LCNB CORP - Annual Report: 2005 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
( X )
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
( )
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 000-26121
LCNB Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio
31-1626393
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification Number)
2 North Broadway, Lebanon, Ohio 45036
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)
(513) 932-1414
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Name of each exchange
Title of Each Class
on which registered
None
None
Securities registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. [ ] Yes [X] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
[ ] Large accelerated filer [X] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
. [X] Yes [ ] No
The aggregate market value of the registrants outstanding voting common stock held by nonaffiliates on June 30, 2005, determined using a per share closing price on that date of $38.25, as quoted on the Nasdaq Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, was $111,048,700.50.
As of March 3, 2006, 3,269,908 common shares were issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Proxy Statement included in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 11, 2006, dated March 9, 2006, are incorporated by reference into Part III.
LCNB Corp.
For the year ended December 31, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |||
PART I. | |||
Item 1. | Business | 3-16 | |
Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 17-20 | |
Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 20 | |
Item 2. | Properties | 21-22 | |
Item 3. | Legal proceedings | 22 | |
Item 4. | Submission of matters to a vote of security holders | 22 | |
PART II. | |||
Item 5. | Market for registrant's common equity, related stockholder matters, and issuer purchases of equity securities | 23-25 | |
Item 6. | Selected financial data | 26-27 | |
Item 7. | Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations | 28-41 | |
Quarterly financial data (unaudited) | 42-43 | ||
Item 7A. | Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk | 44-45 | |
Item 8. | Financial statements and supplementary data | 45 | |
Item 9. | Changes in and disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosures | 45 | |
Item 9A. | Controls and procedures | 45-48 | |
Item 9B. | Other information | 48 | |
PART III. | |||
Item 10. | Directors and executive officers of the registrant | 49 | |
Item 11. | Executive compensation | 49 | |
Item 12. | Security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters | 49 | |
Item 13. | Certain relationships and related transactions | 49 | |
Item 14. | Principal accounting fees and services | 49 | |
PART IV. | |||
Item 15. | Exhibits, financial statement schedules | 50 | |
Signatures | 51 |
PART I
Item 1. Business
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain matters disclosed herein may be deemed to be forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical fact. Such statements are often characterized by the use of qualifying words and their derivatives such as expects, anticipates, believes, estimates, plans, projects, or other statements concerning opinions or judgments of the Company and its management about future events. Factors that could influence the accuracy of such forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, regulatory policy changes, interest rate fluctuations, loan demand, loan delinquencies and losses, general economic conditions and other risks. Such forward-looking statements represent management's judgment as of the current date. Actual strategies and results in future time periods may differ materially from those currently expected. LCNB Corp. disclaims, however, any intent or obligation to update such forward-looking statements. LCNB intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
DESCRIPTION OF LCNB CORP.'S BUSINESS
General Description
LCNB Corp. ("LCNB"), an Ohio corporation formed in December, 1998, is a financial holding company headquartered in Lebanon, Ohio. Through its subsidiaries, Lebanon Citizens National Bank (the Bank") and Dakin Insurance Agency, Inc. ("Dakin"), LCNB is engaged in the commercial banking and insurance agency businesses.
The predecessor of LCNB, the Bank, was formed as a national banking association in 1877. On May 19, 1999, the Bank became a wholly-owned subsidiary of LCNB. The Bank's main office is located in Warren County, Ohio and 20 branch offices are located in Warren, Butler, Clinton, Clermont, and Hamilton Counties, Ohio. In addition, the Bank operates 30 automated teller machines ("ATMs") in its market area.
The Bank is a full service community bank offering a wide range of commercial and personal banking services. Deposit services include checking accounts, NOW accounts, savings accounts, Christmas and vacation savings, money market deposit accounts, Classic 50 accounts (a Senior Citizen program), individual retirement accounts, and certificates of deposit. Deposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Bank Insurance Fund, which is administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC).
-3-
Loan products offered include commercial loans, commercial and residential real estate loans, construction loans, various types of consumer loans, Small Business Administration loans, and commercial leases. The Bank's residential mortgage lending activities consist primarily of loans for purchasing or refinancing personal residences, home equity lines of credit, and loans for commercial or consumer purposes secured by residential mortgages. Consumer lending activities include automobile, boat, home improvement and personal loans. The Bank also offers indirect financing through various automotive, boat, and lawn and garden dealers.
The Trust and Investment Management Division of the Bank performs complete trust administrative functions and offers agency and trust services, retirement savings products, and mutual fund investment products to individuals, partnerships, corporations, institutions and municipalities.
Security brokerage services were first offered by the Bank in April, 2002 through arrangements with UVEST Financial Services, Inc., a registered broker/dealer. A licensed broker offers a full range of investment services and products, including financial needs analysis, mutual funds, securities trading, annuities, and life insurance.
Other services offered include safe deposit boxes, night depositories, U.S. savings bonds, travelers' checks, money orders, cashier's checks, bank-by-mail, ATMs, cash and transaction services, debit cards, wire transfers, electronic funds transfer, utility bill collections, notary public service, personal computer based cash management services, 24 hour telephone banking, PC Internet banking, and other services tailored for both individuals and businesses.
The Bank is not dependent upon any one significant customer or specific industry. Business is not seasonal to any material degree.
The address of the main office of the Bank is 2 North Broadway, Lebanon, Ohio 45036; telephone (513) 932-1414. Its primary market area encompasses all of Butler and Warren Counties and portions of Clinton, Clermont and Hamilton Counties.
Dakin, an Ohio corporation, has been an independent insurance agency in Lebanon, Ohio since 1876. Its primary office is at 24 East Mulberry Street, Lebanon, Ohio 45036; telephone (513) 932-4010. Since being acquired by LCNB on April 11, 2000, Dakin now maintains additional offices in the Bank's Maineville and Mason offices. Dakin is engaged in selling and servicing personal and commercial insurance products and annuity products and is regulated by the Ohio Department of Insurance.
Effective September 1, 2002, Dakin purchased substantially all of the insurance renewal rights and client list of an insurance agency located in Dayton, Ohio. As part of the purchase, Dakin will receive all commission income received after September 1, 2002, and assignments of agency agreements that the agency has with insurers with whom Dakin does not already have an agreement. In consideration for the assets purchased, Dakin will pay to the seller certain percentages of the commissions received from the agency's customer base over a four-year period.
- 4 -
Competition
The Bank faces strong competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. The deregulation of the banking industry and the wide spread enactment of state laws that permit multi-bank holding companies as well as the availability of nationwide interstate banking has created a highly competitive environment for financial services providers. The Bank competes with other national and state banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, mortgage brokerage firms, realty companies with captive mortgage brokerage firms, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking companies, and other financial intermediaries operating in its market and elsewhere, many of whom have substantially larger financial and managerial resources.
The Bank seeks to minimize the competitive effect of other financial corporations through a community banking approach that emphasizes direct customer access to the Bank's president and other officers in an environment conducive to friendly, informed, and courteous personal services. Management believes that the Bank is well positioned to compete successfully in its primary market area. Competition among financial institutions is based upon interest rates offered on deposit accounts, interest rates charged on loans and other credit and service charges, the quality and scope of the services rendered, the convenience of the banking facilities, and, in the case of loans to commercial borrowers, relative lending limits.
Management believes the commitment of the Bank to personal service, innovation, and involvement in the communities and primary market areas it serves, as well as its commitment to quality community banking service, are factors that contribute to its competitive advantage.
Dakin competes with numerous other independent and exclusive insurance agencies (an exclusive agent sells for only one insurance company) and with insurance companies that sell direct to individuals and businesses without using agents. Dakin competes by representing high quality insurance companies, providing personalized and responsive service to its clients, and providing convenient office locations.
Supervision and Regulation
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX") was signed into law by President George W. Bush on July 30, 2002. The purpose of SOX is to strengthen accounting oversight and corporate accountability by enhancing disclosure requirements, increasing accounting and auditor regulation, creating new federal crimes, and increasing penalties for existing federal crimes. SOX directly impacts publicly traded companies, certified public accounting firms auditing public companies, attorneys who work for public companies or have public companies as clients, brokerage firms, investment bankers, and financial analysts who work for brokerage firms or investment bankers. Key provisions affecting LCNB include:
1.
Certification of financial reports by chief executive officers ("CEOs") and chief financial officers ("CFOs"), who are responsible for designing and monitoring internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the issuer and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to the certifying officers by others within the company;
2.
Inclusion of an internal controls report in annual reports that include management's assessment of the effectiveness of a company's internal controls over financial reporting and a report by the company's auditors attesting to management's assessment of internal controls;
- 5 -
3.
Accelerated reporting of stock trades on Form 4 by directors and executive officers;
4.
Disgorgement requirements of incentive pay or stock-based compensation profits received within twelve months of the release of financial statements if the company is later required to restate those financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement that resulted from misconduct;
5.
Disclosure in a company's periodic reports stating if it has adopted a code of ethics for its CFO and principal accounting officer or controller and, if such code of ethics has been implemented, immediate disclosure of any change in or waiver of the code of ethics;
6.
Disclosure in a company's periodic reports stating if at least one member of the audit committee is a "financial expert," as that term is defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"); and
7.
Implementation of new duties and responsibilities for a company's audit committee, including independence requirements, the direct responsibility to appoint the outside auditing firm and to provide oversight of the auditing firm's work, and a requirement to establish procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints from a company's employees regarding questionable accounting, internal control, or auditing matters.
In addition, the SEC adopted final rules on September 5, 2002, which rules were amended in December, 2005, requiring accelerated filing of quarterly and annual reports. Under the amended rules, large accelerated filers include companies with a market capitalization of $700 million or more and accelerated filers include companies with a market capitalization between $75 million and $700 million. Large accelerated filers are required to file their annual report within 60 days of year-end and quarterly reports within 40 days. Accelerated filers are required to file their annual and quarterly reports within 75 days and 40 days, respectively. These new accelerated filing deadlines are effective for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2005. Under the new rules, LCNB is considered an accelerated filer.
LCNB and the Bank are subject to an extensive array of banking laws and regulations that are intended primarily for the protection of the customers and depositors of LCNB's subsidiaries rather than holders of LCNB's securities. These laws and regulations govern such areas as permissible activities, loans and investments, and rates of interest that can be charged on loans and reserves. LCNB and the Bank also are subject to general U.S. federal laws and regulations and to the laws and regulations of the State of Ohio. Set forth below are brief descriptions of selected laws and regulations applicable to LCNB and the Bank.
- 6 -
LCNB, as a financial holding company, is regulated under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "Act"), and is subject to the supervision and examination of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the "Federal Reserve Board"). The Act requires the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board for a bank or financial holding company to acquire or hold more than a 5% voting interest in any bank and restricts interstate banking activities.
On September 29, 1994, the Act was amended by the Interstate Banking and Branch Efficiency Act of 1994, which authorizes interstate bank acquisitions anywhere in the country, effective one year after the date of enactment, and interstate branching by acquisition and consolidation, effective June 1, 1997, in those states that have not opted out by that date.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which amended the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and other banking related laws, was signed into law on November 12, 1999. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed certain sections of the Glass-Steagall Act and substantially eliminated the barriers separating the banking, insurance, and securities industries. Effective March 11, 2000, qualifying bank holding companies could elect to become financial holding companies. Financial holding companies have expanded investment powers, including affiliating with securities and insurance firms and engaging in other activities that are "financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity" or "complementary to a financial activity." The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act defines "financial in nature" to include:
a.
securities underwriting, dealing, and market making;
b.
sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies;
c.
insurance underwriting and agency;
d.
merchant banking activities; and
e.
other activities that the Federal Reserve Board, in consultation with and subject to the approval of the Treasury Department, determines are financial in nature.
Financial holding companies may commence the activities listed above or acquire a company engaged in any of those activities without additional approval from the Federal Reserve. Notice of the commencement or acquisition must be provided to the Federal Reserve within thirty days of the start of the activity. Sixty days advance notice is required before the start of any activity that is "complementary to a financial activity."
The Financial Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 ("FIRREA") provides that a holding company and its controlled insured depository institutions are liable for any loss incurred by the FDIC in connection with the default of any FDIC assisted transaction involving an affiliated insured bank or savings association.
The Bank is subject to the provisions of the National Bank Act. The Bank is subject to primary supervision, regulation and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC"). The Bank is also subject to the rules and regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the FDIC. Under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and under Regulations of the Federal Reserve Board pursuant thereto, a bank or financial holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with the extension of credit.
- 7 -
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 ("FDICIA") substantially revised the bank regulatory and funding provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and several other federal banking statutes. Among its many reforms, FDICIA:
1.
Required regulatory agencies to take "prompt corrective action" with financial institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements;
2.
Established five capital tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized;
3.
Imposed significant restrictions on the operations of a financial institution that is not rated well-capitalized or adequately capitalized;
4.
Prohibited a depository institution from making any capital distributions, including payments of dividends, or paying any management fee to its holding company if the institution would be undercapitalized as a result;
5.
Implemented a risk-based premium system;
6.
Required an audit committee to be comprised of independent, outside directors;
7.
Required a financial institution with more than $500 million in total assets to issue annual, audited financial statements prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; and
8.
Required a financial institution with more than $500 million in total assets to document, evaluate, and report on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control system and required an independent public accountant to attest to management's assertions concerning the bank's internal control system.
During December, 2005, the FDIC amended its annual audit and reporting requirements by raising the asset-size threshold for internal control assessments by management and attestations by external auditors, as described immediately above, from $500 million to $1 billion. In addition, only a majority, rather than all, of the members of the audit committee must be independent of management for institutions with total assets between $500 million and $1 billion. The requirement that all audit committee members must be outside directors has not changed. Financial institutions that are public companies, such as LCNB, are not relieved from their SOX internal control reporting and attestation requirements or their audit committee independence requirements. The amendments took effect December 28, 2005, and apply to fiscal years ending on or after September 30, 2005.
At December 31, 2005, the Bank was well capitalized based on FDICIA's guidelines.
LCNB and the Bank are also subject to the state banking laws of Ohio. Ohio adopted nationwide reciprocal interstate banking effective October, 1988. However, banking laws of other states may restrict branching of banks to other counties within the state and acquisitions or mergers involving banks and bank holding companies located in other states. Additionally, Dakin Insurance Agency, Inc. is subject to State of Ohio insurance regulations and rules and its activities are regulated by the State of Ohio Department of Insurance.
- 8 -
Noncompliance with laws and regulations by bank holding companies and banks can lead to monetary penalties and/or an increased level of supervision or a combination of these two items. Management is not aware of any current instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations and does not anticipate any problems maintaining compliance on a prospective basis. Recent regulatory inspections and examinations of LCNB and the Bank have not disclosed any significant instances of noncompliance.
The earnings and growth of LCNB are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Board. Its policies influence the amount of bank loans and deposits and the interest rates charged and paid thereon and thus have an effect on earnings. The nature of future monetary policies and the effect of such policies on the future business and earnings of LCNB and the Bank cannot be predicted.
A substantial portion of LCNB's cash revenues is derived from dividends paid by the Bank. These dividends are subject to various legal and regulatory restrictions. Generally, dividends are limited to the aggregate of current year net income plus the retained net earnings, as defined, of the two most previous prior years. In addition, dividend payments may not reduce capital levels below minimum regulatory guidelines.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005, LCNB, the Bank, and Dakin employed 226 full-time equivalent employees. LCNB is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement. Management considers its relationship with its employees to be very good. Employee benefit programs are considered by Management to be competitive with benefit programs provided by other financial institutions and major employers within LCNBs market area.
Availability of Financial Information
LCNB files unaudited quarterly financial reports on Form 10-Q, annual financial reports on Form 10-K, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with the SEC. Copies of these reports are available free of charge in the shareholder information section of the Bank's web site, www.lcnb.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed or furnished to the SEC, or by writing to:
Steve P. Foster
Executive Vice President, CFO
LCNB Corp.
2 N. Broadway
P.O. Box 59
Lebanon, Ohio 45036
Financial reports and other materials filed by LCNB with the SEC may also be read and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that file reports electronically, as LCNB does.
- 9 -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS AND EXPORT SALES
LCNB and its subsidiaries do not have any offices located in foreign countries and have no foreign assets, liabilities or related income and expense for the years presented.
STATISTICAL INFORMATION
The following tables and certain tables appearing in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis, present additional statistical information about LCNB Corp. and its operations and financial condition. They should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and the discussion included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity; Interest Rates and Interest Differential
The table presenting an average balance sheet, interest income and expense, and the resultant average yield for average interest-earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The table analyzing changes in interest income and expense by volume and rate is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Investment Portfolio
The following table presents the carrying values of securities for the years indicated:
At December 31, | ||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||
Securities available for sale: | ||||||
U.S. Treasury notes | $ | 4,126 | 1,194 | 2,149 | ||
U.S. Agency notes | 47,199 | 23,789 | 61,822 | |||
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities | 20,858 | 28,503 | 20,988 | |||
Municipal securities | 61,322 | 59,951 | 65,980 | |||
Total securities available for sale | 133,505 | 113,437 | 150,939 | |||
Federal Reserve Bank Stock | 647 | 647 | 647 | |||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock | 2,534 | 2,411 | 2,315 | |||
Total securities | $ | 136,686 | 116,495 | 153,901 |
- 10 -
Contractual maturities of debt securities at December 31, 2005, were as follows. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities when issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations.
Amortized | Market | ||||||
Cost | Value | Yield | |||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||
U.S. Treasury notes: | |||||||
Within one year | $ | 2,986 | 2,956 | 3.15% | |||
One to five years | 1,195 | 1,170 | 3.20% | ||||
Five to ten years | - | - | -% | ||||
After ten years | - | - | -% | ||||
Total U.S. Treasury notes | $ | 4,181 | 4,126 | 3.16% | |||
U.S. Agency notes: | |||||||
Within one year | $ | 23,981 | 23,885 | 3.89% | |||
One to five years | 23,688 | 23,314 | 3.66% | ||||
Five to ten years | - | - | -% | ||||
After ten years | - | - | -% | ||||
Total U.S. Agency notes | $ | 47,669 | 47,199 | 3.77% | |||
Municipal securities (1): | |||||||
Within one year | $ | 13,572 | 13,560 | 5.52% | |||
One to five years | 29,340 | 29,220 | 4.83% | ||||
Five to ten years | 11,103 | 11,140 | 5.59% | ||||
After ten years | 7,222 | 7,402 | 8.06% | ||||
Total Municipal securities | $ | 61,237 | 61,322 | 5.50% | |||
U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities | $ | 21,480 | 20,858 | 3.82% | |||
$ | 134,567 | 133,505 | 4.55% |
(1)
Yields on tax-exempt obligations are computed on a tax equivalent basis based upon a 34% statutory Federal income tax rate.
Excluding holdings in U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government Agencies, there were no investments in securities of any issuer that exceeded 10% of LCNB's consolidated shareholders' equity at December 31, 2005.
- 11 -
Loan Portfolio
The following table summarizes the distribution of the loan portfolio for the years indicated:
At December 31, | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 34,607 | 32,931 | 30,519 | 35,198 | 40,486 | ||||
Commercial, secured by real estate | 124,823 | 107,138 | 99,461 | 80,882 | 72,477 | |||||
Residential real estate | 161,656 | 159,286 | 139,305 | 151,502 | 165,710 | |||||
Consumer, excluding credit cards | 35,879 | 34,672 | 43,283 | 51,184 | 41,006 | |||||
Agricultural | 1,978 | 1,653 | 1,192 | 1,314 | 2,020 | |||||
Credit card | - | - | 2,707 | 2,689 | 2,658 | |||||
Lease Financing | 37 | 253 | 588 | 1,256 | 2,088 | |||||
Other | 152 | 167 | 212 | 57 | 112 | |||||
Total loans | 359,132 | 336,100 | 317,267 | 324,082 | 326,557 | |||||
Deferred costs, net | 669 | 490 | 566 | 750 | 608 | |||||
359,801 | 336,590 | 317,833 | 324,832 | 327,165 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (2,150) | (2,150) | (2,150) | (2,000) | (2,000) | |||||
Loans, net | $ | 357,651 | 334,440 | 315,683 | 322,832 | 325,165 |
As of December 31, 2005, there were no concentrations of loans exceeding 10% of total loans that are not already disclosed as a category of loans in the above table.
The following table summarizes the commercial and agricultural loan maturities and sensitivities to interest rate change at December 31, 2005:
(Dollars in thousands) | |||
Maturing in one year or less | $ | 28,145 | |
Maturing after one year, but within five years | 10,364 | ||
Maturing beyond five years | 122,899 | ||
Total commercial and agricultural loans | $ | 161,408 | |
Loans maturing beyond one year: | |||
Fixed rate | $ | 68,392 | |
Variable rate | 64,871 | ||
Total | $ | 133,263 |
- 12 -
Risk Elements
Generally, a loan is placed on non-accrual status when there is an indication that the borrower's cash flows may not be sufficient to meet payments as they become due, unless the loan is well secured and in the process of collection. Subsequent cash receipts on a non-accrual loan are recorded as a reduction of principal, and interest income is recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured. The current year's accrued interest on loans placed on non-accrual status is charged against earnings. Previous years' accrued interest is charged against the allowance for loan losses.
The following table summarizes non-accrual, past-due, and restructured loans for the dates indicated:
At December 31, | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Non-accrual loans | $ | 785 | - | 794 | - | - | ||||
Past-due 90 days or more and still accruing | 61 | 165 | 2,442 | 232 | 146 | |||||
Restructured loan | 1,717 | 1,817 | - | - | - | |||||
Total | $ | 2,563 | 1,982 | 3,236 | 232 | 146 |
The restructured loan at December 31, 2005 and 2004 consists of a commercial loan whose predecessor loans were classified as loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing at December 31, 2003, at which time they had a total balance of $2,030,000. Principal payments of $100,000 and $213,000 were made on these loans in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Information received during the first quarter, 2004, raised uncertainties concerning the collectibility of certain collateral and management transferred the loans to the non-accrual classification, where they remained until they were re-written in October, 2004. All related interest due on the predecessor loans was paid during October, 2004, and the loans were re-written at that time. Such interest was recorded on a cash basis as received. The restructured loan is secured by a combination of mortgages and other collateral.
Non-accrual loans at December 31, 2005 consist of two real estate mortgage loans. Non-accrual loans at December 31, 2003 included a commercial loan in the amount of $564,000, which was paid in full during the second quarter, 2004; a consumer loan in the amount of $146,000; and residential real estate mortgage loans in the amount of $84,000. Interest income that would have been recorded during 2005 and 2003 if loans on a non-accrual status at the end of those years had been current and in accordance with their original terms was approximately $20,000 and $72,000, respectively.
Loans past-due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 2005 consisted primarily of consumer loans. Loans classified as past-due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 2004 consisted of consumer loans totaling $104,000 and residential mortgage loans totaling $61,000.
- 13 -
The following is a summary of information pertaining to loans considered to be impaired in accordance with SFAS No. 114 (000s):
December 31, | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance | $ | 4,026 | 71 | |
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance | 2,333 | 2,049 | ||
Total impaired loans | 6,359 | 2,120 | ||
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans | $ | 746 | 540 |
The increase in impaired loans without a valuation allowance is primarily due to four loans totaling $3,869,000. Each loan is secured by real estate that has sufficient estimated fair value to pay the principal in full.
The average balance of impaired loans during 2005 and 2004 was $6,601,000 and $2,629,000, respectively. During 2005 LCNB recognized approximately $408,000 of interest on impaired loans, of which $15,000 was recognized on a cash basis. LCNB continued to accrue interest on certain loans classified as impaired during 2005 because they were considered well secured and in the process of collection. During 2004 LCNB received and recognized $164,000 of interest income on impaired loans.
LCNB is not committed to lend additional funds to debtors whose loans have been modified to provide a reduction or deferral of principal or interest because of deterioration in the financial position of the borrower.
At December 31, 2005, there were no material additional loans not already disclosed as non-accrual, restructured, accruing past due 90 days or more, or impaired where known information about possible credit problems of the borrowers causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms.
- 14 -
Summary of Loan Loss Experience
The table summarizing the activity related to the allowance for loan losses is included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for loan loss:
At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | Amount | Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial | $ | 161 | 9.64% | 135 | 9.80% | 420 | 9.62% | 744 | 10.86% | 647 | 12.40% | |||||||||||||
Commercial, secured by real estate | 1,056 | 34.76 | 695 | 31.88 | 649 | 31.35 | - | 24.96 | - | 22.19 | ||||||||||||||
Residential real estate | 240 | 45.01 | 21 | 47.39 | - | 43.91 | - | 46.75 | - | . | 50.75 | |||||||||||||
Consumer | 462 | 9.99 | 690 | 10.32 | 676 | 13.64 | 871 | 15.79 | 774 | 12.56 | ||||||||||||||
Agricultural | - | 0.55 | - | 0.49 | - | 0.38 | - | 0.40 | - | 0.62 | ||||||||||||||
Credit card | - | - | - | - | 42 | 0.85 | 77 | 0.83 | 82 | 0.81 | ||||||||||||||
Lease financing | - | 0.01 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.07 | - | 0.39 | - | 0.64 | ||||||||||||||
Other | 10 | 0.04 | 36 | 0.05 | - | 0.18 | - | 0.02 | - | 0.03 | ||||||||||||||
Unallocated | 221 | 573 | 363 | 308 | 497 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,150 | 100.00% | 2,150 | 100.00% | 2,150 | 100.00% | 2,000 | 100.00% | 2,000 | 100.00% |
This allocation is made for analytical purposes. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any category of the portfolio. The increase in the allocation to the commercial, secured by real estate category at December 31, 2005 as compared to December 31, 2004 reflects growth in the portfolio and an increase in the dollar volume of loans assigned to the higher-risk classifications of substandard or doubtful. The increase in the allocation to the residential real estate category at December 31, 2005 as compared to December 31, 2004 reflects an increase in non-accrual loans and foreclosures at LCNB, an increase in residential second mortgage and home equity loans with high (90% or more) loan-to-value ratios, and an increase in bankruptcies and foreclosures in the Southwestern Ohio economy in general. The decrease in the allocation to the consumer loan category at December 31, 2005 compared to December 31, 2004 reflects decreased delinquencies. The decrease in the allocation to the commercial and industrial category at December 31, 2004 as compared to December 31, 2003 reflects decreased delinquencies. There is not an allocation to the credit card category for 2005 and 2004 because this portfolio was sold during the first quarter, 2004. Allocations to the consumer and credit card categories were less at December 31, 2003 as compared to December 31, 2002 because of general economic improvements in late 2003.
- 15 -
Deposits
The statistical information regarding average amounts and average rates paid for the deposit categories is included in the "Distribution of Assets, Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity" table included in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following table presents the contractual maturity of time deposits of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2005:
(Dollars in thousands) | |||
Maturity within 3 months | $ | 7,139 | |
After 3 but within 6 months | 3,922 | ||
After 6 but within 12 months | 14,605 | ||
After 12 months | 35,786 | ||
$ | 61,452 |
Return on Equity and Assets
The statistical information regarding the return on assets, return on equity, dividend payout ratio, and equity to assets ratio is presented in Item 6, Selected Financial Data.
- 16 -
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are risks inherent in LCNBs operations, many beyond managements control, which may adversely affect its financial condition and results from operations and should be considered in evaluating the company. Credit, market, operational, liquidity, interest rate and other risks are described elsewhere in this report. Other risk factors may include the items described below.
LCNBs earnings are significantly affected by market interest rates.
Fluctuations in interest rates may negatively impact LCNBs profitability. A primary source of income from operations is net interest income, which is equal to the difference between interest income earned on loans and investment securities and the interest paid for deposits and other borrowings. These rates are highly sensitive to many factors beyond LCNBs control, including general economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States Federal government.
The Open Market Committee of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States, primarily by setting the intended federal funds rate. The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which depository institutions lend balances at the Federal Reserve to other depository institutions overnight. The intended federal funds rate significantly influences the interest rates LCNB earns on loans and investments and the rate paid for deposits and other borrowings.
From January 2001 to mid 2003, the Open Market Committee cut the intended federal funds rate thirteen times, and short-term interest rates reached their lowest levels in 45 years. During 2004 and 2005, the Open Market Committee increased the federal funds rate thirteen times. As a consequence, LCNBs net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets, generally loans and investments) has decreased during this period, as the rates paid for deposits and borrowings increased more rapidly than the rates earned on loans and securities could be adjusted.
The slope of the yield curve (that is, the relationship between short and long-term interest rates) also affects LCNBs net interest income and net interest margin. As discussed above, rates rose in general during 2005, but short-term rates rose significantly more than long-term rates. Consequently, short-term term rates at year-end 2005 were not significantly below long-term rates, placing further pressure on LCNBs net interest margin. The following table compares Constant Maturity Treasury rates, as released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, for various maturities as of year-end 2005 and 2004.
Date | 1 mo | 3 mo | 6 mo | 1 yr | 2 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 7 yr | 10 yr | 20 yr |
12/31/05 | 4.01% | 4.08 | 4.37 | 4.38 | 4.41 | 4.37 | 4.35 | 4.36 | 4.39 | 4.61 |
12/31/04 | 1.89% | 2.22 | 2.59 | 2.75 | 3.08 | 3.25 | 3.63 | 3.94 | 4.24 | 4.85 |
LCNB expects the current level of interest rates and the current slope of the yield curve will cause further downward pressure on its net interest margin.
- 17 -
Increases in general interest rates could have a negative impact on LCNBs results of operations by reducing the ability of borrowers to repay their current loan obligations. Some residential real estate mortgage loans, most home equity line of credit loans, and approximately 57% of LCNBs commercial loans have adjustable rates. Borrower inability to make scheduled loan payments due to a higher loan cost could result in increased loan defaults, foreclosures, and write-offs and may necessitate additions to the allowance for loan losses. In addition, increases in the general level of interest rates may decrease the demand for new consumer and commercial loans, thus limiting LCNBs growth and profitability. A general increase in interest rates may also result in deposit disintermediation, which is the flow of deposits away from banks and other depository institutions into direct investments that have the potential for higher rates of return, such as stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. If this occurs, LCNB may have to rely more heavily on borrowings as a source of funds in the future, which could negatively impact its net interest margin.
Banking competition in Southwestern Ohio is intense.
LCNB faces strong competition for deposits, loans, trust accounts, and other services from other banks, savings banks, credit unions, mortgage brokers, and other financial institutions. Many of LCNBs competitors include major financial institutions that have been in business for many years and have established customer bases, numerous branches, and substantially higher regulatory lending limits. Dominant competitors in the Southwestern Ohio area include U.S. Bank, National City Corporation, Fifth Third Bank, Bank One, KeyBank, and First Financial Bank. In addition, credit unions are growing larger due to more flexible membership requirement regulations and are offering more financial services than they legally could in the past.
LCNB also competes with numerous real estate brokerage firms, some owned by realty companies, for residential real estate mortgage loans. Incentives offered by the captive finance companies owned by the major automobile companies, primarily General Motors Acceptance Corporation (GMAC), Chrysler Financial, and Ford Motor Credit Company (FMCC), have limited the banking industrys opportunities for growth in the new automobile loan market. The banking industry now competes with brokerage firms and mutual fund companies for funds that would have historically been held as bank deposits. Technology has lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks, such as automatic transfer and automatic payment systems. Many of LCNBs competitors have fewer regulatory constraints and may have lower cost structures.
If LCNB is unable to attract and retain loan, deposit, and trust customers, its growth and profitability levels may be negatively impacted.
Economic conditions in Southwestern Ohio could adversely affect LCNBs financial condition and results of operations.
LCNB has 21 offices located in Warren, Butler, Clinton and Hamilton Counties in Southwestern Ohio. As a result of this geographic concentration, LCNBs results are heavily influenced by economic conditions in this area. A deterioration in economic conditions or a natural or manmade disaster in Southwestern Ohio or Ohio in general could have a material adverse impact on the ability of borrowers to make scheduled loan payments, the fair value of underlying loan collateral, the ability of depositors to maintain or add to deposit balances, the demand for trust and brokerage services, and the demand for other products and services offered by LCNB.
- 18 -
The allowance for loan losses may be inadequate.
The provision for loan losses is determined by management based upon its evaluation of the amount needed to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered appropriate in relation to the estimated risk of losses inherent in the portfolio. In addition to historic charge-off percentages, factors taken into consideration to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses include the nature, volume, and consistency of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, a review of specific problem loans, the fair value of any underlying collateral, and current economic conditions that may affect borrowers ability to make payments. Increases in the allowance result in an expense for the period. By its nature, the evaluation is imprecise and requires significant judgment. Actual results may vary significantly from managements assumptions. If, as a result of general economic conditions or a decrease in asset quality, management determines that additional increases in the allowance for loan losses are necessary, LCNB will incur additional expenses.
LCNB is subject to environmental liability risk associated with lending activities.
A significant portion of the Banks loan portfolio is secured by real property. During the ordinary course of business, the Bank may foreclose on and take title to properties securing certain loans. In doing so, there is a risk that hazardous or toxic substances could be found on these properties. If hazardous or toxic substances are found, the Bank may be liable for remediation costs, as well as for personal injury and property damage. Environmental laws may require the Bank to incur substantial expenses and may materially reduce the affected propertys value or limit the Banks ability to use or sell the affected property. In addition, future laws or more stringent interpretations or enforcement policies with respect to existing laws may increase the Banks exposure to environmental liability. Although the Bank has policies and procedures to perform an environmental review before initiating any foreclosure action on real property, these reviews may not be sufficient to detect all potential environmental hazards. The remediation costs and any other financial liabilities associated with an environmental hazard could have a material adverse effect on the LCNBs financial condition and results of operations.
The banking industry is highly regulated.
Commercial banks are highly regulated. LCNB Corp. is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Federal Reserve Board and Lebanon Citizens National Bank is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC). LCNB Corp. and Lebanon Citizens National Bank are also subject to regulation and examination by the FDIC, as the deposit insurer. Federal and state laws and regulations govern numerous matters including, but not limited to, changes in the ownership or control of banks, maintenance of adequate capital, permissible business operations, maintenance of deposit insurance, protection of customer financial privacy, the level of reserves held against deposits, restrictions on dividend payments, the making of loans, and the acceptance of deposits. See the previous section titled Supervision and Regulation for more information on this subject.
Federal regulators may initiate various enforcement actions against a financial institution that violates laws or regulations or that operates in an unsafe or unsound manner. These enforcement actions may include, but are not limited to, the assessment of civil money penalties, the issuance of cease-and-desist or removal orders, and the imposition of written agreements.
- 19 -
Proposals to change the laws governing financial institutions are periodically introduced in Congress and proposals to change regulations are periodically considered by the regulatory bodies. Such future legislation and/or changes in regulations could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities, or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions. The likelihood of any major changes in the future and their effects are impossible to determine.
LCNBs controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented.
Management regularly reviews and updates LCNBs internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of LCNBs controls and procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to its controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on LCNBs business, results of operations, and financial condition.
LCNBs information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security.
LCNB relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. Any failure, interruption, or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in LCNBs customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan, and other systems. While LCNB has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption, or security breach of its information systems, there can be no assurance that any such occurrences will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions, or security breaches of LCNBs information systems could damage LCNBs reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject LCNB to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose LCNB to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Factors Related to Dakin Insurance Agency, Inc.
Competition within the insurance agency business is also intense. Dakin competes with numerous other independent and exclusive insurance agencies (an exclusive agent sells for only one insurance company) and with insurance companies that sell direct to individuals and businesses without using agents.
Premium growth within the insurance industry tends to exhibit a cyclical nature. Premium growth might average double digits during the first part of the cycle and then be negative during the later part of the cycle. Such cycles appear to be heavily influenced by general economic conditions, but can also be affected by natural disasters, stock market returns, and the reinsurance market. Deterioration in economic conditions may also have a material adverse impact on the ability of insurance customers to make scheduled premium payments.
Commissions paid independent agents by insurance carriers have been trending downward. Agents therefore need to continually write new business to prevent earnings decreases.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable
- 20 -
Item 2. Properties
The Bank conducts its business from the following offices:
Name of Office | Address | ||||||
1. | Main Office | 2 North Broadway Lebanon, Ohio 45036 | Owned | ||||
2. | Auto Bank | 36 North Broadway Lebanon, Ohio 45036 | Owned | ||||
3. | Columbus Avenue Office | 730 Columbus Avenue Lebanon, Ohio 45036 | Owned | ||||
4. | Fairfield Office | 765 Nilles Road Fairfield, Ohio 45014 | Leased | ||||
5. | Goshen Office | 6726 Dick Flynn Blvd. Goshen, Ohio 45122 | Owned | ||||
6. | Hamilton Office | 794 NW Washington Blvd. Hamilton, Ohio 45013 | Owned | ||||
7. | Hunter Office | 3878 State Route 122 Franklin, Ohio 45005 | Owned | ||||
8. | Loveland Office | 500 Loveland-Madeira Road | Owned | ||||
9. | Maineville Office | 7795 South State Route 48 Maineville, Ohio 45039 | Owned | (2) | |||
10. | Mason/West Chester Office | 1050 Reading Road Mason, Ohio 45040 | Owned | (2) | |||
11. | Mason Christian Village Office | Mason Christian Village 411 Western Row Road Mason, Ohio 45040 | Leased | ||||
12. | Middletown Office | 4441 Marie Drive Middletown, Ohio 45044 | Owned | ||||
13. | Okeana Office | 6225 Cincinnati-Brookville Road Okeana, Ohio 45053 | Owned | ||||
- 21 - | |||||||
Name of Office | Address | ||||||
14. | Otterbein Office | Otterbein Retirement Community State Route 741 Lebanon, Ohio 45036 | Leased | ||||
15. | Oxford Office | 30 West Park Place Oxford, Ohio 45056 | (1) (3) | ||||
16. | Rochester/Morrow Office | Route 22-3 at 123 Morrow, Ohio 45152 | Owned | ||||
17. | South Lebanon Office | 209 East Forest Street South Lebanon, Ohio 45065 | Leased | ||||
18. | Springboro/Franklin Office | 525 West Central Avenue Springboro, Ohio 45066 | Owned | ||||
19. | Warrior Office | Lebanon High School 1916 Drake Road Lebanon, Ohio 45036 | Leased | ||||
20. | Waynesville Office | 9 North Main Street Waynesville, Ohio 45068 | Owned | ||||
21. | Wilmington Office | 1243 Rombach Avenue Wilmington, Ohio 45177 | Owned |
(1)
Excess space in this office is leased to third parties.
(2)
A Dakin office is located in this office.
(3)
The Bank owns the Oxford office building and leases the land.
Dakin owns its main office at 20 & 24 East Mulberry Street, Lebanon, Ohio 45036. Excess space in this office is leased to third parties. Dakin's two other offices are located in the Bank's branch offices.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Except for routine litigation incident to their businesses, LCNB and its subsidiaries are not a party to any material pending legal proceedings and none of their property is the subject of any such proceedings.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
- 22 -
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
LCNB had approximately 635 registered holders of its Common Stock as of December 31, 2005. The number of shareholders includes banks and brokers who act as nominees, each of whom may represent more than one shareholder. The Common Stock is currently traded on the Nasdaq Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board service under the symbol "LCNB". Several market-makers facilitate the trading of the shares of Common Stock. Trade prices for shares of LCNB Common Stock, reported through registered securities dealers, are set forth below. Trades have occurred during the periods indicated without the knowledge of LCNB. The trade prices shown below are interdealer without retail markups, markdowns or commissions. Prices have been restated to reflect a 100% stock dividend, which was accounted for as a stock split, paid on April 30, 2004.
High | Low | ||||
2005 | |||||
First Quarter | $ | 45.00 | 36.50 | ||
Second Quarter | 40.00 | 37.25 | |||
Third Quarter | 38.50 | 36.60 | |||
Fourth Quarter | 38.25 | 36.75 | |||
2004 | |||||
First Quarter | $ | 36.25 | 34.525 | ||
Second Quarter | 40.00 | 35.250 | |||
Third Quarter | 40.00 | 36.000 | |||
Fourth Quarter | 38.90 | 37.000 |
The following table presents cash dividends per share declared and paid in the periods shown. Amounts have been restated to reflect the 100% stock dividend referred to above.
2005 | 2004 | ||||
First Quarter | $ | 0.29 | 0.275 | ||
Second Quarter | 0.29 | 0.280 | |||
Third Quarter | 0.29 | 0.280 | |||
Fourth Quarter | 0.29 | 0.280 | |||
Total | $ | 1.16 | 1.115 |
It is expected that LCNB will continue to pay dividends on a similar schedule, to the extent permitted by business and other factors beyond management's control. LCNB depends on dividends from its subsidiaries for the majority of its liquid assets, including the cash needed to pay dividends to its shareholders. National banking law limits the amount of dividends the Bank may pay to the sum of retained net income, as defined, for the current year plus net income retained for the previous two years. Prior approval from the OCC, the Banks primary regulator, would be necessary for the Bank to pay dividends in excess of this amount. In addition, dividend payments may not reduce capital levels below minimum regulatory guidelines. Management believes the Bank will be able to pay anticipated dividends to LCNB without needing to request approval.
- 23 -
On April 17, 2001, LCNB's Board of Directors authorized three separate stock repurchase programs, two phases of which continue. The shares purchased will be held for future corporate purposes.
Under the "Market Repurchase Program" LCNB was originally authorized to purchase up to 100,000 shares of its stock through market transactions with a selected stockbroker. On November 14, 2005, the Board of Directors extended the Market Repurchase Program by increasing the shares authorized for repurchase to 200,000 total shares. Through December 31, 2005, 95,422 shares had been purchased under this program. The following table shows information relating to the repurchase of shares under the Market Repurchase Program during the twelve months ended December 31, 2005:
Total Number of | Maximum | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Number of | ||||||||||||||
Purchased as | Shares that May | ||||||||||||||
Total | Part of Publicly | Yet Be | |||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Announced | Purchased | ||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Plans or | Under the Plans | ||||||||||||
Purchased | Per Share | Programs | or Programs (1) | ||||||||||||
January | - | $ | - | - | 137,469 | ||||||||||
February | 3,050 | 38.00 | 3,050 | 134,419 | |||||||||||
March | - | - | - | 134,419 | |||||||||||
April | - | - | - | 134,419 | |||||||||||
May | 10,541 | 38.00 | 10,541 | 123,878 | |||||||||||
June | - | - | - | 123,878 | |||||||||||
July | - | - | - | 123,878 | |||||||||||
August | 5,800 | 38.00 | 5,800 | 118,078 | |||||||||||
September | - | - | - | 118,078 | |||||||||||
October | 8,500 | 38.00 | 8,500 | 109,578 | |||||||||||
November | 5,000 | 38.00 | 5,000 | 104,578 | |||||||||||
December | - | - | - | 104,578 | |||||||||||
Total | 32,891 | $ | 38.00 | 32,891 | 104,578 | ||||||||||
(1) Restated to reflect increase in authorized shares approved on November 14, 2005. |
The "Private Sale Repurchase Program" is available to shareholders who wish to sell large blocks of stock at one time. Because LCNB's stock is not widely traded, a shareholder releasing large blocks may not be able to readily sell all shares through normal procedures. Purchases of blocks will be considered on a case-by-case basis and will be made at prevailing market prices. There is no limit to the number of shares that may be purchased under this program. A total of 178,344 shares have been purchased under this program since its inception. The following table shows information relating to private sale repurchases during the twelve months ended December 31, 2005:
- 24 -
Total Number of | Maximum | ||||||||||||
Shares | Number of | ||||||||||||
Purchased as | Shares that May | ||||||||||||
Total | Part of Publicly | Yet Be | |||||||||||
Number of | Average | Announced | Purchased | ||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Plans or | Under the Plans | ||||||||||
Purchased | Per Share | Programs | or Programs | ||||||||||
January | - | $ | - | - | Not applicable | ||||||||
February | - | - | - | ||||||||||
March | - | - | - | ||||||||||
April | - | - | - | ||||||||||
May | 9,200 | 37.50 | 9,200 | ||||||||||
June | - | - | - | ||||||||||
July | - | - | - | ||||||||||
August | 9,000 | 37.50 | 9,000 | ||||||||||
September | - | - | - | ||||||||||
October | - | - | - | ||||||||||
November | - | - | - | ||||||||||
December | - | - | - | ||||||||||
Total | 18,200 | $ | 37.50 | 18,200 | |||||||||
LCNB established an Ownership Incentive Plan during 2002 that allows for the issuance of up to 100,000 shares of stock-based awards to eligible employees, as determined by the Board of Directors. The awards may be in the form of stock options, share awards, and/or appreciation rights. Only stock options had been awarded at December 31, 2005. The following table shows information relating to stock options outstanding at December 31, 2005:
Plan Category | Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options | Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | 9,582 | $ | 30.05 | 90,418 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | - |
| - | - | ||||||||
Total | 9,582 | $ | 30.05 | 90,418 |
- 25 -
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following represents selected consolidated financial data of LCNB for the years ended December 31, 2001 through 2005 and are derived from LCNB's consolidated financial statements. This data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk included in Items 7 and 7A, respectively, of this Form 10-K, and are qualified in their entirety thereby and by other detailed information elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except ratios and per share data) | ||||||||||
Income Statement: | ||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 27,602 | 25,648 | 27,437 | 30,163 | 32,164 | ||||
Interest expense | 9,032 | 7,368 | 8,680 | 10,670 | 14,340 | |||||
Net interest income | 18,570 | 18,280 | 18,757 | 19,493 | 17,824 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 338 | 489 | 658 | 348 | 237 | |||||
Net interest income after provision | 18,232 | 17,791 | 18,099 | 19,145 | 17,587 | |||||
Non-interest income | 7,925 | 7,659 | 6,797 | 5,623 | 4,842 | |||||
Non-interest expenses | 17,212 | 16,404 | 15,725 | 15,705 | 13,922 | |||||
Income before income taxes | 8,945 | 9,046 | 9,171 | 9,063 | 8,507 | |||||
Provision for income taxes | 2,240 | 2,450 | 2,434 | 2,523 | 2,440 | |||||
Net income | $ | 6,705 | 6,596 | 6,737 | 6,540 | 6,067 | ||||
Balance Sheet: | ||||||||||
Securities | $ | 136,686 | 116,495 | 153,901 | 139,049 | 101,382 | ||||
Loans, net | 357,651 | 334,440 | 315,683 | 322,832 | 325,165 | |||||
Total assets | 539,501 | 522,251 | 523,608 | 506,751 | 480,435 | |||||
Total deposits | 481,475 | 463,900 | 463,033 | 442,220 | 414,772 | |||||
Long-term debt | 2,073 | 2,137 | 4,197 | 6,253 | 12,306 | |||||
Total shareholders' equity | 52,022 | 52,296 | 52,448 | 51,930 | 49,507 | |||||
- 26 -
For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except ratios and per share data) | ||||||||||
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data: | ||||||||||
Return on average assets | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.31% | 1.32% | 1.30% | |||||
Return on average equity | 12.80% | 12.56% | 12.64% | 13.00% | 12.50% | |||||
Equity-to-assets ratio | 9.64% | 10.01% | 10.02% | 10.25% | 10.30% | |||||
Dividend payout ratio | 57.14% | 56.60% | 53.93% | 53.43% | 53.94% | |||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share(1) | $ | 2.03 | 1.97 | 1.97 | 1.90 | 1.71 | ||||
Dividends declared per share(1) | $ | 1.16 | 1.115 | 1.0625 | 1.0125 | 0.925 |
(1)
All per share data have been adjusted to reflect a 100% stock dividend accounted for as a stock split in 2004.
- 27 -
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following is management's discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of LCNB Corp. ("LCNB"). It is intended to amplify certain financial information regarding LCNB and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes and the Financial Highlights contained in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain matters disclosed herein may be deemed to be forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical fact. Such statements are often characterized by the use of qualifying words and their derivatives such as expects, anticipates, believes, estimates, plans, projects, or other statements concerning opinions or judgments of the Company and its management about future events. Factors that could influence the accuracy of such forward looking statements include, but are not limited to, regulatory policy changes, interest rate fluctuations, loan demand, loan delinquencies and losses, general economic conditions and other risks. Such forward-looking statements represent management's judgment as of the current date. Actual strategies and results in future time periods may differ materially from those currently expected. LCNB Corp. disclaims, however, any intent or obligation to update such forward-looking statements. LCNB intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Overview
LCNB earned $6,705,000 in 2005, compared to $6,596,000 in 2004 and $6,737,000 in 2003. Basic and diluted earnings per share for 2005, 2004, and 2003 were $2.03, $1.97, and $1.97, respectively. Performance ratios for 2005, 2004, and 2003 included:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |
Return on average assets | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.31% |
Return on average equity | 12.80% | 12.56% | 12.64% |
Net interest income for 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $18,570,000, $18,280,000, and $18,757,000, respectively. Net interest income increased during 2005 as compared to 2004 primarily due to loan growth, especially growth in the commercial, secured by real estate portfolio. Average rates received on loans and other investments grew during 2005, but not at the same rate of increase as rates paid on deposits. A primary factor in the decline in net interest income during 2004 compared to 2003 was the historically low market rate environment of these years, as indicated in LCNBs net interest margin. The net interest margin, which is calculated by dividing taxable-equivalent net interest income by average interest-earning assets, was 3.99%, 4.02%, and 4.09% for 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
- 28 -
Total non-interest income grew from $6,797,000 for 2003 to $7,659,000 for 2004 and $7,925,000 for 2005. Two primary drivers of this upward trend were trust income, primarily from growth in trust and brokerage assets managed, and increases in service charges and fees, primarily due to the introduction of a new overdraft protection program in August, 2003.
Total non-interest expense also increased. Total non-interest expense for 2003 was $15,725,000, compared to $16,404,000 in 2004 and $17,212,000 in 2005. Normal salary and wage increases and increased employee benefit costs comprised a significant portion of this increase. LCNBs continual investments in facilities improvements and data processing system upgrades also was responsible for expense increases, primarily through increased depreciation and computer maintenance and supply costs.
Net Interest Income
The amount of net interest income earned by LCNB is influenced by the dollar amount ("volume") and mix of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and the rates earned or paid on each. The following table presents, for the years indicated, the distribution of average assets, liabilities and shareholders' equity, as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest earning assets and the resultant yields on a fully taxable equivalent basis, and the dollar amounts of interest expense and average interest-bearing liabilities and the resultant rates paid.
- 29 -
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Interest | Average | Average | Interest | Average | Average | Interest | Average | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Earned/ | Yield/ | Outstanding | Earned/ | Yield/ | Outstanding | Earned/ | Yield/ | ||||||||||||||
Balance | Paid | Rate | Balance | Paid | Rate | Balance | Paid | Rate | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (1) | $ | 346,826 | $ | 22,279 | 6.42% | $ | 327,276 | $ | 20,524 | 6.27% | $ | 319,771 | $ | 22,007 | 6.88% | |||||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing demand deposits | 12,503 | 375 | 3.00 | 16,856 | 249 | 1.48 | 17,089 | 177 | 1.04 | |||||||||||||
Federal Reserve Bank Stock | 647 | 39 | 6.03 | 647 | 39 | 6.03 | 647 | 39 | 6.03 | |||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock | 2,455 | 123 | 5.01 | 2,350 | 97 | 4.13 | 2,258 | 90 | 3.99 | |||||||||||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | 74,873 | 2,685 | 3.59 | 80,781 | 2,792 | 3.46 | 87,273 | 3,040 | 3.48 | |||||||||||||
Non-taxable (2) | 55,074 | 3,185 | 5.78 | 52,364 | 2,961 | 5.65 | 57,886 | 3,182 | 5.50 | |||||||||||||
Total earning assets | 492,378 | 28,686 | 5.83 | 480,274 | 26,662 | 5.55 | 484,924 | 28,535 | 5.88 | |||||||||||||
Non-earning assets | 44,350 | 33,780 | 33,265 | |||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (2,155) | (2,158) | (2,037) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 534,573 | $ | 511,896 | $ | 516,152 | ||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits | $ | 112,422 | 889 | 0.79 | $ | 122,893 | 912 | 0.74 | $ | 119,838 | 1,458 | 1.22 | ||||||||||
NOW and money fund | 96,974 | 1,192 | 1.23 | 85,479 | 477 | 0.56 | 95,234 | 702 | 0.74 | |||||||||||||
IRA and time certificates | 188,320 | 6,784 | 3.60 | 169,996 | 5,768 | 3.39 | 172,963 | 6,235 | 3.60 | |||||||||||||
Short-term debt | 1,376 | 49 | 3.56 | 556 | 6 | 1.08 | 681 | 6 | 0.88 | |||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 2,105 | 118 | 5.61 | 4,063 | 205 | 5.05 | 6,115 | 279 | 4.56 | |||||||||||||
Total interest- bearing-liabilities | 401,197 | 9,032 | 2.25 | 382,987 | 7,368 | 1.92 | 394,831 | 8,680 | 2.20 | |||||||||||||
Demand deposits | 78,421 | 73,619 | 64,686 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 2,576 | 2,768 | 3,315 | |||||||||||||||||||
Capital | 52,379 | 52,522 | 53,320 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and capital | $ | 534,573 | $ | 511,896 | $ | 516,152 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread (3) | 3.58 | 3.63 | 3.68 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis (4) | $ | 19,654 | 3.99 | $ | 19,294 | 4.02 |
| $ | 19,855 | 4.09 | ||||||||||||
Ratio of interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities | 122.73% | 125.40% | 122.82% |
(1)
Includes non-accrual loans if any. Income from tax-exempt loans is included in interest income on a taxable equivalent basis, using an incremental rate of 34%.
(2)
Income from tax-exempt securities is included in interest income on a taxable equivalent basis. Interest income has been divided by a factor comprised of the complement of the incremental tax rate of 34%.
(3)
The net interest spread is the difference between the average rate on total interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
(4)
The net interest margin is the taxable-equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
- 30 -
The following table presents the changes in interest income and expense for each major category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the amount of change attributable to volume and rate changes for the years indicated. Changes not solely attributable to rate or volume have been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of absolute dollar amounts of the changes in each.
For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 vs. 2004 | 2004 vs. 2003 | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) due to | Increase (decrease) due to | |||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Total | Volume | Rate | Total | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Interest income attributable to: | ||||||||||||
Loans(1) | $ | 1,247 | 508 | 1,755 | 507 | (1,990) | (1,483) | |||||
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing demand deposits | (78) | 204 | 126 | (2) |
74 | 72 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock | 4 | 22 | 26 | 4 | 3 | 7 | ||||||
Investment securities: | ||||||||||||
Taxable | (209) | 102 | (107) | (225) | (23) | (248) | ||||||
Non-taxable(2) | 156 | 68 | 224 | (310) | 89 | (221) | ||||||
Total interest income | 1,120 | 904 | 2,024 | (26) | (1,847) | (1,873) | ||||||
Interest expense attributable to: | ||||||||||||
Savings deposits | (81) | 58 | (23) | 36 | (582) | (546) | ||||||
NOW and money fund | 72 | 643 | 715 | (67) | (158) | (225) | ||||||
IRA and time certificates | 646 | 370 | 1,016 | (106) | (361) | (467) | ||||||
Short-term borrowings | 17 | 26 | 43 | (1) | 1 | - | ||||||
Long-term debt | (108) | 21 | (87) | (101) | 27 | (74) | ||||||
Total interest expense | 546 | 1,118 | 1,664 | (239) | (1,073) | (1,312) | ||||||
Net interest income | $ | 574 | (214) | 360 | 213 | (774) | (561) |
(1)
Non-accrual loans, if any, are included in average loan balances.
(2)
Change in interest income from non-taxable loans and investment securities is computed based on interest income determined on a taxable equivalent yield basis. Interest income has been divided by a factor comprised of the complement of the incremental tax rate of 34%.
- 31 -
2005 vs. 2004. Tax equivalent interest income increased $2,024,000 primarily due to a $12.1 million increase in total average interest-earning assets and secondarily to a 28 basis point (a basis point equals 0.01%) increase in the average rate earned on such assets. The growth in average interest-earning assets occurred primarily in the loan portfolio, which increased $19.6 million on an average basis. Commercial loans secured by real estate were responsible for most of this growth. The increase in average rates earned was primarily due to a general increase in market rates.
Interest expense increased $1,664,000 primarily due to a 33 basis point increase in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities and secondarily to an $18.2 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities. The increase in the average rate paid is primarily due to a general increase in market rates. IRA and time certificates grew $18.3 million on an average basis and average NOW and money fund deposits grew $11.5 million. These increases were partially offset by a $10.5 million decrease in average savings deposits and a $2.0 million decrease in average long-term borrowings. Average long-term borrowings decreased primarily due to the maturation and payment in December, 2004 of a $2.0 million Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") note bearing an interest rate of 4.40%.
The net interest margin decreased slightly, from 4.02% during 2004 to 3.99% during 2005. Even though the average rate earned on interest-earning assets increased 28 basis points, this increase was offset by a 33 basis point increase in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Short-term rates increased significantly during 2005, while longer-term rates remained substantially stable. Consequently, short-term rates at year-end 2005 were not significantly below long-term rates, placing further pressure on LCNBs net interest margin. The following table compares Constant Maturity Treasury rates, as released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, for various maturities as of year-end 2005 and 2004.
Date | 1 mo | 3 mo | 6 mo | 1 yr | 2 yr | 3 yr | 5 yr | 7 yr | 10 yr | 20 yr |
12/31/05 | 4.01% | 4.08 | 4.37 | 4.38 | 4.41 | 4.37 | 4.35 | 4.36 | 4.39 | 4.61 |
12/31/04 | 1.89% | 2.22 | 2.59 | 2.75 | 3.08 | 3.25 | 3.63 | 3.94 | 4.24 | 4.85 |
2004 vs. 2003. Tax equivalent interest income decreased $1,873,000 primarily due to a 33 basis point decline in the average rate earned on average interest-earning assets. The average rate earned decreased primarily because of historically low market rates.
Interest expense decreased $1,312,000 primarily due to a 28 basis point decrease in the average rate paid for deposits and borrowings and secondarily due to an $11.8 million decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities. The decrease in average rates paid was also due to general market rates. The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities was due to a $9.8 million decrease in average NOW and money fund deposits, a $3.0 million decrease in average IRA and time certificates, and a $2.1 million decrease in average long-term borrowings. Comparing the same periods, average savings deposits increased approximately $3.1 million.
Average long-term borrowings decreased primarily due to the maturation and payment in December, 2003 of a $2.0 million Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") note bearing an interest rate of 3.61%.
The net interest margin decreased from 4.09% during 2003 to 4.02% during 2004 primarily because of the 33 basis point decrease in average rates earned from interest- earning assets, partially offset by the 28 basis point decrease in average rates for interest bearing liabilities.
- 32 -
Provisions and Allowance for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is determined by management based upon it's evaluation of the amount needed to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered appropriate in relation to the estimated risk of losses inherent in the portfolio. In addition to historic charge-off percentages, factors taken into consideration to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses include the nature, volume and consistency of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, a review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect borrowers ability to pay. The following table presents the total loan provision and the other changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years 2001 through 2005.
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Balance Beginning of year | $ | 2,150 | 2,150 | 2,000 | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
Loans charged off: | ||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | - | 126 | - | 36 | - | |||||
Commercial, secured by real estate | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Residential real estate | 14 | 32 | 25 | 26 | - | |||||
Consumer, excluding credit card | 395 | 446 | 504 | 273 | 237 | |||||
Agricultural | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Credit Card | - | 10 | 31 | 55 | 40 | |||||
Other | 335 | - | - | - | - | |||||
Total loans charged off | 744 | 614 | 560 | 390 | 277 | |||||
Recoveries: | ||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 19 | - | - | 8 | - | |||||
Commercial, secured by real estate | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Residential real estate | 9 | - | - | - | - | |||||
Consumer, excluding credit card | 175 | 124 | 46 | 31 | 38 | |||||
Agricultural | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
Credit Card | 11 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 2 | |||||
Other | 192 | - | - | - | - | |||||
Total recoveries | 406 | 125 | 52 | 42 | 40 | |||||
Net charge offs | 338 | 489 | 508 | 348 | 237 | |||||
Provision charged to operations | 338 | 489 | 658 | 348 | 237 | |||||
Balance - End of year | $ | 2,150 | 2,150 | 2,150 | 2,000 | 2,000 | ||||
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.07% | |||||
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to total loans at year-end | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.68% | 0.62% | 0.61% | |||||
- 33 -
The commercial and industrial loan charge-off of $126,000 during 2004 is due to one company that had filed bankruptcy. Consumer loan charge-offs included $41,000 during 2004 and $25,000 during 2003 that were due to a yacht that was subsequently repossessed and sold in 2004. The balance of increased consumer loan charge-offs during 2004 and 2003 are due to a greater number of troubled loans.
Charge-offs and recoveries classified as Other during 2005 represent charge-offs and recoveries on checking and NOW account overdrafts. LCNB charges off such overdrafts when considered uncollectible, but no later than 60 days from the date first overdrawn. Prior to 2005, overdrafts considered uncollectible were netted against service charges and fees in non-interest income.
Non-Interest Income
2005 vs. 2004. Total non-interest income for 2005 was $266,000 or 3.5% more than for 2004. Non-interest income for 2004 included a $306,000 gain from sales of investment securities and a $403,000 gain from the sale of LCNBs credit card portfolio. Sales of investment securities during 2005 produced a slight loss of $8,000. Excluding the above mentioned gains and losses, non-interest income for 2005 was $983,000 greater than for 2004. The increase was primarily the result of increases in income from bank owned life insurance, brokerage income, insurance agency income, and service charges on deposit accounts.
Income from bank owned life insurance during 2005 totaled $487,000, compared to $29,000 for 2004. The insurance was purchased in December, 2004, so 2005 is the first full year of income for this item.
Trust income increased $95,000 or 6.2% primarily due to growth in brokerage accounts managed. LCNB offers brokerage investment products through a partnership with UVEST Financial Services, Inc., a registered broker/dealer. Total brokerage accounts managed increased 45.8% during 2005, from $24.8 million at December 31, 2004 to $36.2 million at December 31, 2005.
Service charges and fees increased $182,000 or 4.7% primarily due to an increase in check card income and the absence of checking and NOW account overdraft charge-offs netted against service charges and fees on deposit accounts prior to 2005. Beginning in 2005, checking and NOW account overdrafts are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Check card income grew because a greater number of cards were outstanding and because of the increasing popularity of check cards as a retail payment method.
Insurance agency income increased $92,000 or 6.8% primarily due to a $60,000 increase in contingency commissions received. Contingency commissions are profit-sharing arrangements on property and casualty policies between the originating agency and the carrier and are generally based on underwriting results and written premiums. As such, the amount received each year can vary significantly depending on loss experience.
Other operating income for 2005 was $110,000 or 84.6% greater than for 2004. Approximately $85,000 of the increase was due to a gain recognized from the sale of LCNBs former Loveland office building.
- 34 -
2004 vs. 2003. Total non-interest income for 2004 was $862,000 or 12.7% more than for 2003. The increase was primarily due to gains from the sales of investment securities and LCNBs credit card portfolio and increases in trust income and service charges and fees. These increases were partially offset by decreases in insurance agency income and gains from sales of mortgage loans.
Trust income increased $236,000 primarily due to an increase in the market value of assets under management, on which fees are based, and secondarily to fees received for brokerage services. The market value of trust assets under management grew $14.6 million or 8.8% during 2004, partially due to increased market values and partially due to new clients. During the same period, brokerage accounts managed grew $11.2 million or 82.4%.
Service charges and fees increased $710,000 primarily due to the introduction of a new overdraft protection program in August, 2003.
The net gain on sales of securities increased $297,000. LCNB sold $36.0 million in securities available for sale during 2004 as compared with $1.8 million in sales during 2003. The proceeds from the 2004 sales were primarily used to purchase securities with slightly longer maturities and higher average interest rates than the ones sold and to fund loan growth.
Insurance agency income decreased $105,000 primarily due to a decrease in contingency commissions recognized by Dakin during 2004 as compared to 2003. The decrease in contingency commissions was partially offset by an increase in sales commissions, primarily due to the placement of new policies. Total written premium produced by Dakin for 2004 totaled $8,806,000, which was $296,000 or 3.5% greater than for 2003.
Gains from sales of mortgage loans decreased $706,000 due to decreased activity in the real estate mortgage loan secondary market during 2004 as compared to 2003. Loans sold during 2004 totaled $2.2 million, compared with $35.1 million for 2003. Historically low residential mortgage rates during 2002 and 2003 created a surge in refinancing activity. During this period, LCNB sold most fixed-rate residential mortgage loans originated to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. Market rates for real estate mortgage loans began increasing during the fourth quarter, 2003 and the volume of refinance activity decreased. Along with the decrease in refinancing activity, LCNB added most loans that were originated during 2004 to its loan portfolio, resulting in minimal loan sales.
During 2004, LCNB exited the credit card market and sold its receivables to MBNA America Bank, N.A. (MBNA), recognizing a $403,000 gain from the sale. LCNB management decided to exit the credit card market because of the high administrative costs of servicing a small portfolio. LCNB will continue to offer credit card products under a marketing agreement with MBNA.
Non-Interest Expense
2005 vs. 2004. Total non-interest expense increased $808,000 or 4.9% during 2005 compared with 2004. Much of the increase was in wages and salaries, which were approximately $540,000 or 7.8% greater in 2005 than in 2004. The increase was primarily due to routine salary and wage increases and to additional staffing required by the respective openings of the Fairfield office during the fourth quarter, 2004 and the Lebanon High School Warrior office during the first quarter, 2005.
- 35 -
Occupancy expense, net increased $101,000 or 8.6%. Increased expenditures for utilities, additional rent expense primarily for the Fairfield office, and additional depreciation expense for buildings and premises contributed to this increase. The additional depreciation expense was primarily caused by the new Loveland office at 500 Loveland-Madeira Road, which opened during the second quarter, 2005 and replaced an office located at 615 West Loveland Avenue.
Contributing to the $116,000 or 3.8% increase in other non-interest expense were increased write-offs on bad and fraudulent checks, increased ATM maintenance costs, and increased professional expenses. Partially offsetting these increases was a $125,000 decrease in credit card expenses due to the sale of the portfolio during 2004.
2004 vs. 2003. Total non-interest expense increased $679,000 or 4.3% during 2004 compared with 2003. Contributing to the increase were a $147,000 or 2.2% increase in salaries and wages, a $138,000 or 7.9% increase in pension and other employee benefits, and a $197,000 or 6.9% increase in other non-interest expense.
Salaries and wages increased due to normal pay increases. Pension and other employee benefits increased primarily due to increased pension expense and an increase in payroll-related taxes and other employee benefits. Items contributing to the increase in other non-interest expenses included increased outside services, increased professional expenses, and increased telephone expenses.
Income Taxes
LCNB's effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, and 2003 were 25.0%, 27.1%, and 26.6%, respectively. The difference between the statutory rate of 34.0% and the effective tax rate is primarily due to tax-exempt interest income and secondarily, for the 2005 period, tax-exempt earnings from bank owned life insurance.
Assets
Net loans grew $23.2 million or 6.9% during 2005 and securities available for sale grew by $20.1 million or 17.7%. Most of the loan growth occurred in the commercial loans secured by real estate category, which grew by $17.7 million. Most of the securities increase was in the U.S. Agency notes category, which grew by $23.4 million. The U.S. Agency note category is composed of securities issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and the Federal Home Loan Banks.
The growth in loans and investment securities was financed through a $30.5 million decrease in federal funds sold and interest-bearing demand deposits and a $17.6 million increase in total deposits.
- 36 -
Deposits
As mentioned above, total deposits grew $17.6 million or 3.8% during 2005. Transaction accounts increased $33.6 million and IRA and time certificates increased $17.5 million. Partially offsetting these increases were an $11.8 million decrease in money fund deposits and a $21.7 million decrease in regular savings accounts. Approximately $27.3 million of the growth in transaction accounts was due to growth in public fund demand deposits from local government entities. The decrease in money fund deposits was significantly influenced by a policy change in LCNBs trust department. Trust funds in selected trust accounts were previously swept into overnight deposit accounts at the Bank. During the third quarter, 2005, management chose to sweep these funds into overnight accounts offered by third party vendors. At December 31, 2005, approximately $11.4 million was swept into these third party accounts, which otherwise would have been included in money fund deposits at the Bank.
Liquidity
Liquidity is the ability to have funds available at all times to meet the commitments of LCNB. These commitments may include paying dividends to shareholders, funding new loans for borrowers, funding withdrawals by depositors, paying general and administrative expenses, and funding capital expenditures. Sources of liquidity include growth in deposits, principal payments received on loans, proceeds from the sale of loans, the sale or maturation of investment securities, cash generated by operating activities, and the ability to borrow funds. Management closely monitors the level of liquid assets available to meet ongoing funding requirements. It is management's intent to maintain adequate liquidity so that sufficient funds are readily available at a reasonable cost. LCNB experienced no liquidity or operational problems during the past year as a result of current liquidity levels.
Commitments to extend credit at December 31, 2005, totaled $74.8 million and standby letters of credit totaled $5.9 million and are more fully described in Note 10 to LCNB's Financial Statements. Since many commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Capital expenditures may include the construction or acquisition of new office buildings, improvements to LCNB's twenty-one offices, purchases of furniture and equipment, and additions or improvements to LCNBs information technology system. Material commitments for capital expenditures outstanding as of December 31, 2005 totaled approximately $45,000.
The liquidity of LCNB is enhanced by the fact that 80.7% of total deposits at December 31, 2005, were "core" deposits. Core deposits, for this purpose, are defined as total deposits less public funds and certificates of deposit greater than $100,000.
An additional source of funding is borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB"). Total borrowings from the FHLB at December 31, 2005 were $2.0 million. The total remaining borrowing capacity from the FHLB at that date was approximately $86 million.
- 37 -
Liquid assets include cash, federal funds sold and securities available for sale. Except for investments in the stock of the Federal Reserve Bank and FHLB, all of LCNB's investment portfolio is classified as "available for sale" and can be readily sold to meet liquidity needs. At December 31, 2005, LCNB's liquid assets amounted to $148.8 million or 27.6% of total gross assets, down from $156.6 million or 30.0% of total gross assets at December 31, 2004. The primary reason for the decrease was a reduction in federal funds sold and interest-bearing demand deposits.
The following table provides information concerning LCNB's contractual obligations at December 31, 2005:
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||
1 year | 2-3 | 4-5 | More than | |||||||||
Total | or less | years | years | 5 years | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations | $ | 2,073 | 2,067 | 6 | - | - | ||||||
Operating lease obligations | 2,239 | 320 | 263 | 127 | 1,529 | |||||||
Purchase obligations | 45 | 45 | - | - | - | |||||||
Certificates of deposit: | ||||||||||||
$100,000 and over | 61,452 | 25,666 | 12,553 | 9,061 | 14,172 | |||||||
Other time certificates | 140,409 | 62,653 | 47,221 | 13,694 | 16,841 | |||||||
Total | $ | 206,218 | 90,751 | 60,043 | 22,882 | 32,542 |
The following table provides information concerning LCNB's commercial commitments at December 31, 2005:
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period | |||||||||||
Total | |||||||||||
Amounts | 1 year | 2-3 | 4-5 | More than | |||||||
Committed | or less | years | years | 5 years | |||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||
Lines of credit | $ | 30,392 | 30,392 | - | - | - | |||||
Standby letters of credit | 5,946 | 1,184 | 40 | - | 4,722 | ||||||
Total | $ | 36,338 | 31,576 | 40 | - | 4,722 |
- 38 -
Capital Resources
LCNB and Lebanon Citizens National Bank (the Bank) are required by banking regulators to meet certain minimum levels of capital adequacy. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on LCNB's and the Bank's financial statements. These minimum levels are expressed in the form of certain ratios. Capital is separated into Tier 1 capital (essentially shareholders' equity less goodwill and other intangibles) and Tier 2 capital (essentially the allowance for loan losses limited to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets). The first two ratios, which are based on the degree of credit risk in the Bank's assets, provide for weighting assets based on assigned risk factors and include off-balance sheet items such as loan commitments and stand-by letters of credit. The ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets must be at least 4.00% and the ratio of Total capital (Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets must be at least 8.00%. The capital leverage ratio supplements the risk-based capital guidelines. Banks are required to maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to adjusted quarterly average total assets of 3.00%. A table summarizing the regulatory capital of LCNB and the Bank at December 31, 2005 and 2004, is included in Note 13, "Regulatory Matters", of the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders.
The FDIC, the insurer of deposits in financial institutions, has adopted a risk-based insurance premium system based in part on an institution's capital adequacy. Under this system, a depository institution is required to pay successively higher premiums depending on its capital levels and its supervisory rating by its primary regulator. It is management's intention to maintain sufficient capital to permit the Bank to maintain a "well capitalized" designation (the FDIC's highest rating).
On April 17, 2001, LCNB's Board of Directors authorized three separate stock repurchase programs, two phases of which continue. The shares purchased will be held for future corporate purposes.
Under the "Market Repurchase Program" LCNB was originally authorized to purchase up to 100,000 shares of its stock through market transactions with a selected stockbroker. On November 14, 2005, the Board of Directors extended the Market Repurchase Program by increasing the shares authorized for repurchase to 200,000 total shares. Through December 31, 2005, 95,422 shares had been purchased under this program.
The "Private Sale Repurchase Program" is available to shareholders who wish to sell large blocks of stock at one time. Because LCNB's stock is not widely traded, a shareholder releasing large blocks may not be able to readily sell all shares through normal procedures. Purchases of blocks will be considered on a case-by-case basis and will be made at prevailing market prices. A total of 178,344 shares had been purchased under this program at December 31, 2005.
LCNB established an Ownership Incentive Plan during 2002 that allows for stock-based awards to eligible employees. The awards may be in the form of stock options, share awards, and/or appreciation rights. The plan provides for the issuance of up to 100,000 shares. No awards were granted during 2005 or 2002. Stock options for 4,054 and 5,528 shares were granted to key executive officers of LCNB during the first quarters of 2004 and 2003, respectively.
- 39 -
The exercise price for stock options granted shall not be less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Options vest ratably over a five-year period and the maximum term for each grant will be specified by the Board of Directors, but cannot be greater than ten years from the date of grant. In the event of an optionee's death, incapacity, or retirement, all outstanding options held by that optionee shall immediately vest and be exercisable.
Critical Accounting Policies
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that the collectibility of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb possible losses on loans that may become uncollectible, based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans and prior loan loss experience. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers' ability to pay.
The allowance consists of specific, general, and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as either doubtful, substandard, or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows or collateral value or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect managements estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
Loans are considered impaired when management believes, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured by the present value of expected future cash flows using the loan's effective interest rate. Impaired collateral-dependent loans may be measured based on collateral value. Smaller-balance homogenous loans, including residential mortgage and consumer installment loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment.
Based on its evaluations, management believes that the allowance for loan losses will be able to absorb estimated losses inherent in the current loan portfolio.
Accounting for Intangibles. Approximately $1.3 million of LCNB's intangible assets at December 31, 2005, represent the unamortized intangible related to LCNB's 1997 acquisition of three branch offices from another bank. Management does not believe this acquisition meets the definition of a business combination, as described in SFAS No. 147, Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, and is amortizing the intangible over ten years, subject to periodic review for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
- 40 -
Another $252,000 of LCNB's intangible assets at December 31, 2005 is comprised of mortgage servicing rights recorded from sales of mortgage loans to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("FHLMC"). The rights are amortized to loan servicing income in proportion to and over the period of estimated servicing income, subject to periodic review for impairment.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position Numbers 115-1 and 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, (the FSP) was released in November, 2005. The FSP provides guidance for determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether impairment is other-than-temporary, and measurement of an impairment loss. LCNB does not expect the guidance in the FSP to have a material affect in its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3, was issued in May, 2005. It primarily applies to voluntary changes in accounting principles, but it also includes changes in accounting estimates and corrections of errors in previously issued financial statements. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005.
SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, was issued in December, 2004 and replaces SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS No. 123 (revised) focuses primarily on accounting for transactions where employees receive share-based compensation, but also covers transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entitys equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of equity instruments. SFAS No. 123 (revised) generally requires an entity to recognize expense for the grant-date fair value of share-based compensation, where the original SFAS No. 123 encouraged but did not require an entity to recognize expense for such transactions. The estimated cost of share-based compensation is to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, usually the vesting period. SFAS No. 123 (revised) is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. LCNB adopted SFAS No. 123 (revised) on January 1, 2005 using the modified prospective approach as allowed by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosurean amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. Adoption of SFAS No. 123 (revised) did not have a material short-term impact on LCNBs financial statements because of LCNBs relatively limited use of options.
- 41 -
LCNB CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES | ||||||||
QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED) | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31 | June 30 | Sep. 30 | Dec. 31 | |||||
2005 | ||||||||
Interest income | $ | 6,548 | 6,837 | 6,977 | 7,240 | |||
Interest expense | 1,975 | 2,209 | 2,333 | 2,515 | ||||
Net interest income | 4,573 | 4,628 | 4,644 | 4,725 | ||||
Provision for loan losses | 98 | 118 | 46 | 76 | ||||
Net interest income after provision | 4,475 | 4,510 | 4,598 | 4,649 | ||||
Net gain on sales of securities | - | - | (8) | - | ||||
Other non-interest income | 1,715 | 2,025 | 2,213 | 1,980 | ||||
Total non-interest expenses | 4,325 | 4,283 | 4,362 | 4,242 | ||||
Income before income taxes | 1,865 | 2,252 | 2,441 | 2,387 | ||||
Provision for income taxes | 459 | 560 | 620 | 601 | ||||
Net income | $ | 1,406 | 1,692 | 1,821 | 1,786 | |||
Earnings per common share: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.55 | |||
Diluted | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.55 | ||||
2004 | ||||||||
Interest income | $ | 6,358 | 6,280 | 6,458 | 6,552 | |||
Interest expense | 1,862 | 1,748 | 1,826 | 1,932 | ||||
Net interest income | 4,496 | 4,532 | 4,632 | 4,620 | ||||
Provision for loan losses | 90 | 210 | 130 | 59 | ||||
Net interest income after provision | 4,406 | 4,322 | 4,502 | 4,561 | ||||
Net gain on sales of securities | 127 | - | 9 | 170 | ||||
Other non-interest income | 2,051 | 1,776 | 1,713 | 1,813 | ||||
Total non-interest expenses | 4,280 | 3,997 | 4,052 | 4,075 | ||||
Income before income taxes | 2,304 | 2,101 | 2,172 | 2,469 | ||||
Provision for income taxes | 642 | 545 | 590 | 673 | ||||
Net income | $ | 1,662 | 1,556 | 1,582 | 1,796 | |||
Earnings per common share: | ||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.55 | |||
Diluted | 0.49 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.55 |
- 42 -
Other non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 includes the $403,000 gain from the sale of LCNBs credit card portfolio. Non-interest income for each of the quarters in 2005 includes earnings from bank-owned life insurance. Such earnings are absent from other non-interest income during 2004 because LCNB did not hold bank-owned life insurance until December, 2004. Also, service charges and fees on deposit accounts, which are included in other non-interest income, increased during each of the quarters in 2005 as compared to 2004 primarily due to increases in check card income and the absence of checking and NOW account overdraft charge-offs. These charge-offs were netted against service charges and fees on deposit accounts during 2004. See the previous sections titled Provisions and Allowance for Loan Losses and Non-Interest Income for more detail.
Non-interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2005 includes an $85,000 gain from the sale of LCNBs former Loveland office building.
Included in non-interest income during the fourth quarter, 2005 and the first quarter, 2004 were insurance agency contingency commissions of $76,000 and $16,000, respectively.
- 43 -
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk for LCNB is primarily interest rate risk. LCNB attempts to mitigate this risk through asset/liability management strategies designed to decrease the vulnerability of its earnings to material and prolonged changes in interest rates. LCNB does not use derivatives such as interest rate swaps, caps or floors to hedge this risk. LCNB has not entered into any market risk instruments for trading purposes.
The Bank's Asset and Liability Management Committee ("ALCO") primarily uses a combination of Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis (IRSA) and Economic Value of Equity (EVE) analysis for measuring and managing interest rate risk. The IRSA model is used to estimate the effect on net interest income during a one-year period of instantaneous and sustained movements in interest rates, also called interest rate shocks, of 100, 200, and 300 basis points. The base projection uses a current interest rate scenario. As shown below, the December 31, 2005 IRSA indicates that an increase in interest rates would have a positive effect on net interest income, and a decrease in rates would have a negative effect on net interest income. The changes in net interest income for all rate assumptions are within LCNBs acceptable ranges.
Rate Shock Scenario in Basis Points | Amount | $ Change in IRSA | % Change in IRSA | |
Up 300 | $ | 19,851 | 759 | 3.98% |
Up 200 | 19,611 | 519 | 2.72% | |
Up 100 | 19,364 | 272 | 1.43% | |
Base | 19,092 | - | -% | |
Down 100 | 18,757 | (335) | -1.76% | |
Down 200 | 18,381 | (711) | -3.73% | |
Down 300 | 18,099 | (993) | -5.20% |
IRSA shows the affect on net interest income during a one-year period only. A more long-range model is the EVE analysis, which shows the estimated present value of future cash inflows from interest-earning assets less the present value of future cash outflows for interest-bearing liabilities for the same rate shocks. The EVE analysis at December 31, 2005 is shown below. It shows a negative effect on the economic value of equity for all rate shocks. The changes in the economic value of equity for these rate assumptions are within LCNBs acceptable ranges.
Rate Shock Scenario in Basis Points | Amount | $ Change in EVE | % Change in EVE | |
Up 300 | $ | 85,607 | (7,150) | -7.71% |
Up 200 | 88,857 | (3,900) | -4.20% | |
Up 100 | 91,567 | (1,190) | -1.28% | |
Base | 92,757 | - | -% | |
Down 100 | 91,302 | (1,455) | -1.57% | |
Down 200 | 90,211 | (2,546) | -2.74% | |
Down300 | 89,399 | (3,358) | -3.62% |
- 44 -
The IRSA and EVE simulations discussed above are not projections of future income or equity and should not be relied on as being indicative of future operating results. Assumptions used, including the nature and timing of interest rate levels, yield curve shape, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits, and reinvestment or replacement of asset and liability cash flows, are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the models cannot precisely measure future net interest income or equity. Furthermore, the models do not reflect actions that borrowers, depositors, and management may take in response to changing economic conditions and interest rate levels.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The Financial Statements and Supplementary Data required by this item are incorporated herein by reference to pages 4 through 30 of the Registrants 2005 LCNB Corp. Annual Report attached to this filing as Exhibit 13.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of LCNBs internal controls over financial reporting was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of LCNBs management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that LCNBs disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
- 45 -
REPORT ON MANAGEMENTS ASSESSMENT OF
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
LCNB Corp. (LCNB) is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. Management of LCNB and its subsidiaries is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15f. LCNBs internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of LCNBs Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The purpose is to provide reasonable assurance to the Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of LCNBs financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Management maintains internal controls over financial reporting. The internal controls contain control processes and actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified. The internal controls are evaluated on an ongoing basis by LCNBs Management, and Audit Committee. Even effective internal controls, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations including the possibility of circumvention or overriding of controls and therefore can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.
Management assessed LCNBs internal controls as of December 31, 2005, in relation to criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2005, LCNBs internal control over financial reporting met the criteria.
J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L. P., an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on managements assessment of the effectiveness of LCNBs internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005.
Submitted by:
LCNB Corp.
/s/ Stephen P. Wilson __________
/s/ Steve P. Foster_____________
Stephen P. Wilson,
Steve P. Foster,
President/CEO
Chief Financial Officer
February 16, 2006
- 46 -
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
LCNB Corp. and subsidiaries
Lebanon, Ohio
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Report on Management Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that LCNB Corp. and subsidiaries (LCNB) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). LCNBs management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
- 47 -
In our opinion, managements assessment that LCNB maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 of LCNB Corp. and subsidiaries, and our report dated February 16, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ J.D. Cloud & Co. L.L.P.
Certified Public Accountant
Cincinnati, Ohio
February 16, 2006
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter, 2005, there were no changes in LCNB's internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, LCNB's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None
- 48 -
PART III
Portions of the Proxy Statement included in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 11, 2006, dated March 9, 2006, are incorporated by reference into Part III.
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
The information contained in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement (dated March 9, 2006), relating to "Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant", is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information contained in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement (dated March 9, 2006), relating to "Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers", is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The information contained in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement (dated March 9, 2006), relating to "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information contained in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement (dated March 9, 2006), relating to "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions", is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information contained in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement (dated March 9, 2006), relating to "Principal Accounting Fees and Services", is incorporated herein by reference.
- 49 -
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) 1. | Financial Statements | |||
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM | ||||
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | ||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Income | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | ||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | ||||
2. | Financial Statement Schedules None | |||
3. | Exhibits required by Item 601 Regulation S-K. | |||
(a) Exhibit No. | Exhibit Description | |||
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation of LCNB Corp. (1) | |||
3.2 | Code of Regulations of LCNB Corp. (2) | |||
Material Contracts: | ||||
10.1 | LCNB Corp. Ownership Incentive Plan (3) | |||
10.2 | Form of Option Grant Agreement under the LCNB Corp. Ownership Incentive Plan | |||
13. | Portions of LCNB Corp. 2005 Annual Report (pages 2-3 and 12-23) | |||
14.1 | LCNB Corp. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (4) | |||
14.2 | LCNB Corp. Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (5) | |||
21. | LCNB Corp. Subsidiaries | |||
23. | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |||
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |||
32. | Section 1350 Certifications |
(1)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, Exhibit 3(i).
(2)
Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, Exhibit 3(ii).
(3)
Incorporated by reference to Registrant's Form DEF 14A Proxy Statement pursuant to Section 14(a), dated March 15, 2002, Exhibit A.
(4)
Incorporated by reference to Registrants 2003 Form 10-K, Exhibit 14.1.
(5)
Incorporated by reference to Registrants 2003 Form 10-K, Exhibit 14.2
- 50 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LCNB Corp. | |
(Registrant) | |
/s/ Stephen P. Wilson | |
Stephen P. Wilson President and Chairman of Board of Directors | |
March 6, 2006 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
/s/ Stephen P. Wilson | /s/ William H. Kaufman | |
Stephen P. Wilson President and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) March 6, 2006 | William H. Kaufman Director March 6, 2006 | |
/s/ Steve P. Foster | /s/ George L. Leasure | |
Steve P. Foster Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) March 6, 2006 | George L. Leasure Director March 6, 2006 | |
/s/ David S. Beckett | /s/ Joseph W. Schwarz | |
David S. Beckett Director March 6, 2006 | Joseph W. Schwarz Director March 6, 2006 | |
/s/ Rick L. Blossom | /s/ Kathleen Porter Stolle | |
Rick L. Blossom Director March 6, 2006 | Kathleen Porter Stolle Director March 6, 2006 | |
/s/ Robert C. Cropper | /s/ Marvin E. Young | |
Robert C. Cropper Director March 6, 2006 | Marvin E. Young Director March 6, 2006 | |
- 51 -