in Japan, Australia and Europe.
Eureka!
commercial tents
include party tents, sold primarily to general rental stores, and other
commercial tents sold directly to tent erectors. Commercial tents are
manufactured by the Company at the Company’s Binghamton, New York location and
the Company’s tent products range from 10’x10’ canopies to 120’ wide pole tents
and other large scale frame structures.
Eureka!
also designs and
manufactures large, heavy-duty tents and lightweight backpacking tents for
the
military at its Binghamton, New York location. Tents produced in the last twelve
months include modular general purpose tents, TEMPER tents, a rapid deploy
tent
system, and various lightweight one to four person tents. Military tent
accessories like fabric floors and tent liners are also
manufactured.
Silva
field compasses are
manufactured by third parties and marketed exclusively in North America where
the Company owns Silva
trademark rights. Tech40
digital
instruments are
manufactured by third parties and are primarily sold in the North American
market.
Watercraft
The
Company’s Watercraft brands are: Old Town canoes and kayaks;
Ocean Kayak; Necky
kayaks;
Carlisle
and Lendal paddles; and Extrasport
personal
flotation
devices.
The
Company manufactures its Watercraft products in two locations in the U.S. and
one in New Zealand. The Company also contracts for manufacturing of Watercraft
products with third parties in Michigan, Tunisia and the Czech
Republic.
In
its
Old Town, Maine facility, the Company produces high quality Old Town kayaks, canoes and
accessories for family recreation, touring and tripping. The Company uses a
rotational-molding process for manufacturing polyethylene kayaks and canoes
to
compete in the high volume, low and mid-priced range of the market. These kayaks
and canoes feature stiffer and more durable hulls than higher priced boats.
The
Company also manufactures canoes from fiberglass, Royalex (ABS) and
wood.
Sit-on-top
Ocean Kayaks and
high-performance Necky
sea touring kayaks are manufactured in the Company’s Ferndale, Washington
facility.
Watercraft
accessory brands, including Extrasport personal flotation
devices and wearable paddle gear, as well as Carlisle branded paddles are
produced primarily by third-party sources. Lendal paddles are produced
in-house at the Old Town Canoe facility.
The
Company’s kayaks, canoes and accessories are sold primarily to specialty stores,
marine dealers, sporting goods stores and catalog and mail order houses such
as
L. L. Bean® in the
U.S.,
Europe and Australasia.
Diving
The
Company manufactures and markets underwater diving products for technical and
recreational divers, which it sells and distributes under the SCUBAPRO, UWATEC
and Seemann brand
names.
The
Company markets a complete line of underwater
diving and snorkeling equipment, including regulators, stabilizing jackets,
dive
computers and gauges, wetsuits, masks, fins, snorkels and accessories. SCUBAPRO and UWATEC
diving equipment are
marketed to the premium segment of the market for both diving enthusiasts and
more technical, advanced divers. Seemann products are marketed
to the recreational diver interested in owning quality equipment at an
affordable price. Products are sold via selected distribution to independent
specialty dive stores worldwide. These specialty dive stores generally provide
a
wide range of services to divers, including sales, service and repair, diving
education and travel.
2
The
Company focuses on maintaining SCUBAPRO and UWATEC
as the market leaders
in innovation. The Company maintains research and development functions in
the
U.S. and Europe and holds a number of patents on proprietary products. The
Company’s consumer communication focuses on building the brand and highlighting
exclusive product features and consumer benefits of the SCUBAPRO and UWATEC
product lines. The
Company’s communication and distribution reinforce the SCUBAPRO and UWATEC
brands’ position as the
industry’s quality and innovation leader. The Company markets its equipment in
diving magazines, via websites and through dive specialty stores. Seemann’s full-line of dive
equipment and accessories are marketed and sold primarily in Europe. Seemann products compete
in
the mid-market on the basis of quality at an affordable price.
The
Company maintains manufacturing and assembly facilities in Italy and
Indonesia and is currently in the process of moving the Swiss manufacturing
operation to Batam, Indonesia, as described in Note 2 to the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements attached to this report. The
Company sources stabilizing jackets from a third-party manufacturer in Mexico.
The majority of the Company’s rubber, proprietary materials, plastic products
and other components are also sourced from third-parties.
Financial
Information for Business Segments
As
noted
above, the Company has four reportable business segments. See Note 12 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report for
financial information concerning each business segment.
International
Operations
See
Note
12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report
for financial information regarding the Company’s domestic and international
operations. See Note 1, subheading “Foreign Operations and Related Derivative
Financial Instruments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere in this report for information regarding risks related to the
Company’s foreign operations.
Research
and Development
The
Company commits significant resources to new product research
and development. The Company expenses these costs as incurred except
for software development for new fishfinder products which are
capitalized once technological feasibility is established and then amortized
over the expected life of the software. The amounts expensed by the Company
in
connection with research and development activities for each of the last three
fiscal years are set forth in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Operations included elsewhere in this report.
Competition
The
Company believes its products compete favorably on the basis of product
innovation, product performance and marketing support and, to a lesser extent,
price.
Marine
Electronics: The
main competitor in electric trolling motors is Motor Guide, owned by Brunswick
Corporation, which manufactures and sells a full range of trolling motors and
accessories. Competition in this business is focused on product quality and
durability as well as product benefits and features for fishing. The main
competitors in the fishfinder market are Lowrance, Garmin, Navman, and Ray
Marine. Competition in this business is primarily focused on the quality of
sonar imaging and display as well as the integration of mapping and GPS
technology. The main competitors in the downrigger market are Big Jon, Walker
and Scotty. Competition in this business primarily focuses on ease of operation,
speed and durability.
Outdoor
Equipment: The
Company’s brands and products compete in the sporting goods and specialty
segments of the outdoor equipment market. Competitive brands with a strong
position in the sporting goods channel include Coleman and private label brands.
The Company also competes with specialty companies such as The North Face and
Kelty on the basis of materials and innovative designs for consumers who want
performance products priced at a value. Commercial tent market competitors
include Anchor Industries and Aztec for tension and frame tents along with
canopies based on structure and styling. The Company also competes for military
tent contracts under the U.S. Government bidding process; competitors include
Base-X, DHS Systems and Alaska Structures, Camel, Outdoor Ventures,
and Diamond Brands.
Watercraft:
The
Company
primarily competes in the paddle boat segment of kayaks and canoes. The
Company’s main competitors in this segment are Confluence Watersports, Pelican,
Wenonah Canoe and Legacy Paddlesports, each of which primarily
competes on the basis of their design, performance and quality.
Diving:
The
main
competitors in Diving include Aqualung/U.S. Divers, Oceanic, Mares, Cressi-sub,
and Suunto, each of which primarily competes on the basis of product innovation,
performance, quality and safety.
3
Employees
At
October 3, 2008, the Company had approximately 1,400 regular, full-time
employees. The Company considers its employee relations to be excellent.
Temporary employees are utilized primarily to manage peaks in the seasonal
manufacturing of products.
Backlog
Unfilled
orders for future delivery of products totaled approximately $38.2 million
at
October 3, 2008 and $36.0 million September 28, 2007. For the majority of its
products, the Company’s businesses do not receive significant orders in advance
of expected shipment dates, with the exception of the military tent business
which has orders outstanding based on contractual agreements.
Patents,
Trademarks and Proprietary Rights
The
Company owns no single patent that is material to its business as a whole.
However, the Company holds various patents, principally for diving products,
electric motors and fishfinders and regularly files applications for patents.
The Company has numerous trademarks and trade names which it considers important
to its business, many of which are noted on the preceding pages. Historically,
the Company has vigorously defended its intellectual property rights and the
Company expects to continue to do so.
Sources
and Availability of Materials
The
Company’s products are made using materials that are generally in adequate
supply and are available from a variety of third-party suppliers.
The
Company has an exclusive supply contract with a single vendor for materials
used
in its military tent business. Interruption or loss in the availability of
these
materials could have a material adverse impact on the sales and operating
results of the Company’s Outdoor Equipment business.
Seasonality
The
Company’s products are outdoor recreation related which results in seasonal
variations in sales and profitability. This seasonal variability is due to
customers increasing their inventories in the quarters ending March and June,
the primary selling season for the Company’s outdoor recreation products. The
following table shows, for the past three fiscal years, the total net sales
and
operating profit or loss of the Company for each quarter, as a percentage of
the
total year.
Year
Ended
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
October
3, 2008
|
September
28, 2007
|
September
29, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
|
Net
Sales
|
Operating
Profit
(Loss)
|
Net
Sales
|
Operating
Profit
(Loss)
|
Net
Sales
|
Operating
Profit
(Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||
December
|
18 | % | (12 | )% | 17 | % | (11 | )% | 19 | % | (1 | )% | ||||||||||||
March
|
29 | 10 | 28 | 23 | 27 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||
June
|
34 | 38 | 35 | 74 | 34 | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||
September
|
19 | (136 | ) | 20 | 14 | 20 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
100 | % | (100 | )% | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % |
Available
Information
The
Company maintains a website at www.johnsonoutdoors.com. On its website, the
Company makes available, free of charge, its Annual Report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments
to
those reports, as soon as reasonably practical after the reports have been
electronically filed or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In
addition, the Company makes available on its website, free of charge, its (a)
Code of Business Conduct; (b) Code of Ethics for its Chief Executive Officer
and
Senior Financial and Accounting Officers; and (c) the charters for the following
committees of the Board of Directors: Audit; Compensation; Executive; and
Nominating and Corporate Governance. The Company is not including the
information contained on or available through its website as a part of, or
incorporating such information by reference into, this Annual Report on Form
10-K. This report includes all
material information about the Company that is included on the Company’s website
and is otherwise required to be included in this report.
4
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
The
risks
described below are not the only risks we face. Additional risks that we do
not
yet know of or that we currently think are immaterial may also impair our future
business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the
following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results
of
operations could be materially adversely affected. In such cases, the trading
price of our common stock could decline.
Our
net sales and profitability depend on our ability to continue to conceive,
design and market products that appeal to our consumers.
The
introduction of new products is critical in our industry and to our growth
strategy. Our business depends on our ability to continue to conceive, design,
manufacture and market new products and upon continued market acceptance of
our
product offering. Rapidly changing consumer preferences and trends make it
difficult to predict how long consumer demand for our existing products will
continue or what new products will be successful. Our current products may
not
continue to be popular or new products that we may introduce may not achieve
adequate consumer acceptance for us to recover development, manufacturing,
marketing and other costs. A decline in consumer demand for our products, our
failure to develop new products on a timely basis in anticipation of changing
consumer preferences or the failure of our new products to achieve and sustain
consumer acceptance could reduce our net sales and profitability.
Competition
in our markets could reduce our net sales and profitability.
We
operate in highly competitive markets. We compete with several large domestic
and foreign companies such as Brunswick, Lowrance, Confluence and Aqualung/U.S.
Divers, with private label products sold by many of our retail customers and
with other producers of outdoor recreation products. Some of our competitors
have longer operating histories, stronger brand recognition and greater
financial, technical, marketing and other resources than us. In addition, we
may
face competition from new participants in our markets because the outdoor
recreation product industries have limited barriers to entry. We experience
price competition for our products, and competition for shelf space at
retailers, all of which may increase in the future. If we cannot compete
successfully in the future, our net sales and profitability will likely
decline.
General
economic conditions affect our results.
Our
revenues are affected by economic conditions and consumer confidence worldwide,
but especially in the United States and Europe. In times of economic
uncertainty, consumers tend to defer expenditures for discretionary items,
which
affects demand for our products. Our businesses are cyclical in
nature, and their success is dependent upon favorable economic conditions,
the
overall level of consumer confidence and discretionary income
levels. Any substantial deterioration in general economic conditions
that diminishes consumer confidence or discretionary income can reduce our
sales
and adversely affect our financial results including the potential for future
impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets. The impact of
weakening consumer credit markets; corporate restructurings; layoffs;
declines in the value of investments and residential real estate; higher fuel
prices and increases in federal and state taxation all can negatively affect
our
results.
Trademark
infringement or other intellectual property claims relating to our products
could increase our costs.
Our
industry is susceptible to litigation regarding trademark and patent
infringement and other intellectual property rights. We could be either a
plaintiff or defendant in trademark and patent infringement claims and claims
of
breach of license from time to time. The prosecution or defense of intellectual
property litigation is both costly and disruptive of the time and resources
of
our management even if the claim or defense against us is without merit. We
could also be required to pay substantial damages or settlement costs to resolve
intellectual property litigation.
Impairment
charges could reduce our profitability.
In
accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, the Company tests goodwill and other intangible assets
with indefinite useful lives for impairment on an annual basis or on an interim
basis if an event occurs that might reduce the fair value of the reporting
unit
below its carrying value. We conduct testing for impairment during
the fourth quarter of our fiscal year. Various uncertainties,
including changes in consumer preferences, deterioration in the political
environment, continued adverse conditions in the capital markets or changes
in
general economic conditions, could impact the expected cash flows to be
generated by an intangible asset or group of intangible assets, and may result
in an impairment of those assets. Although any such impairment charge
would be a non-cash expense, any impairment of our intangible assets could
materially increase our expenses and reduce our
profitability. If we are required to record an impairment
charge, the charge could affect our compliance with the debt covenants in our
credit facility. Additionally, should we violate a covenant under our
debt agreements, the cost of obtaining an amendment or waiver could be
significant, or the lenders could be unwilling to provide a waiver or agree
to
an amendment. For our fiscal year ending October 3, 2008, we recorded
an impairment charge of $41.0 million.
5
Sales
of our products are seasonal, which causes our operating results to vary from
quarter to quarter.
Sales
of
our products are seasonal. Historically, our net sales and profitability have
peaked in the second and third fiscal quarters due to the buying patterns of
our
customers. Seasonal variations in operating results may cause our results to
fluctuate significantly in the first and fourth quarters and may tend to depress
our stock price during the first and fourth quarters.
The
trading price of shares of our common stock fluctuates and investors in our
common stock may experience substantial losses.
The
trading price of our common stock has been volatile and may continue to be
volatile in the future. The trading price of our common stock could decline
or
fluctuate in response to a variety of factors, including:
·
|
the
timing of our announcements or those of our competitors concerning
significant product developments, acquisitions or financial
performance;
|
·
|
fluctuation
in our quarterly operating results;
|
·
|
substantial
sales of our common stock;
|
·
|
general
stock market conditions; or
|
·
|
other
economic or external factors.
|
You
may
be unable to sell your stock at or above your purchase price.
A
limited number of our shareholders can exert significant influence over the
Company.
As
of
December 5, 2008, Helen P. Johnson-Leipold, members of her family and related
entities (hereinafter the Johnson Family) held approximately 78% of the voting
power of both classes of our common stock taken as a whole. This voting power
would permit these shareholders, if they chose to act together, to exert
significant influence over the outcome of shareholder votes, including votes
concerning the election of directors, by-law amendments, possible mergers,
corporate control contests and other significant corporate
transactions.
We
may experience difficulties in integrating strategic acquisitions.
As
part
of our growth strategy, we intend to pursue acquisitions that are consistent
with our mission and that will enable us to leverage our competitive strengths.
Over the past three fiscal years we have acquired:
·
|
certain
assets of Computrol, Inc. on October 3, 2005, including, without
limitation certain intellectual property used in its
business;
|
·
|
Lendal
Products Ltd. on October 3, 2006, including, without limitation certain
intellectual property used in its
business;
|
·
|
Seemann
Sub GmbH & Co. KG on April 2, 2007, including, without limitation
certain intellectual property used in its business;
and
|
·
|
Geonav
S.r.l. on November 16, 2007, including without limitation certain
intellectual property used in its business.
|
Risks
associated with integrating strategic acquisitions include:
·
|
the
acquired business may experience losses which could adversely affect
our
profitability;
|
·
|
unanticipated
costs relating to the integration of acquired businesses may increase
our
expenses;
|
·
|
possible
failure to obtain any necessary consents to the transfer of licenses
or
other agreements of the acquired
company;
|
·
|
possible
failure to maintain customer, licensor and other relationships after
the
closing of the transaction of the acquired
company;
|
·
|
difficulties
in achieving planned cost-savings and synergies may increase our
expenses;
|
·
|
diversion
of our management’s attention could impair their ability to effectively
manage our other business operations;
and
|
·
|
unanticipated
management or operational problems or liabilities may adversely affect
our
profitability and financial
condition.
|
6
We
are dependent upon certain key members of management.
Our
success will depend to a significant degree on the abilities and efforts of
our
senior management. Moreover, our success depends on our ability to attract,
retain and motivate qualified management, marketing, technical and sales
personnel. These people are in high demand and often have competing employment
opportunities. The labor market for skilled employees is highly competitive
due
to limited supply, and we may lose key employees or be forced to increase their
compensation to retain these people. Employee turnover could significantly
increase our training and other related employee costs. The loss of key
personnel, or the failure to attract qualified personnel, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations
and
on the value of our securities.
Sources
of and fluctuations in market prices of raw materials can affect our operating
results.
The
primary raw materials we use are metals, resins and packaging materials. These
materials are generally available from a number of suppliers, but we have chosen
to concentrate our sourcing with a limited number of vendors for each commodity
or purchased component. We believe our sources of raw materials are reliable
and
adequate for our needs. However, the development of future sourcing issues
related to the availability of these materials as well as significant
fluctuations in the market prices of these materials may have an adverse affect
on our financial results.
Currency
exchange rate fluctuations could increase our expenses.
We
have
significant foreign operations, for which the functional currencies are
denominated primarily in euros, Swiss francs, Japanese yen and Canadian dollars.
As the values of the currencies of the foreign countries in which we have
operations increase or decrease relative to the U.S. dollar, the sales,
expenses, profits, losses, assets and liabilities of our foreign operations,
as
reported in our consolidated financial statements, increase or decrease,
accordingly. Approximately 29% of our revenues for the year ended October 3,
2008 were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Approximately
17% were denominated in euros, with the remaining 12% denominated in various
other foreign currencies. In the past, we have mitigated a portion of
the fluctuations in certain foreign currencies through the purchase of foreign
currency swaps, forward contracts and options to hedge known commitments,
primarily for purchases of inventory and other assets denominated in foreign
currencies; however, no such transactions were entered into during fiscal years
2008 or 2007.
We
are subject to environmental and safety regulations.
We
are
subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and other legal requirements
related to the generation, storage, transport, treatment and disposal of
materials as a result of our manufacturing and assembly operations. These laws
include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (as amended), the Clean
Air
Act (as amended) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and
Liability Act (as amended). We believe that our existing environmental
management system is adequate and we have no current plans for substantial
capital expenditures in the environmental area. We do not currently anticipate
any material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition
or
competitive position as a result of compliance with federal, state, local and
foreign environmental laws or other legal requirements. However, risk of
environmental liability and changes associated with maintaining compliance
with
environmental laws is inherent in the nature of our business and there is no
assurance that material liabilities or changes would not arise.
We
rely on our credit facility to provide us with sufficient working capital to
operate our business.
Historically,
we have relied upon our
existing credit facilities to provide us with adequate working capital to
operate our business. The availability of borrowing amounts under our
credit facilities are dependent upon our compliance with the debt covenants
set
forth in the facilities. Violation of those covenants, whether as a
result of recording goodwill impairment charges, incurring operating losses
or
otherwise, could result in our lenders restricting or terminating our borrowing
ability under our credit facilities. If our lenders reduce or
terminate our access to amounts under our credit facilities, we may not have
sufficient capital to fund our working capital needs and/or we may need to
secure additional capital or financing to fund our working capital requirements
or to repay outstanding debt under our credit facilities. We can make
no assurance that we will be successful in ensuring our availability to amounts
under our credit facilities or in connection with raising additional capital
and
that any amount, if raised, will be sufficient to meet our cash
requirements. If we are not able to maintain our borrowing
availability under our credit facilities and/or raise additional capital when
needed, we may be forced to sharply curtail our efforts to manufacture and
promote the sale of our products or to curtail our
operations.
7
Our
debt covenants may limit our ability to complete acquisitions, incur debt,
make
investments, sell assets, merge or complete other significant
transactions.
Our
credit agreement and certain other of our debt instruments include financial
measure requirements that if breached may result in limitations on a number
of
our activities, including our ability to:
·
|
incur
additional debt;
|
·
|
create
liens on our assets or make
guarantees;
|
·
|
make
certain investments or loans;
|
·
|
pay
dividends; or
|
·
|
dispose
of or sell assets or enter into a merger or similar
transaction.
|
These
debt covenants could restrict our ability to pursue opportunities to expand
our
business operations, including engaging in strategic acquisitions. In
addition, a violation of covenants under our credit facilities could cause
a
cross-default under our interest rate swap contract or other financial
agreements. A cross-default under our interest rate swap could accelerate
our obligation to perform under the terms of the interest rate swap
contract.
Our
shares of common stock are thinly traded and our stock price
may be more volatile.
Because
our common stock is thinly traded, its market price may fluctuate significantly
more than the stock market in general or the stock prices of similar companies,
which are exchanged, listed or quoted on NASDAQ. We believe there are 4,375,894
shares of our Class A common stock held by nonaffiliates as of December 5,
2008.
Thus, our common stock will be less liquid than the stock of companies with
broader public ownership, and as a result, the trading prices for our shares
of
common stock may be more volatile. Among other things, trading of a relatively
small volume of our common stock may have a greater impact on the trading price
for our stock than would be the case if our public float were
larger.
ITEM
1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
8
ITEM
2.
|
PROPERTIES
|
The
Company maintains both leased and owned manufacturing, warehousing, distribution
and office facilities throughout the world. The Company believes that its
manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, and office facilities are well
maintained and have capacity adequate to meet its current needs.
See
Note
5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report
for
a discussion of the Company’s lease obligations.
The
Company’s principal manufacturing (identified with an asterisk) and other
locations are:
Alpharetta,
Georgia (Marine Electronics)
|
Antibes,
France (Diving)
|
Barcelona,
Spain (Diving)
|
Basingstoke,
Hampshire, England (Diving)
|
Batam,
Indonesia* (Diving and Outdoor Equipment)
|
Binghamton,
New York* (Outdoor Equipment)
|
Brignais,
France (Watercraft)
|
Brussels,
Belgium (Diving)
|
Burlington,
Ontario, Canada (Marine Electronics, Outdoor Equipment)
|
Chai
Wan, Hong Kong (Diving)
|
Chatswood,
Australia (Diving)
|
El
Cajon, California (Diving)
|
Eufaula,
Alabama* (Marine Electronics)
|
Ferndale,
Washington* (Watercraft)
|
Genoa,
Italy* (Diving)
|
Great
Yarmouth, Norfolk, United Kingdom (Watercraft)
|
Hallwil,
Switzerland (Diving)
|
Henggart,
Switzerland (Diving)
|
Mankato,
Minnesota* (Marine Electronics)
|
Napier,
New Zealand* (Watercraft)
|
Old
Town, Maine* (Watercraft)
|
Silverdale,
New Zealand* (Watercraft)
Viareggio,
Italy (Marine Electronics)
|
Wendelstein,
Germany (Diving)
|
Yokohama,
Japan (Diving)
|
The
Company’s corporate headquarters is leased and located in Racine,
Wisconsin.
9
ITEM
3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
See
Note
14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report
for a discussion of legal proceedings.
ITEM
4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No
matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter
of the fiscal year ended October 3, 2008.
PART
II
ITEM
5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Certain
information with respect to this item is included in Notes 9 and 10 to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.
The Company’s Class A common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global MarketSM
under
the symbol: JOUT. There is no public market for the Company’s Class B common
stock. However, the Class B common stock is convertible at all times at the
option of the holder into shares of Class A common stock on a share for share
basis. As of December 16, 2008, the Company had 735 holders of record of its
Class A common stock and 35 holders of record of its Class B common stock.
We
believe the number of beneficial owners of our Class A common stock on that
date was substantially greater.
10
A
summary
of the high and low prices for the Company’s Class A common stock during
each quarter of the years ended October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 is as
follows:
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
prices:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High
|
$ | 23.50 | $ | 19.13 | $ | 22.50 | $ | 18.83 | $ | 17.77 | $ | 20.25 | $ | 16.06 | $ | 23.91 | ||||||||||||||||
Low
|
21.44 | 17.06 | 16.00 | 17.00 | 15.40 | 18.02 | 12.40 | 17.00 |
In
fiscal
2008 and 2007, the Company declared the following dividends:
·
|
A
cash dividend declared on June 14, 2007, with a record date of July
12,
2007, payable on July 26, 2007 of $0.055 per share to Class A common
stockholders and $0.05 per share to Class B common
stockholders.
|
·
|
A
cash dividend declared on September 19, 2007, with a record date
of
October 11, 2007, payable on October 25, 2007 of $0.055 per share
to Class
A common stockholders and $0.05 per share to Class B common
stockholders.
|
·
|
A
cash dividend declared on December 7, 2007, with a record date of
January
10, 2008, payable on January 25, 2008 of $0.055 per share to Class
A
common stockholders and $0.05 per share to Class B common
stockholders.
|
·
|
A
cash dividend declared on February 28, 2008, with a record date of
April
10, 2008, payable on April 24, 2008 of $0.055 per share to Class
A common
stockholders and $0.05 per share to Class B common
stockholders.
|
·
|
A
cash dividend declared on May 28, 2008, with a record date of July
10,
2008, payable on July 24, 2008 of $0.055 per share to Class A common
stockholders and $0.05 per share to Class B common
stockholders.
|
·
|
A
cash dividend declared on October 1, 2008, with a record date of
October
16, 2008, payable on October 30, 2008 of $0.055 per share to Class
A
common stockholders and $0.05 per share to Class B common
stockholders.
|
The
following limitations apply to the ability of the Company to pay
dividends:
·
|
Pursuant
to the Company’s revolving credit agreement, dated as of October 7, 2005,
by and among the Company, the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., the Company is limited
in
the amount of restricted payments (primarily dividends and purchases
of
treasury stock) made during each fiscal year. The limitation was
approximately $27 million for the fiscal year ending October 3,
2008.
|
·
|
The
Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that no dividend, other than
a
dividend payable in shares of the Company’s common stock, may be declared
or paid upon the Class B common stock unless such dividend is declared
or
paid upon both classes of common stock. Whenever a dividend (other
than a
dividend payable in shares of Company common stock) is declared or
paid
upon any shares of Class B common stock, at the same time there must
be
declared and paid a dividend on shares of Class A common stock equal
in
value to 110% of the amount per share of the dividend declared and
paid on
shares of Class B common stock. Whenever a dividend is payable in
shares
of Company common stock, such dividend must be declared or paid at
the
same rate on the Class A common stock and the Class B common
stock.
|
On
December 4, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors voted to suspend quarterly
dividends to shareholders.
11
Total
Shareholder Return
The
graph
below compares on a cumulative basis the yearly percentage change since October
3, 2003 in the total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) to shareholders
on the Class A common stock with (a) the total return (assuming reinvestment
of
dividends) on The NASDAQ Stock Market-U.S. Index; (b) the total return (assuming
reinvestment of dividends) on the Russell 2000 Index; and (c) the total return
(assuming reinvestment of dividends) on a self-constructed peer group index.
The
peer group consists of Arctic Cat Inc., Brunswick Corporation, Callaway Golf
Company, Escalade Inc., Marine Products Corporation and Nautilus, Inc. The
graph
assumes $100 was invested on October 3, 2003 in the Company’s Class A common
stock, The NASDAQ Stock Market-U.S. Index, the Russell 2000 Index and the peer
group indices.
10/3/03
|
10/1/04
|
9/30/05
|
9/29/06
|
9/28/07
|
10/3/08
|
|
Johnson
Outdoors
|
100.00
|
142.96
|
123.41
|
128.07
|
160.85
|
93.21
|
NASDAQ Composite |
100.00
|
107.74
|
123.03
|
131.60
|
158.88
|
119.05
|
Russell 2000 Index |
100.00
|
118.77
|
140.09
|
154.00
|
173.00
|
147.94
|
Peer Group |
100.00
|
145.24
|
134.04
|
110.69
|
94.86
|
57.47
|
The
information in this section titled “Total Shareholder Return” shall not be
deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the Securities and Exchange
Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C promulgated by the Securities
and
Exchange Commission or subject to the liabilities of section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and this information shall not
be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
ITEM
6.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The
following table presents selected consolidated financial data, which should
be
read along with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes to
those statements and with “Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included or referred to elsewhere
in this report. The consolidated statements of operations for the years ended
October 3, 2008, September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006, and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, are derived
from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
herein. The consolidated statements of operations for the years ended September
30, 2005 and October 1, 2004, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of
September 29, 2006, September 30, 2005 and October 1, 2004, are derived from
the
Company’s audited consolidated financial statements which are not included
herein.
12
Year
Ended
|
(thousands,
except per share data)
|
October
3
2008
|
(6)
|
September
28
2007
|
(7)
|
September
29
2006
|
(8)
|
September
30
2005
|
October
1
2004
|
||||||||||||
Operating
Results(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 420,789 | $ | 430,604 | $ | 393,950 | $ | 377,146 | $ | 351,813 | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
159,551 | 175,496 | 165,277 | 155,678 | 146,511 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
expenses (2)
|
197,604 | 155,470 | 141,918 | 137,216 | 127,813 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) profit
|
(38,053 | ) | 20,026 | 23,359 | 18,462 | 18,698 | ||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
5,695 | 5,162 | 4,989 | 4,792 | 5,283 | |||||||||||||||
Other
expense (income)
|
549 | (931 | ) | (128 | ) | (1,250 | ) | (670 | ) | |||||||||||
(Loss)
Income before income taxes
|
(44,297 | ) | 15,795 | 18,498 | 14,920 | 14,085 | ||||||||||||||
Income
tax expense (3)
|
24,178 | 5,246 | 8,061 | 6,044 | 5,806 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss)
Income from continuing operations
|
(68,475 | ) | 10,549 | 10,437 | 8,876 | 8,279 | ||||||||||||||
(Loss)
Income from discontinued operations
|
(2,559 | ) | (1,315 | ) | (1,722 | ) | (1,775 | ) | 410 | |||||||||||
Net
(Loss) Income
|
$ | (71,034 | ) | $ | 9,234 | $ | 8,715 | $ | 7,101 | $ | 8,689 | |||||||||
Balance
Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Current
assets (4)
|
$ | 189,714 | $ | 205,221 | $ | 185,290 | $ | 186,591 | $ | 194,847 | ||||||||||
Total
assets
|
255,069 | 319,679 | 284,227 | 283,326 | 293,719 | |||||||||||||||
Current
liabilities (5)
|
55,386 | 66,260 | 57,651 | 55,457 | 59,115 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
60,000 | 10,006 | 20,807 | 37,800 | 50,797 | |||||||||||||||
Total
debt
|
60,003 | 42,806 | 37,807 | 50,800 | 67,019 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
122,284 | 200,165 | 180,881 | 166,434 | 160,644 | |||||||||||||||
Common
Share Summary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings
per share, continuing operations – Dilutive:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (7.53 | ) | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.94 | |||||||||
Class
B
|
$ | (7.53 | ) | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.01 | $ | 0.94 | |||||||||
Net
earnings per share – Dilutive:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (7.81 | ) | $ | 1.00 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.99 | |||||||||
Class
B
|
$ | (7.81 | ) | $ | 1.00 | $ | 0.95 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 0.99 | |||||||||
Cash
dividends per share:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | 0.22 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | ||||||||||
Class
B
|
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 |
(1)
|
The
year ended October 3, 2008 included 53 weeks. All other years include
52
weeks.
|
(2)
|
The
year ended October 3, 2008 includes goodwill and other impairment
charges
of $41.0 million.
|
(3)
|
The
year ended October 3, 2008 includes a deferred tax asset valuation
allowance of $29.5 million.
|
(4)
|
Includes
cash and cash equivalents of $41,791, $39,232, $51,689, $72,111 and
$69,572, as of the years ended 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
|
(5)
|
Excluding
short-term debt and current maturities of long-term
debt.
|
(6)
|
The
results in 2008 contain approximately ten months of operating results
of
the acquired Geonav business and a full year of operating results
of the
acquired Seemann business.
|
(7)
|
The
results in 2007 contain a full year of operating results of the acquired
Lendal Products Ltd. business and six months of operating results
of the
acquired
Seemann business.
|
(8)
|
The
results in 2006 contain a full year of operating results of the acquired
Cannon/Bottom Line business.
|
13
ITEM
7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Executive
Overview
The
Company designs, manufactures and markets top-quality recreational products
for
the outdoor enthusiast. Through a combination of innovative products, strong
marketing, a talented and passionate workforce and efficient distribution,
the
Company sets itself apart from the competition. Its subsidiaries operate as
a
network that promotes entrepreneurialism and leverages best practices and
synergies, following the strategic vision set by executive management and
approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.
Recent
Developments
The
Company’s senior debt agreement in
place at October 3, 2008 requires that it meet certain operating requirements
and financial ratios in order to avoid a default or event of default under
the
agreement. The
Company was in
non-compliance with its net worth covenant at October 3, 2008. On
December 31, 2008, the Company entered into an amended financing
arrangement with its lenders,
effective January 2, 2009. Changes
to the senior debt agreement
include shortening the maturity date of the term loan, adjusting financial
covenants and interest rates. Additionally, the Company’s revolving
credit facility was reduced from $75.0 million to $35.0 million, with an
additional reduction of $5.0 million required by January 31, 2009. Due to the fact the Company
has entered into this amended agreement,
the Company’s debt has been
classified as long-term at October 3, 2008, in accordance with the terms of
the
amended debt agreement. See further information
regarding the Company’s indebtedness at Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere in this report.
On
December 29, 2008, the Company and JPMorgan Chase (“the Counterparty”) agreed to
amend the terms of its $60.0 million LIBOR interest rate swap (“the Swap”)
contract to include an automatic termination clause. The Company and the
Counterparty are negotiating a modification of the terms of the Swap to
accommodate the new debt agreements. If the Company and the Counterparty
cannot agree to acceptable modification terms, the Swap will automatically
terminate on January 8, 2009. Early termination of the Swap would require
the Company and the Counterparty to settle their respective obligations to
each
other under the Swap contract terms. If such a termination had occurred on
December 29, 2008, it would have required the Company to pay the Counterparty
approximately $6.5 million, which was the fair value of the Swap on that
date. If the Swap were to terminate on January 8, 2009, the amount
required to be paid by the Company to settle this contract could be materially
different.
As
of October 3, 2008, the Company
recorded a non-cash charge for impairment of goodwill and other indefinite
lived
intangible assets of $41.0 million related to all four of the Company’s business
segments based on assessments performed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Accounting
for
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”), we are required
to test goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets at least annually
for impairment. We determined that as of October 3, 2008, portions of our
goodwill and portions of our indefinite lived intangible assets were impaired
due to our expectations of lower future profitability and increases in our
cost
of capital.
During
2008, the Company recorded a
valuation allowance of $29.5 million
in respect of the net deferred
tax assets recorded in our U.S., Germany, Spain, United Kingdom and New Zealand
tax jurisdictions. Given the current market conditions of the outdoor
recreation equipment market as well as other factors arising during fiscal
2008
which may impact future operating results, the Company considered both positive
and negative evidence in evaluating the need for a valuation allowance relating
to the deferred tax assets of these tax jurisdictions. The Company
determined that it was more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will
not be realized and a valuation allowance of $29.2 million, $1.8 million,
$0.2 million, $0.4 million and $0.1 million was recorded against the net
deferred tax assets in the U.S., Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, and New Zealand
tax jurisdictions respectively.
On
December 17, 2007, management
committed to divest the Company’s Escape business. This
decision resulted in the reporting
of the Escape business as a discontinued operation in the current year and
the reclassification of the results
of this business as discontinued operations for comparable reporting
periods. Individual lines of boats
in
this business have either been sold or are in the process of being
divested. The Company will continue to explore strategic
alternatives
for the
remaining lines of the Escape
business through the first quarter of 2009 at which point we expect to have
either sold or otherwise disposed of the remaining assets of the Escape
business. We believe we have adequately reserved for any losses that
could result from the disposal of the remaining lines.
14
Results
of Operations
Summary
consolidated financial results from continuing operations for the fiscal years
presented were as follows:
(millions,
except per share data)
|
2008
|
(2) |
2007
|
(3) |
2006
|
|||||||
Operating
Results
|
|
|||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
420.8
|
$ |
430.6
|
$ |
394.0
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
159.6
|
|
175.5
|
165.3
|
||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
41.0
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||
Other
operating expenses
|
156.7
|
155.5
|
141.9
|
|||||||||
Operating
(loss) profit
|
(38.1
|
) |
20.0
|
|
23.4
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
5.7
|
5.2
|
5.0
|
|||||||||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
(68.5
|
) |
10.5
|
10.4
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income (1)
|
(71.0
|
) |
9.2
|
8.7
|
(1) The
results of 2008 contain a deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $29.5
million.
(2) The
results of 2008 contain a full year of operating results of the acquired Seemann
business and approximately ten months of operating results of the acquired
Geonav business.
(3) The
results in 2007 contain a full year of operating results of the acquired Lendal
Products Ltd. business and six months of operating results of the acquired
Seemann business.
The
Company’s sales and operating earnings by business segment are summarized as
follows:
(millions)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||||
Marine
Electronics
|
$ | 186.7 | $ | 198.0 | $ | 164.5 | ||||||
Outdoor
Equipment
|
48.3 | 55.9 | 65.9 | |||||||||
Watercraft
|
88.1 | 88.8 | 85.5 | |||||||||
Diving
|
98.2 | 88.7 | 78.5 | |||||||||
Other/corporate/eliminations
|
(0.5 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.4 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 420.8 | $ | 430.6 | $ | 394.0 | ||||||
Operating
profit (loss):
|
||||||||||||
Marine
Electronics
|
$ | 0.4 | $ | 22.9 | $ | 21.6 | ||||||
Outdoor
Equipment
|
2.0 | 8.5 | 8.2 | |||||||||
Watercraft
|
(8.3 | ) | (4.2 | ) | 0.2 | |||||||
Diving
|
(21.5 | ) | 6.9 | 5.6 | ||||||||
Other/corporate/eliminations
|
(10.7 | ) | (14.1 | ) | (12.2 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | (38.1 | ) | $ | 20.0 | $ | 23.4 |
See
Note
12 in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere
in
this report for the definition of segment net sales and operating
profit.
15
Fiscal
2008 vs Fiscal 2007
Net
Sales
Net
sales
totaled $420.8 million in 2008 compared to $430.6 million in 2007, a decrease
of
2.3% or $9.8 million. Sales declined in all but the Company’s Diving
business unit. Foreign currency translations favorably impacted 2008
net sales by $9.6 million in comparison to 2007.
Net
sales
for the Marine Electronics business decreased $11.3 million, or 5.7%, despite
incremental sales from the Geonav business, acquired in November, 2007, which
added $12.4 million in sales for the year. The decline was primarily
the result of general economic conditions and weakness in the domestic boat
market which reduced demand for trolling motors and downriggers, and unfavorable
volume comparisons due to high levels of new product purchases by customers
in
the prior year. This weakness was partially offset by higher sales of
Humminbird fishfinder/GPS combo units.
Outdoor
Equipment net sales declined $7.6 million, or 13.6%, primarily due to the
expected $6.6 million decline in military tent sales. Commercial tent
sales were also down from the prior year by $1.2 million due to softness in
the
U.S. economy driving cautious spending by tent rental companies.
Net
sales
for the Watercraft business decreased $0.7 million, or 0.8%, as a result of
a
decline in sales to big-box retailers in light of unfavorable weather conditions
and economic uncertainty in the retail marketplace. This decline was partially
offset by an increase in sales to outdoor specialty stores driven mainly by
the
timing of orders in the prior year.
The
Diving business saw increased sales of $9.5 million, or 10.7%, due mainly to
$4
million of incremental sales related to the Seemann business acquired in April,
2007, and $6.7 million of favorable currency translations.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit of $159.6 million was 37.9% of net sales on a consolidated basis for
the
year ended October 3, 2008 compared to $175.5 million or 40.8% of net sales
in
the prior year.
Gross
profit in the Marine Electronics business declined $11.2 million, from 37.5%
of
net sales in 2007 to 33.8% of net sales in the current year. The
incremental Geonav gross profit of $2.8 million was more than offset by the
effects of unfavorable overhead expense absorption due to lower production
volumes for electric motors and downriggers and an unfavorable product
mix. In addition, as a result of the weak consumer demand, reserves
for excess and obsolete inventory increased by $1.8 million over the prior
year.
Gross
profit in the Outdoor Equipment business declined $3.9 million from 34.0% of
net
sales in 2007 to 31.3% of net sales in the current year due largely to
unfavorable product mix and lower production volumes of government and
commercial tents.
Gross
profit in the Watercraft segment of 34.4% of net sales in 2008 was $3.9 million
less than 2007 levels at 38.5% of net sales due primarily to lower volume and
related operating inefficiencies, closeout pricing, and $1.2 million of
increased material costs. In addition, the Company recorded an
additional reserve of $1.0 million for excess and obsolete inventory in 2008
compared to 2007 as a result of lower sales and the Company’s efforts to reduce
the number of unique inventory items.
Gross
profit for the Diving segment increased by $3.1 million but decreased as a
percent of net sales from 53.6% in 2007 to 51.6% in 2008 due largely to currency
impacts on purchased product and close out sales on end-of-life
products.
16
Operating
Expenses
During
fiscal 2008, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $41.0 million related
to goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets. Excluding
the impairment charge, operating expenses in 2008 would have been $156.6 million
as compared to $155.5 million in 2007.
Goodwill
impairment charges of $7.2 million and $7.4 million of operating expenses
generated by the newly acquired Geonav business were recognized in the Marine
Electronics segment during 2008. All other operating expenses
decreased $3.2 million from the prior year. This decrease was due mainly to
the
decrease in bonus, profit sharing and other incentive compensation of $2.7
million, partially offset by increased warranty expense.
Outdoor
Equipment operating expenses increased by $2.7 million from the prior year
due
primarily to a goodwill impairment charge of $0.6 million in the current year
and the favorable impact in the prior year of $2.9 million of insurance
recoveries related to the flood at the Company’s facility in Binghamton, New
York in 2006.
The
Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $6.2 million in 2008 related
to
the Watercraft business. Other operating expenses in the Watercraft
business decreased by $6.0 million due primarily to the impact of a $4.4 million
legal settlement recorded in the prior year and the reduction of bonus, profit
sharing and other incentive compensation expense in the current
year.
An
impairment charge of $27.0 million was included in the Diving business operating
expenses for 2008. Other Diving operating expenses increased $4.6
million from the prior year due to $2.5 million of restructuring costs incurred
related to the relocation of dive computer manufacturing and $3.4 million due
to
currency impacts, offset by decreased bonus, profit sharing and other incentive
compensation expenses.
Operating
Results
The
Company recognized an operating loss of $38.1 million in 2008 compared to
an
operating profit of $20 million in fiscal 2007. Primary factors driving the
decrease in operating profit margins were the goodwill impairment loss, the
underabsorption of overhead expenses due to significantly lower production
volumes as well as higher raw material costs, close out pricing and additional
inventory reserves on slow moving inventory. Operating expenses totaled $197.6
million, or 47.0% of net sales in fiscal 2008 compared to $155.5 million
or
36.1% of net sales in fiscal 2007. Marine Electronics operating profit decreased
by $22.5 million, or 98.2%, in fiscal 2008 from the prior
year. Outdoor Equipment operating profit decreased $6.5 million, or
76.5%. Watercraft operating loss worsened by $4.1 million from the prior
year.
Diving operating profit turned into a loss of $21.5 million, a $28.4 million
decrease from the prior year amount.
Other
Income and Expenses
Interest
income remained consistent with the prior year at $0.8 million in fiscal 2008.
Interest expense increased $0.5 million from 2007 to $5.7 million in 2008,
due
largely to higher long term borrowings incurred to fund higher working capital
needs. The Company realized currency losses of $1.9 million in fiscal 2008
as
compared to $0.6 million in fiscal 2007. The increase was primarily
due to significant weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Swiss franc and
the
euro.
Pretax
Income and Income Taxes
The
Company recognized a pretax loss of $44.3 million in fiscal 2008, compared
to
pretax income of $15.8 million in fiscal 2007. The Company recorded income
tax
expense of $24.2 million in fiscal 2008, an effective rate of (54.6%), compared
to $5.2 million in fiscal 2007, an effective rate of 33.2%. The 2008 expense
includes a valuation allowance of $29.5 million in respect of deferred tax
assets in the U.S. and certain foreign tax jurisdictions. The effective tax
rate
for 2007 benefited from a German tax law change, an increased tax rate used
to
record federal deferred tax assets and research and development tax credits.
17
Loss
from Continuing Operations
The
loss
from continuing operations was $68.5 million for the year compared to income
of
$10.5 million in the prior year as a result of the fluctuations discussed
above.
Loss
from Discontinued Operations
On
December 17, 2007, the Company’s management committed to a plan to divest the
Company’s Escape business and is continuing to explore strategic alternatives
for its Escape brand products. In accordance with the provisions of Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144), the results of operations
of the Escape business have been reported as discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years ended October 3,
2008, September 28, 2007, and September 29, 2006 and in the consolidated balance
sheets as of October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007. The Company recorded after
tax losses related to the discontinued Escape business of $2.6 million and
$1.3
million for 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Net
Loss
The
Company recognized a net loss of $71.0 million in fiscal 2008, or $7.81 per
diluted share, compared to net income of $9.2 million in fiscal 2007, or $1.00
per diluted share.
Fiscal
2007 vs Fiscal 2006
Net
Sales
Net
sales
totaled a record $430.6 million in 2007 compared to $394.0 million in 2006,
an
increase of 9.3% or $36.6 million. Foreign currency translations favorably
impacted 2007 net sales by $3.9 million in comparison to 2006. Sales growth
in
the Company’s Marine Electronics, Watercraft and Diving business units overcame
a decline in the Outdoor Equipment business unit.
Net
sales
for the Marine Electronics business increased $33.5 million, or 20.4% primarily
due to the successful launch of new products across the Marine Electronics
brands. Net sales for the Company’s Watercraft business increased $3.3 million,
or 3.9%, as a result of new product introductions and product offerings in
the
U.S. and improved volumes in international markets. Net sales for the Diving
business increased $10.2 million, or 13.0% primarily due to an increase of
$4.6
million from the acquired Seemann Sub business, increased volume in Europe
and
the far east and a $2.8 million favorable currency translation. Net sales in
the
Company’s Outdoor Equipment business declined $10.0 million, or 15.2%, primarily
due to the expected decline in total military tent sales and a $5.3 million
decline in specialty market sales. The declines in military tent sales and
specialty market sales were partially offset by strong sales in the Consumer
and
Commercial businesses.
Operating
Results
The
Company recognized an operating profit of $20.0 million in fiscal 2007 compared
to an operating profit of $23.4 million in fiscal 2006. Company gross profit
margins decreased to 40.8% in fiscal 2007 from 42.0% in fiscal 2006. Primary
factors driving the decrease in gross profit margins were production
inefficiencies in Marine Electronics and Diving supply chain challenges in
Europe. Operating expenses totaled $155.5 million, or 36.1% of net sales in
fiscal 2007 compared to $141.9 million, or 36.0% of net sales in fiscal
2006.
Marine
Electronics operating profit improved by $1.3 million, or 6.2%, in fiscal 2007
from the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by favorable net sales
volume on successful launch of new products across the Marine Electronics
brands, slightly offset by increased labor due to production inefficiencies
incurred in meeting higher new product demand.
Outdoor
Equipment operating profit increased $0.2 million, or 2.8%, mainly due to the
insurance recoveries related to the 2006 Binghamton, New York flood. The Company
recognized gains on the recoveries of $2.9 million compared to losses incurred
in the prior year of $1.5 million. No additional costs or recoveries are
expected related to this event. Without the insurance recoveries the Outdoor
Equipment business operating profit would have declined as a result of lower
military tent sales and $5.3 million of specialty market sales occurring in
2006
which did not recur in 2007.
Watercraft
operating profit of $0.2 million in 2006 decreased by $4.4 million to an
operating loss of $4.2 million for fiscal 2007. However fiscal 2007 operating
losses for this segment included a one-time legal settlement of $4.4 million.
Nonetheless, Watercraft saw improvements in its core Paddlesports
business.
Diving
operating profit increased by $1.3 million, or 23.7%, due primarily to operating
profit provided by the acquired Seemann Sub business along with improved
profitability on increased sales volume in far east markets. Additionally,
the
Diving business incurred $0.6 million in restructuring costs related to the
closure of its Wendelstein, Germany facility.
18
Other
Income and Expenses
Interest
income in 2007 increased $0.2 million to $0.7 million in fiscal 2007. Interest
expense increased $0.2 million to $5.2 million. Favorability resulting from
lower amounts of term debt outstanding for the year was offset by higher short
term borrowings incurred to fund working capital needs. The Company realized
currency losses of $0.6 million in fiscal 2007 as compared to $0.2 million
in
fiscal 2006.
Pretax
Income and Income Taxes
The
Company recognized pretax income of $15.8 million in fiscal 2007, compared
to
$18.5 million in fiscal 2006. The Company recorded income tax expense of $5.2
million in fiscal 2007, an effective rate of 33.2%, compared to $8.1 million
in
fiscal 2006, an effective rate of 43.6%. The effective tax rate for 2007
benefited from a German tax law change, an increased tax rate used to record
federal deferred tax assets and research and development tax credits.
Loss
from Continuing Operations
The
income from continuing operations was $10.5 million for the year compared
to
income of $10.4 million in the prior year as a result of the fluctuations
discussed above.
Loss
from Discontinued Operations
On
December 17, 2007, the Company’s management committed to a plan to divest the
Company’s Escape business and is continuing to explore strategic alternatives
for its Escape brand products. In accordance with the provisions of Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144), the results of operations of
the
Escape business have been reported as discontinued operations in the
consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years ended October
3,
2008, September 28, 2007, and September 29, 2006 and in the consolidated
balance
sheets as of October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007. The Company recorded
after
tax losses related to the discontinued Escape business of $1.3 million and
$1.7
million for 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Net
Income
The
Company recognized net income of $9.2 million in fiscal 2007, or $1.00 per
diluted share, compared to net income of $8.7 million in fiscal 2006, or $0.95
per diluted share.
Financial
Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
The
Company’s cash flow from operating, investing and financing activities, as
reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows, is summarized in the
following table:
(millions)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||
Cash
provided by (used for):
|
||||||||||||
Operating
activities
|
$ | 4.9 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 7.5 | ||||||
Investing
activities
|
(18.2 | ) | (22.0 | ) | (18.6 | ) | ||||||
Financing
activities
|
15.5 | 5.3 | (12.8 | ) | ||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes
|
0.4 | 3.6 | 3.5 | |||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and temporary cash investments
|
$ | 2.6 | $ | (12.5 | ) | $ | (20.4 | ) |
19
Operating
Activities
The
following table sets forth the Company’s working capital position at the end of
each of the past three years:
(millions)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||
Current
assets (1)
|
$ | 189.7 | $ | 205.2 | $ | 185.3 | ||||||
Current
liabilities (2)
|
55.4 | 66.3 | 57.7 | |||||||||
Working
capital (2)
|
$ | 134.3 | $ | 138.9 | $ | 127.6 | ||||||
Current
ratio (2)
|
3.4:1
|
3.1:1
|
3.2:1
|
(1)
|
2008,
2007 and 2006 information includes cash and cash equivalents
of $41.8,
$39.2 and $51.7 million, respectively.
|
(2) | Excludes short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt. |
Cash
flows provided by operations totaled $4.9 million, $0.6 million and $7.5
million
in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The major driver in the increase
in
cash flows from operations in fiscal 2008 was a decline in accounts receivable
due to collections of prior year receivables and lower sales in fiscal 2008
partially offset by fiscal 2007 incentive compensation paid out in fiscal
2008
and income tax payments.
The
major
driver in the decline of cash flows from operations in fiscal 2007 was created
by an increase in working capital. Increases in accounts receivable of $3.1
million and inventory of $22.6 million were offset by increases in accounts
payable and other accrued liabilities of $5.4 million, all of which reflect
the
increase in working capital in fiscal 2007.
Depreciation
and amortization charges were $10.1 million in fiscal 2008, $9.4 million
in
fiscal 2007 and $9.2 million in fiscal 2006.
Investing
Activities
Cash
flows used for investing activities were $18.2 million, $22.0 million and $18.6
million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The acquisition of Geonav
used $5.6 million of cash in fiscal 2008. The acquisition of Lendal
used $1.5 million of cash in fiscal 2007. The acquisition of Seemann
used $0.7 million and $7.9 million of cash in fiscal 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The acquisition of Cannon/Bottom Line used $9.9 million of cash
in
fiscal 2006. Expenditures for property, plant and equipment were $12.4 million,
$13.4 million, $8.9 million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In
general, the Company’s ongoing expenditures are primarily related to tooling for
new products and facilities and information systems improvements.
Financing
Activities
The
following table sets forth the Company’s debt and capital structure at the end
of the past three fiscal years:
(millions)
|
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||
Current
debt
|
$ | — | $ | 32.8 | $ | 17.0 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
60.0 | 10.0 | 20.8 | |||||||||
Total
debt
|
60.0 | 42.8 | 37.8 | |||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
122.3 | 200.2 | 180.9 | |||||||||
Total
capitalization
|
$ | 182.3 | $ | 243.0 | $ | 218.7 | ||||||
Total
debt to total capitalization
|
32.9 | % | 17.6 | % | 17.3 | % |
Cash
flows provided by (used for) financing activities totaled $15.5 million, $5.3
million and ($12.8) million in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Payments on long-term debt were $20.8 million, $17.0 million and $13.0 million
in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
On
October 7, 2005, the Company entered into a $75 million unsecured revolving
credit facility agreement expiring October 7, 2010. The Company had no
outstanding borrowings on this credit facility as of October 3,
2008.
On
February 1, 2007, the Company entered into an additional $10.0 million unsecured
revolving credit facility agreement to satisfy the Company's working capital
requirements. The Company repaid and closed this credit facility in May 2007
as
it was no longer needed.
20
On
February 12, 2008, the Company entered into a Term Loan Agreement with
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as lender and agent and the other lenders named
therein (the "lending group"). This Term Loan Agreement consists of a
$60.0 million term loan maturing on February 12, 2013, bearing interest at
a
three month LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is
based
on the Company’s ratio of consolidated debt to earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and varies between 1.25% and 2.00%.
At
October 3, 2008, the margin in effect was 2.00% for LIBOR loans.
On
October 13, 2008, the Company entered into an Omnibus Amendment of its Term
Loan
Agreeement and revolving credit facility effective as of October 3, 2008 with
the lending group. On the same date, the Company also entered into a
Security Agreement with the lending group. The Omnibus Amendment
temporarily modified certain provisions of the Company’s Term Loan Agreement and
revolving credit facility. The Security Agreement was granted in
favor of the lending group and covers certain inventory and accounts
receivable.
The
Omnibus Amendment reset the applicable margin on the LIBOR based debt at
3.25%. Under the terms of the Omnibus Amendment, certain financial
and non-financial covenants were modified, including restrictions on the
Company’s ability to increase the amount or frequency of dividends, a
restriction in the aggregate amount of acquisitions to no more than $2.0
million, adjustments to the maximum leverage ratio which cannot exceed 5.0
to
1.0 and adjustments to the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio which cannot
be
less than 1.75 to 1.0 for the quarter ended October 3, 2008. In
addition, the definition of consolidated EBITDA was modified to exclude certain
non-cash items.
The
Omnibus Amendment did not reset the net worth covenant and the Company was
in
non-compliance with this covenant as of October 3, 2008. On December
31, 2008, the Company entered into an amended term loan and revolving credit
facility agreement with the lending group, effective January 2,
2009. Changes to the term loan include shortening the maturity date
to October 7, 2010, adjusting financial covenants and interest
rates. The revolving credit facility was reduced from $75.0
million to $35.0 million, with an additional reduction of $5.0 million
required by January 31, 2009. The maturity of the revolving credit
facility remains unchanged at October 7, 2010. The revised term loan
bears interest at a LIBOR rate plus 5.00% with a LIBOR floor of
3.50%. The revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus
4.50%.
On
October 29, 2007, the Company entered into a forward starting interest rate
swap
with a notional amount of $60.0 million, receiving a floating three month LIBOR
interest rate while paying at a fixed rate of 4.685% over the period beginning
December 14, 2007 and ending December 14, 2012. Interest is payable quarterly,
starting on March 14, 2008. The Swap has been designated as a cash flow hedge
and is expected to be an effective hedge against the impact on interest payments
of changes in the three-month LIBOR benchmark rate. The effect of the interest
rate swap is to lock the interest rate on $60.0 million of three-month floating
rate LIBOR debt at 4.685% before applying the applicable margin.
As
a
result of the amendment of the Company’s debt agreements entered into on
December 31, 2008, the Company has prepared an analysis of the Swap in
respect
of the new terms as of that date and concluded that the Swap is no longer
an
effective hedge against the impact on interest payments of changes in the
three-month LIBOR benchmark rate due to the LIBOR floor in the amended
terms. The Company will evaluate the effectiveness of the Swap on a
quarterly basis going forward.
On
December 29, 2008, the Company and JPMorgan Chase (“the Counterparty”) agreed to
amend the terms of its $60.0 million LIBOR interest rate swap (“the Swap”)
contract to include an automatic termination clause. The Company and the
Counterparty are negotiating a modification of the terms of the Swap to
accommodate the new debt agreements. If the Company and the Counterparty
cannot agree to acceptable modification terms, then the Swap will automatically
terminate on January 8, 2009. Early termination of the Swap would require
the Company and the Counterparty to settle their respective obligations to
each
other under the Swap contract terms. If such a termination had occurred on
December 29, 2008, it would have required the Company to pay the Counterparty
approximately $6.5 million, which was the fair value of the Swap on that
date. If the Swap were to terminate on January 8, 2009, the amount
required to be paid by the Company to settle this contract could be materially
different.
21
Contractual
Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
The
Company has contractual obligations and commitments to make future payments
under its existing credit facility, including interest, operating leases and
open purchase orders. The following schedule details these significant
contractual obligations at October 3, 2008.
Payment
Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(millions)
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
year
|
2-3
years
|
4-5
years
|
After
5
years
|
|||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$ | 60.0 | $ | — | $ | 60.0 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Short-term
debt
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
27.6 | 6.5 | 8.6 | 5.1 | 7.4 | |||||||||||||||
Open
purchase orders
|
47.1 | 47.1 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Contractually
obligated interest payments
|
10.9 | 3.6 | 7.3 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total
contractual obligations
|
$ | 145.6 | $ | 57.2 | $ | 75.9 | $ | 5.1 | $ | 7.4 |
Interest
obligations on short-term debt are included in the category "contractually
obligated interest payments" noted above only to the extent accrued as of
October 3, 2008. Future interest costs on the revolving credit facility cannot
be estimated due to the variability of the amount of borrowings and the interest
rates on that facility. Estimated future interest payments on the $60.0 million
floating rate LIBOR term debt were calculated under the terms of the debt
agreement in place at October 3, 2008 using the market rate applicable in the
current period and assumed this rate would not change over the life of the
term
loan. Actual LIBOR market rates and the Company’s applicable margin may differ
significantly from this estimate under its new debt agreement.
The
Company also utilizes letters of credit for trade financing purposes. Letters
of
credit outstanding at October 3, 2008 totaled $2.2 million.
The
Company anticipates making contributions to its defined benefit pension plans
of
$0.3 million through September 30, 2009.
The
Company has no other off-balance sheet arrangements.
Market
Risk Management
The
Company is exposed to market risk stemming from changes in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and, to a lesser extent, commodity prices.
Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in earnings and cash flows.
The Company may reduce exposure to certain of these market risks by entering
into hedging transactions authorized under Company policies that place controls
on these activities. Hedging transactions involve the use of a variety of
derivative financial instruments. Derivatives are used only where there is
an
underlying exposure, not for trading or speculative purposes.
22
Foreign
Operations
The
Company has significant foreign operations for which the functional currencies
are denominated primarily in euros, Swiss francs, Japanese yen and Canadian
dollars. As the values of the currencies of the foreign countries in which
the
Company has operations increase or decrease relative to the U.S. dollar, the
sales, expenses, profits, losses, assets and liabilities of the Company’s
foreign operations, as reported in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements, increase or decrease, accordingly. Approximately 29% of the
Company’s revenues for the year ended October 3, 2008 were denominated in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Approximately 17% were denominated in
euros, with the remaining 12% denominated in various other foreign
currencies.
In
the
past, the Company has mitigated a portion of the fluctuations in certain foreign
currencies through the purchase of foreign currency swaps, forward contracts
and
options to hedge known commitments, primarily for purchases of inventory and
other assets denominated in foreign currencies; however, no such transactions
were entered into during fiscal years 2008 or 2007.
Interest
Rates
The
Company uses interest rate swaps, caps or collars in order to maintain a mix
of
floating rate and fixed rate debt such that permanent working capital needs
are
largely funded with fixed rate debt and seasonal working capital needs are
funded with floating rate debt. The Company’s primary exposure is to U.S.
interest rates. The Company had no interest rate swaps, caps or collars
outstanding as of the fiscal 2007 year end. On October 29, 2007 the Company
entered into a forward starting interest rate swap (the “Swap”) with a notional
amount of $60.0 million, receiving a floating three month LIBOR interest rate
while paying at a fixed rate of 4.685% over an accruing period beginning
December 14, 2007 and ending December 14, 2012. Interest will be payable
quarterly. The Swap has been designated as a cash flow hedge of a forecasted
floating rate debt issuance of approximately $60.0 million and as of October
3,
2008, was expected to be an effective hedge of the impact on interest payments
due to changes in the three-month LIBOR benchmark rate.
As
a
result of the amendment of the Company’s debt agreements entered into on
December 31, 2008, effective January 2, 2009, the Company has prepared
an analysis of the Swap in respect of the new terms as of that date and
concluded that the Swap is no longer an effective hedge against the impact
on
interest payments of changes in the three-month LIBOR benchmark rate due to
the
LIBOR floor in the amended terms. The Company will evaluate the
effectiveness of the Swap on a quarterly basis going forward.
On
December 29, 2008, the Company and JPMorgan Chase (“the Counterparty”) agreed to
amend the terms of its $60.0 million LIBOR interest rate swap (“the Swap”)
contract to include an automatic termination clause. The Company and the
Counterparty are negotiating a modification of the terms of the Swap to
accommodate the new debt agreements. If the Company and the Counterparty
cannot agree to acceptable modification terms, then the Swap will automatically
terminate on January 8, 2009. Early termination of the Swap would require
the Company and the Counterparty to settle their respective obligations to
each
other under the Swap contract terms. If such a termination had occurred on
December 29, 2008, it would have required the Company to pay the Counterparty
approximately $6.5 million, which was the fair value of the Swap on that
date. If the Swap were to terminate on January 8, 2009, the amount
required to be paid by the Company to settle this contract could be materially
different.
Commodities
Certain
components used in the Company’s products are exposed to commodity price
changes. The Company manages this risk through instruments such as purchase
orders and non-cancelable supply contracts. Primary commodity price exposures
include costs associated with metals, resins and packaging
materials.
23
Sensitivity
to Changes in Value
The
estimates that follow are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value
or earnings the Company could lose in one year from adverse changes in market
interest rates. The calculations are not intended to represent actual losses
in
fair value or earnings that the Company expects to incur. The estimates do
not
consider favorable changes in market rates. The table below presents the
estimated maximum potential loss in fair value and annual income before income
taxes from a 100 basis point movement in interest rates on the Company's term
loan outstanding at October 3, 2008:
Estimated
Impact on
|
||
(millions)
|
Fair
Value
|
Income
Before
Income
Taxes
|
Interest
rate instruments
|
$
—
|
$
0.6
|
The
Company had $60.0 million outstanding in a LIBOR based term loan, maturing
on
February 12, 2013, with interest payable quarterly. The term loan bears interest
at three-month LIBOR, which is reset each quarter at the prevailing three month
LIBOR. The fair market value of this term loan was $60.0 million as of October
3, 2008.
Other
Factors
The
Company experienced inflationary pressures during fiscal 2008 on energy, metals,
resins and freight charges. The Company anticipates that changing costs of
basic
raw materials may impact future operating costs and, accordingly, the prices
of
its products. The Company is involved in continuing programs to mitigate the
impact of cost increases through changes in product design and identification
of
sourcing and manufacturing efficiencies. Price increases and, in certain
situations, price decreases are implemented for individual products, when
appropriate.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
Company’s management discussion and analysis of its financial condition and
results of operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements
requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of its assets, liabilities, sales and expenses, and related footnote
disclosures. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates for
product returns, bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, income taxes,
warranty obligations, pensions and other post-retirement benefits, and
litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
The
Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements. Management has discussed these policies with the Audit
Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The
Company recognizes revenue when title and risk of ownership have passed to
the
buyer. Allowances for doubtful accounts are estimated by the individual
operating companies based on estimates of losses related to customer accounts
receivable balances. Estimates are developed by using standard quantitative
measures based on historical losses, adjusting for current economic conditions
and, in some cases, evaluating specific customer accounts for risk of loss.
The
establishment of reserves requires the use of judgment and assumptions regarding
the potential for losses on receivable balances. Though the Company considers
these balances adequate and proper, changes in economic conditions in specific
markets in which the Company operates and any specific customer collection
issues the Company identifies could have a favorable or unfavorable effect
on
required reserve balances.
Inventories
The
Company values inventory at the lower of cost (determined using the first-in
first-out method) or market. Management’s judgment is required to determine the
reserve for obsolete or excess inventory. Inventory on hand may exceed future
demand either because the product is outdated or because the amount on hand
is
more than will be used to meet future needs. Inventory reserves are estimated
by
the individual operating companies using standard quantitative measures based
on
criteria established by the Company. The Company also considers current forecast
plans, as well as market and industry conditions in establishing reserve levels.
Though the Company considers these balances to be adequate, changes in economic
conditions, customer inventory levels or competitive conditions could have
a
favorable or unfavorable effect on required reserve balances.
24
Deferred
Taxes
The
Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to
the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While the Company has
considered ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing
the
need for the valuation allowance, in the event the Company were to determine
that it would not be able to realize all or part of its net deferred tax assets
in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to
income in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company
determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future
in excess of its net recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets
would increase income in the period such determination was made.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets Impairment
In
assessing the recoverability of the Company's goodwill and other intangible
assets, the Company makes assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows
and
other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If these
estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, the Company may
be
required to record impairment charges for these assets not previously
recorded.
Warranties
The
Company accrues a warranty reserve for estimated costs to provide warranty
services. Warranty reserves are estimated by the individual operating companies
using standard quantitative measures based on criteria established by the
Company. Estimates of costs to service its warranty obligations are based on
historical experience, expectation of future conditions and known product
issues. To the extent the Company experiences increased warranty claim activity
or increased costs associated with servicing those claims, revisions to the
estimated warranty reserve would be required. The Company engages in product
quality programs and processes, including monitoring and evaluating the quality
of its suppliers, to help minimize warranty obligations.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(“SFAS No. 157”). This statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of exchange price as the
price between market participants in an orderly transaction to sell an asset
or
transfer a liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact
for the asset or liability, which market is the principal or most advantageous
market for the asset or liability. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS
No. 157 beginning in fiscal 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption
of
SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
115 (“SFAS No. 159”).
This standard
permits an entity to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option permits
a company to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified
election dates. A company will report unrealized gains and losses on items
for
which the fair value option has been elected in earnings after adoption. SFAS
No. 159 will be effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2009. The Company
does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have a material impact on
the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
25
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business
Combinations (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). The objective of SFAS No. 141(R)
is to improve the information provided in financial reports about a business
combination and its effects. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to
recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values
as of that date. SFAS No. 141(R) also requires the acquirer to recognize
and measure the goodwill acquired in a business combination or a gain from
a
bargain purchase. SFAS No. 141(R) will be applied on a prospective basis
for business combinations where the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the Company’s 2010 fiscal year.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests
in
Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51(“SFAS No.
160”). The objective of SFAS No. 160 is to improve the financial information
provided in consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 amends ARB No.
51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest
in
a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 also
changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented, establishes
a
single method of accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a
subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation, requires that a parent
recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated,
and
expands disclosures in the consolidated financial statements in order to clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent’s owners and the
interest of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective
for the Company’s 2010 fiscal year. The Company does not anticipate that SFAS
No. 160 will have any material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133 (“SFAS
No. 161”). SFAS No. 161
is intended to improve financial standards for derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to
better understand the effect these instruments and activities have on an
entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about: how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after
November 15, 2008. We will adopt SFAS No. 161 beginning in fiscal 2009. The
Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
ITEM
7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Information
with respect to this item is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the heading “Market Risk
Management.”
ITEM
8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Information
with respect to this item is included in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements attached to this report on pages F-1 to F-39.
ITEM
9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
None.
26
ITEM
9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
(a)
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
|
As
of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation
under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management,
including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based
on
this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing
and
reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the
Company in reports that the Company files with or submits to the Securities
and
Exchange Commission. It should be noted that in designing and evaluating the
disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls
and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management
necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit
relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company has designed
its
disclosure controls and procedures to reach a level of reasonable assurance
of
achieving the desired control objectives and based on the evaluation described
above, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective
at reaching that level of reasonable assurance.
(b)
|
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting.
|
There
was
no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as
amended) during the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
(c)
|
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
|
The
annual report of management required under this Item 9A is contained in the
section titled “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” under the
heading “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting.”
(d)
|
Attestation
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
|
Ernst
& Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm who audited
the Company's consolidated financial statements, has issued an attestation
report on the Company's internal control over financial reporting, which is
contained in the Company's consolidated financial statements under the heading
“Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting.”
27
ITEM
9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
None.
PART
III
ITEM
10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information
with respect to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion
under the heading “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Audit Committee Matters – Audit
Committee Financial Expert” in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Commission on or before
January 31, 2009. Information regarding the Company’s Code of Business Ethics is
incorporated herein by reference to the discussion under “Corporate Governance
Matters – Employee Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics and Procedures for
Reporting of Accounting Concerns” in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2009
Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
The
Audit
Committee of the Company's Board of Directors is an “audit committee” for
purposes of Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The
members of the Audit Committee are Terry E. London (Chairman), Thomas F. Pyle,
Jr. and John M. Fahey, Jr.
ITEM
11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information
with respect to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion
under the headings “Compensation of Directors” and “Executive Compensation” in
the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which
will be filed with the Commission on or before January 31, 2009.
The
information incorporated by reference from the “Report of the Compensation
Committee” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific
reference in such filing.
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information
with respect to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion
under the heading “Stock Ownership of Management and Others” in the Company's
Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be
filed
with the Commission on or before January 31, 2009.
28
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table summarizes share information, as of October 3, 2008, for the
Company’s equity compensation plans, including the Johnson Outdoors Inc. 2003
Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Plan, the Johnson Outdoors Inc. 2000
Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, and the Johnson Outdoors Inc. 1987 Employees’
Stock Purchase Plan. All of these plans have been approved by the Company’s
shareholders.
Plan
Category
|
Number
of Common Shares to Be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
|
Weighted-average
Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights
|
Number
of Common Shares Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by shareholders
|
271,043
|
$8.36
|
500,458
(1)
|
(1)
|
All
of the available shares under the 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock
Ownership Plan (104,817) and under the 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive
Plan
(395,641) may be issued upon the exercise of stock options or granted
as
restricted stock, and, in the case of the 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive
Plan, as share units. There are 55,764 shares available for issuance
under
the Johnson Outdoors Inc. 1987 Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.
|
ITEM
13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
Information
with respect to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion
under the heading “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the
Company's Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which
will be filed with the Commission on or before January 31, 2009. Information
regarding director independence is incorporated by reference to the discussions
under “Corporate Governance Matters-Director Independence” in the Company’s
Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be
filed
with the Commission on or before January 31, 2009.
ITEM
14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
Information
with respect to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion
under the heading “Audit Committee Matters – Fees of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm” in the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, which will be filed with the Commission on or before
January 31, 2009.
29
PART
IV
ITEM
15.
|
EXHIBITS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
The
following documents are filed as a part of this report:
|
Financial
Statements
|
Included
in Item 8 of Part II of this report are the following:
·
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
|
·
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control
over
Financial Reporting
|
·
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated
Financial
Statements
|
·
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets - October 3, 2008 and September 28,
2007
|
·
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations - Years ended October 3, 2008, September
28, 2007
and September 29, 2006
|
·
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity - Years ended October 3, 2008,
September 28, 2007 and September 29,
2006
|
·
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended October 3, 2008, September
28, 2007
and September 29, 2006
|
·
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
All
schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, are not required or
the
required information has been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements
or notes thereto.
|
Exhibits
|
See
Exhibit Index.
30
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Racine and State
of
Wisconsin, on the 2nd day of January 2009.
JOHNSON
OUTDOORS INC.
(Registrant)
BY/s/
Helen
P.
Johnson-Leipold
Helen
P. Johnson-Leipold
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities indicated on the 2nd day of January 2009.
/s/
Helen P.
Johnson-Leipold
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
(Helen
P.
Johnson-Leipold)
|
and
Director
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
/s/
Thomas F. Pyle,
Jr.
|
Vice
Chairman of the Board
|
|
(Thomas
F. Pyle,
Jr.)
|
and
Director
|
|
/s/
Terry E.
London
|
Director
|
|
(Terry
E.
London)
|
||
/s/
John
M. Fahey,
Jr.
|
Director
|
|
(John
M. Fahey,
Jr.)
|
||
/s/
W. Lee
McCollum
|
Director
|
|
(W.
Lee
McCollum)
|
||
/s/
Edward F. Lang,
III
|
Director
|
|
(Edward
F. Lang,
III)
|
||
/s/
David W.
Johnson
|
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
(David
W.
Johnson)
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
31
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
|
Title
|
2
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated October 28, 2004, by and between JO Acquisition
Corp. and Johnson Outdoors Inc (Filed as Exhibit 2 to the Company’s Form
8-K dated October 28, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference.)
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Company as amended through February 17, 2000.
(Filed as Exhibit 3.1(a) to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
of the Company as amended and restated through September 23, 2008.
|
4.1
|
Note
Agreement dated October 1, 1995. (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 29, 1995 and incorporated
herein
by reference.)
|
4.2
|
First
Amendment dated October 11, 1996 to Note Agreement dated October
1, 1995.
(Filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 27, 1996 and incorporated herein by
reference.)
|
4.3
|
Second
Amendment dated September 30, 1997 to Note Agreement dated October
1,
1995. (Filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended
October 1, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
4.4
|
Third
Amendment dated October 1, 1997 to Note Agreement dated October 1,
1995.
(Filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended
October 1, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
4.5
|
Fourth
Amendment dated January 10, 2000 to Note Agreement dated October
1, 1995.
(Filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
4.6
|
Fifth
Amendment dated December 13, 2001 to Note Agreement dated October
1, 1995.
(Filed as Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended
October 3, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
4.7
|
Consent
and Amendment dated September 6, 2002 to Note Agreement dated October
1, 1995. (Filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year
ended October 3, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference.)
|
4.8
|
Note
Agreement dated as of September 15, 1997. (Filed as Exhibit 4.15
to the
Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 1, 1997 and incorporated
herein by reference.)
|
4.9
|
First
Amendment dated January 10, 2000 to Note Agreement dated September
15,
1997. (Filed as Exhibit 4.10 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by
reference.)
|
4.10
|
Second
Amendment dated December 13, 2001 to Note Agreement dated September
15,
1997. (Filed as Exhibit 4.9 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended
October 3, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
4.11
|
Consent
and Amendment dated as of September 6, 2002 to Note Agreement dated
September 15, 1997. (Filed as Exhibit 4.11 to the Company’s Form 10-K for
the year ended October 3, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference.)
|
4.12
|
Note
Agreement dated as of December 13, 2001. (Filed as Exhibit 4.12 to
the
Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 3, 2003 and incorporated
herein by reference.)
|
4.13
|
Consent
and Amendment dated of September 6, 2002 to Note Agreement dated as
of December 13, 2001. (Filed as Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K
for the year ended October 3, 2003 and incorporated herein by
reference.)
|
4.14
|
Revolving
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2005, by and among Johnson
Outdoors Inc. and, among others, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Filed
as
Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 30,
2005 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
9.1
|
Johnson
Outdoors Inc. Class B common stock Amended and Restated Voting Trust
Agreement, dated December 10, 2007 (Filed as Exhibit 99.54 to Amendment
No. 11 to the Schedule 13D filed by Helen P. Johnson-Leipold on December
10, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference.)
|
|
|
32
10.1 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 12, 2000, by and between Johnson Outdoors Inc. and Berkley Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.2 | Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2000, by and between Johnson Outdoors Inc. and Berkley Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated March 31, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.3+ | Johnson Outdoors Inc. Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.4 | Registration Rights Agreement regarding Johnson Outdoors Inc. common stock issued to the Johnson family prior to the acquisition of Johnson Diversified, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-16998 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.5 | Registration Rights Agreement regarding Johnson Outdoors Inc. Class A common stock held by Mr. Samuel C. Johnson. (Filed as Exhibit 28 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 1991 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.6+ | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement. (Filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-23299 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.7+ | Form of Supplemental Retirement Agreement of Johnson Diversified, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-16998 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.8+ | Johnson Outdoors Retirement and Savings Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 29, 1989 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.9+ | Form of Agreement of Indemnity and Exoneration with Directors and Officers. (Filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-16998 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.10 | Consulting and administrative agreements with S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc. (Filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form S-1 Registration Statement No. 33-16998 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.11+ | Johnson Outdoors Inc. 1994 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-88091 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.12+ | Johnson Outdoors Inc. 1994 Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 4 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-88089 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.13+ | Johnson Outdoors Economic Value Added Bonus Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended October 1, 1997 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.14+ | Johnson Outdoors Inc. 2000 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.15+ | Share Purchase and Transfer Agreement, dated as of August 28, 2002, by and between, among others, Johnson Outdoors Inc. and an affiliate of Bain Capital Fund VII-E (UK), Limited Partnership. (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated September 9, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.16+ | Johnson Outdoors Inc. Worldwide Key Executive Phantom Share Long-Term Incentive Plan (Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated March 28, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.17+ | Johnson Outdoors Inc. Worldwide Key Executives’ Discretionary Bonus Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.18 | Stock Purchase Agreement by and between Johnson Outdoors Inc. and TFX Equities Incorporated. (Filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated April 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.19 | Intellectual Property Purchase Agreement by and among Johnson Outdoors Inc., Technology Holding Company II and Teleflex Incorporated. (Filed as Exhibit 2.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated April 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.20+ | Johnson Outdoors Inc. 1987 Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan as amended. (Filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 29, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.21+ | Johnson Outdoors Inc. 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q dated April 2, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
33
10.22+ | Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under Johnson Outdoors Inc. 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-115298 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.23+ | Form of Stock Option Agreement under Johnson Outdoors Inc. 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Ownership Plan. (Filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-115298 and incorporated herein by reference.) |
10.24 | Amended and Restated Credit Term Loan Agreement (Term), dated as of January 2, 2009, among Johnson Outdoors, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender and agent, and the other lenders named therein (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the current report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 2009). |
10.25 | Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Revolving), dated as of January 2, 2009, among Johnson Outdoors, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender and agent, and the other lenders named therein (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the current report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 2, 2009). |
21 | Subsidiaries of the Company as of October 3, 2008. |
23 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a). |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a). |
32.1 (1) | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
+
A
management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(1)
This certification is not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934, as amended.
34
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
||
Table
of Contents
|
Page
|
|
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
F-1
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control
over
Financial Reporting
|
F-2
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated
Financial
Statements
|
F-4
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
F-6
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
|
F-7
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
F-8
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-9
|
MANAGEMENT’S
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The
management of Johnson Outdoors Inc. is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable
assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. The
Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that:
(a)
|
pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately
and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the
Company;
|
(b)
|
provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
Company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and
directors of the Company; and
|
(c)
|
provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not
prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to
be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation
of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management
assessed the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 3, 2008. In
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of
October 3, 2008, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was
effective based on those criteria.
/s/ Helen P. Johnson-Leipold | /s/ David W. Johnson |
Helen
P. Johnson-Leipold
|
David
W. Johnson
|
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Vice
President and Chief Financial
Officer
|
F-1
REPORT
OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Shareholders
and Board of Directors
Johnson
Outdoors Inc.:
We
have
audited Johnson Outdoors Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
October 3, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (the COSO criteria). Johnson Outdoors Inc.’s management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our
audit.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
F-2
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In
our
opinion, Johnson Outdoors Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of October 3, 2008, based on the
COSO criteria.
We
also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Johnson
Outdoors Inc. as of October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended October 3, 2008 of Johnson Outdoors
Inc. and our report dated January 2, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP | |
Ernst
& Young LLP
|
|
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin
|
|
January
2, 2009
|
F-3
REPORT
OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Shareholders
and Board of Directors
Johnson
Outdoors Inc.:
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Johnson Outdoors Inc.
as
of October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended October 3, 2008. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining,
on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used
and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of Johnson Outdoors
Inc.
as of October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, and the consolidated results
of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended October 3, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
As
discussed in Note 1 of the financial statements, in the year ended October
3,
2008, the Company changed its method of accounting for uncertain tax positions
to conform with FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes.” As discussed in Note 7 of the financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for pensions and
other post retirement benefits, in the year ended September 28,
2007.
We
also
have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Johnson Outdoors
Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 3, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report
dated January 2, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP | |
Ernst
& Young LLP
|
|
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin
|
|
January
2, 2009
|
F-4
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(thousands,
except share data)
|
October
3
2008
|
September
28
2007
|
||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 41,791 | $ | 39,232 | ||||
Accounts
receivable less allowance for doubtful
accounts
of $2,577 and $2,267, respectively
|
52,710 | 57,275 | ||||||
Inventories
|
85,999 | 87,726 | ||||||
Assets
held for sale
|
47 | 1,706 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,963 | 11,029 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
6,204 | 8,253 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
189,714 | 205,221 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
39,077 | 36,406 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
594 | 13,097 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
14,085 | 51,454 | ||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
6,442 | 6,638 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
5,157 | 6,863 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 255,069 | $ | 319,679 | ||||
Liabilities
And Shareholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Short-term
notes payable
|
$ | — | $ | 22,000 | ||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
3 | 10,800 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
24,674 | 23,051 | ||||||
Accrued
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Salaries,
wages and benefits
|
8,671 | 17,326 | ||||||
Accrued
discounts and returns
|
5,776 | 5,524 | ||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
234 | 610 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
1,318 | 2,192 | ||||||
Other
|
14,637 | 16,619 | ||||||
Liabilities
held for sale
|
76 | 938 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
55,389 | 99,060 | ||||||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
60,000 | 10,006 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,111 | — | ||||||
Retirement
benefits
|
6,774 | 2,402 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
9,511 | 8,046 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
132,785 | 119,514 | ||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock: none issued
|
— | — | ||||||
Common
stock:
|
||||||||
Class
A shares issued and outstanding: October 3, 2008, 8,006,569;
September 28, 2007, 7,949,617
|
400 | 397 | ||||||
Class
B shares issued and outstanding: October 3, 2008, 1,216,464;
September 28, 2007, 1,217,409
|
61 | 61 | ||||||
Capital
in excess of par value
|
57,873 | 56,835 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
53,171 | 126,253 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
10,779 | 16,619 | ||||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
122,284 | 200,165 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ | 255,069 | $ | 319,679 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-5
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year
Ended
|
||||||||||
(thousands,
except per share data)
|
October
3
2008
|
September
28
2007
|
September
29
2006
|
|
|
|||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 420,789 |
$
|
430,604 | $ | 393,950 | ||||
Cost
of sales
|
261,238 | 255,108 | 228,673 | |||||||
Gross
profit
|
159,551 | 175,496 | 165,277 | |||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||||
Marketing
and selling
|
101,127 | 100,818 | 91,362 | |||||||
Administrative
management, finance and information systems
|
42,796 | 38,646 | 35,823 | |||||||
Research
and development
|
12,495 | 12,254 | 11,199 | |||||||
Goodwill
and other impairment charges
|
41,007 | — | — | |||||||
Litigation
settlement
|
— | 4,400 | — | |||||||
(Gains)
losses related to New York flood
|
— | (2,874 | ) | 1,500 | ||||||
Profit
sharing
|
179 | 2,226 | 2,034 | |||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
197,604 | 155,470 | 141,918 | |||||||
Operating
(loss) profit
|
(38,053 | ) | 20,026 | 23,359 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
(766 | ) | (738 | ) | (504 |
)
|
||||
Interest
expense
|
5,695 | 5,162 | 4,989 | |||||||
Other
expense (income), net
|
1,315 | (193 | ) | 376 | ||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(44,297 | ) | 15,795 | 18,498 | ||||||
Income
tax expense
|
24,178 | 5,246 | 8,061 | |||||||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
(68,475 | ) | 10,549 | 10,437 | ||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit of $0,
$772 and $1,012 respectively
|
(2,559 | ) | (1,315 | ) | (1,722 |
)
|
||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (71,034 | ) |
$
|
9,234 | $ | 8,715 | |||
Weighted
average common shares – Basic:
|
||||||||||
Class
A
|
7,876 | 7,848 | 7,771 | |||||||
Class
B
|
1,217 | 1,218 | 1,219 | |||||||
Dilutive
stock options and restricted stock
|
169 | 188 | 171 | |||||||
Weighted
average common shares – Dilutive
|
9,262 | 9,254 | 9,161 | |||||||
(Loss)
Income from continuing operations per common share –
Basic:
|
||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (7.53 | ) |
$
|
1.18 | $ | 1.18 | |||
Class
B
|
$ | (7.53 | ) |
$
|
1.06 | $ | 1.06 | |||
Loss
from discontinued operations per common share – Basic:
|
||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (0.28 | ) |
$
|
(0.15 | ) | $ | (0.20 |
)
|
|
Class
B
|
$ | (0.28 | ) |
$
|
(0.13 | ) | $ | (0.18 |
)
|
|
Net
(loss) income per common share – Basic:
|
||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (7.81 | ) |
$
|
1.03 | $ | 0.98 | |||
Class
B
|
$ | (7.81 | ) |
$
|
0.93 | $ | 0.88 | |||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations per common Class A and B share
–
Dilutive
|
$ | (7.53 | ) |
$
|
1.14 | $ | 1.14 | |||
Loss
from discontinued operations per common Class A and B share –
Dilutive
|
$ | (0.28 | ) |
$
|
(0.14 | ) | $ | (0.19 |
)
|
|
Net
(loss) income per common Class A and B share – Dilutive
|
$ | (7.81 | ) |
$
|
1.00 | $ | 0.95 | |||
Dividends
per share:
|
||||||||||
Class
A Common Stock
|
$ | 0.22 |
$
|
0.11 | $ | 0.00 | ||||
Class
B Common Stock
|
$ | 0.20 |
$
|
0.10 | $ | 0.00 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-6
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(thousands)
|
CommonStock
|
Capital
in Excess of Par Value
|
Retaind
Earnings
|
Deferred
Compensation
|
TreasuryStock
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
|
||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2005
|
$ | 451 | $ | 55,279 | $ | 109,300 | $ | (598 | ) | $ | — | $ | 2,002 | $ | 3,719 | ||||||
Net
income
|
— | — | 8,715 | — | — | — | 8,715 | ||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock
options (1)
|
— | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
1 | 109 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation and award of restricted shares
|
2 | 604 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Adoption
of SFAS 123 (R)
|
— | (598 | ) | — | 598 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Translation
adjustment
|
— | — | — | — | — | 3,454 | 3,454 | ||||||||||||||
Additional
minimum
pension liability (2)
|
— | — | — | — | — | 1,497 | 1,497 | ||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 29, 2006
|
454 | 55,459 | 118,015 | — | — | 6,953 | 13,666 | ||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
— | — | 9,234 | — | — | — | 9,234 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
— | — | (996 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock
options (1)
|
1 | 591 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
1 | 160 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation and award of restricted shares
|
2 | 625 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Translation
adjustment
|
— | — | — | — | — | 10,379 | 10,379 | ||||||||||||||
Additional
minimum
pension liability (2)
|
— | — | — | — | — | 45 | 45 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 19,658 | ||||||||||||||
Adoption
of SFAS
158(3)
|
— | — | — | — | — | (758 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 28, 2007
|
458 | 56,835 | 126,253 | — | — | 16,619 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | (71,034 | ) | — | — | — | (71,034 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends
declared
|
— | — | (2,003 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock
options (1)
|
1 | 154 | (45 | ) | — | 80 | — | — | |||||||||||||
Issuance
of stock under employee stock purchase plan
|
1 | 135 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation and award of restricted shares
|
1 | 749 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Translation
adjustment
|
— | — | — | — | — | (1,295 | ) | (1,295 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change
in pension
plans (2)
|
— | — | — | — | — | (1,786 | ) | (1,786 | ) | ||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock at cost
|
— | — | — | — | (80 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Cash
Flow Hedge
|
— | — | — | — | — | (2,759 | ) | (2,759 | ) | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | $ | (76,874 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance
at October 3, 2008
|
$ | 461 | $ | 57,873 | $ | 53,171 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 10,779 |
(1)
|
Includes
tax benefit related to exercise of stock options of $29, $111 and
$25 for
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
(2)
|
Net
of tax provision of $(705), $33 and $771 for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
|
(3)
|
Net
of tax provision of $560 for 2007.
|
The
accompanying notes are
an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-7
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year
Ended
|
||||||||||||
(thousands)
|
October
3
2008
|
September
28
2007
|
September
29
2006
|
|||||||||
Cash
Provided By Operating Activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (71,034 | ) | $ | 9,234 | $ | 8,715 | |||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
9,423 | 9,079 | 8,813 | |||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets and deferred financing costs
|
633 | 323 | 351 | |||||||||
Goodwill
and other impairment charges
|
41,007 | — | — | |||||||||
Loss
on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
565 | 12 | 107 | |||||||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts receivable
|
735 | 990 | 629 | |||||||||
Provision
for inventory reserves
|
5,552 | 1,687 | 2,163 | |||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
711 | 651 | 686 | |||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
20,647 | (88 | ) | 3,755 | ||||||||
Change
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of businesses
acquired
or sold:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
7,079 | (3,063 | ) | (3,591 | ) | |||||||
Inventories
|
(577 | ) | (22,550 | ) | (10,617 | ) | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(15,809 | ) | 5,366 | 1,166 | ||||||||
Other
current assets
|
2,153 | (831 | ) | (2,074 | ) | |||||||
Other
non-current assets
|
1,800 | (1,855 | ) | (575 | ) | |||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
1,898 | 2,371 | (1,479 | ) | ||||||||
Other,
net
|
117 | (668 | ) | (558 | ) | |||||||
4,900 | 658 | 7,491 | ||||||||||
Cash
Used For Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||
Payments
for purchase of business
|
(6,329 | ) | (9,409 | ) | (9,863 | ) | ||||||
Additions
to property, plant and equipment
|
(12,424 | ) | (13,418 | ) | (8,865 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
534 | 814 | 178 | |||||||||
(18,219 | ) | (22,013 | ) | (18,550 | ) | |||||||
Cash
Provided By (Used For) Financing Activities
|
||||||||||||
Net
(repayments) borrowings on short-term debt
|
(22,000 | ) | 22,000 | — | ||||||||
Borrowings
on long-term debt
|
60,000 | — | 7 | |||||||||
Principal
payments on senior notes and other long-term debt
|
(20,803 | ) | (17,001 | ) | (13,000 | ) | ||||||
Excess
tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
30 | 111 | 25 | |||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(2,000 | ) | (498 | ) | — | |||||||
Common
stock transactions
|
301 | 642 | 150 | |||||||||
15,528 | 5,254 | (12,818 | ) | |||||||||
Effect
of foreign currency fluctuations on cash
|
350 | 3,644 | 3,455 | |||||||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
2,559 | (12,457 | ) | (20,422 | ) | |||||||
Cash
and cash
equilavents
|
||||||||||||
Beginning
of year
|
39,232 | 51,689 | 72,111 | |||||||||
End
of year
|
$ | 41,791 | $ | 39,232 | $ | 51,689 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
F-8
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OCTOBER
3, 2008
(in
thousands except share and per share amounts)
1
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Business
Johnson
Outdoors Inc. (“the Company”) is an integrated, global outdoor recreation
products company engaged in the design, manufacture and marketing of brand
name
outdoor equipment, diving, watercraft and marine electronics
products.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Johnson Outdoors
Inc.
and all majority owned subsidiaries and are stated in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. Intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and
operating results and the disclosure of commitments and contingent liabilities.
Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. For the Company,
significant estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable,
reserves for inventory valuation, impairment of goodwill, reserves for sales
returns, reserves for warranty service, pension actuarial assumptions and the
valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
Fiscal
Year
The
Company’s fiscal year ends on the Friday nearest September 30. The fiscal year
ended October 3, 2008 (hereinafter 2008), comprised 53 weeks. The fiscal years
ended September 28, 2007 (hereinafter 2007) and September 29, 2006 (hereinafter
2006) each comprised 52 weeks.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all short-term investments in interest-bearing bank accounts,
securities and other instruments with an original maturity of three months
or
less, when purchased, to be equivalent to cash. Cash equivalents are
stated at cost which approximates market value.
The
Company maintains cash in bank accounts in excess of insured limits. The Company
has not experienced any losses and does not believe that significant credit
risk
exists as a result of this practice.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are stated net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance
for doubtful accounts is based on a combination of factors. In circumstances
where specific collection concerns exist, a reserve is established to reduce
the
amount recorded to an amount the Company believes will be collected. For all
other customers, the Company recognizes allowances for doubtful accounts based
on historical experience of bad debts as a percent of accounts receivable for
each business unit. Uncollectible accounts are written off against the allowance
for doubtful accounts after collection efforts have been exhausted. The Company
typically does not require collateral on its accounts receivable.
F-9
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (determined using the first-in, first-out
method) or market.
Inventories
at the end of the respective years consist of the following:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 30,581 | $ | 34,585 | ||||
Work
in process
|
2,834 | 3,850 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
59,897 | 53,315 | ||||||
93,312 | 91,750 | |||||||
Less
reserves
|
7,313 | 4,024 | ||||||
$ | 85,999 | $ | 87,726 |
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property,
plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation of plant and equipment is determined by straight-line methods
over
the following estimated useful lives:
Property
improvements
|
5-20
years
|
Buildings
and improvements
|
20-40
years
|
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
3-10
years
|
Upon
retirement or disposition, cost and the related accumulated depreciation are
removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized in the
results of operations.
Property,
plant and equipment at the end of the respective years consist of the
following:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Property
and improvements
|
$ | 1,240 | $ | 1,307 | ||||
Buildings
and improvements
|
25,481 | 22,731 | ||||||
Furniture,
fixtures and equipment
|
106,252 | 100,790 | ||||||
132,973 | 124,828 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
93,896 | 88,422 | ||||||
$ | 39,077 | $ | 36,406 |
F-10
Goodwill
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (“SFAS 142”), the Company applies a fair value-based impairment
test to the net book value of goodwill on an annual basis and, if certain events
or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred, on
an
interim basis. The analysis of potential impairment of goodwill
requires a two-step process. The first step is the estimation of fair
value of the applicable reporting units. Reporting units are defined
as operating segments or one level below an operating segment when that
component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is
available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of
that
component. The Company has identified its Outdoor Equipment segment
and Diving segment as reporting units as well as the component businesses of
its
Marine Electronic segment and Watercraft segment. Estimated fair
value is based on management judgments and assumptions and those fair values
are
compared with the aggregate carrying values of the reporting
units. If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its
carrying amount, there is no impairment. If the reporting unit
carrying amount is greater than the fair value, then the second step must be
completed to measure the amount of impairment, if any.
The
second step calculates the implied fair value of the goodwill which is compared
to its carrying value. If the implied fair value is less than the
carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the
difference.
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company performed its annual goodwill
impairment test. The fair value of the reporting units was estimated
based on a discounted projection of future cash flows. The rate used
in determining discounted cash flows is a rate corresponding to the Company’s
cost of capital, adjusted for risk where appropriate. In determining
the estimated future cash flows, current and future levels of income are
considered as well as business trends and market conditions. Due to reduced
growth expectations resulting from weakening economic conditions and increases
in the Company’s weighted average cost of capital, the analysis indicated the
potential for impairment.
With
the
assistance of a third-party valuation firm, the Company performed the second
step and determined that an impairment of goodwill
existed. Accordingly, a non-cash charge of $39.6 million was
recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 for goodwill
impairment. Due to the current economic uncertainty and other
factors, the Company cannot assure that remaining goodwill will not be further
impaired in future periods. There was no impairment recorded for the
years ended September 28, 2007 and September 29, 2006.
The
changes in the carrying amount of segment goodwill for fiscal 2008 and 2007
are
as follows:
Marine
Electronics
|
Outdoor
Equipment
|
Watercraft
|
Diving
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 29, 2006
|
$ | 14,596 | $ | 563 | $ | 5,518 | $ | 22,270 | $ | 42,947 | ||||||||||
Currency
translation
|
- | - | 359 | 1,918 | 2,277 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
- | - | 710 | 5,520 | 6,230 | |||||||||||||||
Balance
at September 28, 2007
|
14,596 | 563 | 6,587 | 29,708 | 51,454 | |||||||||||||||
Currency
translations
|
(92 | ) | - | (345 | ) | 933 | 496 | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
1,738 | - | - | - | 1,738 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment
charges
|
(6,229 | ) | (563 | ) | (5,904 | ) | (26,907 | ) | (39,603 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance
at October 3, 2008
|
$ | 10,013 | $ | - | $ | 338 | $ | 3,734 | $ | 14,085 |
Other
Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is
computed using the straight-line method over periods ranging from 3 to 25 years
for patents and other intangible assets with definite lives. During
2008, the final allocation of the purchase price related to the Geonav
acquisition was completed resulting in definite lived intangible assets of
$1,833. The weighted average amortization period for these assets is
17 years.
In
accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 142, the Company carried out its
annual fair value-based impairment test on indefinite lived intangibles as
of
October 3, 2008. As a result of the test, the Company recorded an
impairment charge of $1.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2008.
F-11
Intangible
assets at the end of the respective years consist of the following:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Patents
|
$ | 3,457 | $ | 3,443 | ||||
Trademarks
|
5,218 | 5,997 | ||||||
Other
|
1,620 | 744 | ||||||
10,295 | 10,184 | |||||||
Less
accumulated amortization
|
3,853 | 3,546 | ||||||
Net
patents, trademarks and other
|
$ | 6,442 | $ | 6,638 |
Trademarks
at October 3, 2008 contain $4,158 of trademarks ($5,382 at September 28, 2007)
which have indefinite lives and are not amortized. Amortization of patents
and
other intangible assets with definite lives was $453, $150 and $172 for 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Amortization of these intangible assets is expected
to be approximately $581 per year until they are fully amortized (the
unamortized value of these assets was $2,284 and $1,256 as of October 3, 2008
and September 28, 2007, respectively).
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
The
components of “Accumulated other comprehensive income” on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as of fiscal year-end 2008 and 2007 are as
follows:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
$ | 16,380 | $ | 17,674 | ||||
Unamortized
loss on pension plans, net of tax of $33 and $771,
respectively
|
(2,842 | ) | (1,055 | ) | ||||
Cash
flow hedge
|
(2,759 | ) | - | |||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
$ | 10,779 | $ | 16,619 |
Warranties
The
Company provides for warranties of certain products as they are sold. The
following table summarizes the warranty activity for the three years in the
period ended October 3, 2008.
Balance
at September 30, 2005
|
$ | 3,287 | ||
Expense
accruals for warranties issued during the year
|
3,915 | |||
Reserve
for businesses acquired
|
100 | |||
Less
current year warranty claims paid
|
3,458 | |||
Balance
at September 29, 2006
|
3,844 | |||
Expense
accruals for warranties issued during the year
|
4,006 | |||
Less
current year warranty claims paid
|
3,560 | |||
Balance
at September 28, 2007
|
4,290 | |||
Expense
accruals for warranties issued during the year
|
3,742 | |||
Less
current year warranty claims paid
|
3,671 | |||
Balance
at October 3, 2008
|
$ | 4,361 |
F-12
Earnings
per Share
Net
income or loss per share of Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock is
computed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS")
No. 128, Earnings per Share ("SFAS No. 128") using the two-class
method.
Holders
of Class A Common Stock are entitled to cash dividends equal to 110% of all
dividends declared and paid on each share of Class B Common Stock. As such,
and
in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force 03-06, Participating Securities
and the Two-Class Method under FASB Statement No. 128 ("EITF 03-06"), the
undistributed earnings for each period are allocated to each class of common
stock based on the proportionate share of the amount of cash dividends that
each
such class is entitled to receive.
Basic
EPS
Under
the
provisions of SFAS No. 128 and EITF 03-06, basic net income or loss per share
is
computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding less any non-vested stock. In periods with
cumulative year to date net income and undistributed income, the undistributed
income for each period is allocated to each class of common stock based on
the
proportionate share of the amount of cash dividends that each such class is
entitled to receive. In periods where there is a cumulative year to
date net loss or no undistributed income because distributions through dividends
exceeds net income, Class B shares are treated as anti-dilutive and losses
are
allocated equally on a per share basis among Class A and Class B
shareholders.
For
2007
and 2006, basic income per share for Class A and Class B shares has been
presented using the two class method in accordance with EITF
03-06. For 2008, basic loss per share for Class A and Class B shares
is the same due to the cumulative net loss incurred.
Diluted
EPS
Diluted
net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for the effect of dilutive stock
options and non-vested stock using the treasury method. The computation of
diluted net income per share of Common Stock assumes that Class B Common
Stock is converted into Class A Common Stock. Therefore, diluted net
income per share is the same for both Class A and Class B shares. In
periods where the Company reports a net loss, the effect of anti-dilutive stock
options and non-vested stock is excluded and diluted loss per share is equal
to
basic loss per share.
For
2007
and 2006, diluted net income per share reflects the effect of dilutive stock
options and non-vested stock using the treasury method and assumes the
conversion of Class B Common Stock into Class A Common
Stock. For 2008, the effect of stock options and non-vested stock is
excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation as they would be
anti-dilutive.
F-13
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
common share:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
$ | (68,475 | ) | $ | 10,549 | $ | 10,437 | |||||
Loss
from discontinued operations
|
(2,559 | ) | (1,315 | ) | (1,722 | ) | ||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (71,034 | ) | $ | 9,234 | $ | 8,715 | |||||
(Loss)
Income from continuing operations per common share –
Basic:
|
||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (7.53 | ) | $ | 1.18 | $ | 1.18 | |||||
Class
B
|
$ | (7.53 | ) | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.06 | |||||
Loss
from discontinued operations per common share – Basic:
|
||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) | |||
Class
B
|
$ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | |||
(Loss)
Income per common share – Basic:
|
||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (7.81 | ) | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.98 | |||||
Class
B
|
$ | (7.81 | ) | $ | 0.93 | $ | 0.88 | |||||
(Loss)
Income from continuing operations per common Class A and B share
–
Dilutive
|
$ | (7.53 | ) | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.14 | |||||
Loss
from discontinued operations per common Class A and B share –
Dilutive
|
$ | (0.28 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.19 | ) | |||
(Loss)
Income per common Class A and B share – Dilutive
|
$ | (7.81 | ) | $ | 1.00 | $ | 0.95 |
Stock
options that could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future which
were not included in the fully diluted computation for 2008 and 2006 because
they would have been anti-dilutive totaled 271,043 and 19,750 respectively.
There were no anti-dilutive stock options for 2007.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Effective
October 1, 2005,
the Company adopted the fair value recognition and measurements provisions
of
SFAS No. 123(R), using the modified-prospective-transition method. Under
that transition method, compensation cost for stock options recognized in
fiscal
2006 includes compensation cost for all options granted prior to, but not
vested
as of October 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123. Compenstation cost will be
recorded for all options granted, if any, subsequent to October 1, 2005,
based
on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions
of SFAS
No. 123(R).
No
stock
options were granted in 2008, 2007 or 2006. See Note 10 of the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the Company’s
stock-based incentive plans, including stock options, restricted stock, phantom
stock and employee stock purchase plans.
In
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R) Share-Based
Payment, cash flows from income tax benefits resulting from tax
deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for stock-based awards
have been classified as financing cash flows.
Income
Taxes
The
Company provides for income taxes currently payable and deferred income taxes
resulting from temporary differences between financial statement and taxable
income.
In
assessing the realizeability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers
whether it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of the deferred
tax
assets, will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets
is
dependent upon the generation of taxable income during the years in which
those temporary differences become deductible. The Company considers the
scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, tax planning strategies, and
when appropriate, projected future taxable income in making this
assessment.
The
Company’s U.S. entities file a consolidated federal income tax
return.
On
October 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income
Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN
48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertain tax
positions. See Note 6 for additional discussion.
F-14
Employee
Benefits
The
Company and certain of its subsidiaries have various retirement and profit
sharing plans. The Company does not have any significant foreign retirement
plans. Pension obligations, which are generally based on compensation and years
of service, are funded by payments to pension fund trustees. The Company’s
policy is to annually fund the minimum amount required under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 for plans subject thereto. Other
retirement costs are funded at least annually.
Foreign
Operations and Related Derivative Financial Instruments
The
functional currencies of the Company’s foreign operations are the local
currencies. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of foreign operations are
translated into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange existing at the end of
the
year. Results of operations are translated at monthly average exchange rates.
Adjustments resulting from the translation of foreign currency financial
statements are classified as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),
a
separate component of shareholders’ equity.
Currency
gains and losses are realized when assets and liabilities of foreign operations,
denominated in other than their local currency, are converted into the local
currency of the entity. Additionally, currency gains and losses are realized
through the settlement of transactions denominated in other than the local
currency. The Company realized currency losses from transactions of $1,945,
$584
and $221 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The
Company operates internationally, which gives rise to exposure to market risk
from movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does
not enter into foreign exchange contracts for trading or speculative purposes.
Gains and losses on unhedged exposures are recorded in operating
results.
Approximately
29% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended October 3, 2008 were
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Approximately 17% were
denominated in euros, with the remaining 12% denominated in various other
foreign currencies. In the past, the Company has mitigated a portion
of the fluctuations in certain foreign currencies through the purchase of
foreign currency swaps, forward contracts and options to hedge known
commitments, primarily for purchases of inventory and other assets denominated
in foreign currencies; however, no such transactions were entered into during
fiscal years 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
from sales is recognized when all substantial risk of ownership transfers to
the
customer, which is generally upon shipment of products. Estimated costs of
returns and allowances are accrued as an offset to sales when revenue is
recognized.
Advertising
The
Company expenses substantially all costs related to the production of
advertising the first time the advertising takes place. Cooperative promotional
arrangements are accrued as related revenue is earned.
Advertising
expense in 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled $24,355 $22,743 and $21,137,
respectively. Capitalized costs at October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007
totaled $1,390 and
$1,194, respectively, and primarily include catalogs and costs of advertising
which have not yet run for the first time.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping
and handling fees billed to customers are included in net sales. Shipping and
handling costs are included in marketing and selling expense and totaled
$14,156, $15,001 and $14,615 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Research
and Development
The
Company expenses research and development costs as incurred except for costs
of
software development for new fishfinder products which are capitalized once
technological feasibility is established. The amount capitalized related to
software development for new fishfinders was $2,854, less accumulated
amortization of $1,752 at October 3, 2008 and $2,227, less accumulated
amortization of $712 at September 28, 2007. These costs are amortized
over the expected life of the software. The amounts expensed by the Company
in
connection with research and development activities for each of the last three
fiscal years are set forth in the Company's Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
F-15
Fair
Values
The
carrying amounts of cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts
payable approximated fair value at October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 due
to
the short maturities of these instruments. See Note 4 for the fair value of
long-term debt.
Reclassifications
Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2008
presentation. These reclassifications were primarily associated with
the classification of our Escape business as discontinued. See Note
15 for additional information.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(“SFAS No. 157”). This statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 clarifies the definition of exchange price as the
price between market participants in an orderly transaction to sell an asset
or
transfer a liability in the market in which the reporting entity would transact
for the asset or liability, which market is the principal or most advantageous
market for the asset or liability. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS
No. 157 beginning in fiscal 2009. The Company does not believe the adoption
of
SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No.
115 (“SFAS No. 159”).
This standard
permits an entity to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. The fair value option permits
a company to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified
election dates. A company will report unrealized gains and losses on items
for
which the fair value option has been elected in earnings after adoption. SFAS
No. 159 will be effective for the Company beginning in fiscal 2009. The Company
does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 159 will have a material impact on
the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS
No. 141(R)”). The objective of SFAS No. 141(R) is to improve the
information provided in financial reports about a business combination and
its
effects. SFAS No. 141(R) requires an acquirer to recognize the assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that
date.
SFAS No. 141(R) also requires the acquirer to recognize and measure the
goodwill acquired in a business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase.
SFAS No. 141(R) will be applied on a prospective basis for business
combinations where the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the
Company’s 2010 fiscal year.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests
in
Consolidated Financial Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No.
160”). The objective of SFAS No. 160 is to improve the financial information
provided in consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 amends ARB No.
51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest
in
a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 also
changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented, establishes
a
single method of accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a
subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation, requires that a parent
recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated,
and
expands disclosures in the consolidated financial statements in order to clearly
identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent’s owners and the
interest of the noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is effective
for the Company’s 2010 fiscal year. The Company does not anticipate that SFAS
No. 160 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133 (“SFAS
No. 161”). SFAS No. 161
is intended to improve financial standards for derivative instruments and
hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures to enable investors to
better understand the effect these instruments and activities have on an
entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. Entities are
required to provide enhanced disclosures about: how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments; how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and how
derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after
November 15, 2008. We will adopt SFAS No. 161 beginning in fiscal
2009.
F-16
2
|
RESTRUCTURING
|
Diving-
Hallwil
In
March
2008, the Company announced plans to consolidate UWATEC dive computer
manufacturing and distribution at its existing facility in Batam, Indonesia
which, for the past nine years, was a sub-assembly site for UWATEC’s main
production in Hallwil, Switzerland. Batam operations were expanded and upgraded
to accommodate needed additional capacity. Consolidation is focused
on improving operating efficiencies and reducing inventory lead times and
operating costs. The total costs incurred during the twelve month period ended
October 3, 2008 were $2,451, consisting of $825 of employee termination costs,
and $1,626 of other costs. The Company expects the total cost of this
restructuring to be approximately $2,783 consisting of employee termination
benefits and related costs of $1,157 and other costs of $1,626. The
other costs consist principally of project management, legal, moving
and contract termination costs. These charges were included in the
“Administrative management, finance and information systems” line in the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. This action impacted 35
employees, resulting in the elimination of 33 positions and the reassignment
of
2 employees to other roles in the Company.
The
following represents a reconciliation of the changes in restructuring reserves
related to this project through October 3, 2008.
Employee
Termination
Costs
|
Contract
Exit
Costs
|
Other
Exit
Costs
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of September 28, 2007
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Activity
during the period ended October 3, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Charges
to earnings
|
825 | — | 1,626 | 2,451 | ||||||||||||
Settlement
payments
|
— | — | (1,626 | ) | (1,626 | ) | ||||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of October 3, 2008
|
825 | — | — | 825 | ||||||||||||
Estimated
completion costs
|
332 | — | — | 332 | ||||||||||||
Total
estimated restructuring cost
|
$ | 1,157 | $ | — | $ | 1,626 | $ | 2,783 |
F-17
Outdoor
Equipment -
Binghamton
In
June
2008, the Company announced plans to restructure and downsize its Binghamton,
New York operations due to continued significant declines in sales of Military
tents. The total costs incurred for this restructuring during the twelve month
period ended October 3, 2008 were $320, consisting entirely of employee
termination costs. The Company expects the total cost of this restructuring
to
be $320. Approximately $47 and $45 of payments will be made in the
first and second quarter of fiscal 2009, respectively. These charges are
included in the “Administrative management, finance and information systems”
line in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. This action
resulted in the elimination of 27 positions.
The
following represents a reconciliation of the changes in restructuring reserves
related to this project through October 3, 2008:
Employee
Termination
Costs
|
Contract
Exit
Costs
|
Other
Exit
Costs
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of September 28, 2007
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Activity
during the year ended October 3,
2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Charges
to earnings
|
320 | — | — | 320 | ||||||||||||
Settlement
payments
|
(228 | ) | — | — | (228 | ) | ||||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of October 3, 2008
|
92 | — | — | 92 | ||||||||||||
Estimated
completion costs
|
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total
estimated restructuring cost
|
$ | 320 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 320 |
F-18
Diving
–
Bad
Säkingen
In
May
2007, the Company announced plans to relocate the operations of the Scubapro
facility in Bad Säkingen, Germany into the Seemann operations in Wendelstein,
Germany. As a result of the relocation of the positions at the Bad Säkingen
facility in fiscal 2007, the Company recognized an expense of $578, consisting
of employee termination benefits and related costs of $428 and non-employee
exit
costs of $150, principally consisting of moving and contract termination
costs. These charges were included in the “Administrative management,
finance and information systems” line in the Company’s Consolidated Statements
of Operations. This relocation resulted in the movement or elimination of 21
positions. The Company incurred charges of $74 in 2008 to exit its lease of
the
Bad Säkingen facility. No further restructuring charges or payments are
anticipated in the future. Total restructuring costs for the Bad Säkingen
closure were $652, consisting of approximately $130 of exit costs, $428 of
employee termination costs, and $94 of other exit costs.
The
following represents a reconciliation of the changes in restructuring reserves
related to this project through October 3 2008:
Employee
Termination
Costs
|
Contract
Exit
Costs
|
Other
Exit
Costs
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of September 29, 2006
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Activity
during the year ended
September 28, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||
Charges
to earnings
|
428 | 130 | 20 | 578 | ||||||||||||
Settlement
payments
|
(281 | ) | (14 | ) | (20 | ) | (315 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of September 29, 2007
|
147 | 116 | — | 263 | ||||||||||||
Activity
during the year ended
October 3, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||
Charges
to earnings
|
— | — | 74 | 74 | ||||||||||||
Settlement
payments
|
(147 | ) | (116 | ) | (74 | ) | (337 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of October 3, 2008
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
Diving
–
European
Distribution
In
September 2005, the Company approved a plan to consolidate distribution in
Europe. These actions resulted in the closure of warehouses in Germany, Italy
and Switzerland and office space in France during fiscal 2006. Additionally,
actions were taken during fiscal 2005 to reorganize the European management
structure to unify the marketing and sales efforts across Europe. This decision
resulted in the reduction of 14 positions. These charges are included in the
"Administrative management, finance and information systems" line in the
Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations.
A
summary
of charges, payments and accruals for 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
Employee
Termination
Costs
|
Contract
Exit
Costs
|
Other
Exit
Costs
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of
September 30, 2005
|
$ | 675 | $ | 43 | $ | — | $ | 718 | ||||||||
Activity
during the year ended
September 29, 2006:
|
||||||||||||||||
Charges
to earnings
|
51 | 9 | 292 | 352 | ||||||||||||
Settlement
payments
|
(726 | ) | (52 | ) | (292 | ) | (1,070 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued
liabilities as of
September 29, 2006
|
$ |
—
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
F-19
3
|
ACQUISITIONS
|
Geonav
S.r.l.
On
November 16, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of outstanding common stock of
Geonav S.r.l. (Geonav), a marine electronics company for approximately $5,646
(cash of $5,242 and transaction costs of $404). The acquisition was funded
with
existing cash and borrowings under our credit facilities. Geonav is a
major European brand of chart plotters based in Viareggio, Italy. The Company
believes that the purchase of Geonav will allow the Company to expand its
product line and add to its marine electronics distribution channels in Europe.
Also sold under the Geonav brand are marine autopilots, VHF radios and
fishfinders. Geonav is included in the Company’s Marine Electronics
segment.
The
following table summarizes the final allocation of the purchase price, fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the resulting
goodwill acquired at the date of the Geonav acquisition.
Accounts
receivable
|
$ | 3,991 | ||
Inventories
|
3,291 | |||
Other
current assets
|
111 | |||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
429 | |||
Trademark
|
855 | |||
Customer
list
|
978 | |||
Goodwill
|
1,738 | |||
Total
assets acquired
|
11,393 | |||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
5,747 | |||
Net
purchase price
|
$ | 5,646 |
The
goodwill acquired is not deductible for tax purposes.
The
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method and, accordingly, the
Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of operations
since the date of acquisition.
The
Company is not required to present pro forma financial information with respect
to the Geonav acquisition due to the immateriality of the
transaction.
F-20
Seemann
Sub GmbH &
Co.
On
April
2, 2007, the Company purchased the assets and assumed related liabilities of
Seemann Sub GmbH & Co. KG (Seemann) for an initial payment of $7,757,
plus $178 in transaction costs and $683 in additional purchase price
consideration. All of the additional purchase price
consideration was paid in fiscal 2008. The transaction was funded
using cash and was made to add to the breadth of the Diving product lines.
Seemann, located in Wendelstein, Germany, is one of that country’s largest dive
equipment providers. The purchase of the Seemann Sub brand was made to expand
the Company’s product line with dive gear for the price-driven consumer. The
Seemann product line is sold through the same channels as the Company’s other
diving products and is included in the Company’s Diving segment.
The
following table summarizes the final allocation of the purchase price, fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the resulting
goodwill acquired at the date of the Seemann acquisition.
Total
current assets
|
$ | 1,831 | ||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
122 | |||
Trademark
|
936 | |||
Customer
list
|
267 | |||
Goodwill
|
5,915 | |||
Total
assets acquired
|
9,071 | |||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
453 | |||
Net
purchase price
|
$ | 8,618 |
The
goodwill acquired is deductible for tax purposes.
The
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method and, accordingly, the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of operations
since the date of acquisition.
The
Company is not required to present pro forma financial information with respect
to the Seemann acquisition due to the immateriality of the
transaction.
Lendal
Products
Ltd.
On
October 3, 2006, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of
Lendal Products Ltd. (Lendal) from Lendal's founders for $1,404, plus $106
in
transaction costs. The transaction was funded using cash and was made to
add to the breadth of the Watercraft product lines. Lendal
manufactures and markets premium performance sea touring, whitewater and surf
paddles and blades. The Lendal products are sold through the same channels
as
the Company’s other Watercraft products and are included in the Company’s
Watercraft segment.
The
following table summarizes the final allocation of the purchase price, fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the resulting
goodwill acquired at the date of the Lendal acquisition.
Total
current assets
|
$ | 623 | ||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
122 | |||
Trademark
|
175 | |||
Patents
|
75 | |||
Customer
list
|
49 | |||
Goodwill
|
710 | |||
Total
assets acquired
|
1,754 | |||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
244 | |||
Net
purchase price
|
$ | 1,510 |
The
goodwill acquired is not deductible for tax purposes.
The
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method and, accordingly, the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of operations
since the date of acquisition.
The
Company is not required to present pro forma financial information with respect
to the Lendal acquisition due to the immateriality of the
transaction.
F-21
Cannon/Bottom
Line
On
October 3, 2005, the Company acquired the assets of Cannon downriggers and
Bottom Line fishfinders (Cannon/Bottom Line) from Computrol, Inc., a wholly
owned subsidiary of Armstrong International. The purchase price was $9,863
and
the transaction was funded using cash on hand. Cannon/Bottom Line is included
in
the Company’s Marine Electronics segment and was acquired to add to the breadth
of the Marine Electronic product lines.
The
following table summarizes the final allocation of the purchase price, fair
values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the resulting
goodwill acquired at the date of the Cannon/Bottom Line
acquisition.
Total
current assets
|
$ | 4,348 | ||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
260 | |||
Trademark
|
940 | |||
Patents
|
195 | |||
Goodwill
|
4,582 | |||
Total
assets acquired
|
10,325 | |||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
462 | |||
Net
purchase price
|
$ | 9,863 |
The
goodwill acquired is deductible for tax purposes.
The
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method and, accordingly, the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of operations
since the date of acquisition.
The
Company is not required to present pro forma financial information with respect
to the Cannon/Bottom Line acquisition due to the immateriality of the
transaction.
F-22
4
|
INDEBTEDNESS
|
At
October 3, 2008, the Company had a $75,000 unsecured revolving credit facility
agreement dated October 7, 2005 which expires October 7, 2010. The Company
had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility at
October 3, 2008.
On
February 12, 2008, the Company entered into a Term Loan Agreement, with JPMorgan
Chase Bank N.A., as lender and agent, and the other lenders named therein.
On
the same date, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement, with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as lender and agent, and the other
lenders named therein (“the lending group”). This amendment updated the
Company’s October 7, 2005 revolving credit facility to allow for the term
loan and to amend the financial covenants in the revolving credit
facility.
The
Term
Loan Agreement consists of a $60,000 term loan maturing on February 12, 2013.
At
October 3, 2008, the Company had Term Loan Agreement borrowings outstanding
of
$60,000 which bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin. The applicable
margin is based on the Company’s ratio of consolidated debt to earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and varies between
1.25%
and 2.00%. At October 3, 2008, the margin in effect was 2.00%.
The
Term
Loan Agreement requires the Company to comply with certain financial
and non-financial covenants. Among other restrictions, the Company is
restricted in its ability to pay dividends, incur additional debt and make
acquisitions above certain amounts. The key financial covenants include minimum
fixed charge coverage and maximum leverage ratios. The most significant changes
to the previous covenants include the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio
increasing from 2.00 to 2.25 and the pledge of 65% of the shares of material
foreign subsidiaries.
On
October 3, 2008, the Company violated certain of its covenants and on October
13, 2008, the Company entered into an Omnibus Amendment of its Term Loan
Agreement and revolving credit facility effective as of October 3, 2008 with
the
lending group. On the same date, the Company also entered into a
Security Agreement with the lending group which resulted in certain inventories
and receivables being used as collateral. The Omnibus Amendment
temporarily modified certain provisions of the Company’s Term Loan
Agreement and revolving credit facility.
The
Omnibus Amendment reset the applicable margin on the LIBOR based debt at
3.25%. Under the terms of the Omnibus Amendment, certain financial
and non-financial covenants were modified, including restrictions on the
Company’s ability to increase the amount or frequency of dividends, a
restriction in the aggregate amount of acquisitions to no more than $2 million,
adjustments to the maximum leverage ratio which cannot exceed 5.0 to 1.0 and
adjustments to the minimum fixed charge coverage ratio which cannot be less
than
1.75 to 1.0 for the quarter ended October 3, 2008. In addition, the
definition of consolidated EBITDA was modified to exclude certain non-cash
items.
The
Omnibus Amendment did not reset the net worth covenant and the Company violated
this covenant as of October 3, 2008. On December 31, 2008, the
Company entered into an amended Term Loan Agreement and revolving credit
facility agreement with the lending group, effective January 2,
2009. Changes to the term loan include shortening the maturity date
to October 7, 2010, adjusting financial covenants and adjusting interest
rates. The revised term loan bears interest at a LIBOR rate plus
5.00% with a LIBOR floor of 3.50%. The revolving credit facility was
reduced from $75,000 to $35,000, with an additional reduction of $5,000 required
by January 31, 2009. The maturity of the revolving credit facility
remains unchanged at October 7, 2010 and bears interest at LIBOR plus
4.50%. The Amended Term Loan and Credit Facility agreements provide for
collateral of fixed assets and intellectual properties in the United States,
in
addition to certain inventory and accounts receivable already pledged under
the
Omnibus Amendment. The Credit Facility is limited to a borrowing base
calculated at 70% of accounts receivable and 55% of inventory for the months
of
October through January, and 50% of accounts receivable and 50% of inventory
for
the other months of the year, then reduced by other outstanding
borrowings.
Due
to
the fact the Company has entered into this amendment, the Company’s term loan
has been classified as long-term as of October 3, 2008, in accordance with
the
terms of the Amended Term Loan Agreement.
F-23
The
Company uses interest rate swaps in order to maintain a mix of floating rate
and
fixed rate debt such that permanent working capital needs are largely funded
with fixed rate debt and seasonal working capital needs are funded with floating
rate debt. To manage this risk in a cost efficient manner, the Company enters
into interest rate swaps in which the Company agrees to exchange, at specified
intervals, the difference between fixed and variable interest amounts calculated
by reference to an agreed upon notional principal amount. The Company formally
documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as
well as its risk-management objectives and strategies for understanding hedge
transactions. Interest rate swaps that meet specific conditions under SFAS
No.
133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 133”), are accounted for as
cash flow hedges. The mark-to-market values of both the cash flow hedging
instruments and the underlying debt obligations are recorded as equal and
offsetting gains and losses in the interest expense component of the Company's
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
On
October 29, 2007 the Company entered into a forward starting interest rate
swap
(the “Swap”) with a notional amount of $60,000 receiving a floating three month
LIBOR interest rate while paying at a fixed interest rate of 4.685% over the
period beginning on December 14, 2007 and ending on December 14, 2012. Interest
is payable quarterly, starting on March 14, 2008. The Swap has been
designated as a cash flow hedge and as of October 3, 2008, is expected to be
an
effective hedge against the impact on interest payments of changes in the
three-month LIBOR benchmark rate. As of October 3, 2008,
ineffectiveness of the Swap is immaterial. The effect of the Swap is
to lock the interest rate on $60,000 of three-month floating rate LIBOR debt
at
4.685%, before applying the applicable margin. The market value of the Swap
will
rise and fall as market expectations of future floating rate LIBOR interest
rates over the five year life of the Swap change in relation to the fixed rate
of 4.685%. The Swap has been recorded as a liability at its fair
value of $2,759 at October 3, 2008, and as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income in equity net of tax, in accordance with SFAS No.
133.
As
a
result of the amendment of the Company’s debt agreements entered into on
December 31, 2008, the Company has prepared an analysis of the Swap in
respect of the new terms as of that date and concluded that the Swap is no
longer an effective hedge against the impact on interest payments of changes
in
the three-month LIBOR benchmark rate due to the LIBOR floor in the amended
terms. The Company will evaluate the effectiveness of the Swap on a
quarterly basis going forward.
On
December 29, 2008, the Company and JPMorgan Chase (“the Counterparty”) agreed to
amend the terms of its $60,000 LIBOR interest rate swap (“the Swap”) contract to
include an automatic termination clause. The Company and the Counterparty
are negotiating a modification of the terms of the Swap to accommodate the
new
debt agreements. If the Company and the Counterparty cannot agree to
acceptable modification terms, then the Swap will automatically terminate on
January 8, 2009. Early termination of the Swap would require the Company
and the Counterparty to settle their respective obligations to each other under
the Swap contract terms. If such a termination had occurred on December
29, 2008, it would have required the Company to pay the Counterparty
approximately $6,500 which was the fair value of the Swap on that
date. If the Swap were to terminate on January 8, 2009, the amount
required to be paid by the Company to settle this contract could be materially
different.
Long-term
debt at the end of the respective years shown below consisted of the
following:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Term
loan
|
$ | 60,000 | $ | — | ||||
2001
senior notes
|
— | 20,000 | ||||||
1998
senior notes
|
— | 800 | ||||||
Other
|
3 | 6 | ||||||
60,003 | 20,806 | |||||||
Less
current maturities
|
3 | 10,800 | ||||||
$ | 60,000 | $ | 10,006 |
The
2001
senior notes were unsecured and accrued interest at 7.82%. The 1998
senior notes were unsecured and accrued interest at 7.15%. The
Company has in place $6,989 in unsecured revolving credit facilities at its
foreign subsidiaries. There was no borrowing outstanding on any of these
facilities during the year ended October 3, 2008 and September 28,
2007.
The
Company utilizes letters of credit for trade financing purposes which totaled
$2,245 at October 3, 2008.
The
Company has total unsecured lines of credit, both foreign and domestic, with
availability totaling $88,398 as of October 3, 2008. This availability is
reduced to $48,398 effective January 2, 2009 under the amended debt agreements,
and then to $43,398 by January 31, 2009.
Aggregate
scheduled maturities of long-term debt as of October 3, 2008 are as
follows:
F-24
Year
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 3 | ||
2010
|
60,000 |
Interest
paid was $5,932, $5,498 and $5,496 for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Based
on
the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar
terms and maturities, the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt as of
October 3, 2008 and September 28, 2007 was approximately $60,003 and $21,522,
respectively.
Certain
of the Company’s loan agreements require that the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer, Helen P. Johnson-Leipold, members of her family and related entities
(hereinafter the Johnson Family) continue to own stock having votes sufficient
to elect a majority of the directors. At December 5, 2008, the Johnson Family
held 3,739,454 shares or approximately 46% of the Class A common stock,
1,211,196 shares or approximately 100% of the Class B common stock and
approximately 78% of the voting power of both classes of common stock taken
as a
whole.
5
|
LEASES
AND OTHER COMMITMENTS
|
The
Company leases certain facilities and machinery and equipment under long-term,
noncancelable operating leases. Future minimum rental commitments under
noncancelable operating leases with an initial lease term in excess of one
year
at October 3, 2008 were as follows:
Year
|
Related
parties
included
in total
|
Total
|
||||||
2009
|
$ | 798 | $ | 6,457 | ||||
2010
|
689 | 4,858 | ||||||
2011
|
542 | 3,715 | ||||||
2012
|
— | 2,836 | ||||||
2013
|
— | 2,302 | ||||||
Thereafter
|
— | 7,354 |
Rental
expense under all leases was approximately $9,126, $8,257 and $7,162 for 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
The
Company makes commitments related to capital expenditures, contracts for
services, sponsorship of broadcast media and supply of finished products and
components, all of which are in the ordinary course of business.
6
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
Income
tax expense for the respective years consisted of the following:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
State
|
251 | 109 | 159 | |||||||||
Foreign
|
2,678 | 3,410 | 3,919 | |||||||||
Deferred
|
21,249 | 1,727 | 3,983 | |||||||||
$ | 24,178 | $ | 5,246 | $ | 8,061 |
F-25
The
tax
effects of temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets and
deferred tax liabilities at the end of the respective years are presented
below:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Deferred
tax assets:
|
||||||||
Inventories
|
$ | 5,146 | $ | 3,303 | ||||
Compensation
|
6,980 | 7,387 | ||||||
Tax
credit carryforwards
|
2,528 | 2,333 | ||||||
Goodwill
and other intangibles
|
4,171 | — | ||||||
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
7,820 | 5,965 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
6,631 | 4,838 | ||||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
3,754 | 3,762 | ||||||
Other
|
1,594 | 1,583 | ||||||
Total
gross deferred tax assets
|
38,624 | 29,171 | ||||||
Less
valuation allowance
|
35,067 | 3,437 | ||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
3,557 | 25,734 | ||||||
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
||||||||
Goodwill
and other intangibles
|
— | 652 | ||||||
Foreign
statutory reserves
|
1,111 | 956 | ||||||
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$ | 2,446 | $ | 24,126 |
The
net
deferred tax assets of $2,446 in 2008 are recorded as $2,963 in current assets,
$594 in non-current assets and $1,111 in non-current liabilities. Net
deferred tax assets of $24,126 in 2007 are recorded as $11,029 in current assets
and $13,097 in non-current assets.
Income
before income taxes for the respective years consists of the
following:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | (20,813 | ) | $ | 5,719 | $ | 10,645 | |||||
Foreign
|
(23,484 | ) | 10,076 | 7,853 | ||||||||
$ | (44,297 | ) | $ | 15,795 | $ | 18,498 |
F-26
The
significant differences between the statutory federal tax rate and the effective
income tax rates for the Company for the respective years shown below are
as
follows:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
|
Statutory
U.S. federal income tax rate
|
34.0%
|
34.0%
|
34.0%
|
Foreign
rate differential
|
(4.1)
|
3.9
|
8.4
|
Tax
law change
|
¾
|
(4.0)
|
—
|
Impairment
of intangibles
|
(15.4)
|
—
|
—
|
Reduction
in valuation reserve for deferred assets
|
¾
|
—
|
(5.2)
|
Increase in valuation reserve for deferred assets |
(66.8)
|
—
|
—
|
Reduction
(increase) in rate utilized to record deferred
taxes
|
¾
|
(2.9)
|
4.9
|
Other
|
(2.3)
|
2.2
|
1.5
|
(54.6)%
|
33.2%
|
43.6%
|
The
foreign rate differential of (4.1)%, 3.9% and 8.4% for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, is comprised of several foreign tax related items including
the
statutory rate differential in each year, settlement of tax audits and
additional contingency reserves in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. During
2007, the Company increased the U.S. federal tax rate used in valuing deferred
tax assets from 34% to 35%, positively impacting the 2007 effective tax rate
by
2.9% and the Company reduced the state income tax rate used in valuing deferred
tax assets during December of 2006, negatively impacting the 2006 effective
tax
rate by 4.9%. Deferred tax assets have been recorded at the maximum federal
income tax rate in effect in the future year(s), when they are anticipated
to be
utilized. A German tax law change (Revised Reorganization Tax Code) during
2007
resulted in a tax receivable recorded by the Company that reduced the effective
tax rate by 4.0%.
At
October 3, 2008, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards
of
$10,746 which begin to expire in 2016, as well as various state net operating
loss carryforwards. In addition, certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries
have operating loss carryforwards totaling $2,379. These operating loss
carryforwards are available to offset future taxable income over the next
3 to
approximately 20 years. The Company has established a valuation
allowance for the portion of deferred tax assets in the U.S., Germany, Spain,
United Kingdom, and New Zealand tax jurisdictions that are anticipated to
expire
unused.
SFAS
No.
109 requires an assessment of whether a valuation allowance should be
established against deferred tax assets based on the consideration of all
available evidence and considering whether it is more likely than not that
the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. Given the current market conditions
of
the outdoor recreation equipment market as well as other factors arising during
fiscal 2008 which may impact future operating results, the Company considered
both positive and negative evidence in evaluating the need for a valuation
allowance relating to the deferred tax assets of the U.S., Germany, Spain,
United Kingdom, and New Zealand tax jurisdictions. Based on projections for
these tax jurisdictions the Company determined that it was more likely than
not
that certain deferred tax assets will not be realized and a valuation allowance
of $29,175, $1,837, $153, $374, and $91 was recorded against the net deferred
tax assets for the U.S., Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, and New Zealand tax
jurisdictions respectively, during fiscal 2008.
Taxes
paid were $3,739, $2,823 and $2,074 for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income
Taxes (“FIN 48”), on September 29, 2007. A reconciliation of the
beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as
follows:
2008
|
||||
Balance
at September 29, 2007
|
$ | 1,074 | ||
Gross
decreases - tax positions in prior period
|
(109 | ) | ||
Gross
increases - tax positions in current period
|
175 | |||
Balance
at October 3, 2008
|
$ | 1,140 |
After
adoption of FIN 48 on September 29, 2007, the Company’s total gross liability
for unrecognized tax benefits was $1,074, including $100 of accrued interest.
The Company is currently under examination in the U.S., and is not currently
undergoing examinations in any major foreign tax jurisdiction. There have been
no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits as a result of tax positions
in
the current year ended October 3, 2008. The Company estimates that
the unrecognized tax benefits will not change significantly within the next
year.
In
accordance with its accounting policy, the Company recognizes accrued interest
and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income
tax
expense. During fiscal 2008, $3 of interest was recorded as a component of
income tax expense in the consolidated statement of operations. At October
3,
2008, $103 of accrued interest and penalties are included in the consolidated
balance sheet.
F-27
The
Company files income tax returns, including returns for its subsidiaries, with
federal, state, local and foreign taxing jurisdictions. The following tax years
remain subject to examination by the respective major tax
jurisdictions:
Jurisdiction
|
Fiscal
Year(s)
|
United
States
|
1993-2007
|
Canada
|
2004-2007
|
France
|
2006-2007
|
Germany
|
2005-2007
|
Italy
|
2004-2007
|
Japan
|
2007
|
Switzerland
|
1998-2007
|
Federal
and state income taxes are provided on foreign subsidiary income distributed
to,
or taxable in, the U.S. during the year. At October 3, 2008, net undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries totaled approximately $117,512. The Company
considers these unremitted earnings to be permanently invested abroad and no
provision for federal or state income taxes has been made on these amounts.
In
the future, if foreign earnings are returned to the U.S., provision for U.S.
income taxes will be made.
7
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The
Company has non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain
U.S.
employees. Retirement benefits are generally provided based on employees’ years
of service and average earnings. Normal retirement age is 65, with provisions
for earlier retirement. The Company recognizes retirement plan
expenses in accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for
Pensions. Effective September 28, 2007,
the Company adopted SFAS No. 158 Employers' Accounting for Defined
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. SFAS
No. 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of defined benefit
and other postretirement benefit plans in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets, with changes in the funded status recognized through “Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss),” net of tax. SFAS No. 158 also requires the
measurement of the funded status to be the same as the balance sheet date by
2008. The Company currently uses its fiscal year-end as its measurement date.
The adoption of SFAS No. 158 did not change the amount of net periodic
benefit cost included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of
Income.
The
impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at
September 28, 2007 is summarized in the following table:
Before
Application of SFAS No. 158
|
Incremental
Effect of Application of SFAS No. 158
|
After
Application of SFAS No. 158
|
||||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
$ | 12,592 | $ | 505 | $ | 13,097 | ||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
6,641 | (3 | ) | 6,638 | ||||||||
Total
assets
|
319,177 | 502 | 319,679 | |||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
9,193 | 1,260 | 10,453 | |||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
17,377 | (758 | ) | 16,619 | ||||||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
200,923 | (758 | ) | 200,165 | ||||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
319,177 | 502 | 319,679 |
F-28
The
status of the Company’s non-contributory defined benefit plans as of fiscal year
end 2008 and 2007 is as follows:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Projected
benefit obligation:
|
||||||||
Projected
benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$ | 16,676 | $ | 16,040 | ||||
Service
cost
|
682 | 630 | ||||||
Interest
cost
|
1,074 | 1,005 | ||||||
Actuarial
gain
|
(1,336 | ) | (266 | ) | ||||
Benefits
paid
|
(748 | ) | (733 | ) | ||||
Projected
benefit obligation at end of year
|
$ | 16,348 | $ | 16,676 | ||||
Fair
value of plan assets:
|
||||||||
Fair
value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$ | 12,629 | $ | 11,594 | ||||
Actual
(loss) return on plan assets
|
(1,505 | ) | 1,230 | |||||
Company
contributions
|
440 | 538 | ||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(748 | ) | (733 | ) | ||||
Fair
value of plan assets at end of year
|
$ | 10,816 | $ | 12,629 | ||||
Funded
status of the plan
|
$ | (5,532 | ) | $ | (4,047 | ) | ||
Amounts
recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of:
|
||||||||
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$ | — | $ | 705 | ||||
Current
pension liabilities
|
194 | 193 | ||||||
Noncurrent
pension liabilities
|
5,338 | 3,854 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(2,842 | ) | (1,760 | ) | ||||
Components
of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||
Net
actuarial loss
|
$ | (2,842 | ) | $ | (1,756 | ) | ||
Prior
service cost
|
— | (4 | ) | |||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
$ | (2,842 | ) | $ | (1,760 | ) |
Net
periodic benefit cost, for our non-contributory defined benefit pension plans,
for the respective years includes the following components:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 682 | $ | 630 | $ | 703 | ||||||
Interest
cost
|
1,074 | 1,005 | 925 | |||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(975 | ) | (923 | ) | (871 | ) | ||||||
Amortization
of unrecognized:
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
59 | 92 | 268 | |||||||||
Prior
service cost
|
4 | 9 | 9 | |||||||||
Transition
asset
|
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||
Net
periodic pension cost
|
$ | 843 | $ | 811 | $ | 1,032 | ||||||
Other
changes in benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive
income
(OCI):
|
||||||||||||
Prior
service cost
|
$ | (4 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | ||||||
Net
loss
|
1,085 | (922 | ) | |||||||||
Transition
asset
|
1 | 2 | ||||||||||
Total
recognized in OCI
|
1,082 | (929 | ) | |||||||||
Total
recognized in net periodic benefit costs and OCI
|
$ | 1,925 | $ | (118 | ) |
The
Company expects to recognize $25 of unrecognized loss amortization as a
component of net periodic benefit cost in 2009. This amount is
included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of October 3,
2008.
The
accumulated benefit obligation for all plans was $13,933 and $13,916 at October
3, 2008 and September 28, 2007, respectively.
At
October 3, 2008, the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation and aggregate
fair
value of plan assets for plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets
was $13,933 and $10,816, respectively, and there were no plans with plan assets
in excess of benefit obligations. At September 28, 2007, the aggregate
accumulated benefit obligation and aggregate fair value of plan assets for
plans
with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets was $1,678 and $0,
respectively, and the aggregate accumulated benefit obligation and aggregate
fair value of plan assets for plans with plan assets in excess of benefit
obligations was $12,238 and $12,629, respectively.
F-29
The
Company anticipates making contributions to the defined benefit pension plans
of
$324 through September 30, 2009.
Estimated
benefit payments from the defined benefit plans to participants for the next
five years ending September 2013 and five years thereafter are as
follows:
Year
|
||||
2009
|
$ | 741 | ||
2010
|
753 | |||
2011
|
749 | |||
2012
|
787 | |||
2013
|
826 | |||
Five
years thereafter
|
4,946 |
Actuarial
assumptions used to determine the projected benefit obligation as of fiscal
year
end are as follows:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
7.00 | % | 6.50 | % | 6.25 | % | ||||||
Long-term
rate of return
|
8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | |||||||||
Average
salary increase rate
|
3.70 | 4.00 | 4.00 |
The
impact of the change in discount rates resulted in an actuarial gain of $1,225
and $668 in 2008 and 2007, respectively. The remainder of the change in
actuarial gains for each year results from adjustments to mortality tables,
other modifications to actuarial assumptions and investment returns in excess
of
or less than estimates.
To
determine the discount rate assumption used in the Company’s pension valuation,
the Company identified a benefit payout stream based on the demographics of
the
pension plans and constructed a hypothetical bond portfolio using high-quality
corporate bonds with cash flows that matched that benefit payout stream. A
yield curve was calculated based on this hypothetical portfolio which was used
for the discount rate determination.
To
determine the long-term rate of return assumption for plan assets, the Company
studies historical markets and preserves the long-term historical relationships
between equities and fixed-income securities consistent with the widely accepted
capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate a greater
return over the long run. The Company evaluates current market factors such
as
inflation and interest rates before it determines long-term capital market
assumptions and reviews peer data and historical returns to check for
reasonableness and appropriateness. The Company uses measurement dates of
October 1 to determine pension expenses for each year and the last day of the
fiscal year to determine the fair value of the pension assets.
The
Company’s pension plans’ weighted average asset allocations at October 3, 2008
and September 28, 2007, by asset category were as follows:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Equity
securities
|
73 | % | 71 | % | ||||
Fixed
income securities
|
26 | 27 | ||||||
Other
securities
|
1 | 2 | ||||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % |
The
Company’s primary investment objective for the plans’ assets is to maximize the
probability of meeting the plans’ actuarial target rate of return of 8%, with a
secondary goal of returning 4% above the rate of inflation. These return
objectives are targeted while simultaneously striving to minimize risk to the
plans’ assets. The investment horizon over which the investment objectives are
expected to be met is a full market cycle or five years, whichever is
greater.
The
Company’s investment strategy for the plans is to invest in a diversified
portfolio that will generate average long-term returns commensurate with the
aforementioned objectives while minimizing risk.
A
majority of the Company’s full-time employees are covered by defined
contribution programs. Expense attributable under the defined contribution
programs was approximately $1,025 $2,800 and $2,600 for 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
F-30
8
PREFERRED STOCK
The
Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock in various
classes and series, of which there are none currently issued or
outstanding.
9
|
COMMON
STOCK
|
The
number of authorized and outstanding shares of each class of the Company's
common stock at the end of the respective years was as follows:
2008
|
2007
|
|
Class
A, $.05 par value:
|
||
Authorized
|
20,000,000
|
20,000,000
|
Outstanding
|
8,006,569
|
7,949,617
|
Class
B, $.05 par value:
|
|
|
Authorized
|
3,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
Outstanding
|
1,216,464
|
1,217,409
|
Holders
of Class A common stock are entitled to elect 25% of the members of the Board
of
Directors and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to elect the
remaining directors. With respect to matters other than the election of
directors or any matters for which class voting is required by law, holders
of
Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share while holders of Class
B
common stock are entitled to ten votes per share. If any dividends (other than
dividends paid in shares of the Company’s stock) are paid by the Company on its
common stock, a dividend would be paid on each share of Class A common stock
equal to 110% of the amount paid on each share of Class B common stock. Each
share of Class B common stock is convertible at any time into one share of
Class
A common stock. During 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, 945, 568 and 1,690
shares of Class B common stock were converted into Class A common
stock.
10
|
STOCK
OWNERSHIP PLANS
|
The
Company’s current stock ownership plans provide for issuance of options to
acquire shares of Class A common stock by key executives and non-employee
directors. Current plans also allow for issuance of restricted stock or stock
appreciation rights in lieu of options. Shares available for grant to key
executives and non-employee directors are 500,458 at October 3,
2008.
Stock
Options
All
stock
options have been granted at a price not less than fair market value at the
date
of grant and become exercisable over periods of one to three years from the
date
of grant. Stock options generally have a term of 10 years.
All
of
the Company’s stock options outstanding are fully vested, with no further
compensation expense to be recorded. There were no grants of stock options
in
2008, 2007 or 2006.
F-31
A
summary
of stock option activity related to the Company’s plans is as
follows:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(in
years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 29, 2005
|
343,034 | $ | 9.13 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
(6,501 | ) | 6.28 | $ | 75 | ||||||||
Cancelled
|
(4,000 | ) | 22.06 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 29, 2006
|
332,533 | $ | 9.03 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
(44,190 | ) | 10.94 | $ | 326 | ||||||||
Cancelled
|
(1,950 | ) | 19.88 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 28, 2007
|
286,393 | $ | 8.66 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
(15,350 | ) | 13.94 | $ | 86 | ||||||||
Cancelled
|
— | — | |||||||||||
Outstanding
and exercisable at October 3, 2008
|
271,043 | $ | 8.36 |
2.1
|
$ | 1,217 |
The
range
of options outstanding at October 3, 2008 is as follows:
Price
Range
per
Share
|
Number
of Options
Outstanding
and
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(in
years)
|
$5.31 –
8.00
|
145,033
|
$6.87
|
2.4
|
$8.01 –
10.00
|
95,390
|
8.24
|
0.7
|
$10.01 –
20.00
|
30,620
|
15.77
|
4.7
|
271,043
|
$8.36
|
2.1
|
F-32
Restricted
Stock
All
restricted stock has been granted at fair market value on the date of grant
and
vests either immediately or in three to five years. The Company
granted 35,972, 43,328 and 69,754 shares of restricted stock with a total value
of $782, $798 and $1,165 during 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Restricted stock forfeitures totaled 0, 7,496 and
22,770 shares during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These forfeited
restricted shares had an original fair market value at date of grant of $0,
$130
and $385, respectively. Stock compensation expense related to the
restricted stock was $711, $596, $530 during 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Unvested restricted stock issued and outstanding as of October 3, 2008 and
September 28, 2007 totaled 109,277 and 105,102 shares, respectively, having
a
gross unamortized value of $992 and $921, respectively, which will be amortized
to expense through November 2012 or adjusted for changes in future estimated
or
actual forfeitures. Restricted stock grantees may elect to reimburse
the Company for withholding taxes due as a result of the vesting of restricted
shares by tendering a portion of the vested shares back to the
Company. Shares tendered back to the Company totaled 4,881 for the
year ended October 3, 2008.
A
summary
of unvested restricted stock activity for 2008 and 2007 related to the Company’s
plans is as follows:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Price
|
|||||||
Unvested
restricted stock at September 29, 2006
|
76,120 | $ | 16.88 | |||||
Restricted
stock grants
|
43,328 | 18.42 | ||||||
Restricted
stock cancelled
|
(7,496 | ) | 17.35 | |||||
Restricted
stock vested
|
(6,850 | ) | 18.25 | |||||
Unvested
restricted stock at September 28, 2007
|
105,102 | 17.39 | ||||||
Restricted
stock grants
|
35,972 | 21.75 | ||||||
Restricted
stock vested
|
(31,797 | ) | (17.77 | ) | ||||
Unvested
restricted stock at October 3, 2008
|
109,277 | $ | 18.72 |
Phantom
Stock
Plan
The
Company adopted a phantom stock plan during fiscal 2003. Under this plan,
certain employees were entitled to earn cash bonus awards based upon the
performance of the Company’s Class A common stock. The Company recognized
expense under the phantom stock plan of $0, $24 and $80 during 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. The Company made payments of $319 and $411 to participants
in the plan during 2007 and 2006, respectively. No payments were made to
participants in this plan in 2008. There were no grants of phantom
shares by the Company in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 and the Company does not
anticipate grants of phantom shares in the future. No further payments are
expected to be made under this Plan.
Employee
Stock Purchase
Plan
The
Company’s employees’ stock purchase plan provides for the issuance of shares of
Class A common stock at a purchase price of not less than 85% of the fair market
value of such shares on the date of grant or at the end of the offering period,
whichever is lower. Shares available for purchase by employees under this plan
were 55,764 at October 3, 2008. The Company issued 9,566 and 10,227 shares
under
the plan on March 31, 2008 and April 30, 2007, respectively. The Company
recognized expense under the employees’ stock purchase plan of $29, $31 and $22,
respectively, during 2008, 2007 and 2006.
F-33
11
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The
Company conducts transactions with certain related parties including
organizations controlled by the Johnson family and other related parties. These
include consulting services, aviation services, office rental, royalties and
certain administrative activities. Total costs of these transactions were
$1,889, $1,833 and $1,838 for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Amounts due
to/from related parties were immaterial at October 3, 2008 and September 28,
2007.
12
|
SEGMENTS
OF BUSINESS
|
The
Company conducts its worldwide operations through separate business segments,
each of which represent major product lines. Operations are conducted in the
U.S. and various foreign countries, primarily in Europe, Canada and the Pacific
Basin.
Net
sales
and operating profit include both sales to customers, as reported in the
Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, and interunit transfers, which
are priced to recover costs plus an appropriate profit margin. Total assets
represent assets that are used in the Company’s operations in each business
segment at the end of the years presented.
F-34
A
summary
of the Company’s operations by business segment is presented below:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||||
Marine
Electronics: Unaffiliated
customers
|
$ | 186,534 | $ | 197,728 | $ | 164,362 | ||||||
Interunit transfers
|
189 | 321 | 110 | |||||||||
Outdoor
Equipment Unaffiliated
customers
|
48,247 | 55,786 | 65,903 | |||||||||
Interunit transfers
|
68 | 76 | 45 | |||||||||
Watercraft:
Unaffiliated customers
|
87,862 | 88,632 | 85,287 | |||||||||
Interunit transfers
|
225 | 216 | 175 | |||||||||
Diving:
Unaffiliated customers
|
97,485 | 87,881 | 77,880 | |||||||||
Interunit transfers
|
761 | 797 | 590 | |||||||||
Other/Corporate
|
660 | 577 | 518 | |||||||||
Eliminations
|
(1,242 | ) | (1,410 | ) | (920 | ) | ||||||
$ | 420,789 | $ | 430,604 | $ | 393,950 | |||||||
Operating
profit (loss):
|
||||||||||||
Marine
Electronics
|
$ | 414 | $ | 22,933 | $ | 21,583 | ||||||
Outdoor
Equipment
|
1,982 | 8,463 | 8,236 | |||||||||
Watercraft
|
(8,282 | ) | (4,219 | ) | 161 | |||||||
Diving
|
(21,520 | ) | 6,933 | 5,604 | ||||||||
Other/Corporate
|
(10,647 | ) | (14,084 | ) | (12,225 | ) | ||||||
$ | (38,053 | ) | $ | 20,026 | $ | 23,359 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization expense:
|
||||||||||||
Marine
Electronics
|
$ | 4,389 | $ | 3,647 | $ | 3,195 | ||||||
Outdoor
Equipment
|
560 | 442 | 358 | |||||||||
Watercraft
|
2,042 | 2,182 | 2,525 | |||||||||
Diving
|
1,664 | 1,663 | 1,646 | |||||||||
Other/Corporate
|
1,401 | 1,468 | 1,440 | |||||||||
$ | 10,056 | $ | 9,402 | $ | 9,164 | |||||||
Additions
to property, plant and equipment:
|
||||||||||||
Marine
Electronics
|
$ | 6,969 | $ | 6,149 | $ | 4,583 | ||||||
Outdoor
Equipment
|
310 | 2,615 | 321 | |||||||||
Watercraft
|
2,597 | 1,832 | 1,336 | |||||||||
Diving
|
1,519 | 1,199 | 1,547 | |||||||||
Other/Corporate
|
1,029 | 1,623 | 1,078 | |||||||||
$ | 12,424 | $ | 13,418 | $ | 8,865 | |||||||
Total
assets:
|
||||||||||||
Marine
Electronics
|
$ | 89,487 | $ | 95,725 | ||||||||
Outdoor
Equipment
|
25,400 | 23,739 | ||||||||||
Watercraft
|
45,586 | 59,019 | ||||||||||
Diving
|
79,138 | 114,091 | ||||||||||
Other/Corporate
|
15,458 | 27,105 | ||||||||||
$ | 255,069 | $ | 319,679 | |||||||||
Goodwill,
net:
|
||||||||||||
Marine
Electronics
|
$ | 10,013 | $ | 14,596 | ||||||||
Outdoor
Equipment
|
— | 563 | ||||||||||
Watercraft
|
338 | 6,587 | ||||||||||
Diving
|
3,734 | 29,708 | ||||||||||
$ | 14,085 | $ | 51,454 |
F-35
A
summary
of the Company’s operations by geographic area is presented below:
2008
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||||
United
States:
|
||||||||||||
Unaffiliated
customers
|
$ | 293,354 | $ | 332,830 | $ | 313,496 | ||||||
Interarea
transfers
|
19,089 | 12,840 | 11,712 | |||||||||
Europe:
|
||||||||||||
Unaffiliated
customers
|
82,315 | 59,976 | 46,684 | |||||||||
Interarea
transfers
|
15,123 | 13,187 | 12,527 | |||||||||
Other:
|
||||||||||||
Unaffiliated
customers
|
45,119 | 37,798 | 33,769 | |||||||||
Interarea
transfers
|
1,259 | 2,037 | 1,561 | |||||||||
Eliminations
|
(35,470 | ) | (28,064 | ) | (25,799 | ) | ||||||
$ | 420,789 | $ | 430,604 | $ | 393,950 | |||||||
Total
assets:
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 139,024 | $ | 180,761 | ||||||||
Europe
|
83,642 | 109,580 | ||||||||||
Other
|
32,403 | 29,338 | ||||||||||
$ | 255,069 | $ | 319,679 | |||||||||
Long-term
assets (1)
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | 50,113 | $ | 60,057 | ||||||||
Europe
|
12,303 | 38,556 | ||||||||||
Other
|
2,345 | 2,748 | ||||||||||
$ | 64,761 | $ | 101,361 |
(1)
|
Long-term
assets consist of net property, plant and equipment, net intangible
assets, goodwill and other assets excluding deferred income
taxes.
|
The
Company had no single customer that accounted for more than 10% of its net
sales
in 2008, 2007, or 2006.
F-36
13
|
VALUATION
AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
The
following summarizes changes to valuation and qualifying accounts for 2008,
2007
and 2006:
Balance
at
Beginning
of
Year
|
Additions
Charged
to
Costs
and
Expenses
|
Reserves
of
Businesses
Acquired
|
Less
Deductions
|
Balance
at
End
of
Year
|
||||||||||||||||
Year
ended October 3, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$ | 2,267 | $ | 735 | $ | 95 | $ | 520 | $ | 2,577 | ||||||||||
Reserves
for inventory valuation
|
4,024 | 4,010 | — | 1,688 | 6,346 | |||||||||||||||
Valuation
of deferred tax assets
|
3,437 | 31,630 | — | — | 35,067 | |||||||||||||||
Reserves
for sales returns
|
1,314 | 2,979 | 119 | 2,855 | 1,557 | |||||||||||||||
Year
ended September 28, 2007:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$ | 2,250 | $ | 977 | $ | 39 | $ | 999 | $ | 2,267 | ||||||||||
Reserves
for inventory valuation
|
3,405 | 1,086 | — | 467 | 4,024 | |||||||||||||||
Valuation
of deferred tax assets
|
3,260 | 663 | — | 486 | 3,437 | |||||||||||||||
Reserves
for sales returns
|
1,023 | 2,648 | — | 2,357 | 1,314 | |||||||||||||||
Year
ended September 29, 2006:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
$ | 2,481 | $ | 554 | $ | — | $ | 785 | $ | 2,250 | ||||||||||
Reserves
for inventory valuation
|
2,540 | 2,734 | — | 1,869 | 3,405 | |||||||||||||||
Valuation
of deferred tax assets
|
4,568 | 224 | — | 1,532 | 3,260 | |||||||||||||||
Reserves
for sales returns
|
1,323 | 583 | 78 | 961 | 1,023 | |||||||||||||||
Deductions
include the net impact of foreign currency fluctuations on the respective
accounts. Previously reported amounts have changed due to the
Company’s accounting for its Escape business as a discontinued
operation.
|
14
|
LITIGATION
|
The
Company is subject to various legal actions and proceedings in the normal course
of business, including those related to product liability, intellectual property
and environmental matters. The Company is insured against loss for certain
of
these matters. Although litigation is subject to many uncertainties and the
ultimate exposure with respect to these matters cannot be ascertained,
management does not believe the final outcome of any pending litigation will
have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of
operations, liquidity or cash flows of the Company.
On
July
10, 2007, after considering the costs, risks and business distractions
associated with continued litigation, the Company reached a settlement agreement
with Confluence Holdings Corp. that ended a long-standing intellectual property
dispute between the two companies. The Company has made a claim with its
insurance carriers to recover the $4,400 settlement, plus defense costs
(approximately $800). This matter is presently the subject of litigation in
the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. The Company is unable
to estimate at this time the amount of insurance recovery and, accordingly,
has
not recorded a receivable for this matter.
F-37
15
|
DISCONTINUED
OPERATIONS
|
On
December 17, 2007, the Company committed to a plan to divest the Company’s
Escape business. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS No. 144), the operations of the
Escape business have been reported as discontinued operations in the
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended October 3,
2008, September 28, 2007, and September 29, 2006. Accordingly,
certain amounts in the 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements have
been
reclassified from the prior year presentation. The Company recorded
after tax losses related to the discontinued Escape business of $2,559, $1,315
and $1,722 for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. Revenues of the Escape
business were $206, $1,457 and $1,840 for 2008, 2007, and 2006
respectively.
The
assets and liabilities of the Escape business have been reported as “held
for sale” in the consolidated balance sheets as of October 3, 2008 and September
28, 2007. As of October 3, 2008, assets of $47 consist
entirely of inventory and liabilities of $76 consist primarily of reserves
for
customer claims. As of September 28, 2007, assets consist primarily
of $335 of net accounts receivable, $1,107 of net inventory and $264 of
property, plant and equipment and liabilities of $938 consist entirely of trade
accounts payable.
F-38
16
|
QUARTERLY
FINANCIAL SUMMARY (unaudited)
|
The
following summarizes
quarterly
operating
results:
First
Quarter
|
Second
Quarter
|
Third
Quarter
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 75,967 | $ | 71,427 | $ | 121,813 | $ | 121,972 | $ | 141,243 | $ | 149,868 | $ | 81,766 | $ | 87,337 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
29,289 | 28,520 | 46,806 | 47,157 | 55,751 | 63,738 | 27,705 | 36,081 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) profit
|
(4,581 | ) | (2,233 | ) | 3,647 | 4,608 | 14,569 | 14,783 | (51,688 | ) | 2,868 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss)
income from continuing operations
|
(3,624 | ) | (1,312 | ) | 782 | 1,931 | 7,887 | 8,335 | (73,520 | ) | 1,595 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit
|
(1,066 | ) | (257 | ) | (320 | ) | (338 | ) | (104 | ) | (67 | ) | (1,069 | ) | (653 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (4,690 | ) | $ | (1,569 | ) | $ | 462 | $ | 1,593 | $ | 7,783 | $ | 8,268 | $ | (74,589 | ) | $ | 942 | |||||||||||||
(Loss)
Income from continuing operations per common share –
Basic:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (0.40 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.88 | $ | 0.93 | $ | (8.07 | ) | $ | 0.18 | |||||||||||||
Class
B
|
$ | (0.40 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.19 | $ | 0.79 | $ | 0.84 | $ | (8.07 | ) | $ | 0.16 | |||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations per common share – Basic:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) |
$
|
(0.04 |
)
|
$
|
(0.04 |
)
|
$
|
(0.01 |
)
|
$
|
--- |
$
|
(0.11 |
)
|
$
|
(0.07 |
)
|
|||||||||
Class
B
|
$
|
(0.12 |
)
|
$
|
(0.03 |
)
|
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||
Net
(loss) income per common share – Basic:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class
A
|
$ | (0.52 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.93 | $ | (8.18 | ) | $ | 0.11 | |||||||||||||
Class
B
|
$ | (0.52 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.78 | $ | 0.83 | $ | (8.18 | ) | $ | 0.09 | |||||||||||||
(Loss)
Income from continuing operations per common Class A and B share
–
Dilutive
|
$ | (0.40 | ) | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.21 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.90 | $ | (8.07 | ) | $ | 0.17 | |||||||||||||
Loss
from discontinued operations per common Class A and B share –
Dilutive
|
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||
Net
(loss) income per common Class A and B share – Dilutive
|
$ | (0.52 | ) | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 0.89 | $ | (8.18 | ) | $ | 0.10 |
Operating
loss, loss from continuing operations, and net loss for the fourth quarter
of 2008 reflect a goodwill and other intangible impairment charge of $41.0
million recognized in that quarter. Loss from continuing operations and
net loss for the fourth quarter of 2008 also reflect a deferred tax asset
valuation allowance of $29.5 million recorded in that quarter.
Due
to
changes in stock prices during the year and timing of issuance of shares, the
cumulative total of quarterly net income (loss) per share amounts may not equal
the net income per share for the year. The first three fiscal quarters in 2008
were 13 weeks long with the last fiscal quarter being 14 weeks long. Each of
the
fiscal quarters in 2007 was thirteen weeks long. Fiscal quarters end
on the Friday nearest to the calendar quarter end.
17
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENT
|
The
Company entered into a revised debt agreement on December 31, 2008,
effective January 2, 2009. See further discussion at Note 4,
Indebtedness. The Company
also modified the terms of its interest rate swap contract on December 29,
2008. See further discussion at Note 4, Indebtedness.
F-39