KOHLS Corp - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
X |
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
For the fiscal year ended February 3, 2018 |
or
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
For the Transition period from ____________ to ___________ |
Commission file number 1-11084
KOHL’S CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin |
|
39-1630919 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
N56 W17000 Ridgewood Drive, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin |
|
53051 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (262) 703-7000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: |
|
None |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes X No .
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No X .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No .
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. X .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer X Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No X .
At July 28, 2017, the aggregate market value of the voting stock of the Registrant held by stockholders who were not affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $7.0 billion (based upon the closing price of Registrant’s Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date). At March 14, 2018, the Registrant had outstanding an aggregate of 168,236,899 shares of its Common Stock.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 16, 2018 are incorporated into Part III.
INDEX
|
||||||
Item 1. |
3 |
|||||
Item 1A. |
5 |
|||||
Item 1B. |
10 |
|||||
Item 2. |
10 |
|||||
Item 3. |
12 |
|||||
Item 4. |
12 |
|||||
Item 4A. |
12 |
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
||||||
Item 5. |
13 |
|||||
Item 6. |
16 |
|||||
Item 7. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
17 |
||||
Item 7A. |
31 |
|||||
Item 8. |
31 |
|||||
Item 9. |
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures |
31 |
||||
Item 9A. |
31 |
|||||
Item 9B. |
33 |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
Item 10. |
34 |
|||||
Item 11. |
34 |
|||||
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
34 |
||||
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
34 |
||||
Item 14. |
34 |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
||||||
Item 15. |
35 |
|||||
Item 16. |
37 |
|||||
|
|
|
||||
38 |
||||||
F-1 |
2
Kohl’s Corporation (the “Company," “Kohl’s,” "we," "our" or "us") was organized in 1988 and is a Wisconsin corporation. As of February 3, 2018, we operated 1,158 Kohl's department stores, a website (www.Kohls.com), 12 FILA outlets, and four Off-Aisle clearance centers. Our Kohl's stores and website sell moderately-priced proprietary and national brand apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty and home products. Our Kohl's stores generally carry a consistent merchandise assortment with some differences attributable to local preferences. Our website includes merchandise that is available in our stores, as well as merchandise that is available only online.
Our merchandise mix includes both national brands and proprietary brands that are available only at Kohl's. Our proprietary portfolio includes well-known established private brands such as Apt. 9, Croft & Barrow, Jumping Beans, SO and Sonoma Goods for Life and exclusive brands that are developed and marketed through agreements with nationally-recognized brands such as Food Network, Jennifer Lopez, Marc Anthony, Rock & Republic and Simply Vera Vera Wang. National brands generally have higher selling prices, but lower gross margins, than proprietary brands.
The following tables summarize our sales penetration by line of business and brand type over the last three years:
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31st each year. Unless otherwise stated, references to years in this report relate to fiscal years rather than to calendar years. The following fiscal periods are presented in this report.
|
Fiscal Year |
Ended |
Number of Weeks |
|
|
|
2017 |
February 3, 2018 |
|
53 |
|
|
2016 |
January 28, 2017 |
|
52 |
|
|
2015 |
January 30, 2016 |
|
52 |
|
For discussion of our financial results, see Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
Distribution
We receive substantially all of our store merchandise at our nine retail distribution centers. A small amount of our merchandise is delivered directly to the stores by vendors or their distributors. The retail distribution centers, which are strategically located throughout the United States, ship merchandise to each store by contract carrier several times a week. Digital sales may be picked up in our stores or are shipped from a Kohl’s fulfillment center, retail distribution center or store; by a third-party fulfillment center; or directly by a third-party vendor.
See Item 2, “Properties,” for additional information about our distribution centers.
3
During 2017, we employed an average of approximately 137,000 associates, including approximately 33,000 full-time and 104,000 part-time associates. The number of associates varies during the year, peaking during the back-to-school and holiday seasons. None of our associates are represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relations with our associates are very good.
Competition
The retail industry is highly competitive. Management considers style, quality and price to be the most significant competitive factors in the industry. Merchandise mix, brands, service, loyalty programs, credit availability, and customer experience and convenience are also key competitive factors. Our primary competitors are traditional department stores, upscale mass merchandisers, off-price retailers, specialty stores, internet and catalog businesses and other forms of retail commerce. Our specific competitors vary from market to market.
Merchandise Vendors
We purchase merchandise from numerous domestic and foreign suppliers. All business partners must meet certain requirements in order to do business with us. Our Terms of Engagement include provisions regarding laws and regulations, employment practices, ethical standards, environmental and legal requirements, communication, monitoring/compliance, record keeping, subcontracting and corrective action. Our expectation is that all business partners will comply with these Terms of Engagement and quickly remediate any deficiencies, if noted, in order to maintain our business relationship.
Approximately 25% of the merchandise we sell is sourced through a third-party purchasing agent. No vendors individually accounted for more than 10% of our net purchases in 2017. We have no significant long-term purchase commitments or arrangements with any of our suppliers, and believe that we are not dependent on any one supplier. We believe we have good working relationships with our suppliers.
Seasonality
Our business, like that of most retailers, is subject to seasonal influences. The majority of our sales and income are typically realized during the second half of each fiscal year. The back-to-school season extends from August through September and represents approximately 15% of our annual sales. Approximately 30% of our annual sales occur during the holiday season in the months of November and December. Because of the seasonality of our business, results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the fiscal year.
Trademarks and Service Marks
KOHL'S® is a registered trademark owned by one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. We consider this mark and the accompanying goodwill to be valuable to our business. This subsidiary has over 200 additional registered trademarks, most of which are used in connection with our private brand products.
Available Information
Our corporate website is https://corporate.kohls.com. Through the “Investors” portion of this website, we make available, free of charge, our proxy statements, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5 and any amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material has been filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
4
The following have also been posted on our website, under the caption “Investors” and sub-caption "Corporate Governance":
|
• |
Committee charters of our Board of Directors’ Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance & Nominating Committee |
|
• |
Corporate Governance Guidelines |
|
• |
Code of Ethics |
|
• |
Corporate Social Responsibility Report |
Information contained on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Paper copies of any of the materials listed above will be provided without charge to any shareholder submitting a written request to our Investor Relations Department at N56 W17000 Ridgewood Drive, Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 53051 or via e-mail to Investor.Relations@Kohls.com.
This Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” made within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as "believes," "anticipates," "plans," "may," "intends," "will," "should," "expects" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements also include comments about our future sales or financial performance and our plans, performance and other objectives, expectations or intentions, such as statements regarding our liquidity, debt service requirements, planned capital expenditures, future business initiatives, and adequacy of capital resources and reserves. There are a number of important factors that could cause our results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements including, among others, those risk factors described below. Forward-looking statements relate to the date made, and we undertake no obligation to update them.
Our sales, gross margin, expenses and operating results could be negatively impacted by a number of factors including, but not limited to those described below. Many of these risk factors are outside of our control. If we are not successful in managing these risks, they could have a negative impact on our sales, gross margin, expenses, and/or operating results.
Macroeconomic and Industry Risks
General economic conditions, consumer spending levels and/or other conditions could decline.
Consumer spending habits, including spending for the merchandise that we sell, are affected by many factors including prevailing economic conditions, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates, prevailing interest rates, housing costs, energy and fuel costs, income tax rates and policies, consumer confidence, consumer perception of economic conditions, and the consumer’s disposable income, credit availability and debt levels. The moderate income consumer, which is our core customer, is especially sensitive to these factors. A slowdown in the U.S. economy or an uncertain economic outlook could adversely affect consumer spending habits. As all of our stores are located in the United States, we are especially susceptible to deteriorations in the U.S. economy.
Consumer confidence is also affected by the domestic and international political situation. The outbreak or escalation of war, or the occurrence of terrorist acts or other hostilities in or affecting the United States, could lead to a decrease in spending by consumers.
Our competitors could make changes to their pricing and other practices.
The retail industry is highly competitive. We compete for customers, associates, locations, merchandise, services and other important aspects of our business with many other local, regional and national retailers. Those competitors include traditional department stores, upscale mass merchandisers, off-price retailers, specialty stores, internet and catalog businesses, and other forms of retail commerce.
5
We consider style, quality and price to be the most significant competitive factors in our industry. The continuing migration and evolution of retailing to digital channels has increased our challenges in differentiating ourselves from other retailers especially as it relates to national brands. In particular, consumers are able to quickly and conveniently comparison shop with digital tools, which can lead to decisions based solely on price. Unanticipated changes in the pricing and other practices of our competitors may adversely affect our performance.
Tax and trade policies could adversely change.
Uncertainty with respect to tax and trade policies, tariffs and government regulations affecting trade between the United States and other countries has recently increased. We source the majority of our merchandise from manufacturers located outside of the United States, primarily in Asia. Major developments in tax policy or trade relations, such as the imposition of tariffs on imported products, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and liquidity.
Operational Risks
We may be unable to offer merchandise that resonates with existing customers and attracts new customers as well as successfully manage our inventory levels.
Our business is dependent on our ability to anticipate fluctuations in consumer demand for a wide variety of merchandise. Failure to accurately predict constantly changing consumer tastes, preferences, spending patterns and other lifestyle decisions could create inventory imbalances and adversely affect our performance and long-term relationships with our customers. Additionally, failure to accurately predict changing consumer tastes may result in excess inventory, which could result in additional markdowns and adversely affect our operating results.
We may be unable to source merchandise in a timely and cost-effective manner.
Approximately 25% of the merchandise we sell is sourced through a third-party purchasing agent. The remaining merchandise is sourced from a wide variety of domestic and international vendors. Our ability to find qualified vendors and access products in a timely and efficient manner is a significant challenge which is typically even more difficult for goods sourced outside the United States, substantially all of which are shipped by ocean to ports in the United States. Political or financial instability, trade restrictions, tariffs, currency exchange rates, transport capacity and costs, work stoppages, port strikes, port congestion and delays and other factors relating to foreign trade are beyond our control and could adversely impact our performance.
Increases in the price of merchandise, raw materials, fuel and labor or their reduced availability could increase our cost of merchandise sold. The price and availability of raw materials may fluctuate substantially, depending on a variety of factors, including demand, weather, supply conditions, transportation costs, energy prices, work stoppages, government regulation and policy, economic climates, market speculation and other unpredictable factors. An inability to mitigate these cost increases, unless sufficiently offset with our pricing actions, might cause a decrease in our profitability. Any related pricing actions might cause a decline in our sales volume. Additionally, a decrease in the availability of raw materials could impair our ability to meet our production or purchasing requirements in a timely manner. Both the increased cost and lower availability of merchandise, raw materials, fuel and labor may also have an adverse impact on our cash and working capital needs as well as those of our suppliers.
If any of our significant vendors were to become subject to bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, we may be unable to arrange for alternate or replacement contracts, transactions or business relationships on terms as favorable as current terms, which could adversely affect our sales and operating results.
6
Our vendors may not adhere to our Terms of Engagement or to applicable laws.
A substantial portion of our merchandise is received from vendors and factories outside of the United States. We require all of our suppliers to comply with all applicable local and national laws and regulations and our Terms of Engagement for Kohl's Business Partners. These Terms of Engagement include provisions regarding laws and regulations, employment practices, ethical standards, environmental and legal requirements, communication, monitoring/compliance, record keeping, subcontracting and corrective action. From time to time, suppliers may not be in compliance with these standards or applicable laws. Significant or continuing noncompliance with such standards and laws by one or more suppliers could have a negative impact on our reputation and our results of operations.
Our marketing may be ineffective.
We believe that differentiating Kohl's in the marketplace is critical to our success. We design our marketing and loyalty programs to increase awareness of our brands and to build personalized connections with new and existing customers. We believe these programs will strengthen customer loyalty, increase the number and frequency of customers that shop our stores and website and increase our sales. If our marketing and loyalty programs are not successful, our sales and operating results could be adversely affected.
The reputation of the Kohl's brand or our proprietary brands could be damaged.
We believe the Kohl's brand name and many of our proprietary brand names are powerful sales and marketing tools. We devote significant resources to promoting and protecting them. We develop and promote proprietary brands that have generated national recognition. In some cases, the brands or the marketing of such brands are tied to or affiliated with well-known individuals. Damage to the reputations (whether or not justified) of the Kohl’s brand, our proprietary brand names or any affiliated individuals, could arise from product failures; concerns about human rights, working conditions and other labor rights and conditions where merchandise is produced; perceptions of our pricing and return policies; litigation; vendor violations of our Terms of Engagement; or various other forms of adverse publicity, especially in social media outlets. Damage to our reputation may result in a reduction in sales, earnings, and shareholder value.
There may be concerns about the safety of products that we sell.
If our merchandise offerings do not meet applicable safety standards or our customers' expectations regarding safety, we could experience lost sales, experience increased costs, and/or be exposed to legal and reputational risk. Events that give rise to actual, potential or perceived product safety concerns could expose us to government enforcement action and/or private litigation. Reputational damage caused by real or perceived product safety concerns, could have a negative impact on our sales and operating results.
We may be unable to adequately maintain and/or update our information systems.
The efficient operation of our business is dependent on our information systems. In particular, we rely on our information systems to effectively manage sales, distribution, and merchandise planning and allocation functions. We also generate sales though the operations of our Kohls.com website. We frequently make investments that will help maintain and update our existing information systems. The potential problems and interruptions associated with implementing technology initiatives or the failure of our information systems to perform as designed could disrupt our business and harm our sales and profitability.
7
Our information technology projects may not yield their intended results.
We regularly have internal information technology projects in process. Although the technology is intended to increase productivity and operating efficiencies, these projects may not yield their intended results or may deliver an adverse user or customer experience. We may incur significant costs in connection with the implementation, ongoing use, or discontinuation of technology projects, or fail to successfully implement these technology initiatives or achieve the anticipated efficiencies from such projects, any of which could adversely affect our operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Weather conditions could adversely affect consumer shopping patterns.
A significant portion of our business is apparel and is subject to weather conditions. As a result, our operating results may be adversely affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions. Frequent or unusually heavy snow, ice or rain storms; natural disasters such as earthquakes, tornadoes, floods, fires, and hurricanes; or extended periods of unseasonable temperatures could adversely affect our performance by affecting consumer shopping patterns, diminishing demand for seasonal merchandise and/or causing physical damage to our properties.
We may be unable to successfully execute an omnichannel strategy.
Customer expectations about the methods by which they purchase and receive products or services are evolving. Customers are increasingly using technology and mobile devices to rapidly compare products and prices and to purchase products. Once products are purchased, customers are seeking alternate options for delivery of those products. We must continually anticipate and adapt to these changes in the purchasing process. Our ability to compete with other retailers and to meet our customer expectations may suffer if we are unable to provide relevant customer-facing technology and omnichannel experiences. Our ability to compete may also suffer if Kohl’s, our suppliers, or our third-party shipping and delivery vendors are unable to effectively and efficiently fulfill and deliver orders, especially during the holiday season when sales volumes are especially high. Consequently, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our business is seasonal in nature, which could negatively affect our revenues, operating results and cash requirements.
Our business is subject to seasonal influences, with a major portion of sales and income historically realized during the second half of the fiscal year, which includes the back-to-school and holiday seasons.
If we do not properly stock or restock popular products, particularly during the back-to-school and holiday seasons, we may fail to meet customer demand, which could affect our revenue and our future growth. If we overstock products, we may be required to take significant inventory markdowns or write-offs, which could reduce profitability.
We may experience an increase in costs associated with shipping digital orders due to complimentary upgrades, split shipments, and additional long-zone shipments necessary to ensure timely delivery for the holiday season. If too many customers access our website within a short period of time, we may experience system interruptions that make our website unavailable or prevent us from efficiently fulfilling orders, which may reduce the volume of goods we sell and the attractiveness of our products and services. Also, third-party delivery and direct ship vendors may be unable to deliver merchandise on a timely basis.
This seasonality causes our operating results and cash needs to vary considerably from quarter to quarter. Additionally, any decrease in sales or profitability during the second half of the fiscal year could have a disproportionately adverse effect on our results of operations.
8
Changes in credit card operations could adversely affect our sales and/or profitability.
Our credit card operations facilitate merchandise sales and generate additional revenue from fees related to extending credit. The proprietary Kohl's credit card accounts are owned by an unrelated third-party, but we share in the net risk-adjusted revenue of the portfolio, which is defined as the sum of finance charges, late fees and other revenue less write-offs of uncollectible accounts. Changes in funding costs related to interest rate fluctuations are shared similar to the revenue when interest rates exceed defined amounts. Though management currently believes that increases in funding costs will be largely offset by increases in finance charge revenue, increases in funding costs could adversely impact the profitability of this program.
Changes in credit card use, payment patterns and default rates may also result from a variety of economic, legal, social and other factors that we cannot control or predict with certainty. Changes that adversely impact our ability to extend credit and collect payments could negatively affect our results.
We may be unable to attract, develop and retain quality associates while controlling costs, which could adversely affect our operating results.
Our performance is dependent on attracting and retaining a large number of quality associates, including our senior management team and other key associates. Many associates are in entry level or part-time positions with historically high rates of turnover. Many of our strategic initiatives require that we hire and/or develop associates with appropriate experience. Our staffing needs are especially high during the holiday season. Competition for these associates is intense. We cannot be sure that we will be able to attract and retain a sufficient number of qualified personnel in future periods.
Our ability to meet our labor needs while controlling costs is subject to external factors such as unemployment levels, prevailing wage rates, minimum wage legislation, actions by our competitors in compensation levels, potential labor organizing efforts, and changing demographics. Competitive and regulatory pressures have already significantly increased our labor costs. Further changes that adversely impact our ability to attract and retain quality associates could adversely affect our performance and/or profitability. In addition, changes in federal and state laws relating to employee benefits, including, but not limited to, sick time, paid time off, leave of absence, wage-and-hour, overtime, meal-and-break time and joint/co-employment could cause us to incur additional costs, which could negatively impact our profitability.
Capital Risks
We may be unable to raise additional capital or maintain bank credit on favorable terms, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
We have historically relied on the public debt markets to raise capital to partially fund our operations and growth. We have also historically maintained lines of credit with financial institutions. Changes in the credit and capital markets, including market disruptions, limited liquidity and interest rate fluctuations, may increase the cost of financing or restrict our access to these potential sources of future liquidity. Our continued access to these liquidity sources on favorable terms depends on multiple factors, including our operating performance and maintaining strong debt ratings. If our credit ratings fall below desirable levels, our ability to access the debt markets and our cost of funds for new debt issuances could be adversely impacted. Additionally, if unfavorable capital market conditions exist if and when we were to seek additional financing, we may not be able to raise sufficient capital on favorable terms and on a timely basis (if at all). If our access to capital was to become significantly constrained or our cost of capital was to increase significantly, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
9
Our capital allocation could be inefficient or ineffective.
Our goal is to invest capital to maximize our overall long-term returns. This includes spending on inventory, capital projects and expenses, managing debt levels, and periodically returning value to our shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. To a large degree, capital efficiency reflects how well we manage our other key risks. The actions taken to address other specific risks may affect how well we manage the more general risk of capital efficiency. If we do not properly allocate our capital to maximize returns, we may fail to produce optimal financial results and we may experience a reduction in shareholder value.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
Regulatory and legal matters could adversely affect our business operations and change financial performance.
Various aspects of our operations are subject to federal, state or local laws, rules and regulations, any of which may change from time to time. The costs and other effects of new or changed legal requirements cannot be determined with certainty. For example, new legislation or regulations may result in increased costs directly for our compliance or indirectly to the extent such requirements increase prices of goods and services, reduce the availability of raw materials or further restrict our ability to extend credit to our customers.
We continually monitor the state and federal legal/regulatory environment for developments that may impact us. Failure to detect changes and comply with such laws and regulations may result in an erosion of our reputation, disruption of business and/or loss of associate morale. Additionally, we are regularly involved in various litigation matters that arise out of the conduct of our business. Litigation or regulatory developments could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance.
Sensitive or confidential customer, associate or company information could be improperly disclosed or lost, which could severely damage our reputation, expose us to risks of litigation and liability, disrupt our operations and harm our business.
As part of our normal course of business, we collect, process and retain sensitive and confidential customer, associate and company information. The protection of this data is extremely important to us, our associates and our customers. Despite the considerable security measures we have in place, our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, may be vulnerable to security breaches, system failures, acts of vandalism, fraud, misappropriation, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors or employee negligence, or other similar events. Any security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, whether by us or our vendors, could disrupt our operations, damage our reputation and customers' willingness to shop in our stores or on our website, violate applicable laws, regulations, orders and agreements, and subject us to additional costs and liabilities which could be material.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Stores
As of February 3, 2018, we operated 1,158 Kohl's department stores with 82.8 million selling square feet in 49 states. We also operate four Off-Aisle clearance centers and 12 FILA outlets.
Our typical store lease has an initial term of 20-25 years and four to eight renewal options for consecutive five-year extension terms. Substantially all of our leases provide for a minimum annual rent that is fixed or adjusts to set levels during the lease term, including renewals. Approximately one-fourth of the leases provide for additional rent based on a percentage of sales over designated levels.
10
The following tables summarize key information about our Kohl's stores as of February 3, 2018:
Number of Stores by State |
|||||||
Mid-Atlantic Region: |
|
Northeast Region: |
|
South Central Region: |
|||
Delaware |
5 |
|
Connecticut |
22 |
|
Arkansas |
8 |
Maryland |
23 |
|
Maine |
5 |
|
Kansas |
12 |
Pennsylvania |
50 |
|
Massachusetts |
25 |
|
Louisiana |
8 |
Virginia |
31 |
|
New Hampshire |
11 |
|
Missouri |
27 |
West Virginia |
7 |
|
New Jersey |
38 |
|
Oklahoma |
11 |
|
|
|
New York |
51 |
|
Texas |
84 |
|
|
|
Rhode Island |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vermont |
2 |
|
|
|
Total Mid-Atlantic |
116 |
|
Total Northeast |
158 |
|
Total South Central |
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest Region: |
|
Southeast Region: |
|
West Region: |
|||
Illinois |
66 |
|
Alabama |
14 |
|
Alaska |
1 |
Indiana |
40 |
|
Florida |
51 |
|
Arizona |
26 |
Iowa |
18 |
|
Georgia |
32 |
|
California |
117 |
Michigan |
46 |
|
Kentucky |
17 |
|
Colorado |
24 |
Minnesota |
27 |
|
Mississippi |
5 |
|
Idaho |
5 |
Nebraska |
7 |
|
North Carolina |
30 |
|
Montana |
3 |
North Dakota |
4 |
|
South Carolina |
16 |
|
Nevada |
12 |
Ohio |
59 |
|
Tennessee |
20 |
|
New Mexico |
5 |
South Dakota |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Oregon |
11 |
Wisconsin |
41 |
|
|
|
|
Utah |
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming |
2 |
Total Midwest |
312 |
|
Total Southeast |
185 |
|
Total West |
237 |
Location |
|
Ownership |
||
Strip centers |
779 |
|
Owned |
412 |
Community & regional malls |
83 |
|
Leased |
509 |
Freestanding |
296 |
|
Ground leased |
237 |
Distribution Centers
The following table summarizes key information about each of our distribution centers.
|
|
|
Year Opened |
|
Square Footage |
|
|
|
Store distribution centers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Findlay, Ohio |
|
1994 |
|
|
780,000 |
|
|
Winchester, Virginia |
|
1997 |
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
Blue Springs, Missouri |
|
1999 |
|
|
540,000 |
|
|
Corsicana, Texas |
|
2001 |
|
|
540,000 |
|
|
Mamakating, New York |
|
2002 |
|
|
605,000 |
|
|
San Bernardino, California |
|
2002 |
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
Macon, Georgia |
|
2005 |
|
|
560,000 |
|
|
Patterson, California |
|
2006 |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
Ottawa, Illinois |
|
2008 |
|
|
328,000 |
|
|
Online fulfillment centers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monroe, Ohio |
|
2001 |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
San Bernardino, California |
|
2010 |
|
|
970,000 |
|
|
Edgewood, Maryland |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,450,000 |
|
|
DeSoto, Texas |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
Plainfield, Indiana |
|
2017 |
|
|
936,000 |
|
We own all of the distribution centers except Corsicana, Texas, which is leased.
11
We own our corporate headquarters in Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin. We also own or lease additional buildings and office space, which are used by various corporate departments, including our credit operations.
We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings, but are subject to certain legal proceedings and claims from time to time that arise out of the conduct of our business.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Our executive officers as of February 3, 2018 were as follows:
Name |
Age |
Position |
Kevin Mansell |
65 |
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
Michelle Gass |
49 |
Chief Merchandising and Customer Officer and CEO-elect |
Sona Chawla |
50 |
Chief Operating Officer and President-elect |
Bruce Besanko |
59 |
Chief Financial Officer |
Richard D. Schepp |
56 |
Chief Administrative Officer |
Mr. Mansell is responsible for Kohl’s strategic direction, long-term growth and profitability. He has served as Chairman since September 2009, Chief Executive Officer since August 2008 and President and Director since February 1999. We previously announced Mr. Mansell’s retirement as the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and as a director of Kohl’s effective as of the close of the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders or any adjournment thereof. Mr. Mansell began his retail career in 1975.
Ms. Gass joined Kohl's in June 2013 as Chief Customer Officer and was named Chief Merchandising and Customer Officer in June 2015 and CEO-elect in September 2017. She is responsible for all of Kohl's merchandising, planning and allocation, and product development functions as well as the company's overall customer engagement strategy, including marketing, public relations, social media and philanthropic efforts. Previously, she served in a variety of management positions with Starbucks Coffee Company since 1996, most recently as President, Starbucks Coffee EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Russia and Africa) from 2011 to May 2013. Ms. Gass began her retail career in 1991.
Ms. Chawla joined Kohl's in November 2015 as Chief Operating Officer and was named President-elect in September 2017. She is responsible for Kohl's full omnichannel operations. She oversees all store operations, logistics and supply chain network, information and digital technology, and omnichannel strategy, planning and operations. Previously, she had served with Walgreens as President of Digital and Chief Marketing Officer from February 2014 to November 2015 and President, E-Commerce from January 2011 to February 2014. Ms. Chawla began her retail and digital career in 2000.
Mr. Besanko joined Kohl’s in July 2017 as Chief Financial Officer and is responsible for financial planning and analysis, investor relations, financial reporting, accounting operations, tax, treasury, non-merchandise purchasing, credit and capital investment strategies. Previously, he served with Supervalu, Inc. as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer from October 2015 to July 2017 and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from August 2013 to October 2015. Mr. Besanko also served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer at OfficeMax, Inc. from 2008 to August 2013 and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer at Circuit City from 2007 to 2008. On November 10, 2008, Circuit City and several of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Circuit City’s Chapter 11
12
plan of liquidation was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court on September 14, 2010. In addition to his business experience, he served 26 years in the U.S. Air Force where he rose to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. Mr. Besanko began his retail career in 1996.
Mr. Schepp was promoted to the principal officer position of Chief Administrative Officer in June 2015 and is responsible for Kohl's human resources, legal, risk management and compliance, real estate, business development and store construction and design functions. He previously served as Senior Executive Vice President, Human Resources, General Counsel and Secretary from April 2013 to June 2015, Senior Executive Vice President General Counsel and Secretary from May 2011 to April 2013 and Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from August 2001 to May 2011. Mr. Schepp began his retail career in 1992.
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market information
Our Common Stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") since May 19, 1992, under the symbol “KSS.” The prices in the table set forth below indicate the high and low sales prices of our Common Stock per the New York Stock Exchange Composite Price History and our quarterly cash dividends per common share for each quarter in 2017 and 2016.
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Dividend |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Dividend |
|
||||||
|
Fourth quarter |
|
$ |
69.14 |
|
|
$ |
37.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
$ |
59.43 |
|
|
$ |
39.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
Third quarter |
|
|
47.44 |
|
|
|
36.50 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
46.15 |
|
|
|
37.70 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
Second quarter |
|
|
42.13 |
|
|
|
35.16 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
45.07 |
|
|
|
34.49 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
First quarter |
|
|
44.50 |
|
|
|
36.66 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
51.13 |
|
|
|
39.69 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
On February 28, 2018, our Board of Directors approved an 11% increase in our dividend to $0.61 per common share. The dividend will be paid on March 28, 2018 to shareholders of record as of March 14, 2018. In 2017, we paid aggregate cash dividends of $368 million.
Holders
As of March 14, 2018, there were approximately 4,000 record holders of our Common Stock.
13
The graph below compares our cumulative five-year shareholder return to that of the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index and a Peer Group Index that is consistent with the retail peer group used in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis section of our Proxy Statement for our May 16, 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Peer Group Index was calculated by S&P Global, a Standard & Poor’s business and includes Bed, Bath & Beyond Inc.; The Gap, Inc.; J.C. Penney Company, Inc.; L Brands, Inc.; Macy’s, Inc.; Nordstrom, Inc.; Ross Stores, Inc.; Sears Holding Corporation; Target Corporation; and The TJX Companies, Inc. The Peer Group Index is weighted by the market capitalization of each component company at the beginning of each period. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on February 2, 2013 and reinvestment of dividends. The calculations exclude trading commissions and taxes.
|
Company / Index |
|
Feb 2, 2013 |
|
|
Feb 1, 2014 |
|
|
Jan 31, 2015 |
|
|
Jan 30, 2016 |
|
|
Jan 28, 2017 |
|
|
Feb 3, 2018 |
|
||||||
|
Kohl’s Corporation |
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
113.07 |
|
|
$ |
137.13 |
|
|
$ |
117.90 |
|
|
$ |
96.59 |
|
|
$ |
165.78 |
|
|
S&P 500 Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
120.30 |
|
|
|
137.42 |
|
|
|
136.50 |
|
|
|
164.99 |
|
|
|
202.66 |
|
|
Peer Group Index |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
110.41 |
|
|
|
140.97 |
|
|
|
132.93 |
|
|
|
123.18 |
|
|
|
134.02 |
|
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities
We did not sell any equity securities from 2015 through 2017 that were not registered under the Securities Act.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
In 2016, our Board of Directors increased the remaining share repurchase authorization under our existing share repurchase program to $2.0 billion. Purchases under the repurchase program may be made in the open market, through block trades and other negotiated transactions. We expect to execute the share repurchase program primarily in open market transactions, subject to market conditions. There is no fixed termination date for the repurchase program, and the program may be suspended, discontinued or accelerated at any time.
14
The following table contains information for shares repurchased and shares acquired from employees in lieu of amounts required to satisfy minimum tax withholding requirements upon the vesting of the employees’ restricted stock during the three fiscal months ended February 3, 2018:
|
Period |
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased During Period |
|
|
Average Price Paid Per Share |
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (Dollars in Millions) |
|
||||
|
October 29 - November 25, 2017 |
|
|
320,380 |
|
|
$ |
41.98 |
|
|
|
318,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,606 |
|
|
November 26 – December 30, 2017 |
|
|
117,520 |
|
|
|
49.34 |
|
|
|
89,600 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
December 31, 2017 - February 3, 2018 |
|
|
12,787 |
|
|
|
62.85 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
450,687 |
|
|
$ |
44.49 |
|
|
|
409,312 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
15
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this document.
|
(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share and per Square Foot Data) |
2017 (e) |
2016 |
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
$ |
19,095 |
|
|
$ |
18,686 |
|
|
$ |
19,204 |
|
|
$ |
19,023 |
|
|
$ |
19,031 |
|
|
Net sales increase (decrease) |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
Comparable sales (a) |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
(1.2 |
)% |
|
Per selling square foot (b) |
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
$ |
6,919 |
|
|
$ |
6,742 |
|
|
$ |
6,939 |
|
|
$ |
6,925 |
|
|
$ |
6,944 |
|
|
As a percent of sales |
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
$ |
4,512 |
|
|
$ |
4,435 |
|
|
$ |
4,452 |
|
|
$ |
4,350 |
|
|
$ |
4,313 |
|
|
As a percent of sales |
|
|
23.6 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
22.9 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported (GAAP) |
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
|
Adjusted (non-GAAP) (c) |
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,742 |
|
|
As a percent of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported (GAAP) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
Adjusted (non-GAAP) (c) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported (GAAP) |
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
Adjusted (non-GAAP) (c) |
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
889 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported (GAAP) |
|
$ |
5.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
$ |
4.24 |
|
|
$ |
4.05 |
|
|
Adjusted (non-GAAP) (c) |
|
$ |
4.19 |
|
|
$ |
3.76 |
|
|
$ |
4.01 |
|
|
$ |
4.24 |
|
|
$ |
4.05 |
|
|
Dividends per share |
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
Balance sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,340 |
|
|
$ |
13,574 |
|
|
$ |
13,606 |
|
|
$ |
14,333 |
|
|
$ |
14,228 |
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
2,680 |
|
|
$ |
2,273 |
|
|
$ |
2,362 |
|
|
$ |
2,721 |
|
|
$ |
2,412 |
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,797 |
|
|
$ |
2,795 |
|
|
$ |
2,792 |
|
|
$ |
2,780 |
|
|
$ |
2,777 |
|
|
Capital lease and financing obligations |
|
$ |
1,717 |
|
|
$ |
1,816 |
|
|
$ |
1,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,968 |
|
|
$ |
2,069 |
|
|
Shareholders’ equity |
|
$ |
5,426 |
|
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
|
$ |
5,491 |
|
|
$ |
5,991 |
|
|
$ |
5,978 |
|
|
Cash flow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operations |
|
$ |
1,691 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,484 |
|
|
$ |
2,027 |
|
|
$ |
1,187 |
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
768 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
682 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
Free cash flow (d) |
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
|
$ |
1,237 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
Return on average shareholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported (GAAP) |
|
|
16.7 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
Adjusted (non-GAAP) (c) |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
Kohl's store information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of stores |
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
Total square feet of selling space (in thousands) |
|
|
82,804 |
|
|
|
82,757 |
|
|
|
83,810 |
|
|
|
83,750 |
|
|
|
83,671 |
|
(a) |
Kohl's store sales are included in comparable sales after the store has been open for 12 full months. Digital sales and sales at remodeled and relocated Kohl's stores are included in comparable sales, unless square footage has changed by more than 10%. Fiscal 2017 compares the 52 weeks ended January 27, 2018 and January 28, 2017. |
(b) |
Net sales per selling square foot includes comparable in-store and digital sales. 2017 excludes the impact of the 53rd week. |
(c) |
Adjustments include $156 million of state tax settlement and tax reform benefits in 2017, $186 million of impairments, store closing, and other costs in 2016, and $169 million of debt extinguishment losses in 2015. See GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation in Results of Operations. |
(d) |
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure which we define as net cash provided by operating activities and proceeds from financing obligations less capital expenditures and capital lease and financing obligation payments. See GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation in Liquidity and Capital Resources. |
(e) |
Fiscal 2017 was a 53-week year. During the 53rd week, net sales were approximately $170 million; selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $30 million; interest was approximately $3 million; net income was approximately $15 million and diluted earnings per share was approximately $0.10. |
16
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executive Summary
As of February 3, 2018, we operated 1,158 Kohl's department stores, a website (www.Kohls.com), 12 FILA outlets, and four Off-Aisle clearance centers. Our Kohl's stores and website sell moderately priced proprietary and national brand apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty and home products. Our Kohl's stores generally carry a consistent merchandise assortment with some differences attributable to local preferences. Our website includes merchandise which is available in our stores, as well as merchandise that is available only online.
Sales increased 2.2% to $19.1 billion for 2017. We saw consistent improvement during the year in sales trends which culminated in a 6.3% increase in our 4th quarter comparable sales and contributed to a 1.5% increase in our comparable sales for the year.
Gross margin as a percentage of sales increased 15 basis points as effective inventory management contributed to fewer permanent and promotional markdowns. These increases were partially offset by higher shipping costs caused by online sales growth.
Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") as a percentage of sales decreased 11 basis points as all areas effectively managed their expenses consistent with improving sales trends throughout the year.
For the year, net income on a GAAP basis was $859 million, or $5.12 per diluted share.
Tax reform and a favorable state tax settlement reduced our 2017 tax expense by $156 million and increased our diluted earnings per share by $0.93. The 53rd week in the 2017 retail calendar increased our diluted earnings per share by approximately $0.10.
Excluding the tax benefits, our net income was $703 million and our diluted earnings per share were $4.19, an increase of 11% over 2016, excluding $0.65 per diluted share of impairment, store closing and other costs in 2016.
See "Results of Operations" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for additional details about our financial results, how we define comparable sales, the impact of the 53rd week and tax reform and the state tax settlement in 2017, and the impairment, store closing and other costs in 2016.
2018 Outlook
Our current expectations for 2018 are as follows:
|
|
Net sales |
Decrease (1) - Increase 1% |
Comparable sales |
Increase 0 - 2% |
Gross margin as a percent of sales |
Increase 5 - 10 bps |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
Increase 1 - 2% |
Depreciation and amortization |
$960 million |
Interest expense, net |
$280 million |
Effective tax rate |
24 - 25% |
Earnings per diluted share |
$4.95 - $5.45 |
Capital expenditures |
$700 million |
Share repurchases |
$300 - $400 million |
This guidance excludes the impact of the new revenue recognition standard which we are required to adopt in 2018. For additional details on the standard, see Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
17
53rd Week
The retail calendar for fiscal January 2018 included a fifth week, resulting in a 14-week fiscal fourth quarter and a 53-week year. During this 53rd week, net sales were approximately $170 million; selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately $30 million; and interest was approximately $3 million. The 53rd week increased our net income by approximately $15 million and our diluted earnings per share by approximately $0.10 for the year. Our comparable sales in 2017 exclude the impact of the 53rd week and compare the 52 weeks ended January 27, 2018 to the 52 weeks ended January 28, 2017.
Net Sales
As an omnichannel retailer, it is often difficult to distinguish between a "store" sale and a "digital" sale. Below is a list of some omnichannel examples:
|
• |
Digital customers can chose to have most online orders either shipped to their home or picked up in any of our stores. |
|
• |
Approximately 75% of our digital customers also shop in our stores. |
|
• |
Digital orders may be shipped from a dedicated E-Commerce fulfillment center, a store, a retail distribution center, direct ship vendors or any combination of the above. |
|
• |
Stores increase digital sales by providing customers opportunities to view, touch and/or try on physical merchandise before ordering online. |
|
• |
Online purchases can easily be returned in our stores. |
|
• |
Kohl's Cash coupons and Yes2You rewards can be redeemed online or in store regardless of where they were earned. |
|
• |
In-store customers can order from online kiosks in our stores. |
|
• |
Customers who utilize our mobile app while in the store may receive mobile coupons to use when they check out. |
Because we do not have a clear distinction between "store" sales and "digital" sales, we do not report them separately.
Kohl’s store sales are included in comparable sales after the store has been open for 12 full months. Digital sales and sales at remodeled and relocated Kohl’s stores are included in comparable sales, unless square footage has changed by more than 10%.
The following table summarizes net sales dollars and changes in comparable sales:
18
Net sales increased $409 million, or 2.2%, to $19.1 billion for 2017. Approximately $170 million of the increase was due to the 53rd week in the fiscal 2017 calendar. The remaining increase was primarily due to a 1.5% increase in comparable sales. The increase in comparable sales reflects higher average transaction values as increases in selling prices were only partially offset by decreases in units per transaction. During the year, number of transactions improved sequentially each quarter and increased in the fourth quarter, but were slightly negative for the full year.
By line of business, Home and Footwear were the strongest categories. Men’s also outperformed the Company average. Accessories and Kids also reported higher comparable sales. Comparable sales trends in the Women’s business improved each quarter, but sales decreased for the year.
Geographically, all regions reported higher sales in 2017.
2016 compared to 2015
Net sales decreased $518 million, or 2.7%, to $18.7 billion for 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a 2.4% decrease in comparable sales. The lower comparable sales were due to fewer transactions, partially offset by higher average transaction values due to increases in both selling prices and units per transaction.
By line of business, Footwear and Men’s were the strongest categories. All other categories underperformed the Company average.
From a regional perspective, the West, Southeast, and Midwest outperformed the Company average and the South Central, Mid-Atlantic and Northeast underperformed.
Gross Margin
Gross margin includes the total cost of products sold, including product development costs, net of vendor payments other than reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs; inventory shrink; markdowns; freight expenses associated with moving merchandise from our vendors to our distribution centers; shipping and handling expenses of digital sales; terms cash discount; and depreciation of product development facilities and equipment. Our gross margin may not be comparable with that of other retailers because we include distribution center and buying costs in selling, general and administrative expenses while other retailers may include these expenses in cost of merchandise sold.
Gross margin as a percent of sales increased 15 bps in 2017. The increase was driven by inventory management and less promotional and permanent markdowns, slightly offset by higher shipping costs.
Gross margin as a percentage of sales in 2016 was consistent with 2015 as higher merchandise margin was substantially offset by higher shipping costs.
19
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“SG&A”) include compensation and benefit costs (including stores, headquarters, buying and merchandising and distribution centers); occupancy and operating costs of our retail, distribution and corporate facilities; freight expenses associated with moving merchandise from our distribution centers to our retail stores and among distribution and retail facilities; marketing expenses, offset by vendor payments for reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs; net revenues from our Kohl’s credit card operations; and other administrative revenues and expenses. We do not include depreciation and amortization in SG&A. The classification of these expenses varies across the retail industry.
Many of our expenses, including store payroll and distribution costs, are variable in nature. These costs generally increase as sales increase and decrease as sales decrease. We measure both the change in these variable expenses and the expense as a percent of sales. If the expense as a percent of sales decreased from the prior year, the expense "leveraged" and indicates that the expense was well-managed or effectively generated additional sales. If the expense as a percent of sales increased over the prior year, the expense "deleveraged" and indicates that sales growth was less than expense growth.
The following graph summarizes the increases and (decreases) in SG&A by expense type from 2016 to 2017 (Dollars in Millions):
SG&A increased $77 million, or 2%, to $4.5 billion for 2017. Approximately $30 million of the increase was due to the 53rd week in the fiscal 2017 calendar. As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased, or leveraged, by 11 basis points.
The increase in corporate expenses reflects higher technology spend as we migrate to the cloud and higher incentive compensation as a result of our strong financial performance in 2017.
Distribution costs, which exclude payroll related to online originated orders that were shipped from our stores, were $303 million for 2017, $23 million higher than 2016. The increase was due to growth in digital sales and the opening of our fifth E-Commerce facility.
In our stores, decreases in controllable expenses were substantially offset by higher store payroll due to on-going wage pressure and omnichannel support of ship-from-store and buy online, pick-up in store operations.
Earnings from our credit card operations, net of servicing and other credit-related expenses, were $496 million in 2017, $12 million higher than 2016. The increase is due to lower marketing and operating costs.
Marketing costs, excluding credit card costs, reflect efficiencies in our non-customer facing spend and the benefit of not repeating a non-productive marketing event.
20
The following graph summarizes the increases and (decreases) in SG&A by expense type from 2015 to 2016 (Dollars in Millions):
SG&A decreased $17 million to $4.4 billion for 2016. As a percentage of sales, SG&A increased, or deleveraged, by 55 basis points in 2016.
Marketing costs, excluding credit card costs, reflect higher digital media spending.
Distribution costs, which exclude payroll related to online originated orders that were shipped from our stores, were $280 million for 2016, $2 million higher than 2015. Increases due to higher fulfillment costs resulting from our growing digital business were partially offset by lower store distribution costs.
The decrease in corporate expenses reflects higher technology spending which was more than offset by expense management in other corporate areas.
The decrease in store expenses includes reductions in store controllable expense, partially offset by higher store payroll due to on-going wage pressure and omnichannel support of ship-from-store and buy online, pick-up in store operations.
Earnings from our credit card operations, net of servicing and other credit-related expenses, were $484 million in 2016, $28 million higher than 2015. The increase is due to higher finance charges and late fees due to growth in the portfolio. Additionally, lower marketing costs were partially offset by higher servicing costs.
Other Expenses
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
$ |
938 |
|
|
$ |
934 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Impairments, store closing and other costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
169 |
|
The increase in depreciation and amortization from 2016 to 2017 includes a $22 million write-off of information technology (“IT”) projects that no longer fit into our strategic and cloud migration plans. The increase was also driven by the opening of our fifth E-commerce fulfillment center and other IT investments. The increase from 2015 to 2016 reflected higher IT amortization which was partially offset by lower store depreciation due to maturing of our stores and store closures.
The decreases in net interest expense in both periods were due to lower interest on capital leases as the portfolio matures. Also contributing to the decreases were higher interest income due to higher yields and investment balances in 2017 and favorable interest rates achieved during our $1.1 billion debt refinancing in 2015.
21
Impairments, store closing and other costs includes the following costs related to closing 18 stores in 2016 and the organizational realignment at our corporate office:
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
|
|
Store leases: |
|
|
|
Record future obligations |
$ |
114 |
|
Write-off net obligations |
|
(21 |
) |
Impairments: |
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
23 |
|
Buildings and other store assets |
|
53 |
|
Severance and other |
|
17 |
|
Total |
$ |
186 |
|
During 2015, we completed a cash tender offer and redemption for $1,085 million of senior unsecured debt. We recognized a $169 million loss on extinguishment of debt which included a $163 million bond tender premium paid to holders of the debt and a $6 million non-cash write-off of deferred financing costs and original issue discounts associated with the extinguished debt.
Income Taxes
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
On December 22, 2017 the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (“the Act”) was signed into law. The Act contains several key tax provisions including the reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, and a variety of other changes including the acceleration of certain business asset expenses and reductions in the amount of executive pay that could qualify as a tax deduction.
Accounting standards require us to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment. However, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 118, which allows us to record provisional amounts during a measurement period.
We have calculated our best estimate of the impact of the Act on our 2017 income tax provision in accordance with our understanding of the Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing. For 2017, the reduction in the tax rate is prorated, resulting in a current year statutory federal tax rate of 33.7%. In 2017, we recorded a total tax benefit of $136 million related to the current year federal tax rate reduction and the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities as well as a $20 million benefit from the settlement of a significant state tax dispute.
Net Income and Earnings per Diluted Share
(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share Data) |
Income before Taxes |
|
Net Income |
|
Earnings per Diluted Share |
|
||||||
2017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP |
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
5.12 |
|
Federal tax reform benefits |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(0.81 |
) |
State tax settlement |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(0.12 |
) |
Adjusted (non-GAAP) |
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
4.19 |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP |
|
$ |
875 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
Impairments, store closing and other costs |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
Adjusted (non-GAAP) |
|
$ |
1,061 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
$ |
3.76 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP |
|
$ |
1,057 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
Adjusted (non-GAAP) |
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
$ |
781 |
|
|
$ |
4.01 |
|
22
We believe adjusted results are useful because they provide enhanced visibility into our results for the periods excluding the impact of infrequent items such as the tax settlement and federal reform in 2017, impairments, store closing and other costs in 2016, and the loss on extinguishment of debt in 2015. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to replace GAAP measures.
Inflation
Although we expect that our operations will be influenced by general economic conditions, including food, fuel and energy prices, and by costs to source our merchandise, we do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations. However, there can be no assurance that our business will not be impacted by such factors in the future.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table presents our primary cash requirements and sources of funds.
Cash Requirements |
Sources of Funds |
• Operational needs, including salaries, rent, taxes and other costs of running our business • Capital expenditures • Inventory (seasonal and new store) • Share repurchases • Dividend payments |
• Cash flow from operations • Short-term trade credit, in the form of extended payment terms • Line of credit under our revolving credit facility |
Our working capital and inventory levels typically build throughout the fall, peaking during the November and December holiday selling season.
The following table includes cash balances and changes.
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
1,691 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,484 |
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
(a)Non-GAAP financial measure
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operations decreased $462 million to $1.7 billion in 2017. The decrease was primarily attributable to changes in accounts payable.
Net cash provided by operations increased $669 million to $2.2 billion in 2016. The increase is primarily due to reductions in inventory and increased accounts payable.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased $107 million to $649 million in 2017. The decrease was primarily due to the completion of the beauty rollout, corporate improvements, and new stores in 2016.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $75 million to $756 million in 2016, primarily due to higher spending for our fifth E-Commerce fulfillment center.
23
The following chart summarizes expected and actual capital expenditures by major category as a percentage of total capital expenditures:
We expect total capital expenditures of approximately $700 million in fiscal 2018. The actual amount of our future capital expenditures will depend on the number and timing of new stores and refreshes; expansion and renovations to distribution centers; the mix of owned, leased or acquired stores; and IT and corporate spending. We do not anticipate that our capital expenditures will be limited by any restrictive covenants in our financing agreements.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $222 million to $808 million in 2017, primarily due to a $251 million decrease in treasury stock purchases. Share repurchases are discretionary in nature. The timing and amount of repurchases is based upon available cash balances, our stock price and other factors.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $473 million to $1.0 billion in 2016, primarily due to a $444 million decrease in treasury stock purchases.
During 2015, we completed a cash tender offer and redemption for $1.1 billion of our higher coupon senior unsecured debt and issued $650 million of 4.25% notes due in July 2025 and $450 million of 5.55% notes due in July 2045. Both notes include semi-annual, interest-only payments that began in January 17, 2016. Proceeds of the issuances and cash on hand were used to pay the principal, premium and accrued interest of the acquired and redeemed debt.
We may again seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through open market cash purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved could be material.
On November 3, 2017 we amended and restated our existing credit facility with various lenders which provides for a $1.0 billion senior unsecured five-year revolving credit facility that will mature in November 2022. Among other things, the agreement includes a maximum leverage ratio financial covenant and restrictions on liens and subsidiary indebtedness.
As of February 3, 2018, our credit ratings were as follows:
|
Moody’s |
Standard & Poor’s |
Fitch |
Long-term debt |
Baa2 |
BBB- |
BBB |
24
During 2017, we paid cash dividends of $368 million as detailed in the following table:
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
||||
|
Declaration date |
|
February 22 |
|
|
May 10 |
|
|
August 8 |
|
|
November 8 |
|
||||
|
Record date |
|
March 8 |
|
|
June 7 |
|
|
September 6 |
|
|
December 6 |
|
||||
|
Payment date |
|
March 22 |
|
|
June 21 |
|
|
September 20 |
|
|
December 20 |
|
||||
|
Amount per common share |
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
On February 28, 2018, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on our common stock of $0.61 per share, an 11% increase over our prior dividend. The dividend is payable March 28, 2018 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 14, 2018.
Free Cash Flow
We generated $881 million of free cash flow for 2017; a decrease of $388 million from 2016. As discussed above, the decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in accounts payable. Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure which we define as net cash provided by operating activities and proceeds from financing obligations (which generally represent landlord reimbursements of construction costs) less capital expenditures and capital lease and financing obligation payments. Free cash flow should be evaluated in addition to, and not considered a substitute for, other financial measures such as net income and cash flow provided by operations. We believe that free cash flow represents our ability to generate additional cash flow from our business operations. See the key financial ratio calculations section above.
Liquidity Ratios
The following table provides additional measures of our liquidity.
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
||
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
2,680 |
|
|
$ |
2,273 |
|
|
Current ratio |
|
|
2.01 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
Liquidity measures our ability to meet short-term cash needs. Working capital increased $407 million and our current ratio increased 25 basis points over year-end 2016 primarily due to higher cash balances.
The accounts payable as a percent of inventory ratio decreased to 35.9%, a 382 basis point reduction from the prior year ratio.
Return on Investment Ratios
The following table provides additional measures of our return on investments.
|
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
|
3.4 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
3.1 |
|
Return on assets |
|
6.4 |
% |
|
4.1 |
% |
|
4.7 |
% |
Return on gross investment ("ROI") (a) |
|
13.9 |
% |
|
12.6 |
% |
|
14.5 |
% |
|
(a) |
Non-GAAP financial measure |
Changes in earnings drove changes in our return on investment ratios. See Exhibit 12.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calculation of our ratio of earnings to fixed charges and the key financial ratio calculations below for the return on assets and ROI calculations.
We believe that ROI is a useful financial measure in evaluating our operating performance. When analyzed in conjunction with our net earnings and total assets and compared with return on assets, it provides investors with a useful tool to evaluate our ongoing operations and our management of assets from period to period. ROI is a non-GAAP financial measure which we define as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent (“EBITDAR”) divided by average gross investment. Our ROI calculation may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. ROI should be evaluated in addition to, and not considered a substitute for, other financial measures such as return on assets.
25
The following table provides additional measures of our capital structure.
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
||
Debt/capitalization |
|
|
45.4 |
% |
|
|
47.1 |
% |
Adjusted debt to EBITDAR (a) |
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
(a) |
Non-GAAP financial measure |
The decreases in our capital structure ratios are primarily due to higher earnings.
Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR is a non-GAAP financial measure which we define as our adjusted outstanding debt balance divided by adjusted EBITDAR. We believe that our debt levels are best analyzed using this measure. Our current goals are to maintain a ratio that demonstrates our commitment to an investment grade rating and allows us to operate with an efficient capital structure for our size, growth plans and industry. We are currently exceeding our target goal to take advantage of a favorable, low interest rate debt environment. Our Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR calculation may not be comparable to similarly-titled measures reported by other companies. Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR should be evaluated in addition to, and not considered a substitute for, other financial measures such as debt/capitalization. See the key financial ratio calculations section below for our Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR calculation.
Our debt agreements contain various covenants including limitations on additional indebtedness and a maximum permitted debt ratio. As of February 3, 2018, we were in compliance with all debt covenants and expect to remain in compliance during 2018. See the key financial ratio calculations section below for our debt covenant calculation.
Key Financial Ratio Calculations
The following table includes our ROI and return on assets calculations:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
Rent expense |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
EBITDAR |
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
2,397 |
|
|
$ |
2,766 |
|
|
Average: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
13,419 |
|
|
$ |
13,584 |
|
|
$ |
14,288 |
|
|
Cash equivalents and long-term investments (b) |
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,217 |
|
|
|
6,558 |
|
|
|
6,203 |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1,548 |
) |
|
|
(1,515 |
) |
|
|
(1,623 |
) |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
(1,155 |
) |
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(674 |
) |
|
|
(620 |
) |
|
|
(556 |
) |
|
Capitalized rent (c) |
|
|
2,767 |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
2,672 |
|
|
Gross investment (“AGI”) |
|
$ |
19,365 |
|
|
$ |
18,962 |
|
|
$ |
19,066 |
|
|
Return on assets (“ROA”) (d) |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
Return on gross investment (“ROI”) (e) |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
14.5 |
% |
|
(a) |
Represents average of 5 most recent quarter end balances |
|
(b) |
Represents excess cash not required for operations |
|
(c) |
Represents 10 times store rent and 5 times equipment/other rent |
|
(d) |
Net income divided by average total assets |
|
(e) |
EBITDAR divided by Gross Investment |
26
The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities (a GAAP measure) to free cash flow (a non-GAAP measure).
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
1,691 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,484 |
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
Capital lease and financing obligation payments |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
Proceeds from financing obligations |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
881 |
|
|
$ |
1,269 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
The following table includes our debt/capitalization and Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR calculations:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
|
|||||
|
Capital lease and financing obligations |
|
$ |
1,717 |
|
|
$ |
1,816 |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
4,514 |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
5,426 |
|
|
|
5,177 |
|
|
|
|
Capitalization |
|
$ |
9,940 |
|
|
$ |
9,788 |
|
|
|
|
Debt/capitalization |
|
|
45.4 |
% |
|
|
47.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
4,514 |
|
|
$ |
4,611 |
|
|
|
|
Rent x 8 |
|
|
2,344 |
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted debt |
|
$ |
6,858 |
|
|
$ |
6,819 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
1,416 |
|
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
|
Rent expense |
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
EBITDAR |
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
|
Impairments, store closing and other costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDAR |
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
2,583 |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted debt to adjusted EBITDAR |
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
The following table includes our debt ratio calculation, as defined by our debt agreements:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
2017 |
|||
|
Included Indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated indebtedness |
|
$ |
4,533 |
|
|
Permitted exclusions for L/C obligations |
|
|
- |
|
|
Permitted exclusions for unamortized debt discount |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
4,528 |
|
|
Rent x 8 |
|
|
2,344 |
|
|
Included indebtedness |
|
$ |
6,872 |
|
|
Debt Compliance EBITDAR - Rolling 12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
Interest charges |
|
|
299 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
258 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
991 |
|
|
Capital losses from the disposition of fixed assets |
|
|
- |
|
|
Other non-cash expenses reducing net income |
|
|
69 |
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
Non-cash items increasing net income |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
Capital gains from the disposition of fixed assets |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
Rent |
|
|
293 |
|
|
Consolidated EBITDAR |
|
$ |
2,744 |
|
|
Debt ratio (a) |
|
|
2.50 |
|
|
Maximum permitted debt ratio |
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
(a) |
Included Indebtedness divided by Consolidated EBITDAR |
27
Our contractual obligations as of February 3, 2018 were as follows:
|
|
|
Maturing in: |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Total |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
2019 and 2020 |
|
|
2021 and 2022 |
|
|
2023 and after |
|
|||||
|
Recorded contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
2,165 |
|
|
Capital lease and financing obligations |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
2,891 |
|
|
Unrecorded contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
Capital lease and financing obligations |
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
|
Operating leases (a) |
|
|
5,123 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
3,873 |
|
|
Other (b) |
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,840 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
6,407 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,898 |
|
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
|
$ |
1,599 |
|
|
$ |
1,996 |
|
|
$ |
9,298 |
|
|
(a) |
Our leases typically require that we pay real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs in addition to the minimum rental payments included in the table above. Such costs vary from period to period and totaled $182 million for 2017, $177 million for 2016 and $179 million for 2015. The lease term includes cancelable option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty. |
|
|
(b) |
Other includes royalties, legally binding minimum lease and interest payments for stores opening in 2018 or later, as well as payments associated with technology and marketing agreements. |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not provided any financial guarantees as of year-end 2017.
We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating our business. We do not have any arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into the financial statements that are reasonably likely to materially affect our financial condition, liquidity, results of operations or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates and assumptions with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. There have been no significant changes in the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed in our 2016 Form 10-K.
Retail Inventory Method and Inventory Valuation
We value our inventory at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis using the retail inventory method (“RIM”). Under RIM, the valuation of inventories at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a cost-to-retail ratio to the retail value of the inventories. The use of RIM will generally result in inventories being valued at the lower of cost or market as permanent markdowns are taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventories.
RIM inherently requires management judgment and estimates, such as the amount and timing of permanent markdowns to clear unproductive or slow-moving inventory, which may impact the ending inventory valuation as
28
well as gross margin. Factors considered in the determination of permanent markdowns include current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, age of the merchandise, fashion trends and weather conditions.
Inventory shrinkage is estimated as a percent of sales for the period between the last physical inventory count and the balance sheet date. Shrink is the difference between the recorded amount of inventory and the physical inventory. We generally perform an annual physical inventory count at the majority of our stores and distribution centers. The shrinkage rate from the most recent physical inventory, in combination with current events and historical experience, is used as the standard for the shrinkage accrual rate for the next inventory cycle. Historically, our actual physical inventory count results have shown our estimates to be reliable.
Vendor Allowances
We frequently receive allowances from our vendors for discounts that we have taken in order to sell the vendor’s merchandise and/or to support gross margins earned on those sales. This markdown support generally relates to sold inventory or permanent markdowns and, accordingly, is reflected as a reduction to cost of merchandise sold. Markdown support related to merchandise that has not yet been sold is recorded in inventory.
We also receive support from vendors for marketing and other costs that we have incurred to sell the vendors’ merchandise. To the extent the reimbursements are for specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to sell the vendor's products and do not exceed the costs incurred, they are recognized as a reduction of selling, general, and administrative expenses. If these criteria are not met, the support is recorded in inventory and reflected as a reduction of costs of merchandise sold when the related merchandise is sold.
Insurance Reserve Estimates
We are primarily self-insured for costs related to workers’ compensation, general liability, and employee-related health care benefits. We use a third-party actuary to estimate the liabilities associated with these risks. The actuary considers historical claims experience, demographic and severity factors, health care trends, and actuarial assumptions to estimate the liabilities associated with these risks. Historically, our actuarial estimates have not been materially different from actual results.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We review our long-lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances, such as decisions to close a store or significant operating losses, indicate the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. All long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment at least annually.
If our evaluations, which are performed on an undiscounted cash flow basis, indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may be not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured as the excess of carrying value over the fair value of the impaired asset.
Identifying impaired assets and quantifying the related impairment loss, if any, requires significant estimates by management. The most significant of these estimates is the cash flow expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. When determining the stream of projected future cash flows associated with an individual store, management estimates future store performance including sales growth rates, gross margin, and controllable expenses, such as store payroll and occupancy expense. Projected cash flows must be estimated for future periods throughout the remaining life of the property, which may be as many as 40 years in the future. The accuracy of these estimates will be impacted by a number of factors including general economic conditions, changes in competitive landscape and our ability to effectively manage the operations of the store.
Other than the stores which we closed in 2016, we have not historically experienced any significant impairment of long-lived assets. Additionally, impairment of an individual building and related improvements, net of accumulated depreciation, would not generally be material to our financial results.
29
In 2016, we closed numerous leased stores prior to their scheduled lease expiration. In addition to future rent obligations, the closed store reserve includes estimates for operating and other expenses expected to be incurred over the remaining lease term, some of which extend through January 2030.
Income Taxes
We regularly evaluate the likelihood of realizing the benefit for income tax positions we have taken in various federal and state filings by considering all relevant facts, circumstances and information available to us. If we believe it is more likely than not that our position will be sustained, we recognize a benefit at the largest amount which we believe is cumulatively greater than 50% likely to be realized.
Unrecognized tax benefits require significant management judgment regarding applicable statutes and their related interpretation, the status of various income tax audits and our particular facts and circumstances. Also, as audits are completed or statutes of limitations lapse, it may be necessary to record adjustments to our taxes payable, deferred tax assets, tax reserves or income tax expense. Although we believe we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different.
Leases
Accounting for leased properties requires compliance with technical accounting rules and significant judgment by management. Application of these accounting rules and assumptions made by management will determine whether we are considered the owner for accounting purposes or whether the lease is accounted for as a capital or operating lease.
If we are considered the owner for accounting purposes or the lease is considered a capital lease, we record the property and a related financing or capital lease obligation on our balance sheet. The asset is then depreciated over its expected lease term. Rent payments for these properties are recognized as interest expense and a reduction of the financing or capital lease obligation.
If the lease is considered an operating lease, it is not recorded on our balance sheet and rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.
The most significant estimates used by management in accounting for property leases and the impact of these estimates are as follows:
|
• |
Expected lease term—Our expected lease term includes both contractual lease periods and cancelable option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty. The expected lease term is used in determining whether the lease is accounted for as an operating lease or a capital lease. A lease is considered a capital lease if the lease term exceeds 75% of the leased asset’s useful life. The expected lease term is also used in determining the depreciable life of the asset or the straight-line rent recognition period. Increasing the expected lease term will increase the probability that a lease will be considered a capital lease and will generally result in higher rent expense for an operating lease and higher interest and depreciation expenses for a leased property recorded on our balance sheet. |
30
|
obligation, the incremental borrowing rate is also used in allocating our rental payments between interest expense and a reduction of the outstanding obligation. |
|
• |
Fair market value of leased asset—The fair market value of leased retail property is generally estimated based on comparable market data as provided by third-party appraisers or consideration received from the landlord. Fair market value is used in determining whether the lease is accounted for as an operating lease or a capital lease. A lease is considered a capital lease if the net present value of the lease payments is greater than 90% of the fair market value of the property. Increasing the fair market value reduces the probability that a lease will be considered a capital lease. Fair market value is also used in determining the amount of property and related financing obligation to be recognized on our balance sheet for certain leased properties which are considered owned for accounting purposes. |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
All of our long-term debt at year-end 2017 is at fixed interest rates and, therefore, is not affected by changes in interest rates. When our long-term debt instruments mature, we may refinance them at then existing market interest rates, which may be more or less than interest rates on the maturing debt.
We share in the net risk-adjusted revenue of the Kohl’s credit card portfolio as defined by the sum of finance charges, late fees and other revenue less write-offs of uncollectible accounts. We also share the costs of funding the outstanding receivables as interest rates exceed defined rates. As a result, our share of profits from the credit card portfolio may be negatively impacted by increases in interest rates. The reduced profitability, if any, will be impacted by various factors, including our ability to pass higher funding costs on to the credit card holders and the outstanding receivable balance. Recent increases in interest rates have not had a material impact on our financial results. The impact of future increases, if any, cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements are included in this report beginning on page F-3.
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (the “Evaluation”) at a reasonable assurance level as of the last day of the period covered by this Report.
Based upon the Evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. "Disclosure controls and procedures" is defined by Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") as controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving our stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
31
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of our published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, our management has concluded that as of February 3, 2018, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, as part of its audit, has issued an attestation report, included herein, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the last fiscal quarter, there were no changes in our internal controls that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect such controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Kohl’s Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Kohl’s Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Kohl’s Corporation (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 3, 2018, and the related notes and our report dated March 23, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
32
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 23, 2018
None
33
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
For information with respect to our Directors, the Board of Directors’ committees and our written code of ethics, see the applicable portions of the “Questions and Answers About our Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Matters” and “Item One: Election of Directors” sections of the Proxy Statement for our May 16, 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“our 2018 Proxy”), which information is incorporated herein by reference. For information with respect to Section 16 reports, see the information provided in the “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” section of our 2018 Proxy, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Any amendment to or waiver from the provisions of the Code of Ethics that is applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or other key finance associates will be disclosed on the “Corporate Governance” portion of http://corporate.kohls.com. We intend to satisfy our disclosure requirements under item 5.05 of form 8-K regarding any amendments or waivers by posting such information at this location or our website.
See also Item 4A, Executive Officers of Part 1 hereof.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
See the information provided in the applicable portions of the “Questions and Answers About our Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Matters” and “Item One: Election of Directors” sections of our 2018 Proxy, including the "Compensation Committee Report" and "Compensation Discussion & Analysis", which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
See the information provided in the “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors and Management” section of our 2018 Proxy, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
The following table includes shares of common stock outstanding and available for issuance under our existing equity compensation plans as of February 3, 2018.
Plan Category |
(a) Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
|
(b) Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
|
(c) Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
1,139,327 |
|
|
$50.51 |
|
|
9,056,536 |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(1) |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
Total |
1,139,327 |
|
|
$50.51 |
|
|
9,056,536 |
|
(1) |
All of our existing equity compensation plans have been approved by shareholders. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
See the information provided in the “Independence Determinations & Related Person Transactions” section of our 2018 Proxy, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
See the information provided in the “Fees Paid to Ernst & Young” section of our 2018 Proxy, which information is incorporated herein by reference.
34
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Documents filed as part of this report
|
1. |
Consolidated Financial Statements: |
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1, the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on page F-2 and the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-3, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
|
2. |
Financial Statement Schedule: |
All schedules have been omitted as they are not applicable.
|
3. |
Exhibits: |
Exhibit |
Description |
|
Document if Incorporated by Reference |
3.1 |
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company |
|
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 16, 2011 |
3.2 |
|
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2015 |
|
4.1 |
|
Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 3, 2017 |
|
4.2 |
Certain other long-term debt is described in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company agrees to furnish to the Commission, upon request, copies of any instruments defining the rights of holders of any such long-term debt described in Note 2 and not filed herewith. |
|
|
10.1 |
|
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2010 |
|
10.2 |
|
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 3, 2014 |
|
10.3 |
|
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 1, 2003 |
|
10.4 |
|
Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 |
35
Exhibit |
Description |
|
Document if Incorporated by Reference |
10.5 |
|
Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 |
|
10.6 |
Summary of Executive Life and Accidental Death and Dismemberment Plans* |
|
Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005 |
10.7 |
|
Annex B to the Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 24, 2016 in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
|
10.8 |
|
Exhibit 10.15 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 4, 1996 |
|
10.9 |
|
Exhibit 4.4 of the Company's registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-26409), filed on May 2, 1997 |
|
10.10 |
|
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended August 2, 2008 |
|
10.11 |
|
Annex A to the Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 24, 2016 in connection with the Company’s 2016 Annual Meeting |
|
10.12 |
|
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2016 |
|
10.13 |
|
Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2014 |
|
10.14 |
|
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010 |
|
10.15 |
|
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010 |
|
10.16 |
|
Exhibit 99.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 15, 2014 |
|
10.17 |
|
Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010 |
|
10.18 |
|
Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 1, 2010 |
|
10.19 |
|
Annex A to the Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 13, 2017 in connection with the company's 2017 Annual Meeting |
|
10.20 |
|
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 29, 2017 |
|
10.21 |
|
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 29, 2017 |
|
10.22 |
|
|
|
10.23 |
|
Exhibit 99.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 14, 2014 |
36
Exhibit |
Description |
|
Document if Incorporated by Reference |
10.24 |
|
Exhibit 99.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 26, 2017 |
|
10.25 |
|
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2017 |
|
10.26 |
|
Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2017 |
|
10.27 |
|
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2015 |
|
10.28 |
|
Exhibit 10.19 (b) of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 17, 2017 |
|
10.29 |
|
Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2017 |
|
10.30 |
|
Exhibit 10.2 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2017 |
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
Exhibit 21.1 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2015 |
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
101.INS |
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
101.SCH |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
|
101.CAL |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
|
|
101.DEF |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
|
|
101.LAB |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
|
|
101.PRE |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*A management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
|
Not applicable.
37
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
Kohl’s Corporation |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/S/ KEVIN MANSELL |
|
|
Kevin Mansell |
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ BRUCE BESANKO |
|
|
Bruce Besanko |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Dated: March 23, 2018
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated above:
/S/ KEVIN MANSELL Kevin Mansell Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ PETER BONEPARTH Peter Boneparth Director |
|
/S/ ADRIANNE SHAPIRA Adrianne Shapira Director |
|
|
|
/S/ STEVEN A. BURD Steven A. Burd Director |
|
/S/ FRANK V. SICA Frank V. Sica Director |
|
|
|
/S/ H. CHARLES FLOYD H. Charles Floyd Director |
|
/S/ STEPHANIE A. STREETER Stephanie A. Streeter Director |
|
|
|
/S/ JONAS PRISING Jonas Prising Director |
|
/S/ NINA G. VACA Nina G. Vaca Director |
|
|
|
/S/ JOHN E. SCHLIFSKE John E. Schlifske Director |
|
/S/ STEPHEN E. WATSON Stephen E. Watson Director |
38
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
Page |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
F-2 |
|
F-3 |
|
F-4 |
|
F-5 |
|
F-6 |
|
F-7 |
|
F-7 |
|
F-13 |
|
F-14 |
|
F-14 |
|
F-15 |
|
F-17 |
|
F-19 |
|
F-19 |
Schedules have been omitted as they are not applicable.
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Kohl’s Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kohl’s Corporation (the “Company“) as of February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended February 3, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements“). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended February 3, 2018, in conformity with US generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 3, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated March 23, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company‘s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company‘s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the US federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1986.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 23, 2018
F-2
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Millions) |
February 3, 2018 |
January 28, 2017 |
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
1,308 |
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
Merchandise inventories |
|
3,542 |
|
|
3,795 |
|
Other |
|
481 |
|
|
378 |
|
Total current assets |
|
5,331 |
|
|
5,247 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
7,773 |
|
|
8,103 |
|
Other assets |
|
236 |
|
|
224 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
13,340 |
|
$ |
13,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
$ |
1,271 |
|
$ |
1,507 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
1,155 |
|
|
1,224 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
99 |
|
|
112 |
|
Current portion of capital lease and financing obligations |
|
126 |
|
|
131 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
2,651 |
|
|
2,974 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
2,797 |
|
|
2,795 |
|
Capital lease and financing obligations |
|
1,591 |
|
|
1,685 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
213 |
|
|
272 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
662 |
|
|
671 |
|
Shareholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock - 373 and 371 million shares issued |
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
3,078 |
|
|
3,003 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 205 and 197 million shares |
|
(10,651 |
) |
|
(10,338 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(11 |
) |
|
(14 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
13,006 |
|
|
12,522 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity |
$ |
5,426 |
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
$ |
13,340 |
|
$ |
13,574 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share Data) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
19,095 |
|
|
$ |
18,686 |
|
|
$ |
19,204 |
|
|
Cost of merchandise sold |
|
|
12,176 |
|
|
|
11,944 |
|
|
|
12,265 |
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
6,919 |
|
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
6,939 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
|
4,435 |
|
|
|
4,452 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
Impairments, store closing and other costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
5.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
5.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share Data) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Paid-In Capital |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Comprehensive Loss (a) |
|
|
Retained Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
Balance at January 31, 2015 |
|
|
367 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
2,743 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,744 |
) |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
12,008 |
|
|
$ |
5,991 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
Stock options and awards, net of tax |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
Dividends paid ($1.80 per common share) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
Balance at January 30, 2016 |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(9,769 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
12,329 |
|
|
|
5,491 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
Stock options and awards, net of tax |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Dividends paid ($2.00 per common share) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
Balance at January 28, 2017 |
|
|
371 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3,003 |
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,338 |
) |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
12,522 |
|
|
$ |
5,177 |
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
Stock options and awards, net of tax |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Dividends paid ($2.20 per common share) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
Balance at February 3, 2018 |
|
|
373 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
3,078 |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,651 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
13,006 |
|
|
$ |
5,426 |
|
(a) |
Includes loss on interest rate derivative and reclassification adjustment for interest expense included in net income |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
|||||||||
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
Other non-cash expenses, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
Impairments, store closing and other costs |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise inventories |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
Other current and long-term assets |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
Accrued and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment |
|
|
(672 |
) |
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
|
(690 |
) |
|
Other |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
(681 |
) |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchases |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
(557 |
) |
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
Shares withheld for taxes on vested restricted shares |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(368 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
Debt refinancing, net |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
Capital lease and financing obligation payments |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
Proceeds from financing obligations |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
(1,503 |
) |
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
1,308 |
|
|
$ |
1,074 |
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
|
Supplemental information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid, net of capitalized interest |
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
318 |
|
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment acquired through additional liabilities |
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
63 |
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-6
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Business and Summary of Accounting Policies
Business
As of February 3, 2018, we operated 1,158 department stores, a website (www.Kohls.com), 12 FILA outlets, and four Off-Aisle clearance centers. Our Kohl's stores and website sell moderately-priced proprietary and national brand apparel, footwear, accessories, beauty and home products. Our Kohl's stores generally carry a consistent merchandise assortment with some differences attributable to local preferences. Our website includes merchandise which is available in our stores, as well as merchandise which is available only online.
Our authorized capital stock consists of 800 million shares of $0.01 par value common stock and 10 million shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Kohl’s Corporation and its subsidiaries including Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., its primary operating company. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Accounting Period
Our fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to January 31st each year. Unless otherwise stated, references to years in this report relate to fiscal years rather than to calendar years. The following fiscal periods are presented in this report.
Fiscal year |
|
Ended |
|
Number of Weeks |
|
|
2017 |
|
February 3, 2018 |
|
|
53 |
|
2016 |
|
January 28, 2017 |
|
|
52 |
|
2015 |
|
January 30, 2016 |
|
|
52 |
|
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
In addition to money market investments, cash equivalents include commercial paper and certificates of deposit with original maturities of three months or less. We carry these investments at cost which approximates fair value.
Also included in cash and cash equivalents are amounts due from credit card transactions with settlement terms of less than five days. Credit and debit card receivables included within cash were $83 million at February 3, 2018 and $81 million at January 28, 2017.
F-7
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis using the retail inventory method (“RIM”). Under RIM, the valuation of inventory at cost and the resulting gross margins are calculated by applying a cost-to-retail ratio to the retail value inventory. RIM is an averaging method that has been widely used in the retail industry due to its practicality. The use of RIM will result in inventory being valued at the lower of cost or market since permanent markdowns are currently taken as a reduction of the retail value of inventory. We would record an additional reserve if the future estimated selling price is less than cost.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
Feb 3, 2018 |
|
Jan 28, 2017 |
|
||||
|
Land |
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
1,118 |
|
|
Buildings and improvements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned |
|
|
8,062 |
|
|
|
8,004 |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
Fixtures and equipment |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
1,711 |
|
|
Information technology |
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
1,939 |
|
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
Total property and equipment, at cost |
|
|
15,179 |
|
|
|
14,891 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,406 |
) |
|
|
(6,788 |
) |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
7,773 |
|
|
$ |
8,103 |
|
Construction in progress includes property and equipment which is not ready for its intended use.
Property and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leased property and improvements to leased property are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or useful life of the asset, whichever is less.
The annual provisions for depreciation and amortization generally use the following ranges of useful lives:
|
Buildings and improvements |
5-40 years |
|
Fixtures and equipment |
3-15 years |
|
Information technology |
3-8 years |
Store Closure and Restructure Reserve
The following table summarizes changes in the store closure and restructure reserve during 2017:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Store Lease Obligations |
|
|
Severance |
|
|
Total |
|
|||
|
Balance - January 28, 2017 |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
Payments |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
Reversals |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Balance - February 3, 2018 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
F-8
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
All property and equipment and other long-lived assets are reviewed for potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset’s carrying value may not be recoverable. If such indicators are present, it is determined whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows attributable to such assets is less than the carrying value of the assets. A potential impairment has occurred if projected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the assets. No material impairments were recorded in 2017 or 2015 as a result of the tests performed. An impairment relating to store closures was recorded in 2016.
Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Feb 3, 2018 |
|
|
Jan 28, 2017 |
|
||
|
Gift cards and merchandise return cards |
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
Sales, property and use taxes |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
Payroll and related fringe benefits |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
Credit card liabilities |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
$ |
1,224 |
|
Self-Insurance
We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks.
We retain the initial risk of $500,000 per occurrence in workers’ compensation claims and $250,000 per occurrence in general liability claims. We record reserves for workers’ compensation and general liability claims which include the total amounts that we expect to pay for a fully developed loss and related expenses, such as fees paid to attorneys, experts and investigators.
We are fully self-insured for employee-related health care benefits, a portion of which is paid by our associates.
We use a third-party actuary to estimate the liabilities associated with workers’ compensation, general liability and employee-related health care risks. These liabilities include amounts for both reported claims and incurred, but not reported losses. Total liabilities for these risks were $53 million as of February 2, 2018 and $65 million as of January 28, 2017.
Our self-insured retention for property losses differs based on the type of claim. For catastrophic claims such as earthquakes, floods and windstorms, the retained amount varies from 2 - 5% of the insurance claim. For other standard claims, such as fire and building damages, we are self-insured for the first $250,000 per occurrence of the property loss.
Treasury Stock
We account for repurchases of common stock and shares withheld in lieu of taxes when restricted stock vests using the cost method with common stock in treasury classified in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a reduction of shareholders’ equity.
F-9
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The tax effects of interest rate derivatives included in other comprehensive income are as follows:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
|
Before-tax amounts |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
Tax expense |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
After-tax amounts |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the sale of merchandise is recognized when received by the customer, net of any returns. Net sales do not include sales tax as we are considered a pass-through conduit for collecting and remitting sales taxes.
Revenue from Kohl's gift card sales is recognized upon gift card redemption. Income from unredeemed cards (breakage) is recorded in proportion and over the time period gift cards are actually redeemed.
Cost of Merchandise Sold and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
The following table illustrates the primary costs classified in Cost of Merchandise Sold and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:
Cost of Merchandise Sold |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
• Total cost of products sold including product development costs, net of vendor payments other than reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs
• Inventory shrink
• Markdowns
• Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise from our vendors to our distribution centers
• Shipping and handling expenses of digital sales
• Terms cash discount • Depreciation of product development facilities and equipment
|
• Compensation and benefit costs including: • Stores • Corporate headquarters, including buying and merchandising • Distribution centers
• Occupancy and operating costs of our retail, distribution and corporate facilities
• Net revenues from the Kohl’s credit card program
• Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise from our distribution centers to our retail stores and between distribution and retail facilities
• Marketing expenses, offset by vendor payments for reimbursement of specific, incremental and identifiable costs
• Other non-operating revenues and expenses |
The classification of these expenses varies across the retail industry.
Vendor Allowances
We receive consideration for a variety of vendor-sponsored programs, such as markdown allowances, volume rebates, and promotion and marketing support. The vendor consideration is recorded as earned either as a reduction of inventory costs or Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Promotional and marketing allowances are intended to offset our marketing costs to promote vendors’ merchandise. Markdown allowances and volume rebates are recorded as a reduction of inventory costs.
F-10
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
We maintain programs in which customers earn rewards, which can be applied to future purchases, based on their spending and other promotional activities. We accrue the cost of anticipated redemptions related to the programs when the rewards are earned on the initial purchase. The costs of the programs are recorded in Cost of Merchandise Sold.
Fair Value
Fair value measurements are required to be classified and disclosed in one of the following pricing categories:
Level 1: |
|
Financial instruments with unadjusted, quoted prices listed on active market exchanges. |
|
|
|
Level 2: |
|
Financial instruments lacking unadjusted, quoted prices from active market exchanges, including over-the-counter traded financial instruments. The prices for the financial instruments are determined using prices for recently traded financial instruments with similar underlying terms as well as directly or indirectly observable inputs, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. |
|
|
|
Level 3: |
|
Financial instruments that are not actively traded on a market exchange. This category includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument. The prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs or valuation techniques. |
Current assets and liabilities are reported at cost, which approximate fair value.
Leases
We lease certain property and equipment used in our operations.
We are often involved extensively in the construction of leased stores. In many cases, we are responsible for construction cost over runs or non-standard tenant improvements (e.g. roof or HVAC systems). As a result of this involvement, we are deemed the “owner” for accounting purposes during the construction period, so are required to capitalize the construction costs on our Balance Sheet. Upon completion of the project, we perform a sale-leaseback analysis to determine if we can remove the assets from our Balance Sheet. In many of our leases, we are reimbursed a portion of the construction costs via adjusted rental payments and/or cash payments or have terms which fix the rental payments for a significant percentage of the leased asset’s economic life. These items generally are considered “continuing involvement” which precludes us from derecognizing the assets from our Balance Sheet when construction is complete. In conjunction with these leases, we also record financing obligations equal to the cash proceeds or fair market value of the assets received from the landlord. At the end of the lease term, including exercise of any renewal options, the net remaining financing obligation over the net carrying value of the fixed asset will be recognized as a non-cash gain on sale of the property. We do not report rent expense for the properties which are owned for accounting purposes. Rather, rental payments under the lease are recognized as a reduction of the financing obligation and interest expense.
Some of our leased property and equipment are recorded as capital leases. These assets are included in property and equipment and depreciated over the term of the lease. We do not report rent expense for capital leases. Rather, rental payments under the lease are recognized as a reduction of the capital lease obligation and interest expense.
All other leases are considered operating leases. Assets subject to an operating lease and the related lease payments are not recorded on our Balance Sheet. Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.
F-11
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The lease term for all types of leases begins on the date we become legally obligated for the rent payments or we take possession of the building or land, whichever is earlier. The lease term includes cancelable option periods where failure to exercise such options would result in an economic penalty. Failure to exercise such options would result in the recognition of accelerated depreciation expense of the related assets.
Marketing
Marketing costs are expensed when the marketing is first seen. Marketing costs, net of related vendor allowances, are as follows:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
|||||||||||
|
Gross marketing costs |
|
$ |
1,124 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,164 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
Vendor allowances |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
Net marketing costs |
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,011 |
|
|
Net marketing costs as a percent of net sales |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on differences between the amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for income tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when we believe it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realizable for tax purposes. We recognize interest and penalty expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in our provision for income tax expense.
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is net income divided by the average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share includes incremental shares assumed for share-based awards.
The information required to compute basic and diluted net income per share is as follows:
|
(Dollars in Millions, Except per Share Data) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
|
Numerator—net income |
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
Denominator—weighted average shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
Impact of dilutive share-based awards (a) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
5.14 |
|
|
$ |
3.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.48 |
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
5.12 |
|
|
$ |
3.11 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
(a) |
Excludes 2 million share-based awards for 2017, 3 million share-based awards for 2016 and 1 million share-based awards for 2015 as the impact of such awards was antidilutive. |
|
Share-Based Awards
Stock-based compensation expense is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the fair value of awards which are expected to vest. The fair value of all share-based awards is estimated on the date of grant.
F-12
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The following table provides a brief description of issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards:
Standard |
Description |
Effect on our Financial Statements |
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC Topic 606)
Issued May 2014
Effective Q1 2018 |
The standard eliminates the transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current U.S. GAAP and replaces it with a principles-based approach for revenue recognition and disclosures. |
The standard will change the way we account for sales returns, our loyalty program and certain promotional programs. Based on current estimates, we do not expect these provisions of the standard will have a material impact on our financial statements.
We have evaluated the principal versus agent provisions of the standard and expect to continue to record sales gross as we are the principal in the transactions.
Upon implementation of the new standard, we expect to reclassify approximately $1 billion of net earnings from our credit card operations, which are currently reported in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, into a newly-created revenue line on the face of our Income Statement.
We plan to adopt the standard using the retrospective method and will restate our prior period financials to reflect the standard as if it had always been applicable. |
Leases (ASC Topic 842)
Issued February 2016
Effective Q1 2019 |
Among other things, the new standard requires us to recognize a right of use asset and a lease liability on our balance sheet for leases. It also changes the presentation and timing of lease-related expenses. |
Approximately 5% of our store leases and all of our land leases are not currently recorded on our balance sheet. Recording right of use assets and liabilities for these and other non-store leases is expected to have a material impact on our balance sheet. We are also evaluating the impact that recording right of use assets and liabilities will have on our income statement and the financial statement impact that the standard will have on leases which are currently recorded on our balance sheet. |
Long-term debt includes the following unsecured senior debt as of February 3, 2018 and January 28, 2017:
|
Maturity (Dollars in Millions) |
Effective Rate |
|
Coupon Rate |
Outstanding |
||||||||
|
2021 |
|
|
4.81 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
350 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
4.78 |
% |
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
300 |
|
|
2025 |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
4.25 |
% |
|
|
650 |
|
|
2029 |
|
|
7.36 |
% |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
99 |
|
|
2033 |
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
166 |
|
|
2037 |
|
|
6.89 |
% |
|
|
6.88 |
% |
|
|
150 |
|
|
2045 |
|
|
5.57 |
% |
|
|
5.55 |
% |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
Long-term debt is net of unamortized debt discounts and deferred financing costs of $18 million at February 3, 2018 and $20 million at January 28, 2017.
F-13
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Our long-term debt is classified as Level 1, financial instruments with unadjusted, quoted prices listed on active market exchanges. The estimated fair value of our long-term debt was $2.9 billion at February 3, 2018 and $2.7 billion at January 28, 2017.
On November 3, 2017, we amended and restated our existing $1.0 billion senior unsecured five-year revolving credit facility with various lenders that matures in November 2022. Among other things, the agreement includes a maximum leverage ratio financial covenant (which is consistent with the ratio under our prior credit agreement) and restrictions on liens and subsidiary indebtedness.
Our various debt agreements contain covenants including limitations on additional indebtedness and certain financial tests. As of February 3, 2018, we were in compliance with all covenants of the various debt agreements.
We also had outstanding trade letters of credit totaling approximately $48 million at February 3, 2018 issued under uncommitted lines with two banks.
Rent expense charged to operations was $293 million for 2017, $276 million for 2016, and $279 million for 2015. In addition to rent payments, we are often required to pay real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs on leased properties. These items are not included in the future minimum lease payments listed below. Many store leases include multiple renewal options, exercisable at our option, that generally range from four to eight additional five-year periods.
Future minimum lease payments at February 3, 2018 were as follows:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Capital Lease and Financing Obligations |
|
|
Operating Leases |
|
||
|
Fiscal year: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018 |
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
2019 |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
2020 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
2021 |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
2022 |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
3,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,404 |
|
|
$ |
5,123 |
|
|
Non-cash gain on future sale of property |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount representing interest |
|
|
(2,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of lease payments |
|
$ |
1,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
We have a defined contribution savings plan covering all full-time and certain part-time associates. Participants in this plan may invest up to 99% of their base compensation, subject to certain statutory limits. We match 100% of the first 5% of each participant’s contribution, subject to certain statutory limits.
We also offer a non-qualified deferred compensation plan to a group of executives which provides for pre-tax compensation deferrals up to 75% of salary and 100% of bonus. Deferrals and credited investment returns are 100% vested.
The total costs for these benefit plans were $49 million for 2017, $47 million for 2016, and $49 million for 2015.
F-14
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Deferred income taxes consist of the following:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
Feb 3, 2018 |
|
Jan 28, 2017 |
||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
$ |
788 |
|
|
$ |
1,226 |
|
|
Merchandise inventories |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease and financing obligations |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
Accrued and other liabilities, including stock-based compensation |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
Accrued step rent liability |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
Federal benefit on state tax reserves |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Unrealized loss on interest rate swap |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Merchandise inventories |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
Net deferred tax liability |
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
249 |
|
Deferred tax assets included in other long-term assets totaled $24 million as of February 3, 2018 and $23 million as of January 28, 2017.
The components of the provision for income taxes were as follows:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||
|
Current federal |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
397 |
|
|
Current state |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Deferred federal |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
Deferred state |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
384 |
|
On December 22, 2017, H.R. 1, originally the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (“the Act”), was signed into law making significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code. Changes include a corporate rate decrease from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018, as well as a variety of other changes including the acceleration of expensing of certain business assets and reductions in the amount of executive pay that could qualify as a tax deduction.
On December 22, 2017, Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) was issued to address the application of U.S. GAAP in situations when a registrant does not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed in reasonable detail to complete the accounting for certain income tax effects of the Act. For matters that have not been completed, provisional amounts are recorded to the extent they can be reasonably estimated.
We have calculated our best estimate of the impact of the Act in our year end income tax provision in accordance with our understanding of the Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing. For 2017, the reduction in the tax rate is prorated, resulting in a current year statutory federal tax rate of 33.7%. The provisional amount related to the current year federal tax rate reduction and the re-measurement of our deferred tax assets and liabilities is recorded as a total tax benefit of $136 million. This estimate may be impacted as we further analyze available tax accounting methods and elections, state tax conformity to the federal tax changes and guidance issued by regulatory bodies that provide interpretive guidance of the Act.
F-15
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The effective tax rate differs from the amount that would be provided by applying the statutory U.S. corporate tax rate due to the following items:
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|||
|
Federal statutory rate |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
Re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Other federal tax credits |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
|
|
|
36.5 |
% |
|
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
The re-measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities above includes the following impacts:
|
• |
Revaluation of deferred taxes that existed on December 22, 2017, the enactment date of the Act |
|
• |
Deferred taxes that were created after December 22, 2017. These items were deducted at the federal statutory rate of 33.7%, but will reverse at the newly enacted 21% rate. |
We have analyzed filing positions in all of the federal and state jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. The federal returns subject to examination are for the 2008 through 2017 tax years. State returns subject to examination vary depending upon the state. Generally, the 2014 through 2017 tax years are subject to state examination. The earliest state open period is 2006. Certain states have proposed adjustments which we are currently appealing. If we do not prevail on our appeals, we do not anticipate that the adjustments would result in a material change in our financial position.
During 2017, we resolved a significant state tax dispute. The resolution relates to fiscal years 2003 through 2012. As a result of the settlement, we recorded a $30 million pre-tax benefit in 2017.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
(Dollars in Millions) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
||
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
Increases due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax positions taken in prior years |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Tax positions taken in current year |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Decreases due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax positions taken in prior years |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
Settlements with taxing authorities |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Lapse of applicable statute of limitations |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
Not included in the unrecognized tax benefits reconciliation above are gross unrecognized accrued interest and penalties of $33 million at February 3, 2018 and $29 million at January 28, 2017. We had interest and penalty expense of $4 million for 2017, $6 million for 2016, and none for 2015.
Our total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate were $112 million as of February 3, 2018 and $110 million as of January 28, 2017. It is reasonably possible that our unrecognized tax positions may change within the next 12 months, primarily as a result of ongoing audits. While it is possible that one or more of these examinations may be resolved in the next year, it is not anticipated that a significant impact to the unrecognized tax benefit balance will occur.
We have both payables and receivables for current income taxes recorded on our balance sheet. Receivables included in other current assets totaled $62 million as of February 3, 2018 and $27 million as of January 28, 2017.
F-16
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
We currently grant share-based compensation pursuant to the Kohl’s Corporation 2017 Long-Term Compensation Plan, which provides for the granting of various forms of equity-based awards, including nonvested stock, performance share units and options to purchase shares of our common stock, to officers, key employees and directors. As of February 3, 2018, there were 9.0 million shares authorized and 9.1 million shares available for grant under the 2017 Long-Term Compensation Plan. Options and nonvested stock that are surrendered or terminated without issuance of shares are available for future grants. We also have outstanding options which were granted under previous compensation plans.
Annual grants are typically made in the first quarter of the fiscal year. Grants to newly-hired and promoted employees and other discretionary grants are made periodically throughout the remainder of the year.
Stock Options
The majority of stock options granted to employees vest in five equal annual installments. Outstanding options granted to employees after 2005 have a term of seven years. Outstanding options granted to employees prior to 2006 have a term of up to 15 years. Outstanding options granted to directors have a term of 10 years.
All stock options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The fair value of each option award was estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model.
The following table summarizes our stock option activity:
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(Shares in Thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
||||||
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
$ |
53.29 |
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
$ |
52.65 |
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
|
$ |
52.95 |
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
50.94 |
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
46.86 |
|
|
|
(2,815 |
) |
|
|
52.79 |
|
|
Forfeited/expired |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
58.00 |
|
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
55.39 |
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
57.36 |
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
$ |
50.51 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
$ |
53.29 |
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
$ |
52.65 |
|
The intrinsic value of options exercised represents the excess of our stock price at the time the option was exercised over the exercise price and was $3 million in 2017, $2 million in 2016, $52 million in 2015.
Additional information related to stock options outstanding and exercisable at February 3, 2018, segregated by exercise price range, is summarized below:
|
(Shares in Thousands) |
|
Stock Options Outstanding |
|
|
Stock Options Exercisable |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years) |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
||||||
|
$ 41.24 – $ 50.00 |
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
47.73 |
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
47.81 |
|
|
$ 50.01 – $ 64.49 |
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
53.21 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
53.16 |
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
50.51 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
50.47 |
|
|
Intrinsic value (in thousands) |
|
$ |
14,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intrinsic value of outstanding and exercisable stock options represents the excess of our closing stock price on February 3, 2018 ($63.47) over the exercise price multiplied by the applicable number of stock options
F-17
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
We have also awarded shares of nonvested common stock to eligible key employees and to our Board of Directors. Substantially all awards have restriction periods tied primarily to employment and/or service. Employee awards generally vest over five years. Director awards vest over the term to which the director was elected, generally one year. In lieu of cash dividends, holders of nonvested stock awards are granted restricted stock equivalents which vest consistently with the underlying nonvested stock awards.
The fair value of nonvested stock awards is the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. We may acquire shares from employees in lieu of amounts required to satisfy minimum tax withholding requirements upon the vesting of the employee’s unvested stock award. Such shares are then designated as treasury shares.
The following table summarizes nonvested stock activity, including restricted stock equivalents issued in lieu of cash dividends:
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(Shares in Thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
||||||
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
$ |
52.75 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
$ |
57.37 |
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
|
$ |
52.29 |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
39.69 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
46.61 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
65.02 |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
52.14 |
|
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
55.54 |
|
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
52.61 |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
59.58 |
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
55.54 |
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
55.16 |
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
2,811 |
|
|
$ |
45.60 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
$ |
52.75 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
$ |
57.37 |
|
The aggregate fair value of awards at the time of vesting was $40 million in 2017, $52 million in 2016, and $50 million in 2015.
Performance Share Units
We grant performance-based restricted stock units ("performance share units") to certain executives. The performance measurement period for these performance share units is three fiscal years. The fair market value of the grants are determined using a Monte-Carlo valuation on the date of grant.
The actual number of shares which will be earned at the end of the three-year vesting periods will vary based on our cumulative financial performance over the vesting periods. The number of performance share units earned will be modified up or down based on Kohl’s Relative Total Shareholder Return against a defined peer group during the vesting periods. The payouts, if earned, will be settled in Kohl's common stock after the end of each multi-year performance periods.
The following table summarizes performance share unit activity by year of grant:
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
(Shares in Thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
||||||
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
|
512 |
|
|
$ |
57.82 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
$ |
63.58 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
$ |
56.76 |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
40.83 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
47.89 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
70.50 |
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
57.58 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
78.35 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
59.74 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
56.71 |
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
660 |
|
|
$ |
44.97 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
$ |
57.82 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
$ |
63.58 |
|
F-18
KOHL’S CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Stock-based compensation expense, other than that included in Impairments, store closing and other costs, is included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Stock-based compensation expense totaled $55 million for 2017, $44 million for 2016 and $48 million for 2015. At February 3, 2018, we had approximately $98 million of unrecognized share-based compensation expense, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years.
At any time, we may be subject to investigations, legal proceedings, or claims related to the on-going operation of our business, including claims both by and against us. Such proceedings typically involve claims related to various forms of liability, contract disputes, allegations of violations of laws or regulations or other actions brought by us or others including our employees, consumers, competitors, suppliers or governmental agencies. We routinely assess the likelihood of any adverse outcomes related to these matters on a case by case basis, as well as the potential ranges of losses and fees. We establish accruals for our potential exposure, as appropriate, for significant claims against us when losses become probable and reasonably estimable. Where we are able to reasonably estimate a range of potential losses relating to significant matters, we record the amount within that range that constitutes our best estimate. We also disclose the nature of and range of loss for claims against us when losses are reasonably possible and material. These accruals and disclosures are determined based on the facts and circumstances related to the individual cases and require estimates and judgments regarding the interpretation of facts and laws, as well as the effectiveness of strategies or other factors beyond our control.
8. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
(Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except per Share Data) |
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
||||
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,843 |
|
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
$ |
4,332 |
|
|
$ |
6,776 |
|
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
1,398 |
|
|
$ |
1,633 |
|
|
$ |
1,595 |
|
|
$ |
2,293 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
975 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,459 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
208 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
Basic shares |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
2.83 |
|
|
Diluted shares |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
(Dollars and Shares in Millions, Except per Share Data) |
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
||||
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
3,972 |
|
|
$ |
4,182 |
|
|
$ |
4,327 |
|
|
$ |
6,205 |
|
|
Gross margin |
|
$ |
1,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
1,607 |
|
|
$ |
2,072 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,360 |
|
|
Impairments, store closing and other costs |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
Basic shares |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
Diluted shares |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
1.44 |
|
Due to changes in stock prices during the year and timing of share repurchases and issuances, the sum of quarterly net income per share may not equal the annual net income per share.
F-19