LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-32373
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
(Exact name of registration as specified in its charter)
Nevada | 27-0099920 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
3355 Las Vegas Boulevard South | 89109 | |
Las Vegas, Nevada | (Zip Code) | |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(702) 414-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrants classes of common stock,
as of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at November 4, 2010 | |
Common Stock ($0.001 par value) | 684,730,086 shares |
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
ITEM 1 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,394,712 | $ | 4,955,416 | ||||
Restricted cash |
203,687 | 118,641 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
618,998 | 460,766 | ||||||
Inventories |
27,751 | 27,073 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
26,931 | 26,442 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
41,481 | 35,336 | ||||||
Total current assets |
3,313,560 | 5,623,674 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
14,471,865 | 13,351,271 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
166,316 | 138,454 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
756,059 | | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
16,855 | 22,219 | ||||||
Leasehold interests in land, net |
1,251,547 | 1,209,820 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
91,735 | 50,129 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
180,060 | 176,539 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 20,247,997 | $ | 20,572,106 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 101,163 | $ | 82,695 | ||||
Construction payables |
571,197 | 778,771 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
15,017 | 18,332 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
1,048,075 | 786,192 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
8,051 | | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
572,458 | 173,315 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
2,315,961 | 1,839,305 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
74,260 | 81,959 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
44,762 | | ||||||
Deferred proceeds from sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo |
243,928 | 243,928 | ||||||
Deferred gain on sale of The Grand Canal Shoppes |
51,674 | 54,272 | ||||||
Deferred rent from mall transactions |
147,802 | 149,074 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
9,567,391 | 10,852,147 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
12,445,778 | 13,220,685 | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, issued to Principal
Stockholders family, 5,250,000 shares issued and
outstanding, after allocation of fair value of attached
warrants, aggregate redemption/liquidation value of
$577,500 |
480,242 | 410,834 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized, 4,089,923 and 4,089,999 shares issued
and outstanding with warrants to purchase up to
68,164,686 and 68,166,786 shares of common stock |
234,603 | 234,607 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares
authorized, 661,140,737 and 660,322,749 shares
issued and outstanding |
661 | 660 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
5,166,396 | 5,114,851 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
101,619 | 26,748 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
608,260 | 473,833 | ||||||
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders equity |
6,111,539 | 5,850,699 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
1,210,438 | 1,089,888 | ||||||
Total equity |
7,321,977 | 6,940,587 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 20,247,997 | $ | 20,572,106 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | 1,573,851 | $ | 908,255 | $ | 3,929,922 | $ | 2,504,233 | ||||||||
Rooms |
208,160 | 155,673 | 579,709 | 492,030 | ||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
117,186 | 74,457 | 314,344 | 248,852 | ||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
147,179 | 95,604 | 370,660 | 304,976 | ||||||||||||
2,046,376 | 1,233,989 | 5,194,635 | 3,550,091 | |||||||||||||
Less-promotional allowances |
(137,604 | ) | (92,845 | ) | (356,499 | ) | (271,185 | ) | ||||||||
Net revenues |
1,908,772 | 1,141,144 | 4,838,136 | 3,278,906 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Casino |
882,178 | 598,934 | 2,367,760 | 1,680,307 | ||||||||||||
Rooms |
36,866 | 28,096 | 100,593 | 93,387 | ||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
50,906 | 37,384 | 143,007 | 124,845 | ||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
70,603 | 56,349 | 194,333 | 178,826 | ||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
37,833 | 29,272 | 72,986 | 70,989 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
193,476 | 127,189 | 492,654 | 372,292 | ||||||||||||
Corporate expense |
28,686 | 17,519 | 78,116 | 105,250 | ||||||||||||
Rental expense |
9,186 | 6,691 | 30,690 | 22,497 | ||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
10,107 | 28,855 | 97,684 | 115,619 | ||||||||||||
Development expense |
425 | 80 | 1,258 | 344 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
186,738 | 148,677 | 510,521 | 431,559 | ||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
16,057 | | 16,057 | 151,175 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
2,406 | (284 | ) | 40,577 | 4,500 | |||||||||||
1,525,467 | 1,078,762 | 4,146,236 | 3,351,590 | |||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
383,305 | 62,382 | 691,900 | (72,684 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
2,661 | 1,599 | 6,367 | 9,840 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(76,723 | ) | (88,514 | ) | (231,875 | ) | (224,503 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense) |
6,444 | (1,564 | ) | (6,205 | ) | (6,534 | ) | |||||||||
Loss on modification or early retirement of debt |
(21,692 | ) | (204 | ) | (18,555 | ) | (204 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
293,995 | (26,301 | ) | 441,632 | (294,085 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(25,161 | ) | (54,316 | ) | (46,436 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
268,834 | (80,617 | ) | 395,196 | (294,726 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(54,337 | ) | 4,111 | (121,311 | ) | 7,674 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
214,497 | (76,506 | ) | 273,885 | (287,052 | ) | ||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(23,350 | ) | (23,350 | ) | (70,050 | ) | (69,676 | ) | ||||||||
Accretion to redemption value of preferred stock issued
to Principal Stockholders family |
(23,136 | ) | (23,136 | ) | (69,408 | ) | (69,408 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 168,011 | $ | (122,992 | ) | $ | 134,427 | $ | (426,136 | ) | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | 0.25 | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.20 | $ | (0.65 | ) | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | 0.21 | $ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.17 | $ | (0.65 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
660,836,841 | 660,245,590 | 660,495,783 | 655,687,503 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
789,156,247 | 660,245,590 | 782,156,007 | 655,687,503 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Las Vegas Sands Corp. Stockholders Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital in | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Treasury | Excess of | Comprehensive | Retained | Comprehensive | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Stock | Par Value | Income | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Interests | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
$ | 298,066 | $ | 642 | $ | | $ | 3,090,292 | $ | 17,554 | $ | 1,015,554 | $ | 3,073 | $ | 4,425,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | (287,052 | ) | (287,052 | ) | (7,674 | ) | (294,726 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
| | | | 8,438 | | 8,438 | | 8,438 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
(278,614 | ) | (7,674 | ) | (286,288 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax shortfall from stock-based
compensation |
| | | (4,275 | ) | | | | (4,275 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | | 35,475 | | | | 35,475 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| | (13 | ) | | | | | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants |
(63,459 | ) | 18 | | 63,441 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contribution from
noncontrolling interest |
| | | | | | 41 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed contribution from
Principal Stockholder |
| | | 481 | | | | 481 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared, net of
amounts previously accrued |
| | | | | (64,493 | ) | | (64,493 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated but undeclared
dividend requirement on
preferred stock issued to
Principal Stockholders family |
| | | | | (6,854 | ) | | (6,854 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion to redemption value
of preferred stock issued to
Principal Stockholders family |
| | | | | (69,408 | ) | | (69,408 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
$ | 234,607 | $ | 660 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 3,185,414 | $ | 25,992 | $ | 587,747 | $ | (4,560 | ) | $ | 4,029,847 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 234,607 | $ | 660 | $ | | $ | 5,114,851 | $ | 26,748 | $ | 473,833 | $ | 1,089,888 | $ | 6,940,587 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 273,885 | 273,885 | 121,311 | 395,196 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
| | | | 74,871 | | 74,871 | (481 | ) | 74,390 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
348,756 | 120,830 | 469,586 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| 1 | | 6,395 | | | | 6,396 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax shortfall from stock-based
compensation |
| | | (195 | ) | | | | (195 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | | 42,674 | | | 2,065 | 44,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants |
(4 | ) | | | 9 | | | | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed contribution from
Principal Stockholder |
| | | 317 | | | | 317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of remaining
shares of noncontrolling
interest |
| | | 2,345 | | | (2,345 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared, net of
amounts previously accrued |
| | | | | (63,196 | ) | | (63,196 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated but undeclared
dividend requirement on
preferred stock issued to
Principal Stockholders family |
| | | | | (6,854 | ) | | (6,854 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion to redemption value
of preferred stock issued to
Principal Stockholders family |
| | | | | (69,408 | ) | | (69,408 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 234,603 | $ | 661 | $ | | $ | 5,166,396 | $ | 101,619 | $ | 608,260 | $ | 1,210,438 | $ | 7,321,977 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 395,196 | $ | (294,726 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash generated from operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
510,521 | 431,559 | ||||||
Amortization of leasehold interests in land included in rental expense |
30,690 | 19,621 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount |
29,885 | 21,794 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred gain and rent |
(3,870 | ) | (3,871 | ) | ||||
Loss on modification or early retirement of debt |
3,756 | 204 | ||||||
Impairment and loss on disposal of assets |
56,634 | 155,675 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
42,552 | 32,914 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
72,986 | 70,989 | ||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
1,183 | (238 | ) | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
58,042 | 15,438 | ||||||
Non-cash contribution from Principal Stockholder included in corporate expense |
317 | 481 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(219,592 | ) | (60,810 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(479 | ) | 2,685 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
(6,371 | ) | 40,201 | |||||
Leasehold interests in land |
(17,199 | ) | (16,094 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
16,912 | 7,483 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
(3,920 | ) | (2,881 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
8,052 | | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
232,703 | 111,995 | ||||||
Net cash generated from operating activities |
1,207,998 | 532,419 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Changes in restricted cash |
(836,805 | ) | (35,394 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures |
(1,650,264 | ) | (1,539,078 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
5,951 | 3,894 | ||||||
Purchases of investments |
(173,774 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from investments |
173,774 | | ||||||
Acquisition of gaming license and certificate and other intangible assets |
(44,599 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,525,717 | ) | (1,570,578 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
6,396 | | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |
5 | | ||||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(70,050 | ) | (71,347 | ) | ||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| (13 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from long-term debt (Note 4) |
1,399,157 | 1,434,874 | ||||||
Repayments on long-term debt (Note 4) |
(2,524,602 | ) | (227,325 | ) | ||||
Contribution from noncontrolling interest |
| 41 | ||||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
(65,823 | ) | (44,759 | ) | ||||
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities |
(1,254,917 | ) | 1,091,471 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
11,932 | 370 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(2,560,704 | ) | 53,682 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
4,955,416 | 3,038,163 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 2,394,712 | $ | 3,091,845 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 205,343 | $ | 205,167 | ||||
Cash payments for taxes, net of refunds |
$ | 175 | $ | (69,604 | ) | |||
Changes in construction payables |
$ | (207,574 | ) | $ | 47,708 | |||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Capitalized stock-based compensation costs |
$ | 2,187 | $ | 2,561 | ||||
Property and equipment acquired under capital lease |
$ | 3,549 | $ | 25,567 | ||||
Accumulated but undeclared dividend requirement on preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholders family |
$ | 6,854 | $ | 6,854 | ||||
Accretion to redemption value of preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholders family |
$ | 69,408 | $ | 69,408 | ||||
Acquisition of remaining shares of noncontrolling interest |
$ | 2,345 | $ | | ||||
Warrants exercised and settled through tendering of preferred stock |
$ | 4 | $ | 63,459 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OF COMPANY
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVSC), a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiaries
(collectively the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009. The year-end balance sheet data
was derived from audited financial statements, except as discussed below, but does not include all
disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments and normal recurring accruals considered necessary
for a fair statement of the results for the interim period have been included. The interim results
reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily
indicative of expected results for the full year. The Companys common stock is traded on the New
York Stock Exchange under the symbol LVS.
In November 2009, the Companys newly formed subsidiary, Sands China Ltd. (SCL, the indirect
owner and operator of the majority of the Companys operations in the Macau Special Administrative
Region (Macau) of the Peoples Republic of China), completed an initial public offering (the SCL Offering)
by listing its ordinary shares on The Main Board of The Stock Exchange of Hong
Kong Limited. Immediately following the SCL Offering and several transactions consummated in
connection with such offering, the Company owned 70.3% of the issued and outstanding ordinary
shares of SCL. The shares of SCL were not, and will not, be registered under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the U.S. absent a registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or an applicable exception from such registration requirements.
Operations
United States
Las Vegas
The Company owns and operates The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino (The Venetian Las Vegas), a
Renaissance Venice-themed resort; The Palazzo Resort Hotel Casino (The Palazzo), a resort
featuring modern European ambience and design; and an expo and convention center of approximately
1.2 million square feet (the Sands Expo Center). These Las Vegas properties, situated on or near
the Las Vegas Strip, form an integrated resort with approximately 7,100 suites; approximately
225,000 square feet of gaming space; a meeting and conference facility of approximately 1.1 million
square feet; an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment complex located within The Venetian Las
Vegas of approximately 440,000 net leasable square feet (The Grand Canal Shoppes), which was sold
to GGP Limited Partnership (GGP) in 2004; and an enclosed retail and dining complex located
within The Palazzo of approximately 400,000 net leasable square feet (The Shoppes at The
Palazzo), which was sold to GGP in February 2008. See Note 2
Property and Equipment, Net regarding the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo.
Pennsylvania
The Company is in the process of developing Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem (the Sands
Bethlehem), a gaming, hotel, retail and dining complex located on the site of the historic
Bethlehem Steel Works in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. Sands Bethlehem is also expected to be home to
the National Museum of Industrial History, an arts and cultural center, and the broadcast home of
the local PBS affiliate. The Company owns 86% of the economic interest of the gaming, hotel and
entertainment portion of the property through its ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC
and more than 35% of the economic interest of the retail portion of the property through its
ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Retail, LLC.
On May 22, 2009, the Company opened the casino component of Sands Bethlehem, which features
slot machines and several food and beverage offerings, as well as the parking garage and surface
parking. In April 2010, the Company recommenced construction of a 300-room hotel tower, which is
expected to open in the second quarter of 2011. In May 2010, the Company paid a $16.5 million table
game licensing fee and in July 2010 was issued its table games certificate by the Pennsylvania
Gaming Control Board and commenced table games operations. Construction activities on the remaining
components, which include an approximate
200,000-square-foot retail facility, a 50,000-square-foot multipurpose event center and a
variety of additional dining options, have been suspended temporarily and are intended to
recommence when capital markets and general economic conditions improve and
when the suspended components are able to be financed. As of September 30, 2010, the Company
has capitalized construction costs of $644.3 million for this project (including $13.1 million in
outstanding construction payables). The Company expects to spend approximately $45.0 million to
complete construction of the hotel tower, on furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) and other
costs, and to pay outstanding construction payables, as noted above. The impact of the suspension
on the estimated overall cost of the projects remaining components is currently not determinable
with certainty.
7
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Macau
The Company owns 70.3% of SCL, which includes the operations of the Sands Macao, The Venetian
Macao, Four Seasons Macao and other ancillary operations that support these properties, as further
discussed below. The Company operates the gaming areas within these properties pursuant to a
20-year gaming subconcession.
The Company owns and operates the Sands Macao, the first Las Vegas-style casino in Macau. The
Sands Macao offers approximately 229,000 square feet of gaming space and a 289-suite hotel tower,
as well as several restaurants, VIP facilities, a theater and other high-end services and
amenities.
The Company also owns and operates The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel (The Venetian Macao),
which anchors the Cotai Striptm, the Companys master-planned development of
integrated resort properties in Macau. With a theme similar to that of The Venetian Las Vegas, The
Venetian Macao includes a 39-floor luxury hotel with over 2,900 suites; approximately
550,000 square feet of gaming space; a 15,000-seat arena; an 1,800-seat theater; retail and dining
space of approximately 1.0 million square feet; and a convention center and meeting room complex of
approximately 1.2 million square feet.
The Company owns the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, Cotai Striptm
(the Four
Seasons Hotel Macao), which features 360 rooms and suites managed and operated by Four Seasons
Hotels Inc. and is located adjacent and connected to The Venetian Macao. Connected to the Four
Seasons Hotel Macao, the Company owns and operates the Plaza Casino (together with the Four Seasons
Hotel Macao, the Four Seasons Macao), which features approximately 70,000 square feet of gaming
space; 19 Paiza mansions; retail space of approximately 211,000 square feet, which is connected to
the mall at The Venetian Macao; several food and beverage offerings; and conference, banquet and
other facilities. This integrated resort will also feature the Four Seasons Apartment Hotel Macao,
Cotai Striptm (the Four Seasons Apartments), an apart-hotel tower that
consists of approximately 1.0 million square feet of Four Seasons-serviced and -branded luxury
apart-hotel units and common areas. The Company has completed the structural work of the tower and
expects to subsequently monetize units within the Four Seasons Apartments subject to market
conditions and obtaining the necessary government approvals. As of September 30, 2010, the Company
has capitalized construction costs of $1.07 billion for the entire project (including $18.3 million
in outstanding construction payables). The Company expects to spend approximately $130.0 million
primarily on additional costs to complete the Four Seasons Apartments, including FF&E, pre-opening
costs and additional land premiums, and to pay outstanding construction payables, as noted above.
Singapore
The Companys wholly owned subsidiary, Marina Bay Sands Pte. Ltd. (MBS), entered into a
development agreement (the Development Agreement) with the Singapore Tourism Board (the STB) to
build and operate an integrated resort called Marina Bay Sands in Singapore. Marina Bay Sands,
portions of which opened on April 27, 2010, is expected to include three 55-story hotel towers
(totaling approximately 2,600 rooms and suites), the Sands SkyParktm (which
sits atop the hotel towers and features an infinity swimming pool and several dining options), a
casino, an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment complex of approximately 800,000 net leasable
square feet, a convention center and meeting room complex of approximately 1.3 million square feet,
theaters and a landmark iconic structure at the bay-front promenade that will contain an
art/science museum. As of September 30, 2010, the Company has capitalized 7.23 billion Singapore
dollars (SGD, approximately $5.49 billion at exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) in
costs for this project, including the land premium and SGD 505.0 million (approximately
$383.7 million at exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) in outstanding construction
payables. The Company expects to spend approximately SGD 1.2 billion (approximately $0.9 billion at
exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) through 2011 on additional costs to complete the
construction of the integrated resort, FF&E, pre-opening and other costs, and to pay outstanding
construction payables, as noted above, of which approximately SGD 340 million (approximately
$260 million at exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) is expected to be spent during
2010. As the Company has obtained Singapore-denominated financing and primarily pays its costs in
Singapore dollars, its exposure to foreign exchange gains and losses is expected to be minimal.
Based on its current development plan, the Company expects to progressively open the majority of
Marina Bay Sands throughout 2010.
8
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Development Projects
The Company has suspended portions of its development projects to focus its development
efforts on those projects with the highest expected rates of return on invested capital. Should
general economic conditions fail to improve, if the Company is unable to obtain sufficient funding
such that completion of its suspended projects is not probable, or should management decide to
abandon certain projects, all or a portion of the Companys investment to date on its suspended
projects could be lost and would result in an impairment charge. In addition, the Company may be
subject to penalties under the termination clauses in its construction contracts or termination
rights under its management contracts with certain hotel management companies.
United States
The Company was constructing a high-rise residential condominium tower (the Las Vegas Condo
Tower), located on the Las Vegas Strip between The Palazzo and The Venetian Las Vegas. The Company
suspended construction activities for the project due to reduced demand for Las Vegas Strip
condominiums and the overall decline in general economic conditions. The Company intends to
recommence construction when demand and conditions improve and expects that it will take
approximately 18 months thereafter to complete construction of the project. As of September 30,
2010, the Company has capitalized construction costs of $176.2 million for this project. The impact
of the suspension on the estimated overall cost of the project is currently not determinable with
certainty.
Macau
The Company submitted plans to the Macau government for its other Cotai Strip developments,
which represent three integrated resort developments, in addition to The Venetian Macao and Four
Seasons Macao, on an area of approximately 200 acres (which are referred to as parcels 3, 5 and 6,
and 7 and 8). Subject to the approval from the Macau government, the developments are expected to
include hotels, exhibition and conference facilities, gaming areas, showrooms, shopping malls,
spas, restaurants, entertainment facilities and other amenities. The Company had commenced
construction or pre-construction on these developments and plans to operate the related gaming
areas under the Companys Macau gaming subconcession.
The Company is staging the construction of its integrated resort development on parcels 5 and
6. Upon completion of phases I and II of the project, the integrated resort is expected to feature
approximately 6,000 hotel rooms, approximately 300,000 square feet of gaming space, approximately
1.2 million square feet of retail, entertainment and dining facilities, exhibition and conference
facilities and a multipurpose theater. Phase I of the project is expected to include two hotel
towers with approximately 3,700 hotel rooms to be managed by Shangri-La International Hotel
Management Limited (Shangri-La) under its Shangri-La and Traders brands and Sheraton
International Inc. and Sheraton Overseas Management Co. (collectively Starwood) under its
Sheraton brand, as well as completion of the structural work of an adjacent hotel tower with
approximately 2,300 rooms to be managed by Starwood under its Sheraton brand. Phase I will also
include the gaming space and a partial opening of the retail and exhibition and conference
facilities. The total cost to complete phase I is expected to be approximately $2.0 billion.
Phase II of the project includes completion of the additional Sheraton hotel tower, the theater and
the remaining retail facilities. The total cost to complete phase II is expected to be
approximately $300 million. Phase III of the project is expected to include a fourth hotel and
mixed-use tower to be managed by Starwood under its St. Regis brand and the total cost is expected
to be approximately $450 million. In connection with the Company entering into the $1.75 billion
Venetian Orient Limited (VOL) credit facility (see Note 4 Long-term Debt VOL Credit
Facility) to be used together with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, the Company
is mobilizing to recommence construction. The Company is currently working with the Macau
government to obtain sufficient construction labor for the project. Until adequate labor quotas are
received, the timing of the completion of phases I and II is currently not determinable with
certainty; however, the Company is progressing on alternative scenarios for completion of selected
portions of phases I and II with the construction labor currently onsite. The Company intends to
commence construction of phase III of the project as demand and market conditions warrant it. As of
September 30, 2010, the Company has capitalized construction costs of $1.88 billion for the entire
project (including $134.2 million in outstanding construction payables). The Companys management
agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La impose certain construction deadlines and opening
obligations on the Company and certain past and/or anticipated delays, as described above, would
allow Starwood and Shangri-La to terminate their respective agreements. See Note 10
Commitments and Contingencies Other Agreements.
The Company had commenced pre-construction on parcels 7 and 8 and 3, and has capitalized
construction costs of $102.4 million for parcels 7 and 8 and $34.5 million for parcel 3 as of
September 30, 2010. The Company intends to commence construction after the integrated resort on
parcels 5 and 6 is complete, necessary government approvals are obtained, regional and global
economic conditions improve, future demand warrants it and additional financing is obtained.
9
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
The impact of the delayed construction on the Companys previously estimated cost to complete
its Cotai Strip developments is currently not determinable with certainty. As of September 30,
2010, the Company has capitalized an aggregate of $6.0 billion in costs for its Cotai Strip
developments, including The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, as well as the Companys
investments in
transportation infrastructure, including its passenger ferry service operations. In addition
to funding phases I and II of parcels 5 and 6 with the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility, the
Company will need to arrange additional financing to fund the balance of its Cotai Strip
developments and there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain any of the
additional financing required.
Land concessions in Macau generally have an initial term of 25 years with automatic extensions
of 10 years thereafter in accordance with Macau law. The Company has received a land concession
from the Macau government to build on parcels 1, 2 and 3, including the sites on which The Venetian
Macao (parcel 1) and Four Seasons Macao (parcel 2) are located. In November 2009, the Company made
an initial premium payment of 700.0 million patacas (approximately $87.6 million at exchange rates
in effect on September 30, 2010) for the land concession on parcels 5 and 6, which became effective
in May 2010 when it was published in Macaus Official Gazette. The Company does not own these land
sites in Macau; however, the land concession grants the Company exclusive use of the land. As
specified in the land concession, the Company is required to pay premiums for each parcel, which
are either payable in a single lump sum upon acceptance of the land concession by the Macau
government or in seven semi-annual installments (provided that the outstanding balance is due upon
the completion of the corresponding integrated resort), as well as annual rent for the term of the
land concession. Based on historical experience with the Macau government with respect to the
Companys land concessions for the Sands Macao and parcels 1, 2, 3 and 5 and 6, management believes
that the land concession for parcels 7 and 8 will be granted; however, if the Company does not
obtain land concession, the Company could forfeit all or a substantial portion of its
$102.4 million in capitalized construction costs, as of September 30, 2010, related to its
development on parcels 7 and 8.
Under the Companys land concession for parcel 3, the Company was initially required to
complete the corresponding development by August 2011. The Macau government has granted the Company
a two-year extension to complete the development of parcel 3, which now must be completed by April
2013. The land concession for parcels 5 and 6 contains a similar requirement that the corresponding
development be completed by May 2014 (48 months from the date the land concession became
effective). The Company believes that if it is not able to complete the developments by the
respective deadlines, it will likely be able to obtain extensions from the Macau government;
however, no assurances can be given that additional extensions will be granted. If the Company is
unable to meet the deadlines and those deadlines are not extended, it could lose its land
concessions for parcels 3 and 5 and 6, which would prohibit the Company from operating any
facilities developed under the respective land concessions. As a result, the Company could forfeit
all or a substantial portion of its $34.5 million and $1.88 billion in capitalized construction
costs, as of September 30, 2010, related to its developments on parcels 3 and 5 and 6,
respectively.
Other
When the current economic environment and access to capital improve, the Company may continue
exploring the possibility of developing and operating additional properties, including integrated
resorts, in additional Asian and U.S. jurisdictions, and in Europe.
Development Financing Strategy
Through September 30, 2010, the Company has funded its development projects primarily through
borrowings under its U.S., Macau and Singapore credit facilities, operating cash flows, proceeds
from its recent equity offerings and proceeds from the disposition of non-core assets.
The U.S. credit facility, as amended in August 2010, requires the Companys Las Vegas
operations to comply with certain financial covenants at the end of each quarter, including
maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of net debt, as defined, to trailing twelve-month adjusted
earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined (Adjusted
EBITDA). The maximum leverage ratio is 6.5x for the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2010
through June 30, 2011, decreases to 6.0x for the quarterly periods ended September 30 and
December 31, 2011, decreases to 5.5x for the quarterly periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2012,
and then decreases to 5.0x for all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. The Macau credit
facility, as amended in August 2009, requires the Companys Macau operations to comply with similar
financial covenants, including maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The
maximum leverage ratio is 3.5x for the quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2010,
and then decreases to 3.0x for all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. The Company can
elect to contribute up to $50 million and $20 million of cash on hand to its Las Vegas and Macau
operations, respectively, on a bi-quarterly basis; such contributions having the effect of
increasing Adjusted EBITDA by the corresponding amount during the applicable quarter for purposes
of calculating compliance with the maximum leverage ratio (the EBITDA true-up). If the Company is
unable to maintain compliance with the financial covenants under these credit facilities, it would
be in default under the respective credit facilities. A default under the U.S. credit facility
would trigger a cross-default under the Companys airplane financings, which, if the respective
lenders chose to accelerate the indebtedness outstanding under these agreements, would result in a
default under the
Companys senior notes. A default under the Macau credit facility would trigger a
cross-default under the Companys ferry financing. Any defaults or cross-defaults under these
agreements would allow the lenders, in each case, to exercise their rights and remedies as defined
under their respective agreements. If the lenders were to exercise their rights to accelerate the
due dates of the indebtedness outstanding, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able
to repay or refinance any amounts that may become due and payable under such agreements, which
could force the Company to restructure or alter its operations or debt obligations.
10
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
In 2008, the Company completed a $475.0 million convertible senior notes offering and a
$2.1 billion common and preferred stock and warrants offering. In 2009, the Company completed a
$600.0 million exchangeable bond offering and its $2.5 billion SCL Offering. A portion of the
proceeds from these offerings was used in the U.S. to pay down $775.9 million under the revolving
portion of the U.S. credit facility in March 2010 and $1.0 billion under the term loan portions of
the U.S. credit facility in August 2010, and to exercise the EBITDA true-up provision during the
quarterly periods ended March 31 and September 30, 2010, and was contributed to Las Vegas Sands,
LLC (LVSLLC) to reduce its net debt in order to maintain compliance with the maximum leverage
ratio for the quarterly periods during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
The Company held unrestricted and restricted cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$2.39 billion and $959.7 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2010. The Company believes that
the cash on hand, cash flow generated from operations and available borrowings under its credit
facilities will be sufficient to fund its development plans and maintain compliance with the
financial covenants of its U.S. and Macau credit facilities. In the normal course of its
activities, the Company will continue to evaluate its capital structure and opportunities for
enhancements thereof. In August 2010, the Company completed an amendment to its U.S. credit
facility, which included a $1.0 billion pay down of its term loans and a reduction of its revolving
credit facility commitments in exchange for the extension of certain maturities and other
modifications to the credit agreement, thereby increasing the Companys financial flexibility.
Additionally, in connection with the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility to be used together with
$500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, the Company is mobilizing to recommence
construction of the Companys Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance
for variable interest entities (VIEs), which changes the approach to determining the primary
beneficiary of a VIE and requires companies to more frequently assess whether they must consolidate
VIEs. In December 2009, the FASB supplemented its authoritative guidance for VIEs, which
establishes new criteria for consolidation based on power to direct the activities of a VIE that
would significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of
the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. The new guidance does not allow grandfathering of existing structures and is effective
January 1, 2010. The application of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 6 Variable Interest
Entities.
In January 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for fair value measurements, which
requires new disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value
measurements and gross presentation of activity within the reconciliation for Level 3 fair value
measurements. The guidance also clarifies existing requirements on the level of disaggregation and
required disclosures regarding inputs and valuation techniques for both recurring and nonrecurring
Level 2 and 3 fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with the exception of gross presentation of Level 3
activity, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. See Note 9 Fair Value Measurements for the
required disclosure.
In April 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for companies that generate revenue from
gaming activities that involve base jackpots, which requires companies to accrue for a liability
and charge a jackpot (or portion thereof) to revenue at the time the company has the obligation to
pay the jackpot. The guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. Base jackpots are currently not accrued for by the Company until it has
the obligation to pay such jackpots. As such, the application of this guidance will not have a
material effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
11
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Revision
In connection with the preparation of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, the Company revised its December 31, 2009, condensed consolidated balance sheet and
condensed consolidated statements of equity and
comprehensive income (loss) to appropriately reflect the impact of the issuance of SCL shares
upon its initial public offering. This revision resulted in a $655.7 million increase in the
noncontrolling interests balance with a corresponding reduction to capital in excess of par value.
The revision, which the Company determined is not material, had no impact on total equity, results
of operations or cash flows.
Reclassification
The Company reclassified its intangible assets, net of amortization, as of December 31, 2009,
which was previously included in other assets, net, to conform to the current presentation (see
Note 3 Intangible Assets, Net). The reclassification had no effect on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 2 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Land and improvements |
$ | 412,642 | $ | 353,791 | ||||
Building and improvements |
10,651,246 | 6,898,071 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements |
1,953,270 | 1,703,792 | ||||||
Transportation |
402,819 | 403,256 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
3,206,879 | 5,647,986 | ||||||
16,626,856 | 15,006,896 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(2,154,991 | ) | (1,655,625 | ) | ||||
$ | 14,471,865 | $ | 13,351,271 | |||||
Construction in progress consists of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Other Macau Development Projects (principally Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6) |
$ | 2,051,157 | $ | 1,915,587 | ||||
Marina Bay Sands |
498,671 | 3,119,935 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao (principally the Four Seasons Apartments) |
377,996 | 328,300 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
93,090 | 85,159 | ||||||
Other |
185,965 | 199,005 | ||||||
$ | 3,206,879 | $ | 5,647,986 | |||||
The $186.0 million in other construction in progress consists primarily of construction of the
Las Vegas Condo Tower, other projects in Las Vegas and at The Venetian Macao and Sands Macao.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company has received proceeds of $295.4 million from the sale of
The Shoppes at The Palazzo; however, the final purchase price will be determined in accordance with
the agreement between Venetian Casino Resort, LLC (VCR) and GGP (the Agreement) based on net
operating income (NOI) of The Shoppes at The Palazzo calculated 30 months after the closing date
of the sale, as defined under the Agreement (the Final Purchase Price) and subject to certain
later audit adjustments. Given the economic and market conditions facing retailers on a national
and local level, tenants are facing economic challenges that have had an effect, and may have a
future effect, on the calculation of NOI. Approximately $282.1 million of property and equipment
(net of $29.3 million of accumulated depreciation), which was sold to GGP, is included in the
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010. In April 2009, GGP and its
subsidiary that owns The Shoppes at The Palazzo filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the
U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the Chapter 11 Cases). The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York entered orders approving the plans of reorganization of GGP and the subsidiary
that owns The Shoppes at The Palazzo on October 21 and April 29, 2010, respectively. Under the
confirmed plans of reorganization, the only impaired creditors were mortgage holders. The Company
will continue to review the Chapter 11 Cases and the projected financial performance of the tenants
to be included in the NOI calculation, and will adjust the estimates of NOI and capitalization
rates as additional information is received. The Company and GGP have entered into several
amendments to the Agreement to defer the time to reach agreement on the Final Purchase Price as
both parties are continuing to work on various matters related to the calculation of NOI. The
Company may be required to record a loss on the sale in the future depending on the resolution of
such matters and the resulting agreed upon Final Purchase Price.
12
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
The cost and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment that the Company is leasing to
tenants as part of its mall operations in Macau was $416.9 million and $68.4 million, respectively,
as of September 30, 2010. The cost and accumulated depreciation of property and equipment that the
Company is leasing under capital lease arrangements is $29.6 million and $2.8 million,
respectively, as of September 30, 2010.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the Company capitalized interest expense of $32.0 million, $74.3 million,
$16.9 million and $45.1 million, respectively.
As described in Note 1 Organization and Business of Company Development Projects, the
Company suspended portions of its development projects given the conditions in the capital markets
and the global economy and their impact on the Companys ongoing operations. If circumstances
change, the Company may be required to record an impairment charge related to these developments in
the future.
NOTE 3 INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Gaming licenses and certificate |
$ | 94,992 | $ | 50,000 | ||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(4,089 | ) | | |||||
90,903 | 50,000 | |||||||
Trademarks and other |
1,008 | 263 | ||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
(176 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||
832 | 129 | |||||||
Total intangible assets, net |
$ | 91,735 | $ | 50,129 | ||||
In August 2007 and July 2010, the Company was issued a gaming license and certificate from the
Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board for its slots and table games operations at Sands Bethlehem,
respectively, which were acquired for $50.0 million and $16.5 million, respectively. The license
and certificate were determined to have indefinite lives and therefore, are not subject to
amortization. In April 2010, the Company was issued a gaming license from the Singapore Casino
Regulatory Authority (the CRA) for its gaming operations at Marina Bay Sands, which was acquired
for SGD 37.5 million (approximately $28.5 million at exchange rates in effect on September 30,
2010). This license is being amortized over its three-year term and is renewable upon submitting a
renewal application, paying the applicable license fee and meeting the renewal requirements as
determined by the CRA.
NOTE 4 LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Corporate and U.S. Related: |
||||||||
Senior Secured Credit Facility Term B |
$ | 2,162,680 | $ | 2,925,000 | ||||
Senior Secured Credit Facility Delayed Draws I and II |
722,090 | 987,000 | ||||||
Senior Secured Credit Facility Revolving |
| 775,860 | ||||||
6.375% Senior Notes (net of original issue discount of $763 and $1,164, respectively) |
188,949 | 248,836 | ||||||
FF&E Facility |
| 108,550 | ||||||
Airplane Financings |
79,344 | 82,110 | ||||||
HVAC Equipment Lease |
23,425 | 24,717 | ||||||
Other |
4,095 | 4,778 | ||||||
Macau Related: |
||||||||
Macau Credit Facility Term B |
1,488,289 | 1,501,789 | ||||||
Macau Credit Facility Term B Delayed |
578,779 | 584,029 | ||||||
Macau Credit Facility Revolving |
| 479,640 | ||||||
Macau Credit Facility Local Term |
41,325 | 67,697 | ||||||
VOL Credit Facility Term |
750,963 | | ||||||
Ferry Financing |
184,316 | 210,762 | ||||||
Other |
11,737 | 11,016 | ||||||
Singapore Related: |
||||||||
Singapore Credit Facility |
3,901,558 | 3,013,678 | ||||||
Other |
2,299 | | ||||||
10,139,849 | 11,025,462 | |||||||
Less current maturities |
(572,458 | ) | (173,315 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 9,567,391 | $ | 10,852,147 | ||||
13
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Senior Secured Credit Facility
In August 2010, the Senior Secured Credit Facility was amended to, among other things, modify
certain financial covenants, including increasing the maximum leverage ratio for the quarterly
periods through June 30, 2012 (see Note 1 Organization and Business of Company Development
Financing Strategy). Certain lenders elected to extend the maturity of $1.42 billion in aggregate
principal amount of the Term B Facility to November 2016, $284.5 million in aggregate principal
amount of the Delayed Draw I Facility to November 2016, $207.9 million in aggregate principal
amount of the Delayed Draw II Facility to November 2015 (collectively the Extended Term Loans)
and to extend the availability of $532.5 million (after giving effect to the reductions described
below) of the Revolving Facility to May 2014 (the Extended Revolving Facility). As part of the
extension, the Company was required to pay down $1.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of the
Extended Term Loans and the commitments under the Revolving Facility were reduced from $1.0 billion
to $750.0 million. The credit spread for the Extended Term Loans increased 100 basis points to
1.75% per annum for borrowings bearing interest at a base rate or 2.75% per annum at an adjusted
Eurodollar rate. The credit spread for the Extended Revolving Facility increased 75 basis points to
1.25% per annum for borrowings bearing interest at a base rate or 2.25% per annum at an adjusted
Eurodollar rate. These credit spreads are subject to downward adjustments in certain circumstances
if the Companys corporate credit rating is increased. As a result of the repayment and amendment,
the Company recorded a $21.2 million loss on modification or early retirement of debt during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid down $775.9 million under
the Revolving Facility, in addition to the pay down of $1.0 billion of the Extended Term Loans as
described above. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had $640.5 million of available borrowing
capacity under the Senior Secured Credit Facility, net of outstanding letters of credit and undrawn
amounts committed to be funded by Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc.
FF&E Credit Facility
In August 2010, the Company repaid the outstanding $91.8 million balance under the FF&E Credit
Facility and incurred a $0.5 million loss on early retirement of debt during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
Senior Notes
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company repurchased $60.3 million of the
outstanding principal of the Senior Notes and recorded a $3.4 million gain on extinguishment of
debt in connection with the repurchase.
Macau Credit Facility
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid down $479.6 million under
the revolving portion of its Macau Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had
$595.3 million of available borrowing capacity under the Macau Credit Facility, net of undrawn
amounts committed to be funded by Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc.
VOL Credit Facility
On May 17, 2010, a subsidiary of the Company, VOL (owner and developer of the integrated
resort on Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6), entered into a credit agreement (the VOL Credit Facility)
providing for up to $1.75 billion (or equivalent in Hong Kong dollars or Macau patacas), which
consists of a $750.0 million term loan (the VOL Term Facility) that was fully drawn on July 16,
2010, a $750.0 million delayed draw term loan available for 18 months after closing (the VOL
Delayed Draw Facility) and a $250.0 million revolving facility (the VOL Revolving Facility). As
of September 30, 2010, the Company had not drawn any amounts under the VOL Delayed Draw Facility or
VOL Revolving Facility.
14
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
The indebtedness under the VOL Credit Facility is guaranteed by any future restricted
subsidiaries of VOL. The obligations under the VOL Credit Facility are collateralized by a
first-priority security interest in substantially all of VOLs assets, other than (1) capital stock
and similar ownership interests, (2) certain furniture, fixtures, fittings and equipment and
(3) certain other excluded assets.
The VOL Credit Facility matures on June 16, 2015, with VOL required to repay or prepay the VOL
Credit Facility under certain circumstances. Commencing on March 31, 2013, and at the end of each
subsequent quarter in 2013, VOL is required to repay the outstanding VOL Term and Delayed Draw
Facilities on a pro rata basis in an amount equal to 5% of the aggregate principal amount of term
loans outstanding as of November 17, 2011. Commencing on March 31, 2014, and at the end of each
subsequent quarter in 2014, VOL is required to repay the outstanding VOL Term and Delayed Draw
Facilities on a pro rata bases in an amount equal to 7.5% of the aggregate principal amount of term
loans outstanding as of November 17, 2011. In addition, commencing with December 31, 2013, and the
end of each fiscal year thereafter, VOL is required to further repay the outstanding VOL Term and
Delayed Draw Facilities on a pro rata basis with 50%, subject to downward adjustments if certain
conditions are met, of its excess free cash flow (as defined by the VOL Credit Facility).
Borrowings under the VOL Credit Facility bear interest at either the adjusted Eurodollar rate
or an alternative base rate (in the case of U.S. dollar denominated loans) or the Hong Kong
Interbank Offered Rate (HIBOR, in the case of Hong Kong dollar and Macau pataca denominated
loans), as applicable, plus a spread of 4.5% per annum. VOL will pay standby fees of 2.0% per annum
on the undrawn amounts under the VOL Term and Delayed Draw Facilities and 1.5% per annum on the
undrawn amounts under the VOL Revolving Facility.
The VOL Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants customary for such
financings, including, but not limited to, limitations on liens, annual capital expenditures other
than project costs, incurrence of indebtedness, loans and guarantees, investments, acquisitions and
asset sales, restricted payments and other distributions, affiliate transactions and use of
proceeds from the facility. The VOL Credit Facility also requires VOL to comply with financial
covenants as of the first full quarter beginning six months after the commencement of substantial
operations of phases I and II of the integrated resort on Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6, including
maximum ratios of total indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA and minimum ratios of Adjusted EBITDA to
total interest expense. The VOL Credit Facility also contains events of default customary for such
financings.
Singapore Credit Facility
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had SGD 46.4 million (approximately $35.2 million at
exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) of available borrowing capacity under the Singapore
Credit Facility, net of outstanding bankers guarantees.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities related to long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Proceeds from Singapore Credit Facility |
$ | 647,988 | $ | 824,986 | ||||
Proceeds from VOL Credit Facility |
751,169 | | ||||||
Proceeds from Exchangeable Bonds |
| 600,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from Ferry Financing |
| 9,888 | ||||||
$ | 1,399,157 | $ | 1,434,874 | |||||
Repayments on Senior Secured Credit Facility |
$ | (1,803,090 | ) | $ | (30,000 | ) | ||
Repayments on Macau Credit Facility |
(524,701 | ) | (150,074 | ) | ||||
Repayments on Singapore Credit Facility |
| (18,223 | ) | |||||
Repayments on Senior Notes |
(56,675 | ) | | |||||
Repayments on Ferry Financing |
(26,331 | ) | | |||||
Repayments on Airplane Financings |
(2,766 | ) | (2,766 | ) | ||||
Repayments on HVAC Equipment Lease |
(1,293 | ) | (421 | ) | ||||
Repayments on FF&E Facility and Other Long-Term Debt |
(109,746 | ) | (25,841 | ) | ||||
$ | (2,524,602 | ) | $ | (227,325 | ) | |||
15
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Fair Value of Long-Term Debt
The estimated fair value of the Companys long-term debt as of September 30, 2010, was
approximately $9.40 billion, compared to its carrying value of $10.11 billion. As of December 31,
2009, the estimated fair value of the Companys long-term debt was approximately $9.66 billion,
compared to its carrying value of $11.0 billion. The estimated fair value of the Companys
long-term debt is based on quoted market prices, if available, or by pricing models based on the
value of related cash flows discounted at current market interest rates.
NOTE 5 EQUITY AND EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Preferred Stock and Warrants
Preferred stock dividend activity is as follows (in thousands):
Preferred Stock | ||||||||||||||
Dividends Paid to | Preferred Stock | |||||||||||||
Board of Directors | Principal | Dividends Paid to | Total Preferred Stock | |||||||||||
Declaration Date | Payment Date | Stockholders Family | Public Holders | Dividends Paid | ||||||||||
February 5, 2009 |
February 17, 2009 | $ | 13,125 | $ | 11,347 | $ | 24,472 | |||||||
April 30, 2009 |
May 15, 2009 | 13,125 | 10,400 | 23,525 | ||||||||||
July 31, 2009 |
August 17, 2009 | 13,125 | 10,225 | 23,350 | ||||||||||
$ | 71,347 | |||||||||||||
February 5, 2010 |
February 16, 2010 | $ | 13,125 | $ | 10,225 | $ | 23,350 | |||||||
May 4, 2010 |
May 17, 2010 | 13,125 | 10,225 | 23,350 | ||||||||||
July 29, 2010 |
August 16, 2010 | 13,125 | 10,225 | 23,350 | ||||||||||
$ | 70,050 | |||||||||||||
November 2, 2010 |
November 15, 2010 | $ | 13,125 | $ | 10,225 | $ | 23,350 |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, holders of preferred stock exercised 126
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,099 shares of the Companys common stock at $6.00 per share
and tendered 76 shares of preferred stock and approximately $5,000 in cash as settlement of the
warrant exercise price. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, holders of the preferred
stock exercised 1,106,301 warrants to purchase an aggregate of 18,438,384 shares of the Companys
common stock at $6.00 per share and tendered 1,106,301 shares of preferred stock as settlement of
the warrant exercise price.
Subsequent
to September 30, 2010, holders of preferred stock exercised
1,857,645 warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 30,960,805 shares of the Companys common stock at $6.00 per share for
$185.8 million in cash as settlement of the warrant exercise price.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares used in the calculation of
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (used in the
calculation of basic earnings (loss) per share) |
660,836,841 | 660,245,590 | 660,495,783 | 655,687,503 | ||||||||||||
Potential dilution from stock options, restricted stock and warrants |
128,319,406 | | 121,660,224 | | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares (used in the
calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share) |
789,156,247 | 660,245,590 | 782,156,007 | 655,687,503 | ||||||||||||
Antidilutive stock options, restricted stock and warrants excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share |
8,570,205 | 170,653,596 | 9,098,805 | 170,653,596 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated Comprehensive Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, accumulated comprehensive income consisted
solely of foreign currency translation adjustments.
16
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Total comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 268,834 | $ | (80,617 | ) | $ | 395,196 | $ | (294,726 | ) | ||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
78,886 | 11,194 | 74,390 | 8,438 | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
347,720 | (69,423 | ) | 469,586 | (286,288 | ) | ||||||||||
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(58,004 | ) | 4,111 | (120,830 | ) | 7,674 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
$ | 289,716 | $ | (65,312 | ) | $ | 348,756 | $ | (278,614 | ) | ||||||
NOTE 6 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
The Company consolidates any VIEs in which it is the primary beneficiary and discloses
significant variable interests in VIEs of which it is not the primary beneficiary, if any, which
management determines such designation based on accounting standards for VIEs.
The Company has entered into various joint venture agreements with independent third parties.
The operations of these joint ventures have been consolidated by the Company due to the Companys
significant investment in these joint ventures, its power to direct the activities of the joint
ventures that would significantly impact their economic performance and the obligation to absorb
potentially significant losses or the rights to receive potentially significant benefits from these
joint ventures. In accordance with revised accounting standards, the Company evaluates its primary
beneficiary designation on an ongoing basis and will assess the appropriateness of the VIEs status
when events have occurred that would trigger such an analysis.
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Companys joint ventures had total assets
of $94.7 million and $105.6 million, respectively, and total liabilities of $75.3 million and
$75.3 million, respectively.
NOTE 7 INCOME TAXES
The Companys major tax jurisdictions are the U.S., Macau and Singapore. In the U.S., during
the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Revenue
Agents Report for years 2005 through 2008 proposing certain assessments. The Company disagrees
with several of the proposed assessments and submitted a protest and a request for an appeals
conference to the IRS. The Company anticipates that the appeals process will take an extended
period of time to resolve and management does not believe that it is reasonably possible that these
issues will be settled in the next twelve months. In the U.S., the Company is currently under
examination for the 2009 year. In Macau and Singapore, the Company is subject to examination for
years after 2005. The Company believes it has adequately reserved for its uncertain tax positions;
however, there is no assurance that the taxing authorities will not propose adjustments that are
different than the Companys expected outcome and impact the provision for income taxes.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company settled certain tax
matters with taxing authorities. As a result of these settlements, the Company reduced its
unrecognized tax benefits by $32.9 million.
The Company recorded valuation allowances on the net deferred tax assets of the Companys U.S.
operations and certain foreign jurisdictions and does not anticipate recording an income tax
benefit related to these deferred tax assets. The Company will reassess the realization of deferred
tax assets based on accounting standards for income taxes each reporting period and will be able to
reduce the valuation allowance to the extent that the financial results of these operations improve
and it becomes more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are realizable.
The Company received a 5-year income tax exemption in Macau that exempts the Company from
paying corporate income tax on profits generated by gaming operations. The Company will continue to
benefit from this tax exemption through the end of 2013.
17
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 8 STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Sands China Ltd. Equity Award Plan
The Companys subsidiary, SCL, adopted an equity award plan (the SCL Equity Plan) for grants
of options to purchase ordinary shares of SCL. The purpose of the SCL Equity Plan is to give SCL a
competitive edge in attracting, retaining and motivating
employees, directors and consultants and to provide SCL with a stock plan providing incentives
directly related to increases in its stockholder value. Subject to certain criteria as defined in
the SCL Equity Plan, SCLs subsidiaries or affiliates employees, directors or officers and many
of its consultants are eligible for awards under the SCL Equity Plan. The SCL Equity Plan provides
for an aggregate of 804,786,508 shares of SCLs common stock to be available for awards,
representing 10% of the outstanding shares of the SCL Offering. The SCL Equity Plan has a term of
ten years and no further awards may be granted after the expiration of the term. SCLs compensation
committee may grant awards of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards,
restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, performance compensation awards or any combination of
the foregoing. As of September 30, 2010, there were 785,480,708 shares available for grant under
the SCL Equity Plan.
Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price not less than (i) the closing price of
SCLs stock on the date of grant or (ii) the average closing price of SCLs stock for the five
business days immediately preceding the date of grant. The outstanding stock options generally vest
over four years and have ten-year contractual terms. Compensation cost for all stock option grants,
which all have graded vesting, is net of estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the awards respective requisite service periods. The Company estimates the fair value
of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on
the historical volatilities from a selection of companies from SCLs peer group due to SCLs lack
of historical information. The Company used the simplified method for estimating expected option
life, as the options qualify as plain-vanilla options. The risk-free interest rate for periods
equal to the expected term of the stock option is based on the Hong Kong Exchange Fund Note rate in
effect at the time of grant.
Stock-Based Compensation Activity
Stock-based compensation activity under the LVSC 2004 and SCL Equity Plans is as follows (in
thousands, except weighted average grant date fair values):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Compensation expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
$ | 13,487 | $ | 12,062 | $ | 42,169 | $ | 32,132 | ||||||||
Restricted shares |
133 | (53 | ) | 383 | 782 | |||||||||||
$ | 13,620 | $ | 12,009 | $ | 42,552 | $ | 32,914 | |||||||||
Compensation cost capitalized as part of property and equipment |
$ | 659 | $ | 937 | $ | 2,187 | $ | 2,561 | ||||||||
LVSC 2004 Plan: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options granted |
289 | 1,194 | 4,378 | 8,242 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 20.99 | $ | 6.41 | $ | 15.40 | $ | 3.02 | ||||||||
Restricted shares granted |
2 | | 16 | 66 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 28.90 | $ | | $ | 25.37 | $ | 7.38 | ||||||||
SCL Equity Plan: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options granted |
4,553 | | 24,929 | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 1.12 | $ | | $ | 1.05 | $ | | ||||||||
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
LVSC 2004 Plan: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average volatility |
89.0 | % | 79.6 | % | 92.7 | % | 75.5 | % | ||||||||
Expected term (in years) |
6.0 | 5.7 | 5.4 | 5.1 | ||||||||||||
Risk-free rate |
3.0 | % | 3.1 | % | 2.9 | % | 2.7 | % | ||||||||
Expected dividends |
| | | | ||||||||||||
SCL Equity Plan: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average volatility |
73.3 | % | | 73.6 | % | | ||||||||||
Expected term (in years) |
6.3 | | 6.2 | | ||||||||||||
Risk-free rate |
1.5 | % | | 2.0 | % | | ||||||||||
Expected dividends |
| | | |
18
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 9 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Under applicable accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants as of the measurement date. Applicable accounting guidance also
establishes a valuation hierarchy for inputs in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of
observable inputs (inputs market participants would use based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the Company) and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs (inputs that reflect the
Companys assumptions based upon the best information available in the circumstances) by requiring
that the most observable inputs be used when available. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that
are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities. Categorization within the hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table provides the assets carried at fair value (in thousands):
Total Carrying | Fair Value Measurements as of September 30, 2010 Using: | |||||||||||||||
Value as of | Quoted Market | Significant Other | Significant | |||||||||||||
September 30, | Prices in Active | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | |||||||||||||
2010 | Markets (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Cash equivalents(1) |
$ | 1,094,958 | $ | 1,094,958 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Interest rate caps(2) |
$ | 1,139 | $ | | $ | 1,139 | $ | |
(1) | The Company has short-term investments
classified as cash equivalents as the original maturities are less
than 90 days. |
|
(2) | The Company has 34 interest rate cap agreements with an aggregate fair value of approximately $1.1 million, based on
quoted market values from the institutions holding the agreements as
of September 30, 2010. |
NOTE 10 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The Company is involved in other litigation in addition to those noted below, arising in the
normal course of business. Management has made certain estimates for potential litigation costs
based upon consultation with legal counsel. Actual results could differ from these estimates;
however, in the opinion of management, such litigation and claims will not have a material effect
on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Macau Operations
On October 15, 2004, Richard Suen and Round Square Company Limited filed an action against
LVSC, Las Vegas Sands, Inc. (LVSI), Sheldon G. Adelson and William P. Weidner in the District
Court of Clark County, Nevada, asserting a breach of an alleged agreement to pay a success fee of
$5.0 million and 2.0% of the net profit from the Companys Macau resort operations to the
plaintiffs as well as other related claims. In March 2005, LVSC was dismissed as a party without
prejudice based on a stipulation to do so between the parties. Pursuant to an order filed March 16,
2006, plaintiffs fraud claims set forth in the first amended complaint were dismissed with
prejudice as against all defendants. The order also dismissed with prejudice the first amended
complaint against defendants Sheldon G. Adelson and William P. Weidner. On May 24, 2008, the jury
returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the amount of $43.8 million. On June 30, 2008, a judgment
was entered in this matter in the amount of $58.6 million (including pre-judgment interest). The
Company appealed the verdict to the Nevada Supreme Court. Oral argument on the appeal
took place on September 2, 2010, and the Court has yet to issue a decision. The Company believes
that it has valid bases in law and fact to overturn the verdict. As a result, the Company has
concluded that it is not probable that it has incurred a loss relating to this matter. The Company
believes a range of possible loss, which cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, is between
zero and the amount of the judgment. Because the Company believes that this potential loss is not
probable or estimable, it has not recorded any reserves or contingencies related to this legal
matter. In the event that the Companys assumptions used to evaluate this matter as neither
probable nor estimable change in future periods, it will be required to record a liability for an
adverse outcome, which may include post judgment interest.
19
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
On February 5, 2007, Asian American Entertainment Corporation, Limited (AAEC) filed an
action against LVSI, VCR, Venetian Venture Development, William P. Weidner and David Friedman in
the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the District Court). The plaintiffs
assert (i) breach of contract by LVSI, VCR and Venetian Venture Development of an agreement under
which AAEC would work to obtain a gaming license in Macau and, if successful, AAEC would jointly
operate a casino, hotel and related facilities in Macau with Venetian Venture Development and
Venetian Venture Development would receive fees and a minority equity interest in the venture and
(ii) breach of fiduciary duties by all of the defendants. The plaintiffs have requested an
unspecified amount of actual, compensatory and punitive damages, and disgorgement of profits
related to the Companys Macau gaming license. The Company filed a motion to dismiss on July 11,
2007. On August 1, 2007, the District Court granted the defendants motion to dismiss the complaint
against all defendants without prejudice. The plaintiffs appealed this decision and subsequently,
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (the Circuit Court) decided that AAEC was not barred from
asserting claims that the written agreement was breached prior to its expiration on January 15,
2002. The Circuit Court remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings on
this issue and discovery has recently begun. The plaintiffs counsel filed a motion to withdraw
from representing the plaintiffs on December 15, 2009, and it was granted by the Magistrate on
January 12, 2010. On February 11, 2010, the Magistrate filed a recommendation that the case be
dismissed in the court docket. The plaintiffs had until February 28, 2010, to file any objections
thereto. None were filed and the District Court entered an order on April 16, 2010, dismissing the
case. The plaintiffs did not timely file an appeal of the District Courts order dismissing the
case and this matter has been closed.
On October 16, 2009, the Company received a letter from counsel to Far East Consortium
International Ltd. (FEC) notifying the Company that it may pursue various claims seeking, among
other things, monetary damages and an entitlement to an ownership interest in any development
projects on parcel 3 in Macau, which the Company will own and operate. The Company believes such
claims are based on a non-legally binding memorandum of agreement that expired by its terms in
2005. The Company intends to vigorously contest any claims or lawsuits that may be brought by FEC.
On October 20, 2010, Steven C. Jacobs, the former Chief Executive Officer of SCL, filed an
action against LVSC and SCL in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, alleging breach of
contract against LVSC and SCL and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and
tortious discharge in violation of public policy against LVSC. Mr. Jacobs is seeking unspecified
damages. This action is in a preliminary stage and management has determined that it is currently unable to
determine the probability of the outcome of this matter.
The Company intends to vigorously defend this matter.
China Matters
The State
Administration of Foreign Exchange in China (“SAFE”) regulates
foreign currency exchange transactions and other business dealings in China.
SAFE has made inquiries and requested and obtained documents relating to
certain payments made by the Company’s wholly foreign-owned enterprises
(“WFOEs”) to counterparties and other vendors in China. These WFOEs
were established to conduct non-gaming marketing activities in China and to
create goodwill in China and Macau for the Company’s operations in Macau.
SAFE has now concluded its investigation of these matters and recently issued a
preliminary penalty decision notice that it would impose a penalty of
approximately 10.8 million renminbi (approximately $1.6 million at
exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) against one of the
Company’s WFOEs. SAFE’s decision will become final shortly, unless
the WOFE formally contests the penalty. The Company does not believe that the
WFOE’s payment of the penalty will have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Securities Litigation
On May 24, 2010, Frank J. Fosbre, Jr. filed a purported class action complaint in the United
States District Court for the District of Nevada, against LVSC, Sheldon G. Adelson, and William P.
Weidner. The complaint alleges that LVSC, through the individual defendants, disseminated or
approved materially false information, or failed to disclose material facts, through press
releases, investor conference calls and other means from August 1, 2007 through November 6, 2008.
The complaint seeks, among other relief, class certification, compensatory damages and attorneys
fees and costs.
On July 21, 2010, Wendell and Shirley Combs filed a purported class action complaint in the
United States District Court for the District of Nevada, against LVSC, Sheldon G. Adelson, and
William P. Weidner. The complaint alleges that LVSC, through the individual defendants,
disseminated or approved materially false information, or failed to disclose material facts,
through press releases, investor conference calls and other means from June 13, 2007 through
November 11, 2008. The complaint, which is substantially similar to the Fosbre litigation,
discussed above, seeks, among other relief, class certification, compensatory damages and
attorneys fees and costs.
On August 31, 2010, the Court entered an order consolidating the two cases, and appointed lead
plaintiffs and lead counsel. On November 1, 2010, a purported class action amended complaint was
filed in the consolidated action against LVSC, Sheldon G. Adelson and William P. Weidner. The
amended complaint alleges that LVSC, through the individual defendants, disseminated or approved
materially false and misleading information, or failed to disclose material facts, through press
releases, investor conference calls and other means from August 2, 2007 through November 6, 2008.
The amended complaint seeks, among other relief, class certification, compensatory damages and
attorneys fees and costs. The defendants have until
December 31, 2010, to file a responsive
pleading. This action is in a preliminary stage and management has determined that based on
proceedings to date, it is currently unable to determine the probability of the outcome of this
matter. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
20
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Singapore Development Project
In August 2006, the Company entered into the Development Agreement with the STB, which
requires the Company to construct and operate the Marina Bay Sands in accordance with the Companys
proposal for the integrated resort and in accordance with the agreement. The Company entered into
the SGD 5.44 billion (approximately $4.14 billion at exchange rates in effect on September 30,
2010) Singapore Credit Facility to fund a significant portion of the construction, operating and
other development costs of the Marina Bay Sands.
In December 2009, MBS signed a supplement to the Development Agreement with the STB, which
permits the Marina Bay Sands to open in stages throughout 2010 in accordance with an agreed upon
schedule. There are no financial consequences to MBS if it fails to meet the agreed upon schedule,
provided that the entire integrated resort is opened by December 31, 2011. If MBS fails to meet
this deadline, the STB will be entitled to draw on the SGD 192.6 million (approximately
$146.3 million at exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) security deposit under the
Singapore Credit Facility.
Other Agreements
The Company has entered into agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La to manage hotels on the
Companys Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6, and for Starwood to brand the serviced luxury apart-hotel
units located thereon. The management agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La impose certain
construction and opening obligations and deadlines on the Company, and certain past and/or
anticipated delays may allow Starwood and Shangri-La to terminate their respective agreements. The
Company is mobilizing to recommence construction on parcels 5 and 6 and is negotiating (or
undertaking to negotiate) amendments to its management agreements with Starwood and Shangri-La to
provide for new opening timelines. If negotiations are unsuccessful and Starwood and Shangri-La
exercise their rights to terminate their agreements, the Company would have to find new managers
and brands for these projects. The Companys agreement with Starwood related to the Las Vegas Condo
Tower has been terminated in connection with the suspension of the project and management is
currently evaluating alternatives for branding the project. If the Company has to find new managers
and brands in Macau or is unsuccessful in rebranding its Las Vegas Condo Tower, such measures could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
NOTE 11 SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys principal operating and developmental activities occur in three geographic
areas: United States, Macau and Singapore. The Company reviews the results of operations for each
of its key operating segments: The Venetian Las Vegas, which includes the Sands Expo Center; The
Palazzo; Sands Bethlehem; Sands Macao; The Venetian Macao; Four Seasons Macao; Other Asia
(comprised primarily of the Companys ferry operations and various other operations that are
ancillary to the Companys properties in Macau); and Marina Bay Sands. The Company also reviews
construction and development activities for each of its primary projects: The Venetian Las Vegas;
The Palazzo; Sands Bethlehem; Sands Macao; The Venetian Macao; Four Seasons Macao; Other Asia;
Marina Bay Sands; Other Development Projects (on Cotai Strip parcels 3, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8); and
Corporate and Other (comprised primarily of airplanes and the Las Vegas Condo Tower). The Venetian
Las Vegas and The Palazzo operating segments are managed as a single integrated resort and have
been aggregated as one reportable segment (the Las Vegas Operating Properties), considering their
similar economic characteristics, types of customers, types of service and products, the regulatory
business environment of the operations within each segment and the Companys organizational and
management reporting structure. The information for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2009, has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The Companys segment
information as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 620,745 | $ | 494,014 | $ | 1,751,472 | $ | 1,421,722 | ||||||||
Sands Macao |
288,235 | 280,793 | 874,253 | 739,403 | ||||||||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
160,367 | 67,052 | 406,807 | 162,743 | ||||||||||||
Other Asia |
28,403 | 21,131 | 80,961 | 64,170 | ||||||||||||
1,097,750 | 862,990 | 3,113,493 | 2,388,038 | |||||||||||||
United States: |
||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
290,690 | 228,993 | 902,419 | 839,571 | ||||||||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
82,843 | 62,994 | 218,708 | 95,705 | ||||||||||||
373,533 | 291,987 | 1,121,127 | 935,276 | |||||||||||||
Singapore |
485,886 | | 702,279 | | ||||||||||||
Intersegment eliminations |
(48,397 | ) | (13,833 | ) | (98,763 | ) | (44,408 | ) | ||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 1,908,772 | $ | 1,141,144 | $ | 4,838,136 | $ | 3,278,906 | ||||||||
21
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted Property EBITDA(1) |
||||||||||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 211,496 | $ | 150,389 | $ | 574,240 | $ | 381,849 | ||||||||
Sands Macao |
74,103 | 77,115 | 225,076 | 188,522 | ||||||||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
48,962 | 10,152 | 101,456 | 20,083 | ||||||||||||
Other Asia |
(5,563 | ) | (8,088 | ) | (16,149 | ) | (23,989 | ) | ||||||||
328,998 | 229,568 | 884,623 | 566,465 | |||||||||||||
United States: |
||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
58,271 | 34,452 | 229,555 | 202,336 | ||||||||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
16,361 | 8,323 | 39,450 | 11,160 | ||||||||||||
74,632 | 42,775 | 269,005 | 213,496 | |||||||||||||
Singapore |
241,589 | | 336,055 | | ||||||||||||
Total adjusted property EBITDA |
645,219 | 272,343 | 1,489,683 | 779,961 | ||||||||||||
Other Operating Costs and Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
(8,309 | ) | (8,423 | ) | (22,880 | ) | (21,701 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate expense |
(28,686 | ) | (17,519 | ) | (78,116 | ) | (105,250 | ) | ||||||||
Rental expense |
(9,186 | ) | (6,691 | ) | (30,690 | ) | (22,497 | ) | ||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
(10,107 | ) | (28,855 | ) | (97,684 | ) | (115,619 | ) | ||||||||
Development expense |
(425 | ) | (80 | ) | (1,258 | ) | (344 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(186,738 | ) | (148,677 | ) | (510,521 | ) | (431,559 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment loss |
(16,057 | ) | | (16,057 | ) | (151,175 | ) | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets |
(2,406 | ) | 284 | (40,577 | ) | (4,500 | ) | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
383,305 | 62,382 | 691,900 | (72,684 | ) | |||||||||||
Other Non-Operating Costs and Expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
2,661 | 1,599 | 6,367 | 9,840 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(76,723 | ) | (88,514 | ) | (231,875 | ) | (224,503 | ) | ||||||||
Other income (expense) |
6,444 | (1,564 | ) | (6,205 | ) | (6,534 | ) | |||||||||
Loss on modification or early retirement of debt |
(21,692 | ) | (204 | ) | (18,555 | ) | (204 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
(25,161 | ) | (54,316 | ) | (46,436 | ) | (641 | ) | ||||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(54,337 | ) | 4,111 | (121,311 | ) | 7,674 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
$ | 214,497 | $ | (76,506 | ) | $ | 273,885 | $ | (287,052 | ) | ||||||
(1) | Adjusted property EBITDA is net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp.
before stock-based compensation expense, corporate expense, rental expense, pre-opening
expense, development expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment loss, gain
(loss) on disposal of assets, interest, other income (expense), loss on modification or
early retirement of debt, income tax expense and net (income) loss attributable to
noncontrolling interests. Adjusted property EBITDA is used by management as the primary
measure of operating performance of the Companys properties and to compare the
operating performance of the Companys properties with that of
its competitors. |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Intersegment Revenues |
||||||||||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 1,535 | $ | 434 | $ | 6,701 | $ | 1,277 | ||||||||
Other Asia |
17,942 | 12,501 | 48,376 | 40,161 | ||||||||||||
19,477 | 12,935 | 55,077 | 41,438 | |||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
28,872 | 898 | 43,234 | 2,970 | ||||||||||||
Singapore |
48 | | 452 | | ||||||||||||
Total intersegment revenues |
$ | 48,397 | $ | 13,833 | $ | 98,763 | $ | 44,408 | ||||||||
22
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Capital Expenditures |
||||||||
Corporate and Other |
$ | 9,746 | $ | 31,527 | ||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
35,618 | 12,700 | ||||||
Sands Macao |
2,500 | 5,556 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
29,348 | 206,546 | ||||||
Other Asia |
2,524 | 23,696 | ||||||
Other Development Projects |
200,292 | 70,084 | ||||||
270,282 | 318,582 | |||||||
United States: |
||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
16,076 | 58,065 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
34,077 | 212,529 | ||||||
50,153 | 270,594 | |||||||
Singapore |
1,320,083 | 918,375 | ||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 1,650,264 | $ | 1,539,078 | ||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Total Assets |
||||||||
Corporate and Other |
$ | 1,432,307 | $ | 1,849,596 | ||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
2,980,826 | 2,886,763 | ||||||
Sands Macao |
494,374 | 527,737 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
1,161,721 | 1,151,028 | ||||||
Other Asia |
350,846 | 328,584 | ||||||
Other Development Projects |
3,108,406 | 2,035,864 | ||||||
8,096,173 | 6,929,976 | |||||||
United States: |
||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
3,944,719 | 6,893,106 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
742,075 | 737,062 | ||||||
4,686,794 | 7,630,168 | |||||||
Singapore |
6,032,723 | 4,162,366 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 20,247,997 | $ | 20,572,106 | ||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Total Long-Lived Assets |
||||||||
Corporate and Other |
$ | 309,374 | $ | 324,268 | ||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
2,192,602 | 2,324,882 | ||||||
Sands Macao |
324,672 | 355,170 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
1,032,310 | 1,047,201 | ||||||
Other Asia |
267,388 | 276,559 | ||||||
Other Development Projects |
2,157,546 | 2,022,861 | ||||||
5,974,518 | 6,026,673 | |||||||
United States: |
||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
3,478,696 | 3,642,405 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
605,690 | 610,846 | ||||||
4,084,386 | 4,253,251 | |||||||
Singapore |
5,355,134 | 3,956,899 | ||||||
Total long-lived assets |
$ | 15,723,412 | $ | 14,561,091 | ||||
23
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 12 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
LVSC is the obligor of the Senior Notes due 2015. LVSLLC, VCR, Mall Intermediate Holding
Company, LLC, Venetian Venture Development, Venetian Transport, LLC, Venetian Marketing, Inc., Lido
Intermediate Holding Company, LLC and Lido Casino Resort Holding Company, LLC (collectively, the
Original Guarantors), have jointly and severally guaranteed the Senior Notes on a full and
unconditional basis. Effective May 2007, in conjunction with entering into the Senior Secured
Credit Facility, LVSC, the
Original Guarantors and the trustee entered into a supplemental indenture related to the
Senior Notes, whereby the following subsidiaries were added as full and unconditional guarantors on
a joint and several basis: Sands Expo & Convention Center, Inc. (formerly Interface Group-Nevada,
Inc.), Palazzo Condo Tower, LLC, Sands Pennsylvania, Inc., Phase II Mall Holding, LLC and Phase II
Mall Subsidiary, LLC (collectively with the Original Guarantors, the Guarantor Subsidiaries). LVS
(Nevada) International Holdings, Inc. (LVS Nevada) and LVS Management Services, LLC, newly formed
subsidiaries, were added in September 2009 as full and unconditional guarantors to the Senior Notes
on a joint and several basis, and have been included in the group of subsidiaries that is the
Guarantor Subsidiaries. In November 2009, Venetian Venture Development was merged with and into LVS
Nevada, with LVS Nevada as the surviving entity. The voting stock of all entities included as
Guarantor Subsidiaries is 100% owned directly or indirectly by Las Vegas Sands Corp. The
noncontrolling interest amount included in the Guarantor Subsidiaries condensed consolidating
balance sheets is related to non-voting preferred stock of one of the subsidiaries held by third
parties.
In February 2008, all of the capital stock of Phase II Mall Subsidiary, LLC was sold to GGP
and in connection therewith, it was released as a guarantor under the Senior Notes. The sale is not
complete from an accounting perspective due to the Companys continuing involvement in the
transaction related to the completion of construction on the remainder of The Shoppes at The
Palazzo, certain activities to be performed on behalf of GGP and the uncertainty of the final sales
price. Certain of the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows related to the
ownership and operation of the mall by Phase II Mall Subsidiary, LLC subsequent to the sale will
continue to be accounted for by the Guarantor Subsidiaries until the final sales price has been
determined, and therefore are included in the Guarantor Subsidiaries columns in the following
condensed consolidating financial information. As a result, net assets of $38.0 million (consisting
of $282.1 million of property and equipment, offset by $244.1 million of liabilities consisting
primarily of deferred proceeds from the sale) and $47.0 million (consisting of $291.1 million of
property and equipment, offset by $244.1 million of liabilities consisting primarily of deferred
proceeds from the sale) as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and a net
loss (consisting primarily of depreciation expense) of $2.5 million and $9.9 million for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $2.7 million and $8.9 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, related to the mall and are being
accounted for by the Guarantor Subsidiaries. These balances and amounts are not collateral for the
Senior Notes and should not be considered as credit support for the guarantees of the Senior Notes.
24
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
The condensed consolidating financial information of LVSC, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, is as follows (in thousands):
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
September 30, 2010
September 30, 2010
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 837,361 | $ | 351,174 | $ | 1,206,177 | $ | | $ | 2,394,712 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash |
| 1,860 | 201,827 | | 203,687 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
| 97,149 | 17,897 | (115,046 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
3,245 | 143,442 | 472,680 | (369 | ) | 618,998 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories |
2,271 | 9,586 | 15,894 | | 27,751 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 22,729 | 18,191 | (13,989 | ) | 26,931 | ||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
3,738 | 6,439 | 31,304 | | 41,481 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
846,615 | 632,379 | 1,963,970 | (129,404 | ) | 3,313,560 | ||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
134,871 | 3,617,733 | 10,719,261 | | 14,471,865 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries |
5,922,534 | 4,706,875 | | (10,629,409 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
807 | 31,202 | 134,307 | | 166,316 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
| 4,935 | 751,124 | | 756,059 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
32,645 | 87,661 | | (120,306 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany notes receivable |
| 605,977 | | (605,977 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
82,431 | | | (65,576 | ) | 16,855 | ||||||||||||||
Leasehold interests in land, net |
| | 1,251,547 | | 1,251,547 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
590 | | 91,145 | | 91,735 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
1,803 | 30,018 | 148,239 | | 180,060 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,022,296 | $ | 9,716,780 | $ | 15,059,593 | $ | (11,550,672 | ) | $ | 20,247,997 | |||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,770 | $ | 23,914 | $ | 72,848 | $ | (369 | ) | $ | 101,163 | |||||||||
Construction payables |
| 1,860 | 569,337 | | 571,197 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
58,656 | | 56,390 | (115,046 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
1,603 | 1,026 | 12,388 | | 15,017 | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
15,041 | 175,404 | 857,630 | | 1,048,075 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
4,741 | | 3,310 | | 8,051 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
13,989 | | | (13,989 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
3,688 | 30,600 | 538,170 | | 572,458 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
102,488 | 232,804 | 2,110,073 | (129,404 | ) | 2,315,961 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
29,083 | 11,013 | 34,164 | | 74,260 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
34,339 | | 85,967 | (120,306 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany notes payable |
| | 605,977 | (605,977 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 66,143 | 44,195 | (65,576 | ) | 44,762 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred amounts related to mall transactions |
| 443,404 | | | 443,404 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
264,605 | 2,877,595 | 6,425,191 | | 9,567,391 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
430,515 | 3,630,959 | 9,305,567 | (921,263 | ) | 12,445,778 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholders
family |
480,242 | | | | 480,242 | |||||||||||||||
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders equity |
6,111,539 | 6,085,416 | 4,543,993 | (10,629,409 | ) | 6,111,539 | ||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
| 405 | 1,210,033 | | 1,210,438 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity |
6,111,539 | 6,085,821 | 5,754,026 | (10,629,409 | ) | 7,321,977 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 7,022,296 | $ | 9,716,780 | $ | 15,059,593 | $ | (11,550,672 | ) | $ | 20,247,997 | |||||||||
25
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 254,256 | $ | 3,033,625 | $ | 1,667,535 | $ | | $ | 4,955,416 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash |
| 6,954 | 111,687 | | 118,641 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
| 101,485 | 27,646 | (129,131 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
727 | 152,151 | 309,547 | (1,659 | ) | 460,766 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories |
1,906 | 12,332 | 12,835 | | 27,073 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 29,117 | 1,992 | (4,667 | ) | 26,442 | ||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
11,410 | 5,251 | 18,675 | | 35,336 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
268,299 | 3,340,915 | 2,149,917 | (135,457 | ) | 5,623,674 | ||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
140,684 | 3,786,061 | 9,424,526 | | 13,351,271 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
6,242,214 | 4,117,915 | | (10,360,129 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
1,095 | 37,850 | 99,509 | | 138,454 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
34,029 | 85,725 | | (119,754 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany notes receivable |
| 500,518 | | (500,518 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
48,362 | | 243 | (26,386 | ) | 22,219 | ||||||||||||||
Leasehold interests in land, net |
| | 1,209,820 | | 1,209,820 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
| | 50,129 | | 50,129 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
2,338 | 27,555 | 146,646 | | 176,539 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,737,021 | $ | 11,896,539 | $ | 13,080,790 | $ | (11,142,244 | ) | $ | 20,572,106 | |||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,229 | $ | 21,353 | $ | 58,772 | $ | (1,659 | ) | $ | 82,695 | |||||||||
Construction payables |
| 9,172 | 769,599 | | 778,771 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
59,029 | | 70,102 | (129,131 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
6,074 | 351 | 11,907 | | 18,332 | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
6,470 | 170,706 | 609,016 | | 786,192 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
4,667 | | | (4,667 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
3,688 | 81,374 | 88,253 | | 173,315 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
84,157 | 282,956 | 1,607,649 | (135,457 | ) | 1,839,305 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
48,907 | 10,621 | 22,431 | | 81,959 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
15,166 | | 104,588 | (119,754 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany notes payable |
| | 500,518 | (500,518 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 26,386 | | (26,386 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred amounts related to mall transactions |
| 447,274 | | | 447,274 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
327,258 | 4,739,753 | 5,785,136 | | 10,852,147 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
475,488 | 5,506,990 | 8,020,322 | (782,115 | ) | 13,220,685 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholders
family |
410,834 | | | | 410,834 | |||||||||||||||
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders equity |
5,850,699 | 6,389,144 | 3,970,985 | (10,360,129 | ) | 5,850,699 | ||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
| 405 | 1,089,483 | | 1,089,888 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity |
5,850,699 | 6,389,549 | 5,060,468 | (10,360,129 | ) | 6,940,587 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 6,737,021 | $ | 11,896,539 | $ | 13,080,790 | $ | (11,142,244 | ) | $ | 20,572,106 | |||||||||
26
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | | $ | 116,554 | $ | 1,457,297 | $ | | $ | 1,573,851 | ||||||||||
Rooms |
| 105,649 | 102,511 | | 208,160 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 34,304 | 82,882 | | 117,186 | |||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 63,501 | 115,858 | (32,180 | ) | 147,179 | ||||||||||||||
| 320,008 | 1,758,548 | (32,180 | ) | 2,046,376 | |||||||||||||||
Less-promotional allowances |
(128 | ) | (39,908 | ) | (96,626 | ) | (942 | ) | (137,604 | ) | ||||||||||
Net revenues |
(128 | ) | 280,100 | 1,661,922 | (33,122 | ) | 1,908,772 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
| 73,740 | 809,234 | (796 | ) | 882,178 | ||||||||||||||
Rooms |
| 24,218 | 12,648 | | 36,866 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 15,144 | 37,141 | (1,379 | ) | 50,906 | ||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 18,206 | 56,582 | (4,185 | ) | 70,603 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| 5,681 | 32,152 | | 37,833 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
| 62,389 | 131,400 | (313 | ) | 193,476 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate expense |
24,931 | 47 | 30,141 | (26,433 | ) | 28,686 | ||||||||||||||
Rental expense |
| | 9,186 | | 9,186 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
178 | 3 | 9,942 | (16 | ) | 10,107 | ||||||||||||||
Development expense |
425 | | | | 425 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,295 | 55,345 | 128,098 | | 186,738 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| | 16,057 | | 16,057 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
| 322 | 2,084 | | 2,406 | |||||||||||||||
28,829 | 255,095 | 1,274,665 | (33,122 | ) | 1,525,467 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(28,957 | ) | 25,005 | 387,257 | | 383,305 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
1,174 | 23,131 | 1,151 | (22,795 | ) | 2,661 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(3,505 | ) | (26,172 | ) | (69,841 | ) | 22,795 | (76,723 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
(1,500 | ) | 725 | 7,219 | | 6,444 | ||||||||||||||
Loss on modification or early retirement of debt |
| (21,692 | ) | | | (21,692 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income from equity investments in subsidiaries |
240,507 | 213,614 | | (454,121 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
207,719 | 214,611 | 325,786 | (454,121 | ) | 293,995 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
6,778 | 3,285 | (35,224 | ) | | (25,161 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
214,497 | 217,896 | 290,562 | (454,121 | ) | 268,834 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | (54,337 | ) | | (54,337 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
$ | 214,497 | $ | 217,896 | $ | 236,225 | $ | (454,121 | ) | $ | 214,497 | |||||||||
27
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | | $ | 99,015 | $ | 809,240 | $ | | $ | 908,255 | ||||||||||
Rooms |
| 98,619 | 57,054 | | 155,673 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 29,209 | 45,248 | | 74,457 | |||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 33,016 | 67,922 | (5,334 | ) | 95,604 | ||||||||||||||
| 259,859 | 979,464 | (5,334 | ) | 1,233,989 | |||||||||||||||
Less-promotional allowances |
(140 | ) | (40,751 | ) | (51,246 | ) | (708 | ) | (92,845 | ) | ||||||||||
Net revenues |
(140 | ) | 219,108 | 928,218 | (6,042 | ) | 1,141,144 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
| 65,769 | 533,854 | (689 | ) | 598,934 | ||||||||||||||
Rooms |
| 22,284 | 5,812 | | 28,096 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 13,000 | 25,936 | (1,552 | ) | 37,384 | ||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 16,301 | 43,563 | (3,515 | ) | 56,349 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| 12,524 | 16,748 | | 29,272 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
| 58,478 | 68,997 | (286 | ) | 127,189 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate expense |
15,205 | 51 | 2,263 | | 17,519 | |||||||||||||||
Rental expense |
| 74 | 6,617 | | 6,691 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
178 | 1 | 28,676 | | 28,855 | |||||||||||||||
Development expense |
87 | | (7 | ) | | 80 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,064 | 57,215 | 88,398 | | 148,677 | |||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
| 3 | (287 | ) | | (284 | ) | |||||||||||||
18,534 | 245,700 | 820,570 | (6,042 | ) | 1,078,762 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(18,674 | ) | (26,592 | ) | 107,648 | | 62,382 | |||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
1,875 | 17,499 | 196 | (17,971 | ) | 1,599 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(4,566 | ) | (31,287 | ) | (70,632 | ) | 17,971 | (88,514 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
| 194 | (1,758 | ) | | (1,564 | ) | |||||||||||||
Loss on modification of debt |
| | (204 | ) | | (204 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income from equity investments in subsidiaries |
14,889 | 38,825 | | (53,714 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(6,476 | ) | (1,361 | ) | 35,250 | (53,714 | ) | (26,301 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(70,030 | ) | 16,250 | (536 | ) | | (54,316 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(76,506 | ) | 14,889 | 34,714 | (53,714 | ) | (80,617 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | 4,111 | | 4,111 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
$ | (76,506 | ) | $ | 14,889 | $ | 38,825 | $ | (53,714 | ) | $ | (76,506 | ) | |||||||
28
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | | $ | 374,801 | $ | 3,555,121 | $ | | $ | 3,929,922 | ||||||||||
Rooms |
| 345,885 | 233,824 | | 579,709 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 119,099 | 195,245 | | 314,344 | |||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 158,593 | 264,010 | (51,943 | ) | 370,660 | ||||||||||||||
| 998,378 | 4,248,200 | (51,943 | ) | 5,194,635 | |||||||||||||||
Less-promotional allowances |
(375 | ) | (131,352 | ) | (222,500 | ) | (2,272 | ) | (356,499 | ) | ||||||||||
Net revenues |
(375 | ) | 867,026 | 4,025,700 | (54,215 | ) | 4,838,136 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
| 228,572 | 2,141,160 | (1,972 | ) | 2,367,760 | ||||||||||||||
Rooms |
| 72,469 | 28,125 | (1 | ) | 100,593 | ||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 51,481 | 96,127 | (4,601 | ) | 143,007 | ||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 56,043 | 148,597 | (10,307 | ) | 194,333 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| 23,376 | 49,610 | | 72,986 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
| 182,424 | 311,081 | (851 | ) | 492,654 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate expense |
67,238 | 179 | 47,132 | (36,433 | ) | 78,116 | ||||||||||||||
Rental expense |
| | 30,690 | | 30,690 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
535 | 6 | 97,193 | (50 | ) | 97,684 | ||||||||||||||
Development expense |
1,258 | | | | 1,258 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
9,331 | 171,475 | 329,715 | | 510,521 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| | 16,057 | | 16,057 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
| 9,026 | 31,551 | | 40,577 | |||||||||||||||
78,362 | 795,051 | 3,327,038 | (54,215 | ) | 4,146,236 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(78,737 | ) | 71,975 | 698,662 | | 691,900 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
2,493 | 65,164 | 2,507 | (63,797 | ) | 6,367 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(11,669 | ) | (82,880 | ) | (201,123 | ) | 63,797 | (231,875 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
(1,500 | ) | 454 | (5,159 | ) | | (6,205 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on modification or early retirement of debt |
3,358 | (21,692 | ) | (221 | ) | | (18,555 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income from equity investments in subsidiaries |
376,674 | 322,268 | | (698,942 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
290,619 | 355,289 | 494,666 | (698,942 | ) | 441,632 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(16,734 | ) | 2,555 | (32,257 | ) | | (46,436 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income |
273,885 | 357,844 | 462,409 | (698,942 | ) | 395,196 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | (121,311 | ) | | (121,311 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
$ | 273,885 | $ | 357,844 | $ | 341,098 | $ | (698,942 | ) | $ | 273,885 | |||||||||
29
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | | $ | 347,902 | $ | 2,156,331 | $ | | $ | 2,504,233 | ||||||||||
Rooms |
| 334,389 | 157,641 | | 492,030 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 120,492 | 128,360 | | 248,852 | |||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 119,511 | 196,430 | (10,965 | ) | 304,976 | ||||||||||||||
| 922,294 | 2,638,762 | (10,965 | ) | 3,550,091 | |||||||||||||||
Less-promotional allowances |
(484 | ) | (124,039 | ) | (144,424 | ) | (2,238 | ) | (271,185 | ) | ||||||||||
Net revenues |
(484 | ) | 798,255 | 2,494,338 | (13,203 | ) | 3,278,906 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
| 210,468 | 1,471,720 | (1,881 | ) | 1,680,307 | ||||||||||||||
Rooms |
| 73,816 | 19,571 | | 93,387 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 51,482 | 78,159 | (4,796 | ) | 124,845 | ||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 55,903 | 128,563 | (5,640 | ) | 178,826 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| 37,239 | 33,750 | | 70,989 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
| 180,408 | 192,770 | (886 | ) | 372,292 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate expense |
96,217 | 182 | 8,851 | | 105,250 | |||||||||||||||
Rental expense |
| 2,895 | 19,602 | | 22,497 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
832 | 96 | 114,691 | | 115,619 | |||||||||||||||
Development expense |
243 | | 101 | | 344 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
8,378 | 170,711 | 252,470 | | 431,559 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment loss |
| 151,175 | | | 151,175 | |||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
| (107 | ) | 4,607 | | 4,500 | ||||||||||||||
105,670 | 934,268 | 2,324,855 | (13,203 | ) | 3,351,590 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(106,154 | ) | (136,013 | ) | 169,483 | | (72,684 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
9,046 | 28,290 | 506 | (28,002 | ) | 9,840 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(13,993 | ) | (90,380 | ) | (148,132 | ) | 28,002 | (224,503 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
| 659 | (7,193 | ) | | (6,534 | ) | |||||||||||||
Loss on modification of debt |
| | (204 | ) | | (204 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from equity investments in subsidiaries |
(97,299 | ) | 21,608 | | 75,691 | | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(208,400 | ) | (175,836 | ) | 14,460 | 75,691 | (294,085 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(78,652 | ) | 78,537 | (526 | ) | | (641 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(287,052 | ) | (97,299 | ) | 13,934 | 75,691 | (294,726 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| | 7,674 | | 7,674 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
$ | (287,052 | ) | $ | (97,299 | ) | $ | 21,608 | $ | 75,691 | $ | (287,052 | ) | |||||||
30
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) operating
activities |
$ | (86,402 | ) | $ | 243,909 | $ | 1,050,491 | $ | | $ | 1,207,998 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in restricted cash |
| 159 | (836,964 | ) | | (836,805 | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(5,261 | ) | (20,308 | ) | (1,624,695 | ) | | (1,650,264 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
| 823 | 5,128 | | 5,951 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments |
| | (173,774 | ) | | (173,774 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from investments |
| | 173,774 | | 173,774 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition of gaming license and certificate
and other intangible assets |
(590 | ) | | (44,009 | ) | | (44,599 | ) | ||||||||||||
Notes receivable to non-guarantor subsidiaries |
| (43,312 | ) | | 43,312 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
5,265,485 | | | (5,265,485 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends from non-guarantor subsidiaries |
| 41,100 | | (41,100 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Capital contributions to subsidiaries |
(4,467,037 | ) | (16,537 | ) | | 4,483,574 | | |||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) investing
activities |
792,597 | (38,075 | ) | (2,500,540 | ) | (779,699 | ) | (2,525,717 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
6,396 | | | | 6,396 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |
5 | | | | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(70,050 | ) | | | | (70,050 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| (5,265,485 | ) | | 5,265,485 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | (41,100 | ) | 41,100 | | ||||||||||||||
Capital contributions received |
| 4,300,037 | 183,537 | (4,483,574 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | 43,312 | (43,312 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from VOL credit facility |
| | 751,169 | | 751,169 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from Singapore credit facility |
| | 647,988 | | 647,988 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments on senior secured credit facility |
| (1,803,090 | ) | | | (1,803,090 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on Macau credit facility |
| | (524,701 | ) | | (524,701 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on senior notes |
(56,675 | ) | | | | (56,675 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on ferry financing |
| | (26,331 | ) | | (26,331 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on airplane financings |
(2,766 | ) | | | | (2,766 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on HVAC equipment lease |
| (1,293 | ) | | | (1,293 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on FF&E facility and other long-term
debt |
| (108,549 | ) | (1,197 | ) | | (109,746 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
| (9,905 | ) | (55,918 | ) | | (65,823 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) financing
activities |
(123,090 | ) | (2,888,285 | ) | 976,759 | 779,699 | (1,254,917 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
| | 11,932 | | 11,932 | |||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
583,105 | (2,682,451 | ) | (461,358 | ) | | (2,560,704 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
254,256 | 3,033,625 | 1,667,535 | | 4,955,416 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 837,361 | $ | 351,174 | $ | 1,206,177 | $ | | $ | 2,394,712 | ||||||||||
31
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities |
$ | 66,743 | $ | (49,051 | ) | $ | 514,727 | $ | | $ | 532,419 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Change in restricted cash |
| (711 | ) | (34,683 | ) | | (35,394 | ) | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(3,322 | ) | (86,242 | ) | (1,449,514 | ) | | (1,539,078 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
60 | 1,687 | 2,147 | | 3,894 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends received from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
4,651,977 | | | (4,651,977 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends received from non-guarantor subsidiaries |
| 11,406 | | (11,406 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Notes receivable to non-guarantor subsidiaries |
(20,000 | ) | | | 20,000 | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables to non-guarantor subsidiaries |
(57,000 | ) | (125,537 | ) | | 182,537 | | |||||||||||||
Repayments of receivable from non-guarantor subsidiaries |
385,000 | 216,537 | | (601,537 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Capital contributions to subsidiaries |
(5,243,581 | ) | (135,022 | ) | | 5,378,603 | | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(286,866 | ) | (117,882 | ) | (1,482,050 | ) | 316,220 | (1,570,578 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(71,347 | ) | | | | (71,347 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(13 | ) | | | | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital contributions received |
| 5,243,581 | 135,022 | (5,378,603 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| (4,651,977 | ) | | 4,651,977 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | (11,406 | ) | 11,406 | | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings from Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| | 77,000 | (77,000 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | 125,537 | (125,537 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Repayments on borrowings from Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| | (385,000 | ) | 385,000 | | ||||||||||||||
Repayments on borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | (216,537 | ) | 216,537 | | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from Singapore credit facility |
| | 824,986 | | 824,986 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exchangeable bonds |
| | 600,000 | | 600,000 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from ferry financing |
| | 9,888 | | 9,888 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments on Macau credit facility |
| | (150,074 | ) | | (150,074 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on senior secured credit facility |
| (30,000 | ) | | | (30,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on Singapore permanent facilities |
| | (18,223 | ) | | (18,223 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on FF&E facility and other long-term debt |
| (25,471 | ) | (791 | ) | | (26,262 | ) | ||||||||||||
Repayments on airplane financings |
(2,766 | ) | | | | (2,766 | ) | |||||||||||||
Contribution from noncontrolling interest |
| | 41 | | 41 | |||||||||||||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
| (2,880 | ) | (41,879 | ) | | (44,759 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities |
(74,126 | ) | 533,253 | 948,564 | (316,220 | ) | 1,091,471 | |||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
| | 370 | | 370 | |||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(294,249 | ) | 366,320 | (18,389 | ) | | 53,682 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
294,563 | 2,286,825 | 456,775 | | 3,038,163 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 314 | $ | 2,653,145 | $ | 438,386 | $ | | $ | 3,091,845 | ||||||||||
32
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2 | MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety
by, the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and other financial
information included in this Form 10-Q. Certain statements in this Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements. See
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Operations
We view each of our casino properties as an operating segment. Our operating segments in the
United States consist of The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino (The Venetian Las Vegas), The Palazzo
Resort Hotel Casino (The Palazzo) and the Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem (the Sands Bethlehem).
The Venetian Las Vegas and The Palazzo operating segments are managed as a single integrated resort
and have been aggregated into one reportable segment (the Las Vegas Operating Properties),
considering their similar economic characteristics, types of customers, types of service and
products, the regulatory business environment of the operations within each segment and our
organizational and management reporting structure. Our operating segments in the Macau Special
Administrative Region (Macau) of the Peoples Republic of China consist of the Sands Macao; The
Venetian Macao Resort Hotel (The Venetian Macao); the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, Cotai
Striptm and the Plaza Casino (collectively, the Four Seasons Macao); and
other ancillary operations in that region (Other Asia). Our operating segment in Singapore,
Marina Bay Sands, opened on April 27, 2010.
United States
Las Vegas
Our Las Vegas Operating Properties, situated on or near the Las Vegas Strip, consist of The
Venetian Las Vegas, a Renaissance Venice-themed resort; The Palazzo, a resort featuring modern
European ambience and design; and an expo and convention center of approximately 1.2 million square
feet (the Sands Expo Center). Our Las Vegas Operating Properties represent an integrated resort
with approximately 7,100 suites and approximately 225,000 square feet of gaming space. Our Las
Vegas Operating Properties also feature a meeting and conference facility of approximately
1.1 million square feet; Canyon Ranch SpaClub facilities; a Paiza Clubtm
offering services and amenities to premium customers, including luxurious VIP suites, spa
facilities and private VIP gaming room facilities; entertainment facilities; an enclosed retail,
dining and entertainment complex located within The Venetian Las Vegas of approximately 440,000 net
leasable square feet (The Grand Canal Shoppes), which was sold to GGP Limited Partnership (GGP)
in 2004; and an enclosed retail and dining complex located within The Palazzo of approximately
400,000 net leasable square feet (The Shoppes at The Palazzo), which was sold to GGP in February
2008. See Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Property and Equipment, Net regarding the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo.
Approximately 63.9% and 64.0% of gross revenue at our Las Vegas Operating Properties for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from room revenues, food
and beverage services, and other non-gaming sources, and 36.1% and 36.0%, respectively, was derived
from gaming activities. The percentage of non-gaming revenue reflects the integrated resorts
emphasis on the group convention and trade show business.
Pennsylvania
We are in the process of developing Sands Bethlehem, a gaming, hotel, retail and dining
complex located on the site of the historic Bethlehem Steel Works in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. Sands
Bethlehem is also expected to be home to the National Museum of Industrial History, an arts and
cultural center, and the broadcast home of the local PBS affiliate. We own 86% of the economic
interest of the gaming, hotel and entertainment portion of the property through our ownership
interest in Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC and more than 35% of the economic interest of the retail
portion of the property through our ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Retail, LLC.
33
Table of Contents
On May 22, 2009, we opened the casino component of Sands Bethlehem, which features slot
machines and several food and beverage offerings, as well as the parking garage and surface
parking. In April 2010, we recommenced construction of a 300-room hotel tower, which is expected to
open in the second quarter of 2011. In May 2010, we paid a $16.5 million table game licensing fee
and in July 2010, we were issued a gaming certificate by the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board and
commenced table games operations. Construction activities on the remaining components, which
include an approximate 200,000-square-foot retail facility, a 50,000-square-foot multipurpose event
center and a variety of additional dining options, have been suspended temporarily and are intended
to recommence when capital markets and general economic conditions improve, and when the suspended
components are able to be financed. Approximately 91.2% and 89.7% of the gross revenue at Sands
Bethlehem for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the period ended September 30, 2009,
respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder derived from food and beverage
services and other non-gaming sources.
Macau
Sands
China Ltd. (SCL) completed an initial public offering (the SCL Offering) by listing its ordinary shares
on The Main Board of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited in November 2009.
We own 70.3% of SCL, which includes the operations of the Sands Macao, The Venetian Macao, Four
Seasons Macao and other ancillary operations that support these properties. We operate the gaming
areas within these properties pursuant to a 20-year gaming subconcession.
We own and operate the Sands Macao, the first Las Vegas-style casino in Macau. The Sands Macao
includes approximately 229,000 square feet of gaming space; a 289-suite hotel tower; several
restaurants; a spacious Paiza Club; a theater and other high-end services and amenities.
Approximately 94.1% and 93.4% of the gross revenue at the Sands Macao for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder
primarily derived from room revenues and food and beverage services.
We also own and operate The Venetian Macao, the anchor property of our master-planned
development of integrated resort properties that we refer to as the Cotai
Striptm in Macau. The Venetian Macao, with a theme similar to that of The
Venetian Las Vegas, features a 39-floor luxury hotel with over 2,900 suites; approximately
550,000 square feet of gaming space; approximately 1.0 million square feet of retail and dining
offerings; a convention center and meeting room complex of approximately 1.2 million square feet; a
15,000-seat arena that has hosted a wide range of entertainment and sporting events; and an
1,800-seat theater that features an original production from Cirque du Soleil. Approximately 82.9%
and 81.4% of the gross revenue at The Venetian Macao for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder derived from room
revenues and other non-gaming sources.
We own the Four Seasons Macao, which is located adjacent and connected to The Venetian Macao.
The Four Seasons Macao is an integrated resort that features 360 rooms and suites managed and
operated by Four Seasons Hotels Inc.; 19 Paiza mansions; approximately 70,000 square feet of gaming
space; retail space of approximately 211,000 square feet, which is connected to the mall at The
Venetian Macao; several food and beverage offerings; and conference, banquet and other facilities
operated by us. The property will also feature the Four Seasons Apartment Hotel Macao, Cotai
Striptm (the Four Seasons Apartments), an apart-hotel tower that consists of
approximately 1.0 million square feet of Four Seasons-serviced and -branded luxury apart-hotel
units and common areas. We have completed the structural work of the tower and expect to monetize
the units within the Four Seasons Apartments subject to market conditions and obtaining the
necessary government approvals. Approximately 85.0% and 73.6% of the gross revenue at the Four
Seasons Macao for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was derived from
gaming activities, with the remainder derived from mall revenues, room revenues and other
non-gaming sources.
Singapore
Our wholly owned subsidiary, Marina Bay Sands Pte. Ltd. (MBS), entered into a development
agreement (the Development Agreement) with the Singapore Tourism Board (the STB) to build and
operate an integrated resort called Marina Bay Sands in Singapore. Marina Bay Sands, portions of
which opened on April 27, 2010, is expected to include three 55-story hotel towers (with over 2,500
rooms and suites), the Sands SkyParktm (which sits atop the hotel towers and
features an infinity swimming pool and several dining options), a casino, an enclosed retail,
dining and entertainment complex of approximately 800,000 net leasable square feet, a convention
center and meeting room complex of approximately 1.3 million square feet, theaters and a landmark
iconic structure at the bay-front promenade that will contain an art/science museum. As of
September 30, 2010, we have capitalized 7.23 billion Singapore dollars (SGD, approximately
$5.49 billion at exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) in costs for this project,
including the land premium and SGD 505.0 million (approximately $383.7 million at exchange rates in
effect on September 30, 2010) in outstanding construction payables. We expect to spend
approximately SGD 1.2 billion (approximately $0.9 billion at
exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) through 2011 on additional costs to complete
the construction of the integrated resort, FF&E, pre-opening and other costs, and to pay
outstanding construction payables, as noted above, of which approximately SGD 340 million
(approximately $260 million at exchange rates in effect on September 30, 2010) is expected to be
spent during 2010. As we have obtained Singapore-denominated financing and primarily pay our costs
in Singapore dollars, our exposure to foreign exchange gains and losses is expected to be minimal.
Based on our current development plan, we expect to progressively open the majority of Marina Bay
Sands throughout 2010. Approximately 81.6% of the gross revenue at the Marina Bay Sands for the
period ended September 30, 2010, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder derived
from room revenues, food and beverage services and other non-gaming sources.
34
Table of Contents
Development Projects
We have suspended portions of our development projects to focus our development efforts on
those projects with the highest expected rates of return on invested capital. Should general
economic conditions fail to improve, if we are unable to obtain sufficient funding such that
completion of our suspended projects is not probable, or should management decide to abandon
certain projects, all or a portion of our investment to date on our suspended projects could be
lost and would result in an impairment charge. In addition, we may be subject to penalties under
the termination clauses in our construction contracts or termination rights under our management
contracts with certain hotel management companies.
United States
We were constructing a high-rise residential condominium tower (the Las Vegas Condo Tower),
located on the Las Vegas Strip between The Palazzo and The Venetian Las Vegas. We suspended our
construction activities for the project due to reduced demand for Las Vegas Strip condominiums and
the overall decline in general economic conditions. We intend to recommence construction when
demand and conditions improve and expect that it will take approximately 18 months thereafter to
complete construction of the project. As of September 30, 2010, we have capitalized construction
costs of $176.2 million for this project. The impact of the suspension on the estimated overall
cost of the project is currently not determinable with certainty.
Macau
We submitted plans to the Macau government for our other Cotai Strip developments, which
represent three integrated resort developments, in addition to The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons
Macao, on an area of approximately 200 acres (which we refer to as parcels 3, 5 and 6, and 7 and
8). Subject to the approval from the Macau government, the developments are expected to include
hotels, exhibition and conference facilities, gaming areas, showrooms, spas, dining, retail and
entertainment facilities and other amenities. We commenced construction or pre-construction on
these developments and plan to operate the related gaming areas under our Macau gaming
subconcession. In addition, we are completing the development of some public areas surrounding our
Cotai Strip properties on behalf of the Macau government. We currently intend to develop our other
Cotai Strip properties as follows:
| Parcels 5 and 6 We are staging the construction of the integrated resort on parcels 5
and 6. Upon completion of phases I and II of the project, the integrated resort will feature
approximately 6,000 luxury and mid-scale hotel rooms, approximately 300,000 square feet of
gaming space, approximately 1.2 million square feet of retail, entertainment and dining
facilities, exhibition and conference facilities and a multipurpose theater. Phase I of the
project is expected to include two hotel towers with approximately 3,700 hotel rooms to be
managed by Shangri-La International Hotel Management Limited (Shangri-La) under its
Shangri-La and Traders brands and Sheraton International Inc. and Sheraton Overseas
Management Co. (collectively Starwood) under its Sheraton brand, as well as completion of
the structural work of an adjacent hotel tower with approximately 2,300 rooms to be managed
by Starwood under its Sheraton brand. Phase I will also include the gaming space and a
partial opening of the retail and exhibition and conference facilities. The total cost to
complete phase I is expected to be approximately $2.0 billion. Phase II of the project
includes completion of the additional Sheraton hotel tower, the theater and the remaining
retail facilities. The total cost to complete phase II is expected to be approximately
$300 million. Phase III of the project is expected to include a fourth hotel and mixed-use
tower to be managed by Starwood under its St. Regis brand. The total cost to complete
phase III is expected to be approximately $450 million. In connection with entering into the
$1.75 billion Venetian Orient Limited (VOL) credit facility to be used together with
$500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, we are mobilizing to recommence
construction. We are currently working with the Macau government to obtain sufficient
construction labor for the project. Until adequate labor quotas are received, the timing of
the completion of phases I and II is currently not determinable with certainty; however, we
are progressing on alternative scenarios for completion of selected portions of phases I and
II with the construction labor currently onsite. We intend to commence construction of
phase III of the project as demand and market conditions warrant it. As of September 30,
2010, we have capitalized construction costs of $1.88 billion for the entire project
(including $134.2 million in outstanding construction payables). Our management agreements
with Starwood and Shangri-La impose certain construction deadlines and opening obligations
on us and certain past and/or anticipated delays, as described above, would allow Starwood
and Shangri-La to terminate their respective agreements. We are currently negotiating (or
undertaking to negotiate) amendments to the management agreements with Starwood and
Shangri-La to provide for new opening timelines. |
35
Table of Contents
| Parcels 7 and 8 The integrated resort on parcels 7 and 8 is expected to be similar in
size and scope to the integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6. We had commenced
pre-construction and have capitalized construction costs of $102.4 million as of September
30, 2010. We intend to commence construction after the integrated resorts on parcels 5 and 6
and 3 are complete, necessary government approvals are obtained, regional and global
economic conditions improve, future demand warrants it and additional
financing is obtained. |
| Parcel 3 The integrated resort on parcel 3 will be connected to The Venetian Macao and
Four Seasons Macao. The multi-hotel complex is intended to include a gaming area, a shopping
mall and serviced luxury apart-hotel units. We had commenced pre-construction and have
capitalized construction costs of $34.5 million as of September 30, 2010. We intend to
commence construction after the integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6 is complete, necessary
government approvals are obtained, regional and global economic conditions improve, future
demand warrants it and additional financing is obtained. |
The impact of the delayed construction on our previously estimated cost to complete our Cotai
Strip developments is currently not determinable with certainty. As of September 30, 2010, we have
capitalized an aggregate of $6.0 billion in construction costs for our Cotai Strip developments,
including The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, as well as our investments in transportation
infrastructure, including our passenger ferry service operations. In addition to funding phases I
and II of parcels 5 and 6 with the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility, we will need to arrange
additional financing to fund the balance of our Cotai Strip developments and there is no assurance
that we will be able to obtain any of the additional financing required.
Land concessions in Macau generally have an initial term of 25 years with automatic extensions
of 10 years thereafter in accordance with Macau law. We have received a land concession from the
Macau government to build on parcels 1, 2 and 3, including the sites on which The Venetian Macao
(parcel 1) and Four Seasons Macao (parcel 2) are located. In November 2009, we made an initial
premium payment of 700.0 million patacas (approximately $87.6 million at exchange rates in effect
on September 30, 2010) for the land concession on parcels 5 and 6, which became effective in May
2010 when it was published in Macaus Official Gazette. We do not own these land sites in Macau;
however, the land concession grants us exclusive use of the land. As specified in the land
concession, we are required to pay premiums for each parcel, which are either payable in a single
lump sum upon acceptance of the land concession by the Macau government or in seven semi-annual
installments (provided that the outstanding balance is due upon the completion of the corresponding
integrated resort), as well as annual rent for the term of the land concession. Based on historical
experience with the Macau government with respect to our land concessions for the Sands Macao and
parcels 1, 2, 3 and 5 and 6, management believes that the land concession for parcels 7 and 8 will
be granted; however, if we do not obtain the land concession, we could forfeit all or a substantial
portion of the $102.4 million in capitalized construction costs, as of September 30, 2010, related
to our development on parcels 7 and 8.
Under our land concession for parcel 3, we were initially required to complete the
corresponding development by August 2011. The Macau government has granted us a two-year extension
to complete the development of parcel 3, which now must be completed by April 2013. The land
concession for parcels 5 and 6 contains a similar requirement that the corresponding development be
completed by May 2014 (48 months from the date the land concession became effective). We believe
that if we are not able to complete the developments by the respective deadlines, we will likely be
able to obtain extensions from the Macau government; however, no assurances can be given that
additional extensions will be granted. If we are unable to meet the deadlines and those deadlines
are not extended, we could lose our land concessions for parcels 3 and 5 and 6, which would
prohibit us from operating any facilities developed under the respective land concessions. As a
result, we could forfeit all or a substantial portion of the $34.5 million and $1.88 billion in
capitalized construction costs, as of September 30, 2010, related to our developments on parcels 3
and 5 and 6, respectively.
Other
When the current economic environment and access to capital improve, we may continue exploring
the possibility of developing and operating additional properties, including integrated resorts, in
additional Asian and U.S. jurisdictions, and in Europe.
36
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates are
based on historical information, information that is currently available to us and on various other
assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could
vary from those estimates and we may change our estimates and assumptions in future evaluations.
Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a material effect on our financial condition
and results of operations. We believe that these critical accounting policies affect our more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial
statements. For a discussion of our significant accounting policies and estimates, please refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presented
in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2010.
There were no newly identified significant accounting estimates in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, nor were there any material changes to the critical accounting policies and
estimates discussed in our 2009 Annual Report.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See related disclosure at Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements Note 1 Organization and Business of Company Recent Accounting
Pronouncements.
Summary Financial Results
The following table summarizes our results of operations:
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 1,908,772 | $ | 1,141,144 | 67.3 | % | $ | 4,838,136 | $ | 3,278,906 | 47.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
1,525,467 | 1,078,762 | 41.4 | % | 4,146,236 | 3,351,590 | 23.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
383,305 | 62,382 | 514.4 | % | 691,900 | (72,684 | ) | 1,051.9 | % | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
293,995 | (26,301 | ) | 1,217.8 | % | 441,632 | (294,085 | ) | 250.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
268,834 | (80,617 | ) | 433.5 | % | 395,196 | (294,726 | ) | 234.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable
to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
214,497 | (76,506 | ) | 380.4 | % | 273,885 | (287,052 | ) | 195.4 | % |
Percent of Net Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months | Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
79.9 | % | 94.5 | % | 85.7 | % | 102.2 | % | ||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
20.1 | % | 5.5 | % | 14.3 | % | (2.2 | )% | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
15.4 | % | (2.3 | )% | 9.1 | % | (9.0 | )% | ||||||||
Net income (loss) |
14.1 | % | (7.1 | )% | 8.2 | % | (9.0 | )% | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
11.2 | % | (6.7 | )% | 5.7 | % | (8.8 | )% |
Operating Results
Key Operating Revenue Measurements
Operating revenues at our Las Vegas Operating Properties, The Venetian Macao, Four Seasons
Macao and Marina Bay Sands are dependent upon the volume of customers who stay at the hotel, which
affects the price that can be charged for hotel rooms and the volume of table games and slot
machine play. Operating revenues at Sands Macao and Sands Bethlehem are principally driven by
casino customers who visit the properties on a daily basis.
37
Table of Contents
The following are the key measurements we use to evaluate operating revenues:
Casino revenue measurements for the U.S.: Table games drop (drop) and slot handle
(handle) are volume measurements. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of drop or
handle that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Table games drop represents the
sum of markers issued (credit instruments) less markers paid at the table, plus cash deposited in
the table drop box. Slot handle is the gross amount wagered for the period cited. We view table
games win as a percentage of drop and slot hold as a percentage of slot handle. Based upon our mix
of table games, our table games in Las Vegas have produced a trailing 12-month win percentage
(calculated before discounts) of 17.1% and slot machines produce a statistical average hold
percentage (calculated before slot club cash incentives) generally between 7.0% and 8.0%. Actual
win may vary from the statistical average. Generally, slot machine play is conducted on a cash
basis. In Las Vegas, approximately 62.7% of our table games play, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, was conducted on a credit basis. In Pennsylvania, our table games play is
primarily conducted on a cash basis. We expect to increase the credit extended to our players as
operations ramp up at Sands Bethlehem.
Casino revenue measurements for Macau and Singapore: Macau and Singapore table games are
segregated into two groups, consistent with the Macau and Singapore markets convention: Rolling
Chip play (all VIP players) and Non-Rolling Chip play (mostly non-VIP players). The volume
measurement for Rolling Chip play is non-negotiable gaming chips wagered and lost. The volume
measurement for Non-Rolling Chip play is table games drop as previously described. Rolling Chip and
Non-Rolling Chip volume measurements are not comparable as the amounts wagered and lost are
substantially higher than the amounts dropped. Slot handle is the gross amount wagered for the
period cited.
We view Rolling Chip win as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip win as a
percentage of drop and slot hold as a percentage of slot handle. Win or hold percentage represents
the percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip drop or slot handle that is won by the
casino and recorded as casino revenue. Based upon our mix of table games, our Rolling Chip win
percentage (calculated before discounts and commissions) is expected to be 2.7% to 3.0% and our
Non-Rolling Chip table games have produced a trailing 12-month win percentage of 24.4%, 20.2% and
24.7% at The Venetian Macao, Sands Macao and Four Seasons Macao, respectively. Our Macau slot
machines produce a statistical average win percentage generally between 6.0% and 7.0%. Actual win
may vary from the statistical average. Generally, gaming is conducted on a cash basis, with only
36.6% of our Macau table games play, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, being conducted
on a credit basis. This percentage is expected to increase as we increase the credit extended to
our premium players and gaming promoters for table games play. In Singapore, 34.4% of table games
play, for the period from opening through September 30, 2010, was conducted on a credit basis. This
percentage is expected to increase as we increase the credit extended to our premium players and as
our operations ramp up at Marina Bay Sands.
Hotel revenue measurements: Hotel occupancy rate, which is the average percentage of
available hotel rooms occupied during a period, and average daily room rate, which is the average
price of occupied rooms per day, are used as performance indicators. Revenue per available room
represents a summary of hotel average daily room rates and occupancy. Because not all available
rooms are occupied, average daily room rates are normally higher than revenue per available room.
Reserved rooms where the guests do not show up for their stay and lose their deposit may be re-sold
to walk-in guests. These rooms are considered to be occupied twice for statistical purposes due to
obtaining the original deposit and the walk-in guest revenue. In cases where a significant number
of rooms are resold, occupancy rates may be in excess of 100% and revenue per available room may be
higher than the average daily room rate.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
Operating Revenues
Our net revenues consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | 1,573,851 | $ | 908,255 | 73.3 | % | ||||||
Rooms |
208,160 | 155,673 | 33.7 | % | ||||||||
Food and beverage |
117,186 | 74,457 | 57.4 | % | ||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
147,179 | 95,604 | 53.9 | % | ||||||||
2,046,376 | 1,233,989 | 65.8 | % | |||||||||
Less promotional allowances |
(137,604 | ) | (92,845 | ) | 48.2 | % | ||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 1,908,772 | $ | 1,141,144 | 67.3 | % | ||||||
38
Table of Contents
Consolidated net revenues were $1.91 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an
increase of $767.6 million as compared to the $1.14 billion for the three months ended September
30, 2009. The increase in net revenues was driven by $485.9 million of net revenues at Marina Bay
Sands, which opened in April 2010, as well as increases across our other operating properties.
Casino revenues increased $665.6 million as compared to the three months ended September 30,
2009. Of the increase, $414.5 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands, as well as a $213.3
million increase at our Macau operations driven by an increase in Rolling Chip activity at The
Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, and Non-Rolling Chip activity at The Venetian Macao and
Sands Macao. The following table summarizes the results of our casino activity:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau Operations: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 540,284 | $ | 420,830 | 28.4 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 956,867 | $ | 834,905 | 14.6 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
26.6 | % | 23.0 | % | 3.6 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 11,035,144 | $ | 9,062,194 | 21.8 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
3.05 | % | 2.83 | % | 0.22 | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 853,705 | $ | 609,734 | 40.0 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
6.5 | % | 7.5 | % | 1.0 | pts | ||||||
Sands Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 281,764 | $ | 275,360 | 2.3 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 649,605 | $ | 626,428 | 3.7 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
20.3 | % | 19.0 | % | 1.3 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 6,275,044 | $ | 5,479,118 | 14.5 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
3.00 | % | 3.37 | % | (0.37 | )pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 435,713 | $ | 327,485 | 33.0 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
5.7 | % | 6.6 | % | (0.9 | )pts | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 142,256 | $ | 54,836 | 159.4 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 98,537 | $ | 82,946 | 18.8 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
29.5 | % | 22.3 | % | 7.2 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 4,740,576 | $ | 2,183,677 | 117.1 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
3.08 | % | 2.31 | % | 0.77 | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 120,328 | $ | 60,620 | 98.5 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
5.4 | % | 5.4 | % | | pts | ||||||
U.S. Operations: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 116,554 | $ | 99,015 | 17.7 | % | ||||||
Table games drop |
$ | 476,492 | $ | 429,717 | 10.9 | % | ||||||
Table games win percentage |
17.1 | % | 12.2 | % | 4.9 | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 663,607 | $ | 672,208 | (1.3 | )% | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
7.9 | % | 7.8 | % | 0.1 | pts | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 78,522 | $ | 58,215 | 34.9 | % | ||||||
Table games drop |
$ | 72,910 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Table games win percentage |
13.0 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 934,586 | $ | 813,292 | 14.9 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
7.2 | % | 7.2 | % | | pts | ||||||
Singapore Operations: |
||||||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 414,471 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 892,079 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
22.1 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 10,254,561 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
2.65 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 1,358,705 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
5.9 | % | | % | | pts |
39
Table of Contents
In our experience, average win percentages remain steady when measured over extended periods
of time, but can vary considerably within shorter time periods as a result of the statistical
variances that are associated with games of chance in which large amounts are wagered.
Room revenues increased $52.5 million as compared to the three months ended September 30,
2009. The increase in revenues was attributable to $38.2 million from Marina Bay Sands, as well as
increases at The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao driven by increased visitation and at our
Las Vegas Operating Properties driven by higher occupancy due to increased group business. The
suites at Sands Macao are primarily provided to casino patrons on a complimentary basis. The
following table summarizes the results of our room activity:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Room revenues in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau Operations: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 50,614 | $ | 45,005 | 12.5 | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 217 | $ | 198 | 9.6 | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
90.1 | % | 88.1 | % | 2.0 | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 195 | $ | 175 | 11.4 | % | ||||||
Sands Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 6,089 | $ | 6,585 | (7.5 | )% | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 239 | $ | 254 | (5.9 | )% | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
96.6 | % | 97.9 | % | (1.3 | )pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 231 | $ | 248 | (6.9 | )% | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 7,632 | $ | 5,464 | 39.7 | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 309 | $ | 294 | 5.1 | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
70.9 | % | 56.2 | % | 14.7 | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 219 | $ | 165 | 32.7 | % | ||||||
U.S. Operations: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 105,649 | $ | 98,619 | 7.1 | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 174 | $ | 172 | 1.2 | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
93.7 | % | 88.4 | % | 5.3 | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 163 | $ | 152 | 7.2 | % | ||||||
Singapore Operations: |
||||||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 38,176 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 246 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
68.2 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 168 | $ | | | % |
Food and beverage revenues increased $42.7 million as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to $31.9 million in revenues at Marina
Bay Sands.
Convention, retail and other revenues increased $51.6 million as compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. The increase is primarily attributable to $31.3 million in revenues at
Marina Bay Sands and a $9.7 million increase across our Macau properties driven by an increase in
mall revenues at Four Seasons Macao.
40
Table of Contents
Operating Expenses
The breakdown of operating expenses is as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | 882,178 | $ | 598,934 | 47.3 | % | ||||||
Rooms |
36,866 | 28,096 | 31.2 | % | ||||||||
Food and beverage |
50,906 | 37,384 | 36.2 | % | ||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
70,603 | 56,349 | 25.3 | % | ||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
37,833 | 29,272 | 29.2 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative |
193,476 | 127,189 | 52.1 | % | ||||||||
Corporate expense |
28,686 | 17,519 | 63.7 | % | ||||||||
Rental expense |
9,186 | 6,691 | 37.3 | % | ||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
10,107 | 28,855 | (65.0 | )% | ||||||||
Development expense |
425 | 80 | NM | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
186,738 | 148,677 | 25.6 | % | ||||||||
Impairment loss |
16,057 | | NM | |||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
2,406 | (284 | ) | NM | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 1,525,467 | $ | 1,078,762 | 41.4 | % | ||||||
NM | Percent change not meaningful. |
Operating expenses were $1.53 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an
increase of $446.7 million as compared to $1.08 billion for the three months ended September 30,
2009. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the opening of Marina Bay
Sands, increased casino activity across all properties and an increase in general and
administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization expense.
Casino expenses increased $283.2 million as compared to the three months ended September 30,
2009. Of the increase, $143.2 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands and $110.2 million was
due to the 39.0% gross win tax on increased casino revenues across all of our Macau operations.
The provision for doubtful accounts was $37.8 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010, compared to $29.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase
primarily relates to a $17.8 million provision on receivables at Marina Bay Sands, offset by an
overall decrease in provision on receivables across our other properties as a result of a higher
provision during the three months ended September 30, 2009, due to the economic conditions during
2009. The amount of this provision can vary over short periods of time because of factors specific
to the customers who owe us money at any given time. We believe that the amount of our provision
for doubtful accounts in the future will depend upon the state of the economy, our credit
standards, our risk assessments and the judgment of our employees responsible for granting credit.
General and administrative expenses increased $66.3 million as compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. Of the increase, $56.1 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands and
$11.8 million was due to payroll-related expenses in Macau and Las Vegas.
Pre-opening expenses were $10.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to $28.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. Pre-opening expense
represents personnel and other costs incurred prior to the opening of new ventures, which are
expensed as incurred. Pre-opening expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010, were
primarily related to costs associated with recommencing work on our Cotai Strip development on
parcels 5 and 6 and activities at Marina Bay Sands.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $38.1 million as compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of the opening of Marina Bay Sands,
which contributed $44.1 million.
Impairment loss was $16.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, which related
to equipment in Macau that is expected to be disposed of.
41
Table of Contents
Adjusted Property EBITDA
Adjusted property EBITDA is used by management as the primary measure of the operating
performance of our segments. Adjusted property EBITDA is net income (loss) attributable to Las
Vegas Sands Corp. before stock-based compensation expense, corporate expense, rental expense,
pre-opening expense, development expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment loss, gain
(loss) on disposal of assets, interest, other income (expense), loss on modification or early
retirement of debt, income taxes and net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests.
The following table summarizes information related to our segments (see Item 1 Financial
Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note 11 Segment Information
for discussion of our operating segments and a reconciliation of adjusted property EBITDA to net
income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp.):
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 211,496 | $ | 150,389 | 40.6 | % | ||||||
Sands Macao |
74,103 | 77,115 | (3.9 | )% | ||||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
48,962 | 10,152 | 382.3 | % | ||||||||
Other Asia |
(5,563 | ) | (8,088 | ) | 31.2 | % | ||||||
United States: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
58,271 | 34,452 | 69.1 | % | ||||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
16,361 | 8,323 | 96.6 | % | ||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
241,589 | | | % | ||||||||
Total adjusted property EBITDA |
$ | 645,219 | $ | 272,343 | 136.9 | % | ||||||
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Macau properties increased $99.4 million as compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2009, driven by an increase of $61.1 million at The Venetian
Macao. As previously described, the increase across the properties was primarily attributable to a
combined increase in net revenues of $234.8 million, partially offset by an increase of
$110.2 million in gross win tax on increased casino revenues.
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Las Vegas Operating Properties increased $23.8 million as
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009. As previously described, the increase was
primarily attributable to an increase in net revenues of $61.7 million, offset by increases in the
associated operating expenses and an increase in general and administrative expenses.
Adjusted property EBITDA at Sands Bethlehem increased $8.0 million as compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2009. The increase was driven by the commencement of table games
operations in July 2010, as well as continued ramp up of operations at the property, which opened
in May 2009.
Adjusted property EBITDA at Marina Bay Sands, which opened in April 2010, does not have a
comparable prior-year period. Results of the operations of Marina Bay Sands are as previously
described.
Interest Expense
The following table summarizes information related to interest expense on long-term debt:
Three Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest cost (which includes
the amortization of deferred
financing costs and original issue
discount) |
$ | 108,726 | $ | 105,462 | ||||
Less capitalized interest |
(32,003 | ) | (16,948 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 76,723 | $ | 88,514 | ||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 102,367 | $ | 94,635 | ||||
Weighted average total debt balance |
$ | 10,502,487 | $ | 11,210,464 | ||||
Weighted average interest rate |
4.1 | % | 3.8 | % |
42
Table of Contents
Interest cost increased $3.3 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009,
resulting primarily from an increase in the weighted average interest rate, which was primarily
driven by the 100 basis point increase in the credit spread on the extended term loan portions of
the U.S. credit facility in connection with the August 2010 amendment, partially offset by a
decrease in the average total debt balance, as we paid down debt in the U.S. and Macau. The
increase in interest cost was partially offset by an increase in capitalized interest driven by the
recommencement of activities at our Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6 in Macau.
Other Factors Effecting Earnings
Other income was $6.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to
other expense of $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The income during the
three months ended September 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to foreign exchange gains in
Macau and Singapore offset by a decrease in the fair value of our interest rate cap agreements held
in Macau and Singapore.
The loss on modification or early retirement of debt was $21.7 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2010, and primarily related to the amendment of our U.S. credit facility in
August 2010. See Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements Note 4 Long-term Debt.
Our effective income tax rate was 8.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as
compared to 206.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The effective income tax rate for
the three months ended September 30, 2010, reflects a 17% statutory tax rate on our Singapore
operations; a zero percent tax rate from our Macau gaming operations due to our income tax
exemption in Macau, which is set to expire in 2013; and non-realizable net operating losses in
foreign jurisdictions, which unfavorably impacted our effective income tax rate. The effective
income tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2009, includes the recording of a
valuation allowance on the net deferred tax assets of our U.S. operations. Management does not
anticipate recording an income tax benefit related to deferred tax assets generated by operations
in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions; however, to the extent that the financial results of
these operations improve and it becomes more likely than not that these deferred tax assets are
realizable, we will be able to reduce the valuation allowances.
The net income attributable to our noncontrolling interests was $54.3 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to a net loss of $4.1 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009. The net income during the three months ended September 30, 2010, was
primarily attributable to the noncontrolling interest of SCL.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
Operating Revenues
Our net revenues consisted of the following:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | 3,929,922 | $ | 2,504,233 | 56.9 | % | ||||||
Rooms |
579,709 | 492,030 | 17.8 | % | ||||||||
Food and beverage |
314,344 | 248,852 | 26.3 | % | ||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
370,660 | 304,976 | 21.5 | % | ||||||||
5,194,635 | 3,550,091 | 46.3 | % | |||||||||
Less promotional allowances |
(356,499 | ) | (271,185 | ) | 31.5 | % | ||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 4,838,136 | $ | 3,278,906 | 47.6 | % | ||||||
Consolidated net revenues were $4.84 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an
increase of $1.56 billion as compared to the $3.28 billion for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The increase was driven by an increase of $725.5 million in net revenues across our Macau
properties, primarily driven by an increase in casino activities, $702.3 million of net revenues at
Marina Bay Sands, which opened in April 2010, and an increase of $123.0 million in net revenues at
Sands Bethlehem, which opened in May 2009.
43
Table of Contents
Casino revenues increased $1.43 billion as compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2009. Of the increase, $675.0 million was attributable to our Macau operations driven primarily by
an increase in Rolling Chip activity, as well as $605.2 million in revenues attributable to Marina
Bay Sands. The following table summarizes the results of our casino activity:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau Operations: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 1,521,090 | $ | 1,214,083 | 25.3 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 2,776,469 | $ | 2,458,155 | 12.9 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
25.5 | % | 23.2 | % | 2.3 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 30,850,448 | $ | 27,652,284 | 11.6 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
3.11 | % | 2.74 | % | 0.37 | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 2,226,029 | $ | 1,703,548 | 30.7 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
7.0 | % | 7.5 | % | (0.5 | )pts | ||||||
Sands Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 856,778 | $ | 724,236 | 18.3 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 1,842,682 | $ | 1,834,840 | 0.4 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
20.4 | % | 19.1 | % | 1.3 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 19,902,862 | $ | 15,324,411 | 29.9 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
3.08 | % | 2.97 | % | 0.11 | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 1,204,842 | $ | 904,733 | 33.2 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
5.8 | % | 6.7 | % | (0.9 | )pts | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 365,253 | $ | 129,832 | 181.3 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 293,102 | $ | 250,435 | 17.0 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
27.7 | % | 24.2 | % | 3.5 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 13,303,508 | $ | 3,308,855 | 302.1 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
2.91 | % | 2.60 | % | 0.31 | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 376,638 | $ | 160,642 | 134.5 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
5.5 | % | 5.6 | % | (0.1 | )pts | ||||||
U.S. Operations: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 374,801 | $ | 347,902 | 7.7 | % | ||||||
Table games drop |
$ | 1,440,665 | $ | 1,260,288 | 14.3 | % | ||||||
Table games win percentage |
18.5 | % | 17.3 | % | 1.2 | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 1,972,181 | $ | 2,046,734 | (3.6 | )% | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
7.8 | % | 7.3 | % | 0.5 | pts | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 206,751 | $ | 88,181 | 134.5 | % | ||||||
Table games drop |
$ | 72,910 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Table games win percentage |
13.0 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 2,803,567 | $ | 1,182,886 | 137.0 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
7.0 | % | 7.5 | % | (0.5 | )pts | ||||||
Singapore Operations: |
||||||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 605,249 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 1,430,375 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
21.9 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 14,138,555 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
2.52 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 1,841,031 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
6.3 | % | | % | | pts |
In our experience, average win percentages remain steady when measured over extended periods
of time, but can vary considerably within shorter time periods as a result of the statistical
variances that are associated with games of chance in which large amounts are wagered.
44
Table of Contents
Room revenues increased $87.7 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
The increase in room revenues was attributable to $47.8 million from Marina Bay Sands, as well as
increases at The Venetian Macao, Four Seasons Macao and at the Las Vegas Operating Properties
driven by increased visitation. The following table summarizes the results of our room activity:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Room revenues in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau Operations: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 145,953 | $ | 124,538 | 17.2 | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 207 | $ | 205 | 1.0 | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
91.6 | % | 80.6 | % | 11.0 | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 190 | $ | 165 | 15.2 | % | ||||||
Sands Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 18,919 | $ | 19,704 | (4.0 | )% | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 248 | $ | 258 | (3.9 | )% | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
97.2 | % | 97.5 | % | (0.3 | )pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 241 | $ | 252 | (4.4 | )% | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 21,117 | $ | 13,399 | 57.6 | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 295 | $ | 293 | 0.7 | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
71.0 | % | 46.5 | % | 24.5 | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 209 | $ | 136 | 53.7 | % | ||||||
U.S. Operations: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 345,885 | $ | 334,389 | 3.4 | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 191 | $ | 194 | (1.5 | )% | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
94.3 | % | 89.7 | % | 4.6 | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 180 | $ | 174 | 3.4 | % | ||||||
Singapore Operations: |
||||||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 47,835 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 242 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
64.8 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 157 | $ | | | % |
Food and beverage revenues increased $65.5 million as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to $45.3 million in revenues at Marina
Bay Sands and $15.9 million at our Macau properties.
Convention, retail and other revenues increased $65.7 million as compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The increase is primarily attributable to $43.8 million in revenues at
Marina Bay Sands.
Operating Expenses
The breakdown of operating expenses is as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | 2,367,760 | $ | 1,680,307 | 40.9 | % | ||||||
Rooms |
100,593 | 93,387 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||
Food and beverage |
143,007 | 124,845 | 14.5 | % | ||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
194,333 | 178,826 | 8.7 | % | ||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
72,986 | 70,989 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative |
492,654 | 372,292 | 32.3 | % | ||||||||
Corporate expense |
78,116 | 105,250 | (25.8 | )% | ||||||||
Rental expense |
30,690 | 22,497 | 36.4 | % | ||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
97,684 | 115,619 | (15.5 | )% | ||||||||
Development expense |
1,258 | 344 | 265.7 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
510,521 | 431,559 | 18.3 | % | ||||||||
Impairment loss |
16,057 | 151,175 | (89.4 | )% | ||||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
40,577 | 4,500 | NM | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 4,146,236 | $ | 3,351,590 | 23.7 | % | ||||||
NM | Percent change not meaningful. |
45
Table of Contents
Operating expenses were $4.15 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an
increase of $794.6 million as compared to $3.35 billion for the nine months ended September 30,
2009. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to increased casino activity
and increases in general and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense,
partially offset by decreases due to a $151.2 million impairment charge and a $42.5 million legal
settlement included in corporate expense that were recorded during the nine months ended September
30, 2009.
Casino expenses increased $687.5 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2009. Of the increase, $349.4 million was due to the 39.0% gross win tax on increased casino
revenues across all of our Macau operations, as well as $216.1 million and $81.5 million in
expenses attributable to Marina Bay Sands and Sands Bethlehem, respectively.
The provision for doubtful accounts was $73.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, compared to $71.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase was
attributable to a $17.8 million provision for casino receivables at Marina Bay Sands, offset by an
overall decrease in provision for receivables across all other properties as a result of a higher
provision during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, due to the economic conditions during
2009. The amount of this provision can vary over short periods of time because of factors specific
to the customers who owe us money at any given time. We believe that the amount of our provision
for doubtful accounts in the future will depend upon the state of the economy, our credit
standards, our risk assessments and the judgment of our employees responsible for granting credit.
General and administrative expenses increased $120.4 million as compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. Of the increase, $92.2 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands,
$11.8 million was attributable to Sands Bethlehem and $31.5 million was due to payroll-related
expenses in Macau and Las Vegas, offset by cost saving initiatives that were implemented during
2009.
Pre-opening expenses were $97.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared
to $115.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Pre-opening expense represents
personnel and other costs incurred prior to the opening of new ventures, which are expensed as
incurred. Pre-opening expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, were primarily related
to activities at Marina Bay Sands and costs associated with recommencing work on our Cotai Strip
development on parcels 5 and 6.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $79.0 million as compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of the opening of Marina Bay Sands
and a full nine months of depreciation expense at Sands Bethlehem, which contributed $70.3 million
and $10.6 million, respectively.
Impairment loss was $16.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to $151.2 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The 2010 impairment loss related
to equipment in Macau that is expected to be disposed of.
Loss on disposal of assets was $40.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
compared to $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The 2010 loss related to the disposition of construction materials in Macau and Las Vegas.
46
Table of Contents
Adjusted Property EBITDA
Adjusted property EBITDA is used by management as the primary measure of the operating
performance of our segments. Adjusted property EBITDA is net income (loss) attributable to Las
Vegas Sands Corp. before stock-based compensation expense, corporate expense, rental expense,
pre-opening expense, development expense, depreciation and amortization, impairment loss, gain
(loss) on disposal of assets, interest, other expense, loss on modification or early retirement of
debt, income taxes and net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests. The following
table summarizes information related to our segments (see Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note 11 Segment Information for discussion of our
operating segments and a reconciliation of adjusted property EBITDA to net income (loss)
attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp.):
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 574,240 | $ | 381,849 | 50.4 | % | ||||||
Sands Macao |
225,076 | 188,522 | 19.4 | % | ||||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
101,456 | 20,083 | 405.2 | % | ||||||||
Other Asia |
(16,149 | ) | (23,989 | ) | 32.7 | % | ||||||
United States: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
229,555 | 202,336 | 13.5 | % | ||||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
39,450 | 11,160 | 253.5 | % | ||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
336,055 | | | % | ||||||||
Total adjusted property EBITDA |
$ | 1,489,683 | $ | 779,961 | 91.0 | % | ||||||
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Macau properties increased $318.2 million as compared to the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, led by an increase of $192.4 million at The Venetian Macao.
As previously described, the increase across the properties was primarily attributable to a
combined increase in net revenues of $725.5 million, partially offset by an increase of
$349.4 million in gross win tax on increased casino revenues.
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Las Vegas Operating Properties increased $27.2 million as
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to an
increase in net revenues of $62.8 million, partially offset by increases in the associated
operating expenses.
Adjusted property EBITDA at Sands Bethlehem, which opened in May 2009, and Marina Bay Sands,
which opened in April 2010, do not have a comparable prior-year period. Results of the operations
of Sands Bethlehem and Marina Bay Sands are as previously described.
Interest Expense
The following table summarizes information related to interest expense on long-term debt:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest cost (which includes
the amortization of deferred
financing costs and original issue
discount) |
$ | 306,201 | $ | 269,622 | ||||
Less capitalized interest |
(74,326 | ) | (45,119 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 231,875 | $ | 224,503 | ||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 279,669 | $ | 250,286 | ||||
Weighted average total debt balance |
$ | 10,771,226 | $ | 10,774,878 | ||||
Weighted average interest rate |
3.8 | % | 3.3 | % |
Interest cost increased $36.6 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
resulting from an increase in our weighted average interest rate, driven primarily by the 325 basis point
increase in the credit spread on borrowings under our Macau credit facility in connection with the
amendment in August 2009. The increase in interest cost was partially offset by an increase in
capitalized interest driven by the recommencement of activities at our Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6
in Macau.
47
Table of Contents
Other Factors Effecting Earnings
Other expense was $6.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to
$6.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The expense during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to foreign exchange losses and decreases in the fair value of our interest rate cap
agreements in Macau and Singapore.
The loss on modification or early retirement of debt was $18.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, and primarily related to a $21.1 million loss related to the amendment of our
U.S. credit facility in August 2010, offset by a gain on early
retirement of debt of $3.4 million, which related to the repurchase of $60.3 million of the
outstanding principal of our senior notes. See Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements Note 4 Long-term Debt.
Our effective income tax rate was 10.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as
compared to 0.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The effective income tax rate for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, reflects the commencement of our Singapore operations
that are subject to a statutory tax rate of 17%; a zero percent tax rate from our Macau gaming
operations due to our income tax exemption in Macau, which is set to expire in 2013; and
non-realizable net operating losses in foreign jurisdictions, which unfavorably impacted our
effective income tax rate. A valuation allowance was recorded during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, on the net deferred tax assets of our U.S. operations. Management does not
anticipate recording an income tax benefit related to deferred tax assets generated by operations
in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions; however, to the extent that the financial results of
these operations improve and it becomes more likely than not that these deferred tax assets are
realizable, we will be able to reduce the valuation allowances.
The net income attributable to our noncontrolling interests was $121.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, as compared to a net loss of $7.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The net income during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, was
primarily attributable to the noncontrolling interest of SCL.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows Summary
Our cash flows consisted of the following:
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Net cash generated from operations |
$ | 1,207,998 | $ | 532,419 | ||||
Investing cash flows: |
||||||||
Change in restricted cash |
(836,805 | ) | (35,394 | ) | ||||
Capital expenditures |
(1,650,264 | ) | (1,539,078 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
5,951 | 3,894 | ||||||
Purchases of investments |
(173,774 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from investments |
173,774 | | ||||||
Acquisition of gaming license and certificate and other intangible assets |
(44,599 | ) | | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,525,717 | ) | (1,570,578 | ) | ||||
Financing cash flows: |
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
6,396 | | ||||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(70,050 | ) | (71,347 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long term-debt |
1,399,157 | 1,434,874 | ||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(2,524,602 | ) | (227,325 | ) | ||||
Other |
(65,818 | ) | (44,731 | ) | ||||
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities |
(1,254,917 | ) | 1,091,471 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
11,932 | 370 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (2,560,704 | ) | $ | 53,682 | |||
Cash Flows Operating Activities
Table games play at our Las Vegas Operating Properties is conducted on a cash and credit basis
while table games play at our Macau and Singapore properties is generally conducted on a cash
basis. Slot machine play is primarily conducted on a cash basis. The retail hotel rooms business is
generally conducted on a cash basis, the group hotel rooms business is conducted on a cash and
credit basis, and banquet business is conducted primarily on a credit basis resulting in operating
cash flows being generally affected by changes in operating income and accounts receivable. Net
cash generated from operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, increased
$675.6 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase was
attributable primarily to the increase in our operating income during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, as previously described, and favorable changes in our working capital,
primarily related to the commencement of operations at Marina Bay Sands.
48
Table of Contents
Cash Flows Investing Activities
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, totaled $1.65 billion,
including $1.32 billion for construction and development activities in Singapore; $270.3 million
for construction and development activities in Macau (primarily for our Cotai Strip development on
parcels 5 and 6); $34.1 million for construction activities at Sands Bethlehem; and $25.8 million
at our Las Vegas Operating Properties and for corporate and other activities.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we paid $27.5 million for our Singapore
gaming license and $16.5 million for our Pennsylvania table games certificate.
Cash Flows Financing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash flows used in financing activities were
$1.25 billion, which was primarily attributable to the repayments of $1.8 billion of borrowings
under our U.S. credit facility and $524.7 million of borrowings under our Macau credit facility,
repayment of $91.8 million under our FF&E credit facility, payments of $56.7 million to purchase
our senior notes and dividends paid to preferred stockholders of $70.1 million, offset by proceeds
of $751.2 million under our VOL credit facility and $648.0 million under our Singapore credit
facility.
Development Financing Strategy
Through September 30, 2010, we have funded our development projects primarily through
borrowings under our U.S., Macau and Singapore credit facilities, operating cash flows, proceeds
from our recent equity offerings and proceeds from the disposition of non-core assets.
The U.S. credit facility, as amended in August 2010, requires our Las Vegas operations to
comply with certain financial covenants at the end of each quarter, including maintaining a maximum
leverage ratio of net debt, as defined, to trailing twelve-month adjusted earnings before interest,
income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined (Adjusted EBITDA). The maximum leverage
ratio is 6.5x for the quarterly periods ended September 30, 2010 through June 30, 2011, decreases
to 6.0x for the quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2011, decreases to 5.5x for
the quarterly periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2012, and then decreases to 5.0x for all
quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. The Macau credit facility, as amended in August
2009, requires our Macau operations to comply with similar financial covenants, including
maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The maximum leverage ratio is 3.5x
for the quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2010, and then decreases to 3.0x for
all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. We can elect to contribute up to $50 million and
$20 million of cash on hand to our Las Vegas and Macau operations, respectively, on a bi-quarterly
basis; such contributions having the effect of increasing Adjusted EBITDA by the corresponding
amount during the applicable quarter for purposes of calculating compliance with the maximum
leverage ratio (the EBITDA true-up). If we are unable to maintain compliance with the financial
covenants under these credit facilities, we would be in default under the respective credit
facilities. A default under the U.S. credit facility would trigger a cross-default under our
airplane financings, which, if the respective lenders chose to accelerate the indebtedness
outstanding under these agreements, would result in a default under our senior notes. A default
under the Macau credit facility would trigger a cross-default under our ferry financing. Any
defaults or cross-defaults under these agreements would allow the lenders, in each case, to
exercise their rights and remedies as defined under their respective agreements. If the lenders
were to exercise their rights to accelerate the due dates of the indebtedness outstanding, there
can be no assurance that we would be able to repay or refinance any amounts that may become due and
payable under such agreements, which could force us to restructure or alter our operations or debt
obligations.
In 2008, we completed a $475.0 million convertible senior notes offering and a $2.1 billion
common and preferred stock and warrants offering. In 2009, we completed a $600.0 million
exchangeable bond offering and our $2.5 billion SCL Offering. A portion of the proceeds from these
offerings was used in the U.S. to pay down $775.9 million under the revolving portion of the
U.S. credit facility in March 2010 and $1.0 billion under the term loan portions of the U.S. credit
facility in August 2010, and to exercise the EBITDA true-up provision during the quarterly periods
ended March 31 and September 30, 2010, and was contributed to Las Vegas Sands, LLC to reduce its
net debt in order to maintain compliance with the maximum leverage ratio for the quarterly periods
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. As of September 30, 2010, our U.S. leverage ratio
was 5.9x, compared to the maximum leverage ratio allowed of 6.5x, and our Macau leverage ratio was
1.8x, compared to the maximum leverage ratio allowed of 3.5x.
We held unrestricted and restricted cash and cash equivalents of approximately $2.39 billion
and $959.7 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2010. We believe that the cash on hand, cash
flow generated from operations and available borrowings under our credit facilities will be
sufficient to fund our development plans and maintain compliance with the financial covenants of
our U.S. and Macau credit facilities. In the normal course of our activities, we will continue to
evaluate our capital structure and opportunities for enhancements thereof. In August 2010, we
completed an amendment to our U.S. credit facility, which included a $1.0 billion pay
down of our term loans and a reduction of our revolving credit facility commitments in
exchange for the extension of maturities and other modifications to the credit agreement, thereby
increasing our financial flexibility. Additionally, in connection with the $1.75 billion VOL credit
facility to be used together with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, we are
mobilizing to recommence construction of our Cotai Strip development on parcels
5 and 6.
49
Table of Contents
Aggregate Indebtedness and Other Known Contractual Obligations
In August 2010, we amended our U.S. credit facility, which among other things, extended $1.42
billion in aggregate principal amount of the term B facility to November 2016, $284.5 million in
aggregate principal amount of delayed draw I facility to November 2016, $207.9 million in aggregate
principal amount of delayed draw II facility to November 2015 (collectively the Extended Term
Loans) and to extend the availability of $532.5 million of the revolving facility to May 2014 (the
Extended Revolving Facility). The credit spread for the Extended Term Loans increased by 100
basis points to 1.75% per annum for borrowings bearing interest at a base rate or 2.75% per annum
at an adjusted Eurodollar rate. The credit spread for the Extended Revolving Facility increased by
75 basis points to 1.25% per annum for borrowings bearing interest at a base rate or 2.25% per
annum at an adjusted Eurodollar rate.
As of September 30, 2010, there had been no material changes to our aggregated indebtedness
and other known contractual obligations, which are set forth in the table included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, with the exception of the following:
| borrowings of $887.9 million under our Singapore credit facility (which mature in
March 2015 and include quarterly payments commencing with the quarter ending March 31,
2011, with the remaining principal due in full upon maturity); |
||
| borrowings of $751.0 million under the term loan of our VOL credit facility (which
mature in June 2015 and include quarterly payments commencing with the quarter ending
March 31, 2013, with the remaining principal due in full upon maturity); |
||
| repayment of $1.0 billion under the Extended Term Loans of our U.S. credit facility
(which would have matured in May 2013 and 2014); |
||
| repayment of $775.9 million under the revolving portion of our U.S. credit facility
(which would have matured in May 2012 with no interim amortization); |
||
| repayment of $91.8 million under our FF&E credit facility (which would have matured
in June 2011); |
||
| repayments of $479.6 million under the revolving portion of our Macau credit facility
(which would have matured in May 2011 with no interim amortization); |
||
| repurchases of $60.3 million of the outstanding principal of our senior notes (which
would have matured in February 2015); and |
||
| subsequent to September 30, 2010, repayment of $11.0 million of outstanding
borrowings under our Macau vehicle loan. |
Restrictions on Distributions
We are a parent company with limited business operations. Our main asset is the stock and
membership interests of our subsidiaries. The debt instruments of our U.S., Macau and Singapore
subsidiaries contain certain restrictions that, among other things, limit the ability of certain
subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, issue disqualified stock or equity interests, pay
dividends or make other distributions, repurchase equity interests or certain indebtedness, create
certain liens, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, enter into certain mergers or
consolidations or sell our assets of our company without prior approval of the lenders or
noteholders.
Inflation
We believe that inflation and changing prices have not had a material impact on our sales,
revenues or income from continuing operations during the past year.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor
Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements include the discussions of our business strategies and expectations concerning future
operations, margins, profitability, liquidity and capital resources. In addition, in certain
portions included in this report, the words: anticipates, believes, estimates, seeks,
expects, plans, intends and similar expressions, as they relate to our company or management,
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that any forward-looking statements will prove to
be correct. These forward- looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks associated with:
| our substantial leverage, debt service and debt covenant compliance (including
sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates, as a significant portion of our debt is
variable-rate debt, and other capital markets trends); |
||
| disruptions in the global financing markets and our ability to obtain sufficient funding
for our current and future developments, including our Cotai Strip, Singapore, Pennsylvania
and Las Vegas developments; |
50
Table of Contents
| general economic and business conditions which may impact levels of disposable income,
consumer spending, group meeting business, pricing of hotel rooms and retail and mall sales; |
| the impact of the suspensions of certain of our development projects and our ability to
meet certain development deadlines; |
| the uncertainty of tourist behavior related to spending and vacationing at casino-resorts
in Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore; |
| regulatory policies in mainland China or other countries in which our customers reside,
including visa restrictions limiting the number of visits or the length of stay for visitors
from mainland China to Macau and restrictions on foreign currency exchange or importation of
currency; |
| our dependence upon properties primarily in Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore for all of our
cash flow; |
| the expected annualized savings and enhanced operating leverage to be generated from our
cost-cutting measures, which were fully implemented during 2009, may not be fully realized; |
| our relationship with GGP or any successor owner of The Shoppes at The Palazzo and The
Grand Canal Shoppes, and the ability of GGP to perform under the purchase and sale agreement
for The Shoppes at The Palazzo, as amended; |
| new developments, construction and ventures, including our Cotai Strip developments,
Marina Bay Sands and Sands Bethlehem; |
| the passage of new legislation and receipt of governmental approvals for our proposed
developments in Macau and other jurisdictions where we are planning to operate; |
| our insurance coverage, including the risk that we have not obtained sufficient coverage
or will only be able to obtain additional coverage at significantly increased rates; |
| disruptions or reductions in travel due to acts of terrorism; |
| disruptions or reductions in travel, as well as disruptions in our operations, due to
outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, avian flu or
swine flu; |
| government regulation of the casino industry, including gaming license regulation, the
legalization of gaming in other jurisdictions and regulation of gaming on the Internet; |
| increased competition in Las Vegas and Macau, including recent and upcoming increases in
hotel rooms, meeting and convention space, and retail space; |
| fluctuations in the demand for all-suites rooms, occupancy rates and average daily room
rates in Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore; |
| the popularity of Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore as convention and trade show
destinations; |
| new taxes, changes to existing tax rates or proposed changes in tax legislation; |
| our ability to maintain our gaming licenses, certificates and subconcession; |
| the completion of infrastructure projects in Macau and Singapore; |
| increased competition for labor and materials due to other planned construction projects
in Macau and Singapore; and |
| the outcome of any ongoing and future litigation. |
51
Table of Contents
All future written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained or referred to in this section. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and
it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. Readers are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update
any forward-looking statements after the date of this report as a result of new information, future
events or developments, except as required by federal securities laws.
ITEM 3 | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such
as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to
market risk is interest rate risk associated with our variable rate long-term debt, which we
attempt to manage through the use of interest rate cap agreements. We do not hold or issue
financial instruments for trading purposes and do not enter into derivative transactions that would
be considered speculative positions. Our derivative financial instruments consist exclusively of
interest rate cap agreements, which do not qualify for hedge accounting. Interest differentials
resulting from these agreements are recorded on an accrual basis as an adjustment to interest
expense.
To manage exposure to counterparty credit risk in interest rate cap agreements, we enter into
agreements with highly rated institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of
such agreements. Frequently, these institutions are also members of the bank group providing our
credit facilities, which management believes further minimizes the risk of nonperformance.
The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to
changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents notional amounts and weighted
average interest rates by contractual maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the
contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. Weighted average variable rates are based
on September 30, 2010, LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR plus the applicable interest rate spread in accordance
with the respective debt agreements. The information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents, which
is the Companys reporting currency, for the years ending September 30:
Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Thereafter | Total | Value(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 189.7 | $ | | $ | 189.7 | $ | 191.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate(2) |
| | | | 6.4 | % | | 6.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate |
$ | 569.8 | $ | 1,259.1 | $ | 1,690.8 | $ | 1,504.0 | $ | 3,023.5 | $ | 1,877.2 | $ | 9,924.4 | $ | 9,208.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate(2) |
4.4 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.1 | % | 3.5 | % | 3.9 | % | 4.0 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cap agreements(3) |
$ | | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.7 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1.1 | $ | 1.1 |
(1) | The estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices, if
available, or by pricing models based on the value of related cash
flows discounted at current market interest rates. |
|
(2) | Based upon contractual interest rates for fixed rate indebtedness or
current LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR for variable-rate indebtedness. Based on
variable-rate debt levels as of September 30, 2010, an assumed
100 basis point change in LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR would cause our annual
interest cost to change approximately $98.9 million. |
|
(3) | As of September 30, 2010, we have 34 interest rate cap agreements with
an aggregate fair value of approximately $1.1 million based on quoted
market values from the institutions holding the agreements. |
Borrowings under the U.S. credit facility, as amended, bear interest at our election, at
either an adjusted Eurodollar rate or at an alternative base rate plus a credit spread. The
portions of the revolving facility and term loans that were not extended bear interest at the
alternative base rate plus 0.5% per annum or 0.75% per annum, respectively, or at the adjusted
Eurodollar rate plus 1.5% per annum or 1.75% per annum, respectively. The Extended Revolving
Facility and Extended Term Loans bear interest at the alternative base rate plus 1.25% per annum or
1.75% per annum, respectively, or at the adjusted Eurodollar rate plus 2.25% per annum or 2.75% per
annum, respectively. Applicable spreads under the U.S. credit facility are subject to downward
adjustments based upon our credit rating. Borrowings under the Macau credit facility, as amended,
bear interest at our election, at either an adjusted Eurodollar rate (or in
the case of the local term loan, adjusted HIBOR) plus 4.5% per annum or at an alternative base
rate plus 3.5% per annum. Applicable spreads under the Macau revolving facility and the local term
loan are subject to a downward adjustment if certain consolidated leverage ratios are satisfied.
Borrowings under the Singapore credit facility bear interest at SOR plus a spread of 2.25% per
annum. Borrowings under the airplane financings bear interest at LIBOR plus approximately 1.5% per
annum. Borrowings under the ferry financing, as amended, bear interest at HIBOR plus 2.5% per
annum.
52
Table of Contents
Foreign currency transaction losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, were
$1.0 million primarily due to U.S. denominated debt held in Macau. We may be vulnerable to changes
in the U.S. dollar/Macau pataca exchange rate. Based on balances as of September 30, 2010, an
assumed 1% change in the U.S. dollar/Macau pataca exchange rate would cause a foreign currency
transaction gain/loss of approximately $21.9 million. We do not hedge our exposure to foreign
currencies; however, we maintain a significant amount of our operating funds in the same currencies
in which we have obligations; thereby, reducing our exposure to currency fluctuations.
See also Liquidity and Capital Resources.
ITEM 4 | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) of the Company as of September 30, 2010, and have concluded that they are effective at
the reasonable assurance level.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In
addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems,
there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company is party to litigation matters and claims related to its operations. For more
information, see the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and
Part I Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies Litigation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
53
Table of Contents
ITEM 1A | RISK FACTORS |
The only change from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, is set forth below.
The ultimate final purchase price on the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo could have an adverse effect
on the results of operations or cash flows at our Las Vegas Operating Properties.
Pursuant to the amended Agreement for the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo, a
calculation was to be performed during the third quarter of 2010 (on the 30-month anniversary of
the closing date) to determine whether additional amounts were owed to the Company. The Company and
GGP have entered into several additional amendments to the Agreement to defer the time to reach
agreement on the final purchase price as both parties are continuing to work on various matters
related to the calculation of the net operating income of The Shoppes at The Palazzo during the
measurement period. The Company may be required to record a loss on the sale in the future
depending on the resolution of such matters and the resulting agreed upon final purchase price.
ITEM 5 | OTHER INFORMATION |
On November 3, 2010, Wing T. Chao and the Company entered into a consulting agreement
pursuant to which Mr. Chao will advise the Company on its design and development projects. Under
the agreement, Mr. Chao will provide consulting services at least four days per month and will be
compensated at the rate of $6,000 per day. Mr. Chaos previously announced departure from the Companys Board of Directors became
effective on November 3, 2010.
54
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
ITEM 6 | EXHIBITS |
List of Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description of Document | |||
10.1 | Amendment and Restatement Agreement dated as of August 17, 2010,
to the Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of May 23, 2007, as
amended, among Las Vegas Sands, LLC, the Guarantors party thereto,
the Lenders party thereto and The Bank of Nova Scotia (including
as Exhibit A thereto the Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty
Agreement dated as of August 18, 2010 among Las Vegas Sands, LLC,
the Guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto, Goldman
Sachs Credit Partners L.P, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., The Bank
of Nova Scotia and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch,
Barclays Capital Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.). |
|||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document(1) |
|||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document(1) |
|||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document(1) |
|||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document(1) |
|||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document(1) |
|||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document(1) |
(1) | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is
deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for
purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these
sections. |
55
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. |
||||
By: | /s/ Sheldon G. Adelson | |||
Sheldon G. Adelson | ||||
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
November 8, 2010
By: | /s/ Kenneth J. Kay | |||
Kenneth J. Kay | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
November 8, 2010
56