LANCASTER COLONY CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 000-04065
Lancaster Colony Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
13-1955943 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
37 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio (Address of principal executive offices) |
43215 (Zip Code) |
614-224-7141
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller Reporting Company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ
As of October 30, 2009, there were approximately 28,172,000 shares of Common Stock, without
par value, outstanding.
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
15 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
21 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
22 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
24 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
Exhibit 32 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
September 30 | June 30 | |||||||
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 52,440 | $ | 38,484 | ||||
Receivables (less allowance for doubtful accounts,
September $919 and June $942) |
78,195 | 61,152 | ||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
31,621 | 33,067 | ||||||
Finished goods and work in process |
78,984 | 69,456 | ||||||
Total inventories |
110,605 | 102,523 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other current assets |
23,951 | 20,653 | ||||||
Total current assets |
265,191 | 222,812 | ||||||
Property, Plant and Equipment: |
||||||||
Land, buildings and improvements |
130,939 | 130,683 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
240,814 | 239,380 | ||||||
Total cost |
371,753 | 370,063 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
203,449 | 199,163 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment net |
168,304 | 170,900 | ||||||
Other Assets: |
||||||||
Goodwill |
89,840 | 89,840 | ||||||
Other intangible assets net |
10,387 | 10,678 | ||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
3,929 | 4,251 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 537,651 | $ | 498,481 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 42,674 | $ | 41,180 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
46,969 | 33,399 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
89,643 | 74,579 | ||||||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
16,730 | 16,719 | ||||||
Deferred Income Taxes |
4,770 | 4,627 | ||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock authorized 3,050,000 shares; outstanding none
|
||||||||
Common stock authorized 75,000,000 shares; outstanding September 28,171,809 shares; June 28,101,885 shares |
92,240 | 88,962 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
1,018,854 | 998,476 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(8,789 | ) | (9,085 | ) | ||||
Common stock in treasury, at cost |
(675,797 | ) | (675,797 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
426,508 | 402,556 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 537,651 | $ | 498,481 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 254,160 | $ | 263,837 | ||||
Cost of Sales |
190,453 | 224,168 | ||||||
Gross Margin |
63,707 | 39,669 | ||||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
20,468 | 20,261 | ||||||
Restructuring and Impairment Charges |
830 | 1,614 | ||||||
Operating Income |
42,409 | 17,794 | ||||||
Other (Expense) Income: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
| (491 | ) | |||||
Interest income and other net |
25 | 75 | ||||||
Income Before Income Taxes |
42,434 | 17,378 | ||||||
Taxes Based on Income |
14,029 | 6,358 | ||||||
Net Income |
$ | 28,405 | $ | 11,020 | ||||
Net Income Per Common Share: |
||||||||
Basic and Diluted |
$ | 1.01 | $ | .39 | ||||
Cash Dividends Per Common Share |
$ | .285 | $ | .28 | ||||
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
28,081 | 28,262 | ||||||
Diluted |
28,115 | 28,264 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 28,405 | $ | 11,020 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,422 | 5,556 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other noncash changes |
(171 | ) | (1,050 | ) | ||||
Restructuring and impairment charges |
952 | (370 | ) | |||||
Loss on sale of property |
| 121 | ||||||
Pension plan activity |
117 | (54 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Receivables |
(17,248 | ) | (22,484 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(8,204 | ) | (4,755 | ) | ||||
Other current assets |
(3,499 | ) | 5,105 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
13,102 | 1,516 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
18,876 | (5,395 | ) | |||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Payments on property additions |
(1,919 | ) | (3,693 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property |
| 10 | ||||||
Other net |
(275 | ) | (453 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,194 | ) | (4,136 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from debt |
| 25,000 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| (10,088 | ) | |||||
Payment of dividends |
(8,027 | ) | (7,906 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
2,985 | | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash overdraft balance |
2,316 | (1,095 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(2,726 | ) | 5,911 | |||||
Net change in cash and equivalents |
13,956 | (3,620 | ) | |||||
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year |
38,484 | 19,417 | ||||||
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
$ | 52,440 | $ | 15,797 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Operating Cash Flows: |
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
$ | 1,704 | $ | 576 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In our opinion, the
interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of the results of operations and financial position for such periods. All such adjustments
reflected in the interim consolidated financial statements are considered to be of a normal
recurring nature. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative
of results for the full year. Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Unless otherwise noted, the term year and references to a particular year pertain to our fiscal
year, which begins on July 1 and ends on June 30; for example, 2010 refers to fiscal 2010, which is
the period from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010.
Subsequent Events
We
have evaluated events occurring between the end of our most recent
fiscal quarter and November
6, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Purchases of property, plant and equipment
included in accounts payable at September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $0.1 million and
$0.2 million, respectively. These purchases, less the preceding June 30 balances, have been
excluded from the property additions in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Earnings Per Share
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of a Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Staff Position (FSP) on the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities, which is now part of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 260, Earnings
Per Share. This FSP addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are
participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the two-class method described in
generally accepted accounting principles for EPS. The restricted stock we previously granted to
employees was deemed to meet the definition of a participating security as the employees receive
nonforfeitable dividends before the stock becomes vested. Our adoption of this FSP required that we
retrospectively restate EPS for all periods presented. There was no impact on EPS for the three
months ended September 30, 2008.
6
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
Basic and diluted net income per common share were calculated as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 28,405 | $ | 11,020 | ||||
Net income allocated to participating securities |
(29 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Net income allocated to common shareholders |
$ | 28,376 | $ | 11,011 | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic |
28,081 | 28,262 | ||||||
Incremental share effect from: |
||||||||
Stock options |
8 | | ||||||
Restricted stock |
11 | 2 | ||||||
Stock-settled stock appreciation rights |
15 | | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted |
28,115 | 28,264 | ||||||
Net income per common share basic and diluted |
$ | 1.01 | $ | 0.39 |
Significant Accounting Policies
There were no changes to our Significant Accounting Policies from those disclosed in our 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Note 2 Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1), which is now part of ASC Topic 715,
Compensation-Retirement Benefits. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 provides guidance on an employers disclosures
about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This FSP expands the
disclosure set forth in general accounting principles for retirement benefits by adding required
disclosures about (1) how investment allocation decisions are made by management, (2) major
categories of plan assets, and (3) significant concentration of risk. Additionally, the FSP
requires an employer to disclose information about the valuation of plan assets similar to that
required under general accounting principles for fair value measurements. This FSP is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, with earlier adoption permitted. We are currently
reviewing the additional disclosure requirements regarding our benefit plans assets.
Note 3 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill attributable to the Specialty Foods segment was approximately $89.8 million at
September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
7
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes our identifiable other intangible assets by segment as of
September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009:
September 30 | June 30 | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
Specialty Foods |
||||||||
Trademarks (40-year life) |
||||||||
Gross carrying value |
$ | 370 | $ | 370 | ||||
Accumulated amortization |
(170 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||
Net Carrying Value |
$ | 200 | $ | 203 | ||||
Customer Relationships (12 to 15-year life) |
||||||||
Gross carrying value |
$ | 13,020 | $ | 13,020 | ||||
Accumulated amortization |
(3,352 | ) | (3,118 | ) | ||||
Net Carrying Value |
$ | 9,668 | $ | 9,902 | ||||
Non-compete Agreements (5 to 8-year life) |
||||||||
Gross carrying value |
$ | 1,540 | $ | 1,540 | ||||
Accumulated amortization |
(1,021 | ) | (967 | ) | ||||
Net Carrying Value |
$ | 519 | $ | 573 | ||||
Total Net Carrying Value |
$ | 10,387 | $ | 10,678 | ||||
Amortization expense relating to these assets was approximately $0.3 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. Total annual amortization expense is estimated to be
approximately $1.2 million next year, $1.1 million for the second year and $0.9 million for each of
the following three years.
Note 4 Long-Term Debt
At September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, we had an unsecured revolving credit facility under
which we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million at any one time, with the potential to expand
the total credit availability to $260 million based on obtaining consent of the issuing bank and
certain other conditions. The facility expires on October 5, 2012, and all outstanding amounts are
due and payable on that day. At September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings
outstanding under this facility. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes.
Based on the long-term nature of this facility and in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, we have classified any outstanding balance as long-term debt. We paid no
interest for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to approximately $0.4 million
in the corresponding period of the prior year.
The facility contains two principal financial covenants: an interest expense test that
requires us to maintain an interest coverage ratio not less than 2.5 to 1 at the end of each fiscal
quarter; and an indebtedness test that requires us to maintain a leverage ratio not greater than 3
to 1 at all times. The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing Consolidated EBIT (as
defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated Interest Expense (as defined
more specifically in the credit agreement), and the leverage ratio is calculated by dividing
Consolidated Debt (as defined more specifically in the credit agreement) by Consolidated EBITDA (as
defined more specifically in the credit agreement). We met the requirements of these financial
covenants at September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
Note 5 Pension Benefits
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple defined benefit pension plans.
Benefits under the plans are primarily based on negotiated rates and years of service and cover the
union workers at such locations. We contribute to these plans at least the minimum amount required
by regulation or contract. We recognize the cost of plan benefits as the employees render service.
8
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table discloses net periodic benefit cost for our pension plans:
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended | ||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 27 | $ | 30 | ||||
Interest cost |
529 | 541 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(538 | ) | (602 | ) | ||||
Curtailment charge |
349 | | ||||||
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
124 | 62 | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
5 | 26 | ||||||
Amortization of unrecognized net obligation existing at transition |
| 1 | ||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 496 | $ | 58 | ||||
In the first quarter of 2010, one of our plans became subject to curtailment accounting. This
resulted in the immediate recognition of all of the outstanding prior service cost of the plan,
which was approximately $0.3 million, as required under generally accepted accounting principles
for retirement benefits. This charge was included in our Specialty Foods segment.
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we made less than $0.1 million in contributions
to our pension plans. We expect to make approximately $0.8 million more in contributions to our
pension plans during the remainder of 2010.
Note 6 Postretirement Benefits
We and certain of our operating subsidiaries provide multiple postretirement medical and life
insurance benefit plans. We recognize the cost of benefits as the employees render service.
Postretirement benefits are funded as incurred.
The following table discloses net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement plans:
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended | ||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 4 | $ | 4 | ||||
Interest cost |
48 | 49 | ||||||
Amortization of unrecognized gain |
(3 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Amortization of prior service asset |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 48 | $ | 48 | ||||
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we made less than $0.1 million in contributions
to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans. We expect to make approximately
$0.2 million more in contributions to our postretirement medical and life insurance benefit plans
during the remainder of 2010.
Note 7 Stock-Based Compensation
As approved by our shareholders in November 1995, the terms of the 1995 Key Employee Stock
Option Plan (the 1995 Plan) reserved 3,000,000 common shares for issuance to qualified key
employees. All options granted under the 1995 Plan were exercisable at prices not less than fair
market value as of the date of grant. The 1995 Plan expired in August 2005, but there are still
options outstanding that were issued under this plan. In general, options granted under the 1995
Plan vested immediately and had a maximum term of
9
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
five years. Our policy is to issue shares upon option exercise from new shares that had been
previously authorized.
Our shareholders approved the adoption of the Lancaster Colony Corporation 2005 Stock Plan
(the 2005 Plan) at our 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 2005 Plan reserved 2,000,000
common shares for issuance to our employees and directors, and all awards granted under the 2005
Plan will be exercisable at prices not less than fair market value as of the date of the grant. The
vesting period for awards granted under the 2005 Plan varies as to the type of award granted, but
generally these awards have a maximum term of five years.
Stock Options
Until 2008, we used stock options as the primary vehicle for providing long-term incentives to
and rewarding certain employees for their efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value.
Under generally accepted accounting principles for stock-based compensation, we calculated the fair
value of option grants using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were no grants of stock
options during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
We recognized compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost
related to stock options for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was zero, as compared to
less than $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. These amounts were reflected
in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and were allocated to each segment appropriately.
No initial tax benefits are recorded for the portion of these compensation costs that relate to
incentive stock options, which do not qualify for a tax deduction until, and only if, a
disqualifying disposition occurs.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we received approximately $2.8 million in
cash from the exercise of stock options. The aggregate intrinsic value of these options was
approximately $0.6 million. A related tax benefit of approximately $0.2 million was recorded in the
three months ended September 30, 2009. These tax benefits were included in the financing section of
the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and resulted from incentive stock option disqualifying
dispositions and exercises of non-qualified options. The benefits include less than $0.1 million of
gross windfall tax benefits for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
There were no stock option exercises during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The following table summarizes the activity relating to stock options granted under the 1995
Plan mentioned above for the three months ended September 30, 2009:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Remaining | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
of | Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Life in Years | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
96,350 | $ | 41.52 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(66,750 | ) | 41.52 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of period |
29,600 | $ | 41.52 | .41 | $ | 289 | ||||||||||
Exercisable and vested at end of period |
29,600 | $ | 41.52 | .41 | $ | 289 | ||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at end of period |
29,600 | $ | 41.52 | .41 | $ | 289 | ||||||||||
There were no unvested options at September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009. At September 30, 2009,
there was also no unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options.
Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights
Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SSSARs)
as a vehicle for providing long-term incentives to and rewarding certain employees for their
efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. Under generally accepted accounting
principles for stock-based
10
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
compensation, we calculate the fair value of SSSARs grants using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. There were no grants of SSSARs during the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost
related to SSSARs was approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008. These amounts were reflected in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses and were
allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded a tax benefit of less than $0.1 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
The following table summarizes the activity relating to SSSARs granted under the 2005 Plan
mentioned above for the three months ended September 30, 2009:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Number | Average | Remaining | Aggregate | |||||||||||||
of | Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Rights | Price | Life in Years | Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of period |
222,240 | $ | 38.85 | |||||||||||||
Exercised |
(15,191 | ) | 38.31 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
| | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited |
(250 | ) | 38.31 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at end of period |
206,799 | $ | 38.89 | 3.79 | $ | 2,560 | ||||||||||
Exercisable and vested at end of period |
27,565 | $ | 38.31 | 3.42 | $ | 357 | ||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at end of period |
198,799 | $ | 38.89 | 3.79 | $ | 2,461 | ||||||||||
The following table summarizes the status of, and changes to, unvested SSSARs during the three
months ended September 30, 2009:
Weighted | ||||||||
Number | Average | |||||||
of | Grant Date | |||||||
Rights | Fair Value | |||||||
Unvested at beginning of period |
179,234 | $ | 6.39 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
| | ||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Unvested at end of period |
179,234 | $ | 6.39 | |||||
At September 30, 2009, there was approximately $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to SSSARs that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.91
years.
Restricted Stock
Since 2008, we have used periodic grants of restricted stock as a vehicle for providing
long-term incentives to and rewarding our nonemployee directors and certain employees for their
efforts in helping to create long-term shareholder value. There were no grants of restricted stock
during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period. Total compensation cost
related to restricted stock for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was
approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. These amounts were reflected in Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses and were allocated to each segment appropriately. We recorded a
tax benefit of approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as
compared to less than $0.1 million for the comparable period of the prior year.
11
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
The following table summarizes the activity relating to restricted stock granted under the
2005 Plan mentioned above for the three months ended September 30, 2009:
Weighted | ||||||||
Number | Average | |||||||
of | Grant Date | |||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Unvested restricted stock at beginning of period |
42,950 | $ | 35.61 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Vested |
| | ||||||
Forfeited |
| | ||||||
Unvested restricted stock at end of period |
42,950 | $ | 35.61 | |||||
Expected to vest restricted stock at end of period |
42,230 | $ | 35.55 | |||||
At September 30, 2009, there was approximately $0.6 million of unrecognized compensation
expense related to restricted stock that we will recognize over a weighted-average period of
approximately 1.58 years.
Note 8 Restructuring and Impairment Charges
Specialty Foods Segment Fiscal 2010
In the first quarter of 2010, we committed to a plan to close our dressings and sauces
manufacturing operation located in Wilson, New York. This decision is intended to provide greater
efficiency in our Specialty Foods segment by consolidating most of this facilitys operations into
other existing plants, outsourcing certain requirements and exiting less profitable dressing lines.
It is anticipated that production at this facility will be phased out by December 2009, and while
timing of the disposal of the associated real estate is difficult to predict, we expect that all
other disposal and closing activities will be complete by the end of the calendar year. The
operations of this location have not been reclassified to discontinued operations in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded restructuring charges of
approximately $0.9 million ($0.6 million after taxes), including approximately $0.1 million
recorded in Cost of Sales for the write-down of inventories. The remaining charges consisted of
one-time termination benefits and a pension curtailment charge. There were no cash payments made
related to these charges in the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
The total estimated pretax costs associated with this plant closure are expected to be
approximately $3 to $4 million. We estimate one-time termination benefits and other employee costs
included in the pretax charges will exceed $2 million, with the balance of the pretax charges
relating to other disposal-related activities. Cash expenditures are expected to be approximately
$2 to $3 million.
An analysis of the restructuring activity for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
the related liability recorded in accounts payable within the Specialty Foods segment follows:
Accrual at | 2010 | Accrual at | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | 2010 | Cash | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2009 | Charges | Outlays | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Restructuring Charges |
||||||||||||||||
Employee Separation Costs |
$ | | $ | 481 | $ | | $ | 481 | ||||||||
Pension Curtailment Charges |
349 | |||||||||||||||
Inventory Write-Down |
122 | |||||||||||||||
Total Restructuring Charges |
$ | 952 | ||||||||||||||
Specialty Foods Segment Fiscal 2009
In the first quarter of 2009, we began consolidating our Atlanta, Georgia dressing operation
into our
12
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
other existing food facilities as part of our cost-reduction efforts within the Specialty
Foods segment. During
the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded restructuring and impairment charges of
approximately $0.8 million ($0.5 million after taxes). This closure was essentially complete at
September 30, 2008, and the disposition of the associated real estate occurred in December 2008. We
do not expect any other costs or cash expenditures related to this closure.
Other Segments Fiscal 2009
During fiscal 2007, we initiated our plan to close our industrial glass operation located in
Lancaster, Ohio. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded additional
restructuring and impairment charges of approximately $0.8 million ($0.5 million after taxes)
within corporate expenses for costs incurred during the period. The total costs associated with
this plant closure totaled approximately $5.7 million. This closure was essentially complete at
September 30, 2008. We do not currently expect other significant restructuring costs related to
this closure.
Other Segments Held for Sale
As a result of various prior-year restructuring and divestiture activities, we have certain
held for sale properties, with a total net book value of approximately $2.6 million, which have
been reclassified to current assets and are included in Deferred Income Taxes and Other Current
Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles for property, plant and equipment, we are no longer depreciating these held for sale
assets and they are being actively marketed for sale.
Note 9 Income Taxes
The gross tax contingency reserve at September 30, 2009 was approximately $1.6 million and
consisted of tax liabilities of approximately $1.0 million and penalties and interest of
approximately $0.6 million. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for income
taxes, we have classified approximately $0.3 million as current liabilities as these amounts are
expected to be paid within the next 12 months. The remaining liability of approximately
$1.3 million is included in long-term liabilities. We expect that the amount of these liabilities
will change within the next 12 months; however, we do not expect the change to have a significant
effect on our financial position or results of operations. We recognize interest and penalties
related to these tax liabilities in income tax expense.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we executed several state tax voluntary
disclosure agreements. The settlement of these liabilities resulted in pre-tax income of
approximately $0.9 million, which impacted our effective tax rate by approximately 1.7%.
Note 10 Business Segment Information
The following summary of financial information by business segment is consistent with the
basis of segmentation and measurement of segment profit or loss presented in our June 30, 2009
consolidated financial statements:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Net Sales |
||||||||
Specialty Foods |
$ | 216,341 | $ | 220,786 | ||||
Glassware and Candles |
37,819 | 43,051 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 254,160 | $ | 263,837 | ||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
||||||||
Specialty Foods |
$ | 43,152 | $ | 23,489 | ||||
Glassware and Candles |
1,671 | (2,862 | ) | |||||
Corporate Expenses |
(2,414 | ) | (2,833 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | 42,409 | $ | 17,794 | ||||
13
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Tabular amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies
In addition to the items discussed below, at September 30, 2009, we were a party to various
claims and litigation matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Such matters did not have
a material adverse effect on the current-year results of operations and, in our opinion, their
ultimate disposition will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial
statements.
The Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (CDSOA) provides for the distribution
of monies collected by U.S. Customs from antidumping cases to qualifying domestic producers. Our
reported CDSOA receipts totaled approximately $8.7 million in the second quarter of 2009. These
remittances related to certain candles being imported from the Peoples Republic of China.
Legislation was enacted in February 2006 to repeal the applicability of the CDSOA to duties
collected on products imported after September 2007. However, all duties collected on an entry
filed before October 1, 2007 will continue to be available for distribution under former section
1675(c) of the CDSOA. Accordingly, we may receive some level of annual distributions for an
undetermined period of years in the future as the monies collected that relate to entries filed
prior to October 2007 are administratively finalized by U.S. Customs. Without further legislative
action, we expect these distributions will eventually cease.
The uncertainties surrounding the legislative and administrative challenges have been
compounded by cases brought in U.S. courts challenging the CDSOA. In two separate cases, the U.S.
Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that the procedure for determining recipients eligible
to receive CDSOA distributions is unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit reversed one of the CIT decisions in February 2009, but the case remains subject to further
appeal. The second CIT case has been stayed pending resolution of this appeal. Other cases remain
pending that challenge certain aspects of the CDSOA, any of which could affect the amount of funds
available for distribution, including funds relating to entries prior to October 2007.
The extent to which we may receive any future CDSOA distributions is subject to the legal
challenges and uncertainties described above. Accordingly, we cannot predict the amount of future
distributions, and it is possible that we may not receive any further distributions. Any reduction
in CDSOA distributions could reduce our earnings and cash flow.
Note 12 Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was
approximately $28.7 million and $11.1 million, respectively. The September 30, 2009 and 2008
comprehensive income consists of net income and pension amortization.
14
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Tabular dollars in thousands)
OVERVIEW
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(MD&A) describes the matters that we consider to be important in understanding the results of our
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and our financial condition as of
September 30, 2009. Our fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Unless otherwise noted,
references to year pertain to our fiscal year; for example, 2010 refers to fiscal 2010, which is
the period from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2010. In the discussion that follows, we analyze the
results of our operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009, including the trends in
our overall business, followed by a discussion of our financial condition.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto, all included elsewhere in this report. The forward-looking
statements in this section and other parts of this report involve risks and uncertainties including
statements regarding our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and financial performance. Our
actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of factors set forth under the caption Forward-Looking Statements.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Business Overview
Lancaster Colony Corporation is a diversified manufacturer and marketer of consumer products
focusing primarily on specialty foods for the retail and foodservice markets. We also manufacture
and market candles for the food, drug and mass markets. Less significantly, we are also engaged in
the distribution of various products, including glassware and candles, to commercial markets. Our
operations are organized in two reportable segments: Specialty Foods and Glassware and Candles.
Over 90% of the sales of each segment are made to customers in the United States.
In recent years, our strategy has shifted away from operating businesses in a variety of
industries towards emphasizing the growth and success we have achieved in our Specialty Foods
segment. Fiscals 2008 and 2007 were significant years in implementing this strategy as we divested
nonfood operations and focused our capital investment in the Specialty Foods segment.
We view our food operations as having the potential to achieve future growth in sales and
profitability due to attributes such as:
| leading retail market positions in several branded products with a high-quality perception; |
||
| a broad customer base in both retail and foodservice accounts; |
||
| well-regarded culinary expertise among foodservice accounts; |
||
| recognized leadership in foodservice product development; |
||
| demonstrated experience in integrating complementary business acquisitions; and |
||
| historically strong cash flow generation that supports growth opportunities. |
Our goal is to grow our specialty foods retail and foodservice business by:
| leveraging the strength of our retail brands to increase current product sales and
introduce new products; |
| growing our foodservice sales through the strength of our reputation in product
development and quality; and |
| pursuing acquisitions that meet our strategic criteria. |
15
Table of Contents
We have made substantial capital investments to support our existing food operations and
future growth opportunities. Based on our current plans and expectations, we believe that total
capital expenditures for 2010 will be approximately $15 million.
Summary of 2010 Results
The following is an overview of our consolidated operating results for the three months ended
September 30, 2009.
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased nearly 4% to approximately
$254.2 million from the prior-year total of $263.8 million. This sales decline reflects lower sales
in both operating segments. The Specialty Foods segments decline reflects a decline in foodservice
sales that was not fully offset by growth in retail sales. The decrease in sales of the Glassware
and Candles segment reflects generally weaker retail markets, competitive factors and the shifting
of some seasonal sales to the second fiscal quarter.
Gross margin increased nearly 61% to approximately $63.7 million from the prior-year total of
$39.7 million. A more favorable trend in raw-material costs contributed to the higher gross margin.
Net income for the current year was approximately $28.4 million, or $1.01 per diluted share,
compared to $11.0 million, or $.39 per diluted share, in the prior year.
RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
Net Sales and Gross Margin
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
||||||||||||||||
Specialty Foods |
$ | 216,341 | $ | 220,786 | $ | (4,445 | ) | (2 | )% | |||||||
Glassware and Candles |
37,819 | 43,051 | (5,232 | ) | (12 | )% | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 254,160 | $ | 263,837 | $ | (9,677 | ) | (4 | )% | |||||||
Gross Margin |
$ | 63,707 | $ | 39,669 | $ | 24,038 | 61 | % | ||||||||
Gross Margin as a Percentage of Sales |
25.1 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Consolidated net sales for the first quarter decreased nearly 4%, reflecting lower sales in
both operating segments.
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, net sales of the Specialty Foods segment totaled
approximately $216.3 million, a decrease of 2% from the prior-year total of $220.8 million. The
segments foodservice sales declined reflecting somewhat weaker consumer demand and downward
pricing adjustments in certain of our supply arrangements that occurred as a result of lower key
ingredient costs. Retail sales increased approximately five percent with growth coming from both
frozen and non-frozen products.
Net sales of the Glassware and Candles segment for the quarter ended September 30, 2009
totaled approximately $37.8 million, a 12% decrease from the prior-year total of $43.1 million. Net
sales of candles and related products declined due to several factors, including generally weaker
retail markets and some shifting of seasonal sales to the second fiscal quarter.
As a percentage of sales, our consolidated gross margin for the three months ended September
30, 2009 was 25.1%, as compared to 15.0% achieved in the prior-year comparative period. A more
favorable trend in raw-material costs was a significant factor in the comparative results.
In the Specialty Foods segment, gross margin percentages improved for the quarter despite
lower net sales. Comparatively lower ingredient costs, especially for soybean oil, drove this
increase. Operational improvements and a greater retail sales mix also contributed to the improved
margins. We anticipate that these favorable comparisons may continue through our second fiscal
quarter.
16
Table of Contents
Gross margin percentages in the Glassware and Candles segment improved from the prior-year
period due to lower wax costs, higher operating levels and improved pricing.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||||||
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
$ | 20,468 | $ | 20,261 | $ | 207 | 1 | % | ||||||||
SG&A Expenses as a Percentage of Sales |
8.1 | % | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||||
Consolidated selling, general and administrative costs of approximately $20.5 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 increased by 1% from the $20.3 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2008, and were slightly higher as a percentage of sales compared to the same
period in the prior year due to reduced sales leverage given the semi-variable nature of these
costs.
Restructuring and Impairment Charges
Specialty Foods Segment Fiscal 2010
In the first quarter of 2010, we committed to a plan to close our dressings and sauces
manufacturing operation located in Wilson, New York. This decision is intended to provide greater
efficiency in our Specialty Foods segment by consolidating most of this facilitys operations into
other existing plants, outsourcing certain requirements and exiting less profitable dressing lines.
It is anticipated that production at this facility will be phased out by December 2009, and while
timing of the disposal of the associated real estate is difficult to predict, we expect that all
other disposal and closing activities will be complete by the end of the calendar year. The
operations of this location have not been reclassified to discontinued operations in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.
During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded restructuring charges of
approximately $0.9 million ($0.6 million after taxes), including approximately $0.1 million
recorded in Cost of Sales for the write-down of inventories. The remaining charges consisted of
one-time termination benefits and a pension curtailment charge. There were no cash payments made
related to these charges in the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
The total estimated pretax costs associated with this plant closure are expected to be
approximately $3 to $4 million. We estimate one-time termination benefits and other employee costs
included in the pretax charges will exceed $2 million, with the balance of the pretax charges
relating to other disposal-related activities. Cash expenditures are expected to be approximately
$2 to $3 million.
An analysis of the restructuring activity for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
the related liability recorded in accounts payable within the Specialty Foods segment follows:
Accrual at | 2010 | Accrual at | ||||||||||||||
June 30, | 2010 | Cash | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2009 | Charges | Outlays | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Restructuring Charges |
||||||||||||||||
Employee Separation Costs |
$ | | $ | 481 | $ | | $ | 481 | ||||||||
Pension Curtailment Charges |
349 | |||||||||||||||
Inventory Write-Down |
122 | |||||||||||||||
Total Restructuring Charges |
$ | 952 | ||||||||||||||
Specialty Foods Segment Fiscal 2009
In the first quarter of 2009, we began consolidating our Atlanta, Georgia dressing operation
into our other existing food facilities as part of our cost-reduction efforts within the Specialty
Foods segment. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded restructuring and
impairment charges of approximately $0.8 million ($0.5 million after taxes). This closure was
essentially complete at September 30, 2008, and the disposition of the associated real estate
occurred in December 2008. We do not expect any other costs or cash expenditures related to this
closure.
17
Table of Contents
Other Segments Fiscal 2009
During fiscal 2007, we initiated our plan to close our industrial glass operation located in
Lancaster, Ohio. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded additional
restructuring and impairment charges of approximately $0.8 million ($0.5 million after taxes)
within corporate expenses for costs incurred during the period. The total costs associated with
this plant closure totaled approximately $5.7 million. This closure was essentially complete at
September 30, 2008. We do not currently expect other significant restructuring costs related to
this closure.
Other Segments Held for Sale
As a result of various prior-year restructuring and divestiture activities, we have certain
held for sale properties, with a total net book value of approximately $2.6 million, which have
been reclassified to current assets and are included in Deferred Income Taxes and Other Current
Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles for property, plant and equipment, we are no longer depreciating these held for sale
assets and they are being actively marketed for sale.
Operating Income (Loss)
The foregoing factors contributed to consolidated operating income totaling approximately
$42.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. This amount more than doubled from the
prior year. By segment, our operating income can be summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30 | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | Change | ||||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Specialty Foods |
$ | 43,152 | $ | 23,489 | $ | 19,663 | 84 | % | ||||||||
Glassware and Candles |
1,671 | (2,862 | ) | 4,533 | 158 | % | ||||||||||
Corporate Expenses |
(2,414 | ) | (2,833 | ) | 419 | (15 | )% | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 42,409 | $ | 17,794 | $ | 24,615 | 138 | % | ||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) as a Percentage of Sales |
||||||||||||||||
Specialty Foods |
19.9 | % | 10.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Glassware and Candles |
4.4 | % | (6.6 | )% | ||||||||||||
Consolidated |
16.7 | % | 6.7 | % |
Interest Expense
We incurred no interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2009 as there were
no borrowings outstanding during the period. We incurred interest expense of approximately
$0.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 related to long-term borrowings.
Interest Income and Other Net
Interest income and other was less than $0.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,
as compared to approximately $0.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
Income Before Income Taxes
As impacted by the factors discussed above, income before income taxes for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 increased by approximately $25.0 million to $42.4 million from the
prior-year total of $17.4 million. Our effective tax rate of 33.1% for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 decreased from the prior-year rate of 36.6%. This decrease reflected, in part, a
favorable resolution of certain previously-reserved state tax matters as further discussed in Note
9 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Net Income
First quarter net income for 2010 of approximately $28.4 million increased from the
prior-years net income for the quarter of $11.0 million, as influenced by the factors noted above.
Net income per share for
18
Table of Contents
the first quarter of 2010 totaled approximately $1.01 per basic and diluted share, as compared
to $.39 per basic and diluted share recorded in the prior year.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, net cash provided by operating activities
totaled approximately $18.9 million as compared to $5.4 million used in operating activities in the
prior-year period. The increase results from a higher level of net income, as well as comparatively
favorable relative changes in various working capital components. The most significant changes
occurred within accrued and prepaid federal and state income tax liabilities, as influenced by the
improved operating results and the timing of estimated tax payments. The increase in receivables
since June 2009 primarily relates to seasonal influences on sales within the Glassware and Candles
segment.
Cash used in investing activities for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was
approximately $2.2 million as compared to $4.1 million in the prior year. This decrease reflects a
lower level of capital expenditures in 2010.
Cash used in financing activities for the three months ended September 30, 2009 of
approximately $2.7 million decreased from the prior-year total of $5.9 million provided by
financing activities. This decrease was due to lower proceeds from debt, as partially offset by a
decrease in treasury share repurchases, the change in the cash overdraft balance and an increase in
proceeds from the exercise of stock options. At September 30, 2009, approximately 509,000 shares
remained authorized for future buyback under the existing share repurchase program.
Under our unsecured revolving credit facility, we may borrow up to a maximum of $160 million
at any one time. Loans may be used for general corporate purposes. We currently have no borrowings
outstanding under this facility. The facility expires on October 5, 2012, and all outstanding
amounts are due and payable on that day.
The facility contains certain restrictive covenants, including limitations on indebtedness,
asset sales and acquisitions, and financial covenants relating to interest coverage and leverage.
At September 30, 2009, we were in compliance with all applicable provisions and covenants of the
facility, and we met the requirements of the financial covenants by substantial margins.
We currently expect to remain in compliance with the facilitys covenants for the foreseeable
future. A default under the facility could accelerate the repayment of any outstanding indebtedness
and limit our access to additional credit available under the facility. Such an event could require
curtailment of cash dividends or share repurchases, reduce or delay beneficial expansion or
investment plans, or otherwise impact our ability to meet our obligations when due. At September
30, 2009, we were not aware of any event that would constitute a default under the facility.
We believe that internally generated funds and our existing aggregate balances in cash and
equivalents, in addition to our currently available bank credit arrangements, should be adequate to
meet our foreseeable cash requirements. If we were to borrow outside of our credit facility under
current market terms, our average interest rate may increase significantly and have an adverse
effect on our results of operations.
For additional information regarding our credit facility, see Note 4 in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
We have various contractual obligations that are appropriately recorded as liabilities in our
consolidated financial statements. Certain other obligations, such as purchase obligations, are not
recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Examples of obligations not
recognized as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements are commitments to purchase raw
materials or inventory that have not yet been received as of September 30, 2009 and future minimum
lease payments for the use of property and equipment under operating lease agreements. Aside from
expected changes in raw-material needs due to changes in product demand, there have been no
significant changes to the contractual obligations disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
19
Table of Contents
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
There have been no changes in critical accounting policies from those disclosed in our 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In December 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a FASB Staff
Position (FSP) No. FAS 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1), which is now part of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic
715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 provides guidance on an employers
disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. This FSP
expands the disclosure set forth in general accounting principles for retirement benefits by adding
required disclosures about (1) how investment allocation decisions are made by management, (2)
major categories of plan assets, and (3) significant concentration of risk. Additionally, the FSP
requires an employer to disclose information about the valuation of plan assets similar to that
required under general accounting principles for fair value measurements. This FSP is effective for
fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, with earlier adoption permitted. We are currently
reviewing the additional disclosure requirements regarding our benefit plans assets.
RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Effective July 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of the FASBs EITF Issue No. 03-6-1, which
is now part of ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share. This FSP addresses whether instruments granted
in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore,
need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (EPS) under the
two-class method described in generally accepted accounting principles for EPS. The restricted
stock we previously granted to employees was deemed to meet the definition of a participating
security as the employees receive nonforfeitable dividends before the stock becomes vested. Our
adoption of this FSP required that we retrospectively restate EPS for all periods presented. There
was no impact on EPS for the three months ended September 30, 2008. See further discussion in Note
1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We desire to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the PSLRA). This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the PSLRA and other applicable securities laws.
Such statements can be identified by the use of the forward-looking words anticipate, estimate,
project, believe, intend, plan, expect, hope or similar words. These statements discuss
future expectations; contain projections regarding future developments, operations or financial
conditions; or state other forward-looking information. Such statements are based upon assumptions
and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current
conditions, expected future developments, and other factors we believe to be appropriate. These
forward-looking statements involve various important risks, uncertainties and other factors that
could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking
statements. Actual results may differ as a result of factors over which we have no, or limited,
control including, without limitation, the specific influences outlined below. Management believes
these forward-looking statements to be reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on
such statements that are based on current expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update such forward-looking statements.
More detailed statements regarding significant events that could affect our financial results are
included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K and also our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Specific influences relating to these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| the potential for loss of larger programs or key customer relationships; |
||
| the effect of consolidation of customers within key market channels; |
||
| the continued solvency of key customers; |
||
| the success and cost of new product development efforts; |
20
Table of Contents
| the lack of market acceptance of new products; |
||
| the reaction of customers or consumers to the effect of price increases we may implement; |
| changes in demand for our products, which may result from loss of brand reputation
or customer goodwill; |
||
| changes in market trends; |
||
| the extent to which future business acquisitions are completed and acceptably integrated; |
||
| the possible occurrence of product recalls; |
| efficiencies in plant operations, including the ability to optimize overhead
utilization in candle operations; |
||
| the overall strength of the economy; |
||
| changes in financial markets; |
||
| slower than anticipated sales growth; |
||
| the extent of operational efficiencies achieved; |
||
| price and product competition; |
| the uncertainty regarding the effect or outcome of any decision to explore further
strategic alternatives among our nonfood operations; |
| fluctuations in the cost and availability of raw materials; |
| adverse changes in energy costs and other factors that may affect costs of
producing, distributing or transporting our products; |
| the impact of fluctuations in our pension plan asset values on funding levels,
contributions required and benefit costs; |
| maintenance of competitive position with respect to other manufacturers, including
import sources of production; |
||
| dependence on key personnel; |
||
| stability of labor relations; |
||
| fluctuations in energy costs; |
||
| dependence on contract copackers; |
||
| effect of governmental regulations, including environmental matters; |
| legislation and litigation affecting the future administration of the Continued
Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000; |
||
| access to any required financing; |
||
| changes in income tax laws; |
||
| unexpected costs relating to the holding or disposition of idle real estate; |
||
| changes in estimates in critical accounting judgments; and |
||
| innumerable other factors. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our market risks have not changed materially from those disclosed in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
evaluated, with the participation of management, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act)). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
September 30, 2009 to ensure that information
21
Table of Contents
required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is 1)
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities
and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and 2) accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, in a manner that allows timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. No changes were made to our internal
control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the
Exchange Act) during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Item 1A in our 2009
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c) In August 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase authorization of
2,000,000 shares, of which approximately 509,000 shares remained authorized for future repurchases
at September 30, 2009. In the first quarter, we made no repurchases of our common stock. This share
repurchase authorization does not have a stated expiration date.
Item 6. Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits following Signatures.
22
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Lancaster Colony Corporation | ||||
(Registrant) |
||||
Date: November 6, 2009 | By: | /s/ John B. Gerlach, Jr. | ||
John B. Gerlach, Jr. | ||||
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
||||
Date: November 6, 2009 | By: | /s/ John L. Boylan | ||
John L. Boylan | ||||
Treasurer, Vice President, Assistant Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
23
Table of Contents
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
FORM 10-Q
SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Description | Located at | ||||
31.1 | Certification of CEO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith | ||||
31.2 | Certification of CFO under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith | ||||
32 | Certification of CEO and CFO under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Filed herewith |
24