Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
____________________________________________________
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
T
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File No. 333-146316
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
|
|
(Exact
name of issuer as specified in its charter)
|
|
Wyoming
|
83-0459707
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
120
N. Washington Square, Suite 805,
Lansing,
Michigan
|
48933
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (517)
336-0807
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
|
None.
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
|
Common
stock, no par value per share.
|
(Title
of class)
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No T
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No T
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes T No o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference Part III of this Form 10-K or
any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
o
|
Accelerated
filer
|
o
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
o
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
T
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No
T
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant on December 31, 2008 based on a closing price
of $0.10 was approximately $937,230.
As of
April 14, 2009, the registrant had 49,974,850 shares issued and
outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by
Reference:
None.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
I
|
||
ITEM
1.
|
1 | |
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK FACTORS
|
2 |
ITEM
2.
|
2 | |
ITEM
3.
|
2 | |
ITEM
4.
|
2 | |
PART
II
|
||
ITEM
5.
|
2 | |
ITEM
6.
|
3 | |
ITEM
7.
|
3 | |
ITEM
7A.
|
5 | |
ITEM
8.
|
F | |
ITEM
9.
|
6 | |
ITEM
9A(T).
|
6 | |
PART
III
|
||
ITEM
10.
|
7 | |
ITEM
11.
|
7 | |
ITEM
12.
|
9 | |
ITEM
13.
|
10 | |
ITEM
14.
|
10 | |
PART
IV
|
||
ITEM
15.
|
||
SIGNATURES
|
11 | |
PART
I
ITEM
1. DESCRIPTION OF
BUSINESS.
General
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of
the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The Company was organized to develop
high strength, protein based fiber, using recombinant DNA technology, for
commercial applications in the textile and specialty fiber
industries.
The
Market
We are
focusing our work on the development and production of high performance and
technical fiber. The performance fiber market is currently dominated
by two classes of product: aramid fibers and ultra high molecular weight
polyethylene fiber. These products service the need for materials
with high strength, resilience, and flexibility. Because these
synthetic performance fibers are stronger and tougher than steel, they are used
in a wide variety of military, industrial, and consumer
applications.
The users
of high performance and technical fiber include the military and police
departments, which employ them for ballistic protection. The
materials are also used for industrial applications requiring superior strength
and toughness, i.e. critical cables and abrasion/impact resistant
components. These fibers are also employed in safety equipment, and
high strength composite materials for the aero-space industry. The
Company anticipates that the materials it is developing will service on many of
these same markets.
The
Product
It has
long been known that certain fibers produced in nature possess unique mechanical
properties in terms of strength, resilience and flexibility. These
protein based fibers, exemplified by spider silk, have been the subject of much
interest to materials scientists.
We believe
that the production of recombinant protein based polymers in commercial
quantities holds the promise of a material, which is lighter, thinner, more
flexible, and tougher than aramid fibers. Other applications include use as
structural material for aircraft, and for any application in which light weight
and high strength are required.
While the
properties of spider silks are well known, there is presently no known way to
produce the fibers in commercial quantity. The spiders are
cannibalistic, and can not be raised in concentrated colonies.
The
Technology
While
scientists have been able to replicate the proteins that are the building blocks
of spider silk, the technological barrier that has stymied production, is the
incapacity to form these proteins into a fiber with the desired mechanical
characteristics.
We have
acquired the right to use the patented genetic sequences and genetic engineering
technology developed in two university laboratories. Our technology
builds upon the unique advantages of the discoveries made within the university
system. The university technology, in collaboration with our own
concepts and leadership, form the foundations of our research and product
development.
We are
working to use this genetic engineering technology to create recombinant protein
based polymers. Management is committed to steering the research
toward the development of commercial production of spider silks, spider silks
analogs and new polymers composed of recombinant proteins. The goal is to create
recombinant fibers for use in the technical textiles market.
The
Company
The
inventor of this technology concept, Kim Thompson, is the founder of Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Certain
patented genetic tools, methods, and proprietary gene sequences invented and
discovered by university researchers are pivotal in our work. We have
negotiated and obtained certain exclusive proprietary rights to use the
universities’ intellectual property for our product development and
commercialization.
1
The
company has entered into a intellectual property and collaborative research
agreement with the University of Notre Dame, whereby the genetic work is being
conducted in concert with the University and within the University’s
laboratories. The company has also entered into an intellectual
property and sponsored research agreement with the University of
Wyoming. Pursuant to these two agreements, the company anticipates
that the genetic work will be performed primarily or exclusively within
university controlled genetic laboratories. Also pursuant to these
agreements, we have ongoing financial commitments to both universities in
connection with the collaborative and sponsored scientific and genetic
research. We are performing our research in cooperation and
collaboration with researchers within the two university systems. At
the present time, we do not operate any laboratories, all laboratories are
owned and operated by the universities.
We
are in the research and development
stage. We currently have no developed products and does
not produce any revenue from the sale of products. Management
anticipates that we will remain in the research and development stage for the
next two to three years at a minimum.
Employees
We
currently have no employees other than Kim Thompson, our sole officer and
director.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS.
Not
required for smaller reporting companies.
ITEM
2. DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY.
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. was incorporated in April 2006 in Wyoming. Our
business office is located at 120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805, Lansing,
Michigan 48950.
ITEM
3. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.
To the
best of our knowledge, there are no known or pending litigation proceedings
against us..
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO
A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
PART
II
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S
COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES.
Market
Information
Our
common stock has traded on the OTC Bulletin Board system under the symbol “KBLB”
since February 20, 2008.
The
following table sets forth the high and low trade information for our common
stock for each quarter since we began trading on February 20, 2008. The prices
reflect inter-dealer quotations, do not include retail mark-ups, markdowns or
commissions and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions.
Quarter
ended
|
Low
Price
|
High
Price
|
||||||
June 30, 2008 | $ | .20 | $ | .42 | ||||
September
30, 2008
|
$
|
.35
|
$
|
.10
|
||||
December
31, 2008
|
$
|
.36
|
$
|
.10
|
Holders
As of
April 14, 2009 in accordance with our transfer agent records, we had 30
record holders of our Common Stock.
Dividends
To date,
we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do
not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common
stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our
earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our
Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the
future.
Payment
of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements,
and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Stock Option
Grants
To date,
we have not granted any stock options. In 2006, our CEO, Kim Thompson,
received substantial warrants on our stock pursuant to the employment agreement
between Mr. Thompson and us. However, Mr. Thompson surrendered all
such warrants and options to the corporation prior to the close of the 2006
calendar year. As of this date, we have no outstanding stock
options.
2
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA.
Not
applicable for smaller reporting companies.
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
Caution Regarding
Forward-Looking Information
Certain
statements contained herein, including, without limitation, statements
containing the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects” and words of similar
import, constitute forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause
the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry
results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements.
Such
factors include, among others, the following: international, national and local
general economic and market conditions: demographic changes; the ability of the
Company to sustain, manage or forecast its growth; the ability of the Company to
successfully make and integrate acquisitions; raw material costs and
availability; new product development and introduction; existing government
regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, government
regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers
or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results;
changes in business strategy or development plans; business disruptions; the
ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect
technology; and other factors referenced in this and previous
filings.
Given
these uncertainties, readers of this prospectus and investors are cautioned not
to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
Plan of
Operations
During
the next twelve months, we expect to take the following steps in connection with
the further development of our business and the implementation of our plan of
operations:
»
|
We
expect to spend up to $35,000 per quarter through March 2009 on
collaborative research and development of high strength polymers at the
University of Notre Dame. We believe that this research is essential to
our product development. If our financing will allow, management will give
strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on research and
development within the University of Notre Dame’s laboratories. No fees
have been accrued under these terms to date.
|
»
|
We
expect to spend approximately $13,700 on collaborative research and
development of high strength polymers and spider silk protein at the
University of Wyoming over the next twelve months. We believe that this
research is important to our product development. This level of research
spending at the university is also a requirement of our licensing
agreement with the university. If our financing will allow, management
will give strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on
research and development within the University of Wyoming’s
laboratories.
|
»
|
We
will actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities with
other university laboratories in the area of high strength polymers. If
our financing will allow, management will give strong consideration to
increasing the depth of our research to include polymer production
technologies that are closely related to our core
research
|
»
|
We
will consider buying an established revenue producing company which is
operating in the biotechnology arena, in order to broaden our financial
base and increase our research and development capability. We expect to
use a combination of stock and cash for any such
purchase.
|
»
|
We
will also actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities
with university laboratories in areas of research which overlap the
company’s existing research and development. One such potential area for
collaborative research which the company is considering is protein
expression platforms. If our financing will allow, management will give
strong consideration to increasing the breadth of our research to include
protein expression platform
technologies.
|
Limited Operating
History
We have
not previously demonstrated that we will be able to expand our business through
an increased investment in our research and development efforts. We cannot
guarantee that the research and development efforts described in this
Registration Statement will be successful. Our business is subject to risks
inherent in growing an enterprise, including limited capital resources, risks
inherent in the research and development process and possible rejection of our
products in development.
3
If
financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue
expanding our operations. Equity financing will result in a dilution to existing
shareholders.
Results
of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2008.
Revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $0. This compares to $0 in
revenue for the preceding year ended December 31, 2007. No sales are
anticipated during the next twelve months as the company will remain in the
development stage.
Operating
expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $355,647. This compares to
$472,864 in expenses during the year ended December 31,
2007. Research and development expenses for the year ended December
31, 2008 were $33,077. This compares to $177,019 spent on research
and development during the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition,
we had the following expenses during the year ended December 31, 2008: general
and administrative-$74,062, professional fees-$31,066, officer’s salary-$207,866
and payroll taxes-$9,576. This compares to the same expenses during
the year ended December 31, 2007: general and administrative-$40,798,
professional fees-$49,759, officer’s salary-$196,100 and payroll
taxes-$9,188.
Capital
Resources and Liquidity
As of
December 31, 2008 we had $9,537 in cash compared to $105,818 as of December 31,
2007.
We
believe we can not satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months with
our current cash. Completion of our plan of operation is subject to
attaining adequate financing. We cannot assure investors that
adequate financing will be available. In the absence of such financing, we may
be unable to proceed with our plan of operations.
We
anticipate that our operational, and general & administrative expenses for
the next 12 months will total approximately $400,000. We do not anticipate the
purchase or sale of any significant equipment. We also do not expect any
significant additions to the number of employees. The foregoing represents our
best estimate of our cash needs based on current planning and business
conditions. The exact allocation, purposes and timing of any monies raised in
subsequent private financings may vary significantly depending upon the exact
amount of funds raised and our progress with the execution of our business
plan.
In the
event we are not successful in obtaining financing, we may not be able to
proceed with our business plan for the research and development of our
products. We anticipate that we will incur operating losses in the
foreseeable future. Therefore, our auditors have raised substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
financial statements and related public financial information are based on the
application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and
subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the
assets, liabilities, revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can
also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures
including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We
believe our use if estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to
GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to
monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial
statements.
Our
significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of our financial
statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact its financial
condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as
critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the
most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to
use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ
from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and
circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or
estimate methodologies would cause effect on our results of operations,
financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this
report.
4
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
160, “Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No.
51”. This statement improves the relevance, comparability, and
transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in
its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting
standards that require; the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties
other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to
the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and
presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, changes in a
parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial
interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently, when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former
subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, entities provide sufficient
disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160
affects those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one
or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The
adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the
Company's financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”
(SFAS 161). This statement is intended
to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures
of an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects
on the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS 161 applies to all derivative
instruments within the scope of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133) as well as related hedged items, bifurcated
derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are designated and qualify as
hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS 161 must provide more robust
qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements
issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15,
2008, with early application permitted. We are currently evaluating the
disclosure implications of this statement.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting
principles and provides entities with a framework for selecting the principles
used in preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity
with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because it is directed
to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it ranks FASB
Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level
of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below
industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are
not subject to due process. The Board believes the GAAP hierarchy should be
directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditors) that is
responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that
are presented in conformity with GAAP. The adoption of FASB 162 is not expected
to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee
Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” Diversity
exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by
insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by
Insurance Enterprises. This results in inconsistencies in the recognition and
measurement of claim liabilities. This Statement requires that an insurance
enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured
event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an
insured financial obligation. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about
financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure
requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of information provided
to users of financial statements. The adoption of FASB 163 is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We do not
have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with
unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose
entities” (SPEs).
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not
applicable because we are a smaller reporting company.
5
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONTENTS
PAGE
|
F-1
|
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
PAGE
|
F-2
|
BALANCE
SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 and 2007.
|
PAGE
|
F-3
|
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 AND FOR THE
PERIOD APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2008.
|
PAGES
|
F-4
|
STATEMENT
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 25, 2006
(INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2008.
|
PAGE
|
F-5
|
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007 AND FOR THE
PERIOD APRIL 25, 2006 (INCEPTION) TO DECEMBER 31, 2008.
|
PAGES
|
F-6
- F-17
|
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors of:
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.,
(a development stage company), as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and
the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the period April 25,
2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2008. The financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly in all
material respects, the financial position of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the results of its operations and its cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the period April 25,
2006 (Inception) to December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the
financial statements. The Company is in the development stage with a working
capital and stockholders’ deficit of $538,301 and used $517,358 of cash in
operations from inception. These factors raise substantial doubt about the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans
concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
WEBB
& COMPANY, P.A.
Certified
Public Accountants
Boynton
Beach, Florida
April 13,
2009
F-1
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
|
||||||||
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
||||||||
Balance
Sheets
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
December 31, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
|||||||
Current
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ | 9,537 | $ | 105,818 | ||||
Prepaid
Expenses
|
3,123 | 12,500 | ||||||
Total
Assets
|
$ | 12,660 | $ | 118,318 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS'
DEFICIT
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 65,750 | $ | 22,121 | ||||
Payroll
Tax Payable
– related party
|
16,933 |
18,414
|
||||||
Royality
agreement payable - related party
|
120,000 | 120,000 | ||||||
Accrued
Expenses - related party
|
348,278
|
139,980
|
||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
550,961 | 300,515 | ||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
- | - | ||||||
Stockholders'
Deficit
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value; unlimited shares authorized,
|
||||||||
none
issued and outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock Class A, no par value; unlimited shares
authorized,
|
||||||||
49,934,850
and 49,934,850 shares issued and outstanding during
|
779,050 | 779,050 | ||||||
2008
and 2007, respectively
|
||||||||
Common
stock Class B, no par value; unlimited shares
authorized,
|
||||||||
no
shares issued and outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
Stock Issuable, 40,000 shares
|
4,000 | - | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
42,060 | 42,060 | ||||||
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
(1,363,411 | ) | (1,003,307 | ) | ||||
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
(538,301 | ) | (182,197 | ) | ||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
|
$ | 12,660 | $ | 118,318 | ||||
See
accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-2
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
||||||||||||
Statements
of Operations
|
||||||||||||
For
the Years Ended
|
For
the Period from April 25, 2006
|
|||||||||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
(Inception)
to
|
||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Operating
Expenses
|
||||||||||||
General
and Administrative
|
74,062 | 40,798 | 122,703 | |||||||||
Professional
Fees
|
31,066 | 49,759 | 80,825 | |||||||||
Officer's
Salary
|
207,866 | 196,100 | 653,734 | |||||||||
Contract
Settlement
|
- | - | 107,143 | |||||||||
Payroll
Taxes
|
9,576 | 9,188 | 18,764 | |||||||||
Research
and Development
|
33,077 | 177,019 | 375,009 | |||||||||
Total
Operating Expenses
|
355,647 | 472,864 | 1,358,178 | |||||||||
Loss
from Operations
|
(355,647 | ) | (472,864 | ) | (1,358,178 | ) | ||||||
Other
Income/(Expenses)
|
||||||||||||
Other
income
|
2,781 | - | 2,781 | |||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(7,238 | ) | (122 | ) | (8,014 | ) | ||||||
Total
Other Income/(Expenses)
|
(4,457 | ) | (122 | ) | (5,233 | ) | ||||||
Net
Loss before Provision for Income Taxes
|
(360,104 | ) | (472,986 | ) | (1,363,411 | ) | ||||||
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Net
Loss
|
$ | (360,104 | ) | $ | (472,986 | ) | $ | (1,363,411 | ) | |||
Net
Loss Per Share - Basic and Diluted
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||||||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding
|
||||||||||||
during
the year/period - Basic and Diluted
|
49,973,316 | 41,162,532 | ||||||||||
See
accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-3
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statement
of Changes in Stockholders Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the period from April 25, 2006 (inception) to
December 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
Stock
|
Common
Stock -
Class
A
|
Common
Stock -
Class
B
|
Common
Stock – Class A Shares To Be Issued
|
Deficit
Accumulated during
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Par
|
Shares
|
Par
|
Shares
|
Par
|
Shares
|
Par
|
APIC
|
Development
Stage
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
April 25, 2006
|
- | $ | - | - | $ | - | - | $ | - | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued to founder
|
- | - | 33,229,200 | 180 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 180 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for services ($.08/share)
|
- | - | 1,750,000 | 140,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 140,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for services ($.08/share)
|
- | - | 70,000 | 5,600 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5,600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
contributed by shareholder
|
- | - | (1,166,650 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($2.00/share)
|
- | - | 400 | 200 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($2.00/share)
|
- | - | 400 | 200 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
value of warrants issued
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 126,435 | - | 126,435 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (530,321 | ) | (530,321 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
- | - | 33,883,350 | 146,180 | - | - | - | - | 126,435 | (530,321 | ) | (257,706 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.09/share)
|
- | - | 175,000 | 15,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.09/share)
|
- | - | 1,200,000 | 103,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 103,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.003/share)
|
- | - | 900,000 | 3,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.08/share)
|
- | - | 187,500 | 15,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.08/share)
|
- | - | 187,500 | 15,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for services ($.08/share)
|
- | - | 200,000 | 16,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.08/share)
|
- | - | 1,312,500 | 105,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 105,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.03/share)
|
- | - | 8,049,500 | 241,485 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 241,485 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.03/share)
|
- | - | 20,000 | 600 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.03/share)
|
- | - | 830,000 | 24,900 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 24,900 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.03/share)
|
- | - | 2,500 | 75 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.03/share)
|
- | - | 12,000 | 360 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 360 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for cash ($.03/share)
|
- | - | 102,500 | 3,075 | - | - | - | - | 3,075 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued in connection to cash offering
|
- | - | 2,812,500 | 84,375 | - | - | - | - | (84,375 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issued for services ($.10/share)
|
- | - | 60,000 | 6,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss, for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (472,986 | ) | (472,986 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
- | - | 49,934,850 | 779,050 | - | - | - | - | 42,060 | (1,003,307 | ) | (182,197 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issuable for services ($.10/share)
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 40,000 | 4,000 | - | - | 4,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
loss, for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (360,104 | ) | (360,104 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2008
|
- | $ | - | 49,934,850 | $ | 779,050 | - | $ | - | 40,000 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 42,060 | $ | (1,363,411 | ) | $ | (538,301 | ) |
See
accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-4
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
|
||||||||||||
(A
Development Stage Company)
|
||||||||||||
Statements of Cash Flows
|
||||||||||||
For
the Years Ended December 31,
|
For
the Period from April 25, 2006
|
|||||||||||
(Inception)
to
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
$ | (360,104 | ) | $ | (472,986 | ) | $ | (1,363,411 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
|
||||||||||||
Stock
issuable for services
|
4,000 | 22,000 | 171,780 | |||||||||
Warrants
issued to employees
|
- | - | 126,435 | |||||||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
(Increase)Decrease
in prepaid expenses
|
9,377 | (12,500 | ) | (3,123 | ) | |||||||
Increase
in accrued expenses and other payables
|
86,817 | 26,574 | 365,211 | |||||||||
Increase
in royality agreement payable - related party
|
120,000 | 12,857 | 120,000 | |||||||||
Increase
in accounts payable
|
43,629 | 12,988 | 65,750 | |||||||||
Net
Cash Used In Operating Activities
|
(96,281 | ) | (411,067 | ) | (517,358 | ) | ||||||
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from Notes Payable - Stockholder
|
- | - | 10,000 | |||||||||
Repayments
of Notes Payable - Stockholder
|
- | (10,000 | ) | (10,000 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
- | 526,495 | 526,895 | |||||||||
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
- | 516,495 | 526,895 | |||||||||
Net
Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
(96,281 | ) | 105,428 | 9,537 | ||||||||
Cash
at Beginning of Period/Year
|
105,818 | 390 | - | |||||||||
Cash
at End of Period/Year
|
$ | 9,537 | $ | 105,818 | $ | 9,537 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow
information:
|
||||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Cash
paid for taxes
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURE OF NON CASH ITEMS
|
During
the period ended December 31, 2006, the principal stockholder contributed
1,166,650
|
shares
of common stock to the Company as an in kind contribution of
stock. The shares were
|
retired
by the Company.
|
In
accordance with the May 2007 stock purchase agreement which contains an
anti-dilution clause which requires the Company to issue additional common
shares under the stock purchase agreement for any subsequent issuance at a
price below $.08 per share for a period of 12 months. The Company has
issued 2,812,500 additional shares through September 2007 as a result of
the subsequent stock issuances in the amount of $84,375
($0.03/share).
|
See
accompanying notes to financial statements.
F-5
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
NOTE
1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION
(A)
Organization
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (a development stage company) (the "Company") was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The
Company was organized to develop high strength, protein based fiber, using
recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in the textile and
specialty fiber industries.
Activities
during the development stage include developing the business plan, negotiating
intellectual property agreements and raising capital.
(B) Use of
Estimates
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and
expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
(C) Cash and Cash
Equivalents
For
purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of
purchase to be cash equivalents.
(D) Loss Per
Share
Basic and
diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average
common shares outstanding as defined by Financial Accounting Standards No. 128,
“Earnings per Share.” As of December 31, 2007, the Company does not
have any dilutive securities outstanding. As of December 31, 2008,
$362,494 of debt is convertible to 18,124,680 shares as per agreement with
CEO. The effect of these shares is anti-dilutive
and not included in dilutive earnings per share.
(E) Research and Development
Costs
The
Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for which there
is no alternative future use. These costs also include the expensing of employee
compensation and employee stock based compensation.
F-6
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(F) Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under the Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Statement
109”). Under Statement 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are
recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. Under Statement 109, the effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date.
As of
December 31, 2008, and 2007 the Company has a net operating loss carry forward
of approximately $1,234,136 and $874,061, respectively, available to offset
future taxable income through 2028. The valuation allowance at
December 31, 2008 was $419,606. The change in the valuation allowance for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was an increase of $122,426
and $159,860, respectively.
(G) Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R and related interpretations
as provided by SAB 107. As such, compensation cost is measured on the
date of grant at their fair value. Such compensation amounts, if any,
are amortized over the respective vesting periods of the option
grant.
Common
stock, stock options and common stock warrants issued to other than
employees or
directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value, as required by SFAS No.
123(R), which is measured as of the date required by EITF Issue 96-18,
“Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for
Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” In accordance
with EITF 96-18, the stock options or common stock warrants are valued using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis of the market price of the
underlying common stock on the “valuation date,” which for options and warrants
related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to non-performance is
the date of the contract, and for all other contracts is the vesting date.
Expense related to the options and warrants is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the shorter of the period over which services are to be received or
the vesting period. Where expense must be recognized prior to a valuation date,
the expense is computed under the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the
basis of the market price of the underlying common stock at the end of the
period, and any subsequent changes in the market price of the underlying common
stock up through the valuation date is reflected in the expense recorded in the
subsequent period in which that change occurs.
(H) Business
Segments
The
Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not
presented.
F-7
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(I) Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
160, “Noncontrolling Interests
in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No.
51”. This statement improves the relevance, comparability, and
transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in
its consolidated financial statements by establishing accounting and reporting
standards that require; the ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties
other than the parent and the amount of consolidated net income attributable to
the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be clearly identified and
presented on the face of the consolidated statement of income, changes in a
parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial
interest in its subsidiary be accounted for consistently, when a subsidiary is
deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former
subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, entities provide sufficient
disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160
affects those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one
or more subsidiaries or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The
adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on the
Company's financial statements.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133”
(SFAS 161). This statement is intended
to improve transparency in financial reporting by requiring enhanced disclosures
of an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities and their effects
on the entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.
SFAS 161 applies to all derivative
instruments within the scope of SFAS 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133) as well as related hedged items, bifurcated
derivatives, and nonderivative instruments that are designated and qualify as
hedging instruments. Entities with instruments subject to SFAS 161 must provide more robust
qualitative disclosures and expanded quantitative disclosures. SFAS 161 is effective prospectively for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application permitted. We are currently
evaluating the disclosure implications of this statement.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting
principles and provides entities with a framework for selecting the principles
used in preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity
with GAAP. The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because it is directed
to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex, and it ranks FASB
Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level
of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below
industry practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are
not subject to due process. The Board believes the GAAP hierarchy should be
directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditors) that is
responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that
are presented in conformity with GAAP. The adoption of FASB 162 is not expected
to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position.
F-8
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163, “Accounting for Financial Guarantee
Insurance Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.” Diversity
exists in practice in accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by
insurance enterprises under FASB Statement No. 60, Accounting and Reporting by
Insurance Enterprises. This results in inconsistencies in the recognition and
measurement of claim liabilities. This Statement requires that an insurance
enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default (insured
event) when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an
insured financial obligation. This Statement requires expanded disclosures about
financial guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting
and disclosure requirements of the Statement will improve the quality of
information provided to users of financial statements. The adoption of FASB 163
is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial
position.
(J)
Reclassification
The 2007
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2008
presentation.
NOTE
2 GOING
CONCERN
As
reflected in the accompanying unaudited financial statements, the Company is in
the development stage, has a working capital deficiency and stockholders
deficiency of $538,301 and used $517,358 of cash in operations from
inception. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue
as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional
capital and implement its business plan. The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to
continue as a going concern.
Management
believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and
implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for the Company to
continue as a going concern.
NOTE 3 STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFCIT
(A) Common Stock Issued for Cash
On
January 8, 2007 the Company issued 175,000 shares of common stock for $15,000
($0.09/share). This agreement was subsequently terminated effective
May 23, 2007.
On
January 22, 2007 the Company issued 1,200,000 shares of common stock for
$103,000 ($0.09/share). In addition, 900,000 shares were issued
for $3,000 ($0.0033/share).
F-9
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
On April
4, 2007, the Company issued 187,500 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000
($0.08 per share).
On April
20, 2007, the Company issued 187,500 shares of common stock for cash of $15,000
($0.08 per share).
On April
28, 2006, the Company issued 800 shares of common stock for cash of $400 ($0.50
per share).
On May
18, 2007, the Company issued 1,312,500 shares of common stock for cash of
$105,000 ($0.08 per share).
On August
28, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 8,049,500
shares common stock in the amount of $241,485 ($0.03/share).
On August
29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 20,000
shares common stock in the amount of $600 ($0.03/share).
On August
29, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue 830,000
shares common stock in the amount of $24,900 ($0.03/share).
On
September 1, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue
2,500 shares common stock in the amount of $75 ($0.03/share).
On
September 5, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue
12,000 shares common stock in the amount of $360 ($0.03/share
On
September 12, 2007 the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement to issue
102,500 shares common stock in the amount of $3,075($0.03/share).
In
accordance with the May 2007 stock purchase agreement which contains an
anti-dilution clause which requires the Company to issue additional common
shares under the stock purchase agreement for any subsequent issuance at a price
below $.08 per share for a period of 12 months. The Company has issued 2,812,500
additional shares through May 2008 as a result of the subsequent stock issuances
$0.03/share.
(B) Common Stock Issued for
Intellectual Property
On April
26, 2006, the Company issued 33,229,200 shares of common stock to its founder
having a fair value of $180 ($0.000005/share) in exchange for intellectual
property. The fair value of the patent was determined based upon the
historical cost of the intellectual property contributed by the
founder.
F-10
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(C) Common Stock Issued for
Services
On
January 15, 2008 the Company issued 40,000 shares of common stock for consulting
services rendered with a fair value of $4,000 ($0.10/share).
On May 8,
2006, the Company entered into a license agreement for research and development.
Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company issued 1,750,000 of common
stock upon execution of the agreement. The Company also received a five-year
call option from the license holder to repurchase 700,000 common shares at an
exercise price of $150,000 or $.21 per share. The option gives the Company the
right, but not the obligation to repurchase the shares of common
stock. The call option expires May 4, 2011. As of December 31, 2008
the value of the stock was greater then $.10 per share. However, the
Company does not have the obligation to repurchase the
shares. Accordingly, the net effect on the balance sheet is
$0(See Note 4).
On July
1, 2006 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research
and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid 70,000
shares of common stock upon execution. These shares had a fair value
of $5,600 ($0.08/share) based upon the recent cash offering
price. Additionally, 200,000 shares of common stock were issued on
May 18, 2007 with a fair value of $16,000 ($0.08/share). As of
December 31, 2008 the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock for
consulting services rendered with a fair value of $10,000
($0.10/share).
(D) Cancellation and
Retirement of Common Stock
On
December 29, 2006, the Company’s founder returned 1,166,650 shares of common
stock to the Company. These shares were cancelled and
retired. Accordingly, the net effect on equity is $0.
(E) Common Stock
Warrants
During
2006, the Company issued 4,200,000 warrants to an officer under his employment
agreement. The Company recognized an expense of $126,435 for
the period from inception to December 31, 2006. The Company recorded
the fair value of the warrants based on the fair value of each
warrant grant estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in
2006, dividend yield of zero, expected volatility of 183%; risk-free interest
rates of 4.98%, expected life of one year. The warrants vested
immediately. The options expire between 5 and 9 years from the
date of issuance and have an exercise price of between $.21 and $.40 per share.
During November 2006, the Company and the officer entered into an amendment to
the employment agreement whereby all the warrants were retired.
F-11
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(F) Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation
On
February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to amend
the number of shares the Company is authorized to issue as follows (See Note
6(A)):
·
|
Common
stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
·
|
Common
stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
·
|
Preferred
stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
(G) Stock Split Effected in
the Form of a Stock Dividend
On March
23, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock
dividend to be distributed to shareholders of record on April 27,
2009. The financial statements were not retroactively restated
to reflect the stock dividend.
NOTE
4 COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
(A) Employment
Agreement
On April
26, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with the
Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement renews annually so
that at all times, the term of the agreement is five years. Pursuant
to this agreement, the Company will pay an annual base salary of $185,000 for
the period May 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. Base pay will be
increased each January 1st, for
the subsequent twelve month periods by six percent. The officer will
also be entitled to life, disability, health and dental
insurance. In addition, the officer received 700,000 five year
warrants at an exercise price of $.21 per share, 1,500,000 eight year warrants
at an exercise price of $ .33 per share and 2,000,000 nine year warrants at an
exercise price of $ .40 per share (See Note 3(E)). The warrants fully
vested on the date of grant. The agreement also calls for the
issuance of warrants and increase in the officer’s base compensation upon the
Company reaching certain milestones:
1.
|
Upon
the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber
composed of one or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company
will issue 500,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.20 per
share and raise executive’s base salary by
14%.
|
2.
|
Upon
the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber
composed of two or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company
will issue 600,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.18 per
share and raise executive’s base salary by
15%.
|
3.
|
Upon
the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber
composed of at least in part of one or more synthetic proteins, the
Company will issue 900,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of
$.18 per share and raise executive’s base salary by
18%.
|
F-12
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
4.
|
Upon
the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber
composed of at least in part of one or more proteins that are genetic
modifications or induced mutations of a host silk protein, the Company
will raise the executive’s base salary by
8%.
|
5.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $35 million
for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will
increase to $225,000.
|
6.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $65 million
for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase
to $260,000.
|
7.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $100
million for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will
increase to $290,000.
|
8.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $200
million for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will
increase to $365,000.
|
9.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $350
million for over 150 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will
increase to $420,000.
|
On
November 6, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment
agreement whereby the officer agreed to retire all stock warrants issued or to
be issued under his employment agreement in return for an increase in his
severance allowance to $600,000 or seventy five percent of total salary due
under the remaining term of the employment agreement, which ever is greater and
a death benefit of $300,000 or thirty five percent of the total salary due under
the remaining term of the employment agreement.
In
addition, upon expiration or termination of the employment agreement, the
Company agrees to keep the officer employed as a consultant for a period of six
years at a rate of $4,000 per month with annual increases of 3%. The agreement
also calls for certain increases based on milestones reached by the company,
including:
1. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $10 million or net income exceeding
$1 million for any two years within the ten year period after the date of this
agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $45 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 10 years.
F-13
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
2. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $19 million or net income exceeding
$3 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of
this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $65 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and
his spouse at a rate of $6,500 per month with a 3% annual increase.
3. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $38 million or net income exceeding
$6 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of
this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $120 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and
his spouse at a rate of $10,000 per month with a 3% annual
increase.
4. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $59 million or net income exceeding
$9 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this
agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $210 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and
his spouse at a rate of $15,000 per month with a 3% annual
increase.
5. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $78 million or net income exceeding
$12 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this
agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $320 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and
his spouse at a rate of $20,000 per month with a 3% annual
increase.
On
October 10, 2008, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment
agreement whereby all unpaid back salary will accrue interest at 7% per
year. At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded interest expense and
related accrued interest payable of $5,351. In addition, the Company
granted the CEO the right to convert any accrued salary into Class “A” Common
Stock at either 1) The lowest price at which the Company’s Class “A” Common
Stock has traded over the preceding twelve month period, 2) At the lowest bid
price for the preceding thirty days, 3) The lowest price paid in cash for the
Class “A” Common Stock during the twelve months preceding the
conversion. The conversion price is the lesser of options 1-3 or
$0.02. As of December 31, 2008, no accrued salary has been converted
to Class “A” Common Stock. As of December 31, 2008 the Company owes
$340,263 in accrued salary (See Note 5).
F-14
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
(B)License
Agreement
On May 8,
2006, the Company entered into a license agreement. Pursuant to the
terms of the agreement, the Company paid a non-refundable license fee of
$10,000. The Company will pay a license maintenance fee of $10,000 on the one
year anniversary of this agreement and each year thereafter. The
Company will pay an annual research fee of $13,700 with first payment due
January 2007, then on each subsequent anniversary of the effective date
commencing May 4, 2007. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the
Company may be required to pay additional fees aggregating up to a maximum of
$10,000 a year for patent maintenance and prosecution relating to the licensed
intellectual property. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has not
made the required payments and has accrued $28,752 under the
agreement. (See Note 3(C))
(C)Royalty and Research
Agreements
On May 1,
2008 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for research and
development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company will be
required to pay $1,000 per month, or at the Company’s option, the consulting fee
may be paid in the form of Company common stock based upon the greater of $0.50
per share or the average of the closing price of the Company’s shares over the
five days preceding such stock issuance. As of December 31, 2008 the
Company accrued $8,000 of accounts payable for the services
provided.
On
December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual
property transfer agreement with an officer. In consideration of the
Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences;
no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred
stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty
payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the
non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the
Company. On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any
preferred stock authorized with the required preferences. In
accordance with SFAS 150, the Company determined that the present value of the
payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary
of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the
Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares
authorized. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has recorded
$120,000 in accrued expenses- related party. On December 21, 2007 the
officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008. On May 30, 2008 the
officer extended the due date to December 31, 2008. On October 10,
2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or
(b) upon demand by the officer. Additionally, the accrued expenses
are accruing 7% interest per year. At December 31, 2008, the Company
recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of
$1,887.
On
February 1, 2007 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for research
and development for a period of one year. As of December 31, 2008, all
payments under the consulting agreement totaling $150,000 were fully paid and
expensed. In April
2008, this agreement was extended through March 31, 2009 on a cost reimbursement
basis. Reimbursements are to be made quarterly and are not to exceed
$35,000.
F-15
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
On
February 26, 2007 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement for
research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company
paid 200,000 shares of common stock upon execution. These shares had
a fair value of $16,000 ($0.08/share) based upon the recent cash offering price.
Additionally, the Company will be required to pay $1,000 per month, or at the
Company’s option, the consulting fee may be paid in the form of Company common
stock based upon the greater of $0.10 per share or the average of the closing
price of the Company’s shares over the five days preceding such stock
issuance. As of December 31, 2008 the Company issued 100,000 shares
of common stock for consulting services rendered with a fair value of $10,000
($0.10/share). The agreement also requires the Company to issue up to
450,000 additional shares to the consultant upon the consultant reaching certain
milestone events. As of December 31, 2008, the consultant has not
reached the milestone events and no additional shares are earned.
NOTE
5 RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
On
October 6, 2006 the Company received $10,000 from a principal
stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the
advance bears interest at 12%, is unsecured and matures on May 1, 2007. At
December 31, 2008, the Company recorded accrued interest payable of
$776. As of December 31, 2008, the loan principle was
repaid.
F-16
KRAIG
BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS
OF DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND 2007
On
December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual
property transfer agreement with an officer. In consideration of the
Company issuing either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences;
no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred
stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty
payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the
non protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the
Company. On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any
preferred stock authorized with the required preferences. In
accordance with SFAS 150, the Company determined that the present value of the
payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, the one year anniversary
of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the
Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares
authorized. As of December 31, 2008, the Company has recorded
$120,000 in royalty agreement payable- related party. On December 21,
2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30, 2008. On May 30,
2008 the officer extended the due date to December 31, 2008. On
October 10, 2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March
30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer. Additionally, the accrued
expenses are accruing 7% interest per year. At December 31, 2008, the
Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $1,887
(See Note 4 (C).
As of
December 31, 2008 the Company owes $340,263 in accrued salary to principal
stockholder. On October 10, 2008, the Company entered into an
addendum to the employment agreement whereby all unpaid back salary will accrue
interest at 7% per year. At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded
interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $5,351. In
addition, the Company granted the CEO the right to convert any accrued salary
into Class “A” Common Stock at either 1) The lowest price at which the Company’s
Class “A” Common Stock has traded over the preceding twelve month period, 2) At
the lowest bid price for the preceding thirty days, 3) The lowest price paid in
cash for the Class “A” Common Stock during the twelve months preceding the
conversion. The conversion price is the lesser of options 1-3 or
$0.02. As of December 31, 2008, no accrued salary has been converted
to Class “A” Common Stock (See Note 4(A)).
On
January 1, 2007, the company entered into a one year lease agreement with an
officer for office space. The agreement calls for monthly rent of
$100 plus the reimbursement to officer for internet services at $50 per month.
The terms of this agreement became month-to-month on January 1, 2008. Payments
under the agreement totaled $1,800 for the year ended December 31,
2008.
NOTE
6 SUBSEQUENT
EVENT
(A) Amendment to
Articles of Incorporation
On
February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to amend
the number and class of shares the Company is authorized to issue as follows
(See Note 3 (F)):
·
|
Common
stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
·
|
Common
stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
·
|
Preferred
stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
(B) Stock Split Effected in
the Form of a Stock Dividend
On March
23, 2009, the Company's Board of Directors declared a nine-for-one stock
dividend to be distributed to shareholders of record on April 27,
2009. The financial statements were not retroactively restated to
reflect the stock dividend. (See Note 3 (G)).
F-17
ITEM
9. CHANGES IN AND
DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
Our
accountant is Webb & Company, P.A. Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm. We do not presently intend to change accountants. At no time
have there been any disagreements with such accountants regarding any matter of
accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing
scope or procedure.
ITEM
9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pursuant
to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”),
the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief
Financial Officer (“CFO”) (the Company’s principal financial and accounting
officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the
Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange
Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and
CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Management's
Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
The
management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting for the
Company. Our internal control system was designed to, in general,
provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, but because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation
of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our
management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. The framework used by
management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document
entitled “ Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment,
our management has determined that as of December 31, 2008, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting was not effective for the purposes for
which it is intended based on the following material weaknesses:
-
|
We
do not have a system in place to ensure all of our consulting agreements
are timely reconciled to the financial
statements.
|
We are
developing a plan to ensure that all information will be recorded, processed,
summarized and reported accurately, and as of the date of this report, we have
taken the following steps to address the above-referenced material weaknesses in
our internal control over financial reporting:
1.
|
We
will continue to educate our management personnel to comply with the
disclosure requirements and financial reporting controls necessary;
and
|
2.
|
We
will increase management oversight of accounting and reporting functions
in the future.
|
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered
public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered
public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report
in this annual report.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change
in our system of internal control over financial reporting occurred during the
period covered by this report, fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December
31, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
6
PART
III
ITEM
10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND
CONTROL PERSONS: COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT
Our sole
executive officer and director as of April 14, 2009 is as follows:
NAME
|
AGE
|
POSITION
|
DATE
APPOINTED
|
Kim
Thompson
|
46
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, Director
|
April
25, 2006
|
The
following summarizes the occupation and business experience during the past five
years for our sole officer and directors.
KIM
THOMPSON.
Mr.
Thompson was a founder of the California law firm of Ching & Thompson which
was founded in 1997 where he specialized in commercial litigation. He
has been a partner in the Illinois law firm of McJessy, Ching & Thompson
since 2004 where he also specializes in commercial
litigation. Mr. Thompson received his bachelor’s degree in
applied economics from James Madison College, Michigan State University, and his
Juris Doctorate from the University of Michigan.
Term of
Office
Our
directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual
general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance
with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold
office until removed by the board. Mr. Thompson is employed as the
CEO of the company pursuant to a five year employment contract.
Our
officer and director has not filed any bankruptcy petition, been convicted of or
been the subject of any criminal proceedings or the subject of any order,
judgment or decree involving the violation of any state or federal securities
laws within the past five (5) years.
Family
relationships
None.
Term
of Office
Our sole
director was appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual
general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance
with our bylaws. Our sole officer was appointed by our board of directors and
holds office until removed by the board
Current
Issues and Future Management Expectations
No board
audit committee has been formed as of the filing of this Annual
Report.
Compliance
With Section 16(A) Of The Exchange Act.
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and
persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of the
Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are required to
furnish copies to the Company. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, any
reports required to be filed were timely filed in fiscal year ended December 31,
2008.
Code
of Ethics
The
Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer. This Code of Ethics was previously filed with the
10KSB on March 26, 2008 as an exhibit.
ITEM
11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation awarded to,
earned by, or paid to the named executive officer during the years ended
December 31, 2008, and 2007 in all capacities for the accounts of our executive,
including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer
(CFO):
7
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
Name
and principal position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
|
Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)
|
All
Other Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||||||
Kim
Thompson,
|
2008
|
$
|
207,866
|
$
|
$
|
7,230(1)
|
$
|
215,096
|
|||||||||||||
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
2007
|
$
|
196,100
|
0
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
8,204(2)
|
$
|
204,304
|
||||||||
1)
|
For
the calendar year 2008, Kim Thompson is to receive $7,229 in medical and
dental insurance pursuant to an employment agreement entered into with
us.
|
|
2)
|
For
the calendar year 2007, Kim Thompson is to receive $7,229 in medical and
dental insurance as well as $950 for automobile expenses pursuant to an
employment agreement entered into with
us.
|
Employment
Agreements
On April
26, 2006, the Company entered into a five-year employment agreement with the
Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement renews annually so
that at all times, the term of the agreement is five years. Pursuant
to this agreement, the Company will pay an annual base salary of $185,000 for
the period May 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006. Base pay will be
increased each January 1st, for
the subsequent twelve month periods by six percent. The officer will
also be entitled to life, disability, health and dental
insurance. In addition, the officer received 700,000 five year
warrants at an exercise price of $.21 per share, 1,500,000 eight year warrants
at an exercise price of $ .33 per share and 2,000,000 nine year warrants at an
exercise price of $ .40 per share (See Note 3(E)). The warrants fully
vested on the date of grant. The agreement also calls for the
issuance of warrants and increase in the officer’s base compensation upon the
Company reaching certain milestones:
1.
|
Upon
the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber
composed of one or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company
will issue 500,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.20 per
share and raise executive’s base salary by
14%.
|
2.
|
Upon
the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber
composed of two or more proteins that are exogenous to a host, the Company
will issue 600,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of $.18 per
share and raise executive’s base salary by
15%.
|
3.
|
Upon
the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber
composed of at least in part of one or more synthetic proteins, the
Company will issue 900,000 eight year warrants at an exercise price of
$.18 per share and raise executive’s base salary by
18%.
|
4.
|
Upon
the Company’s successful laboratory development of a new silk fiber
composed of at least in part of one or more proteins that are genetic
modifications or induced mutations of a host silk protein, the Company
will raise the executive’s base salary by
8%.
|
5.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $35 million
for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will
increase to $225,000.
|
6.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $65 million
for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will increase
to $260,000.
|
7.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $100
million for over 91 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will
increase to $290,000.
|
8.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $200
million for over 120 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will
increase to $365,000.
|
9.
|
Upon
the Company becoming either a registered company or upon its stock trading
and the company achieving a market capitalization in excess of $350
million for over 150 calendar day period, the executive’s base salary will
increase to $420,000.
|
On
November 6, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the employment
agreement whereby the officer agreed to retire all stock warrants issued or to
be issued under his employment agreement in return for an increase in his
severance allowance to $600,000 or seventy five percent of total salary due
under the remaining term of the employment agreement, which ever is greater and
a death benefit of $300,000 or thirty five percent of the total salary due under
the remaining term of the employment agreement.
In
addition, upon expiration or termination of the employment agreement, the
Company agrees to keep the officer employed as a consultant for a period of six
years at a rate of $4,000 per month with annual increases of 3%. The agreement
also calls for certain increases based on milestones reached by the company,
including:
8
1. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $10 million or net income exceeding
$1 million for any two years within the ten year period after the date of this
agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $45 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 10 years.
2. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $19 million or net income exceeding
$3 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of
this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $65 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and
his spouse at a rate of $6,500 per month with a 3% annual increase.
3. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $38 million or net income exceeding
$6 million for any two years within the twelve year period after the date of
this agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $120 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and
his spouse at a rate of $10,000 per month with a 3% annual
increase.
4. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $59 million or net income exceeding
$9 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this
agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $210 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and
his spouse at a rate of $15,000 per month with a 3% annual
increase.
5. If
the company achieves gross sales exceeding $78 million or net income exceeding
$12 million for any year within the twelve year period after the date of this
agreement or a market capitalization in excess of $320 million for over 180
calendar days within six years from the date of this agreement, the term of the
consulting agreement will be extended to 20 years or the life of the officer and
his spouse at a rate of $20,000 per month with a 3% annual
increase.
Outstanding
Equity Awards
None
Long-Term Incentive Plan
(“LTIP”) Awards Table.
There were no awards made to a named executive officer in the last
completed fiscal year under any LTIP
Compensation of
Directors
Directors
are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as
directors. The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of
directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to, directors in such
capacity.
ITEM
12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table provides the names and addresses of each person known to us to
own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of April 14, 2009
and by the officers and directors, individually and as a group. Except as
otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.
Title
of Class
|
Name
and Address
of
Beneficial Owner
|
Amount
and Nature
of
Beneficial Owner
|
Percent
of
Class
(1)
|
Common
Stock
|
Kim
Thompson
120
N. Washington Square, Suite 805
Lansing,
MI 48933
|
32,062,550
|
64.21%
|
Common
Stock
|
Lion
Equity
1001
Brickell Bay Dr, Suite 1812
Miami,
FL 33131
|
4,500,000
|
9.01%
|
Common
Stock
|
Sean
March
8901
South Ocean Dr. #14
W.
Hollywood, FL 33019
|
4,000,000
|
8.01%
|
Common
Stock
|
All
executive officers and directors as a group
|
32,062,550
|
64.21%
|
(1)The
percent of class is based on 49,974,850 shares of our common class “A” stock
issued and outstanding as of April 14, 2009.
9
Stock Option
Grants
To date,
we have not granted any stock options. In 2006, our CEO, Kim Thompson,
received substantial warrants on our stock pursuant to the employment agreement
between Mr. Thompson and us. However, Mr. Thompson surrendered all
such warrants and options to the corporation prior to the close of the 2006
calendar year. As of this date, we have no outstanding stock
options.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
On
October 6, 2006 the Company received $10,000 from a principal
stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the
advance bears interest at 12%, is unsecured and matures on May 1, 2007. At
December 31, 2007, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued
interest payable of $776. As of December 31, 2007, the loan
principle was repaid.
During
2006, the Company entered into addendum to the Intellectual Property transaction
and agreed to issue the CEO either 20,000 preferred shares or a payment of
$120,000 (See Note 4 (C).
On
January 1, 2007, the company entered into a one year lease agreement with an
officer for office space. The agreement calls for monthly rent of
$100 plus the reimbursement to officer for internet services at $50 per
month. Payments under the agreement totaled $1,800 for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The terms of this agreement became month-to-month
on January 1, 2008. Payments under the agreement totaled $1,800 for the period
ended December 31, 2008.
As of
December 31, 2008 the Company owes $340,263 in accrued salary to principal
stockholder. On October 10, 2008, the Company entered into an
addendum to the employment agreement whereby all unpaid back salary will accrue
interest at 7% per year. At December 31, 2008, the Company recorded
interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $5,351. In
addition, the Company granted the CEO the right to convert any accrued salary
into Class “A” Common Stock at either 1) The lowest price at which the Company’s
Class “A” Common Stock has traded over the preceding twelve month period, 2) At
the lowest bid price for the preceding thirty days, 3) The lowest price paid in
cash for the Class “A” Common Stock during the twelve months preceding the
conversion. The conversion price is the lesser of options 1-3 or
$0.02. As of December 31, 2008, no accrued salary has been converted
to Class “A” Common Stock..
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND
SERVICES
Audit
Fees
For the
Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we were billed
approximately $14,692 and $10,684 for professional services rendered for the
audit and review of our financial statements.
Audit Related
Fees
There
were no fees for audit related services for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007.
Tax Fees
For the
Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we were not billed for
professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax
planning.
All Other
Fees
The
Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our
principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007.
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Effective
May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require
that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted
non-audit related service, the engagement be:
-approved
by our audit committee; or
-entered
into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit
committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the
particular service, the audit committee is
informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include
delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to management.
We do not
have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors pre-approves
all services provided by our independent auditors.
The
pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules.
Therefore, our board of directors does not have records
of what percentage of the above fees were
pre-approved. However, all of the above services and fees were
reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after
the respective services were rendered.
10
PART
IV
a)
Documents filed as part of this Annual Report
3.
Exhibits
14 Code
of Ethics *
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
|
* Filed
with the original Form 10-KSB on March 25, 2008
11
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated:
April 14, 2009
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories,
Inc.
|
|||
By:
|
/s/
Kim Thompson
|
||
Kim
Thompson
Chief
Executive Officer
|
PURSUANT
TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT
HAS BEEN SIGNED BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS IN THE CAPACITIES AND ON THE DATES
INDICATED:
Name
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
/s/
Kim Thompson
|
||||
Kim
Thompson
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
April
14, 2009
|