KonaTel, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2015 December (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

________________

FORM 10-Q

______________

x  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2015

o  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to____________

Commission File No. 001-10171

DALA PETROLEUM CORP.

(Exact name of the issuer as specified in its charter)

175 South Main Street

Suite 1410

Salt Lake City, Utah 84111

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(801)303-5721

(Registrant Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o  (The Registrant does not maintain a website.)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements contain forward-looking statements that discuss, among other things, future expectations and projections regarding future developments, operations and financial conditions. All forward-looking statements are based on management’s existing beliefs about present and future events outside of management’s control and on assumptions that may prove to be incorrect. If any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated, projected or intended.

DALA PETROLEUM CORP.

FORM 10-Q

DECEMBER 31, 2015

INDEX

2

PART I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

C O N T E N T S

3

Item 1. Financial Statements.

DALA PETROLEUM CORP.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

DALA PETROLEUM CORP.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the Three Months Ended December 31,

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

DALA PETROLEUM CORP.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Three Months Ended December 31,

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2015

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION

Dala Petroleum Corp. (the “Company” or “Dala”), formerly known as “Westcott Products Corporation”, was incorporated as “Light Tech, Inc.” under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 24, 1984. A subsidiary in the name “Westcott Products Corporation” was organized by us under the laws of the State of Delaware on June 24, 1986, for the purpose of changing our name and domicile to the State of Delaware. On June 27, 1986, we merged with the Delaware subsidiary, with the survivor being Westcott Products Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

NOTE 2 – MERGER

On June 2, 2014, the Company, its newly formed and wholly-owned subsidiary, Dala Acquisition Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Merger Subsidiary”), and Dala Petroleum Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Dala”), executed and delivered an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), whereby Merger Subsidiary merged with and into Dala, and Dala was the surviving company under the merger and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Westcott (the “Merger”) on the closing of the Merger.

Effective June 2, 2014, the respective Boards of Directors of Westcott and Dala, along with Westcott, as the sole stockholder of Merger Subsidiary, and Dala’s sole stockholder Chisholm Partners II, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company (“Chisholm II”) owning 100% of the outstanding voting securities of Dala approved the Merger by written consent, and the Articles of Merger were filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on such date, which was the effective date of the Merger. Accordingly, Westcott issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Dala, which was distributed to Dala Petroleum’s sole shareholder and was then distributed on a pro rata basis to its members.

Immediately after the Merger, there were 12,500,000 outstanding shares of Westcott common stock, with pre-Merger Westcott stockholders owning 2,500,000 of these shares or approximately 20% of the outstanding voting securities of Westcott; and the members of Dala’s sole stockholder owning approximately 10,000,000 of these shares or approximately 80% of these outstanding voting securities of Westcott.

Several conditions precedent as set forth in the Merger Agreement were completed prior to the Merger. A condition of the Merger Agreement was that Westcott would raise no less than $2,000,000 (the minimum offering) from persons who are “accredited investors” in consideration of the issuance (or the conversion) or a minimum of 2,000 shares up to a maximum of 2,500 shares of its Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock at the offering price of $1,000 per unit.

On June 3, 2014, the Company sold 2,025 units in the offering. Each unit consisted of (i) one share of Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock that is convertible at any time at the option of the Holder into common stock at the conversion price of $0.70 per common share based on the total dollar amount invested and (ii) 1,429 warrants to purchase common shares of the Company at an exercise price of $1.35 with a life of three years as of the “Effective Date, ” defined as the earliest date of the following to occur: (a) the initial registration statement required by the Offering Documents has been declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), (b) all of the underlying shares have been sold pursuant to SEC Rule 144 or may be sold pursuant to SEC Rule 144 without the requirement for the Company to be in compliance with the current public information required under SEC Rule 144 and without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions or (c) following the one year anniversary of June 3, 2014.

Prior to the Merger, Westcott was considered a shell company, as defined in SEC Rule 12b-2. Therefore, for financial reporting purposes, the Merger was accounted for as a reverse-merger and recapitalization of Dala.

7

NOTE 3 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of Dala Petroleum, Inc. have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. The results of operations for the interim period ended December 31, 2015 shown in this report are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year ending September 30, 2016. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the information contained herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015 filed on January 13, 2016 and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

As discussed above in Note 2, the Company merged with Dala Petroleum Corp., a Nevada corporation (“Dala”) on June 2, 2014 (the “Merger”).   Dala is focused on the acquisition and development of oil and natural gas resources in the United States.  Prior to the Merger, Westcott was considered a shell company, as defined in SEC Rule 12b-2.  For financial reporting purposes, the Merger represents a “reverse merger” rather than a business combination. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the operations that are reflected in the historical financial statements are those of Dala immediately following the consummation of the reverse merger.

Use of Estimates

The timely preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Accounting for Derivatives

The Company evaluates its convertible debt, options, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for. The result of this accounting treatment is that under certain circumstances the fair value of the derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the statement of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification under this accounting standard are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company accounts for long-lived assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 360-10, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. This statement requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For certain of our financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, deposits received from customers for layaway sales and short term loans the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

We follow accounting guidance for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. This standard defines fair value, provides guidance for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures. This standard does not require any new fair value measurements, but rather applies to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. This guidance does not apply to measurements related to share-based payments. This guidance discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach (present value of future income or cash flow), and the cost approach (cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The guidance utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

8

Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore developed using estimates and assumptions developed by us, which reflect those that a market participant would use.

Unproved oil and natural gas properties are accounted for and measured under Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10.

We currently measure and report at fair value other intangible assets (due to our impairment analysis) and derivative liabilities using ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurement.  The fair value of intangible assets has been determined using the present value of estimated future cash flows method. The fair value of derivative liabilities is measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing method. The following tables summarizes our non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Oil and Natural Gas Properties

The Company follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and natural gas operations whereby all costs related to the exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties are initially capitalized into a single cost center (“full cost pool”). Such costs include land acquisition costs, a portion of employee salaries related to property development, geological and geophysical expenses, carrying charges on non-producing properties, costs of drilling directly related to acquisition, and exploration activities. Internal salaries are capitalized based on employee time allocated to the acquisition of leaseholds and development of oil and natural gas properties. The Company did not capitalize interest for the period ended December 31, 2015 as it was not required.

Proceeds from property sales will generally be credited to the full cost pool, with no gain or loss recognized, unless such a sale would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and the proved reserves attributable to these costs.

9

The Company assesses all items classified as unproved property on a quarterly basis for possible impairment or reduction in value. The assessment includes consideration of the following factors, among others: intent to drill, remaining lease term, geological and geophysical evaluations, drilling results and activity, the assignment of proved reserves, and the economic viability of development if proved reserves are assigned. During any period in which these factors indicate an impairment, the cumulative drilling costs incurred to date for such property and all or a portion of the associated leasehold costs are transferred to the full cost pool and are then subject to depletion and amortization.  The costs of drilling exploratory dry holes are included in the amortization base immediately upon determination that the well is dry.

Capitalized costs associated with impaired properties and properties having proved reserves, estimated future development costs, and asset retirement costs under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 410-20-25 are depleted and amortized on the unit-of-production method based on the estimated gross proved reserves. The costs of unproved properties are withheld from the depletion base until such time as they are developed, impaired, or abandoned.

Under the full cost method of accounting, capitalized oil and natural gas property costs less accumulated depletion, net of deferred income taxes, may not exceed a ceiling amount equal to the present value, discounted at 10%, of estimated future net revenues from proved oil and natural gas reserves plus the cost of unproved properties not subject to amortization (without regard to estimates of fair value), or estimated fair value, if lower, of unproved properties that are subject to amortization. Should capitalized costs exceed this ceiling, which is tested on a quarterly basis, an impairment is recognized. The present value of estimated future net revenues is computed by applying prices based on a 12-month unweighted average of the oil and natural gas prices in effect on the first day of each month, less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves (assuming the continuation of existing economic conditions), less any applicable future taxes.  If such capitalized costs exceed the ceiling, the Company will record a write-down to the extent of such excess as a non-cash charge to earnings.  Any such write-down will reduce earnings in the period of occurrence and result in a lower depreciation, depletion and amortization rate in future periods.  A write-down may not be reversed in future periods even though higher oil and natural gas prices may subsequently increase the ceiling.

In April, 2015, the Company participated in the completion of a well in which the Company owns a 10% non-operated working interest targeting the Simpson and Viola formations, Kansas. That well was determined to be dry in June 2015.

During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred total $0 in oil and natural gas expenditures.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company’s oil and natural gas properties were determined to be impaired thereby reducing the unproved oil and natural gas properties to $608,000.  No additional impairment was realized for the three months ended December 31, 2015.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes oil and natural gas revenues from our interests in producing wells when production is delivered to, and title has transferred to, the purchaser and to the extent the selling price is reasonably determinable.

The Company uses the sales method of accounting for balancing of natural gas production and would recognize a liability if the existing proven reserves were not adequate to cover the current imbalance situation. For the three months ended December 31, 2015, no revenue has been recognized as all wells are still unproved and non-producing.

Asset Retirement Obligation

Asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) reflects the estimated present value of the amount of dismantlement, removal, site reclamation and similar activities associated with the Company's oil and natural gas properties. Inherent in the fair value calculation of the ARO are numerous assumptions and judgments including the ultimate settlement amounts, inflation factors, credit adjusted discount rates, timing of settlement and changes in the legal, regulatory, environmental and political environments.   As of December 31, 2015, the Company had no ARO liability as no wells have been established.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company records stock based compensation in accordance with the guidance in ASC 718 which requires the Company to recognize expenses related to the fair value of its employee stock option awards. This requires that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. The Company recognizes the cost of all share-based awards on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period of the award.

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with ASC 718-10 and the conclusions reached by the ASC 505-50. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services as defined by ASC 505-50.

10

Income Taxes

The Company follows ASC Topic 740 for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.

Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

The Company applies a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties. ASC Topic 740 only allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. As of December 31, 2015, the Company reviewed its tax positions and determined there were no outstanding, or retroactive tax positions with less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, therefore this standard has not had a material effect on the Company.

Net Loss Per Share

The Company follows ASC Topic 260 to account for the loss per share. Basic loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per common share calculations are determined by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During periods when common stock equivalents, if any, are anti-dilutive they are not considered in the computation.  As the Company has incurred losses for the three months ended December 31, 2015, the potentially dilutive shares totaling 6,362,296 are anti-dilutive and are thus not added into the loss per share calculations.

Segment Information

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 280-10, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” the Company is required to report financial and descriptive information about its reportable operating segments. The Company does not have any operating segments as of December 31, 2015.

Effect of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company reviews new accounting standards and updates as issued. No new standards or updates had any material effect on these unaudited financial statements. The accounting pronouncements and updates issued subsequent to the date of these unaudited financial statements that were considered significant by management were evaluated for the potential effect on these unaudited financial statements. Management does not believe any of the subsequent pronouncements will have a material effect on these unaudited financial statements as presented and does not anticipate the need for any future restatement of these unaudited financial statements because of the retro-active application of any accounting pronouncements issued subsequent to December 31, 2015 through the date these unaudited financial statements were issued.

NOTE 4 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (“ASU No. 2014-09”), which requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The ASU will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  Early application is not permitted. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company has not yet selected a transition method nor has it determined the effect of the standard on its ongoing financial reporting.

11

In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share is More Akin to Debt or Equity.  This update amends existing guidance with the objective to eliminate the use of different methods in practice with respect to the consideration of redemption features in relation to other features when determining whether the nature of a host contract is more akin to debt or equity and thereby reduce existing diversity under GAAP in accounting for hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share.  The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share.  The amendments clarify that no single term or feature would necessarily determine the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract, but rather, the nature of the host contract depends upon the economic characteristics and risks of the entire hybrid financial instrument.  In addition, the amendments in this update clarify that, in evaluating the nature of a host contract, an entity should assess the substance of the relevant terms and features when considering how to weight those terms and features. The guidance applies to all entities that are issuers of, or investor in, hybrid instruments that are issued in the form of a share.   The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective.  Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.  The updates in this pronouncement are effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015.  The Company is currently evaluating the adoption of ASU 2014-16 and the impact of the updates upon the Company.  The Company plans on adopting the pronouncement for periods beginning after December 15, 2015 and does not anticipate early adoption of this pronouncement.

The Company has evaluated all other recent accounting pronouncements and believes that none of them will have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statement.

NOTE 5 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On June 2, 2014, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock to Chisholm II in exchange for oil and gas assets.  Chisholm II was the sole stockholder of Dala Petroleum Corp. (a Nevada corporation) prior to the Merger and now is the Company’s wholly-owned operating subsidiary.  As the leases were transferred to the Company by the sole shareholder of the Company, the leases were recorded based on the historical cost basis of the contributing shareholder of $1,898,947.

The Company had a service agreement, which has been suspended by the Company since May 2015, with Chisholm II to use its existing technical exploration team for general and administrative-type services on behalf of the Company.   The Company was obligated to pay Chisholm II $25,000 per month plus expenses for these services under the Master Services Agreement.  For the year ended September 30, 2015, the Company paid $225,472 and had accrued $50,000 for its services prior to suspending the Master Services Agreement.

In June 2014, the Company entered into an Option Participation Agreement with Chisholm II, whereby Chisholm II granted the Company the option, at the Company’s own election, to participate for up to twenty-five percent (25%) of Chisholm II’s share of each drilling operation in search for oil or gas in the State of Kansas undertaken by Chisholm II.  The Company has not elected to participate in the Option Participation Agreement since April 2015.

On June 15, 2015, the Company received the funds from a Promissory Note (the “Note”) in the amount of $99,999 in favor of Pacific Oil & Gas, LLC (the “Lender”). The Note bears an interest rate of 12% per annum and all principal and accrued interest will be due and payable by the Company to the Lender on December 31, 2015. The Note is secured by a Mortgage, Deed of Trust, Assignment of Production, Security Agreement and Financing Statement that was filed on June 25, 2015 against the Company’s Evans 9-1 lease in McPherson County, Kansas. The trustee of the Lender is the Company’s director, Clancy Cottman, and the funds delivered to the Company by the Lender were provided by a group of the Company’s Series A 6% Convertible Preferred shareholders.

12

On December 22, 2015, the Company entered into four Promissory Notes (the “Notes”) in the total amount of $20,000 in favor of Chisholm Partners II, LLC, Mill City Ventures, LLC, Lane Ventures, Inc. and Alpha Capital Anstalt (the “Lenders”). The Notes all bear an interest rate of 12% per annum and all principal and accrued interest will be due and payable by the Company to the Lender on December 22, 2016. The Note is unsecured. The managing partner of Chisholm Partners II, LLC is the Company’s director, Clancy Cottman.  The other three Lenders are the shareholders in the Company’s Series A 6% Convertible Preferred offering.

NOTE 6 – NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable, all classified as current at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, consists of the following:

Notes payable

On June 15, 2015, the Company received funds from a demanded Promissory Note (the “Note”) that it entered into on June 8, 2015 in the amount of $99,999 in favor of Pacific Oil & Gas, LLC (the “Lender”). The Note bears an interest rate of 12% per annum and all principal and accrued interest will be due and payable by the Company to the Lender on December 31, 2015. The Note is secured by a Mortgage, Deed of Trust, Assignment of Production, Security Agreement and Financing Statement that was filed on June 25, 2015 against the Company’s Evans 9-1 lease in McPherson County, Kansas. The trustee of the Lender is the Company’s director, Clancy Cottman, and the funds delivered to the Company by the Lender were provided by a group of the Company’s Series A 6% Convertible Preferred shareholders. As of December 31, 2015, the Company received proceeds of $97,500. During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company accrued $6,542 interest expense under this note.  On January 26, 2016, Lender extended the maturity date to March 1, 2016 (see Note 14).

On December 22, 2015, the Company entered into a promissory note with Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. for $5,195.  The note matures on December 22, 2016 and bears interest at the rate of 12%.  During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company accrued $15 interest expense under this note.

On December 22, 2015, the Company entered into a promissory note with Chisholm Partners II, LLC for $7,002.  The note matures on December 22, 2016 and bears interest at the rate of 12%.  During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company accrued $21 interest expense under this note.

On December 22, 2015, the Company entered into a promissory note with Lane Ventures, Inc. for $488.  The note matures on December 22, 2016 and bears interest at the rate of 12%.  During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company accrued $1 interest expense under this note.

On December 22, 2015, the Company entered into a promissory note with Alpha Capital Anstalt for $7,315.  The note matures on December 22, 2016 and bears interest at the rate of 12%.  During the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company accrued $22 interest expense under this note.

NOTE 7 – PREFERRED CONVERTIBLE STOCK AND WARRANTS

As discussed above in Note 2, in fiscal year 2014, the Company has sold 2,025 units of Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock and related warrants at the price of $1,000 per unit.  Proceeds received totaled $1,990,000 (net of offering costs of $35,000).  Each unit consisted of (i) one share of Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock that is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into common stock at the conversion price of $0.70 per common share based on the total dollar amount invested (subject to adjustment) and (ii) 1,429 warrants to purchase common shares of the Company at an exercise price of $1.35 for three years of the “Effective Date, ” defined as the earliest date of the following to occur: (a) the initial registration statement required by the Offering Documents has been declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), (b) all of the underlying shares have been sold pursuant to SEC Rule 144 or may be sold pursuant to SEC Rule 144 without the requirement for the Company to be in compliance with the current public information required under SEC Rule 144 and without volume or manner-of-sale restrictions or (c) following the one year anniversary of June 3, 2014.  A total of 2,008 shares of Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock, exercisable into 2,868,571 shares of common stock, remain issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2015. The 6% per annum dividends are cumulative and payable quarterly in cash or, at the Company’s option, in shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company discontinued paying the quarterly dividend as of July 1, 2015 and the amount owed thereunder has been accruing since that time.

13

As the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock is contingently redeemable at a fixed price and such redemption would not be solely within the control of the Company, the preferred stock is classified outside of stockholders’ equity, as “temporary equity” between liabilities and stockholders’ equity on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

The Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock has no voting rights.

If, at any time while this Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock is outstanding, the Company sells or grants any option to purchase any Common Stock or Common Stock at a price lower than $0.70, the conversion price shall be reduced to equal the lower issuance price.

Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, each holder shall have the right to require the Company to redeem all of the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock in cash at the redemption amount which is the sum of (a) the greater of (i) 130% of the stated value, and (ii) the product of (y) the VWAP on the trading day immediately preceding the date of the triggering event and (z) the stated value divided by the then conversion price, (b) all accrued but unpaid dividends thereon, and (c) all liquidated damages and other costs, expenses or amounts due in respect of the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock.

On November 17, 2014, one of the Company’s shareholders of Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock, Chienn Consulting Company, converted 17 shares of its Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock into 24,286 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of December 31, 2015, 2,008 Convertible Preferred Shares remain outstanding.

Effective December 31, 2015, the valuation of the derivative from the warrants using the Black Sholes model was no longer a liability given the decrease in the Company’s stock and the exercise price of the warrants.

NOTE 8 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

On June 2, 2014, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of its common stock to Chisholm II in exchange for oil and natural gas assets recorded at $1,898,947.

As discussed above, the Company completed a reverse merger with Dala, with Dala being the acquirer for financial reporting purposes.  At the date of the Merger, Westcott had 2,500,000 shares of common stock outstanding, which are now outstanding for the merged Company. The total amount of shares issued and outstanding post-Merger, as of December 31, 2014 was 12,500,000 shares of common stock.

On November 17, 2014, one of the Company’s shareholders of Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock, Chienn Consulting Company, converted 17 shares of its Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock into 24,286 shares of the Company’s common stock.

As of December 31, 2015 there are a total of 12,524,286 common shares outstanding.

Stock-Based Compensation

On June 2, 2014, the Company granted options to acquire common shares to its Chief Executive Officer and two directors, totaling 600,000 options.  The options have an exercise price of $0.70 per share for terms of six years.  Of the total stock options, 400,000 vest equally over the next four years and 200,000 vest equally over the next two years.  The total fair value of these options at the date of grant was estimated to be $400,087, and was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with an expected lives of 4.25 (four-year vesting) and 3.75 years (two-year vesting), a risk-free interest rate of 1.92%, a dividend yield of 0% and expected volatility of 195%.  The expected terms were determined using the simplified method.  For the three months ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded approximately $33,261 of stock-based compensation expense.

On December 21, 2015, ninety days after the resignation of a former officer of the Company, his 400,000 stock options expired.

14

The following is a summary of the status of all of the Company’s stock options as of December 31, 2015 and changes during the period ended on that date:

As of December 31, 2015, the intrinsic value of outstanding stock options was $0.

NOTE 9 – DERIVATIVES

The Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock issued by the Company had a full-ratchet down-round provision on the exercise price, in which the investors’ conversion price is adjusted down to the share price of future financings.  Therefore, prior to December 31, 2015, following ASC 815-40, the warrants and the conversion feature of the preferred stock are not considered indexed to our own stock, and as such, the fair value of the embedded derivative liabilities are reflected on the balance sheet prior to December 31, 2015.

Activity for derivative instruments liability during the year ended December 31, 2015 and the period ended September 30, 2015 was as follows:

15

NOTE 10 – REGISTRATION RIGHTS PENALTY

In connection with the private placement and sale of 2,025 units of Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock and related warrants at the price of $1,000 per unit, the Company was required to register certain shares of common stock as part of a Registration Rights Agreement.

The Company granted the investors’ registration rights on the underlying shares related to the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants.  The registration rights agreement provided for a liquidated damages provision imposed upon the Company of 1.5% of the gross proceeds per month for each month that the shares are not registered.  The liquidated damages are not to exceed 9%.  The Company filed a registration statement that was effective on September 12, 2014 that did not register all of the underlying shares of the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock the warrants and the dividend payments required to be registered in the Registration Rights Agreement.  As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred registration rights penalty of $133,658 and $48,600, respectively.

The Company has also accrued interest in the amount of $6,543 and $986 as of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively, at the rate of 18% per annum simple interest in accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement.

NOTE 11 – CONCENTRATIONS

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk, consist principally of temporary cash investments.

The Company places its temporary cash investments with financial institutions insured by the FDIC. No amounts exceeded federally insured limits as of December 31, 2015. There have been no losses in these accounts through December 31, 2015.

Concentration of Supplier

The Company does not rely on any particular suppliers for its services.

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company, as a lessee of oil and gas properties, is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment.  These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the lessee under an oil and gas lease for the cost of pollution clean-up resulting from operations and subject the lessee to liability for pollution damages.  We believe our operations are in substantial compliance with existing requirements of governmental bodies.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company sustained net losses of $28,330 and used cash in operating activities of $17,383 for the three months ended December 31, 2015. The Company had working capital deficit, stockholders’ deficiency and accumulated deficit of $370,962, $1,065,887 and $2,870,582, respectively, at December 31, 2015. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to generate revenues and its ability to continue receiving investment capital and loans from third parties to sustain its current level of operations. The Company is in the process of securing working capital from investors for common stock, convertible notes payable, and/or strategic partnerships. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in these efforts.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company is attempting to commence explorations and generate revenue; however, the Company’s future cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations.  While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy in the exploration and development of its unproved properties and the Company’s ability to raise additional funds, until such time it is able to generate sufficient revenue to support its operations, there can be no assurances to that effect.  The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and in its ability to raise additional funds, until such time the Company can generate sufficient revenues to support its operations.

In the event the Company is unable to raise funding in the near term, we will not be able to pay our liabilities. In the event we are unable to raise adequate funding in the future for our operations and to pay our outstanding debt obligations, and if our current creditors elect to foreclose on the outstanding debts then owed, we would be forced to liquidate our assets or may be forced to seek bankruptcy protection, which could result in the value of our outstanding securities declining in value or becoming worthless.

16

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On February 17, 2016, the Company entered into a Promissory Notes (the “Note”) in the amount of $30,000 in favor of Mill City Ventures, LLC (the “Lender”). The Note bears an interest rate of 12% per annum and all principal and accrued interest will be due and payable by the Company to the Lender on February 17, 2016. The Note is unsecured. The Lender is the shareholders in the Company’s Series A 6% Convertible Preferred offering. The funds have been used by the Company to pay liabilities and to maintain the Company’s listing on the OTCQB.

On January 26, 2016, the Company entered into a letter agreement through which Pacific Oil & Gas, LLC extended the maturity date of that certain Promissory Note dated June 8, 2015 and made pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Mortgage, Deed of Trust, Assignment of Production, Security Agreement and Financing Statement dated June 8, 2015. The extended maturity date is now March 1, 2016.  See Note 6.

On February 17, 2016, a supermajority of more than 67% of the shareholders of the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock approved certain corporate transactions in an effort to settle certain violations of the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation and other documents related to the sale of Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock in 2014. The transactions approved by a supermajority of the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Shareholders are to be implemented by the Board of Directors at the Board’s discretion. The approved transactions include the following: (i) the approval of a potential settlement agreement with Chisholm Partners II, LLC and certain members of Chisholm II, (ii) the approval of the amendment of the Certificate of Designation for the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock modifying the Conversion Price to $0.05, (iii) the Removal of Section 7, “Certain Adjustments” in the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation (iv) the modification of the permitted indebtedness allowable under the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation to $200,000, (v) the approval of promissory notes with related parties in an amount up to $60,000, (vi) the waiver of the right of redemption upon Triggering Events for the Company’s violations of Section 10 of the Certificate of Designation, (vii) the waiver of the accrual of the late fee for unpaid dividends as of January 1, 2016, (viii) the waiver of the first right of refusal to purchase shares from other Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Shareholders, and (ix) waiver of the “Most Favored Nation” provision in the SPA for the Series A 6% Convertible Preferred Stock, among other things.

17

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-looking Statements

Statements made in this Quarterly Report which are not purely historical are forward-looking statements with respect to the goals, plan objectives, intentions, expectations, financial condition, results of operations, future performance and our business, including, without limitation, (i) our ability to raise capital, and (ii) statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expects,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” “targets” or similar expressions.

Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties, and important factors (many of which are beyond our control) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, including the following: general economic or industry conditions, nationally and/or in the communities in which we may conduct business, changes in the interest rate environment, legislation or regulatory requirements, conditions of the securities markets, our ability to raise capital, changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines, financial or political instability, acts of war or terrorism, other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory and technical factors affecting our current or potential business and related matters.

Accordingly, results actually achieved may differ materially from expected results in these statements.  Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.  We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim, any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.

Our revenues and future profitability are substantially dependent on our ability to raise additional funds. We have suspended drilling and other exploration and development operations until the market conditions related to the price of oil have improved.  We have substantially cut administrative expenses to conserve to conserve cash.  The management and directors are no longer paid any salary or bonus.  We also are not immediately planning any other leasing activity in our areas of operation.  We continue to search for a financial and/or operational partner to assist in developing our oil and gas properties.  If we were to partner with another entity, we would consider all options in developing our properties.

Our common stock currently trades on the OTCQB under the symbol “DALP.”

Results of Operations

Three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014

During the three months ended December 31, 2015, we had no revenues and we incurred $76,938 of general and administrative expenses, which included $19,801 of legal and accounting fees, consulting and other professional fees and $33,261 of stock-based compensation expense).  As a result, we incurred a net loss attributable to common stock of $(0.00) per share for the three months ended December 31, 2015.

During the three months ended December 31, 2014, we had no revenues and we incurred $237,677 of general and administrative expenses, which included $78,938 of legal and accounting fees, $20,000 officer and director compensation expense, and $33,261 of stock-based compensation expense).  Additionally, we paid $30,121 in quarterly dividends on our preferred stock.  As a result, we incurred a net loss attributable to common stock of $(0.02) per share for the three months ended December 31, 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Requirements

We had $11,107 in cash on hand and negative working capital of $370,962 at December 31, 2015.  We believe these funds will be sufficient to enable us to fund our principal business operations through at least the next 30 days.   The Company plans to raise additional capital from the sale of its securities (including, without limitation common stock, preferred stock, promissory notes, etc.) and achieve operating revenues with the development of its oil and gas properties. In the event the Company is unable to raise funding in the near term, we will not be able to pay our liabilities. In the event we are unable to raise adequate funding in the future for our operations and to pay our outstanding debt obligations, and if our current creditors elect to foreclose on the outstanding debts then owed, we would be forced to liquidate our assets or may be forced to seek bankruptcy protection, which could result in the value of our outstanding securities declining in value or becoming worthless.

Cash flows used in operating activities was $17,383 in cash for the three months ended December 31, 2015, primarily the result of our loss of $28,330, change on fair value of derivative liabilities of $54,240, offset by $33,261 in stock-based compensation, decrease in prepaid assets of $12,788 and increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $18,067.

18

Cash flows from investing activities was $0 for the three months ended December 31, 2015.

Cash flows provided by financing activities was $25,616 for the three months ended December 31, 2015, related to $25,616 in proceeds received from notes payable.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Not required.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Securities and Exchange Commission defines the term “disclosure controls and procedures” to mean a company's controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its chief executive and chief financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company maintains such a system of controls and procedures in an effort to ensure that all information which it is required to disclose in the reports it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified under the SEC's rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to the chief executive and interim chief financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of such date. The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that the Company continues to have the following deficiencies which represent a material weakness:

1.

The Company intends to appoint additional independent directors;

2.

Lack of in-house personnel with the technical knowledge to identify and address some of the reporting issues surrounding certain complex or non-routine transactions. With material, complex and non-routine transactions, management has and will continue to seek guidance from third-party experts and/or consultants to gain a thorough understanding of these transactions;

3.

Insufficient personnel resources within the accounting function to segregate the duties over financial transaction processing and reporting;

4.

Insufficient written policies and procedures over accounting transaction processing and period end financial disclosure and reporting processes.

To remediate our internal control weaknesses, management intends to implement the following measures:

·

As funding permits, the Company will add sufficient accounting personnel to properly segregate duties and to effect a timely, accurate preparation of the financial statements.

·

The Company will hire staff technically proficient at applying U.S. GAAP to financial transactions and reporting.

·

Upon the hiring of additional accounting personnel, the Company will develop and maintain adequate written accounting policies and procedures.

The additional hiring is contingent upon The Company’s efforts to obtain additional funding through equity or debt and the results of its operations. Management hopes to secure funds in the coming fiscal year but provides no assurances that it will be able to do so.

19

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

The Company’s sole officer does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of the control system must reflect that there are resource constraints and that the benefits must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not required.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None; not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

20

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)

Exhibits.

21

22

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DALA PETROLEUM CORP.

23