LegacyXChange, Inc. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: March 31, 2017

or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

COMMISSION FILE NO. 333-201811

LegacyXchange, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐    No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐    No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐    No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☐    No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☒    No ☐

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of September 30, 2016, the last business day of the registrant’s last completed second quarter, based upon the closing price of the common stock of $0.0045 on such date is $214,068.

As of December 21, 2020, there were 62,570,659 shares of the issuer’s common stock, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. Business

Business Development

LegacyXchange, Inc., formerly known as True 2 Beauty, Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated as Burrow Mining, Inc., a Nevada corporation, on December 11, 2006. In February 2010, the Company shifted its focus to the beauty industry and later amended its Articles of Incorporation and changed its name to True 2 Beauty, Inc., to better reflect its new business focus.

On July 10, 2012, the Company formed a new wholly owned subsidiary True2Bid, Inc. (“True2Bid”) which was incorporated in the state of Nevada. This subsidiary’s name was changed to LegacyXchange, Inc. (“LegacyXchange”) in December 2014. The Company continued to sell existing inventory of beauty products through May 2013 when the final inventory was sold. LegacyXchange operates an online e-commerce platform focused on delivering users a wide array of sports and entertainment related products that can be won in an action-packed environment of a live auction. The Company is currently inactive and management is seeking other business opportunities.

The Company’s articles authorize the Company to issue 190,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, both at a par value of $0.001 per share.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

N/A

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

N/A

Item 2. Properties.

The Company has no property as of the date of this report.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 4. Submission of matters to a vote of Security holders.

None.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our shares of common stock are quoted on OTC Pink operated by the OTC Markets Group, under the symbol “LEGX”. The following table sets forth the range of reported high and low closing bid quotations for our common stock for the fiscal quarters indicated. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. Consequently, the information provided below may not be indicative of our common stock price under different conditions.

Holders of Common Stock

As of December 21, 2020, there were approximately 80 record holders of our common stock. The number of record holders does not include beneficial owners of common stock whose shares are held in the names of banks, brokers, nominees or other fiduciaries.

Cash Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our current policy is to retain earnings, if any, for use in our operations and in the development of our business. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our board of directors.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Except for provided below, all unregistered sales of our securities during the quarter ended March 31, 2017, were previously disclosed in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, there were no unregistered sales of our securities.

The shares of common stock, notes and warrants referenced herein were issued in reliance upon the exemption from securities registration afforded by the provisions of Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (“Securities Act”).

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

None.

Repurchases of Equity Securities by our Company and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Not applicable.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

LegacyXchange, Inc., formerly known as True 2 Beauty, Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated as Burrow Mining, Inc., a Nevada corporation, on December 11, 2006. In February 2010, the Company shifted its focus to the beauty industry and later amended its Articles of Incorporation and changed its name to True 2 Beauty, Inc., to better reflect its new business focus.

On July 10, 2012, the Company formed a new wholly owned subsidiary True2Bid, Inc. (“True2Bid”) which was incorporated in the state of Nevada. This subsidiary’s name was changed to LegacyXchange, Inc. (“LegacyXchange”) in December 2014. The Company continued to sell existing inventory of beauty products through May 2013 when the final inventory was sold. LegacyXchange operates an online e-commerce platform focused on delivering users a wide array of sports and entertainment related products that can be won in an action-packed environment of a live auction. The Company has ceased all operations related to LegacyXchange. Currently, management is seeking other business opportunities.

The Company’s articles authorize the Company to issue 190,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, both at a par value of $0.001 per share.

The following table summarizes the results of operations for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and is based primarily on the comparative audited consolidated financial statements, footnotes and related information for the periods identified and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere in this annual report.

Revenue and gross loss:

We did not generate any revenues from operations during the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Operating expenses:

For the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, operating expenses amounted to $213,060 and $745,943, respectively, a decrease of $532,883 or 71%. For the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, operating expenses consisted of the following:

For the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, compensation and related taxes amounted to $121,036 and $283,500, respectively, a decrease of $162,464 or 57%. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in stock-based compensation to an executive and director in the amount of $139,000 during fiscal year 2016.

For the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, professional and consulting fees amounted to $80,290 and $413,543, respectively, a decrease of $333,253 or 81%. The decrease was primarily attributable to the decrease in our operational activities in fiscal year 2017.

For the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, other selling, general and administrative expenses amounted to $11,734 and $48,900, respectively, a decrease of $37,166, or 76%. The decrease was primarily attributable to decrease in our operational activities in fiscal year 2017.

Loss from operations:

For the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, loss from operations amounted to $213,060 and $745,943, respectively, a decrease of $532,883, or 71%. The decrease was a result of the changes in operating expenses as discussed above.

Other income (expense):

Other income (expense) includes interest expense, initial derivative expense, gain (loss) from change in fair value of derivative liabilities and loss on debt extinguishment.

For the year ended March 31, 2017, total other income (expense), net, amounted to $491,248 as compared to $(184,131) for the year ended March 31, 2016, a change of $675,379. The change in other income (expense), was attributable to a decrease in interest expense of $101,886, or 31%, decrease in initial derivative expense of $192,151, or 100% and decrease in loss on debt extinguishment of $87,363 or 100%, for a total decrease in other (expense) of $(381,400) and an increase on other income from the gain from change in fair value of derivative liabilities of $293,979 or 69%.

Net income (loss):

For the year ended March 31, 2017, net income amounted to $278,188, or per common share income (loss) of $0.00 basic and $(0.00) diluted as compared to $(930,074) net (loss), or per common share (loss) of $(0.02) (basic and diluted) for the year ended March 31, 2016, a change of $1,208,262, or 130%. The change was a result of the changes in operating expenses and other income (expense) as discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs for cash requirements. We had a working capital deficit of $1,022,703 and $0 of cash as of March 31, 2017 and working capital deficit of $1,300,891 and $4,209 of cash as of March 31, 2016.

The decrease in working capital deficit was primarily attributable to decrease in current assets of $65,826 and decrease in current liabilities of $344,014.

Cash Flow

A summary of cash flow activities is summarized as follows:

Net cash used in operating activities:

Net cash flow used in operating activities was $15,364 for the year ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $344,172 for the year ended March 31, 2016, a decrease of $328,808 or 96%.

Cash provided by financing activities:

Net cash provided by financing activities was $11,155 for the year ended March 31, 2017 as compared to $344,019 for the year ended March 31, 2016, a decrease of $332,864 or 97%.

Cash Requirements

Our management does not believe that our current capital resources will be adequate to continue operating our company and maintaining our business strategy for more than 12 months from the date of this report. Accordingly, we will have to raise additional capital in the near future to meet our working capital requirements. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease the operation of our business.

Going Concern

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in our accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had net income and net cash used in operating activities of $278,188 and $15,364, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2017. The net income was primarily attributed to the gain from the change in fair value of derivative liabilities. The Company had accumulated deficit, stockholders’ deficit and working capital deficit of $10,267,849, $1,022,703 and $1,022,703, respectively, at March 31, 2017. The Company had no revenues for the year ended March 31, 2017. Our notes payable and certain convertible notes are currently in default. Management believes that these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months from the issuance date of this report.

Management cannot provide assurance that we will ultimately achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive, or raise additional debt and/or equity capital. Management believes that our capital resources are not currently adequate to continue operating and maintaining its business strategy for a period of twelve months from the issuance date of this report. The Company will seek to raise capital through additional debt and/or equity financings to fund its operations in the future.

Although the Company has historically raised capital from sales of equity and from the issuance of promissory notes, there is no assurance that it will be able to continue to do so. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital or secure additional lending in the near future, management expects that the Company will need to curtail or cease operations. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Common Stock for Debt Conversion

During the year ended March 31, 2017, the lenders did not convert any of the outstanding convertible notes.

During the year ended March 31, 2016, the Company issued 7,065,084 shares of its common stock upon the conversion of principal note balances of $130,510 and accrued interest of $10,792. These shares of common stock had an aggregate fair value $304,022 and the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate converted amount of $141,302 resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment of $162,720.

Sales of Common Stock Pursuant to Subscription Agreements

During the year ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no sales of common stock.

Future Financings

We will require additional financing to fund our planned operations. We currently do not have committed sources of additional financing and may not be able to obtain additional financing particularly, if the volatile conditions of the stock and financial markets persist.

There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, if and when it is needed, we will be forced to further delay or further scale down some or all of our activities or perhaps even cease the operations of the business.

Since inception we have funded our operations primarily through equity and debt financings and we expect that we will continue to fund our operations through the equity and debt financing. If we are able to raise additional financing by issuing equity securities, our existing stockholders’ ownership will be diluted. Obtaining commercial or other loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for an investor to obtain a return on his, her, or its investment in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be unprofitable.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the following policies as critical to our business and results of operations. Our reported results are impacted by the application of the following accounting policies, certain of which require management to make subjective or complex judgments. These judgments involve making estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may significantly impact quarterly or annual results of operations. For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as expected, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Specific risks associated with these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates during the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 include assumptions used in estimation of deferred tax valuation allowances and the valuation of derivative liabilities.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to the Company on March 31, 2017. Accordingly, the estimates presented in these consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments. FASB ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, due from and to related parties, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Derivative Liabilities

The Company has certain financial instruments that are embedded derivatives associated with capital raises and certain warrants. The Company evaluates all its financial instruments to determine if those contracts or any potential embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 815-10 – Derivative and Hedging – Contract in Entity’s Own Equity. This accounting treatment requires that the carrying amount of any derivatives be recorded at fair value at issuance and marked-to-market at each balance sheet date. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, as is the case with the Company, the change in the fair value during the period is recorded as either other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or repayment, the respective derivative liability is marked to fair value at the conversion, repayment or exercise date and then the related fair value amount is reclassified to other income or expense as part of gain or loss on debt extinguishment.

In July 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features. These amendments simplify the accounting for certain financial instruments with down-round features. The amendments require companies to disregard the down-round feature when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to its own stock, for purposes of determining liability or equity classification. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, FASB issued an update Accounting Standards Update, ASU 2014-09, establishing ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09, as amended by subsequent ASUs on the topic, establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. This standard, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2017, requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and also requires certain additional disclosures. adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the process for, timing of, and presentation and disclosure of revenue recognition from customers. The Company did not have revenues for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (ASU 2014-12). The guidance applies to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period is treated as a performance condition. For all entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The effective date is the same for both public business entities and all other entities. The Company early adopted ASU 2014-12 during the period ending June 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Pursuant to ASC 505-50 - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, all share-based payments to non-employees, including grants of stock options, were recognized in the financial statements as compensation expense over the service period of the consulting arrangement or until performance conditions are expected to be met. Using a Black Scholes valuation model, the Company periodically reassessed the fair value of non-employee options until service conditions are met, which generally aligns with the vesting period of the options, and the Company adjusts the expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements accordingly. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of the stock-based compensation guidance in ASC 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. ASU No. 2018-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, but entities may not adopt prior to adopting the new revenue recognition guidance in ASC 606. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13—Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, to modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not believe this will have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Removals. The following disclosure requirements were removed from Topic 820:

Modifications. The following disclosure requirements were modified in Topic 820:

Additions. The following disclosure requirements were added to Topic 820; however, the disclosures are not required for nonpublic entities:

In addition, the amendments eliminate at a minimum from the phrase an entity shall disclose at a minimum to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements. The Company is evaluating the impact of the revised guidance and believes that it will not have a significant impact on its financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to our stockholders.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. Changes and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as that term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e), promulgated by the SEC pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated our company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of March 31, 2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The ineffectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures was due to material weaknesses, which we identified, in our report on internal control over financial reporting.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2017. Our management’s evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting was based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that as of March 31, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

The ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting was due to the following material weaknesses which we identified in our internal control over financial reporting:

We expect to be materially dependent upon third parties to provide us with accounting consulting services related to accounting services for the foreseeable future. We believe this will be sufficient to remediate the material weaknesses related to our accounting discussed above. Until such time as we have a chief financial officer with the requisite expertise in U.S. GAAP, there are no assurances that the material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures will not result in errors in our consolidated financial statements which could lead to a restatement of those financial statements.

A material weakness is a deficiency or a combination of control deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additional controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to SEC rules that permit us to provide only management’s report on internal control over financial reporting in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

Not Applicable.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Board of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names, positions and ages of our directors and executive officers as of the date of this report.

Biographical information concerning the executive officer and director listed above is set forth below. The information presented includes information each individual has given us about all positions they hold and their principal occupation and business experience for the past five years. In addition to the information presented below regarding each director’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our board to conclude that he should serve as a director, we also believe that all of our directors have a reputation for integrity, honesty and adherence to high ethical standards. Each has demonstrated business acumen and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as a commitment of service to our company and our board of directors.

William Bollander. Mr. Bollander has served as our President/Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer/Chief Accountancy Officer/Director/Secretary/Treasurer since January 17, 2012. From November 2008 to March 2011, he was an independent financial consultant for vFinance, a registered securities broker dealer located in located in Boca Raton FL. From March 2011 to November 2011, William Bollander was our business consultant. William Bollander received a Bachelor’s Degree in Accounting & Information Systems from Queens College/City University of New York in February 1992.

Board of Directors

Directors are elected at our annual meeting of shareholders and serve for one year until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified. We reimburse all directors for their expenses in connection with their activities as our directors.

Family Relationships

No family relationships exist between any of our current or former directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

There are no material proceedings to which any director or executive officer or any associate of any such director or officer is a party adverse to our company or has a material interest adverse to our company.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file reports regarding ownership of, and transactions in, our securities with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to provide us with copies of those filings.

Code of Ethics

We have not yet adopted a formal, written Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

Corporate Governance

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Although we have not adopted a formal policy on whether the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions should be separate or combined, we have determined that it is in our best interests and its shareholders to combine these roles. Due to the small size and our early development stage, we believe it is currently most effective to have the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions combined.

Our board of directors is primarily responsible for overseeing our risk management processes. The board of directors receives and reviews periodic reports from management, auditors, legal counsel, and others, as considered appropriate regarding our assessment of risks. The board of directors focuses on the most significant risks facing us and our general risk management strategy, and also ensures that risks undertaken by us are consistent with the board’s appetite for risk. While the board oversees our risk management, management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes. We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing us and that our board leadership structure supports this approach.

We have had no meetings of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors have approved corporate actions by Board resolution.

We do not have any defined policy or procedure requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nominations for directors. We do not currently have any specific or minimum criteria for the election of nominees to our board of directors and we do not have any specific process or procedure for evaluating such nominees. Our board of directors assesses all candidates, whether submitted by management or shareholders, and makes recommendations for election or appointment.

A shareholder who wishes to communicate with our board of directors may do so by directing a written request to the address appearing on the first page of this annual report.

Terms of Office

Our directors are appointed for one-year terms to hold office until the next annual general meeting of the holders of our Common Stock or until removed from office in accordance with our by-laws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by our Board of Directors or terminated pursuant to their employment agreements.

Committees of the Board of Directors

We presently do not have an audit committee, compensation committee, nominating committee, corporate governance committee or any other committee of our board of directors. Our entire Board of Directors meets to undertake the responsibilities that would otherwise be delegated to a committee of our board of directors.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

We do not have a standing audit committee at the present time. Our board of directors has determined that we do not have a board member that qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

We believe that our board of directors is capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The board of directors of our Company does not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors. In addition, we believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned in or with respect to our fiscal year 2017 and 2016 by:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

FOR OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Compensation of Management

We have no contractual arrangements with any executives or directors.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year-End for Named Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of March 31, 2017, for each named executive officer.

Compensation of Directors

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the compensation paid to our directors during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016:

There are no contractual arrangements with any member of the Board of Directors.

Long-Term Incentive Plans, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are currently no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers.

Our directors, executive officers and employees may receive common stock at the discretion of our board of directors.

Resignation, Retirement, Other Termination, or Change in Control Arrangements

We do not have arrangements in respect of remuneration received or that may be received by our executive officers to compensate such officers in the event of termination of employment (as a result of resignation, retirement, change of control) or a change of responsibilities following a change of control.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock, as of December 21, 2020, by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each director and each of our Named Executive Officers and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group.

The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person is determined under the rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which such person has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days after the date hereof, through the exercise of any stock option, warrant or other right. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole investment and voting power (or shares such power with his or her spouse) with respect to the shares set forth in the following table. The inclusion herein of any shares deemed beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership of those shares.

This table is based upon information derived from our stock records. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, each of the shareholders named in this table has sole or shared voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Except as set forth above, applicable percentages are based upon 62,570,659 shares of common stock outstanding as of the date of this annual report.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transaction, and Director Independence

Transactions with Related Persons

There were no transactions, or currently proposed transactions, in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or 1% of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of the following persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest:

Director Independence

Because the Company’s Common Stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, the Company has used the definition of “independence” of the NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the company’s board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

Based on this review, we have no independent directors pursuant to the requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the fees billed to our company for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm, Salberg and Company, P.A.:

Audit Fees

Audit fees were for professional services rendered for the audits of our annual consolidated financial statements and for review of our quarterly consolidated financial statements during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Audit-Related Fees

This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees”.

Tax Fees

As our independent registered public accountants did not provide any services to us for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning during the fiscal years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, no tax fees were billed or paid during those fiscal years.

All Other Fees

Our independent registered public accountants did not provide any products and services not disclosed in the table above during the 2017 and 2016 fiscal years. As a result, there were no other fees billed or paid during those fiscal years.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our entire board of directors, which acts as our audit committee, pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by our board of directors before the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent registered public accounting firm and believe that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining their respective independence.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

Not Applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

March 31, 2017 and 2016

CONTENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of:

LegacyXChange, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LegacyXChange, Inc. (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2017 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2, to the consolidated financial statements, the Company had net cash used in operating activities of $15,364 for the year ended March 31, 2017. The Company had an accumulated deficit, stockholders’ deficit and working capital deficit of $10,267,849, $1,022,703 and $,1022,703, respectively, at March 31, 2017. The Company had no revenue for the year ended March 31, 2017 and has defaulted on their debt. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s Plan regarding these matters is also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Salberg & Company, P.A.

SALBERG & COMPANY, P.A.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013

Boca Raton, Florida

December 23, 2020

2295 NW Corporate Blvd., Suite 240 ● Boca Raton, FL 33431 

Phone: (561) 995-8270 ● Toll Free: (866) CPA-8500 ● Fax: (561) 995-1920

www.salbergco.com ● info@salbergco.com

Member National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts ● Registered with the PCAOB

Member CPAConnect with Affiliated Offices Worldwide ● Member Center for Public Company Audit Firms

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

For the Years Ended March 31, 2017 and 2016

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS

LegacyXchange, Inc., formerly known as True 2 Beauty, Inc. (the “Company”) was originally incorporated as Burrow Mining, Inc., a Nevada corporation, on December 11, 2006. In February 2010, the Company shifted its focus to the beauty industry and later amended its Articles of Incorporation and changed its name to True 2 Beauty, Inc., to better reflect its new business focus.

On July 10, 2012, the Company formed a new wholly owned subsidiary True2Bid, Inc. (“True2Bid”) which was incorporated in the state of Nevada. This subsidiary’s name was changed to LegacyXchange, Inc. (“LegacyXchange”) in December 2014. The Company continued to sell existing inventory of beauty products through May 2013 when the final inventory was sold. LegacyXchange operates an online e-commerce platform focused on delivering users a wide array of sports and entertainment related products that can be won in an action-packed environment of a live auction.

On July 2, 2015, pursuant to a Certificate of Dissolution filing with the Nevada Secretary of State, the Company dissolved LegacyXchange (formerly True2Bid, Inc.) to allow for the change in name of its parent company, True 2 Beauty, Inc., to LegacyXchange, Inc.

The Company is currently inactive due to lack of working capital to fund its operations.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Principals of Consolidation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, True2Bid, Inc. (“True2Bid”) up until the dissolution of True2Bid on July 2, 2015, at which point the financial statements were no longer consolidated. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation

Going Concern

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. As reflected in our accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had net income and net cash used in operating activities of $278,188 and $15,364, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2017. The net income was primarily attributed to the gain from the change in fair value of derivative liabilities. The Company had accumulated deficit, stockholders’ deficit and working capital deficit of $10,267,849, $1,022,703 and $1,022,703, respectively, at March 31, 2017. The Company had no revenues for the year ended March 31, 2017. Our notes payable and certain convertible notes are currently in default. Management believes that these matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months from the issuance date of this report.

Management cannot provide assurance that we will ultimately achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive, or raise additional debt and/or equity capital. Management believes that our capital resources are not currently adequate to continue operating and maintaining its business strategy for a period of twelve months from the issuance date of this report. The Company will seek to raise capital through additional debt and/or equity financings to fund its operations in the future.

Although the Company has historically raised capital from sales of equity and from the issuance of promissory notes, there is no assurance that it will be able to continue to do so. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital or secure additional lending in the near future, management expects that the Company will need to curtail or cease operations. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant estimates during the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 include assumptions used in assessing estimates of deferred tax valuation allowances and the valuation of derivative liabilities.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820 - Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to the Company on March 31, 2017. Accordingly, the estimates presented in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments. FASB ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, due from and to related parties, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis included conversion options in convertible notes and warrants with their exercise price containing a down-round provision (see Note 6) were as follows at March 31, 2017 and 2016:

A roll forward of the level 3 valuation financial instruments is as follows:

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

ASC 825-10 “Financial Instruments”, allows entities to voluntarily choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value (fair value option). The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. If the fair value option is elected for an instrument, unrealized gains and losses for that instrument should be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The Company did not elect to apply the fair value option to any outstanding financial instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the purchase date and money market accounts to be cash equivalents. At March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any cash equivalents.

The Company maintains its cash in bank and financial institution deposits that at times may exceed federally insured limits. There were no balances in excess of FDIC insured levels as of March 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts through March 31, 2017.

Inventory

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the cost to acquire inventory and is valued using the first-in, first-out method. During the year ended March 31, 2017, the Company determined that the inventory of $570 was impaired and was written off. As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s inventory was not significant as the Company was inactive during year ended March 31, 2017.

Derivative Liabilities

The Company has certain financial instruments that are embedded derivatives associated with capital raises and certain warrants. The Company evaluates all its financial instruments to determine if those contracts or any potential embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 815-10 – Derivative and Hedging – Contract in Entity’s Own Equity. This accounting treatment requires that the carrying amount of any derivatives be recorded at fair value at issuance and marked-to-market at each balance sheet date. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, as is the case with the Company, the change in the fair value during the period is recorded as either other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or repayment, the respective derivative liability is marked to fair value at the conversion, repayment or exercise date and then the related fair value amount is reclassified to other income or expense as part of gain or loss on debt extinguishment.

In July 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features. These amendments simplify the accounting for certain financial instruments with down-round features. The amendments require companies to disregard the down-round feature when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to its own stock, for purposes of determining liability or equity classification. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, FASB issued an update Accounting Standards Update, ASU 2014-09, establishing ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09, as amended by subsequent ASUs on the topic, establishes a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most of the existing revenue recognition guidance. This standard, which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2017, requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services and also requires certain additional disclosures. adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the process for, timing of, and presentation and disclosure of revenue recognition from customers. The Company did not have revenues from operations for the year ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) (ASU 2014-12). The guidance applies to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period is treated as a performance condition. For all entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The effective date is the same for both public business entities and all other entities. The Company early adopted ASU 2014-12 during the period ending June 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Pursuant to ASC 505-50 - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, all share-based payments to non-employees, including grants of stock options, were recognized in the financial statements as compensation expense over the service period of the consulting arrangement or until performance conditions are expected to be met. Using a Black Scholes valuation model, the Company periodically reassessed the fair value of non-employee options until service conditions are met, which generally aligns with the vesting period of the options, and the Company adjusts the expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements accordingly. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions by expanding the scope of the stock-based compensation guidance in ASC 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. ASU No. 2018-07 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted, but entities may not adopt prior to adopting the new revenue recognition guidance in ASC 606. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income tax using the liability method prescribed by ASC 740 - Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to offset net deferred tax assets if based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or loss in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company follows the accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes using the provisions of ASC 740 “Income Taxes”. Using that guidance, tax positions initially need to be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. As of March 31, 2017, and 2016, the Company had no uncertain tax positions that qualify for either recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions in other expense. However, no such interest and penalties were recorded as of March 31, 2017.

Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share

Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45, basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the periods presented. Diluted income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of common stock issuable for stock options and warrants (using the treasury stock method), convertible notes and common stock issuable. These common stock equivalents may be dilutive in the future. The following potentially dilutive equity securities outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and 2016 were not included in the computation of dilutive income (loss) per common share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive:

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the year ended March 31, 2017:

Related Parties

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal with if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13—Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, to modify the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not believe this will have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Removals. The following disclosure requirements were removed from Topic 820:

Modifications. The following disclosure requirements were modified in Topic 820:

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

Additions. The following disclosure requirements were added to Topic 820; however, the disclosures are not required for nonpublic entities:

In addition, the amendments eliminate at a minimum from the phrase an entity shall disclose at a minimum to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements. The Company is evaluating the impact of the revised guidance and believes that it will not have a significant impact on its financial statements.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 3 – PREPAID EXPENSES

At March 31, 2017 and 2016, prepaid expenses consisted of the following:

NOTE 4 – ACCRUED LIABILITIES

At March 31, 2017 and 2016, accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

NOTE 5 – LOANS PAYABLE

Between July 2015 through March 2016, the Company entered into individual loan agreements with various investors in the aggregate principal amount of $132,769. These loans bear an interest rate of 10% and were due and payable on the first anniversary of the date of issuance of the loans. As of March 31, 2016, these loans had outstanding principal and accrued interest of $132,769 and $2,751, respectively.

In April and May 2016, the Company entered into individual loan agreements with various investors in the aggregate principal amount of $11,155. These loans bear an interest rate of 10% and were due and payable on the first anniversary of the date of issuance of the loans.

As of March 31, 2017, these loans were in default and had outstanding principal and accrued interest of $143,924 and $17,278, respectively. During the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded interest expense of $14,527 and $2,751, respectively, on these loans.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

NOTE 6 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

At March 31, 2017 and 2016, convertible notes consisted of the following:

Fiscal 2015 Financing

In October and November 2014, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with various purchasers (the “Fiscal 2015 Agreements”) for the sale of the Company’s convertible notes. Pursuant to the Fiscal 2015 Agreements, the Company issued to these purchasers, convertible promissory notes (the “Fiscal 2015 Convertible Notes”) for an aggregate principal amount of $400,000 with the Company receiving proceeds equal to the principal amount. The Fiscal 2015 Convertible Notes bear an interest rate of 10% per year and were due and payable on the third anniversary of the date of issuance through October and November 2017. The purchasers are entitled, at their option, at any time after the issuance of the Fiscal 2015 Convertible Notes, to convert all or any lesser portion of the outstanding principal amount and accrued and unpaid interest into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.02 During the year ended March 31, 2016, the conversion price was ratcheted down to $0.01. During the year ended March 31, 2016, the purchasers converted $130,510 and $10,792 of outstanding principal and accrued interest, respectively, into 7,065,084 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of March 31, 2016, the Fiscal 2015 Convertible Notes had outstanding principal and accrued interest of $269,490 and $40,197, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, the Fiscal 2015 Convertible Notes had outstanding principal and accrued interest of $269,490 and $67,520, respectively.

Fiscal 2016 Financing

In May and June 2015, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with various purchasers (the “Fiscal 2016 Agreements I”) for the sale of the Company’s convertible notes and warrants. Pursuant to the Fiscal 2016 Agreements I, the Company issued to the purchasers for an aggregate subscription amount of $115,000: (i) convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $115,000 (the “Fiscal 2016 Notes I”) and (ii) five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,300,000 (twenty warrants for each dollar of the principal amount) shares Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 (the “Fiscal 2016 Warrants I”). The Company received proceeds equal to the principal amount. The Fiscal 2016 Notes I bear an interest rate of 10% per year and were due and payable on the third anniversary of the date of issuance through May and June 2018. The purchasers are entitled, at their option, at any time after the issuance of the Fiscal 2016 Notes I, to convert all or any lesser portion of the outstanding principal amount and accrued and unpaid interest into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.05. The conversion price of the Fiscal 2016 Notes I shall be subject to adjustment for issuances of common stock at a purchase price of less than the then-effective conversion price. During the year ended March 31, 2016, the conversion price was ratcheted down to $0.01. As of March 31, 2016, the Fiscal 2016 Notes I had outstanding principal and accrued interest of $115,000 and $10,074, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, the Fiscal 2016 Notes I had outstanding principal and accrued interest of $115,000 and $21,733, respectively.

During August through September 2015, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with various purchasers (the “Fiscal 2016 Agreements II”) for the sale of the Company’s convertible notes and warrants. Pursuant to the Fiscal 2016 Agreements II, the Company issued to the purchasers for an aggregate subscription amount of $96,250: (i) convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $96,250 (the “Fiscal 2016 Notes II”) and (ii) five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,925,000 (twenty warrants for each dollar of the principal amount) shares Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.07 (the “Fiscal 2016 Warrants II”). The Company received proceeds equal to the principal amount. The Fiscal 2016 Notes II bear an interest rate of 10% per year and were due and payable on the third anniversary of the date of issuance through August through September 2018. The purchasers are entitled, at their option, at any time after the issuance of the Fiscal 2016 Notes II, to convert all or any lesser portion of the outstanding principal amount and accrued and unpaid interest into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.05. The conversion price of the Fiscal 2016 Notes II shall be subject to adjustment for issuances of common stock at a purchase price of less than the then-effective conversion price. During the year ended March 31, 2016, the conversion price was ratcheted down to $0.01. As of March 31, 2016, the Fiscal 2016 Notes II had outstanding principal and accrued interest of $96,250 and $5,203, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, the Fiscal 2016 Notes II had outstanding principal and accrued interest of $96,250 and $14,961, respectively.

During the year ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded interest expense of $48,741 and $48,572, respectively, on these convertible notes.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

Derivative Liabilities Pursuant to Notes and Warrants

In connection with the issuance of the Notes and Warrants, the Company determined that the terms of the Notes and Warrants contain terms that included a down-round provision under which the conversion price and exercise price could be affected by future equity offerings undertaken by the Company or contain terms that are not fixed monetary amounts at inception and included various other terms such as default provisions that caused derivative treatment. Accordingly, under the provisions of ASC 815-40 –Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in an Entity’s Own Stock, the embedded conversion option contained in the convertible instruments and the Warrants were accounted for as derivative liabilities at the date of issuance and shall be adjusted to fair value through earnings at each reporting date. The fair value of the embedded conversion option derivatives and warrant derivatives were determined using the Binomial valuation model. At the end of each period, on the date that debt was converted into common shares, and on the date of a cashless exercise of warrants, the Company revalued the embedded conversion option and warrants derivative liabilities.

In July 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features. These amendments simplify the accounting for certain financial instruments with down-round features. The amendments require companies to disregard the down-round feature when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to its own stock, for purposes of determining liability or equity classification. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU No. 2017-11 on its consolidated financial statements.

In connection with the issuance of the Fiscal 2016 Financing Notes and related Warrants, during year ended March 31, 2016, on the initial measurement date, the fair values of the conversion option derivative and warrants derivative of $403,401 was recorded as derivative liabilities and was allocated as a debt discount of $211,250 with the remaining $192,151 recorded as derivative expense.

At March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company revalued the conversion option and warrant derivative liabilities. In connection with these revaluations, the Company recorded gain from change on fair value of derivative liabilities of $720,808 and $426,829 for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

At March 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of the derivative liabilities was estimated using the Binomial option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

For the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, amortization of debt discounts related to the convertible notes amounted to $166,292 and $267,865, respectively, which has been included in interest expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Authorized shares

The Company is authorized to issue 200,000,000 consisting of 190,000,000 shares of common stock at $0.001 per share par value, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock at $0.001 per share par value.

Preferred Stock

As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not have any preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

Common stock issued for stock-based compensation

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

Common stock issued for services

Common stock issued for payment of loan fees

Common stock issued for debt conversion

Common stock issued to a former related party for services

Warrants

Warrants issued pursuant to equity subscription agreements

During fiscal years 2013 to 2015, in connection with the sale of common stock, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,048,315 five-year warrants to purchase shares of Company’s common stock for an exercise price of $0.40 per common share, to investors pursuant to unit subscription agreements. These warrants were accounted for as equity. As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, 1,048,315 warrants were issued and outstanding.

Warrants issued in connection with the Fiscal 2016 Financing

During fiscal years 2016, pursuant to the convertible note agreements under the fiscal 2016 financing discussed in Note 6, the Company issued five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,225,000 (twenty warrants for each dollar of the principal amount) shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.07. The exercise price of these warrants shall be subject to adjustment for issuances of common stock at a purchase price of less than the then-effective conversion price and were accounted for as derivative liabilities. During the year ended March 31, 2016, the conversion price was ratcheted down to $0.01. As of March 31, 2017 and 2016, 4,225,000 warrants were issued and outstanding.

LEGACYXCHANGE, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017 and 2016

Warrant activity for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 are summarized as follows:

NOTE 8 – INCOME TAXES

The Company maintains deferred tax assets and liabilities that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The deferred tax assets at March 31, 2017 and 2016 consist of net operating loss carryforwards. The net deferred tax asset has been fully offset by a valuation allowance because of the uncertainty of the attainment of future taxable income.

The items accounting for the difference between income taxes at the effective statutory rate and the provision for income taxes for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:

The Company’s approximate net deferred tax asset at March 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:

The net operating loss carryforward was $3,721,296 and $3,444,968 at March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company provided a valuation allowance equal to the deferred income tax asset for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 because it was not known whether future taxable income will be sufficient to utilize the loss carryforward. The change in the allowance was $107,768 and $295,600 for the years ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The potential tax benefit arising from the loss carryforward will expire through 2037. 

Additionally, the future utilization of the net operating loss carryforward to offset future taxable income may be subject to an annual limitation as a result of ownership changes that could occur in the future. If necessary, the deferred tax assets will be reduced by any carryforward that expires prior to utilization as a result of such limitations, with a corresponding reduction of the valuation allowance.

The Company does not have any uncertain tax positions or events leading to uncertainty in a tax position. The Company’s 2017, 2016 and 2015 Corporate Income Tax Returns are subject to Internal Revenue Service examination.

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Between October 2017 and November 2017, the Fiscal 2015 Convertible Notes defaulted due to non-payment at maturity date and between May 2018 and September 2018, the Fiscal 2016 Convertible Notes I and II defaulted due to non-payment at maturity date (see Note 6). 

Between November 2019 through June 2020, the Company entered into loan agreements with an investor in the aggregate principal amount of $91,000. The loans bear interest rate of 6% and were due and payable two-years from the date of issuances.