LAKELAND INDUSTRIES INC - Quarter Report: 2007 October (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
one)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended October
31,
2007
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from _______________ to _______________
Commission
File Number: 0-15535
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
13-3115216
|
|
(State
of incorporation)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
|
701
Koehler Avenue, Suite 7, Ronkonkoma, New York
|
11779.
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(631)
981-9700
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
YES
x NO
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large
Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated
Filer x
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES
o NO
x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of December 6, 2007
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value per share 5,523,288 shares
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Table
of Contents
The
following information of the Registrant and its subsidiaries is submitted
herewith:
Page
|
||
3
|
||
4
|
||
5
|
||
6
|
||
7
|
||
8
|
||
15
|
||
23
|
||
23
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
26
|
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
PART
I
- FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial
Statements:
Introduction
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
10-Q
may contain certain forward-looking statements. When used in this
10-Q or in any other presentation, statements which are not historical in
nature, including the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,”
“believe,” “intend,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements. They also include statements containing a
projection of sales, earnings or losses, capital expenditures, dividends,
capital structure or other financial terms.
The
forward-looking statements in
this 10-Q are based upon our management’s beliefs, assumptions and expectations
of our future operations and economic performance, taking into account the
information currently available to us. These statements are not
statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties, some of which are not currently known to us, that
may
cause our actual results, performance or financial condition to be materially
different from the expectations of future results, performance or financial
condition we express or imply in any forward-looking statements. Some
of the important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or
financial condition to differ materially from expectations are:
|
·
|
Our
ability to obtain fabrics and components from key suppliers such
as DuPont
and other manufacturers at competitive prices or prices that vary
from
quarter to quarter;
|
|
·
|
Risks
associated with our international manufacturing and start up sales
operations;
|
|
·
|
Potential
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates;
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to respond to rapid technological
change;
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to identify and complete acquisitions or future
expansion;
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to manage our growth;
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to recruit and retain skilled employees, including our senior
management;
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to accurately estimate customer
demand;
|
|
·
|
Competition
from other companies, including some with much greater
resources;
|
|
·
|
Risks
associated with sales to foreign
buyers;
|
|
·
|
Restrictions
on our financial and operating flexibility as a result of covenants
in our
credit facilitates;
|
|
·
|
Our
ability to obtain additional funding to expand or operate our business
as
planned;
|
|
·
|
The
impact of a decline in federal funding for preparations for terrorist
incidents;
|
|
·
|
The
impact of potential product liability
claims;
|
|
·
|
Liabilities
under environmental laws and
regulations;
|
|
·
|
Fluctuations
in the price of our common stock;
|
|
·
|
Variations
in our quarterly results of
operations;
|
|
·
|
The
cost of compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and rules
and
regulations relating to corporate governance and public
disclosure;
|
|
·
|
The
significant influence of our directors and executive officer on our
company and on matters subject to a vote of our
stockholders;
|
|
·
|
The
limited liquidity of our common
stock;
|
|
·
|
The
other factors referenced in this 10-Q, including, without limitation,
in
the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations,” and
“Business.”
|
We
believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, you should
not
place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which are based on
current expectations. Furthermore, forward-looking statements speak
only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements after the date of
this
10-Q, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions,
the forward-looking events discussed in this Form 10-Q might not
occur. We qualify any and all of our forward-looking statements
entirely by these cautionary factors.
3
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
|
October
31, 2007
(Unaudited)
|
January
31, 2007
|
||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ |
2,671,296
|
$ |
1,906,557
|
||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $90,000
at October 31, 2007 and $103,000 at January 31,
2007
|
14,759,522
|
14,780,266
|
||||||
Inventories,
net of reserves of $596,000 at October 31, 2007 and
$306,000 at January 31, 2007
|
46,475,504
|
40,955,739
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,512,955
|
1,355,364
|
||||||
Other
current assets
|
1,768,617
|
3,115,722
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
67,187,894
|
62,113,648
|
||||||
Property
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$6,711,000
at October 31, 2007 and $6,707,000 at
January
31, 2007
|
12,317,153
|
11,084,030
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
871,297
|
871,297
|
||||||
Other
assets
|
106,954
|
129,385
|
||||||
$ |
80,483,298
|
$ |
74,198,360
|
|||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ |
2,845,455
|
$ |
3,055,339
|
||||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
1,579,553
|
1,270,623
|
||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
4,425,008
|
4,325,962
|
||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
27,227
|
27,227
|
||||||
Construction
loan payable (net of current maturity of $94,000)
|
992,887
|
-----
|
||||||
Borrowings
under revolving credit facility
|
7,236,000
|
3,786,000
|
||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par; authorized 1,500,000 shares
|
||||||||
(none
issued)
|
||||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par; authorized 10,000,000 shares;
|
||||||||
issued
and outstanding 5,523,288 shares at October 31, 2007 and
5,521,824 at January 31, 2007
|
55,233
|
55,218
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
49,149,472
|
48,972,025
|
||||||
Other
comprehensive loss
|
(115,512 | ) |
-----
|
|||||
Retained
earnings (1)
|
18,712,983
|
17,031,928
|
||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
67,802,176
|
66,059,171
|
||||||
$ |
80,483,298
|
$ |
74,198,360
|
(1)
A cumulative total of $17,999,739 has been transferred from retained earnings
to
additional paid-in-capital and par value of common stock due to four separate
stock dividends paid in 2002, 2003, 2005 and 2006, with $6,386,916 included
in
the year ended January 31, 2007.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
4
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
THREE
MONTHS ENDED
|
NINE
MONTHS ENDED
|
|||||||||||||||
October
31,
|
October
31
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
23,452,983
|
$ |
23,262,933
|
$ |
70,781,406
|
$ |
74,571,820
|
||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
17,748,865
|
17,626,698
|
54,593,816
|
55,937,033
|
||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
5,704,118
|
5,636,235
|
16,187,590
|
18,634,787
|
||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
4,355,330
|
4,579,291
|
12,928,909
|
13,330,136
|
||||||||||||
Operating
profit
|
1,348,788
|
1,056,944
|
3,258,681
|
5,304,651
|
||||||||||||
Interest
and other income, net
|
51,249
|
123,737
|
176,387
|
156,722
|
||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(94,344 | ) | (79,696 | ) | (205,470 | ) | (266,469 | ) | ||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
1,305,693
|
1,100,985
|
3,229,598
|
5,194,904
|
||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
375,536
|
120,935
|
936,543
|
1,398,560
|
||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
930,157
|
$ |
980,050
|
$ |
2,293,055
|
$ |
3,796,344
|
||||||||
Net
income per common share*:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ |
.17
|
$ |
.18
|
$ |
.42
|
$ |
.69
|
||||||||
Diluted
|
$ |
.17
|
$ |
.18
|
$ |
.41
|
$ |
.69
|
||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding*:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
5,523,288
|
5,521,824
|
5,522,572
|
5,520,567
|
||||||||||||
Diluted
|
5,544,619
|
5,531,497
|
5,542,144
|
5,526,561
|
*Adjusted
for the 10% stock dividend to shareholders of record on August 1,
2006.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
5
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
Nine
months ended October 31, 2007
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Other
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Loss
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
February 1, 2007
|
5,521,824
|
$ |
55,218
|
$ |
48,972,025
|
$ |
17,031,928
|
$ |
-----
|
$ |
66,059,171
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
-----
|
-----
|
-----
|
2,293,055
|
-----
|
2,293,055
|
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of Stock Option
|
1,464
|
15
|
6,675
|
-----
|
-----
|
6,690
|
||||||||||||||||||
Effect
of Adoption of FIN 48
(Note
10)
|
-----
|
-----
|
-----
|
(350,000 | ) |
-----
|
(350,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Effect
of Adoption of SAB No. 108
(Note
16)
|
-----
|
-----
|
-----
|
(262,000 | ) |
-----
|
(262,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other
Comprehensive Loss
|
-----
|
-----
|
-----
|
-----
|
(115,512 | ) | (115,512 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock
Based Compensation
|
-----
|
-----
|
170,772
|
-----
|
-----
|
170,772
|
||||||||||||||||||
Balance
October 31, 2007
|
5,523,288
|
$ |
55,233
|
$ |
49,149,472
|
$ |
18,712,983
|
$ | (115,512 | ) | $ |
67,802,176
|
(Reflects
four separate 10% stock dividends issued on July 31, 2002, 2003, April 30,
2005
and August 1, 2006, which resulted in a cumulative transfer of $17,999,739
from
retained earnings to additional paid-in capital and par value of common
stock).
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
6
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
NINE
MONTHS ENDED
|
||||||||
October
31,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ |
2,293,055
|
$ |
3,796,344
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided
|
||||||||
by
operating activities:
|
||||||||
Stock
based compensation
|
170,772
|
93,947
|
||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
13,000
|
(197,000 | ) | |||||
Reserve
for inventory obsolescence
|
289,601
|
(40 | ) | |||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
816,441
|
798,484
|
||||||
Deferred
income tax
|
(157,591 | ) | (338,000 | ) | ||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Decrease
in accounts receivable
|
33,744
|
1,316,873
|
||||||
(Increase)
decrease in inventories
|
(5,809,366 | ) |
65,097
|
|||||
Decrease
(Increase) decrease in other assets
|
1,369,535
|
(3,854,674 | ) | |||||
(Decrease)
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses
and
other liabilities
|
(628,465 | ) |
241,720
|
|||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(1,635,274 | ) |
1,922,751
|
|||||
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(2,049,565 | ) | (631,045 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(2,049,565 | ) | (631,045 | ) | ||||
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock option
|
6,690
|
11,876
|
||||||
Construction
loan proceeds
|
992,888
|
-----
|
||||||
Net
borrowings under loan agreements
|
3,450,000
|
606,000
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
4,449,578
|
617,876
|
||||||
Net
increase in cash
|
764,739
|
1,909,582
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,906,557
|
1,532,453
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ |
2,671,296
|
$ |
3,442,035
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
7
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Business
Lakeland
Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “we,” “us,” “our”
or “the Company"), a Delaware corporation, organized in April 1982, manufactures
and sells a comprehensive line of safety garments and accessories for the
industrial protective clothing and homeland security markets. The principal
market for our products is the United States. In FY2007, the Company expanded
its operations by opening sales offices and/or warehousing facilities in Chile,
Japan, China and continued expanding its operations in Canada and the United
Kingdom. The Company also purchased the Industrial Glove Assets of RFB Latex
in
New Delhi, India in November 2006. No customer accounted for more than 10%
of
net sales during the three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
2. Basis
of Presentation
|
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have
been
prepared by us, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations
of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and reflect all adjustments
(consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments) which are, in the
opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the consolidated
financial information required therein. Certain information and
note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared
in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such
rules and regulations. While we believe that the disclosures are
adequate
to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested
that
these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto
included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the year ended January 31,
2007.
|
The
results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended October 31,
2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full
year.
3. Principles
of Consolidation
|
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include
the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
|
4.
|
Inventories:
|
Inventories
consist of the
following:
October
31,
|
January
31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2007
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ |
24,328,065
|
$ |
19,051,284
|
||||
Work-in-process
|
3,026,003
|
2,760,196
|
||||||
Finished
Goods
|
19,121,436
|
19,144,259
|
||||||
$ |
46,475,504
|
$ |
40,955,739
|
|||||
|
Inventories
include freight-in, materials, labor and overhead costs and are stated
at
the lower of cost (on a first-in-first-out basis) or
market.
|
5.
|
Earnings
Per Share:
|
Basic
earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding without consideration of common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings
per share are based on the
8
weighted
average number of common and common stock equivalents. The diluted earnings
per
share calculation takes into account the shares that may be issued upon exercise
of stock options, reduced by the shares that may be repurchased with the funds
received from the exercise, based on the average price during the
period.
The
following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share at October 31, 2007 and 2006, adjusted, retroactively, for the 10% Stock
dividends to Shareholders on August 1, 2006.
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
October
31,
|
October
31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Numerator
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
Income
|
$ |
930,157
|
$ |
980,050
|
$ |
2,293,055
|
$ |
3,796,344
|
||||||||
Denominator
|
||||||||||||||||
Denominator
for basic earnings per share
|
5,523,288
|
5,521,824
|
5,522,572
|
5,520,567
|
||||||||||||
(Weighted-average
shares)
|
||||||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
21,331
|
9,673
|
19,572
|
5,994
|
||||||||||||
Denominator
for diluted earnings per share
|
5,544,619
|
5,531,497
|
5,542,144
|
5,526,561
|
||||||||||||
(adjusted
weighted average shares)
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ |
.17
|
$ |
.18
|
$ |
.42
|
$ |
.69
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ |
.17
|
$ |
.18
|
$ |
.41
|
$ |
.69
|
6.
|
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
At
October 31, 2007, the balance outstanding under our $25 million five year
revolving credit facility amounted to $7.236 million. The credit facility is
collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company. The credit
facility contains financial covenants, including, but not limited to, fixed
charge ratio, funded debt to EBIDTA ratio, inventory and accounts receivable
collateral coverage ratio, with respect to which the Company was in compliance
at October 31, 2007 and for the period then ended. The weighted average interest
rate for the three and nine month periods ended October 31, 2007 was 5.79%
and
5.75%, respectively.
7.
|
Major
Supplier
|
We
purchased 64.42% of our raw materials from one supplier during the nine month
period ended October 31, 2007. We expect this relationship to continue for
the
foreseeable future. If required, similar raw materials could be purchased from
other sources; however, our competitive position in the marketplace would be
adversely affected.
8.
|
Employee
Stock Compensation
|
|
The
Company’s Director’s Plan permits the grant of share options and shares to
its Directors for up to 60,000 shares of common stock as stock
compensation. All stock options under this Plan are granted at
the fair market value of the common stock at the grant
date. This date is fixed only once a year upon a Board Member’s
re-election to the Board at the Annual Shareholders’ meeting which is the
third Wednesday in June pursuant to the Director’s Plan and our Company
By-Laws. Directors’ stock options vest ratably over a 6 month
period and generally expire 6 years from the grant
date.
|
9
|
The
following table represents our stock options granted, exercised,
and
forfeited during the first quarter of fiscal
2008.
|
Stock
Options
|
Number
of
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price per
Share
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
at January 31, 2007
|
19,031
|
$ |
12.79
|
3.5
years
|
$ |
35,778
|
||||||||||
Exercised
Stock Option
|
1,464
|
$ |
4.57
|
-----
|
-----
|
|||||||||||
Outstanding
at October 31, 2007
|
17,567
|
$ |
13.48
|
2.8
years
|
$ |
0
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
at October 31, 2007
|
17,567
|
$ |
13.48
|
2.8
years
|
$ |
0
|
Restricted
Stock Plan and Performance
Equity Plan
On
June
21, 2006, the shareholders of the Company approved a restricted stock plan.
A
total of 253,000 shares of restricted stock were authorized under this plan.
Under the restricted stock plan, eligible employees and directors are awarded
performance-based restricted shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The
amount recorded as expense for the performance-based grants of restricted stock
is based upon an estimate made at the end of each reporting period as to the
most probable outcome of this plan at the end of the three year performance
period. (e.g., baseline, minimum, maximum or zero). In addition to the grants
vesting based solely on performance, certain awards pursuant to the plan have
a
time-based vesting requirement, under which awards vest from three to four
years
after issuance, subject to continuous employment and certain other conditions.
Restricted stock has the same voting rights as other common stock. Restricted
stock awards do not have voting rights, and the underlying shares are not
considered to be issued and outstanding until vested.
The
Company has granted up to a maximum of 141,559 restricted stock awards as of
October 31, 2007. All of these restricted stock awards are non-vested at October
31, 2007 (97,449 shares at “baseline” and 54,329 shares at “minimum”) and have a
weighted average grant date fair value of $13.09. The Company recognizes expense
related to performance-based awards over the requisite service period using
the
straight-line attribution method based on the outcome that is
probable.
As
of
October 31, 2007, unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to
restricted stock awards totaled $1,039,868, before income taxes, based on the
maximum performance award level. Such unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense related to restricted stock awards totaled $723,521 and
$414,270 at the baseline and minimum performance levels, respectively. The
cost
of these non-vested awards is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of three years. The board has estimated the Company’s current
performance level to be at the minimum level and expenses have been recorded
accordingly. The performance based awards are not considered stock
equivalents for EPS purposes
Stock-Based Compensation
|
The
Company recognized total stock-based compensation costs of $170,772,
of
which $170,772 results from the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, and $0
results
from the Non-Employee Directors Option Plan for the nine months ended
October 31, 2007 and $72,597 and $21,350 for the nine months ended
October
31, 2006, respectively. These amounts are reflected in selling,
general and administrative expenses. The total income tax
benefit recognized for stock-based compensation arrangements was
$61,500
and $33,821 for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
|
10
9. Manufacturing
Segment Data
Domestic
and international sales are as follows in millions of dollars:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October
31,
|
October
31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ |
19.8
|
84.3 | % | $ |
20.6
|
88.4 | % | $ |
59.7
|
84.3 | % | $ |
66.3
|
88.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
International
|
3.7
|
15.7 | % |
2.7
|
11.6 | % |
11.1
|
15.7 | % |
8.3
|
11.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
23.5
|
100 | % | $ |
23.3
|
100 | % | $ |
70.8
|
100 | % | $ |
74.6
|
100 | % |
We
manage
our operations by evaluating each of our geographic locations. Our North
American operations include our facilities in Decatur, Alabama (primarily the
distribution to customers of the bulk of our products and the manufacture of
our
chemical, glove and disposable products), Jerez, Mexico (primarily disposable,
glove and chemical suit production), St. Joseph, Missouri and Shillington,
Pennsylvania (primarily woven products production). We also maintain three
manufacturing facilities in China (primarily disposable and chemical suit
production) and a glove manufacturing facility in New Delhi, India. Our China
facilities and our Decatur, Alabama facility produce the majority of the Company’s
products. The accounting policies of these operating entities are the same
as
those described in Note 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended January 31, 2007. We evaluate the performance of these entities
based
on operating profit which is defined as income before income taxes, interest
expense and other income and expenses. We have sales forces in Canada, Europe,
Chile and China which sell and distribute products shipped from the United
States, Mexico or China.
The
table
below represents information about reported manufacturing segments for the
three
and nine month periods noted therein:
Three
Months Ended
October
31,
(in
millions of dollars)
|
Nine
Months Ended
October
31,
(in
millions of dollars)
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales:
|
||||||||||||||||
North
America and other foreign
|
$ |
23.62
|
$ |
24.39
|
$ |
72.67
|
$ |
77.87
|
||||||||
China
|
4.14
|
3.0
|
10.6
|
8.6
|
||||||||||||
India
|
.04
|
.11
|
.13
|
.43
|
||||||||||||
Less
inter-segment sales
|
(4.30 | ) | (4.20 | ) | (12.60 | ) | (12.30 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated
sales
|
$ |
23.50
|
$ |
23.30
|
$ |
70.80
|
$ |
74.60
|
||||||||
Operating
Profit:
|
||||||||||||||||
North
America and other foreign
|
$ |
.62
|
$ |
1.25
|
$ |
1.87
|
$ |
4.9
|
||||||||
China
|
1.02
|
.50
|
2.0
|
1.4
|
||||||||||||
India
|
(.22 | ) | (.68 | ) | (.46 | ) | (.90 | ) | ||||||||
Less
inter-segment profit (loss)
|
(.07 | ) | (.07 | ) | (.11 | ) | (.10 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated
profit
|
$ |
1.35
|
$ |
1.0
|
$ |
3.3
|
$ |
5.3
|
||||||||
Identifiable
Assets (at Balance Sheet date or change during quarter):
|
||||||||||||||||
North
America and other foreign
|
$ |
2.5
|
$ |
2.33
|
$ |
65.8
|
$ |
65.4
|
||||||||
China
|
2.0
|
.50
|
10.4
|
7.5
|
||||||||||||
India
|
-----
|
.57
|
4.3
|
4.3
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated
assets
|
$ |
4.5
|
$ |
3.4
|
$ |
80.5
|
$ |
77.2
|
||||||||
Depreciation and
Amortization Expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
North
America and other foreign
|
$ |
.16
|
$ |
.20
|
$ |
.47
|
$ |
.50
|
||||||||
China
|
.07
|
.10
|
.27
|
.30
|
||||||||||||
India
|
.08
|
-----
|
.08
|
-----
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated
depreciation expense
|
$ |
.31
|
$ |
.30
|
$ |
.82
|
$ |
.80
|
11
10.
Adoption
of FIN 48
UNCERTAIN
TAX POSITIONS. Effective February 1, 2007, the first day of fiscal 2008,
the Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”
(“FIN 48”). FIN 48 prescribes recognition thresholds that must be met before a
tax position is recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance
on
de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure, and transition. Under FIN 48, an entity may only recognize
or continue to recognize tax positions that meet a "more likely than not"
threshold. The Company recorded the cumulative effect of applying FIN 48 as
a
$350,000 decrease to the opening balance of retained earnings as of February
1,
2007, the date of adoption.
The
Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax
issues as components of income tax expense. The Company had approximately
$60,000 of accrued interest as of February 1, 2007, which was included in the
above $350,000 charge pursuant to FIN 48, and has accrued $10,000
additional interest to date.
The
Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax, as well as income tax in multiple
U.S. state and local jurisdictions and a limited number of foreign
jurisdictions. The Company’s Federal Income Tax returns for the
fiscal years ended January 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 have been audited by the
Internal Revenue Service. Such audits are complete with one issue in dispute
relating to deductions taken by the Company for charitable contributions of
its
stock in trade, and one other issue in dispute which would result in a timing
difference. Such issues are in the Appellate Division of the Internal Revenue
Service. An initial meeting was held in May 2007 and a second meeting was held
on October 16, 2007. Since the final result of these issues cannot be
estimated by management at this time, in the first quarter of FY08, management
has recorded a charge of $350,000 representing the government’s position plus
interest.
11.
Real
Estate Purchases
|
In
June 2006, the Company entered into an agreement to construct a
distribution facility in Brantford, Ontario at a cost of approximately
$2,200,000 (Canadian) ($2,324,353) US at the exchange rate at October
31, 2007. In order to finance the acquisition, the Company has arranged
a
term loan in the amount of $2,000,000 (Canadian) bearing interest
at the
Business Development Bank of Canada’s floating base rate minus 1.25%
(currently equal to 6.75%) and is repayable in 240 monthly principal
installments of $8,350 (Canadian) plus interest. The Company has
drawn
down $992,887 USD against this loan to fund construction in progress
at
October 31, 2007, and has included $16,182 CAD as capitalized interest
reflected in the asset cost.
|
12.
Related
Party Transactions
In
connection with the asset purchase agreement, dated August 1, 2005, between
the
Company and Mifflin Valley, Inc., the Company entered into a five year lease
agreement with the seller (now an employee of the Company) to rent the
manufacturing facility owned by the seller at an annual rental
of $57,504, or a per square foot rental of $3.10. This
amount was obtained, prior to the acquisition from an independent appraisal
of
the fair market rental value per square foot. In addition the Company
has been renting since January 1, 2006, 12,000 sq ft of warehouse space in
PA
from this employee, on a month by month basis, for the annual amount of $3.00
per square foot.
On
March
1, 1999, we entered into a one year (renewable for four additional one year
terms) lease agreement with Harvey Pride, Jr., our Vice President of
Manufacturing, for a 2,400 sq. ft. customer service office located next to
our
existing Decatur, Alabama facilityat an annual rent of $18,000. This lease
was
renewed on March 1, 2004 through March 31, 2009 at the same rental
rate.
13. Formation
of New Subsidiariesand
Restructuring
On
February 23, 2007, Lakeland Gloves and Safety Apparel Private Limited was formed
to hold the assets of the Company’s recently purchased Indian business. On March
27, 2007, Industrias Lakeland de S.A. de C.V. was formed to operate the new
facilities in Jerez, Mexico.
12
The
Company is closing its Celaya, Mexico manufacturing facility and opening a
new
and larger facility in Jerez, Mexico. Lakeland is making this change in
facilities primarily to reduce the unit cost of its production. Jerez presents
better labor, rental and transportation values than does our current Celaya
plant and the Company believes it can realize savings of close to $500,000
annually once the production move is fully implemented in December 2007. The
new
Jerez facility will also double our capacity in Mexico and will be used for
specialty woven items that are not made in China due to high tariffs and/or
quotas imposed by most customs departments in North and South America on such
goods, but not dutiable if made in Mexico under the NAFTA and other Latin
American Trade Treaties. The Company has taken a $506,000 pretax write-off
in
its first quarter ended April 30, 2007, primarily attributable to $275,000
in
legally mandated severance costs to its Celaya employees, $134,000 in other
termination costs and $97,000 in moving and start-up costs.
14.
Mexican
Tax Situation
In
August
2001, Guanajuato Mexico, Secretaria de Hacienda Credito Publico (“Hacienda”)
began an audit of our wholly-owned subsidiary Lakeland de Mexico de SA de
CV. The audit resulted in a claim by Hacienda for 9,195,254 Mexican
Pesos (approximately $800,000 USD), in December 2002. In June 2003
Hacienda’s own Legal Department, in an administrative opinion, dismissed this
deficiency in total. In December 2003 the Hacienda Audit Department
changed tactics and reinstated the deficiency based on new legal
theories. In response to this second claim, in March 2004 Lakeland de
Mexico filed a Nullity Proceeding against Hacienda at the Tribunal Federal
de
Justica Fiscal Administrativa, Celaya, Guanajuato to nullify Hacienda’s tax
liens and deficiencies. On August 4, 2006 we were officially notified
that the above described legal proceedings were decided in Lakeland’s favor by a
three judge panel. The Hacienda tax authority then asked for a review from
a
higher court of the lower court’s holding. The higher Mexican court upheld the
lower court’s holding on May 4, 2007 and this tax deficiency issue has been
closed in Lakeland’s favor.
15.
Derivative
Instruments and Foreign Currency Exposure
The
Company has foreign currency exposure, principally through sales in Canada
and
the UK and production in Mexico and China. Management has commenced a
hedging program to partially offset this risk by purchasing forward contracts
to
sell the Canadian Dollar, Euro and Great Britain Pound. Such
contracts for the Euro and Pound are largely timed to expire with the last
day
of the fiscal quarter, with a new contract purchased on the first day of the
following quarter, to match the operating cycle of the
Company. Management has decided not to hedge its long position in the
Chinese Yuan.
The
Company accounts for its foreign exchange derivative instruments under Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended. This standard requires
recognition of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value
and
may result in additional volatility in both current period earnings and other
comprehensive income as a result of recording recognized and unrecognized gains
and losses from changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments.
|
The
Company had one derivative instrument outstanding at October 31,
2007
which was treated as a cash flow hedge intended for forecasted purchases
of merchandise by the Company’s Canadian subsidiary. The Company had
no derivative instruments outstanding at October 31, 2006. The
change in the fair market value of the effective hedge portion of
the
foreign currency forward exchange contracts was an unrealized loss
of
$115,512, for the nine month period ended October 31, 2007 and was
recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). It will be released
into
operations over 18 months based on the timing of the sales of the
underlying inventory. The release to operations will be reflected in
cost of products sold.
During the period ended October 31, 2007, the Company recorded
an
immaterial loss in cost of goods sold for the remaining portion of
the
foreign currency forward exchange contract that did not qualify for
hedge
accounting treatment. The derivative instrument was in the form
of a foreign currency “participating forward” exchange contract. The
“participating forward” feature affords the Company full protection on the
downside and the ability to retain 50% of any gains, in exchange
for a
premium at inception. Such premium is built into the contract
in the form of a different contract rate in the amount of
$0.0160.
|
13
16.
Adoption
of SAB No. 108
In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements.” The transition provisions of SAB 108 permit the Company to
adjust for the cumulative effect on retained earnings of immaterial errors
relating to prior years. SAB 108 also requires the adjustment of any prior
quarterly financial statements within the fiscal year of adoption for the
effects of such errors on the quarters when the information is next presented.
Such adjustments do not require previously filed reports with the SEC to be
amended. The Company adopted SAB 108 at the end of fiscal 2007. In accordance
with SAB 108, the Company has adjusted beginning retained earnings for fiscal
2008 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the items
described under “Elimination of Intercompany Profit in Inventory” below. The
Company considers these adjustments to be immaterial to prior
periods.
Elimination
of Intercompany Profit in Inventory
As
part
of the Company’s routine testing for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, it was
determined that a report used for the calculation of the elimination of
intercompany profit in inventory did not include finished goods inbound in
transit, thereby serving to understate the amount of intercompany profit to
be eliminated.
The
Company analyzed the effect of this adjustment on prior years to fiscal 2005
and
has quantified an adjustment of $262,000, net of taxes, over the effected period
through fiscal 2007. In accordance with the provisions of SAB 108, the
Company decreased beginning retained earnings for fiscal year 2008 by $262,000
within the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The
Company does not believe that the net effect of this adjustment was material,
either quantitatively or qualitatively, in any of the years covered by the
review. In reaching that determination, the following quantitative measures
were
considered:
(in thousands)
|
|
Net Adjustment, After
|
||||||||||
|
Net
Decrease to
|
Net Income
|
Tax as a
% of Net
|
|||||||||
Fiscal Year
|
Net
Income
|
As Reported
|
Income As Reported
|
|||||||||
2007
|
$ |
154
|
$ |
5,104
|
3.02 | % | ||||||
2006
|
20
|
6,329
|
0.32 | % | ||||||||
2005
|
88
|
5,016
|
1.75 | % | ||||||||
Total
|
$ |
262
|
16,449
|
1.59 | % |
Impact
of Adjustments
The
impact of each of the items noted above, net of tax, on fiscal 2008 beginning
balances are presented below:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
$
|
(262)
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
(262)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
14
You
should read the following summary together with the more detailed business
information and consolidated financial statements and related notes that
appeared in our Form 10-K and Annual Report and in the documents that were
incorporated by reference into our Form 10-K for the year ended January 31,
2007. This Form 10-Q may contain certain “forward-looking”
information within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act
of 1995. This information involves risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from the
results discussed in the forward-looking statements. See page 3 of this
10-Q.
Overview
We
manufacture and sell a comprehensive line of safety garments and accessories
for
the industrial protective clothing and homeland security markets. Our products
are sold by our in-house sales force and independent sales representatives
to a
network of over 1,000 safety and mill supply distributors. These distributors
in
turn supply end user industrial customers such as chemical/petrochemical,
automobile, steel, glass, construction, smelting, janitorial, pharmaceutical
and
high technology electronics manufacturers, as well as hospitals and
laboratories. In addition, we supply federal, state and local governmental
agencies and departments such as fire and police departments, airport crash
rescue units, the Department of Defense, the Centers for Disease Control, and
numerous other agencies of the federal and state governments.
We
have
operated manufacturing facilities in Mexico since 1995 and in China since 1996.
Beginning in 1995, we moved the labor intensive sewing operation for our limited
use/disposable protective clothing lines to these facilities. In late 2006
we
acquired an Indian glove manufacturing operation to complement our existing
string knit glove lines. Our facilities and capabilities in China, India and
Mexico allow access to a less expensive labor pool than is available in the
United States and permit us to purchase certain raw materials at a lower cost
than they are available domestically. As we have increasingly moved production
of our products to our facilities in Mexico and China, we have seen improvements
in the profit margins for these products. We continue to move production of
our
reusable woven garments and gloves to these facilities and expect to continue
this process through fiscal 2008. As a result, we expect to see continuing
profit margin improvements for these product lines over time.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales
and
expenses, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base estimates
on our past experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to
be
reasonable under the circumstances and we periodically evaluate these
estimates.
We
believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue
Recognition. We derive our sales primarily from our limited use/disposable
protective clothing and secondarily from our sales of high-end chemical
protective suits, reusable woven garments, fire fighting and heat protective
apparel, gloves, arm guards and high visibility clothing. Sales are recognized
when goods are shipped to our distributors at which time title and the risk
of
loss passes. Sales are reduced for sales returns and allowances. Payment terms
are generally net 30 days for United States sales and net 90 days for
international sales.
Inventories.
Inventories include freight-in, materials, labor and overhead costs and
are
stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market.
Provision is made for slow-moving, obsolete or unusable inventory.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts.
We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts to provide for
15
accounts
receivable that may not be collectible. In establishing the allowance for
doubtful accounts, we analyze the collectibility of individual large or past
due
accounts customer-by-customer.
Income
Taxes and Valuation Reserves. We are required to estimate our income taxes
in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate as part of preparing our
consolidated financial statements. This involves estimating the actual current
tax in addition to assessing temporary differences resulting from differing
treatments for tax and financial accounting purposes. These differences,
together with net operating loss carry forwards and tax credits, are recorded
as
deferred tax assets or liabilities on our balance sheet. A judgment must then
be
made of the likelihood that any deferred tax assets will be realized from future
taxable income. A valuation allowance may be required to reduce deferred tax
assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event
we determine that we may not be able to realize all or part of our deferred
tax
asset in the future, or that new estimates indicate that a previously recorded
valuation allowance is no longer required, an adjustment to the deferred tax
asset is charged or credited to net income in the period of such
determination.
Valuation
of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. On February 1, 2002, we adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets,” which provides that goodwill and other intangible assets are
no longer amortized, but are assessed for impairment annually and upon
occurrence of an event that indicates impairment may have occurred. Goodwill
impairment is evaluated utilizing a two-step process as required by SFAS No.
142. Factors that we consider important that could identify a potential
impairment include: significant underperformance relative to expected
historical or projected future operating results; significant changes in the
overall business strategy; and significant negative industry or economic trends.
When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles and goodwill may not
be
recoverable based upon one or more of these indicators of impairment, we measure
any potential impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow
method. Estimating future cash flows requires our management to make
projections that can differ materially from actual results.
Self-Insured
Liabilities. We have a self-insurance program for certain employee health
benefits. The cost of such benefits is recognized as expense based on claims
filed in each reporting period, and an estimate of claims incurred but not
reported during such period. Our estimate of claims incurred but not reported
is
based upon historical trends. If more claims are made than were estimated or
if
the costs of actual claims increases beyond what was anticipated, reserves
recorded may not be sufficient and additional accruals may be required in future
periods. We maintain separate insurance to cover the excess liability over
set
single claim amounts and aggregate annual claim amounts.
Significant
Balance Sheet Fluctuation October 31, 2007 as compared to January 31,
2007
Cash
increased by $.765 million as a result of normal fluctuations
in uncollected funds deposited. Accounts receivable decreased by
$.021 million. Inventory increased by $5.52 million due to an increase in raw
materials of $5.28 million. A decrease in finished goods of $.22 million was
offset by an increase in inventory reserves of $.29 million and intercompany
profit elimination of $.109 million. Overall inventories increased by $5.5
million from their January 2007 levels resulting from lower sales of Tyvek
products in Q3 FY08 compared with purchasing commitments to vendors and
approximately a $1 million increase in wovens to support a new customer. The
Company has started to realize the benefits of its recent discounted purchases.
Raw material purchasing continued at higher levels than normal in order to
take
advantage of discounts offered by suppliers. Such discounts
positively impacted our third quarter earnings and should positively impact
our
fourth quarter earning as these discounted raw materials roll through our
international pipelines. Deferred income taxes increased by a $.158 million
tax
benefit for the India and Mexican operations. Other current assets
decreased principally due to receipt of $1.94 million rebates related to the
purchase of raw material. Accounts payable decreased by $.21
million.
At
October 31, 2007 the Company had an outstanding loan balance of $7.236 million
under its facility with Wachovia Bank, N.A. compared with $3.786 million at
January 31, 2007 largely to finance the purchase of increase in inventory
referred to above. Total stockholder’s equity increased principally
by the net income for the period of $2.29 million, offset by adoption of FIN
48
and SAB 108, stock based compensation and other comprehensive loss.
16
For
the Nine
Months
|
For
the Three
Months
|
|||||||||||||||
Ended
October
31,
|
Ended
October
31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||||
Sales
|
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||
Gross
Profit
|
24.30 | % | 24.20 | % | 22.90 | % | 25.00 | % | ||||||||
Selling,
general and
administrative
|
18.60 | % | 19.70 | % | 18.30 | % | 17.90 | % | ||||||||
Income
from
operations
|
5.80 | % | 4.50 | % | 4.60 | % | 7.10 | % | ||||||||
Income
before provision for
income taxes
|
5.60 | % | 4.70 | % | 4.60 | % | 7.00 | % | ||||||||
Net
income
|
4.00 | % | 4.20 | % | 3.30 | % | 5.10 | % |
Nine
months ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended October
31,
2006
Net
Sales. Net sales decreased $3.79 million, or 5.1% to $70.8 million for the
nine months ended October 31, 2007 from $74.6 million for the nine months ended
October 31, 2006. The net decrease was comprised of decreased sales
in Tyvek disposable garments of $5.2 million in the U.S. and $1.03 million
in
Canada primarily due to competitive market conditions, competitors rebate
programs, lower government spending in the Company’s Chemical Protective
garments by $21,000 and less revenue from India of $295,000 as a result of
its
shutdown for retooling during this fiscal year to date, counter balanced by
growth in sales in Chile, Japan and United Kingdom subsidiaries of $1,103,000
and by increased external sales from China of $1,681,000. The Company
expects to reopen its Indian facility in December 2007, so the resumption of
glove sales should take full effect in the first quarter of fiscal
2009. Sales of wovens and gloves increased by $270,000 compared to
the same period last year. The increase in fire gear sales was due to all new
NFPA standards and Underwriter’s Laboratory (UL) certifications regarding the
construction of fire gear, which negatively impacted the entire industry in
the
first two quarters. The decline in glove sales was due to the loss of two
customers, one of whom went out of business. Wovens sales benefited from the
introduction of a new line of aseptic anti-static garments.
Gross
Profit. Gross profit decreased $2.4 million or 13.1% to $16.2 million for
the nine months ended October 31, 2007 from $18.6 million for the nine months
ended October 31, 2006. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales
decreased to 22.9% for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 from 24.9% for
the
nine months ended October 31, 2006, primarily due to a sales rebate program
to
meet competitive conditions resulting in a $777,000 reduction in sales and
higher Tyvek fabric costs. Such higher Tyvek costs resulted from Tyvek purchased
earlier at no rebate charged to costs of goods sold for the months of April,
May
and into early June resulting in higher costs of approximately $510,000. The
supply of this higher cost raw material has now been exhausted, so gross margin
improvement is anticipated relative to the lower cost of materials for new
sales
as compared to sales in the prior periods. Start-up costs related to the new
foreign subsidiaries of approximately $714,000 were partially offset by ongoing
cost reduction programs in component and service-purchasing, shifting production
from the U.S. to China and Mexico, and a continuation of the plant restructuring
in Mexico, rework expenses on a chemical suit contract, and reduced volumes
in
lower margin fire gear and gloves.
Operating
Expenses. Operating expenses decreased $.40 million, or 3.0% to $12.9
million for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 from $13.3 million for the
nine months ended October 31, 2006. As a percentage of sales, operating expenses
increased to 18.3% for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 from 17.9% for
the
nine months ended October 31, 2006. This increase as a
17
percent
of sales is largely due to reduced volume. The decrease in operating expenses
in
the nine months ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended
October 31, 2006 included:
|
·
|
$0.27
increase in R & D costs relating to UL certifications of fire gear and
other non-related certifications and for new product
lines.
|
|
·
|
$0.23
million in higher professional and consulting fees, largely resulting
from
audit fees and engineering fees related to
India.
|
|
·
|
$0.08
million in share-based
compensation.
|
|
·
|
($0.03)
million lower freight out costs resulting from slight relief in prevailing
carrier rates and lower volume.
|
|
·
|
($0.05)
million in reduced bank charges resulting from reduced use of credit
cards
and a re-negotiation of the fee
structure.
|
|
·
|
($0.07)
million lower insurance costs.
|
|
·
|
($0.08)
million decreased sales commissions and selling expenses due to decreased
volume.
|
|
·
|
($0.11)
million lower currency fluctuation costs resulting from our hedging
program.
|
|
·
|
($0.28)
million miscellaneous decreases.
|
|
·
|
($0.36)
million lower start up expenses in
India.
|
Operating
Profit. Operating profit decreased 38.6% to $3.3 million for the nine
months ended October 31, 2007 from $5.3 million for the nine months ended
October 31, 2006. Operating margins were 4.6% for the nine months
ended October 31, 2007 compared to 7.1% for the nine months ended October 31,
2006.
Interest
Expenses. Interest expenses decreased by $.061 million for the
nine months ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the nine months ended October
31, 2006 because of lower amounts borrowed and steady to lower interest rates
under the Company’s credit facility.
Income
Tax Expense. Income tax expenses consist of federal, state, and
foreign income taxes. Income tax expenses decreased $.462 million, or
33%, to $.937 million for the nine months October 31, 2007 from $1.399 million
for the nine months ended October 31, 2006. Lakeland’s effective tax
rates were 28.9% and 26.9% for the nine months ended October 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate varied from the
federal statutory rate of 34% due primarily to the Mexican restructuring costs
charged to the first quarter largely not eligible for tax benefits, which was
offset by reduced domestic profits in the second quarter, and otherwise lower
foreign tax rates, primarily resulting from greater profits resulting from
outsourced production, reduced domestic profits in the second quarter, partially
offset by state taxes and by start up losses in Chile and Japan which are not
eligible for tax credits and for India in which a U.S. tax benefit of $158,000
was recorded at October 31, 2007 and further offset by some foreign exchange
items not eligible for foreign tax benefits. The Indian losses became
eligible for the tax benefit as a result of the planned liquidation of the
existing Indian subsidiary which will result in a bad debt deduction for the
U.S. parent company on its taxes for the uncollected portion of its loans and
advances from the Indian subsidiary.
Net
Income. Net income decreased
$1.50
million, or 39.6% to $2.29 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2007
from $3.80 million for the nine months ended October 31, 2006. The decrease
in
net income primarily resulted from lower sales and meeting competitive
conditions in the disposable garment division both in the U.S. and Canada,
offset by the decreased operating expenses described above, and the combined
operating losses of $561,000 of the new foreign operations and the Mexican
plant
closing of $500,000.
Three
months ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the three months ended October
31,
2006
Net
Sales. Net sales increased $.19 million, or .82% to $23.5 million for the
three months ended
18
October
31, 2007 from $23.3 million for the three months ended October 31,
2006. The net increase on a year-over-year basis reflects decreased
sales in disposable garments of $2.12 million in the U.S. and $59,000 in Canada,
primarily due to competitive market conditions, increased government spending
for Chemical Protective garments by $305,000, and a $68,000 reduction of revenue
from India as a result of its shutdown for retooling during the quarter,
partially offset by growth in sales in subsidiaries in Chile and United Kingdom
of $320,000 and increased sales from China of $1,014,000. The Company
expects to reopen its Indian facility in December 2007, so the resumption of
glove sales should take full effect in the first quarter of fiscal
2009. Sales of fire gear and wovens increased by $900,000 compared to
the same period last year. The increase in fire gear sales was due to all new
NFPA standards and Underwriter’s Laboratory (UL) certifications regarding the
construction of fire gear, which negatively impacted the entire industry in
the
first half of the year. Wovens sales improvement reflects sales of Lakeland’s
new line of aseptic anti-static garments. An increase in glove sales of $44,000
was due to the addition of two new customers and increased
capacity.
Gross
Profit. Gross profit increased $.068 million or 1.2% to $5.7 million for
the three months ended October 31, 2007 from $5.6 million for the three months
ended October 31, 2006. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales
increased to 24.3% for the three months ended October 31, 2007 from 24.2% for
the three months ended October 31, 2006, primarily due to the higher volume
in
wovens, offset by the implementation of a sales rebate program to meet
competitive conditions resulting in a $179,000 reduction in sales. Other
contributing factors were start-up costs related to the new foreign subsidiaries
of approximately $100,000, partially offset by ongoing cost reduction programs
in component and service-purchasing, shifting production from the US to China
and Mexico, and continuation of the plant restructuring in Mexico that lowered
the unit’s production costs.
Operating
Expenses. Operating expenses decreased $.224 million, or 4.9% to $4.4
million for the three months ended October 31, 2007 from $4.6 million for the
three months ended October 31, 2006. As a percentage of sales, operating
expenses decreased to 18.6% for the three months ended October 31, 2007 from
19.7% for the three months ended October 31, 2006. This decrease as a percent
of
sales is largely due to the large write offs in India in the previous year.
Operating expenses in the three months ended October 31, 2007 decreased by
$.224
million as compared to the three months ended October 31, 2006. The
changes in operating expenses included:
|
·
|
$0.15
million increased sales commissions and selling expenses due to increased
volume.
|
|
·
|
$0.13
million miscellaneous net
decreases.
|
|
·
|
$0.11
million higher freight out costs resulting from prevailing carrier
rates
and higher volume.
|
|
·
|
$0.10
increase in research and development costs relating to UL certifications
of fire gear and other non-related certifications and for other new
product lines.
|
|
·
|
($0.40)
million reduced operating expenses in
India.
|
|
·
|
($0.04)
million reduced insurance costs.
|
|
·
|
($0.01)
reduced currency fluctuation, largely resulting from hedging
activities.
|
Operating
profit. Operating profit increased 27.6% to $1.349 million for the three
months ended October 31, 2007 from $1.057 million for the three months ended
October 31, 2006 and increased 47.4% from the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Operating margins were 5.7% for the three months ended October 31, 2007 compared
to 4.5% for the three months ended October 31, 2006 and 4.2% on a sequential
quarter basis over Q2 FY08.
Interest
Expenses. Interest expenses increased by $.015 million for the
three months ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the three months ended
October 31, 2006 because of higher amounts borrowed and steady to lower interest
rates under the Company’s credit facility.
Income
Tax Expense. Income tax expenses consist of federal, state, and
foreign income taxes.
19
Income
tax expenses increased $.255 million, or 210.5%, to $.376 million for the three
months ended October 31, 2007 from $.121 million for the three months ended
October 31, 2006. Lakeland’s effective tax rates were 28.8% and 10.9% for the
three months ended October 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The effective tax
rate varied from the federal statutory rate of 34% due primarily to reduced
domestic profits in the third quarter, and otherwise lower foreign tax rates,
primarily resulting from greater profits resulting from outsourced production,
partially offset by state taxes and by start up losses in Chile and Japan which
are not eligible for tax credits and for India in which a U.S. tax benefit
of
$74,000 was recorded at October 31, 2007 and further offset by foreign exchange
items not eligible for foreign tax benefits. These Indian losses
became eligible for the tax benefit as a result of the planned liquidation
of
the existing Indian subsidiary which will result in a bad debt deduction for
the
U.S. parent company on its taxes for the uncollected portion of its loans and
advances from the Indian subsidiary.
Net
Income. Net income decreased $.050 million, or 5.1% to $.930
million for the three months ended October 31, 2007 from $.980 million for
the
three months ended October 31, 2006. The decrease in net income primarily
resulted from meeting competitive pricing conditions in our disposable garment
division both in the U.S. and Canada, the operating expenses described above,
and the combined operating losses of $255,000 of the new foreign operations
and
the ongoing Mexican plant restructuring, in addition to the cumulative tax
benefit of $277,000 taken in the third quarter of fiscal 2007due to the Indian
subsidiary losses.
During
the third quarter of fiscal 2007 it was determined to restructure the Indian
operations which would allow a tax benefit on the accumulated
losses. A tax benefit of $89,000 was taken in that quarter relating
to losses incurred in previous periods, resulting in a lower effective tax
rate
in the prior year.
Earnings
per share were $0.17 for the three months ended October 31, 2007, compared
to
$0.18 for the three months ended October 31, 2006 (after reflecting adjustments
resulting from the 10% stock dividend payable to holders of record on August
1,
2006). Earnings per share in the third quarter of fiscal 2008
increased 21.4% as compared to $0.14 in the second quarter, reflecting the
Company’s increase in sales and improvements in international operating
performance.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
|
Cash
Flows. As of October 31, 2007 we had cash and cash equivalents of
$2.7 million and working capital of $62.8 million, increases of $.8
million and $5 million, respectively, from January 31, 2007. Our
primary
sources of funds for conducting our business activities have been
cash
flow provided by operations and borrowings under our credit facilities
described below. We require liquidity and working capital
primarily to fund increases in inventories and accounts receivable
associated with our net sales and, to a lesser extent, for capital
expenditures.
|
|
Net
cash (used in) operating activities of $1.64 million for the nine
months
ended October 31, 2007 was due primarily to net income from
operations of $2.3 million, a decrease in accounts payable accrued
expenses and other liabilities of $.63 million, an increase in inventories
of $5.8 million and a decrease in accounts receivable of $.034
million. Net cash used in investing activities of $2.1 million
in the nine months ended October 31, 2007, was due to purchases of
property and equipment.
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities of $1.9 million for the nine
months
ended October 31, 2006 was due primarily to net income from operations
of
$3.8 million, an increase in accounts payable of $.24 million, a
decrease
in inventories of $.06 million, a decrease in accounts receivable
of $1.3
million and a decrease in other current assets of $1.4
million. Net cash used in investing activities of $.63 million
in the nine months ended October 31, 2006, was due to purchases of
property and equipment.
|
|
We
currently have one credit facility - a $25 million revolving credit,
of
which $7.236 million of borrowings were outstanding as of October
31,
2007. Our credit facility requires that we comply with
specified financial covenants relating to fixed charge ratio, debt
to
EBIDTA coverage, and inventory
|
20
and
accounts receivable collateral coverage ratios. These restrictive
covenants could affect our financial and operational flexibility or impede
our
ability to operate or expand our business. Default under our credit
facility would allow the lender to declare all amounts outstanding to be
immediately due and payable. Our lender has a security interest in
substantially all of our assets to secure the debt under our credit
facility. As of October 31, 2007, we were in compliance with all
covenants contained in our credit facility.
We
believe that our current cash position of $2.7 million, our cash flow from
operations along with borrowing availability under our $25 million revolving
credit facility will be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated operating,
capital expenditures and debt service requirements for at least the next 12
months.
Capital
Expenditures. Our capital expenditures principally relate to purchases of
manufacturing equipment, computer equipment, and leasehold improvements, as
well
as payments related to the construction of our new facilities in China. Our
facilities in China are not encumbered by commercial bank mortgages and thus
Chinese commercial mortgage loans may be available with respect to these real
estate assets if we need additional liquidity. Our capital expenditures are
expected to be approximately $1.2 million for capital equipment, primarily
computer equipment and apparel manufacturing equipment in fiscal 2008, and
approximately $2 million (Canadian) (approximately $1.8 US) for a new Canadian
facility (some of which may be incurred in FY09).
Foreign
Currency Exposure. The Company has foreign currency exposure,
principally through sales in Canada and the UK and production in Mexico and
China. Management has commenced a hedging program to offset this risk
by purchasing forward contracts to sell the Canadian Dollar, Euro and Great
Britain Pound. Such contracts for the Euro and Pound are largely
timed to expire with the last day of the fiscal quarter, with a new contract
purchased on the first day of the following quarter, to match the operating
cycle of the company. Management has decided not to hedge its long
position in the Chinese Yuan.
The
Company accounts for its foreign exchange derivative instruments under Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended. This standard requires
recognition of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value
and
may result in additional volatility in both current period earnings and other
comprehensive income as a result of recording recognized and unrecognized gains
and losses from changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments.
The
Company had one derivative instrument outstanding at October 31, 2007 which
was
treated as a cash flow hedge intended for forecasted purchases of merchandise
by
the Company’s Canadian subsidiary. The Company had no
derivative instruments outstanding at October 31, 2006. The change in the
fair market value of the effective hedge portion of the foreign currency forward
exchange contracts was a loss of $115,512, for the nine month period
ended October 31, 2007 and was recorded in other comprehensive
(income) loss (see Note 16). It will be released into operations over 18
months based on the timing of the sales of the underlying inventory. The
release to operations will be reflected in cost of products sold. During the
period ended October 31, 2007, the Company recorded an immaterial loss in cost
of goods sold for the remaining portion of the foreign currency forward exchange
contract that did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The
derivative instrument was in the form of a foreign currency “participating
forward” exchange contract. The “participating forward” feature affords the
Company full protection on the downside and the ability to retain 50% of any
gains, in exchange for a premium at inception. Such premium is built
into the contract in the form of a different contract rate in the amount of
$0.0160.
21
STAFF
ACCOUNTING BULLETIN NO. 108, CONSIDERING THE EFFECTS OF PRIOR YEAR MISSTATEMENTS
WHEN QUANTIFYING MISSTATEMENTS IN CURRENT YEAR FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
As
discussed under Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Note 16, in September 2006,
the SEC issued SAB 108. The transition provisions of SAB 108 permit the Company
to adjust for the cumulative effect on retained earnings of immaterial errors
relating to prior years. SAB 108 also requires the adjustment of any prior
quarterly financial statements within the fiscal year of adoption for the
effects of such errors on the quarters when the information is next presented.
Such adjustments do not require previously filed reports with the SEC to be
amended. The Company adopted SAB 108 at the end of fiscal 2007. In accordance
with SAB 108, the Company has adjusted beginning retained earnings for fiscal
2008 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the items
described below. The Company considers these adjustments to be immaterial to
prior periods.
Elimination
of Intercompany Profit in Inventory
As
part
of the Company’s routine testing for Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, it was
determined that a report used for the calculation of the elimination of
intercompany profit in inventory has not included finished goods inbound in
transit. The quantities of cases on hand to calculate this adjustment has
been consistently based on the same report for many years, thus understating
the
amount of intercompany profit to be eliminated.
The
Company analyzed the effect of this adjustment on prior years to fiscal 2005
and
has derived an adjustment of $262,000, net of taxes, over the effected period
through fiscal 2007. In accordance with the provisions of SAB 108, the
Company decreased beginning retained earnings for fiscal year 2008 by $262,000
within the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
The
Company does not believe that the net effect of this adjustment was material,
either quantitatively or qualitatively, in any of the years covered by the
review. In reaching that determination, the following quantitative measures
were
considered:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Net Adjustment, After
|
|||||||||
|
Net Decrease
to
|
Net Income
|
Tax as a
% of Net
|
|||||||||
Fiscal Year
|
Net
Income
|
As Reported
|
Income As Reported
|
|||||||||
2007
|
$ | 154 | $ | 5,104 | 3.02 | % | ||||||
2006
|
20
|
6,329
|
0.32 | % | ||||||||
2005
|
88
|
5,016
|
1.75 | % | ||||||||
Total
|
$ |
262
|
16,449
|
1.59 | % |
Impact
of Adjustments
The
impact of each of the items noted above, net of tax, on fiscal 2008 beginning
balances are presented below:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
$
|
(262)
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
(262)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
There
have been no significant changes in market risk from that disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2007.
22
Item
4.
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures - Lakeland Industries, Inc.’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the
effectiveness of Lakeland Industries, Inc.’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(c) under the Securities Exchange Act)
as
of the end of the period covered by this report, have concluded that, based
on
the evaluation of these controls and procedures, the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting - Lakeland Industries, Inc.’s
management, with the participation of Lakeland Industries, Inc.’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated whether any change
in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting occurred during the
third quarter of fiscal 2008. Based on that evaluation, management
concluded that there has been no change in Lakeland Industries, Inc.’s internal
control over financial reporting during the third quarter of fiscal 2008 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Lakeland
Industries, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting.
Through
the forty five months ended October 31, 2007 additional expense has been
incurred relating to documenting and testing the systems of internal
controls. The Company hired internal auditors in 2004 and 2005 and
has contracted with an independent consultant for services related to overall
Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance and more specifically Section 404, in February
2004. The total cumulative amount expensed so far is approximately
$1,667,000 including $315,000 in additional director fees.
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Items
1,
2, 3, 4 and 5 are not applicable
Item
6.
|
Exhibits*
and Reports on
Form 8-K:
|
Exhibits:
|
||
a.
|
31.1
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act, Signed by Chief Executive Officer
(filed herewith)
|
|
b.
|
31.2
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and
Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act, Signed by Chief Financial Officer
(filed herewith)
|
|
c.
|
32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of
2002, Signed by Chief Executive Officer (filed
herewith)
|
|
d.
|
32.2
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
of 2002, Signed by Chief Financial Officer (filed
herewith)
|
23
Reports
on Form 8-K:
|
a
-
|
On
September 6, 2007, the Company filed a Form 8-K under Item 2.02,
relating
to the results of operations and financial condition for the purpose
of
furnishing a press release announcing results of operations for the
three
months ended July 31, 2007.
|
*
|
Incorporated
by reference herein are two Registration Statements on Form S-8 filed
by
the Company on January 9, 1987 registering the common stock underlying
the
options in the Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan and the Directors
Stock Option Plan and on July 26, 2007, registering the common stock
awardable to employees and directors pursuant to the 2006 Equity
Incentive
Plan
|
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LAKELAND
INDUSTRIES, INC.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: December
6, 2007
|
/s/
Christopher J. Ryan
|
Christopher
J. Ryan,
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President,
|
|
Secretary
and General Counsel
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer and Authorized
|
|
Signatory)
|
|
Date:
December 6, 2007
|
/s/Gary
Pokrassa
|
Gary
Pokrassa,
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
(Principal
Accounting Officer and Authorized
|
|
Signatory)
|
25