KINETA, INC./DE - Quarter Report: 2016 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number: 001-37695

Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

200 Technology Square, 4^th Floor

Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139

(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 225-0096

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

As of August 9, 2016, there were 19,183,039 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

Any forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q reflect our current views with respect to future events or to our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, among other things, those listed under Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available in the future.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business, and the markets for certain diseases, including data regarding the estimated size of those markets, and the incidence and prevalence of certain medical conditions. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances reflected in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources.

2

Table of Contents

Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc.

INDEX

3

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PROTEOSTASIS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

PROTEOSTASIS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

PROTEOSTASIS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

(In thousands, except share amounts)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

PROTEOSTASIS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

7

Table of Contents

PROTEOSTASIS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Proteostasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on December 13, 2006. The Company is an innovative biopharmaceutical company committed to the discovery and development of novel therapeutics that treat diseases caused by an imbalance in the proteostasis network, a set of pathways that control protein biosynthesis, folding, trafficking and clearance. The Company’s initial therapeutic focus is on cystic fibrosis, which is caused by defects in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (“CFTR”) protein and insufficient CFTR protein function. The Company’s lead product candidate, PTI-428, is in early clinical development, and the Company’s other drug candidates are in the discovery phase.

The Company is subject to risks and uncertainties common to early-stage companies in the biotechnology industry, including, but not limited to, development by competitors of new technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, protection of proprietary technology, compliance with government regulations and ability to secure additional capital to fund operations. Product candidates currently under development will require significant additional research and development efforts, including extensive preclinical and clinical testing and regulatory approval prior to commercialization. These efforts require significant amounts of additional capital, adequate personnel and infrastructure and extensive compliance-reporting capabilities. Even if the Company’s product development efforts are successful, it is uncertain when, if ever, the Company will realize significant revenue from product sales.

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on the basis of continuity of operations, realization of assets, and the satisfaction of liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Through June 30, 2016, the Company has primarily funded its operations with proceeds received from its initial public offering, proceeds from the sale of convertible preferred stock and, to a lesser extent, payments received in connection with collaboration agreements and research grants. The Company has incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations and had an accumulated deficit of $137,262 as of June 30, 2016. The Company expects to continue to generate losses for the foreseeable future. As of June 30, 2016, the Company expects that its cash of $42,642 will be sufficient to fund its operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through at least the second quarter of 2017. The future viability of the Company beyond that point is dependent on its ability to raise additional capital to finance its operations. Although the Company has been successful in raising capital in the past, there is no assurance that it will be successful in obtaining such additional financing on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. If the Company is unable to obtain funding, the Company could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate its research and development programs, product portfolio expansion or commercialization efforts, which could adversely affect its business prospects.

Reverse Stock Split

On January 19, 2016, the Company effected a 1-for-10.8102 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of common stock and a proportional adjustment to the existing conversion ratios for each series of the Company’s Preferred Stock. Accordingly, all share and per share amounts for all periods presented in the accompanying financial statements and notes thereto have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect this reverse stock split and adjustment of the preferred stock conversion ratios.

Initial Public Offering

In February 2016, the Company issued and sold 6,250,000 shares of its common stock in its initial public offering (“IPO”) at a public offering price of $8.00 per share, for net proceeds of $42,529 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $3,500 and other offering expenses of $3,971. Upon the closing of the IPO, all shares of convertible preferred stock then outstanding converted into an aggregate of 9,699,600 shares of common stock, and the Company issued 2,590,742 shares of common stock as payment of $36,016 of accruing dividends due to holders of Series A preferred stock. In addition, the Company’s convertible preferred stock warrant outstanding at the close of the IPO converted to a warrant to purchase common stock.

In connection with the completion of the IPO, the Company amended its certificate of incorporation to authorize the future issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of June 30, 2016, there were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.

8

Table of Contents

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements as of June 30, 2016 and for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 have been prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial statements. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2016.

The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements contain all adjustments which are necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2016 and results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.

Revision of Previously Issued Financial Information

As presented in Note 8 and within the accompanying statements of operations and comprehensive loss, the Company has revised basic net income per share attributable to common stockholders and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended June 30, 2015 from the amounts presented in error in the unaudited quarterly financial data footnote in the previously filed Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Amounts previously reported for basic and diluted net income per share did not appropriately present the allocation of income to participating securities and reflect the impact of certain potential common shares. These revisions decreased basic net income attributable to common stockholders from $3.24 per share to $0.12 per share and reduced diluted net income attributable to common stockholders from $3.24 per share to a loss of $0.46 per share. Based upon the Company’s evaluation of relevant factors, the Company concluded that the revisions to the basic and diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders within the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss are not material to the previously issued quarterly financial data.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Significant estimates and assumptions reflected in these financial statements include, but are not limited to, revenue recognition, the accrual for research and development expenses and the valuation of common stock, preferred stock warrant liability and derivative liability. Estimates are periodically reviewed in light of changes in circumstances, facts and experience. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Deferred Offering Costs

The Company capitalizes certain legal, professional accounting and other third-party fees that are directly associated with in-process equity financings as deferred offering costs until such financings are consummated. After consummation of the equity financing, these costs are recorded in stockholders’ equity (deficit) as a reduction of additional paid-in capital generated as a result of the offering. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had recorded $2,744 of deferred offering costs in contemplation of the Company’s initial public offering. In conjunction with the completion of the IPO, the Company reclassified $3,971 of deferred offering costs to additional paid-in capital as a reduction of the proceeds from the IPO.

Restricted Cash

At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, restricted cash consisted of a certificate of deposit collateralizing a letter of credit issued as a security deposit in connection with the Company’s lease of its corporate facilities.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2016, the Company’s cash equivalents consisted of money market funds.

Fair Value Measurements

Certain assets and liabilities are carried at fair value under GAAP. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are to be classified and disclosed in one of the following three levels of the fair value hierarchy, of which the first two are considered observable and the last is considered unobservable:

9

Table of Contents

The Company’s derivative liability and cash equivalents are carried at fair value determined according to the fair value hierarchy described above (see Note 3). The carrying value of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities.

In connection with the automatic conversion of the Company’s convertible preferred stock, which occurred upon the listing of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ on February 10, 2016, the preferred stock warrant became a warrant to purchase common stock and the liability was remeasured at fair value and reclassified to additional paid-in capital.

Net Income (Loss) per Share

In February 2016, upon the closing of the IPO, all of the outstanding shares of the Company’s redeemable convertible preferred stock automatically converted into 9,699,600 shares of the Company’s common stock. Prior to this conversion, the Company followed the two-class method when computing net loss per share as the Company had issued shares that met the definition of participating securities. The two-class method determines net loss per share for each class of common and participating securities according to dividends declared or accumulated and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The two-class method requires income available to common stockholders for the period to be allocated between common and participating securities based upon their respective rights to receive dividends as if all income for the period had been distributed. The Company’s redeemable convertible preferred stock contractually entitled the holders of such shares to participate in dividends, but did not contractually require the holders of such shares to participate in losses of the Company. Accordingly, the two-class method did not apply for periods in which the Company reported a net loss or a net loss attributable to common stockholders resulting from dividends or accretion related to its redeemable convertible preferred stock.

Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the diluted net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares, including potential dilutive common shares assuming the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and unvested restricted common shares, as determined using the treasury stock method. For periods in which the Company has reported net losses, diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders is the same as basic net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders, since dilutive common shares are not assumed to have been issued if their effect is anti-dilutive. For period in which the Company has reported net income, basic net income per common share attributable to common stockholders is adjusted for certain amounts to calculate diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders, since dilutive common shares are assumed to have been issued if their effect is dilutive and not to have been issued if their effect is anti-dilutive.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (ASU 2014-15). The amendments in this update will explicitly require a company’s management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. The new standard will be effective in the first annual period ending after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of this standard, but believes its adoption will have no impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. This guidance will require that lease arrangements longer than 12 months result in an entity recognizing an asset and liability equal to the present value of the lease payments in the statement of financial position. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. This standard requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to use certain transition relief. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-17 will have on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The new standard involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on its financial position, statements of operations and statement of cash flows.

10

Table of Contents

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”), which supersedes existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard defines a five-step process to achieve this principle, and will require companies to use more judgment and make more estimates than under the current guidance. The Company expects that these judgments and estimates will include identifying performance obligations in the customer contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which delays the effective date of ASU 2014-09 such that the standard is effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the standard is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on its financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The new standard clarifies two aspects of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance. This ASU will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-10 will have on its financial statements.

The following tables present information about the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the level of the fair value hierarchy utilized to determine such fair values:

Cash Equivalents

As of June 30, 2016, the Company’s cash equivalents, which were invested in money market funds, were valued based on Level 1 inputs. The Company did not hold any cash equivalents as of December 31, 2015. During the periods ended June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3.

Preferred Stock Warrant Liability

The warrant liability in the table above is comprised of the fair value of a warrant for the purchase of Series A preferred stock and is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. On February 10, 2016, upon the closing of the initial public offering the Series A preferred stock converted into common

11

Table of Contents

stock, the preferred stock warrant became exercisable for common stock instead of preferred stock, and the preferred stock warrant liability, was remeasured at the fair value at that time, then reclassified to additional paid-in capital. The following assumptions and inputs were used in determining the fair value of the preferred stock warrant liability valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:

Derivative Liability

The fair value of the derivative liability is based on significant inputs not observable in the market, which represents a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the derivative instrument was determined using the Monte-Carlo simulation analysis. In determining the fair value of the derivative liability, the inputs impacting fair value include the fair value of the Company’s common stock, expected term of the derivative instrument, expected volatility of the common stock price, risk-free interest rate, expected sales-based milestone payments, discount rate, probability of a change of control event, and the probability that the counterparty would elect to accept the alternative cash payment in lieu of its right to the future sales-based milestone payments.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company determined the per share common stock price available based on publicly traded markets. As of December 31, 2015, the Company determined the per share fair value of the underlying stock price by taking into consideration recent business development and economic factors it deemed relevant. The Company determined the expected term of the instrument to be 2.50 years and 0.12 years as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The Company estimated its expected stock volatility to be 82.6% and 74.1% as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, based on the historical volatility of publicly traded peer companies for terms matching the expected term of the instrument for each respective period. The risk-free interest rate was determined to be 0.65% and 0.14% as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, by reference to the U.S. Treasury yield curve for terms matching the expected term of the instrument for each respective period.

Changes in the values of the preferred stock warrant liability and the derivative liability are summarized below:

12

Table of Contents

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

13

Table of Contents

2016 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

On February 3, 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2016 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”), which became effective on February 9, 2016. The 2016 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, restricted stock awards and other stock-based awards. The number of shares initially reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan is 1,581,839 shares. The number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2016 Plan will automatically increase on each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2017, by the lesser of 3% of the shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31 or an amount determined by the Company’s board of directors or the compensation committee of the board of directors. The shares of common stock underlying any awards that are forfeited, canceled, repurchased or are otherwise terminated by the Company under the 2016 Plan and the 2008 Plan will be added back to the shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2016 Plan.

2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

On February 3, 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “2016 ESPP”), which became effective in connection with the completion of the Company’s initial public offering. A total of 138,757 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under this plan. In addition, the number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2016 ESPP will automatically increase on each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2017 and ending on January 1, 2026, by the least of (i) 138,757 shares of common stock, (ii) 1% of the Company’s shares of common stock outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31 and (iii) an amount determined by the Company’s board of directors or the compensation committee of the board of directors.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company grants stock-based awards under the 2016 Plan and is authorized to issue common stock under the 2016 ESPP. The Company also has outstanding stock options under its 2008 Equity Incentive Plan but is no longer granting awards under this plan. As of June 30, 2016, 1,284,444 shares of common stock were available for issuance under the 2016 Plan. As of June 30, 2016, 138,757 shares of common stock were available for issuance to participating employees under the 2016 ESPP. Stock-based compensation expense was classified in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss as follows:

Prior to 2013, the Company issued options to purchase 203,964 shares of common stock to non-employees, primarily members of the Company’s scientific advisory board, that vest upon the achievement of specified development and clinical milestones. As of June 30, 2016, options for the purchase of 83,250 shares held by non-employees remained unvested, pending achievement of the specified milestones, and had an aggregate fair value of $829. During the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not grant any options to non-employees. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 the Company did not record any stock-based compensation expense for options granted to non-employees prior to 2013. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense for options granted to non-employees prior to 2013 of $(472) and $(100), respectively.

Stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2015 was reduced by $478 for the cumulative correction of immaterial errors associated with the recognition of stock-based compensation for certain stock options with performance-based vesting conditions. Of this amount, $168 related to years prior to 2015 and $310 related to the three months ended March 31, 2015. Based upon its evaluation of relevant factors, the Company concluded that the uncorrected errors in its previously issued financial statements for any of the periods affected are immaterial and that the impact of recording the cumulative correction during the six months ended June 30, 2015 is not material to the Company’s results for the year ending December 31, 2015.

14

Table of Contents

Astellas

In May 2016, the Company entered into a fourth amendment, effective as of January 31, 2016, to the Collaborative Research, Development, Commercialization and License Agreement (as further amended the “Astellas Agreement”) with Astellas Pharma Inc. (“Astellas”). In connection with the amendment, in June 2016 the Company received a payment of $1,000 to conduct certain experiments in order to gain additional data on compounds being researched. During the period from February 1, 2016 through July 31, 2016, the Company will not receive any other payment or reimbursement under the agreement. The payment is being recognized by the Company as revenue over the three and a half year research term of the agreement, which commenced in January 2015, with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed portion of the research term.

In July 2016, the Company entered into a fifth amendment effective as of July 31, 2016, to the Astellas Agreement, Inc. as a result of achieving a pre-clinical milestone and progress to the optimization phase. These amendments provide for the Joint Research Committee to evaluate the progress at various intervals throughout the lead optimization phase. In connection with the amendment, the Company will receive a payment of a $750 non-substantive milestone payment which will be recognized, over the three and half-year research term of the agreement, with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed portion of the research term.

Biogen

In December 2015, the Company commenced the third year of the research term under the Collaborative Research, Development, Commercialization and License Agreement (the “Biogen Agreement”) with Biogen New Ventures (“Biogen”). Under the original terms of the agreement, beginning in the third year and continuing through the fourth year of the research term, the Company is entitled to receive reimbursement of costs incurred for actual full-time equivalent employees conducting research under the Biogen agreement. During the first two years of the research term the Company received research funding payments on a guaranteed basis in the amount of $4,000. Payments received as reimbursement for actual costs incurred will be accounted for in the same manner as the guaranteed research funding payments, such that the payments will be recognized over the four-year research term of the agreement, which commenced in December 2013, with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed research term being recognized at the time any such payments are earned.

The Company did not provide for any income taxes in the three or six months ended June 30, 2016 or 2015. The Company had gross deferred tax assets of $46,562 at December 31, 2015 which increased by approximately $6,800 at June 30, 2016. The Company has provided a valuation allowance for the full amount of its net deferred tax assets because, at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, it was more likely than not that any future benefit from deductible temporary differences and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards would not be realized.

The Company has not yet recorded any amounts for unrecognized tax benefits, interest or penalties historically through December 31, 2015. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal and state jurisdictions in which it operates. The Company’s income tax returns are generally subject to tax examinations for the tax years ended December 31, 2012 to the present. There are currently no pending income tax examinations. To the extent the Company has tax attribute carryforwards, the tax years in which the attribute was generated may still be adjusted upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state tax authorities to the extent utilized in a future period.

15

Table of Contents

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders was calculated as follows:

The Company’s potential dilutive securities, which include stock options, convertible preferred stock and a warrant to purchase preferred stock, have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be to reduce the net loss per share. Therefore, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is the same, except for the three months ended June 30, 2015.

The Company excluded the following potential common shares, presented based on amounts outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, from the computation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the periods indicated because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:

The Company excluded the following potential common shares, presented based on amounts outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, from the computation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the periods indicated because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:

In addition to the potentially dilutive securities noted above, as of June 30, 2015, the Company had outstanding convertible promissory notes for which principal and unpaid accrued interest due under the notes was automatically convertible into the class of the Company’s stock issued in the Company’s next qualified financing, as defined, based on a conversion price equal to the price per share paid by the investors in the financing. Because the necessary conditions for conversion of the notes had not been met as of June 30, 2015, the Company excluded these notes from the table above and the calculation of diluted net loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015. On September 2, 2015, and concurrent with the sale of Series B preferred stock, all outstanding convertible promissory notes and accrued interest thereon were automatically converted into shares of Series B preferred stock.

Dr. Stelios Papadopoulos

In May 2016 the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with Dr. Stelios Papadopoulos with an effective date of July 1, 2016 and a term of 36 months. Under the terms of the Letter Agreement, Dr. Papadopoulos will provide certain consulting and advisory services to the Company as and when requested. The Company will pay a quarterly retainer of $210 to Dr. Papadopoulos for

16

Table of Contents

the duration of the Letter Agreement with aggregate fees totaling $2,520 over the term of the Letter Agreement. The retainer may be paid in cash, common stock of the Company or a combination of the two at the discretion of the Company. Any common stock issued in settlement of payments due under this agreement will be valued at the average closing price of the stock for 20 trading days, as listed on the NASDAQ, ending three trading days prior to the issuance of the shares. Additionally, under the terms of the Letter Agreement, if the Company consummates a merger and acquisition (“M&A) transaction, as defined in the Letter Agreement, with another party during the term of the Agreement or the 12-month period following the expiration of the Letter Agreement, Dr. Papadopoulos will be entitled to a M&A transaction fee equal to 1% of the value of the transaction, as defined in the Letter Agreement.

17

Table of Contents

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and the results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Quarterly Report”) and our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Annual Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2016. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis in or set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business, includes forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, including those factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section in our Annual Report and in this Quarterly Report, our actual results could differ materially from the results described, in or implied, by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

Overview

We are an innovative biopharmaceutical company committed to the discovery and development of novel therapeutics that treat diseases caused by an imbalance in the proteostasis network, a set of pathways that control protein biosynthesis, folding, trafficking and clearance. Leveraging our unique and comprehensive expertise of the proteostasis network, we have developed the Disease Relevant Translation, or DRT, technology platform, a validated drug screening approach for identifying highly translatable therapeutics based on predictive and functionally pertinent phenotypic assays and disease relevant models. Using this proprietary platform, we identified a new class of small molecules, which we call amplifiers, that modulate proteins in the proteostasis network. Our initial therapeutic focus is on cystic fibrosis, or CF, which is caused by defects in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, or CFTR, protein and insufficient CFTR protein function. We are initially developing and intend to commercialize our lead amplifier of CFTR protein, PTI-428, to improve CFTR protein function.

Our lead product candidate PTI-428 is an orally bioavailable CFTR modulator belonging to the amplifier class. CFTR modulators are compounds that affect the folding, trafficking and clearance of CFTR protein and can be classified according to the ways in which they affect CFTR protein. Amplifiers, which include PTI-428, are CFTR modulators that selectively increase the amount of an unfolded form of CFTR protein to provide additional substrate for other CFTR modulators, such as certain correctors and potentiators, to act upon. Using industry-standard in vitro studies, we have confirmed that co-administration of PTI-428 with other CFTR modulators significantly improves the in vitro CFTR protein activity achieved by those CFTR modulators alone.

In December 2015, the investigational new drug application, or IND, that we submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for a Phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate our PTI-428 product candidate became effective. We initiated our first Phase 1 clinical trial in the first quarter of 2016, to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics in CF subjects. We initiated the second Phase 1 study of PTI-428 in healthy volunteers to assess potential drug-drug interactions with oral contraceptives. We expect to have preliminary data from both Phase 1 clinical trials available throughout the second half of 2016 and the topline proof-of-concept efficacy endpoint data by the end of 2016. If our Phase 1 clinical trial results are favorable, we plan to initiate our Phase 2 clinical trial in the first half of 2017 with dose-range finding data expected to be available in the first half of 2017. We have also received notification from the regulatory authority in Canada allowing us to expand the Phase 1 study in patients. The Company has nominated its CFTR modulators PTI-801 as a corrector and PTI-808 as a potentiator as clinical candidates. In combination with PTI-428, the three compounds together comprise PTI-NC-733. PTI-801 and PTI-808 are both on track for IND filing by the end of 2016.

Since our inception in 2006, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring and developing product and technology rights, and conducting research and development activities for our product candidates. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We have funded our operations to date with proceeds from the sale of preferred stock, the issuance of convertible promissory notes, proceeds from our initial public offering in February 2016 and, to a lesser extent, payments received in connection with collaboration agreements and a research grant.

On February 10, 2016, we completed an initial public offering, or IPO, of our common stock, and issued and sold 6,250,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $8.00 per share, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $42.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and other offering expenses. Upon the listing of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, or NASDAQ, on February 11, 2016, all outstanding shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock automatically converted into 9,699,600 shares of the Company’s common stock and 2,590,742 common shares were issued for payment of $36.0 million of accruing dividends due to the holders of Series A preferred stock.

Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net losses were $9.1 million and $6.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively and $17.0 million and $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. As of June 30, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $137.3 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses

18

Table of Contents

and increasing operating losses for at least the next several years. We expect our expenses and capital requirements will increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities, as we:

We will not generate revenue from product sales unless and until we successfully complete clinical development and obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates. If we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant expenses related to developing our internal commercialization capability to support product sales, marketing and distribution. Further, we expect to incur additional costs going forward associated with operating as a public company.

As a result, we will need substantial additional funding to support our continuing operations and pursue our growth strategy. Until such time as we can generate significant revenue from product sales, if ever, we expect to finance our operations through the sale of public or private equity, debt financings or other capital sources, including potential collaborations with other companies or other strategic transactions. We may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other agreements or arrangements when needed on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to raise capital or enter into such agreements as, and when, needed, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or discontinue the development and commercialization of one or more of our product candidates.

Components of our Results of Operations

Revenue

To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales and do not expect to generate any revenue from the sale of products in the foreseeable future. All of our revenue during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 has been derived from our collaboration agreements with Astellas and Biogen.

Under the Astellas collaboration agreement, entered into in November 2014, we recognized revenue of $0.8 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively and $1.2 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We recognize revenue from all upfront payments, research funding payments, non-substantive milestone payments and reimbursements of third-party costs under this arrangement, together as a single unit, over the three and a half-year research term, which commenced in January 2015, with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed portion of the research services being recognized at the time any non-substantive milestone payment or other consideration is earned. Amounts recorded as deferred revenue under the Astellas collaboration agreement totaled $3.0 million and $3.2 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

In May 2016, we entered into a fourth amendment, effective as of January 31, 2016, to the Collaboration and License Agreement with Astellas Pharma, Inc. In connection with such amendment, in June 2016 we received a payment of $1.0 million to conduct certain experiments during the period from February 1, 2016 through July 31, 2016. During this period, we did not receive any other payment or reimbursement under the agreement. The payment is being recognized over research term of the agreement with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed portion of the research term being recognized at the time any such payments are earned. In July 2016, we entered into a fifth amendment effective as of July 31, 2016, to the Collaboration and License Agreement with Astellas Pharma, Inc. as a result of achieving a pre-clinical milestone and have progressing to the optimization phase. The amendment provides for the Joint Research Committee to evaluate the progress at various intervals throughout the optimization phase.

Under the Biogen collaboration agreement, we recognized revenue of $0.7 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively and $1.4 million and $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We recognize revenue from all upfront license payments, research funding payments, non-substantive milestone payments and reimbursements of third-party costs under this arrangement, together as a single unit, over the four-year research term, which commenced in December 2013, with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed portion of the research services being recognized at the time any non-substantive milestone payment or other consideration is earned. Amounts recorded as deferred revenue under the Biogen collaboration agreement totaled $3.8 million and $5.1 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In December 2015, we commenced the third year of the research term under the Biogen collaboration agreement. Under the original terms of the agreement, beginning in the third year and continuing through the fourth year of the research term, we are entitled to receive reimbursement of costs incurred for actual full-time equivalent employees conducting research under the Biogen agreement. During the first two years of the research term, we received research funding payments on a guaranteed basis in the amount of $4.0 million.

19

Table of Contents

We expect that any future revenue recognized under the collaboration agreements will fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of the uncertain timing of future milestone payments and the uncertain quantity of our research services provided from quarter to quarter. Further, subject to the terms and conditions of our collaboration agreements, our collaborators have certain unilateral rights to discontinue their participation in the research activities and, as a result, future payments to us under the agreements.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses, which include costs of research services incurred in connection with our collaboration agreements and research grant, consist primarily of costs incurred in connection with the discovery and development of our product candidates, which include:

We expense research and development costs as incurred. We recognize external development costs based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using information provided to us by our service providers.

Our direct research and development expenses are tracked on a program-by-program basis and consist primarily of external costs, such as fees paid to consultants, central laboratories, contractors and CROs in connection with our preclinical development activities. We do not allocate employee costs, costs associated with our platform technology and facility expenses, including depreciation or other indirect costs, to specific product development programs because these costs are deployed across multiple product development programs and, as such, are not separately classified. We use internal resources to manage our preclinical development activities and perform data analysis for such activities. These employees work across multiple development programs and, therefore, we do not track their costs by program.

The table below summarizes our research and development expenses incurred by development program:

We expect that our expenses will increase substantially in connection with our ongoing preclinical development activities and our clinical trials. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate the costs for completing the clinical development of PTI-428 for the treatment of CF or the cost associated with the development of any of our other product candidates.

The successful development and commercialization of our product candidates is highly uncertain. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development and commercialization, including the uncertainty of:

20

Table of Contents

Any changes in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of our product candidates in preclinical and clinical development could mean a significant change in the costs and timing associated with the development of these product candidates. For example, if the FDA or another regulatory authority were to delay our planned start of clinical trials or require us to conduct clinical trials or other testing beyond those that we currently expect or if we experience significant delays in enrollment in any of our planned clinical trials, we could be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time on the completion of clinical development of that product candidate.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs, including stock-based compensation, for personnel in executive, finance and administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include direct and allocated facility-related costs as well as professional fees for legal, patent, consulting, accounting and audit services.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we increase our headcount to support our continued research activities and development of our product candidates. We also anticipate that we will incur increased accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, compliance, expenses related to the Board of Directors, director and officer insurance costs as well as investor and public relations expenses associated with being a public company.

Other Income (Expense), Net

Interest Income. Interest income consists of interest earned on cash equivalents held by us during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. There were no cash equivalents held by us during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest Expense. Interest expense consists of interest accrued on $15.0 million in convertible promissory notes we issued during 2015 and 2014, all of which notes and accrued interest were converted into Series B preferred stock in September 2015.

Other Income (Expense), Net. Other income (expense), net consists primarily of the gains or losses associated with the changes in the fair values of our preferred stock warrant liability and our derivative liability. We previously issued a warrant for the purchase of our Series A preferred stock that we believe is a financial instrument that may require a transfer of assets because of the redemption features of the underlying stock. Therefore, we have classified this warrant as a liability that we have remeasured to fair value at each reporting period, and we have recorded the changes in the fair value as a component of other income (expense), net. Upon the closing of our initial public offering in February 2016, the underlying convertible preferred stock was converted into common stock, the preferred stock warrant became exercisable for common stock instead of preferred stock, and the fair value of the warrant liability was reclassified to additional paid-in capital. The derivative liability relates to a cash settlement option associated with the change of control provision in our CFFT collaboration agreement, which meets the definition of a derivative. Therefore, we have classified this derivative as a liability that we remeasure to fair value at each reporting period, and we record the changes in the derivative liability as a component of other income (expense), net.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis.

Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, there were no material changes to our critical accounting policies. Our critical accounting policies are described under the

21

Table of Contents

heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 30, 2016 and the notes to the financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We believe that of our critical accounting policies, the following accounting policies involve the most judgment and complexity:

Accordingly, we believe the policies set forth above are critical to fully understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations. If actual results or events differ materially from the estimates, judgments and assumptions used by us in applying these policies, our reported financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:

Revenue

Revenue was $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase of $0.4 million was the result of an increase of $0.5 million of revenue recognized from our collaboration with Astellas partially offset by a decrease of $0.1 million of revenue recognized from our collaboration with Biogen.

Under our Astellas collaboration agreement, we recognized revenue of $0.8 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in revenue from the Astellas collaboration in the 2016 period was primarily the result of the $1.0 million payment received under the fourth amendment of the agreement. Payments received under the agreement are recognized as revenue over the research term, with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed research term being recognized at the time any such payments are earned.

Under our Biogen collaboration agreement, we recognized revenue of $0.7 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The $0.7 million of revenue recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was comprised of $0.4 million related to research funding payments, $0.2 million related to the upfront payment and $0.1 million related to the in vivo target validation milestone payment, all of which are being recognized as a single unit of accounting over the research term. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the $0.8 million of revenue recognized was comprised of $0.5 million related to

22

Table of Contents

research funding payments, $0.2 million related to the upfront payment and $0.1 million related to the in vivo target validation milestone payment, all of which are being recognized as a single unit of accounting over the research term. In December 2015, we commenced the third year of the research term under the Biogen collaboration agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, beginning in the third year and continuing through the fourth year of the research term, we are entitled to receive reimbursement of costs incurred for actual full-time equivalent employees conducting research under the Biogen agreement. During the first two years of the research term, we received research funding payments on a guaranteed basis in the amount of $4.0 million. The change from a guaranteed fixed payment to reimbursement of actual costs incurred could result in a decline in future revenue recognized under the Biogen collaboration agreement in future periods if our actual costs incurred are less than the fixed payments received in prior periods.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses were $7.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $6.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase of $1.4 million was primarily due to an increase of $1.4 million in costs incurred in advancing the preclinical development of our CF program, including activities supporting our Phase 1 clinical trial of PTI-428 which commenced during the first quarter of 2016. Additionally, there was an increase of $0.9 million in personnel-related costs, of which $0.6 million related to stock-based compensation expense. These increases are partially offset by a decrease of $1.0 million in costs incurred on our Usp14 program as we focused our resources on the clinical development of PTI-428. We do not allocate our research and development expenses related to specific areas of business functionality, such as personnel or facility related costs, to our breakdown of research and development expenses by development program.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase of $1.4 million in general and administrative expenses was due to an increase of $1.0 million in professional fees primarily associated with our year-end audit and the filing of our annual report on Form 10-K as well as other periodic SEC filings such as the filing of our proxy statement on Schedule 14A and the filing of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q along with an increase of $0.3 million in stock-based compensation expense.

Interest Income

We recorded interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2016 of $20,000 as compared to no interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was due to interest earned on cash equivalents held during the three months ended June 30, 2016. There were no cash equivalents outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest Expense

We recorded no interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The decrease was due to interest accrued on principal amount of our convertible promissory notes issued during 2014 and 2015, prior to the conversion of all of our outstanding convertible promissory notes and accrued interest thereon into shares of Series B preferred stock in September 2015.

23

Table of Contents

Other Income (Expense), Net

We recorded an immaterial amount of other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $0.2 million of other income for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The $0.2 million net increase in other income was primarily due to the decrease in the fair value of our derivative liability during the second half of 2015, which itself was principally due to the decrease in the probability of a change of control event as we neared the completion of our IPO.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015:

Revenue

Revenue was $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase of $0.7 million was the result of an increase of $0.8 million of revenue recognized from our collaboration with Astellas partially offset by a decrease of $0.1 million of revenue recognized from our collaboration with Biogen.

Under our Astellas collaboration agreement, we recognized revenue of $1.2 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase in revenue from the Astellas collaboration in the 2016 period was primarily the result of the $1.0 million payment received under the fourth amendment of the agreement. Additionally, the increase is the result of the research term commencing in January 2015. Payments received under the agreement are recognized as revenue over the research term, with a cumulative catch-up for the elapsed research term being recognized at the time any such payments are earned. As a result, amortization of payments received after June 30, 2015 through the second quarter of 2016 were not included in revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2015 but are included in revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Under our Biogen collaboration agreement, we recognized revenue of $1.4 million and $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The $1.4 million of revenue recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was comprised of $0.8 million related to research funding payments, $0.4 million related to the upfront payment and $0.2 million related to the in vivo target validation milestone payment, all of which are being recognized as a single unit of accounting over the research term. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the $1.5 million of revenue recognized was comprised of $0.9 million related to research funding payments, $0.4 million related to the upfront payment and $0.2 million related to the in vivo target validation milestone payment, all of which are being recognized as a single unit of accounting over the research term. In December 2015, we commenced the third year of the research term under the Biogen collaboration agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, beginning in the third year and continuing through the fourth year of the research term, we are entitled to receive reimbursement of costs incurred for actual full-time equivalent employees conducting research under the Biogen agreement. During the first two years of the research term, we received research funding payments on a guaranteed basis in the amount of $4.0 million. The change from a guaranteed fixed payment to reimbursement of actual costs incurred could result in a decline in future revenue recognized under the Biogen collaboration agreement in future periods if our actual costs incurred are less than the fixed payments received in prior periods.

24

Table of Contents

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses were $14.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $10.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase of $3.8 million was primarily due to an increase of $4.6 million in costs incurred in advancing the preclinical development of our CF program, including activities supporting our Phase 1 clinical trial of PTI-428 which commenced during the first quarter of 2016. Additionally there was an increase of $0.8 million in personnel-related costs, of which $0.5 million was related to stock-based compensation expense. These increases were offset by a decrease of $1.8 million in costs incurred on our Usp14 program as we focused our resources on the clinical development of PTI-428. We do not allocate our research and development expenses related to specific areas of business functionality, such as personnel or facility related costs, to our breakdown of research and development expenses by development program.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase of $2.4 million in general and administrative expenses was due to an increase of $1.6 million in professional fees primarily associated with our year-end audit and the filing of our annual report on Form 10-K as well as other periodic SEC filings such as the proxy statement and the first quarter 10-Q, an increase of $0.6 million in personnel-related costs, including $0.5 million in stock-based compensation expense.

Interest Income

We recorded interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 of $20,000 as compared to no interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The increase was due to interest earned on cash equivalents held during the six months ended June 30, 2016. There were no cash equivalents outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Interest Expense

We recorded no interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. The decrease was due to interest accrued on principal amount of our convertible promissory notes issued during 2014 and 2015, prior to the conversion of all of our outstanding convertible promissory notes and accrued interest thereon into shares of Series B preferred stock in September 2015.

Other Income (Expense), Net

We recorded other expense of $23,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $0.3 million other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The $0.3 million net increase in other income was primarily due to the decrease in the fair value of our derivative liability during the second half of 2015, which itself was principally due to the decrease in the probability of a change of control event as we neared the completion of our IPO.

25

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. We have generated limited revenue to date from our collaboration agreements and research grant. We have not yet commercialized any of our product candidates, which are in various phases of preclinical development, and we do not expect to generate revenue from sales of any product for several years, if at all. We have funded our operations to date with proceeds received from our initial public offering, the sale of preferred stock, the issuance of convertible promissory notes and, to a lesser extent, payments received in connection with collaboration agreements and a research grant. As of June 30, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents of $42.6 million.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for each of the periods presented:

Operating Activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, operating activities used $15.2 million of cash, primarily resulting from our net loss of $17.0 million, partially offset by cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $1.0 million and stock-based compensation expense of $0.8 million. Our net loss was primarily attributed to research and development activities and our general and administrative expenses, as we had limited collaboration revenue in the period. Net cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2016 consisted primarily of a $1.5 million increase in accounts payable, a $1.1 million increase in accrued expenses and a $0.8 million decrease in accounts receivable, which was the result of the payments made to us under the Biogen and Astellas collaboration agreements. The increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses were due to increased spending on our research and development programs as well as the timing of vendor invoicing and payments. These increases were partially offset by $1.5 million decrease in deferred revenue related to our collaboration agreements and a $0.9 million decrease in other current assets.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, operating activities used $6.6 million of cash, primarily resulting from our net loss of $12.4 million, partially offset by cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $4.9 million and non-cash charges of $0.9 million. Our net loss was primarily attributed to research and development activities and our general and administrative expenses, as we had limited collaboration and research grant revenue in the period. Net cash provided by changes in our operating assets and liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 consisted primarily of a $3.0 million increase in deferred revenue related to our collaboration agreements, a $2.4 million increase in accounts payable, a $0.5 million increase in accrued expenses and a $0.1 million decrease in other current assets. The increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses were due to increased spending on our research and development programs as well as the timing of vendor invoicing and payments. These increases were partially offset by a $1.2 million increase in accounts receivable related to our collaboration agreements with Biogen and Astellas.

Investing Activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we used $19,000 of cash in investing activities, consisting of $32,000 of cash used for purchases of property and equipment, offset by $13,000 of cash proceeds received for sales of property and equipment.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we used $19,000 of cash in investing activities, consisting of purchases of property and equipment.

26

Table of Contents

Financing Activities. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, net cash provided by financing activities was $44.0 million, primarily resulting from gross proceeds of $46.5 million from the sale of common stock in connection with the initial public offering, partially offset by payments of $2.5 million of initial public offering costs.

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, net cash used by financing activities was $0.3 million as a result of payments of $0.4 million of initial public offering costs, partially offset by proceeds of $0.1 million received from the exercise of stock options.

Operating Capital Requirements

We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we advance the preclinical activities and clinical trials of our product candidates in development. In addition, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company.

Our expenses will also increase as we:

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with research, development and commercialization of pharmaceutical drugs, we are unable to estimate the exact amount of our working capital requirements. Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including:

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaboration agreements, other third-party funding, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements or marketing and distribution arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include

27

Table of Contents

liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through other third-party funding, collaborations agreements, strategic alliances, licensing arrangements or marketing and distribution arrangements, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market products or product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2016 and the effects that such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Interest Rate Fluctuation Risk

Our cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2016, consisted of money market funds. The primary objectives of our investment activities are to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income without significantly increasing risk. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. However, because of the nature of the instruments in our portfolio, a sudden change in market interest rates would not be expected to have a material impact on our financial condition and/or results of operation.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is (1) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer, who is our principal executive officer, and our Chief Financial Officer, who is also our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2016, our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)

28

Table of Contents

and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). Our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded based upon the evaluation described above that, as of June 30, 2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

In the ordinary course of business, we are from time to time involved in lawsuits, claims, investigations, proceedings, and threats of litigation relating to intellectual property, commercial arrangements, employment and other matters. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, as of June 30, 2016, we were not party to any material pending legal proceedings, and we are not aware of any claims or actions pending or threatened against us that would have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Risks Relating to Our Business

We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we may never achieve or maintain profitability.

We are a drug development company focused primarily on developing our lead product candidate, PTI-428, for the treatment of CF. We have incurred significant net losses in each year since our inception, including a net loss of $17.0 million and $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of June 30, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $137.3 million.

To date, we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of equity securities and debt financings. We have devoted most of our financial resources to research and development, including our preclinical development activities. We have not completed the development of any of our product candidates. We expect to continue to incur significant and increasing losses and negative cash flows for the foreseeable future. The size of our losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future expenditures and our ability to generate revenues. In particular, we expect to incur substantial and increased expenses as we:

29

Table of Contents

To become and remain profitable, we must succeed in developing and eventually commercializing products with significant market potential. This will require us to be successful in a range of challenging activities, including discovering product candidates, completing preclinical testing and clinical trials of our product candidates, obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval for these product candidates, and manufacturing, marketing and selling those products. We are only in the preliminary stages of these activities.

None of our product candidates have been approved or commercialized. We may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for or commercializing any of our product candidates. If our product candidates are not approved or commercialized, if any products that do receive regulatory approvals later show unanticipated properties (for example, unexpected safety issues), or if revenues from any products that do receive regulatory approvals are insufficient, we will not achieve profitability and our business may fail.

Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would depress the value of our company and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, diversify our product offerings or continue our operations. A decline in the value of our company could cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

Our ability to generate future revenues from product sales is uncertain and depends upon our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidates, as well as the regulatory approval of product candidates under development by third parties that our product candidates will depend on.

Our ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability depends on our ability, alone or with collaborators, to successfully complete the development of, obtain the necessary regulatory approvals for, and commercialize, a product candidate. Our PTI-428 development program is currently focused on demonstrating the clinical benefit of our amplifier for CF patients. If PTI-428 is approved, it may be approved for co-administration with ivacaftor and lumacaftor. We do not anticipate generating revenues from sales of PTI-428 or any product candidate for the foreseeable future, if ever. Our ability to generate future revenues from product sales depends heavily on:

Conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete, and we may never generate the data necessary to obtain regulatory approval and achieve product sales. Our anticipated development costs would likely increase if we do not obtain favorable results or if development of any product candidate is delayed. In particular, if we are required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, and comparable regulatory authorities in other countries to perform studies or trials in addition to those that we currently expect to undertake, we would likely incur higher costs than we anticipate. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with pharmaceutical product development, we are unable to predict the timing or amount of any increase in our anticipated development costs.

In addition, our product candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our commercial revenues, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially available for several years, if at all. Even if one or more of our product candidates is approved for commercial sale, we anticipate incurring significant costs in connection with commercialization. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be able to generate revenues from sales of any approved product candidates, or that we will achieve or maintain profitability even if we do generate sales.

We will require additional capital to fund our operations. If we fail to obtain additional capital, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs, seek corporate partners for the development of our product development programs or relinquish or license on unfavorable terms our rights to technologies or product candidates.

30

Table of Contents

Developing pharmaceutical products, including conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes years to complete. We expect our research and development expenses to substantially increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we advance our clinical programs for PTI-428 and our other product candidates.

In February 2016, we received net proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock upon completion of our initial public offering of approximately $42.5 million at an initial public offering price of $8.00 after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Based upon our current operating plan, we believe that the net proceeds we received from our initial public offering, together with our existing cash and cash equivalents, will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through the second quarter of 2017. However, changing circumstances beyond our control may cause us to consume capital more rapidly than we currently anticipate, and we may need additional funds sooner than planned. For example, our clinical trials may encounter technical, enrollment or other difficulties that could increase our development costs more than we expect, or the FDA may require us to perform studies or trials in addition to those that we currently anticipate. We may need to raise additional funds if we choose to initiate clinical trials for our product candidates other than PTI-428 or if we need to obtain regulatory approval for PTI-428 for administration with drugs other than ivacaftor and lumacaftor. In any event, we will require additional capital to obtain regulatory approval for, and to commercialize, our product candidates.

Securing additional financing may divert our management from our day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates, including PTI-428. In addition, we cannot guarantee that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when required or on acceptable terms, we may be required to:

If we are unable to raise additional capital in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to us, we will be prevented from pursuing our development and commercialization efforts, which will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects and on our ability to develop our product candidates.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates on terms unfavorable to us.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs primarily through the sale of equity securities, debt financings and government and foundation grants. We may also seek to raise capital through third-party collaborations, strategic alliances and similar arrangements. We currently do not have any committed external source of funds.

In order to raise additional funds to support our operations, we may sell additional equity or debt securities, enter into collaborations, strategic alliances, or licensing arrangements or other marketing or distribution arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a stockholder. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, and declaring dividends, and will impose limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances, or licensing arrangements or other marketing or distribution arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or commercialization efforts, or grant others rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

We have a limited operating history, which may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

31

Table of Contents

We were formed and began operations in December 2006. Our operations to date have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring and developing product and technology rights and conducting research and development activities for our product candidates. We are currently in preclinical development for PTI-130 and PTI-NC-733 and clinical development for PTI-428, respectively. We have not obtained regulatory approval for any of our product candidates. Consequently, any predictions about our future success, performance or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history, more experience with clinical development or approved products on the market.

We might not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss carryforwards and research and development tax credit carryforwards.

As of December 31, 2015, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of $102.6 million and $88.6 million, respectively, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities and begin to expire in 2026 and 2030, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, we also had federal and state research and development tax credit carryforwards of $3.6 million and $2.2 million, respectively, which may be available to offset future income tax liabilities and begin to expire in 2027 and 2025, respectively. These net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. In addition, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an ‘‘ownership change,’’ which is generally defined as a greater than 50% change, by value, in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be limited. We have not determined if we have experienced Section 382 ownership changes in the past and if a portion of our net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are subject to an annual limitation under Section 382. In addition, we may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock ownership, some of which may be outside of our control. If we determine that an ownership change has occurred and our ability to use our historical net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards is materially limited, it would harm our future operating results by effectively increasing our future tax obligations.

Risks Relating to the Development and Regulatory Approval of Our Product Candidates

We depend almost entirely on the success of our lead product candidate, PTI-428, which is currently in early clinical development. We cannot be certain that we will be able to, successfully complete the clinical development of, obtain regulatory approval for, or successfully commercialize PTI-428.

We currently have no products on the market, and our most advanced product candidate, PTI-428, is currently in early clinical development. We initiated our first Phase 1 clinical trial in CF patients in the first quarter of 2016 and initiated a second Phase 1 study of PTI-428 in healthy volunteers in the second quarter of 2016.

Our business depends almost entirely on the successful clinical development, regulatory approval and commercialization of PTI-428, and it will require additional preclinical testing and substantial additional clinical development and regulatory approval efforts before we are permitted to commence its commercialization, if ever. The clinical trials and manufacturing and marketing of PTI-428 and any other product candidates will be subject to extensive and rigorous review and regulation by numerous government authorities in the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions where we intend to test and, if approved, market our product candidates. Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of any product candidate, we must demonstrate through preclinical testing and clinical trials that the product candidate is safe and effective for use in each target indication, and potentially in specific patient populations, including the pediatric population. This process can take many years and may include post-marketing studies and surveillance, which would require the expenditure of substantial resources beyond the proceeds we raised in our initial public offering. Of the large number of drugs in development for approval in the United States and the European Union, only a small percentage successfully complete the FDA or European Medicines Agency, or EMA, regulatory approval processes, as applicable, and are commercialized. Accordingly, even if we are able to obtain the requisite financing to continue to fund our research, development and clinical programs, we cannot assure you that PTI-428 or any of our other product candidates will be successfully developed or commercialized.

32

Table of Contents

The regulatory approval processes of the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and inherently unpredictable. If we are ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for PTI-428 or our other product candidates, our business will be substantially harmed.

We are not permitted to market PTI-428 or any of our other product candidates in the United States or the European Union until we receive approval of a New Drug Application, or NDA, from the FDA or a Marketing Authorization Application, or MAA, from the European Commission, respectively. Prior to submitting an NDA to the FDA or an MAA to the EMA for approval of any of our product candidates for a specific indication, we will need to complete preclinical and toxicology studies, as well as a proof-of-concept study and Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials.

Successfully initiating and completing our clinical program and obtaining approval of an NDA or an MAA is a complex, lengthy, expensive and uncertain process, and the FDA, the EMA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may delay, limit or deny approval of any of our candidates for many reasons, including, among others:

Any of these factors, many of which are beyond our control, could jeopardize our ability to obtain regulatory approval for and successfully market PTI-428 or any of our other product candidates. Any such setback in our pursuit of regulatory approval would have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects.

In addition to the United States and the European Union, we intend to market our product candidates, if approved, in other international markets. Such marketing will require separate regulatory approvals in each market and compliance with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedures vary from country-to-country and may require additional testing. Moreover, the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA or EMA approval. In addition, in many countries, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that country. Approval by the FDA or the EMA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA or the EMA. The regulatory approval process in other international markets may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA or EMA approval.

33

Table of Contents

Our lead product candidate, PTI-428, is designed to be administered with other CF therapies. Developing product candidates for administration with other therapies may lead to unforeseen side effects or failures in our clinical trials that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval or limit the commercial profile of an approved label. Such other therapies could also be removed from the market and result in significant negative consequences.

We are studying our lead product candidate, PTI-428, in clinical trials as a combination therapy with therapies that are approved and commercially available to the patients we plan to enroll in such clinical trials. We anticipate that if our product candidate is approved for marketing, it will be approved to be administered only with other therapies. Our development programs and planned studies carry all the risks inherent in drug development activities, including the risk that they will fail to demonstrate meaningful efficacy or acceptable safety. In addition, our development programs are subject to additional regulatory, commercial, manufacturing and other risks because of the use of other therapies in combination with our product candidates. For example, the other therapies may lead to toxicities that are improperly attributed to our product candidates or the combination of our product candidates with other therapies may result in toxicities that the product candidate or other therapy does not produce when used alone. The other therapies we are using in combination may be removed from the market and thus be unavailable for testing or commercial use with any of our approved products. Testing product candidates in combination with other therapies may increase the risk of significant adverse effects or test failures. The timing, outcome and cost of developing products to be used in combination with other therapies is difficult to predict and dependent on a number of factors that are outside our reasonable control. If we experience safety or toxicity issues in our clinical trials or with any approved products, we may not receive approval to market any products, which could prevent us from ever generating revenues or achieving profitability.

If the data from our ongoing and planned preclinical and clinical studies of PTI-428 as a combination therapy administered with ivacaftor and lumacaftor regarding the safety or efficacy of this combination are not favorable, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not approve this combination therapy and we may be forced to delay or terminate the development of this combination therapy, which would materially harm our business. Further, even if we gain marketing approvals for this combination therapy from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities in a timely manner, we cannot be certain that this combination therapy will be commercially successful. If the results of the anticipated or actual timing of marketing approvals for this combination therapy, or the market acceptance of this combination therapy, if approved, including treatment reimbursement levels agreed to by third-party payors, do not meet the expectations of investors or public market analysts, the market price of our common stock would likely decline.

34

Table of Contents

Failures or delays in the commencement or completion of our future clinical trials of PTI-428 could result in increased costs to us and could delay, prevent or limit our ability to generate revenue and continue our business.

Successful completion of the clinical trials for PTI-428 is a prerequisite to submitting an NDA to the FDA or a MAA to the EMA and, consequently, the ultimate approval and commercial marketing of PTI-428 in the United States and the European Union. Similar prerequisites apply in other foreign jurisdictions. Clinical trials are expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and are uncertain as to outcome. A product candidate can unexpectedly fail at any stage of clinical development. The historical failure rate for product candidates is high due to scientific feasibility, safety, efficacy, changing standards of medical care and other variables. If the FDA requires us to complete additional studies beyond what we currently expect, we may be delayed in completing our clinical trials for PTI-428. We do not know whether all our clinical trials will begin or be completed on schedule, if at all, as the commencement and completion of clinical trials can be delayed or prevented for a number of reasons, including, among others:

Additionally, in our initial Phase 1 clinical trial of PTI-428 in CF patients, we have activated five clinical investigation sites in the US as of August 4, 2016 with additional sites planned. If there is a delay in activating additional trial sites, completion of our Phase 1 clinical trial and our clinical development plan for PTI-428 may be delayed.

Clinical trials may also be delayed or terminated as a result of ambiguous or negative interim results. In addition, a clinical trial may be suspended or terminated by us, the FDA, other regulatory authorities or the IRBs at the sites where the IRBs are overseeing a clinical trial, a data safety monitoring board, or DSMB, which may recommend that the sponsor suspend or terminate a trial, due to a number of factors, including, among others:

Positive results from preclinical or in vitro and in vivo testing of PTI-428 are not necessarily predictive of the results of our future and current clinical trials of PTI-428. If we cannot achieve positive results in our clinical trials for PTI-428, we may be unable to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize PTI-428.

35

Table of Contents

Positive results from our preclinical testing of PTI-428 in vitro and in vivo may not necessarily be predictive of the results from our clinical trials in humans. Many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in clinical trials after achieving positive results in preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies, and we, or the third parties whose drug candidates we expect to be co-administered with PTI-428, may face similar setbacks. Preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, and the FDA or other regulatory agencies may require changes to our protocols or other aspects of our clinical trials or require additional studies. Additionally, many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials nonetheless failed to obtain FDA or EMA approval. If we fail to produce positive results in our clinical trials of PTI-428, the development timeline and regulatory approval and commercialization prospects for our leading product candidate, and, correspondingly, our business and financial prospects would be materially adversely affected.

Even if we obtain positive clinical results for PTI-428 in early-stage clinical trials, those positive results may not be repeated in later-stage clinical trials.

Before obtaining regulatory approval for the sale of our product candidates, including PTI-428, we must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Successful completion of such clinical trials is a prerequisite to submitting an NDA to the FDA and, consequently, the ultimate approval and commercial marketing of PTI-428 in the United States. Similar requirements apply in the European Union and other foreign jurisdictions. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. The outcome of preclinical testing and early clinical trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials, and interim results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results.

Negative or inconclusive results of our clinical trials of PTI-428, or any other clinical trials we conduct, could mandate repeated or additional clinical studies. We do not know whether our clinical trials of PTI-428 will demonstrate adequate efficacy and safety to result in regulatory approval to market PTI-428 or our other product candidates. Even if early-stage clinical results are favorable, if later-stage clinical trials do not produce favorable results, our ability to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, including PTI-428, may be adversely impacted.

Our product candidates may cause adverse effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval or limit the scope of any approved label or market acceptance.

Undesirable side effects caused by our product candidates could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in the denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities. It is possible that, during the course of the clinical development of PTI-428, results of our clinical trials could reveal an unacceptable severity and prevalence of this or other side effects. For example, in preclinical testing of PTI-428 and PTI-130 we observed reduced platelet counts in the animals we tested following administration of these compounds at doses in excess of the doses we expect to administer in our clinical trials. As a result of this or any other side effects, our clinical trials could be suspended or terminated and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development, or deny approval, of our product candidates for any or all targeted indications. The drug-related side effects could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled patients to complete the trial or result in potential product liability claims.

Additionally if one or more of our product candidates receive marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by such products, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including:

Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the particular product candidate, if approved, and could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.

If we cannot demonstrate an acceptable toxicity profile for our product candidates in our clinical studies, we will not be able to continue our clinical trials or obtain approval for our product candidates.

36

Table of Contents

In order to obtain approval of a product candidate, we must demonstrate safety in various nonclinical and clinical tests. At the time of initiating human clinical trials, we may not have conducted or may not conduct the types of nonclinical testing ultimately required by regulatory authorities, or future nonclinical tests may indicate that our product candidates are not safe for use. Nonclinical testing and clinical testing are both expensive and time-consuming and have uncertain outcomes. For example, results of an earlier laboratory study of PTI-130 in non-rodent species suggested potential hematologic and reproductive toxicology issues that we believe are specific to the non-rodent species. While we intend to develop a different formulation and route of administration designed to avoid such issues, we cannot predict whether future safety and toxicology studies may produce these same problems or cause other undesirable effects. We also observed certain undesired hematological (including reduced platelet count) side effects in animals dosed at levels of PTI-428 that are higher than those intended for our clinical studies. We plan to complete additional toxicity studies of reproductive toxicity, carcinogenicity and long-term side effects prior to or concurrent with any Phase 3 clinical trials of our product candidates, and we cannot exclude the possible occurrence of these or other side effects in future nonclinical or clinical studies. In addition, success in initial tests does not ensure that later testing will be successful. We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result of, the testing process, which could delay or prevent our ability to develop or commercialize our product candidates, including:

Any such events would increase our costs and could delay or prevent our ability to commercialize our product candidates, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

PTI-428 is based on a novel technology, which may raise development issues we may not be able to resolve, regulatory issues that could delay or prevent approval, or personnel issues that may keep us from being able to develop our product candidates.

Our product candidates are based on our novel amplifier technology. We are not aware of other drugs that work in a manner that we believe our amplifier technology does. There can be no assurance that development problems related to our novel technology will not arise in the future that cause significant delays or that we are not able to resolve.

Regulatory approval of novel product candidates such as ours can be more expensive and take longer than other, more well-known or extensively studied pharmaceutical product candidates due to our and regulatory agencies’ lack of experience with them. There are no other amplifiers in clinical development and none have been approved to date. The novelty of our technology may lengthen the regulatory review process, require us to conduct additional studies or clinical trials, increase our development costs, lead to changes in regulatory positions and interpretations, delay or prevent approval and commercialization of our product candidates or lead to significant post-approval limitations or restrictions. For example, the FDA could require additional studies or characterization that may be difficult or impossible to perform.

In addition, if we are unable to hire and retain the necessary personnel, the rate and success at which we can develop and commercialize product candidates will be limited. Any such events would increase our costs and could delay or prevent our ability to commercialize our product candidates, which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if we meet safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials, we cannot predict whether or when we will obtain regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates and we cannot, therefore, predict the timing of any future revenue from PTI-428 or any of our other product candidates.

We cannot commercialize our product candidates, including PTI-428, until the appropriate regulatory authorities, such as the FDA, have reviewed and approved the product candidate. The regulatory agencies may not complete their review processes in a timely manner, or we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for PTI-428 or our other product candidates at all. Additional delays may result if PTI-428 or any other product candidate is brought before an FDA advisory committee or an analogous foreign body, which could recommend restrictions on approval or recommend non-approval of the product candidate. In addition, we may experience delays or rejections based upon additional government regulation from future legislation or administrative action, or changes in regulatory agency policy during the period of product development, clinical studies and the review process. As a result, we cannot predict when, if at all, we will receive any future revenue from commercialization of any of our product candidates, including PTI-428. Even if we obtain regulatory approval for PTI-428 and our other product candidates, we will still face extensive regulatory requirements and our products may face future development and regulatory difficulties.

37

Table of Contents

Even if we obtain regulatory approval in the United States, the FDA may still impose significant restrictions on the indicated uses or marketing of our product candidates, including PTI-428, or impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly post-approval studies or post-market surveillance, including Phase 4 clinical trials. For example, the labeling, if approved for our product candidates, including PTI-428, will likely include restrictions on use due to the specific patient population and manner of use in which the drug was evaluated and the safety and efficacy data obtained in those evaluations.

PTI-428 and our other product candidates will also be subject to additional ongoing FDA requirements governing the labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, safety surveillance, advertising, promotion, record-keeping and reporting of safety and other post-market information. The holder of an approved NDA is obligated to monitor and report adverse events and any failure of a product to meet the specifications described in the NDA. The holder of an approved NDA must also submit new or supplemental applications and obtain FDA approval for certain changes to the approved product, product labeling or manufacturing process. Advertising and promotional materials must comply with FDA rules and are subject to FDA review, in addition to other potentially applicable federal and state laws.

In addition, manufacturers of drug products and their facilities are subject to payment of user fees and continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and other regulatory authorities for compliance with current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP, requirements and adherence to commitments made in the NDA. If we, or a regulatory agency, discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as quality issues or adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions relative to that product or the manufacturing facility, including requiring recall or withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension of manufacturing.

If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements following approval of our product candidate, a regulatory agency may:

Any government investigation of alleged violations of law could require us to expend significant time and resources in response and could generate negative publicity. The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit our ability to commercialize PTI-428 and our other product candidates and inhibit our ability to generate revenues.

Even if we obtain FDA approval for PTI-428 or any of our other product candidates in the United States, we may never obtain approval for or commercialize PTI-428 or any of our other product candidates outside of the United States, which would limit our ability to realize their full market potential.

In order to market any products outside of the United States, we must establish and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements on a country-by-country basis regarding safety and efficacy. Approval by the FDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions. In addition, clinical trials conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one country does not guarantee regulatory approval in any other country. Approval processes vary among countries and can involve additional product testing and validation and additional administrative review periods. Seeking foreign regulatory approval could result in difficulties and costs for us and require additional preclinical studies or clinical trials which could be costly and time consuming. Regulatory requirements can vary widely from country to country and could delay or prevent the introduction of our product candidates in those countries. We do not have any product candidates approved for sale in any jurisdiction, including international markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets. If we fail to comply with regulatory requirements in international markets or to obtain and maintain required approvals, or if regulatory approvals in international markets are delayed, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be unrealized.

38

Table of Contents

If we are not able to obtain orphan product status for PTI-428 or obtain such status for future product candidates for which we seek this status, we will not be able to claim the tax credits for our clinical trials of such products provided by this status or potentially take advantage of other benefits of orphan drug status.

Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and the European Union, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act of 1983, the FDA may designate a product as an orphan drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a disease or condition that fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States have been diagnosed as having at the time of the submission of the request for orphan drug designation. Under Regulation No. (EC) 141/2000 on Orphan Medicinal Products, a medicinal product may be designated as an orphan medicinal product if, among other things, it is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition affecting not more than five in 10,000 people in the European Union when the application is made. Generally, if a product with an orphan drug designation subsequently receives the first marketing approval for the indication for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to a period of market exclusivity. This exclusivity precludes the EMA or the FDA, as applicable, from approving another marketing application for the same or, in the European Union, a similar drug for the same indication for that time period, unless, among other things, the later product is clinically superior. The exclusivity period is seven years in the United States and ten years in the European Union following marketing approval. The EU exclusivity period can be reduced to six years if a drug no longer meets the criteria for orphan drug designation, for example if the drug is sufficiently profitable so that market exclusivity is no longer justified. We intend to seek orphan designation for PTI-428.

In the United States, orphan drug exclusivity may be lost if the FDA withdraws or revokes the orphan-drug designation as permitted by law, we withdraw the marketing application for the drug, we consent to another’s marketing application for approval of the same use or indication as the designated orphan drug, or we fail to assure a sufficient quantity of the drug as required by law. Similarly, in the European Union, exclusivity may be lost if we request the removal of the orphan-drug designation or the drug no longer meets any of the criteria that made it eligible for orphan-drug status at the outset. Even after an orphan drug is approved, the same or, in the European Union, a similar drug can subsequently be approved for the same condition if the competent regulatory agency concludes that the later drug is clinically superior to the original orphan drug by providing a significant therapeutic advantage over and above that drug.

If we do not obtain orphan drug exclusivity or if our competitors obtain orphan drug exclusivity for other rare diseases or conditions we are targeting before we do, we may be delayed in obtaining marketing authorization or we may lose out on the potential benefits of market exclusivity associated with the orphan drug designation. Among the other benefits of orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research and a waiver of the NDA application user fee. If we do not obtain orphan designation for PTI-428, we will lose our on such benefits associated with orphan designation.

Risks Relating to Our Dependence on Third Parties

If third parties on which we depend to conduct our preclinical studies or any ongoing or future clinical trials do not perform as contractually required, fail to satisfy regulatory or legal requirements or miss expected deadlines, our development program could be delayed with materially adverse effects on our business and prospects.

We rely on CROs, clinical data management organizations and consultants to design, conduct, supervise and monitor preclinical studies of our product candidates and will do the same for our ongoing and planned clinical trials for PTI-428 and any other clinical trials. We and our CROs are required to comply with various regulations, including Good Clinical Practice, or GCP, requirements, which are enforced by the FDA, and guidelines of the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the European Economic Area, and comparable foreign regulatory authorities to ensure that the health, safety and rights of patients are protected in clinical development and clinical trials, and that trial data integrity is assured. Regulatory authorities ensure compliance with these requirements through periodic inspections of trial sponsors, principal investigators and trial sites. If we or any of our CROs fail to comply with applicable requirements, the clinical data generated in our clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA, the EMA or other comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that any of our clinical trials comply with such requirements. In addition, our clinical trials must be conducted with products produced under cGMP requirements, which mandate the methods, facilities and controls used in manufacturing, processing and packaging of a drug product to ensure its safety and identity. Failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat preclinical and clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

39

Table of Contents

Our CROs are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such CROs, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing clinical and preclinical programs. If CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed.

Because we have relied on third parties, our internal capacity to perform these functions is limited. Outsourcing these functions involves risk that third parties may not perform to our standards, may not produce results in a timely manner or may fail to perform at all. In addition, the use of third-party service providers requires us to disclose our proprietary information to these parties, which could increase the risk that this information will be misappropriated. We currently have a small number of employees, which limits the internal resources we have available to identify and monitor our third-party providers. To the extent we are unable to identify and successfully manage the performance of third-party service providers in the future, our business may be adversely affected. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.

If we cannot contract with acceptable third parties on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or if these third parties do not carry out their contractual duties, satisfy legal and regulatory requirements for the conduct of preclinical studies or clinical trials or meet expected deadlines, our clinical development programs could be delayed and otherwise adversely affected. In all events, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our preclinical studies and clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial. The FDA and the EMA require clinical trials to be conducted in accordance with GCP, including for conducting, recording and reporting the results of preclinical studies and clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and confidentiality of clinical trial participants are protected. Our reliance on third parties that we do not control does not relieve us of these responsibilities and requirements. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We rely on third-party manufacturers and suppliers and we intend to rely on third parties to produce preclinical, clinical and commercial supplies of PTI-428 and any future product candidates. These third parties may not perform as contractually required or expected and issues may arise that could delay the completion of clinical trials.

We rely on third parties to supply the materials and components for our research and development, preclinical and clinical trial supplies. We do not own manufacturing facilities or supply sources for such components and materials. There can be no assurance that our supply of research and development, preclinical and clinical development drugs and other materials will not be limited, interrupted, restricted in certain geographic regions or of satisfactory quality or continue to be available at acceptable prices. Any replacement of these third parties could require significant effort and expertise because there may be a limited number of qualified replacements.

The manufacturing process for a product candidate is subject to FDA, EMA and other foreign regulatory authority review. Suppliers and manufacturers must meet applicable manufacturing requirements and undergo rigorous facility and process validation tests required by regulatory authorities to comply with regulatory standards such as cGMP. In the event that any of our suppliers or manufacturers fails to comply with such requirements or to perform its obligations to us in relation to quality, timing or otherwise, or if our supply of components or other materials becomes limited or interrupted for other reasons, we may be forced to manufacture the materials ourselves, for which we currently do not have the capabilities or resources, or enter into an agreement with another third party, which we may not be able to do on reasonable terms, if at all. In some cases, the technical skills or technology required to manufacture our product candidates may be unique or proprietary to the original manufacturer and we may have difficulty, or there may be contractual restrictions prohibiting us from, transferring such skills or technology to another third party and a feasible alternative may not exist. These factors would increase our reliance on such manufacturer or require us to obtain a license from such manufacturer in order to have another third party manufacture our product candidates. If we are required to change manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations and guidelines. The delays associated with the verification of a new manufacturer could negatively affect our ability to develop product candidates in a timely manner or within budget.

40

Table of Contents

We expect to continue to rely on third-party manufacturers if we receive regulatory approval for any product candidate. To the extent that we have existing, or enter into future, manufacturing arrangements with third parties, we will depend on these third parties to perform their obligations in a timely manner consistent with contractual and regulatory requirements, including those related to quality control and assurance. If we are unable to obtain or maintain third-party manufacturing for product candidates, or to do so on commercially reasonable terms, we may not be able to develop and commercialize our product candidates successfully. Our or a third party’s failure to execute on our manufacturing requirements could adversely affect our business in a number of ways, including:

If a current or future collaborative partner terminates or fails to perform its obligations under an agreement with us, the development and commercialization of the product candidates could be delayed or terminated.

We are currently party to collaborative arrangements with Biogen, Astellas and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics, Inc. If our collaborative partners do not devote sufficient time and resources to a collaboration arrangement with us, we may not realize the potential commercial benefits of the arrangement, and our results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

Much of the potential revenue from our collaborations consists of contingent payments, such as payments for achieving regulatory milestones or royalties payable on sales of drugs. The milestone and royalty revenue that we may receive under these collaborations will depend upon our collaborators’ ability to successfully develop, introduce, market and sell new products. Our collaboration partners may fail to develop or effectively commercialize their products using our products or technologies or otherwise discontinue their research activities because they:

Competition may negatively impact a partner’s focus on and commitment to our relationship and, as a result, could delay or otherwise negatively affect the commercialization of our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

We face a number of challenges in seeking future collaborations. Collaborations are complex and any potential discussions may not result in a definitive agreement for many reasons. For example, whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration, and the proposed collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors, such as the design or results of our clinical trials, the potential market for our product candidates, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering our product candidates to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to ownership or the coverage of our intellectual property, and industry and market conditions generally. If we determine that additional collaborations for our product candidates are necessary and are unable to enter into such collaborations on acceptable terms, we might elect to delay or scale back the development or commercialization of our product candidates in order to preserve our financial resources or to allow us adequate time to develop the required physical resources and systems and expertise ourselves.

41

Table of Contents

Collaboration agreements may not lead to development or commercialization of product candidates in the most efficient manner, or at all. In addition, there have been a significant number of recent business combinations among large pharmaceutical companies that have resulted in a reduced number of potential future collaborators. If a future collaborator of ours were to be involved in a business combination, the continued pursuit and emphasis on our product development or commercialization program could be delayed, diminished or terminated.

Risks Relating to Commercialization of Our Product Candidates

The commercial success of PTI-428 and our other product candidates will depend upon the acceptance of those products, if approved, by the medical community, including physicians, patients and health care payors.

Even if PTI-428 or our other product candidates are approved for sale, they may not achieve sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare payors and others in the medical community. If these product candidates, if approved, do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues and we may not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of any of our product candidates, including PTI-428, will depend on a number of factors, including:

If any of our product candidates, including PTI-428, is approved but does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, patients and health care payors, we may not generate sufficient revenue and we may not become or remain profitable.

If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to sell and market our product candidates, we may not be successful in commercializing our product candidates if and when they are approved.

We do not have a sales or marketing infrastructure, and we have limited experience in the sales, marketing or distribution of pharmaceutical products. Our commercialization strategy will target key prescribing physicians and advocacy groups, as well as provide patients with support programs, ensure product access and secure reimbursement. Outside of the United States, Canada, Europe and Australia, we may seek a partner to commercialize our products. In the future, we may choose to build a focused sales and marketing infrastructure to market or co-promote our product candidates if and when they are approved, which would be expensive and time-consuming. Alternatively, we may elect to outsource these functions to third parties. Either approach carries significant risks. For example, recruiting and training a sales force is expensive and time-consuming and, if done improperly, could delay a product launch and result in limited sales. If the commercial launch of a product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and establish marketing capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our sales and marketing personnel.

Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our product candidates on our own include:

42

Table of Contents

We may also not be successful in entering into additional arrangements with third parties to sell and market our product candidates or doing so on terms that are favorable to us. Even if we do enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales, marketing and distribution services, our product revenues or the profitability of these product candidates are likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell our products ourselves. In addition, we likely will have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our products effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.

If our competitors develop technologies or product candidates more rapidly than we do or their technologies are more effective, our ability to develop and successfully commercialize our products may be adversely affected. Competitive products for treatment of CF may reduce or eliminate the commercial opportunity for our product candidates.

The clinical and commercial landscape for CF is highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change. New data from clinical-stage products continue to emerge. It is possible that these data may alter the current standard of care, completely precluding us from further developing PTI-428 for CF. Further, it is possible that we may advance our clinical trials for PTI-428 only to find that data from competing products make it impossible for us to complete enrollment in these trials, resulting in our inability to file for marketing approval with regulatory agencies. Even if PTI-428 is approved for marketing, it may have limited sales due to particularly intense competition in the CF market.

Competitive therapeutic treatments include those that are currently in development and any new treatments that enter the market. We believe that a significant number of products are currently under development, and may become commercially available in the future, for the treatment of conditions for which we may try to develop product candidates. Our potential competitors include large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, specialty pharmaceutical and generic drug companies, academic institutions, government agencies and research institutions. Examples include Vertex, AbbVie Inc., Galapagos NV, ProQR Therapeutics N.V., Nivalis Therapeutics, Inc., F. Hoffmann-LaRoche Ltd., Novartis AG, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Ampliphi Biosciences Corporation, Pfizer Inc., Parion Sciences, Inc. Genzyme Corporation, Bayer AG and several other companies.

Although PTI-428 is being developed as a combination therapy to be administered with ivacaftor and lumacaftor, Vertex or other competitors could develop other drugs or combinations that may obviate the applicability of PTI-428. Changes in standard of care or use patterns could also make our combination therapy obsolete. If PTI-428 is approved for marketing as a combination therapy to be administered with ivacaftor and lumacaftor but use of another therapy becomes more prevalent than ivacaftor and lumacaftor, sales of PTI-428 could be negatively impacted and our financial results and stock price would be adversely affected.

Many of our competitors have greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, sales and supply resources, technical and human resources or experience than us and significantly greater experience in the discovery and development of product candidates, obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of product candidates and the commercialization of those products. Accordingly, our competitors may be more successful than we may be in obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals for therapies and achieving widespread market acceptance. Our competitors’ products may be more effective, or more effectively marketed and sold, than any product candidate we may commercialize and may render our therapies obsolete or non-competitive before we can recover development and commercialization expenses.

If we successfully obtain approval for any product candidate, we will face competition based on many different factors, including the efficacy, safety and tolerability of our products, the ease with which our products can be administered and the extent to which patients accept relatively new routes of administration, the timing and scope of regulatory approvals for these products, the availability and cost of manufacturing, marketing and sales capabilities, price, reimbursement coverage and patent position. Competing products could present superior treatment alternatives, including being more effective, safer, less expensive, or could be marketed and sold more effectively than any products we may develop. Competitive products may make any products we develop obsolete or noncompetitive before we recover the expense of developing and commercializing our product candidates. Such competitors could also recruit our employees, which could negatively impact our level of expertise and our ability to execute our business plan. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a small number of competitors.

43

Table of Contents

We also compete with other clinical-stage companies and institutions for clinical trial participants, which could reduce our ability to recruit participants for our clinical trials. For example, actual or perceived risks of our product candidates, such as PTI-428, may negatively affect potential clinical trial participants or patients when deciding whether to participate in our clinical trials, and could result in patients seeking alternative clinical trials or commercial therapies from our competitors. Delay in recruiting clinical trial participants could adversely affect our ability to bring a product to market prior to our competitors. Further, research and discoveries by others may result in breakthroughs that render our product candidates obsolete even before they begin to generate any revenue.

In addition, our competitors may obtain patent protection or FDA approval and commercialize products more rapidly than we do, which may impact future sales of any of our product candidates that receive marketing approval. If the FDA approves the commercial sale of any of our product candidates, we will also be competing with respect to marketing capabilities and manufacturing efficiency, areas in which we have limited or no experience. We expect competition among products will be based on product efficacy and safety, the timing and scope of regulatory approvals, availability of supply, marketing and sales capabilities, product price, reimbursement coverage by government and private third-party payors, and patent position. Our profitability and financial position will suffer if we cannot compete effectively in the marketplace, even if our products receive regulatory approval.

Payor approval and reimbursement may not be available for PTI-428 and our other product candidates, which could make it difficult or impossible for us to sell our products profitably.

Market acceptance and sales of PTI-428, or any other product candidates that we develop, will depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement for these products and related treatments will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other organizations. Government authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers, health maintenance organizations and pharmacy benefit management organizations, decide which medications they will pay for, at what tier level and establish reimbursement levels. A primary trend in the United States healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Government authorities and these third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications. Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that reimbursement will be available for any product that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level of reimbursement will be. Reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any product for which we obtain marketing approval. Obtaining reimbursement for our products may be particularly difficult because of the higher prices often associated with products administered under the supervision of a physician. Also, reimbursement amounts may reduce the demand for, or the price of, our products. If reimbursement is not available, or is available only to limited levels, we may not be able to successfully commercialize PTI-428, or any other product candidates that we develop. We will also be required to establish systems and programs that assist patients in determining the reimbursement level and in some instances establishing patient economic support programs to alleviate the economic burden of co-pays and/or co-insurance. These patient support programs are complex, costly and require knowledge and expertise that we currently do not possess.

There have been a number of legislative and regulatory proposals to change the healthcare system in the United States and in some foreign jurisdictions that could affect our ability to sell any future products profitably. These legislative and regulatory changes may negatively impact the reimbursement for any future products, following approval. The availability of generic treatments may also substantially reduce the likelihood of reimbursement for any future products, including PTI-428. The application of user fees to generic drug products will likely expedite the approval of additional generic drug treatments. We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with the sale of PTI-428 and any other product candidate that we develop, due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations and additional legislative changes.

In addition, there may be significant delays in obtaining reimbursement for approved products, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the product is approved by the FDA or regulatory authorities in other countries. Moreover, eligibility for reimbursement does not imply that any product will be paid for in all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research, development, manufacture, sale and distribution. Interim payments for new products, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be made permanent. Payment rates may vary according to the use of the product and the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on payments allowed for lower cost products that are already reimbursed, and may be incorporated into existing payments for other services. Net prices for products may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of products from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States. Third-party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement policies.

44

Table of Contents

Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and profitable payment rates from both government-funded and private payors for any of our product candidates, including PTI-428, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to commercialize products and our overall financial condition.

We may expend our limited resources to pursue a particular product candidate or indication and fail to capitalize on product candidates or indications that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.

The success of our business depends primarily on our ability to identify, develop and commercialize product candidates. Because we have limited financial and managerial resources, we focus on research programs and product candidates for the indications that take advantage of our deep expertise and knowledge and that we believe are the most scientifically and commercially promising. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable scientific or commercial products or profitable market opportunities. In addition, we may spend valuable time and managerial and financial resources on research programs and product candidates for specific indications that ultimately do not yield any scientifically or commercially viable products. If we do not accurately evaluate the scientific and commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in situations where it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole rights to development and commercialization.

Risks Relating to Regulation of Our Industry

We may be subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and health information privacy and security laws. Some of these laws were recently amended, and their interpretation following such amendments remains unclear. If we are unable to comply, or have not fully complied, with such laws, we could face substantial penalties.

If we obtain FDA approval for any of our product candidates and begin commercializing those products in the United States, our operations may be directly, or indirectly through our customers, subject to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws, including, without limitation, the federal anti-kickback statute. These laws may impact, among other things, our proposed sales, marketing and education programs. In addition, we may be subject to patient privacy regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The laws that may affect our ability to operate include:

45

Table of Contents

Further, the recently enacted ACA, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal health care fraud statutes. A person or entity can now be found guilty of fraud or false claims under ACA without actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it. In addition, ACA provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the false claims statutes. Possible sanctions for violation of these anti-kickback laws include monetary fines, civil and criminal penalties, exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other government programs and forfeiture of amounts collected in violation of such prohibitions. Any violations of these laws, or any action against us for violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against it, could result in a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.

ACA also imposes new reporting requirements on device and pharmaceutical manufacturers to make annual public disclosures of payments to health care providers and ownership of their stock by health care providers. Failure to submit required information may result in civil monetary penalties of up to an aggregate of $150,000 per year (or up to an aggregate of $1 million per year for “knowing failures”), for all payments, transfers of value, or ownership or investment interests that are not reported. Manufacturers were required to begin data collection on August 1, 2013 and were required to report such data to CMS by March 31, 2014.

In addition, there has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made to physicians for marketing. Some states, such as California, Massachusetts and Vermont, mandate implementation of corporate compliance programs, along with the tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation, and other remuneration to physicians.

The scope and enforcement of these laws is uncertain and subject to change in the current environment of health care reform, especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. Such changes are impossible to predict. It is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge by federal or state regulatory authorities under one or more of these laws. Any such challenge could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition. Any state or federal regulatory review of us, regardless of the outcome, would be costly and time-consuming, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our employees may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees could include intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations, provide accurate information to the FDA, comply with manufacturing standards we have established, comply with federal and state health-care fraud and abuse laws and regulations, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics but it is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent misconduct may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business and results of operations, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.

46

Table of Contents

Health care reform measures could adversely affect our business.

In the United States and foreign jurisdictions, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could affect our future results of operations. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels that seek to reduce healthcare costs. Most recently, the ACA, which includes measures to significantly change the way health care is financed by both governmental and private insurers, was enacted in March 2010. Among the provisions of the ACA of greatest importance to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry are the following:

At this time, the full effect that the ACA would have on our business remains unclear.

Individual states have become increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access, and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Legally mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce ultimate demand for our products or put pressure on our product pricing, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

In addition, given recent federal and state government initiatives directed at lowering the total cost of healthcare, Congress and state legislatures will likely continue to focus on healthcare reform, the cost of prescription drugs and biologics and the reform of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. While we cannot predict the full outcome of any such legislation, it may result in decreased reimbursement for drugs and biologics, which may further exacerbate industry-wide pressure to reduce prescription drug prices. This could harm our ability to generate revenues. Increases in importation or re-importation of pharmaceutical products from foreign countries into the United States could put competitive pressure on our ability to profitably price our products, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. We might elect not to seek approval for or market our products in foreign jurisdictions in order to minimize the risk of re-importation, which could also reduce the revenue we generate from our product sales. It is also possible that other legislative proposals having similar effects will be adopted.

Furthermore, regulatory authorities’ assessment of the data and results required to demonstrate safety and efficacy can change over time and can be affected by many factors, such as the emergence of new information, including on other products, changing policies and agency funding, staffing and leadership. We cannot be sure whether future changes to the regulatory environment will be favorable or unfavorable to our business prospects. For example, average review times at the FDA for marketing approval applications can be affected by a variety of factors, including budget and funding levels and statutory, regulatory and policy changes.

47

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to Protecting Our Intellectual Property

It is difficult and expensive to protect our intellectual property rights and we cannot ensure that they will prevent third parties from competing against us. If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary technology, or obtain and maintain issued patents that are sufficient to protect our product candidates, others could compete against us more directly, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property rights, both in the United States and other countries, successfully defend this intellectual property against third-party challenges and successfully enforce this intellectual property to prevent third-party infringement. We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements.

Our ability to protect any of our product candidates and technologies from unauthorized or infringing use by third parties depends in substantial part on our ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable patents in both the United States and other countries. Patent matters in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual questions. Changes in the patent laws, their implementing regulations or their interpretations may diminish the value of our patent rights.

There can be no assurance that we will discover or develop patentable products or processes or that patents will issue from any pending patent applications owned or licensed by us, or if issued, the breadth of such patent coverage. We currently have no issued patents covering any of our product candidates, including PTI-428 and PTI-130, or our technologies, and our patent applications related to our CF program are in the earliest stages, including several provisional patent applications. We cannot provide any assurances that any of our pending patent applications will lead to issued patents and, if they do, that such patents will include claims with a scope sufficient to protect our product candidates or otherwise provide any competitive advantage. Even if issued, we cannot guarantee that claims of issued patents owned or licensed to us are or will be held valid or enforceable by the courts or, even if unchallenged, will provide us with exclusivity or commercial value for our product candidates or technology or any significant protection against competitive products or prevent others from designing around our claims. Further, if we encounter delays in regulatory approvals, the period of time during which we could market our product candidates under patent protection could be reduced. Our patent rights also depend on our compliance with technology and patent licenses upon which our patent rights are based and upon the validity of assignments of patent rights from consultants and other inventors that were, or are, not employed by us.

The patent positions of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, including our patent position, involve complex legal and factual questions, and, therefore, the issuance, scope, validity and enforceability of any patent claims that we may obtain cannot be predicted with certainty. Patents, if issued, may be challenged, deemed unenforceable, invalidated, or circumvented. U.S. patents and patent applications may also be subject to interference proceedings, ex parte reexamination, or inter partes review proceedings, supplemental examination and challenges in district court. Patents may be subjected to opposition, post-grant review, or comparable proceedings lodged in various foreign, both national and regional, patent offices. These proceedings could result in either loss of the patent or denial of the patent application or loss or reduction in the scope of one or more of the claims of the patent or patent application. In addition, such proceedings may be costly. Thus, any patents, should they issue, that we may own or exclusively license may not provide any protection against competitors.

Patent applications are generally maintained in confidence until publication. In the United States, for example, patent applications are maintained in secrecy for up to 18 months after their filing. Similarly, publication of discoveries in scientific or patent literature often lags behind actual discoveries. Consequently, we cannot be certain that we were the first to file patent applications on our product candidates. There is also no assurance that all of the potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found, which could be used by a third party to challenge validity of our patents, should they issue, or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application.

In addition, even if patents do successfully issue, third parties may challenge any such patent we own or license through adversarial proceedings in the issuing offices, which could result in the invalidation or unenforceability of some or all of the relevant patent claims. If a third party asserts a substantial new question of patentability against any claim of a U.S. patent we own or license, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, may grant a request for reexamination, which may result in a loss of scope of some claims or a loss of the entire patent. The adoption of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, on September 16, 2011, established additional opportunities for third parties to invalidate U.S. patent claims, including inter partes review and post-grant review, on the basis of a lower legal standards than reexamination and additional grounds.

48

Table of Contents

We will incur significant ongoing expenses in maintaining our patent portfolio. Should we lack the funds to maintain our patent portfolio or to enforce our rights against infringers, we could be adversely impacted. Moreover, the failure of any patents that may issue to us or our licensors to adequately protect our product candidates or technology could have an adverse impact on our business.

We will not be able to seek and obtain protection for our intellectual property in all jurisdictions throughout the world, and we may not be able to adequately enforce our intellectual property rights even in the jurisdictions where we seek protection.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on all of our product candidates throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. Competitors may manufacture and sell our potential products in those foreign countries where we do not file for and obtain patent protection or where patent protection may be unavailable, not obtainable or ultimately not enforceable. Our competitors might conduct research and development activities in countries where we do not have patent rights and then use the information learned from such activities to develop competitive products for sale in our major commercial markets and, further, may be able to export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection but where enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our products in jurisdictions where we do not have any issued patents and our patent claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from so competing.

The statutory deadlines for pursuing patent protection in individual foreign jurisdictions are based on the priority date of each of our patent applications. For all of our patent applications related to PTI-428, PTI-130, potentiator correctors and our CF and COPD programs, as well as for all but one of the remaining applications related to our CF program and most of the patent applications related to our Usp14 program, the relevant statutory deadlines have not yet expired. Thus, for each of these patent families, particularly those that we believe provide coverage for our lead product candidates, we will need to decide whether and where to pursue protection outside the United States by the relevant deadlines, and we will only have the opportunity to obtain patent protection in those jurisdictions where we file for protection, and prosecute and obtain issued claims.

The laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. The scope and available coverage thus may vary significantly. Outside of the United States, patents we own or license, if issued, may become subject to patent opposition in the European Patent Office or similar proceedings, which may result in loss of scope of some claims or loss of the entire patent. Participation in adversarial proceedings is very complex and expensive, and may divert our management’s attention from our core business and may result in unfavorable outcomes that could adversely affect our ability to prevent third parties from competing with us.

The legal systems of some countries, particularly developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, especially those relating to biotechnology. This could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents, if obtained, or the misappropriation of our other intellectual property rights. For example, many foreign countries have compulsory licensing laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit. Patent protection must ultimately be sought on a country-by-country basis, which is an expensive and time-consuming process with uncertain outcomes. Accordingly, we may choose not to seek patent protection in certain countries, and we will not have the benefit of patent protection in such countries.

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biopharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. For example, an April 2014 report from the Office of the United States Trade Representative identified a number of countries, including India and China, where challenges to the procurement and enforcement of patent rights have been reported. Several countries, including India and China, have been listed in the report every year since 1989. If we encounter difficulties in protecting our intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions, our business prospects could be substantially harmed.

Proceedings to enforce our patent rights, if obtained, in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

49

Table of Contents

Intellectual property rights do not necessarily address all potential threats to our competitive advantage.

The degree of future protection afforded by our intellectual property rights is uncertain because intellectual property rights have limitations, and may not adequately protect our business, or permit us to maintain our competitive advantage. The following examples are illustrative:

Should any of these events occur, they could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.

Recent patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents.

The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to United States patent law. These include provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. Accordingly, it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business, our current and pending patent portfolio and future intellectual property strategy. However, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees on any issued patent are due to be paid to the USPTO, the European Patent Office and other foreign patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and various foreign national or international patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of patent rights include, but are not limited to, failure to file non-provisional applications claiming priority to our provisional applications by the statutory deadlines, failure to timely file national and regional stage patent applications based on an international patent application, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. If we or our licensors fail to maintain the patents and patent applications covering our product candidates, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

50

Table of Contents

The patent protection and patent prosecution for some of our product candidates is dependent or may be dependent in the future on third parties.

While we normally seek and gain the right to fully prosecute the patents relating to our product candidates, there may be times when platform technology patents or product-specific patents that relate to our product candidates are controlled by our licensors or collaboration partners. In addition, our licensors and/or licensees and/or collaboration partners may have back-up rights to prosecute patent applications in the event that we do not do so or choose not to do so, and our licensees and/or collaboration partners may have the right to assume patent prosecution rights after certain milestones are reached. If any of our licensing partners fails to appropriately prosecute and maintain patent protection for patents covering any of our product candidates, our ability to develop and commercialize those product candidates may be adversely affected and we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using and selling competing products.

We have entered into and may in the future enter into licenses to licensed intellectual property. If we were to lose our rights to licensed intellectual property, we may not be able to continue developing or commercializing a product candidate, if approved, that relied on such licensed intellectual property.

We are currently a party to and may in the future be party to license agreements under which we are or will be granted rights to intellectual property that are important to our business. Our existing license agreement imposes, and we expect that future license agreements will impose on us, various diligence obligations, payment of milestones and/or royalties and other obligations. If we fail to comply with our obligations under these agreements, or we are subject to a bankruptcy, the licensor may have the right to terminate the license, in which event we would not be able to market products covered by the license. Our business could suffer, for example, if any current or future licenses terminate, if the licensors fail to abide by the terms of the license, if the licensed patents or other rights are found to be invalid or unenforceable, or if we are unable to enter into necessary licenses on acceptable terms.

We may need to obtain licenses from third parties to advance our research or allow commercialization of our product candidates, and we cannot provide any assurances that third-party patents do not exist that might be enforced against our current product candidates or future products in the absence of such a license. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Even if we are able to obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same technologies licensed to us. In that event, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to develop or license replacement technology. If we are unable to do so, we may be unable to develop or commercialize the affected product candidates, which could materially harm our business, and the third parties owning such intellectual property rights could seek either an injunction prohibiting our sales, or, with respect to our sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties and/or other forms of compensation.

Licensing of intellectual property involves complex legal, business and scientific issues. Disputes may arise between us and our licensors regarding intellectual property subject to a license agreement, including:

If disputes over intellectual property that we license now or in the future prevent or impair our ability to maintain our licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates.

We may be subject to litigation alleging that we are infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties or litigation or other adversarial proceedings seeking to invalidate our patents or other proprietary rights, and we may need to resort to litigation to protect or enforce our patents or other proprietary rights, all of which will be costly to defend uncertain in its outcome and may prevent or delay development and commercialization efforts or otherwise harm our business.

Our success also will depend, in part, on our refraining from infringing patents or otherwise violating intellectual property owned or controlled by others. Numerous patents and pending applications are owned by third parties in the fields in which we are developing product candidates, both in the United States and elsewhere. It is difficult for industry participants, including us, to identify all third-party patent rights that may be relevant to our product candidates and technologies because patent searching is imperfect due

51

Table of Contents

to differences in terminology among patents, incomplete databases and the difficulty in assessing the meaning and scope of patent claims. Moreover, because some patent applications are maintained in secrecy until the patents publish, we cannot be certain that third parties have not filed patent applications that cover our products and technologies. We may fail to identify relevant patents or patent applications or may identify pending patent applications of potential interest but incorrectly predict the likelihood that such patent applications may issue with claims of relevance to our technology. In addition, we may be unaware of one or more issued patents that would be infringed by the manufacture, sale, importation or use of a current or future product candidate, or we may incorrectly conclude that a third-party patent is invalid, unenforceable or not infringed by our activities. Additionally, pending patent applications can, subject to certain limitations, be later amended in a manner that could cover our technologies, our future products or the manufacture or use of our future products. Pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, universities, research institutions and others may have filed patent applications or have received, or may obtain, issued patents in the United States or elsewhere relating to aspects of our technology, including our products, processes for manufacture or methods of use, including combination therapy. It is uncertain whether the issuance of any third-party patents will require us to alter our product candidates or processes, obtain licenses, or cease certain activities.

If patents issued to third parties contain blocking, dominating or conflicting claims we may choose to or, if such claims are ultimately determined to be valid, be required to obtain licenses to these patents or to develop or obtain alternative non-infringing technology and cease practicing those activities, including, potentially, the manufacture or marketing of any products deemed to infringe those patents. If any licenses are required, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any such licenses on commercially favorable terms, if at all, and if these licenses are not obtained, we might be prevented from pursuing the development and commercialization of certain of our potential products entirely or for certain indications. Even if a license can be obtained on acceptable terms, the rights may be non-exclusive, which could give our competitors access to the same technology or intellectual property rights licensed to us. Our failure to obtain a license to any technology that we may require to commercialize our products on favorable terms may have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be exposed to, or threatened with, future litigation by third parties, including our competitors, having patent or other intellectual property rights alleging that our technologies, including our products, processes for manufacture or methods of use, including combination therapy, or other proprietary technologies infringe either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents their intellectual property rights. Parties making claims against us may obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to further develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. In the event of a successful infringement or other intellectual property claim against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, obtain one or more licenses from third parties, pay royalties or redesign our affected products, which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure. We cannot predict whether any such license would be available at all or whether it would be available on commercially reasonable terms. Parties making successful claims against us may obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to further develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates. We cannot provide any assurances that third-party patents do not exist which might be enforced against our products or product candidates, resulting in either an injunction prohibiting our sales, or, with respect to our sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties and/or other forms of compensation to third parties. Any of those occurrences would have a material adverse impact on our business.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation or any other patent litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our intellectual property, which could be time consuming, expensive and unsuccessful, and issued patents covering our product candidates could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court.

Competitors may infringe our patents or the patents of our licensors, assuming patents issue from patent applications we own or license. Litigation, which could result in substantial costs to us (even if determined in our favor), may also be necessary to enforce any patents issued or licensed to us. The cost to us in initiating any litigation or other proceeding relating to patent or other proprietary rights, even if resolved in our favor, could be substantial, and litigation would divert our management’s attention. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because they have substantially greater resources. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could delay our research and development efforts and limit our ability to continue our operations. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or our licensors is not valid, is unenforceable and/or is not infringed, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question.

52

Table of Contents

If we were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one of our product candidates or our technology, the defendant could counterclaim that our patent is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States and in most European countries, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, for example, lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability during patent litigation is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on one or more of our products or certain aspects of our platform technology. Such a loss of patent protection could have a material adverse impact on our business. Patents and other intellectual property rights also will not protect our technology if competitors design around our protected technology without legally infringing our patents or other intellectual property rights.

An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. Any of these outcomes would not only have an adverse effect on our patent portfolio but may also have an adverse effect on our business if we are unable to prevent the competitive activities of third parties.

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation or any other patent litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

If we are not able to adequately prevent disclosure of trade secrets and other proprietary information, the value of our technology and products could be significantly diminished.

We rely on trade secrets to protect technology, including our DRT technology platform, especially where patent protection is not believed to be appropriate or obtainable or where patents have not issued. We attempt to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, with confidentiality agreements and assignment of invention agreements with our employees and confidentiality agreements with our consultants and certain contractors. There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets will not otherwise become known or be independently discovered by competitors. We may fail in certain circumstances to obtain the necessary confidentiality agreements, or their scope or term may not be sufficiently broad to protect our interests.

If our trade secrets or other intellectual property become known to our competitors, it could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. To the extent that we or our consultants or research collaborators use intellectual property owned by others in work for us, disputes may also arise as to the rights to related or resulting know-how and inventions.

We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.

We enter into confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, outside scientific advisors, and sponsored researchers. These agreements generally provide that inventions conceived by the party in the course of rendering services to us will be our exclusive property. However, these agreements may not be honored and may not effectively assign intellectual property rights to us. Moreover, we may not obtain these agreements in all circumstances.

Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship or ownership. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

53

Table of Contents

We may be subject to claims that we or our employees or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of our employees’ or consultants’ former employers or their clients. These claims may be costly to defend and if we do not successfully do so, we may be required to pay monetary damages and may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel.

Many of our employees and consultants were previously or concurrently employed at universities or biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although no claims against us are currently pending, we may be subject to claims that these employees, consultants or we have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed trade secrets or other proprietary information of their employers. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. A loss of key research personnel or their work product could compromise our ability to commercialize, or prevent us from commercializing, our product candidates, which could severely harm our business. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management.

Risks Relating to Our Business Operations and Industry

Our future success depends on our ability to retain executives and to attract, retain and motivate key personnel.

Because of the specialized scientific nature of our business and the unique properties of our technology, our success is highly dependent upon our ability to attract and retain qualified scientific and technical personnel, consultants and advisors. We are dependent on the principal members of our scientific and management staff, particularly Ms. Meenu Chhabra and Drs. Po-Shun Lee and Benito Munoz, who have extensive knowledge of and experience developing our technology. The loss of their services might significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our research, development and business objectives.

We will need to recruit a significant number of additional personnel in order to achieve our operating goals. In order to pursue our product development and marketing and sales plans, we will need to hire additional qualified scientific personnel to perform research and development, as well as personnel with expertise in clinical testing, government regulation, manufacturing, marketing and sales, which may strain our existing managerial, operational, regulatory compliance, financial and other resources. We also rely on consultants and advisors to assist in formulating our research and development strategy and adhering to complex regulatory requirements. We face competition for qualified individuals from numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, universities and other research institutions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to attract and retain such individuals on acceptable terms, if at all. Additionally, our facilities are located in Massachusetts, which may make attracting and retaining qualified scientific and technical personnel from outside of Massachusetts difficult. The failure to attract and retain qualified personnel, consultants and advisors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As PTI-428 advances through clinical trials we may experience difficulties in managing our growth and expanding our operations.

We have limited experience in drug development. As our product candidates advance through preclinical studies and any clinical trials, we will need to expand our development, regulatory and manufacturing capabilities or contract with other organizations to provide these capabilities for us. In the future, we expect to have to manage additional relationships with collaborators or partners, suppliers and other organizations. Our ability to manage our operations and future growth will require us to continue to improve our operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures. We may not be able to implement improvements to our management information and control systems in an efficient or timely manner and may discover deficiencies in existing systems and controls.

We are exposed to potential product liability or similar claims, and insurance against these claims may not be available to us at a reasonable rate in the future or at all.

Our business exposes us to potential liability risks that are inherent in the testing, manufacturing and marketing of human therapeutic products. Clinical trials involve the testing of product candidates on human subjects or volunteers under a research plan, and carry a risk of liability for personal injury or death to patients due to unforeseen adverse side effects, improper administration of the product candidate, or other factors. Many of these patients are already seriously ill and are therefore particularly vulnerable to further illness or death.

54

Table of Contents

We carry clinical trial liability insurance, however there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the amount of insurance necessary to cover potential claims or liabilities. We could be materially and adversely affected if we were required to pay damages or incur defense costs in connection with a claim outside the scope of indemnity or insurance coverage, if the indemnity is not performed or enforced in accordance with its terms, or if our liability exceeds the amount of applicable insurance. In addition, there can be no assurance that insurance, if obtained, will continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. Similar risks would exist upon the commercialization or marketing of any products by us or our collaborators.

Regardless of their merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:

Should any of these events occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

We may become involved in securities class action litigation that could divert management’s attention and adversely affect our business and could subject us to significant liabilities.

The stock markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices for the common stock of pharmaceutical companies. These broad market fluctuations as well a broad range of other factors, including the realization of any of the risks described in this “Risk Factors” section of this report, may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. This risk is especially relevant for us because biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies generally experience significant stock price volatility. We may become involved in this type of litigation in the future. Litigation often is expensive and diverts management’s attention and resources, which could adversely affect our business. Any adverse determination in any such litigation or any amounts paid to settle any such actual or threatened litigation could require that we make significant payments.

Our employees may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees could include intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations, to provide accurate information to the FDA, to comply with manufacturing standards we have established, to comply with federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations, to report financial information or data accurately or to disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.

55

Table of Contents

We must comply with environmental laws and regulations, and failure to comply with these laws and regulations could expose us to significant liabilities.

We use hazardous chemicals and biological materials in certain aspects of our business and are subject to a variety of U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the use, generation, manufacture, distribution, storage, handling, treatment and disposal of these materials. Although we believe our safety procedures for handling and disposing of these materials and waste products comply with these laws and regulations, we cannot eliminate the risk of accidental injury or contamination from the use, manufacture, distribution, storage, handling, treatment or disposal of hazardous materials. In the event of contamination or injury, or failure to comply with environmental, occupational health and safety and export control laws and regulations, we could be held liable for any resulting damages and any such liability could exceed our assets and resources, including any available insurance.

Risks Relating to Our Common Stock

Our stock price will likely be volatile and an active, liquid and orderly trading market may not develop for our common stock.

Prior to February 11, 2016, there was no public market for shares of our common stock. Although our common stock is currently listed on The NASDAQ Global Market, an active trading market for our shares has not developed. If an active market for our common stock does not develop, it may be difficult for you to sell shares without depressing the market price for the shares or at all. Even if an active market for our common stock does develop, it may not be sustained. The lack of an active market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling our common stock and may impair our ability to enter into strategic partnerships or acquire future products or licenses by using our common stock as consideration.

The market price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially as a result of many factors, some of which are beyond our control. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or part of the value of your investment in our common stock. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the market price of our common stock include the following: