Annual Statements Open main menu

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc - Annual Report: 2020 (Form 10-K)

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2020

 

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Commission File No. 333-146316

 

KRAIG BIOCRAFT LABORATORIES, INC.

(Exact name of issuer as specified in its charter)

 

Wyoming   83-0459707

(State or Other Jurisdiction

of Incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

2723 South State St. Suite 150

Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

  (734) 619-8066
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Registrant’s Telephone Number)

 

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None.

 

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Class A Common Stock, no par value.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [  ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes [X] No [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer [  ] Accelerated filer [  ]
Non-accelerated filer [X] Smaller reporting company [X]
  Emerging growth company [  ]

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. [  ]

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [  ] No [X]

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2020 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $132,763,463. The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the last sale price ($0.206 price per share) of such common equity as of that date.

 

As of March 12, 2021, the registrant had 854,410,001 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

 

 

 

   
 

 

INTRODUCTORY NOTE

 

“Kraig”, “Kraig Biocraft” “KBLB”, “the Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, unless the context otherwise requires.

 

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

 

This report contains forward-looking statements and information that are based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us. Such statements should not be unduly relied upon. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts or that are not present facts or conditions. Forward-looking statements and information can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology or words, such as “anticipate,” “approximately,” “believe,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “ongoing,” “pending,” “perceive,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seeks,” “should,” “views” or similar words or phrases or variations thereon, or the negatives of those words or phrases, or statements that events, conditions or results “can,” “will,” “may,” “must,” “would,” “could” or “should” occur or be achieved and similar expressions in connection with any discussion, expectation or projection of future operating or financial performance, costs, regulations, events or trends. The absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking.

 

Forward-looking statements and information are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict. These statements reflect our current view concerning future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. There are important factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from those described in this report as anticipated, estimated or expected, as well as general conditions in the economy, petrochemicals industry and capital markets, Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regulations which affect trading in the securities of “penny stocks,” and other risks and uncertainties. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future. Depending on the market for our stock and other conditional tests, a specific safe harbor under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 may be available. Notwithstanding the above, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), expressly state that the safe harbor for forward-looking statements does not apply to companies that issue penny stock. Because we may from time to time be considered to be an issuer of penny stock, the safe harbor for forward-looking statements may not apply to us at certain times.

 

 2 
 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

    Page
PART I    
     
ITEM 1. BUSINESS 4
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 16
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 16
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 16
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 16
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES 17
     
PART II    
     
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY; RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES 17
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 20
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 20
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 27
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 28
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 52
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 52
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION 54
     
PART III    
     
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 54
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 56
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 60
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 61
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES 64
     
PART IV    
     
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS 65
     
SIGNATURES 67

 

 3 
 

 

PART I

 

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

 

Overview

 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, is a corporation organized to develop high strength fibers using recombinant DNA technology for commercial applications in technical textile. We use genetically engineered silkworms that produce spider silk to create our recombinant spider silk. Applications include performance apparel, workwear, filtration, luxury fashion, flexible composites, medical implants, and more. We believe that we have been a leader in the research and development of commercially scalable and cost effective spider silk for technical textile. Our primary proprietary fiber technology includes natural and engineered variants of spider silk produced in domesticated mulberry silkworms. Our business brings twenty-first century biotechnology to the historical silk industry, permitting us to introduce materials with innovative properties and claims into an established commercial ecosystem of silkworm rearing, silk spinning and weaving, and manufacture of garments and other products that can include our specialty fibers and textiles. Specialty fibers are engineered for specific uses that require exceptional strength, flexibility, heat resistance and/or chemical resistance. The specialty fiber market is exemplified by two synthetic fiber products that come from petroleum derivatives: (1) aramid fibers; and (2) ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers. The technical textile industry involves products for both industrial and consumer products, such as filtration fabrics, medical textiles (e.g., sutures and artificial ligaments), safety and protective clothing and fabrics used in military and aerospace applications (e.g., high-strength composite materials).

 

We are using genetic engineering technologies to develop fibers with greater strength, resiliency and flexibility for use in our target markets, namely the specialty fiber and technical textile industries. We believe that the genetically engineered protein-based fibers we seek to produce have properties that are in some ways superior to the materials currently available in the marketplace. Production of our product in commercial quantities holds what we believe to be potential life-saving ballistic resistant material, which we believe is lighter, thinner, more flexible, and tougher than steel. Other potential applications for spider silk based recombinant fibers include use as structural material and for any application in which light weight and high strength are required. We believe that fibers made with recombinant protein-based polymers will make significant inroads into the specialty fiber and technical textile markets.

 

Through our technologies, the introduction of the gene sequence based on those found in native spider silk, results in a germline transformation and is therefore self-perpetuating. This technology is in essence a protein expression platform which has other potential applications including diagnostics and pharmaceutical production. Moreover, our technologies are “green” inasmuch as our fibers and textiles do not require petroleum inputs and our production processes are traditional and eco-friendly.

 

The Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to our financial statements as of December 31, 2020 include an explanatory paragraph stating that our net loss from operations and net capital deficiency at December 31, 2020 raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

Corporate Information

 

Kraig was incorporated in Wyoming in 2006. Our principal executive offices are located at 2723 South State St. Suite 150, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104. Our website is located at www.kraiglabs.com and we make available, free of charge, on or through our website all of our periodic reports, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports with the SEC. Our website and the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference and is not a part of this Annual Report.

 

 4 
 

 

Recent Developments

 

In February, 2019, we signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding (“MOU”) with Polartec LLC for the development of products for the protective textile markets.

 

On April 16, 2020, the Company announced that it successfully developed a new technology platform, based on a non-CRISPR gene editing knock-in knock-out technology. This is the first knock-in knock-out technology essentially pure spider silk transgenic in the Company’s history. The new technology, which is the result of over ten years of effort, hits the target of one of the Company’s primary technological goals and potentially opens the door for large scale U.S. production. Other than the silkworm’s remaining specifically desired native silk protein elements, we are now able to produce nearly pure spider silk. Based on our internal studies, the new technology has a purity rate that is about ten times greater than Dragon Silk, a fiber that the Company developed with its previous tools. Dragon Silk has already demonstrated to be tougher than many fibers used in bullet proof vests and the Company expects that the increased spider silk purity, created using this new approach, will yield materials beyond those capabilities. This new system utilizes the Company’s eco-friendly and cost-effective silkworm production system, which we believe is significantly more advanced than any of the competing methods. We have already begun the validation process for the first of these new transgenics and anticipate that U.S. production will be possible as early as 2022 or 2023.

 

This does not affect our current work of overseeing our production facility to ramp up our production of Dragon SilkTM and Monster Silk®, as these fibers are designed to address their own markets.

 

In August 2019, we received authorization to begin rearing genetically enhanced silkworms at our production facility in Vietnam. We received our investment registration certificate for the facility in April 2018. In October 2019, the Company delivered the first batch of these silkworms and began operations. These silkworms will serve as the basis for the commercial expansion of our proprietary silk technology. On November 4, 2019, we reported that we had successfully completed rearing the first batch of its transgenic silkworms at the Quang Nam production factory. Seasonal challenges in late December 2019 slowed production operations and the restrictions imposed due to the global pandemic further delayed our operations in 2020 by about 4-6 months. However, we were able to resume production operations of our specialized silk in October 2020, once travel and work restrictions for COVID-19 were lifted. In January of 2021 we received the first shipment of silk from our factory in Vietnam. We believe that we will be able to target a capacity of 40 metric tons of our recombinant spider silk fiber per annum from this factory once it reaches maximum utilization. This capacity will allow us to address initial demand for our products and materials for various applications in the protective, performance, and luxury textile markets.

 

In light of the significant uncertainty regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 19, 2020, we furloughed non-essential staff consistent with leading health official recommendations in order to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. This decision was made in an abundance of caution and primarily impacted staff at our fully owned subsidiary, Prodigy Textiles, in Vietnam and resulted in the temporary closing of silk rearing operations at that facility. As of the date hereof, we have resumed silk production operations at the factory in Vietnam. The temporary suspension of rearing operations resulted in a delay of 4-6 months in the Company’s production expansion schedule. The Company supported its furloughed staff and paid their salaries through June 30, 2020. During the duration of the furlough, the Company CEO did not receive or accrue any salary. On July 1, 2020, furloughed staff returned to work preparing the factory in Vietnam to receive the next shipment of silkworm eggs. On October 24, 2020, silk production operations at the factory resumed and in January of 2021 the first production silk sample was completed. The global pandemic of COVID-19 continues to evolve rapidly, and we will continue to monitor the situation closely, including its potential effect on our plans and timelines.

 

Reverse Stock Split

 

At our 2019 annual stockholders meeting, our stockholders approved a reverse stock split of our issued and outstanding Common Stock by a ratio of not less than one-for-ten and not more than one-for-forty at any time prior to July 23, 2020, with the exact ratios to be set at a whole number within this range, as determined by our board of directors (the “Board”) in its sole discretion and approved and adopted the articles of amendment to our articles of incorporation to affect the same. Since we are still in the uplisting process with Nasdaq, but past July 23, 2020, such stockholder approval expired. However, on January 25, 2021, we obtained the written consent from a majority of our stockholders to effect the Reverse Stock Split before December 31, 2021, at a whole number within the range of not less than one-for-ten and not more than one-for-one hundred, and file articles of amendment to our articles of incorporation to affect same (the “Common Stock Written Consent”); the Board again retains sole discretion to determine the final ratio and timing to implement the Reverse Stock Split. As of the date of this Report, the Board has not yet effected the Reverse Stock Split.

 

 5 
 

 

Decrease in Series A Preferred Stock Voting Power

 

In line with the Reverse Stock Split, the sole holder of our Series A Preferred Stock, Mr. Thompson, who is also our CEO and sole director, approved, via written consent, to reduce the voting rights of the Series A preferred stock by the same ratio used for the Reverse Stock Split (the “Reduced Voting Power”), to be effective as of the date of the Reverse Stock Split. Mr. Thompson’s consent, together with the Common Stock Written Consent, provides the Board with the authority to amend our articles of incorporation to reflect the Reduced Voting Power. Following the Reduced Voting Power, we will no longer be considered a “Controlled Company,” which Nasdaq Stock Market Rules define as any company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the election of directors is held by an individual, a group or another company. As of the date of this Report, the Company has not filed the amendment to its articles of incorporation to effect the Reduced Voting Power.

 

The Product

 

Our products exploit the unique characteristics of spider silk, specifically dragline silk from Nephila clavipes (golden orb-web spider) and variants thereof. Such fibers possess unique mechanical properties in terms of strength, resilience and flexibility. Through the use of genetic engineering, we believe that we have produced a variety of unique transgenic silkworm strains that produce recombinant spider silk. Our recombinant spider silk fiber blends the silk proteins found in spider silk with the native silkworm silk proteins. This approach allows for the cost-effective and eco-responsible production of spider silk at commercial production levels.

 

Monster Silk®

 

Monster Silk® was the first recombinant spider silk fiber product we developed. Monster Silk incorporates the natural elasticity of spider silk to make a silk fiber which is more flexible that conventional silk fibers and textiles. We have produced sample products using Monster Silk® including knit fabrics, gloves, and shirts in collaboration with textile mills. We expect that Monster Silk® will have market applications across the traditional textile markets where its increased flexibility will provide increased durability and comfort.

 

Dragon SilkTM

 

Dragon SilkTM is the next evolution in recombinant spider silk, combining the elasticity of Monster Silk® with additional high strength elements of native spider silk. Some samples of Dragon SilkTM have demonstrated strength beyond that of native spider silk. This combination of strength and elasticity results in a silk fiber which is soft and flexible, yet tougher than leading synthetic fiber available on the market. Based on inquires we have received from end market leaders, we believe that Dragon SilkTM- will have applications in performance apparel, durable workwear, luxury goods and apparel, and composites.

 

 6 
 

 

Other Products

 

We are continuing to develop new recombinant silks and other protein-based fibers and materials using our genetic engineering capabilities. We recently unveiled our first knock in knock out spider silk material using our silkworm based production platform. These new spider silk fibers offer increased silk purity. Due to the biocompatible and biodegradable properties of silk, we expect that the new materials developed using this higher purity process will create opportunities for products in the medical industry, including sutures, grafts, and implants.

 

Our Technology

 

Our technology builds upon the unique advantages of the domesticated silkworm. The silkworm is an efficient commercial and industrial producer of protein based polymers, and forty percent (40%) of the caterpillars’ weight is devoted to the silk glands. The silk glands produce large amounts of an insoluble protein called fibroin, which the silkworm spins into a composite protein thread (silk).

 

We use our genetic engineering technology to create proprietary recombinant silk polymers from the silkworms. On September 29, 2010, we, along with our collaborators at Notre Dame created approximately twenty different strains of transgenic silkworm which produce recombinant silk polymers. In April 2011, we entered into a licensing agreement with Sigma-Aldrich which provides us the use of Sigma-Aldrich’s zinc finger technology to accelerate and enhance our product development. In October of 2017, with the support of funding from the U.S. Army, we transitioned our research operations out of Notre Dame and into our own research and development headquarters.

 

Our transgenic silkworms are created by inserting the genes expressing spider silk with either natural or engineered amino acid sequences into the embryos of the silkworm. The spider silk sequence is introduced to the embryo of the silkworm and incorporated into the silkworm genome using state of the art molecular biology approaches. The spider sequence is created on a circular loop of DNA called a plasmid. We developed a method to alter the plasmid DNA to more readily allow the mixing and matching of various spider DNA genes. In this way, we can combine different spider genetic cassettes to create a fiber with the desired physical and mechanical properties more rapidly than through conventional methods.

 

In addition to this ability to easily mix and match DNA construction, we have also adapted new approaches to accelerate the rate we generate new transgenic silkworms. Our initial approaches limited us to process silkworm eggs at a rate of roughly 50-200 a day, however, we have developed a new approach which allows us to process thousands of eggs a day. Utilizing both visual and non-visual genetic markers, we have successfully developed methods to speed up the screening of potentially transgenic silkworms, which allows for rapid screening of transgenic eggs. The eggs expressing the new spider silk constructs are propagated while the eggs without the visual marker are discarded, greatly increasing the efficiency of our screen for transgenic eggs. This new approach has been highly effective in increasing the rate of development for new transgenics. We have employed this new procedure and have filed provisional patent applications to protect its use.

 

We utilize the latest advancements in molecular biology and genetic engineering to deliver targeted gene incorporations. The new constructs are designed to integrate in the silkworm genome directly where the native silkworm silk is created. First made public in April 2020, this new capability allows for the full knock out and knock in replacement of the native silkworm heavy chain silk protein. We believe that this increased expression and incorporation of the spider protein into the silkworm cocoon leading to increased performance and open the door for additional opportunities beyond fibers and textiles.

 

 7 
 

 

Comparison of the Properties of Spider Silk and Steel

 

   Material Toughness (1)  Tensile Strength (2)  Weight (3)
Dragline spider silk     120,000-160,000      1,100-2,900      1.18-1.36   
Aramid Fibers     30,000-50,000      2,600-4,100    1.44 
Steel     2,000-6,000      300-2,000    7.84 

 

1 Measured by the energy required to break a continuous filament, expressed in joules per kilogram (J/kg). A .357 caliber bullet has approximately 925 joules of kinetic energy at impact.
2 Tensile strength refers to the greatest longitudinal stress the fiber can bear, measured by force over area in units of newtons per square meter. The measurement here is in millions of pascals.
3 In grams per cubic centimeter of material.

 

This comparison table was the result of research performed by Randolph Lewis, Ph.D. at the University of Wyoming. Such work was summarized in an article entitled “Spider Silk: Ancient Ideas for New Biomaterials” which was published in Chemicals Review, volume 106, issue 9, pages 3672–3774. The measurements in joules in the table above are a conversion from Dr. Lewis’ measurements in newtons/meter squared.

 

We believe that the genetically engineered protein-based fibers we currently produce have properties that are superior to the materials currently available in the marketplace, including but not limited to, aramid fibers, ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene, and steel. For example, as noted above, the ability of spider silk to absorb in excess of 100,000 joules of kinetic energy per kilogram makes it a potentially ideal material for structural blast protection.

 

Production of this material in commercial quantities holds the potential of a life-saving ballistic resistant material, which is lighter, thinner, more flexible, and tougher than steel. However, the Company does not currently have any life-saving ballistic products and could be some time before we are able to produce such a product from the material. Other applications for spider silk based recombinant fibers include use as structural material and for any application in which light weight and high strength are required. We believe that fibers made with recombinant protein-based polymers will make significant inroads into the specialty fiber and technical textile markets. Our interactions with manufacturers of high performance textiles, including Polartec and other leaders in performance textiles, convince us that there is an eager commercial market for our innovative, sustainable, and differentiated technology and products.

 

Manufacturing

 

Our spider silk technology is designed for easy plug and play incorporation into the existing silk production model. We manufacture and plan to continue to manufacture our proprietary spider silk fibers using traditional silkworm production practices (sericulture).

 

Over several years, we sought a license for an Enterprise Registration Certificate (“ERC”) in order to begin operations in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam, an important region for sericulture. In May 2018, we announced that we were granted an ERC, and thereafter formed a subsidiary, Prodigy Textiles, Co., Ltd. (“Prodigy Textiles”) to implement our Vietnam business. In June 2018, we announced that we had entered collaborative agreements with several silk farming cooperatives in Quang Nam Province, Vietnam, and that these cooperatives had begun planting mulberry, the key production input for our technology; in July 2018, we celebrated the grand opening of Prodigy Textiles’ facility in Quang Nam province. In December 2018, we made the first shipment of our specialized silkworm to Vietnam to conduct trial rearing and to demonstrate their safety. In October 2019, we delivered the first batch of production silkworms and began operations. These silkworms will serve as the basis for the commercial expansion of our proprietary silk technology. On November 4, 2019, we reported that we successfully completed rearing the first batch of its transgenic silkworms at the Quang Nam production factory. Seasonal challenges in late December 2019 slowed production operations and the restrictions imposed due to the global pandemic further delayed our operations in 2020 by about 4-6 months. However, we were able to resume production operations of our specialized silk in October 2020, once travel and work restrictions for COVID-19 were lifted. In January of 2021 we delivered the first production sample of silk from our factory in Vietnam. We believe that we will be able to target a capacity of 40 metric tons of our recombinant spider silk fiber per annum from this factory once it reaches maximum utilization. This capacity will allow us to address initial demand for our products and materials for various applications in the protective, performance, and luxury textile markets.

 

We contract local farmer and farming cooperatives to provide fresh mulberry for our operations. Prodigy Textiles has hired local workers with experience in sericulture production to care for and raise our silkworms through the five instars, or stages, of the silkworm life cycle, including the final instar when the mature caterpillars produce a cocoon comprised of pure silk. These cocoons are then reeled to our specifications to form the final recombinant spider silk threads such as Dragon SilkTM and Monster Silk®.

 

 8 
 

 

By utilizing existing production methodology in traditional silk regions to produce our high performance materials, we leverage historical knowledge, available labor and existing capital infrastructure for production, spinning, and weaving of our recombinant spider silk materials. This approach reduces the risk to our manufacturing operations and decreases our need for upfront capital expenditure.

 

We believe that we will be able to target a capacity of 40 metric tons of recombinant spider silk fiber per annum from this factory once it reaches maximum utilization. This capacity will allow us to address our anticipated initial demand for applications in the protective, performance, and luxury textile markets from Polartec and other companies with whom we have a relationship, but which we cannot disclose due to non-disclosure agreements.

 

Our long-term goal for Prodigy Textiles is to create a research center for development of our specialized silk, to contract with local farming cooperatives to grow upwards of 2,500 hectares of mulberry (which would allow for production of up to 250 metric tons of our high strength silk per year), and to serve as our principal manufacturing center.

 

In addition, in light of the significant uncertainty regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 19, 2020, we furloughed non-essential staff consistent with leading health official recommendations in order to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. This decision was made in an abundance of caution and will primarily impact staff at our fully owned subsidiary, Prodigy Textiles, in Vietnam and resulted in the temporary closing of silk rearing operations at that facility. As of the date hereof, we have resumed silk production operations at the factory in Vietnam. The temporary suspension of rearing operations resulted in a delay of 4-6 months in the Company’s production expansion schedule. The Company supported its furloughed staff and paid their salaries through June 30, 2020. During the duration of the furlough, the Company CEO did not receive or accrue any salary. On July 1, 2020, furloughed staff returned to work preparing the factory in Vietnam to receive the next shipment of silkworm eggs. On October 24, 2020, silk production operations at the factory resumed. In January 2021 we delivered the first production silk sample from the factory. The global pandemic of COVID-19 continues to evolve rapidly, and we will continue to monitor the situation closely, including its potential effect on our plans and timelines. See, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak.”

 

The Market

 

We are focusing our work on the creation of new fibers with unique properties including fibers with potential high performance and technical fiber applications for the performance fiber market. The performance fiber market is currently dominated by two classes of product: aramid fibers, and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers. These existing products serve the need for materials with high strength, resilience, but are unable to delivery flexibility. Because these synthetic performance fibers are stronger and tougher than steel, they are used in a wide variety of military, industrial, and consumer applications.

 

The military and police are among the users of performance fibers for its ballistic protection. The materials are also used for industrial applications requiring superior strength and toughness, e.g., critical cables and abrasion/impact resistant components. Performance fibers are also employed in safety equipment, high strength composite materials for the aero-space industry and for ballistic protection by the defense industry.

 

The global market for technical textiles was estimated at greater than $184 billion in 2020 and projected to reach $250 billion by 20271.

 

 

 

1 https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/technical-textiles-
market#:~:text=Report%20Overview,4.5%25%20from%202020%20to%202027.

 

 9 
 

 

These are industrial materials which have become essential products for both industrial and consumer applications. The market for technical textiles can be defined as consisting of:

 

Medical textiles;
   
Geotextiles;
   
Textiles used in Defense and Military;
   
Safe and Protective Clothing;
   
Filtration Textiles;
   
Textiles used in Transportation;
   
Textiles used in Buildings;
   
Composites with Textile Structure; and,
   
Functional and Sportive Textiles.

 

We believe that the superior mechanical characteristics of the next generation of protein-based polymers (in other words, genetically engineered silk fibers), will open up new applications for the technology. The materials which we are working to produce are many times tougher and stronger than steel.

 

We are actively pursuing relationships within target end markets to secure product collaborations with key market channel leaders. Due to the unique nature of our product, we received numerous unsolicited requests from leading businesses across a range of attractive end markets requesting materials for applications development. This substantial demand for spider silk materials across the broad spectrum of applications for high performance fibers and textiles, combined with the limited initial production capacity, has provided the opportunity to be selective in choosing market channel partners best able to quickly bring our product to market at scale. We are working under non-disclosure agreements to secure these collaborative development agreements and to establish limited channel exclusivity for firms we believe mirror our culture of innovation. In January 2021 the Company announced its partnership and exlusive purchase agreement worth up to $40 million with M the Movement by Kings Group. This partnership will establish a jointly owned apparel and fashion brand headquarter in Singapore focues on sales to the ASEAN region. With recent advancements in our manufacturing capacity, we expect to generate revenues from these relationships in 2021.

 

Research and Development

 

In 2007, we entered into the first series of the Notre Dame Agreements to develop new transgenic silkworms. On September 29, 2010, we announced that we had achieved our longstanding goal of producing new silk fibers composed of recombinant proteins. In 2016, we received a contract from the U.S. Army to deliver the first samples of its recombinant spider silk materials. In 2017, this contract was expanded to include research into the development of stronger silk materials. As a result of that contract, the Company brought its research operations in-house, opening its own research laboratories and expanding its scientific staff. This transition to in-house operations has led to a series of new technical breakthroughs and is believed to have accelerated the pace of new development. We intend to turn its technology to the development and production of high performance polymers.

 

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we have spent approximately 11,754 hours and 12,450 hours, respectively, on research and development activities, which consisted primarily of laboratory research on genetic engineering by our in-house research operations.

 

As of the date of this Report, our research and development efforts remain focused on growing our internal capabilities, but we may consider renewing funding of the collaborative research and development of high strength polymers with Notre Dame or other joint development opportunities; we have not had any formal discussions regarding any such collaborations.

 

We have initiated commercial scale production of our recombinant materials including Monster Silk® and Dragon SilkTM. Additionally, we plan to accelerate both our microbiology and selective breeding programs, as well as providing more resources for their material testing protocols in 2021.

 

 10 
 

 

Our Intellectual Property Approach

 

Our intellectual property strategy utilizes a blended approach of licensed technologies and in-house developments. As part of our intellectual property portfolio, we have licensed the exclusive right to use certain patented spider silk gene sequences in silkworm. Under the exclusive license agreement with the University of Wyoming (the “Exclusive Licensing Agreement”), we have obtained certain exclusive rights to use numerous genetic sequences which are the subject of U.S. patents.

 

Under the Notre Dame Agreements, we were issued and exercised our right to exclusive commercial use for spider silk technologies developed under that agreement. We have worked collaboratively with the university to develop fibers with the mechanical characteristics of spider silk. We are applying this proprietary genetic engineering technology to domesticated silkworms, which to our knowledge, is the only proven commercially scaled system for producing silk.

 

In 2017, we opened a research and development facility to expand on the work conducted at Notre Dame. Since opening this new facility, we have expanded our intellectual property portfolio with six additional provisional patent filings based on new discoveries and inventions and made numerous advancements that have decreased the development time for new technologies, none of which rely on the patented material from our collaboration with Notre Dame. We will continue to utilize this in-house research facility to expand and strengthen its patent portfolio while also maintaining and growing its trade secret technologies approach to genetic advancement. We are actively working to develop and patent new approaches to the development of genetically engineering silkworms, underlying construction techniques, and fundamental genetic sequences for improved material performance.

 

The Notre Dame Agreements will last for the duration of the patented materials that we developed with Notre Dame. The new technologies that we are developing in our internal research labs does not rely on the Notre Dame patented materials and as a result will not be impacted by an expiration of those agreements.

 

The introduction of the gene sequence, in the manner employed by us, results in a germline transformation and is therefore self-perpetuating.

 

License Agreements/Intellectual Property

 

We have obtained certain rights to use a number of university created, and patented, spider silk proteins, gene sequences and methodologies.

 

As part of the Notre Dame Agreements, we exercised our option for the exclusive commercial rights to technologies derived from a family of patent applications filed in various jurisdictions worldwide. As of the date of this filing, four patents have been issued, number 10-1926286 in South Korea, number 2011314072 in Australia, number 26612 in Vietnam, and number 2,812,791 in Canada. These locations are a mix of silk producing and consuming locations. We believe protecting our technologies in these locations will be beneficial to our future operations.

 

In addition to the patents related to licensed technologies from Notre Dame listed above, we have filed two full patents and four provisional patent applications based on technologies developed and discovered as a result of its independent research operations.

 

 11 
 

 

Table of Patent Applications and Status

 

Title  Country  Application No.   Filing Date  Patent No.   Patent Date  Status*
Chimeric Spider Silk and Methods of Use Thereof  United States of America  16/221267  14-Dec-2018         Published
Transgenic Silkworms Capable of Producing Chimeric Spider Silk Polypeptides and Fibers  United States of America  16/246318  11-Jan-2019         Published
Transgenic Silkworms Capable of Producing Chimeric Spider Silk Polypeptides and Fibers  United States of America  16/275159  13-Feb-2019         Published
A chimeric spider silk polypeptide, composite fiber comprising the polypeptide and method of making a chimeric spider silk fiber  Vietnam  1-2013-01306   25-Apr-2013  26612   3-Nov-2020  Granted
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  Australia  2011314072   26-Apr-2013  2011314072   13-Jul-2017  Granted
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  Australia  2019201497   05-Mar-2019         Pending
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  Brazil  BR112013007247-4   27-Mar-2013         Under Exam
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  Canada  2812791   28-Sep-2011  2,812,791    14-July-2020  Granted
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  China (People’s Republic)  201180057127.1   28-May-2013         Pending
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  China (People’s Republic)  201710335250.4   12-May-2017         Published
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  China (People’s Republic)  2018110261070.8   04-Sep-2018         Pending
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  European Patent Convention  11833071.1   26-Apr-2013         Under Exam
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  India  3574/DELNP/2013  22-Apr-2013         Under Exam
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  Japan  2013-530432   26-Mar-2013         Pending
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses Thereof  Japan  2019-142869   02-Aug-2019         Pending
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  Korea, Republic of  10-2017-7005086   22-Feb-2017  10-1926286    30-Nov-2018  Granted
Chimeric Spider Silk and Uses thereof  Korea, Republic of  10-2018-7034773   30-Nov-2018         Under Exam
Method of producing auto-assembling high molecular weight proteins  United States of America  63/053469   17-July-2020         Pending
Transgenic Silkworm Capable of Sustaining Non-Mulberry Diet  United States of America  63/053478   17-July-202         Pending
Non-invasive genetic screening method for Bombyx Mori and other molting caterpillars  United States of America  63/053481  

17-July-2020

         Pending
Method of producing non-native proteins in Bombyx Mori  United States of America 

63/053491

   23-May-1917-July-2020         Pending

Method for the genetic removal and replacementModification of heavy chain fibroin of Bombyx Mori

 

United States of America

  62/995,717  

19-Feb-2010-Feb-2021

        

Pending

Modification of heavy chain fibrion in Bombys Mori

  European Patent Convention 

PCT/US2021/017544

  

11-Feb-2021

        

Pending

 

* The terms in this column have the following meanings:

 

Published: Pending patent applications that have been published by a corresponding state Patent Office (e.g., the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) or international patent authority (e.g., the World Intellectual Property Association).

 

Pending: Patent applications that have been submitted to a corresponding state Patent Office for examination but that have not been issued or abandoned.

 

 12 
 

 

Under Exam: Pending patent applications currently being examined by a corresponding state Patent Office.

 

Granted: Patent applications that have been allowed by a corresponding state Patent Office and that have passed through the registration process; a granted patent application is synonymous with a “patent” and is conferred the associated patent rights for the given jurisdiction.

 

In addition to patent protection for intellectual property developed by the Company and through its collaborative research agreements, the Company has developed specialized skills and knowledge in the field of selective breeding, performance selection, and husbandry. This information is considered to be trade secrets and will play a critical role in the development of unique strains of new transgenic with diverse mechanical properties. These operations and knowledge held as trade secrets provide an additional layer of security and protection for the products and technologies we seek to develop.

 

In 2014, the following six trademarks were issued to the Company; the Company shall use these trademarks for product branding in the future:

 

Marks
 
Monster SilkTM
SpiderpillarTM
SpilkTM
Monster WormTM
Spider WormTM
Spider MothTM

 

Notre Dame Agreements

 

As discussed above, in 2007 we entered into the first series of Notre Dame Agreements. We provided financial support to ongoing research and development of transgenic silkworms and the creation of recombinant silk fibers. In exchange, we have an option to obtain the exclusive global commercialization rights to the technology developed pursuant to the research effort.

 

Following the first agreement, we entered into successive intellectual property and collaborative research agreements with Notre Dame to provide different levels of financial support. The trend had been for an increase in financial support for the research and development in nearly every successive agreement. In June 2012, we entered into an Intellectual Property / Collaborative Research Agreement with Notre Dame (“2012 Notre Dame Research Agreement”). On March 4, 2015, we entered into a new Intellectual Property / Collaborative Research Agreement with Notre Dame extending the agreement through March 2016 (“2015 Notre Dame Research Agreement”). Under the 2015 Notre Dame Research agreement, the Company provided approximately $534,000 in financial support. On September 20, 2015, the 2015 Notre Dame Research Agreement was amended to increase the total funding by approximately $179,000; in February 2016, the 2015 Notre Dame Research Agreement was extended to July 31, 2016 and in August 2016, the 2015 Notre Dame Research Agreement was extended to December 31, 2016. In May 2017, the 2015 Notre Dame Research Agreement was amended to increase the total funding by approximately $189,000 and the duration of the 2015 Notre Dame Research Agreement was extended to September 30, 2017. With the funding we received from the U.S. Army, we were able to conduct our research and development in-house, at less cost, and therefore we did not extend the 2015 Notre Dame Research Agreement after September 30, 2017, but in the future we may consider forming new collaborative research agreements.

 

 13 
 

 

In 2011, we exercised our option to obtain the global commercialization rights to the technology developed under the Notre Dame Agreements, which resulted in a separate license agreement with Notre Dame (the “2011 Notre Dame Agreement”). Pursuant to the 2011 Notre Dame Agreement, Notre Dame filed an international patent application and numerous national patent applications on technology relating to the creation and use of recombinant spider silks and we received exclusive and non-exclusive rights to certain spider silk technologies including commercial rights with the right to sublicense such intellectual property. The 2011 Notre Dame Agreement obligates us to reimburse Notre Dame for costs associated with the filing, prosecuting and maintaining of such patents and patent applications. In exchange for the rights to commercialization, Notre Dame has received 2,200,000 shares of our Common Stock and we have agreed to pay Notre Dame royalties equal to 2% of our gross sales of the licensed products and 10% of any sublicensing fees received by the Company on licensed technology. We have also agreed to pay to Notre Dame $50,000 a year, which will be reduced from the total amount of royalties paid in the same year. The $50,000 payment to Notre Dame is not owed for any year in which the Company is sponsoring research within Notre Dame.

 

Exclusive License Agreement with the University of Wyoming

 

In May 2006, we entered into a license agreement with the University of Wyoming, pursuant to which we have licensed the right to commercialize the production by silkworms of certain synthetic and natural spider silk proteins and the genetic sequencing for such spider silk proteins. These spider silk proteins and genetic sequencing are covered by patents held by the University of Wyoming. Our license allows us only to use silkworms to produce the licensed proteins and genetic sequencing. We have the right to sublicense the intellectual property that we license from the University of Wyoming. Our license agreement with the University of Wyoming required that we pay licensing and research fees to the university in exchange for an exclusive license in our field of use for certain university-developed intellectual property including patented spider silk gene sequences. Pursuant to the agreement, we issued 17,500,000 shares of our Common Stock to the University Foundation. Our license agreement with the University of Wyoming was to continue until the later of (i) expiration of the last-to-expire patent we license from the University of Wyoming under this license agreement in such country or (ii) ten years from the date of first commercial sale of a licensed product in such country. There are no royalties payable to the University of Wyoming under the terms of our agreement with them. We anticipate making arrangements with the University of Wyoming to address any accrued or unpaid fees which may exist.

 

Cooperative Agreement in Vietnam

 

On December 30, 2015, we entered into a cooperative agreement with a provincial government office in Vietnam for the research and pilot production of hybrid silkworms. In April 2018, we received our investment registration certificate for our facility in Vietnam. On May 1, 2018, we were issued our ERC so that we can begin our operations in Vietnam. We have established a subsidiary in Vietnam where we will develop and produce hybrid silkworms. Management believes the ERC puts the Company on a path to scale at a much greater level by harnessing existing silk production infrastructure with the capacity to match the existing demand for their spider silk materials.

 

Other Agreements

 

On October 15, 2013, we entered into an intellectual property agreement with a scientific researcher relating to the development of new recombinant silk fibers. Under the terms of that agreement, the scientific researcher transferred his rights of intellectual property, inventions and trade secrets which the researcher develops relating to recombinant silk to us. Upon signing, the researcher received 8,000,000 common stock purchase warrants from the Company, exercisable 24 months from the date of the agreement. As per the terms of the agreement, the researcher received an additional 10,000,000 warrants after creating a new recombinant silk fiber for us that met specified performance characteristics and another 8,000,000 warrants for performing the contract in good faith. The warrants described above all contain a cashless exercise provision and are exercisable on the 24-month anniversary of the date on which they were issuable under the agreement.

 

Governmental Regulations

 

We are subject to U.S. federal, state and local laws and regulations, as well as Vietnam central, provisional, and district laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, labor relations, the labeling and safety of the products we sell, the methods we use to sell these products and/or the production of the products we sell. We believe that we are in material compliance with all such applicable laws and regulations, although no assurance can be provided that this will remain true in the future.

 

 14 
 

 

Environment

 

We seek to comply with all applicable statutory and administrative requirements concerning environmental quality. Expenditures for compliance with federal state and local environmental laws have not had, and are not expected to have, a material effect on our capital expenditures, results of operations or competitive position.

 

While being environmentally conscious is the objective of all producers in this industry, the fermentation process used by our competitors produces high levels of carbon dioxide. CO2 is a greenhouse gas and is argued to be the leading cause of global warming. In stark contrast, Kraig Labs’ mulberry trees and the silk from silkworms have proven to be effective at sequestering carbon dioxide and are renewable resources. Mulberry trees are also very low maintenance, while still providing essential global green-cover and significantly help in reducing soil erosion in areas.

 

In addition to climate impacts of the fermentation approach, solvents typically used to wet-spin fibers can have significant environmental impacts. DMSO, a common wet-spinning solvent, can be absorbed directly through human skin, carrying with it potentially dangerous side effects. This is another reason we pride ourselves on the use of silkworms, which do not require the use of DMSO, to produce our products.

 

Competition

 

We compete directly with numerous other companies with similar product lines and/or distribution that have extensive capital, resources, market share, and brand recognition.

 

There are presently three primary competitors that we face in our industry, but there are few barriers to entry in our industry. This creates the strong possibility of new competitors emerging, and of others succeeding in developing the same or similar fibers for application that we are trying to develop. The effects of this increased competition may be materially adverse to us and our stockholders. As this is an emergent industry there is no one producer that has captured a significant portion of the market. Bolt Threads, Inc. based in California and Spiber Inc. based in Japan are competitors which have raised the largest amounts of investment capital to date. We also compete with AMSilk, which is based in Germany. We believe that our technology offers more cost-effective methods with lower environmental impact than technologies used by our identified competitors, however, new technologies could be developed that remove this advantage.

 

These competitors have raised and spent 100’s of millions of dollars in pursuit of the same results that we have achieved, but through different and more complex means. The Company believes that its competitors will continue to overspend while struggling to deliver the results that we have been able to achieve utilizing the existing global infrastructure.

 

 15 
 

 

Based on our research and internal assessments, the following chart illustrates why we believe we have a competitive advantage over our three main, known competitors:

 

 

Employees

 

The Company currently employees 9 people at its U.S. facilities, 8 full-time and 1 part-time, which includes Kim Thompson, our sole officer and director and Jonathan R. Rice, our Chief Operating Officer. The Company employs 7 full time personnel at its Vietnamese subsidiary. We plan to hire more persons on as-needed basis.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

 

As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item is not applicable.

 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

 

As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item is not applicable.

 

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

 

Our principal executive office is located at 2723 South State St., Suite 150, Ann Arbor, Michigan. We pay an annual rent of $2,508 for conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception services located at this location.

 

On May 9, 2019, we signed a 5-year property lease for 4,560.57 square meters of space in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam at a current rent of approximately $45,150 in each of year one and two and with a 5% increase per year for years three through five.

 

On January 23, 2017, we signed an 8-year property lease with the Kim Thompson, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, sole director, and controlling shareholder, for land in Texas where the Company grows its mulberry. We pay a monthly rent of $960.

 

On September 5, 2019, we signed a new two-year lease for a 5,000 square foot property in Lansing, MI that commenced on October 1, 2019 and ends on September 30, 2021, for its research and development headquarters. We pay an annual rent of $42,000 for year one of the lease and will pay $44,800 for year two of the lease.

 

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

 

We may from time to time become a party to various legal or administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.

 

 16 
 

 

To the knowledge of our management, we are currently not a party to any material legal or administrative proceedings and are not aware of any pending or threatened legal or administrative proceedings against us.

 

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

 

As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item is not applicable.

 

PART II

 

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock trades on the OTCQB system under the symbol “KBLB.” Our CUSIP number is 50075W.

 

You should be aware that over-the-counter market quotations may reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions. The high and low bid quotations for our shares of our common stock for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years and the first fiscal quarter of our current fiscal year are (prices set forth below represent inter-dealer quotations, without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not be reflective of actual transactions):

 

   High   Low 
Fiscal 2019        
Quarter ended March 31, 2019  $0.08   $0.05 
Quarter ended June 30, 2019  $0.481   $0.0629 
Quarter ended September 30 2019  $0.49   $0.19 
Quarter ended December 31, 2019  $0.23   $0.18 
Fiscal 2020          
Quarter ended March 31, 2020  $0.1055   $0.256 
Quarter ended June 30, 2020  $0.146   $0.2999 
Quarter ended September 30, 2020  $0.118   $0.2031 
Quarter ended December 31, 2020  $0.1181   $0.146 

 

As of March 11, 2021, the last reported sale price of our Common Stock on the OTCQB was $0.18 per share.

 

Holders

 

As of March 12, 2021 in accordance with our transfer agent records, we had 33 record holders of our Class A common stock and 0 holders of our Class B common stock; there is 1 holder of Series A Preferred Stock. This number excludes any estimate by us of the number of beneficial owners of shares held in street name, the accuracy of which cannot be guaranteed.

 

Dividends

 

We have never paid cash dividends on any of our capital stock and we currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future.

 

 17 
 

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table discloses information as of December 31, 2020, with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance, aggregated as follows:

 

Plan category  Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights   Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights   Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) 
   (a)   (b)   (c) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders   0    0    0 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders   27,340,000    0    69,449,360 
Total   27,340,000    0    69,449,360 

 

2019 Employee Stock Option Plan

 

Effective December 9, 2019, we adopted the 2019 Employee Stock Option Plan (“Plan”), with 80,000,000 shares issuable pursuant to the Plan. Beginning on January 1, 2020 and continuing on each January 1st that the Plan is in place, an additional number of shares equal to the lesser of: (i) 2% of the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding (fully-diluted) on the immediately preceding December 31 and (ii) such lower number of shares as may be determined by the Board or committee, shall be added to the number of shares issuable under the Plan. As of the date hereof, 28,940,000 options have been issued pursuant to the Plan and 84,037,388 shares remain issuable pursuant to the Plan, based on the terms of the Plan as set forth above.

 

Eligibility. The Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options to our employees and any parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees and for the grant of nonqualified share options, restricted shares, restricted share units, share appreciation rights, share bonuses and performance awards to our employees, directors and consultants and our parent and subsidiary corporations employees and consultants.

 

Administration. The Plan is administered by the Board or by a committee of not fewer than 2 members, each of whom is an outside Director and all of whom are disinterested, designated by the Board to administer the Plan. The plan administrator determines the terms of all awards.

 

Types of Awards. The Plan allows for the grant of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted share options, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, stock bonuses and performance awards.

 

Award Agreements. All awards under the Plan are evidenced by an award agreement which shall set forth the number of shares subject to the award and the terms and conditions of the award, which shall be consistent with the Plan.

 

Term of Awards. The term of awards granted under the Plan is ten years.

 

Vesting Schedule and Price. The plan administrator has the sole discretion in setting the vesting period and, if applicable, exercise schedule of an award, determining that an award may not vest for a specified period after it is granted and accelerating the vesting period of an award. The plan administrator determines the exercise or purchase price of each award, to the extent applicable.

 

Transferability. Unless the plan administrator provides otherwise, the Plan does not allow for the transfer of awards other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Unless otherwise permitted by the plan administrator, options may be exercised during the lifetime of the optionee only by the optionee or the optionee’s guardian or legal representative.

 

 18 
 

 

Adjustments. In the event the Board or committee determines that any dividend or distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidate, split-up, spin-off, or other similar corporate transact or event affects the shares subject to the Plan such that an adjustment is determined by the Board or committee to be appropriate to prevent dilution or enlargement of the benefits intended to be made under the Plan, appropriate adjustments will be made to the share maximums and exercise prices, as applicable.

 

Governing Law and Compliance with Law. The Plan and awards granted under it are governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Wyoming. Shares will not be issued under an award unless the issuance is permitted by applicable law.

 

Amendment and Termination. The Plan terminates ten years from the date it was approved, unless it is terminated earlier by our Board. The Board may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the plan, including, without limitation, any amendment, alternation, suspension, discontinuation, or termination that would impart the rights of any participant, or any other holder or beneficiary of any award thertofore granted, without the consent of any share owner, participant, other holder or beneficiary of an award, or other person, unless required by applicable law.

 

Sale of Unregistered Securities

 

Information regarding any equity securities we have sold during the period covered by this Report that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended is set forth below. Each such transaction was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC, unless otherwise noted. Unless stated otherwise: (i) the securities were offered and sold only to accredited investors; (ii) there was no general solicitation or general advertising related to the offerings; (iii) each of the persons who received these unregistered securities had knowledge and experience in financial and business matters which allowed them to evaluate the merits and risk of the receipt of these securities, and that they were knowledgeable about our operations and financial condition; (iv) no underwriter participated in, nor did we pay any commissions or fees to any underwriter in connection with the transactions; and, (v) each certificate issued for these unregistered securities contained a legend stating that the securities have not been registered under the Securities Act and setting forth the restrictions on the transferability and the sale of the securities.

 

On February 9, 2018, the Company issued 3-year warrant to purchase 3,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.056 per share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $52,660, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Warrants will be exercisable on August 9, 2019, and for a period of 2 years expiring on August 9, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $52,660 as an expense for warrants issued. 

 

On March 20, 2018, the Company issued 4-year warrant to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $19,915, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and fully vested on March 20, 2018. Warrants will be exercisable on March 20, 2019, and for a period of 3 years expiring on March 20, 22. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $19,915 as an expense for warrants issued. The warrants were canceled during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 in exchange for a cash payment of $6,000.

 

On April 6, 2018, the Company issued 36,000 shares with a fair value of $1,076 ($0.0299/share) to a consultant as consideration for consulting fees owed from October 1, 2014 through December 31, 2018 of $21,000. 

 

On March 9, 2019, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with one investor (the “Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued the investor 14,797,278 Units at a purchase price of $0.06758 per Unit, for total gross proceeds to the Company of $1,000,000. The Units consist of 14,797,278 shares of the Company’s common stock and two warrants (the “Warrants”): (i) one warrant entitles the investor to purchase up to 14,797,278 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share (the “6 Cent Warrants”) and (ii) one warrant entitles the investor to purchase up to 7,398,639 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.08 per share (the “8 Cent Warrant”). The securities sold in the private placement were issued in reliance on an exemption from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Regulation S”). The bases for the availability of this exemption include the facts that the sales of the securities were made to a non-U.S. person (as defined under Rule 902 section (k)(2)(i) of Regulation S), pursuant to an offshore transaction, and no directed selling efforts were made in the United States by the issuer, a distributor, any of their respective affiliates, or any person acting on behalf of any of the foregoing.

 

On March 20, 2019, the Company issued 4,052,652 shares of its Common Stock as payment for $243,159 of certain debt owed to Notre Dame.

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a set of four (4) warrants totaling 500,000 shares to a related party, with an exercise price of $0.2299 per share.

 

 19 
 

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a set of two (2) warrants totaling 2,000,000 shares to a related party, with an exercise price of $0.2299 per share.

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a set of three (3) warrant totaling 6,000,000 shares to a related party, with an exercise price of $0.2299 per share.

 

On August 14, 2019, the Company issued 7,967,871 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 8,000,000 warrants.

 

On September 26, 2019, the Company issued 766,667 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of 1,000,000 warrants.

 

On July 30, 2020, the Company issued 9,941,623 shares of common stock in connection with the cashless exercise of 10,000,000 warrants.

 

Repurchases of Equity Securities

 

None.

 

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 

As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item is not applicable.

 

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

 

Caution Regarding Forward-Looking Information

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and result of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements and involves numerous risks and uncertainties contained in this report and the other reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

 

The following section reflects management’s views on the financial condition as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of operations and cash flows for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. This section is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes to the consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

Overview

 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. We were organized to develop high strength fibers using recombinant DNA technology for commercial applications in technical textile. We use genetically engineered silkworms that produce spider silk to create our recombinant spider silk. Applications include performance apparel, workwear, filtration, luxury fashion, flexible composites, medical implants, and more. We believe that we have been a leader in the research and development of commercially scalable and cost effective spider silk for technical textile. Our primary proprietary fiber technology includes natural and engineered variants of spider silk produced in domesticated mulberry silkworms. Our business brings twenty-first century biotechnology to the historical silk industry, permitting us to introduce materials with innovative properties and claims into an established commercial ecosystem of silkworm rearing, silk spinning and weaving, and manufacture of garments and other products that can include our specialty fibers and textiles. Specialty fibers are engineered for specific uses that require exceptional strength, flexibility, heat resistance and/or chemical resistance. The specialty fiber market is exemplified by two synthetic fiber products that come from petroleum derivatives: (1) aramid fibers; and (2) ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers. The technical textile industry involves products for both industrial and consumer products, such as filtration fabrics, medical textiles (e.g., sutures and artificial ligaments), safety and protective clothing and fabrics used in military and aerospace applications (e.g., high-strength composite materials).

 

 20 
 

 

We are using genetic engineering technologies to develop fibers with greater strength, resiliency and flexibility for use in our target markets, namely the specialty fiber and technical textile industries.

 

On April 16, 2020, we announced that we successfully developed a new technology platform, based on a non-CRISPR gene editing knock-in knock-out technology. CRISPR is the most recent and efficient gene editing technology2 CRISPR stands for “Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats.” This is our first knock-in knock-out technology of essentially pure spider silk transgenic. This new system is built on our eco-friendly and cost-effective silkworm production system, which we believe is significantly more advanced than any competing methods. Knock-in knock-out technology allows for the targeting of specific locations and genetic traits for modification, addition, and removal. This new capability will accelerate new product developments, which should allow us to bring products to market more quickly. This capability also allows for genetic trait modifications that were previously impractical, creating opportunities for products outside of silk fibers and increased flexibility in production location. Based on our internal studies, the new technology has a purity rate that is significantly greater than Dragon Silk, a fiber that we developed with our previous tools. Samples of Dragon Silk has already demonstrated to be tougher than many fibers used in bullet proof vests and we expect that the increased spider silk purity, created using this new approach, will yield materials beyond those capabilities. This new system utilizes our eco-friendly and cost-effective silkworm production system, which we believe is significantly more advanced than any of the competing methods. We have already begun the validation process for the first of these new transgenics and anticipate that U.S. production will be possible as early as 2022 or 2023.

 

This does not affect our current work of overseeing our production facility to ramp up our production of Dragon SilkTM and Monster Silk®, as these fibers are designed to address their own markets.

 

In August 2019, we received authorization to begin rearing genetically enhanced silkworms at our production facility in Vietnam. We received our investment registration certificate for the facility in April 2018. In October 2019, we delivered the first batch of these silkworms and began operations. These silkworms will serve as the basis for the commercial expansion of our proprietary silk technology. On November 4, 2019, we reported that we had successfully completed rearing the first batch of its transgenic silkworms at the Quang Nam production factory. Seasonal challenges in late December 2019 slowed production operations and the restrictions imposed due to the global pandemic further delayed our operations in 2020 by about 4-6 months. However, we were able to resume production operations of our specialized silk in October 2020, once travel and work restrictions for COVID-19 were lifted. In January 2021 we delivered the first sample silk shipment from this factory. We believe that we will be able to target a capacity of 40 metric tons of our recombinant spider silk fiber per annum from this factory once it reaches maximum utilization. This capacity will allow us to address initial demand for our products and materials for various applications in the protective, performance, and luxury textile markets.

 

 

2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131771/

https://www.yourgenome.org/facts/what-is-genome-editing

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/genomicresearch/genomeediting

 

 21 
 

 

Plan of Operations

 

During the next twelve months, we expect to take the following steps in connection with the further development of our business and the implementation of our plan of operations:

 

We plan to establish a apparel brand under a joint venture with Kings Group to create a line of fashion wear trade named SpydasilkTM
   
We plan to continue the expansion of our production operations at our Quang Nam, Vietnam factory in accordance with our investment and enterprise registration certificates, including the planting of additional mulberry fields in collaboration with local farming cooperatives and the hiring of additional direct staff for our factory as needed.
   
We plan to accelerate both our microbiology and selective breeding programs as well as provide more resources for our material testing protocols. We spent approximately $89,000 over the last 12 months on research and development of high strength polymers. In 2020, we directed our research and development efforts on growing our internal capabilities; we plan to continue to dedicate our efforts in 2021/2022 to grow our internal research and development programs.

 

We will consider buying an established revenue producing company in a compatible business, in order to broaden our financial base and facilitate the commercialization of our products; as of the date hereof, we have not had any formal discussion or entered into any definitive agreements regarding any such purchase.
   
We will also actively consider pursuing collaborative research opportunities with both private and university laboratories in areas of research which overlap the company’s existing research and development. One such potential area for collaborative research which the company is considering is protein expression platforms. If our financing allows, management will give strong consideration to increasing the breadth of our research to include protein expression platform technologies.
   
We plan to actively pursue collaborative research and product testing opportunities with companies in the biotechnology, materials, textile and other industries.
   
We plan to actively pursue additional collaborative commercialization, marketing and manufacturing opportunities with companies in the textile and material sectors for the fibers we developed and for any new polymers that we create in the remainder of 2021 and going forward.
   
We plan to actively pursue the development of commercial scale production of our recombinant materials including Monster Silk® and Dragon SilkTM.
   
We have initiated and plan to accelerate our efforts for large scale U.S. production. This work will include the research and production of a new transgenic tailored specifically domestic production.

 

Limited Operating History

 

We have not previously demonstrated that we will be able to expand our business through an increased investment in our research and development efforts. We cannot guarantee that the research and development efforts described in this filing will be successful. Our business is subject to risks inherent in growing an enterprise, including limited capital resources, risks inherent in the research and development process and possible rejection of our products in development.

 

If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue our research and development and other operations. Equity financing will result in dilution to existing stockholders.

 

 22 
 

 

Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak

 

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus outbreak a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” and on March 10, 2020, declared it to be a pandemic. Actions taken around the world to help mitigate the spread of the coronavirus include restrictions on travel, and quarantines in certain areas, and forced closures for certain types of public places and businesses. The coronavirus and actions taken to mitigate it have had and are expected to continue to have an adverse impact on the economies and financial markets of many countries, including the geographical area in which the Company operates. While the closures and limitations on movement, domestically and internationally, are expected to be temporary, if the outbreak continues on its current trajectory the duration of the supply chain disruption could reduce the availability, or result in delays, of materials or supplies to and from the Company, which in turn could materially interrupt the Company’s business operations. As stated above, U.S. travel restrictions impacted our ability to ship eggs to our Vietnam facility and without such eggs, we cannot conduct operations there. In October of 2020, with restrictions lifted, we were able to deliver silkworm eggs to the Vietnam facility and production resumed. In January 2021 we delivered the first sample silk shipment from the factory. Given the speed and frequency of the continuously evolving developments with respect to this pandemic, the Company cannot reasonably estimate the magnitude of the impact to its consolidated results of operations. The Company’s manufacturing facilities support business that have been deemed essential by their respective state governments and remain operational. We have taken every precaution possible to ensure the safety of our employees.

 

On March 19, 2020, we furloughed non-essential staff consistent with leading health official recommendations in order to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. This decision was made in an abundance of caution and will primarily impact staff at our fully owned subsidiary, Prodigy Textiles, in Vietnam and will result in the temporary closing of silk rearing operations at that facility. As of the date hereof, we have resumed silk production operations at the factory in Vietnam. The temporary suspension of rearing operations resulted in a delay of 4-6 months in the Company’s production expansion schedule. The Company supported its furloughed staff and paid their salaries through June 30, 2020. During the duration of the furlough, the Company CEO did not receive or accrue any salary. On July 1, 2020, furloughed staff returned to work preparing the factory in Vietnam to receive the next shipment of silkworm eggs. On October 24, 2020, silk production operations at the factory resumed. In January 2021 we delivered the first sample silk shipment from the factory. The global pandemic of COVID-19 continues to evolve rapidly, and we will continue to monitor the situation closely, including its potential effect on our plans and timelines.

 

Additionally, it is reasonably possible that estimates made in the financial statements have been, or will be, materially and adversely impacted in the near term as a result of these conditions, including losses on inventory; impairment losses related to goodwill and other long-lived assets and current obligations.

 

Results of Operations for the Years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019

 

Our revenue, operating expenses, and net loss from operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, were as follows – some balances on the prior period’s combined financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation:

 

 

    Years Ended December 31,          

% Change

Increase

 
    2020     2019     Change     (Decrease)  
NET REVENUES   $ -     $ -       -       0.00 %
OPERATING EXPENSES:                                
General and Administrative     3,518,527       1,413,982       2,104,545       148.84 %
Professional Fees     397,727       342,845       54,882       16.01 %
Officer’s Salary     516,332       627,197       (110,865 )     -17.68 %
Rent - Related Party     13,092       14,793       (1,701 )     -11.50 %
Research and Development     88,470       223,050       (134,580 )     -60.34 %
Total operating expenses     4,534,148       2,621,867       1,912,281       72.94 %
Loss from operations     (4,534,148 )     (2,621,867 )     (1,912,281 )     72.94 %
Interest expense     (386,624 )     (294,352 )     (92,272 )     31.35 %
Amortization of original issue discount     (50,505 )     -       (50,505 )     100.00 %
Interest income     -       6,369       (6,369 )     100.00 %
Net Loss   $ (4,971,277 )   $ (2,909,850 )     (2,061,427 )     70.84 %

 

 23 
 

 

Net Revenues: During the year ended December 31, 2020, we realized $0 of revenues from our business. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we realized $0 of revenues from our business. Accordingly, there was no change in revenues between the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

 

Research and development expenses: During year ended December 31, 2020 we incurred $88,470 research and development expenses. During year ended December 31, 2019 we incurred $223,050 of research and development expenses, a decrease of $134,580 or 60.34% compared with the same period in 2019. The research and development expenses are attributable to the research and development with the Notre Dame University; the decrease was due to the timing of research related activity and costs by insources the Company’s research operations.

 

Professional Fees: During year ended December 31, 2020, we incurred $397,727 professional expenses, which increased by $54,882 or 16.01% from $342,845 for year ended December 31, 2019. The increase in professional fees expense was attributable to increased expenses related to investor relations services during year ended December 31, 2020.

 

Officers Salary: During year ended December 31, 2010, officers’ salary expenses decreased to $516,332 or 17.68% compared to $627,197 for year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease is due to the Company’s staff having been furloughed from March 19, 2020 – June 30, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, during which the CEO also did not receive or accrue any salary.

 

General and Administrative Expense: General and administrative expenses increased by $2,104,545 or 148.84% to $3,518,527 for year ended December 31, 2020 from $1,413,982 for year ended December 31, 2019. Our general and administrative expenses for year ended December 31, 2020 consisted of other general and administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Investor Relations, General Office, warrant Compensation) of $3,177,652 Travel of $29,528, office salary of $311,347 for a total of $3,518,527. Our general and administrative expenses for year ended December 31, 2019 consisted of consulting fees of $5,787 and other general and administrative expenses (which includes expenses such as Auto, Business Development, SEC Filing, Investor Relations, General Office, warrant Compensation) of $1,123,787, Travel of $40,734, office salary of $243,674 for a total of $1,413,982. The primary reason for the increase in comparing year ended December 31, 2020 to the corresponding period for 2019 was mainly due to general business expenses and warrants issuances for services.

 

Rent – Related Party: During the year ended December 31 2020, rent-related party expense decreased to $13,092 or 11.50% compared to $14,793 for the year ended December 31, 2019. This decrease is due to an adjustment in 2019 per ASC 843 lease valuation.

 

Interest Expense: Interest expense increased to $386,624, or 31.35% for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to $294,352 for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily due to interest on the related party loans and accounts payable and accrued expenses to the related parties.

 

Amortization of original issue and debt discounts: Amortization of original issue and debt discount increased to $50,505, or 100% for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was primarily due to amortization of original issue and debt discounts on convertible loan.

 

Interest Income: Interest income decreased by $6,369 to $0 for the year ended December 31, 2020 from $6,369 for the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease was primarily due to interest on bank accounts.

 

 24 
 

 

Net Loss: Net loss increased by $2,061,427, or 70.84%, to a net loss of $4,971,277 for the year ended December 31, 2020 from a net loss of $2,909,850 for the year ended December 31, 2019. This increase in net loss was driven primarily by increased in warrant compensation and professional fees.

 

Capital Resources and Liquidity

 

Our financial statements have been presented on the basis that we have a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As presented in the financial statements, we incurred a net loss of $4,971,277 during the year ended December 31, 2020, and losses are expected to continue in the near term. The accumulated deficit is $34,769,183 at December 31, 2020. Refer to Note 2 for our discussion of stockholder deficit. We have been funding our operations through private loans and the sale of common stock in private placement transactions. Refer to Note 6 and Note 7 in the financial statements for our discussion of notes payable and shares issued, respectively. Our cash resources are insufficient to meet our planned business objectives without additional financing. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of our company to continue as a going concern.

 

Management anticipates that significant additional expenditures will be necessary to develop and expand our business before significant positive operating cash flows can be achieved. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately achieve sustainable revenues and profitable operations. At December 31, 2020, we had $816,907 of cash on hand. These funds are insufficient to complete our business plan and as a consequence, we will need to seek additional funds, primarily through the issuance of debt or equity securities for cash to operate our business. No assurance can be given that any future financing will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to us. Even if we are able to obtain additional financing, it may contain undue restrictions on our operations, in the case of debt financing or cause substantial dilution for our stockholders, in the case of equity financing.

 

Management has undertaken steps as part of a plan to improve operations with the goal of sustaining our operations for the next twelve months and beyond. These steps include (a) raising additional capital and/or obtaining financing; (b) controlling overhead and expenses; and (c) executing material sales or research contracts. There can be no assurance that the Company can successfully accomplish these steps and it is uncertain that the Company will achieve a profitable level of operations and obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that any additional financing will be available to the Company on satisfactory terms and conditions, if at all. As of the date of this Report, we have not entered into any formal agreements regarding the above.

 

In the event the Company is unable to continue as a going concern, the Company may elect or be required to seek protection from its creditors by filing a voluntary petition in bankruptcy or may be subject to an involuntary petition in bankruptcy. To date, management has not considered this alternative, nor does management view it as a likely occurrence.

 

Cash, total current assets, total assets, total current liabilities and total liabilities as of December 31, 2020 as compared to December 31, 2019, were as follows:

 

    December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
Cash   $ 816,907     $ 125,024  
Prepaid expenses   $ 2,588     $ 31,745  
Total current assets   $ 819,495     $ 156,769  
Total assets   $ 1,277,285     $ 750,850  
Total current liabilities   $ 7,450,794     $ 5,584,383  
Total liabilities   $ 7,850,849     $ 6,138,908  

 

 25 
 

 

At December 31, 2020, we had a working capital deficit of $6,631,299, compared to a working capital deficit of $5,427,614 at December 31, 2019. Current liabilities increased to $7,450,794 at December 31, 2020 from $5,584,383 at December 31, 2019, primarily as a result of primarily as a result of accounts payable and accrued compensation.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash used in operations of $1,254,712 was the result of a net loss of $4,971,277 offset by depreciation expense of $28,074, amortization of original issue and debt discount of $50,505, options issued to related parties of $2,845,459, imputed interest on related party loans of $58,817, decrease in prepaid expenses of $29,159, a decrease in operating lease right of use of $108,217, an increase of accrued expenses and other payables-related party of $657,520, an increase in accounts payable of $39,055 and a decrease in operating lease liabilities of $100,239. For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in operations of $1,087,881 was the result of a net loss of $2,909,850 offset by depreciation expense of $30,781, warrant cancellation of $19,915, options issued to related parties of $696,934, imputed interest on related party loans of $22,337, increase in prepaid expenses of $24,887, a decrease in operating lease right of use of $86,326, an increase of accrued expenses and other payables-related party of $795,633, an increase in accounts payable of $314,369 and a decrease in operating lease liabilities of $79,609.

 

Net cash used in our investing activities were $0 and $100,792 for the year ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Our investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 is attributable to purchases of fixed assets.

 

Our financing activities resulted in a cash inflow of $1,946,595 for the year ended December 31, 2020, which is represented by $1,015,000 proceeds from a shareholder note payable, proceeds from convertible note payable, net of $950,000, payment of debt offering costs of $86,000 related to convertible note payable, $40,000 loan repayment, contributed capital by related party of $17,495 and proceeds from SBA Paychex Protection Loan of $90,100. Our financing activities resulted in a cash inflow of $1,300,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019, which is represented by $1,000,000 proceeds from the issuance of common stock, $20,000 loan repayment and $320,000 proceeds from a shareholder note payable.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, and revenue and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.

 

Our significant accounting policies are summarized in Note 1 of our financial statements. While all these significant accounting policies impact its financial condition and results of operations, we view certain of these policies as critical. Policies determined to be critical are those policies that have the most significant impact on our financial statements and require management to use a greater degree of judgment and estimates. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Our management believes that given current facts and circumstances, it is unlikely that applying any other reasonable judgments or estimate methodologies would cause effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Changes to accounting principles are established by the FASB in the form of ASU’s to the FASB’s Codification. We consider the applicability and impact of all ASU’s on our financial position, results of operations, stockholders’ deficit, cash flows, or presentation thereof.

 

 26 
 

 

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. The amendments in the ASU include removing exceptions to incremental intraperiod tax allocation of losses and gains from different financial statement components, exceptions to the method of recognizing income taxes on interim period losses, and exceptions to deferred tax liability recognition related to foreign subsidiary investments. In addition, the ASU requires that entities recognize franchise tax based on an incremental method and requires an entity to evaluate the accounting for step-ups in the tax basis of goodwill as inside or outside of a business combination. The amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods therein. Early adoption of the standard is permitted, including adoption in interim or annual periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. We have not early adopted this ASU as of December 31, 2020. The ASU is currently not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. The ASU simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments by removing certain separation models in ASC 470- 20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options, for convertible instruments. The ASU updates the guidance on certain embedded conversion features that are not required to be accounted for as derivatives under Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or that do not result in substantial premiums accounted for as paid-in capital, such that those features are no longer required to be separated from the host contract. The convertible debt instruments will be accounted for as a single liability measured at amortized cost. This will also result in the interest expense recognized for convertible debt instruments to be typically closer to the coupon interest rate when applying the guidance in Topic 835, Interest. Further, the ASU made amendments to the EPS guidance in Topic 260 for convertible instruments, the most significant impact of which is requiring the use of the if-converted method for diluted EPS calculation, and no longer allowing the net share settlement method. The ASU also made revisions to Topic 815-40, which provides guidance on how an entity must determine whether a contract qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. The amendments to Topic 815-40 change the scope of contracts that are recognized as assets or liabilities. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted for periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Adoption of the ASU can either be on a modified retrospective or full retrospective basis. The ASU is currently not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

All other newly issued accounting pronouncements but not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, to require financial assets carried at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected based on historical experience, current conditions, and forecasts. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, to clarify that receivables arising from operating leases are within the scope of lease accounting standards. Further, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, ASU No. 2019-05, ASU 2019-10, ASU 2019-11, ASU 2020-02, and ASU 2020-03 to provide additional guidance on the credit losses standard. Adoption of the ASUs is on a modified retrospective basis. We adopted the ASUs on January 1, 2020. The ASUs did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. ASU No. 2016-13 applies to all financial assets including loans, trade receivables and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our financial statements.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).

 

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

 

As the Company is a smaller reporting company, this item is not applicable.

 

 27 
 

 

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

 

CONTENTS

 

PAGE 27 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
     
PAGE 28 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND DECEMBER 31, 2019.
     
PAGE 29 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND DECEMBER 31, 2019.
     
PAGE 30 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND DECEMBER 31, 2019.
     
PAGES 31 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019 AND DECEMBER 31, 2020.
     
PAGES 32 NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

 

 28 
 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the two-year period then ended, and the related notes and schedules (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB .

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and the significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Critical Audit Matters

 

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

 

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company issues stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation.

 

Auditing management’s calculation of the fair value of stock-based compensation can be a significant judgment given the fact that the Company uses management estimates on various inputs to the calculation.

 

To evaluate the appropriateness of the fair value determined by management, we examined and evaluated the inputs management used in calculating the fair value of the stock-based compensation.

 

Going Concern

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered net losses from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are discussed in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC  
   
M&K CPAS, PLLC  

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013

 

Houston, TX

 

March 12, 2021

 

 29 
 

 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

   December 31, 2020   December 31, 2019 
ASSETS          
Current Assets          
Cash  $816,907   $125,024 
Prepaid expenses   2,588    31,745 
Total Current Assets   819,495    156,769 
           
Property and Equipment, net   89,247    117,321 
Operating lease right-of-use asset, net   365,025    473,242 
Security deposit   3,518    3,518 
           
Total Assets  $1,277,285   $750,850 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT          
           
Current Liabilities          
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  $600,003   $560,948 
Note payable - related party   1,657,000    642,000 
Royalty agreement payable - related party   65,292    65,292 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party   4,802,985    4,145,465 
Operating lease liability, current   124,909    110,678 
Loan payable   60,000    60,000 
Convertible note payable, net of debt discount of $949,495 and $0, respectively   

50,505

    - 
SBA Paycheck Protection Loan   90,100    - 
Total Current Liabilities   

7,450,794

    5,584,383 
           
Long Term Liabilities          
Loan payable, net of current   145,244    185,244 
Operating lease liability, net of current   254,811    369,281 
           
Total Liabilities   

7,850,849

    6,138,908 
           
Commitments and Contingencies          
           
Stockholders’ Deficit          
Preferred stock, no par value; unlimited shares authorized, none, issued and outstanding   -    - 
Preferred stock Series A, no par value; 2 and 2 shares issued and outstanding, respectively   5,217,800    5,217,800 
Common stock Class A, no par value; unlimited shares authorized, 854,410,001 and 844,468,378 shares issued and outstanding, respectively   17,122,236    16,757,079 
Common stock Class B, no par value; unlimited shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding   -    - 
Common Stock Issuable, 1,122,311 and 1,122,311 shares, respectively   22,000    22,000 
Additional paid-in capital   5,833,583    2,412,969 
Deferred Compensation   -    - 
Accumulated Deficit   (34,769,183)   (29,797,906)
           
Total Stockholders’ Deficit   (6,573,564)   (5,388,058)
           
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit  $1,277,285   $750,850 

 

 30 
 

 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

   For the Years Ended 
   December 31, 2020   December 31, 2019 
         
Revenue  $-   $- 
           
Operating Expenses          
General and Administrative   3,518,527    1,413,982 
Professional Fees   397,727    342,845 
Officer’s Salary   516,332    627,197 
Rent - Related Party   13,092    14,793 
Research and Development   88,470    223,050 
Total Operating Expenses   4,534,148    2,621,867 
           
Loss from Operations   (4,534,148)   (2,621,867)
           
Other Income/(Expenses)          
Interest expense   (386,624)   (294,352)
Amortization of original issue discount   (50,505)   - 
Interest income   -    6,369 
Total Other Income/(Expenses)   (437,129)   (287,983)
           
Net (Loss) before Provision for Income Taxes   (4,971,277)   (2,909,850)
           
Provision for Income Taxes   -    - 
           
Net (Loss)  $(4,971,277)  $(2,909,850)
           
Net (Loss) Per Share - Basic and Diluted  $(0.01)  $(0.00)
           
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period - Basic and Diluted   848,651,465    835,587,422 

 

 31 
 

 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

   For the years ended December 31, 
   2020   2019 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:          
Net Loss  $(4,971,277)  $(2,909,850)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations          
Depreciation expense   28,074    30,781 
Amortization of original issue discount   50,505      
Imputed interest - related party   58,817    22,337 
Fair value of options issued for services   2,845,459    696,937 
Warrants issued/(cancelled) to consultants   -    (19,915)
Decrease (Increase) in prepaid expenses   29,157    (24,887)
Operating lease right-of-use, net   108,217    86,326 
Increase in accrued expenses and other payables - related party   657,520    795,633 
(Decrease) Increase in royalty agreement payable - related party          
(Decrease)Increase in accounts payable   39,055    314,369 
Operating lease liabilities, current   (100,239)   (79,609)
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities   (1,254,712)   (1,087,878)
           
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:          
Purchase of Fixed Assets and Leasehold Improvements   -    (100,792)
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities   -    (100,792)
           
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:          
Proceeds from notes payable - related party   1,015,000    320,000 
Proceeds from convertible note payable, net of original issue discount   950,000    - 
Payment of debt offering costs   (86,000)   - 
Principal payments on debt   (40,000)   (20,000)
Contributed capital - related party   17,495    - 
Proceeds from SBA Paycheck Protection Loan   90,100    - 
Proceeds from issuance of common stock   -    1,000,000 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities   1,946,595    1,300,000 
           
Net Increase in Cash   691,883    111,327 
           
Cash at Beginning of Year   125,024    13,697 
           
Cash at End of Year  $816,907   $125,024 
           
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:          
           
Cash paid for interest  $-   $- 
Cash paid for taxes  $-   $- 
           
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:          
Shares issued in connection with cashless warrants exercise  $365,157   $329,622 
Beneficial conversion feature in connection with convertible debt  $864,000   $- 

Original issue discount in connection with convertible debt

  $

50,000

   $- 
Settlement of accounts payable with note payable  $-   $265,244 
Settlement of accounts payable with stock issuance  $-   $281,659 
Adoption of lease standard ASC 842  $-   $559,568 

 

 32 
 

 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Deficit

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019

 

                 Common Stock -             
  

Preferred Stock -

Series A

  

Common Stock -

Class A

  

Common Stock -

Class B

  

Class A Shares To

be issued

       Accumulated     
   Shares   Par   Shares   Par   Shares   Par   Shares   Par   APIC   Deficit   Total 
                                             
Balance, December 31, 2018   2   $5,217,800    816,883,910   $15,145,798                    -   $                  -    1,122,311   $22,000   $2,043,235   $(26,888,056)  $(4,459,223)
                                                        
Units issued for cash   -   $-    14,797,278   $1,000,000    -   $-    -   $-   $-   $-   $1,000,000 
                                                        
Shares issued in exchange for accounts payable   -   $-    4,052,652   $281,659    -   $-    -   $-   $-   $-   $281,659 
                                                        
Warrants issued for services - related parties   -   $-    -   $-    -   $-    -   $-   $669,248   $-   $669,248 
                                                        
Warrants issued for services   -   $-    -   $-    -   $-    -   $-   $27,686   $-   $27,686 
                                                        
Exercise of 9,000,000 warrants in exchange for stock   -   $-    8,734,538   $329,622    -   $-    -   $-   $(329,622)  $-   $- 
                                                        
Cancellation of warrants issued for services   -   $-    -   $-    -   $-    -   $-   $(19,915)  $-   $(19,915)
                                                        
Imputed interest - related party   -   $-    -   $-    -   $-    -   $-   $22,337   $-   $22,337 
                                                        
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2019   -   $-    -   $-    -   $-    -   $-   $-   $(2,909,850)  $(2,909,850)
                                                        
Balance, December 31, 2019   2   $5,217,800    844,468,378   $16,757,079   -   $-    1,122,311   $22,000   $2,412,969   $(29,797,906)  $(5,388,058)
                                                        
Warrants issued for services - related parties   -   $-    -   $-   $-   $-   $-   $-   $2,794,696   $-   $2,794,696 
                                                        
Warrants issued for services   -   $-    -   $-   $-   $-   $-   $-   $50,763   $-   $50,763 
                                                        
Exercise of 10,000,000 warrants in exchange for stock   -   $-    9,941,623   $365,157   $-   $-   $-   $-   $(365,157)  $-   $- 
                                                        
Contributed capital - related party   -   $-    -   $-   $-   $-   $-   $-   $17,495   $-   $17,495 
                                                        
Imputed interest - related party   -   $-    -   $-   $-   $-   $-   $-   $58,817   $-   $58,817 
                                                        
Beneficial conversion feature   -   $-    -   $-   $-   $-   $-   $-   $864,000   $-   $

864,000

 
                                                        
Net loss for the years ended December 31, 2020   -   $-    -   $-   $-   $-   $-   $-   $-   $(4,971,277)  $(4,971,277)
                                                        
Balance, December 31, 2020   2   $5,217,800    854,410,001   $17,122,236    -   $-    1,122,311   $22,000   $5,833,583   $(34,769,183)  $(6,573,564)

 

 33 
 

 

NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ORGANIZATION

 

Organization

 

Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Wyoming on April 25, 2006. The Company was organized to develop high strength, protein based fiber, using recombinant DNA technology, for commercial applications in the textile and specialty fiber industries.

 

On March 5, 2018, the Company issued a board resolution authorizing investment in a Vietnamese subsidiary and appointing a representative for the subsidiary.

 

On April 24, 2018, the Company announced that it had received its investment registration certificate for its new Vietnamese subsidiary Prodigy Textiles Co., Ltd.

 

On May 1, 2018, the Company announced that it had received its enterprise registration certificate for its new Vietnamese subsidiary Prodigy Textiles Co., Ltd.

 

Foreign Currency

 

The assets and liabilities of Prodigy Textiles, Co., Ltd. (the Company’s Vietnamese subsidiary) whose functional currency is the Vietnamese Dong, are translated into US dollars at period-end exchange rates prior to consolidation. Income and expense items are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the period. The adjustments resulting from translating the Company’s financial statements are reflected as a component of other comprehensive (loss) income. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized in net earnings based on differences between foreign exchange rates on the transaction date and settlement date.

 

Use of Estimates

 

In preparing financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Cash

 

For the purposes of the cash flow statements, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

 

Loss Per Share

 

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is computed based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding as defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB” Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 260, “Earnings per Share.” For December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, warrants were not included in the computation of income/ (loss) per share because their inclusion is anti-dilutive.

 

The computation of basic and diluted loss per share for December 31, 2020 and 2019 excludes the common stock equivalents of the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive:

 

   December 31, 2020   December 31, 2019 
Stock Warrants (Exercise price - $0.001- $0.16/share)   49,120,917    57,995,917 
Stock Options (Exercise price - $0.1150/Share)   27,340,000    - 
Convertible Preferred Stock   2    2 
Total   76,460,919    57,995,919 

 

 34 
 

 

Research and Development Costs

 

The Company expenses all research and development costs as incurred for which there is no alternative future use. These costs also include the expensing of employee compensation and employee stock based compensation.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC No. 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC No. 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

The net deferred tax liability in the accompanying balance sheets includes the following amounts of deferred tax assets and liabilities:

 

   2020   2019 

Expected income tax (recovery) expense at the statutory rate of 21%

  $(1,043,948)  $(610,845)
Tax effect of expenses that are not deductible for income tax purposes (net of other amounts deductible for tax purposes)   608,152    142,167 
Change in valuation allowance   435,795    468,678 
           
Provision for income taxes  $-   $- 

 

The components of deferred income taxes are as follows:

 

   Years Ended December, 
   2020   2019 
Deferred tax liability:  $-   $- 
Deferred tax asset          
Net Operating Loss Carryforward   3,815,336    3,379,542 
Valuation allowance   (3,815,336)   (3,379,542)
Net deferred tax asset   -    - 
Net deferred tax liability  $-   $- 

 

The valuation allowance was established to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that will more likely than not be realized. This is necessary due to the Company’s continued operating losses and the uncertainty of the Company’s ability to utilize all of the net operating loss carryforwards before they will expire through the year 2040.

 

The net change in the valuation allowance for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was an increase of $435,795 and an increase of $610,845, respectively.

 

 35 
 

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation for employees and directors in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation (“ASC 718”). ASC 718 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of operations based on their fair values. Under the provisions of ASC 718, stock-based compensation costs are measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and are recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant). The fair value of the Company’s common stock options are estimated using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions: expected volatility, dividend rate, risk free interest rate and the expected life. The Company expenses stock-based compensation by using the straight-line method. In accordance with ASC 718 and, excess tax benefits realized from the exercise of stock-based awards are classified as cash flows from operating activities. All excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services, as prescribed by ASC 718-10, at either the fair value of the services rendered or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable, using the measurement date guidelines enumerated in ASU 2018-07.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Changes to accounting principles are established by the FASB in the form of ASU’s to the FASB’s Codification. We consider the applicability and impact of all ASU’s on our financial position, results of operations, stockholders’ deficit, cash flows, or presentation thereof.

 

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. The amendments in the ASU include removing exceptions to incremental intraperiod tax allocation of losses and gains from different financial statement components, exceptions to the method of recognizing income taxes on interim period losses, and exceptions to deferred tax liability recognition related to foreign subsidiary investments. In addition, the ASU requires that entities recognize franchise tax based on an incremental method and requires an entity to evaluate the accounting for step-ups in the tax basis of goodwill as inside or outside of a business combination. The amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods therein. Early adoption of the standard is permitted, including adoption in interim or annual periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. We have not early adopted this ASU as of December 31, 2020. The ASU is currently not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity. The ASU simplifies the accounting for convertible instruments by removing certain separation models in ASC 470- 20, Debt—Debt with Conversion and Other Options, for convertible instruments. The ASU updates the guidance on certain embedded conversion features that are not required to be accounted for as derivatives under Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, or that do not result in substantial premiums accounted for as paid-in capital, such that those features are no longer required to be separated from the host contract. The convertible debt instruments will be accounted for as a single liability measured at amortized cost. This will also result in the interest expense recognized for convertible debt instruments to be typically closer to the coupon interest rate when applying the guidance in Topic 835, Interest. Further, the ASU made amendments to the EPS guidance in Topic 260 for convertible instruments, the most significant impact of which is requiring the use of the if-converted method for diluted EPS calculation, and no longer allowing the net share settlement method. The ASU also made revisions to Topic 815-40, which provides guidance on how an entity must determine whether a contract qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting. The amendments to Topic 815-40 change the scope of contracts that are recognized as assets or liabilities. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted for periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Adoption of the ASU can either be on a modified retrospective or full retrospective basis. The ASU is currently not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, to require financial assets carried at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected based on historical experience, current conditions, and forecasts. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, to clarify that receivables arising from operating leases are within the scope of lease accounting standards. Further, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, ASU No. 2019-05, ASU 2019-10, ASU 2019-11, ASU 2020-02, and ASU 2020-03 to provide additional guidance on the credit losses standard. Adoption of the ASUs is on a modified retrospective basis. We adopted the ASUs on January 1, 2020. The ASUs did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. ASU No. 2016-13 applies to all financial assets including loans, trade receivables and any other financial assets not excluded from the scope that have the contractual right to receive cash. The adoption of this ASU did not have any impact on our financial statements.

 

 36 
 

 

Equipment

 

The Company values property and equipment at cost and depreciates these assets using the straight-line method over their expected useful life.

 

In accordance with FASB ASC No. 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, the Company carries long-lived assets at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value. Impairment is evaluated by estimating future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. If the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flow is less than the carrying amount of the assets, an impairment loss is recognized. Fair value, for purposes of calculating impairment, is measured based on estimated future cash flows, discounted at a market rate of interest.

 

There were no impairment losses recorded for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

We hold certain financial assets, which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“ASC Topic 820-10”). ASC Topic 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Level 1 instruments include cash, account receivable, prepaid expenses, inventory and account payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying values are assumed to approximate the fair value due to the short term nature of the instrument.

 

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC Topic 820-10 are described below:

 

  Level 1 - Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that an entity has the ability to access. We believe our carrying value of level 1 instruments approximate their fair value at December 31, 2020 and 2019.
     
  Level 2 - Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
     
  Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. We consider depleting assets, asset retirement obligations and net profit interest liability to be Level 3. We determine the fair value of Level 3 assets and liabilities utilizing various inputs, including NYMEX price quotations and contract terms.

 

    December 31, 2020     December 31, 2019  
Level 1   $           -     $           -  
Level 2   $ -     $ -  
Level 3   $ -     $ -  
Total   $ -     $ -  

 

Revenue Recognition

 

The Company’s revenues have been generated primarily from a contract with the U.S. Government. The Company performed work under a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract. Under the base phase of that contract, the Company produced recombinant spider silk woven into ballistic shootpack panels. Those shootpack panels were delivered to the U.S. Government customer. Under an option period award starting in July 2017, to that original contract, the Company worked to develop new recombinant silks.

 

 37 
 

 

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC No. 606 — Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under ASC No. 606, the Company recognizes revenue from the commercial sales of products, licensing agreements and contracts by applying the following steps: (1) identify the contract with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to each performance obligation in the contract; and (5) recognize revenue when each performance obligation is satisfied.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized $0 and $0 respectively in revenue from the Government contract. These revenues were generated for work performed in the development and production of the Company’s recombinant silks under the base and option period phases of our ongoing contract with the US Army.

 

On July 24, 2017, the Company signed a contract option extension with the US Army to research and deliver recombinant spider silk fibers and threads. This contract option increased the total contract award by an additional $921,130 to a total of $1,021,092 and added 12 months to the contract duration. This effort was scheduled to end on September 24, 2018, but the Company requested an extension of this contract option period through April 2019 to complete the work. The Company has been in communication with the contracting office and is working with them as they determine the best path forward; Management believes there is a possibility of securing a follow-up contract to complete the delivery of all materials for the contract. The Company is also continuing to pursue additional contract opportunities with the Department of Defense, Department of Energy and other governmental agencies.

 

Concentration of Credit Risk

 

The Company at times has cash in banks in excess of FDIC insurance limits. At December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company had approximately $500,006 and $0, respectively in excess of FDIC insurance limits.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company booked $0 and $0 for doubtful accounts.

 

Original Issue Discount

 

For certain notes issued, the Company provides the debt holder with an original issue discount. The original issue discount is recorded as a debt discount, reducing the face amount of the note, and is amortized to interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the life of the debt.

 

Debt Issue Cost

 

Debt issuance cost paid to lenders, or third parties are recorded as debt discounts and amortized to interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations, over the life of the underlying debt instrument.

 

Beneficial Conversion Feature

 

For conventional convertible debt where the rate of conversion is below market value, the Company records a “beneficial conversion feature” (“BCF”) and related debt discount.

 

When the Company records a BCF, the relative fair value of the BCF is recorded as a debt discount against the face amount of the respective debt instrument. The discount is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt

 

 38 
 

 

NOTE 2 GOING CONCERN

 

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficiency of $6,631,299 and stockholders’ deficiency of $6,573,564 and used $1,254,712 of cash in operations for the year ended December 31, 2020. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

 

Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

 

NOTE 3 EQUIPMENT

 

At December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, property and equipment, net, is as follows:

 

   December 31, 2020   December 31, 2019 
Automobile  $41,805   $41,805 
Laboratory Equipment   96,536    96,536 
Office Equipment   7,260    7,260 
Leasehold Improvements   85,389    85,389 
Less: Accumulated Depreciation   (141,743)   (113,669)
Total Property and Equipment, net  $89,247   $117,321 

 

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $28,074 and $30,781, respectively.

 

NOTE 4 - RIGHT TO USE ASSETS AND LEASE LIABILITITY

 

Since September of 2015, we rent office space at 2723 South State Street, Suite 150, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, which is our principal place of business. We pay an annual rent of $2,508 for conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception services located at our principal place of business.

 

On January 23, 2017 the Company signed an 8 year property lease with the Company’s President for land in Texas where the Company grows its mulberry. The Company pays a monthly rent of $960. Rent expense – related party for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $13,092 and $14,793, respectively (See Note 9).

 

On September 13, 2017, the Company signed a new two year lease commencing on October 1, 2017 and ending on September 30, 2019. The Company paid an annual rent of $39,200 for year one of lease and $42,000 for year two of lease for office and manufacturing space.

 

On September 5, 2019, we signed a new two-year lease for a 5,000 square foot property in Lansing, MI that commenced on October 1, 2019 and ends on September 30, 2021, for its research and development headquarters. We pay an annual rent of $42,000 for year one of the lease and will pay $44,800 for year two of the lease.

 

On May 9, 2019 the Company signed a 5 year property lease with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam which consists of 4,560.57 square meters of space, which it leases at a current rent of approximately $45,150 per year one and two and with the 5% increase per year for years three through five.

 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” Topic 842, which amends the guidance in former ASC Topic 840, Leases. The new standard increases transparency and comparability most significantly by requiring the recognition by lessees of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases longer than 12 months. Under the standard, disclosures are required to meet the objective of enabling users of financial statements to assess the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. For lessees, leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the income statement.

 

The Company adopted the new lease guidance effective January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective transition approach, applying the new standard to all of its leases existing at the date of initial application which is the effective date of adoption. Consequently, financial information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019. We elected the package of practical expedients which permits us to not reassess (1) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (2) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, and (3) any initial direct costs for any existing leases as of the effective date. We did not elect the hindsight practical expedient which permits entities to use hindsight in determining the lease term and assessing impairment. The adoption of the lease standard did not change our previously reported consolidated statements of operations and did not result in a cumulative catch-up adjustment to opening equity. The adoption of the new guidance resulted in the recognition of ROU assets of $529,135 and lease liabilities of $531,462.

 

 39 
 

 

The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. In calculating the present value of the lease payments, the Company elected to utilize its incremental borrowing rate based on the remaining lease terms as of the January 1, 2019 adoption date. This rate was determined to be 8% and the Company determined the initial present value, at inception, of $559,568.

 

Operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives and initial direct costs incurred, if any.

 

The Company has elected the practical expedient to combine lease and non-lease components as a single component. The lease expense is recognized over the expected term on a straight-line basis. Operating leases are recognized on the balance sheet as right-of-use assets, current operating lease liabilities and non-current operating lease liabilities.

 

The new standard also provides practical expedients and certain exemptions for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We have elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases where the initial lease term is one year or less or for which the ROU asset at inception is deemed immaterial, we will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities. Those leases are expensed on a straight line basis over the term of the lease

 

Right to use assets is summarized below:

 

   December 31,
2020
 
Right to use assets, net – related party  $44,849 
Right to use assets, net   41,138 
Right to use assets, net   279,038 
Total  $365,025 

 

During the years ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $98,888 as lease expense to current period operations.

 

Lease liability is summarized below:

 

   December 31,
2020
 
Right to use liability, net – related party   47,418 
Right to use liability, net   42,918 
Right to use liability, net   289,385 
Total   379,720 
Less: short term portion  $(124,909)
Long term position  $254,811 

 

Lease expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 was comprised of the following:

 

Operating lease expense  $49,505 
Operating lease expense  $36,291 
Operating lease expense – related party  $13,092 

 

 40 
 

 

NOTE 5 ACCRUED INTEREST – RELATED PARTY

 

On June 6, 2016, the Company received a $50,000 loan from our principal stockholder. Subsequently on December 1, 2017, the Company received an additional $30,000 loan from the same stockholder. On January 8, 2018 and March 31, 2018 the Company received an additional loan of $100,000 and $15,000, respectively. The Company received additional loan funds from the same stockholder as follows: $20,000 on April 26, 2018; $15,000 on June 21, 2018; $15,000 on June 29, 2018; $20,000 on July 5, 2018; $26,000 on October 1, 2018; $11,000 on October 12, 2018; $20,000 on December 21, 2018; $3,000 on January 4, 2019; $30,000 on January 17, 2019; $30,000 on February 1, 2019; $20,000 on February 15, 2019; $20,000 on March 1, 2019; $17,000 on January 4, 2019, $100,000 on November 20, 2019, $100,000 on December 18, 2019, $100,000 on January 24, 2020, $100,000 on February 19, 2020 $100,000 on March 9, 2020, $100,000 on April 8, 2020, $150,000 on June 3, 2020, $100,000 on July 16, 2020, $100,000 on August 12, 2020,$100,000 on September 10, 2020 $30,000 on October 19, 2020, $30,000 on November 4, 2020, $35,000 on November 17, 2020 and $70,000 on December 1, 2020. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears an interest at 3%, is unsecured, and due on demand. Total loan payable to principal stockholder for as of December 31, 2019 is $642,000. Total loan payable to this principal stockholder as of December 31, 2020 is $1,657,000. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $50,763 as an in-kind contribution of interest related to the loan and recorded accrued interest payable of $36,562. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $22,337 as an in-kind contribution of interest related to the loan and recorded accrued interest payable of $15,581.

 

NOTE 6 NOTE PAYABLE

 

On March 1, 2019, the Company entered into an unsecured promissory note with Notre Dame - an unrelated party in the amount of $265,244 in exchange for outstanding account payable due to the debtor. Pursuant to the terms of the note, the note bears 10% interest per year from the date of default until the date the loan is paid in full. The term of the loan is twenty four months. The loan repayment commenced immediately over a twenty-four month period according to the following table. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company paid $40,000 of the loan balance (See Note 8 (A)):

 

1. $1,000 per month for the first six months;

2. $2,000 per month for the months seven and eight;

3. $5,000 per month for months nine through twenty three; and,

4. Final payment of all remaining balance, in the amount of $180,224 in month 24.

 

On April 16, 2020, the Company, was granted a loan (the “Loan”) from The Huntington National Bank, in the aggregate amount of $90,100, pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) under Division A, Title I of the CARES Act, which was enacted March 27, 2020.

 

The Loan, which was in the form of a Note dated on or about April 16, 2020 issued by the Borrower, matures on or about April 16, 2022 and bears interest at an approximate rate of 1% per annum. The Note may be prepaid by the Borrower at any time prior to maturity with no prepayment penalties. Funds from the Loan may only be used for payroll costs, costs used to continue group health care benefits, mortgage payments, rent, utilities, and interest on other debt obligations incurred before February 15, 2020. The Company intends to use the entire Loan amount for qualifying expenses. Under the terms of the PPP, certain amounts of the Loan may be forgiven if they are used for qualifying expenses as described in the CARES Act.

 

NOTE 7 CONVERTIBLE NOTE

 

The Company issued a $1,000,000, thirteen-month (13), unsecured, convertible note on December 11, 2020, which is due January 11, 2022. The convertible note bears interest at 10%, with a 5% original issue discount ($50,000), resulting in net proceeds of $950,000. The note contains a discount to market feature, whereby, the lender can purchase stock at 90% of the lowest trading price for a period of ten (10) days preceding the conversion date.

 

 41 
 

 

Additionally, the Company issued 3,125,000 five-year (5) warrants. The warrants had a fair value of $2,599,066, based upon using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following inputs:

 

Stock Price  $0.14 
Exercise price  $0.16 
Expected term (in years)   5 
Expected volatility   60.64%
Annual rate of quarterly dividends   0%
Risk free interest rate   0.10%

 

The Company has determined that ASC 815 does not apply since the Company has unlimited authorized shares, which in turn satisfies the requirement of having sufficient authorized shares available to settle any potential instruments that may require physical net-share settlement.

 

Pursuant to ASC 470, the Company will record a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) based upon the relative fair value of the conversion feature within the convertible note and the related warrants. The BCF cannot exceed the face amount of the note, therefore, the discount for this note is $1,000,000, and was recorded on the commitment date. The discount is amortized to amortization of debt discount over the life of the underlying convertible note.

 

The Company also paid $86,000 as a debt issuance cost to a placement agent for services rendered. These costs are considered to be a component of the total debt discount.

 

The following represents a summary of the Company’s convertible debt at December 31, 2020:

 

Convertible Note Payable

 

    Amounts     In-Default  
Balance – December 31, 2019     -                -  
Proceeds – net     950,000        
Original issue discount     50,000        
Debt discount recorded     (1,000,000 )      
Amortization of debt discount     50,505        
Balance – December 31, 2020   $ 50,505     $ -  

 

Accrued Interest Payable

 

   Amounts   In-Default 
Balance – December 31, 2019   -              - 
Interest Expense 2020   5,479      
Balance – December 31, 2020  $5,479   $- 

 

NOTE 8 STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

 

(A) Common Stock Issued for Cash

 

On March 9, 2019, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with one investor (the “Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company issued the investor 14,797,278 Units at a purchase price of $0.06758 per Unit, for total gross proceeds to the Company of $1,000,000. The Units consist of 14,797,278 shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) and two warrants (the “Warrants”): (i) one warrant entitles the investor to purchase up to 14,797,278 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.06 per share (the “6 Cent Warrants”) and (ii) one warrant entitles the investor to purchase up to 7,398,639 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.08 per share (the “8 Cent Warrant”). The Warrants shall be exercisable at any time from the issuance date until the following expiration dates:

 

● ½ of all $0.06 Warrants shall expire on March 8, 2021;

● ½ of all $0.06 Warrants shall expire on March 8, 2022;

● ½ of all $0.08 Warrants shall expire on March 8, 2022; and,

● ½ of all $0.08 Warrants shall expire on March 8, 2023.

 

 42 
 

 

(B) Common Stock Issued for Services

 

Shares issued for services as mentioned below were valued at the closing price of the stock on the date of grant.

 

On March 20, 2019, the Company issued 4,052,652 shares of its class A common stock with a fair value of $281,659 ($0.0695/share) on the date of settlement. The Company settled $243,159 of accounts payable to the University of Notre Dame. The Company recorded an additional amount of $38,500 based on the fair value of the shares on the date of settlement. See Note 8 (A).

 

(C) Common Stock Warrants and Options

 

On July 30, 2020, the Company issued 9,941,623 shares of Common stock in connection with the cashless exercise of 10,000,000 warrants.

 

On February 19, 2020 the Company issued a 20-year option to purchase 20,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.115 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $2,198,411, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Options will be exercisable on February 19, 2025, and for a period of 15 years expiring on February 19, 2040. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $2,198,411 as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   125.19%
Expected term   3 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.56%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On February 19, 2020 the Company issued a 10-year option to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.115 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $626,047, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and 2,000,000 options are fully vested on the date granted and 1,000,000 options vest at the end of each successive year for four years. Options will be exercisable on February 19, 2021, and for a period of 10 years expiring on February 19, 2030. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $272,673 as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   125.19%
Expected term   3 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.50%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On February 19, 2020 the Company issued a 7-year option to purchase 1,340,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.115 per share to employees for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $133,063, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and 268,000 options are fully vested on the date granted and the remaining option vest equally over the remaining 4 years at the end of each successive year. Options will be exercisable on February 19, 2021, and for a period of 6 years expiring on February 19, 2027. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $40,935 as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   125.19%
Expected term   6 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.46%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

 43 
 

 

On September 26, 2019, the Company issued 766,667 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 1,000,000 warrants. On August 14, 2019, the Company issued 7,967,871 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 8,000,000 warrants.

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 2-year option to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $267,574, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2020, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $267,574 as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   105.73%
Expected term   2 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.62%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 2-year option to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $267,574, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and is fully vested on August 8, 2020. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2022, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $161,568 as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   105.73%
Expected term   2 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.62%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 3-year option to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $291,842, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and is fully vested on August 8, 2021. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2023, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2026. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $146,121 as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   105.73%
Expected term   3 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.54%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 2-year option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $118,874, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2020, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $118,874 as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   105.73%
Expected term   2 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.62%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

 44 
 

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 2-year option to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $118,874, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2021, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2024. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $118,874 as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   105.73%
Expected term   2 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.62%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 2-year option to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to an employee for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $14,859, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2020, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2023. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $14,859, as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   105.73%
Expected term   2 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.62%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 2-year option to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $16,723, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on August 8, 2020. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2022, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $10,098, as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   105.73%
Expected term   2 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.62%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 2-year options to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $18,240, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on August 8, 2021. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2023, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2026. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $9,133, as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   105.73%
Expected term   3 years 
Risk free interest rate   1.54%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued a 2-year options to purchase 125,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share to a related party for services rendered. The options had a fair value of $19,525, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on August 8, 2022. Options will be exercisable on August 8, 2024, and for a period of 3 years expiring on August 8, 2027. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $6,520, as an expense for options issued.

 

Expected dividends     0 %
Expected volatility     105.73 %
Expected term     3 years  
Risk free interest rate     1.54 %
Expected forfeitures     0 %

 

 45 
 

 

On March 20, 2018, the Company issued a 4-year warrant to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $19,915, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on March 20, 2018. Warrants will be exercisable on March 20, 2019, and for a period of 3 years expiring on March 20, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $19,915 as an expense for warrants issued. On April 5, 2019, the Company cancelled 600,000 warrant issued to a consultant on February 20, 2018 in exchange for $6,000 cash payment. In addition the Company also recorded a $19,915 reduction to warrant expense related to the warrant cancellation.

 

Expected dividends   0%
Expected volatility   97.56%
Expected term   4 years 
Risk free interest rate   2.65%
Expected forfeitures   0%

 

On September 26, 2019, the Company issued 766,667 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 1,000,000 warrants.

 

On August 14, 2019, the Company issued 7,967,871 shares in connection with the cashless exercise of the 8,000,000 warrants.

 

   Number of Warrants   Weighted Average Exercise Price  

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in Years)

 
             
Balance, December 31, 2019   55,995,917              2.77 
Granted   3,125,000    -    - 
Exercised   (10,000,000)   -    - 
Cancelled/Forfeited   -    -    - 
Balance, December 31, 2020   49,120,917         1.83 
Intrinsic Value  $3,013,010           

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the following warrants were outstanding:

 

Exercise Price
Warrants
Outstanding
   Warrants
Exercisable
   Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 
$0.001    11,000,000    1.19   $1,371,500 
$0.056    2,000,000    0.60   $139,000 
$0.04    2,300,000    0.65   $196,650 
$0.06    7,398,639    0.18   $484,611 
$0.06    7,398,639    1.18   $484,611 
$0.08    3,699,320    1.18   $168,319 
$0.08    3,699,320    2.18   $168,319 
$0.2299    8,500,000    4.27   $- 
$0.16    3,125,000    4.95   $

-

 

 

 46 
 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the following warrants were outstanding:

 

Exercise Price
Warrants
Outstanding
   Warrants
Exercisable
   Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
   Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
 
$0.001    21,000,000    1.65   $4,069,800 
$0.056    3,000,000    1.61   $387,600 
$0.04    2,300,000    1.70   $445,740 
$0.06    7,398,639    1.19   $1,433,856 
$0.06    7,398,639    2.19   $1,433,856 
$0.08    3,699,320    2.19   $716,928 
$0.08    3,699,320    3.19   $719,928 
$0.2299    8,500,000    5.39   $1,647,300 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the following options were outstanding:

 

            Weighted Average 
Exercise   Options   Options   Remaining 
Price   Outstanding   Exercisable   Contractual Life 
                  
$0.115            -    22,267,800    22.6 

 

(D) Amendment to Articles of Incorporation

 

On February 16, 2009, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to amend the number and class of shares the Company is authorized to issue as follows:

 

Common stock Class A, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value
Common stock Class B, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value
Preferred stock, unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value

 

Effective December 17, 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to designate a Series A no par value preferred stock. Two shares of Series A Preferred stock have been authorized.

 

(E) Common Stock Issued for Debt

 

None

 

(F) Capital contribution – Related Party

 

For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $17,495 as contribution of capital by Chief Financial Officer.

 

NOTE 9 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its CEO, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015. The term of the agreement is a five year period at an annual salary of $210,000. There is a 6% annual increase. For the year ending December 31, 2015, the annual salary was $281,027. The employee is also to receive a 20% bonus based on the annual based salary. Any stock, stock options bonuses have to be approved by the board of directors. On January 1, 2016 the agreement was renewed with the same terms for another 5 years with an annual salary of $297,889 for the year ended December 31, 2016. On January 1, 2017 the agreement renewed with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $315,764 for the year ended December 31, 2017. On January 1, 2019 the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $354,791 for the year ended December 31, 2019. On January 1, 2020 the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $376,078 for the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the accrued salary balance is $2,804,725 and $2,535,203, respectively. (See Note 10).

 

 47 
 

 

On January 20, 2015, the board of directors appointed Mr. Jonathan R. Rice as our Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Rice’s employment agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to an annual cash compensation of $120,000, which includes salary, health insurance, 401K retirement plan contributions, etc. The Company also agreed to reimburse Mr. Rice for his past educational expenses of approximately $11,000. In addition, Mr. Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share (the “January 2015 Warrant”) pursuant to the employment agreement. Additionally, on May 28, 2015, the Company issued a three-year warrant to purchase 3,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share (the “May 2015 Warrant”) to Mr. Rice. The May 2015 warrant fully vested on October 28, 2016 and will expire on May 28, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded $121,448 for the warrants issued to Mr. Rice. On January 14, 2016, the Company signed a new employment agreement with Mr. Rice. The employment agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to annual cash compensation of $140,000, which includes salary, health insurance, 401K retirement plan contributions, etc. In addition, Mr. Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share pursuant to the employment agreement (the “May 2016 Warrant”). The May 2016 warrant fully vested on February 20, 2017 and will expire on May 20, 2026. On January 9, 2018, the Company extended the expiration date of the January 2015 warrant from January 19, 2018 to January 31, 2020, and on January 10, 2020 the Company extended the expiration date of the January 2015 warrant to January 10, 2025 and on March 15, 2018, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement with its COO, extending the term to January 31, 2019. On March 25, 2019, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement with its COO, extending the term to January 1, 2020. On March 5, 2021, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement with its COO, extending the term to January 1, 2022. On August 8, 2019, Mr. Rice was issued a set of three five-year warrants to purchase a total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share pursuant to the employment agreement. On April 26, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to increase Mr. Rice’s base salary by $20,000 per year and issue a one-time $20,000 bonus. Additionally, on August 15, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to increase Mr. Rice’s base salary by an additional $20,000 per year. The salary increase and the bonus is accrued and to be paid in full earlier by the direction of the Board or upon the earlier of:

 

●The Company maintaining $6,000,000 or more in working capital,

●Upon the transfer of ownership of more than 50% of the Corporation’s voting share or an assignment for the benefit of creditors or bankruptcy, or

●Upon the fifth year anniversary of the salary increase and the bonus issuance.

 

As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 the Company owes $103,730 and $64,352, respectively, to Mr. Rice for payroll payable.

 

On October 21, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to increase Mr. Rice’s base salary by $20,000 per year (effective August 15, 2019). The salary increase is accrued and to be paid in full earlier by the direction of the Board or upon the earlier of:

 

●The Company maintaining $6,000,000 or more in working capital,

●Upon the transfer of ownership of more than 50% of the Corporation’s voting share or an assignment for the benefit of creditors or bankruptcy, or

●Upon the fifth year anniversary of the salary increase and the bonus issuance.

 

On July 3, 2019, the board of directors appointed Mr. Kenneth Le as the Company’s Director of Government relations and President of Prodigy Textiles. Mr. Le’s employment agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Le is entitled to annual cash compensation of $60,000. In addition, Mr. Le was issued two three-year warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the accrued salary balance is $888 and $1,154, respectively.

 

 48 
 

 

(A) License Agreement

 

On May 8, 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the Company paid a non- refundable license fee of $10,000. The Company will pay a license maintenance fee of $10,000 on the one year anniversary of this agreement and each year thereafter. The Company will pay an annual research fee of $13,700 with first payment due January 2007, then on each subsequent anniversary of the effective date commencing May 4, 2007. The annual research fees are accrued by the Company for future payment. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement the Company may be required to pay additional fees aggregating up to a maximum of $10,000 a year for patent maintenance and prosecution relating to the licensed intellectual property.

 

On October 28, 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement with the University of Notre Dame. Under the agreement, the Company received exclusive and non-exclusive rights to certain spider silk technologies including commercial rights with the right to sublicense such intellectual property. In consideration of the licenses granted under the agreement, the Company agreed to issue to the University of Notre Dame 2,200,000 shares of its common stock and to pay a royalty of 2% of net sales. The license agreement has a term of 20 years which can be extended on an annual basis after that. It can be terminated by the University of Notre Dame if the Company defaults on its obligations under the agreement and fails to cure such default within 90 days of a written notice by the university. The Company can terminate the agreement upon a 90 day written notice subject to payment of a termination fee of $5,000 if the termination takes place within 2 years after its effectiveness, $10,000 if the termination takes place within 4 years after its effectiveness and $20,000 if the Agreement is terminated after 4 years. On May 5, 2017, the Company signed an addendum to that agreement relating to tangible property and project intellectual property. On March 1, 2019, the Company singed an addendum to that agreement. The Company entered into a separate loan agreement and promissory noted dated March 1, 2019 as a payment for expenses paid by the University prior to January 31, 2019 totaling $265,244 and issued 4,025,652 shares of Class A common stock with a fair value of $281,659 as payment of certain debt. In the event of default the license agreement will be terminated. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company paid $40,000 of the balance (See Notes 6).

 

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with Mr. Thompson, its CEO. In accordance with FASB ASC No 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the outstanding balance is $65,292. As of December 31, 2019, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $2,623. In 2020 the Company recorded $1,960 in interest expensed and related accrued interest payable. As of December 31, 2020 the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $8,503.

 

On December 30, 2015, the Company entered into a cooperative agreement for the research and pilot production of hybrid silkworms in Vietnam. Under this agreement, the Company will establish a subsidiary in Vietnam where it will develop and produce hybrid silkworms. On April 24, 2018, the Company announced that it had received its investment registration certificate for its new Vietnamese subsidiary Prodigy Textiles Co., Ltd. On May 1, 2018, the Company announced that it had received its enterprise registration certificate for its new Vietnamese subsidiary Prodigy Textiles Co., Ltd.

 

(B) Consulting Agreement

 

On February 20, 2018, the Company signed an agreement with a consultant to provide services. Under this agreement the consultant will receive a warrant for 600,000 shares of common stock and may be awarded additional warrants for up to 3,000,000 shares of common stock if performance metrics are achieved. On March 20, 2018, the Company issued a 4-year warrant to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.001 per share to a consultant for services rendered. The warrants had a fair value of $19,915, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on March 20, 2018. Warrants will be exercisable on March 20, 2019, and for a period of 3 years expiring on March 20, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $19,915 as an expense for warrants issued (See Note 8 (C)). On April 5, 2019, the Company cancelled 600,000 warrant issued to a consultant on February 20, 2018 in exchange for $6,000 cash payment.

 

(C) Operating Lease Agreements

 

Since September of 2015, we rent office space at 2723 South State Street, Suite 150, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, which is our principal place of business. We pay an annual rent of $2,508 for conference facilities, mail, fax, and reception services located at our principal place of business.

 

On May 9, 2019 the Company signed a 5 year property lease Socialist Republic of Vietnam which consists of 4,560.57 square meters of space, which it leases at a current rent of approximately $45,150 per year one and two and with the 5% increase per year for years three through five.

 

 49 
 

 

On January 23, 2017 the Company signed an 8 year property lease with the Company’s President for land in Texas where the Company grows its mulberry. The Company pays a monthly rent of $960. Rent expense – related party for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, was $9,819 and $11,913, respectively (See Note 10).

 

On September 13, 2017, the Company signed a new two year lease commencing on October 1, 2017 and ending on March 31, 2020. The Company pays an annual rent of $39,200 for the year one of lease and $42,000 for the year two of lease for office and manufacturing space. On September 5, 2019, the Company signed a new two-year lease for this 5,000 square foot property in Lansing, MI that commenced on October 1, 2019 and ends on September 30, 2021, for its research and development headquarters. The Company pays an annual rent of $42,000 for year one of the lease and $44,800 for year two of the lease.

 

NOTE 10 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

On December 26, 2006, the Company entered into an addendum to the intellectual property transfer agreement with Mr. Thompson, its CEO. Pursuant to the addendum, the Company agreed to issue either 200,000 preferred shares with the following preferences; no dividends and voting rights equal to 100 common shares per share of preferred stock or the payment of $120,000, the officer agreed to terminate the royalty payments due under the agreement and give title to the exclusive license for the non-protective apparel use of the intellectual property to the Company. On the date of the agreement, the Company did not have any preferred stock authorized with the required preferences. In accordance with FASB ASC No. 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the Company determined that the present value of the payment of $120,000 that was due on December 26, 2007, one year anniversary of the addendum, should be recorded as an accrued expense until such time as the Company has the ability to assert that it has preferred shares authorized. As of December 31, 2020 the outstanding balance is $65,292. Additionally, the accrued expenses are accruing 7% interest per year. As of December 31, 2020, the Company recorded interest expense and related accrued interest payable of $8,503.

 

On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement, with its CEO, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015. Subsequently, on January 1, 2018 the agreement renewed with the same terms for another 5 years with an annual salary of $334,708 for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the accrued salary balance is $2,804,725and $2,535,203, respectively.

 

On January 14, 2016, the Company signed a new employment agreement with Mr. Rice, the Company’s COO. The employment agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to annual cash compensation of $140,000, which includes salary, health insurance, 401K retirement plan contributions, etc. In addition, Mr. Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share pursuant to the employment agreement. On January 9, 2018, the Company extended the expiration date of a warrant for 2,000,000 shares of common stock from January 19, 2018 to January 31, 2020 and on January 10, 2020, the Company extended the expiration date of the warrant to January 10, 2025 for Mr. Rice. Additionally, on March 15, 2018, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement with its COO. On March 5, 2021, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement with its COO extending until January 1, 2022. On April 26, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to increase Mr. Rice’s base salary by $20,000 per year and issue a one-time $20,000 bonus. Additionally, on August 15, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to increase Mr. Rice’s base salary by an additional $20,000 per year. The salary increase and the bonus is accrued and to be paid in full earlier by the direction of the Board or upon the earlier of:

 

  The Company maintaining $6,000,000 or more in working capital,
     
  Upon the transfer of ownership of more than 50% of the Corporation’s voting share or an assignment for the benefit of creditors or bankruptcy, or
     
  Upon the fifth year anniversary of the salary increase and the bonus issuance.

 

 50 
 

 

As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company owes $103,730 and $64,351, respectively, to Mr. Rice for payroll payable.

 

On July 3, 2019, the board of directors appointed Mr. Kenneth Le as the Company’s Director of Government relations and President of Prodigy Textiles. Mr. Le’s employment agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Le is entitled to an annual cash compensation of $60,000. In addition, Mr. Le was issued two three-year warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the accrued salary balance is $888 and $1,154, respectively.

 

June 6, 2016, the Company received a $50,000 loan from our principal stockholder. Subsequently on December 1, 2017, the Company received an additional $30,000 loan from the same stockholder. On January 8, 2018 and March 31, 2018 the Company received an additional loan of $100,000 and $15,000, respectively. The Company received additional loan funds from the same stockholder as follows: $20,000 on April 26, 2018; $15,000 on June 21, 2018; $15,000 on June 29, 2018; $20,000 on July 5, 2018; $26,000 on October 1, 2018; $11,000 on October 12, 2018; $20,000 on December 21, 2018; $3,000 on January 4, 2019; $30,000 on January 17, 2019; $30,000 on February 1, 2019; $20,000 on February 15, 2019; $20,000 on March 1, 2019; $17,000 on January 4, 2019, $100,000 on November 20, 2019, $100,000 on December 18, 2019, $100,000 on January 24, 2020, $100,000 on February 19, 2020 $100,000 on March 9, 2020, $100,000 on April 8, 2020, $150,000 on June 3, 2020, $100,000 on July 16, 2020, $100,000 on August 12, 2020,$100,000 on September 10, 2020 $30,000 on October 19, 2020, $30,000 on November 4, 2020, $35,000 on November 17, 2020 and $70,000 on December 1, 2020. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advance bears an interest at 3%, is unsecured, and due on demand. Total loan payable to principal stockholder for as of December 31, 2019 is $642,000. Total loan payable to this principal stockholder as of December 31, 2020 is $1,657,000. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company recorded $50,763 as an in-kind contribution of interest related to the loan and recorded accrued interest payable of $36,562. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded $22,337 as an in-kind contribution of interest related to the loan and recorded accrued interest payable of $15,581.

 

On January 23, 2017, the Company signed an 8 year property lease with the Company’s President for land in Texas. The Company pays $960 per month starting on February 1, 2017 and uses this facility to grow mulberry for its U.S. silk operations. Rent expense – related party for years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $13,092 and $14,793, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, there was $331,143 and $304,539, respectively, included in accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operations Officer.

 

As of December 31, 2020, there was $1,562,499 of accrued interest- related party and $69,669 in shareholder loan interest – related party included in accounts payable and accrued expenses – related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief Executive officer.

 

As of December 31, 2019, there was $1,196,503 of accrued interest- related party and $43,715 in shareholder loan interest – related party included in accounts payable and accrued expenses – related party, which is owed to the Company’s Chief Executive officer.

 

As of December 31, 2020, the Company owes $2,804,725 in accrued salary to principal stockholder, $103,730 to the Company’s COO, $888 to Director of Prodigy Textiles and $22,900 to its office employees.

 

As of December 31, 2019, the Company owes $2,535,203 in accrued salary to principal stockholder, $64,351 to the Company’s COO, $1,153 to Director of Prodigy Textiles and $4,477 to its office employees.

 

The Company owes $65,292 in royalty payable to related party as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

 

NOTE 11 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

The Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to March 12, 2021 through the date these financial statements were issued, and has determined that, other than disclosed below, it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose.

 

On January 25, 2021, the Company issued a stock option for 2,500,000 shares to a related party under the Company’s employee stock option plan. The exercise price was $0.134 per share

 

On January 25, 2021, the Company signed an amendment to a strategic partnership agreement with Kings Group for and exclusive sales agreement for up to $40 million.

 

On March 2, 2021, the Company issued 1,479,728 share of Common Stock in exchange for $88,783.68, per the terms of a cash stock warrant exercise.

 

On March 3, 2021, the Company received forgiveness for a $90,1000.00 Paycheck Protection Program loan granted on April 17, 2020.

 

 51 
 

 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (the Company’s principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

 

Our Chief Executive Officer, as the principal executive officer (chief executive officer) and principal financial officer (chief financial officer), is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, our internal controls and procedures may not prevent or detect misstatements. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

 

 52 
 

 

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “ Internal Control – Integrated Framework” (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our management has determined that as of December 31, 2020, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective for the purposes for which it is intended based on the following material weaknesses:

 

Lack of internal audit function. During 2020, the Company, upon review of the independent auditors, made some adjustments to its financial statements, including, adjusting salary amounts and the related tax accruals, correcting warrant expense for a warrant issued to a related party, and adding the liability due to our attorney that should have been recorded. Management believes that the foregoing is due to the fact that the Company lacks qualified resources to perform the internal audit functions properly and that the scope and effectiveness of the internal audit function are yet to be developed. Specifically, the reporting mechanism between the accounting department and the Board of Directors and the CEO was not effective, therefore resulting in the delay of recording and reporting.
   
No Segregation of Duties Ineffective controls over financial reporting: As of December 31, 2020, we had no full-time employees with the requisite expertise in the key functional areas of finance and accounting. As a result, there is a lack of proper segregation of duties necessary to insure that all transactions are accounted for accurately and in a timely manner.
   
Lack of a functioning audit committee: Due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, and no audit committee has been elected, the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures is inadequate.
   
Written Policies & Procedures: Due to lack of written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting, the Company did not establish a formal process to close our books monthly and account for all transactions.
   
Lack of controls over related party transactions: As of December 31, 2020, the Company did not establish a formal written policy for the approval, identification and authorization of related party transactions.

 

We are developing a plan to ensure that all information will be recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately, and as of the date of this report, we have hired a payroll service firm to manage all payroll functions including tax withholdings. We will take the following steps to address the above-referenced material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting:

 

1. We will continue to educate our management personnel to increase its ability to comply with the disclosure requirements and financial reporting controls; and
   
2. We will increase management oversight of accounting and reporting functions in the future; and
   
3. As soon as we can raise sufficient capital or our operations generate sufficient cash flow, we will hire personnel to handle our accounting and reporting functions.

 

While the first two steps of our remediation process are ongoing, we do not expect to remediate the weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting until the time when we start to commercialize a recombinant fiber (and, therefore, may have sufficient cash flow for hiring personnel to handle our accounting and reporting functions).

 

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this report.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

No change in our system of internal control over financial reporting occurred during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 53 
 

 

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

 

PART III

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

 

Our executive officers and sole director as of the date of this report are as follows:

 

NAME  AGE  POSITION  DATE APPOINTED
Kim Thompson  59  President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director  April 25, 2006
Jonathan R. Rice  41  Chief Operating Officer  January 20, 2015

 

The following summarizes the occupation and business experience during the past five years for our officers and sole director.

 

KIM THOMPSON

 

Mr. Thompson was a founder of the California law firm of Ching & Thompson which was founded in 1997 where he focused primarily on commercial litigation. He has been a partner in the Illinois law firm of McJessy, Ching & Thompson since 2004 where he also emphasizes commercial and civil rights litigation. Mr. Thompson received his bachelor’s degree in applied economics from James Madison College, Michigan State University, and his Juris Doctorate from the University of Michigan. He is the named inventor or co-inventor on a number of provisional patent applications including inventions relating to biotechnology and mechanics. Mr. Thompson is the inventor of the technology concept that lead to the forming of the Company. We believe that Mr. Thompson is well suited to serve as our director because of his knowledge of biotechnology, legal expertise and background in economics.

 

JONANTHAN R. RICE

 

Jonathan R. Rice had worked at Ultra Electronics, Adaptive Materials Inc., a Michigan company (“UEA”) since 2002. At UEA, he worked as the Director of Advanced Technologies, where he was responsible for new products development and commercialization. He was also the Corporate Facility Security Officer for UEA since 2006, where Mr. Rice ensured UEA’s compliance with federal regulations under the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual and completed its annual security audit. During 2004 through 2007 while working as an Engineering Manager at UEA, Mr. Rice, among other things, led the design and development of multiple fuel cell and power management systems, established a team to identify and eliminate production and performance limitation, authored technical progress and final reports for customers and provided training to military personnel on use of fuel cell systems. From 2002 through 2005, Mr. Rice had also served as UEA’s Production Manager in charge of developing manufacturing process and techniques and sourcing the production equipment for UEA’s products. Mr. Rice graduated from Michigan Technological University in 2002 with a degree of Bachelors of Science Chemical Engineering. Mr. Rice received his Masters of Business Administration at Michigan State University in 2016.

 

Term of Office

 

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board. Mr. Thompson is employed as the CEO and CFO of the company pursuant to a five year employment contract.

 

Our sole director was appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

 

 54 
 

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

 

To the best of the Company’s knowledge, none of the following events occurred during the past ten years that are material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity of any of our executive officers, directors or promoters:

 

(1) A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

 

(2) Convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

 

(3) Subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

 

(i) Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

 

(ii) Engaging in any type of business practice; or

 

(iii) Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

 

(4) Subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described y such activity;

 

(5) Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

 

(6) Found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

 

(7) Subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

 

(i) Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

 

(ii) Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

 

(iii) Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

 

(8) Subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S. C 78c(a)(26)), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

 

 55 
 

 

Committees

 

Our board of directors has not established any committees, including an audit committee, a compensation committee, a nominating committee or any committee performing a similar function. The functions of those committees are being undertaken by our sole Board member. Because we have only one director and do not have any independent directors, the establishment of committees of the Board of Directors would not provide any benefits to our company and could be considered more form than substance. In addition, we do not have an “audit committee financial expert,” because our sole director does not qualify as such within the applicable definition of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Meetings of the Board of Directors

 

During its fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, the Board of Directors did not meet on any occasion, but rather transacted business by unanimous written consent.

 

Code of Ethics

 

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. This Code of Ethics was previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-KSB on March 26, 2008 and has been included in this annual report as Exhibit 14.1.

 

Corporate Governance

 

The business and affairs of the Company are managed under our sole board member. In addition to the contact information in this annual report, each stockholder will be given specific information on how he/she can direct communications to the officers and directors of the Company at our annual stockholders meetings. All communications from stockholders are relayed to the board of member.

 

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

As of December 11, 2020, the date we filed a Form 8-A with the SEC, we are a fully reporting company under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. As a result, and pursuant to Rule 16a-2, our directors and officers and beneficial owners of 10% or more of our common stock are currently required to file statements of beneficial ownership with respect to their ownership of our equity securities under Sections 13 or 16 of the Exchange Act. Based on a review of Forms 3, 4 and 5 furnished to us, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 the directors, officers and owners of more than 10% of our common stock filed, on a timely basis, all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act.

 

Family Relationships

 

There are no family relationships by between or among the members of the Board or other executive officers of the Company.

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

The following summary compensation table sets forth all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the named executive officer during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 in all capacities for the accounts of our executive, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO):

 

During the period the Company’s staff was furloughed (March 19, 2020 – June 30, 2020), due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CEO did not receive or accrue any salary.

 

 56 
 

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and principal position  Year   Salary ($)     Bonus ($)   Stock Awards ($)   Option Awards ($)     Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)   Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)   All Other Compensation ($)   Total
($)
 
Kim Thompson
President, CEO, CFO and Director
   2020   $269,523 (1)    $-(2)     $2,198,411 (14)   $-   $-   $44,567(3)  $2,512,500 
    2019   $354,791 (4)   $70,958(5)  $ 0   $-     $-   $-   $52,798(6)  $478,547 
                                                  
Jonathan R. Rice
COO
   2020   $180,000 (7)   $-   $-   $626,047 (15)   $-   $-   $4,020(9)  $810,067 
    2019   $150,774 (10)   $24,000(8)  $-   $-     $-   $-   $13,295(11)  $188,069 
                                                
Kenneth Le President of Prodigy Textiles(12)   2020   $60,000 (13)   $-   $-   $-     $-   $-0   $-   $60,000(16)
    2019   $27,692 (13)   $-   $ -   $-     $-   $-0   $237,748(12)  $265,440 

  

(1) This represents the annual salary payable to Mr. Thompson pursuant to the then current terms of his employment agreement. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson agreed to defer all such annual compensation until such time as our cash position improves. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information regarding the payback terms of the deferred compensation.
(2) This represents the annual bonus payable to Mr. Thompson pursuant to the then current terms of his employment agreement. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson agreed to defer this bonus until such time as our cash position improves. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information regarding the payback terms of all of Mr. Thompson’s deferred compensation.
(3) This amount includes: $41,496 in medical insurance and medical reimbursement we agreed to cover for Mr. Thompson pursuant to his employment agreement and $3,071 in reimbursement for office and travel related expenses. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson agreed to defer all such reimbursement until such time as our cash position improves. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information regarding the payback terms of these funds, which we deem “accounts payable – related party.”
(4) This represents the annual salary payable to Mr. Thompson pursuant to the then current terms of his employment agreement. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson agreed to defer all such annual compensation until such time as our cash position improves. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information regarding the payback terms of the deferred compensation.
(5) This represents the annual bonus payable to Mr. Thompson pursuant to the then current terms of his employment agreement. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson agreed to defer this bonus until such time as our cash position improves. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information regarding the payback terms of all of Mr. Thompson’s deferred compensation.
(6) This amount includes: $49,833 in medical insurance and medical reimbursement we agreed to cover for Mr. Thompson pursuant to his employment agreement and $2,965 in reimbursement for office and travel related expenses. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson agreed to defer all such reimbursement until such time as our cash position improves. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information about regarding the payback terms of these funds, which we deem “accounts payable – related party.”

 

 57 
 

 

(7) This represents the annual salary paid to Mr. Rice pursuant to the then current terms of his employment agreement. In 2020, Mr. Rice’s annual base salary was $180,000. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, the Company has deferred the payment of $40,000 of the $180,000. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information regarding the payback terms of all of Mr. Rice’s deferred compensation. In addition to his annual base salary Mr. Rice was reimbursed for $3,000 in medical insurance premiums and $1,020 in phone service expenses, pursuant to his employment agreement recorded and reported under “all other compensation”.
(8) This represents the annual bonus payable to Mr. Rice pursuant to the then current terms of his employment agreement. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, the Company has deferred the payment of $20,000 of the $24,000. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information regarding the payback terms of all of Mr. Rice’s deferred compensation.
(9) In 2020, Mr. Rice received $3,000 in medical insurance and medical reimbursement and $1,080 in phone service expenses and travel related, pursuant to his employment agreement.
(10) This represents the annual salary paid to Mr. Rice pursuant to the then current terms of his employment agreement. In 2019, Mr. Rice’s annual base salary was $150,774. However, in light of the Company’s cash position, the Company has deferred the payment of $23,076 of the $150,774. See the section, “Employment Agreements” below for additional information regarding the payback terms of all of Mr. Rice’s deferred compensation. In addition to his annual base salary Mr. Rice was reimbursed for $12,274 in medical insurance premiums and $1,020 in phone service expenses, pursuant to his employment agreement recorded and reported under “all other compensation”.
(11) In 2019, Mr. Rice received $12,274 in medical insurance and medical reimbursement and $1,020 in phone service expenses and travel related, pursuant to his employment agreement.
(12) On July 3, 2019, the Board appointed Mr. Kenneth Le as the Company’s Director of government relations and President of Prodigy Textiles. Mr. Le’s employment agreement has a term of one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Le at any time. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Le is entitled to annual cash compensation of $60,000. In addition, Mr. Le was issued two three-year warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share, which are exercisable as of August 2021 and August 2022, respectively.
(13) This represents the annual salary paid to Mr. Le pursuant to the then current terms of his employment agreement.
(14) On February 19, 2020, the Company issued a 20-year option to purchase 20,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.115 per share to Mr. Thompson as part of the Incentive Stock Option Agreement. The options had a fair value of $2,198,411, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and are fully vested on the date granted. Options will be exercisable on February 19, 2025, and for a period of 15 years expiring on February 19, 2040.
(15) On February 19, 2020, the Company issued a 10-year option to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.115 per share to Mr. Rice as part of the Incentive Stock Option Agreement. The options had a fair value of $626,047, based upon the Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the date of grant and 2,000,000 options are fully vested on the date granted and 1,000,000 options vest at the end of each successive year for four years. Options will be exercisable on February 19, 2021, and for a period of 10 years expiring on February 19, 2030.
(16) As of December 31, 2020, $888 of Mr. Le’s compensation was recorded as accrued and was paid on the first pay cycle of 2021.

 

Employment Agreements

 

CEO

 

On November 10, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Kim Thompson, its President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and sole director, effective January 1, 2011 through the December 31, 2015. The agreement was for a term of five years at an annual salary of $210,000 in 2011, with a 6% annual increase thereafter. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the annual salary was $281,027, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2016, the agreement was renewed with the same terms for another 5 years with an annual salary of $297,889 for the year ended December 31, 2016, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2017, the agreement renewed with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $315,764 for the year ended December 31, 2017, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2018, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $334,708 for the year ended December 31, 2018, but in light of the Company’s cash position, Mr. Thompson deferred such compensation. On January 1, 2019, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $354,791 for the year ended December 31, 2019. On January 1, 2020, the agreement renewed again with the same terms for another 5 years, but with an annual salary of $376,078 for the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2020, the accrued salary balance is $2,804,725. See, “Certain Relationships And Related Transactions, And Director Independence - Accrued Salaries and Officer Loans – Mr. Thompson, CEO/President.”

 

 58 
 

 

Base pay will be increased each January 1st, for the subsequent twelve month periods by 6%. Mr. Thompson will also be entitled to life, disability, health and dental insurance as well as an annual bonus in an amount equal to 20% of the base salary. In light of the Company cash position, Mr. Thompson declined the life and disability insurance.

 

The agreement also calls for the retention of the executive as a consultant following the termination of employment with compensation during such consultancy based upon the Company reaching certain milestones:

 

Upon the expiration or termination of this agreement for any reason, or by either party, Company agrees that it will employ Executive as a consultant for a period of four (4) years and at a rate of $4,500 per month.

 

(a) In the event that Company achieves gross sales of five million dollars ($5,000,000) or more, or one million dollars ($1,000,000) or more in net income, in any year during the term of this agreement, or upon the Company’s achieving an average market capitalization over a 240 consecutive calendar day period, in excess of $70,000,000 during the term of this agreement, then the consulting period will be for five (5) years and the consulting rate will be increased to $5,500 per month.
(b) In the event that Company achieves gross sales of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or more, or two million dollars ($2,000,000) or more in net income, in any year during the term of this agreement, or upon the Company’s achieving an average market capitalization over a 240 consecutive calendar day period, in excess of $90,000,000 during the term of this agreement, then the consulting period will be for six (6) years and the consulting rate will be increased to $7,500 per month.

 

COO

 

On January 20, 2015, the Company entered into an at-will employment agreement with Mr. Jonathan R. Rice, its Chief Operating Officer (the “2015 COO Employment Agreement”). Although the 2015 COO Employment Agreement has been superseded (as described below), on January 23, 2015, Mr. Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase 2,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share pursuant to the COO Employment Agreement (the “January 2015 Warrant”) and on May 28, 2015, the Company issued a three-year warrant to purchase 3,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share (the “May 2015 Warrant”). The May 2015 share warrant fully vested on October 28, 2016 and will expire on May 28, 2022. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded $121,448 for the warrants issued to Mr. Rice.

 

On January 14, 2016, the Company entered into a new at-will employment agreement with Mr. Rice (the “2016 COO Employment Agreement”). The 2016 COO Employment Agreement had a term of one year and can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. Under the 2016 COO Employment Agreement, Mr. Rice is entitled to an annual cash compensation of $140,000, which includes salary, health insurance, 401K retirement plan contributions, and other benefits. In addition, on March 30, 2016, Mr. Rice was issued a three-year warrant to purchase 6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.001 per share pursuant to the 2016 COO Employment Agreement; this warrant fully vested on February 20, 2017 and will expire on May 20, 2026. Additionally, on August 4, 2016, the Company approved a performance retention bonus to Mr. Rice of $20,000 which was payable on March 31, 2018, but which has not yet been paid. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $0 for the warrants issued to related party.

 

The Company extended the 2016 COO Employment Agreement to a term ending on January 31, 2019. On March 25, 2019, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement with its COO, extending the term to January 31, 2020. On May 19, 2020, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement with its COO, extending the term to January 31, 2021. On March 5, 2021, the Company signed an extension of its at-will employment agreement with its COO, extending the term to January 1, 2022. The COO Employment Agreement can be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Rice at any time. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, the Company recorded $0 for the warrants issued to related party.

 

 59 
 

 

On August 4, 2016, the Company issued an accommodation to Mr. Rice awarding him a bonus of $20,000 payable on March, 31, 2018. In light of the Company’s cash position, this bonus has been deferred.

 

On January 9, 2018, the Company extended the expiration date of the January 2015 Warrant from January 19, 2018 to January 31, 2020. On January 10, 2020, the Company extended the expiration date of the January 2015 Warrant from January 31, 2020 to January 10, 2025.

 

On April 26, 2019, the Company signed an agreement to increase Mr. Rice’s base salary by $20,000 per year and issue a one-time $20,000 bonus. The salary increase and the bonus is accrued and to be paid in full earlier by the direction of the Board or upon the earlier of:

 

  The Company maintaining $6,000,000 or more in working capital;
  Upon the transfer of ownership of more than 50% of the Corporation’s voting share or an assignment for the benefit of creditors or bankruptcy; or,
  Upon the fifth year anniversary of the salary increase and the bonus issuance.

 

On October 21, 2019, the Company signed another agreement to increase Mr. Rice’s base salary by another $20,000 per year (effective August 15, 2019). Such salary increase is accrued and to be paid on the same terms as set forth above regarding the April 2019 increase.

 

On August 8, 2019, Mr. Rice was issued a set of three five-year warrants to purchase a total of 6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.2299 per share pursuant to his employment agreement.

 

Over the years, in light of our cash position, certain amounts of Mr. Rice’s annual compensation have been deferred. As a result of these deferments, we accrued a total of $103,729 in deferred compensation payable to Mr. Rice as of December 31, 2020. See, “Certain Relationships And Related Transactions, And Director Independence - Accrued Salaries and Officer Loans – Mr. Rice, COO.”

 

Compensation of Directors

 

Directors are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as directors. The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to, directors in such capacity.

 

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The following table provides the names and addresses of each person known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock as of the date of this report and by the officers and directors, individually and as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly.

 

Title of Class  Name and Address of Beneficial Owner  Amount and Nature of Beneficial    Percent of Class (1)  
              
Class A Common Stock  Kim Thompson  225,589,025 (2)  26.403 %
   2723 South State St Suite 150          
   Ann Arbor, MI 48104          
              
   Jonathan R. Rice  11,786,230 (3)  1.38 %
   2723 South State St Suite 150          
   Ann Arbor, MI 48104          
              
   Kenneth Le  5,800,000 (4)  0.68 % 
   2723 South State St Suite 150        
   Ann Arbor, MI 48104          
              
   Julie Bishop          
   2723 South State St Suite 150          
   Ann Arbor, MI 48104          
              
   Anurag Gupta          
   2723 South State St Suite 150          
   Ann Arbor, MI 48104          
              
   Greg Scheessele          
   2723 South State St Suite 150          
   Ann Arbor, MI 48104          
              
   All executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons) 

223,157,305

  

28.459

%
              
Series A Preferred Stock  Kim Thompson 

2

   100 %
   2723 South State St Suite 150          
   Ann Arbor, MI 48104          
              
   All executive officers and directors as a group (1 Person)  2    100 %

 

(1) The percent of class is based on 854,410,001 shares of our Class A common stock issued and outstanding as of the date of this Report.

 

(2) Such shares include 205,589,025 shares of common stock that are owned by Mr. Thompson, 20,000,000 shares of common stock that may be issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants, and 2 shares of common stock that may be issued upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock that are owned by Mr. Thompson.

 

(3) Such shares include 768,280 shares of common stock that are owned by Mr. Rice and 11,000,000 shares of common stock that may be issued upon exercise of warrants Mr. Rice owns

 

(4) These shares represent shares of common stock that may be issued upon exercise of warrants Mr. Le owns.

 

 60 
 

 

Change in Control

 

As of the date of this Report, there were no arrangements which may result in a change in control of the Company.

 

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTION, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer, shareholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since January 1, 2019, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the year-end for the last two completed fiscal years.

 

Related Party Transactions

 

Accrued Salaries and Officer Loans

 

Mr. Thompson, CEO/President

 

Mr. Thompson agreed to defer a significant portion of the compensation and other payments, as set forth below, owed to him. Mr. Thompson also agreed not to collect or accrue any salary while the Company had employees furloughed over concerns regarding the current global pandemic.

 

  Annual Compensation: Between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2020, Kim Thompson, our CEO accrued $2,804,725 of unpaid salary, which represents a portion of the annual compensation owed to him pursuant to the terms of his employment agreements during such time period. As of December 31, 2020, there was $1,562,498 in accrued interest on Mr. Thompson’s accrued salary; such interest accrues at the rate of 3% per annum. As a result of these accruals, as of December 31, 2020, we owed Mr. Thompson $4,367,224 in salary and interest related payments.
  Company Loans: As of December 31, 2020, Mr. Thompson loaned the Company an aggregate of $1,657,000 and has been repaid $0, leaving a balance of $1,657,000. As of December 31, 2020, there was $59,052 in loan interest; such interest accrues at the rate of 3% per annum.
  Royalty Payments: Mr. Thompson was entitled to certain royalties as compensation for the transfer of intellectual property he owned to the Company. As of December 31, 2020, there was $65,292 in royalty payments payable to Mr. Thompson.
  As of December 31, 2020, there was $304,539 included in accounts payable and accrued expense payable to Mr. Thompson, which includes rent payments owed on the Texas Property (as hereinafter defined).

 

On September 30, 2010, the Company agreed to issue preferred stock to Mr. Thompson in exchange for $650,000 in forgiveness of back salary. On December 19, 2013, the Company issued Mr. Thompson two shares of Series A Preferred Stock, which entitles him to a total of 400,000,000 votes on all matters, in consideration for his agreement to extend the Company’s repayment of the aforementioned debts owed to him to October 30, 2014 and to forgive an additional $30,000 in compensation that the Company previously owed to him.

 

 61 
 

 

Mr. Rice, COO

 

As previously stated, in light of our cash position, the Company has deferred a portion of the compensation owed to Mr. Rice. Between December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2020, Mr. Rice accrued a total of $103,730 in unpaid salary (“Accrued COO Salary”). As of December 31, 2020, there was $30 included in accounts payable and accrued expenses payable to Mr. Rice, which is the balance of funds previously owed to Mr. Rice.

 

In consideration of the Company’s current and potential future cash position the Company shall repay Mr. Rice in full either by the direction of the Board or upon the earlier of:

 

  The Company maintaining $6,000,000 or more in working capital;
  Upon the transfer of ownership of more than 50% of the Corporation’s voting share or an assignment for the benefit of creditors or bankruptcy; or,
    Upon the fifth year anniversary of the salary increase and the bonus issuance.

 

 62 
 

 

Property Lease

 

On January 23, 2017, the Company signed an 8-year property lease with the Company’s CEO, President and controlling shareholder for land in Texas (the “Texas Property”). The Company pays $960 per month starting on February 1, 2017 and uses this facility to grow mulberry for its U.S. silk operations.

 

The Company is not a subsidiary of any company.

 

Loans

 

On January 24, 2020, the Company received $100,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On February 19, 2020, the Company received $100,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On March 9, 2020, the Company received $100,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On April 8, 2020, the Company received $100,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On June 3, 2020, the Company received $150,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On July 16, 2020, the Company received $100,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On August 12, 2020, the Company received $100,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On September 10, 2020, the Company received $100,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On October 19, 2020, the Company received $30,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On November 4, 2020, the Company received $30,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 7%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On November 4, 2020, the Company received $30,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On November 17, 2020, the Company received $35,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3% is unsecured and due on demand.

 

On December 1, 2020, the Company received $70,000 from Mr. Thompson. Pursuant to the terms of the loan, the advances bear an interest at 3%, is unsecured and due on demand.

 

Convertible Note

 

The Company issued a $1,000,000, thirteen-month (13), unsecured, convertible note on December 11, 2020, which is due January 11, 2022. The convertible note bears interest at 10%, with a 5% original issue discount ($50,000), resulting in net proceeds of $950,000. The note contains a discount to market feature, whereby, the lender can purchase stock at 90% of the lowest trading price for a period of ten (10) days preceding the conversion date.

 

Additionally, the Company issued 3,125,000 five-year (5) warrants. The warrants had a fair value of $2,599,066, based upon using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following inputs:

 

Stock Price  $0.14 
Exercise price  $0.16 
Expected term (in years)   5 
Expected volatility   60.64%
Annual rate of quarterly dividends   0%
Risk free interest rate   0.10%

 

 63 
 

 

Director Independence

 

Nasdaq listing standards require that a majority of our board of directors be independent within one year of our initial public offering. An “independent director” is defined generally as a person other than an officer or employee of the company or its subsidiaries or any other individual having a relationship which in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. We have identified persons who meet these requirements and are qualified to serve on our board; we anticipate appointing such persons to our Board at such time is required to meet the applicable listing standards.

 

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

   2020   2019 
Audit Fees  $31,550   $25,950 
Audit-Related Fees  $-   $- 
Tax Fees  $24,032   $- 
All Other Fees  $-   $- 
Total  $55,582   $25,950 

 

Audit Fees

 

For the Company’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, we were billed approximately $31,550 and $25,950 for professional services rendered for the audit and review of our financial statements.

 

Audit Related Fees

 

There were no fees for audit related services for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

 

Tax Fees

 

For the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, we were billed approximately $24,032 for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning For the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, we were billed $0 for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

 

All Other Fees

 

The Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

 

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

 

approved by our audit committee; or
   
entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee’s responsibilities to management.

 

 64 
 

 

We do not have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors.

 

The pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records of what percentages of the above fees were pre-approved. However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

 

PART IV

 

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

 

(a)

 

1. The financial statements listed in the “Index to Financial Statements” at page F-1 are filed as part of this report. The financial statements listed in the “Index to Financial Statements” at page F-1 are filed as part of this report.
2. Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits included or incorporated herein: see index to Exhibits.

 

(b) Exhibits

 

EXHIBIT

NUMBER

  DESCRIPTION
    
3.1  Articles of Incorporation (1)
    
3.2  Articles of Amendment (3)
    
3.3  Articles of Amendment, filed with the Wyoming Secretary of State on November 15, 2013 (6)
    
3.4  Articles of Amendment, filed with the Wyoming Secretary of State on December 17, 2013 (7)
    
3.5  By-Laws (1)
    
4.1  Form of Warrant issued Mr. Jonathan R. Rice (14)
    
4.2  Description of Securities*
    
10.1  Employment Agreement, dated November 10, 2010, by and between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc. and Kim Thompson (8)
    
10.6  Addendum to the Founder’s Stock Purchase and Intellectual Property Transfer Agreement, dated December 26, 2006, and the Founder’s Stock Purchase and Intellectual Property Transfer Agreement dated April 26, 2006 (3)
    
10.7  Intellectual Property/Collaborative Research Agreement, dated March 20, 2010, by and between Kraig Biocraft Laboratories and The University of Notre Dame du Lac. (2)
    
10.11  License Agreement, dated October 28, 2011, between the Company and University of Notre Dame du Lac. (12)
    
10.12  Intellectual Property / Collaborative Research Agreement, dated June 6, 2012, between the Company and University of Notre Dame du Lac. (12)
    
10.14  Employment Agreement, dated January 19, 2015, between the Company and Mr. Jonathan R. Rice (11)
    
10.15  Intellectual Property and Collaborative Research Agreements, dated March 4, 2015, between the Company and University of Notre Dame du Lac. (15)
    
10.16  2019 Employee Stock Option Plan (16)
    
10.17  Strategic Partnership Agreement (portions of the exhibit have been omitted because they are (i) not material and (ii) would likely cause competitive harm to the Registratin if publicly disclosed) (17)
    
10.18  Amendment (portions of the exhibit have been omitted because they are (i) not material and (ii) would likely cause competitive harm to the Registratin if publicly disclosed) (17)

 

 65 
 

 

14.1   Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (13)
     
21.1   Subsidiaries*
     
31.1   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.*
     
31.2   Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.*
     
32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
     
32.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
     
101.INS*   XBRL Instance Document
101.CAL*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.SCH*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.DEF*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE*   XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

* Filed herewith

 

(1) Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (Reg. No. 333-146316) filed with the SEC on September 26, 2007.

 

(2) Incorporated by reference to our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on April 15, 2010.

 

(3) Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-162316) filed with the SEC on October 2, 2009.

 

(4) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2011.

 

(5) Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 15, 2013.

 

(6) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 22, 2013.

 

(7) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 19, 2013.

 

(8) Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-175936) filed with the SEC on August 1, 2011.

 

(9) Incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Reg. No. 333-199820) filed with the SEC on November 3, 2014.

 

(10) Incorporated by reference to our Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Reg. No. 333-199820) filed with the SEC on January 7, 2015.

 

(11) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 21, 2015.

 

(12) Incorporated by reference to our Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Reg. No. 333-199820) filed with the SEC on January 30, 2015.

 

(13) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC on March 26, 2008.

 

(14) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2015

 

(15) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2015

 

(16) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 27, 2020

 

(17) Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 26, 2021.

 

 66 
 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  Kraig Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.
     
Dated: March 12, 2021 By: /s/ Kim Thompson
    Kim Thompson
    President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this annual report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Signature   Title   Date
         
/s/ Kim Thompson   President, Chief Executive Officer,   March 12, 2021
Kim Thompson   Chief Financial Officer and Sole Director    

 

 67