Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc - Quarter Report: 2016 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☑
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2016
OR
☐
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
transition period from_____ to _____
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
83-0459707
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
(Commission
File No.)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
2723
South State St. Suite 150
Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48104
|
|
(734) 619-8066
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number)
|
(Former
name and address, if changed since last report)
Copies to:
Hunter
Taubman Fischer & Li LLC
1450
Broadway, 26th Floor
New
York, NY 10018
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes ☑ No
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated
filer ☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer ☐
|
Smaller
reporting company ☑
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
As of
November 10, 2016, there were 772,131,261 shares of the
issuer’s common stock, no par value per share, outstanding,
and 2 shares of preferred stock, no par value per share,
outstanding.
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
|
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
3
|
|
|
Item 1. Unaudited
Condensed Financial Statements:
|
3
|
|
|
Condensed Balance
Sheets as of September 30, 2016 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2015
(Audited)
|
3
|
|
|
Condensed
Statements of Operations (Unaudited) for the three and nine month
periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
|
4
|
|
|
Condensed
Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit (Unaudited) for the nine
months ended September 30, 2016
|
5
|
|
|
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the nine month periods
ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
|
6
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
20
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls
and Procedures
|
25
|
|
|
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal
proceedings
|
26
|
|
|
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
|
26
|
|
|
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
26
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
26
|
|
|
Item 5. Other
information
|
26
|
2
PART I
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Condensed Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2016 (Unaudited)
|
December 31,
2015 (Audited)
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
335,909
|
238,188
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
1,861
|
645
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
18,673
|
-
|
Total
Current Assets
|
356,433
|
238,833
|
|
|
|
Property and
Equipment, net
|
55,953
|
66,104
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
412,396
|
304,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
519,579
|
469,833
|
Note Payable -
related party
|
50,000
|
-
|
Royalty agreement
payable – Related Party
|
65,292
|
65,292
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses – related party
|
2,042,642
|
1,666,748
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
2,677,513
|
2,201,873
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
2,677,513
|
2,201,873
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Deficit
|
|
|
Preferred
stock Series A, no par value;
|
|
|
2 and 2 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively
|
5,217,800
|
5,217,800
|
Common
stock Class A, no par value; unlimited shares
authorized,
|
|
|
767,952,594
and 708,068,385 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
12,749,211
|
10,801,942
|
Common
stock Class B, no par value; unlimited shares
authorized,
|
|
|
no shares issued
and outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
Common
Stock Issuable, 1,122,311 and 1,122,311 shares,
respectively
|
22,000
|
22,000
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
2,219,520
|
2,373,458
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
(22,473,648)
|
(20,312,136)
|
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
(2,265,117)
|
(1,896,936)
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
|
412,396
|
304,937
|
See
accompanying notes which are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed financial statements.
3
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 and
2015
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
For
the Nine Months Ended
|
||
|
September 30,
2016
|
September 30,
2015
|
September 30,
2016
|
September 30,
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$18,673
|
-
|
$18,673
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
General and
Administrative
|
821,651
|
54,990
|
1,046,324
|
854,517
|
Professional
Fees
|
29,060
|
82,431
|
319,309
|
221,851
|
Officer's
Salary
|
127,809
|
94,735
|
340,999
|
280,127
|
Research and
Development
|
129,282
|
90,650
|
379,815
|
313,739
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
1,107,802
|
322,806
|
2,086,447
|
1,670,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
(1,089,129)
|
(322,806)
|
(2,067,774)
|
(1,670,235)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income/(Expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on forgiveness
of debt
|
- |
-
|
5,704
|
9,679
|
Loss on disposal of
fixed asset
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(953)
|
Interest
expense
|
(35,339)
|
(25,709)
|
(99,442)
|
(71,435)
|
Total
Other Income/(Expenses)
|
(35,339)
|
(25,709)
|
(93,738)
|
(62,709)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) before Provision for Income Taxes
|
(1,124,468)
|
(348,515)
|
(2,161,512)
|
(1,732,944)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
$(1,124,468)
|
$(348,515)
|
$(2,161,512)
|
$(1,732,944)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss Per Share - Basic and Diluted
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.00)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding
|
762,420,118
|
683,999,140
|
734,960,525
|
680,911,696
|
See
accompanying notes which are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed financial statements.
4
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock -Class
A
|
|
||||
|
Preferred Stock -Series A
|
Common
Stock -
|
|
To
be issued
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Par
|
Shares
|
Par
|
Shares
|
Par
|
Shares
|
Par
|
APIC
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
Total
|
|
|||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2015
|
2
|
$5,217,800
|
708,068,385
|
$10,801,942
|
-
|
$-
|
1,122,311
|
$22,000
|
$2,373,458
|
$(20,312,136)
|
$(1,896,936)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
issued for cash ($0.01/share)
|
-
|
-
|
37,459,609
|
875,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
875,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
6,000,000 warrants for services to related party
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
153,619
|
-
|
153,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
18,000,000 Warrants for services to Related Party
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
702,156
|
-
|
702,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued for services - related party
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
62,261
|
-
|
62,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
of 23,500,000 warrants in exchange for stock
|
-
|
-
|
22,412,600
|
1,071,973
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,071,973)
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of
accounts payable with stock issuance ($0.03/share
|
-
|
-
|
12,000
|
296
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss for the three months ended September 30, 2016
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,161,512)
|
(2,161,512)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2016
|
2
|
$5,217,800
|
767,952,594
|
$12,749,211
|
-
|
$-
|
1,122,311
|
$22,000
|
$2,219,520
|
$(22,473,648)
|
$(2,265,117)
|
See
accompanying notes which are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed financial statements.
5
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 and
2015
|
For the nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
$(2,161,512)
|
$(1,732,944)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
|
|
|
Depreciation
expense
|
12,639
|
11,175
|
(Gain) Loss on forgiveness of debt
|
5,704
|
(9,679)
|
Loss
on disposal of fixed asset
|
-
|
953
|
Warrants
issued to consultants
|
702,156
|
590,335
|
Warrants
issued to related party
|
215,880
|
100,618
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
(Increase)
Decrease in prepaid expenses
|
(1,216)
|
750
|
(Increase)
in accounts receivables, net
|
(18,673)
|
-
|
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related
party
|
375,893
|
282,743
|
(Increase)
in accounts payable
|
44,338
|
70,950
|
Net
Cash Used In Operating Activities
|
(824,791)
|
(685,099)
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
Purchase of Fixed
Assets and Domain Name
|
(2,488)
|
(39,285)
|
Net
Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
(2,488)
|
(39,285)
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes
payable - related party
|
50,000
|
-
|
Proceeds from
issuance of common stock
|
875,000
|
450,000
|
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
925,000
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
Net
Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
97,721
|
(274,384)
|
|
|
|
Cash at Beginning
of Period
|
238,188
|
495,036
|
|
|
|
Cash
at End of Period
|
$335,909
|
$220,652
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for
interest
|
$-
|
$-
|
Cash paid for
taxes
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
Shares
issued in connection with cashless warrants exercise
|
$1,071,973
|
$238,342
|
Settlement of accounts payable with stock issuance
|
$296
|
$321
|
See
accompanying notes which are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed financial statements.
6
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION
(A) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in The United States of America and the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim
financial information. Accordingly, they do not include
all the information necessary for a comprehensive presentation of
financial position and results of operations.
It is management's opinion, however that all material adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which
are necessary for a fair financial statements
presentation. The results for the interim period are not
necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the
year.
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated under
the laws of the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The Company was
organized to develop high strength, protein based fiber, using
recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in the
textile and specialty fiber industries.
(B) Use of Estimates
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues
and expenses during the reported period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
(C) Cash
For
purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months
or less at the time of purchase to be cash
equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of
September 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.
(D) Loss Per Share
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the
weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by FASB
Accounting Standards Codification No. 260, “Earnings per
Share.” During the nine month periods ended
September 30, 2016 and 2015, warrants were not included in the
computation of income/ (loss) per share because their inclusion is
anti-dilutive.
The
computation of basic and diluted loss per share during the nine
months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 excludes the common stock
equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities
because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:
|
September 30,
2016
|
September 30,
2015
|
|
|
|
Stock
Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001/share)
|
34,500,000
|
34,000,000
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
2
|
2
|
Total
|
34,500,002
|
345,000,002
|
(E) Research and Development Costs
The
Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for
which there is no alternative future use. These costs also include
the expensing of employee compensation and employee stock based
compensation.
(F) Income Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic
740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC
740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
7
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
Effective
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance regarding accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance clarifies the
accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition
threshold an income tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements and applies to all federal
or state income tax positions. Each income tax position is assessed
using a two-step process. A determination is first made as to
whether it is more likely than not that the income tax position
will be sustained, based upon technical merits, upon examination by
the taxing authorities. If the income tax position is expected to
meet the more likely than not criteria, the benefit recorded in the
financial statements equals the largest amount that is greater than
50% likely to be realized upon its ultimate settlement. As of
September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 there were no amounts that
had been accrued in respect to uncertain tax
positions.
The
Company’s federal income tax returns, for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2013, is currently under examination by the
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”); and all returns from
fiscal 2009 through today remain subject to examination by the IRS
and respective states.
(G) Derivative Financial Instruments
Fair
value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative
instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or
equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value for
accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the
Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing
the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the
convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt
and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring
measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional
convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process
of these instruments as derivative financial
instruments.
Once
determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair
value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease
in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an
adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair
value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are
also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model.
(H) Stock-Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards
Codification No. 718, Compensation – Stock
Compensation. Under FASB Accounting Standards
Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the
compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based
on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the
financial statements over the period during which employees are
required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements
include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based
awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase
plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the
date of grant at their fair value. Such compensation
amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods
of the option grant. The Company applies this statement
prospectively.
Equity
instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than
employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the
instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification
No. 718. FASB Accounting Standards Codification No.
505, Equity Based Payments to
Non-Employees defines the measurement date and
recognition period for such instruments. In general, the
measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as
defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee
performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The
measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a
period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular
grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification.
(I) Business Segments
The
Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information
is not presented.
(J)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
September, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business
Combinations (Topic 805) (“ASU 2015-16”). Topic 805
requires that an acquirer retrospectively adjust provisional
amounts recognized in a business combination, during the
measurement period. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made
to provisional amounts, the amendments in the Update require that
the acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are
identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in
which the adjustment amount is determined. The acquirer is required
to also record, in the same period’s financial statements,
the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or
other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the
provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been
completed at the acquisition date. In addition an entity is
required to present separately on the face of the income statement
or disclose in the notes to the financial statements the portion of
the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that
would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the
adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the
acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years
beginning December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-016 is not
expected to have a material effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial statements.
8
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
In
August, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective
Date (“ASU 2015-14”). The amendment in this ASU defers
the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities for one
year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities,
and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU
2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning December 15, 2017,
including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.
Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting
periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim
reporting periods with that reporting period.
In
April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2015-03, Interest–Imputation of
Interest (Subtopic 835-30) (“ASU 2015-03”), which
changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial
statements. ASU 2015-03 requires an entity to present such costs in
the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt
liability rather than as an asset. Amortization of the costs will
continue to be reported as interest expense. It is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early
adoption is permitted. The new guidance will be applied
retrospectively to each prior period presented. The Company is
currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of
ASU 2015-03 on its balance sheets.
All
other newly issued accounting pronouncements but not yet effective
have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.
(K)
Reclassification
The
2015 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
2016 presentation.
(L) Equipment
The
Company values property and equipment at cost and depreciates these
assets using the straight-line method over their expected useful
life. The Company uses a five year life for
automobiles.
In
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No.
360, Property, Plant and
Equipment, the Company carries long-lived assets at the
lower of the carrying amount or fair value. Impairment is evaluated
by estimating future undiscounted cash flows expected to result
from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum
of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is less than the
carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized.
Fair value, for purposes of calculating impairment, is measured
based on estimated future cash flows, discounted at a market rate
of interest.
There
were no impairment losses recorded during the nine months ended
September 30, 2016 and 2015.
(M) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We hold
certain financial assets, which are required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“ASC Topic 820-10”). ASC Topic 820-10
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements)
and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurements). ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. Level 1 instruments include
cash, account receivable, prepaid expenses, inventory and account
payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying values are assumed to
approximate the fair value due to the short term nature of the
instrument.
The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are
described below:
°
|
Level 1
- Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to
access. We believe our carrying value of level 1
instruments approximate their fair value at September 30, 2016 and
December 31, 2015.
|
°
|
Level 2
- Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or
can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities.
|
°
|
Level 3
- Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the
assets or liabilities. We consider depleting assets, asset
retirement obligations and net profit interest liability to be
Level 3. We determine the fair value of Level 3
assets and liabilities utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX
price quotations and contract terms.
|
|
September 30,
2016
|
December 31,
2015
|
Level
1
|
$-
|
$-
|
Level
2
|
-
|
-
|
Level
3
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$-
|
$-
|
9
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
(N) Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenues are generated primarily from contracts
with the U.S. Government. The Company performs work under the
cost-plus-fixed-fee contract.
Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts—Revenue is recognized on
cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts with the U.S. Government on the basis
of partial performance equal to costs incurred plus an estimate of
applicable fees earned as the Company becomes contractually
entitled to reimbursement of costs and the applicable
fees.
Invoicing for costs and applicable fees are reported to the U.S.
Government on a monthly basis and invoices are typically paid
within 30 days.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company
recognized $18,673 in revenue from the Government
contract.
(O)
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company at times has cash in banks in excess of FDIC insurance
limits. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company
had approximately $85,909 and $0, respectively in excess of FDIC
insurance limits.
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had a
concentration of accounts receivable of:
Customer
|
September
30, 2016
|
December
31, 2015
|
Customer
A
|
100%
|
0%
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30,
2015, the Company had a concentration of sales of:
Customer
|
September
30, 2016
|
September 30,
2015
|
Customer A
|
100%
|
0%
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30,
2015, the Company had a concentration of sales of:
Customer
|
September
30, 2016
|
September
30, 2015
|
Customer A
|
100%
|
0%
|
NOTE 2 GOING CONCERN
As
reflected in the accompanying unaudited financial statements, the
Company has a working capital deficiency of $2,321,080 and
stockholders’ deficiency of $2,265,117 and used $824,791 of
cash in operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2016. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company
to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s
ability to raise additional capital and implement its business
plan. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to
continue as a going concern.
Management
believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional
funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity
for the Company to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 3 EQUIPMENT
At
September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, property and equipment,
net, is as follows:
|
As of September 30,
2016
(Unaudited)
|
As of December 31, 2015
|
Automobile
|
$41,805
|
$41,805
|
Laboratory Equipment
|
39,311
|
36,822
|
Office Equipment
|
6,466
|
6,466
|
Less: Accumulated
Depreciation
|
(31,629)
|
(18,989)
|
Total Property and Equipment,
net
|
$55,953
|
$66,104
|
10
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
and 2015 was $12,639 and $11,175 respectively.
Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2016
and 2015 was $4,268 and $4,244 respectively.
NOTE 4 ACRRUED INTEREST – RELATED
PARTY
On
September 6, 2016 the Company received $50,000 from a principal
stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the
advance bears interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand. The
Company recorded accrued interest payable of $475 as of September
30, 2016.
On
February 25, 2013 the Company received $150,000 from a principal
stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the
advance bears interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand. At
December 31, 2013 the loan balance was repaid. The
Company recorded accrued interest payable of $2,001 as of December
31, 2015.
NOTE 5 STOCKHOLDERS’
DEFICIT
(A) Common Stock Issued
for Cash
On June
16, 2015, the Company issued 4,675,811 share of common stock for
$150,000 ($0.03/share).
On July
9, 2015, the Company issued 3,731,343 share of common stock for
$100,000 ($0.026/share).
On
August 3, 2015, the Company issued 4,152,824 share of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.024/share).
On
September 28, 2015, the Company issued 4,166,667 share of common
stock for $100,000 ($0.024/share).
On
October 19, 2015, the Company issued 3,894,081 shares of common
stock for $100,000 ($0.026/share).
On
November 16, 2015, the Company issued 4,166,667 shares of common
stock for $100,000 ($0.024/share).
On
December 21, 2015, the Company issued 5,186,722 shares of common
stock for $100,000 ($0.019/share).
On
February 16, 2016 the Company issued 5,630,631 share of common
stock for $100,000 ($0.018/share).
On
March 28, 2016 the Company issued 5,411,255 share of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.018/share).
On
April 25, 2016 the Company issued 5,952,381 share of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.017/share).
On June
28, 2016 the Company issued 7,812,500 share of common stock for
$125,000 ($0.016/share).
On July
26, 2016 the Company issued 6,028,939 shares of common stock for
$150,000 ($0.025/share).
On
August 8, 2016 the Company issued 2,181,501 shares of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.046/share).
On
August 18, 2016 the Company issued 1,838,235 shares of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.054/share).
On
September 9, 2016 the Company issued 2,604,167 shares of common
stock for $100,000 ($0.038/share).
(B) Common Stock Issued for Service
Shares
issued for services as mentioned below were valued at the closing
price of the stock on the date of grant.
On
March 5, 2015, the Company issued 10,000 shares with a fair value
of $321 ($0.0321/share) to a consultant as consideration for
consulting fees owed from October 1, 2014 through February 28, 2015
of $10,000. The issuance of shares resulted in gain on settlement
of accounts payable of $9,679.
On
November 9, 2015, the Company issued 14,000 shares with a fair
value of $434 ($0.031/share) to a consultant as consideration for
consulting fees owed from March 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015
of $14,000. The issuance of shares resulted in gain on settlement
of accounts payable of $13,566.
On
April 4, 2016, the Company issued 12,000 shares with a fair value
of $296 ($0.0247/share) to a consultant as consideration for
consulting fees owed from October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 of
$6,000. The issuance of shares resulted in gain on settlement of
accounts payable of $5,704.
11
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
(C) Common Stock Warrants
On
January 21, 2015, the Company issued 2,918,919 shares in connection
with the cashless exercise of the 3,000,000 warrants.
On
January 23, 2015, the Company issued 3-year warrant for 2,000,000
shares to a related party, with an exercise price of $0.001 per
share. The warrants were granted for services to be rendered. The
warrants had a fair value of $72,317, based upon the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant and were fully vested
upon issuance and will be exercisable on February 2, 2016, and for
a period expiring on January 19, 2018.
Grant
Date
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
88.13%
|
Expected
term
|
3
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.33%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On May
28, 2015, the Company issued 3-year warrant for 3,000,000 shares to
a related party, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The
warrants were granted for services to be rendered. The warrants had
a fair value of $117,503, based upon the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant and vesting on October
28, 2016, and will be exercisable on May 28, 2018, and for a period
expiring on May 28, 2022. During the nine months ended September
30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded $62,261 and $28,300 as an
expense for warrants issued to related party.
Grant Date
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
77.49%
|
Expected
term
|
4
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.24%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On June
22, 2015, the Company issued 3-year warrant for 15,000,000 shares
to a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The
warrants were granted for services to be rendered. The warrants had
a fair value of $590,335, based upon the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant and were fully vested
upon issuance and will be exercisable on December 28, 2015, and for
a period expiring on September 22, 2018.
Grant Date
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
78.85%
|
Expected
term
|
3
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.06%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On July
2, 2015, the Company issued 1,176,922 shares in connection with the
cashless exercise of the 1,200,000 warrants.
On
January 1, 2016, the Company issued 3-year warrant for 6,000,000
shares to a related party, with an exercise price of $0.001 per
share. The warrants were granted for services to be rendered. The
warrants had a fair value of $234,086, based upon the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant and vesting on February
20, 2017, and will be exercisable on February 20, 2018, and for a
period expiring on February 20, 2021. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $153,619 as an expense for
warrants issued to related party.
Grant Date
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
82.95%
|
Expected
term
|
4
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.31%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
12
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
On
April 7, 2016, the Company issued 958,506 shares in connection with
the cashless exercise of the 1,000,000 warrants.
On
April 7, 2016, the Company issued 958,506 shares in connection with
the cashless exercise of the 1,000,000 warrants.
On May
5, 2016, the Company issued 7,627,907 shares in connection with the
cashless exercise of the 8,000,000 warrants.
On June
23, 2016, the Company issued 12,867,681 shares in connection with
the cashless exercise of the 13,500,000 warrants.
On July 26, 2016 the company issued, the Company
issued 4-year warrant for 10,000,000 shares to a consultant, with
an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrants were granted
for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $390,087,
based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of
grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Warrants will be
exercisable on July 26, 2018, and for a period of 4 years expiring
on July 26, 2022. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016,
the Company recorded $390,087 as an expense for warrants
issued.
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
87.52%
|
Expected
term
|
4
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
0.87%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On July
26, 2016 the company issued, the Company issued 4-year warrant for
8,000,000 shares to a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.001
per share. The warrants were granted for services rendered. The
warrants had a fair value of $312,069, based upon the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on
the date granted. Warrants will be exercisable on July 26, 2018,
and for a period of 4 years expiring on July 26, 2022. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $312,069
as an expense for warrants issued.
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
87.52%
|
Expected
term
|
4
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
0.87%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
|
Number
of
Warrants
|
Weighted Average Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years
|
Balance, December
31, 2014
|
18,200,000
|
$0.001
|
2.1
|
Granted
|
20,000,000
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(4,200,000)
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
-
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2015
|
34,000,000
|
$0.001
|
1.7
|
Granted
|
24,000,000
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(23,500,000)
|
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
-
|
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2016
|
34,500,000
|
$0.001
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic
Value
|
$1,475,100
|
|
|
13
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the following
warrants were outstanding:
Exercise
Price Warrants Outstanding
|
Warrants
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
$0.001
|
34,500,000
|
4.1
|
$1,475,100
|
For the year ended December 31, 2015, the following warrants were
outstanding:
Exercise
Price Warrants Outstanding
|
Warrants
Exercisable
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life
|
A
ggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
$0.001
|
34,000,000
|
1.7
|
$842,000
|
(D) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
On
February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of
incorporation to amend the number and class of shares the Company
is authorized to issue as follows:
●
|
Common
stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
●
|
Common
stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
●
|
Preferred
stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
Effective
December 17, 2013, the Company amended its articles of
incorporation to designate a Series A no par value preferred
stock. Two shares of Series A Preferred stock have been
authorized.
NOTE 6 COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
On
March 18, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the
employment agreement whereby the Company will reimburse the
employee and his family for up to $20,000 of out of pocket medical
and dental care costs, including prescription costs or
co-pays.
On
November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the
employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011 through the
December 31, 2015. The term of the agreement is a five
year period at an annual salary of $210,000. There is a
6% annual increase. For the year ending
December 31, 2015 the annual salary was $281,027. The
employee is also to receive a 20% bonus based on the annual based
salary. Any stock, stock options bonuses have to be
approved by the board of directors. On January 1, 2016 the
agreement renewed with the same terms for another 5 years with an
annual salary of $297,889 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(See Note 8).
On
October 2, 2014, the Company entered into a letter agreement for an
equity line of financing up to $7,500,000 (the
“Letter Agreement”) with Calm Seas Capital, LLC
(“Calm Seas”).
Under
the Letter Agreement, over a 24 month period from the Effective
Date we may put to Calm Seas up to an aggregate of $7,500,000 in
shares of our Class A common stock for a purchase price equal to
80% of the lowest price of our Class A common stock during the five
consecutive trading days immediately following the date we deliver
notice to Calm Seas of our election to put shares pursuant to the
Letter Agreement. We may put shares
bi-monthly. The dollar value that will be
permitted for each put pursuant to the Letter Agreement
will be the lesser of: (A) the product of (i) 200% of the average
daily volume in the US market of our Class A common stock for the
ten trading days prior to the date we deliver our put notice to
Calm Seas multiplied by (ii) the average of the daily closing
prices for the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding the date
we deliver our put notice to Calm Seas, or (B)
$100,000. We will automatically withdraw our put notice
to Calm Seas if the lowest closing bid price used to determine the
purchase price of the put shares is not at least equal to
seventy-five percent (75%) of the average closing “bid”
price for our Class A common stock for the ten (10) trading days
prior to the date we deliver our put notice to Calm Seas.
Notwithstanding the $100,000 ceiling for each bi-monthly put,
as described above, we may at any time request Calm Seas to
purchase shares in excess of such ceiling, either as a part of
bi-monthly puts or as an additional put(s) during such
month. If Calm Seas, in its sole discretion, accepts
such request to purchase additional shares, then we may include the
put for additional shares in our monthly put request or submit an
additional put for such additional shares in accordance with the
procedure set forth above.
14
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
The
Letter Agreement will terminate when any of the following events
occur:
●
|
Calm
Seas has purchased an aggregate of $7,500,000 of our Class A common
stock; or
|
●
|
The
second anniversary from the Effective Date.
|
On
January 23, 2015, the board of directors appointed Mr. Jonathan R.
Rice as its Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Rice’s employment
agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either
the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the employment
agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to an annual cash compensation of
$120,000, which includes salary, health insurance, 401K retirement
plan contributions, etc. The Company also agreed to reimburse Mr.
Rice for his past educational expenses of approximately $11,000. In
addition, Mr. Rice will be issued a three-year warrant to purchase
2,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise
price of $0.001 per share pursuant to the employment agreement.
Additionally, on May 28, 2015, the Company issued a three-year
warrant to purchase 3,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company
at an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The warrant fully vests
on October 28, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the
Company recorded $121,448 for the warrants issued to related party.
On January 14, 2016 the Company signed and employment agreement
with its COO. The employment agreement has a term of one year and
can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time.
Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to an annual
cash compensation of $140,000, which includes salary, health
insurance, 401K retirement plan contributions, etc. In addition,
Mr. Rice will be issued a three-year warrant to purchase 6,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of
$0.001 per share pursuant to the employment agreement. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $153,618 for
the warrants issued to related party.
(A)License Agreement
On May
8, 2006, the Company entered into a license
agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the
Company paid a non-refundable license fee of $10,000. The Company
will pay a license maintenance fee of $10,000 on the one year
anniversary of this agreement and each year
thereafter. The Company will pay an annual research fee
of $13,700 with first payment due January 2007, then on each
subsequent anniversary of the effective date commencing May 4,
2007. The annual research fees are accrued by the Company for
future payment. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company
may be required to pay additional fees aggregating up to a maximum
of $10,000 a year for patent maintenance and prosecution relating
to the licensed intellectual property.
On
October 28, 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement with
the University of Notre Dame. Under the agreement, the Company
received exclusive and non-exclusive rights to certain spider silk
technologies including commercial rights with the right to
sublicense such intellectual property. In consideration of the
licenses granted under the agreement, the Company agreed to issue
to the University of Notre Dame 2,200,000 shares of its common
stock and to pay a royalty of 2% of net sales. On March
4, 2015, the Company entered into a new Intellectual Property /
Collaborative Research Agreement with Notre Dame extending the
duration of the agreement through March 2016. In February of 2016
this agreement was extended to July 31, 2016. Under the
agreement the Company will provide approximately $534,000 in
financial support. The license agreement has a term of 20 years
which can be extended on an annual basis after that. It can be
terminated by the University of Notre Dame if the Company defaults
on its obligations under the agreement and fails to cure such
default within 90 days of a written notice by the university. The
Company can terminate the agreement upon a 90 day written notice
subject to payment of a termination fee of $5,000 if the
termination takes place within 2 years after its effectiveness,
$10,000 if the termination takes place within 4 years after its
effectiveness and $20,000 if the Agreement is terminated after 4
years. The Company is currently working with the University of
Notre Dame to extend this contract, but no final agreement has been
signed as of the date of this report.
(B)Royalty and Research Agreements
On May
1, 2008 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement
for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreement, the Company will be required to pay $1,000 per month, or
at the Company’s option, the consulting fee may be paid in
the form of Company common stock based upon the greater of $0.05
per share or the average of the closing price of the
Company’s shares over the five days preceding such stock
issuance. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had
accrued $17,000 of accounts payable for the services provided of
which was paid in common stock on July 1, 2009. As of
September 30, 2011 the Company issued 280,000 shares of common
stock in exchange for $14,000 of accounts payable for the services
performed. On March 19, 2014, the Company entered into a
five year consulting agreement for general advisor and consulting
services. As consideration for the services performed,
the Company agrees to pay the consultant a fee of $1,000 per
month. At the Company’s option, said consulting
fee may be paid to the consultant in the form of Company stock
based upon the greater of $0.50/share or the average of the closing
price of the Company’s common stock over the five days
preceding such stock issuance. On March 28, 2014, the
Company issued 44,000 shares of common stock as consideration for
consulting fees owed from September 1, 2012 through March 31, 2014.
On October 9, 2014 the Company issued 12,000 shares with a fair
value of $484 ($0.0403/share) to a consultant as consideration for
consulting fees owed from April 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014
of $12,000. The issuance of shares resulted in gain on
settlement of accounts payable of $11,516. The consultant also
received a bonus of 4,000 shares with a fair value of $161
($0.0403/share).
15
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
On
December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the
intellectual property transfer agreement with an
officer. In consideration of the Company issuing either
200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no
dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of
preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to
terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give
title to the exclusive license for the non-protective apparel use
of the intellectual property to the Company. On the date
of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock
authorized with the required preferences. In accordance
with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No
480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity, the Company determined that the
present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December
26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be
recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has
the ability to assert that it has preferred shares
authorized. As of March 31, 2010, the Company has
recorded $120,000 in accrued expenses- related party. On
December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due date to July 30,
2008. On May 30, 2008 the officer extended the due date
to December 31, 2008. On October 10, 2008, the officer
extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30, 2010 or (b)
upon demand by the officer. The due date was extended to
March 31, 2011. On September 8, 2009, a payment of
$15,000 was paid to the officer. An additional payment of $10,000
was made on October 19, 2009 and December 1, 2009,
respectfully. Additionally, the accrued expenses are
accruing 7% interest per year. On January 15, 2010 an additional
payment of $10,000 was made. During the quarter ending
September 30, 2010 an additional payment of $8,000 was made. During
the quarter ending September 30, 2012 an additional payment of
$1,000 was made. During the year ended December 31,
2013, an additional payment of $1,280 was made. During
the year ended December 31, 2014, an additional loan of $572 was
made. As of September 30, 2016 and December 31,
2015 the outstanding balance is $65,292. As of September 30, 2016
the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest
payable of $1,470.
On June
6, 2012 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for
intellectual property and collaborative research and development
with an American university. The agreement covers
ongoing research and development work performed by the university
at the Company’s behest and with the Company’s
assistance. On March 4, 2015, the Company entered into a new
Intellectual Property / Collaborative Research Agreement with Notre
Dame extending the duration of the agreement through March
2016. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company will
be required to pay approximately $534,000 for research and
development over the two year period. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, the company recorded
$379,815 and $313,739 in research and development fees. On
September 20, 2015 this agreement was amended to increase the total
funding by approximately $179,000. In February 2016 this agreement
was extended to July 31, 2016. In August 2016 this agreement was
amended to increase the total funding by approximately $175,000 and
the duration of this agreement was extended to December 31,
2016.
On December 30, 2015, the Company entered into a cooperative
agreement for the research and pilot production of hybrid silkworms
in Vietnam. Under this agreement the Company will establish a
subsidiary in Vietnam where it will develop and produce hybrid
silkworms. As of September 30, 2016, the subsidiary was not yet
established and no work has been performed in Vietnam for the nine
months ended September 30, 2016. The Company delayed the announcement of this
agreement until late in February, 2016. This additional time was
used to confirm this agreement with higher level authorities and
outside review.
(C) Consulting Agreement
On July
9, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to
provide investor relations services in exchange for a warrant for
10,000,000 common shares at $.001 with a cashless provision and a
five year term.
On
September 30, 2013 the Company entered into a Collaborative Yarn
and Textile Development Agreement with a technical textile
manufacturing company. Pursuant to the terms of that
agreement the Company has agreed to supply the technical textile
manufacturing company with sample quantities of the Company’s
recombinant spider silk for the purpose of developing and testing
new textiles which are made from, or which incorporate recombinant
spider silk. The agreement provides that the two
companies will jointly share, on an equal basis, any intellectual
property, including any utility patents, which are developed as a
result of this collaboration. Such intellectual property
potentially includes utility patents on textile
designs. The Company has agreed that it will pay half of
the cost associated with the filing and prosecution of utility
patents relating to intellectual property which is developed
through its collaboration with the technical textile manufacturing
company.
On
October 15, 2013 the Company entered into an intellectual property
agreement with a scientific researcher relating to the development
of new recombinant silk fibers. Under the terms of that
agreement the scientific researcher will transfer to the Company
his rights to intellectual property, inventions and trade secrets
which the researcher develops relating to recombinant
silk. The researcher will receive 8,000,000 warrants of
the Company’s stock, exercisable 24 months from the date of
the agreement. The researcher will also receive
additional warrants when and if the researcher develops advanced
recombinant silk fibers for the Company’s
use. Under the terms of the agreement the researcher
will receive 10,000,000 warrants in the event that he develops a
new recombinant silk fiber with certain performance
characteristics, and another 10,000,000 warrants if he develops a
second recombinant silk fiber with certain
characteristics. If the consultant performs the contract
in good faith the consultant will be entitled to an additional
8,000 warrants. The warrants described in this note all
contain a cashless exercise provision and are exercisable on the 24
month anniversary of the date on which they were issuable under the
agreement. On July 26, 2016 the Company issued a warrant for
10,000,000 to the researcher in accordance with this agreement for
the development of a new recombinant silk fiber. On July 26,
2016 the Company issued a warrant for 8,000,000 to the researcher
upon reaching the 24 month of this agreement.
16
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
On
February 17, 2014, the Company entered into two consulting
agreements with two consultants for independent technical expertise
to further the Company’s business plans and scientific
research and development. As consideration for the
services performed, the Company agrees to issue the following to
each of the consultants:
|
●
|
Within
30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for six hundred
thousand shares of the Company’s common stock to be
exercisable on the 14 month anniversary of this agreement for a
period of 12 months with a cashless exercise
provision.
|
|
●
|
Within
30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for one million
shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the
20 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months
with a cashless exercise provision.
|
|
●
|
Within
30 days of the date of this agreement, a warrant for two million
shares of the Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the
32 month anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months
with a cashless exercise provision.
|
|
●
|
Based
on the consultants reaching two sets of benchmarks, two separate
warrants for one million five hundred thousand shares of the
Company’s common stock to be exercisable on the 28 month
anniversary of this agreement for a period of 12 months with a
cashless exercise provision.
|
|
●
|
On the
three year anniversary, assuming the consultant acted in good faith
and the Company’s board of directors approval, a warrant for
one million five hundred thousand shares of the Company’s
common stock to be exercisable on the 28 month anniversary of this
agreement for a period of 12 months with a cashless exercise
provision.
|
On June
22, 2015 the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to
provide investor relations services. The agreement
commenced on June 22, 2015 and ended on December 16,
2015. As consideration for the services performed,
the Company agrees to issue a warrant for 15,000,000 shares of
common stock $0.001 with a cashless exercise provision and a three
year term. On June 22, 2015, the company issued a warrant for
15,000,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $590,335
(See Note 6(C)).
On
November 11, 2015 the Company entered into an agreement with a
consultant to provide advisory services. As consideration for the
services performed, the Company agreed to pay the consultant
$10,000.
On
January 23, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with a
consultant to provide investor relations services. The agreement
commenced on January 23, 2016 and will continue for four months. As
consideration for the services performed, the Company agrees to pay
$100,000 broken up into $25,000 dollar monthly payments. During the
course of that contract additional services were rendered totaling
$31,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 the
Company paid $131,000.
(D) Operating Lease Agreement
On
April 1, 2012 the Company executed a one-year non-cancelable
operating lease for its Laboratory space. The lease was
subsequently extended through March 31, 2014. On February 25, 2015,
the Company renewed its lease of a Laboratory. The lease is on a
month to month basis at an annual rate of $13,200. On
June 30, 2015 the Company cancelled its lease of this
laboratory.
We
rented office space at 120 N. Washington Square, Suite 805,
Lansing, Michigan 48950, which was our principal place of business.
Our lease was on a month to month basis. We paid an annual rent of
$600 for conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception services
located at our principal place of business. On September
1, 2015 the Company ended the lease of this office.
Starting
in February of 2015, we rent additional office space in East
Lansing, Michigan. In July 2015, the Company signed a
new lease for its East Lansing, Michigan office
space. The Company pays an annual rent of $4,742 for
office space, conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception
services.
Starting
in September of 2015, we rent office space at 2723 South State
Street, Suite 150, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, which is our
principal place of business. We pay an annual rent of $2,028 for
conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception services located at
our principal place of business.
On
February 1, 2016 the Company signed a six (6) month lease extension
for its East Lansing office. The Company pays an annual rent of
$4,893 for office space, conference facilities, mail, fax, and
reception services.
On June
29, 2016 the Company signed a twelve (12) month lease for new
office space in Vietnam. The Company pays an annual rent of $2,329
for office space and reception services.
On July
19, 2016 the Company signed a month to month lease for a production
facility in Indiana. The Company pays a monthly rent of $670 for
office space light industrial manufacturing space.
Rent
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was
$6,381 and $10,979, respectively.
17
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
NOTE 7 RELATED PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
On
December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the
intellectual property transfer agreement with an
officer. In consideration of the Company issuing either
200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no
dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of
preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to
terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give
title to the exclusive license for the non-protective apparel use
of the intellectual property to the Company. On the date
of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock
authorized with the required preferences. In accordance
with In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No.
480, Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity, the Company determined that the
present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December
26, 2007, the one year anniversary of the addendum, should be
recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has
the ability to assert that it has preferred shares
authorized. As of March 31, 2010, the Company has
recorded $120,000 in royalty agreement payable- related
party. On December 21, 2007 the officer extended the due
date to July 30, 2008. On May 30, 2008 the officer
extended the due date to March 31, 2009. On October 10,
2008, the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March
30, 2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer. On March 30, 2010,
the officer extended the due date to the earlier of (a) March 30,
2010 or (b) upon demand by the officer. On September 8,
2009, a payment of $15,000 was paid to the officer. On October 19,
2009 and December 1, 2009, $10,000 was paid to the officer
respectfully. An additional payment of $10,000 was made
on January 15, 2010. During the quarter ending September
30, 2010 an additional payment of $8,000 was made. During the year
ended December 31, 2012 an additional payment of $1,000 was made.
During the year ended December 31, 2013 an additional payment of
$1,280 was made. During the year ended December 31,
2014, an additional loan of $572 was made. As
of September 30, 2016 the outstanding balance is
$65,292. Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing
7% interest per year. As of September 30, 2016 the
Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest
payable of $1,470.
On
November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an addendum to the
employment agreement, with its CEO, effective January 1, 2011
through the March 31, 2016. The term of the agreement is a
five year period at an annual salary of $210,000. There
is a 6% annual increase. The employee is also to receive a 20%
bonus based on the annual based salary. Any stock, stock
options bonuses have to be approved by the board of directors. On
January 1, 2016 the agreement renewed with the same terms for
another 5 years with an annual salary of $297,889 for the year
ended December 31, 2016.
On
January 23, 2015, the board of directors appointed Mr. Jonathan R.
Rice as its Chief Operating Officer. The employment agreement has a
term of one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr.
Rice at any time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rice is
entitled to an annual cash compensation of $120,000, which includes
salary, health insurance, 401K retirement plan contributions, etc.
The Company also agreed to reimburse Mr. Rice for his past
educational expenses of approximately $11,000. In addition, Mr.
Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares
of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per
share pursuant to the employment agreement. Additionally, on May
28, 2015, the Company issued a three-year warrant to purchase
3,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise
price of $0.001 per share. The warrant fully vests on October 28,
2016. On January 14, 2016 the Company signed and employment
agreement with its COO. The employment agreement has a term of one
year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any
time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to an
annual cash compensation of $140,000, which includes salary, health
insurance, 401K retirement plan contributions, etc. In addition,
Mr. Rice will be issued a three-year warrant to purchase 6,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of
$0.001 per share pursuant to the employment agreement. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $215,653 for
the warrants issued to related party.
On
August 4, 2016 the Company issued a bonus of $20,000 payable to the
COO if he remains employed with the Company through March 31,
2018.
On June
6, 2016 the Company received $50,000 from a principal
stockholder. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the
advance bears interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on
demand.
As of
September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there was $241,748 and
$148,019, respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses - related party, which is owed to the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer.
As of
September 30, 2016 there was $523,552 of accrued interest- related
party and $14,662 in shareholder loan interest – related
party included in accounts payable and accrued expenses –
related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief Executive
officer.
As of
December 31, 2015, there was $426,054 of accrued interest- related
party and $12,718 in shareholder loan interest – related
party included in accounts payable and accrued expenses –
related party, which his owed to the Company’s Chief
Executive officer.
As of
September 30, 2016, the Company owes $1,317,560 in accrued salary
to principal stockholder, $24,762 to the Company’s COO, and
$294 to its intern.
As of
December 31, 2015, the Company owes $1,094,153 in accrued salary to
principal stockholder and $1,748 to the Company’s
COO.
On May
28, 2015, the Company issued 3-year warrant for 3,000,000 shares to
a related party, with an exercise price of $0.001 per share. The
warrants were granted for services to be rendered. The warrants had
a fair value of $117,503, based upon the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant and vesting on October
28, 2016, and will be exercisable on May 28, 2018, and for a period
expiring on May 28, 2022. During the nine months ended of September
30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded $62,034 and $28,300 as an
expense for warrants issued to related party.
On
January 1, 2016, the Company issued 3-year warrant for 6,000,000
shares to a related party, with an exercise price of $0.001 per
share. The warrants were granted for services to be rendered. The
warrants had a fair value of $234,086, based upon the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant and vesting on February
20, 2017, and will be exercisable on February 20, 2018, and for a
period expiring on February 20, 2021. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2016, the Company recorded $153,619 as an expense for
warrants issued to related party.
18
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)
As of September 30, 2016 and 2015
NOTE 8 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In
preparing these financial statements, the Company has evaluated
events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure
through November 14, 2016, the date the financial statements were
available to be issued.
On
October 2, 2016 the Company issued a warrant for 2,300,000 share of
common stock to a consultant for services rendered.
On
October 21, 2016 the Company issued 4,166,667 shares of common
stock for $150,000 ($0.036/per share) cash
recieved.
On
November 7, 2016 the Company issued 12,000 shares of common stock
to a consultant for services rendered.
On
November 7, 2016 the Compnay issued 1,496,703 share of common stock
to a consultant for services rendered.
19
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
FORWARD-LOOKING
INFORMATION
The
following information should be read in conjunction with Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("we", "us",
"our", or the “Company”) condensed unaudited financial
statements and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this
report. Information in this Item 2, "Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and
elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that does not consist of historical
facts, are "forward-looking statements." Statements
accompanied or qualified by, or containing words such as "may,"
"will," "should," "believes," "expects," "intends," "plans,"
"projects," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," "outlook,"
"forecast," "anticipates," "presume," and "assume" constitute
forward-looking statements, and as such, are not a guarantee of
future performance.
Forward-looking
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, certain of which
are beyond our control. Actual results could differ materially
from those anticipated as a result of the factors described in the
“Risk Factors” and detailed in our other Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings. Risks and
uncertainties can include, among others, international, national and local
general economic and market conditions: demographic changes; the
ability of the Company to sustain, manage or forecast its growth;
the ability of the Company to successfully make and integrate
acquisitions; raw material costs and availability; new product
development and introduction; existing government regulations and
changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations;
adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers
or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating
results; changes in business strategy or development plans;
business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified
personnel; the ability to obtain sufficient financing to continue
and expand business operations; the ability to develop technology
and products; changes in technology and the development of
technology and intellectual property by competitors; the ability to
protect technology and develop intellectual property; and other
factors referenced in this and previous filings.
Consequently, investors should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements as predictive of future
results.
Because
of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events and
circumstances discussed in this report or incorporated by reference
might not transpire. Factors that cause actual results or
conditions to differ from those anticipated by these and other
forward-looking statements include those more fully described
elsewhere in this report and in the “Risk Factors”
section of our registration statement on Form S-1.
The
Company disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking
statements in this report.
Overview
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. is a corporation organized under the
laws of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. We were organized to develop
high strength fibers using recombinant DNA technology, for
commercial applications in both the specialty fiber and technical
textile industries. Specialty fibers are engineered for specific
uses that require exceptional strength, flexibility, heat
resistance and/or chemical resistance. The specialty fiber market
is exemplified by two synthetic fiber products: aramid fibers and
ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber. The technical
textile industry involves products for both industrial and consumer
products, such as filtration fabrics, medical textiles (e.g.,
sutures and artificial ligaments), safety and protective clothing
and fabrics used in military and aerospace applications (e.g.,
high-strength composite materials).
We are
using genetic engineering technologies to develop fibers with
greater strength, resiliency and flexibility for use in our target
markets, namely the textile, specialty fiber and technical textile
industries.
The
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to our
financial statements as of December 31, 2015 include an explanatory
paragraph stating that our
net loss from operations and net capital deficiency at
December 31, 2015 raise substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
Plan of Operations
During
the next twelve months, we expect to take the following steps in
connection with the further development of our business and the
implementation of our plan of operations:
|
●
|
We have
spent approximately $379,815 between January 2016 and September
2016 on collaborative research and development of high strength
polymers at the University of Notre Dame. We expect to spend
approximately $105,000 between October 2016 and December 2016 on
collaborative research and development of high strength polymers at
the University of Notre Dame. With this funding we plan to
accelerate both our microbiology and selective breeding programs as
well as providing more resources for our material testing
protocols. If our financing allows, management will give
strong consideration to accelerating the pace of spending on
research and development within the University of Notre
Dame’s laboratories.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We
expect to spend approximately $13,700 on collaborative research and
development of high strength polymers and spider silk protein at
the University of Wyoming over the next twelve months. This level
of research spending at the university is also a requirement of our
licensing agreement with the university. If our financing will
allow, management will give strong consideration to accelerating
the pace of spending on research and development within the
University of Wyoming’s laboratories.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We will
actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities
with other university laboratories in the area of high strength
polymers. If our financing allows, management will give strong
consideration to increasing the depth of our research to include
polymer production technologies that are closely related to our
core research.
|
|
|
|
20
|
●
|
We will
consider buying an established revenue producing company in a
compatible business, in order to broaden our financial base and
facilitate the commercialization of our products. We expect to use
a combination of stock and cash for any such purchase.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We will
also actively consider pursuing collaborative research
opportunities with both private and university laboratories in
areas of research which overlap the company’s existing
research and development. One such potential area for collaborative
research which the company is considering is protein expression
platforms. If our financing allows, management will give strong
consideration to increasing the breadth of our research to include
protein expression platform technologies.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We plan
to actively pursue collaborative research and product testing,
opportunities with companies in the biotechnology, materials,
textile and other industries.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We plan
to actively pursue collaborative commercialization, marketing and
manufacturing opportunities with companies in the textile and
material sectors for the fibers we developed and for any new
polymers that we create in 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We plan
to actively pursue the development of commercial scale production
of our recombinant materials including Monster Silk® and Dragon
SilkTM
|
We have
not previously demonstrated that we will be able to expand our
business through an increased investment in our research and
development efforts. We cannot guarantee that the research and
development efforts described in this filing will be successful.
Our business is subject to risks inherent in growing an enterprise,
including limited capital resources, risks inherent in the research
and development process and possible rejection of our products in
development.
If
financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable
to continue expanding our operations. Equity financing will result
in a dilution to existing shareholders.
Three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the Three months
ended September 30, 2015
Our
revenue, operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the
three month period ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the
three month period ended September 30, 2015, were as follows
– some balances on the prior period’s combined
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation:
|
Three Months Ended September 30
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Change
|
Increase(Decrease)
|
NET
REVENUES
|
$18,673
|
$-
|
18,673
|
100%
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
General and
Administrative
|
821,651
|
54,990
|
766,661
|
1394.18%
|
Professional
Fees
|
29,060
|
82,431
|
(53,371)
|
(64.754%)
|
Officer's
Salary
|
127,809
|
94,735
|
33,074
|
34.91%
|
Research and
Development
|
129,282
|
90,650
|
38,632
|
42.62%
|
Total
operating expenses
|
1,107,802
|
322,806
|
784,996
|
243.18%
|
Loss
from operations
|
(1,089,129)
|
(322,806)
|
(766,323)
|
(243.18)%
|
Interest
expense
|
(35,339)
|
(25,709)
|
(9,630)
|
37.46%
|
Net
Loss
|
$(1,124,468)
|
(348,515)
|
(775,953)
|
222.65%
|
Net Revenues: During
the three months ended September 30, 2016, we realized $18,673 of
revenues from our business. During the three months ended September
30, 2015, we realized $0 of revenues from our business. The change
in revenues between the quarter ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
was $18,673 or 100%.
Cost of
Revenues: Costs of revenues for the three months
ended September 30, 2016 were $0, as compared to $0 for the three
months ended September 30, 2015, a change of $0 or 0%.
Gross Profit: During the
three months ended September 30, 2016, we realized a gross profit
of $18,673, as compared to $0 for the three months ended September
30, 2015, a change of $18,673 or 100%.
Research and development
expenses: During the three months ended September
30, 2016 we incurred $129,282 research and development
expenses. During the three months ended September 30, 2015 we
incurred $90,650 of research and development expenses, a decrease
of $38,632 or 42.62% compared with the same period in 2016. The
research and development expenses are attributable to the research
and development with the Notre Dame University; this increase was
due to the timing of research related activity and related charges
and the hiring of an additional lab team member.
21
Professional
Fees: During the three months ended September 30,
2016, we incurred $29,060 professional expenses, which decreased by
$53,371 or (64.75 %) from $82,431 for the three months ended
September 30, 2015. The decrease in professional fees expense
was attributable to decreased expenses related to intellectual
property protection of the research and development activities
during the three months ended September 30. 2016.
Officers
Salary: During the three months ended September
30, 2016, officers’ salary expenses increased to $127,809 or
34.91% from $94,735 for the three months ended September 30,
2015. The increase in officer’s salary expenses was
attributable to the hiring of a Chief Operations Officer in late
January of 2015.
General and Administrative
Expense: General and administrative expenses increased by
$766,661 or 1394.18% to $821,651 for the three months ended
September 30, 2016 from $54,990 for the three months ended
September 30, 2015. Our general and administrative expenses
for the three months ended September 30, 2016 consisted of
consulting fees of $10,079 and other general and administrative
expenses (which includes expenses such as Auto, Business
Development, SEC Filing, Investor Relations, General Office,
warrant Compensation) of $807,865, Travel of $1,207 and office
salary of $2,500, for a total of $821,651. Our general and
administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30,
2015 consisted of consulting fees of $6,000, and other general and
administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as: Auto,
Business Development, SEC Filing, Investor Relations, and General
Office) of $48,661, Travel of $329 for a total of $54,990. The
primary reason for the increase in comparing the three months ended
September 30, 2016 to the corresponding period for 2015 was mainly
due to general business expenses.
Interest
Expense: Interest expense increased by $9,630 to
$35,339 for the three month period ended September 30, 2016 from
$25,709 for the three month period ended September 30,
2015. The increase was primarily due to interest on the
loans.
Net Loss: Net loss
increased by $775,953, or 222.65%, to a net loss of $1,124,468 for
the three month period ended September 30, 2016 from a net loss of
$348,515 for the three month period ended September 30,
2015. This increase in net loss was driven primarily by
increases in research and development and professional
fees.
Nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2015
Our
revenue, operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the nine
month period ended September 30, 2015, were as follows – some
balances on the prior period’s combined financial statements
have been reclassified to conform to the current period
presentation:
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30 |
|
%
Change
|
|
|
2016
|
2015
|
Change
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
NET
REVENUES
|
$18,673
|
$-
|
18,673
|
100%
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
General and
Administrative
|
1,046,324
|
854,517
|
191,807
|
22.45%
|
Professional
Fees
|
319,309
|
221,852
|
97,457
|
43.93%
|
Officer's
Salary
|
340,999
|
280,127
|
60,872
|
21.73%
|
Research and
Development
|
379,815
|
313,739
|
66,076
|
21.06%
|
Total
operating expenses
|
2,086,447
|
1,670,235
|
416,212
|
24.92%
|
Loss
from operations
|
(2,067,774)
|
(1,670,235)
|
(397,539)
|
(23.87%)
|
Gain on forgiveness
of debt
|
5,704
|
9,679
|
(3,975)
|
(41.07%)
|
Loss on disposal of
fixed asset
|
-
|
(953)
|
(953)
|
100%
|
Interest
expense
|
(99,442)
|
(71,435)
|
(28,007)
|
39.21%
|
Net
Loss
|
$(2,161,512)
|
(1,732,944)
|
(428,568)
|
24.73%
|
Net Revenues: During
the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we realized $18,673 of
revenues from our business. During the nine months ended September
30, 2015, we realized $0 of revenues from our business. The change
in revenues between the quarter ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
was $18,673 or 100%.
Cost of
Revenues: Costs of revenues for the nine months
ended September 30, 2016 were $0, as compared to $0 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2015, a change of $0 or 0%.
Gross Profit: During the
nine months ended September 30, 2016, we realized a gross profit of
$18,673, as compared to $0 for the nine months ended September 30,
2015, a change of $18,673 or 100%.
Research and development
expenses: During the nine months ended September
30, 2016 we incurred $379,815 research and development
expenses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 we
incurred $313,739 of research and development expenses, an increase
of $66,076 or 21.06% compared with the same period in 2016. The
research and development expenses are attributable to the research
and development with the Notre Dame University; this increase was
due to the timing of research related activity and related charges
and the hiring of an additional lab team member.
22
Professional
Fees: During the nine months ended September 30,
2016, we incurred $319,309 professional expenses, which increased
by $97,457 or 43.93% from $221,852 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2015. The increase in professional fees expense
was attributable to increased expenses related to intellectual
property protection of the research and development activities
during the nine months ended September 30. 2016.
Officers
Salary: During the nine months ended September
30, 2016, officers’ salary expenses increased to $340,999 or
21.73% from $280,127 for the nine months ended September 30,
2015. The increase in officer’s salary expenses was
attributable to the hiring of a Chief Operations Officer in late
January of 2015.
General and Administrative
Expense: General and administrative expenses increased by
$191,807 or 22.45% to $1,046,324 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2016 from $854,517 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2015. Our general and administrative expenses
for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 consisted of
consulting fees of $16,655 and other general and administrative
expenses (which includes expenses such as Auto, Business
Development, SEC Filing, Investor Relations, General Office,
warrant Compensation) of $1,022,333, Travel of $1,377, office
salary of $5,959 for a total of $1,046,324. Our general and
administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30,
2015 consisted of salaries and benefits of $3,570, consulting fees
of $18,000, and other general and administrative expenses (which
includes expenses such as: Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing,
Investor Relations, General Office, warrant Compensation of
$816,423, and travel of $16,524 for a total of $854,517. The
primary reason for the decrease in comparing the nine months ended
September 30, 2016 to the corresponding period for 2015 was mainly
due to general business expenses.
Interest
Expense: Interest expense increased by $28,007 to
$99,442 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2016 from
$71,435 for the nine month period ended September 30,
2015. The increase was primarily due to interest on the
loans.
Net Loss: Net loss
increased by $428,568, or 24.739%, to a net loss of $2,161,512 for
the nine month period ended September 30, 2016 from a net loss of
$1,732,944 for the nine month period ended September 30,
2015. This increase in net loss was driven primarily by
increases in research and development, warrant compensation and
professional fees.
Liquidity, Capital Resources, and Management Plans
Our
condensed financial statements have been presented on the basis
that we are a going concern, which contemplates the realization of
assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of
business. As presented in the financial statements, we
incurred a net loss of $2,161,512 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2016, and losses are expected to continue in the near
term. The accumulated deficit is $22,473,648 at September 30,
2016. Refer to Note 5 for our discussion of stockholder
deficit. We have been funding our operations through private
loans and the sale of common stock in private placement
transactions. Refer to Note 4 and Note 5 in the condensed
financial statements for our discussion of notes payable and shares
issued, respectively. Our cash resources are insufficient to meet
our planned business objectives without additional
financing. These and other factors raise substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern. The
accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to
reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and
classification of assets or the amounts and classification of
liabilities that may result from the possible inability of our
company to continue as a going concern.
Management
anticipates that significant additional expenditures will be
necessary to develop and expand our business before significant
positive operating cash flows can be achieved. Our ability to
continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise
additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues
and profitable operations. At September 30, 2016, we had
$335,909 of cash on hand. These funds are insufficient to
complete our business plan and as a consequence, we will need to
seek additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or
equity securities for cash to operate our business. No
assurance can be given that any future financing will be available
or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to
us. Even if we are able to obtain additional financing, it may
contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt
financing or cause substantial dilution for our stock holders, in
case or equity financing.
Management has
undertaken steps as part of a plan to improve operations with the
goal of sustaining our operations for the next twelve months and
beyond. These steps include (a) raising additional capital
and/or obtaining financing; (b) controlling overhead and expenses;
and (c) executing material sales or research contracts. There
can be no assurance that the Company can successfully accomplish
these steps and it is uncertain that the Company will achieve a
profitable level of operations and obtain additional
financing. There can be no assurance that any additional
financing will be available to the Company on satisfactory terms
and conditions, if at all. As of the date of this Report, we
have not entered into any formal agreements regarding the
above.
In the
event the Company is unable to continue as a going concern, the
Company may elect or be required to seek protection from its
creditors by filing a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or may be
subject to an involuntary petition in bankruptcy. To date,
management has not considered this alternative, nor does management
view it as a likely occurrence.
Presently, due to
the lack of revenues and profitability we are not able to meet our
operating and capital expenses. The success of our ability to
continue as a going concern is dependent upon raising additional
capital and/or financing, of which there can be no guarantee, and
maintaining a break even or profitable level of operations. We have
incurred operating losses since inception, and this is likely to
continue in the near future.
23
The
downturn in the United States stock and debt markets could make it
more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity
or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds
required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and
expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or
experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek
alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or
debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or
the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or
privileges senior to those of existing holders of our shares of
common stock or the debt securities may cause us to be subject to
restrictive covenants. Even if we are able to raise the funds
required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and
expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or
experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek
additional financing. If additional financing is not available
or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail
our operations.
Cash,
total current assets, total assets, total current liabilities and
total liabilities as of September 30, 2016 as compared to December
31, 2015, were as follows:
|
September 30, 2016
|
December 31,
2015
|
Cash
|
$335,909
|
$238,188
|
Accounts
receivable
|
$18,673
|
$-
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
$1,861
|
$645
|
Total current
assets
|
$356,443
|
$238,833
|
Total
assets
|
$412,396
|
$304,937
|
Total current
liabilities
|
$2,677,513
|
$2,201,873
|
Total
liabilities
|
$2,677,513
|
$2,201,873
|
At September
30, 2016, we had a working capital deficit of $2,321,080, compared
to a working capital deficit of $1,963,040 at December 31,
2015. Current liabilities increased to $2,677,513 at September
30, 2016 from $2,201,873 at December 31, 2015, primarily as a
result of accounts payable and accrued compensation.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2016, net cash used in operations
of $824,791 was the result of a net loss of $2,161,512 offset by
depreciation expense of $12,639, loss on forgiveness of debt of
$5,704, warrants issued to related parties of $215,880, increase in
prepaid expenses of $1,216, an increase of accrued expenses and
other payables-related party of $375,893 and an increase in
accounts payable of $44,338. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2015, net cash used in operations of $685,099 was the
result of a net loss of $1,732,944 offset by depreciation expense
of $11,175, gain on forgiveness of debt of $9,679, loss on disposal
of fixed assets of $953, warrants issued to related parties of
$100,618, warrants issued to consultants of $590,335, deccrease in
prepaid expenses of $750, an increase of accrued expenses and other
payables-related party of $282,743 and an increase in accounts
payable of $70,950.
Our
investing activities were $2,488 and $39,285 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015,
respectively. Our investing activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are attributable to purchases of
fixed assets.
Our
financing activities resulted in a cash inflow of $925,000 for the
nine months ended September 30, 2016, which is represented by
$875,000 proceeds from issuance of common stock and $50,000
proceeds from shareholder note payable. Our financing activities
resulted in cash inflow of $450,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2015, which is represented by $450,000 proceeds from
issuance of common stock.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The
Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have
or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the
Company's financial condition, changes in financial condition,
revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources that are material to
investors.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Please
refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, for
disclosures regarding the Company's critical accounting policies
and estimates, as well as updates further disclosed in our interim
financial statements as described in this Form 10-Q.
24
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of
the end of our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2016, we carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation
of management, including our chief executive officer and principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon those
evaluations, management concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were not effective as of September 30, 2016, to cause
the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by SEC,
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
management, including our chief executive officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
Going
forward from this filing, the Company intends to work on
re-establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)
that are designed to be effective in providing reasonable assurance
that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC, and
that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
In
designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute assurance of achieving the desired objectives. Also, the
design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. The design of any system of controls is based, in part,
upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and
there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving
its stated goals under all potential future
conditions.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During
the quarter covered by this Report, there were no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting. No
remediation has been made in this quarter since, as we stated in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2015, we have not yet commercialized a recombinant fiber and,
therefore do not yet have sufficient cash flow to carry out our
remediation plans.
25
Part II – Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From
time to time, the Company may become a party to litigation or other
legal proceedings that it considers to be a part of the ordinary
course of its business. To the best of our knowledge, the Company
is not currently involved in any legal proceedings that could
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our
business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations;
however, the Company may become involved in material legal
proceedings in the future.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We are
a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, are not required to
provide the information under this item. Please refer to Amendment
No. 5 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC
on May 15, 2015 under Risk
Factors.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
Information on any and all equity securities we have sold during
the period covered by this Report that were not registered under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended is set forth
below:
On July
26, 2016 the Company issued 6,028,939 share of common stock for
$150,000 ($0.025/share).
On
August 8, 2016 the Company issued 2,181,501 shares of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.046/share)
On
August 18, 2016 the Company issued 1,838,235 shares of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.054/share)
On
September 6, 2016 the company issued 2,604,167 shares of common
stock for $100,000 ($0.038/share)
All of the transactions listed above were made pursuant to the
exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
for sales not involving a public offering or Rule 506(b) of
Regulation D promulgated by the SEC.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
(a)
|
Not
applicable.
|
(b)
|
Not
applicable.
|
26
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
3.1
|
Articles of
Incorporation (1)
|
3.2
|
Articles of
Amendment (2)
|
3.3
|
Articles of
Amendment, filed with the Wyoming Secretary of State on November
15, 2013 (3)
|
3.4
|
Articles of
Amendment, filed with the Wyoming Secretary of State on December
17, 2013 (4)
|
3.5
|
Bylaws(1)
|
4.1
|
Form of Warrant
issued Mr. Jonathan R. Rice (5)
|
10.1
|
Employment
Agreement between Mr. Jonathan Rice and the Company
(6)
|
31.1
|
Certification of
the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith)
|
31.2
|
Certification of
the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
32.1
|
Certification of
the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)
|
32.2
|
Certification of
the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 As
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(filed herewith)
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance
Document (filed herewith)
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy
Extension Schema Document
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy
Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy
Extension Definition Linkbase Document
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy
Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy
Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
1.
|
Incorporated by
reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Reg. No.
333-146316) filed with the SEC on September 26, 2007
|
2.
|
Incorporated by
reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No.
333-162316) filed with the SEC on October 2, 2009
|
3.
|
Incorporated by
reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
November 22, 2013
|
4.
|
Incorporated by
reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
December 19, 2013
|
5.
|
Incorporated by
reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 30, 2016
|
6.
|
Incorporated by
reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
January 21, 2015.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
of the undersigned thereunto duly authorized
|
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
November 14, 2016
|
By:
|
/s/ Kim
Thompson
|
|
|
Kim
Thompson
|
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
|
|
27