KEY TRONIC CORP - Quarter Report: 2002 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For Quarter Ended September 28, 2002
Commission File Number 0-11559
KEY TRONIC CORPORATION
Washington |
91-0849125 | |
(State of Incorporation) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification
No.) |
North 4424 Sullivan
Spokane, Washington 99216
(509) 928-8000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of October 25, 2002, was 9,672,580.
Table of Contents
KEY TRONIC CORPORATION
Page Number | ||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION: |
||||
Item 1. |
||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6-8 | ||||
Item 2. |
9-12 | |||
Item 3. |
13 | |||
Item 4. |
13 | |||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION: |
||||
Item 1. |
13 | |||
Item 4. |
13 | |||
Item 5. |
13 | |||
Item 6. |
13 | |||
14 | ||||
15-16 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
First Quarters Ended |
||||||||
September 28, 2002 |
September 29, 2001 |
|||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
34,034 |
|
$ |
34,627 |
| ||
Cost of sales |
|
30,528 |
|
|
32,495 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Gross margin |
|
3,506 |
|
|
2,132 |
| ||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Research, development and engineering |
|
710 |
|
|
558 |
| ||
Selling |
|
467 |
|
|
721 |
| ||
General and administrative |
|
1,794 |
|
|
1,745 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total operating expenses |
|
2,971 |
|
|
3,024 |
| ||
Operating income (loss) |
|
535 |
|
|
(892 |
) | ||
Interest expense |
|
238 |
|
|
341 |
| ||
Litigation settlement |
|
(12,186 |
) |
|
|
| ||
Other income |
|
(235 |
) |
|
(29 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit) |
|
12,718 |
|
|
(1,204 |
) | ||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
239 |
|
|
(222 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
12,479 |
|
$ |
(982 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||
Earnings (loss) per common sharebasic and diluted |
$ |
1.29 |
|
$ |
(.10 |
) |
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
September 28, 2002 |
June 29, 2002* |
|||||||
(Unaudited) |
||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
1,797 |
|
$ |
1,485 |
| ||
Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $268 and $444 |
|
18,489 |
|
|
20,978 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
18,234 |
|
|
18,395 |
| ||
Other |
|
2,348 |
|
|
2,588 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total current assets |
|
40,868 |
|
|
43,446 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Property, plant and equipmentat cost |
|
85,779 |
|
|
85,286 |
| ||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
|
73,430 |
|
|
73,054 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total property, plant and equipment |
|
12,349 |
|
|
12,232 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Other (net of accumulated amortization of $333 and $240) |
|
1,125 |
|
|
996 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
765 |
|
|
765 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total assets |
$ |
55,107 |
|
$ |
57,439 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term obligations |
$ |
355 |
|
$ |
228 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
14,325 |
|
|
14,409 |
| ||
Accrued compensation and vacation |
|
2,976 |
|
|
2,803 |
| ||
Litigation settlementshort-term |
|
3,553 |
|
|
|
| ||
Other |
|
2,720 |
|
|
3,465 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total current liabilities |
|
23,929 |
|
|
20,905 |
| ||
Long-term liabilities: |
||||||||
Revolving loanlong-term |
|
4,064 |
|
|
6,475 |
| ||
Litigation settlementlong-term |
|
3,700 |
|
|
19,186 |
| ||
Other |
|
1,224 |
|
|
1,162 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total long-term liabilities |
|
8,988 |
|
|
26,823 |
| ||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7) |
||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, no par valueshares authorized 25,000; outstanding 9,673 and 9,673 |
|
38,393 |
|
|
38,393 |
| ||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(16,203 |
) |
|
(28,682 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total shareholders equity |
|
22,190 |
|
|
9,711 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ |
55,107 |
|
$ |
57,439 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The balance sheet at June 29, 2002 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
First Quarters Ended |
||||||||
September 28, 2002 |
September 29, 2001 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents: |
||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
12,479 |
|
$ |
(982 |
) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
744 |
|
|
1,224 |
| ||
Provision for obsolete inventory |
|
93 |
|
|
|
| ||
Provision for doubtful receivables |
|
(76 |
) |
|
30 |
| ||
Litigation settlement |
|
(12,186 |
) |
|
|
| ||
Loss on disposal of assets |
|
10 |
|
|
1 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
(434 |
) | ||
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
(245 |
) | ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade receivables |
|
2,566 |
|
|
(1,885 |
) | ||
Inventories |
|
68 |
|
|
(4,363 |
) | ||
Other assets |
|
64 |
|
|
(851 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
(85 |
) |
|
2,656 |
| ||
Accrued compensation and vacation |
|
174 |
|
|
529 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
(512 |
) |
|
(239 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
3,339 |
|
|
(4,559 |
) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
(675 |
) |
|
(334 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash used in investing activities |
|
(675 |
) |
|
(334 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Payment of financing costs |
|
(150 |
) |
|
(440 |
) | ||
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement |
|
33,521 |
|
|
33,041 |
| ||
Repayment of revolving credit agreement |
|
(35,723 |
) |
|
(29,132 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
(2,352 |
) |
|
3,469 |
| ||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
312 |
|
|
(1,424 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
1,485 |
|
|
2,137 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ |
1,797 |
|
$ |
713 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a
normal and recurring nature necessary for a fair presentation, in all material respects, of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the period presented. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes
thereto contained in the Companys 10-K report for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2002. Certain reclassifications have been made for consistent presentation.
On October 24, 2002, the Company announced the settlement of the litigation with F&G Scrolling Mouse LLC as explained in greater detail in Note 7 to these financial
statements. Because this settlement was material to the Companys financial position and results of operations, and because the settlement was reached prior to publication of this quarterly report, the financial statements have been adjusted to
incorporate the settlement within them. Readers should be aware that the reported earnings for the quarter ended September 28, 2002, include a one-time benefit for reversal of previously recorded litigation expense. Excluding this benefit, net
income would have been approximately $293,000 or $0.03 per share for the first quarter of fiscal 2003.
1. INVENTORIES
The
components of inventory consist of the following:
September 28, 2002 |
June 29, 2002 |
|||||||
(in thousands) |
||||||||
Finished goods |
$ |
7,442 |
|
$ |
8,323 |
| ||
Work-in-process |
|
1,822 |
|
|
2,002 |
| ||
Raw materials and supplies |
|
13,341 |
|
|
12,835 |
| ||
Reserve for obsolescence |
|
(4,371 |
) |
|
(4,765 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
$ |
18,234 |
|
$ |
18,395 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. NEW ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 changes the accounting for goodwill from an amortization method to an impairment-only approach. Under the statement, the Company will address intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a
group of other assets upon their acquisition and initially recorded in the financial statements. Goodwill in each reporting unit shall be tested for impairment as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which Statement 142 is initially applied in its
entirety. An entity has six months from the date it initially applies Statement 142 to complete the first step of that transitional goodwill impairment test. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 on June 30, 2002 but has not completed the transitional
impairment test. The goodwill transitional impairment test is not expected to have a material impact. The adoption of SFAS No. 142 did not have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations. SFAS No. 143 addresses accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. Under SFAS No. 143, the Company will report all legal
obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from acquisition, construction, development, and the normal operation of long-lived assets. The Company adopted SFAS No. 143 on June 30, 2002. The impact of adoption did not
have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment
or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS No. 144 addresses accounts and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This statement supersedes FASB No. 121 and Opinion No. 30. SFAS No. 144 retains the fundamental provision of
SFAS No. 121. It sets new criteria for asset classifications and establishes a broader scope of qualifying discounted operations. The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 on June 30, 2002. The impact of adoption did not have a material impact on the
Companys financial statements.
In April, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No.
145. The purpose of this statement is to rescind previously issued SFAS Nos. 4, 44, and 64, and to amend SFAS No. 13. Statement Nos. 4 and 64 relate to reporting gains and losses from extinguishment of debt. Statement No. 44 concerned accounting of
intangible assets of motor carriers, and Statement No. 13, Accounting for Leases was amended to eliminate an inconsistency between the required accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and the required accounting for certain lease
modifications that have economic effects that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions. The provisions related to Statement 13 are effective for transactions occurring after May 15, 2002, and the remaining provisions of the statement are effective
for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company adopted this new statement after issuance in April 2002; however, there were no lease transactions during the period between May 15, 2002 and June 29, 2002 that would be covered under the
provisions of the statement. This new statement, in its entirety, was in effect for the Companys fiscal year beginning June 30, 2002. Adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Companys financial results.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal
Activities, was issued in June 2002. This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition
for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring). The provisions of this statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after
December 31, 2002. The Company adopted SFAS No. 146 on June 30, 2002 for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the Companys financial results.
3. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
On August 22, 2001, the Company obtained a new revolving credit facility with CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. for up to $25 million. The new revolving loan is secured by
certain assets of the Company. For the first year of the financing agreement with CIT, a margin of 0.75% was applicable as an adder to the prime rate. The margin applicable at September 28, 2002 is 0.50%. The full rate of interest as of September
28, 2002 was 5.25%. The agreement specifies four different levels of margin between 0.25% and 1.00% depending on the Companys earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. On August 23, 2001, just prior to closing the
financing agreement with CIT, the Company was paying 9.0% interest, which included a 2.5% premium above the prime rate as of that date. The CIT agreement contains financial covenants that relate to maximum capital expenditures, minimum tangible net
worth, and a minimum fixed charge ratio. The agreement is for a term of three years beginning on August 24, 2001 (the closing date of the agreement) and ending on August 23, 2004. As of September 28, 2002, the outstanding revolving credit balance
was $4,064,000 compared to $6,475,000 for fiscal year ending June 29, 2002. The decrease of the revolving credit balance was due to the large volume of sales that occurred during the last period of fiscal year end and collected during the first
quarter of fiscal year 2003. As of September 28, 2002, the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.
4. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
First Quarters Ended | ||||||
September 28, 2002 |
September 29, 2001 | |||||
(in thousands) | ||||||
Interest payments |
$ |
249 |
$ |
346 | ||
Income tax payments |
|
57 |
|
106 |
5. INCOME TAXES
The income tax provision for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002 was $239,000 versus a benefit of ($222,000)
for the first fiscal quarter of the prior year. The $239,000 provision for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002 is the result of tax provisions on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The ($222,000) benefit for the first quarter of fiscal 2001 was
net of $212,000 in tax provisions on the earnings of foreign operations. The Company has tax loss carryforwards of approximately $44.9 million, which expire in varying amounts in the years 2006 through 2022.
7
Table of Contents
6. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) per income statement (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of
common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) per income statement by the weighted-average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding during the period. Key
Tronic uses the Treasury Stock Method required by the standard in calculating the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents.
There were no adjustments to the net income (loss) available to common shareholders for the first quarters ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001. A net loss occurred in the first quarter ended September 29, 2001, creating
an antidilutive effect. The following table presents the Companys calculations of weighted average shares outstanding (number of shares):
For the Quarter Ended |
Weighted Avg. Shares |
Adjustment for Potential Common shares |
Total | |||
September 28, 2002 |
9,672,580 |
|
9,672,580 | |||
September 29, 2001 |
9,672,580 |
Antidilutive |
9,672,580 |
7. COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
The amount of firm commitments to contractors and suppliers for capital expenditures was
approximately $233,000 at September 28, 2002.
Litigation Settlement
On December 20, 2001, a jury in Seattle federal court rendered a verdict in the case of F&G Scrolling Mouse, LLC, Fernando Falcon and
Federico Gilligan v. Microsoft Corporation, Honeywell, Inc., and Key Tronic Corporation, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Case No. C99-995C (the litigation) finding that Key Tronic misappropriated
trade secrets and breached a confidentiality agreement with Plaintiffs. The jury awarded damages to the Plaintiffs in the amount of $16.5 million. The judgment against the Company was subsequently increased to approximately $19.2 million through an
award of pre-judgment interest. On October 24, 2002, the Company reached a settlement of the litigation with the Plaintiffs (hereafter called F&G). Under the terms of the settlement, the Company has agreed to pay F&G a total of
$7.0 million. The Company was required to make an initial payment to F&G of $2.5 million, as well as make quarterly payments to F&G of $200,000 or 50% of Key Tronics operating income, whichever is greater, until the total payment of
$7.0 million has been made, provided the total payment is completed by December 15, 2005.
If the total of $7.0
million is not paid by 12/15/2005, the total settlement amount increases on 12/15/2005 to $7.6 million. If payment of $7.6 million is not completed by 12/15/2006 the total settlement amount increases to $8.2 million. If payment of $8.2 million is
not completed by 12/15/2007 the total settlement amount increases to $8.8 million. If payment of $8.8 million is not completed by 12/15/2008 the total settlement amount increases to $9.7 million. If payment of $9.7 million is not completed by
12/15/2009 the total settlement amount increases to $10.6 million. If payment of $10.6 million is not made by 12/15/2010 the total settlement amount increases to $11.5 million. Any unpaid balance remaining at 12/15/2011 will accrue interest
thereafter at prime plus 1½% per annum until paid. If the Company fails to make any minimum quarterly payment when due, Plaintiffs have the right to accelerate all remaining payments in the amount of $11.5 million less any amounts previously
paid.
Because this settlement was material to the Companys financial position and results of operations,
and because the settlement was reached prior to publication of this quarterly report, the financial statements have been adjusted to incorporate the settlement within them. Reported earnings for the quarter ended September 28, 2002, include a
one-time benefit of $12.2 million for reversal of previously recorded litigation expense.
8
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements in addition to historical information. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to those outlined in Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsRisks and Uncertainties That May Affect Future Results. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect
managements opinions only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or publicly release the results of any revision to forward-looking statements. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in other
documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes
revenue primarily when products are shipped. SAB 101 states that revenue generally is realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met:
|
Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists |
|
Delivery has occurred or services have been rendered |
|
The sellers price to the buyer is fixed or determinable |
|
Collectibility is reasonably assured |
The Company believes that it meets the above criteria for the following reasons:
|
Customer purchase orders confirming the price and shipping terms are required prior to shipment. |
|
The terms of the Companys sales are generally FOB shipping point meaning that the customer takes ownership of the goods and assumes the risk of loss when
the goods leave the Companys premises. |
|
The sellers price to the buyer is fixed or determinable as noted, we require a customer purchase order, which confirms the price and shipping
terms. |
|
Collectibility is reasonably assured the credit terms for customers are pre-established so that collection of the account can be reasonably assured.
|
Inactive, Obsolete and Surplus Inventory Reserve: The Company reserves for inventories
that it deems inactive, obsolete or surplus. This reserve is calculated based upon the demand for the products that the Company produces. Demand is determined by expected sales or customer forecasts. If expected sales do not materialize, then the
Company would have inventory in excess of their reserves and would have to charge the excess against future earnings. In the case where the Company has purchased material based upon a customers forecast, the Company is usually covered by
lead-time assurance agreements with each customer. These contracts state that the financial liability for material purchased within lead-time and based upon the customers forecasts, lies with the customer. If the Company purchases material
outside the lead-time assurance agreement and the customers forecasts do not materialize, the Company would have the financial liability and would have to charge the excess against future earnings.
Bad Debt Accrual: The Company values its accounts receivable net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. This allowance is based on
estimates of the portion of accounts receivable that may not be collected in the future, and the amount of this allowance is disclosed in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet. The estimates used are based primarily on specific
identification of potentially uncollectible accounts. Such accounts are identified using publicly available information in conjunction with evaluations of current payment activity. However, if any of the Companys customers were to develop
unexpected and immediate financial problems that would prevent payment of open invoices, the Company could incur additional and possibly material expenses that would negatively impact earnings.
9
Table of Contents
Accrued Warranty: An accrual is made for expected warranty costs, with the
related expense recognized in cost of good sold. Management reviews the adequacy of this accrual quarterly based on historical analysis and anticipated product returns. Over the of the past three years, the Companys warranty expense has
decreased. As the Company has made the transition from manufacturing keyboards only to electronic manufacturing services (EMS), its exposure to warranty issues has declined significantly. The Companys warranty period for keyboards
is generally three times longer than that for EMS products. Also the Company does not warranty design defects for EMS customers. The declines in warranty expense and the related accrual account are directly related to the change in the composition
of the Companys revenue from keyboards to EMS.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Operating activities provided $3.3 million of cash during the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 versus $4.6
million of cash used in the same period of the prior year. This change in cash for operating activities is due primarily to the Companys decreases in accounts receivable and inventory. The decrease in accounts receivable was primarily
attributable to a major EMS customer utilizing offered discount terms. The decrease in inventory was due primarily to increases in the Companys reserve for obsolescence.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, the Company spent $0.7 million on capital additions versus $0.3 million spent in capital additions in the same period in the
previous fiscal year. The Company anticipates capital expenditures of approximately $1.8 million through the remainder of the current fiscal year ending June 28, 2003. Actual capital expenditures may vary from anticipated expenditures depending upon
future results of operations. See RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS, pages 11-12. Capital expenditures are expected to be financed with internally generated funds.
On August 22, 2001, the Company entered into a financing agreement with CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. for a revolving credit facility of up to $25 million. The new
revolving loan is secured by certain assets of the Company. The financing agreement contains financial covenants that relate to maximum capital expenditures, minimum tangible net worth and a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. The agreement is for
a term of three years beginning on August 24, 2001 (the closing date of the agreement) and ending on August 23, 2004. In addition to the financial covenants, the financing agreement restricts investments, disposition of assets, and the payment of
dividends.
The terms of the settlement reached in the F&G Scrolling Mouse L.L.C. v. Key Tronic Corporation
litigation require an immediate cash payment of $2,500,000. A payment of $600,000 was transferred on October 28, 2002. The remaining payment of $1,900,000 was transferred on November 4, 2002 in conjunction with the cancellation of the supersedeas
bond that was put in place under the terms of the stay of execution granted by the federal district court on June 6, 2002. See footnote 10, Commitments and Contingencies, in the Companys 10-K report as of June 29, 2002.
The Company believes that funds available under the revolving credit facility and internally generated funds can
satisfy cash requirements for a period in excess of 12 months.
NET SALES
Net sales for the fiscal 2002 first quarter ended September 28, 2002 were $34.0 million compared to $34.6 million for the first
quarter of the previous year. The majority of the decrease is due to a $.4 million drop in keyboard sales. Although revenues from keyboard sales continue to decline, margins realized on these sales tend to exceed those that can be realized from EMS
products. Therefore, the Company will continue to produce and sell keyboards as long as it remains feasible and profitable to do so.
EMS revenue accounted for 86.0% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 versus 85.5% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2002. EMS products continue to be the focus of the Company, and it
will continue to grow this business in the future. Keyboard and other sales were 14.0% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 versus 14.5% of total revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2002.
COST OF SALES
Cost of sales were 89.7% of revenue in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, compared to 93.8% for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002. The cost of sales percentage decreased primarily due to better
utilization of the Companys production capacity and cuts in overhead costs. Management continues to emphasize material cost reductions through negotiations with suppliers.
10
Table of Contents
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING
Research, development and engineering (RD&E) expenses were $0.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 and $0.6
million for the same period of fiscal year 2002. As a percentage of sales, RD&E expenditures were 2.1% in the first quarter of fiscal year 2002 and 1.6% for the fiscal first quarter of 2002. The slight increase is due primarily to fewer
development projects that are rebillable to customers.
SELLING EXPENSES
Selling expenses were $0.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 compared to $0.7 million in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2002. Selling expenses as a percentage of revenue were 1.4% for the quarter compared to 2.1% in the same quarter of fiscal year 2002. These decreases can be attributed to a reduction in marketing expenses related to keyboard sales.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General and administrative (G&A) expenses were $1.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $1.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2002. As a
percentage of revenue, G&A expenses were 5.3% in the first quarter of fiscal 2003 versus 5.0% in the same quarter of the prior year.
INTEREST
Interest expense was $238,000 in the first
quarter of fiscal 2003 compared to $341,000 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002. This decrease resulted primarily from a lower debt amount outstanding during the quarter and lower interest rates from the prior year.
INCOME TAXES
The income tax provision for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002 was $239,000 versus a benefit $(222,000) for the first fiscal quarter of the prior year. The $239,000 provision for the first quarter
of fiscal year 2002 is the result of tax provisions on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The $(222,000) benefit for the first quarter of fiscal 2001 was net of $212,000 in tax provisions on the earnings of foreign operations. The Company has tax
loss carryforwards of approximately $44.9 million, which expire in varying amounts in the years 2006 through 2022.
BACKLOG
The Companys backlog at the end of first fiscal quarter of fiscal
year 2003 was $18.1 million compared to $24.6 million at August 3, 2002 and $49.3 million at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2002. The decrease in the backlog from fiscal year end is attributable to decreased orders received from
existing customers partially offset by purchase orders for new products from newly acquired customers. The change in backlog from the first quarter of fiscal year 2002 is due primarily to increased orders from a new EMS customer during that time
period in order to fill sales channels. Order backlog consists of purchase orders received for products expected to be shipped approximately within the next fiscal year although shipment dates are subject to change due to design modifications or
other customer requirements. Order backlog should not be considered an accurate measure of future sales.
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
The following risks and
uncertainties could affect the Companys actual results and could cause results to differ materially from past results or those contemplated by the Companys forward-looking statements. When used herein, the words expects,
believes, anticipates and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Potential
Fluctuations in Quarterly Results The Companys quarterly operating results have varied in the past and may vary in the future due to a variety of factors, including changes in overall demand for customers products, success of
customers programs, timing of new programs, new product introductions or technological advances by the Company, its customers and its competitors and changes in pricing policies by the Company, its customers, its suppliers and its competitors.
For example, the Company relies on customers forecasts to plan its business. If those forecasts are overly optimistic, the Companys revenues and profits may fall short of expectations. Conversely, if those forecasts are too conservative,
the Company could have an unexpected increase in revenues and profits. The products which the Company manufactures for its customers have relatively short product lifecycles, therefore the Companys business, operating results and financial
condition are dependent in significant part on the Companys ability to obtain orders from new customers and new product programs from existing customers.
11
Table of Contents
Competition The EMS industry is intensely competitive. Competitors may offer customers lower
prices on certain high volume programs. This could result in price reductions, reduced margins and loss of market share, all of which would materially and adversely affect the Companys business, operating results and financial condition. The
Companys inability to provide comparable or better manufacturing services at a lower cost than its competitors could cause sales to decline. In addition, competitors can copy the Companys non-proprietary designs after the Company has
invested in development of products for customers, thereby enabling such competitors to offer lower prices on such products due to savings in development costs.
Concentration of Major Customers At present, the Companys customer base is highly concentrated, and there can be no assurance that its customer base will not become more concentrated. Four of the Companys
EMS customers accounted for 39%, 10%, 13%, and 10% of net sales, respectively during fiscal 2002. In 2001, these same customers accounted for 0%, 39%, 27% and 5%, of the Companys net sales, respectively. There can be no assurance that the
Companys principal customers will continue to purchase products from the Company at current levels. Moreover, the Company typically does not enter into long-term volume purchase contracts with its customers, and the Companys customers
have certain rights to extend or delay the shipment of their orders. The loss of one or more of the Companys major customers or the reduction, delay or cancellation of orders from such customers could materially and adversely affect the
Companys business, operating results and financial condition.
Dependence on Suppliers The Company is dependent on many
suppliers, including sole source suppliers, to provide key components and raw materials used in manufacturing customers products. Delays in deliveries from suppliers or the inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and raw
materials could cause delays or reductions in shipment of products to our customers which could adversely affect the Companys operating results and damage customer relationships.
Dependence on Key Personnel The Companys future success depends in large part on the continued service of its key technical, marketing and management personnel and on its ability to
continue to attract and retain qualified employees. The competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. The loss of key employees could have a
material adverse effect on the Companys business, operating results and financial condition.
Technological Change and New
Product Risk The markets for the Companys customers products is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and relatively short product life cycles. The introduction
of products embodying new technologies or the emergence of new industry standards can render existing products obsolete or unmarketable. The Companys success will depend upon its customers ability to enhance existing products and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products that keep pace with technological developments and emerging industry standards and address evolving and increasingly sophisticated customer requirements. Failure of the
Companys customers to do so could substantially harm the Companys customers competitive positions. There can be no assurance that the Companys customers will be successful in identifying, developing and marketing products
that respond to technological change, emerging industry standards or evolving customer requirements.
Foreign Manufacturing
Operations Virtually all products manufactured by the Company are produced at the Companys facilities located in Mexico and China. Accordingly the Companys operations are subject to a variety of risks unique to international
operations including import and export duties and value added taxes, import and export regulation changes, the burden and cost of compliance with foreign laws and foreign economic and political risk.
Dilution and Stock Price Volatility As of September 28, 2002, there were outstanding options and warrants for the purchase of approximately 2,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company (Common Stock), of which options for approximately 1,800,000 shares were vested and exercisable. Holders of the Common Stock will suffer immediate and substantial dilution to the extent outstanding options and
warrants to purchase the Common Stock are exercised. The stock price of the Company may be subject to wide fluctuations and possible rapid increases or declines over a short time period. These fluctuations may be due to factors specific to the
Company such as variations in quarterly operating results or changes in analysts earnings estimates, or to factors relating to the computer industry or to the securities markets in general, which, in recent years, have experienced significant
price fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies whose stocks are traded.
12
Table of Contents
The Company is subject to
the risk of fluctuating interest rates in the normal course of business. The Companys major market risk relates to its secured debt. A portion of the Companys accounts receivable are used as collateral for its revolving debt. The
interest rates applicable to the Companys revolving loan fluctuate with the JP Morgan Chase Bank prime rate. As of November 7, 2002, the JP Morgan Chase Bank prime rate was 4.25%.
The Company does not enter into derivative transactions or leveraged swap agreements.
Although the Company has international operations, the functional currency for all active subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. The Company imports for its own use raw materials
that are used in its manufacturing operations. Substantially all of the Companys purchases are denominated in U.S. dollars and are paid under normal trade terms.
a) |
Within the 90-day period prior to the date of this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the
Companys chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in the Companys periodic SEC reports. |
b) |
There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors which could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date the Company carried out the evaluation. |
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION:
None
None
(a) Exhibits
1) 99.1 Certifications
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
1) Press release, dated October 24, 2002, announcing litigation settlement
13
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
KEY
TRONIC CORPORATION
Name |
Title |
Date | ||
/s/ JACK W.
OEHLKE Jack W. Oehlke |
(Director, President and Chief Executive Officer) |
November 12, 2002 | ||
/s/ RONALD F.
KLAWITTER Ronald F. Klawitter
|
Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer |
November 12, 2002 |
14
Table of Contents
I, Jack W. Oehlke, President and Chief Executive Officer of Key Tronic Corporation, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-Q of Key Tronic Corporation; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) |
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
5. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent functions); |
a) |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
|
6. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Dated: November 12, 2002
/s/ JACK W.
OEHLKE | ||
Jack W. Oehlke President and Chief Executive Officer |
15
Table of Contents
CERTIFICATION
I,
Ronald F. Klawitter, Chief Financial Officer of Key Tronic Corporation, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-Q of Key Tronic Corporation; |
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; |
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; |
4. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: |
a) |
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; |
b) |
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); and |
c) |
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; |
5. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent functions); |
a) |
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
b) |
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and
|
6. |
The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Dated: November 12, 2002
/s/ RONALD F.
KLAWITTER | ||
Ronald F. Klawitter Executive Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
16