KEY TRONIC CORP - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

For the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011

OR

For the transition period from            to            

Commission File Number 0-11559

KEY TRONIC CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(509) 928-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

(Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of January 1, 2011, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $52.6 million based on the closing price as reported on the NASDAQ.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 10,439,187 shares of common stock were outstanding as of September 7, 2011.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

The following documents are incorporated by reference to the extent specified herein:

Table of Contents

KEY TRONIC CORPORATION

2011 FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

References in this report to “the Company”, “Key Tronic”, “we”, “our”, or “us” mean Key Tronic Corporation together with its subsidiaries, except where the context otherwise requires.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements in addition to historical information. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Risks and uncertainties that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to those outlined in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risks and Uncertainties that May Affect Future Results.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s opinions only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect developments or information obtained after the date hereof and disclaims any obligation to do so. Readers should carefully review the risk factors described in periodic reports the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.

2

Table of Contents

PART I

Background

Key Tronic Corporation (dba: KeyTronicEMS Co.), was organized in 1969 as a Washington corporation that locally manufactured computer keyboards. The ability to design, build and deliver a quality product led us to become a leading independent manufacturer of keyboards for computers in the United States. Our fully integrated design, tooling, and automated manufacturing capabilities enabled us to rapidly respond to customers’ needs for keyboards in production quantities worldwide. We supported our sales growth through the development and purchase of international manufacturing facilities. As the computer keyboard market matured with increasing competition from other international providers, we determined that our business could no longer solely rely on keyboard sales.

After assessing market conditions and our strengths and capabilities, we shifted focus from keyboard manufacturing to contract manufacturing for a wide range of products. Our unique strategic attributes are based on our core strengths of innovative design and engineering expertise in electronics, mechanical engineering, and precision plastics combined with high-quality, low cost production, and assembly on an international basis while providing exceptional customer service. These strengths have made our company a strong competitor in the electronic manufacturing services (EMS) market.

Our Industry and Strategy

The expansion of the EMS industry during the last decade allowed us to continue to expand our customer base and the industries that we serve. The challenging global macroeconomic environment has had a negative impact on previously held customer programs. However, we successfully confronted the challenging global macroeconomic environment by controlling our costs while winning new customer programs, which allowed us to maintain our profitability and maintain a strong balance sheet during the global economic downturn. The increase in new programs represents a growing portion of our revenue and a promising foundation for our future. In keeping with our long-term strategic objectives, we have been successfully building a more diversified customer portfolio, spanning a wider range of industries. We currently offer our customers the following services: integrated electronic and mechanical engineering, precision plastic molding, assembly, component selection, sourcing and procurement, worldwide logistics, and new product testing and production all at competitive pricing due to our global footprint.

We believe that we are well positioned in the EMS industry to continue the expansion of our customer base and achieve long term growth. Our unique blend of multinational facilities, centralized management, and core strengths continue to support our growth and our customers’ needs. We continue to focus on controlling operating expenses and leveraging the synergistic capabilities of our world-class facilities in the United States, Mexico, and China. This international production capability provides our customers with the benefits of improved supply-chain management, reduced inventory, lower labor costs, lower transportation costs, and reduced product fulfillment time. Given our competitive advantages and the growing need for some potential customers to move forward with their outsourcing strategies, we are strongly positioned to win new business in coming periods and grow our revenue and profits.

The EMS industry is intensely competitive. Although our customer base is growing we still have less than 1% of the potential global market and our revenue can fluctuate significantly due to reliance on a concentrated base of customers. We are planning for new customer growth in the coming quarters by securing new programs, increasing our worldwide manufacturing capacity, and continuing to improve our manufacturing and procurement processes. Ongoing challenges that we face include the following: Continuing to win programs from new and existing customers, balancing production capacity and key personnel in support of new customer programs, improving operating efficiencies, controlling costs while developing competitive pricing strategies, and successfully transitioning new program wins to full production during a time of macroeconomic uncertainty.

3

Table of Contents

Customers and Marketing

We provide a mix of manufacturing services for outsourced Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM) products. We provide the following EMS services: Product design, surface mount technologies (SMT) and pin through hole capability for printed circuit board assembly, tool making, precision plastic molding, liquid injection molding, automated tape winding, prototype design and full product assembly.

Sales of the majority of our products have historically not been seasonal in nature, but may be seasonal in the future if there are changes in the types of products manufactured. Sales can, however, fluctuate significantly between quarters from changes in customers and customer demand due to our concentrated customer base.

For the fiscal years ended July 2, 2011, July 3, 2010, and June 27, 2009, the five largest customers in each year accounted for 62%, 57%, and 52% of total net sales, respectively. At the end of fiscal year 2011, we were generating revenue from 30 EMS customers as compared with 20 at the end of fiscal year 2010. New customer program wins would dilute our concentration of revenue in the future.

The following table represents all customers that represented 10% or more of total net sales during the last three fiscal years:

Although keyboard manufacturing is still included in our product offerings, we do not expect annual keyboard sales to be a material component of our business. We realized revenues of approximately $3.9 million, $4.5 million, and $4.2 million in fiscal years 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively, from the sale of keyboards. In order to accommodate the demand for standard keyboard layouts, we maintain a purchase-from-stock program. The more popular standard layouts are built and stocked for immediate availability.

We market our products and services primarily through our direct sales department aided by strategically located field sales people and distributors. Although we maintain relationships with several independent sales organizations to assist in marketing our EMS product lines, commissions earned and paid are not material to the consolidated financial statements.

Manufacturing

We have continually made investments in developing and expanding a capital equipment base to achieve vertical integration and efficiencies in our manufacturing processes. We have invested significant capital into SMT for volume manufacturing of complex printed circuit board assemblies. We also design and develop tooling for injection molding and manufacture the majority of plastic parts used in the products we manufacture. Additionally, we have equipment to maintain a controlled clean environment for manufacturing processes that require a high level of precise control.

We use a variety of manual and automated assembly processes in our facilities, depending upon product complexity and degree of customization. Some examples of automated processes include component insertion, SMT, flexible robotic assembly, automated storage tape winding, computerized vision system quality inspection, automated switch and key top installation, and automated functional testing.

Our engineering expertise and automated manufacturing processes enable us to work closely with our customers during the design and prototype stages of production and to jointly increase productivity and reduce response time to the marketplace. We use computer-aided design techniques and software to assist

4

Table of Contents

in preparation of the tool design layout and component placement, to reduce tooling and production costs, improve component and product quality, and enhance turnaround time during product development.

We purchase materials and components for our products from many different suppliers, including both domestic and international sources. We develop close working relationships with our suppliers, many of whom have been supplying products to us for several years.

Research, Development, and Engineering

As part of our long-term strategy, we are committed to supporting our customers by providing research, development, and engineering services. These services allow us to facilitate in optimizing new product designs, and the production processes of our customers programs.

Research, development, and engineering (RD&E) expenses consist principally of employee related costs, third party development costs, program materials costs, depreciation, and allocated information technology and facilities costs. Our RD&E expenses were $3.8 million, $2.8 million, and $2.3 million in fiscal years 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. In each of these years, we focused most of our RD&E efforts on current customer EMS programs. The increase in RD&E in fiscal years 2011 and 2010 as compared to their respective prior fiscal year periods is primarily the result of increased headcount and to a lesser extent higher incentive compensation.

Competition

The market for the products and services we provide is highly competitive. There are numerous competitors in the EMS industry, many of which have substantially more resources and are more geographically diverse than we are. Some of our competitors have similar international production capabilities, large financial resources and some have substantially greater manufacturing, research and development, and marketing resources. There is also competition from the manufacturing operations of our current and potential customers, who are continually evaluating the merits of manufacturing their products internally versus the advantages of outsourcing. We believe that we can currently compete favorably in these areas primarily on the basis of our international footprint, responsiveness, creativity, vertical production capability, quality, and cost.

Trademarks and Patents

Our name and logo are federally registered trademarks, and we believe they are valuable assets of our business. During 2001, we began operating under the trade name “KeyTronicEMS Co.” to better identify our primary business concentration. We also own several keyboard patents; however, since our focus is EMS, management believes that these patents will not have a significant impact on future revenues.

Employees

We consider our employees to be our primary strength and we make considerable efforts to maintain a well-qualified workforce. Our employee benefits include bonus programs involving periodic payments to all employees based on meeting quarterly or fiscal year performance targets. We regularly provide transportation, medical services, and meals to all of our employees in foreign locations. We maintain a 401(k) plan for U.S. employees, which provides a discretionary matching company contribution of up to 4% of an employee’s salary. We provide group health, life, and disability insurance plans. We also maintain stock option plans and other long term incentive plans for certain employees and outside directors.

As of July 2, 2011 we had 1,997 employees compared to 2,036 on July 3, 2010, and 1,963 on June 27, 2009. Since we can have significant fluctuations in product demand, we seek to maintain flexibility in our workforce by utilizing skilled temporary and short-term contract labor in our manufacturing facilities in addition to full-time employees.

Backlog

On July 30, 2011 our order backlog was valued at approximately $54.9 million, compared to approximately $56.9 million on July 31, 2010. Even though our order backlog is comprised of firm purchase orders, the amount of backlog is not necessarily indicative of future sales but can be indicative of trends in expected future sales revenue. Due to the relationships with our customers, we will occasionally allow orders to be canceled or rescheduled and as a result it is not a meaningful indicator of future financial results. If there

5

Table of Contents

are canceled or rescheduled orders, we will attempt to negotiate fees to cover the costs we have incurred. Order backlog consists of purchase orders received for products expected to be shipped approximately within the next twelve months, although shipment dates are subject to change due to design modifications, customer forecast changes, or other customer requirements.

Foreign Markets

Information concerning net sales and long-lived assets (property, plant, and equipment) by geographic areas is set forth in Note 12, “Enterprise-Wide Disclosures” of the consolidated financial statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and that information is incorporated herein.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The table below sets forth the name, current age and current position of our executive officers and other significant employees as of July 2, 2011:

Executive Officers

CRAIG D. GATES – President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Gates, age 52, has been President and Chief Executive officer of the Company since April 2009. Previously he was Executive Vice President and General Manager from August 2002 to April 2009. He served as Executive Vice President of Marketing, Engineering and Sales from July 1997 to August 2002 and served as Vice President and General Manager of New Business Development from October 1995 to July 1997. He joined the Company as Vice President of Engineering in October of 1994. From 1982 he held various engineering and management positions within the Microswitch Division of Honeywell, Inc., in Freeport, Illinois, and from 1991 to October 1994 he served as Director of Operations, Electronics for Microswitch. Mr. Gates has a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering and a Masters in Business Administration from the University of Illinois, Urbana.

RONALD F. KLAWITTER – Executive Vice President of Administration, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer

Mr. Klawitter, age 59, has been Executive Vice President of Administration, CFO, and Treasurer since July 1997. Previously he was Vice President of Finance, Secretary, and Treasurer of the Company from October 1995 to July 1997. He was Acting Secretary from November 1994 to October 1995 and Vice President of Finance and Treasurer from 1992 to October 1995. From 1987 to 1992, Mr. Klawitter was Vice President of Finance at Baker Hughes Tubular Service, a subsidiary of Baker Hughes, Inc. Mr. Klawitter has a BA degree from Wittenberg University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

6

Table of Contents

DOUGLAS G. BURKHARDT – Executive Vice President of Worldwide Operations

Mr. Burkhardt, age 53, has been Executive Vice President of Worldwide Operations of the Company since

July 22, 2010. Previously Mr. Burkhardt was Vice President of Worldwide Operations from July 2008 to July 2010 and Director of China Operations and Program Management from January 2006 to July 2008. Mr. Burkhardt also served as Director of Northwest and China Operations from November of 1998 to January of 2006. Mr. Burkhardt also served as Director of Customer Satisfaction from March 1997 to November 1998 and Director of Molding from September of 1995 to March of 1997. Prior to this, Mr. Burkhardt served in other various senior management positions within the Company. Mr. Burkhardt has been with the Company since May of 1989. Prior to joining Key Tronic, Mr. Burkhardt worked for House of Aluminum and Glass for 12 years where he was the plant manager.

LAWRENCE J. BOSTWICK – Vice President of Engineering and Quality

Mr. Bostwick, age 59, has been Vice President of Engineering and Quality since July 2008. Previously he was Director of Engineering and Quality from February 2007 to July 2008 and served as Corporate Director of Quality from February 2006 to February 2007. From 2003 to 2006 he was Director of Supply Chain Management and Quality for the Lancer Corporation and from 1998 to 2003 he was Vice President of Operations for Thermacore International. He is a graduate of the Westinghouse and General Electric – Engineering and Manufacturing Professional Development Programs. He is certified in both Quality and Industrial Engineering and is a Lean – Six Sigma Master Black Belt. Mr. Bostwick has a combined B.S. degree in Production and Operation and Industrial Engineering from Bowling Green State University and a Masters degree in Industrial Engineering and Business Administration from Syracuse University.

PHIL S. HOCHBERG – Vice President of Business Development

Mr. Hochberg, age 49, has been Vice President of Business Development since October 2009. Previously he was Director of Business Development and Program Management from July 2008 to October 2009. Mr. Hochberg served as Director of Business Development from October 2004 to July 2008 and as Director of EMS Sales and Marketing from July 2000 to October 2004. Prior to joining Key Tronic, Mr. Hochberg worked for Quinton Instrument Company as their Director of Marketing and Product Management from 1992 to 2000. From 1988 to 1992, he was employed by SpaceLabs Medical as their Business Development Marketing Manager. Mr. Hochberg has an MBA from the University of British Columbia, a BA Psychology, with a minor in Business from Washington University in St. Louis.

BRETT R. LARSEN – Vice President of Finance, and Controller

Mr. Larsen, age 38, has served as Vice President of Finance and Controller since February 2010. He was Chief Financial Officer of FLSmidth Spokane, Inc. from December 2008 to February 22, 2010. From October 2005 through November 2008, Mr. Larsen served as Controller of Key Tronic Corporation. From May 2004 to October 2005, Mr. Larsen served as Manager of Financial Reporting of Key Tronic Corporation. From 2002 to May 2004, Mr. Larsen was an audit manager for the public accounting firm BDO Seidman, LLP. He also held various auditing and supervisory positions with Grant Thornton LLP from 1997 to 2002. Mr. Larsen has a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and a Masters degree in Accounting from Brigham Young University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Available Information

Our principal executive offices are located at N. 4424 Sullivan Road, Spokane Valley, Washington 99216, and our telephone number is (509) 928-8000. Our website is located at http://www.keytronicems.com where filings of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K are available after they have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information presented on our website currently and in the future is not considered to be part of this document or any document incorporated by reference in this document.

There are risks and uncertainties that could affect our business. These risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to, the risk factors described below, in Item 7A: “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

7

Table of Contents

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

The following risks and uncertainties could affect our actual results and could cause results to differ materially from past results or those contemplated by our forward-looking statements. When used herein, the words “expects”, “believes”, “anticipates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Potential Fluctuations in Quarterly Results of Operations

Our quarterly operating results have varied in the past and may vary in the future due to a variety of factors, including adverse changes in the U.S. and global macroeconomic environment, volatility in overall demand for our customers’ products, success of customers’ programs, timing of new programs, new product introductions or technological advances by us, our customers and our competitors, and changes in pricing policies by us, our customers, our suppliers, and our competitors. Our customer base is diverse in the markets they serve, however, decreases in demand, particularly from customers that supply the banking, consumer products, and gambling industries, could affect future quarterly results. Additionally, our customers could be impacted by the illiquidity of the credit markets which could directly impact our operating results.

Component procurement, production schedules, personnel and other resource requirements are based on estimates of customer requirements. Occasionally, our customers may request accelerated production that can stress resources and reduce operating margins. In addition, because many of our operating expenses are relatively fixed, a reduction in customer demand can harm our gross profit and operating results. The products which we manufacture for our customers have relatively short product lifecycles. Therefore, our business, operating results and financial condition are dependent in a significant way on our ability to obtain orders from new customers and new product programs from existing customers.

Operating results can also fluctuate if changes are made to significant estimates and assumptions. Significant estimates and assumptions include the allowance for doubtful receivables, provision for obsolete and non-saleable inventory, stock-based compensation, the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, impairment of long-lived assets, long-term incentive compensation accrual, and the provision for warranty costs.

Economic Conditions

Recently there have been adverse conditions and uncertainty in the global economy as the result of unstable global financial and credit markets, inflation, and recession. These unfavorable economic conditions and the weakness of the credit market could affect the demand for our customers’ products. The current global macroeconomic environment may affect some of our customers that could reduce orders and change forecasts which could adversely affect our sales in future periods. Additionally, the financial strength of our customers and suppliers and their ability to obtain and rely on credit financing may affect their ability to fulfill their obligations to us and have an adverse affect on our financial results.

Credit Markets

The current illiquidity and financial instability in the credit markets could adversely impact lenders and potentially limit the ability of our suppliers and customers to borrow. This may affect their ability to fulfill their obligations to us and have an adverse effect on our financial results.

Dependence on Suppliers

We are dependent on many suppliers, including sole source suppliers, to provide key components and raw materials used in manufacturing customers’ products. We have seen supply shortages in certain electronic components. This can result in longer lead times and the inability to meet our customers request for flexible production and extended shipment dates. Additionally, force majeure issues in Japan have caused supply constraints from some suppliers. If demand for components outpaces supply, capacity delays could affect future operations. Delays in deliveries from suppliers or the inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and raw materials could cause delays or reductions in shipment of products to our customers which could adversely affect our operating results and damage customer relationships.

8

Table of Contents

Concentration of Credit Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are exposed to concentrations of credit risk. We place our cash with high credit quality institutions. At times, such balances may be in excess of the federal depository insurance limit or may be on deposit at institutions which are not covered by insurance. If such institutions were to become insolvent during which time it held our cash and cash equivalents in excess of the insurance limit, it could be necessary to obtain other credit financing to operate our facilities.

Competition

The EMS industry is intensely competitive. Competitors may offer customers lower prices on certain high volume programs. This could result in price reductions, reduced margins and loss of market share, all of which would materially and adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. If we were unable to provide comparable or better manufacturing services at a lower cost than our competitors, it could cause sales to decline. In addition, competitors can copy our non-proprietary designs after we have invested in development of products for customers, thereby enabling such competitors to offer lower prices on such products due to savings in development costs.

Concentration of Major Customers

At present, our customer base is concentrated and could become more or less concentrated. There can be no assurance that our principal customers will continue to purchase products from us at current levels. Moreover, we typically do not enter into long-term volume purchase contracts with our customers, and our customers have certain rights to extend or delay the shipment of their orders. We, however, require that our customers contractually agree to buy back inventory purchased within specified lead times to build their products if not used.

The loss of one or more of our major customers, or the reduction, delay or cancellation of orders from such customers, due to economic conditions or other forces, could materially and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Specifically, some of our major customers provide products to the banking and gambling industries which have been adversely affected by the unfavorable economic environment. The contraction in demand from our customers in these industries could continue to impact our customer orders and continue to have a negative impact on our operations over the foreseeable future. Additionally, if one or more of our customers were to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay for the manufacturing services provided by us, our operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected.

Foreign Manufacturing Operations and Currencies

Most of the products manufactured by us are produced at our facilities located in Mexico and China. These international operations may be subject to a number of risks, including:

9

Table of Contents

Our operations in certain foreign locations receive favorable income tax treatment in the form of tax credits or other incentives. In the event that such tax incentives are not extended, are repealed, or we no longer qualify for such programs, our taxes may increase, which would reduce our net income.

A significant portion of our operations are in foreign locations. As a result, transactions occur in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Exchange rate fluctuations among other currencies used by us could directly or indirectly affect our financial results. Future currency fluctuations are dependent upon a number of factors and cannot be easily predicted. We currently use Mexican peso forward contracts to hedge foreign currency fluctuations for a portion of our Mexican peso denominated expenses. However, unexpected losses could occur from future fluctuations in exchange rates.

Additionally, certain foreign jurisdictions restrict the amount of cash that can be transferred to the U.S or impose taxes and penalties on such transfers of cash. To the extent we have excess cash in foreign locations that could be used in, or is needed by, our operations in the United States, we may incur significant penalties and/or taxes to repatriate these funds.

Dependence on Key Personnel

Our future success depends in large part on the continued service of our key technical, marketing and management personnel and on our ability to continue to attract and retain qualified employees. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. The loss of key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

New Program, New Product, and New Customer Risk

The markets for our customers’ products is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions and short product life cycles. The introduction of products embodying new technologies or the emergence of new industry standards can render existing products obsolete or unmarketable. Our success will depend upon our customers’ ability to enhance existing products and to develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products that keep pace with technological developments and emerging industry standards and address evolving and increasingly sophisticated customer requirements. Failure of our customers to do so could substantially harm our customers’ competitive positions. There can be no assurance that our customers will be successful in identifying, developing and marketing products that respond to technological change, emerging industry standards or evolving customer requirements.

Start-up costs, the management of labor and equipment resources in connection with the establishment of new programs and new customer relationships, and the need to obtain required resources in advance can adversely affect our gross margins and operating results. These factors are particularly evident in the ramping stages of new programs. These factors also affect our ability to efficiently use labor and equipment. We are currently managing a number of new programs. Consequently, our exposure to these factors has increased. In addition, if any of these new programs or new customer relationships were terminated, our operating results could be harmed, particularly in the short term. We may not be able to recoup these start-up costs or replace anticipated new program revenues.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk under our revolving line of credit with interest rates based on various levels of margin added to published prime rate and LIBOR rates depending on the calculation of a certain financial covenant.

Compliance with Current and Future Environmental Regulation

We are subject to a variety of domestic and foreign environmental regulations relating to the use, storage, and disposal of materials used in our manufacturing processes. If we fail to comply with any present or future regulations, we could be subject to future liabilities or the suspension of current manufacturing operations. In addition, such regulations could restrict our ability to expand our operations or could require us to acquire costly equipment, substitute materials, or incur other significant expenses to comply with government regulations.

10

Table of Contents

Dilution and Stock Price Volatility

Holders of the common stock will suffer immediate dilution to the extent outstanding options to purchase the common stock are exercised. Our stock price may be subject to wide fluctuations and possible rapid increases or declines over a short time period. These fluctuations may be due to factors specific to us such as variations in quarterly operating results or changes in earnings estimates, or to factors relating to the EMS industry or to the securities markets in general, which, in recent years, have experienced significant price fluctuations. These fluctuations often have been unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies whose stocks are traded.

Disclosure and Internal Controls

Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and internal controls and procedures will prevent all errors or fraud. A control system is designed to give reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, any control system reflects resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Inherent limitations of a control system may include: judgments in decision making may be faulty, breakdowns can occur simply because of error or mistake and controls can be circumvented by collusion or management override. Due to the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be detected.

Managing Growth

Our business is experiencing rapid growth which can place considerable additional demands upon our management team and our operational, financial and management information systems. Our ability to manage growth effectively requires us to continue to implement and improve these systems; avoid cost overruns; maintain customer, supplier and other favorable business relationships during possible transition periods; continue to develop the management skills of our managers and supervisors; and continue to train, motivate and manage our employees. Our failure to effectively manage growth could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

Manufacturing Process

We manufacture and design products to our customers’ specifications, and, in some cases, our manufacturing processes and facilities may need to comply with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. For example, medical devices that we manufacture or design, as well as the facilities and manufacturing processes that we use to produce them, are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and non-U.S. counterparts of this agency. In addition, our customers’ products and the manufacturing processes that we use to produce them often are highly complex. As a result, products that we manufacture may at times contain manufacturing or design defects, and our manufacturing processes may be subject to errors or not be in compliance with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements. Defects in the products we manufacture or design, whether caused by a design, manufacturing or component failure or error, or deficiencies in our manufacturing processes, may result in delayed shipments to customers or reduced or cancelled customer orders. If these defects or deficiencies are significant, our business reputation may also be damaged. The failure of the products that we manufacture or our manufacturing processes and facilities to comply with applicable statutory and regulatory requirements may subject us to legal fines or penalties and, in some cases, require us to shut down or incur considerable expense to correct a manufacturing process or facility. In addition, these defects may result in liability claims against us or expose us to liability to pay for the recall of a product. Even if our customers are responsible for the defects, they may not, or may not have resources to, assume responsibility for any costs or liabilities arising from these defects, which could expose us to additional liability claims.

Energy Prices

Certain components that we use in our manufacturing process are petroleum-based. In addition, we, along with our suppliers and customers, rely on various energy sources in our transportation activities. While significant uncertainty currently exists about the future levels of energy prices, a significant increase is possible. Increased energy prices could cause an increase to our raw material costs and transportation costs. In addition, increased transportation costs of certain of our suppliers and customers could be passed along to us. We may not be able to increase our product prices enough to offset these increased costs. In addition, any increase in our product prices may reduce our future customer orders and profitability.

11

Table of Contents

None

We have manufacturing and sales operations located in the United States, Mexico, and China. The table below lists the locations and square footage of our operating facilities:

The geographic diversity of these locations allows us to offer services near certain of our customers and major electronics markets with the additional benefit of reduced labor costs. We consider the productive capacity of our current facilities sufficient to carry on our current business. In addition, in Juarez, Mexico one of our buildings includes adjacent vacant land that could be developed into additional manufacturing and warehouse space.

All of our facilities are ISO certified to ISO 9001:2008 standards, ISO-14001 environmental standards, ISO-13485:2003 medical devices standards, AS9001 aviation, space and defense standards, and ISO/TS 16949 automotive standards. The Spokane, Washington facilities are additionally registered to AS9100B, and ITAR. Our China facilities are also registered to AS9100B and ISO/TS.

12

Table of Contents

We are a party to certain lawsuits or claims in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flow.

PART II

Market Information

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market, formerly the NASDAQ National Market System under the symbol “KTCC”. Quarterly high and low closing sales prices for our common stock for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

High and low stock prices are based on the daily closing price reported by the NASDAQ Stock Market. These quotations represent prices between dealers without adjustment for markups, markdowns, and commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.

Holders and Dividends

As of July 2, 2011, we had 788 shareholders of common stock on record. As a result of our credit agreement with Wells Fargo, N.A. we are restricted from declaring or paying dividends in cash or stock. We have not paid a cash dividend and do not anticipate payment of dividends in the foreseeable future.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Information concerning securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is set forth in Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report, under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans”, and that information is incorporated herein by reference.

13

Table of Contents

Performance Graph

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Stock Market (U.S. & Foreign) Index and the NASDAQ Electronic Components Index in fiscal 2011.

14

Table of Contents

The following selected data is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the consolidated financial statements and related notes, and other information included in this report.

Financial Highlights

(In thousands, except for Supplemental Data and Book Value per Share)

15

Table of Contents

Overview

KeyTronicEMS is a leader in electronic manufacturing services and solutions to original equipment manufacturers of a broad range of products. We provide engineering services, worldwide procurement and distribution, materials management, world-class manufacturing and assembly services, in-house testing, and unparalleled customer service. Our international production capability provides our customers with benefits of improved supply-chain management, reduced inventories, lower transportation costs, and reduced product fulfillment time. We continue to make investments in all of our operating facilities to give us the production capacity and logistical advantages to continue to win new business. The following information should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included herein and with Item 1A, Risk Factors.

Our mission is to provide our customers with superior manufacturing and engineering services at the lowest total cost for the highest quality products, and create long-term mutually beneficial business relationships by employing our “Trust, Commitment, Results” philosophy.

Executive Summary

Our sales of $253.8 million in fiscal year 2011 increased by 27.2 percent as compared to sales of $199.6 million in fiscal year 2010. This increase in sales was primarily driven by new customer programs for both longstanding and new customers, partially offset by an unfavorable macroeconomic environment and industry-wide shortages in the global supply chain that occurred through most of fiscal year 2011. Sales for the first quarter of fiscal year 2012 are expected to be within the range of $65 million to $69 million. Future results will depend on actual levels of customers’ orders, the timing of the start up of production of new product programs and the potential impact of the macroeconomic uncertainty. We believe that we are well positioned in the EMS industry to continue expansion of our customer base and continue long-term growth.

The concentration of our largest customers increased during fiscal year 2011 with the top five customers’ sales increasing to 62 percent of total sales in 2011 from 57 percent in 2010, and 52 percent in 2009. Our current customer relationships involve a variety of products, including consumer electronics, electronic storage devices, plastics, household products, gaming devices, specialty printers, telecommunications, industrial equipment, computer accessories, and electronic whiteboards. At the end of fiscal year 2011, we were generating revenue from 30 EMS customers as compared with 20 at the end of fiscal year 2010. These new customers have programs that represent small annual sales while others have multi-million-dollar potential.

Gross profit as a percent of sales was 8.1 percent in fiscal year 2011 compared to 9.6 percent for the prior fiscal year. This 1.5 percentage point decrease is primarily related to a 6.4 percentage point increase in material costs as a percent of sales, resulting from higher material content in certain new customer programs, partially offset by a 4.9 percentage point improvement in leveraging of certain overhead costs. The level of gross margin is impacted by product mix, timing of the start up of new programs, facility utilization, pricing within the electronics industry and material costs, which can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter.

Operating income as a percentage of sales for fiscal year 2011 was 2.7 percent compared to 3.7 percent for fiscal year 2010. The decrease in operating income as a percentage of sales was due to a decline in gross margin, partially offset by the leveraging of certain operating expenses and by improving efficiencies during fiscal year 2011.

Net income for fiscal year 2011 was $5.7 million or $0.55 per diluted share, as compared to net income of $8.7 million or $0.85 per diluted share for fiscal year 2010. The decrease in net income for fiscal year 2011 as compared to fiscal year 2010 was primarily due to an approximate 1.5 percentage point decline in our gross margin. Also, our fiscal year 2010 results include an income tax benefit of $1.4 million, resulting in part from the release of our valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to our domestic net operating loss carryforwards that occurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.

16

Table of Contents

We maintain a strong balance sheet with a current ratio of 2.7 and a long-term debt to equity ratio of 0.11. Total cash used in operating activities as defined on our cash flow statement was $2.6 million during fiscal year 2011. However, we maintain sufficient liquidity for our expected future operations and had $6.0 million in borrowings on our revolving line of credit with Wells Fargo, N.A. of which $24.0 million remained available at July 2, 2011. We believe cash flow from operations, our borrowing capacity, and equipment lease financing should provide adequate capital for planned growth over the long term.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the Fiscal Year Ended July 2, 2011 with the Fiscal Year Ended July 3, 2010

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain items of the consolidated statements of income expressed as a percentage of net sales. The financial information and discussion below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this Annual Report.

Net Sales

Net sales were $253.8 million, and $199.6 million in fiscal years 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Net sales increased $54.2 million during fiscal year 2011 as compared with fiscal year 2010. This increase in net sales was primarily driven by an approximate $77.9 million increase in revenues related to new programs for both new and longstanding customers. This was partially offset by a $18.5 million decline related to decreased demand from certain current customer programs. In addition, during fiscal year 2011 we experienced an approximately $5.2 million decline related to the negative impact of end-of-life customer programs and to a lesser extent customer program losses. The negative impact resulting from industry-wide shortages in the global supply chain that occurred throughout most of the year and the uncertain macroeconomic environment are reflected in the analysis of our new and longstanding customers programs as discussed above.

17

Table of Contents

The following table shows the revenue by industry sectors as a percentage of revenue for fiscal years 2011 and 2010:

We provide services to customers in a number of industries and produce a variety of products for our customers in each industry. As we continue to diversify our customer base and win new customers we may continue to see a change in the industry concentrations of our revenue.

Sales to foreign locations represented 31.9 percent, and 17.9 percent of our total net sales in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Cost of Sales

Total cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 91.9 percent, and 90.4 percent in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively.

Total cost of materials as a percentage of net sales was approximately 73.9 percent, and 68.6 percent in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. The change from year-to-year is primarily the result of higher material content in certain new customer programs and changes in product mix.

Production and support costs as a percentage of net sales were 18.0 percent, and 21.8 percent in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. The decrease in fiscal year 2011 is primarily related to the leveraging of our fixed costs as a percentage of sales during the fiscal year.

We provide for obsolete and non-saleable inventories based on specific identification of inventory against current demand and recent usage. The amounts charged to expense for these inventories were approximately $0.3 million, and $2.2 million in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. The large provision in fiscal year 2010 was primarily due to a discontinuance of manufacturing for certain customers that became no longer viable.

We provide warranties on certain products we sell and estimate warranty costs based on historical experience and anticipated product returns. The amounts charged to expense are determined based on an estimate of warranty exposure. The net warranty expense was approximately $158,000 and $45,000 in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. Warranty expense for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 is related to workmanship claims on keyboards and EMS products.

Gross Profit

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 8.1 percent, and 9.6 percent in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively.

The 1.5 percentage point decrease in gross profit as a percentage of net sales during fiscal year 2011as compared to fiscal year 2010 is primarily related to a 6.4 percentage point increase in material costs, as a percent of sales, resulting from higher material content in certain new customer programs, partially offset by a 4.9 percentage point improvement in leveraging of certain overhead costs.

We took early pay discounts to suppliers that totaled approximately $678,000, and $364,000, in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. Early pay discounts will fluctuate based on our liquidity and changes in the discounts and terms offered by our suppliers.

18

Table of Contents

Changes in gross profit margins reflect the impact of a number of factors that can vary from period to period, including product mix, start-up costs and efficiencies associated with new programs, product life cycles, sales volumes, capacity utilization of our resources, management of inventories, component pricing and shortages, end market demand for customers’ products, fluctuations in and timing of customer orders, and competition within the EMS industry. These and other factors can cause variations in operating results. There can be no assurance that gross margins will not decrease in future periods.

Research, Development and Engineering

Research, development and engineering expenses (RD&E) consists principally of employee related costs, third party development costs, program materials, depreciation and allocated information technology and facilities costs. Total RD&E was $3.8 million, and $2.8 million in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, RD&E was 1.5 percent and 1.4 percent in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. The increase in RD&E in fiscal year 2011 is primarily the result of increased headcount and to a lesser extent higher incentive compensation.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) consist principally of salaries and benefits, advertising and marketing programs, sales commissions, travel expenses, provision for doubtful accounts, facilities costs, and professional services. Total SG&A expenses were $9.9 million, and $9.1 million in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. As a percentage of net sales SG&A was 3.9 percent, and 4.5 percent in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. Approximately half of our SG&A expenses relates to salary costs of our employees.

The $0.8 million increase in SG&A expenses in fiscal year 2011 as compared to fiscal year 2010 is primarily due to a $0.5 million increase in outside services and professional fees, a $0.4 million increase in salary related costs, and a $0.3 million increase related to other overhead costs. This was partially offset by an approximate $0.4 million decrease in incentive compensation expense.

Interest Expense

We had net interest expense of $0.5 million, and $0.1 million in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. Interest expense increased in fiscal year 2011 when compared to fiscal year 2010 as the average balance of the revolving line of credit was higher in addition to interest expense incurred as a result of our capital lease obligations. We often utilize short-term fixed LIBOR rates on portions of our revolving line of credit to limit the affect of interest rate volatilities.

Income Tax Provision

We had an income tax expense of $746,000 during fiscal year 2011 as compared to an income tax benefit of $1.4 million in fiscal year 2010. The income tax expense recognized during fiscal 2011 was primarily a function of U.S. and foreign taxes recognized at the statutory rates offset by the net benefit associated with federal research and development tax credits, the release of the valuation allowance in China, and changes in potential foreign tax credits. The income tax benefit of fiscal year 2010 is primarily related to the release of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets related to domestic tax net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) and foreign tax credits, partially offset by the recognition of domestic deferred tax liabilities for an unremitted portion of foreign earnings and the change of applicable tax regimes in Mexico.

Due to increased profitability, revenue growth, and new customer programs, we have determined that a valuation allowance against our domestic NOLs is not required. We anticipate that we will fully utilize our domestic NOLs prior to their expiration. In addition, we reviewed our requirements for liquidity domestically to fund our revenue growth and to look for potential future acquisitions. We have changed our previous assessments of being permanently reinvested and now anticipate repatriating a portion of our unremitted foreign earnings. The associated taxes and potential foreign tax credits were first included in the income tax benefit that was realized during fiscal year 2010 and certain changes in the estimates of foreign earnings and profits and tax pools resulted in the recognition of additional tax benefits during fiscal year 2011. For further information on taxes please review footnote 5 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.

19

Table of Contents

International Subsidiaries

We offer customers a complete global manufacturing solution. Our facilities provide our customers the opportunity to have their products manufactured in the facility that best serves specific cost, product manufacturing, and distribution needs. Key Tronic Reynosa, SA de CV operated manufacturing and warehouse facilities in Reynosa, Mexico for a specific customer program. This subsidiary ceased its operations during fiscal year 2011. The closure of the facility did not have a significant impact on our results of operations. The locations of active foreign subsidiaries are as follows:

Foreign sales (based on shipping instructions) from our worldwide operations, including domestic exports, were $81.1 million, and $35.7 million in fiscal years 2011, and 2010, respectively. Products and manufacturing services provided by our subsidiary operations are sold to customers directly by the parent company. Key Tronic Computer Peripherals (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., our subsidiary in Shanghai, China, had only minimal direct sales to customers in China during the past two fiscal years.

Comparison of the Fiscal Year Ended July 3, 2010 with the Fiscal Year Ended June 27, 2009

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain items of the consolidated statements of income expressed as a percentage of net sales. The financial information and discussion below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this Annual Report.

Net Sales

Net sales were $199.6 million and $184.9 million in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively.

Net sales increased $14.7 million during fiscal year 2010 as compared with fiscal year 2009. This increase in sales was primarily driven by new customer programs for both longstanding and new customers, partially offset by a continuance of an unfavorable macroeconomic environment and industry-wide shortages in the global supply chain.

20

Table of Contents

The table below shows the revenue by industry sectors as a percentage of revenue for the following fiscal years:

We provide services to customers in a number of industries and produce a variety of products for our customers in each industry. As we continue to diversify our customer base and win new customers we may continue to see a change in the industry concentrations of our revenue.

Sales to foreign locations represented 17.9 percent and 11.3 percent of our total net sales in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively.

Cost of Sales

Total cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 90.4 percent and 92.9 percent in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively.

Total cost of materials as a percentage of net sales was approximately 68.6 percent and 69.2 percent in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. The change from year-to-year was directly related to changes in product mix.

Production and support costs as a percentage of net sales were 21.8 percent and 23.7 percent in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. The decrease in fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 was related to higher fixed cost absorption due to a $14.7 million increase in net sales, while production and support costs decreased $0.3 million due to favorable foreign exchange rates and a reduction of manufacturing facility payroll. These savings were partially offset by an increase in the provision for obsolete inventory.

We provide for obsolete and non-saleable inventories based on specific identification of inventory against current demand and recent usage. The amounts charged to expense for these inventories were approximately $2.2 million, and $0.3 million in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. The increased provision in fiscal year 2010 was primarily due to no longer manufacturing for certain customers that were no longer viable.

We provide warranties on certain products we sell and estimate warranty costs based on historical experience and anticipated product returns. The amounts charged to expense were determined based on an estimate of warranty exposure. The net warranty expense (recovery) was approximately $45,000, and $(93,000) in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. Warranty expense for fiscal year 2010 is related to workmanship claims on keyboards and EMS products. The recovery in fiscal year 2009 was related to the release of a warranty claim for a specific product that was identified in fiscal year 2008.

Gross Profit

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 9.6 percent and 7.1 percent in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively.

The 2.5 percentage point increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales during fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 was primarily the result of a $14.7 million increase in net sales, while production and support cost decreased by $0.3 million due to favorable foreign exchange changes, a

21

Table of Contents

decrease in headcount of overhead employees and severance costs incurred in fiscal year 2009 that did not recur in fiscal year 2010. This was partially offset by a $8.9 million increase in material costs.

We took early pay discounts to suppliers that totaled approximately $364,000, and $142,000 in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. Early pay discounts will fluctuate based on our liquidity and changes in the discounts and terms offered by our suppliers.

Changes in gross profit margins reflect the impact of a number of factors that can vary from period to period, including product mix, start-up costs and efficiencies associated with new programs, product life cycles, sales volumes, capacity utilization of our resources, management of inventories, component pricing and shortages, end market demand for customers’ products, fluctuations in and timing of customer orders, and competition within the EMS industry. These and other factors can cause variations in operating results. There can be no assurance that gross margins will not decrease in future periods.

Research, Development and Engineering

Research, development and engineering expenses (RD&E) consists principally of employee related costs, third party development costs, program materials, depreciation and allocated information technology and facilities costs. Total RD&E was $2.8 million, and $2.3 million in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, RD&E was 1.4 percent, and 1.2 percent in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. The increase in RD&E expenses in fiscal year 2010 compared to fiscal year 2009 was primarily the result of higher incentive compensation expense and increased headcount.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) consist principally of salaries and benefits, advertising and marketing programs, sales commissions, travel expenses, provision for doubtful accounts, facilities costs, and professional services. Total SG&A expenses were $9.1 million, and $8.4 million in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. As a percentage of net sales SG&A was 4.5 percent, and 4.5 percent in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. Approximately half of our SG&A expenses relates to salary costs of our employees.

The $0.7 million increase in SG&A expenses in fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 was primarily due to a $1.6 million increase in incentive compensation expense. This was partially offset by an approximate $0.3 million decrease in salaries in addition to an approximate $0.6 million decrease in expense related to the write off of a receivable in the prior year.

Goodwill Impairment

We recorded an impairment charge of $765,000 during fiscal year 2009. We did not record an impairment charge during fiscal year 2010. As of July 3, 2010, there was no goodwill recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Interest Expense

We had net interest expense of $0.1 million, and $0.6 million in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. Interest expense decreased in fiscal year 2010 when compared to fiscal year 2009 as the average balance of the revolving line of credit was lower along with a decrease in variable interest rates. We do not currently use derivatives to hedge interest rate risk. We often utilize short-term fixed LIBOR rates on portions of our revolving line of credit to limit the affect of interest rate volatilities.

Income Tax Provision

We had an income tax benefit of $1.4 million during fiscal year 2010 as compared to $130,000 of tax expense in fiscal year 2009. The income tax benefit of fiscal year 2010 was primarily related the release of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax assets related to domestic tax net operating loss carryforwards (NOLs) and foreign tax credits, partially offset by the recognition of domestic deferred tax liabilities for an unremitted portion of foreign earnings and the change of applicable tax regimes in Mexico.

Due to increased profitability, revenue growth, and new customer programs, we determined that a valuation allowance against our domestic NOLs was not longer required. We anticipate that we will fully utilize our domestic NOLs prior to their expiration. In addition, we reviewed our requirements for liquidity

22

Table of Contents

domestically to fund our revenue growth and to look for potential future acquisitions. We changed our previous assessments of being indefinitely reinvested and anticipated repatriating a portion of our unremitted foreign earnings. The associated taxes and potential foreign tax credits are included in the income tax benefit that was realized during fiscal year 2010. The tax provision in fiscal year 2009 was primarily related to income taxes in China and Mexico. For further information on taxes please review footnote 7 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”.

International Subsidiaries

Foreign sales (based on shipping instructions) from our worldwide operations, including domestic exports, were $35.7 million, and $20.9 million in fiscal years 2010, and 2009, respectively. Products and manufacturing services provided by our subsidiary operations are sold to customers directly by the parent company. Key Tronic Computer Peripherals (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., our subsidiary in Shanghai, China, had only minimal sales to customers in China during the past two fiscal years.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Cash flows used in operating activities were $2.6 million in fiscal year 2011 as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $3.7 million and $10.0 million in fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The $6.3 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal year 2011 as compared with fiscal year 2010 was primarily due to an increase in trade receivables, inventory, and a decrease in accounts payable. Trade receivables increased by $5.7 million as a result of the increase in sales that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011. The $2.1 million increase in inventory was attributable to our recent and expected growth in production levels for a number of new programs. We purchase inventory based on customer forecasts and orders and expected lead times, and when those forecasts cannot be met or changes are made to lead times, inventory can increase. The $3.0 million decrease in accounts payable was primarily driven by the timing of payments and terms of the supply chain related to new programs. Accounts payable fluctuates with changes in inventory levels, volume of purchases, and negotiated supplier terms. The $6.3 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities in fiscal year 2010 as compared with fiscal year 2009 was primarily due to an increase in trade receivables and inventory, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable. Trade receivables increased by $10.1 million as a result of the increase in sales that occurred during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. The $9.7 million increase in inventory was attributable to new customer programs and increasing lead times on certain components which led to some scheduled shipments not being shipped by the end of the fiscal year. We purchase inventory based on customer forecasts and orders and expected lead times, and when those forecasts cannot be met or changes are made to lead times, inventory can increase. The $10.5 million increase in accounts payable was primarily driven by the increase in inventory and extending payment terms during fiscal year 2010. Accounts payable fluctuates with changes in inventory levels, volume of purchases, and negotiated supplier terms.

Cash flows used in investing activities were $3.7 million, $3.3 million, and $1.9 million in fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Cash used in investing activities includes capital expenditures and proceeds from the sale of property and equipment. Capital expenditures were $3.8 million, $3.4 million, and $1.9 million in fiscal years 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. Our capital expenditures are primarily for purchases of manufacturing assets to support our operations in Spokane Valley, Washington, Mexico and China. The increase in capital expenditures for fiscal year 2011 as compared to fiscal year 2010 is primarily related to the increased investment in manufacturing equipment to support the requirements of our growing customer programs and sales. The increase in capital expenditures for fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 was primarily related to the purchase of a manufacturing facility and to a lesser extent the increased investment in manufacturing equipment to support the requirements of our growing customer programs and sales.

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $6.7 million in fiscal year 2011 as compared to cash used in financing activities of $0.4 million and $10.3 million in fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our primary financing activity in fiscal years 2011, 2010, and 2009 was borrowing and repayment under our revolving line of our credit facility. Our credit agreement with Wells Fargo Bank N.A. provides a revolving line of credit facility of up to $30 million. The agreement specifies that the proceeds of the revolving line of credit be used primarily for working capital and general corporate purposes of the Company and its

23

Table of Contents

subsidiaries. The outstanding balance under the credit facility was $6.0 million as of July 2, 2011. We had availability to borrow an additional $24.0 million under the Wells Fargo line of credit and we were in compliance with our loan covenants. During fiscal year 2011, cash provided by financing activities reflected an additional $2.2 million of proceeds to finance capital leases and we made payments of $0.3 million on such capital leases.

Our cash requirements are affected by the level of current operations and new EMS programs. We believe that projected cash from operations, funds available under the revolving credit facility and leasing capabilities will be sufficient to meet our working and fixed capital requirements for the foreseeable future.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In the normal course of business, we enter into contracts which obligate us to make payments in the future.

The table below sets forth our significant future obligations by fiscal year:

Payments Due by Fiscal Year (in thousands)

In addition to the cash requirements presented above, we have various other accruals which are not included in the table above. We owe our suppliers approximately $21.4 million for accounts payable and shipments in transit at the end of the fiscal year. We generally pay our suppliers in a range from 30 to 120

24

Table of Contents

days depending on terms offered. These payments are financed by operating cash flows and our revolving line of credit.

We believe that cash flows generated from operations, leasing facilities, and funds available under the revolving credit facility will satisfy cash requirements for a period in excess of 12 months and into the foreseeable future.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements describes the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Management believes the most complex and sensitive judgments, because of their significance to our consolidated financial statements, result primarily from the need to make estimates about effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The most significant areas involving management judgments are described below. Actual results in these areas could differ from management’s estimates.

Inactive, Obsolete, and Surplus Inventory Reserve

We reserve for inventories that we deem inactive, obsolete or surplus. This reserve is calculated based upon the demand for the products that we produce. Demand is determined by expected sales or customer forecasts. If expected sales do not materialize, then we would have inventory in excess of our reserves and would have to charge the excess against future earnings. In the case where we have purchased material based upon a customer’s forecast, we are usually covered by lead-time assurance agreements with each customer. These contracts state that the financial liability for material purchased within agreed upon lead-time and based upon the customer’s forecasts, lies with the customer. If we purchase material outside the lead-time assurance agreement and the customer’s forecasts do not materialize or if we have no lead-time assurance agreement for a specific program, we would have the financial liability and may have to charge inactive, obsolete or surplus inventory against earnings.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We value our accounts receivable net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $111,000 at July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010. This allowance is based on estimates of the portion of accounts receivable that may not be collected in the future. The estimates used are based primarily on specific identification of potentially uncollectible accounts. Such accounts are identified using publicly available information in conjunction with evaluations of current payment activity. However, if any of our customers were to develop unexpected and immediate financial problems that would prevent payment of open invoices, we could incur additional and possibly material expenses that would negatively impact earnings.

Accrued Warranty

An accrual is made for expected warranty costs, with the related expense recognized in cost of goods sold. We review the adequacy of this accrual quarterly based on historical analysis and anticipated product returns and rework costs. As we have made the transition from manufacturing primarily keyboards to primarily EMS products, our exposure to warranty claims has declined significantly. Our warranty period for keyboards is generally longer than that for EMS products. We only warrant materials and workmanship on EMS products, and we do not warrant design defects for EMS customers.

Income Taxes

Income tax expense includes U.S. and international income taxes and the provision for U.S. taxes on undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries not deemed to be permanently invested. Certain income and expenses are not reported in tax returns and financial statements in the same year. The tax effect of such temporary differences is reported as deferred income taxes. The deferred income taxes are classified as current or long-term based on the classification of the related asset or liability. The most significant areas involving management judgments include deferred income tax assets and liabilities, uncertain tax positions, and research and development tax credits. Our estimates of the realization of the deferred tax assets related to our net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits is based upon our estimates of future taxable income which may change.

25

Table of Contents

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for according to Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation . ASC 718 requires us to expense the fair value of employee stock options, stock appreciation rights and other forms of stock-based compensation. Under the fair value recognition provisions of ASC 718, share-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based upon the value of the stock option and at each reporting period for stock appreciation rights classified as liability awards and is recognized as expense ratably over the requisite service period of the award (generally the vesting). Determining the appropriate fair value model and calculating the fair value of share-based awards requires judgment, including estimating the expected life of the share-based award, the expected stock price volatility over the expected life of the share-based award and forfeitures.

To determine the fair value of stock based awards on the date of grant and at each reporting period for any stock appreciation rights that may be classified as liability awards, we use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in this model are assumptions related to expected stock price volatility, option life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. The risk-free interest rate is a less-subjective assumption as it is based on factual data derived from public sources. We use a dividend yield of zero as we have never paid cash dividends and have no intention to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The expected stock price volatility and option life assumptions require a greater level of judgment. Our expected stock-price volatility assumption is based upon the historical volatility of our stock which is obtained from public data sources. The expected life represents either the weighted average period of time that share-based awards are expected to be outstanding (stock options), giving consideration to vesting schedules and historical exercise patterns. We determine the expected life assumption based upon the exercise and post-vesting behavior that has been exhibited historically, adjusted for specific factors that may influence future exercise patterns. If expected volatility or expected life were to increase, that would result in an increase in the fair value of our stock options which would result in higher compensation charges, while a decrease in volatility or the expected life would result in a lower fair value of our stock option awards resulting in lower compensation charges.

We estimate forfeitures for all of our awards based upon historical experience of stock-based pre-vesting forfeitures. We believe that our estimates are based upon outcomes that are reasonably likely to occur. If actual forfeitures are higher than our estimates it would result in lower compensation expense and to the extent the actual forfeitures are lower than our estimate we would record higher compensation expense.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge would be recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, goodwill is tested annually for impairment, and is tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss would be recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value.

Upon the completion of the Company’s annual impairment test during fiscal year 2009 and as a result of the deteriorating global economy adversely affecting the Company’s common stock price. The Company concluded that 100% of the goodwill was impaired due to the significant and sustained decline in the Company’s market capitalization to below the book value. The Company recorded an impairment charge of $765,000 during the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. As of July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively, there was no goodwill recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet.

26

Table of Contents

Derivatives and Hedging Activity

Derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their estimated fair value. On the date a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (a “cash flow” hedge). The Company does not enter into derivatives for speculative purposes. Changes in the fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a cash flow hedge are recorded in “Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”, until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows. See Note 11 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.

Interest Rate Risk

We are subject to the risk of fluctuating interest rates in the normal course of business. Our major market risk relates to our secured debt. Our revolving credit facility is secured by substantially all of our assets. The interest rates applicable to our revolving credit facility fluctuate with the JP Morgan Chase Bank prime rate and LIBOR rates. There was outstanding $6.0 million in borrowings under our revolving credit facility as of July 2, 2011, and the rate of interest being paid on the outstanding balance was 2.48%. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Capital Resources and Liquidity” and Note 4 – “Long-Term Debt” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our revolving credit facility.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

A significant portion of our operations are in foreign locations. As a result, transactions occur in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Exchange rate fluctuations among other currencies used by us would directly or indirectly affect our financial results. We currently use Mexican peso forward contracts to hedge foreign currency fluctuations for a portion of our Mexican peso denominated expenses. There was $37.9 million of foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of July 2, 2011. The fair value of these contracts was approximately $2.6 million. See Note 11 – “Derivative Financial Instruments” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our derivative instruments.

27

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Key Tronic Corporation

Spokane Valley, Washington

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Key Tronic Corporation (the Company) as of July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 2, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. In connection with our audits of the financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Key Tronic Corporation at July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended July 2, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

28

Table of Contents

KEY TRONIC CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

29

Table of Contents

KEY TRONIC CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands)