Kearny Financial Corp. - Quarter Report: 2017 September (Form 10-Q)

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 001-37399

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

973-244-4500

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filers,” “accelerated filers,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.     ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: November 2, 2017.

$0.01 par value common stock — 81,017,848 shares outstanding

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

- 1 -

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 2 -

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Continued)

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

(Unaudited)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 3 -

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In Thousands, Unaudited)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 4 -

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

(In Thousands, Unaudited)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 5 -

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

(In Thousands, Unaudited)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 6 -

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands, Unaudited)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 7 -

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

(In Thousands, Unaudited)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

- 8 -

KEARNY FINANCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

1.     PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kearny Financial Corp. (the “Company”), its wholly-owned subsidiary, Kearny Bank (the “Bank”) and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, CJB Investment Corp. and KFS Financial Services, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, KFS Insurance Services, Inc. The Company conducts its business principally through the Bank. Management prepared the unaudited consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), including the elimination of all significant inter-company accounts and transactions during consolidation.

2.     BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X and do not include information or footnotes necessary for a complete presentation of financial condition, income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three-month period ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.

The data in the consolidated statement of financial condition for June 30, 2017 was derived from the Company’s 2017 annual report on Form 10-K. That data, along with the interim unaudited financial information presented in the consolidated statements of financial condition, income, comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in the Company’s 2017 annual report on Form 10-K.

3.     NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE (“EPS”)

Basic EPS is based on the weighted average number of common shares actually outstanding including restricted stock awards adjusted for Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares not yet committed to be released. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock, such as outstanding stock options, were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding to include the effect of contracts or securities exercisable or which could be converted into common stock, if dilutive, using the treasury stock method. Shares issued and reacquired during any period are weighted for the portion of the period they were outstanding.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations:

- 9 -

During the three months ended September 30, 2017, the average number of options which were considered anti-dilutive totaled approximately 3,290,000.  During the three months ended September 30, 2016, there were no options which were considered anti-dilutive.

4.     SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the statement of financial condition date of September 30, 2017 and has identified the following items that should be disclosed in these consolidated financial statements.  The evaluation was conducted through the date this document was filed.

On November 1, 2017, Kearny Financial Corp. (Nasdaq: KRNY), the holding company for Kearny Bank (“Kearny”), and Clifton Bancorp Inc. (Nasdaq: CSBK), the holding company for Clifton Savings Bank (“Clifton”), announced  that the companies have entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which KRNY will acquire CSBK in an all-stock transaction. Under the terms of the agreement, Clifton will merge with and into Kearny and each outstanding share of CSBK common stock will be exchanged for 1.191 shares of KRNY common stock. The transaction is valued at an estimated $408 million, or approximately $18.25 per CSBK share, based upon the 10 day volume-weighted average common stock price of $15.32 for KRNY as of October 31, 2017 and is subject to stockholder and regulatory approvals.

As of September 30, 2017, CSBK had approximately $1.6 billion of assets, $1.1 billion of loans, and $915 million of deposits held across a network of 12 branches throughout Bergen, Passaic, Hudson, and Essex counties.  Upon closing, KRNY stockholders and CSBK stockholders will own approximately 76% and 24% of the combined company, respectively.

5.     RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).  The objective of this amendment is to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are in the scope of other standards.  For public entities, the guidance is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017.  Subsequently, the FASB issued the following standards related to ASU 2014-09: ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations” ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing” ASU 2016-11, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Rescission of SEC Guidance Because of Accounting Standards Updates 2014-09 and 2014-16 Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the March 3, 2016 EITF Meeting” ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients” and ASU 2017-05, “Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets.” These amendments are intended to improve and clarify the implementation guidance of ASU 2014-09 and have the same effective date as the original standard.  The Company’s main source of revenue is comprised of net interest income on interest earning assets and liabilities and non-interest income.  The scope of this ASU explicitly excludes net interest income as well as other revenues associated with financial assets and liabilities, including loans, leases, securities, certain insurance revenues and derivatives.  Accordingly, the majority of the Company’s revenues will not be affected.

- 10 -

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.  The ASU requires an entity to: (i) measure equity investments at fair value through net income, with certain exceptions; (ii) present in OCI the changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured using the fair value option; (iii) present financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset; (iv) calculate the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes based on an exit price and; (v) assess a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses of AFS debt securities in combination with other deferred tax assets. The Update provides an election to subsequently measure certain nonmarketable equity investments at cost less any impairment and adjusted for certain observable price changes. The Update also requires a qualitative impairment assessment of such equity investments and amends certain fair value disclosure requirements. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).  The ASU applies a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record, for all leases with a lease term of more than 12 months, an asset representing its right to use the underlying asset and a liability to make lease payments. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a practical expedient is available whereby a lessee may elect, by class of underlying asset, not to recognize an ROU asset or lease liability. At inception, lessees must classify all leases as either finance or operating based on five criteria. Balance sheet recognition of finance and operating leases is similar, but the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement, as well as the effect on the statement of cash flows, differs depending on the lease classification.

The new leases standard requires a lessor to classify leases as either sales-type, direct financing or operating, similar to existing U.S. GAAP. Classification depends on the same five criteria used by lessees plus certain additional factors. The subsequent accounting treatment for all three lease types is substantially equivalent to existing U.S. GAAP for sales-type leases, direct financing leases, and operating leases. However, the new standard updates certain aspects of the lessor accounting model to align it with the new lessee accounting model, as well as with the new revenue standard under Topic 606.

Lessees and lessors are required to provide certain qualitative and quantitative disclosures to enable users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The new leases standard addresses other considerations including identification of a lease, separating lease and non-lease components of a contract, sale and leaseback transactions, modifications, combining contracts, reassessment of the lease term, and re-measurement of lease payments. It also contains comprehensive implementation guidance with practical examples. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  A modified retrospective approach must be applied for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements.  The Company continues to evaluate the impact of the guidance, including determining whether other contracts exist that may be deemed to be in scope.  As such, no conclusions have yet been reached regarding the potential impact on adoption on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and regulatory capital and risk-weighted assets; however, the Company does not expect the amendment to have a material impact on its results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instrument.  The ASU requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model). Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument (considering estimated prepayments, but not expected extensions or modifications unless reasonable expectation of a troubled debt restructuring exists) from the date of initial recognition of that instrument.

The ASU also replaces the current accounting model for purchased credit impaired loans and debt securities. The allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (“PCD assets”), should be determined in a similar manner to other financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis. However, upon initial recognition, the allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price (“gross up approach”) to determine the initial amortized cost basis. The subsequent accounting for PCD financial assets is the same expected loss model described above.

Further, the ASU made certain targeted amendments to the existing impairment model for available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities. For an AFS debt security for which there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-not requirement to sell, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis.

For public business entities that are SEC filers, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e. modified retrospective approach).  The Company has begun its evaluation of this ASU including the potential impact on its Consolidated

- 11 -

Financial Statements.  The extent of change is indeterminable at this time as it will be dependent upon portfolio composition and credit quality at the adoption date, as well as economic conditions and forecasts at that time.  Upon adoption, any impact to the allowance for credit losses, currently allowance for loan and lease losses, will have an offsetting impact on retained earnings.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force.  The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows.  The new guidance addresses eight classification issues related to the statement of cash flows, which include proceeds from settlement of corporate-owned and bank-owned life insurance policies.  For a public entity, ASU 2016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This ASU simplifies subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 of the impairment test while retaining the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The ASU also eliminates the requirements for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. Therefore, the same impairment assessment applies to all reporting units. For public entities, ASU 2017-04 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 with early adoption permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment testing dates beginning after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic715), to improve the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the income statement, and to narrow the amounts eligible for capitalization in assets. Topic 715 does not currently prescribe where the amount of net benefit cost should be presented in an employer’s income statement, nor does it require entities to disclose by line item the amount of net benefit cost that is included in the income statement or capitalized in assets. This lack of guidance has resulted in diversity in practice in the presentation of such costs.  For public entities, ASU 2017-07 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables-Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20), to amend the amortization period to the earliest call date for purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Previously, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP); generally required an investor to amortize the premium on a callable debt security as a component of interest income over the contractual life of the instrument (i.e., yield-to-maturity amortization) even when the issuer was certain to exercise the call option at an earlier date. This resulted in the investor recording a loss equal to the unamortized premium when the call option was exercised by the issuer. For public entities, ASU 2017-08 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 including interim periods within those years.  The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting, to clarify which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718.  Topic 718 provides an accounting framework applicable to modifications of share-based payments, and currently defines a modification as “a change in any of the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award.”  This definition is open to a broad range of interpretation and has resulted in diversity in practice as to whether certain changes in terms or conditions are treated as modifications.  ASU 2017-09 further clarifies that an entity must apply modification accounting to changes in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award unless certain criteria are met.  For public entities, ASU 2017-09 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.  The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down-Round Features and      II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception.  This ASU simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with down-round features by eliminating the requirement to consider the down-round feature in the liability or equity classification determination.  Also, the new standard will reduce income statement volatility for many entities that issue warrants and convertible instruments which contain such features.  Part l of ASU 2017-11 changes the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments, such as warrants and embedded conversion features, such that a down-round feature is disregarded when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock under Subtopic 815-40.  As a result, a down-round feature, by itself, no longer requires an instrument to be re-measured at fair value through earnings each period, although all other aspects of the indexation guidance under Subtopic 815-40 continue to apply.  

- 12 -

For freestanding equity-classified financial instruments, ASU 2017-11 requires entities that present earnings per share (EPS) to recognize the effect of the down-round feature when it is triggered, i.e., when the exercise price of the related equity-linked financial instrument is adjusted downward because of the down-round feature.  The amount of the EPS adjustment is determined as the difference between the fair value of the instrument immediately before and after the strike price is adjusted.  That amount is recorded as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common stockholders in basic EPS.  An entity may also be required to adjust its diluted EPS calculation.  Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down-round features will be accounted for under existing guidance.  ASU 2017-11 does not change the accounting for liability-classified financial instruments where classification resulted from a term or feature other than a down-round feature.  Part ll of this ASU changes the indefinite deferral available to private companies with mandatorily redeemable financial instruments and certain non-controlling interests to a scope exception, which does not have an accounting effect.  For public entities, Part 1 of ASU 2017-11 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.  The amendments in Part ll have no accounting impact and therefore do not have an associated effective date.  The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging: Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, to improve its hedge accounting guidance and simplify and expand eligible hedging strategies for financial and nonfinancial risks.  ASU 2017-12 also enhances the transparency of how hedging results are presented and disclosed and provides partial relief on the timing of certain aspects of hedge documentation and eliminates the requirement to recognize hedge ineffectiveness separately in earnings.  This ASU more closely aligns hedge accounting with a company’s risk management activities and simplifies its application through targeted improvements in key practice areas.  This includes expanding the list if items eligible to be hedged and amending the methods used to measure the effectiveness of hedging relationships.  ASU 2017-12 eliminates the concept of benchmark interest rates, instead an entity can hedge any contractually specified interest rate, however for fair value hedges; the concept of benchmark interest rates was retained.  Similar to the amendments for cash flow hedges of interest-rate risk, this ASU permits an entity to hedge the variability in cash flows attributable to changes in any contractually specified component of a nonfinancial asset.  ASU 2017-12 eliminates the concept of hedge ineffectiveness for financial statement recognition purposes.  While the hedging relationship is still required to be highly effective in order to apply hedge accounting, the ineffective portion of the hedging instrument is no longer required to be recognized currently in earnings or disclosed.  Further, for cash flow and net investment hedges, all changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument, both the effective and ineffective portions, will be deferred to other comprehensive income and recognized in earnings at the same time that the hedged item affects earnings.  For fair value hedges, the entire fair value change of the hedging instruments is presented in the same income statement line item that included the hedged item’s impact on earnings.  For public entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted in any interim period or annual period for existing hedging relationships on the date of adoption.  The effect of adoption should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

- 13 -

6.     SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair values of debt and mortgage-backed securities available for sale at September 30, 2017 and June 30, 2017 and stratification by contractual maturity of debt securities available for sale at September 30, 2017 are presented below:

- 14 -