Annual Statements Open main menu

KINDER MORGAN, INC. - Quarter Report: 2022 March (Form 10-Q)


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

F O R M  10-Q  

  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022

or

  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____to_____

Commission file number: 001-35081
kmi-20220331_g1.gif

KINDER MORGAN, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware80-0682103
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77002
(Address of principal executive offices)(zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 713-369-9000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Class P Common StockKMINew York Stock Exchange
2.250% Senior Notes due 2027KMI 27 ANew York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes þ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ☐ No þ

As of April 21, 2022, the registrant had 2,267,472,525 shares of Class P common stock outstanding.




KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Number
 
1



KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
GLOSSARY

Company Abbreviations
EPNG=El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.Ruby=Ruby Pipeline Holding Company, L.L.C.
KMBT=Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals, Inc.SFPP=SFPP, L.P.
KMI=Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiariesSNG=Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
TGP=Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
KMLT=Kinder Morgan Liquid Terminals, LLC
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” or “the Company” are intended to mean Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its majority-owned and/or controlled subsidiaries.
Common Industry and Other Terms
/d=per dayFASB=Financial Accounting Standards Board
Bbl=barrelsFERC=Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
BBtu=billion British Thermal Units GAAP=U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
Bcf=billion cubic feetLLC=limited liability company
CERCLA=Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability ActLIBOR=London Interbank Offered Rate
MBbl=thousand barrels
CO2
=
carbon dioxide or our CO2 business segment
MMBbl=million barrels
DCF=distributable cash flowMMtons=million tons
DD&A=depreciation, depletion and amortization NGL=natural gas liquids
EBDA=earnings before depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses, including amortization of excess cost of equity investmentsNYMEX=New York Mercantile Exchange
OTC=over-the-counter
EBITDA=earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses, and amortization of excess cost of equity investmentsROU=Right-of-Use
U.S.=United States of America
EPA=U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWTI=West Texas Intermediate


2


Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “forecast,” “strategy,” “outlook,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “shall,” or the negative of those terms or other variations of them or comparable terminology. In particular, expressed or implied statements concerning future actions, conditions or events, future operating results or the ability to generate sales, income or cash flow, service debt or pay dividends, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this report include, among others, express or implied statements pertaining to: the long-term demand for our assets and services, our anticipated dividends and capital projects, including expected completion timing and benefits of those projects.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements in this report include: the timing and extent of changes in the supply of and demand for the products we transport and handle; commodity prices; and the other risks and uncertainties described in Part I, Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Part I, Item 3. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this report, as well as “Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (except to the extent such information is modified or superseded by information in subsequent reports).

You should keep these risk factors in mind when considering forward-looking statements. These risk factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. Because of these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement. We disclaim any obligation, other than as required by applicable law, to publicly update or revise any of our forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments.

3


PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.


KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions, except per share amounts, unaudited)

Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
Revenues 
Services$2,050 $1,917 
Commodity sales2,208 3,229 
Other35 65 
Total Revenues
4,293 5,211 
Operating Costs, Expenses and Other 
Costs of sales1,894 2,009 
Operations and maintenance585 514 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization538 541 
General and administrative156 156 
Taxes, other than income taxes111 110 
Gain on divestitures and impairments, net(10)(4)
Other income, net(5)(1)
Total Operating Costs, Expenses and Other
3,269 3,325 
Operating Income1,024 1,886 
Other Income (Expense) 
Earnings from equity investments187 66 
Amortization of excess cost of equity investments(19)(22)
Interest, net(333)(377)
Other, net (Note 2)19 223 
Total Other Expense
(146)(110)
Income Before Income Taxes878 1,776 
Income Tax Expense (194)(351)
Net Income684 1,425 
Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(17)(16)
Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc.$667 $1,409 
Class P Shares
Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share$0.29 $0.62 
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding2,267 2,264 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4


KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In millions, unaudited)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
Net income$684 $1,425 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Net unrealized loss from derivative instruments (net of taxes of $125 and $47, respectively)
(411)(156)
Reclassification into earnings of net derivative instruments loss to net income (net of taxes of $(41) and $(18), respectively)
135 59 
Benefit plan adjustments (net of taxes of $(4) and $(4), respectively)
13 17 
Total other comprehensive loss (263)(80)
Comprehensive income421 1,345 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests(17)(16)
Comprehensive income attributable to KMI$404 $1,329 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5



KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except per share amounts, unaudited)

March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$84 $1,140 
Restricted deposits264 
Accounts receivable1,661 1,611 
Fair value of derivative contracts147 220 
Inventories591 562 
Other current assets286 289 
Total current assets3,033 3,829 
Property, plant and equipment, net 35,557 35,653 
Investments7,545 7,578 
Goodwill19,914 19,914 
Other intangibles, net1,618 1,678 
Deferred income taxes115 
Deferred charges and other assets1,460 1,649 
Total Assets$69,135 $70,416 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Current portion of debt $3,324 $2,646 
Accounts payable1,204 1,259 
Accrued interest302 504 
Accrued taxes211 270 
Fair value of derivative contracts535 178 
Other current liabilities874 964 
Total current liabilities6,450 5,821 
Long-term liabilities and deferred credits
Long-term debt
Outstanding
28,175 29,772 
Debt fair value adjustments
584 902 
Total long-term debt28,759 30,674 
Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits2,219 2,000 
Total long-term liabilities and deferred credits30,978 32,674 
Total Liabilities37,428 38,495 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3 and 9)
Stockholders’ Equity
Class P shares, $0.01 par value, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 2,267,382,723 and 2,267,391,527 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding
23 23 
Additional paid-in capital41,813 41,806 
Accumulated deficit(10,544)(10,595)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(674)(411)
Total Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity30,618 30,823 
Noncontrolling interests1,089 1,098 
Total Stockholders’ Equity31,707 31,921 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$69,135 $70,416 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6


KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions, unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
20222021
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income$684 $1,425 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization538 541 
Deferred income taxes190 347 
Amortization of excess cost of equity investments19 22 
Change in fair market value of derivative contracts77 14 
Gain on divestitures and impairments, net (10)(4)
Gain on sale of interest in equity investment (Note 2)— (206)
Earnings from equity investments(187)(66)
Distributions from equity investment earnings165 184 
Changes in components of working capital
Accounts receivable(51)(122)
Inventories(34)(47)
Other current assets(14)
Accounts payable55 26 
Accrued interest, net of interest rate swaps(188)(204)
Accrued taxes(59)(63)
Other current liabilities(39)157 
Rate reparations, refunds and other litigation reserve adjustments(68)(144)
Other, net
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities1,084 1,873 
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Capital expenditures(407)(267)
Proceeds from sales of investments— 413 
Contributions to investments(11)(22)
Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings50 18 
Other, net(3)(12)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities(371)130 
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Issuances of debt 1,588 3,110 
Payments of debt (2,453)(4,268)
Debt issue costs(4)(10)
Dividends(616)(597)
Repurchases of shares(1)— 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests— 
Distributions to investment partner— (23)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(26)(2)
Other, net— (2)
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities(1,512)(1,789)
Net (decrease) increase in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Deposits(799)214 
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Deposits, beginning of period1,147 1,209 
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Deposits, end of period$348 $1,423 
7


KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Continued)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions, unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31,
20222021
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period$1,140 $1,184 
Restricted Deposits, beginning of period25 
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Deposits, beginning of period1,147 1,209 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period84 1,377 
Restricted Deposits, end of period264 46 
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Deposits, end of period348 1,423 
Net (decrease) increase in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Deposits$(799)$214 
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
ROU assets and operating lease obligations recognized$$
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest (net of capitalized interest)561 589 
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
8


KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In millions, unaudited)

Common stock
Issued sharesPar valueAdditional
paid-in
capital
Accumulated
deficit
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Stockholders’
equity
attributable
to KMI
Non-controlling
interests
Total
Balance at December 31, 20212,267 $23 $41,806 $(10,595)$(411)$30,823 $1,098 $31,921 
Impact of adoption of ASU 2020-06 (Note 4)
(11)(11)(11)
Balance at January 1, 20222,267 23 41,795 (10,595)(411)30,812 1,098 31,910 
Repurchases of shares(1)(1)(1)
EP Trust I Preferred security conversions
Restricted shares
18 18 18 
Net income667 667 17 684 
Distributions
— (26)(26)
Dividends
(616)(616)(616)
Other comprehensive loss(263)(263)(263)
Balance at March 31, 20222,267 $23 $41,813 $(10,544)$(674)$30,618 $1,089 $31,707 
Common stock
Issued sharesPar valueAdditional
paid-in
capital
Accumulated
deficit
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Stockholders’
equity
attributable
to KMI
Non-controlling
interests
Total
Balance at December 31, 20202,264$23 $41,756 $(9,936)$(407)$31,436 $402 $31,838 
Restricted shares
19 19 19 
Net income1,409 1,409 16 1,425 
Distributions
— (3)(3)
Contributions
— 
Dividends(597)(597)(597)
Other
— (1)(1)
Other comprehensive loss(80)(80)(80)
Balance at March 31, 20212,264$23 $41,775 $(9,124)$(487)$32,187 $416 $32,603 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

9



KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

1. General

Organization

We are one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. We own an interest in or operate approximately 83,000 miles of pipelines, 141 terminals, and 700 billion cubic feet of working natural gas storage capacity. Our pipelines transport natural gas, renewable fuels, refined petroleum products, crude oil, condensate, CO2 and other products, and our terminals store and handle various commodities including gasoline, diesel fuel, chemicals, biodiesel, renewable fuels, metals and petroleum coke.

Basis of Presentation

General

Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These rules and regulations conform to the accounting principles contained in the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), the single source of GAAP. In compliance with such rules and regulations, all significant intercompany items have been eliminated in consolidation.

In our opinion, all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, considered necessary for a fair statement of our financial position and operating results for the interim periods have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, and certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year; accordingly, you should read these consolidated financial statements in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our 2021 Form 10-K.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries over which we have control or are the primary beneficiary. We evaluate our financial interests in business enterprises to determine if they represent variable interest entities where we are the primary beneficiary.  If such criteria are met, we consolidate the financial statements of such businesses with those of our own.

Earnings per Share

We calculate earnings per share using the two-class method. Earnings were allocated to Class P common stock and participating securities based on the amount of dividends paid in the current period plus an allocation of the undistributed earnings or excess distributions over earnings to the extent that each security participates in earnings or excess distributions over earnings. Our unvested restricted stock awards, which may be restricted stock or restricted stock units issued to employees and non-employee directors and include dividend equivalent payments, do not participate in excess distributions over earnings.

The following table sets forth the allocation of net income available to shareholders of Class P common stock and participating securities:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Net Income Available to Stockholders$667 $1,409 
Participating securities:
   Less: Net Income Allocated to Restricted Stock Awards(a)(4)(7)
Net Income Allocated to Class P Stockholders$663 $1,402 
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding2,267 2,264 
Basic Earnings Per Share$0.29 $0.62 
(a)As of March 31, 2022, there were 13 million restricted stock awards outstanding.
10




The following maximum number of potential common stock equivalents are antidilutive and, accordingly, are excluded from the determination of diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions on a weighted average basis)
Unvested restricted stock awards13 13 
Convertible trust preferred securities

2. Investments

Investment in Ruby

During the first quarter of 2021, we recognized a pre-tax charge of $117 million related to a write-down of our subordinated note receivable from our equity investee, Ruby, which is included within “Earnings from equity investments” in our accompanying consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2021. The write-down was driven by the impairment recognized by Ruby of its assets.

Ruby Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing

The balance of Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C.'s 2022 unsecured notes matured on April 1, 2022 in the principal amount of $475 million. Although Ruby has sufficient liquidity to operate its business, it lacked sufficient liquidity to satisfy its obligations under the 2022 unsecured notes on the maturity date of April 1, 2022. Accordingly, on March 31, 2022, Ruby filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Ruby, as the debtor, will continue to operate in the ordinary course as a debtor in possession under the jurisdiction of the United States Bankruptcy Court. We fully impaired our equity investment in Ruby in the fourth quarter of 2019 and fully impaired our investment in Ruby’s subordinated notes in the first quarter of 2021. We had no amounts included in our “Investments” in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets associated with Ruby as of March 31, 2022 or December 31, 2021.

Sale of an Interest in NGPL Holdings

On March 8, 2021, we and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (Brookfield) completed the sale of a combined 25% interest in our joint venture, NGPL Holdings LLC (NGPL Holdings), to a fund controlled by ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC (ArcLight). We received net proceeds of $413 million for our proportionate share of the interests sold. We recognized a pre-tax gain of $206 million for our proportionate share, which is included within “Other, net” in our accompanying consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2021. We and Brookfield now each hold a 37.5% interest in NGPL Holdings.
11



3. Debt

The following table provides information on the principal amount of our outstanding debt balances:
March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(In millions, unless otherwise stated)
Current portion of debt
$3.5 billion credit facility due August 20, 2026
$— $— 
$500 million credit facility due November 16, 2023
— — 
Commercial paper notes(a)290 — 
Current portion of senior notes
8.625%, due January 2022(b)
— 260 
4.15%, due March 2022(b)
— 375 
1.50%, due March 2022(b)(c)
— 853 
3.95% due September 2022
1,000 1,000 
3.15% due January 2023
1,000 — 
Floating rate, due January 2023(d)250 — 
3.45% due February 2023
625 — 
Trust I preferred securities, 4.75%, due March 2028
111 111 
Current portion of other debt48 47 
Total current portion of debt3,324 2,646 
Long-term debt (excluding current portion)
Senior notes27,506 29,097 
EPC Building, LLC, promissory note, 3.967%, due 2021 through 2035
344 348 
Trust I preferred securities, 4.75%, due March 2028
109 110 
Other216 217 
Total long-term debt28,175 29,772 
Total debt(e)$31,499 $32,418 
(a)Weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding as of March 31, 2022 was 0.65%.
(b)We repaid the principal amount of these senior notes during the first quarter of 2022.
(c)Consists of senior notes denominated in Euros that have been converted to U.S. dollars. The December 31, 2021 balance is reported above at the exchange rate of 1.1370 U.S. dollars per Euro. As of December 31, 2021, the cumulative change in the exchange rate of U.S. dollars per Euro since issuance had resulted in an increase to our debt balance of $38 million related to these notes, which was offset by a corresponding change in the value of cross-currency swaps reflected in “Other current assets” and “Other current liabilities” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. At the time of issuance, we entered into foreign currency contracts associated with these senior notes, effectively converting these Euro-denominated senior notes to U.S. dollars (see Note 5 “Risk Management—Foreign Currency Risk Management”).
(d)These senior notes have an associated floating-to-fixed interest rate swap agreement which is designated as a cash flow hedge (see Note 5, “Risk Management—Interest Rate Risk Management”).
(e)Excludes our “Debt fair value adjustments” which, as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, increased our total debt balances by $584 million and $902 million, respectively.

We and substantially all of our wholly owned domestic subsidiaries are parties to a cross guarantee agreement whereby each party to the agreement unconditionally guarantees, jointly and severally, the payment of specified indebtedness of each other party to the agreement.

On February 23, 2022, EPNG issued in a private offering $300 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% senior notes due 2032 and received net proceeds of $298 million after discount and issuance costs. These notes are guaranteed through the cross guarantee agreement discussed above.

Credit Facilities and Restrictive Covenants

As of March 31, 2022, we had no borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities, $290 million in borrowings outstanding under our commercial paper program and $81 million in letters of credit. Our availability under our credit facilities as of March 31, 2022 was $3.6 billion. As of March 31, 2022, we were in compliance with all required covenants.

12



Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value and estimated fair value of our outstanding debt balances are disclosed below: 
March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Carrying
value
Estimated
fair value(a)
Carrying
value
Estimated
fair value(a)
(In millions)
Total debt$32,083 $33,895 $33,320 $37,775 
(a)Included in the estimated fair value are amounts for our Trust I Preferred Securities of $216 million and $218 million as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.

We used Level 2 input values to measure the estimated fair value of our outstanding debt balance as of both March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021.

4. Stockholders’ Equity

Class P Common Stock

On July 19, 2017, our board of directors approved a $2 billion share buy-back program that began in December 2017. During the three months ended March 31, 2022, we repurchased approximately 31,000 of our shares for less than $1 million at an average price of $16.97 per share. Since December 2017, in total, we have repurchased 33 million of our shares under the program at an average price of $17.71 per share for $576 million.

Dividends

The following table provides information about our per share dividends:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
Per share cash dividend declared for the period$0.2775 $0.27 
Per share cash dividend paid in the period0.27 0.2625 

On April 20, 2022, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.2775 per share for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2022, which is payable on May 16, 2022 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on May 2, 2022.

Adoption of Accounting Pronouncement

On January 1, 2022, we adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2020-06, “Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity.” This ASU (i) simplifies an issuer’s accounting for convertible instruments by eliminating two of the three models in ASC 470-20 that require separate accounting for embedded conversion features, (ii) amends diluted EPS calculations for convertible instruments by requiring the use of the if-converted method and (iii) simplifies the settlement assessment entities are required to perform on contracts that can potentially settle in an entity’s own equity by removing certain requirements. Using the modified retrospective method, the adoption of this ASU resulted in a pre-tax adjustment of $14 million to unwind the remaining unamortized debt discount within “Debt fair value adjustments” on our consolidated balance sheet and an adjustment of $11 million to unwind the balance of the conversion feature classified in “Additional paid in capital” on our consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2022.

13



Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Cumulative revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under GAAP are included within our comprehensive income but excluded from our earnings are reported as “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” within “Stockholders’ Equity” in our consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the components of our “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” not including non-controlling interests are summarized as follows:
Net unrealized
gains/(losses)
on cash flow
hedge derivatives
Pension and
other
postretirement
liability adjustments
Total
accumulated other
comprehensive loss
(In millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$(172)$(239)$(411)
Other comprehensive (loss) gain before reclassifications(411)13 (398)
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss135 — 135 
Net current-period change in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(276)13 (263)
Balance as of March 31, 2022$(448)$(226)$(674)
Net unrealized
gains/(losses)
on cash flow
hedge derivatives
Pension and
other
postretirement
liability adjustments
Total
accumulated other
comprehensive loss
(In millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2020$(13)$(394)$(407)
Other comprehensive (loss) gain before reclassifications(156)17 (139)
Loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss59 — 59 
Net current-period change in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income(97)17 (80)
Balance as of March 31, 2021$(110)$(377)$(487)

14



5.  Risk Management

Certain of our business activities expose us to risks associated with unfavorable changes in the market price of natural gas, NGL and crude oil. We also have exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk as a result of the issuance of our debt obligations. Pursuant to our management’s approved risk management policy, we use derivative contracts to hedge or reduce our exposure to some of these risks.

Energy Commodity Price Risk Management

As of March 31, 2022, we had the following outstanding commodity forward contracts to hedge our forecasted energy commodity purchases and sales:
Net open position long/(short)
Derivatives designated as hedging contracts
Crude oil fixed price(20.5)MMBbl
Crude oil basis(5.3)MMBbl
Natural gas fixed price(59.4)Bcf
Natural gas basis(28.5)Bcf
NGL fixed price(0.8)MMBbl
Derivatives not designated as hedging contracts
Crude oil fixed price(1.5)MMBbl
Crude oil basis(7.7)MMBbl
Natural gas fixed price(10.6)Bcf
Natural gas basis1.8 Bcf
Natural gas options(0.6)Bcf
NGL fixed price(1.6)MMBbl

As of March 31, 2022, the maximum length of time over which we have hedged, for accounting purposes, our exposure to the variability in future cash flows associated with energy commodity price risk is through December 2026.

Interest Rate Risk Management

We utilize interest rate derivatives to hedge our exposure to both changes in the fair value of our fixed rate debt instruments and variability in expected future cash flows attributable to variable interest rate payments. The following table summarizes our outstanding interest rate contracts as of March 31, 2022:
Notional amountAccounting treatmentMaximum term
(In millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Fixed-to-variable interest rate contracts(a)(b)$7,250 Fair value hedgeMarch 2035
Variable-to-fixed interest rate contracts250 Cash flow hedgeJanuary 2023
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Variable-to-fixed interest rate contracts5,100 Mark-to-MarketDecember 2022
(a)The principal amount of hedged senior notes consisted of $600 million included in “Current portion of debt” and $6,650 million included in “Long-term debt” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
(b)During the three months ended March 31, 2022, certain optional expedients as set forth in Topic 848 – Reference Rate Reform were elected on certain of these contracts to preserve fair value hedge accounting treatment. See Note 10 “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” for further information on Topic 848.

During the three months ended March 31, 2022, we entered into fixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreements with a combined notional principal amount of $400 million. These agreements were designated as accounting hedges and convert a portion of our fixed rate debt to variable rates through February 2032.

15



Foreign Currency Risk Management

We utilize foreign currency derivatives to hedge our exposure to variability in foreign exchange rates. The following table summarizes our outstanding foreign currency contracts as of March 31, 2022:
Notional amountAccounting treatmentMaximum term
(In millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
EUR-to-USD cross currency swap contracts(a)$543 Cash flow hedgeMarch 2027
(a)These swaps eliminate the foreign currency risk associated with our Euro-denominated debt.

16



The following table summarizes the fair values of our derivative contracts included in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets:
Fair Value of Derivative Contracts
Derivatives AssetDerivatives Liability
March 31,
2022
December 31,
2021
March 31,
2022
December 31,
2021
LocationFair valueFair value
(In millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Energy commodity derivative contracts
Fair value of derivative contracts/(Other current liabilities)
$34 $61 $(398)$(141)
Deferred charges and other assets/(Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits)
(220)(94)
Subtotal39 64 (618)(235)
Interest rate contracts
Fair value of derivative contracts/(Other current liabilities)
45 101 (4)(3)
Deferred charges and other assets/(Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits)
106 284 (94)(15)
Subtotal151 385 (98)(18)
Foreign currency contracts
Fair value of derivative contracts/(Other current liabilities)
— 35 (12)(3)
Deferred charges and other assets/(Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits)
11 — — 
Subtotal11 41 (12)(3)
Total201 490 (728)(256)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Energy commodity derivative contracts
Fair value of derivative contracts/(Other current liabilities)
20 11 (121)(31)
Deferred charges and other assets/(Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits)
16 (57)(6)
Subtotal36 12 (178)(37)
Interest rate contracts
Fair value of derivative contracts/(Other current liabilities)
48 12 — — 
Subtotal48 12 — — 
Total84 24 (178)(37)
Total derivatives$285 $514 $(906)$(293)

17



The following two tables summarize the fair value measurements of our derivative contracts based on the three levels established by the ASC. The tables also identify the impact of derivative contracts which we have elected to present on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis that are eligible for netting under master netting agreements.
Balance sheet asset fair value measurements by level

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3
Gross amountContracts available for nettingCash collateral held(b)Net amount
(In millions)
As of March 31, 2022
Energy commodity derivative contracts(a)$35 $40 $— $75 $(75)$— $— 
Interest rate contracts— 199 — 199 (25)— 174 
Foreign currency contracts— 11 — 11 (11)— — 
As of December 31, 2021
Energy commodity derivative contracts(a)$56 $20 $— $76 $(53)$(20)$
Interest rate contracts— 397 — 397 (9)— 388 
Foreign currency contracts— 41 — 41 (3)— 38 
Balance sheet liability
fair value measurements by level
Level 1Level 2Level 3Gross amountContracts available for nettingCash collateral posted(b)Net amount
(In millions)
As of March 31, 2022
Energy commodity derivative contracts(a)$(141)$(655)$— $(796)$75 $196 $(525)
Interest rate contracts— (98)— (98)25 — (73)
Foreign currency contracts— (12)— (12)11 — (1)
As of December 31, 2021
Energy commodity derivative contracts(a)$(15)$(257)$— $(272)$53 $— $(219)
Interest rate contracts— (18)— (18)— (9)
Foreign currency contracts— (3)— (3)— — 
(a)Level 1 consists primarily of NYMEX natural gas futures. Level 2 consists primarily of OTC WTI swaps, NGL swaps and crude oil basis swaps.
(b)Any cash collateral paid or received is reflected in this table, but only to the extent that it represents variation margins. Any amount associated with derivative prepayments or initial margins that are not influenced by the derivative asset or liability amounts or those that are determined solely on their volumetric notional amounts are excluded from this table.

18



The following tables summarize the pre-tax impact of our derivative contracts in our accompanying consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income:
Derivatives in fair value hedging relationshipsLocationGain/(loss) recognized in income
 on derivative and related hedged item
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions)
Interest rate contracts
Interest, net$(317)$(217)
Hedged fixed rate debt(a)
Interest, net$320 $219 
(a)As of March 31, 2022, the cumulative amount of fair value hedging adjustments to our hedged fixed rate debt was an increase of $56 million included in “Debt fair value adjustments” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationshipsGain/(loss)
recognized in OCI on derivative(a)
LocationGain/(loss) reclassified from Accumulated OCI
into income(b)
Three Months Ended
March 31,
Three Months Ended
March 31,
2022202120222021
(In millions)(In millions)
Energy commodity derivative contracts
$(499)$(158)
Revenues—Commodity sales
$(132)$(20)
Costs of sales
Interest rate contracts
Earnings from equity investments(c)— — 
Foreign currency contracts
(40)(46)
Other, net
(53)(61)
Total$(536)$(203)Total$(176)$(77)
(a)We expect to reclassify approximately $357 million of loss associated with cash flow hedge price risk management activities included in our accumulated other comprehensive loss balance as of March 31, 2022 into earnings during the next twelve months (when the associated forecasted transactions are also expected to impact earnings); however, actual amounts reclassified into earnings could vary materially as a result of changes in market prices.
(b)During the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, we recognized no gains and $6 million gains, respectively, associated with a write-down of hedged inventory. All other amounts reclassified were the result of the hedged forecasted transactions actually affecting earnings (i.e., when the forecasted sales and purchases actually occurred).
(c)Amounts represent our share of an equity investee’s accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
19




Derivatives not designated as accounting hedgesLocationGain/(loss) recognized in income on derivatives
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions)
Energy commodity derivative contracts
Revenues—Commodity sales
$(9)$(631)
Costs of sales
(91)163 
Earnings from equity investments(5)— 
Interest rate contractsInterest, net36 — 
Total(a)$(69)$(468)
(a)The three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 amounts include approximate gains of $18 million and losses of $488 million, respectively, associated with natural gas, crude and NGL derivative contract settlements.

Credit Risks

In conjunction with certain derivative contracts, we are required to provide collateral to our counterparties, which may include posting letters of credit or placing cash in margin accounts. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had no outstanding letters of credit supporting our commodity price risk management program. As of March 31, 2022, we had cash margins of $254 million posted by us with our counterparties as collateral and reported within “Restricted deposits” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2021, we had cash margins of $14 million posted by our counterparties with us as collateral and reported within “Other current liabilities” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The balance at March 31, 2022 represents our initial margin requirements of $58 million and variation margin requirements of $196 million posted by us with our counterparties. We also use industry standard commercial agreements that allow for the netting of exposures associated with transactions executed under a single commercial agreement. Additionally, we generally utilize master netting agreements to offset credit exposure across multiple commercial agreements with a single counterparty.

We also have agreements with certain counterparties to our derivative contracts that contain provisions requiring the posting of additional collateral upon a decrease in our credit rating. As of March 31, 2022, based on our current mark-to-market positions and posted collateral, we estimate that if our credit rating were downgraded one notch, we would not be required to post additional collateral. If we were downgraded two notches, we estimate that we would be required to post $377 million of additional collateral.

20



6. Revenue Recognition

Disaggregation of Revenues

The following tables present our revenues disaggregated by revenue source and type of revenue for each revenue source:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2022
Natural Gas PipelinesProducts PipelinesTerminals
CO2
Corporate and EliminationsTotal
(In millions)
Revenues from contracts with customers(a)
Services
Firm services(b)$939 $59 $188 $— $(1)$1,185 
Fee-based services213 234 98 13 — 558 
Total services1,152 293 286 13 (1)1,743 
Commodity sales
Natural gas sales1,226 — — 20 (4)1,242 
Product sales342 426 348 (16)1,104 
Total commodity sales1,568 426 368 (20)2,346 
Total revenues from contracts with customers2,720 719 290 381 (21)4,089 
Other revenues(c)
Leasing services(d)117 44 140 13 — 314 
Derivatives adjustments on commodity sales(39)(3)— (99)— (141)
Other15 — 10 — 31 
Total other revenues93 47 140 (76)— 204 
Total revenues$2,813 $766 $430 $305 $(21)$4,293 
21



Three Months Ended March 31, 2021
Natural Gas PipelinesProducts PipelinesTerminals
CO2
Corporate and EliminationsTotal
(In millions)
Revenues from contracts with customers(a)
Services
Firm services(b)$866 $59 $191 $— $— $1,116 
Fee-based services178 221 81 15 — 495 
Total services1,044 280 272 15 — 1,611 
Commodity sales
Natural gas sales3,319 — — (5)3,315 
Product sales220 125 229 (10)569 
Total commodity sales3,539 125 230 (15)3,884 
Total revenues from contracts with customers4,583 405 277 245 (15)5,495 
Other revenues(c)
Leasing services(d)119 43 143 12 (1)316 
Derivatives adjustments on commodity sales
(618)— — (33)— (651)
Other41 — — 51 
Total other revenues(458)48 143 (16)(1)(284)
Total revenues$4,125 $453 $420 $229 $(16)$5,211 
(a)Differences between the revenue classifications presented on the consolidated statements of income and the categories for the disaggregated revenues by type of revenue above are primarily attributable to revenues reflected in the “Other revenues” category above (see note (c)).
(b)Includes non-cancellable firm service customer contracts with take-or-pay or minimum volume commitment elements, including those contracts where both the price and quantity amount are fixed. Excludes service contracts with index-based pricing, which along with revenues from other customer service contracts are reported as Fee-based services.
(c)Amounts recognized as revenue under guidance prescribed in Topics of the ASC other than in Topic 606 were primarily from leases and derivative contracts. See Note 5 for additional information related to our derivative contracts.
(d)Our revenues from leasing services are predominantly comprised of specific assets that we lease to customers under operating leases where one customer obtains substantially all of the economic benefit from the asset and has the right to direct the use of that asset. These leases primarily consist of specific tanks, treating facilities, marine vessels and gas equipment and pipelines with separate control locations. We do not lease assets that qualify as sales-type or finance leases.

Contract Balances

As of both March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, our contract asset balances were $39 million. Of the contract asset balance at December 31, 2021, $16 million was transferred to accounts receivable during the three months ended March 31, 2022. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, our contract liability balances were $222 million and $212 million, respectively. Of the contract liability balance at December 31, 2021, $35 million was recognized as revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2022.

22



Revenue Allocated to Remaining Performance Obligations

The following table presents our estimated revenue allocated to remaining performance obligations for contracted revenue that has not yet been recognized, representing our “contractually committed” revenue as of March 31, 2022 that we will invoice or transfer from contract liabilities and recognize in future periods:
YearEstimated Revenue
(In millions)
Nine months ended December 31, 2022$3,244 
20233,595 
20242,987 
20252,453 
20262,158 
Thereafter12,760 
Total$27,197 

Our contractually committed revenue, for purposes of the tabular presentation above, is generally limited to service or commodity sale customer contracts which have fixed pricing and fixed volume terms and conditions, generally including contracts with take-or-pay or minimum volume commitment payment obligations. Our contractually committed revenue amounts generally exclude, based on the following practical expedient that we elected to apply, remaining performance obligations for contracts with index-based pricing or variable volume attributes in which such variable consideration is allocated entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation.

7.  Reportable Segments

Financial information by segment follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions)
Revenues
Natural Gas Pipelines
Revenues from external customers$2,793 $4,110 
Intersegment revenues20 15 
Products Pipelines766 453 
Terminals
Revenues from external customers429 419 
Intersegment revenues
CO2
305 229 
Corporate and intersegment eliminations(21)(16)
Total consolidated revenues$4,293 $5,211 
23



Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions)
Segment EBDA(a)
Natural Gas Pipelines$1,184 $2,103 
Products Pipelines299 248 
Terminals238 227 
CO2
192 286 
Total Segment EBDA1,913 2,864 
DD&A(538)(541)
Amortization of excess cost of equity investments(19)(22)
General and administrative and corporate charges(145)(148)
Interest, net (333)(377)
Income tax expense(194)(351)
Total consolidated net income$684 $1,425 
March 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(In millions)
Assets
Natural Gas Pipelines$47,580 $47,746 
Products Pipelines9,143 9,088 
Terminals8,465 8,513 
CO2
2,895 2,843 
Corporate assets(b)1,052 2,226 
Total consolidated assets$69,135 $70,416 
(a)Includes revenues, earnings from equity investments, operating expenses, gain on divestitures and impairments, net, other income, net, and other, net. Operating expenses include costs of sales, operations and maintenance expenses, and taxes, other than income taxes.
(b)Includes cash and cash equivalents, restricted deposits, certain prepaid assets and deferred charges, including income tax related assets, risk management assets related to derivative contracts, corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas and miscellaneous corporate assets (such as information technology, telecommunications equipment and legacy activity) not allocated to our reportable segments.

8.  Income Taxes

Income tax expense included in our accompanying consolidated statements of income is as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions, except percentages)
Income tax expense$194 $351 
Effective tax rate22.1 %19.8 %

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2022 is higher than the statutory federal rate of 21% primarily due to state income taxes, partially offset by dividend-received deductions from our investments in Florida Gas Pipeline (Citrus), NGPL Holdings, and Products (SE) Pipe Line Company (PPL).

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2021 is lower than the statutory federal rate of 21% primarily due to the release of the valuation allowance on our investment in NGPL Holdings upon the sale of a partial interest in NGPL Holdings, and dividend-received deductions from our investments in Citrus, NGPL Holdings and PPL, partially offset by state income taxes.
24


9.   Litigation and Environmental

We and our subsidiaries are parties to various legal, regulatory and other matters arising from the day-to-day operations of our businesses or certain predecessor operations that may result in claims against the Company. Although no assurance can be given, we believe, based on our experiences to date and taking into account established reserves and insurance, that the ultimate resolution of such items will not have a material adverse impact to our business. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the matters to which we are a party and intend to vigorously defend the Company. When we determine a loss is probable of occurring and is reasonably estimable, we accrue an undiscounted liability for such contingencies based on our best estimate using information available at that time. If the estimated loss is a range of potential outcomes and there is no better estimate within the range, we accrue the amount at the low end of the range. We disclose the following contingencies where an adverse outcome may be material or, in the judgment of management, we conclude the matter should otherwise be disclosed.

SFPP FERC Proceedings

The FERC approved the SFPP North, Oregon, and West Line Settlement in Docket No. IS22-100 (NOW Settlement) on January 14, 2022 and the settlement is final and effective. The amounts SFPP agreed to pay pursuant to the NOW Settlement were fully accrued on or before December 31, 2021. Together with the East Line Settlement (which the FERC approved previously on December 31, 2020 in Docket No. IS21-138), the NOW Settlement resolves all remaining disputes before the FERC relating to SFPP (including Docket Nos. OR11-13, OR11-16, OR11-18, OR14-35, OR14-36, OR19-21, OR19-33, and OR19-37) and establishes a moratorium with settling shippers that prohibits the filing of a protest or complaint against SFPP’s FERC rates until February 1, 2025.

EPNG FERC Proceeding

On April 21, 2022, EPNG was notified by the FERC of the commencement of a rate proceeding against it pursuant to section 5 of the Natural Gas Act. This proceeding sets the matter for hearing to determine whether EPNG’s current rates remain just and reasonable. A proceeding under section 5 of the Natural Gas Act is prospective in nature such that a change in rates charged to customers, if any, would likely only occur after the FERC has issued a final order. Unless a settlement is reached sooner, an initial Administrative Law Judge decision is anticipated in late May 2023, with a final FERC decision anticipated in late 2023. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of this proceeding will have a material adverse impact to our business.

Gulf LNG Facility Disputes

On March 1, 2016, Gulf LNG Energy, LLC and Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC (GLNG) received a Notice of Arbitration from Eni USA Gas Marketing LLC (Eni USA), one of two companies that entered into a terminal use agreement for capacity of the Gulf LNG Facility in Mississippi for an initial term that was not scheduled to expire until the year 2031. Eni USA is an indirect subsidiary of Eni S.p.A., a multi-national integrated energy company headquartered in Milan, Italy.  Pursuant to its Notice of Arbitration, Eni USA sought declaratory and monetary relief based upon its assertion that (i) the terminal use agreement should be terminated because changes in the U.S. natural gas market since the execution of the agreement in December 2007 “frustrated the essential purpose” of the agreement and (ii) activities allegedly undertaken by affiliates of Gulf LNG Holdings Group LLC “in connection with a plan to convert the LNG Facility into a liquefaction/export facility have given rise to a contractual right on the part of Eni USA to terminate” the agreement.  On June 29, 2018, the arbitration tribunal delivered an Award that called for the termination of the agreement and Eni USA’s payment of compensation to GLNG. On February 1, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a Final Order and Judgment confirming the Award, which was paid by Eni USA on February 20, 2019.

On September 28, 2018, GLNG filed a lawsuit against Eni S.p.A. in the Supreme Court of the State of New York in New York County to enforce a Guarantee Agreement entered into by Eni S.p.A. in connection with the terminal use agreement. In response to the foregoing lawsuit, Eni S.p.A. filed counterclaims under the terminal use agreement and claims under a parent direct agreement with Gulf LNG Energy (Port), LLC. The foregoing claims asserted by Eni S.p.A seek unspecified damages and involve the same allegations as the claims which were resolved conclusively in the arbitrations with Eni USA described above and with GLNG’s remaining customer as described below. On January 4, 2022, the trial court entered a decision granting Eni S.p.A’s motion for summary judgment on the claims asserted by GLNG to enforce the Guarantee Agreement. GLNG filed an interlocutory appeal of the decision. Pending resolution of GLNG’s appeal, the foregoing counterclaims and other claims asserted by Eni S.p.A under the terminal use agreement and parent direct agreement remain pending in the trial court.

25


On December 20, 2019, GLNG’s remaining customer, Angola LNG Supply Services LLC (ALSS), a consortium of international oil companies including Eni S.p.A., filed a Notice of Arbitration seeking a declaration that its terminal use agreement should be deemed terminated as of March 1, 2016 on substantially the same terms and conditions as set forth in the arbitration award pertaining to Eni USA. ALSS also sought a declaration on substantially the same allegations asserted previously by Eni USA in arbitration that activities allegedly undertaken by affiliates of Gulf LNG Holdings Group LLC in connection with the pursuit of an LNG liquefaction export project gave rise to a contractual right on the part of ALSS to terminate the agreement. On July 15, 2021, the arbitration tribunal delivered an Award on the merits of all claims submitted to the tribunal and denied all of ALSS’s claims with prejudice. On November 23, 2021, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a Final Order and Judgment confirming the Award.

Continental Resources, Inc. v. Hiland Partners Holdings, LLC

On December 8, 2017, Continental Resources, Inc. (CLR) filed an action in Garfield County, Oklahoma state court alleging that Hiland Partners Holdings, LLC (Hiland Partners) breached a Gas Purchase Agreement, dated November 12, 2010, as amended (GPA), by failing to receive and purchase all of CLR’s dedicated gas under the GPA (produced in three North Dakota counties).  CLR also alleged fraud, maintaining that Hiland Partners promised the construction of several additional facilities to process the gas without an intention to build the facilities. Hiland Partners denied these allegations, but the parties entered into a settlement agreement in June 2018, under which CLR agreed to release all of its claims in exchange for Hiland Partners’ construction of 10 infrastructure projects by November 1, 2020. CLR has filed an amended petition in which it asserts that Hiland Partners’ failure to construct certain facilities by specific dates nullifies the release contained in the settlement agreement. CLR’s amended petition makes additional claims under both the GPA and a May 8, 2008 gas purchase contract covering additional North Dakota counties, including CLR’s contention that Hiland Partners is not allowed to deduct third-party processing fees from the gas purchase price. CLR seeks damages in excess of $276 million. We deny and are vigorously defending against these claims.

Freeport LNG Winter Storm Litigation

On September 13, 2021, Freeport LNG Marketing, LLC (Freeport) filed suit against Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC and Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline LLC in the 133rd District Court of Harris County, Texas (Case No. 2021-58787) alleging that defendants breached the parties’ base contract for sale and purchase of natural gas by failing to repurchase natural gas nominated by Freeport between February 10-22, 2021 during Winter Storm Uri. We deny that we were obligated to repurchase natural gas from Freeport given our declaration of force majeure during the storm and our compliance with emergency orders issued by the Railroad Commission of Texas providing heightened priority for the delivery of gas to human needs customers. Freeport alleges that it is owed approximately $104 million, plus attorney fees and interest. We believe that our declaration of force majeure is valid and appropriate and are vigorously defending against these claims.

Pipeline Integrity and Releases

From time to time, despite our best efforts, our pipelines experience leaks and ruptures. These leaks and ruptures may cause explosions, fire, and damage to the environment, damage to property and/or personal injury or death. In connection with these incidents, we may be sued for damages caused by an alleged failure to properly mark the locations of our pipelines and/or to properly maintain our pipelines. Depending upon the facts and circumstances of a particular incident, state and federal regulatory authorities may seek civil and/or criminal fines and penalties.

General

As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, our total reserve for legal matters was $164 million and $231 million, respectively.

Environmental Matters

We and our subsidiaries are subject to environmental cleanup and enforcement actions from time to time. In particular, CERCLA generally imposes joint and several liability for cleanup and enforcement costs on current and predecessor owners and operators of a site, among others, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, subject to the right of a liable party to establish a “reasonable basis” for apportionment of costs. Our operations are also subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment. Although we believe our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, risks of additional costs and liabilities are inherent in pipeline, terminal and CO2 field and oil field operations, and there can be no assurance that we will not incur significant costs and liabilities. Moreover, it is possible that other developments could result in substantial costs and liabilities to us, such as
26


increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies under the terms of authority of those laws, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from our operations.

We are currently involved in several governmental proceedings involving alleged violations of local, state and federal environmental and safety regulations. As we receive notices of non-compliance, we attempt to negotiate and settle such matters where appropriate. These alleged violations may result in fines and penalties, but we do not believe any such fines and penalties will be material to our business, individually or in the aggregate. We are also currently involved in several governmental proceedings involving groundwater and soil remediation efforts under state or federal administrative orders or related remediation programs. We have established a reserve to address the costs associated with the remediation efforts.

In addition, we are involved with and have been identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) in several federal and state Superfund sites. Environmental reserves have been established for those sites where our contribution is probable and reasonably estimable. In addition, we are from time to time involved in civil proceedings relating to damages alleged to have occurred as a result of accidental leaks or spills of refined petroleum products, crude oil, NGL, natural gas or CO2.

Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Willamette River, Portland, Oregon

On January 6, 2017, the EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) that established a final remedy and cleanup plan for an industrialized area on the lower reach of the Willamette River commonly referred to as the Portland Harbor Superfund Site (PHSS). The cost for the final remedy is estimated to be more than $2.8 billion and active cleanup is expected to take more than 10 years to complete. KMLT, KMBT, and some 90 other PRPs identified by the EPA are involved in a non-judicial allocation process to determine each party’s respective share of the cleanup costs related to the final remedy set forth by the ROD. We are participating in the allocation process on behalf of KMLT (in connection with its ownership or operation of two facilities) and KMBT (in connection with its ownership or operation of two facilities). Effective January 31, 2020, KMLT entered into separate Administrative Settlement Agreements and Orders on Consent (ASAOC) to complete remedial design for two distinct areas within the PHSS associated with KMLT’s facilities. The ASAOC obligates KMLT to pay a share of the remedial design costs for cleanup activities related to these two areas as required by the ROD. Our share of responsibility for the PHSS costs will not be determined until the ongoing non-judicial allocation process is concluded or a lawsuit is filed that results in a judicial decision allocating responsibility. At this time we anticipate the non-judicial allocation process will be complete in or around October 2023. Until the allocation process is completed, we are unable to reasonably estimate the extent of our liability for the costs related to the design of the proposed remedy and cleanup of the PHSS. Because costs associated with any remedial plan are expected to be spread over at least several years, we do not anticipate that our share of the costs of the remediation will have a material adverse impact to our business.

In addition to CERCLA cleanup costs, we are reviewing and will attempt to settle, if possible, natural resource damage (NRD) claims in the amount of approximately $5 million asserted by state and federal trustees following their natural resource assessment of the PHSS.

Uranium Mines in Vicinity of Cameron, Arizona

In the 1950s and 1960s, Rare Metals Inc., a historical subsidiary of EPNG, mined approximately 20 uranium mines in the vicinity of Cameron, Arizona, many of which are located on the Navajo Indian Reservation. The mining activities were in response to numerous incentives provided to industry by the U.S. to locate and produce domestic sources of uranium to support the Cold War-era nuclear weapons program. In May 2012, EPNG received a general notice letter from the EPA notifying EPNG of the EPA’s investigation of certain sites and its determination that the EPA considers EPNG to be a PRP within the meaning of CERCLA. In August 2013, EPNG and the EPA entered into an Administrative Order on Consent and Scope of Work pursuant to which EPNG is conducting environmental assessments of the mines and the immediate vicinity. On September 3, 2014, EPNG filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona seeking cost recovery and contribution from the applicable federal government agencies toward the cost of environmental activities associated with the mines. The U.S. District Court issued an order on April 16, 2019 that allocated 35% of past and future response costs to the U.S. The decision does not provide or establish the scope of a remedial plan with respect to the sites, nor does it establish the total cost for addressing the sites, all of which remain to be determined in subsequent proceedings and adversarial actions, if necessary, with the EPA. Until such issues are determined, we are unable to reasonably estimate the extent of our potential liability. Because costs associated with any remedial plan approved by the EPA are expected to be spread over at least several years, we do not anticipate that our share of the costs of the remediation will have a material adverse impact to our business.

27


Lower Passaic River Study Area of the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site, New Jersey

EPEC Polymers, Inc. and EPEC Oil Company Liquidating Trust (collectively EPEC) are identified as PRPs in an administrative action under CERCLA known as the Lower Passaic River Study Area (Site) concerning the lower 17-mile stretch of the Passaic River in New Jersey. EPEC entered into two Administrative Orders on Consent (AOCs) with the EPA which obligates EPEC to investigate and characterize contamination at the Site. EPEC is part of a joint defense group of approximately 44 cooperating parties which is directing and funding the AOC work required by the EPA. We have established a reserve for the anticipated cost of compliance with these two AOCs. On March 4, 2016, the EPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the lower eight miles of the Site. At that time the cleanup plan in the ROD was estimated to cost $1.7 billion. The cleanup is expected to take at least six years to complete once it begins. In addition, the EPA and numerous PRPs, including EPEC, engaged in an allocation process for the implementation of the remedy for the lower eight miles of the Site. That process was completed December 28, 2020 and certain PRPs, including EPEC, are engaged in discussions with the EPA as a result thereof. There remains significant uncertainty as to the implementation and associated costs of the remedy set forth in the lower eight mile ROD. On October 4, 2021, the EPA issued a ROD for the upper nine miles of the Site. The cleanup plan in the ROD is estimated to cost $440 million. No timeline for the cleanup has been established. Certain PRPs, including EPEC, are engaged in discussions with the EPA concerning the upper nine miles. There remains significant uncertainty as to the implementation and associated costs of the remedy set forth in the upper nine mile ROD. Until the ongoing discussions with the EPA conclude, we are unable to reasonably estimate the extent of our potential liability. We do not anticipate that our share of the costs to resolve this matter, including the costs of any remediation of the Site, will have a material adverse impact to our business.

Louisiana Governmental Coastal Zone Erosion Litigation

Beginning in 2013, several parishes in Louisiana and the City of New Orleans filed separate lawsuits in state district courts in Louisiana against a number of oil and gas companies, including TGP and SNG. In these cases, the parishes and New Orleans, as Plaintiffs, allege that certain of the defendants’ oil and gas exploration, production and transportation operations were conducted in violation of the State and Local Coastal Resources Management Act of 1978, as amended (SLCRMA) and that those operations caused substantial damage to the coastal waters of Louisiana and nearby lands. The Plaintiffs seek, among other relief, unspecified money damages, attorneys’ fees, interest, and payment of costs necessary to restore the affected areas. There are more than 40 of these cases pending in Louisiana against oil and gas companies, one of which is against TGP and one of which is against SNG, both described further below.

On November 8, 2013, the Parish of Plaquemines, Louisiana filed a petition for damages in the state district court for Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana against TGP and 17 other energy companies, alleging that the defendants’ operations in Plaquemines Parish violated SLCRMA and Louisiana law, and caused substantial damage to the coastal waters and nearby lands. Plaquemines Parish seeks, among other relief, unspecified money damages, attorney fees, interest, and payment of costs necessary to restore the allegedly affected areas. In December 2013, the case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. In April 2015, the U.S. District Court ordered the case to be remanded to the state district court for Plaquemines Parish. In May 2018, the case was removed for a second time to the U.S. District Court. In May 2019, the U.S. District Court ordered the case to be remanded to the state district court. The case is effectively stayed pending the resolution of jurisdictional issues in separate, consolidated cases to which TGP is not a party; The Parish of Plaquemines, et al. vs. Chevron USA, Inc. et al. consolidated with The Parish of Cameron, et al. v. BP America Production Company, et al. Those cases were removed to federal court and ordered to be remanded to the state district courts for Plaquemines and Cameron Parishes, respectively. The defendants to those consolidated cases are pursuing an appeal of the remand decisions to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to determine whether there is federal officer jurisdiction. The case remains effectively stayed pending a ruling by the Fifth Circuit in the consolidated case. Until these and other issues are determined, we are not able to reasonably estimate the extent of our potential liability, if any. We will continue to vigorously defend this case.

On March 29, 2019, the City of New Orleans and Orleans Parish (collectively, Orleans) filed a petition for damages in the state district court for Orleans Parish, Louisiana against SNG and 10 other energy companies alleging that the defendants’ operations in Orleans Parish violated the SLCRMA and Louisiana law, and caused substantial damage to the coastal waters and nearby lands. Orleans seeks, among other relief, unspecified money damages, attorney fees, interest, and payment of costs necessary to restore the allegedly affected areas. In April 2019, the case was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. In May 2019, Orleans moved to remand the case to the state district court. In January 2020, the U.S. District Court ordered the case to be stayed and administratively closed pending the resolution of issues in a separate case to which SNG is not a party; Parish of Cameron vs. Auster Oil & Gas, Inc., pending in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; after which either party may move to re-open the case. Until these and other issues are determined, we are not able to reasonably estimate the extent of our potential liability, if any. We will continue to vigorously defend this case.

28


Louisiana Landowner Coastal Erosion Litigation

Beginning in January 2015, several private landowners in Louisiana, as Plaintiffs, filed several separate lawsuits in state district courts in Louisiana against a number of oil and gas pipeline companies, including TGP and SNG. In these cases, the Plaintiffs allege that the defendants failed to properly maintain pipeline canals and canal banks on their property, which caused the canals to erode and widen and resulted in substantial land loss, including significant damage to the ecology and hydrology of the affected property, and damage to timber and wildlife. The Plaintiffs seek, among other relief, unspecified money damages, attorney fees, interest, and payment of costs necessary to return the canals and canal banks to their as-built conditions and restore and remediate the affected property. The Plaintiffs also seek a declaration that the defendants are obligated to take steps to maintain canals and canal banks going forward. We have resolved two of these cases and we will continue to vigorously defend the remaining cases. While it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes, we believe the resolution of these cases will not have a material adverse impact to our business.

Products Pipeline Incident, Walnut Creek, California

On November 20, 2020, SFPP identified an issue on its Line Section 16 (LS-16) which transports petroleum products in California from Concord to San Jose. We shut down the pipeline and notified the appropriate regulatory agencies of a “threatened release” of gasoline. We investigated the issue over the next several days and on November 24, 2020, identified a crack in the pipeline and notified the regulatory agencies of a “confirmed release.” The damaged section of the pipeline was removed and replaced, and the pipeline resumed operations on November 26, 2020. We reported the estimated volume of gasoline released to be 8.1 Bbl. On December 2, 2020, complaints of gasoline odors were reported along the LS-16 pipeline corridor in Walnut Creek. A unified response was implemented by us along with the U.S. EPA, the California Office of Spill Prevention and Response, the California Fire Marshall, and the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board. On December 8, 2020, we reported an updated estimated spill volume of up to 1,000 Bbl.

On October 28, 2021, we were informed by the California Attorney General it was contemplating criminal charges against us asserting the November 2020 discharge of gasoline affected waters of the State of California, and there was a failure to make timely notices of this discharge to appropriate state agencies. On December 16, 2021, we entered into a plea agreement with the State of California to resolve misdemeanor charges of the unintentional, non-negligent discharge of gasoline resulting from the release and the claimed failure to provide timely notices of the discharge to appropriate state agencies. Under the plea agreement, SFPP plead no-contest to two misdemeanors and paid approximately $2.5 million in fines, penalties, restitution, environmental improvement project funding, and for enforcement training in the State of California, and was placed on informal, unsupervised probation for a term of 18 months.

Since the November 2020 release, we have cooperated fully with federal and state agencies and have worked diligently to remediate the affected areas. We anticipate civil enforcement actions by federal and state agencies arising from the November 2020 release as well as ongoing monitoring and, where necessary, remediation under the oversight of the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board until site conditions demonstrate no further actions are required. We do not anticipate the costs to resolve those enforcement matters, including the costs to monitor and further remediate the site, will have a material adverse impact to our business.

General

Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes, we believe that the resolution of the environmental matters set forth in this note, and other matters to which we and our subsidiaries are a party, will not have a material adverse effect on our business. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we have accrued a total reserve for environmental liabilities in the amount of $240 million and $243 million, respectively. In addition, as of both March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, we had a receivable of $12 million recorded for expected cost recoveries that have been deemed probable.

10. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Updates

Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848)

On March 12, 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform - Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” This ASU provides temporary optional expedients and exceptions to GAAP guidance on contract modifications and hedge accounting to ease the financial reporting burdens of the expected market transition from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
29


Entities can elect not to apply certain modification accounting requirements to contracts affected by reference rate reform, if certain criteria are met. An entity that makes this election would not have to remeasure the contracts at the modification date or reassess a previous accounting determination. Entities can also elect various optional expedients that would allow them to continue applying hedge accounting for hedging relationships affected by reference rate reform, if certain criteria are met.

On January 7, 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope.” This ASU clarifies that all derivative instruments affected by changes to the interest rates used for discounting, margining or contract price alignment (the “Discounting Transition”) are in the scope of ASC 848 and therefore qualify for the available temporary optional expedients and exceptions. As such, entities that employ derivatives that are the designated hedged item in a hedge relationship where perfect effectiveness is assumed can continue to apply hedge accounting without de-designating the hedging relationship to the extent such derivatives are impacted by the Discounting Transition.

The guidance was effective upon issuance and generally can be applied through December 31, 2022.

During the first quarter of 2022 we amended certain of our existing fixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreements, which were designated as fair value hedges, to transition the variable leg of such agreements from LIBOR to SOFR. These agreements contain a combined notional principal amount of $625 million and convert a portion of our fixed rate debt to variable rates through March 2035. Concurrent with these amendments, we elected certain of the optional expedients provided in Topic 848 which allow us to maintain our prior designation of fair value hedge accounting to these agreements. As we continue to amend our interest rate swap agreements to transition from LIBOR to SOFR, we will assess whether such amendments qualify for any of the optional expedients in Topic 848 and, should they qualify, whether we wish to elect any such optional expedients. See Note 5 “Risk Management—Interest Rate Risk Management” for more information on our interest rate risk management activities.
30


Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

General and Basis of Presentation

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our accompanying interim consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report, and in conjunction with (i) our consolidated financial statements and related notes in our 2021 Form 10-K; (ii) our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our 2021 Form 10-K; (iii) “Information Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this report and in our 2021 Form 10-K; and (iv) “Risk Factors” in our 2021 Form 10-K.

2022 Dividends and Discretionary Capital

We expect to declare dividends of $1.11 per share for 2022, a 3% increase from the 2021 declared dividends of $1.08 per share. We now expect to invest $1.5 billion in expansion projects and contributions to joint ventures or discretionary capital expenditures during 2022.

The expectations for 2022 discussed above involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and are not guarantees of performance.  Many of the factors that will determine these expectations are beyond our ability to control or predict, and because of these uncertainties, it is advisable not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.

Results of Operations

Overview

As described in further detail below, our management evaluates our performance primarily using the GAAP financial measures of Segment EBDA (as presented in Note 7, “Reportable Segments”) and Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc., along with the non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted Earnings and DCF, both in the aggregate and per share for each, Adjusted Segment EBDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Net Debt.

GAAP Financial Measures

The Consolidated Earnings Results for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021 present Segment EBDA and Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. which are prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. Segment EBDA is a useful measure of our operating performance because it measures the operating results of our segments before DD&A and certain expenses that are generally not controllable by our business segment operating managers, such as general and administrative expenses and corporate charges, interest expense, net, and income taxes. Our general and administrative expenses and corporate charges include such items as unallocated employee benefits, insurance, rentals, unallocated litigation and environmental expenses, and shared corporate services including accounting, information technology, human resources and legal services.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Our non-GAAP financial measures described below should not be considered alternatives to GAAP Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. or other GAAP measures and have important limitations as analytical tools. Our computations of these non-GAAP financial measures may differ from similarly titled measures used by others. You should not consider these non-GAAP financial measures in isolation or as substitutes for an analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Management compensates for the limitations of these non-GAAP financial measures by reviewing our comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences between the measures and taking this information into account in its analysis and its decision making processes.

Certain Items

Certain Items, as adjustments used to calculate our non-GAAP financial measures, are items that are required by GAAP to be reflected in Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc., but typically either (i) do not have a cash impact (for example, unsettled commodity hedges and asset impairments), or (ii) by their nature are separately identifiable from our normal business operations and in our view are likely to occur only sporadically (for example, certain legal settlements, enactment of new tax legislation and casualty losses). We also include adjustments related to joint ventures (see “Amounts from Joint Ventures” below and the tables included in “—Consolidated Earnings Results (GAAP)—Certain Items Affecting Consolidated Earnings Results,” “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP) to
31


Adjusted EBITDA” and “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Supplemental Information” below). In addition, Certain Items are described in more detail in the footnotes to tables included in “—Segment Earnings Results” and “—DD&A, General and Administrative and Corporate Charges, Interest, net, and Noncontrolling Interests” below.

Adjusted Earnings

Adjusted Earnings is calculated by adjusting Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. for Certain Items. Adjusted Earnings is used by us and certain external users of our financial statements to assess the earnings of our business excluding Certain Items as another reflection of our ability to generate earnings. We believe the GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted Earnings is Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. Adjusted Earnings per share uses Adjusted Earnings and applies the same two-class method used in arriving at basic earnings per share. See “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP) to Adjusted Earnings to DCF” below.

DCF

DCF is calculated by adjusting Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. for Certain Items (Adjusted Earnings), and further by DD&A and amortization of excess cost of equity investments, income tax expense, cash taxes, sustaining capital expenditures and other items. We also include amounts from joint ventures for income taxes, DD&A and sustaining capital expenditures (see “Amounts from Joint Ventures” below). DCF is a significant performance measure useful to management and external users of our financial statements in evaluating our performance and in measuring and estimating the ability of our assets to generate cash earnings after servicing our debt, paying cash taxes and expending sustaining capital, that could be used for discretionary purposes such as dividends, stock repurchases, retirement of debt, or expansion capital expenditures. DCF should not be used as an alternative to net cash provided by operating activities computed under GAAP. We believe the GAAP measure most directly comparable to DCF is Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. DCF per share is DCF divided by average outstanding shares, including restricted stock awards that participate in dividends. See “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP) to Adjusted Earnings to DCF” and “—Adjusted Segment EBDA to Adjusted EBITDA to DCF” below.

Adjusted Segment EBDA

Adjusted Segment EBDA is calculated by adjusting Segment EBDA for Certain Items attributable to the segment. Adjusted Segment EBDA is used by management in its analysis of segment performance and management of our business. We believe Adjusted Segment EBDA is a useful performance metric because it provides management and external users of our financial statements additional insight into the ability of our segments to generate cash earnings on an ongoing basis. We believe it is useful to investors because it is a measure that management uses to allocate resources to our segments and assess each segment’s performance. We believe the GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted Segment EBDA is Segment EBDA. See “—Consolidated Earnings Results (GAAP)—Certain Items Affecting Consolidated Earnings Results” for a reconciliation of Segment EBDA to Adjusted Segment EBDA by business segment.

Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA is calculated by adjusting EBITDA for Certain Items. We also include amounts from joint ventures for income taxes and DD&A (see “Amounts from Joint Ventures” below). Adjusted EBITDA is used by management and external users, in conjunction with our Net Debt (as described further below), to evaluate certain leverage metrics. Therefore, we believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors. We believe the GAAP measure most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA is Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. See “—Adjusted Segment EBDA to Adjusted EBITDA to DCF” and “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP) to Adjusted EBITDA” below.

Amounts from Joint Ventures

Certain Items, DCF and Adjusted EBITDA reflect amounts from unconsolidated joint ventures and consolidated joint ventures utilizing the same recognition and measurement methods used to record “Earnings from equity investments” and “Noncontrolling interests,” respectively. The calculations of DCF and Adjusted EBITDA related to our unconsolidated and consolidated joint ventures include the same items (DD&A and income tax expense, and for DCF only, also cash taxes and sustaining capital expenditures) with respect to the joint ventures as those included in the calculations of DCF and Adjusted EBITDA for our wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries. (See “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Supplemental Information” below.) Although these amounts related to our unconsolidated joint ventures are included in the calculations of
32


DCF and Adjusted EBITDA, such inclusion should not be understood to imply that we have control over the operations and resulting revenues, expenses or cash flows of such unconsolidated joint ventures.

Net Debt

Net Debt is calculated, based on amounts as of March 31, 2022, by subtracting the following amounts from our debt balance of $32,083 million: (i) cash and cash equivalents of $84 million; (ii) debt fair value adjustments of $584 million; and (iii) the foreign exchange impact on Euro-denominated bonds of $10 million for which we have entered into currency swaps to convert that debt to U.S. dollars. Net Debt is a non-GAAP financial measure that management believes is useful to investors and other users of our financial information in evaluating our leverage. We believe the most comparable measure to Net Debt is debt net of cash and cash equivalents.

Consolidated Earnings Results (GAAP)

The following tables summarize the key components of our consolidated earnings results.
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021Earnings
increase/(decrease)
(In millions, except percentages)
Segment EBDA(a)
Natural Gas Pipelines$1,184 $2,103 $(919)(44)%
Products Pipelines299 248 51 21 %
Terminals238 227 11 %
CO2
192 286 (94)(33)%
Total Segment EBDA1,913 2,864 (951)(33)%
DD&A(538)(541)%
Amortization of excess cost of equity investments(19)(22)14 %
General and administrative and corporate charges(145)(148)%
Interest, net(333)(377)44 12 %
Income before income taxes878 1,776 (898)(51)%
Income tax expense(194)(351)157 45 %
Net income684 1,425 (741)(52)%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(17)(16)(1)(6)%
Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc.$667 $1,409 $(742)(53)%
(a)Includes revenues, earnings from equity investments, operating expenses, gain on divestitures and impairments, net, other income, net, and other, net. Operating expenses include costs of sales, operations and maintenance expenses, and taxes, other than income taxes.

Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. decreased $742 million in 2022 compared to 2021. The decrease primarily resulted from the benefit in the 2021 period of $1,077 million for largely nonrecurring earnings related to the February 2021 winter storm, mostly impacting the earnings from our Natural Gas Pipelines and CO2 business segments partially offset by lower income tax expense and higher earnings from our Products Pipelines business segment.

33


Certain Items Affecting Consolidated Earnings Results


Three Months Ended March 31,
20222021
GAAPCertain ItemsAdjustedGAAPCertain ItemsAdjustedAdjusted amounts increase/(decrease) to earnings
(In millions)
Segment EBDA
Natural Gas Pipelines$1,184 $113 $1,297 $2,103 $(9)$2,094 $(797)
Products Pipelines299 — 299 248 15 263 36 
Terminals238 — 238 227 — 227 11 
CO2
192 16 208 286 291 (83)
Total Segment EBDA(a)1,913 129 2,042 2,864 11 2,875 (833)
DD&A and amortization of excess cost of equity investments(557)— (557)(563)— (563)
General and administrative and corporate charges(a)(145)— (145)(148)— (148)
Interest, net(a)(333)(44)(377)(377)(6)(383)
Income before income taxes878 85 963 1,776 1,781 (818)
Income tax expense(b)(194)(20)(214)(351)(40)(391)177 
Net income684 65 749 1,425 (35)1,390 (641)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(a)(17)— (17)(16)— (16)(1)
Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc.$667 $65 $732 $1,409 $(35)$1,374 $(642)
(a)For a more detailed discussion of Certain Items, see the footnotes to the tables within “—Segment Earnings Results” and “—DD&A, General and Administrative and Corporate Charges, Interest, net and Noncontrolling Interests” below.
(b)The combined net effect of the income tax Certain Items represents the income tax provision on Certain Items plus discrete income tax items.

Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. adjusted for Certain Items (Adjusted Earnings) decreased by $642 million from the prior year resulting from earnings decreases of $834 million from our Natural Gas Pipelines business segment’s Midstream region and $93 million from our CO2 business segment’s oil and gas producing activities (both primarily related to the February 2021 winter storm, and therefore largely nonrecurring) partially offset by lower income tax expense and higher earnings from our Products Pipelines business segment.

34


Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP) to Adjusted Earnings to DCF
Three Months Ended March 31,
20222021
(In millions)
Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP)$667 $1,409 
Total Certain Items65 (35)
Adjusted Earnings(a)732 1,374 
DD&A and amortization of excess cost of equity investments for DCF(b)623 638 
Income tax expense for DCF(a)(b)235 419 
Cash taxes(b)(1)
Sustaining capital expenditures(b)(125)(107)
Other items(c)(9)
DCF$1,455 $2,329 

Adjusted Segment EBDA to Adjusted EBITDA to DCF
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions, except per share amounts)
Natural Gas Pipelines$1,297 $2,094 
Products Pipelines299 263 
Terminals238 227 
CO2
208 291 
Adjusted Segment EBDA(a)2,042 2,875 
General and administrative and corporate charges(a)(145)(148)
Joint venture DD&A and income tax expense(a)(b)87 103 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(a)(17)(16)
Adjusted EBITDA1,967 2,814 
Interest, net(a)(377)(383)
Cash taxes(b)(1)
Sustaining capital expenditures(b)(125)(107)
Other items(c)(9)
DCF$1,455 $2,329 
Adjusted Earnings per share$0.32 $0.60 
Weighted average shares outstanding for dividends(d)2,280 2,277 
DCF per share$0.64 $1.02 
Declared dividends per share$0.2775 $0.27 
(a)Amounts are adjusted for Certain Items. See tables included in “—Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP) to Adjusted EBITDA” and “—Supplemental Information” below.
(b)Includes or represents DD&A, income tax expense, cash taxes and/or sustaining capital expenditures (as applicable for each item) from joint ventures. See tables included in “—Supplemental Information” below.
(c)Includes pension contributions, non-cash pension expense and non-cash compensation associated with our restricted stock program.
(d)Includes restricted stock awards that participate in dividends.
35


Reconciliation of Net Income Attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP) to Adjusted EBITDA
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions)
Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (GAAP)$667 $1,409 
Certain Items:
Fair value amortization(4)(4)
Legal, environmental and taxes other than income tax reserves— 84 
Change in fair value of derivative contracts(a)82 14 
Gain on divestitures, impairments and other write-downs, net(b)— (89)
Income tax Certain Items(20)(40)
Other— 
Total Certain Items(c)65 (35)
DD&A and amortization of excess cost of equity investments557 563 
Income tax expense(d)214 391 
Joint venture DD&A and income tax expense(d)(e)87 103 
Interest, net(d)377 383 
Adjusted EBITDA$1,967 $2,814 
(a)Gains or losses are reflected in our DCF when realized.
(b)2021 amount includes a pre-tax gain of $206 million associated with the sale of a partial interest in our equity investment in NGPL Holdings LLC, offset partially by a write-down of $117 million on a long-term subordinated note receivable from an equity investee, Ruby, reported within “Other, net” and “Earnings from equity investments,” respectively, on the accompanying consolidated statement of income.
(c)2022 and 2021 amounts include $5 million and $117 million, respectively, reported within “Earnings from equity investments” on our consolidated statements of income.
(d)Amounts are adjusted for Certain Items. See tables included in “—Supplemental Information” and “—DD&A, General and Administrative and Corporate Charges, Interest, net, and Noncontrolling Interests” below.
(e)Represents joint venture DD&A and income tax expense. See tables included in “—Supplemental Information” below.

36


Supplemental Information
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions)
DD&A (GAAP)$538 $541 
Amortization of excess cost of equity investments (GAAP)19 22 
DD&A and amortization of excess cost of equity investments557 563 
Joint venture DD&A66 75 
DD&A and amortization of excess cost of equity investments for DCF$623 $638 
Income tax expense (GAAP)$194 $351 
Certain Items20 40 
Income tax expense(a)214 391 
Unconsolidated joint venture income tax expense(a)(b)21 28 
Income tax expense for DCF(a)$235 $419 
Additional joint venture information
Unconsolidated joint venture DD&A$77 $86 
Less: Consolidated joint venture partners’ DD&A11 11 
Joint venture DD&A66 75 
Unconsolidated joint venture income tax expense(a)(b)21 28 
Joint venture DD&A and income tax expense(a)$87 $103 
Unconsolidated joint venture cash taxes(b)$— $— 
Unconsolidated joint venture sustaining capital expenditures$(12)$(20)
Less: Consolidated joint venture partners’ sustaining capital expenditures(2)(1)
Joint venture sustaining capital expenditures$(10)$(19)
(a)Amounts are adjusted for Certain Items.
(b)Amounts are associated with our Citrus, NGPL and Products (SE) Pipe Line equity investments.

37


Segment Earnings Results

Natural Gas Pipelines
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions, except operating statistics)
Revenues$2,813 $4,125 
Operating expenses(1,784)(2,270)
Other income
Earnings from equity investments154 41 
Other, net— 206 
Segment EBDA1,184 2,103 
Certain Items(a)113 (9)
Adjusted Segment EBDA$1,297 $2,094 
Change from prior periodIncrease/(Decrease)
Adjusted Segment EBDA$(797)
Volumetric data(b)
Transport volumes (BBtu/d)39,731 38,850 
Sales volumes (BBtu/d)2,515 2,260 
Gathering volumes (BBtu/d)2,817 2,509 
NGLs (MBbl/d)32 30 
Certain Items affecting Segment EBDA
(a)Includes Certain Item amounts of $113 million and $(9) million for 2022 and 2021, respectively. 2022 amount includes a decrease in revenues of $14 million and an increase in costs of sales of $87 million related to non-cash mark-to-market derivative contracts used to hedge forecasted natural gas and NGL sales and purchases. 2021 amount includes a pre-tax gain of $206 million associated with the sale of a partial interest in our equity investment in NGPL Holdings partially offset by a write-down of $117 million on a long-term subordinated note receivable from an equity investee, Ruby, and an increase in expense of $69 million related to a litigation reserve.
Other
(b)Joint venture throughput is reported at our ownership share. Volumes for acquired pipelines are included and volumes for assets sold are excluded for all periods presented.

38


Below are the changes in Adjusted Segment EBDA in the comparable three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:

Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2021

Adjusted Segment EBDA
20222021increase/(decrease)
Midstream$384 $1,218 $(834)
West261 286 (25)
East652 590 62
Total Natural Gas Pipelines$1,297 $2,094 $(797)

The changes in Segment EBDA for our Natural Gas Pipelines business segment are further explained by the following discussion of the significant factors driving Adjusted Segment EBDA in the comparable three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
$834 million (68%) decrease in Midstream was primarily due to lower commodity prices, primarily as a result of the February 2021 winter storm, driving lower sales margins resulting in decreases of $869 million on our Texas intrastate natural gas pipeline operations and $88 million on our South Texas assets. These decreases were partially offset by higher earnings on our Oklahoma assets from lower commodity prices on certain purchase contracts as a result of the February 2021 winter storm and higher volumes on Kinderhawk Field Services LLC. Overall Midstream’s revenues decreased primarily due to lower commodity prices, primarily as a result of the February 2021 winter storm, which was partially offset by corresponding decrease in costs of sales; and
$25 million (9%) decrease in the West Region was primarily due to lower earnings from EPNG driven by lower fee and park and loan revenues; and lower earnings from Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C. driven by lower revenues due to contract expirations; partially offset by,
$62 million (11%) increase in the East Region was primarily due to (i) our July 2021 acquisition of the Stagecoach assets; and (ii) higher earnings from TGP primarily due to increases in transportation revenues as a result of new customer contracts partially offset by lower revenues as a result of the February 2021 winter storm.

39


Products Pipelines
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions, except operating statistics)
Revenues$766 $453 
Operating expenses(497)(219)
Gain on divestitures and impairments, net12 — 
Earnings from equity investments18 14 
Segment EBDA299 248 
Certain Items(a)— 15 
Adjusted Segment EBDA$299 $263 
Change from prior periodIncrease/(Decrease)
Adjusted Segment EBDA$36 
Volumetric data(b)
Gasoline(c)940 892 
Diesel fuel369 379 
Jet fuel242 175 
Total refined product volumes1,551 1,446 
Crude and condensate486 507 
Total delivery volumes (MBbl/d)2,037 1,953 
Certain Items affecting Segment EBDA
(a)Includes Certain Item amount of $15 million in 2021 as an increase in expense related to an environmental reserve adjustment.
Other
(b)Joint venture throughput is reported at our ownership share.
(c)Volumes include ethanol pipeline volumes.

Below are the changes in Adjusted Segment EBDA in the comparable three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:

Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2021

Adjusted Segment EBDA
20222021increase/(decrease)
West Coast Refined Products$137 $110 $27 
Southeast Refined Products73 65 
Crude and Condensate89 88 
Total Products Pipelines$299 $263 $36 

The changes in Segment EBDA for our Products Pipelines business segment are further explained by the following discussion of the significant factors driving Adjusted Segment EBDA in the comparable three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
$27 million (25%) increase in West Coast Refined Products was primarily due to (i) increased earnings on Calnev Pipe Line LLC (Calnev), Pacific operations (SFPP) and West Coast terminals driven by higher revenues resulting from higher volumes; and (ii) a gain on sale of land at Calnev;
$8 million (12%) increase in Southeast Refined Products was primarily due to higher earnings at our Transmix processing operations primarily due to higher prices and volumes; and
40


Crude and Condensate had higher revenues of $223 million, with corresponding increases in cost of sales, resulting from increased marketing activities.

Terminals
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions, except operating statistics)
Revenues$430 $420 
Operating expenses(199)(197)
(Loss) gain on divestitures and impairments, net(3)
Other income— 
Earnings from equity investments
Other, net— 
Segment EBDA238 227 
Certain Items— — 
Adjusted Segment EBDA$238 $227 
Change from prior periodIncrease/(Decrease)
Adjusted Segment EBDA$11 
Volumetric data(a)
Liquids leasable capacity (MMBbl)78.9 79.0 
Liquids utilization %(b)92.3 %95.1 %
Bulk transload tonnage (MMtons)13.0 10.9 
Other
(a)Volumes for acquired pipelines are included for all periods. Volumes for facilities divested, idled and/or held for sale are excluded for all periods presented.
(b)The ratio of our tankage capacity in service to tankage capacity available for service.

41


Below are the changes in Adjusted Segment EBDA in the comparable three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:

Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 versus Three Months Ended March 31 2021

Adjusted Segment EBDA
20222021increase/(decrease)
Gulf Central $32 $19 $13 
Mid Atlantic21 16 $
Marine operations38 42 $(4)
Northeast22 26 $(4)
All others (including intrasegment eliminations)125 124 $
Total Terminals$238 $227 $11 

The changes in Segment EBDA for our Terminals business segment are further explained by the following discussion of the significant factors driving Adjusted Segment EBDA in the comparable three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
$13 million (68%) increase in the Gulf Central terminals was primarily due to higher revenues resulting from contractual rate escalations and higher volumes for petroleum coke handling activities, owing largely to refinery outages in the 2021 period associated with the February 2021 winter storm, higher revenues due to increased coal volumes and lower property tax expense at Battleground Oil Specialty Terminal Company LLC in 2021; and
$5 million (31%) increase in the Mid Atlantic terminals was primarily due to higher handling rates and coal volumes at our Pier IX facility; partially offset by,
$4 million (10%) decrease in Marine operations was primarily due to lower average charter rates partially offset by higher fleet utilization; and
$4 million (15%) decrease in the Northeast terminals was primarily driven by decreased revenues associated with lower utilization and rates on re-contracted tank positions at our Carteret and Perth Amboy facilities.

42


CO2
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20222021
(In millions, except operating statistics)
Revenues$305 $229 
Operating expenses(125)49 
Earnings from equity investments11 
Segment EBDA192 286 
Certain Items(a)16 
Adjusted Segment EBDA$208 $291 
Change from prior periodIncrease/(Decrease)
Adjusted Segment EBDA$(83)
Volumetric data
SACROC oil production19.3 19.4 
Yates oil production6.8 6.1 
Katz and Goldsmith oil production1.9 2.6 
Tall Cotton oil production1.0 0.9 
Total oil production, net (MBbl/d)(b)29.0 29.0 
NGL sales volumes, net (MBbl/d)(b)9.4 8.8 
CO2 sales volumes, net (Bcf/d)
0.4 0.4 
Realized weighted average oil price ($ per Bbl)$66.90 $51.05 
Realized weighted average NGL price ($ per Bbl)$43.68 $20.14 
Certain Items affecting Segment EBDA
(a)Includes Certain Item amounts of $16 million and $5 million decreasing revenue in 2022 and 2021, respectively, related to non-cash mark-to-market derivative contracts used to hedge forecasted commodity sales.
Other
(b)Net of royalties and outside working interests.

Below are the changes in Adjusted Segment EBDA in the comparable three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:

Three Months Ended March 31, 2022 versus Three Months Ended March 31, 2021

Adjusted Segment EBDA
20222021increase/(decrease)
Oil and Gas Producing activities$142 $235 (93)
Source and Transportation activities62 56 
Subtotal204 291 (87)
Energy Transition Ventures— 
Total CO2
$208 $291 $(83)

43



The changes in Segment EBDA for our CO2 business segment are further explained by the following discussion of the significant factors driving Adjusted Segment EBDA in the comparable three-month periods ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
$93 million (40%) decrease in Oil and Gas Producing activities was primarily due to higher operating expenses of $153 million driven by the benefit realized in the 2021 period from returning power to the grid by curtailing oil production during the February 2021 winter storm partially offset by higher realized crude oil and NGL prices which increased revenues by $60 million; and
$6 million (11%) increase in Source and Transportation activities primarily due to increase in revenues related to higher CO2 sales prices.

We believe that our existing hedge contracts in place within our CO2 business segment substantially mitigate commodity price sensitivities in the near-term and to lesser extent over the following few years from price exposure. Below is a summary of our CO2 business segment hedges outstanding as of March 31, 2022.

Remaining 20222023202420252026
Crude Oil(a)
Price ($ per Bbl)$61.32 $58.92 $58.07 $58.84 $64.98 
Volume (MBbl/d)25.13 17.80 11.20 6.65 1.60 
NGLs
Price ($ per Bbl)$54.07 $75.61 
Volume (MBbl/d)4.56 0.45 
Midland-to-Cushing Basis Spread
Price ($ per Bbl)$0.53 
Volume (MBbl/d)23.65 
(a)Includes West Texas Intermediate hedges.

DD&A, General and Administrative and Corporate Charges, Interest, net and Noncontrolling Interests

Three Months Ended
March 31,
Earnings
increase/(decrease)
20222021
(In millions, except percentages)
DD&A (GAAP)$(538)$(541)$%
General and administrative (GAAP)$(156)$(156)$— — %
Corporate benefit11 38 %
Certain Items— — — — %
General and administrative and corporate charges(a)$(145)$(148)$%
Interest, net (GAAP)$(333)$(377)$44 12 %
Certain Items(b)(44)(6)(38)(633)%
Interest, net(a)$(377)$(383)$%
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (GAAP)$(17)$(16)$(1)(6)%
Certain Items(c)— — — — %
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests(b)$(17)$(16)$(1)(6)%
Certain items
(a)Amounts are adjusted for Certain Items.
(b)2022 and 2021 amounts include decreases in interest expense of $40 million and $2 million, respectively, related to non-cash mismatches between the change in fair value of interest rate swaps and change in fair value of hedged debt, primarily related to our floating-to-fixed
44


LIBOR interest rate swaps which are not designated as accounting hedges, and decreases of $4 million in each period related to non-cash debt fair value adjustments associated with acquisitions.
(c)2022 and 2021 amounts include none and less than $1 million, respectively, of noncontrolling interests associated with Certain Items.

General and administrative expenses and corporate charges adjusted for Certain Items decreased $3 million in 2022 when compared to 2021 primarily due to higher capitalized costs of $9 million reflecting higher capital spending and $5 million of lower environmental expenses partially offset by $5 million of higher employee labor and travel costs.

In the table above, we report our interest expense as “net,” meaning that we have subtracted interest income and capitalized interest from our total interest expense to arrive at one interest amount.  Our consolidated interest expense, net adjusted for Certain Items decreased $6 million in 2022 when compared to 2021 primarily due to lower long-term average interest rates and long-term debt balances, partially offset by higher LIBOR rates.

We use interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of the underlying cash flows related to our long-term fixed rate debt securities (senior notes) into variable rate debt in order to achieve our desired mix of fixed and variable rate debt. As of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, approximately 8% and 21%, respectively, of the principal amount of our debt balances were subject to variable interest rates—either as short-term or long-term variable rate debt obligations or as fixed-rate debt converted to variable rates through the use of interest rate swaps. For more information on our interest rate swaps, see Note 5 “Risk Management—Interest Rate Risk Management” to our consolidated financial statements.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests represents the allocation of our consolidated net income attributable to all outstanding ownership interests in our consolidated subsidiaries that are not owned by us.

Income Taxes

Our tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2022 was approximately $194 million as compared with tax expense of $351 million for the same period of 2021. The $157 million decrease in tax expense is due primarily to higher pre-tax book income in the 2021 period, partially offset by the release of a valuation allowance related to our investment in NGPL Holdings in 2021.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

As of March 31, 2022, we had $84 million of “Cash and cash equivalents,” a decrease of $1,056 million from December 31, 2021. Additionally, as of March 31, 2022, we had borrowing capacity of approximately $3.6 billion under our credit facilities (discussed below in “—Short-term Liquidity”). As discussed further below, we believe our cash flows from operating activities, cash position and remaining borrowing capacity on our credit facilities are more than adequate to allow us to manage our day-to-day cash requirements and anticipated obligations.

We have consistently generated substantial cash flows from operations, providing a source of funds of $1,084 million and $1,873 million in the first three months of 2022 and 2021, respectively. The period-to-period decrease is discussed below in “—Cash Flows—Operating Activities.” We primarily rely on cash provided from operations to fund our operations as well as our debt service, sustaining capital expenditures, dividend payments and our growth capital expenditures; however, we may access the debt capital markets from time to time to refinance our maturing long-term debt.

Our board of directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.2775 per share for the first quarter of 2022, a 3% increase over the dividend declared for the previous quarter. We expect to fully fund our dividend payments as well as our discretionary spending for 2022 without funding from the capital markets.

On February 23, 2022, EPNG issued in a private offering $300 million aggregate principal amount of 3.50% senior notes due 2032 and received net proceeds of $298 million after discount and issuance costs.

During the first quarter, upon maturity, we repaid EPNG’s 8.625% senior notes, our 4.15% corporate senior notes, and the 1.50% series of our Euro denominated debt.

45


Short-term Liquidity

As of March 31, 2022, our principal sources of short-term liquidity are (i) cash from operations; and (ii) our combined $4.0 billion of credit facilities and associated commercial paper program. The loan commitments under our credit facilities can be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes and as a backup to our commercial paper program. Commercial paper borrowings reduce borrowings allowed under our credit facilities and letters of credit reduce borrowings allowed under our $3.5 billion credit facility. We provide for liquidity by maintaining a sizable amount of excess borrowing capacity under our credit facilities and, as previously discussed, have consistently generated strong cash flows from operations.

As of March 31, 2022, our $3,324 million of short-term debt consisted primarily of senior notes that mature in the next twelve months. We intend to fund our debt, as it becomes due, primarily through credit facility borrowings, commercial paper borrowings, cash flows from operations, and/or issuing new long-term debt. Our short-term debt balance as of December 31, 2021 was $2,646 million.

We had working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities) deficits of $3,417 million and $1,992 million as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. From time to time, our current liabilities may include short-term borrowings used to finance our expansion capital expenditures, which we may periodically replace with long-term financing and/or pay down using retained cash from operations. The overall $1,425 million unfavorable change from year-end 2021 was primarily due to (i) a $1,056 million decrease in cash and cash equivalents which includes $1,190 million related to repayments of senior notes that matured in the first quarter of 2022 using cash on hand; (ii) net unfavorable short-term fair value adjustments on derivative contracts of $430 million; (iii) a $387 million increase in senior notes that mature in the next twelve months; and (iv) a $290 million increase in commercial paper borrowings; partially offset by (i) a $257 million increase in restricted deposits related to our derivative activity; (ii) a $202 million decrease in accrued interest; (iii) a combined $105 million favorable change in our accounts receivables and payables; and (iv) a $68 million decrease in accrued contingencies. Generally, our working capital balance varies due to factors such as the timing of scheduled debt payments, timing differences in the collection and payment of receivables and payables, the change in fair value of our derivative contracts, and changes in our cash and cash equivalent balances as a result of excess cash from operations after payments for investing and financing activities.

Capital Expenditures

We account for our capital expenditures in accordance with GAAP. We also distinguish between capital expenditures that are maintenance/sustaining capital expenditures and those that are expansion capital expenditures (which we also refer to as discretionary capital expenditures). Expansion capital expenditures are those expenditures which increase throughput or capacity from that which existed immediately prior to the addition or improvement, and are not deducted in calculating DCF (see “—Results of Operations—Overview—Non-GAAP Financial Measures—DCF”). With respect to our oil and gas producing activities, we classify a capital expenditure as an expansion capital expenditure if it is expected to increase capacity or throughput (i.e., production capacity) from the capacity or throughput immediately prior to the making or acquisition of such additions or improvements. Maintenance capital expenditures are those which maintain throughput or capacity. The distinction between maintenance and expansion capital expenditures is a physical determination rather than an economic one, irrespective of the amount by which the throughput or capacity is increased.

Budgeting of maintenance capital expenditures is done annually on a bottom-up basis. For each of our assets, we budget for and make those maintenance capital expenditures that are necessary to maintain safe and efficient operations, meet customer needs and comply with our operating policies and applicable law. We may budget for and make additional maintenance capital expenditures that we expect to produce economic benefits such as increasing efficiency and/or lowering future expenses. Budgeting and approval of expansion capital expenditures are generally made periodically throughout the year on a project-by-project basis in response to specific investment opportunities identified by our business segments from which we generally expect to receive sufficient returns to justify the expenditures. Generally, the determination of whether a capital expenditure is classified as maintenance/sustaining or as expansion capital expenditures is made on a project level. The classification of our capital expenditures as expansion capital expenditures or as maintenance capital expenditures is made consistent with our accounting policies and is generally a straightforward process, but in certain circumstances can be a matter of management judgment and discretion. The classification has an impact on DCF because capital expenditures that are classified as expansion capital expenditures are not deducted from DCF, while those classified as maintenance capital expenditures are.

46


Our capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2022, and the amount we expect to spend for the remainder of 2022 to sustain our assets and grow our business are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, 20222022 RemainingTotal 2022
(In millions)
Sustaining capital expenditures(a)(b)$125 $784 $909 
Discretionary capital investments(b)(c)(d)206 1,257 1,463 
(a)Three months ended March 31, 2022, 2022 Remaining, and Total 2022 amounts include $10 million, $112 million, and $122 million, respectively, for sustaining capital expenditures from unconsolidated joint ventures, reduced by consolidated joint venture partners’ sustaining capital expenditures. See table included in “Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Supplemental Information.
(b)Three months ended March 31, 2022 amount excludes $101 million due to decreases in accrued capital expenditures and contractor retainage and net changes in other.
(c)Three months ended March 31, 2022 amount includes $15 million of our contributions to certain unconsolidated joint ventures for capital investments.
(d)Amounts include our actual or estimated contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures, net of actual or estimated contributions from certain partners in non-wholly owned consolidated subsidiaries for capital investments.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

There have been no material changes in our obligations with respect to other entities that are not consolidated in our financial statements that would affect the disclosures presented as of December 31, 2021 in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 were $283 million and $209 million, respectively. The increase of $74 million was primarily driven by capital commitments related to our Natural Gas Pipelines and Products Pipelines business segments.

Cash Flows

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities decreased $789 million in the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the respective 2021 period primarily due to:

an $840 million decrease in net income resulting from the benefit recognized in the 2021 period for largely nonrecurring earnings related to the February 2021 winter storm (see discussion above in “—Results of Operations”); partially offset by,
a combined $83 million net impact of the certain non-cash items consisting of a $206 million gain from the sale of a partial interest in our equity investment in NGPL Holdings LLC, partially offset by a $117 million write-down of a related party note receivable from Ruby, both in the 2021 period, and a $6 million increase in gains on divestitures and impairments, net in the 2022 period over the 2021 period. See Note 2 “Investments” to our consolidated financial statements for further information regarding the sale of an interest in NGPL Holdings LLC and write-down of note receivable from Ruby.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities increased $501 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the respective 2021 period primarily attributable to:

a $413 million decrease in cash due to $413 million of net proceeds received from the sale of a partial interest in our equity investment in NGPL Holdings in the 2021 period; and
a $140 million increase in capital expenditures reflecting an overall increase of expansion capital projects in the 2022 period over the comparative 2021 period; partially offset by,
a combined $43 million increase in cash in distributions received from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings and lower contributions to equity investees in the 2022 period compared with the 2021 period.

47


Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities decreased $277 million for the three months ended March 31, 2022 compared to the respective 2021 period primarily attributable to:

a $299 million net decrease in cash used related to debt activity as a result of lower net debt payments in the 2022 period compared to the 2021 period.

Dividends

We expect to declare dividends of $1.11 per share on our stock for 2022. The table below reflects our 2022 dividends declared:
Three months endedTotal quarterly dividend per share for the periodDate of declarationDate of recordDate of dividend
March 31, 2022$0.2775 April 20, 2022May 2, 2022May 16, 2022

The actual amount of dividends to be paid on our capital stock will depend on many factors, including our financial condition and results of operations, liquidity requirements, business prospects, capital requirements, legal, regulatory and contractual constraints, tax laws, Delaware laws and other factors. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors—The guidance we provide for our anticipated dividends is based on estimates. Circumstances may arise that lead to conflicts between using funds to pay anticipated dividends or to invest in our business.” of our 2021 Form 10-K. All of these matters will be taken into consideration by our board of directors in declaring dividends.

Our dividends are not cumulative. Consequently, if dividends on our stock are not paid at the intended levels, our stockholders are not entitled to receive those payments in the future. Our dividends generally will be paid on or about the 15th day of each February, May, August and November.

48


Summarized Combined Financial Information for Guarantee of Securities of Subsidiaries

KMI and certain subsidiaries (Subsidiary Issuers) are issuers of certain debt securities. KMI and substantially all of KMI’s wholly owned domestic subsidiaries (Subsidiary Guarantors), are parties to a cross guarantee agreement whereby each party to the agreement unconditionally guarantees, jointly and severally, the payment of specified indebtedness of each other party to the agreement. Accordingly, with the exception of certain subsidiaries identified as subsidiary non-guarantors (Subsidiary Non-Guarantors), the parent issuer, Subsidiary Issuers and Subsidiary Guarantors (the “Obligated Group”) are all guarantors of each series of our guaranteed debt (Guaranteed Notes). As a result of the cross guarantee agreement, a holder of any of the Guaranteed Notes issued by KMI or Subsidiary Issuers are in the same position with respect to the net assets, and income of KMI and the Subsidiary Issuers and Guarantors. The only amounts that are not available to the holders of each of the Guaranteed Notes to satisfy the repayment of such securities are the net assets, and income of the Subsidiary Non-Guarantors.

In lieu of providing separate financial statements for the Obligated Group, we have presented the accompanying supplemental summarized combined income statement and balance sheet information for the Obligated Group based on Rule 13-01 of the SEC’s Regulation S-X.  Also, see Exhibit 10.1 to this Report “Cross Guarantee Agreement, dated as of November 26, 2014, among Kinder Morgan, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, with schedules updated as of March 31, 2022.

All significant intercompany items among the Obligated Group have been eliminated in the supplemental summarized combined financial information. The Obligated Group’s investment balances in Subsidiary Non-Guarantors have been excluded from the supplemental summarized combined financial information. Significant intercompany balances and activity for the Obligated Group with other related parties, including Subsidiary Non-Guarantors, (referred to as “affiliates”) are presented separately in the accompanying supplemental summarized combined financial information.

Excluding fair value adjustments, as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Obligated Group had $30,695 million and $31,608 million, respectively, of Guaranteed Notes outstanding.

Summarized combined balance sheet and income statement information for the Obligated Group follows:
Summarized Combined Balance Sheet InformationMarch 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(In millions)
Current assets$2,752 $3,556 
Current assets - affiliates1,266 1,233 
Noncurrent assets61,294 61,754 
Noncurrent assets - affiliates508 508 
Total Assets$65,820 $67,051 
Current liabilities$6,111 $5,413 
Current liabilities - affiliates1,399 1,332 
Noncurrent liabilities30,595 32,310 
Noncurrent liabilities - affiliates1,012 1,047 
Total Liabilities39,117 40,102 
Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity26,703 26,949 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity$65,820 $67,051 
Summarized Combined Income Statement InformationThree Months Ended March 31, 2022
(In millions)
Revenues$3,977 
Operating income906 
Net income568 

49


Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There have been no material changes in market risk exposures that would affect the quantitative and qualitative disclosures presented as of December 31, 2021, in Item 7A in our 2021 Form 10-K. For more information on our risk management activities, refer to Item 1, Note 5 “Risk Management” to our consolidated financial statements.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

As of March 31, 2022, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.  Based upon and as of the date of the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2022 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

See Part I, Item 1, Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements entitled “Litigation and Environmental” which is incorporated in this item by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A in our 2021 Form 10-K. For more information on our risk management activities, refer to Item 1, Note 5 “Risk Management” to our consolidated financial statements.

Item 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Our Purchases of Our Class P Shares
PeriodTotal number of securities purchased(a)Average price paid per security(b)Total number of securities purchased as part of publicly announced plans(a)Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of securities that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs
January 1 to January 31, 2022— $— — $1,424,909,386 
February 1 to February 28, 2022— — — 1,424,909,386 
March 1 to March 31, 202231,283 16.96 31,283 1,424,378,799 
Total
31,283 $16.96 31,283 $1,424,378,799 
(a)On July 19, 2017, our board of directors approved a $2 billion common share buy-back program that began in December 2017. After repurchase, the shares are canceled and no longer outstanding.
(b)Amount excludes any commission or other costs to repurchase shares.

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None. 

50


Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.

Except for at one terminal facility that is in temporary idle status with the Mine Safety and Health Administration, we do not own or operate mines for which reporting requirements apply under the mine safety disclosure requirements of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank). We have not received any specified health and safety violations, orders or citations, related assessments or legal actions, mining-related fatalities, or similar events requiring disclosure pursuant to the mine safety disclosure requirements of Dodd-Frank for the quarter ended March 31, 2022.

Item 5.  Other Information.

None.
51


Item 6.  Exhibits.
Exhibit NumberDescription
10.1 
22.1 
31.1 
31.2 
32.1 
32.2 
101 
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) our Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021; (ii) our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021; (iii) our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021; (iv) our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021; (v) our Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021; and (vi) the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File pursuant to Rule 406 of Regulation S-T formatted in iXBRL (Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language) and contained in Exhibit 101.

52


SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
KINDER MORGAN, INC.
Registrant
Date:April 22, 2022By:/s/ David P. Michels
David P. Michels
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
53