JUNIATA VALLEY FINANCIAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-13232
Juniata Valley Financial Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania | 23-2235254 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Bridge and Main Streets, Mifflintown, Pennsylvania | 17059 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(717) 436-8211
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of accelerated
filer, large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding as of August 7, 2009 | |
Common Stock ($1.00 par value) | 4,336,129 shares |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
18 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
31 | ||||||||
Exhibit 10.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(Unaudited, Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 9,282 | $ | 12,264 | ||||
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
252 | 193 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
7,500 | | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
17,034 | 12,457 | ||||||
Interest bearing time deposits with banks |
5,325 | 5,325 | ||||||
Securities available for sale |
74,331 | 64,321 | ||||||
Restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock |
2,197 | 2,197 | ||||||
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiary |
3,270 | 3,176 | ||||||
Total loans, net of unearned interest |
307,745 | 315,132 | ||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
(2,496 | ) | (2,610 | ) | ||||
Total loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
305,249 | 312,522 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
7,118 | 7,374 | ||||||
Bank owned life insurance and annuities |
12,827 | 12,582 | ||||||
Core deposit intangible |
321 | 344 | ||||||
Goodwill |
2,046 | 2,046 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable and other assets |
6,210 | 5,740 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 435,928 | $ | 428,084 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Non-interest bearing |
$ | 51,663 | $ | 54,200 | ||||
Interest bearing |
320,594 | 302,831 | ||||||
Total deposits |
372,257 | 357,031 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
1,718 | 1,944 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| 8,635 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
5,000 | 5,000 | ||||||
Other interest bearing liabilities |
1,118 | 1,096 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
6,417 | 5,893 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
386,510 | 379,599 | ||||||
Stockholders Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value: |
||||||||
Authorized 500,000 shares, none issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share: |
||||||||
Authorized 20,000,000 shares |
||||||||
Issued 4,745,826 shares |
||||||||
Outstanding
|
||||||||
4,342,587 shares at June 30, 2009; |
||||||||
4,341,055 shares at December 31, 2008 |
4,746 | 4,746 | ||||||
Surplus |
18,294 | 18,324 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
35,684 | 34,758 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,264 | ) | (1,247 | ) | ||||
Cost of common stock in Treasury: |
||||||||
403,239 shares at June 30, 2009; |
||||||||
404,771 shares at December 31, 2008 |
(8,042 | ) | (8,096 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
49,418 | 48,485 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 435,928 | $ | 428,084 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans, including fees |
$ | 5,256 | $ | 5,497 | $ | 10,545 | $ | 11,023 | ||||||||
Taxable securities |
320 | 394 | 628 | 840 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt securities |
278 | 282 | 559 | 528 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
58 | 44 | 114 | 114 | ||||||||||||
Other interest income |
3 | 66 | 5 | 141 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
5,915 | 6,283 | 11,851 | 12,646 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
1,821 | 2,294 | 3,699 | 4,740 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
| 18 | 1 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
35 | | 69 | | ||||||||||||
Other interest bearing liabilities |
6 | 7 | 11 | 16 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
1,862 | 2,320 | 3,781 | 4,801 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
4,053 | 3,963 | 8,070 | 7,845 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
77 | 112 | 212 | 144 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
3,976 | 3,851 | 7,858 | 7,701 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Trust fees |
86 | 94 | 170 | 217 | ||||||||||||
Customer service fees |
426 | 414 | 798 | 806 | ||||||||||||
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance and annuities |
112 | 112 | 218 | 236 | ||||||||||||
Commissions from sales of non-deposit products |
150 | 172 | 258 | 383 | ||||||||||||
Income from unconsolidated subsidiary |
48 | 51 | 96 | 93 | ||||||||||||
Securities impairment charge |
(226 | ) | (393 | ) | (226 | ) | (393 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on sale of securities |
| 28 | | 41 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sales of other assets |
27 | 59 | 33 | 53 | ||||||||||||
Gain from life insurance proceeds |
| 179 | | 179 | ||||||||||||
Prior period income from insurance sales |
| | 323 | | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest income |
286 | 206 | 481 | 439 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
909 | 922 | 2,151 | 2,054 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Employee compensation expense |
1,214 | 1,302 | 2,500 | 2,557 | ||||||||||||
Employee benefits |
411 | 255 | 855 | 692 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
236 | 240 | 475 | 472 | ||||||||||||
Equipment |
162 | 177 | 324 | 356 | ||||||||||||
Data processing expense |
337 | 337 | 670 | 671 | ||||||||||||
Director compensation |
108 | 113 | 218 | 227 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees |
90 | 85 | 211 | 169 | ||||||||||||
Taxes, other than income |
127 | 129 | 255 | 260 | ||||||||||||
FDIC Insurance premiums |
317 | 11 | 405 | 21 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
12 | 12 | 23 | 23 | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest expense |
301 | 284 | 570 | 538 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
3,315 | 2,945 | 6,506 | 5,986 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
1,570 | 1,828 | 3,503 | 3,769 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
405 | 431 | 928 | 970 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,165 | $ | 1,397 | $ | 2,575 | $ | 2,799 | ||||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.59 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||||
Weighted average basic shares outstanding |
4,338,545 | 4,390,838 | 4,339,583 | 4,396,985 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding |
4,342,086 | 4,398,055 | 4,343,850 | 4,404,367 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Number | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Common | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Surplus | Earnings | Loss | Stock | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
4,341,055 | $ | 4,746 | $ | 18,324 | $ | 34,758 | $ | (1,247 | ) | $ | (8,096 | ) | $ | 48,485 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
2,575 | 2,575 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized losses on securities
available for sale, net of reclassifica-
tion adjustment and tax effects |
(17 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
2,558 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends at $0.38 per share |
(1,649 | ) | (1,649 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation activity |
19 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock, at cost |
(7,600 | ) | (128 | ) | (128 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock issued for stock option
and stock purchase plans |
9,132 | (49 | ) | 182 | 133 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2009 |
4,342,587 | $ | 4,746 | $ | 18,294 | $ | 35,684 | $ | (1,264 | ) | $ | (8,042 | ) | $ | 49,418 | |||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June
30, 2008
Number | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Common | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Surplus | Earnings | Loss | Stock | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
4,409,445 | $ | 4,746 | $ | 18,297 | $ | 32,755 | $ | (557 | ) | $ | (6,669 | ) | $ | 48,572 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
2,799 | 2,799 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized losses on securities
available for sale, net of reclassifica-
tion adjustment and tax effects |
(97 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
2,702 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Implementation of EITF 06-4, Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements |
(480 | ) | (480 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends at $0.36 per share |
(1,584 | ) | (1,584 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation activity |
24 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock, at cost |
(27,155 | ) | (566 | ) | (566 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock issued for stock option
and stock purchase plans |
3,863 | (10 | ) | 77 | 67 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
4,386,153 | $ | 4,746 | $ | 18,311 | $ | 33,490 | $ | (654 | ) | $ | (7,158 | ) | $ | 48,735 | |||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,575 | $ | 2,799 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
212 | 144 | ||||||
Provision for depreciation |
309 | 338 | ||||||
Net (accretion) amortization of securities premiums (discounts) |
97 | 83 | ||||||
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
23 | 23 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred net loan costs |
18 | 7 | ||||||
Deferral of net loan costs |
(9 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Securities impairment charge |
226 | 393 | ||||||
Net realized gains on sales of securities |
| (41 | ) | |||||
Losses (gains) on sales of other assets |
(33 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||
Earnings on bank owned life insurance and annuities |
(218 | ) | (236 | ) | ||||
Gain from life insurance proceeds |
| (179 | ) | |||||
Deferred income tax expense |
(54 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary, net of dividends of $17
and $0 |
(79 | ) | (93 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
19 | 24 | ||||||
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets |
(163 | ) | (766 | ) | ||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
552 | (200 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
3,475 | 2,178 | ||||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of: |
||||||||
Securities available for sale |
(31,937 | ) | (35,217 | ) | ||||
FHLB stock |
| (294 | ) | |||||
Premises and equipment |
(86 | ) | (591 | ) | ||||
Bank owned life insurance and annuities |
(68 | ) | (66 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from: |
||||||||
Maturities of and principal repayments on
securities available for sale |
21,568 | 26,995 | ||||||
Bank owned life insurance and annuities |
35 | 37 | ||||||
Life insurance claims |
| 438 | ||||||
Sale of other real estate owned |
228 | 210 | ||||||
Sale of other assets |
113 | 322 | ||||||
Net decrease in interest-bearing time deposits |
| 200 | ||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable |
6,528 | (10,892 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,619 | ) | (18,858 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
15,226 | 9,585 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
(8,861 | ) | 1,749 | |||||
Cash dividends |
(1,649 | ) | (1,584 | ) | ||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(128 | ) | (566 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock issued for employee stock plans |
133 | 67 | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
4,721 | 9,251 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
4,577 | (7,429 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
12,457 | 20,524 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 17,034 | $ | 13,095 | ||||
Supplemental information: |
||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 3,841 | $ | 4,936 | ||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 700 | $ | 1,175 | ||||
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned and repossessed assets |
$ | 524 | $ | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and Subsidiary
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies
The financial information includes the accounts of Juniata Valley Financial Corp. (the
Corporation) and its wholly owned subsidiary, The Juniata Valley Bank (the Bank). All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they
do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. For comparative purposes, the June
30, 2008 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. Such
reclassifications had no impact on net income. Operating results for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ended December 31, 2009.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included in Juniata Valley Financial Corp.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008.
The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet
date of June 30, 2009 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these
consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through August 7, 2009, the date
these consolidated financial statements were issued.
NOTE 2 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. This Statement introduces the
concept of financial statements being available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the
date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date, that is,
whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or available to be
issued. This disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not
evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented.
This Statement is effective for the Corporation for interim and annual reporting periods ending
June 30, 2009 and after.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This statement prescribes the information that a reporting
entity must provide in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a
transfer on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows; and a transferors
continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Specifically, among other aspects,
SFAS 166 amends Statement of Financial Standard No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, or SFAS 140, by removing the concept of a
qualifying special-purpose entity from SFAS 140 and removes the exception from applying FIN 46(R)
to variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities. It also modifies the
financial-components approach used in SFAS 140. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2009. We have not determined the effect that the adoption of SFAS 166 will have
on our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This
statement amends FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised
December 2003) an interpretation of ARB No. 51, or FIN 46(R), to require an enterprise to
determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a
variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise
that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most
significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of
the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to
receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest
entity. SFAS 167 also amends FIN 46(R) to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise
is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2009. We have no variable interest entities and do not believe that
the adoption of SFAS 167 will impact our financial position or results of operations.
7
Table of Contents
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.
SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, to
establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in preparation of
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We
do not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on our financial position or results
of operations.
NOTE 3 Comprehensive Income
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains, and
losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as
unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component
of the equity section of the consolidated statements of financial condition, such items, along with
net income, are components of comprehensive income.
The components of comprehensive income and related tax effects are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | Tax Expense | Before | Tax Expense | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax | or | Net-of-Tax | Tax | or | Net-of-Tax | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount | (Benefit) | Amount | Amount | (Benefit) | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,570 | $ | 405 | $ | 1,165 | $ | 1,828 | $ | 431 | $ | 1,397 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses arising during the period |
(33 | ) | (11 | ) | (22 | ) | (1,118 | ) | (380 | ) | (738 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) from unconsolidated subsidiary |
7 | | 7 | (14 | ) | | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less reclassification adjustment for: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
losses included in net income |
| | | (28 | ) | (10 | ) | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
securities impairment charge |
226 | 77 | 149 | 393 | 134 | 259 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
200 | 66 | 134 | (767 | ) | (256 | ) | (511 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 1,770 | $ | 471 | $ | 1,299 | $ | 1,061 | $ | 175 | $ | 886 | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Before | Tax Expense | Before | Tax Expense | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax | or | Net-of-Tax | Tax | or | Net-of-Tax | |||||||||||||||||||
Amount | (Benefit) | Amount | Amount | (Benefit) | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,503 | $ | 928 | $ | 2,575 | $ | 3,769 | $ | 970 | $ | 2,799 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized losses arising during the period |
(262 | ) | (89 | ) | (173 | ) | (497 | ) | (169 | ) | (328 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) from unconsolidated subsidiary |
7 | | 7 | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Less reclassification adjustment for: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
losses included in net income |
| | | (41 | ) | (14 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||||
securities impairment charge |
226 | 77 | 149 | 393 | 134 | 259 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(29 | ) | (12 | ) | (17 | ) | (146 | ) | (49 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 3,474 | $ | 916 | $ | 2,558 | $ | 3,623 | $ | 921 | $ | 2,702 | ||||||||||||
8
Table of Contents
NOTE 4 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months | Three Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
(Amounts, except earnings per share, in thousands) | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,165 | $ | 1,397 | ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
4,338 | 4,391 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.32 | ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
4,338 | 4,391 | ||||||
Common stock equivalents due to effect of stock options |
4 | 7 | ||||||
Total weighted-average common shares and equivalents |
4,342 | 4,398 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 0.32 | ||||
Six Months | Six Months | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,575 | $ | 2,799 | ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
4,340 | 4,397 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.59 | $ | 0.64 | ||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
4,340 | 4,397 | ||||||
Common stock equivalents due to effect of stock options |
4 | 7 | ||||||
Total weighted-average common shares and equivalents |
4,344 | 4,404 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.59 | $ | 0.64 | ||||
NOTE 5 Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation makes commitments to extend credit to its
customers through letters of credit, loan commitments and lines of credit. At June 30, 2009, the
Corporation had $43,884,000 outstanding in loan commitments and other unused lines of credit
extended to its customers as compared to $47,738,000 at December 31, 2008.
The Corporation does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or
disclosure, other than its letters of credit. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued
by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Generally, all
letters of credit have expiration dates within one year of issuance. The credit risk involved in
issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as the risks that are involved in extending loan
facilities to customers. The Corporation generally holds collateral and/or personal guarantees
supporting these commitments. The Corporation had outstanding $979,000 and $639,000 of letters of
credit commitments as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Management believes
that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the enforcement of guarantees
would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payments required under the
corresponding guarantees. The current amount of the liability as of June 30, 2009 for payments
under letters of credit issued was not material. Because these instruments have fixed maturity
dates, and because many of them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present
any significant liquidity risk.
9
Table of Contents
NOTE 6 Defined Benefit Retirement Plan
The
Corporation had a defined benefit retirement plan covering substantially all of its employees,
prior to January 1, 2008. Effective January 1, 2008, the plan was amended to close the plan to new
entrants. The benefits are based on years of service and the employees compensation. The
Corporations funding policy is to contribute annually the maximum amount that can be deducted for
federal income taxes purposes. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits
attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the future. The
Corporation has made no contributions in the first six months of 2009 and does not expect to
contribute to the defined benefit plan in the remainder of 2009. Pension expense included the
following components for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(Dollar amounts in thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||
Components of net periodic pension cost |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 47 | $ | 45 | $ | 94 | $ | 90 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
112 | 110 | 224 | 220 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(115 | ) | (106 | ) | (230 | ) | (212 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | ||||||||||
Additional recognized amounts |
40 | 9 | 80 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 83 | $ | 58 | $ | 167 | $ | 116 | ||||||||
NOTE 7 Acquisition
In 2006, the Corporation acquired a branch office in Richfield, PA. The acquisition included real
estate, deposits and loans. The assets and liabilities of the acquired business were recorded on
the consolidated statement of financial condition at their estimated fair values as of September 8,
2006, and their results of operations have been included in the consolidated statements of income
since such date.
Included in the purchase price of the branch was goodwill and core deposit intangible of $2,046,000
and $449,000, respectively. The core deposit intangible is being amortized over a ten-year period
on a straight line basis. During the first six months of 2009 and 2008, amortization expense was
$23,000. Accumulated amortization of core deposit intangible through June 30, 2009 was $128,000.
The goodwill is not amortized, but is measured annually for impairment.
NOTE 8 Investment in Unconsolidated Subsidiary
The Corporation owns 39.16% of the outstanding common stock of The First National Bank of Liverpool
(FNBL), Liverpool, PA. This investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting, as
defined in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18. The investment is being carried at
$3,270,000 as of June 30, 2009. The Corporation increases its investment in FNBL for its share of
earnings and decreases its investment by any dividends received from FNBL. A loss in value of the
investment which is other than a temporary decline will be recognized. Evidence of a loss in value
might include, but would not necessarily be limited to, absence of an ability to recover the
carrying amount of the investment or inability of FNBL to sustain an earnings capacity which would
justify the carrying amount of the investment.
10
Table of Contents
NOTE 9 Securities
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2
clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt
security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether
(a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be
required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before
assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this
assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security
for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid
recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast
recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.
In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists but the
investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it will
be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS
124-2 changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the
income statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from
the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment
related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to
the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment
related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. This FSP is effective for
the Corporation for interim and annual reporting periods ending June 30, 2009 and after.
The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, by
contractual maturity, are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from
contractual maturities because the securities may be called or prepaid with or without prepayment
penalties.
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale | Amortized | Fair | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||
Type and maturity | Cost | Value | Gains | Losses | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S.
Government agencies and corporations |
||||||||||||||||
Within one year |
$ | 3,000 | $ | 3,028 | $ | 28 | $ | | ||||||||
After one year but within five years |
23,490 | 23,658 | 174 | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
26,490 | 26,686 | 202 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
||||||||||||||||
Within one year |
7,191 | 7,206 | 15 | | ||||||||||||
After one year but within five years |
33,945 | 34,848 | 907 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
After five years but within ten years |
2,069 | 2,126 | 57 | | ||||||||||||
43,205 | 44,180 | 979 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
||||||||||||||||
After one year but within five years |
1,000 | 996 | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||
1,000 | 996 | | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,648 | 1,750 | 102 | | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
984 | 719 | 8 | (273 | ) | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 73,327 | $ | 74,331 | $ | 1,291 | $ | (287 | ) | |||||||
11
Table of Contents
December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale | Amortized | Fair | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||
Type and maturity | Cost | Value | Gains | Losses | ||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government agencies and corporations |
||||||||||||||||
Within one year |
$ | 4,627 | 4,732 $ | $ | 105 | $ | | |||||||||
After one year but within five years |
19,961 | 20,236 | 275 | | ||||||||||||
24,588 | 24,968 | 380 | | |||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
||||||||||||||||
Within one year |
3,571 | 3,593 | 22 | | ||||||||||||
After one year but within five years |
27,622 | 28,343 | 727 | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
After five years but within ten years |
3,485 | 3,579 | 95 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
34,678 | 35,515 | 844 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Corporate notes |
||||||||||||||||
After one year but within five years |
1,000 | 957 | | (43 | ) | |||||||||||
1,000 | 957 | | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
1,803 | 1,867 | 64 | | ||||||||||||
Equity securities |
1,210 | 1,014 | 29 | (225 | ) | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | 63,279 | $ | 64,321 | $ | 1,317 | $ | (275 | ) | |||||||
In accordance with the disclosure requirements of EITF 03-01, the following table shows gross
unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 (in thousands):
Unrealized Losses 06/30/2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury securities and
obligations of U.S. Government
agencies and corporations |
$ | 3,052 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,052 | $ | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
3,229 | (4 | ) | | | 3,229 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
| | 996 | (4 | ) | 996 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Debt securities |
6,281 | (10 | ) | 996 | (4 | ) | 7,277 | (14 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
501 | (222 | ) | 120 | (51 | ) | 621 | (273 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
$ | 6,782 | $ | (232 | ) | $ | 1,116 | $ | (55 | ) | $ | 7,898 | $ | (287 | ) | |||||||||
Unrealized Losses 12/31/2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
$ | 1,016 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,016 | $ | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
957 | (43 | ) | | | 957 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Debt securities |
1,973 | (50 | ) | | | 1,973 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
743 | (181 | ) | 99 | (44 | ) | 842 | (225 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired securities |
$ | 2,716 | $ | (231 | ) | $ | 99 | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 2,815 | $ | (275 | ) | |||||||||
12
Table of Contents
The unrealized losses noted above are considered to be temporary impairments. Decline in the
value of our debt securities is due only to interest rate fluctuations, rather than erosion of
quality. As a result, the payment of contractual cash flows, including principal repayment, is not
at risk. As management has the intent and ability to hold these investments until market recovery
or maturity, none of the debt securities are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. There is
one debt security that has had unrealized losses for more than 12 months. This corporate note has a
maturity date in February 2012, representing approximately 1.6% of the total debt securities
amortized cost as of June 30, 2009.
Equity securities owned by the Company consist of common stock of various financial services
providers (Bank stocks) that have traditionally been high-performing stocks prior to 2008. During
2008 and into 2009, market values of most of the Bank stocks have materially declined. As part of
the quarterly analysis performed to assess impairment of its investment portfolio, management has
determined that some of the unrealized losses in the Bank stock portfolio are other than
temporary. Considerations used to determine other-than-temporary impairment status to individual
holdings include the length of time the stock has remained in an unrealized loss position, and the
percentage of unrealized loss compared to the carrying cost of the stock, dividend reduction or
suspension, market analyst reviews and expectations, and other pertinent news that would affect
expectations for recovery or further decline. In the second quarter of 2009, a total of $226,000
was recorded as an other-than-temporary impairment charge on two of the 17 Bank stocks held.
We understand that stocks can be cyclical and will experience some down periods. Historically, bank
stocks have sustained cyclical losses, followed by periods of substantial gains. When market values
of the Bank stocks recover, accounting standards do not allow reversal of the other-than-temporary
impairment charge until the security is sold, at which time any proceeds above the carrying value
will be recognized as gains on the sale of investment securities.
NOTE 10 Fair Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted the provisions of SFAS No 157, Fair Value
Measurements for financial assets and financial liabilities and on January 1, 2009, adopted the
provision for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. SFAS 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) No. FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS
157-4). FASB Statement 157, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value as the price that would be
received to sell the asset or transfer the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a
forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under
current market conditions. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance on determining when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. The FSP also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.
FSP FAS 157-4 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine
whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting
entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the
asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant
adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with
Statement 157.
This FSP clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the
entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly.
The FSP provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a
transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction
is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value. This FSP is effective for the
Corporation for interim and annual reporting periods ending June 30, 2009 and after.
13
Table of Contents
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value
measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the
principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most
advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous)
market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability is not to be adjusted for
transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for
a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and
customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction.
Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii)
knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.
SFAS 157 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the
income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant
information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and
liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash
flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on
the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset
(replacement cost). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation
techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from
independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entitys own
assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, SFAS 157
establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. |
Level 2 Inputs Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that
are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment
speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by
market data by correlation or other means. |
Level 3 Inputs Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or
liabilities that reflect an entitys own assumptions about the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. |
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well
as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth
below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Corporations financial assets and
financial liabilities carried at fair value effective January 1, 2008.
In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market
prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use,
as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that
financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect
counterparty credit quality, the Corporations creditworthiness, among other things, as well as
unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The
Corporations valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be
indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes
the Corporations valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market
participants, the use of different methodologies or
assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a
different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Securities Available for Sale. Debt securities classified as available for sale are reported at
fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Corporation obtains fair value
measurement from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable
data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve,
live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information
and the bonds terms and conditions, among other things. Equity securities classified as available
for sale are reported at fair value using Level 1 inputs.
14
Table of Contents
Impaired Loans. Certain impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying
collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated
using Level 3 inputs based on customized discounting criteria.
Other Real Estate Owned. Assets included in other real estate owned are reported at fair value on a
non-recurring basis. Values are estimated using Level 3 inputs, based on appraisals that consider
the sales prices of similar properties in the proximate vicinity.
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value as
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the
fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value (in thousands).
(Level 2) | ||||||||||||||||
(Level 1) | Significant | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant Other | ||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009 | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity securities available-for-sale |
$ | 719 | $ | 719 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Debt securities available-for-sale |
73,612 | 73,612 | | |||||||||||||
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring
basis: |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
1,104 | | | 1,104 | ||||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
594 | | | 594 |
(Level 2) | ||||||||||||||||
(Level 1) | Significant | (Level 3) | ||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant Other | ||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2008 | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity securities available-for-sale |
$ | 1,014 | $ | 1,014 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Debt securities available-for-sale |
63,307 | 63,307 | | |||||||||||||
Measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis: |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired loans |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
305 | | | 305 |
Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis include reporting units measured at fair value in the first step of a goodwill
impairment test. Certain non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis
include non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value in the second
step of a goodwill impairment test, as well as intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived
assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment. As stated above, SFAS 157 was applicable
to these fair value measurements beginning January 1, 2009 and were not significant at June 30,
2009.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 amends FASB
Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures
about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded
companies as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. This FSP is effective for the Corporation for interim and annual
reporting periods ending June 30, 2009 and after.
15
Table of Contents
The estimated fair values of the Corporations financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):
Financial Instruments
(in thousands)
(in thousands)
June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | |||||||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 9,282 | $ | 9,282 | $ | 12,264 | $ | 12,264 | ||||||||
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
252 | 252 | 193 | 193 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
7,500 | 7,500 | | | ||||||||||||
Interest bearing time deposits with banks |
5,325 | 5,483 | 5,325 | 5,471 | ||||||||||||
Securities |
74,331 | 74,331 | 64,321 | 64,321 | ||||||||||||
Restricted investment in FHLB stock |
2,197 | 2,197 | 2,197 | 2,197 | ||||||||||||
Total loans, net of unearned interest |
305,249 | 313,069 | 312,522 | 323,289 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
2,544 | 2,544 | 2,315 | 2,315 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
51,663 | 51,663 | 54,200 | 54,200 | ||||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits |
320,594 | 322,816 | 302,831 | 306,500 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
1,718 | 1,718 | 1,944 | 1,944 | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| | 8,635 | 8,635 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
5,000 | 5,041 | 5,000 | 5,021 | ||||||||||||
Other interest bearing liabilities |
1,118 | 1,122 | 1,096 | 1,096 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
741 | 741 | 801 | 801 | ||||||||||||
Off-balance sheet financial instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
| | | |
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Corporations financial
instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, the
fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Corporation could
have realized in sales transactions on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have
been measured as of their respective quarter ends and have not been re-evaluated or updated for
purposes of these consolidated financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such,
the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting
dates may be different than the amounts reported at each quarter end.
The information presented above should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the
entire Corporation since a fair value calculation is provided only for a limited portion of the
Corporations assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of
subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Corporations disclosures and
those of other companies may not be meaningful.
The following describes the estimated fair value of the Corporations financial instruments as well
as the significant methods and assumptions used to determine these estimated fair values.
Carrying values approximate fair value for cash and due from banks, interest-bearing demand
deposits with other banks, federal funds sold, restricted stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank,
interest receivable, non-interest bearing demand deposits, securities sold under agreements to
repurchase, other interest bearing liabilities and interest payable.
16
Table of Contents
Interest bearing time deposits with banks The estimated fair value is determined by discounting
the contractual future cash flows, using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar
remaining maturities.
Securities Available for Sale Debt securities classified as available for sale are reported at
fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Corporation obtains fair value
measurement from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable
data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve,
live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information
and the bonds terms and conditions, among other things. Equity securities classified as available
for sale are reported at fair value using Level 1 inputs.
Loans
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and which entail no significant changes in
credit risk, carrying values approximated fair value. Substantially all commercial loans and real
estate mortgages are variable rate loans. The fair value of other loans (i.e. consumer loans and
fixed-rate real estate mortgages) are estimated by calculating the present value of the cash flow
difference between the current rate and the market rate, for the average maturity, discounted
quarterly at the market rate.
Impaired Loans Certain impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral
if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 3
inputs based on customized discounting criteria.
Fixed rate time deposits The estimated fair value is determined by discounting the contractual
future cash flows, using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
Commitments
to extend credit and letters of credit The fair value of commitments to extend credit
is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account
market interest rates, the remaining terms and present credit worthiness of the counterparties. The
fair value of guarantees and letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar
agreements.
NOTE 11 Subsequent Events
On July 21, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend for the third quarter of
2009 of $0.20 per share to shareholders of record on August 14, 2009, payable on September 1, 2009.
17
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
Forward Looking Statements:
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains safe harbor provisions regarding
forward-looking statements. When used in this discussion, the words believes, anticipates,
contemplates, expects, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which could cause actual
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements to
differ materially from those projected. Those risks and uncertainties include changes in interest
rates and their impact on the level of deposits, loan demand and value of loan collateral, changes
in the market value of the securities portfolio, increased competition from other financial
institutions, governmental monetary policy, legislation and changes in banking regulations, changes
in levels of FDIC deposit insurance premiums and assessments, risks associated with the effect of
opening a new branch, the ability to control costs and expenses, and general economic conditions.
The Corporation undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Critical Accounting Policies:
Disclosure of the Corporations significant accounting policies is included in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements of the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Some of these policies require significant judgments, estimates, and
assumptions to be made by management, most particularly in connection with determining the
provision for loan losses and the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses, as well as
managements evaluation of the investment portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment.
General:
The following discusses the consolidated financial condition of the Corporation as of June 30,
2009, as compared to December 31, 2008, and the consolidated results of operations for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to the same period in 2008. This discussion should be
read in conjunction with the interim consolidated financial statements and related footnotes
included herein.
Introduction:
Juniata Valley Financial Corp. is a Pennsylvania corporation organized in 1983 to become the
holding Corporation of The Juniata Valley Bank. The Bank is a state-chartered bank headquartered in
Mifflintown, Pennsylvania. Juniata Valley Financial Corp. and its subsidiary bank derive
substantially all of their income from banking and bank-related services, including interest earned
on residential real estate, commercial mortgage, commercial and consumer loans, interest earned on
investment securities and fee income from deposit services and other financial services to its
customers through 12 locations in central Pennsylvania. Juniata Valley Financial Corp. also owns
39.16% of the First National Bank of Liverpool (Liverpool), located in Liverpool, Pennsylvania.
The Corporation accounts for Liverpool as an unconsolidated subsidiary using the equity method of
accounting.
Financial Condition:
As of June 30, 2009, total assets increased by $7,844,000, or 1.8%, as compared to December 31,
2008. Deposits increased $15.2 million, $8.6 million of which was used to repay short-term debt.
Interest-bearing deposits grew by $17.8 million, while non-interest bearing deposits declined by
$2.5 million.
18
Table of Contents
The table below shows changes in deposit volumes by type of deposit (in thousands of dollars)
between December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009.
June 30, | December 31, | Change | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
Demand, non-interest bearing |
$ | 51,663 | $ | 54,200 | $ | (2,537 | ) | (4.7 | %) | |||||||
NOW and money market |
68,460 | 62,099 | 6,361 | 10.2 | % | |||||||||||
Savings |
41,111 | 37,114 | 3,997 | 10.8 | % | |||||||||||
Time deposits, $100,000 and more |
41,182 | 39,059 | 2,123 | 5.4 | % | |||||||||||
Other time deposits |
169,841 | 164,559 | 5,282 | 3.2 | % | |||||||||||
Total deposits |
$ | 372,257 | $ | 357,031 | $ | 15,226 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||
Overall, loans, net of unearned interest, decreased by $7,387,000, or 2.3%, between December
31, 2008 and June 30, 2009. As shown in the table below (in thousands of dollars), the decrease in
outstanding loans since December 31, 2008 has been related primarily to commercial, home equity and
personal installment loan activity.
June 30, | December 31, | Change | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
Loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial, financial and agricultural |
$ | 34,311 | $ | 38,755 | $ | (4,444 | ) | (11.5 | %) | |||||||
Real estate commercial |
34,344 | 32,171 | 2,173 | 6.8 | % | |||||||||||
Real estate construction |
22,563 | 22,144 | 419 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||
Real estate mortgage |
139,484 | 140,016 | (532 | ) | (0.4 | %) | ||||||||||
Home equity |
55,914 | 60,949 | (5,035 | ) | (8.3 | %) | ||||||||||
Obligations of states and political
subdivisions |
7,901 | 7,177 | 724 | 10.1 | % | |||||||||||
Personal |
13,228 | 13,920 | (692 | ) | (5.0 | %) | ||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 307,745 | $ | 315,132 | ($7,387 | ) | (2.3 | %) | ||||||||
A summary of the transactions in the allowance for loan losses for each of the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands) are presented below.
Periods Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Balance of allowance January 1 |
$ | 2,610 | $ | 2,322 | ||||
Loans charged off |
(331 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged off |
5 | 19 | ||||||
Net charge-offs |
(326 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
212 | 144 | ||||||
Balance of allowance end of period |
$ | 2,496 | $ | 2,412 | ||||
Ratio of net charge-offs during period to
average loans outstanding |
0.11 | % | 0.02 | % | ||||
19
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation had several loan relationships, with an aggregate
carrying balance of $1,824,000, deemed to be impaired that have been placed in nonaccrual status.
Specific allocations totaling $150,000 have been included within the loan loss reserve for these
loans. Management believes that the specific reserve is adequate to cover potential future losses
related to these relationships. There are four other significant loan relationships considered to
be impaired, with outstanding balances totaling $4,776,000, on which interest continues to accrue.
Specific allocations within the allowance for loan losses for these loans total $60,000. Otherwise,
there are no material loans classified for regulatory purposes as loss, doubtful, substandard, or
special mention which management expects to significantly impact future operating results,
liquidity or capital resources. Following is a summary of the Banks non-performing loans on June
30, 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008.
(Dollar amounts in thousands) | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | ||||||
Non-performing loans |
||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 1,824 | $ | 1,255 | ||||
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
906 | 664 | ||||||
Restructured loans |
| | ||||||
Total |
$ | 2,730 | $ | 1,919 | ||||
Average loans outstanding |
$ | 310,381 | $ | 307,606 | ||||
Ratio of non-performing loans to
average loans outstanding |
0.88 | % | 0.62 | % |
Stockholders equity increased by $933,000, or 1.92%, from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009.
Net income of $2,575,000 and cash received for treasury stock reissued for the Corporations stock
option and stock purchase plans of $133,000 increased stockholders equity, while dividends paid of
$1,649,000 and cash used to purchase Corporation stock into treasury of $128,000 reduced the
Corporations capital position. The Corporation repurchased stock into treasury pursuant to its
stock repurchase program. During the first six months of 2009, the Corporation purchased 7,600
shares. Securities available for sale decreased in market value, representing a decrease to equity
of $17,000, net of taxes while accounting for stock-based compensation activity increased equity by
$19,000.
Recently, the FDIC Board has adopted a restoration plan that raised assessment rates for deposit
insurance premiums for 2009 and also levied a special emergency assessment; these developments
significantly affected operating results for the Corporation during the second quarter of 2009, as
described in the following operations overview. The FDIC has also indicated that an additional
special assessment could be proposed that would be charged again during 2009.
Management is not aware of any other current recommendations of applicable regulatory authorities
that, if implemented, would have a material effect on the Corporations liquidity, capital
resources, or operations.
Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the following events took place:
On July 21, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a regular cash dividend for the third quarter of
2009 of $0.20 per share to shareholders of record on August 14, 2009, payable on September 1, 2009.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Operations Overview:
Net income for the second quarter of 2009 was $1,165,000, a decrease of $232,000, or 16.6%,
compared to the second quarter of 2008. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $.27 in the
second quarter of 2009, a $0.05 decrease from the second quarter in 2008. Annualized return on
average equity for the second quarter in 2009 was 9.47%, compared to the prior years ratio for the
same period of 11.42%. For the quarter ended June 30, annualized return on average assets was 1.07%
in 2009, versus 1.31% in 2008, reflecting a decrease of 18.3%. The decrease in net income was
primarily a result of the increase in the assessment for FDIC insurance on deposits during the
second quarter of 2009.
20
Table of Contents
Presented below are selected key ratios for the two periods:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Return on average assets (annualized) |
1.07 | % | 1.31 | % | ||||
Return on average equity (annualized) |
9.47 | % | 11.42 | % | ||||
Average equity to average assets |
11.26 | % | 11.43 | % | ||||
Non-interest income, excluding securities gains and impairment
charges, as a percentage of average assets (annualized) |
1.04 | % | 1.20 | % | ||||
Non-interest expense as a percentage of average assets (annualized) |
3.03 | % | 2.75 | % |
There were items that impact comparability when making comparisons of the second quarters of
2009 and 2008. Charges to earnings for equity securities deemed to be other-than-temporarily
impaired occurred in both periods. In the second quarter of 2009, a special assessment was charged
to banks by the FDIC, and a refund was received from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for sales tax
overpaid in prior years. During the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation recorded a gain from
receipt of life insurance proceeds, a lump-sum adjustment to reduce accrued, unvested
post-retirement liabilities as a result of the departure of personnel and a gain from the sale of
property formerly used as a branch.
The discussion that follows further explains changes in the components of net income when comparing
the second quarter of 2009 with the second quarter of 2008.
Net Interest Income:
Net interest income was $4,053,000 for the second quarter of 2009, as compared to $3,963,000 in the
same quarter in 2008. Average earning assets grew by 2.4%, while the net interest margin on a fully
tax equivalent basis decreased by 1 basis point.
Interest on loans decreased $241,000, or 4.4%, in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the
same period in 2008. The average weighted interest rate decrease of 47 basis points lowered
interest income by approximately $348,000, while an increase in average balances outstanding added
approximately $107,000 in interest income.
Interest earned on investment securities and money market investments decreased $127,000 in the
second quarter of 2009 as compared to 2008, with average balances increasing $2.9 million during
the period. The yield on money market investments (federal funds and interest bearing deposits)
decreased by 126 basis points in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to the second quarter of
2008, due to the reduction in the federal funds target rate from 2.00% on June 30, 2008 to 0.25% as
of June 30, 2009. Likewise, the overall pre-tax yield on the investment securities portfolio
decreased during that same timeframe by 58 basis points.
Average interest-bearing deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase declined by
$178,000, while average non-interest bearing deposits grew by $3,661,000. This change in the mix of
deposits, in addition to the lower general rate environment, contributed to the reduction in the
cost to fund earning assets, which was reduced by 52 basis points, to 1.88%, in the second quarter
of 2009.
Total average earning assets during the second quarter of 2009 were $397,760,000, compared to
$388,264,000 during the second quarter of 2008, yielding 5.96% in 2009 versus 6.48% in 2008.
Funding costs for the earning assets were 1.88% and 2.40% for the second quarters of 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the second quarter of 2009
was 4.26%. For the same period in 2008, the fully-tax equivalent net interest margin was 4.27%.
21
Table of Contents
Provision for Loan Losses:
In the second quarter of 2009, the provision for loan losses was $77,000, as compared to a
provision of $112,000 in the second quarter of 2008. Management regularly reviews the adequacy of
the loan loss reserve and makes assessments as to specific loan impairment, historical charge-off
expectations, general economic conditions in the Banks market area, specific loan quality and
other factors.
Non-interest Income:
Non-interest income in the second quarter of 2009 was $909,000, compared to $922,000 in the second
quarter of 2008, a decrease of $13,000. As mentioned in the overview above, there were items that
impact comparability when making comparisons of the two quarters. The following table quantifies
the impact of these items.
Quarter ended June 30, | ||||||||
Non-interest income (in thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Securities other-than-temporary impairment charge |
$ | (226 | ) | $ | (393 | ) | ||
Gains on the sale of securities |
| 28 | ||||||
Gains on the sale of former branch locations |
14 | 58 | ||||||
Gains from life insurance proceeds |
| 179 | ||||||
Refund of overcharged PA sales tax from years 2004-2006 |
40 | | ||||||
Total positive (negative) impact on non-interest income |
$ | (172 | ) | $ | (128 | ) | ||
In the second quarter of 2009, management identified other-than-temporary impairment on two
equities in the Corporations common stock portfolio and accordingly, an impairment charge to
earnings of $226,000 was recorded. The same type of analysis one year ago resulted in a similar
impairment charge of $393,000 on six equity securities. The Corporation recognized no gains from
the sales of securities during the second quarter of 2009, while a gain of $28,000 was recorded in
the second quarter of 2008 from the disposal of a stock that had been written down for impairment
in the prior year. Property used formerly as branch locations was
sold in each of the comparative
quarters, yielding gains of $14,000 in the second quarter of 2009 and $58,000 in the second quarter
of 2008. As a result of petitions to the state of Pennsylvania disputing certain charges for state
sales tax over the periods of 2004 through 2006, the Corporation received a refund of $40,000 in
the second quarter of 2009. During the second quarter of 2008, the Corporation received $179,000 in
death benefits in excess of the carrying cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
policies. These types of transactions generally do not occur on a regular basis as part of
recurring operating income. As a total, the negative impact of these items on non-interest income
was $44,000 greater in the second quarter of 2009 than in the same period in 2008.
Trust fee income was $8,000 or 8.5% lower in 2009s second quarter as compared to 2008s second
quarter. Likewise, commissions from sales of non-deposit products in the second quarter of 2009
were 12.8%, or $22,000, lower than in the previous years same quarter. Fees received for customer
services, primarily overdraft protection, increased by $12,000, or 2.9%, while increased electronic
banking card fees earned in the second quarter of 2009 contributed significantly to the increase in
other noninterest income.
As a percentage of average assets, annualized non-interest income, exclusive of net gains on the
sale of securities and impairment charge, was 1.04% in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to
1.20% in the same period of 2008. If all items impacting comparability were excluded from the
computation, the ratios would be 0.99% in 2009 compared to 0.98% in 2008.
Non-interest Expense:
Total non-interest expense increased $370,000, or 12.6%, in the second quarter of 2009 as compared
to 2008. Of the $370,000 increase, $300,000 was due to items that impact comparability when making
comparisons of the two quarters. The following table quantifies the impact of the items that made
up the $300,000 variance.
Quarter ended June 30, | ||||||||
Non-interest expense (in thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Forfeiture of unvested employee benefits |
$ | | $ | (106 | ) | |||
FDIC Insurance special assessment |
194 | | ||||||
Total negative (positive) impact on non-interest expense |
$ | 194 | $ | (106 | ) | |||
22
Table of Contents
In the second quarter of 2008, certain unvested benefits were forfeited, resulting in an
adjustment to the accrued liability for post-retirement benefits of $106,000. In 2009s second
quarter, banks were charged a special assessment by the FDIC, which is intended to replenish the
Bank Insurance Fund. In Juniatas case, the special assessment was $194,000.
Exclusive of the benefit from the forfeiture of unvested employee benefits in 2008, employee
compensation and benefits costs decreased by $38,000, or 2.3%, in the second quarter of 2009
compared to the second quarter of 2008, primarily due to a decrease in part time salaries and
commissions. The cost of regular, recurring FDIC insurance premiums rose by $112,000 in the second
quarter of 2009 when compared to the second quarter of 2008, exclusive of the special assessment.
As a percentage of average assets, annualized noninterest expense was 3.03% in the second quarter
of 2009 as compared to 2.75% in the same period of 2008. If the items impacting comparability were
excluded from the computation, the ratios would be 2.85% in both periods.
Provision for income taxes:
Income tax expense in the second quarter of 2009 was $405,000, or 6.0%, less than in the same time
period in 2008. The effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2009 was 25.8% versus 23.5% in
2008. The ratio of tax-free interest-earning assets to total assets increased in 2009, providing
for a greater amount of non-taxable interest income. The item having the most influence in reducing
the effective tax rate in 2008, however, were the tax-free proceeds from a death claim on insurance
policies, as discussed earlier.
Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Operations Overview:
Income before income taxes for the first six months of 2009 decreased by $266,000, or 7.1%, when
compared to the same period in 2008. Net interest income after provision for loan losses increased
by $157,000, or 2.0%. Non-interest income increased $97,000, or 4.7%, while non-interest expense
increased by $520,000, or 8.7%. The provision for income tax decreased by $42,000 when comparing
the two periods, resulting in an overall decrease to net income of $224,000, or 8.0%.
Presented below are selected key ratios for the two periods:
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Return on average assets (annualized) |
1.19 | % | 1.32 | % | ||||
Return on average equity (annualized) |
10.52 | % | 11.51 | % | ||||
Average equity to average assets |
11.34 | % | 11.48 | % | ||||
Non-interest income, excluding securities gains and impairment
charges, as a percentage of average assets (annualized) |
1.10 | % | 1.14 | % | ||||
Non-interest expense as a percentage of average assets (annualized) |
3.01 | % | 2.82 | % |
There were several items that impact comparability when making comparisons of the two periods.
Charges to earnings for equity securities deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired and gains on
the sale of properties occurred in both periods. During the first six months of 2008, the
Corporation recorded a gain from receipt of life insurance proceeds, a gain from the sale of
securities, a lump-sum adjustment to reduce accrued, unvested post-retirement liabilities as a
result of the departure of personnel and proceeds from the partial redemption of VISA shares. In
2009, noninterest income was recorded for Pennsylvania sales tax refunds and for deferred fees
earned on the sale of credit life insurance. Additionally, in 2009, a special assessment was
charged to banks by the FDIC.
23
Table of Contents
The discussion that follows further explains these and other changes in the components of net
income when comparing the year-to-date results of operations for 2009 and 2008.
Net Interest Income:
Net interest income was $8,070,000 for the first six months of 2009, as compared to $7,845,000 in
the same period in 2008. A 175 basis point reduction in the prime and federal funds rates between
June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2009, affected the cost of funding to a greater extent than the yield on
earning assets in the year to year comparison.
Interest on loans decreased $478,000, or 4.3%, in the first six months of 2009 as compared to the
same period in 2008. An average weighted interest rate decrease of 53 basis points, in conjunction
with an increase of $9,539,000 in the average balance of the loan portfolio, was responsible for
lower interest income in comparison to the 2009 period.
Interest earned on investment securities and money market investments decreased $317,000 in the
first six months of 2009 as compared to 2008, with average balances decreasing $2,014,000 during
the period. The yield on money market investments (federal funds and interest bearing deposits)
decreased by 132 basis points in the first half of 2009 as compared to the first half of 2008, due
to the reduction in the federal funds target rate from 2.00% on June 30, 2008 to a range of 0% to
0.25% as of June 30, 2009. Likewise, the overall pre-tax yield on the investment securities
portfolio decreased during that same timeframe by 59 basis points.
Average interest-bearing deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase declined by
$1,821,000, while average non-interest bearing deposits grew by $4,003,000, when comparing the
first half of 2009 to the same period in 2008. This change in the mix of deposits, in addition to
the lower general rate environment, contributed to the reduction in the cost to fund earning
assets, which was reduced by 57 basis points, to 1.94%, in the first half of 2009.
Total average earning assets during the first half of 2009 were $392,435,000, compared to
$384,910,000 during the first half of 2008, yielding 6.06% in 2009 versus 6.59% in 2008. Funding
costs for the earning assets were 1.94% and 2.51% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Net interest margin on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the first half of 2009 was
4.31%. For the same period in 2008, the fully-tax equivalent net interest margin was 4.26%.
Provision for Loan Losses:
In the first six months of 2009, the provision made for loan losses was $212,000. Management
regularly reviews the adequacy of the loan loss reserve and makes assessments as to specific loan
impairment, historical charge-off expectations, general economic conditions in the Banks market
area, specific loan quality and other factors. In the first six months of 2008, a loan loss
provision of $144,000 was recorded.
Noninterest income:
Non-interest income in the first six months of 2009 was $2,151,000, compared to $2,054,000 in the
first six months of 2008, an increase of $97,000. As mentioned in the overview above, there were
several items that impact comparability when making comparisons of the two periods. The following
table quantifies the impact of these items.
Year-to-date through June 30, | ||||||||
Non-interest income (in thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Securities other-than-temporary impairment charge |
$ | (226 | ) | $ | (393 | ) | ||
Gains on the sale of securities |
| 41 | ||||||
Partial redemption of VISA shares |
| 38 | ||||||
Gains on the sale of former branch locations |
14 | 58 | ||||||
Gains from life insurance proceeds |
| 179 | ||||||
Refund of overcharged PA sales tax from years 2004-2006 |
40 | | ||||||
Prior period income from credit-life insurance sales |
323 | | ||||||
Total positive (negative) impact on non-interest income |
$ | 151 | $ | (77 | ) | |||
24
Table of Contents
In the first six months of 2009, management identified other-than-temporary impairment on two
equities in the Corporations common stock portfolio and, accordingly, an impairment charge to
earnings of $226,000 was recorded. The same type of analysis one year ago resulted in a similar
impairment charge of $393,000 on six equity securities. The Corporation recognized no gains from
the sales of securities during the first half of 2009, while a gain of $41,000 was recorded in the
first half of 2008. Property used formerly as branch locations was sold during each of the
comparative periods, yielding gains of $14,000 in 2009 and $58,000 in 2008. As a result of
petitions to the state of Pennsylvania disputing certain charges for state sales tax over the
periods of 2004 through 2006, the Corporation received a refund of $40,000 in the first half of
2009. During the first six months of 2008, the Corporation received $179,000 in death benefits in
excess of the carrying cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance policies. In 2008, the
Corporation received funds from VISA for the partial redemption of Class B shares that were created
as a result of VISAs IPO. The redemption amount was $38,000 and was recorded as other non-interest
income. Included also in non-interest income in the first half of 2009 was an adjustment of
$323,000, representing previously unrecorded fees earned in prior periods from the sales of
insurance policies on loans. The adjustment was deemed by management to be immaterial to the
consolidated financial statements in all prior periods and therefore required no prior period
restatement of earnings. These types of transactions generally do not occur on a regular basis as
part of recurring operating income. As a total, the positive impact of these transactions on
non-interest income was $228,000 greater in the first half of 2009 than in the same period in 2008.
Trust fees earned in the first six months of 2009 were $47,000 lower than those earned in the first
six months of 2008, primarily due to the reduction in market values in the recent economic
downturn. Fees for customer service on deposit accounts in the first half of 2009 decreased
slightly compared to the same period in 2008 by $8,000, or 1.0%, due to reduced activity in the
overdraft protection product. At $258,000, commissions from the sale of non-deposit products were
67% of the $383,000 in commissions earned in 2008. Income from bank owned life insurance and
annuities decreased in the first half of 2009 compared to the first half of 2008 by $18,000, or
7.6%, as a result of lower earning rates. Income from our unconsolidated subsidiary was $96,000,
representing earnings recorded under the equity method of accounting for the ownership of 39.16% of
the First National Bank of Liverpool during the first six months of 2009, a 3.2% increase over the
previous years same period.
As a percentage of average assets, annualized non-interest income, exclusive of net gains on the
sale of securities and impairment charge, was 1.10% in the first six months of 2009 as compared to
1.14% in the same period of 2008. If the infrequently-occurring items were excluded from the
computation, the ratios would be 0.93% in 2009 and 1.01% in 2008.
Noninterest expense:
Total non-interest expense increased $520,000, or 8.7%, in the first six months of 2009 as compared
to 2008. Of the $520,000 increase, $300,000 was due to items that affected comparability. The
following table quantifies the impact of the items that made up the $300,000 variance.
Year-to-date through June 30, | ||||||||
Non-interest expense (in thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Forfeiture of unvested employee benefits |
$ | | $ | (106 | ) | |||
FDIC Insurance special assessment |
194 | | ||||||
Total negative (positive) impact on non-interest expense |
$ | 194 | $ | (106 | ) | |||
In the first six months of 2008, certain unvested benefits were forfeited, resulting in an
adjustment to the accrued liability for post-retirement benefits of $106,000. In 2009s second
quarter, banks were charged for a special assessment by the FDIC, which is intended to replenish
the Bank Insurance Fund. In Juniatas case, the special assessment was $194,000.
Exclusive of the benefit from the forfeiture of unvested employee benefits in 2008, employee
compensation and benefits costs were unchanged in the first six months of 2009 when compared to the
same period in 2008. The cost of regular, recurring FDIC insurance premiums (exclusive of the
special assessment) rose by $190,000 in the first six months of 2009 when compared to the first six
months of 2008.
Other changes in noninterest expense in the comparable periods included an increase of $51,000 in
costs to maintain foreclosed assets and an increase of $42,000 in professional consulting fees.
Cost increases in these categories were offset somewhat by modest reductions in equipment expense
and in director compensation costs.
25
Table of Contents
As a percentage of average assets, annualized noninterest expense was 3.01% in the first six months
of 2009 as compared to 2.82% in the same period of 2008. If the items that affected comparability
were excluded from the computation, the ratios would be 2.93% in 2009 and 2.87% in 2008. The
increase in regular, recurring FDIC insurance expense added 9 basis points to the 2009 ratio.
Provision for income taxes:
Income tax expense in the first six months of 2009 was $42,000, or 43%, less than in the same time
period in 2008. The effective tax rate in 2009 was 26.5% versus 25.7% in 2008. The tax-free
proceeds from a death claim on insurance policies in 2008 were responsible for the lower effective
tax rate in 2008. Additionally, the ratio of tax-free interest-earning assets to total assets
dropped from 9.4% in 2008 to 9.2% in 2009, providing for a lesser amount of non-taxable interest
income.
Liquidity:
The objective of liquidity management is to ensure that sufficient funding is available, at a
reasonable cost, to meet the ongoing operational cash needs of the Corporation and to take
advantage of income producing opportunities as they arise. While the desired level of liquidity
will vary depending upon a variety of factors, it is the primary goal of the Corporation to
maintain a high level of liquidity in all economic environments. Principal sources of asset
liquidity are provided by securities maturing in one year or less, other short-term investments
such as federal funds sold and cash and due from banks. Liability liquidity, which is more
difficult to measure, can be met by attracting deposits and maintaining the core deposit base. The
Corporation is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh for the purpose of providing
short-term liquidity when other sources are unable to fill these needs. During the first six months
of 2009, the average balance of short-term borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank was $220,000,
with none outstanding on June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation had long-term debt of
$5,000,000 and had unused borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of $180 million.
Funding derived from securities sold under agreements to repurchase is available through corporate
cash management accounts for business customers. This product gives the Corporation the ability to
pay interest on corporate checking accounts.
In view of the sources previously mentioned, management believes that the Corporations liquidity
is capable of providing the funds needed to meet loan demand.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements:
The Corporations consolidated financial statements do not reflect various off-balance sheet
arrangements that are made in the normal course of business, which may involve some liquidity risk,
credit risk, and interest rate risk. These commitments consist mainly of loans approved but not
yet funded, unused lines of credit and letters of credit issued using the same credit standards as
on-balance sheet instruments. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as
long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Letters of credit are
conditional commitments issued to guarantee the financial performance obligation of a customer to a
third party. Unused commitments and letters of credit at June 30, 2009, were $43,884,000 and
$979,000, respectively. Because these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and because many of
them will expire without being drawn upon, they do not generally present any significant liquidity
risk to the Corporation. Management believes that any amounts actually drawn upon can be funded in
the normal course of operations. The Corporation has no investment in or financial relationship
with any unconsolidated entities that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on liquidity
or the availability of capital resources.
Interest Rate Sensitivity:
Interest rate sensitivity management is the responsibility of the Asset/Liability Management
Committee. This process involves the development and implementation of strategies to maximize net
interest margin, while minimizing the earnings risk associated with changing interest rates.
Traditional gap analysis identifies the maturity and re-pricing terms of all assets and
liabilities. A simulation analysis is used to assess earnings and capital at risk from movements in
interest rates. See Item 3 for a description of the complete simulation process and results.
26
Table of Contents
Capital Adequacy:
Bank regulatory authorities in the United States issue risk-based capital standards. These capital
standards relate a banking Corporations capital to the risk profile of its assets and provide the
basis by which all banking companies and banks are evaluated in terms of capital adequacy. The
risk-based capital standards require all banks to have Tier 1 capital of at least 4% and total
capital, including Tier 1 capital, of at least 8% of risk-adjusted assets. Tier 1 capital includes
common stockholders equity and qualifying perpetual preferred stock together with related
surpluses and retained earnings. Total capital is comprised of Tier 1 capital, limited life
preferred stock, qualifying debt instruments, and the reserves for possible loan losses. Banking
regulators have also issued leverage ratio requirements. The leverage ratio requirement is measured
as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted average assets. At June 30, 2009, the Bank exceeded the
regulatory requirements to be considered a well capitalized financial institution, i.e., a
leverage ratio exceeding 5%, Tier 1 capital exceeding 6% and total capital exceeding 10%.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Market risk is the exposure to economic loss that arises from changes in the values of certain
financial instruments. The types of market risk exposures generally faced by financial institutions
include equity market price risk, interest rate risk, foreign currency risk and commodity price
risk. Due to the nature of its operations, only equity market price risk and interest rate risk are
significant to the Corporation.
Equity market price risk is the risk that changes in the values of equity investments could have a
material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Corporation. The
Corporations equity investments consist of common stocks of publicly traded financial
institutions.
Recent declines and volatility in the values of financial institution stocks have significantly
reduced the likelihood of realizing significant gains in the near-term. Although the Corporation
has realized occasional gains from this portfolio in the past, the primary objective of the
portfolio is to achieve value appreciation in the long term while earning consistent attractive
after-tax yields from dividends. The carrying value of the financial institutions stocks accounted
for less than 0.2% of the Corporations total assets as of June 30, 2009. Management performs an
impairment analysis on the entire investment portfolio, including the financial institutions stocks
on a quarterly basis. As of June 30, 2009, other-than-temporary impairment was identified on two
equity securities, resulting in a charge to earnings of $226,000. There is no assurance that
further declines in market values of the common stock portfolio in the future will not result in
other-than-temporary impairment charges, depending upon facts and circumstances present.
The equity investments in the Corporations portfolio had an adjusted cost basis of approximately
$984,000 and a fair value of $719,000 at June 30, 2009. Net unrealized losses in this portfolio
were approximately $265,000 at June 30, 2009.
In addition to its equity portfolio, the Corporations investment management and trust services
revenue could be impacted by fluctuations in the securities markets. A portion of the Corporations
trust revenue is based on the value of the underlying investment portfolios. If securities values
decline, the Corporations trust revenue could be negatively impacted.
Interest rate risk creates exposure in two primary areas. First, changes in rates have an impact on
the Corporations liquidity position and could affect its ability to meet obligations and continue
to grow. Second, movements in interest rates can create fluctuations in the Corporations net
interest income and changes in the economic value of equity.
The primary objective of the Corporations asset-liability management process is to maximize
current and future net interest income within acceptable levels of interest rate risk while
satisfying liquidity and capital requirements. Management recognizes that a certain amount of
interest rate risk is inherent, appropriate and necessary to ensure profitability. A simulation
analysis is used to assess earnings and capital at risk from movements in interest rates. The model
considers three major factors of (1) volume differences, (2) repricing differences, and (3) timing
in its income simulation. As of the most recent model run, data was disseminated into appropriate
repricing buckets, based upon the static position at that time. The interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities were assigned a multiplier to simulate how much that particular
balance sheet item would re-price when interest rates change. Finally, the estimated timing effect
of rate changes is applied, and the net interest income effect is determined on a static basis (as
if no other
factors were present). As the table below indicates, based upon rate shock simulations
27
Table of Contents
on a static
basis, the Corporations balance sheet is slightly asset sensitive. Over a one-year period, the
effect of a 100, 200 and 300 basis point rate increase would decrease net interest income by
$60,000, $119,000 and $178,000, respectively. No rate shock modeling was done for a declining rate
environment, as the federal funds target rate currently is between zero and 0.25%. The modeling
process is continued by further estimating the impact that imbedded options and probable internal
strategies may have in the changing-rate environment. Examples of imbedded options are floor and
ceiling features in adjustable rate mortgages and call features on securities in the investment
portfolio. Applying the likely results of all known imbedded options and likely internal pricing
strategies to the simulation produces quite different results from the static position assumptions.
Over a one-year period, the effect a 100, 200 and 300 basis point rate increase would add about
$36,000, $138,000 and $376,000, respectively, to net interest income. As the table below indicates,
the net effect of interest rate risk on net interest income is minimal in a rising rate
environment. Juniatas rate risk policies provide for maximum limits on net interest income that
can be at risk for 100 through 300 basis point changes in interest rates.
Effect of Interest Rate Risk on Net Interest Income
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in Net | Change in Net | |||||||||||||||
Change in | Interest Income | Interest Income | Total Change in | |||||||||||||
Interest Rates | Due to Interest | Due to Imbedded | Net Interest | |||||||||||||
(Basis Points) | Rate Risk (Static) | Options | Income | |||||||||||||
300 | $ | (178 | ) | $ | 376 | $ | 198 | |||||||||
200 | (119 | ) | 138 | 19 | ||||||||||||
100 | (60 | ) | 36 | (24 | ) | |||||||||||
0 | | | |
The net interest income at risk position remained within the guidelines established by the
Corporations asset/liability policy.
No material change has been noted in the Banks equity value at risk. Please refer to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2008 for further discussion of this matter.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2009, the Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of the Corporations management, including the Corporations Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), Rule
13a-15(e). Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in Corporation reports filed or submitted under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms. These controls and procedures include,
without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Based upon that evaluation, the Corporations Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of
the period covered by this quarterly report.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In
addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems,
there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential conditions, regardless of how remote.
28
Table of Contents
Attached as Exhibits 31 and 32 to this quarterly report are certifications of the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer required in accordance with Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange
Act. This portion of the Corporations quarterly report includes the information concerning the
controls evaluation referred to in the certifications and should be read in conjunction with the
certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no significant changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting
since December 31, 2008.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
In the opinion of management of the Corporation, there are no legal proceedings
pending to which the Corporation or its subsidiary is a party or to which their
property is subject, which, if determined adversely to the Corporation or its
subsidiary, would be material in relation to the Corporations or its subsidiarys
financial condition. There are no proceedings pending other than ordinary routine
litigation incident to the business of the Corporation or its subsidiary. In
addition, no material proceedings are pending or are known to be threatened or
contemplated against the Corporation or its subsidiary by government authorities.
Item 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
There have been no material changes in risk factors that were disclosed in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2008.
Item 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
The following table provides information on repurchases by the Corporation of its
common stock in each month of the quarter ended June 30, 2009:
Total Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased as | Maximum Number of | |||||||||||||||
Total Number | Average | Part of Publicly | Shares that May Yet Be | |||||||||||||
of Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plans or | Purchased Under the | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | per Share | Programs | Plans or Programs (1) | ||||||||||||
April 1-30, 2009 |
| $ | | | 210,936 | |||||||||||
May 1-31, 2009 |
| 210,936 | ||||||||||||||
June 1-30, 2009 |
| | 210,936 | |||||||||||||
Totals |
| | 210,936 | |||||||||||||
(1) | On March 23, 2001, the Corporation announced plans to buy back 100,000
(200,000 on a post-split basis) shares of its common stock. There is no expiration
date to this buyback plan, but subsequent to the initial plan, the Board of
Directors authorized the repurchase of 400,000 additional shares in 2005 and then
authorized 200,000 additional shares in September of 2008. As of August 5, 2009, the
number of shares that may yet be purchased under the program was 210,936. No
repurchase plan or program expired during the period covered by the table. The
Corporation has no stock repurchase plan or program that it has determined to
terminate prior to expiration or under which it does not intend to make further
purchases. |
29
Table of Contents
Item 3. | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES |
Not applicable
Item 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Juniata Valley Financial Corp. was held
on May 19, 2009. At the Annual Meeting, the stockholders elected 5 Class A
directors to serve until the 2012 Annual Meeting, as described below:
Withhold | Abstentions / | |||||||||||
Name | For | Authority | Broker Non-votes | |||||||||
A. Jerome Cook |
2,625,558 | 166,368 | 0 | |||||||||
Martin L. Dreibelbis |
2,728,007 | 63,919 | 0 | |||||||||
Marshall L. Hartman |
2,721,187 | 70,739 | 0 | |||||||||
Robert K. Metz |
2,726,009 | 65,917 | 0 | |||||||||
Richard M. Scanlon, DMD |
2,724,566 | 67,360 | 0 |
The terms of the following directors continued after the annual meeting:
Timothy I. Havice, Charles L. Hershberger, Ronald H. Witherite, Joe E.
Benner, Francis J. Evanitsky, Philip E. Gingerich, Jr., Dale G. Nace, P.E.,
Jan G. Snedeker.
There were no other matters considered at the meeting.
Item 5. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None
Item 6. | EXHIBITS |
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Corporations Form S-3 Registration Statement No. 333-129023 filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005) | ||||
3.2 |
|
Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Corporations report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2007) | ||||
10.0 |
|
2004 Executive Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Corporations report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2005)* | ||||
10.1 |
|
Exhibits A-B to 2004 Executive Annual Incentive Plan (filed herewith)* | ||||
31.1 |
|
Rule 13a 14(a)/15d 14(a) Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
31.2 |
|
Rule 13a 14(a)/15d 14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | ||||
32.1 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer (furnished, not filed) | ||||
32.2 |
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (furnished, not filed) |
30
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Juniata Valley Financial Corp. (Registrant) |
||||
Date: 08-07-2009 | By: | /s/ Francis J. Evanitsky | ||
Francis J. Evanitsky, President
and Chief Executive Officer |
||||
Date: 08-07-2009 | By: | /s/ JoAnn N. McMinn | ||
JoAnn N. McMinn, Chief Financial Officer |
31
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
No. | Description | |||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Corporations Form S-3
Registration Statement No. 333-129023 filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005) |
|||
3.2 | Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the
Corporations report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2007) |
|||
10.0 | 2004 Executive Annual Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.15 to the Corporations report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC
on March 16, 2005)* |
|||
10.1 | Exhibits A-B to 2004 Executive Annual Incentive Plan (filed herewith)* |
|||
31.1 | Rule 13a 14(a)/15d 14(a) Certification of President and Chief
Executive Officer |
|||
31.2 | Rule 13a 14(a)/15d 14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer |
|||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification of President and Chief Executive
Officer (furnished, not filed) |
|||
32.2 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(furnished, not filed) |
32