LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP - Quarter Report: 2011 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from
to
Commission file number 001-32373
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
(Exact name of registration as specified in its charter)
Nevada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
27-0099920 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
3355 Las Vegas Boulevard South Las Vegas, Nevada (Address of principal executive offices) |
89109 (Zip Code) |
(702) 414-1000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrants classes of common stock,
as of the latest practicable date.
Class | Outstanding at April 29, 2011 | |
Common Stock ($0.001 par value) | 728,978,326 shares |
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
ITEM 1 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share | ||||||||
and per share data) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,133,941 | $ | 3,037,081 | ||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
146,532 | 164,315 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
803,100 | 716,919 | ||||||
Inventories |
33,633 | 32,260 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
33,860 | 61,606 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
54,219 | 46,726 | ||||||
Total current assets |
4,205,285 | 4,058,907 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
14,693,989 | 14,502,197 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
144,402 | 155,378 | ||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
512,345 | 645,605 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
8,729 | 10,423 | ||||||
Leasehold interests in land, net |
1,403,797 | 1,398,840 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
87,905 | 89,805 | ||||||
Other assets, net |
180,538 | 183,153 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 21,236,990 | $ | 21,044,308 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 87,734 | $ | 113,505 | ||||
Construction payables |
477,989 | 516,981 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
23,421 | 42,625 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
1,072,192 | 1,160,234 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
8,631 | | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
917,007 | 767,068 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
2,586,974 | 2,600,413 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
81,182 | 78,240 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
124,038 | 115,219 | ||||||
Deferred proceeds from sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo |
243,928 | 243,928 | ||||||
Deferred gain on sale of The Grand Canal Shoppes |
49,942 | 50,808 | ||||||
Deferred rent from mall transactions |
139,392 | 147,378 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
9,185,752 | 9,373,755 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
12,411,208 | 12,609,741 | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, issued to Principal
Stockholders family, 5,250,000 shares issued and
outstanding, after allocation of fair value of attached
warrants, aggregate redemption/liquidation value of
$577,500 |
526,515 | 503,379 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized, 2,437,523 and 3,614,923 shares issued and
outstanding with warrants to purchase up to 2,751,506
and 22,663,212 shares of common stock |
139,819 | 207,356 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares
authorized, 728,656,309 and 707,507,982 shares issued
and outstanding |
729 | 708 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
5,544,162 | 5,444,705 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
164,012 | 129,519 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
1,108,859 | 880,703 | ||||||
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders equity |
6,957,581 | 6,662,991 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
1,341,686 | 1,268,197 | ||||||
Total equity |
8,299,267 | 7,931,188 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 21,236,990 | $ | 21,044,308 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share and | ||||||||
per share data) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
Casino |
$ | 1,664,489 | $ | 1,061,770 | ||||
Rooms |
231,974 | 180,782 | ||||||
Food and beverage |
145,393 | 92,079 | ||||||
Convention, retail and other |
164,655 | 108,215 | ||||||
2,206,511 | 1,442,846 | |||||||
Less-promotional allowances |
(94,592 | ) | (107,958 | ) | ||||
Net revenues |
2,111,919 | 1,334,888 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||
Casino |
921,536 | 694,635 | ||||||
Rooms |
48,453 | 29,654 | ||||||
Food and beverage |
71,703 | 44,303 | ||||||
Convention, retail and other |
87,245 | 58,404 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
35,058 | 16,442 | ||||||
General and administrative |
210,485 | 126,259 | ||||||
Corporate expense |
37,576 | 23,476 | ||||||
Rental expense |
13,156 | 8,698 | ||||||
Pre-opening expense |
9,471 | 37,459 | ||||||
Development expense |
573 | 157 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
190,237 | 153,089 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
499 | 492 | ||||||
1,625,992 | 1,193,068 | |||||||
Operating income |
485,927 | 141,820 | ||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||
Interest income |
2,047 | 1,633 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(73,585 | ) | (78,165 | ) | ||||
Other expense |
(4,675 | ) | (6,448 | ) | ||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
| 2,176 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
409,714 | 61,016 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
(45,211 | ) | (13,202 | ) | ||||
Net income |
364,503 | 47,814 | ||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(75,180 | ) | (30,233 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
289,323 | 17,581 | ||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
(19,598 | ) | (23,350 | ) | ||||
Accretion to redemption value of preferred stock
issued to Principal Stockholders family |
(23,136 | ) | (23,136 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock inducement and repurchase premiums |
(18,433 | ) | | |||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ | 228,156 | $ | (28,905 | ) | |||
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | 0.32 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | 0.28 | $ | (0.04 | ) | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
723,389,226 | 660,280,641 | ||||||
Diluted |
811,239,242 | 660,280,641 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income
Las Vegas Sands Corp. Stockholders Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital in | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Excess of | Comprehensive | Retained | Comprehensive | Noncontrolling | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Par Value | Income | Earnings | Income | Interests | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2010 |
$ | 234,607 | $ | 660 | $ | 5,114,851 | $ | 26,748 | $ | 473,833 | $ | 1,089,888 | $ | 6,940,587 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 17,581 | 17,581 | 30,233 | 47,814 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
| | | (877 | ) | | (877 | ) | (1,447 | ) | (2,324 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
16,704 | 28,786 | 45,490 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| | 73 | | | | 73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation |
| | (195 | ) | | | | (195 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 14,970 | | | 853 | 15,823 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed contribution from Principal Stockholder |
| | 58 | | | | 58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared, net of amounts previously
accrued |
| | | | (16,496 | ) | | (16,496 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated but undeclared dividend
requirement on preferred stock issued to
Principal Stockholders family |
| | | | (6,854 | ) | | (6,854 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion to redemption value of preferred
stock issued to Principal Stockholders
family |
| | | | (23,136 | ) | | (23,136 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 234,607 | $ | 660 | $ | 5,129,757 | $ | 25,871 | $ | 444,928 | $ | 1,119,527 | $ | 6,955,350 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
$ | 207,356 | $ | 708 | $ | 5,444,705 | $ | 129,519 | $ | 880,703 | $ | 1,268,197 | $ | 7,931,188 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 289,323 | 289,323 | 75,180 | 364,503 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation adjustment |
| | | 34,493 | | 34,493 | (2,537 | ) | 31,956 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
323,816 | 72,643 | 396,459 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
| 1 | 8,419 | | | 91 | 8,511 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax shortfall from stock-based compensation |
| | (11 | ) | | | | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 20,084 | | | 755 | 20,839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants |
(65,225 | ) | 20 | 70,965 | | | | 5,760 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of preferred stock |
(2,312 | ) | | | | (2,232 | ) | | (4,544 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared, net of amounts previously
accrued |
| | | | (12,744 | ) | | (12,744 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated but undeclared dividend
requirement on preferred stock issued to
Principal Stockholders family |
| | | | (6,854 | ) | | (6,854 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion to redemption value of preferred
stock issued to Principal Stockholders
family |
| | | | (23,136 | ) | | (23,136 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock inducement premium |
| | | | (16,201 | ) | | (16,201 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | 139,819 | $ | 729 | $ | 5,544,162 | $ | 164,012 | $ | 1,108,859 | $ | 1,341,686 | $ | 8,299,267 | ||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 364,503 | $ | 47,814 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash generated from operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
190,237 | 153,089 | ||||||
Amortization of leasehold interests in land included in rental expense |
13,156 | 8,698 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount |
11,871 | 7,809 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred gain and rent |
(1,290 | ) | (1,290 | ) | ||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
| (2,176 | ) | |||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
499 | 492 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
20,239 | 15,093 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
35,058 | 16,442 | ||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss |
2,462 | (3,198 | ) | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
35,372 | 4,965 | ||||||
Non-cash contribution from Principal Stockholder included in corporate expense |
| 58 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(119,311 | ) | 8,070 | |||||
Inventories |
(1,239 | ) | 2,139 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
(3,135 | ) | (8,050 | ) | ||||
Leasehold interests in land |
| (13,891 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(26,026 | ) | 4,164 | |||||
Accrued interest payable |
(19,148 | ) | (1,784 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
8,631 | 7,033 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
(93,501 | ) | 37,317 | |||||
Net cash generated from operating activities |
418,378 | 282,794 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
149,962 | (182,575 | ) | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(332,508 | ) | (538,201 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
3,097 | 2,311 | ||||||
Acquisition of intangible assets |
(329 | ) | | |||||
Purchases of investments |
| (173,978 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(179,778 | ) | (892,443 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
8,511 | 73 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |
5,760 | | ||||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(19,598 | ) | (23,350 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt (Note 3) |
| 272,056 | ||||||
Repayments on long-term debt (Note 3) |
(121,721 | ) | (847,326 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of preferred stock |
(4,544 | ) | | |||||
Payments of preferred stock inducement premium |
(16,201 | ) | | |||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
| (821 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(147,793 | ) | (599,368 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
6,053 | 5,446 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
96,860 | (1,203,571 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
3,037,081 | 4,955,416 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 3,133,941 | $ | 3,751,845 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 80,881 | $ | 72,149 | ||||
Cash payments for taxes, net of refunds |
$ | (5,726 | ) | $ | 120 | |||
Changes in construction payables |
$ | (38,992 | ) | $ | (5,519 | ) | ||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Capitalized stock-based compensation costs |
$ | 600 | $ | 730 | ||||
Property and equipment acquired under capital lease |
$ | | $ | 773 | ||||
Accumulated but undeclared dividend requirement on preferred stock issued to Principal
Stockholders family |
$ | 6,854 | $ | 6,854 | ||||
Accretion to redemption value of preferred stock issued to Principal Stockholders family |
$ | 23,136 | $ | 23,136 | ||||
Warrants exercised and settled through tendering of preferred stock |
$ | 65,225 | $ | | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OF COMPANY
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVSC), a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiaries
(collectively the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010. The year-end balance sheet data
was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments and normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair statement
of the results for the interim period have been included. The interim results reflected in the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of expected
results for the full year. The Companys common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange
under the symbol LVS.
In November 2009, the Companys subsidiary, Sands China Ltd. (SCL, the indirect owner and
operator of the majority of the Companys operations in the Macau Special Administrative Region
(Macau) of the Peoples Republic of China), completed an initial public offering by listing its
ordinary shares (the SCL Offering) on The Main Board of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited
(SEHK). Immediately following the SCL Offering and several transactions consummated in connection
with such offering, the Company owned 70.3% of the issued and outstanding ordinary shares of SCL.
The shares of SCL were not, and will not, be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and may not be offered or sold in the U.S. absent a registration under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or an applicable exception from such registration requirements.
Operations
United States
Las Vegas
The Company owns and operates The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino (The Venetian Las Vegas), a
Renaissance Venice-themed resort; The Palazzo Resort Hotel Casino (The Palazzo), a resort
featuring modern European ambience and design; and an expo and convention center of approximately
1.2 million square feet (the Sands Expo Center). These Las Vegas properties, situated on or near
the Las Vegas Strip, form an integrated resort with approximately 7,100 suites; approximately
225,000 square feet of gaming space; a meeting and conference facility of approximately 1.1 million
square feet; an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment complex located within The Venetian Las
Vegas of approximately 440,000 net leasable square feet (The Grand Canal Shoppes), which was sold
to GGP Limited Partnership (GGP) in 2004; and an enclosed retail and dining complex located
within The Palazzo of approximately 400,000 net leasable square feet (The Shoppes at The
Palazzo), which was sold to GGP in February 2008. See Note 2 Property and Equipment, Net
regarding the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo.
Pennsylvania
In May 2009, the Company partially opened Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem (the Sands
Bethlehem), a gaming, hotel, retail and dining complex located on the site of the historic
Bethlehem Steel Works in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. The Sands Bethlehem currently features
approximately 152,000 square feet of gaming space, which include table games operations that
commenced in July 2010. The Company recommenced construction of a 300-room hotel tower, which is
expected to open in May 2011. The Company is initiating construction activities on the remaining
components of the integrated resort, which include an approximate 200,000-square-foot retail
facility and a 50,000-square-foot multipurpose event center. Sands Bethlehem is also expected to be
home to the National Museum of Industrial History, an arts and cultural center, and the broadcast
home of the local PBS affiliate. The Company owns 86% of the economic interest of the gaming, hotel
and entertainment portion of the property through its ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Gaming
LLC and more than 35% of the economic interest of the retail portion of the property through its
ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Retail LLC. As of March 31, 2011, the Company has capitalized
construction costs of $670.3 million for this project (including $10.1 million in outstanding
construction payables). The Company expects to spend approximately $55 million to complete
construction of the
project, on furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) and other costs, and to pay outstanding
construction payables, as noted above.
7
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Macau
The Company currently owns 70.3% of SCL, which includes the operations of the Sands Macao, The
Venetian Macao, Four Seasons Macao and other ancillary operations that support these properties, as
further discussed below. The Company operates the gaming areas within these properties pursuant to
a 20-year gaming subconcession.
The Company owns and operates the Sands Macao, the first Las Vegas-style casino in Macau. The
Sands Macao offers approximately 197,000 square feet of gaming space and a 289-suite hotel tower,
as well as several restaurants, VIP facilities, a theater and other high-end services and
amenities.
The Company also owns and operates The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel (The Venetian Macao),
which anchors the Cotai Strip, the Companys master-planned development of integrated resort
properties in Macau. With a theme similar to that of The Venetian Las Vegas, The Venetian Macao
includes a 39-floor luxury hotel with over 2,900 suites; approximately 550,000 square feet of
gaming space; a 15,000-seat arena; an 1,800-seat theater; retail and dining space of approximately
1.0 million square feet; and a convention center and meeting room complex of approximately
1.2 million square feet.
The Company owns the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, Cotai Strip (the Four Seasons Hotel Macao),
which features 360 rooms and suites managed and operated by Four Seasons Hotels Inc. and is located
adjacent and connected to The Venetian Macao. Connected to the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, the
Company owns and operates the Plaza Casino (together with the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, the Four
Seasons Macao), which features approximately 70,000 square feet of gaming space; 19 Paiza
mansions; retail space of approximately 211,000 square feet, which is connected to the mall at The
Venetian Macao; several food and beverage offerings; and conference, banquet and other facilities.
This integrated resort will also feature the Four Seasons Apartment Hotel Macao, Cotai Strip (the
Four Seasons Apartments), an apart-hotel tower that consists of approximately 1.0 million square
feet of Four Seasons-serviced and -branded luxury apart-hotel units and common areas. The Company
has completed the structural work of the tower and expects to subsequently monetize units within
the Four Seasons Apartments subject to market conditions and obtaining the necessary government
approvals. As of March 31, 2011, the Company has capitalized $1.15 billion for the property,
including the land premium and $14.1 million in outstanding construction payables. The Company
expects to spend approximately $115 million primarily on additional costs to complete the Four
Seasons Apartments, including FF&E and pre-opening costs, and to pay outstanding construction
payables, as noted above.
Singapore
The Company owns and operates the Marina Bay Sands in Singapore, which partially opened on
April 27, 2010, with additional portions opened progressively throughout 2010. The Marina Bay Sands
features three 55-story hotel towers (totaling approximately 2,600 rooms and suites), the Sands
SkyPark (which sits atop the hotel towers and features an infinity swimming pool and several
dining options), approximately 161,000 square feet of gaming space, an enclosed retail, dining and
entertainment complex of approximately 800,000 net leasable square feet, a convention center and
meeting room complex of approximately 1.3 million square feet and theaters. In February 2011, the
Marina Bay Sands opened a landmark iconic structure at the bay-front promenade that contains an
art/science museum. As of March 31, 2011, the Company has capitalized 7.56 billion Singapore
dollars (SGD, approximately $5.99 billion at exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2011) in costs
for this project, including the land premium and SGD 383.9 million (approximately $304.0 million at
exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2011) in outstanding construction payables. The Company
expects to spend approximately SGD 760 million (approximately $602 million at exchange rates in
effect on March 31, 2011) on additional costs to complete the construction of the integrated
resort, FF&E and other costs, and to pay outstanding construction payables, as noted above. As the
Company has obtained Singapore-denominated financing and primarily pays its costs in Singapore
dollars, its exposure to foreign exchange gains and losses is expected to be minimal.
8
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Development Projects
The Company has suspended portions of its development projects to focus its efforts on those
projects with the highest expected rates of return on invested capital. Should general economic
conditions fail to improve, if the Company is unable to obtain sufficient funding or applicable
government approvals such that completion of its suspended projects is not probable, or should
management decide to abandon certain projects, all or a portion of the Companys investment to date
on its suspended projects could be lost and would result in an impairment charge. In addition, the
Company may be subject to penalties under the termination clauses in its construction contracts or
termination rights under its management contracts with certain hotel management companies.
United States
The Company was constructing a high-rise residential condominium tower (the Las Vegas Condo
Tower), located on the Las Vegas Strip between The Palazzo and The Venetian Las Vegas. The Company
suspended construction activities for the project due to reduced demand for Las Vegas Strip
condominiums and the overall decline in general economic conditions. The Company intends to
recommence construction when demand and conditions improve and expects that it will take
approximately 18 months thereafter to complete construction of the project. As of March 31, 2011,
the Company has capitalized construction costs of $177.1 million for this project. The impact of
the suspension on the estimated overall cost of the project is currently not determinable with
certainty.
Macau
The Company submitted plans to the Macau government for its other Cotai Strip developments,
which represent three integrated resort developments, in addition to The Venetian Macao and Four
Seasons Macao, on an area of approximately 200 acres (which are referred to as parcels 3, 5 and 6,
and 7 and 8). Subject to the approval from the Macau government, as discussed further below, the
developments are expected to include hotels, exhibition and conference facilities, gaming areas,
showrooms, shopping malls, spas, restaurants, entertainment facilities and other amenities. The
Company had commenced construction or pre-construction activities on these developments and plans
to operate the related gaming areas under the Companys Macau gaming subconcession.
The Company is staging the construction of its integrated resort development on parcels 5 and
6. Upon completion of phases I and II of the project, the integrated resort is expected to feature
approximately 6,000 hotel rooms, approximately 300,000 square feet of gaming space, approximately
1.2 million square feet of retail, entertainment and dining facilities, exhibition and conference
facilities and a multipurpose theater. Phase I of the project is expected to include two hotel
towers, one of which will be managed by Sheraton International Inc. and Sheraton Overseas
Management Co. (collectively Starwood) under its Sheraton brand, as well as completion of the
structural work of an adjacent hotel tower to be managed by Starwood under its Sheraton brand. The
second hotel tower was to be managed by Shangri-La International Hotel Management Limited
(Shangri-La); however, in March 2011, the Company and Shangri-La mutually agreed to terminate the
hotel management agreement and the Company is currently evaluating alternative hotel brands to
manage its second tower. Phase I will also include the gaming space and a partial opening of the
retail and exhibition and conference facilities. Phase II of the project includes completion of the
additional Sheraton hotel tower, the theater and the remaining retail facilities. The total cost to
complete phases I and II is expected to be approximately $1.9 billion. Phase III of the project is
expected to include a fourth hotel and mixed-use tower to be managed by Starwood under its St.
Regis brand and the total cost is expected to be approximately $450 million. In connection with
entering into the $1.75 billion Venetian Orient Limited
(VOL) credit facility to be used together with $500.0 million of proceeds from the
SCL Offering, the Company has recommenced construction activities. The Company is currently working
with the Macau government to obtain sufficient construction labor for the project. Although the
Company has made significant progress on phases I and II with the construction labor currently
onsite, the Companys anticipated opening of phase I may be delayed until the first quarter of 2012
if additional construction labor is not secured. Until adequate labor quotas are received, the
timing of the completion of phase II is currently not determinable. The Company intends to commence
construction of phase III of the project as demand and market conditions warrant it. As of March
31, 2011, the Company has capitalized costs of $2.24 billion for the entire project, including the
land premium and $136.1 million in outstanding construction payables. The Companys
management agreement with Starwood imposes certain construction deadlines and opening
obligations on the Company and certain past and/or anticipated delays, as described above, would
allow Starwood to terminate its agreement. See Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies Other
Agreements. The Company is currently negotiating an amendment to the management agreement with
Starwood to provide for new opening timelines.
9
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
The Company had commenced pre-construction activities on parcels 7 and 8 and 3, and has
capitalized costs of $101.9 million for parcels 7 and 8 and $97.2 million for parcel 3 (including
the land premium) as of March 31, 2011. The Company intends to commence construction after the
integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6 is complete, necessary government approvals are obtained
(including the land concession, see below), regional and global economic conditions improve, future
demand warrants it and additional financing is obtained.
The impact of the delayed construction on the Companys previously estimated cost to complete
its Cotai Strip developments is currently not determinable. As of March 31, 2011, the Company has
capitalized an aggregate of $6.61 billion in construction costs and land premiums for its Cotai
Strip developments, including The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, as well as the Companys
investments in transportation infrastructure, including its passenger ferry service operations. In
addition to funding phases I and II of parcels 5 and 6 with the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility,
the Company will need to arrange additional financing to fund the balance of its Cotai Strip
developments and there is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain any of the
additional financing required.
Land concessions in Macau generally have an initial term of 25 years with automatic extensions
of 10 years thereafter in accordance with Macau law. The Company has received land concessions from
the Macau government to build on parcels 1, 2, 3 and 5 and 6, including the sites on which The
Venetian Macao (parcel 1) and Four Seasons Macao (parcel 2) are located. The Company does not own
these land sites in Macau; however, the land concessions grant the Company exclusive use of the
land. As specified in the land concessions, the Company is required to pay premiums for each
parcel, which are either payable in a single lump sum upon acceptance of the land concessions by
the Macau government or in seven semi-annual installments (provided that the outstanding balance is
due upon the completion of the corresponding integrated resort), as well as annual rent for the
term of the land concessions. During December 2010, the Company received notice from the Macau
government that its application for a land concession for parcels 7 and 8 was not approved and the
Company applied to the Chief Executive of Macau for a review of the decision. In January 2011, the
Company filed an appeal with the Court of Second Instance in Macau, which has yet to issue a
decision. Should the Company win its appeal, it is still possible for the Chief Executive of Macau
to again deny the land concession based upon public policy considerations. If the Company does not
obtain the land concession or does not receive full reimbursement of its capitalized investment in
this project, the Company would record a charge for all or some portion of the $101.9 million in
capitalized construction costs, as of March 31, 2011, related to its development on parcels 7 and
8.
Under the Companys land concession for parcel 3, the Company was initially required to
complete the corresponding development by August 2011. The Macau government has granted the Company
a two-year extension to complete the development of parcel 3, which now must be completed by April
2013. The land concession for parcels 5 and 6 contains a similar requirement that the corresponding
development be completed by May 2014. The Company believes that if it is not able to complete the
developments by the respective deadlines, it will likely be able to obtain extensions from the
Macau government; however, no assurances can be given that additional extensions will be granted.
If the Company is unable to meet the applicable deadlines and those deadlines are not extended, it
could lose its land concessions for parcels 3 or 5 and 6, which would prohibit the Company from
operating any facilities developed under the respective land concessions. As a result, the Company
could record a charge for all or some portion of its $97.2 million and $2.24 billion in capitalized
construction costs and land premiums, as of March 31, 2011, related to its developments on parcels
3 or 5 and 6, respectively.
Other
When the current economic environment and access to capital improve, the Company may continue
exploring the possibility of developing and operating additional properties, including integrated
resorts, in additional Asian and U.S. jurisdictions, and in Europe.
10
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Development Financing Strategy
Through March 31, 2011, the Company has funded its development projects primarily through
borrowings under its U.S., Macau and Singapore credit facilities, operating cash flows, proceeds
from its recent equity offerings and proceeds from the disposition of non-core assets.
The U.S. credit facility, as amended in August 2010, requires the Companys Las Vegas
operations to comply with certain financial covenants at the end of each quarter, including
maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of net debt, as defined, to trailing twelve-month adjusted
earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined (Adjusted
EBITDA). The maximum leverage ratio is 6.5x for the quarterly periods ended March 31 and June 30,
2011, decreases to 6.0x for the quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2011,
decreases to 5.5x for the quarterly periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2012, and then decreases to
5.0x for all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity. One of the Companys Macau credit
facilities, the VML credit facility, as amended in August 2009, requires certain of the Companys
Macau operations to comply with similar financial covenants, including maintaining a maximum
leverage ratio of debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The maximum leverage ratio is 3.0x for the quarterly
periods through maturity. The Company can elect to contribute up to $50 million and $20 million of
cash on hand to its Las Vegas and relevant Macau operations, respectively, on a bi-quarterly basis;
such contributions having the effect of increasing Adjusted EBITDA by the corresponding amount
during the applicable quarter for purposes of calculating compliance with the maximum leverage
ratio (the EBITDA true-up). The Singapore credit facility requires operations of Marina Bay Sands
to comply with similar financial covenants commencing with the quarterly period ending
September 30, 2011, including maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The
maximum leverage ratio is 5.5x for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2011, and then
decreases by 0.25x every other quarter until it decreases to, and remains at, 3.75x for all
quarterly periods thereafter through maturity (commencing with the quarterly period ending
September 30, 2014). If the Company is unable to maintain compliance with the financial covenants
under these credit facilities, it would be in default under the respective credit facilities. A
default under the U.S. credit facility would trigger a cross-default under the Companys airplane
financings, which, if the respective lenders chose to accelerate the indebtedness outstanding under
these agreements, would result in a default under the Companys senior notes. A default under the
VML credit facility would trigger a cross-default under the Companys ferry financing. Any defaults
or cross-defaults under these agreements would allow the lenders, in each case, to exercise their
rights and remedies as defined under their respective agreements. If the lenders were to exercise
their rights to accelerate the due dates of the indebtedness outstanding, there can be no assurance
that the Company would be able to repay or refinance any amounts that may become due and payable
under such agreements, which could force the Company to restructure or alter its operations or debt
obligations.
In 2008, the Company completed a $475.0 million convertible senior notes offering and a $2.1
billion common and preferred stock and warrants offering. In 2009, the Company completed a $600.0
million exchangeable bond offering and its $2.5 billion SCL Offering. A portion of the proceeds
from these offerings was used in the U.S. to pay down $775.9 million under the revolving portion of
the U.S. credit facility in March 2010 and $1.0 billion under the term loan portions of the U.S.
credit facility in August 2010, and to exercise the EBITDA true-up provision during the quarterly
periods ended September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011.
The Company held unrestricted and restricted cash and cash equivalents of approximately $3.13
billion and $658.9 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2011. The Company believes that the cash
on hand, cash flow generated from operations and available borrowings under its credit facilities
will be sufficient to fund its development plans and maintain compliance with the financial
covenants of its U.S., Macau and Singapore credit facilities. In the normal course of its
activities, the Company will continue to evaluate its capital structure and opportunities for
enhancements thereof. In connection with the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility to be used together
with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, the Company has recommenced construction
activities on the Companys Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
11
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued authoritative guidance for
fair value measurements, which requires new disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out
of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and gross presentation of activity within the
reconciliation for Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance also clarifies existing
requirements on the level of disaggregation and required disclosures regarding inputs and valuation
techniques for both recurring and nonrecurring Level 2 and 3 fair value measurements. The guidance
is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, with the
exception of gross presentation of Level 3 activity, which is effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. See
Note 8 Fair Value Measurements for the required disclosure.
NOTE 2 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Land and improvements |
$ | 428,636 | $ | 410,758 | ||||
Building and improvements |
11,227,718 | 10,881,936 | ||||||
Furniture, fixtures, equipment and leasehold improvements |
2,037,863 | 1,990,721 | ||||||
Transportation |
402,832 | 402,904 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
3,114,633 | 3,147,750 | ||||||
17,211,682 | 16,834,069 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(2,517,693 | ) | (2,331,872 | ) | ||||
$ | 14,693,989 | $ | 14,502,197 | |||||
Construction in progress consists of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6 |
$ | 2,138,211 | $ | 2,005,386 | ||||
Four Seasons Macao (principally the
Four Seasons Apartments) |
379,474 | 379,161 | ||||||
Marina Bay
Sands |
165,703 | 337,835 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
116,100 | 101,960 | ||||||
Other |
315,145 | 323,408 | ||||||
$ | 3,114,633 | $ | 3,147,750 | |||||
The $315.1 million in other construction in progress consists primarily of construction of the
Las Vegas Condo Tower and costs incurred at the Cotai Strip parcels 3 and 7 and 8.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company has received proceeds of $295.4 million from the sale of The
Shoppes at The Palazzo; however, the final purchase price will be determined in accordance with the
April 2004 purchase and sale agreement, as amended, between Venetian Casino Resort, LLC (VCR) and
GGP (the Amended Agreement) based on net operating income (NOI) of The Shoppes at The Palazzo
calculated 30 months after the closing date of the sale, as defined under the Amended Agreement
(the Final Purchase Price) and subject to certain later audit adjustments. Given the economic and
market conditions facing retailers on a national and local level, tenants are facing economic
challenges that have had an effect on the calculation of NOI. Approximately $282.1 million of
property and equipment (net of $29.3 million of accumulated depreciation), which was sold to GGP,
is included in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2011. In April 2009, GGP
and its subsidiary that owns The Shoppes at The Palazzo filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 11
of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the Chapter 11 Cases). The United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York entered orders approving the plans of reorganization of GGP and the
subsidiary that owns The Shoppes at The Palazzo on October 21 and April 29, 2010, respectively, and
the effective date of such plans of reorganization occurred on November 9 and May 28, 2010,
respectively. Under the confirmed plans of reorganization, the only impaired creditors were
mortgage holders. The Company will continue to review the Chapter 11 Cases and will adjust the
estimates of NOI and capitalization rates as additional information is received. The Company and
GGP have entered
into several amendments to the Amended Agreement to defer the time to reach agreement on the
Final Purchase Price as both parties are continuing to work on various matters related to the
calculation of NOI. The Company may be required to record a loss on the sale in the future
depending on the resolution of such matters and the resulting agreed upon Final Purchase Price.
12
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company capitalized interest
expense of $30.6 million and $19.7 million, respectively.
The Company suspended portions of its development projects. As described in Note 1
Organization and Business of Company Development Projects, the Company may be required to record
an impairment charge related to these developments in the future.
The Company had commenced pre-construction activities on parcels 7 and 8, and has capitalized
construction costs of $101.9 million as of March 31, 2011. During December 2010, the Company
received notice from the Macau government that its application for a land concession for parcels 7
and 8 was not approved and the Company applied to the Chief Executive of Macau for a review of the
decision. In January 2011, the Company filed an appeal with the Court of Second Instance in Macau,
which has yet to issue a decision. Should the Company win its appeal, it is still possible for the
Chief Executive of Macau to again deny the land concession based upon public policy considerations.
In order to obtain the land concession and construct the resort, the Company would need to win its
appeal and avoid any future denial of the land concession based upon public policy considerations.
If the Company does not obtain the land concession or does not receive full reimbursement of its
capitalized investment in this project, the Company would record a charge for all or some portion
of the $101.9 million in capitalized construction costs, as of March 31, 2011, related to its
development on parcels 7 and 8.
NOTE 3 LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Corporate and U.S. Related: |
||||||||
Senior Secured Credit Facility Term B |
$ | 2,151,775 | $ | 2,157,199 | ||||
Senior Secured Credit Facility Delayed Draws I and II |
718,522 | 720,332 | ||||||
6.375% Senior Notes (net of original issue discount of
$677 and $720, respectively) |
189,035 | 188,992 | ||||||
Airplane Financings |
77,500 | 78,422 | ||||||
HVAC Equipment Lease |
22,580 | 23,006 | ||||||
Other |
3,640 | 3,868 | ||||||
Macau Related: |
||||||||
VML Credit Facility Term B |
1,479,289 | 1,483,789 | ||||||
VML Credit Facility Term B Delayed |
575,279 | 577,029 | ||||||
VOL Credit Facility Term |
749,316 | 749,930 | ||||||
Ferry Financing |
165,961 | 175,011 | ||||||
Other |
551 | 640 | ||||||
Singapore Related: |
||||||||
Singapore Credit Facility |
3,967,274 | 3,980,435 | ||||||
Other |
2,037 | 2,170 | ||||||
10,102,759 | 10,140,823 | |||||||
Less current maturities |
(917,007 | ) | (767,068 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 9,185,752 | $ | 9,373,755 | ||||
Senior Secured Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $724.6 million of available borrowing capacity under the
Senior Secured Credit Facility, net of outstanding letters of credit and undrawn amounts committed
to be funded by Lehman Brothers Commercial Paper Inc.
13
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
VML Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $595.3 million of available borrowing capacity under the
VML Credit Facility, net of undrawn amounts committed to be funded by Lehman Brothers Commercial
Paper Inc.
VOL Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had $1.0 billion of available borrowing capacity under the
VOL Credit Facility.
Singapore Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2011, the Company had SGD 48.4 million (approximately $38.3 million at
exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2011) of available borrowing capacity under the Singapore
Credit Facility, net of outstanding bankers guarantees.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Cash flows from financing activities related to long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Proceeds from Singapore Credit Facility |
$ | | $ | 272,056 | ||||
Repayments on Singapore Credit Facility |
$ | (97,691 | ) | $ | | |||
Repayments on Senior Secured Credit Facility |
(7,234 | ) | (785,860 | ) | ||||
Repayments on VML Credit Facility |
(6,250 | ) | (12,525 | ) | ||||
Repayments on Ferry Financing |
(8,745 | ) | (8,762 | ) | ||||
Repayments on Airplane Financings |
(922 | ) | (922 | ) | ||||
Repayments on HVAC Equipment Lease |
(426 | ) | (437 | ) | ||||
Repurchase and cancellation of Senior Notes |
| (30,156 | ) | |||||
Repayments on FF&E Facility and Other Long-Term Debt |
(453 | ) | (8,664 | ) | ||||
$ | (121,721 | ) | $ | (847,326 | ) | |||
Fair Value of Long-Term Debt
The estimated fair value of the Companys long-term debt as of March 31, 2011, was
approximately $9.84 billion, compared to its carrying value of $10.08 billion. As of December 31,
2010, the estimated fair value of the Companys long-term debt was approximately $9.72 billion,
compared to its carrying value of $10.10 billion. The estimated fair value of the Companys
long-term debt is based on quoted market prices, if available, or by pricing models based on the
value of related cash flows discounted at current market interest rates.
NOTE 4 EQUITY AND EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
Preferred Stock and Warrants
Preferred stock dividend activity is as follows (in thousands):
Preferred Stock | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends Paid to | Preferred Stock | Total Preferred | ||||||||||||||
Board of Directors | Principal | Dividends Paid to | Stock | |||||||||||||
Declaration Date | Payment Date | Stockholders Family | Public Holders | Dividends Paid | ||||||||||||
February 5, 2010 |
February 16, 2010 | $ | 13,125 | $ | 10,225 | $ | 23,350 | |||||||||
February 1, 2011 |
February 15, 2011 | $ | 13,125 | $ | 6,473 | $ | 19,598 | |||||||||
May 5, 2011 |
May 16, 2011 | $ | 13,125 | $ | 6,094 | $ | 19,219 |
14
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, holders of preferred stock exercised 1,194,700
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 19,911,702 shares of the Companys common stock at $6.00 per
share and tendered 1,137,100 shares of preferred stock and $5.8 million in cash as settlement of
the warrant exercise price. In conjunction with certain of these transactions, the Company paid
$16.2 million in premiums to induce the exercise of warrants with settlement through tendering
preferred stock. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company also repurchased and
retired 40,300 shares of preferred stock for $4.5 million and recorded a $2.2 million repurchase
premium as part of the transaction. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, no warrants were
exercised.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
The weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares used in the calculation of
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (used in the
calculation of basic earnings (loss) per share) |
723,389,226 | 660,280,641 | ||||||
Potential dilution from stock options, restricted stock and warrants |
87,850,016 | | ||||||
Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares (used in the
calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share) |
811,239,242 | 660,280,641 | ||||||
Antidilutive stock options, restricted stock and warrants excluded
from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share |
5,334,276 | 172,467,803 | ||||||
Accumulated Comprehensive Income and Comprehensive Income
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, accumulated comprehensive income consisted solely
of foreign currency translation adjustments.
Total comprehensive income consisted of the following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 364,503 | $ | 47,814 | ||||
Currency translation adjustment |
31,956 | (2,324 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive income |
396,459 | 45,490 | ||||||
Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(72,643 | ) | (28,786 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
$ | 323,816 | $ | 16,704 | ||||
NOTE 5 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
The
Company consolidates any variable interest entities (VIEs) in which it is the primary beneficiary and discloses
significant variable interests in VIEs of which it is not the primary beneficiary, if any, which
management determines such designation based on accounting standards for VIEs.
The Company has entered into various joint venture agreements with independent third parties.
The operations of these joint ventures have been consolidated by the Company due to the Companys
significant investment in these joint ventures, its power to direct the activities of the joint
ventures that would significantly impact their economic performance and the obligation to absorb
potentially significant losses or the rights to receive potentially significant benefits from these
joint ventures. The Company evaluates its primary beneficiary designation on an ongoing basis and
will assess the appropriateness of the VIEs status when events have occurred that would trigger
such an analysis.
15
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys joint ventures had total assets of
$94.6 million and $95.3 million, respectively, and total liabilities of $81.2 million and $78.4
million, respectively.
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
The Companys major tax jurisdictions are the U.S., Macau and Singapore. During the year ended
December 31, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Revenue Agents Report for years
2005 through 2008 proposing certain adjustments. The Company disagrees with several of the proposed
adjustments and has submitted a protest and a request for an appeals conference to the IRS. The
opening appeals conference is scheduled to occur during the third quarter of 2011. While the final
outcome of these matters is inherently uncertain, the Company believes it is reasonably possible
that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits may decrease by a range between zero and $23 million
within the next twelve months primarily due to the possible settlement of matters presently under
consideration at appeals. In the U.S., the Companys 2009 tax year is also under examination by the
IRS. The Company is subject to examination for years after 2006 in Macau and Singapore. The Company
believes it has adequately reserved for its uncertain tax positions; however, there is no assurance
that the taxing authorities will not propose adjustments that are more or less than the Companys
expected outcome and impact the provision for income taxes.
The Company recorded valuation allowances on the net deferred tax assets of the Companys U.S.
operations and certain foreign jurisdictions and does not anticipate recording an income tax
benefit related to these deferred tax assets. The Company will reassess the realization of deferred
tax assets based on accounting standards for income taxes each reporting period and will be able to
reduce the valuation allowance to the extent that the financial results of these operations improve
and it becomes more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are realizable.
The Company received a 5-year income tax exemption in Macau that exempts the Company from
paying corporate income tax on profits generated by gaming operations. The Company will continue to
benefit from this tax exemption through the end of 2013. In February 2011, the Company entered into
an agreement with the Macau government effective through 2013 that provides for an annual payment
of 14.4 million patacas (approximately $1.8 million at exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2011).
The annual payment is in substitution of a 12% tax otherwise due from Venetian Macau Limited
(VML) shareholders on dividend distributions paid from VML gaming profits.
NOTE 7 STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation activity under the LVSC 2004 and SCL Equity Plans is as follows (in
thousands, except weighted average grant date fair values):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Compensation expense: |
||||||||
Stock options |
$ | 15,301 | $ | 14,968 | ||||
Restricted shares |
4,938 | 125 | ||||||
$ | 20,239 | $ | 15,093 | |||||
Compensation cost capitalized as part of property and equipment |
$ | 600 | $ | 730 | ||||
LVSC 2004 Plan: |
||||||||
Stock options granted |
230 | 2,046 | ||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 36.22 | $ | 10.66 | ||||
Restricted shares granted |
620 | | ||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 48.01 | $ | | ||||
SCL Equity Plan: |
||||||||
Stock options granted |
2,746 | 17,876 | ||||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 1.52 | $ | 1.06 | ||||
16
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
LVSC 2004 Plan: |
||||||||
Weighted average volatility |
94.3 | % | 97.8 | % | ||||
Expected term (in years) |
6.3 | 4.4 | ||||||
Risk-free rate |
2.8 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||
Expected dividends |
| | ||||||
SCL Equity Plan: |
||||||||
Weighted average volatility |
68.9 | % | 73.6 | % | ||||
Expected term (in years) |
6.3 | 6.3 | ||||||
Risk-free rate |
1.7 | % | 2.0 | % | ||||
Expected dividends |
| |
NOTE 8 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Under applicable accounting guidance, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants as of the measurement date. Applicable accounting guidance also
establishes a valuation hierarchy for inputs in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of
observable inputs (inputs market participants would use based on market data obtained from sources
independent of the Company) and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs (inputs that reflect the
Companys assumptions based upon the best information available in the circumstances) by requiring
that the most observable inputs be used when available. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and inputs (other than quoted prices) that
are observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities. Categorization within the hierarchy is based
upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table provides the assets carried at fair value (in thousands):
Fair Value Measurements Using: | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Market | Significant Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Total Carrying | Prices in Active | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | |||||||||||||
Value | Markets (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents(1) |
$ | 2,202,759 | $ | 2,202,759 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Interest rate caps(2) |
$ | 1,414 | $ | | $ | 1,414 | $ | | ||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents(1) |
$ | 2,490,809 | $ | 2,490,809 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Interest rate caps(2) |
$ | 1,617 | $ | | $ | 1,617 | $ | |
(1) | The Company has short-term investments classified as cash equivalents
as the original maturities are less than 90 days. |
|
(2) | As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has 34
interest rate cap agreements with an aggregate fair value of
approximately $1.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively, based on
quoted market values from the institutions holding the agreements. |
NOTE 9 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
The Company is involved in other litigation in addition to those noted below, arising in the
normal course of business. Management has made certain estimates for potential litigation claims
based upon consultation with legal counsel. Actual results could differ from these estimates;
however, in the opinion of management, such litigation and claims will not have a material effect
on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
17
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
On October 15, 2004, Richard Suen and Round Square Company Limited filed an action against
LVSC, Las Vegas Sands, Inc. (LVSI), Sheldon G. Adelson and William P. Weidner in the District
Court of Clark County, Nevada, asserting a breach of an alleged agreement to pay a success fee of
$5.0 million and 2.0% of the net profit from the Companys Macau resort operations to the
plaintiffs as well as other related claims. In March 2005, LVSC was dismissed as a party without
prejudice based on a stipulation to do so between the parties. Pursuant to an order filed March 16,
2006, plaintiffs fraud claims set forth in the first amended complaint were dismissed with
prejudice against all defendants. The order also dismissed with prejudice the first amended
complaint against defendants Sheldon G. Adelson and William P. Weidner. On May 24, 2008, the jury
returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the amount of $43.8 million. On June 30, 2008, a judgment
was entered in this matter in the amount of $58.6 million (including pre-judgment interest). The
Company appealed the verdict to the Nevada Supreme Court. On November 17, 2010, the Nevada Supreme
Court reversed the judgment and remanded the case to the District Court of Clark County for a new
trial. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
On October 20, 2010, Steven C. Jacobs, the former Chief Executive Officer of SCL, filed an
action against LVSC and SCL in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, alleging breach of
contract against LVSC and SCL and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and
tortious discharge in violation of public policy against LVSC. On
March 16, 2011, an amended complaint was filed, which added
Sheldon G. Adelson as a defendant and alleged a claim of defamation
per se against him, LVSC and SCL. Mr. Jacobs is seeking unspecified
damages. This action is in a preliminary stage and management has determined that based on
proceedings to date, it is currently unable to determine the probability of the outcome of this
matter. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
On February 9, 2011, LVSC received a subpoena from the Securities and Exchange Commission
requesting that the Company produce documents relating to its compliance with the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (the FCPA). The Company has also been advised by the Department of Justice that it
is conducting a similar investigation. It is the Companys belief that the subpoena may have
emanated from allegations contained in the lawsuit filed by Steven C. Jacobs described above. The
Company intends to cooperate with the investigations.
On March 31, 2011, SCL filed an announcement with the SEHK stating that SCL has been informed
by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (the SFC) that SCL is under investigation
by the SFC in relation to alleged breaches of the provisions of the Hong Kong Securities and
Futures Ordinance and has been requested to produce certain documents. The Company intends to
cooperate with the investigation.
On May 24, 2010, Frank J. Fosbre, Jr. filed a purported class action complaint in the United
States District Court for the District of Nevada (the District Court), against LVSC, Sheldon G.
Adelson, and William P. Weidner. The complaint alleges that LVSC, through the individual
defendants, disseminated or approved materially false information, or failed to disclose material
facts, through press releases, investor conference calls and other means from August 1, 2007
through November 6, 2008. The complaint seeks, among other relief, class certification,
compensatory damages and attorneys fees and costs.
On July 21, 2010, Wendell and Shirley Combs filed a purported class action complaint in the
District Court, against LVSC, Sheldon G. Adelson, and William P. Weidner. The complaint alleges
that LVSC, through the individual defendants, disseminated or approved materially false
information, or failed to disclose material facts, through press releases, investor conference
calls and other means from June 13, 2007 through November 11, 2008. The complaint, which is
substantially similar to the Fosbre litigation, discussed above, seeks, among other relief, class
certification, compensatory damages and attorneys fees and costs.
18
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
On August 31, 2010, the District Court entered an order consolidating the Fosbre and Combs
cases, and appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel. On November 1, 2010, a purported class
action amended complaint was filed in the consolidated action against LVSC, Sheldon G. Adelson and
William P. Weidner. The amended complaint alleges that LVSC, through the individual defendants,
disseminated or approved materially false and misleading information, or failed to disclose
material facts, through press releases, investor conference calls and other means from August 2,
2007 through November 6, 2008. The amended complaint seeks, among other relief, class
certification, compensatory damages and attorneys fees and costs. This action is in a preliminary
stage and management has determined that based on proceedings to date, it is currently unable to
determine the probability of the outcome of this matter. The Company intends to defend this matter
vigorously.
On March 9, 2011, Benyamin Kohanim filed a shareholder derivative action (the Kohanim
action) on behalf of the Company in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, against Sheldon G.
Adelson, Jason N. Ader, Irwin Chafetz, Charles D. Foreman, George P. Koo, Michael A. Leven, Jeffrey
H. Schwartz and Irwin A. Siegel, the current members of the Board of Directors. The complaint
alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties in failing to properly implement, oversee
and maintain internal controls to ensure compliance with the FCPA. The complaint seeks to recover
for the Company unspecified damages, including
restitution and disgorgement of profits, and also seeks to recover attorneys fees, costs and
related expenses for the plaintiff. This action is in a preliminary stage and management has
determined that based on proceedings to date, it is currently unable to determine the probability
of the outcome of this matter. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
On April 1, 2011, Nasser Moradi, Richard Buckman, Douglas Tomlinson, and Matt Abbeduto filed a
shareholder derivative action (the Moradi action), as amended on April 15, 2011, on behalf of the
Company in the District Court, against Sheldon G. Adelson, Jason N. Ader, Irwin Chafetz, Charles D.
Foreman, George P. Koo, Michael A. Leven, Jeffrey H. Schwartz and Irwin A. Siegel, the current
members of the Board of Directors. The complaint raises substantially similar claims as alleged in
the Kohanim action. The complaint seeks to recover for the Company unspecified damages, including
exemplary damages and restitution, and also seeks to recover attorneys fees, costs and related
expenses for the plaintiffs. This action is in a preliminary stage and management has determined
that based on proceedings to date, it is currently unable to determine the probability of the
outcome of this matter. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
On April 18, 2011, Ira J. Gaines, Sunshine Wire and Cable Defined Benefit Pension Plan Trust
dated 1/1/92 and Peachtree Mortgage Ltd. filed a shareholder derivative action (the Gaines
action) on behalf of the Company in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, against Sheldon G.
Adelson, Jason N. Ader, Irwin Chafetz, Charles D. Foreman, George P. Koo, Michael A. Leven, Jeffrey
H. Schwartz and Irwin A. Siegel, the current members of the Board of Directors. The complaint
raises substantially similar claims as alleged in the Kohanim and Moradi actions. The complaint
seeks to recover for the Company unspecified damages, and also seeks
to recover attorneys fees, costs and related expenses for the plaintiffs.
This action is in a preliminary stage and management has determined that based on proceedings to
date, it is currently unable to determine the probability of the outcome of this matter. The
Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
On April 18, 2011, the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System filed a
shareholder derivative action (the LAMPERS action) on behalf of the Company in the District
Court, against Sheldon G. Adelson, Jason N. Ader, Irwin Chafetz, Charles D. Foreman, George P. Koo,
Michael A. Leven, Jeffrey H. Schwartz and Irwin A. Siegel, the current members of the Board of
Directors, and Wing T. Chao, a former member of the Board of Directors. The complaint raises
substantially similar claims as alleged in the Kohanim, Moradi and Gaines actions. The complaint
seeks to recover for the Company unspecified damages, and also seeks to recover attorneys fees,
costs and related expenses for the plaintiff. This action is in a preliminary stage and management
has determined that based on proceedings to date, it is currently unable to determine the
probability of the outcome of this matter. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.
19
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
On April 22, 2011, John Zaremba filed a shareholder derivative action on behalf of the Company
in the District Court, against Sheldon G. Adelson, Jason N. Ader, Irwin Chafetz, Charles D.
Foreman, George P. Koo, Michael A. Leven, Jeffrey H. Schwartz and Irwin A. Siegel, the current
members of the Board of Directors, and Wing T. Chao, a former member of the Board of Directors. The
complaint raises substantially similar claims as alleged in the
Kohanim, Moradi, Gaines and LAMPERS actions. The complaint seeks to recover for the Company
unspecified damages, including restitution, disgorgement of profits, and injunctive relief, and
also seeks to recover attorneys fees, costs and related expenses for the plaintiff. This action
is in a preliminary stage and management has determined that based on proceedings to date, it is
currently unable to determine the probability of the outcome of this matter. The Company intends to
defend this matter vigorously.
Singapore Development Project
In August 2006, the Company entered into a development agreement, as amended by a
supplementary agreement on December 11, 2009 (the Development Agreement), with the Singapore
Tourism Board (the STB), which requires the Company to construct and operate the Marina Bay Sands
in accordance with the Companys proposal for the integrated resort and in accordance with the
agreement. The Company entered into the SGD 5.44 billion (approximately $4.31 billion at exchange
rates in effect on March 31, 2011) Singapore Credit Facility to fund a significant portion of the
construction, operating and other development costs of the Marina Bay Sands.
The Development Agreement permits the Marina Bay Sands to open in stages and in accordance
with an agreed upon schedule that runs through September 30, 2011. There are no financial
consequences to MBS if it fails to meet the agreed upon schedule, provided that the entire
integrated resort is opened by December 31, 2011. The Company believes it will meet this deadline;
however, if it doesnt, the STB will be entitled to draw on the SGD 192.6 million (approximately
$152.5 million at exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2011) security deposit under the Singapore
Credit Facility.
Other Agreements
The Company has entered into an agreement with Starwood to manage hotels, as well as brand
serviced luxury apart-hotels, on the Companys Cotai Strip parcels 5 and 6. The management
agreement imposes certain construction and opening obligations and deadlines on the Company, and
certain past and/or anticipated delays would allow Starwood to terminate its agreement. The Company
has recommenced construction activities on parcels 5 and 6 and is negotiating an amendment to its
management agreement with Starwood to provide for new opening timelines. If negotiations are
unsuccessful and Starwood exercises its rights to terminate its agreement, the Company would have
to find a new manager and brand for these projects. The Companys agreements with Shangri-La
related to the management of a hotel on parcels 5 and 6 and Starwood related to the sales and
marketing of the Las Vegas Condo Tower have been terminated. Management is currently evaluating
alternative hotel brands to manage and brand these projects. If the Company is unsuccessful in
finding new managers and brands in Macau or Las Vegas, such measures could have a material adverse
effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
NOTE 10 SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Companys principal operating and developmental activities occur in three geographic
areas: United States, Macau and Singapore. The Company reviews the results of operations for each
of its key operating segments: The Venetian Las Vegas, which includes the Sands Expo Center; The
Palazzo; Sands Bethlehem; Sands Macao; The Venetian Macao; Four Seasons Macao; and Other Asia
(comprised primarily of the Companys ferry operations and various other operations that are
ancillary to the Companys properties in Macau); and Marina Bay Sands. The Company also reviews
construction and development activities for each of its primary projects: The Venetian Las Vegas;
The Palazzo; Sands Bethlehem; Sands Macao; The Venetian Macao; Four Seasons Macao;
20
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Other Asia;
Marina Bay Sands; Other Development Projects (on Cotai Strip parcels 3, 5 and 6, and 7 and 8); and
Corporate and Other (comprised primarily of airplanes and the Las Vegas Condo Tower). The Venetian
Las Vegas and The Palazzo operating segments are managed as a single integrated resort and have
been aggregated as one reportable segment (the Las Vegas Operating Properties), considering their
similar economic characteristics, types of customers, types of service and products, the regulatory
business environment of the operations within each segment and the Companys organizational and
management reporting structure. The information for the three months ended March 31, 2010, has been
reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The Companys segment information
as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and
2010, is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net Revenues: |
||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 638,269 | $ | 549,695 | ||||
Sands Macao |
322,793 | 283,806 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
172,107 | 102,344 | ||||||
Other Asia |
33,773 | 24,172 | ||||||
1,166,942 | 960,017 | |||||||
United States: |
||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
305,075 | 330,510 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
91,030 | 67,241 | ||||||
396,105 | 397,751 | |||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
584,925 | | ||||||
Intersegment eliminations |
(36,053 | ) | (22,880 | ) | ||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 2,111,919 | $ | 1,334,888 | ||||
Adjusted Property EBITDA(1) |
||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 228,400 | $ | 169,915 | ||||
Sands Macao |
92,648 | 69,761 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
57,547 | 19,495 | ||||||
Other Asia |
(4,606 | ) | (4,432 | ) | ||||
373,989 | 254,739 | |||||||
United States: |
||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
65,165 | 105,292 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
22,109 | 10,968 | ||||||
87,274 | 116,260 | |||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
284,471 | | ||||||
Total adjusted property EBITDA |
745,734 | 370,999 | ||||||
Other Operating Costs and Expenses |
||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
(8,295 | ) | (5,808 | ) | ||||
Corporate expense |
(37,576 | ) | (23,476 | ) | ||||
Rental expense |
(13,156 | ) | (8,698 | ) | ||||
Pre-opening expense |
(9,471 | ) | (37,459 | ) | ||||
Development expense |
(573 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(190,237 | ) | (153,089 | ) | ||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
(499 | ) | (492 | ) | ||||
Operating income |
485,927 | 141,820 | ||||||
Other Non-Operating Costs and Expenses |
||||||||
Interest income |
2,047 | 1,633 | ||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(73,585 | ) | (78,165 | ) | ||||
Other expense |
(4,675 | ) | (6,448 | ) | ||||
Gain on early retirement of debt |
| 2,176 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
(45,211 | ) | (13,202 | ) | ||||
Net income |
$ | 364,503 | $ | 47,814 | ||||
(1) | Adjusted property EBITDA is net income before stock-based compensation
expense, corporate expense, rental expense, pre-opening expense,
development expense, depreciation and amortization, loss on disposal
of assets, interest, other expense, gain on early retirement of debt
and income taxes. Adjusted property EBITDA is used by management as
the primary measure of operating performance of the Companys
properties and to compare the operating performance of the Companys
properties with that of its competitors. |
21
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Intersegment Revenues |
||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 895 | $ | 2,413 | ||||
Other Asia |
7,901 | 13,826 | ||||||
8,796 | 16,239 | |||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
27,060 | 6,641 | ||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
197 | | ||||||
Total intersegment revenues |
$ | 36,053 | $ | 22,880 | ||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Capital Expenditures |
||||||||
Corporate and Other |
$ | 2,845 | $ | 8,009 | ||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
| 5,867 | ||||||
Sands Macao |
| 654 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
1,293 | 11,636 | ||||||
Other Asia |
3,718 | 1,784 | ||||||
Other Development Projects |
140,094 | 27,798 | ||||||
145,105 | 47,739 | |||||||
United States: |
||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
8,402 | 4,631 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
18,172 | 11,259 | ||||||
26,574 | 15,890 | |||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
157,984 | 466,563 | ||||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 332,508 | $ | 538,201 | ||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Total Assets |
||||||||
Corporate and Other |
$ | 1,412,180 | $ | 1,574,180 | ||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
3,377,662 | 3,194,598 | ||||||
Sands Macao |
469,216 | 483,678 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
1,133,927 | 1,155,243 | ||||||
Other Asia |
382,963 | 370,525 | ||||||
Other Development Projects |
3,136,676 | 3,140,905 | ||||||
8,500,444 | 8,344,949 | |||||||
United States: |
||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
3,966,295 | 3,966,754 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
785,903 | 757,993 | ||||||
4,752,198 | 4,724,747 | |||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
6,572,168 | 6,400,432 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 21,236,990 | $ | 21,044,308 | ||||
22
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Total Long-Lived Assets |
||||||||
Corporate and Other |
$ | 307,236 | $ | 308,438 | ||||
Macau: |
||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
2,086,513 | 2,138,419 | ||||||
Sands Macao |
306,506 | 315,380 | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
1,010,665 | 1,024,302 | ||||||
Other Asia |
226,787 | 230,640 | ||||||
Other Development Projects |
2,433,401 | 2,303,959 | ||||||
6,063,872 | 6,012,700 | |||||||
United States: |
||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
3,384,003 | 3,429,997 | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
616,817 | 608,021 | ||||||
4,000,820 | 4,038,018 | |||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
5,725,858 | 5,541,881 | ||||||
Total long-lived assets |
$ | 16,097,786 | $ | 15,901,037 | ||||
NOTE 11 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION
LVSC is the obligor of the Senior Notes due 2015. Las Vegas Sands, LLC, VCR, Mall Intermediate
Holding Company, LLC, Venetian Transport, LLC, Venetian Marketing, Inc., Lido Intermediate Holding
Company, LLC, Lido Casino Resort Holding Company, LLC, Interface Group-Nevada, Inc., Palazzo Condo
Tower, LLC, Sands Pennsylvania, Inc., Phase II Mall Holding, LLC, LVS (Nevada) International
Holdings, Inc. and LVS Management Services, LLC (collectively, the Guarantor Subsidiaries), have
jointly and severally guaranteed the Senior Notes on a full and unconditional basis. The voting
stock of all entities included as Guarantor Subsidiaries is 100% owned directly or indirectly by
Las Vegas Sands Corp. The noncontrolling interest amount included in the Guarantor Subsidiaries
condensed consolidating balance sheets is related to non-voting preferred stock of one of the
subsidiaries held by third parties.
In February 2008, all of the capital stock of Phase II Mall Subsidiary, LLC was sold to GGP
and in connection therewith, it was released as a guarantor under the Senior Notes. The sale is not
complete from an accounting perspective due to the Companys continuing involvement in the
transaction related to the completion of construction on the remainder of The Shoppes at The
Palazzo, certain activities to be performed on behalf of GGP and the uncertainty of the final sales
price. Certain of the assets, liabilities, operating results and cash flows related to the
ownership and operation of the mall by Phase II Mall Subsidiary, LLC subsequent to the sale will
continue to be accounted for by the Guarantor Subsidiaries until the final sales price has been
determined, and therefore are included in the Guarantor Subsidiaries columns in the following
condensed consolidating financial information. As a result, net assets of $38.0 million (consisting
of $282.1 million of property and equipment, offset by $244.1 million of liabilities consisting
primarily of deferred proceeds from the sale) as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and a net
loss (consisting primarily of depreciation expense) of $3.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, related to the mall and are being accounted for by the Guarantor Subsidiaries.
These balances and amounts are not collateral for the Senior Notes and should not be considered as
credit support for the guarantees of the Senior Notes.
23
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
The condensed consolidating financial information of LVSC, the Guarantor Subsidiaries and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, is as follows (in thousands):
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
March 31, 2011
March 31, 2011
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 930,935 | $ | 468,724 | $ | 1,734,282 | $ | | $ | 3,133,941 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
| 2,090 | 144,442 | | 146,532 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
45,092 | 59,209 | 21,640 | (125,941 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
763 | 174,130 | 628,438 | (231 | ) | 803,100 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories |
2,338 | 12,006 | 19,289 | | 33,633 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 26,427 | 17,665 | (10,232 | ) | 33,860 | ||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
7,889 | 9,124 | 37,206 | | 54,219 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
987,017 | 751,710 | 2,602,962 | (136,404 | ) | 4,205,285 | ||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
132,147 | 3,526,378 | 11,035,464 | | 14,693,989 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
6,667,060 | 5,288,011 | | (11,955,071 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
728 | 27,193 | 116,481 | | 144,402 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
| 4,705 | 507,640 | | 512,345 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
31,976 | 105,989 | | (137,965 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany notes receivable |
| 681,626 | | (681,626 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
59,668 | | | (50,939 | ) | 8,729 | ||||||||||||||
Leasehold interests in land, net |
| | 1,403,797 | | 1,403,797 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
690 | | 87,215 | | 87,905 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
113 | 25,266 | 155,159 | | 180,538 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,879,399 | $ | 10,410,878 | $ | 15,908,718 | $ | (12,962,005 | ) | $ | 21,236,990 | |||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,025 | $ | 23,053 | $ | 60,887 | $ | (231 | ) | $ | 87,734 | |||||||||
Construction payables |
| 2,090 | 475,899 | | 477,989 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
21,640 | 45,092 | 59,209 | (125,941 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
1,604 | 1,033 | 20,784 | | 23,421 | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
6,926 | 175,088 | 890,178 | | 1,072,192 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
7,965 | | 666 | | 8,631 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
10,232 | | | (10,232 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
3,688 | 30,595 | 882,724 | | 917,007 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
56,080 | 276,951 | 2,390,347 | (136,404 | ) | 2,586,974 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
26,761 | 10,282 | 44,139 | | 81,182 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
49,615 | | 88,350 | (137,965 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany notes payable |
| | 681,626 | (681,626 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 51,847 | 123,130 | (50,939 | ) | 124,038 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred amounts related to mall
transactions |
| 433,262 | | | 433,262 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
262,847 | 2,862,282 | 6,060,623 | | 9,185,752 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
395,303 | 3,634,624 | 9,388,215 | (1,006,934 | ) | 12,411,208 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock issued to Principal
Stockholders family |
526,515 | | | | 526,515 | |||||||||||||||
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp.
stockholders equity |
6,957,581 | 6,775,849 | 5,179,222 | (11,955,071 | ) | 6,957,581 | ||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
| 405 | 1,341,281 | | 1,341,686 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity |
6,957,581 | 6,776,254 | 6,520,503 | (11,955,071 | ) | 8,299,267 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 7,879,399 | $ | 10,410,878 | $ | 15,908,718 | $ | (12,962,005 | ) | $ | 21,236,990 | |||||||||
24
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2010
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,031,844 | $ | 412,226 | $ | 1,593,011 | $ | | $ | 3,037,081 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
| 2,179 | 162,136 | | 164,315 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
11,843 | 65,834 | 22,927 | (100,604 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
298 | 156,012 | 561,217 | (608 | ) | 716,919 | ||||||||||||||
Inventories |
2,174 | 11,755 | 18,331 | | 32,260 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
| 24,496 | 47,389 | (10,279 | ) | 61,606 | ||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
15,272 | 4,782 | 30,432 | (3,760 | ) | 46,726 | ||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
1,061,431 | 677,284 | 2,435,443 | (115,251 | ) | 4,058,907 | ||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
133,901 | 3,570,465 | 10,797,831 | | 14,502,197 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
6,273,755 | 4,996,023 | | (11,269,778 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
767 | 29,198 | 125,413 | | 155,378 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted cash and cash equivalents |
| 4,616 | 640,989 | | 645,605 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany receivables |
31,996 | 97,813 | | (129,809 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany notes receivable |
| 638,986 | | (638,986 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes, net |
62,638 | | | (52,215 | ) | 10,423 | ||||||||||||||
Leasehold interests in land, net |
| | 1,398,840 | | 1,398,840 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets, net |
590 | | 89,215 | | 89,805 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
78 | 27,104 | 155,971 | | 183,153 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 7,565,156 | $ | 10,041,489 | $ | 15,643,702 | $ | (12,206,039 | ) | $ | 21,044,308 | |||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 5,750 | $ | 26,975 | $ | 81,388 | $ | (608 | ) | $ | 113,505 | |||||||||
Construction payables |
| 2,179 | 514,802 | | 516,981 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
22,926 | 11,843 | 65,835 | (100,604 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
4,629 | 7,689 | 30,307 | | 42,625 | |||||||||||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
15,692 | 175,011 | 969,531 | | 1,160,234 | |||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
| | 3,760 | (3,760 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
10,279 | | | (10,279 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
3,687 | 30,606 | 732,775 | | 767,068 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
62,963 | 254,303 | 2,398,398 | (115,251 | ) | 2,600,413 | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
26,761 | 10,911 | 40,568 | | 78,240 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
45,336 | | 84,473 | (129,809 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany notes payable |
| | 638,986 | (638,986 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 53,034 | 114,400 | (52,215 | ) | 115,219 | ||||||||||||||
Deferred amounts related to mall
transactions |
| 442,114 | | | 442,114 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
263,726 | 2,869,931 | 6,240,098 | | 9,373,755 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
398,786 | 3,630,293 | 9,516,923 | (936,261 | ) | 12,609,741 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock issued to Principal
Stockholders family |
503,379 | | | | 503,379 | |||||||||||||||
Total Las Vegas Sands Corp.
stockholders equity |
6,662,991 | 6,410,791 | 4,858,987 | (11,269,778 | ) | 6,662,991 | ||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
| 405 | 1,267,792 | | 1,268,197 | |||||||||||||||
Total equity |
6,662,991 | 6,411,196 | 6,126,779 | (11,269,778 | ) | 7,931,188 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 7,565,156 | $ | 10,041,489 | $ | 15,643,702 | $ | (12,206,039 | ) | $ | 21,044,308 | |||||||||
25
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | | $ | 83,123 | $ | 1,581,366 | $ | | $ | 1,664,489 | ||||||||||
Rooms |
| 112,874 | 119,100 | | 231,974 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 50,307 | 95,086 | | 145,393 | |||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 64,543 | 130,059 | (29,947 | ) | 164,655 | ||||||||||||||
| 310,847 | 1,925,611 | (29,947 | ) | 2,206,511 | |||||||||||||||
Less-promotional allowances |
(163 | ) | (17,626 | ) | (76,396 | ) | (407 | ) | (94,592 | ) | ||||||||||
Net revenues |
(163 | ) | 293,221 | 1,849,215 | (30,354 | ) | 2,111,919 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
| 64,368 | 857,745 | (577 | ) | 921,536 | ||||||||||||||
Rooms |
| 32,248 | 16,205 | | 48,453 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 23,596 | 49,563 | (1,456 | ) | 71,703 | ||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 21,153 | 70,582 | (4,490 | ) | 87,245 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| 6,096 | 28,962 | | 35,058 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
| 60,732 | 149,973 | (220 | ) | 210,485 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate expense |
32,980 | 55 | 28,152 | (23,611 | ) | 37,576 | ||||||||||||||
Rental expense |
| | 13,156 | | 13,156 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
| | 9,471 | | 9,471 | |||||||||||||||
Development expense |
573 | | | | 573 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,183 | 52,813 | 133,241 | | 190,237 | |||||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
| (55 | ) | 554 | | 499 | ||||||||||||||
37,736 | 261,006 | 1,357,604 | (30,354 | ) | 1,625,992 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(37,899 | ) | 32,215 | 491,611 | | 485,927 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
557 | 25,275 | 1,292 | (25,077 | ) | 2,047 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(3,450 | ) | (23,072 | ) | (72,140 | ) | 25,077 | (73,585 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expense |
| (717 | ) | (3,958 | ) | | (4,675 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income from equity investments in
subsidiaries |
328,939 | 277,722 | | (606,661 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
288,147 | 311,423 | 416,805 | (606,661 | ) | 409,714 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
1,176 | (9,052 | ) | (37,335 | ) | | (45,211 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income |
289,323 | 302,371 | 379,470 | (606,661 | ) | 364,503 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
| | (75,180 | ) | | (75,180 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands
Corp. |
$ | 289,323 | $ | 302,371 | $ | 304,290 | $ | (606,661 | ) | $ | 289,323 | |||||||||
26
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | | $ | 155,345 | $ | 906,425 | $ | | $ | 1,061,770 | ||||||||||
Rooms |
| 120,067 | 60,715 | | 180,782 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 43,522 | 48,557 | | 92,079 | |||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 51,022 | 66,241 | (9,048 | ) | 108,215 | ||||||||||||||
| 369,956 | 1,081,938 | (9,048 | ) | 1,442,846 | |||||||||||||||
Less-promotional allowances |
(132 | ) | (50,650 | ) | (56,485 | ) | (691 | ) | (107,958 | ) | ||||||||||
Net revenues |
(132 | ) | 319,306 | 1,025,453 | (9,739 | ) | 1,334,888 | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Casino |
| 86,652 | 608,590 | (607 | ) | 694,635 | ||||||||||||||
Rooms |
| 23,211 | 6,443 | | 29,654 | |||||||||||||||
Food and beverage |
| 18,332 | 27,599 | (1,628 | ) | 44,303 | ||||||||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
| 19,700 | 40,938 | (2,234 | ) | 58,404 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
| 8,340 | 8,102 | | 16,442 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
| 56,575 | 69,948 | (264 | ) | 126,259 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate expense |
20,271 | 81 | 8,124 | (5,000 | ) | 23,476 | ||||||||||||||
Rental expense |
| | 8,698 | | 8,698 | |||||||||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
178 | 2 | 37,285 | (6 | ) | 37,459 | ||||||||||||||
Development expense |
157 | | | | 157 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3,019 | 58,459 | 91,611 | | 153,089 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
| | 492 | | 492 | |||||||||||||||
23,625 | 271,352 | 907,830 | (9,739 | ) | 1,193,068 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(23,757 | ) | 47,954 | 117,623 | | 141,820 | ||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
504 | 20,278 | 510 | (19,659 | ) | 1,633 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(4,278 | ) | (29,564 | ) | (63,982 | ) | 19,659 | (78,165 | ) | |||||||||||
Other expense |
| (16 | ) | (6,432 | ) | | (6,448 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on early retirement of debt |
2,397 | | (221 | ) | | 2,176 | ||||||||||||||
Income from equity investments in
subsidiaries |
50,590 | 25,556 | | (76,146 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
25,456 | 64,208 | 47,498 | (76,146 | ) | 61,016 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(7,875 | ) | (8,440 | ) | 3,113 | | (13,202 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income |
17,581 | 55,768 | 50,611 | (76,146 | ) | 47,814 | ||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
| | (30,233 | ) | | (30,233 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands
Corp. |
$ | 17,581 | $ | 55,768 | $ | 20,378 | $ | (76,146 | ) | $ | 17,581 | |||||||||
27
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Non- | Consolidating/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) operating
activities |
$ | (49,859 | ) | $ | 46,192 | $ | 422,045 | $ | | $ | 418,378 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
| | 149,962 | | 149,962 | |||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(2,429 | ) | (8,760 | ) | (321,319 | ) | | (332,508 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
| | 3,097 | | 3,097 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition of intangible assets |
(100 | ) | | (229 | ) | | (329 | ) | ||||||||||||
Notes receivable to non-guarantor subsidiaries |
| (18,110 | ) | | 18,110 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
28,564 | | | (28,564 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends from non-guarantor subsidiaries |
| 23,400 | | (23,400 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Capital contributions to subsidiaries |
(50,000 | ) | | | 50,000 | | ||||||||||||||
Net used in investing activities |
(23,965 | ) | (3,470 | ) | (168,489 | ) | 16,146 | (179,778 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
8,420 | | 91 | | 8,511 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |
5,760 | | | | 5,760 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(19,598 | ) | | | | (19,598 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| (28,564 | ) | | 28,564 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | (23,400 | ) | 23,400 | | ||||||||||||||
Capital contributions received |
| 50,000 | | (50,000 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | 18,110 | (18,110 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Repayments on Singapore credit facility |
| | (97,691 | ) | | (97,691 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on senior secured credit facility |
| (7,234 | ) | | | (7,234 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on VML credit facility |
| | (6,250 | ) | | (6,250 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on ferry financing |
| | (8,745 | ) | | (8,745 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on airplane financings |
(922 | ) | | | | (922 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on HVAC equipment lease |
| (426 | ) | | | (426 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on FF&E facility and other long-term
debt |
| | (453 | ) | | (453 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repurchase of preferred stock |
(4,544 | ) | | | | (4,544 | ) | |||||||||||||
Payments of preferred stock inducement premium |
(16,201 | ) | | | | (16,201 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) financing
activities |
(27,085 | ) | 13,776 | (118,338 | ) | (16,146 | ) | (147,793 | ) | |||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
| | 6,053 | | 6,053 | |||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(100,909 | ) | 56,498 | 141,271 | | 96,860 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
1,031,844 | 412,226 | 1,593,011 | | 3,037,081 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 930,935 | $ | 468,724 | $ | 1,734,282 | $ | | $ | 3,133,941 | ||||||||||
28
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(UNAUDITED)
(UNAUDITED)
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Consolidating/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Las Vegas | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | Eliminating | |||||||||||||||||
Sands Corp. | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Entries | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in)
operating activities |
$ | (44,115 | ) | $ | 103,595 | $ | 223,314 | $ | | $ | 282,794 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
| | (182,575 | ) | | (182,575 | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(4,378 | ) | (8,170 | ) | (525,653 | ) | | (538,201 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
| 700 | 1,611 | | 2,311 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments |
| | (173,978 | ) | | (173,978 | ) | |||||||||||||
Notes receivable to non-guarantor subsidiaries |
| (42,695 | ) | | 42,695 | | ||||||||||||||
Repayment of receivable from non-guarantor
subsidiaries |
| 50 | | (50 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
1,675,313 | | | (1,675,313 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends from non-guarantor subsidiaries |
| 11,500 | | (11,500 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Capital contributions to subsidiaries |
(1,400,000 | ) | | | 1,400,000 | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) investing
activities |
270,935 | (38,615 | ) | (880,595 | ) | (244,168 | ) | (892,443 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
73 | | | | 73 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(23,350 | ) | | | | (23,350 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
| (1,675,313 | ) | | 1,675,313 | | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | (11,500 | ) | 11,500 | | ||||||||||||||
Capital contributions received |
| 1,400,000 | | (1,400,000 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries |
| | 42,695 | (42,695 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Repayment on borrowings from Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
| | (50 | ) | 50 | | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from Singapore credit facility |
| | 272,056 | | 272,056 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments on senior secured credit facility |
| (785,860 | ) | | | (785,860 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on VML credit facility |
| | (12,525 | ) | | (12,525 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repurchase and cancellation of senior notes |
(30,156 | ) | | | | (30,156 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on ferry financing |
| | (8,762 | ) | | (8,762 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on airplane financings |
(922 | ) | | | | (922 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on HVAC equipment lease |
| (437 | ) | | | (437 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repayments on FF&E facility and other long-term
debt |
| (8,350 | ) | (314 | ) | | (8,664 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
| | (821 | ) | | (821 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash generated from (used in) financing
activities |
(54,355 | ) | (1,069,960 | ) | 280,779 | 244,168 | (599,368 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
| | 5,446 | | 5,446 | |||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
172,465 | (1,004,980 | ) | (371,056 | ) | | (1,203,571 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
254,256 | 3,033,625 | 1,667,535 | | 4,955,416 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 426,721 | $ | 2,028,645 | $ | 1,296,479 | $ | | $ | 3,751,845 | ||||||||||
29
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2 | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety
by, the condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and other financial
information included in this Form 10-Q. Certain statements in this Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements. See
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Operations
We view each of our casino properties as an operating segment. Our operating segments in the
United States consist of The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino (The Venetian Las Vegas), The Palazzo
Resort Hotel Casino (The Palazzo) and the Sands Casino Resort Bethlehem (the Sands Bethlehem).
The Venetian Las Vegas and The Palazzo operating segments are managed as a single integrated resort
and have been aggregated into one reportable segment (the Las Vegas Operating Properties),
considering their similar economic characteristics, types of customers, types of service and
products, the regulatory business environment of the operations within each segment and our
organizational and management reporting structure. Our operating segments in the Macau Special
Administrative Region (Macau) of the Peoples Republic of China consist of the Sands Macao; The
Venetian Macao Resort Hotel (The Venetian Macao); the Four Seasons Hotel Macao, Cotai Strip and
the Plaza Casino (collectively, the Four Seasons Macao); and other ancillary operations in that
region (Other Asia). Our operating segment in Singapore, Marina Bay Sands, opened on April 27,
2010.
United States
Las Vegas
Our Las Vegas Operating Properties, situated on or near the Las Vegas Strip, consist of The
Venetian Las Vegas, a Renaissance Venice-themed resort; The Palazzo, a resort featuring modern
European ambience and design; and an expo and convention center of approximately 1.2 million square
feet (the Sands Expo Center). Our Las Vegas Operating Properties represent an integrated resort
with approximately 7,100 suites and approximately 225,000 square feet of gaming space. Our Las
Vegas Operating Properties also feature a meeting and conference facility of approximately
1.1 million square feet; Canyon Ranch SpaClub facilities; a Paiza Club offering services and
amenities to premium customers, including luxurious VIP suites, spa facilities and private VIP
gaming room facilities; entertainment facilities; an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment
complex located within The Venetian Las Vegas of approximately 440,000 net leasable square feet
(The Grand Canal Shoppes), which was sold to GGP Limited Partnership (GGP) in 2004; and an
enclosed retail and dining complex located within The Palazzo of approximately 400,000 net leasable
square feet (The Shoppes at The Palazzo), which was sold to GGP in February 2008. See Item 1
Financial Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note 2 Property and
Equipment, Net regarding the sale of The Shoppes at The Palazzo.
Approximately 74.3% and 59.4% of gross revenue at our Las Vegas Operating Properties for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, was derived from room revenues, food and
beverage services, and other non-gaming sources, and 25.7% and 40.6%, respectively, was derived
from gaming activities. The percentage of non-gaming revenue reflects the integrated resorts
emphasis on the group convention and trade show business.
Pennsylvania
In May 2009, we partially opened the Sands Bethlehem, a gaming, hotel, retail and dining
complex located on the site of the historic Bethlehem Steel Works in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. The
Sands Bethlehem currently features approximately 152,000 square feet of gaming space, which include
table games operations that commenced in July 2010. We recommenced construction of a 300-room hotel
tower, which is expected to open in the May 2011. We are initiating construction activities on the
remaining components of the integrated resort, which include an approximate 200,000-square-foot
retail facility and a 50,000-square-foot multipurpose event center. Sands Bethlehem is also
expected to be home to the National Museum of Industrial History, an arts and cultural center, and
the broadcast
home of the local PBS affiliate. We own 86% of the economic interest of the gaming, hotel and
entertainment portion of the property through our ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Gaming LLC
and more than 35% of the economic interest of the retail portion of the property through our
ownership interest in Sands Bethworks Retail LLC. Approximately 92.0% and 91.1% of the gross
revenue at Sands Bethlehem for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, was
derived from gaming activities, with the remainder derived from food and beverage services and
other non-gaming sources.
30
Table of Contents
Macau
Sands China Ltd. (SCL) completed an initial public offering (the SCL Offering) by listing
its ordinary shares on The Main Board of The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited in November 2009.
We own 70.3% of SCL, which includes the operations of the Sands Macao, The Venetian Macao, Four
Seasons Macao and other ancillary operations that support these properties. We operate the gaming
areas within these properties pursuant to a 20-year gaming subconcession.
We own and operate the Sands Macao, the first Las Vegas-style casino in Macau. The Sands Macao
includes approximately 197,000 square feet of gaming space; a 289-suite hotel tower; several
restaurants; VIP facilities; a theater and other high-end services and amenities. Approximately
94.6% and 94.3% of the gross revenue at the Sands Macao for the three months ended March 31, 2011
and 2010, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder primarily derived
from room revenues and food and beverage services.
We also own and operate The Venetian Macao, the anchor property of our master-planned
development of integrated resort properties that we refer to as the Cotai Strip in Macau. With a
theme similar to that of The Venetian Las Vegas, The Venetian Macao includes a 39-floor luxury
hotel with over 2,900 suites; approximately 550,000 square feet of gaming space; a 15,000-seat
arena; an 1,800-seat theater; retail and dining space of approximately 1.0 million square feet; and
a convention center and meeting room complex of approximately 1.2 million square feet.
Approximately 84.0% and 82.3% of the gross revenue at The Venetian Macao for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder
derived from room revenues and other non-gaming sources.
We own the Four Seasons Macao, which is located adjacent and connected to The Venetian Macao.
The Four Seasons Macao is an integrated resort that features 360 rooms and suites managed and
operated by Four Seasons Hotels Inc.; 19 Paiza mansions; approximately 70,000 square feet of gaming
space; retail space of approximately 211,000 square feet, which is connected to the mall at The
Venetian Macao; several food and beverage offerings; and conference, banquet and other facilities
operated by us. This integrated resort will also feature the Four Seasons Apartment Hotel Macao,
Cotai Strip (the Four Seasons Apartments), an apart-hotel tower that consists of approximately
1.0 million square feet of Four Seasons-serviced and -branded luxury apart-hotel units and common
areas. We have completed the structural work of the tower and expect to monetize the units within
the Four Seasons Apartments subject to market conditions and obtaining the necessary government
approvals. Approximately 89.8% and 83.1% of the gross revenue at the Four Seasons Macao for the
three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, was derived from gaming activities, with
the remainder derived from mall revenues, room revenues and other non-gaming sources.
31
Table of Contents
Singapore
We own and operate the Marina Bay Sands in Singapore, which partially opened on April 27,
2010, with additional portions opened progressively throughout 2010. Marina Bay Sands features
three 55-story hotel towers (with approximately 2,600 rooms and suites), the Sands SkyPark (which
sits atop the hotel towers and features an infinity swimming pool and several dining options),
approximately 161,000 square feet of gaming space, an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment
complex of approximately 800,000 net leasable square feet, a convention center and meeting room
complex of approximately 1.3 million square feet and theaters. In February 2011, the Marina Bay
Sands opened a landmark iconic structure at the bay-front promenade that contains an art/science
museum. As of March 31, 2011, we have capitalized 7.56 billion Singapore dollars (SGD,
approximately $5.99 billion at exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2011) in costs for this
project, including the land premium and SGD 383.9 million (approximately $304.0 million at exchange
rates in effect on March 31, 2011) in outstanding construction payables. We expect to spend
approximately SGD 760 million (approximately $602 million at
exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2011) on additional costs to complete the integrated
resort, FF&E and other costs, and to pay outstanding construction payables, as noted above. As we
have obtained Singapore-denominated financing and primarily pay our costs in Singapore dollars, our
exposure to foreign exchange gains and losses is expected to be minimal.
Approximately 75.3% of the gross revenue at the Marina Bay Sands for the three months ended
March 31, 2011, was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder derived from room revenues,
food and beverage services and other non-gaming sources.
Development Projects
We have suspended portions of our development projects to focus our efforts on those projects
with the highest expected rates of return on invested capital. Should general economic conditions
fail to improve, if we are unable to obtain sufficient funding or applicable government approvals
such that completion of our suspended projects is not probable, or should management decide to
abandon certain projects, all or a portion of our investment to date on our suspended projects
could be lost and would result in an impairment charge. In addition, we may be subject to penalties
under the termination clauses in our construction contracts or termination rights under our
management contracts with certain hotel management companies.
United States
We were constructing a high-rise residential condominium tower (the Las Vegas Condo Tower),
located on the Las Vegas Strip between The Palazzo and The Venetian Las Vegas. We suspended our
construction activities for the project due to reduced demand for Las Vegas Strip condominiums and
the overall decline in general economic conditions. We intend to recommence construction when
demand and conditions improve and expect that it will take approximately 18 months thereafter to
complete construction of the project. As of March 31, 2011, we have capitalized construction costs
of $177.1 million for this project. The impact of the suspension on the estimated overall cost of
the project is currently not determinable with certainty.
32
Table of Contents
Macau
We submitted plans to the Macau government for our other Cotai Strip developments, which
represent three integrated resort developments, in addition to The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons
Macao, on an area of approximately 200 acres (which we refer to as parcels 3, 5 and 6, and 7 and
8). Subject to the approval from the Macau government, as discussed further below, the developments
are expected to include hotels, exhibition and conference facilities, gaming areas, showrooms,
spas, dining, retail and entertainment facilities and other amenities. We commenced construction or
pre-construction activities on these developments and plan to operate the related gaming areas
under our Macau gaming subconcession. In addition, we are completing the development of some public
areas surrounding our Cotai Strip properties on behalf of the Macau government. We currently intend
to develop our other Cotai Strip properties as follows:
| Parcels 5 and 6 We are staging the construction of the integrated
resort on parcels 5 and 6. Upon completion of phases I and II of the
project, the integrated resort will feature approximately 6,000 hotel
rooms, approximately 300,000 square feet of gaming space,
approximately 1.2 million square feet of retail, entertainment and
dining facilities, exhibition and conference facilities and a
multipurpose theater. Phase I of the project is expected to include
two hotel towers, one of which will be managed by Sheraton
International Inc. and Sheraton Overseas Management Co. (collectively
Starwood) under its Sheraton brand, as well as completion of the
structural work of an adjacent hotel tower to be managed by Starwood
under its Sheraton brand. The second hotel tower was to be managed by
Shangri-La International Hotel Management Limited (Shangri-La);
however, in March 2011, we mutually agreed with Shangri-La to
terminate the hotel management agreement and are now currently
evaluating alternative hotel brands to manage our second tower. Phase
I will also include the gaming space and a partial opening of the
retail and exhibition and conference facilities. Phase II of the
project includes completion of the additional Sheraton hotel tower,
the theater and the remaining retail facilities. The total cost to
complete phases I and II is expected to be approximately $1.9 billion.
Phase III of the project is expected to include a fourth hotel and
mixed-use tower to be managed by Starwood under its St. Regis brand
and the total cost to complete is expected to be approximately
$450 million. In connection with entering into the $1.75 billion
Venetian Orient Limited (VOL) credit facility to be used together
with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, we have
recommenced construction activities. We are currently working with the
Macau government to obtain sufficient construction labor for the
project. Although we have made significant progress on phases I and II
with the construction labor currently onsite, our anticipated opening
of phase I may be delayed until the first quarter of 2012 if
additional construction labor is not secured. Until adequate labor
quotas are received, the timing of the completion of phase II is
currently not determinable. We intend to commence construction of
phase III of the project as demand and market conditions warrant it.
As of March 31, 2011, we have capitalized costs of $2.24 billion for
the entire project, including the land premium and $136.1 million in
outstanding construction payables. Our management agreement with
Starwood imposes certain construction deadlines and opening
obligations on us and certain past and/or anticipated delays, as
described above, would allow Starwood to terminate its agreement. We
are currently negotiating an amendment to the management agreement
with Starwood to provide for new opening timelines. |
||
| Parcels 7 and 8 If we are successful in winning our appeal and
obtaining the land concession for parcels 7 and 8 (as discussed
below), the related integrated resort is expected to be similar in
size and scope to the integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6. We had
commenced pre-construction activities and have capitalized
construction costs of $101.9 million as of March 31, 2011. We intend
to commence construction after the integrated resorts on parcels 5 and
6 and 3 are complete, necessary government approvals are obtained
(including the land concession), regional and global economic
conditions improve, future demand warrants it and additional financing
is obtained. |
||
| Parcel 3 The integrated resort on parcel 3 will be connected to The
Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao. The multi-hotel complex is
intended to include a gaming area, a shopping mall and serviced luxury
apart-hotel units. We had commenced pre-construction activities and
have capitalized costs of $97.2 million, including the land premium,
as of March 31, 2011. We intend to commence construction after the
integrated resort on parcels 5 and 6 is complete, necessary government
approvals are obtained, regional and global economic conditions
improve, future demand warrants it and additional financing is
obtained. |
The impact of the delayed construction on our previously estimated cost to complete our Cotai
Strip developments is currently not determinable. As of March 31, 2011, we have capitalized an
aggregate of $6.61 billion in construction costs and land premiums for our Cotai Strip
developments, including The Venetian Macao and Four Seasons Macao, as well as our investments in
transportation infrastructure, including our passenger ferry service operations. In addition to
funding phases I and II of parcels 5 and 6 with the $1.75 billion VOL credit facility, we will need
to arrange additional financing to fund the balance of our Cotai Strip developments and there is no
assurance that we will be able to obtain any of the additional financing required.
33
Table of Contents
Land concessions in Macau generally have an initial term of 25 years with automatic extensions
of 10 years thereafter in accordance with Macau law. We have received land concessions from the
Macau government to build on parcels 1, 2, 3 and 5 and 6, including the sites on which The Venetian
Macao (parcel 1) and Four Seasons Macao (parcel 2) are located. We do not own these land sites in
Macau; however, the land concessions grant us exclusive use of the land. As specified in the land
concessions, we are required to pay premiums for each parcel, which are either payable in a single
lump sum upon acceptance of the land concessions by the Macau government or in seven semi-annual
installments (provided that the outstanding balance is due upon the completion of the corresponding
integrated resort), as well as annual rent for the term of the land concessions. During
December 2010, we received notice from the Macau government that our application for a land
concession for parcels 7 and 8 was not approved and we applied to the Chief Executive of Macau for
a review of the decision. In January 2011, we filed an appeal with the Court of Second Instance in
Macau, which has yet to issue a decision. Should we win our appeal, it is still possible for the
Chief Executive of Macau to again deny the land concession based upon public policy considerations.
If we do not obtain the land concession or do not receive full reimbursement of our capitalized
investment in this project, we would record a charge for all or some portion of the $101.9 million
in capitalized construction costs, as of March 31, 2011, related to our development on parcels 7
and 8.
Under our land concession for parcel 3, we were initially required to complete the
corresponding development by August 2011. The Macau government has granted us a two-year extension
to complete the development of parcel 3, which now must be completed by April 2013. The land
concession for parcels 5 and 6 contains a similar requirement that the corresponding development be
completed by May 2014. We believe that if we are not able to complete the developments by the
respective deadlines, we will likely be able to obtain extensions from the Macau government;
however, no assurances can be given that additional extensions will be granted. If we are unable to
meet the applicable deadlines and those deadlines are not extended, we could lose our land
concessions for parcels 3 or 5 and 6, which would prohibit us from operating any facilities
developed under the respective land concessions. As a result, we could record a charge for all or
some portion of the $97.2 million and $2.24 billion in capitalized costs and land premiums, as of
March 31, 2011, related to our developments on parcels 3 or 5 and 6, respectively.
Other
When the current economic environment and access to capital improve, we may continue exploring
the possibility of developing and operating additional properties, including integrated resorts, in
additional Asian and U.S. jurisdictions, and in Europe.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates are
based on historical information, information that is currently available to us and on various other
assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could
vary from those estimates and we may change our estimates and assumptions in future evaluations.
Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a material effect on our financial condition
and results of operations. We believe that these critical accounting policies affect our more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial
statements. For a discussion of our significant accounting policies and estimates, please refer to
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations presented
in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 1, 2011.
There were no newly identified significant accounting estimates during the three months ended
March 31, 2011, nor were there any material changes to the critical accounting policies and
estimates discussed in our 2010 Annual Report.
34
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See related disclosure at Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements Note 1 Organization and Business of Company Recent Accounting
Pronouncements.
Summary Financial Results
The following table summarizes our results of operations:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net revenues |
$ | 2,111,919 | $ | 1,334,888 | 58.2 | % | ||||||
Operating expenses |
1,625,992 | 1,193,068 | 36.3 | % | ||||||||
Operating income |
485,927 | 141,820 | 242.6 | % | ||||||||
Income before income taxes |
409,714 | 61,016 | 571.5 | % | ||||||||
Net income |
364,503 | 47,814 | 662.3 | % | ||||||||
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
289,323 | 17,581 | 1,545.7 | % |
Percent of Net Revenues | ||||||||
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Operating expenses |
77.0 | % | 89.4 | % | ||||
Operating income |
23.0 | % | 10.6 | % | ||||
Income before income taxes |
19.4 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||
Net income |
17.3 | % | 3.6 | % | ||||
Net income attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp. |
13.7 | % | 1.3 | % |
Operating Results
Key Operating Revenue Measurements
Operating revenues at our Las Vegas Operating Properties, The Venetian Macao, Four Seasons
Macao and Marina Bay Sands are dependent upon the volume of customers who stay at the hotel, which
affects the price that can be charged for hotel rooms and the volume of table games and slot
machine play. Operating revenues at Sands Macao and Sands Bethlehem are principally driven by
casino customers who visit the properties on a daily basis.
The following are the key measurements we use to evaluate operating revenues:
Casino revenue measurements for the U.S.: Table games drop (drop) and slot handle (handle)
are volume measurements. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of drop or handle that is
won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Table games drop represents the sum of markers
issued (credit instruments) less markers paid at the table, plus cash deposited in the table drop
box. Slot handle is the gross amount wagered for the period cited. We view table games win as a
percentage of drop and slot hold as a percentage of slot handle. Based upon our mix of table games,
our table games in Las Vegas have produced a trailing 12-month win percentage (calculated before
discounts) of 18.8%. Slot machines in Las Vegas and Pennsylvania have produced a trailing 12-month
hold percentage (calculated before slot club cash incentives) of 7.8% and 7.1%, respectively.
Actual win may vary from the trailing 12-month win and hold
percentages. Generally, slot machine play is
conducted on a cash basis. In Las Vegas, approximately 71.1% of our table games play, for the three
months ended March 31, 2011, was conducted on a credit basis. In Pennsylvania, our table games
play, which commenced in July 2010, is primarily conducted on a cash basis. We expect to increase
the credit extended to our players as operations ramp up at Sands Bethlehem.
Casino revenue measurements for Macau and Singapore: Macau and Singapore table games are
segregated into two groups, consistent with the Macau and Singapore markets convention: Rolling
Chip play (all VIP players) and Non-Rolling Chip play (mostly non-VIP players). The volume
measurement for Rolling Chip play is non-negotiable gaming chips wagered and lost. The volume
measurement for Non-Rolling Chip play is table games drop as
previously described. Rolling Chip and Non-Rolling Chip volume measurements are not comparable
as the amounts wagered and lost are substantially higher than the amounts dropped. Slot handle is
the gross amount wagered for the period cited.
35
Table of Contents
We view Rolling Chip win as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip win as a
percentage of drop and slot hold as a percentage of slot handle. Win or hold percentage represents
the percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip drop or slot handle that is won by the
casino and recorded as casino revenue. Based upon our mix of table games, our Rolling Chip win
percentage (calculated before discounts and commissions) is expected to be 2.7% to 3.0% and our
Non-Rolling Chip table games have produced a trailing 12-month win percentage of 26.2%, 20.3% and
29.1% at The Venetian Macao, Sands Macao and Four Seasons Macao, respectively. Our slot machines
produced a trailing 12-month hold percentage of 7.1%, 5.9% and 5.9% at The Venetian Macao, Sands
Macao and Four Seasons Macao, respectively. Actual win may vary from
the trailing 12-month win and hold percentages. In Macau, 33.3% of our table games play was conducted on a credit basis for the three
months ended March 31, 2011. This percentage is expected to increase as we continue to extend
credit to our premium players and junket operators for table games play. In Singapore, 35.8% of
table games play was conducted on a credit basis for the three months ended March 31, 2011. This
percentage is expected to increase as we increase the credit extended to our premium players and as
our operations ramp up at Marina Bay Sands.
Hotel revenue measurements: Hotel occupancy rate, which is the average percentage of available
hotel rooms occupied during a period, and average daily room rate, which is the average price of
occupied rooms per day, are used as performance indicators. Revenue per available room represents a
summary of hotel average daily room rates and occupancy. Because not all available rooms are
occupied, average daily room rates are normally higher than revenue per available room. Reserved
rooms where the guests do not show up for their stay and lose their deposit may be re-sold to
walk-in guests. These rooms are considered to be occupied twice for statistical purposes due to
obtaining the original deposit and the walk-in guest revenue. In cases where a significant number
of rooms are resold, occupancy rates may be in excess of 100% and revenue per available room may be
higher than the average daily room rate.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Operating Revenues
Our net revenues consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | 1,664,489 | $ | 1,061,770 | 56.8 | % | ||||||
Rooms |
231,974 | 180,782 | 28.3 | % | ||||||||
Food and beverage |
145,393 | 92,079 | 57.9 | % | ||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
164,655 | 108,215 | 52.2 | % | ||||||||
2,206,511 | 1,442,846 | 52.9 | % | |||||||||
Less promotional allowances |
(94,592 | ) | (107,958 | ) | 12.4 | % | ||||||
Total net revenues |
$ | 2,111,919 | $ | 1,334,888 | 58.2 | % | ||||||
Consolidated net revenues were $2.11 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an
increase of $777.0 million as compared to the $1.33 billion for the three months ended March 31,
2010. The increase in net revenues was driven by $584.9 million of net revenues at Marina Bay
Sands, which opened in April 2010, as well as increases at our Macau operations.
36
Table of Contents
Casino revenues increased $602.7 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Of the increase, $464.4 million was attributable to Marina Bay Sands, as well as a $186.8 million
increase at our Macau operations driven by an increase in Rolling Chip volume at The Venetian Macao
and Sands Macao. The increase was partially offset by our Las Vegas Operating Properties driven by
decreases in win percentage, drop and handle. The following table summarizes the results of our
casino activity:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau Operations: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 553,417 | $ | 474,755 | 16.6 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 980,605 | $ | 921,931 | 6.4 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
27.9 | % | 25.1 | % | 2.8 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 12,388,979 | $ | 10,049,678 | 23.3 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
2.69 | % | 2.92 | % | (0.23 | )pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 743,071 | $ | 670,749 | 10.8 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
6.9 | % | 7.4 | % | (0.5 | )pts | ||||||
Sands Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 315,674 | $ | 277,945 | 13.6 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 688,680 | $ | 589,496 | 16.8 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
20.3 | % | 20.3 | % | 0.0 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 8,269,381 | $ | 6,406,933 | 29.1 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
2.75 | % | 3.18 | % | (0.43 | )pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 435,865 | $ | 362,505 | 20.2 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
6.5 | % | 6.1 | % | 0.4 | pts | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 160,823 | $ | 90,454 | 77.8 | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 82,443 | $ | 99,012 | (16.7 | )% | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
40.1 | % | 25.3 | % | 14.8 | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 3,947,963 | $ | 3,717,941 | 6.2 | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
3.90 | % | 2.48 | % | 1.42 | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 187,504 | $ | 148,761 | 26.0 | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
6.5 | % | 5.6 | % | 0.9 | pts | ||||||
U.S. Operations: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 83,123 | $ | 155,345 | (46.5 | )% | ||||||
Table games drop |
$ | 476,582 | $ | 547,043 | (12.9 | )% | ||||||
Table games win percentage |
13.3 | % | 23.4 | % | (10.1 | )pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 407,348 | $ | 637,795 | (36.1 | )% | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
8.5 | % | 7.8 | % | 0.7 | pts | ||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 87,055 | $ | 63,271 | 37.6 | % | ||||||
Table games drop |
$ | 118,965 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Table games win percentage |
16.7 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 881,378 | $ | 921,631 | (4.4 | )% | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
7.4 | % | 6.9 | % | 0.5 | pts | ||||||
Singapore Operations: |
||||||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
||||||||||||
Total casino revenues |
$ | 464,397 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip drop |
$ | 986,444 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Non-Rolling Chip win percentage |
22.6 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Rolling Chip volume |
$ | 10,132,339 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Rolling Chip win percentage |
2.56 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Slot handle |
$ | 2,041,765 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Slot hold percentage |
5.3 | % | | % | | pts |
In our experience, average win percentages remain steady when measured over extended periods
of time, but can vary considerably within shorter time periods as a result of the statistical
variances that are associated with games of chance in which large amounts are wagered.
37
Table of Contents
Room revenues increased $51.2 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The increase in room revenues was attributable to $55.8 million from the Marina Bay Sands,
partially offset by a decrease at our Las
Vegas Operating Properties driven by reduced occupancy. The suites at Sands Macao are
primarily provided to casino patrons on a complimentary basis. The following table summarizes the
results of our room activity:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
(Room revenues in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau Operations: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 50,225 | $ | 47,557 | 5.6 | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 227 | $ | 202 | 12.4 | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
86.5 | % | 92.8 | % | (6.3 | )pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 197 | $ | 187 | 5.3 | % | ||||||
Sands Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 5,535 | $ | 6,594 | (16.1 | )% | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 251 | $ | 262 | (4.2 | )% | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
84.9 | % | 97.3 | % | (12.4 | )pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 213 | $ | 254 | (16.1 | )% | ||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 7,506 | $ | 6,564 | 14.4 | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 341 | $ | 278 | 22.7 | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
64.6 | % | 72.9 | % | (8.3 | )pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 220 | $ | 203 | 8.4 | % | ||||||
U.S. Operations: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 112,874 | $ | 120,067 | (6.0 | )% | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 212 | $ | 207 | 2.4 | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
83.9 | % | 91.3 | % | (7.4 | )pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 178 | $ | 189 | (5.8 | )% | ||||||
Singapore Operations: |
||||||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
||||||||||||
Total room revenues |
$ | 55,834 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Average daily room rate |
$ | 285 | $ | | | % | ||||||
Occupancy rate |
86.3 | % | | % | | pts | ||||||
Revenue per available room |
$ | 246 | $ | | | % |
Food and beverage revenues increased $53.3 million as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to $43.2 million in revenues at the Marina Bay Sands
and a $6.6 million increase at our Las Vegas Operating Properties driven by increased banquet
activities.
Convention, retail and other revenues increased $56.4 million as compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily due to $53.3 million in revenues at the Marina Bay
Sands.
Operating Expenses
The breakdown of operating expenses is as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Casino |
$ | 921,536 | $ | 694,635 | 32.7 | % | ||||||
Rooms |
48,453 | 29,654 | 63.4 | % | ||||||||
Food and beverage |
71,703 | 44,303 | 61.8 | % | ||||||||
Convention, retail and other |
87,245 | 58,404 | 49.4 | % | ||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
35,058 | 16,442 | 113.2 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative |
210,485 | 126,259 | 66.7 | % | ||||||||
Corporate expense |
37,576 | 23,476 | 60.1 | % | ||||||||
Rental expense |
13,156 | 8,698 | 51.3 | % | ||||||||
Pre-opening expense |
9,471 | 37,459 | (74.7 | )% | ||||||||
Development expense |
573 | 157 | 265.0 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
190,237 | 153,089 | 24.3 | % | ||||||||
Loss on disposal of assets |
499 | 492 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 1,625,992 | $ | 1,193,068 | 36.3 | % | ||||||
38
Table of Contents
Operating expenses were $1.63 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2011, an increase
of $432.9 million as compared to $1.19 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The
increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable the opening of Marina Bay Sands in April
2010.
Casino expenses increased $226.9 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Of the increase, $158.9 million was attributable to the Marina Bay Sands and $80.6 million was due
to the 39.0% gross win tax on increased casino revenues across all of our Macau operations.
Room, food and beverage and convention, retail and other expenses increased $18.8 million,
$27.4 million and $28.8 million, respectively, as compared to the three months ended March 31,
2010, primarily attributable to the operations of Marina Bay Sands.
The provision for doubtful accounts was $35.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011, compared to $16.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was
attributable to $19.5 million in provisions at the Marina Bay Sands. The amount of this provision
can vary over short periods of time because of factors specific to the customers who owe us money
from gaming activities at any given time. We believe that the amount of our provision for doubtful
accounts in the future will depend upon the state of the economy, our credit standards, our risk
assessments and the judgment of our employees responsible for granting credit.
General
and administrative expenses increased $84.2 million as compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2010, primarily attributable to $78.3 million at the Marina Bay Sands.
Corporate
expenses increased $14.1 million as compared to the three months ended March 31,
2010. The increase was primarily due to higher incentive compensation expenses, driven by
stock-based compensation, as well as increased transportation and recruitment expenses.
Pre-opening expenses were $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, compared to
$37.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Pre-opening expense represents personnel
and other costs incurred prior to the opening of new ventures, which are expensed as incurred.
Pre-opening expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011, were primarily related to
activities at our Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $37.1 million as compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily the result of the opening of Marina Bay Sands,
which contributed $54.9 million, partially offset by decreases at our Macau and Las Vegas
properties due to certain assets being fully depreciated.
Adjusted Property EBITDA
Adjusted property EBITDA is used by management as the primary measure of the operating
performance of our segments. Adjusted property EBITDA is net income before stock-based compensation
expense, corporate expense, rental expense, pre-opening expense, development expense, depreciation
and amortization, loss on disposal of assets, interest, other expense, gain on early retirement of
debt and income taxes. The following table summarizes information related to our segments (see
Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note 10
Segment Information for discussion of our operating segments and a reconciliation of adjusted
property EBITDA to net income):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
Percent | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Macau: |
||||||||||||
The Venetian Macao |
$ | 228,400 | $ | 169,915 | 34.4 | % | ||||||
Sands Macao |
92,648 | 69,761 | 32.8 | % | ||||||||
Four Seasons Macao |
57,547 | 19,495 | 195.2 | % | ||||||||
Other Asia |
(4,606 | ) | (4,432 | ) | (3.9 | )% | ||||||
373,989 | 254,739 | 46.8 | % | |||||||||
United States: |
||||||||||||
Las Vegas Operating Properties |
65,165 | 105,292 | (38.1 | )% | ||||||||
Sands Bethlehem |
22,109 | 10,968 | 101.6 | % | ||||||||
87,274 | 116,260 | (24.9 | )% | |||||||||
Marina Bay Sands |
284,471 | | | % | ||||||||
Total adjusted property EBITDA |
$ | 745,734 | $ | 370,999 | 101.0 | % | ||||||
39
Table of Contents
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Macau properties increased $119.3 million as compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2010, led by an increase of $58.5 million at The Venetian Macao. As
previously described, the increase across the properties was primarily attributable to an increase
in net revenues of $206.9 million, partially offset by an increase of $80.6 million in gross win
tax on increased casino revenues.
Adjusted property EBITDA at our Las Vegas Operating Properties decreased $40.1 million as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. As previously described, the decrease was
primarily attributable to a decrease in net revenues of $49.2 million (excluding intersegment
royalty revenue), partially offset by decreases in expenses as a result of lower revenues.
Adjusted property EBITDA at Sands Bethlehem increased $11.1 million as compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was driven by the commencement of table games operations
in July 2010.
Adjusted property EBITDA at Marina Bay Sands, which opened in April 2010, does not have a
comparable prior-year period. Adjusted property EBITDA and the resulting EBITDA margin in the
first quarter of 2011 were reduced, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2010, by non-recurring
or extraordinary expense increases of approximately $16 million, which were primarily attributable
to added incentive compensation, higher training costs, an additional reserve for accounts
receivable and charges associated with the start-up of operations at the art/science museum.
Interest Expense
The following table summarizes information related to interest expense on long-term debt:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Interest cost (which includes
the amortization of deferred
financing costs and original issue
discount) |
$ | 104,196 | $ | 97,818 | ||||
Less capitalized interest |
(30,611 | ) | (19,653 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 73,585 | $ | 78,165 | ||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 111,492 | $ | 91,802 | ||||
Weighted average total debt balance |
$ | 10,162,989 | $ | 11,138,465 | ||||
Weighted average interest rate |
4.1 | % | 3.5 | % |
Interest cost increased $6.4 million as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010,
resulting from an increase in our weighted average interest rate, partially offset by a decrease in
our weighted average debt balances. Capitalized interest increased $11.0 million as compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to the recommencement of activities at our Cotai
Strip parcels 5 and 6 in Macau and the increase in the weighted average interest rate.
Other Factors Effecting Earnings
Other expense was $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $6.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The expense amounts in both periods were
primarily attributable to foreign exchange losses, principally in Macau.
Our effective income tax rate was 11.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared
to a rate of 21.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The decrease in the effective tax
rate was primarily due to the commencement of operations at Marina Bay Sands in April 2010. The
effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2011, reflects a 17% statutory tax
rate on our Singapore operations; a zero percent tax rate from our Macau gaming operations due to
our income tax exemption in Macau, which is set to expire in 2013; and non-realizable deferred tax assets in the U.S. and certain foreign jurisdictions, which
unfavorably impacted our effective income tax rate. Management does not anticipate recording an
income tax benefit related to deferred tax assets generated by operations in the U.S. and certain
foreign jurisdictions; however, to the extent that the financial results of these operations
improve and it becomes more likely than not that these deferred tax assets are realizable, we will
reduce the valuation allowances in the period such determination is made.
40
Table of Contents
The net income attributable to our noncontrolling interests was $75.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to $30.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2010, and was primarily attributable to the noncontrolling interest of SCL for both periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows Summary
Our cash flows consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Net cash generated from operations |
$ | 418,378 | $ | 282,794 | ||||
Investing cash flows: |
||||||||
Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents |
149,962 | (182,575 | ) | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(332,508 | ) | (538,201 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
3,097 | 2,311 | ||||||
Acquisition of intangible assets |
(329 | ) | | |||||
Purchases of investments |
| (173,978 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(179,778 | ) | (892,443 | ) | ||||
Financing cash flows: |
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
8,511 | 73 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of warrants |
5,760 | | ||||||
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders |
(19,598 | ) | (23,350 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
| 272,056 | ||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(121,721 | ) | (847,326 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of preferred stock |
(4,544 | ) | | |||||
Payments of preferred stock inducement premium |
(16,201 | ) | | |||||
Payments of deferred financing costs |
| (821 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(147,793 | ) | (599,368 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate on cash |
6,053 | 5,446 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 96,860 | $ | (1,203,571 | ) | |||
Cash Flows Operating Activities
Table games play at our properties is conducted on a cash and credit basis. Slot machine play
is primarily conducted on a cash basis. The retail hotel rooms business is generally conducted on a
cash basis, the group hotel rooms business is conducted on a cash and credit basis, and banquet
business is conducted primarily on a credit basis resulting in operating cash flows being generally
affected by changes in operating income and accounts receivable. Net cash generated from operating
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011, increased $135.6 million as compared to the
three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to the increase in our
operating income during the three months ended March 31, 2011, as previously described, partially
offset by unfavorable changes in our working capital, driven by decreases in other accrued
liabilities.
Cash Flows Investing Activities
Capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2011, totaled $332.5 million,
including $158.0 million for construction activities in Singapore; $145.1 million for construction
and development activities in Macau (primarily for our Cotai Strip developments); $18.2 million for
construction activities at Sands Bethlehem; and $11.2 million at our Las Vegas Operating Properties
and for corporate and other activities.
41
Table of Contents
Cash Flows Financing Activities
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net cash flows used in financing activities were
$147.8 million. The net decrease was primarily attributable to the repayment of $97.7 million under
our Singapore credit facility and payments of $19.6 million for preferred stock dividends and $16.2
million to induce the exercise of warrants with settlement through tendering of preferred stock.
As of March 31, 2011, we had $2.36 billion available for borrowing under our U.S., Macau and
Singapore credit facilities, net of letters of credit, outstanding bankers guarantees and undrawn
amounts committed to be funded by Lehman Brothers-related subsidiaries.
Development Financing Strategy
Through March 31, 2011, we have funded our development projects primarily through borrowings
under our U.S., Macau and Singapore credit facilities, operating cash flows, proceeds from our
recent equity offerings and proceeds from the disposition of non-core assets.
The U.S. credit facility, as amended in August 2010, requires our Las Vegas operations to
comply with certain financial covenants at the end of each quarter, including maintaining a maximum
leverage ratio of net debt, as defined, to trailing twelve-month adjusted earnings before interest,
income taxes, depreciation and amortization, as defined (Adjusted EBITDA). The maximum leverage
ratio is 6.5x for the quarterly periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2011, decreases to 6.0x for the
quarterly periods ended September 30 and December 31, 2011, decreases to 5.5x for the quarterly
periods ended March 31 and June 30, 2012, and then decreases to 5.0x for all quarterly periods
thereafter through maturity. One of our Macau credit facilities, the VML credit facility, as
amended in August 2009, requires certain of our Macau operations to comply with similar financial
covenants, including maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The maximum
leverage ratio is 3.0x for all quarterly periods through maturity. We can elect to contribute up to
$50 million and $20 million of cash on hand to our Las Vegas and relevant Macau operations,
respectively, on a bi-quarterly basis; such contributions having the effect of increasing Adjusted
EBITDA by the corresponding amount during the applicable quarter for purposes of calculating
compliance with the maximum leverage ratio (the EBITDA true-up). The Singapore credit facility
requires operations of Marina Bay Sands to comply with similar financial covenants commencing with
the quarterly period ending September 30, 2011, including maintaining a maximum leverage ratio of
debt to Adjusted EBITDA. The maximum leverage ratio is 5.5x for the quarterly period ending
September 30, 2011, and then decreases by 0.25x every other quarter until it decreases to, and
remains at, 3.75x for all quarterly periods thereafter through maturity (commencing with the
quarterly period ending September 30, 2014). If we are unable to maintain compliance with the
financial covenants under these credit facilities, it would be in default under the respective
credit facilities. A default under the U.S. credit facility would trigger a cross-default under our
airplane financings, which, if the respective lenders chose to accelerate the indebtedness
outstanding under these agreements, would result in a default under our senior notes. A default
under the VML credit facility would trigger a cross-default under our ferry financing. Any defaults
or cross-defaults under these agreements would allow the lenders, in each case, to exercise their
rights and remedies as defined under their respective agreements. If the lenders were to exercise
their rights to accelerate the due dates of the indebtedness outstanding, there can be no assurance
that we would be able to repay or refinance any amounts that may become due and payable under such
agreements, which could force us to restructure or alter its operations or debt obligations.
In 2008, we completed a $475.0 million convertible senior notes offering and a $2.1 billion
common and preferred stock and warrants offering. In 2009, we completed a $600.0 million
exchangeable bond offering and our $2.5 billion SCL Offering. A portion of the proceeds from these
offerings was used in the U.S. to pay down $775.9 million under the revolving portion of the U.S.
credit facility in March 2010 and $1.0 billion under the term loan portions of the U.S. credit
facility in August 2010, and to exercise the EBITDA true-up provision during the quarterly periods
ended September 30, 2010 and March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, our U.S. and VML leverage ratios
were 5.2x and 1.5x, respectively, compared to the maximum leverage ratios allowed of 6.5x and 3.0x,
respectively.
42
Table of Contents
We held unrestricted and restricted cash and cash equivalents of approximately $3.13 billion
and $658.9 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2011. We believe that the cash on hand, cash flow
generated from operations and
available borrowings under our credit facilities will be sufficient to fund our development
plans and maintain compliance with the financial covenants of our U.S., Macau and Singapore credit
facilities. In the normal course of our activities, we will continue to evaluate our capital
structure and opportunities for enhancements thereof. In connection with the $1.75 billion VOL
credit facility to be used together with $500.0 million of proceeds from the SCL Offering, we have
recommenced construction activities on our Cotai Strip development on parcels 5 and 6.
Aggregate Indebtedness and Other Known Contractual Obligations
As of March 31, 2011, there had been no material changes to our aggregated indebtedness and
other known contractual obligations, which are set forth in the table included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Restrictions on Distributions
We are a parent company with limited business operations. Our main asset is the stock and
membership interests of our subsidiaries. The debt instruments of our U.S., Macau and Singapore
subsidiaries contain certain restrictions that, among other things, limit the ability of certain
subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, issue disqualified stock or equity interests, pay
dividends or make other distributions, repurchase equity interests or certain indebtedness, create
certain liens, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, enter into certain mergers or
consolidations or sell our assets of our company without prior approval of the lenders or
noteholders.
Inflation
We believe that inflation and changing prices have not had a material impact on our sales,
revenues or income from continuing operations during the past year.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor
Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements include the discussions of our business strategies and expectations concerning future
operations, margins, profitability, liquidity and capital resources. In addition, in certain
portions included in this report, the words: anticipates, believes, estimates, seeks,
expects, plans, intends and similar expressions, as they relate to our company or management,
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that any forward-looking statements will prove to
be correct. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks associated with:
| our substantial leverage, debt service and debt covenant compliance (including
sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates, as a significant portion of our debt is
variable-rate debt, and other capital markets trends); |
| disruptions in the global financing markets and our ability to obtain sufficient funding
for our current and future developments, including our Cotai Strip, Singapore, Pennsylvania
and Las Vegas developments; |
| general economic and business conditions which may impact levels of disposable income,
consumer spending, group meeting business, pricing of hotel rooms and retail and mall sales; |
| increased competition for labor and materials due to other planned construction projects
in Macau; |
| the impact of the suspensions of certain of our development projects and our ability to
meet certain development deadlines; |
| the uncertainty of tourist behavior related to spending and vacationing at casino-resorts
in Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore;
|
43
Table of Contents
| regulatory policies in mainland China or other countries in which our customers reside,
including visa restrictions limiting the number of visits or the length of stay for visitors
from mainland China to Macau and restrictions on foreign currency exchange or importation of
currency; |
| our dependence upon properties primarily in Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore for all of our
cash flow; |
| our relationship with GGP or any successor owner of The Shoppes at The Palazzo and The
Grand Canal Shoppes, and the ability of GGP to perform under the purchase and sale agreement
for The Shoppes at The Palazzo, as amended; |
| new developments, construction and ventures, including our Cotai Strip developments,
Marina Bay Sands and Sands Bethlehem; |
| the passage of new legislation and receipt of governmental approvals for our proposed
developments in Macau and other jurisdictions where we are planning to operate; |
| our insurance coverage, including the risk that we have not obtained sufficient coverage
or will only be able to obtain additional coverage at significantly increased rates; |
| disruptions or reductions in travel due to acts of terrorism; |
| disruptions or reductions in travel, as well as disruptions in our operations, due to
outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, avian flu or
swine flu; |
| government regulation of the casino industry, including gaming license regulation, the
legalization of gaming in other jurisdictions and regulation of gaming on the Internet; |
| increased competition in Las Vegas and Macau, including recent and upcoming increases in
hotel rooms, meeting and convention space, and retail space; |
| fluctuations in the demand for all-suites rooms, occupancy rates and average daily room
rates in Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore; |
| the popularity of Las Vegas, Macau and Singapore as convention and trade show
destinations; |
| new taxes, changes to existing tax rates or proposed changes in tax legislation; |
| our ability to maintain our gaming licenses, certificates and subconcession; |
| the completion of infrastructure projects in Macau and Singapore; and |
| the outcome of any ongoing and future litigation. |
All future written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained or referred to in this section. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and
it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. Readers are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update
any forward-looking statements after the date of this report as a result of new information, future
events or developments, except as required by federal securities laws.
44
Table of Contents
ITEM 3 | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such
as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to
market risk is interest rate risk associated with our variable rate long-term debt, which we
attempt to manage through the use of interest rate cap
agreements. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes and do not
enter into derivative transactions that would be considered speculative positions. Our derivative
financial instruments consist exclusively of interest rate cap agreements, which do not qualify for
hedge accounting. Interest differentials resulting from these agreements are recorded on an accrual
basis as an adjustment to interest expense.
To manage exposure to counterparty credit risk in interest rate cap agreements, we enter into
agreements with highly rated institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of
such agreements. Frequently, these institutions are also members of the bank group providing our
credit facilities, which management believes further minimizes the risk of nonperformance.
The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to
changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents notional amounts and weighted
average interest rates by contractual maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the
contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. Weighted average variable rates are based
on March 31, 2011, LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR plus the applicable interest rate spread in accordance with
the respective debt agreements. The information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents, which is
the Companys reporting currency, for the years ending March 31:
Fair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Thereafter | Total | Value(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 189.7 | $ | | $ | | $ | 189.7 | $ | 192.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate(2) |
| | | 6.4 | % | | | 6.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate |
$ | 914.3 | $ | 1,742.3 | $ | 1,071.4 | $ | 3,878.2 | $ | 619.7 | $ | 1,662.7 | $ | 9,888.6 | $ | 9,644.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate(2) |
3.6 | % | 4.2 | % | 3.6 | % | 2.5 | % | 4.1 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cap agreements(3) |
$ | 0.1 | $ | 1.3 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1.4 | $ | 1.4 |
(1) | The estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices, if
available, or by pricing models based on the value of related cash
flows discounted at current market interest rates. |
|
(2) | Based upon contractual interest rates for fixed rate indebtedness or
current LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR for variable-rate indebtedness. Based on
variable-rate debt levels as of March 31, 2011, an assumed 100 basis
point change in LIBOR, HIBOR and SOR would cause our annual interest
cost to change approximately $96.7 million. |
|
(3) | As of March 31, 2011, we have 34 interest rate cap agreements with an
aggregate fair value of approximately $1.4 million based on quoted
market values from the institutions holding the agreements. |
Borrowings under the U.S. credit facility, as amended, bear interest, at our election, at
either an adjusted Eurodollar rate or at an alternative base rate plus a credit spread. The
portions of the revolving facility and term loans that were not extended bear interest at the
alternative base rate plus 0.5% per annum or 0.75% per annum, respectively, or at the adjusted
Eurodollar rate plus 1.5% per annum or 1.75% per annum, respectively. The extended revolving
facility and extended term loans bear interest at the alternative base rate plus 1.25% per annum or
1.75% per annum, respectively, or at the adjusted Eurodollar rate plus 2.25% per annum or 2.75% per
annum, respectively. Applicable spreads under the U.S. credit facility are subject to downward
adjustments based upon our credit rating. Borrowings under the VML credit facility, as amended,
bear interest, at our election, at either an adjusted Eurodollar rate (or in the case of the local
term loan, adjusted HIBOR) plus 4.5% per annum or at an alternative base rate plus 3.5% per annum.
Applicable spreads under the VML revolving facility are subject to a downward adjustment if certain
consolidated leverage ratios are satisfied. Borrowings under the VOL
credit facility bear interest
at either the adjusted Eurodollar rate or an alternative base rate (in the case of U.S. dollar
denominated loans or HIBOR, in the case of Hong Kong dollar and Macau pataca denominated loans), as
applicable, plus a spread of 4.5% per annum. Borrowings under the Singapore credit facility bear
interest at SOR plus a spread of 2.25% per annum. Borrowings under the airplane financings bear
interest at LIBOR plus approximately 1.5% per annum. Borrowings under the ferry financing, as
amended, bear interest at HIBOR plus 2.5% per annum.
45
Table of Contents
Foreign currency transaction losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011, were
$4.1 million primarily due to U.S. denominated debt held in Macau. We may be vulnerable to changes
in the U.S. dollar/pataca exchange rate. Based on balances as of March 31, 2011, an assumed 1%
change in the U.S. dollar/pataca exchange rate would cause a foreign currency transaction gain/loss
of approximately $18.4 million. We do not hedge our exposure to foreign currencies; however, we
maintain a significant amount of our operating funds in the same currencies in which we have
obligations thereby reducing our exposure to currency fluctuations.
See also Liquidity and Capital Resources.
ITEM 4 | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including its principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The
Companys Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) of the Company as of March 31, 2011, and have concluded that they are effective at the
reasonable assurance level.
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In
addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems,
there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Part II
OTHER INFORMATION
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1 | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Company is party to litigation matters and claims related to its operations. For more
information, see the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and
Part I Item 1 Financial Statements Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
ITEM 1A | RISK FACTORS |
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
46
Table of Contents
ITEM 6 | EXHIBITS |
List of Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description of Document | |||
31.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
31.2 | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Las Vegas
Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Las Vegas
Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|||
101.INS | * | XBRL Instance Document |
||
101.SCH | * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
||
101.CAL | * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
||
101.DEF | * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
||
101.LAB | * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
||
101.PRE | * | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
* | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is
deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for
purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
47
Table of Contents
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. |
||||
By: | /s/ Sheldon G. Adelson | |||
Sheldon G. Adelson | ||||
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
May 9, 2011
By: | /s/ Kenneth J. Kay | |||
Kenneth J. Kay | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
May 9, 2011