Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark
One)
☑ ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2018
☐ TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
Commission File No. 333-146316
KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.
(Exact
name of issuer as specified in its charter)
Wyoming
|
|
83-0459707
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
2723
South State St. Suite 150
Ann
Arbor, Michigan 48104
|
|
(734)
619-8066
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number)
|
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None.
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None.
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
☑ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K (§
229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☑
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large
accelerated filer,”
“accelerated
filer,” “smaller reporting
company” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated
filer ☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer ☑
|
Smaller
reporting company ☑
Emerging
growth company ☐
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
As of
March 29, 2019, the registrant had 835,733,840
shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
1
INTRODUCTORY
NOTE
“Kraig”,
“Kraig
Biocraft” “KBLB”, “the Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Kraig Biocraft
Laboratories, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, unless the context
otherwise requires.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This
report contains forward-looking statements and information that are
based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made
by and information currently available to us. Such statements
should not be unduly relied upon. Forward-looking statements
include statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans,
objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are
not historical facts or that are not present facts or conditions.
Forward-looking statements and information can generally be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology or words, such
as “anticipate,” “approximately,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “pending,” “perceive,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seeks,” “should,” “views” or similar words or phrases or
variations thereon, or the negatives of those words or phrases, or
statements that events, conditions or results “can,” “will,” “may,” “must,” “would,” “could” or “should” occur or be achieved and similar
expressions in connection with any discussion, expectation or
projection of future operating or financial performance, costs,
regulations, events or trends. The absence of these words does not
necessarily mean that a statement is not
forward-looking.
Forward-looking
statements and information are based on management’s current expectations and
assumptions, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks
and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. These
statements reflect our current view concerning future events and
are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. There are
important factors that could cause actual results to vary
materially from those described in this report as anticipated,
estimated or expected, including, but not limited to, those factors
and conditions described under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” as well as general conditions in
the economy, petrochemicals industry and capital markets,
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regulations which affect trading
in the securities of “penny stocks,” and other risks and uncertainties.
Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any
forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons
actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in
any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes
available in the future. Depending on the market for our stock and
other conditional tests, a specific safe harbor under the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 may be available.
Notwithstanding the above, Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”), and Section
21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”), expressly state that the safe
harbor for forward-looking statements does not apply to companies
that issue penny stock. Because we may from time to time be
considered to be an issuer of penny stock, the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements may not apply to us at certain
times.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
PART I
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF
BUSINESS
|
4
|
ITEM
1A.
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
8
|
ITEM
1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS
|
8
|
ITEM
2.
|
DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY
|
8
|
ITEM
3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
8
|
ITEM
4.
|
MINE SAFETY
DISCLOSURES
|
8
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
5.
|
MARKET FOR
REGISTRANT’S COMMON
EQUITY; RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES
|
8
|
ITEM
6.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
|
9
|
ITEM
7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
9
|
ITEM
7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
13
|
ITEM
8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
13
|
ITEM
9.
|
CHANGES IN AND
DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
|
34
|
ITEM
9A.
|
CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
|
34
|
ITEM
9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
35
|
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
35
|
ITEM
11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
37
|
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP
OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
|
39
|
ITEM
13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
39
|
ITEM
14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
40
|
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM
15.
|
EXHIBITS
|
41
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
43
|
3
PART I
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.
Overview
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. is a corporation organized under
the laws of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. We were organized to develop
high strength fibers using recombinant DNA technology, for
commercial applications in both the specialty fiber and technical
textile industries. Specialty fibers are engineered for specific
uses that require exceptional strength, flexibility, heat
resistance and/or chemical resistance. The specialty fiber market
is exemplified by two synthetic fiber products: aramid fibers and
ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber. The technical
textile industry involves products for both industrial and consumer
products, such as filtration fabrics, medical textiles (e.g.,
sutures and artificial ligaments), safety and protective clothing
and fabrics used in military and aerospace applications (e.g.,
high-strength composite materials).
We are using genetic engineering technologies to develop fibers
with greater strength, resiliency and flexibility for use in our
target markets, namely the textile, specialty fiber and technical
textile industries.
The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to our
financial statements as of December 31, 2018 include an explanatory
paragraph stating that our net loss from
operations and net capital deficiency at December 31, 2018 raise substantial doubt about
our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty.
The Product
Certain
fibers produced in nature possess unique mechanical properties in
terms of strength, resilience and flexibility.
Comparison of the Properties of Spider Silk and Steel
|
Material Toughness (1)
|
Tensile Strength (2)
|
Weight (3)
|
Dragline spider
silk
|
120,000-160,000
|
1,100-2,900
|
1.18-1.36
|
|
|
|
|
Steel
|
2,000-6,000
|
300-2,000
|
7.84
|
1
|
Measured by the energy required to
break a continuous filament, expressed in joules per kilogram
(J/kg). A .357 caliber bullet has approximately 925 joules of
kinetic energy at impact.
|
2
|
Tensile strength refers to the
greatest longitudinal stress the fiber can bear, measured by force
over area in units of newtons per square meter. The measurement
here is in millions of pascals.
|
3
|
In grams per cubic centimeter of
material.
|
This
comparison table was the result of research performed by Randolph
Lewis, Ph.D. at the University of Wyoming. Such work was summarized
in an article entitled “Spider Silk: Ancient Ideas for New
Biomaterials” which was
published in Chemicals Review, volume 106, issue 9, pages 3672
– 3774. The measurements
in joules in the table above are a conversion from Dr.
Lewis’ measurements in
newtons/meter squared.
We
believe that the genetically engineered protein-based fibers we
seek to produce have properties that are in some ways superior to
the materials currently available in the marketplace. For example,
as noted above, the ability of spider silk to absorb in excess of
100,000 joules of kinetic energy per kilogram makes it a
potentially ideal material for structural blast
protection.
Production
of this material in commercial quantities holds the potential of a
life-saving ballistic resistant material, which is lighter,
thinner, more flexible, and tougher than steel. Other applications
for spider silk based recombinant fibers include use as structural
material and for any application in which light weight and high
strength are required. We believe that fibers made with recombinant
protein-based polymers will make significant inroads into the
specialty fiber and technical textile markets.
Our Technology
While
scientists have been able to replicate the proteins that are the
building blocks of spider silk, the technological barrier that has
stymied production until now has been the inability to form these
proteins into a fiber with the desired mechanical characteristics
and to do so in a cost effective manner.
We have
licensed the right to use the patented genetic sequences and
genetic engineering technology developed in university
laboratories. The Company has been working collaboratively with
university laboratories to develop fibers with the mechanical
characteristics of spider silk. We are applying this proprietary
genetic engineering technology to domesticated silkworms, which are
already the most efficient commercial producers of
silk.
4
Our
technology builds upon the unique advantages of the domesticated
silkworm for this application. The silkworm is ideally suited to
produce recombinant protein fiber because it is already an
efficient commercial and industrial producer of protein based
polymers. Forty percent (40%) of the caterpillars’ weight is devoted to the silk
glands. The silk glands produce large volumes of protein, called
fibroin, which are then spun into a composite protein thread
(silk).
We are
working to use our genetic engineering technology to create
recombinant silk polymers. On September 29, 2010, we jointly
announced with the University of Notre Dame the success of our
collaborative research with Notre Dame in creating approximately
twenty different strains of transgenic silkworm which produce
recombinant silk polymers. In April 2011, we entered into a
licensing agreement with Sigma-Aldrich which provides us the use of
Sigma-Aldrich’s zinc
finger technology to accelerate and enhance our product
development.
A part
of our intellectual property portfolio is the exclusive right to
use certain patented spider silk gene sequences in silkworm. Under
the Exclusive License Agreement with the University of Wyoming, we
have obtained certain exclusive rights to use numerous genetic
sequences which are the subject of US patents.
The
introduction of the gene sequence, in the manner employed by us,
results in a germline transformation and is therefore
self-perpetuating. This technology is in essence a protein
expression platform which has other potential applications
including diagnostics and pharmaceutical production.
Collaborative Research and Licensing
In May
2006, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with the
University Of Wyoming, which granted the Company the exclusive
global rights to use and commercialize patented genetic sequences
in silkworm. In
exchange for this license the University of Wyoming received
$10,000 cash payment and the University of Wyoming Foundation
received 17,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. Under the terms of
the licensing agreement, the Company is obligated to provide annual
license fees of $10,000 and support the University research with
$13,700 annually. As of
today, the Company is current on the $10,000 per year payment and
are accruing the $13,700 annual payments. No royalties are
required. This agreement has remained unchanged since
2006. The Company
has not signed any other agreements with the University of
Wyoming.
In
2007, the Company entered into the first of a series of
collaborative research agreements with the University
of Notre Dame
(“Notre Dame”). The Company provides financial
support to ongoing research and development of transgenic silkworms
and the creation of recombinant silk fibers. In exchange, the
Company has an option to obtain the exclusive global
commercialization rights to the technology developed pursuant to
the research effort.
Following
the first collaborative research agreement, the Company entered
into successive licensing and collaborative research agreements to
provide different levels of financial support. The trend has been for an
increase in financial support for the research and development in
nearly every successive agreement. In June 2012, we entered into
an Intellectual Property / Collaborative Research Agreement with
Notre Dame (“2012 Notre Dame Research
Agreement”). On
March 4, 2015, we entered into a new Intellectual Property /
Collaborative Research Agreement with Notre Dame extending the
agreement through March 2016 (“2015
Notre Dame Research Agreement”). Under the 2015 Notre Dame
Research agreement, the Company provided approximately $534,000 in
financial support. On September 20, 2015, the 2015 Notre Dame
Research Agreement was amended to increase the total funding by
approximately $179,000;in February 2016, the agreement was extended
to July 31, 2016 and in August 2016, the agreement was extended to
December 31, 2016. In May 2017, the 2015 Notre Dame Research
Agreement was amended to increase the total funding by
approximately $189,000 and the
duration of the agreement was extended to September 30, 2017. The
Company has not extended the 2015 Notre Dame Research Agreement
after September 30, 2017, but may negotiate a new collaborative
research agreement with the Notre Dame in 2019 at reduced levels of
funding.
In
2011, the Company exercised its option to obtain the global
commercialization rights to the technology developed under the
collaborative research agreements with Notre Dame, which resulted
in a separate license agreement with Notre Dame (the
“2011 ND
Agreement”). Pursuant to the 2011 ND
Agreement, Notre Dame filed an international patent application and
numerous national patent applications on technology relating to the
creation and use of recombinant spider silks and the Company
received exclusive and non-exclusive rights to certain spider silk
technologies including commercial rights with the right to
sublicense such intellectual property. The 2011 ND Agreement
obligates the Company to reimburse Notre Dame for costs associated
with the filing, prosecuting and maintaining of such patents and
patent applications. In exchange for the rights to
commercialization, Notre Dame has received 2,200,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock
and the Company has agreed to pay Notre Dame royalties of 2% of the
Company’s gross sales of
the licensed products and 10% of any sublicensing fees received by
the Company on licensed technology. The Company has also agreed to
pay to Notre Dame $50,000 a year, which will be reduced from the
total amount of royalties paid in the same year. The $50,000
payment to Notre Dame is not owed for any year in which the Company
is sponsoring research within Notre Dame.
On
October 15, 2013, the Company entered into an intellectual property
agreement with a scientific researcher relating to the development
of new recombinant silk fibers. Under the terms of that
agreement, the scientific researcher would transfer to the Company
his rights of intellectual property, inventions and trade secrets
which the researcher develops relating to recombinant
silk. The researcher
received 8,000,000 common stock warrants from the Company,
exercisable 24 months from the date of the agreement. The researcher would also
receive additional warrants when and if the researcher develops
advanced recombinant silk fibers for the Company’s use. Under the terms of the
agreement, the researcher would receive 10,000,000 warrants in the
event that he develops a new recombinant silk fiber with certain
performance characteristics, and another 10,000,000 warrants if he
develops a second recombinant silk fiber with certain
characteristics. If
the researcher performs the contract in good faith the consultant
will be entitled to an additional 8,000,000 warrants on the two
year anniversary of the agreement. The researcher received the
10,000,000 warrants for the creation of a new transgenic meeting
performance characteristics and a warrant of 8,000,000 for
performance of the contract in good faith. The warrants
described above all
contain a cashless exercise provision and are exercisable on the 24
month anniversary of the date on which they were issuable under the
agreement.
On
December 30, 2015, the Company entered into a cooperative agreement
for the research and pilot production of hybrid silkworms in
Vietnam. On May 1, 2018,
the Company was issued its Enterprise Registration Certificate
(“ERC”) so that it can begin its operations in Vietnam.
The Company has established a subsidiary in Vietnam where it will
develop and produce hybrid silkworms. Management believes the ERC
puts the Company on a path to scale to a much greater level by
harnessing existing silk production infrastructure with the
capacity to match the demand for their spider silk
materials.
5
As of
the date of this Report, the Company’s research and
development efforts are focused on growing their internal
capabilities, but will consider renewing funding of the
collaborative research and development of high strength polymers at
Notre Dame in 2019. The Company has been actively pursuing the
development of the commercial scale production of their recombinant
materials including Monster Silk® and Dragon SilkTM. Additionally, the
Company plans to accelerate both their microbiology and selective
breeding programs, as well as providing more resources for their
material testing protocols in 2019.
The Market
We are
focusing our work on the creation of new fibers with unique
properties including fibers with potential high performance and
technical fiber applications. The performance fiber market is
exemplified by two classes of product: aramid fibers, and
ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber. These products
service the need for materials with high strength, resilience, and
flexibility. Because these synthetic performance fibers are
stronger and tougher than steel, they are used in a wide variety of
military, industrial, and consumer applications.
Among
the users of performance fibers are the military and police, which
employ them for ballistic protection. The materials are also used
for industrial applications requiring superior strength and
toughness, i.e. critical cables and abrasion/impact resistant
components. Performance fibers are also employed in safety
equipment, high strength composite materials for the aero-space
industry and for ballistic protection by the defense
industry.
The
global market for technical textiles was estimated at greater than
$234 billion in 2017.1
1https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/technical-textile-market
These
are industrial materials which have become essential products for
both industrial and consumer applications. The market for technical
textiles can be defined as consisting of:
●
|
Medical
textiles;
|
●
|
Geotextiles;
|
●
|
Textiles
used in Defense and Military;
|
●
|
Safe
and Protective Clothing;
|
●
|
Filtration
Textiles;
|
●
|
Textiles
used in Transportation;
|
●
|
Textiles
used in Buildings;
|
●
|
Composites
with Textile Structure;
|
●
|
Functional
and Sportive Textiles.
|
We
believe that the superior mechanical characteristics of the next
generation of protein-based polymers (in other words, genetically
engineered silk fibers), will open up new applications for the
technology. The materials which we are working to produce are many
times tougher and stronger than steel. These fibers are often
referred to as “super
fibers.”
The Company
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (Kraig) is a Wyoming corporation. Our
shares are traded on the OTCQB under the ticker symbol: KBLB. There are
835,733,840
shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of March 29, 2019;
Kim Thompson, our founder and CEO, owns approximately 27.01% of
such common shares. There are 2 shares of super voting preferred
stock issued and outstanding as of March 29, 2019, all of which Kim
Thompson owns.
The
inventor of our technology concept, Kim Thompson, is the founder of
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. Our protein expression system is,
in concept, scalable, cost effective, and capable of producing a
wide range of proteins and materials.
In 2006, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with the
University Of Wyoming, which granted the Company the exclusive
global rights to use and commercialize patented genetic sequences
in silkworm. In exchange for this license, the
University of Wyoming received $10,000 cash payment and the
University of Wyoming Foundation received 17,050,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock. Under the terms of the licensing
agreement, the Company is obligated to provide annual license fees
of $10,000 and support the University’s research with $13,700
annually. As of the date of this Report, the Company is
current on the $10,000 per year payment, but has been accruing the
$13,700 payments since 2006. No royalties are required under the
agreement. This agreement has remained unchanged since
2006.
On
April 8, 2011, Kraig and Sigma-Aldrich Co., an Illinois corporation
(“Sigma”) entered into a License and Option
Agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, Sigma will provide
Kraig with its proprietary genetic engineering tools and expertise
in zinc finger nuclease to enable Kraig to significantly accelerate
its product development. In addition to providing the customized
tools and technological know-how, Sigma has granted Kraig an option
for a commercial license to use the technology in the textile,
technical textile and biomedical markets. Sigma will create
customized zinc fingers for Kraig's use in its development of
spider silk polymers and technical textiles.
In
September 2010, the Company announced that it had succeeded in
introducing spider silk DNA in silkworm with the result that the
transgenic silkworm were producing new recombinant silk fibers.
These fibers are a combination of natural silkworm silk proteins
and proteins that the silkworms are making as a result of the
introduction of the spider silk DNA. The Company announced that it
had created approximately twenty different transgenic silkworm
strains producing recombinant silk.
6
We entered into an intellectual property collaborative research
agreement with the University of Notre Dame in 2007. That agreement
was subsequently extended and expanded to include research and
development of certain platform technologies with potential
applications for diagnostics and pharmaceutical production. On
March 20, 2010, the Company extended its agreement with Notre Dame
through February 28, 2011. Pursuant
to these agreements the genetic work has been conducted primarily
within Notre Dame’s
laboratories. In June 2012, we entered into a Collaborative
Research Agreement with Notre Dame (“2012
Notre Dame Research Agreement”). On
March 4, 2015, we entered into a new Collaborative Research
Agreement with University of Notre Dame extending the agreement
through March 2016 (“2015
Notre Dame Research Agreement”). Under
the 2015 Notre Dame Research agreement, the Company provided
approximately $534,000 in financial support. On
September 20, 2015, this agreement was amended to increase the
total funding by approximately $179,000;in February 2016, this
agreement was extended to July 31, 2016 and in August 2016 this
agreement was extended to December 31, 2016. In May 2017, the 2015
Notre Dame Agreement was amended to increase the total funding by
approximately $189,000 and the duration of this agreement was
extended to September 30, 2017. The Company did not extend the
agreement after September 30, 2017. The
Company will consider negotiating a new Collaborative Research
Agreement with the University of Notre Dame in 2019 at reduced
levels of funding. For the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively, the Company paid $0 and $258,892 in research and
development fees.
License Agreements/Intellectual Property
We have
obtained certain rights to use a number of university created, and
patented, spider silk proteins, gene sequences and
methodologies.
Between
2010 and 2014 the University of Notre Dame filed approximately
twelve patent applications pursuant to our intellectual property
and collaborative research agreement. Under the terms of that
agreement the Company has an option for the exclusive commercial
rights to that technology. The Company has notified the University
of its exercise of that option. These patent
applications include coverage in the United States, Europe, South
Korea, Vietnam, Brazil, India, China, Australia, Japan, and
Canada. As of the date hereof, two patents have been
issued, number 10-1926286 in South Korea and number 2011314072 in
Australia, all remaining patents applications are still in
process.
In
2014, seven trademarks were issued to the Company which it intends
to use for product branding in the future. The details of such
trademarks are set forth in the following table:
Marks
|
Registered Owner
|
Country
|
Status
|
Monster
SilkTM
|
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories
|
United
States of America
|
issued
|
SpiderpillarTM
|
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories
|
United
States of America
|
issued
|
SpilkTM
|
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories
|
United
States of America
|
issued
|
Monster
WormTM
|
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories
|
United
States of America
|
issued
|
Spider
WormTM
|
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories
|
United
States of America
|
issued
|
Spider
MothTM
|
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories
|
United
States of America
|
issued
|
License Agreement with Notre Dame University
As previously stated, in 2011, the Company exercised its
option to obtain the global commercialization rights to the
technology developed under the collaborative research agreements
with Notre Dame, which resulted in a separate license agreement
with Notre Dame. Pursuant to that license
agreement, Notre Dame has filed an international patent application
and numerous national patent applications on technology relating to
the creation and use of recombinant spider silks. The license agreement obligates
the Company to reimburse Notre Dame for costs associated with the
filing, prosecuting and maintaining of such patents and patent
applications. The license
agreement has a term of 20 years which can be extended on an annual
basis after that. It can be terminated by the University of Notre
Dame if the Company defaults on its obligations under the agreement
and fails to cure such default within 90 days of a written notice
by the university. The Company may terminate the agreement upon a
90 day written notice subject to payment of a termination fee of
$5,000 if the termination takes place within 2 years after its
effectiveness, $10,000 if the termination takes place within 4
years after its effectiveness and $20,000 if the Agreement is
terminated after 4 years.
Exclusive License Agreement with University of Wyoming
In May
2006, we entered into a license agreement with the University of
Wyoming, pursuant to which we have licensed the right to
commercialize the production by silkworms of certain synthetic and
natural spider silk proteins and the genetic sequencing for such
spider silk proteins. These spider silk proteins and genetic
sequencing are covered by patents held by the University of
Wyoming. Our license allows us only to use silkworms to produce the
licensed proteins and genetic sequencing. We have the right to
sublicense the intellectual property that we license from the
University of Wyoming. Our license agreement with the University of
Wyoming requires that we pay licensing and research fees to the
university in exchange for an exclusive license in our field of use
for certain university-developed intellectual property including
patented spider silk gene sequences. Pursuant to the agreement, we
issued 17,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock to the
University Foundation. Our license agreement with the University of
Wyoming will continue until the later of (i) expiration of the
last-to-expire patent we license from the University of Wyoming
under this license agreement in such country or (ii) ten years from
the date of first commercial sale of a licensed product in such
country. There are no royalties payable to the University of
Wyoming under the terms of our agreement with them.
We
anticipate making arrangements with the University of Wyoming to
address accrued fees. If we fail to make such arrangements the
University of Wyoming could terminate our license agreement. We
anticipate that such a termination would result in a loss of one to
three months of research time and result in increased research and
development costs in the range of $20,000 to $60,000.
7
Research and Development
On
September 29, 2010 we announced that we had achieved our
longstanding goal of producing new silk fibers composed of
recombinant proteins. The Company intends to turn our technology to
the development and production of high performance
polymers.
During
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we have spent
approximately 13,160 hours and 8,200 hours, respectively, on
research and development activities, which consisted primarily of
laboratory research on genetic engineering by our in-house research
operations and outside consultants pursuant to our collaborative
research agreement with the University of Notre Dame in
2017..
Employees
As of
the date of this filing, we have 9 employees including Kim
Thompson, our sole officer and director and Jonathan R. Rice, our
Chief Operating Officer.
We plan to hire more persons on as-needed basis.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item
is not
applicable.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.
Starting
in September of 2015, we rent office space at 2723 South State
Street, Suite 150, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, which is our
principal place of business. We pay an annual rent of $2,328 for
conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception services located at
our principal place of business.
Starting
in February of 2015, we rent additional office space in East
Lansing, Michigan and currently pay a monthly rent of $432 for
office space, conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception
services. This lease ended in October of 2017.
Starting
in July of 2016, we rent factory space in South Bend, Indiana with
a monthly rent of $670. This lease ended in November of
2017.
On
January 23, 2017, the Company signed an 8 year property lease with
the Company’s President
for land in Texas where the Company grows its mulberry. The Company
pays a monthly rent of $960. Rent expense – related party for the year ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $11,520 and $10,560,
respectively.
On
September 13, 2017, the Company signed a new two year lease
commencing on October 1, 2017 and ending on September 30, 2019. The
Company pays an annual rent of $39,200 for the year one of lease
and $42,000 for the year two of lease for office and manufacturing
space. For the
year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company paid $46,433 and
$9,800 respectively, for office and manufacturing
space.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We may
from time to time become a party to various legal or administrative
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our
business.
To the
knowledge of our management, we are currently not a party to any
material legal or administrative proceedings and are not aware of
any pending or threatened legal or administrative proceedings
against us.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item
is not
applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES.
Market Information
Our
common stock trades on the OTCQB system under the symbol
“KBLB.”
Our CUSIP number is 50075W.
Holders
As of
March 29, 2019 in accordance with our transfer agent records, we
had 30 record holders of our Class A common stock and 0 holders of
our Class B common stock. This number excludes any estimate by us
of the number of beneficial owners of shares held in street name,
the accuracy of which cannot be guaranteed.
8
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Our
transfer agent is Olde Monmouth Stock Transfer Co., Inc., 200
Memorial Parkway, Atlantic Highlands, NJ 07716 and its phone number is
(732) 872-2727.
Sale of Unregistered Securities
Information
regarding any equity securities we have sold during the period
covered by this Report that were not registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is set forth below. Each such
transaction was exempt from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act
or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC, unless
otherwise noted. Unless stated otherwise: (i) the securities were
offered and sold only to accredited investors; (ii) there was no
general solicitation or general advertising related to the
offerings; (iii) each of the persons who received these
unregistered securities had knowledge and experience in financial
and business matters which allowed them to evaluate the merits and
risk of the receipt of these securities, and that they were
knowledgeable about our operations and financial condition; (iv) no
underwriter participated in, nor did we pay any commissions or fees
to any underwriter in connection with the transactions; and, (v)
each certificate issued for these unregistered securities contained
a legend stating that the securities have not been registered under
the Securities Act and setting forth the restrictions on the
transferability and the sale of the securities.
On
January 25, 2017, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock
to a consultant for services rendered.
On
February 6, 2017 the Company issued a warrant for 750,000 share of
common stock to a consultant for services rendered.
On June
20, 2017 the Company granted 14,745,203 shares in connection with
the cashless exercise of the 15,000,000 warrants. The shares were
issued on July 14, 2017.
On June 26, 2017, the Company issued 2-year warrant to purchase
15,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001
per share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $848,011, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date
granted. Warrants became exercisable on December 26, 2017,
and for a period of 2 years expiring on June 26, 2019. During the
year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded 848,011 as an
expense for warrants issued.
On
December 27, 2017, the Company granted 14,651,162 shares in
connection with the cashless exercise of the 15,000,000 warrants.
The shares were issued on December 29, 2017.
On
February 9, 2018, the Company issued 3-year warrant to purchase
3,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.056 per
share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $52,660, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date
granted. Warrants will be exercisable on August 9, 2019, and
for a period of 2 years expiring on August 9, 2021. During the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded 52,660 as an expense
for warrants issued.
On
March 20, 2018, the Company issued 4-year warrant to purchase
600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per
share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $19,915, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on March 20,
2018. Warrants will be exercisable on March 20, 2019, and for
a period of 3 years expiring on March 20, 22. During the year ended
December 31, 2018, the Company recorded 19,915 as an expense for
warrants issued.
On April 6, 2018, the Company issued 36,000 shares with a fair
value of $1,076 ($0.0299/share) to a consultant as consideration
for consulting fees owed from October 1, 2014 through June 30, 2018
in the amount of $21,000.
Repurchases of Equity Securities
None.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item
is not
applicable.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and result of operations should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those
financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This
discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves
numerous risks and uncertainties contained in this report and the
other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in
any forward-looking statements.
Plan of Operations
During
the next twelve months, we expect to take the following steps in
connection with the further development of our business and the
implementation of our plan of operations:
●
|
We plan
to accelerate both our microbiology and selective breeding programs
as well as providing more resources for our material testing
protocols into 2019. We spent approximately $148,069 over the last
12 months on research and development of high strength polymers. In
2018 we directed our research and development efforts on growing
our internal capabilities. We will consider renewing funding of the
collaborative research and development of high strength polymers at
the University of Notre Dame in 2019.
|
|
9
|
|
|
●
|
We
expect to spend approximately $13,700 on collaborative research and
development of high strength polymers and spider silk protein at
the University of Wyoming over the next twelve months. This level
of research spending at the university is also a requirement of our
licensing agreement with the university.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We plan
to complete renovations of our Quang Nam, Vietnam factory and begin
commercial scale production of our recombinant spider silk in
Vietnam according to our investment and enterprise registration
certificates.
|
|
|
●
|
We
will consider buying an established revenue producing company in a
compatible business, in order to broaden our financial base and
facilitate the commercialization of our products. We expect to use
a combination of stock and cash for any such purchase.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We will
also actively consider pursuing collaborative research
opportunities with both private and university laboratories in
areas of research which overlap the company’s existing
research and development. One such potential area for collaborative
research which the company is considering is protein expression
platforms. If our financing allows, management will give strong
consideration to increasing the breadth of our research to include
protein expression platform technologies.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We plan
to actively pursue collaborative research and product testing,
opportunities with companies in the biotechnology, materials,
textile and other industries.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We plan
to actively pursue collaborative commercialization, marketing and
manufacturing opportunities with companies in the textile and
material sectors for the fibers we developed and for any new
polymers that we create in 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
We plan
to actively pursue the development of commercial scale production
of our recombinant materials including Monster Silk® and Dragon
SilkTM.
|
Limited Operating History
We have
not previously demonstrated that we will be able to expand our
business through an increased investment in our research and
development efforts. We cannot guarantee that the research and
development efforts described in this filing will be successful.
Our business is subject to risks inherent in growing an enterprise,
including limited capital resources, risks inherent in the research
and development process and possible rejection of our products in
development.
If
financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable
to continue our research and development and other operations.
Equity financing will result in dilution to existing
shareholders.
Results of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017.
Our
revenue, operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the
years ended December 31, 2018 as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2017, were as follows – some balances on the prior
period’s combined
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation:
|
Year Ended
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
December 31
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Change
|
|
NET
REVENUES
|
$401,620
|
$97,318
|
304,302
|
312.69%
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
General
and Administrative
|
515,875
|
1,217,050
|
(701,175)
|
-57.61%
|
Professional
Fees
|
157,976
|
322,215
|
(164,239)
|
-50.97%
|
Officer's
Salary
|
528,127
|
444,596
|
83,531
|
18.79%
|
Rent
- Related Party
|
11,520
|
10,560
|
960
|
9.09%
|
Research
and Development
|
148,069
|
258,892
|
(110,823)
|
-42.81%
|
Total operating expenses
|
1,361,567
|
2,253,313
|
(891,746)
|
-39.57%
|
Loss from operations
|
(959,947)
|
(2,155,995)
|
1,196,048
|
-55.48%
|
Gain
on forgiveness of debt
|
19,924
|
-
|
19,924
|
100.00%
|
Interest
expense
|
(228,954)
|
(177,105)
|
(51,849)
|
29.28%
|
Net Loss
|
$(1,168,977)
|
$(2,333,100)
|
1,164,123
|
-49.90%
|
Net
Revenues: During the year ended December
31, 2018, we realized $401,620 of revenues from our business.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, we realized $97,318 of
revenues from our business. The change in revenues between the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $304,302 or
312.69%. This increase was
related to the US Defense Department exercise of our contract
option extension and increased funding
levels.
Research and
development expenses: During year ended December 31,
2018 we incurred $148,069 research and development
expenses. During year
ended December 31, 2017 we incurred $258,892 of research and
development expenses, a decrease of $110,823 or 42.81% compared
with the same period in 2017. The research and development expenses
are attributable to the research and development with the Notre
Dame University; the decrease was due to the timing of research
related activity and reduced costs by insources the Company's
research operations.
Professional
Fees: During
year ended December 31 2018, we incurred $157,976 professional
expenses, which decreased by $164,239 or 50.97% from $322,215 for
year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease in professional fees
expense was attributable to decreased expenses related to investor
relations services during year ended December 31,
2018.
10
Officers
Salary: During year ended December 31,
2018, officers’ salary
expenses increased to $528,127 or 18.79% compared to $444,596 for
year ended December 31, 2017.
General and
Administrative Expense: General and
administrative expenses decreased by $701,175 or 57.61% to $515,875
for year ended December 31, 2018 from $1,217,050 for year ended
December 31, 2017. Our
general and administrative expenses for year ended December 31,
2018 consisted of consulting fees of $26,538 and other general and
administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as Auto,
Business Development, SEC Filing, Investor Relations, General
Office, warrant Compensation) of $325,897, Travel of $19,141,
office salary of $144,299 for a total of $515,875. Our general and
administrative expenses for year ended December 31, 2017 consisted
of salaries and benefits of $55,852, consulting fees of $81,280,
and other general and administrative expenses (which includes
expenses such as: Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Investor
Relations, General Office, warrant Compensation of $1,048,939, and
travel of $30,979 for a total of $1,217,050. The primary reason for
the decrease in comparing year ended December 31, 2018 to the
corresponding period for 2017 was mainly due to general business
expenses and warrants issuances for services.
Rent – Related
Party: During
the year ended December 31 2018, rent- related party expense
increased to $11,520 or 9.09 % compared to $10,560 for the year
ended December 31, 2017. The increase in rent-related party
expense was attributable to the additional month of rent recorded
in 2018.
Gain on Forgiveness of
Debt: Gain on
forgiveness of debt increased by $19,924 to $19,924 for the year
ended December 31, 2018 compared to $0 for the year ended December
31, 2017. The increase was
primarily due to the issuance of stock as payment for consulting
services.
Interest
Expense: Interest expense increased to
$228,954, or 29.27%
for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $177,105 for the
year ended December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to
interest on the related party loans and accounts payable and
accrued expenses to the related parties.
Net
Loss: Net loss decreased
by $1,164,123, or 49.90%, to a net loss of $1,168,977 for the year
ended December 31, 2018 from a net loss of $2,333,100 for the year
ended December 31, 2017. This decrease in net loss was driven
primarily by decreases in research and development, warrant
compensation, and professional fees.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Our
financial statements have been presented on the basis that we have
a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and
satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of
business. As presented in
the financial statements, we incurred a net loss of $1,168,977
during the year ended December 31, 2018, and losses are expected to
continue in the near term. The accumulated deficit is
$26,888,056 at December 31, 2018. Refer to Note 2 for our discussion of
stockholder deficit. We
have been funding our operations through private loans and the sale
of common stock in private placement transactions. Refer to Note 5 and Note 7 in the
financial statements for our discussion of notes payable and shares
issued, respectively. Our cash resources are insufficient to meet
our planned business objectives without additional
financing. These and other
factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a
going concern. The
accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to
reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and
classification of assets or the amounts and classification of
liabilities that may result from the possible inability of our
company to continue as a going concern.
Management
anticipates that significant additional expenditures will be
necessary to develop and expand our business before significant
positive operating cash flows can be achieved. Our ability to continue as a going
concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital
and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable
operations. At December
31, 2018, we had $13,697 of cash on hand. These funds are insufficient to
complete our business plan and as a consequence, we will need to
seek additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or
equity securities for cash to operate our business. No assurance can be given that any
future financing will be available or, if available, that it will
be on terms that are satisfactory to us. Even if we are able to obtain
additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our
operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial
dilution for our stockholders, in the case of equity
financing.
Management has
undertaken steps as part of a plan to improve operations with the
goal of sustaining our operations for the next twelve months and
beyond. These steps
include (a) raising additional capital and/or obtaining financing;
(b) controlling overhead and expenses; and (c) executing material
sales or research contracts. There can be no assurance that the
Company can successfully accomplish these steps and it is uncertain
that the Company will achieve a profitable level of operations and
obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that any
additional financing will be available to the Company on
satisfactory terms and conditions, if at all. As of the date of this Report, we
have not entered into any formal agreements regarding the
above.
In the
event the Company is unable to continue as a going concern, the
Company may elect or be required to seek protection from its
creditors by filing a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or may be
subject to an involuntary petition in bankruptcy. To date, management has not
considered this alternative, nor does management view it as a
likely occurrence.
11
Cash,
total current assets, total assets, total current liabilities and
total liabilities as of December 31, 2018 as compared to December
31, 2017, were as follows:
|
December 31, 2018
|
December 31, 2017
|
Cash
|
$13,697
|
$18,150
|
Accounts
receivable
|
$-
|
$25,872
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
$6,858
|
$4,465
|
Total
current assets
|
$20,555
|
$48,487
|
Total
assets
|
$71,383
|
$114,499
|
Total
current liabilities
|
$4,530,606
|
$3,490,305
|
Total
liabilities
|
$4,530,606
|
$3,490,305
|
At
December 31, 2018, we had a working capital deficit of $4,510,051,
compared to a working capital deficit of $3,441,818 at December 31,
2017. Current liabilities
increased to $4,530,606 at December 31, 2018 from $3,490,305 at
December 31, 2017, primarily as a result of primarily as a result
of accounts payable and accrued compensation.
For the
year ended December 31, 2018, net cash used in operations of
$235,005 was the result of a net loss of $1,168,977 offset by
offset by depreciation expense of $26,632, gain on forgiveness of debt of
$19,924, imputed interest on
related party loans of $11,909, warrants issued to consultants of
$72,575, decrease in accounts
receivable of $25,872, and an
increase in other receivable of $2,394, an increase of accrued
expenses and other payables-related party of $682,976, an increase in accounts payable of
$136,326. For the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in
operations of $729,542 was the result of a net loss of $2,333,100
offset by depreciation expense of $20,291, imputed interest on
related party loans of $2,623, warrants issued to related
parties of $17,473, warrants issued to consultants of $848,011,
increase in prepaid expenses of $6,658, decrease in accounts
receivable of $5,986, an increase of accrued expenses and other
payables-related party of $551,237, and an increase in accounts
payable of $164,595.
Net
cash used in our investing activities were $11,448 and $31,167 for
the year ended December
31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Our investing activities for the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 are attributable to
purchases of fixed assets.
Our
financing activities resulted in a cash inflow of $242,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2018, which is represented by shareholder
loan payable. Our financing activities resulted in cash inflow of
$480,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is represented
by $450,000 proceeds from issuance of common stock and $30,000
proceeds from shareholder note payable.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our
financial statements and related public financial information are
based on the application of accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of
estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of
accounting principles that have an impact on the assets,
liabilities, and revenue and expense amounts reported. These
estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our
external disclosures including information regarding contingencies,
risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and
underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are
consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results
may differ materially from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant
estimates made during the preparation of our financial
statements.
Our
significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of our
financial statements. While all these significant accounting
policies impact its financial condition and results of operations,
we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined
to be critical are those policies that have the most significant
impact on our financial statements and require management to use a
greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ
from those estimates. Our management believes that given current
facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other
reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect
on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for
the periods presented in this report.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Reclassification
of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
. The guidance permits entities to reclassify tax effects
stranded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income as a result of
tax reform to retained earnings. This new guidance is effective for
annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted in annual and interim periods
and can be applied retrospectively or in the period of adoption.
We are evaluating
the impact of adopting this guidance on our Consolidated
Financial
Statements.
In
March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic
740) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 118. The amendment provides guidance on
accounting for the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the
“Tax Act”) and allows entities to complete the
accounting under ASC 740 within a one-year measurement period from
the Tax Act enactment date. This standard is effective upon
issuance. The Tax Act has several significant changes that impact
all taxpayers, including a transition tax, which is a one-time tax
charge on accumulated, undistributed foreign earnings. The
calculation of accumulated foreign earnings requires an analysis of
each foreign entity’s financial results going back to 1986.
We are evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
12
In June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-07, Compensation-Stock
Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based
Payment Accounting , which expands the
scope of Topic 718 to include
share-based payment transactions for
acquiring goods and services from
nonemployees. An entity should apply
the requirements of Topic 718
to nonemployee awards except for specific
guidance on inputs to an option pricing model and the attribution
of cost (that is, the period of time over which share-based payment
awards vest and the pattern of cost recognition over that period).
The new guidance is effective for all entities for annual periods,
and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2017, with
early adoption permitted. We are evaluating
the impact of adopting this guidance on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair
Value Measurement (Topic 820), Disclosure Framework – Changes
to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.
The amendments in this Update modify certain disclosure requirements of fair value measurements and are effective for all entities for fiscal
years, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2019. Early adoption
is permitted. We are evaluating
the impact of adopting this guidance on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). The
amendments in this update simplify the test for goodwill impairment
by eliminating Step 2 from the impairment test, which required the
entity to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the
impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities following the
procedure that would be required in determining fair value of
assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.
The amendments in this update are effective for public companies
for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019. We are evaluating the impact of
adopting this guidance on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations
(Topic 805); Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The
amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business to
help companies evaluate whether transactions should be accounted
for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The
amendments in this update are effective for public companies for
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim
periods within those periods. We are evaluating the impact of
adopting this guidance on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In July
2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share
(Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480),
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in Part I of
this Update change the classification analysis of certain
equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with
down round features. When determining whether certain financial
instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity
instruments, a down round feature no longer precludes equity
classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to
an entity’s own stock.
The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for
equity-classified instruments.
As a
result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or
embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a
derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of
a down round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial
instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings
per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the
effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect
is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to
common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with
embedded conversion options that have down round features are now
subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial
conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other
Options), including related EPS guidance (in Topic 260). The
amendments in Part II of this Update recharacterize the indefinite
deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented
as pending content in the Codification, to a scope
exception.
Those
amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business
entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for
all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity
early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments
should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that
includes that interim period. The Company is currently reviewing
the impact of adoption of ASU 2017-11on its financial
statements.
All
other newly issued accounting pronouncements but not yet effective
have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do
not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other
relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also
known as “special purpose
entities”
(SPEs).
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK.
As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item
is not
applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
CONTENTS
PAGE
|
14
|
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
|
|
|
|
PAGE
|
15
|
BALANCE
SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER 31, 2017.
|
|
|
|
PAGE
|
16
|
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER
31, 2017.
|
|
|
|
PAGE
|
17
|
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND DECEMBER
31, 2017.
|
|
|
|
PAGES
|
18
|
STATEMENT
OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE PERIOD FROM
DECEMBER 31, 2016 TO DECEMBER 31, 2018.
|
|
|
|
PAGES
|
19
|
NOTES
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
|
13
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the Board of Directors and
Stockholders
of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2018
and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 2018, and the related
notes and schedules (collectively referred to as the financial
statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Basis for Opinion
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required
to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to
perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.
As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that
the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
2 to the financial statements, the Company suffered a net loss from
operations and has a net capital deficiency, which raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management’s plans regarding those matters are described in
Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
/s/
M&K CPAS, PLLC
We have
served as the Company’s audit since 2013.
Houston,
TX
March
29, 2019
14
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Subsidiary
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
||
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
||
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
December
31, 2017
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
$13,697
|
$18,150
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
-
|
25,872
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
6,858
|
4,465
|
Total
Current Assets
|
20,555
|
48,487
|
|
|
|
Property and
Equipment, net
|
47,310
|
62,494
|
Security
deposit
|
3,518
|
3,518
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
$71,383
|
$114,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
||
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
$793,482
|
$678,157
|
Note payable -
related party
|
322,000
|
80,000
|
Royalty agreement
payable - related party
|
65,292
|
65,292
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses - related party
|
3,349,832
|
2,666,856
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
4,530,606
|
3,490,305
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Deficit
|
|
|
Preferred
stock Series A, no par value;
|
|
|
2 and 2 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively
|
5,217,800
|
5,217,800
|
Common
stock Class A, no par value; unlimited shares
authorized,
|
|
|
816,883,910 and
816,847,910 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
15,145,798
|
15,144,722
|
Common
stock Class B, no par value; unlimited shares
authorized,
|
|
|
no shares issued
and outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
Common
Stock Issuable, 1,122,311 and 1,122,311 shares,
respectively
|
22,000
|
22,000
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
2,043,235
|
1,958,751
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
(26,888,056)
|
(25,719,079)
|
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders' Deficit
|
(4,459,223)
|
(3,375,806)
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
|
$71,383
|
$114,499
|
15
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Subsidiary
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
||
|
|
|
|
For
the Years Ended
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$401,620
|
$97,318
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
General and
Administrative
|
515,875
|
1,217,050
|
Professional
Fees
|
157,976
|
322,215
|
Officer's
Salary
|
528,127
|
444,596
|
Rent - Related
Party
|
11,520
|
10,560
|
Research and
Development
|
148,069
|
258,892
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
1,361,567
|
2,253,313
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations
|
(959,947)
|
(2,155,995)
|
|
|
|
Other
Income/(Expenses)
|
|
|
Gain on forgiveness
of debt
|
19,924
|
-
|
Interest
expense
|
(228,954)
|
(177,105)
|
Total
Other Income/(Expenses)
|
(209,030)
|
(177,105)
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss) before Provision for Income Taxes
|
(1,168,977)
|
(2,333,100)
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net
(Loss)
|
$(1,168,977)
|
$(2,333,100)
|
|
|
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share - Basic and Diluted
|
$(0.00)
|
$(0.00)
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
during
the period - Basic and Diluted
|
816,874,442
|
791,393,428
|
16
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Subsidiary
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
||
|
For
the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
$(1,168,977)
|
$(2,333,100)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
|
|
|
Depreciation
expense
|
26,632
|
20,291
|
Gain
on forgiveness of debt
|
(19,924)
|
-
|
Imputed
interest - related party
|
11,909
|
2,623
|
Warrants
issued to consultants
|
72,575
|
848,011
|
Warrants
issued to related party
|
-
|
17,473
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
(Increase)
Decrease in prepaid expenses
|
(2,394)
|
(6,658)
|
(Increase)
Decrease in accounts receivables, net
|
25,872
|
5,986
|
Increase
in accrued expenses and other payables - related party
|
682,976
|
551,237
|
Increase
in accounts payable
|
136,326
|
164,595
|
Net
Cash Used In Operating Activities
|
(235,005)
|
(729,542)
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
Purchase of Fixed
Assets and Domain Name
|
(11,448)
|
(31,167)
|
Net
Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
(11,448)
|
(31,167)
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
Proceeds from Notes
Payable - related party
|
242,000
|
30,000
|
Proceeds from
issuance of common stock
|
-
|
450,000
|
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
242,000
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
Net
Increase in Cash
|
(4,453)
|
(280,709)
|
|
|
|
Cash at Beginning
of Period
|
18,150
|
298,859
|
|
|
|
Cash
at End of Period
|
$13,697
|
$18,150
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for
interest
|
$10
|
$-
|
Cash paid for
taxes
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
Shares
issued in connection with cashless warrants exercise
|
$-
|
$1,703,115
|
Shares
issued from stock payable
|
$-
|
$-
|
Settlement of accounts payable with stock issuance
|
$1,076
|
$32,850
|
17
Kraig Biocraft
Laboratories, Inc. and Subsidiary
|
||||||||||||
Conolidated Statement
of Changes in Stockholders Deficit
|
||||||||||||
For
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
A Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock - Series A
|
Common
Stock - Class A
|
|
Common
Stock - Class B
|
To
be issued
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Par
|
Shares
|
Par
|
|
Shares
|
Par
|
Shares
|
Par
|
APIC
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2016
|
2
|
$5,217,800
|
773,627,964
|
$12,958,757
|
|
-
|
$-
|
5,778,633
|
$279,754
|
$2,568,855
|
$(23,385,979)
|
$(2,360,813)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for
cash ($0.0491/share)
|
-
|
$-
|
9,167,259
|
$450,000
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued for
services - related party
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$17,473
|
$-
|
$17,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued for
services
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$848,011
|
$-
|
$848,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of
30,000,000 warrants in exchange for stock
|
-
|
$-
|
29,396,365
|
$1,478,211
|
|
-
|
$-
|
|
|
$(1,478,211)
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued shares for
warrant exercise issuable as of December 31, 2016
|
-
|
$-
|
3,906,322
|
$224,904
|
|
-
|
$-
|
(3,906,322)
|
$(224,904)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued shares for
services issuable as of December 31, 2016
|
-
|
$-
|
750,000
|
$32,850
|
|
-
|
$-
|
(750,000)
|
$(32,850)
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imputed interest -
related party
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$2,623
|
$-
|
$2,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the
years ended December 31, 2017
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$(2,333,100)
|
$(2,333,100)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2017
|
2
|
$5,217,800
|
816,847,910
|
$15,144,722
|
|
-
|
$-
|
1,122,311
|
$22,000
|
$1,958,751
|
$(25,719,079)
|
$(3,375,806)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants issued for
services
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$72,575
|
$-
|
$72,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued for
services ($0.0299/Sh)
|
-
|
$-
|
36,000
|
$1,076
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$1,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Imputed interest -
related party
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$11,909
|
$-
|
$11,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the
year ended December 31, 2018
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
|
-
|
$-
|
-
|
$-
|
$-
|
$(1,168,977)
|
$(1,168,977)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2018
|
2
|
$5,217,800
|
816,883,910
|
$15,145,798
|
|
-
|
$-
|
1,122,311
|
$22,000
|
$2,043,235
|
$(26,888,056)
|
$(4,459,223)
|
18
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION
(A) Organization
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (the "Company") was incorporated under
the laws of the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The Company was
organized to develop high strength, protein based fiber, using
recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in the
textile and specialty fiber industries.
On
March 5, 2018, the Company issued a board resolution authorizing
investment in a Vietnamese subsidiary and appointing a
representative for the subsidiary.
On
April 24, 2018, the Company announced that it had received its
investment registration certificate for its new Vietnamese
subsidiary Prodigy Textiles Co., Ltd.
On May
1, 2018, the Company announced that it had received its enterprise
registration certificate for its new Vietnamese subsidiary Prodigy
Textiles Co., Ltd.
(B) Foreign Currency
The
assets and liabilities of Prodigy Textiles, Co., Ltd. whose
functional currency is the Vietnamese Dong, are translated into US
dollars at period-end exchange rates prior to consolidation. Income
and expense items are translated at the average rates of exchange
prevailing during the period. The adjustments resulting from
translating the Company’s financial statements are reflected
as a component of other comprehensive (loss) income. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in net
earnings based on differences between foreign exchange rates on the
transaction date and settlement date.
(C) Use of Estimates
In
preparing financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, management is required to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues
and expenses during the reported period. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
(D) Cash
For
purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months
or less at the time of purchase to be cash
equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of
December 31, 2018 or December 31, 2017.
(E) Loss Per Share
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the
weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by FASB
Accounting Standards Codification No. 260, “Earnings per
Share.” For December 31, 2018 and 2017, warrants were not
included in the computation of income/ (loss) per share because
their inclusion is anti-dilutive.
The
computation of basic and diluted loss per share for December 31,
2018 and September 30, 2017 excludes the common stock equivalents
of the following potentially dilutive securities because their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive:
|
December
31, 2018
|
September
30, 2017
|
Stock Warrants
(Exercise price - $0.001/share)
|
36,400,000
|
47,800,000
|
Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
2
|
2
|
Total
|
36,400,002
|
47,800,002
|
(F) Research and Development Costs
The
Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for
which there is no alternative future use. These costs also include
the expensing of employee compensation and employee stock based
compensation.
19
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
(G)
Income Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic
740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC
740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The net
deferred tax liability in the accompanying balance sheets includes
the following amounts of deferred tax assets and
liabilities:
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
Expected income tax
recovery (expense) at the statutory rate of 34% in 2017; 21% in
2018
|
$(1,412,328)
|
$(793,170)
|
Tax effect of
expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of
other amounts deductible for tax purposes)
|
11,057
|
294,265
|
Change in valuation
allowance
|
(1,423,384)
|
498,906
|
|
|
|
Provision for
income taxes
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
The
components of deferred income taxes are as follows:
|
Years Ended December,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
liability:
|
$-
|
$-
|
Deferred tax
asset
|
|
|
Net
Operating Loss Carryforward
|
2,910,863
|
4,334,248
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(2,910,863)
|
(4,334,248)
|
Net
deferred tax asset
|
-
|
-
|
Net
deferred tax liability
|
$-
|
$-
|
|
|
|
The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax
asset to the amount that will more likely than not be
realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s
continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the
Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss
carryforwards before they will expire through the year
2038.
The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017 was a decrease of $1,412,328 and an
increase of $498,906 respectively.
On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Tax Act)
was enacted into law and the new legislation contains several key
tax provisions that affected us, including a one-time mandatory
transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and a reduction of
the corporate income tax rate to 21% effective January 1, 2018,
among others. We are required to recognize the effect of the tax
law changes in the period of enactment, such as determining the
transition tax, remeasuring our U.S. deferred tax assets and
liabilities as well as reassessing the net realizability of our
deferred tax assets and liabilities. In December 2017, the SEC
staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
118, Income Tax Accounting
Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (SAB 118), which allows us to record provisional
amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year
of the enactment date. Since the Tax Act was passed late in the
fourth quarter of 2017, and ongoing guidance and accounting
interpretation are expected over the next 12 months, we consider
the accounting of the transition tax, deferred tax re-measurements,
and other items to be incomplete due to the forthcoming guidance
and our ongoing analysis of final year-end data and tax positions.
We expect to complete our analysis within the measurement period in
accordance with SAB 118.
Effective
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted guidance regarding accounting
for uncertainty in income taxes. This guidance clarifies the
accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition
threshold an income tax position is required to meet before being
recognized in the financial statements and applies to all federal
or state income tax positions. Each income tax position is assessed
using a two-step process. A determination is first made as to
whether it is more likely than not that the income tax position
will be sustained, based upon technical merits, upon examination by
the taxing authorities. If the income tax position is expected to
meet the more likely than not criteria, the benefit recorded in the
financial statements equals the largest amount that is greater than
50% likely to be realized upon its ultimate settlement. As of
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 there were no amounts that
had been accrued in respect to uncertain tax
positions.
20
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
Fair
value accounting requires bifurcation of embedded derivative
instruments such as conversion features in convertible debt or
equity instruments, and measurement of their fair value for
accounting purposes. In determining the appropriate fair value, the
Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In assessing
the convertible debt instruments, management determines if the
convertible debt host instrument is conventional convertible debt
and further if there is a beneficial conversion feature requiring
measurement. If the instrument is not considered conventional
convertible debt, the Company will continue its evaluation process
of these instruments as derivative financial
instruments.
Once
determined, derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair
value at each reporting period end, with any increase or decrease
in the fair value being recorded in results of operations as an
adjustment to fair value of derivatives. In addition, the fair
value of freestanding derivative instruments such as warrants, are
also valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model.
(H) Stock-Based Compensation
In
December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards
Codification No. 718, Compensation – Stock
Compensation. Under FASB Accounting Standards
Codification No. 718, companies are required to measure the
compensation costs of share-based compensation arrangements based
on the grant-date fair value and recognize the costs in the
financial statements over the period during which employees are
required to provide services. Share-based compensation arrangements
include stock options, restricted share plans, performance-based
awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase
plans. As such, compensation cost is measured on the
date of grant at their fair value. Such compensation
amounts, if any, are amortized over the respective vesting periods
of the option grant. The Company applies this statement
prospectively.
Equity
instruments (“instruments”) issued to other than
employees are recorded on the basis of the fair value of the
instruments, as required by FASB Accounting Standards Codification
No. 718. FASB Accounting Standards Codification No.
505, Equity Based Payments to
Non-Employees defines the measurement date and
recognition period for such instruments. In general, the
measurement date is when either a (a) performance commitment, as
defined, is reached or (b) the earlier of (i) the non-employee
performance is complete or (ii) the instruments are vested. The
measured value related to the instruments is recognized over a
period based on the facts and circumstances of each particular
grant as defined in the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification.
The
Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information
is not presented.
(I)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Reclassification
of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
. The guidance permits entities to reclassify tax effects
stranded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income as a result of
tax reform to retained earnings. This new guidance is effective for
annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted in annual and interim periods
and can be applied retrospectively or in the period of adoption. We
are evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our
Consolidated Financi al
Statements.
In
March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic
740) - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 118. The amendment provides guidance on
accounting for the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the
“Tax Act”) and allows entities to complete the
accounting under ASC 740 within a one-year measurement period from
the Tax Act enactment date. This standard is effective upon
issuance. The Tax Act has several significant changes that impact
all taxpayers, including a transition tax, which is a one-time tax
charge on accumulated, undistributed foreign earnings. The
calculation of accumulated foreign earnings requires an analysis of
each foreign entity’s financial results going back to 1986.
We are evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-07, Compensation-Stock
Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based
Payment Accounting , which expands the
scope of Topic 718 to include
share-based payment transactions for
acquiring goods and services from
nonemployees. An entity should apply
the requirements of Topic 718
to nonemployee awards except for specific
guidance on inputs to an option pricing model and the attribution
of cost (that is, the period of time over which share-based payment
awards vest and the pattern of cost recognition over that period).
The new guidance is effective for all entities for annual periods,
and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2017, with
early adoption permitted. We are evaluating the
impact of adopting this guidance on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair
Value Measurement (Topic 820), Disclosure Framework – Changes
to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.
The amendments in this Update modify certain disclosure requirements of fair value measurements and are effective for all entities for fiscal
years, and interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2019. Early adoption
is permitted. We are evaluating the impact of adopting
this guidance on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
21
In
January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
(“ASU”) 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
(Topic 350). The amendments in this update simplify the test for
goodwill impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the impairment test,
which required the entity to perform procedures to determine the
fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and
liabilities following the procedure that would be required in
determining fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed
in a business combination. The amendments in this update are
effective for public companies for annual or any interim goodwill
impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
We are evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations
(Topic 805); Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The
amendments in this update clarify the definition of a business to
help companies evaluate whether transactions should be accounted
for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The
amendments in this update are effective for public companies for
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim
periods within those periods. We are evaluating the impact of
adopting this guidance on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In July
2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-11,
Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from
Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The
amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification
analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or
embedded features) with down round features. When determining
whether certain financial instruments should be classified as
liabilities or equity instruments, a down round feature no longer
precludes equity classification when assessing whether the
instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The
amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for
equity-classified instruments.
As a
result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or
embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a
derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of
a down round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial
instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings
per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the
effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect
is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to
common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with
embedded conversion options that have down round features are now
subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial
conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with
Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in
Topic 260). The amendments in Part II of this Update recharacterize
the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now
are presented as pending content in the Codification, to a scope
exception.
Those
amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business
entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for
fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for
all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity
early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments
should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that
includes that interim period. The
Company is currently reviewing the impact of adoption of ASU
2017-11on its financial statements.
22
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
All other newly issued accounting pronouncements but not yet
effective have been deemed either immaterial or not
applicable
The
2017 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
2018 presentation.
(J) Equipment
The
Company values property and equipment at cost and depreciates these
assets using the straight-line method over their expected useful
life. The Company uses a five year life for
automobiles.
In
accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No.
360, Property, Plant and
Equipment, the Company carries long-lived assets at the
lower of the carrying amount or fair value. Impairment is evaluated
by estimating future undiscounted cash flows expected to result
from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum
of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is less than the
carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized.
Fair value, for purposes of calculating impairment, is measured
based on estimated future cash flows, discounted at a market rate
of interest.
There
were no impairment losses recorded for the year ended December 31,
2018 and 2017.
(K) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We hold
certain financial assets, which are required to be measured at fair
value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”
(“ASC Topic 820-10”). ASC Topic 820-10
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to
valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy
gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements)
and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurements). ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. Level 1 instruments include
cash, account receivable, prepaid expenses, inventory and account
payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying values are assumed to
approximate the fair value due to the short term nature of the
instrument.
|
The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are
described below:
°
|
Level 1
- Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to
access. We believe our carrying value of level 1
instruments approximate their fair value at December 31, 2018 and
December 31, 2017.
|
°
|
Level 2
- Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or
can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities.
|
°
|
Level 3
- Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no
market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the
assets or liabilities. We consider depleting assets, asset
retirement obligations and net profit interest liability to be
Level 3. We determine the fair value of Level 3
assets and liabilities utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX
price quotations and contract terms.
|
23
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
|
December
31, 2018
|
December
31, 2017
|
Level
1
|
$-
|
$-
|
Level
2
|
$-
|
$-
|
Level
3
|
$-
|
$-
|
Total
|
$-
|
$-
|
(L)
Revenue Recognition
During 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2018 the
Company’s revenues were generated primarily from a contract
with the U.S. Government. The Company performs work under this
cost-plus-fixed-fee contract. Under the base phase of that contract
the Company produced recombinant spider silk woven into ballistic
shootpack panels. Those shootpack panels were delivered to the U.S.
Government customer. Under an option period award starting in July
2017, to that original contract, the Company has worked to develop
new recombinant silks.
Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 —
Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under ASC 606, the Company
recognizes revenue from the commercial sales of products, licensing
agreements and contracts by applying the following steps: (1)
identify the contract with a customer; (2) identify the performance
obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price;
(4) allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation
in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when each performance
obligation is satisfied. For the comparative periods, revenue has
not been adjusted and continues to be reported under ASC 605
— Revenue Recognition. Under ASC 605, revenue is recognized
when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists;(2) the performance of service has been rendered
to a customer or delivery has occurred; (3) the amount of fee to be
paid by a customer is fixed and determinable; and (4) the
collectability of the fee is reasonably
assured.
For the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company
recognized $401,620 and $0 respectively in revenue from the
Government contract. These revenues were generated for work
performed in the development and production of the Company’s
recombinant silks under the base and option period phases of our
ongoing contract with the US Army.
On July 24, 2017, the Company signed a
contract option extension with the US Army to research and deliver
recombinant spider silk fibers and threads. This contract option
increased the total contract award by an additional $921,130 to a
total of $1,021,092 and added 12 months to the contract duration.
This effort was scheduled to end on September 24, 2018, but the
Company requested an extension of this contract option period
through April 2019 to complete the work. The Company has been
in communication with the contracting office and is working with
them as they determine the best path forward. Management
believes there is a possibility of securing a follow-up contract to
complete the delivery of all materials for the contract. The
Company is also continuing to pursue additional contract
opportunities with the Department of Defense, Department of Energy
and other governmental agencies.
(M)
Concentration of Credit Risk
The Company at times has cash in banks in excess of FDIC insurance
limits. At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had
approximately $0 and $0, respectively in excess of FDIC insurance
limits.
At December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had a
concentration of accounts receivable of:
Customer
|
December
31, 2018
|
December
31, 2017
|
Customer
A
|
-
|
100%
|
Customer
A
|
$-
|
$25,872
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had a
concentration of sales of:
Customer
|
December
31, 2018
|
September
30, 2017
|
Customer
A
|
100%
|
0%
|
Customer
A
|
$401,620
|
$--
|
For the
year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company booked $0 and $0
for doubtful accounts.
24
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
NOTE 2 GOING CONCERN
As
reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has
a working capital deficiency of $4,510,051 and stockholders’
deficiency of $4,459,223 and used $235,005 of cash in operations
for year ended December 31, 2018. This raises
substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a
going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise
additional capital and implement its business plan. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be
necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going
concern.
Management
believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional
funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity
for the Company to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 3 EQUIPMENT
At
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, property and equipment,
net, is as follows:
|
As
of December 31, 2018
|
December
31, 2017
|
Automobile
|
$41,805
|
$41,805
|
Laboratory Equipment
|
73,194
|
61,746
|
Office Equipment
|
7,260
|
7,260
|
Leasehold
Improvements
|
7,938
|
7,938
|
Less: Accumulated
Depreciation
|
(82,887)
|
(56,255)
|
Total Property and Equipment,
net
|
$47,310
|
$62,494
|
Depreciation
expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $26,632
and $20,291 respectively.
NOTE 4 ACRRUED INTEREST – RELATED
PARTY
On June
6, 2016, the Company received $50,000 from a principal
stockholder. Subsequently on December 1, 2017, the Company
received an additional $30,000 from a principal stockholder. On
January 8, 2018 and March 31, 2018 the Company received an
additional $100,000 and $15,000, respectively. On April 26,
2018, the Company received $20,000 from a principal stockholder,
$15,000 on June 21, 2018, $15,000 on June 29, 2018, $26,000 on
October 1, 2018, $11,000 on October 12, 2018 and $20,000 on October
21, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears an
interest at 3%, is unsecured, and due on demand. Total loan payable
to principal stockholder for as of December 31, 2018 is $322,000.
Pursuant to the terms of the loans, the advances bear an interest
at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand. During the year ended
December 31, 2018 the Company recorded $11,909 as an in-kind
contribution of interest related to the loan and recorded accrued
interest payable of $7,071. During the year ended December
31, 2017, the Company recorded accrued interest payable of $1,621
and $2,623 as an in-kind contribution of interest related to the
loan.
NOTE 5 STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
(A) Common Stock Issued
for Cash
On
January 25, 2017, the Company issued 2,678,571 share of common
stock for $150,000 ($0.056/share).
On
April 6, 2017, the Company issued 2,083,333 share of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.05/share).
On
June 12, 2017, the Company issued 2,268,603 shares of common stock
for $100,000 ($0.044/share)
On June
15, 2017, the Company issued 2,136,752 shares of common stock for
$100,000 ($0.047/share)
(B) Common Stock Issued for Services
Shares
issued for services as mentioned below were valued at the closing
price of the stock on the date of grant.
On
December 30, 2016, the Company recorded 3,906,322 issuable shares
with a fair value of $224,904 ($0.0575/share) to two consultants
for services rendered. Those shares were issued on January 23,
2017.
On
January 25, 2017, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock
previously recorded as common stock issuable for the year end
December 31, 2016 (See Note 6 (C)).
25
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
On
April 6, 2018, the Company issued 36,000 shares with a fair value
of $1,076 ($0.0299/share) to a consultant as consideration for
consulting fees owed from October 1, 2014 through December 31, 2018
of $21,000. The issuance of shares resulted in gain on settlement
of accounts payable of $19,924 (See Note 6(B)).
(C)
Common Stock Warrants
On
January 1, 2016, the Company issued 3-year warrant to purchase
6,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.001 per share to a related
party for services to be rendered. The warrants had a fair value of
$142,526, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the
date of grant and vested on February 20, 2017, and became
exercisable commencing on February 20, 2018, and for a period
expiring on February 20, 2021. During the year ended December 31,
2016, the Company recorded $17,473 as an expense for warrants
issued to related party.
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
78.58%
|
Expected
term
|
3
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.32%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On July
26, 2016, the Company issued 4-year warrant to purchase 10,000,000
shares of common stock at $0.001 per share to a consultant for
services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $365,157, based
upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant
and are fully vested on the date granted. Warrants became
exercisable on July 26, 2018, and for a period of 4 years expiring
on July 26, 2022. During the years ended December 31, 2016, the
Company recorded $365,157 as an expense for such warrants
issued.
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
93.6%
|
Expected
term
|
4
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.01%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On July
26, 2016, the Company issued 4-year warrant to purchase 8,000,000
shares of common stock at a price of $0.001 per share to a
consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of
$292,126, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the
date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Warrants
became exercisable on July 26, 2018, and for a period of 4 years
expiring on July 26, 2022. During the years ended December 31,
2016, the Company recorded $292,126 as an expense for such warrants
issued.
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
93.60%
|
Expected
term
|
4
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.01%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On
October 2, 2016, the Company issued 2-year warrant to purchase
2,300,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.04 per
share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $68,686, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date
granted. Warrants will become exercisable on August 25, 2019, and
for a period of 2 years expiring on August 25, 2021. During the
year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $68,686 as an
expense for such warrants issued (See Note 6(C)).
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
107.51%
|
Expected
term
|
2
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
0.82%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
26
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
On
December 8, 2016, the Company issued 4-year warrant to purchase
15,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001
per share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $630,259, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date
granted. Warrants became exercisable on June 12, 2017, and for a
period of 2 years expiring on December 8, 2019. During the years
ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $630,259 as an
expense for warrants.
On
December 30, 2016, the Company recorded stock issuable of 1,953,161
shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 1,500,000
warrants. The shares were subsequently issued on January 23,
2017.
On
December 30, 2016, the Company recorded stock issuable of 1,953,161
shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 1,500,000
warrants. The shares were subsequently issued on January 23,
2017.
On
February 6, 2017, the Company issued 4-year warrant to purchase
750,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.03 per
share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $44,421, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on March 6, 2018 as
long as the employee remains as full time. Warrants will be
exercisable on October 6, 2019, and for a period of 3 years
expiring on October 6, 2022. During the year ended December 31,
2017, the Company recorded $5,161 as an expense for warrants
issued. On May 2, 2017, the Company cancelled a 750,000 share
warrant with a consultant as the consultant was terminated and the
option expense was recaptured by the Company.
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
106.40%
|
Expected
term
|
3
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.43%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On June
26, 2017, the Company issued 2-year warrant to purchase 15,000,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share to
a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value
of $848,011, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on
the date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted.
Warrants became exercisable on December 26, 2017, and for a period
of 2 years expiring on June 26, 2019. During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company recorded 848,011 as an expense for
warrants issued.
On July
14, 2017 the Company granted 14,745,203 shares in connection with
the cashless exercise of the 15,000,000 warrants. (See Note 6
(C)).
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
106.57%
|
Expected
term
|
2
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.15%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On
December 27, 2017, the Company issued of 14,651,162 shares in
connection with the cashless exercise of the 15,000,000 warrants.
The shares were issued on December 29, 2017. (See Note 6
(C)).
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
102.65%
|
Expected
term
|
2
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
1.38%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On
February 9, 2018, the Company issued 3-year warrant to purchase
3,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.056 per
share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $52,660, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date
granted. Warrants will be exercisable on August 9, 2019, and
for a period of 2 years expiring on August 9, 2021. During the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded 52,660 as an expense
for warrants issued.
27
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
96.95%
|
Expected
term
|
3
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
2.26%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
On
March 20, 2018, the Company issued 4-year warrant to purchase
600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per
share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $19,915, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on March 20,
2018. Warrants will be exercisable on March 20, 2019, and for
a period of 3 years expiring on March 20, 2022. During the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $19,915 as an expense
for warrants issued.
Expected
dividends
|
0%
|
Expected
volatility
|
97.56%
|
Expected
term
|
4
years
|
Risk free
interest rate
|
2.65%
|
Expected
forfeitures
|
0%
|
|
Number
of
Warrants
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)
|
Balance, December
31, 2017
|
32,800,000
|
|
3.0
|
Granted
|
3,600,000
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
|
Cancelled/Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|
Balance, December
31, 2018
|
36,400,000
|
|
2.9
|
Intrinsic
Value
|
$1,783,600
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the following warrants were
outstanding:
Exercise
Price Warrants Outstanding
|
Warrants Exercisable
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual
Life
|
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
$0.001
|
31,100,000
|
2.9
|
$1,523,900
|
$0.056
|
3,000,000
|
2.6
|
$147,000
|
$0.04
|
2,300,000
|
2.7
|
$112,700
|
For the year ended December 31, 2017 the following warrants were
outstanding:
Exercise Price Warrants Outstanding
|
Warrants Exercisable
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual
Life
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
$0.001
|
30,500,000
|
2.5
|
$2,639,000
|
$0.04
|
2,300,000
|
3.1
|
$133,400
|
28
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
(D) Amendment
to Articles of Incorporation
On
February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of
incorporation to amend the number and class of shares the Company
is authorized to issue as follows:
●
|
Common
stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
●
|
Common
stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
●
|
Preferred
stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par
value
|
Effective
December 17, 2013, the Company amended its articles of
incorporation to designate a Series A no par value preferred
stock. Two shares of Series A Preferred stock have been
authorized.
NOTE 6 COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
On
November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement
with its CEO, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31,
2015. The term of the agreement is a five year period at
an annual salary of $210,000. There is a 6% annual
increase. For the year ending December 31,
2015, the annual salary was $281,027. The employee is
also to receive a 20% bonus based on the annual based
salary. Any stock, stock options bonuses have to be
approved by the board of directors. On January 1, 2016 the
agreement was renewed with the same terms for another 5 years with
an annual salary of $297,889 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
On January 1, 2017 the agreement renewed with the same terms for
another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $315,764 for the year
ended December 31, 2017. On January 1, 2018 the agreement
renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an
annual salary of $334,708 for the year ended December 31, 2018. As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the accrued salary
balance is $2,109,454 and $1,707,804, respectively. (See Note
7).
On
October 2, 2014, the Company entered into a letter agreement for an
equity line of financing up to $7,500,000 (the
“Letter Agreement”) with Calm Seas Capital, LLC
(“Calm Seas”).
Under
the Letter Agreement, over a 24 month period from the effective
date of a registration statement covering shares issuable to Calm
Seas (the "Effective Date"), we may put to Calm Seas up to an
aggregate of $7,500,000 in shares of our Class A common stock for a
purchase price equal to 80% of the lowest price of our Class A
common stock during the five consecutive trading days immediately
following the date we deliver notice to Calm Seas of our election
to put shares pursuant to the Letter Agreement. We may
put shares bi-monthly. The dollar value that will be
permitted for each put pursuant to the Letter Agreement
will be the lesser of: (A) the product of (i) 200% of the average
daily volume in the US market of our Class A common stock for the
ten trading days prior to the date we deliver our put notice to
Calm Seas multiplied by (ii) the average of the daily closing
prices for the ten (10) trading days immediately preceding the date
we deliver our put notice to Calm Seas, or (B)
$100,000. We will automatically withdraw our put notice
to Calm Seas if the lowest closing bid price used to determine the
purchase price of the put shares is not at least equal to
seventy-five percent (75%) of the average closing “bid”
price for our Class A common stock for the ten (10) trading days
prior to the date we deliver our put notice to Calm Seas.
Notwithstanding the $100,000 ceiling for each bi-monthly put,
as described above, we may at any time request Calm Seas to
purchase shares in excess of such ceiling, either as a part of
bi-monthly puts or as an additional put(s) during such
month. If Calm Seas, in its sole discretion, accepts
such request to purchase additional shares, then we may include the
put for additional shares in our monthly put request or submit an
additional put for such additional shares in accordance with the
procedure set forth above.
The
Letter Agreement will terminate when any of the following events
occur:
●
|
Calm
Seas has purchased an aggregate of $7,500,000 of our Class A common
stock; or
|
●
|
The
second anniversary from the Effective Date.
|
As of December 31, 2018, 78,089,079 shares of class A common stock
were issued pursuant to the Letter Agreement and the Letter
Agreement was terminated passing the second anniversaryfrom
the Effective Date.
On January 20, 2015, the board of directors appointed Mr. Jonathan
R. Rice as our Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Rice’s employment
agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either
the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the employment
agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to an annual cash compensation of
$120,000, which includes salary, health insurance, 401K retirement
plan contributions, etc. The Company also agreed to reimburse Mr.
Rice for his past educational expenses of approximately $11,000. In
addition, Mr. Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase
2,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise
price of $0.001 per share (the “January 2015 Warrant”)
pursuant to the employment agreement. Additionally, on May 28,
2015, the Company issued a three-year warrant to purchase 3,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of
$0.001 per share (the "May 20165 Warrant") to Mr. Rice. The
2,000,000 share warrant fully vested on October 28, 2016. For the
year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded $121,448 for the
warrants issued to Mr. Rice. On January 14, 2016, the Company
signed a new employment agreement with Mr. Rice. The employment
agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either
the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the employment
agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to annual cash compensation of
$140,000, which includes salary, health insurance, 401K retirement
plan contributions, etc. In addition, Mr. Rice was issued a
three-year warrant to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock of
the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share pursuant to
the employment agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the
Company recorded $193,652 for the warrants issued to Mr. Rice in
2016. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded
$17,473 for the warrants issued to Mr. Rice in 2016. On January 9,
2018, the Company extended the expiration date of the January 2015
Warrant from January 19, 2018 to January 31, 2020 and on March 15,
2018, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment
agreement with its COO, extending the term to January 31,
2019. On March 25, 2019, the Company signed an extension of
its at-will employment agreement with its COO, extending the term
to January 1, 2020. As of December 31, 2018 the
Company owes $24,433 to Mr. Rice for payroll payable.
29
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
(A)License
Agreement
On May
8, 2006, the Company entered into a license
agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the
Company paid a non-refundable license fee of $10,000. The Company
will pay a license maintenance fee of $10,000 on the one year
anniversary of this agreement and each year
thereafter. The Company will pay an annual research fee
of $13,700 with first payment due January 2007, then on each
subsequent anniversary of the effective date commencing May 4,
2007. The annual research fees are accrued by the Company for
future payment. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company
may be required to pay additional fees aggregating up to a maximum
of $10,000 a year for patent maintenance and prosecution relating
to the licensed intellectual property.
On
October 28, 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement with
the University of Notre Dame. Under the agreement, the Company
received exclusive and non-exclusive rights to certain spider silk
technologies including commercial rights with the right to
sublicense such intellectual property. In consideration of the
licenses granted under the agreement, the Company agreed to issue
to the University of Notre Dame 2,200,000 shares of its common
stock and to pay a royalty of 2% of net sales. The license
agreement has a term of 20 years which can be extended on an annual
basis after that. It can be terminated by the University of Notre
Dame if the Company defaults on its obligations under the agreement
and fails to cure such default within 90 days of a written notice
by the university. The Company can terminate the agreement upon a
90 day written notice subject to payment of a termination fee of
$5,000 if the termination takes place within 2 years after its
effectiveness, $10,000 if the termination takes place within 4
years after its effectiveness and $20,000 if the Agreement is
terminated after 4 years. On May 5, 2017 the Company signed
an addendum to that agreement relating to tangible property and
project intellectual property.
(B) Royalty and Research Agreements
On May
1, 2008 the Company entered into a five year consulting agreement
for research and development. Pursuant to the terms of the
agreement, the Company will be required to pay $1,000 per month, or
at the Company’s option, the consulting fee may be paid in
the form of Company common stock based upon the greater of $0.05
per share or the average of the closing price of the
Company’s shares over the five days preceding such stock
issuance. On April 6, 2018, the Company issued 36,000 shares
with a fair value of $1,076 ($0.0299/share) to a consultant as
consideration for consulting fees owed from October 1, 2014 through
December 31, 2018 of $21,000. The issuance of shares resulted in
gain on settlement of accounts payable of $19,924. On April 1,
2018, the Company ended the consulting agreement and no additional
compensation will be issued. (See Note 5
(B)).
On
December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the
intellectual property transfer agreement with Mr. Thompson, its
CEO. In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards
Codification No 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,
the Company determined that the present value of the payment of
$120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007. As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the outstanding
balance is $65,292. As of December 31, 2017, the Company recorded
interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $2,623. In
2018 the Company recorded $1,960 in interest expensed and relted
accrued interest payable. As of December 31, 2018 the Company
recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of
$4,583.
On June
6, 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement for
intellectual property and collaborative research and development
with The University of Notre Dame. On March 4, 2015,
the Company entered into a new collaborative research agreements
(“2015 Notre Dame Research
Agreement”)
extending the duration of the agreement through March 2016; in
February 2016 the agreement was extended to July 31,
2016. Under the agreement the Company will provide
approximately $534,000 in financial support. In May 2017
this agreement was amended to increase the total funding by
approximately $189,000 and the duration of this agreement was
extended to September 30, 2017. The Company did not extend the
agreement after September 30, 2017. As of December 31, 2018 no new
agreement has been signed.
On
December 30, 2015, the Company entered into a cooperative agreement
for the research and pilot production of hybrid silkworms in
Vietnam. Under this agreement, the Company will establish a
subsidiary in Vietnam where it will develop and produce hybrid
silkworms. On April 24, 2018, the Company announced that it had
received its investment registration certificate for its new
Vietnamese subsidiary Prodigy Textiles Co,. Ltd. On May 1,
2018, the Company announced that it had received its enterprise
registration certificate for its new Vietnamese subsidiary Prodigy
Textiles Co,. Ltd
(C) Consulting Agreement
On
August 25, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with a
consultant to provide consulting services in helping the Company
expand its operations. The agreement commenced on August 25, 2016
and will continue for 18 months. On January 24, 2017, the
Company agreed to continue the agreement and agreed to advance
$10,000 for costs and expenses incurred.
On
December 4, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with a
consultant to provide investor relations services. The agreement
commenced on December 4, 2016 and will continue for twelve months.
As consideration for the services performed, the Company will issue
750,000 shares with a fair value of $32,850 ($0.0321/share) to this
consultant. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company
recorded 750,000 as common stock issuable. Shares were subsequently
issued on January 25, 2017 (See Note 5).
30
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
On June
26, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant
to provide investor relations services for nine
months. As consideration for the services performed, the
Company agrees to issue a 2-year warrant to purchase 15,000,000
shares of common stock at a price of $0.001 per share with a
cashless exercise provision. On June 26, 2016, the company issued
such warrant with a fair value of $848,011. On December 27, 2017,
the Company issued of 14,651,162 shares in connection with the
cashless exercise of the 15,000,000 warrants. The shares were
issued on December 29, 2017. (See Note 5 (C)).
On
February 9, 2018, the Company issued a 3-year warrant to purchase
3,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.056 per
share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $52,660, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date
granted. Warrants will be exercisable on August 9, 2019, and
for a period of 2 years expiring on August 9, 2021. During the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded 52,660 as an expense
for warrants issued (See Note 5 (C)).
On
February 20, 2018, the Company signed an agreement with a
consultant to provide services. Under this agreement the
consultant will receive a warrant for 600,000 shares of common
stock and may be awarded additional warrants for up to 3,000,000
shares of common stock if performance metrics are achieved. On
March 20, 2018, the Company issued a 4-year warrant to purchase
600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per
share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a
fair value of $19,915, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model on the date of grant and are fully vested on March 20,
2018. Warrants will be exercisable on March 20, 2019, and for
a period of 3 years expiring on March 20, 2022. During the year
ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $19,915 as an expense
for warrants issued (See Note 5 (C)).
(D) Operating Lease Agreements
Starting
in February of 2015, we rent additional office space in East
Lansing, Michigan. In July 2015, the Company signed a
new lease for its East Lansing, Michigan office space. On February
1, 2016 the Company signed a six (6) month lease extension for its
East Lansing office. In July 2016 the Company signed a twelve (12)
month lease extension for its East Lansing office. The Company pays
an annual rent of $5,187 for office space, conference facilities,
mail, fax, and reception services. In July 2017 the Company signed
a twelve (12) month lease extension for its East Lansing office.
The Company pays an annual rent of $4,804.68 for office space,
conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception services. In
October 2017 the Company ended this lease.
Since
September of 2015, we rent office space at 2723 South State Street,
Suite 150, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, which is our principal place
of business. We pay an annual rent of $2,508 for conference
facilities, mail, fax, and reception services located at our
principal place of business.
On June
29, 2016 the Company signed a twelve (12) month lease for new
office space in Vietnam. The Company pays an annual rent of $2,329
for office space and reception services. The company ended this
lease on June 29, 2017.
On
July 19, 2016 the Company signed a month to month lease for a
production facility in Indiana. The Company pays a monthly rent of
$670 for office space light industrial manufacturing space. In
November 2017 the Company ended this lease.
Rent
expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $41,885
and $19,880, respectively.
On
January 23, 2017 the Company signed an 8 year property lease with
the Company’s President for land in Texas where the Company
grows its mulberry. The Company pays a monthly rent of $960. Rent
expense – related party for the year ended December 31, 2018
and 2017, was $11,520 and $7,680, respectively (See Note
7).
On
September 13, 2017, the Company signed a new two year lease
commencing on October 1, 2017 and ending on September 30, 2019. The
Company pays an annual rent of $39,200 for the year one of lease
and $42,000 for the year two of lease for office and manufacturing
space. For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company paid
$41,885. For the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company paid
$9,800 for office and manufacturing space.
NOTE 7 RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On
December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the
intellectual property transfer agreement with Mr. Thompson, its
CEO. Pursuant to the addendum, the Company agreed to issue
either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no
dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of
preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to
terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give
title to the exclusive license for the non-protective apparel use
of the intellectual property to the Company. On the date
of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock
authorized with the required preferences. In accordance with
FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,
the Company determined that the present value of the payment of
$120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, one year anniversary of
the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such
time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred
shares authorized. As of December 31, 2017 the
outstanding balance is $65,292. Additionally, the
accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year. As
of December 31, 2018, the Company recorded interest expense and
related accrued interest payable of $4,593.
31
Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017
On
November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an employment
agreement, with its CEO, effective January 1, 2011 through the
December 31, 2015. Subsequently, on January 1, 2018 the agreement
renewed with the same terms for another 5 years with an annual
salary of $334,708 for the year ended December 31, 2018. As
of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the accrued salary
balance is $2,109,454 and $1,707,804, respectively.
On
January 14, 2016 the Company signed a new employment agreement with
Mr. Rice, the Company's COO. The employment agreement has a term of
one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at
any time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to
annual cash compensation of $140,000, which includes salary, health
insurance, 401K retirement plan contributions, etc. In addition,
Mr. Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase 6,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of
$0.001 per share pursuant to the employment agreement. For the year
ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded $193,654 for the
warrants issued to Mr Rice. For the year ended December 31, 2017
the Company recorded $17,473 for the warrants issued to Mr. Rice in
2016. On January 9, 2018, the Company extended the expiration date
of a warrant for 2,000,000 shares of common stock from January 19,
2018 to January 31, 2020 for an employee. Additionally, on March
15, 2018, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment
agreement with its COO.
On
January 1, 2016, the Company issued 3-year warrant for 6,000,000
shares to a related party, with an exercise price of $0.001 per
share. The warrants were granted for services to be rendered. The
warrants had a fair value of $142,526, based upon the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant and vesting on February
20, 2017, and will be exercisable on February 20, 2018, and for a
period expiring on February 20, 2021. During the year ended
December 31, 2017, the Company recorded $17,473 as an expense for
warrants issued to related party.
On June
6, 2016, the Company received $50,000 from a principal
stockholder. Subsequently on December 1, 2017, the Company
received an additional $30,000 from a principal stockholder. On
January 8, 2018 and March 31, 2018 the Company received an
additional $100,000 and $15,000, respectively. On April 26,
2018, the Company received $20,000 from a principal stockholder,
$15,000 on June 21, 2018, $15,000 on June 29, 2018, $26,000 on
October 1, 2018, $11,000 on October 12, 2018 and $20,000 on October
21, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears an
interest at 3%, is unsecured, and due on demand. Total loan payable
to principal stockholder for as of December 31, 2018 is $322,000.
Pursuant to the terms of the loans, the advances bear an interest
at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand. During the year ended
December 31, 2018 the Company recorded $11,909 as an in-kind
contribution of interest related to the loan and recorded accrued
interest payable of $7,071. During the year ended December
31, 2017, the Company recorded accrued interest payable of $1,621
and $2,623 as an in-kind contribution of interest related to the
loan.
On
August 4, 2016 the Company issued a bonus of $20,000 payable to Mr.
Rice if he remains employed with the Company through March 30,
2018.
On
January 23, 2017 the Company signed an 8 year property lease with
the Company’s President for land in Texas. The Company pays
$960 per month starting on February 1, 2017 and uses this facility
to grow mulberry for its U.S. silk operations. Rent expense –
related party for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $7,680 and
$4,800, respectively.
As of
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there was $247,652 and
$184,439, respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses - related party, which is owed to the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operations
Officer.
As
of December 31, 2018 there was $940,158 of accrued interest-
related party and $28,135 in shareholder loan interest –
related party included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
– related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief
Executive officer.
As of
December 31, 2017 there was $732,147 of accrued interest- related
party and $19,111 in shareholder loan interest – related
party included in accounts payable and accrued expenses –
related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief Executive
officer.
As of
December 31, 2018, the Company owes $2,109,454 in accrued salary to
principal stockholder, $24,433 to the Company’s COO, and
$7,640 to its office employees.
As of
December 31, 2017, the Company owes $1,707,804 in accrued salary to
principal stockholder, $23,354 to the Company’s COO, and
$3,554 to its office employees.
The
Company owes $65,292 in royalty payable to related party as of
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
32
NOTE 8 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The
Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to December 31, 2018
through the date these financial statements were issued, and has
determined that, other than disclosed below, it does not have any
material subsequent events to disclose.
On March 9, 2019, the Company entered into a purchase agreement
with one investor (the “Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant
to the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued the investor
14,797,278 Units at a purchase price of $0.06758 per Unit, for
total gross proceeds to the Company of $1,000,000. The Units
consist of 14,797,278 shares of the Company’s Class A Common
Stock (the “Common Stock”) and two warrants (the
“Warrants”): (i) one warrant entitles the investor to
purchase up to 14,797,278 shares of Common Stock at an exercise
price of $0.06 per share (the “6 Cent Warrants”)
and (ii) one warrant entitles the investor to purchase up to
7,398,639 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.08 per
share (the “8 Cent Warrant”). The Warrants shall be
exercisable at any time from the issuance date until the following
expiration dates:
● ½ of all $0.06 Warrants shares shall expire on March
8, 2021;
●½ of all $0.06 Warrants shall expire on March 8,
2022;
●½ of all $0.08 Warrants shall expire on March 8, 2022;
and,
●½ of all $0.08 Warrants shall expire on March 8,
2023.
The
securities sold in the private placement were issued in reliance on
an exemption from registration under Regulation S of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Regulation S”).
The bases for the availability of this exemption include the facts
that the sales of the securities were made to a non-U.S. person (as
defined under Rule 902 section (k)(2)(i) of Regulation S), pursuant to an
offshore transaction, and no directed selling efforts were made in
the United States by the issuer, a distributor, any of their
respective affiliates, or any person acting on behalf of any of the
foregoing.
On
March 20, 2019, the Company issued 4,052,652 shares of its class A
common stock as payment for $243,159 of certain debt owed to the
University of Notre Dame.
33
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Pursuant
to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(“Exchange
Act”), the Company
carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the
Company’s management,
including the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer
(“CFO”) (the Company’s principal financial and accounting
officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the
end of the period covered by this Report. Based upon that
evaluation, the Company’s
CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
are not effective as of the end of the period covered by this
Report, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the
Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported,
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to the
Company’s management,
including the Company’s
CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting.
Our
Chief Executive Officer, as the principal executive officer (chief
executive officer) and principal financial officer (chief financial
officer), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal
control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions
and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management
and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding
prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, our internal controls and procedures
may not prevent or detect misstatements. A control system, no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the
control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any,
have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may
deteriorate.
Our
management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2018. The framework used by management
in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the
document entitled “
Internal Control –
Integrated Framework”
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our management has
determined that as of December 31, 2018, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting was not effective for the purposes for which it is
intended based on the following material weaknesses:
–
|
Lack of internal audit function. During 2018, the Company, upon review
of the independent auditors, made some adjustments to its financial
statements, including, adjusting salary amounts and the related tax
accruals, correcting warrant expense for a warrant issued to a
related party, and adding the liability due to our attorney that
should have been recorded. Management believes that the
foregoing is due to the fact that the Company lacks qualified
resources to perform the internal audit functions properly and that
the scope and effectiveness of the internal audit function are yet
to be developed. Specifically, the reporting mechanism between the
accounting department and the Board of Directors and the CEO was
not effective, therefore resulting in the delay of recording and
reporting.
|
|
|
–
|
No Segregation of Duties Ineffective controls over financial
reporting: As of December 31, 2018, we had no full-time
employees with the requisite expertise in the key functional areas
of finance and accounting. As a result, there is a lack of proper
segregation of duties necessary to insure that all transactions are
accounted for accurately and in a timely manner.
|
|
|
–
|
Lack of a functioning audit committee: Due to a lack of a
majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside
directors on our board of directors, and no audit committee has
been elected, the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of
required internal controls and procedures is
inadequate.
|
|
|
–
|
Written Policies & Procedures: Due to lack of written
policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting, the
Company did not establish a formal process to close our books
monthly and account for all transactions.
|
|
|
–
|
Lack
of controls over related party transactions: As of
December 31, 2018, the Company did not establish a formal written
policy for the approval, identification and authorization of
related party transactions.
|
34
We are
developing a plan to ensure that all information will be recorded,
processed, summarized and reported accurately, and as of the date
of this report, we have hired a payroll service firm to manage all
payroll functions including tax withholdings. We will take the
following steps to address the above-referenced material weaknesses
in our internal control over financial reporting:
1.
|
We will
continue to educate our management personnel to increase its
ability to comply with the disclosure requirements and financial
reporting controls; and
|
2.
|
We will
increase management oversight of accounting and reporting functions
in the future; and
|
3.
|
As soon
as we can raise sufficient capital or our operations generate
sufficient cash flow, we will hire personnel to handle our
accounting and reporting functions.
|
While
the first two steps of our remediation process are ongoing, we do
not expect to remediate the weaknesses in our internal controls
over financial reporting until the time when we start to
commercialize a recombinant fiber (and, therefore, may have
sufficient cash flow for hiring personnel to handle our accounting
and reporting functions).
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the
Company’s registered
public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial
reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by
the Company's registered public accounting firm because as a
smaller reporting company we are not subject to Section 404(b) of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No
change in our system of internal control over financial reporting
occurred during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2018 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL
PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT
Our
executive officers and sole director as of the date of this report
are as follows:
NAME
|
AGE
|
POSITION
|
DATE APPOINTED
|
Kim
Thompson
|
57
|
President, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Director
|
April 25,
2006
|
Jonathan R.
Rice
|
39
|
Chief Operating
Officer
|
January 20,
2015
|
The
following summarizes the occupation and business experience during
the past five years for our officers and sole
director.
KIM THOMPSON
Mr.
Thompson was a founder of the California law firm of Ching &
Thompson which was founded in 1997 where he focused primarily on
commercial litigation. He has been a partner in the Illinois law
firm of McJessy, Ching & Thompson since 2004 where he also
emphasizes commercial and civil rights litigation. Mr. Thompson
received his bachelor’s
degree in applied economics from James Madison College, Michigan
State University, and his Juris Doctorate from the University of
Michigan. He is the named inventor or co-inventor on a number of
provisional patent applications including inventions relating to
biotechnology and mechanics. Mr. Thompson is the inventor of the
technology concept that lead to the forming of the Company. We
believe that Mr. Thompson is well suited to serve as our director
because of his knowledge of biotechnology, legal expertise and
background in economics.
JONANTHAN R. RICE
Jonathan
R. Rice had worked at Ultra Electronics, Adaptive Materials Inc., a
Michigan company (“UEA”) since 2002. At UEA, he worked as
the Director of Advanced Technologies, where he was responsible for
new products development and commercialization. He was also the
Corporate Facility Security Officer for UEA since 2006, where Mr.
Rice ensured UEA’s
compliance with federal regulations under the National Industrial
Security Program Operating Manual and completed its annual security
audit. During 2004 through 2007 while working as an Engineering
Manager at UEA, Mr. Rice, among other things, led the design and
development of multiple fuel cell and power management systems,
established a team to identify and eliminate production and
performance limitation, authored technical progress and final
reports for customers and provided training to military personnel
on use of fuel cell systems. From 2002 through 2005, Mr. Rice had
also served as UEA’s
Production Manager in charge of developing manufacturing process
and techniques and sourcing the production equipment for
UEA’s products. Mr. Rice
graduated from Michigan Technological University in 2002 with a
degree of Bachelors of Science Chemical Engineering. Mr. Rice
received his Masters of Business Administration at Michigan State
University in 2016.
35
Term of Office
Our
directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until
the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until
removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are
appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed
by the board. Mr. Thompson is employed as the CEO and CFO of the
company pursuant to a five year employment contract.
Our
sole director was appointed for a one-year term to hold office
until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until
removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are
appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed
by the board.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
To the
best of the Company’s knowledge, none of the following events
occurred during the past ten years that are material to an
evaluation of the ability or integrity of any of our executive
officers, directors or promoters:
(1) A
petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency
law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar
officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of
such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner
at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any
corporation or business association of which he was an executive
officer at or within two years before the time of such
filing;
(2)
Convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a
pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other
minor offenses);
(3)
Subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently
reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent
jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or
otherwise limiting, the following activities:
(i)
Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker,
commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker,
leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of
any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter,
broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person,
director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and
loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing
any conduct or practice in connection with such
activity;
(ii)
Engaging in any type of business practice; or
(iii)
Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of
any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of
Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities
laws;
(4)
Subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently
reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority
barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the
right of such person to engage in any activity described y such
activity;
(5)
Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by
the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities
law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the
Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or
vacated;
(6)
Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any
Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or
finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been
subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;
(7)
Subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or
administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not
subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged
violation of:
(i) Any
Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation;
or
(ii)
Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or
insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or
permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil
money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or
removal or prohibition order; or
(iii)
Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in
connection with any business entity; or
(8)
Subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently
reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization
(as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S. C
78c(a)(26)), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29)
of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any
equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has
disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with
a member.
36
Committees
Our
board of directors has not established any committees, including an
audit committee, a compensation committee, a nominating committee
or any committee performing a similar function. The functions of
those committees are being undertaken by our sole Board member.
Because we have only one director and do not have any independent
directors, the establishment of committees of the Board of
Directors would not provide any benefits to our company and could
be considered more form than substance. In addition, we do not have
an “audit committee
financial expert,” because our
sole director does not qualify as such within the applicable
definition of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Meetings of the Board of Directors
During
its fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the Board of Directors did
not meet on any occasion, but rather transacted business by
unanimous written consent.
Code of Ethics
The
Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. This Code of Ethics
was previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form
10-KSB on March 26, 2008 and has been included in this annual
report as Exhibit 14.1.
Corporate Governance
The
business and affairs of the Company are managed under our sole
board member. In addition to the contact information in this annual
report, each stockholder will be given specific information on how
he/she can direct communications to the officers and directors of
the Company at our annual stockholders meetings. All communications
from stockholders are relayed to the board of member.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
Our common stock is not registered pursuant to Section
12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).
Accordingly, our officers, directors, and principal stockholders
are not subject to the beneficial ownership reporting requirements
of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships by between or among the members
of the Board or other executive officers of the
Company.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The
following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation
awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officer
during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 in all capacities
for the accounts of our executive, including the Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO):
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and principal position
|
Year
|
Salary ($)
|
Bonus ($)
|
Stock Awards ($)
|
Option Awards ($)
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)
|
All Other Compensation ($)
|
Total ($)
|
Kim Thompson
President, CEO, CFO and Director
|
2018
|
$334,708
|
$66,942
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$55,934(1)
|
$457,584
|
2017
|
$315,764
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$47,140(2)
|
$362,902
|
|
Jonathan R. Rice
COO
|
2018
|
$126,477
|
$20,000(3)
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$15,808(4)
|
$162,285
|
|
2017
|
$124,834
|
$4,000
|
$0
|
$17,473
|
$0
|
$0
|
$16,970(5)
|
$163,277
|
37
(1)
|
In
2018, Kim Thompson received $48,565 in medical insurance and
medical reimbursement pursuant to an employment agreement entered
into with us. In 2018, Kim Thompson received $7,161 in
reimbursement for office and travel related expenses.
|
(2)
|
In
2017, Kim Thompson received $31,997 in medical insurance and
medical reimbursement pursuant to an employment agreement entered
into with us. In 2017, Kim Thompson received $15,143 in
reimbursement for office and travel related expenses.
|
(3)
|
In 2018, Jonathan Rice was owed a $20,000 bonus payable in March
2018, that bonus has not been paid.
|
(4)
|
In
2018, Jonathan Rice received $14,285 in medical insurance and
medical reimbursement, $1,523 in phone service expenses and travel
related, pursuant to an employment agreement entered into with
us. Mr
Rice was owed a $20,000 bonus payable in March 2018, that bonus has
not been paid.
|
(5)
|
In
2017, Jonathan Rice received $15,930 in medical insurance and
medical reimbursement, $1,040 in phone service expenses, pursuant
to an employment agreement entered into with us.
|
Employment Agreements
CEO
On
November 10, 2010, the Company entered into a five-year employment
agreement with the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, effective as of January 1, 2011. The agreement renews annually so
that at all times, the term of the agreement was five years. On
January 1, 2017 this agreement renewed. Pursuant to this agreement, the
Company will pay an annual base salary of $210,000 for the period
January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011. Base pay will be
increased each January 1st, for the subsequent twelve month periods
by six percent. The officer will also be entitled to life,
disability, health and dental insurance as well as an annual bonus
in an amount equal to 20% of the base salary. The agreement also
calls for the retention of the executive as a consultant following
the termination of employment with compensation during such
consultancy based upon the Company reaching certain
milestones:
a. Upon
the expiration or termination of this agreement for any reason, or
by either party, Company agrees that it will employ Executive as a
consultant for a period of four (4) years and at a rate of $4,500
per month.
b. In
the event that Company achieves gross sales of five million dollars
($5,000,000) or more, or one million dollars ($1,000,000) or more
in net income, in any year during the term of this agreement, or
upon the Company’s
achieving an average market capitalization over a 240 consecutive
calendar day period, in excess of $70,000,000 during the term of
this agreement, then the consulting period will be for five (5)
years and the consulting rate will be increased to $5,500 per
month.
c. In
the event that Company achieves gross sales of ten million dollars
($10,000,000) or more, or two million dollars ($2,000,000) or more
in net income, in any year during the term of this agreement, or
upon the Company’s
achieving an average market capitalization over a 240 consecutive
calendar day period, in excess of $90,000,000 during the term of
this agreement, then the consulting period will be for six (6)
years and the consulting rate will be increased to $7,500 per
month.
The
November 10, 2010 employment agreement replaced the prior agreement
dated April 26, 2006 and Mr. Thompson waved all warrants and
milestone based compensation to which he would have been entitled
under the April 26, 2006 agreement.
COO
On
January 20, 2015, the Company entered into an at-will employment
agreement with Mr. Jonathan R. Rice, its Chief Operating Officer
(the “COO Employment
Agreement”). The COO
Employment Agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated
by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the COO
Employment Agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to an annual cash
compensation of $120,000, which includes salary, health insurance,
401K retirement plan contributions, etc. The Company also agreed to
reimburse Mr. Rice for his past educational expenses of
approximately $11,000. In addition, on January 23, 2015, Mr. Rice
was issued a three-year warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of
common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per
share pursuant to the COO Employment Agreement and on May 28, 2015,
the Company issued a three-year warrant to purchase 3,000,000
shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of
$0.001 per share. The
3,000,000 share warrant fully vested on October 28,
2016. For the twelve
months ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded $121,448 for
the warrants issued to related party.
On
January 1, 2016, the Company entered into a new at-will employment
agreement with Mr. Rice (the “2016 COO Employment
Agreement”). The 2016 COO
Employment Agreement had a term of one year and can be terminated
by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the 2016 COO
Employment Agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to an annual cash
compensation of $140,000, which includes salary, health insurance,
401K retirement plan contributions, etc. In addition, on March 30,
2016, Mr. Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase
6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise
price of $0.001 per share pursuant to the 2016 COO Employment
Agreement. Additionally,
on August 4, 2016, the Company issued a performance retention bonus
to Mr. Rice of $20,000 which was payable on March 31,
2018. For the twelve
months ended December 31, 2016 the Company recorded $125,053 for
the warrants issued to related party.
The
Company extended the 2016 COO Employment Agreement to a term ending
on January 31, 2019. On March 25, 2019,
the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement
with its COO, extending the term to January 1, 2020.
The COO Employment Agreement can be terminated by either the
Company or Mr. Rice at any time. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $0 for the warrants issued
to related party.
On
January 9, 2018, the Company extended the expiration date of the
January 2015 Warrant from January 19, 2018 to January 31,
2020.
38
Compensation of Directors
Directors
are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for
their services as directors. The Board of Directors has the
authority to fix the compensation of directors. No amounts have
been paid to, or accrued to, directors in such
capacity.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The
following table provides the names and addresses of each person
known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common
stock as of the date of this report and by the officers and
directors, individually and as a group. Except as otherwise
indicated, all shares are owned directly.
Title of Class
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial
|
|
Percent of Class (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
Common Stock
|
Kim
Thompson
|
225,700,067
|
(2)
|
27.01%
|
|
2723
South State St Suite 150
|
|
|
|
|
Ann
Arbor, MI 48104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
Common Stock
|
Jonathan
R. Rice
|
11,000,000
|
(3)
|
1.32%
|
|
2723
South State St Suite 150
|
|
|
|
|
Ann
Arbor, MI 48104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
Common Stock
|
All
executive officers and directors as a group (2 Person)
|
236,700,067
|
|
28.33%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A Preferred Stock
|
Kim
Thompson
|
2
|
|
100%
|
|
2723
South State St Suite 150
|
|
|
|
|
Ann
Arbor, MI 48104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A Preferred Stock
|
All
executive officers and directors as a group (1 Person)
|
2
|
|
100%
|
_______________
(1) The
percent of class is based on 835,733,840
shares of our Class A common stock issued and outstanding as of the
date of this report.
(2)
Such shares include 225,700,065 shares of common stock that are
owned by Mr. Thompson and 2 shares of common stock that may be
issued upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock that are
owned by Mr. Thompson.
(3)
These shares represent shares of common stock that may be issued
upon exercise of warrants Mr. Rice owns.
Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans
None.
Change in Control
As of
the date of this report, there were no arrangements which may
result in a change in control of the Company.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION, AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer,
shareholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or
any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or
indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since January
1, 2018, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeds
the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total
assets at the year-end for the last two completed fiscal
years.
39
Related Party Transactions
On
December 19, 2013, the Company issued to the CEO two shares of
Series A Preferred Stock, with each share entitles the CEO to
200,000,000 votes on all matters. Each share of Series A
Preferred Stock is convertible into one share of common stock and
has the same right to normal dividends as a common share but has no
other right to distributions. Such shares of Series A Preferred
Stock was issued to the CEO in consideration for the
CEO’s agreement to extend
the Company’s repayment
of the debts owed to him to October 30, 2014 and to forgive $30,000
compensation that the Company owed to him. On March 25, 2015, with
agreement of the CEO not to request repayment before July 1, 2015,
the Company extended the repayment period to begin no sooner than
July 31, 2016. No changes
have been made to this agreement since July 1, 2015 and the Company
has not repaid this debt.
On
January 23, 2017, the Company signed an 8 year property lease with
the Company’s President
for land in Texas. The Company pays $960 per month starting on
February 1, 2017 and uses this facility to grow mulberry for its
U.S. silk operations.
As of
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company
owed $2,109,454 and
$1,707,804, respectively, in accrued salary and accrued payroll
taxes to an executive officer. As of December 31, 2018, no accrued
salary has been converted to Class A Common Stock.
As of
December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there was $247,652 and
$184,439, respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued
expenses - related party, which was owed to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Operations Officer.
As of
December 31, 2017, there was $732,147 of accrued interest- related
party and $19,111 in shareholder loan interest –related party included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses – related party, which was owed to
the Company’s Chief
Executive officer.
As of
December 31, 2018, there was $940,158 of accrued interest- related
party and $28,135 in shareholder loan interest –related party included in accounts
payable and accrued expenses – related party, which was owed to
the Company’s Chief
Executive officer.
The
Company owes $65,292 in royalty payable to related party for the
year ended December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
On June
6, 2016, the Company received $50,000 from a principal
stockholder. Subsequently on December 1, 2017, the Company
received an additional $30,000 from a principal stockholder. On
January 8, 2018 and March 31, 2018 the Company received an
additional $100,000 and $15,000, respectively. On April 26,
2018, the Company received $20,000 from a principal stockholder,
$15,000 on June 21, 2018, $15,000 on June 29, 2018, $26,000 on
October 1, 2018, $11,000 on October 12, 2018 and $20,000 on October
21, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the
advance bears an interest at 3%, is unsecured, and due on demand.
Total loan payable to principal stockholder for as of December 31,
2018 is $322,000. During the year ended December 31, 2018 the
Company recorded $11,909 as an in-kind contribution of interest
related to the loan and recorded accrued interest payable of
$7,071. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company
recorded accrued interest payable of $1,621 and $2,623 as an
in-kind contribution of interest related to the loan.
The
Company is currently not a subsidiary of any company.
Director Independence
We are
not subject to listing requirements of any national securities
exchange and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have
our board comprised of a majority of “independent Directors.” Mr. Kim Thompson, our Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and President, is our
sole director. Mr. Thompson does not qualify as independent
directors under Rule 10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and as defined under the rules and regulations of
NASDAQ.
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
2018
|
2017
|
Audit
Fees
|
$15,450
|
$17,900
|
Audit-Related
Fees
|
$-
|
-
|
Tax
Fees
|
$13,385
|
$27,352
|
All Other
Fees
|
$-
|
-
|
Total
|
$28,835
|
$45,252
|
Audit Fees
For the
Company’s fiscal years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we were billed approximately
$15,450 and $17,900 for professional services rendered for the
audit and review of our financial statements.
Audit Related Fees
There
were no fees for audit related services for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Tax Fees
For the
Company’s fiscal year
ended December 31, 2018, we were billed approximately $13,385 for
professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and
tax planning. For the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31,
2017, we were billed approximately $27,532 for professional
services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax
planning.
40
All Other Fees
The
Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered
by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017.
Effective
May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules
that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any
auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement
be:
●
|
approved
by our audit committee; or
|
●
|
entered
into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established
by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are
detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is
informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not
include delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to
management.
|
We do
not have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors
pre-approves all services provided by our independent
auditors.
The
pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the
new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records
of what percentages of the above fees were pre-approved. However,
all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by
the entire board of directors either before or after the respective
services were rendered.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a)
1.
|
The financial statements listed in the “Index to Financial
Statements” at page F-1
are filed as part of this report. The financial statements listed
in the “Index to
Financial Statements” at
page F-1 are filed as part of this report.
|
2.
|
Financial statement schedules are omitted
because they are not applicable or the required information is
shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
|
3.
|
Exhibits included or incorporated herein: see
index to Exhibits.
|
(b) Exhibits
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NUMBER
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation (1)
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Articles
of Amendment (3)
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Articles
of Amendment, filed with the Wyoming Secretary of State on November
15, 2013 (6)
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Articles
of Amendment, filed with the Wyoming Secretary of State on December
17, 2013 (7)
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
By-Laws (1)
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of
Warrant issued Mr. Jonathan R. Rice
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Employment
Agreement, dated November 10, 2010, by and between Kraig Biocraft
Laboratories, Inc. and Kim Thompson (8)
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Worth
Equity Fund, L.P. and Mutual Release (1)
|
10.3
|
|
Securities
Purchase Agreement between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and Lion
Equity (1)
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amended
Letter Agreement, dated September 14, 2009, by and between Kraig
Biocraft Laboratories and Calm Seas Capital, LLC (3)
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Exclusive
License Agreement, effective as of May 8, 2006, by and between The
University of Wyoming and Kraig Biocraft Laboratories,
Inc. (2)
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Addendum
to the Founder’s Stock
Purchase and Intellectual Property Transfer Agreement, dated
December 26, 2006, and the Founder’s Stock Purchase and Intellectual
Property Transfer Agreement dated April 26, 2006 (3)
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Intellectual
Property/Collaborative Research Agreement, dated March 20, 2010, by
and between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and The University of Notre
Dame du Lac. (2)
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Letter
Agreement, dated June 28, 2011, by and between Kraig Biocraft
Laboratories and Calm Seas Capital, LLC (4)
|
41
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Letter
Agreement, dated April 30, 2013, by and between Kraig Biocraft
Laboratories and Calm Seas Capital, LLC (5)
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Letter
Agreement, dated October 2, 2014, by and between Kraig Biocraft
Laboratories and Calm Seas Capital, LLC (10)
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
License
Agreement, dated October 28, 2011, between the Company and
University of Notre Dame du Lac. (12)
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Intellectual
Property / Collaborative Research Agreement, dated June 6, 2012,
between the Company and University of Notre Dame du
Lac. (12)
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
Collaborative
Yarn and Textile Development Agreement, dated September 30, 2013,
between the Company and Warwick Mills, Inc. (12)
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Employment
Agreement, dated January 19, 2015, between the Company and Mr.
Jonathan R. Rice (11)
|
|
|
|
10.15
|
|
Intellectual
Property and Collaborative Research Agreements, dated March 4,
2015, between the Company and University of Notre Dame du
Lac.
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics (13)
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries*
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Interactive
data files #
|
(1) Incorporated
by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Reg. No.
333-146316) filed with the SEC on September 26, 2007.
(2)
Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on April 15,
2010.
(3)
Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Reg. No. 333-162316) filed with the SEC on October 2,
2009.
(4)
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on June 29, 2011.
(5)
Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed with the SEC on May 15, 2013.
(6)
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on November 22, 2013.
(7)
Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on December 19, 2013.
(8)
Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Reg. No. 333-175936) filed with the SEC on August 1,
2011.
(9)
Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1
(Reg. No. 333-199820) filed with the SEC on November 3,
2014.
(10) Incorporated
by reference to our Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on
Form S-1/A (Reg. No. 333-199820) filed with the SEC on January 7,
2015.
(11) Incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on January 21, 2015.
(12) Incorporated
by reference to our Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on
Form S-1/A (Reg. No. 333-199820) filed with the SEC on January 30,
2015.
(13)
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC
on March 26, 2008.
* Filed
herewith
42
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual
Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Dated:
March 29, 2019
|
By:
|
/s/ Kim Thompson
|
|
|
|
Kim
Thompson
|
|
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
annual report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kim Thompson
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Sole
Director
|
|
March
29, 2019
|
Kim Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
INFORMATIONTO BE FURNISHED WITH
REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 15(d) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT
REGISTERED
SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT.
No
annual report or proxy material has been sent to our stockholders.
An annual report and proxy material may be sent to our stockholders
subsequent to the filing of this Form 10-K. We shall furnish to the
SEC copies of any annual report or proxy material that is sent to
our stockholders.
43