LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES INC - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009


o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ____________

Commission file number 000-27548

LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE	86-0708398
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

http://www.lightpath.com

2603 Challenger Tech Ct. Suite 100
Orlando, Florida 32826

(Address of principal executive offices)

(ZIP Code)

(407) 382-4003

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the proceeding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.YES o NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”: in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES o NO x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
6,688,453 shares of common stock, Class A, $.01 par value, outstanding as of May 11, 2009.

LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Form 10-Q

Index


Item		Page


Part I	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	4
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	5
	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
	Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	32

Part II	Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	33
Item 6.	Exhibits	33

Signatures		38

Item 1. Financial Statements

LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


	Unaudited March 31, 2009			June 30, 2008

Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	380,068		$	358,457
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $44,304 and $44,862		1,052,949			1,334,856
Inventories, net		1,207,970			1,323,555
Prepaid expenses and other assets		581,801			277,359

Total current assets		3,222,788			3,294,227
Property and equipment - net		1,666,410			1,937,741
Intangible assets - net		175,086			199,737
Debt costs, net		331,744			—
Other assets		57,306			57,306

Total assets	$	5,453,334		$	5,489,011

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,342,987		$	1,827,461
Accrued liabilities		178,693			196,125
Accrued severance		—			97,401
Accrued payroll and benefits		271,696			423,222
Secured note payable		—			260,828
Note payable, current portion		152,624			166,645
Capital lease obligation, current portion		9,936			18,603

Total current liabilities		1,955,936			2,990,285


Deferred rent		220,066			222,818
Capital lease obligation, excluding current portion		—			5,050
Note payable, excluding current portion		—			111,097
8% convertible debentures to related parties, net of debt discount		120,891			—
8% convertible debentures, net of debt discount		1,243,093			—

Total liabilities		3,539,986			3,329,250

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock: Series D, $.01 par value, voting; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock: Class A, $.01 par value, voting; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 6,676,453 and 5,331,664 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		66,765			53,317
Additional paid-in capital		203,089,544			199,847,356
Foreign currency translation adjustment		24,812			21,369
Accumulated deficit		(201,267,773	)		(197,762,281	)

Total stockholders’ equity		1,913,348			2,159,761

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	5,453,334		$	5,489,011

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations


	Unaudited						Unaudited

	Three months ended March 31,						Nine months ended March 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008


Product sales, net	$	1,656,889		$	2,114,196		$	5,899,853		$	6,444,515
Cost of sales		1,242,291			1,694,679			4,387,283			5,780,978

Gross margin		414,598			419,517			1,512,570			663,537

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		816,805			1,272,269			3,155,255			4,063,080
New product development		184,111			308,302			686,579			924,049
Amortization of intangibles		8,217			8,217			24,651			24,651
Loss (Gain) on sale of property & equipment		2,463			13,707			(5,244	)		13,707

Total costs and expenses		1,011,596			1,602,495			3,861,241			5,025,487

Operating loss		(596,998	)		(1,182,978	)		(2,348,671	)		(4,361,950	)

Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(161,330	)		(19,357	)		(1,173,578	)		(48,285	)
Investment and other income		2,153			12,066			16,757			73,767

Net loss	$	(756,175	)	$	(1,190,269	)	$	(3,505,492	)	$	(4,336,468	)

Foreign currency translation adjustment		3,061			9,771			3,443			51,181

Comprehensive loss	$	(753,114	)	$	(1,180,498	)	$	(3,502,049	)	$	(4,285,287	)

Loss per share (basic and diluted)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.58	)	$	(0.81	)

Number of shares used in per share calculation		6,674,453			5,332,655			5,993,114			5,326,003

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated statements.

LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Nine months ended March 31, 2009
Unaudited


	Class A Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital			Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment					Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Class A Common Stock									Accumulated Deficit
	Shares		Amount							Accumulated Deficit


Balances at June 30, 2008		5,331,664	$	53,317	$	199,847,356		$	21,369	$	(197,762,281	)	$	2,159,761

Issuance of common stock for:
Current interest on convertible debentures		103,971		1,040		96,593								97,633
Incentive to participate in convertible debenture placement, recorded as debt discount		73,228		732		74,399								75,131
Prepayment of interest on convertible debentures		589,614		5,896		448,099								453,995
Conversion of 25% of debentures		475,496		4,755		727,495								732,250
Payment on consulting service arrangements		60,000		600		49,200								49,800
Vested restricted stock units		27,700		277		(277	)							—
Employee Stock Purchase Plan		14,780		148		14,072								14,220
Issuance of warrants to private placement agent recorded as debt costs						194,057								194,057
Debt discount and beneficial conversion feature on convertible debentures						1,316,334								1,316,334
Issuance of warrants as inducement to convert debentures						215,975								215,975
Stock based compensation on stock options and restricted stock units						106,241								106,241
Foreign currency adjustment									3,443					3,443
Net loss											(3,505,492	)		(3,505,492	)


Balances at March 31, 2009		6,676,453	$	66,765	$	203,089,544		$	24,812	$	(201,267,773	)	$	1,913,348

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


	Unaudited Nine Months Ended March 31,

	2009			2008


Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(3,505,492	)	$	(4,336,468	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		432,505			330,636
Foreign exchange translation adjustment		3,443			51,181
Interest from amortization of debt discount		558,699			—
Fair value of warrants issued to induce debenture conversion		215,975			—
Amortization of debt costs		222,564			—
Issuance of common stock for interest on convertible debentures		97,633			—
Gain on sale of property and equipment		(5,244	)		(7,000	)
Stock based compensation		106,241			280,525
Provision for doubtful accounts receivable		(558	)		17,901
Loss on abandonment of fixed assets		—			20,707
Deferred rent		(2,752	)		—
Common stock issued for payment of consulting services		49,800			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivables		282,465			3,743
Inventories		115,585			400,431
Prepaid expenses and other assets		686			(93,734	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(750,833	)		213,762

Net cash used in operating activities		(2,179,283	)		(3,118,316	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(123,884	)		(646,020	)
Proceeds from sale of equipment		37,791			7,000

Net cash used in investing activities		(86,093	)		(639,020	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of costs		—			2,978,544
Proceeds from sale of common stock from employee stock purchase plan		14,220			44,548
Borrowings on 8% convertible debenture, net of issuance costs		2,672,430			—
Payments on secured note payable		(260,828	)		—
Payments on capital lease obligation		(13,717	)		(12,008	)
Payments on note payable		(125,118	)		(124,983	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		2,286,987			2,886,101

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		21,611			(871,235	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		358,457			1,291,364

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	380,068		$	420,129

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid in cash	$	31,568		$	29,993
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing & financing activities:
Landlord credits for leasehold improvements	$	—		$	161,678
Convertible debentures exchanged into common stock	$	732,250		$	—
Fair value of warrants issued to broker of debt financing	$	194,057		$	—
Fair value of warrants & incentive shares issued to debenture holders	$	790,830		$	—
Intrinsic value of beneficial conversion feature underlying convertible debentures	$	600,635		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated statements.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

1. Basis of Presentation

References in this document to “the Company”, “LightPath”, “we”, “us”, “our” are intended to mean LightPath Technologies, Inc.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Article 8 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes, included in its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

These condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited but include all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the interim periods presented. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year as a whole.

History and Liquidity

History: LightPath was incorporated in Delaware in 1992 to pursue a strategy of supplying hardware to the telecommunications industry. In April 2000, the Company acquired Horizon Photonics, Inc. (“Horizon”), and in September 2000 the Company acquired Geltech, Inc. (“Geltech”). During fiscal 2003, in response to sales declines in the telecommunications industry, the operations of Horizon in California and LightPath in New Mexico were consolidated into the former Geltech facility in Orlando, Florida. In November 2005, the Company announced the formation of LightPath Optical Instrumentation (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, (“LPOI”) a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary located in Jiading, People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). The manufacturing operations are housed in a 17,000 square foot facility located in the Jiading Industrial Zone near Shanghai. This plant has increased overall production capacity and enabled LightPath to compete for larger production volumes of optical components and assemblies, and strengthened partnerships within the Asia/Pacific region. It also provides a launching point to drive the Company’s sales expansion in Asia/Pacific. Over 93% of precision molded lenses were manufactured in LPOI’s Shanghai facility during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 compared to 71% during the nine months ended March 31, 2008.

The Company is engaged in the production of precision molded aspherical lenses, GRADIUM® glass lenses, collimators and isolator optics used in various markets, including industrial, medical, defense, test & measurement and telecommunications. As used herein, the terms “LightPath,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our,” refer to LightPath individually or, as the context requires, collectively with its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Going Concern and Management’s Plans

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Because of recurring operating losses during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and fiscal 2008 and 2007 of $3.5 million, $5.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and cash used in operations during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 of $2.2 million and $3.1 million, respectively, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent on attaining profitable operations through achieving revenue growth targets.

We have instituted a cost reduction program and have reduced headcount in Orlando and Shanghai and costs for medical insurance for our employees. In March 2009 we reduced the Orlando staff to a four day work week. This is estimated to save $663,000 for salaries and benefits per year. In addition, we have redesigned certain product lines, increased sales prices on certain items, obtained more favorable material costs, and have instituted more efficient management techniques. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009 we used $92,000 of cash from operations. This compares to $484,000 cash used from operations in the fiscal second quarter ended December 31, 2008 and $1.6 million cash used for operations for the fiscal first quarter ended September 30, 2008. We are seeing the cash impacts of our cost savings initiatives and during the third quarter we have been extending out payment terms for some vendors. Going forward we expect to keep our cash usage

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

similar to the third quarter or better as our sales volumes rise. These changes have increased our gross margin to 25% in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 on lower sales from 20% in the same quarter one year ago and from 14% for the year ended June 30, 2008. We believe these factors will contribute towards achieving profitability assuming we meet our sales targets. However, achievement of the sales targets has become subject to doubt based on a slow down in our bookings and delays with shipping the low cost orders from our Shanghai facility. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Liquidity: Cash continues to be a concern of the Company. In fiscal 2006, 2007 and 2008, cash used in operations was approximately $2.0 million, $1.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. During the nine months ending March 31, 2009, the Company used approximately $2,179,000 of cash for operating activities.

Although there can be no assurance, we are optimistic that we will achieve improved cash flows from operations. However, we still expect our cash flows to be negative in the near term. We plan to maintain the cost improvements we have achieved for our products by continuing to work within our reduced material and overhead cost structure. At March 31, 2009, the Company had a cash and cash equivalent balance of approximately $380,000.

We engage in continuing efforts to keep costs under control as we seek renewed sales growth. Our efforts are directed toward reaching positive cash flow and profitability. If these efforts are not successful, we will need to raise additional capital. The current instability of the equity and credit markets and financial institutions will materially adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital should it be needed or the terms under which such capital might be available to us. Should capital not be available to us at reasonable terms, other actions may become necessary in addition to cost control measures and continued efforts to increase sales. These actions may include exploring strategic options for the sale of the Company or certain product lines of the company, the creation of joint ventures or strategic alliances under which the Company will pursue business opportunities, the creation of licensing arrangements with respect to the Company’s technology, or other alternatives. We have no commitments for any financing at this time. On May 11, 2009, the Company had a book cash balance of approximately $652,000, which included $295,000 received from the Chinese government to pay for move related expenses of the Shanghai plant.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2009, cash increased by $22,000 compared to a decrease of $871,000 in the same period of the prior fiscal year. The increase in cash in fiscal 2009 was primarily related to net proceeds of $2,672,430 received by the Company through a 8% senior convertible debenture offering in August 2008 offset by spending for net losses, working capital, fixed asset purchases and notes payable. The decrease in cash for fiscal 2008 was due to spending for net losses, working capital, fixed assets purchases and notes payable offset by net proceeds of $2,978,544 received by the Company through a $3,200,000 private placement of common stock and warrants in July 2007.

As heretofore stated, significant risk and uncertainty remains in achieving the goal of generating positive cash flow from operations on an ongoing basis. Factors which could adversely affect cash balances in future quarters include, but are not limited to, a continued decline in revenue, increased material costs, increased labor costs, planned production efficiency (yield) improvements not being realized, the current economic recession and increases in other discretionary spending required to effectively compete in our markets.

As a result of the Company’s cash flow position, should the Company find it desirable or necessary to issue additional equity securities or debt that may be convertible into or exercisable for equity securities, the action would have the effect of increasing our fully diluted shares outstanding and ultimately diluting our operating results (net earnings or net loss) on a per share basis, and the action would dilute the voting power of current stockholders who do not acquire sufficient additional shares to maintain their percentage of share ownership.

We have taken certain actions to conserve our cash including extending payment terms with certain of our suppliers. We have negotiated payment plans with some key vendors and are working with other vendors to develop payment plans.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

slower than planned given the current economic condition. However, management believes that taking the current booking rate combined with the existing order backlog the Company will be able to generate increased revenues. If we determine that future revenues are below current projections then we will attempt to implement additional cost savings measures and seek to negotiate extended payment plans with vendors. We are continuously evaluating our supplier situation to ensure we meet our booked orders. This also includes seeking new suppliers and looking for price reductions

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in the bank and temporary investments with maturities of 90 days or less when purchased.

Allowance for accounts receivable, is calculated by taking 100% of the total of invoices that are over 90 days past due from due date and 10% of the total of invoices that are over 60 days past due from due date. Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. The Company performs continuing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition. Recovery of bad debt amounts previously written off is recorded as a reduction of bad debt expense in the period the payment is collected. If the Company’s actual collection experience changes, revisions to its allowance may be required. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance.

Inventories, which consist principally of raw materials, work-in-process and finished lenses, isolators, collimators and assemblies are stated at the lower of cost or market, on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory costs include materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. Fixed costs related to excess manufacturing capacity have been expensed. Also unusual or abnormal costs, primarily relating to the start up of the Shanghai facility have been expensed. The inventory obsolescence reserve is calculated by reserving 100% for items that have not been sold in two years or that have not been purchased in two years or of which we have more than a two year supply, as well as reserving 50% for other items deemed to be slow moving within the last 12 months and reserving 25% for items deemed to have low material usage within the last six months.

Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets ranging from three to seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method.

Long-lived assets are recorded in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”). In accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to its estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset and liability sections of the balance sheet. We are currently considering the sale of our collimator product line which is insignificant to the financial statements.

Intangible assets, consisting of patents and trademarks, are recorded at cost. Upon issuance of the patent or trademark, the assets are amortized on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the related assets ranging from two to seventeen years.

Debt costs consist of third party fees incurred and other costs associated with the issuance of long-term debt. Debt costs are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over the term of the debt using the effective interest method.

Deferred rent relates to certain of the Company’s operating leases containing predetermined fixed increases of the base rental rate during the lease term being recognized as rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company has recorded the difference between the amounts charged to operations and amounts payable under the leases as deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Shipping and handling costs related to the acquisition of goods from its vendors are accounted for as cost of sales.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are computed on the basis of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based upon enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances have been established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), on July 1, 2007. The Company has not recognized a liability as a result of the implementation of FIN 48. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits has not been provided since there is no unrecognized benefit since the date of adoption. The Company has not recognized interest expense or penalties as a result of the implementation of FIN 48. If there were an unrecognized tax benefit, the Company would recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003.

Revenue is recognized from product sales when products are shipped to the customer, provided that the Company has received a valid purchase order, the price is fixed, title has transferred, collection of the associated receivable is reasonably assured, and there are no remaining significant obligations. Revenues from product development agreements are recognized as milestones are completed in accordance with the terms of the agreements and upon shipment of products, reports or designs to the customer.

New product development costs are expensed as incurred.

Stock based compensation is expensed according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”). Stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company elected to use the modified prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted shares beginning in the first quarter of adoption. For all unvested options outstanding as of July 1, 2005, and subsequently granted options, the previously measured but unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value at the original grant date, will be recognized on a straight-line basis in the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the remaining vesting period. We estimate the fair value of each stock option as of the date of grant. We use the Black-Scholes pricing model. Most options granted under our Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan vest ratably over two to four years and generally have ten-year contract lives. The volatility rate is based on four-year historical trends in common stock closing prices and the expected term was determined based primarily on historical experience of previously outstanding options. The interest rate used is the U.S. Treasury interest rate for constant maturities. The likelihood of meeting targets for option grants that are performance based are evaluated each quarter. If it is determined that meeting the targets is probable then the compensation expense will be amortized over the remaining vesting period.

Management makes estimates and assumptions during the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements that affect amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes available, which in turn could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein.

Financial instruments. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 introduces a framework for measuring fair value and expands required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable;

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2009. The Company uses the market approach to measure fair value for its Level 1 financial assets and liabilities, which include cash equivalents of $279,000 at March 31, 2009. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The Company does not have other financial assets or liabilities that would be characterized as Level 2 or Level 3 assets.

The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments which include cash, trade receivables, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments since they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are receivable or payable on demand. The carrying value of note payable, capital lease obligations and convertible debentures approximate their fair values because the interest rates associated with the instruments approximates current interest rates charged on similar current borrowings.

SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, except for non-financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a non-recurring basis, for which the effective date is fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. On July 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 for assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets that are recognized or disclosed on a non-recurring basis on July 1, 2009 in accordance with FASB Staff Position 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157” (“FSP 157-2”). The Company is currently evaluating the effect, if any, of FSP 157-2 on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 133”), and its related interpretations, and complies with SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 133”). SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 138 establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities.

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risk. Terms of convertible debt instruments are reviewed to determine whether or not they contain embedded derivative instruments that are required under SFAS No. 133 to be accounted for separately from the host contract, and recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative liabilities, if any, is required to be revalued at each reporting date, with corresponding changes in fair value recorded in current period operating results.

Freestanding warrants issued by the Company in connection with the issuance or sale of debt and equity instruments are considered to be derivative instruments, and are evaluated and accounted for in accordance with the provisions of the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (“EITF”) No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock (“EITF No. 00-19”). Pursuant to EITF No. 00-19, an evaluation of specifically identified conditions is made to determine whether the fair value of warrants issued is required to be classified as equity or as a derivative liability.

Beneficial Conversion and Warrant Valuation. In accordance with EITF No. 98-5, Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios and EITF No. 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments, the Company records a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) related to the issuance of convertible debt instruments that have conversion features at fixed rates that are in-the-money when issued, and the fair value of warrants issued in connection with those instruments. The BCF for the convertible instruments is recognized and measured by allocating a portion of the proceeds to warrants, based on their relative fair value, and as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible instrument equal to the intrinsic value of the conversion feature. The discounts recorded in connection with the BCF and warrant valuation are recognized as non-cash interest expense over the term of the convertible debt, using the effective interest method.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

Comprehensive Income (Loss) of the Company is defined as the change in equity (net assets) of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. It includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive income (loss) has two components, net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss), and is included on the statement of stockholders’ equity. Our other comprehensive income (loss) consists of the foreign currency translation adjustment. For more information see Note 14 - Foreign Operations in in the annual consolidated financial statements filed with the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008.

Business segments, pursuant to SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of a Business Enterprise and Related Information,” are required to be reported by the Company. As the Company only operates in principally one business segment, no additional reporting is required.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements, which have had or may have an effect on the consolidated financial statements, are as follows:

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. Management does not believe the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, results of operations and cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” which requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP will not impact the consolidated financial results as the requirements are disclosure-only in nature and is effective for interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP 157-4”) which clarifies the application of fair value accounting. FSP 157-4 affirms the objective of fair value when a market is not active, clarifies and includes additional factors for determining whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity, eliminates the presumption that all transactions are distressed unless proven otherwise, and requires an entity to disclose a change in valuation technique. FSP 157-4 is effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2010. The adoption of FSP 157-4 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). The standard changes the accounting for business combinations including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development, the accounting for acquisition-related restructuring cost accruals, the treatment of acquisition related transaction costs and the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company doe not believe that the impact of the pending adoption of SFAS 141(R) will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, results of operations and cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” It requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have a material impact on its results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

(“SFAS No. 142”). This FSP also adds certain disclosures to those already prescribed in SFAS No. 142. FSP 142-3 becomes effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning in the Company’s fiscal 2010. The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date.

In June 2008, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus regarding EITF Issue No. 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (“EITF 07-5”). EITF 07-5 outlines a two-step approach to evaluate the instrument’s contingent exercise provisions, if any, and to evaluate the instrument’s settlement provisions when determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to an entity’s own stock. EITF 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and must be applied to outstanding instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not anticipate the adoption of EITF 07-5 will have a material impact on its results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In May 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position APB No. 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB No. 14-1”)which requires issuers of convertible debt that may be settled wholly or partly in cash when converted to account for the debt and equity components separately. FSP APB No. 14-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, which will be the Company’s fiscal year 2010, and must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company is evaluating the financial impact that FSP APB No. 14-1 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Staff Position No. EITF No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“FSP EITF No. 03-6-1”). According to FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities under SFAS No. 128. As such, they should be included in the computation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”) using the two-class method. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, as well as interim periods within those years. Once effective, all prior-period EPS data presented must be adjusted retrospectively. The Company does not expect FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

3. Inventories

The components of inventories include the following at:


	Unaudited

	March 31, 2009			June 30, 2008

Raw material	$	480,014		$	563,254
Work in Process		684,698			560,495
Finished Goods		457,444			433,992
Reserve for obsolescence		(414,186	)		(234,186	)

	$	1,207,970		$	1,323,555

4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are summarized as follows:

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009


	Estimated Life (Years)		Unaudited March 31, 2009		June 30, 2008


Manufacturing equipment		5	$	6,964,668	$	6,867,727
Computer equipment and software		3 - 5		526,249		683,972
Furniture and fixtures		5		214,307		215,766
Platinum molds		5		—		44,100
Leasehold improvements		6 - 7		829,194		826,614

Total Property and Equipment				8,534,418		8,638,179

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization				6,868,008		6,700,438

Total property and equipment, net			$	1,666,410	$	1,937,741

5. Intangible Assets

The following table discloses information regarding the carrying amounts and associated accumulated amortization for intangible assets:


	Unaudited March 31, 2009			June 30, 2008

Gross carrying amount	$	621,303		$	621,303

Accumulated amortization		(446,217	)		(421,566	)


Net carrying amount	$	175,086		$	199,737

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

6. Stock and Share-Based Arrangements

Share-Based Compensation Arrangements—The Company’s Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) included several available forms of stock compensation of which incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards have been granted to date. The Company has also issued stock options under a separate non-qualified plan. In 2003, a substantial number of those options were cancelled and replaced with restricted stock award grants under the Plan. At March 31, 2009, there were options remaining for 2,500 shares still outstanding that were not issued in a qualified plan.

These three plans are summarized below:


	Award Shares Authorized		Award Shares Outstanding at March 31, 2009		Available for Issuance at March 31, 2009

Equity Compensation Arrangement
Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan		1,715,625		698,536		629,067
Non-Qualified Plan		2,500		2,500		—
ESPP		200,000		—		148,388


		1,918,125		701,036		777,455

The 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) permits employees to purchase common stock through payroll deductions, which may not exceed 15% of an employee’s compensation, at a price not less than 85% of the market value of the stock on specified dates (June 30 and December 31). In no event may any participant purchase more than $25,000 worth of shares in any calendar year and an employee may purchase no more than 4,000 shares on any purchase date within an offering period of 12 months and 2,000 shares on any purchase date within an offering period of six months. The first distribution under this plan was issued in January 2006. The discount on market value is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying statements of operations and was $1,466 and $4,391 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Grant Date Fair Values and Underlying Assumptions; Contractual Terms—The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The ESPP fair value is the amount of the discounted market value the employee obtains at the date of the purchase transaction.

For stock options granted in the nine month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company estimated the fair value of each stock option as of the date of grant using the following assumptions:


	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2009	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2008
Range of expected volatilities	108%-132%	263%-313%
Weighted average expected volatility	119%	307%
Dividend yields	0%	0%
Range of risk-free interest rate	0.43%-1.79%	3.14% - 4.47%
Expected term, in years	3-5.5	5.5-7

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

Most options granted under the Company’s Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan vest ratably over two to four years and are generally exercisable for ten years. The assumed forfeiture rates used in calculating the fair value of options and restricted stock unit grants with both performance and service conditions were 44% and 5%, respectively, for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 25% and 6%, respectively, for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. The volatility rate and expected term are based on five-year historical trends in common stock closing prices and actual forfeitures. The interest rate used is the U.S. Treasury interest rate for constant maturities.

Information Regarding Current Share-Based Compensation Awards—A summary of the activity for share-based compensation awards in the nine months ended March 31, 2009 is presented below:


	Stock Options							Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”)

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price (per share)		Weighted Average Remaining Contract Lifes (YRS)		Shares			Weighted Average Remaining Contract Lifes (YRS)

Options Outstanding June 30, 2008		410,231		$	8.50		8.0		265,600			1.0

Granted		90,174			1.05		9.8		75,000			2.6
Exercised		—			—		—		(27,700	)		—
Cancelled		(112,269	)		4.03		7.6		—			—


March 31, 2009		388,136		$	8.09		7.8		312,900			1.0


Awards exercisable/vested as of March 31, 2009		178,629		$	14.93		6.3		171,230			—

Awards unexercisable/unvested as of March 31, 2009		209,507		$	2.26		8.9		141,670			2.4

		388,136							312,900


	Stock Options		RSU’s		All Awards

Weighted average fair value of share awards granted for the nine months ended
March 31, 2009	$	0.84	$	0.77	$	0.81
March 31, 2008	$	2.61	$	3.05	$	2.69

The total intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $0 and $2,129, respectively.

The total intrinsic value of RSU’s exercised during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $10,089 and $9,100, respectively.

The total intrinsic value of RSUs outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $80,852 and $284,571, respectively.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

The total fair value of RSU’s vested during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $116,151 and $201,581, respectively.

The total fair value of option shares vested during the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $249,140, and $265,939, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, there was $318,987 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements (including share options and restricted stock units) granted under the Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan.

The compensation cost is expected to be recognized as follows:


	Stock Options		Restricted Stock Units		Total

Three months ended June 30, 2009	$	25,719	$	27,369	$	53,088
Year ended June 30, 2010		81,673		64,116		145,789
Year ended June 30, 2011		39,134		48,252		87,386
Year ended June 30, 2012		11,015		21,709		32,724

	$	157,541	$	161,446	$	318,987

The table above does not include shares under the Company’s ESPP, which has purchase settlement dates in the second and fourth fiscal quarters of each year. The Company’s ESPP is not administered with a look-back option provision and, as a result, there is not a population of outstanding option grants during the employee contribution period.

Restricted stock unit awards vest immediately or from two to four years from the date of grant.

The Company issues new shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock options. The following table is a summary of the number and weighted average grant date fair values regarding the Company’s unexercisable/unvested awards as of March 31, 2009 and changes during the nine months then ended:


Unexercisable/unvested awards	Stock Options Shares			RSU Shares			Total Shares			Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Values (per share)

At June 30, 2008		280,614			105,005			385,619		$	3.03
Granted		90,174			75,000			165,174			0.81
Vested		(86,864	)		(38,335	)		(125,199	)		3.03
Cancelled/Issued/Forfeited		(74,417	)		—			(74,417	)		3.81

March 31, 2009		209,507			141,670			351,177		$	1.87

Acceleration of Vesting—The Company has not accelerated the vesting of any stock options, except for 4,067 options and restricted stock units issued to a former director that were accelerated during the quarter ended December 31, 2007 upon his decision not to stand for re-election. The stock compensation expense recognized for the acceleration of options and restricted stock units for this former director was $47,085.

Financial Statement Effects and Presentation—The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009


	Nine Months March 31, 2009			Nine Months March 31, 2008

Stock options	$	36,795		$	156,771

RSU	$	69,446		$	123,754


Total	$	106,241		$	280,525


The amounts above were included in:
General & administrative	$	116,195		$	212,117
Cost of sales	$	(19,970	)	$	47,794
Research & development	$	10,016		$	20,614

	$	106,241		$	280,525

During the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 the Company reversed approximately $74,000 and $41,600, respectively, in stock compensation expense related to the forfeiture of unvested options and RSU’s.

7. Net Loss Per Share

Basic net loss per share is computed based upon the weighted-average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding, not including unvested restricted stock, during each period presented. The computation of diluted net loss per share does not differ from the basic computation because potentially issuable securities of warrants and options for 2,886,360 shares and 1,426,621 conversion shares related to debentures for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 1,545,623 shares for warrants and options for the nine months ended March 31, 2008 would be anti-dilutive.

8. Foreign Operations

Assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. currencies are translated at rates of exchange prevailing on the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange for the nine-month periods. Gains or losses on the translation of the financial statements of a non-U.S. operation, where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, the Renminbi (RMB), are reflected as a separate component of equity. The foreign exchange translation adjustment balance reflects gains of $21,369 at June 30, 2008 and $24,812 at March 31, 2009. The Company, as of March 31, 2009, had approximately $1,024,000 in assets and $607,000 in net assets located in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). New equipment was purchased for the PRC plant and equipment was transferred from Orlando to PRC during fiscal 2006, 2007, 2008 & 2009.

9. Convertible Debentures

On August 1, 2008, we executed a Securities Purchase Agreement with twenty-four institutional and private investors with respect to a private placement of 8% senior convertible debentures (the “Debentures”). The sale of the Debentures generated gross proceeds of approximately $2,929,000. We will use the funds to provide working capital for our operations. Among the investors were Steven Brueck, J. James Gaynor, Louis Leeburg, Robert Ripp, Gary Silverman and James Magos, all of whom were directors or officers of LightPath as of August 1, 2008. Mr. Magos resigned effective September 2, 2008.

The maturity date of the Debentures is August 1, 2011, on which date the outstanding principal amount of the Debentures will be due. Interest on the Debentures was prepaid by issuing common stock in December 2008. Interest of $39,053 was due on October 1, 2008 and was prepaid by the Company on August 1, 2008 by issuing 27,893 shares of common stock in payment of such interest based upon the closing price of $1.40 per share. The Debentures are secured by substantially all of our previously unencumbered assets pursuant to a Security Agreement and are guaranteed by our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Geltech Inc. and LPOI pursuant to a Subsidiary Guarantee.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

Upon issuance the Debentures were immediately convertible into 1,901,948 shares of common stock, based on a conversion price of $1.54 per share, which is 110% of the closing bid price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on July 31, 2008. Investors also received warrants to purchase up to 950,974 shares of our common stock (the “Warrants”). The Warrants are exercisable for a period of five years beginning on August 1, 2008 with 65% of the Warrants, exercisable for 618,133 shares, priced at $1.68 per share and the remaining 35% of the Warrants priced at $1.89 per share. If all of the Warrants were exercised at that time, we would have received additional proceeds in the amount of $1,645,184.

Investors who participated in our July 2007 common stock private placement equity were offered an incentive to invest in the debenture offering. Four investors from the July 2007 offering participated in the debenture offering and as a result we reduced the exercise price of the warrants they received in the July 2007 offering from $5.50 per share to $2.61 per share. This reduced warrant strike price lowered potential proceeds on the exercise of the warrants by $119,212 to $107,663. Additionally, such investors were issued an aggregate of 73,228 incentive common shares (the “Incentive Shares”), valued at $75,131.

We paid a commission to the exclusive placement agent for the offering, First Montauk Securities Corp. (“First Montauk”), in an amount equal to $216,570 plus costs and expenses. We also issued to First Montauk and its designees warrants to purchase an aggregate of 190,195 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $1.68 per share, which is 120% of the closing bid price of the our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on July 31, 2008. The Warrants are exercisable for a period of five years beginning on August 1, 2008. In addition, the exercise price of 50% of the warrants previously issued to the First Montauk and its designees at the closing of the July 2007 financing was reduced from $5.50 to $2.61 per share. This reduced warrant strike price lowered potential proceeds on the exercise of the warrants by $115,600 to $104,400.

The private placement is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act (in that we sold the Debentures and Warrants in a transaction not involving any public offering) and pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The shares into which the Debentures are convertible, the shares issuable upon exercise of the Warrants and the Incentive Shares have been registered for resale under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The registration was declared effective on October 16, 2008.

The Warrants and the Incentive Shares issued to the Debenture holders were valued at $790,830 and recorded as a discount on the debt. The Incentive Shares were valued using the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of issuance. The Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes valuation model using assumptions similar to those used to value the Company’s stock options and RSU’s. In addition a beneficial conversion feature associated with the Debentures was valued at $600,635 and was recorded as a discount on the debt. The total debt discount of $1,391,465 will be amortized using the effective interest method over the 36-month term of the Debentures.

On December 31, 2008 the Debentures were amended to allow debenture holders to convert 25% of their debentures into common stock, as a result, $732,250 of debentures were converted into 475,496 common shares. As an inducement to convert the debentures, we issued additional warrants (valued at $215,975 using the Black-Scholes method) and prepaid the interest of $453,995 on the unconverted portion of the Debentures through the maturity date of August 1, 2011, which resulted in the issuance of 589,614 shares of common stock. Interest payment of $58,580 for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 resulted in the issuance of 76,078 shares of common stock. As a result of the Debenture conversion, $304,382 of debt discount was written off to interest expense. During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, $277,589 of the debt discount was amortized through interest expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations and the remaining unamortized debt discount was $832,766 at March 31, 2009. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, $80,378 of the amortized debt discount was amortized through interest expense. We intend to file a registration statement to register those additional interest shares and warrants which were issued in December 2008.

We also incurred debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the debentures of $554,310 which will be amortized over the 36-month term using the effective interest method. The costs were for broker commissions, legal and accounting fees, filing fees and $194,057 representing the fair value of the 190,195 warrants shares issued to the First Montauk. We used the Black-Scholes model to determine fair value of the warrants. The warrants carry a five year term, expiring on August 1, 2013, and are immediately exercisable at a per share price of $1.68. As of March 31, 2009, $101,311 of the debt issuance costs were amortized through interest expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations and the remaining unamortized balance was $331,744.

LightPath Technologies, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2009

Total principal outstanding on the Debenture and the amount outstanding for directors and officers purchases under the Debenture agreement was $2,196,750 and $194,700, respectively at March 31, 2009, less unamortized debt discount of $832,766 and $73,809, respectively.

10. Secured Note Payable

On May 8, 2008, the Company entered into a receivables purchase and security agreement with LSQ pursuant to which the Company received a $600,000 line of credit secured by the Company’s accounts receivable and certain other assets. The agreement had an initial term of six-months, with an option to renew for additional six-month periods. Under the agreement the Company presented to LSQ accounts receivable invoices and received funding from LSQ of 85% of the invoice balance immediately. Interest was set at prime plus two percent. A 2.5% discount fee was charged upon the funding of each invoice. The Company terminated the LSQ line of credit and agreement on August 1, 2008 and the remaining balance was paid off. There was no termination fee as the minimum funding requirement under the agreement had been met.

11. Contingencies

On September 24, 2007, the Company received a letter from one of the investors that purchased $500,000 of common stock issued in the offering demanding rescission of their investment and reimbursement the investor for its expenses incurred in connection with transaction. The demand was based on the investor’s allegations that we failed to disclose facts material to the investor in making its investment decision. The alleged material omissions include facts relating to the prospective termination of the employment of Kenneth J. Brizel, our then Chief Executive Officer and our financial condition, and alleged breaches of certain representations and warranties set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement executed with respect to the transaction. We believed there was no merit to the investor’s claims and rejected the demand.

On October 24, 2007, we were served with a complaint filed by the investor against the Company, Mr. Brizel, and Mr. Ripp, our Chairman, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In the complaint, the investor sought, among other things, rescission of its purchase and the return of its $500,000 investment, as well as reimbursement of its expenses incurred in connection with its investment. On January 31, 2008, after we filed a motion to dismiss the original complaint, the investor filed an amended complaint making substantially the same allegations and seeking the same relief. On January 30, 2009 the district court dismissed the case.

On March 9, 2009 we were served with a complaint filed by the same investor who filed the Federal Action against the Company in the New York State Supreme Court of New York County. In the complaint, the investor is seeking $125,000 as well as reimbursement of its expenses incurred in connection with its investment. We believe there is no merit to the investor’s claims and intend to vigorously defend against this litigation.

12. Subsequent Event

In 2000, a group of holders of Class E Common Stock commenced an action in a state court in Texas (the “Texas Action”). Plaintiffs in the Texas Action made various allegations regarding the circumstances surrounding the issuance of the Class E Common Stock and sought damages based upon those allegations. On May 26, 2006, the Texas Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for rehearing of the denial of the petition for review. No further review was sought by the plaintiffs. The summary judgment in favor of the Company as to all claims asserted by the plaintiffs was now final and the case was closed.

In May 2008, we submitted a claim against our D&O carrier, Reliance, for reimbursement of legal fees. Reliance had previously filed for bankruptcy. In April 2009 we received notice of a proposed determination as to our claim arising from the Reliance D&O Policy. The full $1 million limit claimed will be allowed for LightPath as a Class B claimant. This will result in an initial payment to LightPath in the amount of $276,376, which we anticipate will be paid prior to the end of the current fiscal year. The balance would be reflected in a Notice of Determination issued to LightPath which would proceed under the court approval process for the Liquidation, with the distribution of the remaining claim balance up to the total of $1 million to occur following court approval, possibly in the third quarter of fiscal 2010, for the related claim which will be submitted by the end of 2009. The actual amount of the subsequent distribution to LightPath will be determined according to the court-approved percentage participation for Class B claimants.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the LightPath Technologies, Inc. (“LightPath”, the “Company” or “We”). All statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Quarterly Report”), other than statements of historical facts, which address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such things as future capital expenditures, growth, product development, sales, business strategy and other similar matters are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements set forth herein as a result of a number of factors, including, but not limited to, limited cash resources and the need for additional financing, our dependence on a few key customers, our ability to transition our business into new markets, our ability to increase sales and manage and control costs and other risks described in our reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In light of these risks and uncertainties, all of the forward-looking statements made herein are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any of the forward-looking statements contained herein.

Overview

Historical: We are in the business of supplying users with glass lenses and other specialty optical products, that have applications in a number of different industries. Due to the emergence of optical technologies in communications, networking and data storage products in the late 1990’s, there was a significant surge in demand for our products, particularly in the period represented by our fiscal 1999-2001 years. During this period, our annual revenues increased from less than $2 million in sales to approximately $25 million due to both acquisitions (to add glass lens production capacity and market presence, and isolators to our existing line of collimators and proprietary glass lenses) and organic product line growth.

During fiscal 2002, optical component markets experienced a severe downturn that resulted in a significant decline in the demand for our products. By fiscal 2003, our sales had contracted to just under $7 million. The business infrastructure was too large and diverse to support a business of this reduced size and a decision was made in late fiscal 2002 and implemented during fiscal 2003 to close our isolator production facility in California and our headquarters and collimator and lens production facility in New Mexico. Our manufacturing and production equipment from these locations was consolidated in our headquarters and manufacturing facility in Orlando, Florida and until November 2005 all of the aforementioned products were manufactured there. The consolidation was completed by June 30, 2003, resulting in a significant reduction in net cash use by the business.

In November 2005, we formed LightPath Optical Instrumentation (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, (“LPOI”) a wholly owned manufacturing subsidiary, located in Jiading, People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). The manufacturing operations are housed in a 17,000 square foot facility located in the Jiading Industrial Zone near Shanghai. This plant has increased overall production capacity and enabled us to compete for larger production volumes of optical components and assemblies, and strengthened our partnerships within the Asia/Pacific region. Over 95% of the Company’s precision molded lenses produced in the nine months ended March 31, 2009 were manufactured in LPOI’s Shanghai facility. We have increased the capacity of the Shanghai facility by increasing capital equipment. Due to improved operating efficiencies and lower revenues we reduced our Shanghai workforce by approximately 20 employees in December 2008.

We execute all foreign sales from our Orlando facility and intercompany transactions in U.S. dollars, mitigating the impact of foreign currency fluctuations. Assets and liabilities denominated in non-U.S. currencies, primarily Chinese RMB, are translated at rates of exchange prevailing on the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange for the nine-month periods. During the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 we incurred a $3,443 gain and a $51,181 gain on foreign currency translation, respectively.

How we operate: We have continuing sales of two basic types: occasional sales via ad-hoc purchase orders of mostly standard product configurations (our “turns” business); and the more challenging and potentially more rewarding business of custom product development. In this latter type of business, we work with customers in the industrial, medical, defense and communications markets to help them determine optical specifications and even create certain optical designs for them,

including complex multi-component designs that we call “engineered assemblies.” That is followed by “sampling” small numbers of the product for their test and evaluation. Thereafter, should the customer conclude that our specification or design is the best solution to their product need, we negotiate and “win” a contract (sometimes called a “design win”) – whether of a “blanket purchase order” type or a supply agreement. The strategy is to create an annuity revenue stream that makes the best use of our production capacity as compared to the turns business, which is unpredictable and uneven. A key business objective is to convert as much of our business to the design win and annuity model as possible. We have several challenges in doing so:


	•	Maintaining an optical design and new product sampling capability, including a high-quality and responsive optical design engineering staff.

	•	Customers that incorporate products such as ours into higher volume commercial applications, continously work to reduce their expenses, which often leads them to larger or overseas lower-cost suppliers even at the cost of lower quality.

	•	Because of our limited cash resources and cash flow, we may not be able to support the supply requirements needed to service the demands in the market for high volume, low cost lenses.

Despite these challenges to obtaining more design win business, we nevertheless have been, and believe we can continue to be, successful in procuring this business because of our unique capabilities in optical design engineering. Additionally, we believe that we offer value to some customers as a secondary or backup source of supply in the United States should they be unwilling to commit all of their source of supply of a critical component to a foreign merchant production source. We also continue to have the proprietary GRADIUM lens glass technology to offer to certain laser markets.

Our key indicators:

Sales Backlog – We believe that sales growth is our best indicator of success. Our best view into the efficacy of our sales efforts is in our “order book.” Our order book equates to sales “backlog.” It has a quantitative and a qualitative aspect: quantitatively, our backlog’s prospective dollar value and qualitatively, what percent of the backlog is scheduled by the customer for date-certain delivery. We define our “disclosure backlog” as customer orders for delivery within one year which is reasonably likely to be fulfilled, including customer purchase orders and products to be provided under supply contracts if they meet the aforementioned criteria. At June 30, 2008 our disclosure backlog was approximately $3.0 million.

At March 31, 2009, our disclosure backlog has grown to $3.4 million from $3.0 million at June 30, 2008 during these slow economic times. We believe this growth to be partially the result of our efforts to enter high volume lower cost commercial markets, like the industrial laser tool market and other imaging related product markets. We have seen increased quote activity for our Black Diamond product line. With the continuing diversification of our backlog and the smaller percentage of telecom business in our backlog we expect to show modest increases in revenue starting with the fiscal fourth quarter 2009 and into the fiscal first quarter of 2010. Bookings have increased for our industrial low cost lenses in Asia. We have seen an increase in bookings due beyond one year. Our total sales backlog at March 31, 2009 was $5.3 million with orders scheduled through 2011. This is a result of booking orders in Shanghai with two to three year delivery schedules. We anticipate beginning production over the next 3 to 6 months on these large Shanghai orders subject to customer qualifications of our samples lenses.

Inventory Levels – We manage our inventory levels to minimize investment in working capital but still have the flexibility to meet customer demand to a reasonable degree. While the mix of inventory is an important factor, including adequate safety stocks of long lead-time materials, an important aggregate measure of inventory in all phases of production is the quarter’s ending inventory expressed as a number of days worth of the quarter’s cost of sales, also known as “days cost of sales in inventory,” or “DCSI.” It is calculated by dividing the quarter’s ending inventory by the quarter’s cost of goods sold, multiplied by 365 and divided by 4. Generally, a lower DCSI measure equates to a lesser investment in inventory and therefore more efficient use of capital. During the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, our DCSI was 89 and 81, respectively compared to 66 for the year ended June 30, 2008. The increase in DCSI was principally caused by lower sales to customers.

Accounts Receivable Levels and Quality – Similarly, we manage our accounts receivable to minimize investment in working capital. We measure the quality of receivables by the proportions of the total that are at various increments past due

from our normally extended terms, which are generally 30 days. The most important aggregate measure of accounts receivable is the quarter’s ending balance of net accounts receivable expressed as a number of day’s worth of the quarter’s net revenues, also known as “days sales outstanding,” or “DSO.” It is calculated by dividing the quarters ending net accounts receivable by the quarter’s net revenues, multiplied by 365 and divided by 4. Generally, a lower DSO measure equates to a lesser investment in accounts receivable, and therefore, more efficient use of capital. During the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, our DSO was 58 and 59, respectively. During the year ended June 30, 2008 our DSO was 51.

Other Key Indicators – Other key indicators include various operating metrics, some of which are qualitative and others are quantitative. These indicators change from time to time as the opportunities and challenges in the business change. They are mostly non-financial indicators such as on time delivery trends, units of shippable output by major product line, production yield rates by major product line and the output and yield data from significant intermediary manufacturing processes that support the production of the finished shippable product. These indicators can be used to calculate such other related indicators as fully-yielded unit production per-shift, which varies by the particular product and our state of automation in production of that product at any given time. Higher unit production per shift means lower unit cost and therefore improved margins or improved ability to compete where desirable for price sensitive customer applications. The data from these reports is used to determine tactical operating actions and changes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Going Concern and Management’s Plans

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern. Because of the current operating loss of $2.3 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 as well as recurring operating losses during fiscal years 2008 and 2007 of $5.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively, and cash used in operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 of $2.2 million as well as cash used in operations during fiscal years 2008 and 2007 of $3.6 million and $1.9 million, respectively, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent on attaining profitable operations through achieving revenue growth targets.

We have instituted a cost reduction program and have reduced headcount in Orlando and Shanghai and reduced costs for medical insurance for our Orlando employees. In March 2009 the Orlando staff was reduced to a four day work week. This is expected to save $663,000 per year of wages and benefits. In addition, we have redesigned certain product lines, increased sales prices on certain items, obtained more favorable material costs, and have instituted more efficient management techniques. We believe these factors will contribute towards achieving profitability assuming we meet our sales targets. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2009 we faced financial challenges along with many in the industries we do business with, as the worldwide economic instability continued to create turbulence in the market. We engage in continuing efforts to keep costs under control as we seek renewed sales growth. Our efforts are directed toward reaching positive cash flow and profitability. If these efforts are not successful, we will need to raise additional capital. Should capital not be available to us at reasonable terms, other actions may become necessary in addition to cost control measures and continued efforts to increase sales. These actions may include exploring strategic options for the sale of the Company, the sale of certain product lines, the creation of joint ventures or strategic alliances under which we will pursue business opportunities, the creation of licensing arrangements with respect to our technology, or other alternatives. On May 11, 2009, the Company had a book cash balance of approximately $621,000, which included $277,000 received from the Chinese government to pay for move related expenses of the Shanghai plant.

In the second quarter of fiscal 2005, we entered into a $75,000 capital equipment lease for equipment to support our molded optics production. On January 11, 2006 we procured a secured line of credit loan in the maximum available principal amount of $500,000. We drew the maximum available principal amount of $500,000 under the loan during the first twelve

months following the execution of the loan agreement. Effective February 1, 2007, the loan was converted into a term loan which shall be amortized over the 36-month period beginning February 1, 2007. The $500,000 principal amount outstanding as of February 1, 2007, is payable in equal monthly installments along with accrued interest thereon. The loan balance was approximately $153,000 at March 31, 2009.

If additional capital expenditures are required, we may seek similar capital equipment lease or other debt financing, however, it is uncertain whether we would be successful in obtaining any such financing on terms acceptable to us.

In July 2007 we raised gross proceeds of approximately $3,200,000 by way of the sale of newly issued common stock and warrants to certain institutional and private investors, resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $2,978,544 through the issuance of 800,000 shares of common stock at $4.00 per share. Professional fees of $230,456 were paid to First Montauk for its role as exclusive placement agent and financial advisor and for attorney and escrow agent fees. The investors along with First Montauk and its principals, the placement agent, also received warrants which vested 100% on January 26, 2008 and can be exercised through January 26, 2013 for the future purchase of 320,000 shares of our common stock, 238,750 warrants are at $5.50 per share and 81,250 warrants are at $2.61 per share. If all of the warrants are ultimately exercised an additional $1,525,000 will be raised. Effective August 1, 2008, in conjunction with the convertible debenture agreement (see below), the exercise price of half of the warrants issued to First Montauk and all of the warrants issued to the four investors that also participated in the August transaction, were reduced from $5.50 per share to $2.61 per share, this decreased the potential proceeds to be received upon exercise of such warrants by $234,813.

The maturity date of the Debentures is August 1, 2011, on which date the outstanding principal amount of the Debentures will be due. Interest on the Debentures was prepaid by issuing 589,614 shares of in common stock in December 2008. Interest of $39,053 was due on October 1, 2008 and was prepaid by the Company on August 1, 2008 by issuing 27,893 shares of common stock in payment of such interest based upon the closing price of $1.40 per share. The Debentures are secured by substantially all of our previously unencumbered assets pursuant to a Security Agreement and are guaranteed by our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Geltech Inc. and LPOI pursuant to a Subsidiary Guarantee.

Upon issuance the Debentures were immediately convertible into 1,901,948 shares of common stock, based on a conversion price of $1.54 per share, which is 110% of the closing bid price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on July 31, 2008. Investors also received warrants to purchase up to 950,974 shares of our common stock (the “Warrants”). The Warrants are exercisable for a period of five years beginning on August 1, 2008 with 65% of the Warrants, exercisable for 618,133 shares, priced at $1.68 per share and the remaining 35% of the Warrants priced at $1.89 per share. If all of the Warrants were exercised, we would receive additional proceeds in the amount of $1,645,184.

We paid a commission to the exclusive placement agent for the offering, First Montauk Securities Corp. (“First Montauk”), in an amount equal to $216,570 plus costs and expenses. We also issued to First Montauk and its designees warrants to purchase an aggregate of 190,195 shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to $1.68 per share, which is 120% of the closing bid price of the our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on July 31, 2008. The Warrants are exercisable for a period of five years beginning on August 1, 2008. In addition, the exercise price of 50% of the warrants previously issued to the First Montauk and its designees at the closing of the July 2007 financing was reduced from $5.50 to $2.61 per share. The reduced warrant strike price resulted in lower potential proceeds on the exercise of the warrants by $115,600 to $104,400.

On December 31, 2008 the Debentures were amended to allow debenture holders to convert 25% of their debentures into common stock, as a result, $732,250 of debentures were converted into 475,496 common shares. As an inducement to convert the debentures, we issued additional warrants (valued at $215,975 using the Black-Scholes method) and prepaid the interest of $453,995 on the unconverted portion of the Debentures through the maturity date of August 1, 2011, which resulted in the issuance of 589,614 shares of common stock. Interest payment of $58,580 for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 resulted in the issuance of 76,078 shares of common stock. As a result of the Debenture conversion, $304,382 of debt discount was written off to interest expense. During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, $558,699 of the debt discount was amortized through interest expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations and the remaining unamortized debt discount was $832,766 at March 31, 2009. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, $80,378 of the unamortized debt discount was amortized through interest expense and $43,935 of prepaid interest was amortized. We plan on filing a registration statement to register the prepaid interest shares and warrants issued in December 2008.

We also incurred debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the debentures of $554,310 which will be amortized over the 36-month term using the effective interest method. The costs were for broker commissions, legal and accounting fees, filing fees and $194,057 representing the fair value of the warrants issued to the First Montauk. We used the Black-Scholes model to determine fair value of the warrants. During the nine months ended March 31, 2009, $222,566 of the debt issuance costs were amortized through interest expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations and the remaining unamortized balance was $331,744. For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, $32,019 of the unamortized debt issuance cost was amortized through interest expense.

Further improvement in cash flow, initially meaning a reduction in cash use, is expected to be primarily a function of sales increases and, to some extent, margin improvements. Sales increases are expected to be the most important source of future reductions in operating cash outflow. Focused efforts are underway to penetrate non-laser markets. In support of these efforts, the Company is engaged in new product development and customer prospecting for these markets. Although we believe that cash flows from operations will improve in the future based upon anticipated increases in sales and further cost reductions, it is anticipated that cash flows from operations will continue to be negative through the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. The recent recession or slowdown in economic conditions has had an impact on our ability to book and ship revenues. During the second fiscal quarter we had $400,000 of orders cancelled and $100,000 of orders due to ship in the quarter which were pushed out for later deliveries. We have seen a slowdown in booking new orders in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. Our quote activity is still strong but we are seeing a higher incidence of re-quotes.

During the nine months ending March 31, 2009, we used approximately $2,179,000 of cash for operating activities. At March 31, 2009, we had a cash and cash equivalent balance of approximately $380,000.

For the nine months ended March 31, 2009, cash decreased from June 30, 2008 by approximately $2,651,000, excluding the proceeds we received from the issuance of the Debentures in August 2008, compared to a decrease of approximately $3,850,000, excluding the private placement proceeds we received in July 2007 in the same period of the prior fiscal year. The use of cash in both periods was primarily for the operating expenses, capital expenditures and financing expenses of the periods. Additionally, the use of cash for the nine month period ending March 31, 2009 included payments to vendors of which $1,149,000 were for invoices over 60 days beyond vendor terms.

Factors which could adversely affect cash balances in future quarters include, but are not limited to, a decline in revenue, poor cash collections from our accounts receivables, increased material costs, increased labor costs, planned production efficiency improvements not being realized, the current recession and economic times and increases in other discretionary spending, particularly sales and marketing costs.

NASDAQ Listing Notification

On October 3, 2008, we received a notification from The NASDAQ Listing Qualifications of The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC that we did not comply with Marketplace Rule 4310(c)(3), which requires us to have a minimum of $2,500,000 in stockholders’ equity or $35,000,000 market value of listed securities or $500,000 of net income from continuing operations for the most recently completed fiscal year or two of the three most recently completed fiscal years.

In the notification letter from the NASDAQ Staff, the following was noted: (i) based on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, our stockholders’ equity was $2,159,761; (ii) as of October 2, 2008, the market value of our listed securities was $7,357,696; and (iii) we have reported net losses from continuing operations of $(5,467,769), $(2,614,629) and $(3,368,881), in our annual filings for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

On November 14, 2008 we received a notification letter from the NASDAQ staff stating that, based on our Form 10-Q dated November 12, 2008, which demonstrated stockholders’ equity of $2,802,008 as of September 30, 2008, the NASDAQ Staff had determined that we complied with the applicable Rules and this matter was closed.

Our stockholders’ equity was $1,913,348 as of March 31, 2009. We expect to receive a similar letter from NASDAQ as we received on October 3, 2008 subsequent to the filing of this Form 10-Q.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Currently, our sources of cash consist of our limited cash reserves and the cash generated from the collection of receivables after invoicing customers for product shipments. We do not currently have any availability for borrowing under our equipment lease or other loan facilities and we do not currently have any commitment from any party to provide any other financing to the Company.

Our uses of cash primarily consist of payments to vendors for materials and services purchased, payments to employees for wages and compensation, payments to providers of employee benefits, rent, utilities and payments on our debt obligations. Periodically, however, we do make expenditures for capital goods. Since 2001 we have experienced negative cash flow or net use of cash from operations. This net use of cash has recently been met by drawing down on our cash and cash equivalent balances and raising additional funds through the sale of stock or debt convertible into stock, such as our private placement offerings in 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004.

In the future, we may be required to replenish cash and cash equivalent balances through the sale of equity securities or by debt financing. The Company’s convertible debenture agreement entered into in August 2008 contains certain limitations on the Company’s ability to issue additional equity securities without the approval of the current debenture holders, or offering such holders to participate in the equity offerings. Ultimately, this may affect the Company’s ability to obtain additional equity financing. There can be no assurances that such financing will be available to us, or, if available, that the terms of such financing will be acceptable to us. As a result, there is significant risk to us in terms of having limited cash resources with which to continue our operations as currently conducted or to pursue new business opportunities. Unless we are able to expand our cash resources over the next quarter, we will be unable to sustain our business transition and growth plan and may be unable to maintain our current level of business. Either of these outcomes would materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial performance and stock price.

Management believes the Company currently has sufficient cash to fund its operations through October 31, 2009 assuming our revenue stays at current levels and no additional sources of capital are used. The extent to which the Company can sustain its operations beyond this date will depend on the Company’s ability to generate cash from operations on increased revenues from low cost and infrared lenses or sale of non-strategic assets or from future equity or debt financing. This quarter we expect to receive approximately $276,000 for a D&O insurance settlement from a claim filed in 2007, see footnote 12 These funds should provide additional flexibility in sustaining operations. Recent booking trends have been slower than planned given the current economic condition. However, management believes that taking the current booking rate combined with the existing order backlog the Company will be able to generate increased revenues. If we determine that future revenues are below current projections then we will attempt to implement additional cost savings measures and seek to negotiate extended payment plans with vendors. We are continuously evaluating our supplier situation to ensure we meet our booked orders. This also includes seeking new suppliers and looking for price reductions

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not engage in any activities involving variable interest entities or off-balance sheet arrangements.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Third Quarter: Three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008

Revenues:

For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we reported total revenues of $1.66 million compared to $2.11 million for the third quarter of last fiscal year, a decrease of 22%. The decrease from the third quarter of last year was primarily attributable to lower sales volumes of molded optics products and isolators. We expect future revenue to increase as we ship more low cost lenses and infrared lenses.

Cost of Sales:

Our gross margin percentage in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to third quarter fiscal 2008 increased to 25% from 20%. Total manufacturing cost of $1.24 million was $0.5 million lower in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Direct costs, which include material, labor and services were reduced 3% to 21% of revenue in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, as compared to 24% in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. We have improved our gross margins as a result of the cost reduction programs we have implemented. During the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, over 95% of our precision molded optics were produced at our Shanghai facility as compared to 83% in the same period in the prior fiscal year. Material costs are improving with the conversion to lower cost glass preforms and improved production yields in both Shanghai and Orlando.

The most significant factor creating downward pressure on our gross margins is the level of revenue from the sales of molded optics, collimator and isolator products. Lower revenues generated from sales of these products may affect our ability to cover certain fixed costs related to such products. Our plants were at 35% of capacity for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as compared to 40% for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. As our revenues increase we expect improvements in gross margins as our overhead costs are amortized over a higher base.

Selling, General and Administrative:

During the third quarter of fiscal 2009, selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) costs were approximately $817,000, which was a decrease of approximately $455,000 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2008. This decrease was primarily due to reduced salaries and benefits of $282,000, a $79,000 decrease in rental costs, a decrease of $167,000 for legal fees relating to the securities litigation in fiscal 2008 offset by a $41,000 increase in accounting fees and an increase of $32,000 in bank fees and penalties. We intend to maintain SG&A costs generally at current levels, but we are considering adding to our sales force in China while continuing to seek additional cost reductions opportunities. In December 2007, we renegotiated the lease for our Orlando, Florida headquarters and manufacturing facility to reduce the space leased from approximately 40,000 square feet to approximately 21,000 square feet resulting in the rental cost (SG&A) savings of approximately $79,000 noted above.

New Product Development:

New product development costs decreased by approximately $124,000 to approximately $184,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 versus $308,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2008 due to decreased salaries and material costs. We anticipate a minor decrease in fiscal year 2009 in product development costs due to lower spending for materials.

Amortization of Intangibles:

Amortization expense from intangibles remained the same at approximately $8,000 per quarter in both the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

Other Income (Expense):

Interest expense was approximately $161,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 versus interest expense of $19,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2008. Approximately $7,000 of the interest for the third quarter of fiscal 2009 is attributable to our equipment term loan and our capital equipment lease. The Debentures issued in August 1, 2008 accounted for approximately $156,000 of interest during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 representing interest at 8%, amortization and write-off of the related debt issuance costs and debt discount, and value of common shares and warrants issued as incentive to participate in the debenture placement and to induce the conversion of the debt to equity. Future interest expense on the Debentures is expected to be approximately $44,000 per quarter. In future quarters combined amortization of both the debt issuance costs and debt discount is expected to average approximately $124,000 per quarter. Other income was approximately $2,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 and $12,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2008.

Net Loss:

As a result of the foregoing, net loss was approximately $756,000 or $0.11 basic and diluted per share during the third quarter of fiscal 2009, compared with the third quarter of fiscal 2008, in which we reported a net loss of $1,190,000 or $0.22 basic and diluted per share. This represents an $434,000 decrease in net loss. Weighted-average shares outstanding increased in the third quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the third quarter in fiscal 2008 primarily due to the issuance of shares related to the conversion of 25% of the debentures and prepayment of interest in common shares in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

Fiscal Nine Months: Nine months ended March 31, 2009 compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2008

Revenues:

For the nine months ended March 31, 2009, we reported total revenues of $5.90 million compared to $6.44 million for the nine months of the prior fiscal year, a decrease of 8%. The decrease from the prior fiscal year was primarily attributable to lower sales volumes of molded optics, collimators and gradium. We expect future revenue to increase as we ship more low cost lenses and infrared lenses.

Cost of Sales:

Our gross margin percentage in the nine months of fiscal 2009 compared to the nine months of fiscal 2008 increased to 26% from 10%. Total manufacturing cost of $4.39 million was $1.39 million lower in the nine months of fiscal 2009 compared to the same period of the prior fiscal year. Direct costs, which include material, labor and services, were stable at 23% of revenue in the nine months of fiscal 2009, as compared to 23% in the nine months of fiscal 2008. We have improved our gross margins by 16 points from 10% for the nine months of fiscal 2008 to 26% in the nine months of fiscal 2009 as a result of the cost reduction programs we have implemented. During the nine months of fiscal year 2009, over 95% of our precision molded optics were produced at our Shanghai facility, as compared to 83% the nine months of fiscal year 2008. Material costs are improving with the use of in-house built holders, which are used to hold molded glass lenses for some applications, the conversion to lower cost glass preforms and improved production yields in both Shanghai and Orlando.

The most significant factor creating downward pressure on our gross margins is the level of revenue from the sales of molded optics, collimator and isolator products. Although we have reduced our overhead costs from $2.9 million to $2.3 million for the nine months of 2009 compared to 2008, overhead is still 74% of our total costs. Lower revenues generated from sales of these products may affect our ability to cover certain overhead costs related to such products.

Our plants were at a combined 35% of capacity for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to 40% for the nine months ended March 31, 2008. We have the equipment to manufacture 3.1 million units per year of precision molded optics but we only manufactured 342,000 units for the nine months of fiscal 2009. As our revenues increase we expect improvements in gross margins as our overhead costs are amortized over a higher base.

Selling, General and Administrative:

During the nine months of fiscal 2009, selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) costs were approximately $3.16 million, which was a decrease of approximately $908,000 compared to the nine months of fiscal 2008, primarily due to reduced salaries and benefits of $621,000, of which $346,000 was due to severance for our CEO in 2008 and reduced rent, legal and recruiting fees of $487,000, offset by increased costs relating to investor relations and our annual shareholder meeting, penalties and depreciation of $200,000. We intend to maintain SG&A costs at current levels, but we are considering adding to our sales force in China while continuing to seek additional cost reductions opportunities. In December 2007, we renegotiated the lease for our Orlando, Florida headquarters and manufacturing facility to reduce the space leased from approximately 40,000 square feet to approximately 21,000 square feet resulting in a rental cost (SG&A) reduction of approximately $274,000 during the nine months of fiscal 2009 compared to the same period in fiscal 2008.

New Product Development:

New product development costs decreased by approximately $237,000 to approximately $687,000 in the nine months of fiscal 2009 versus $924,000 in the nine months of fiscal 2008 due to decreased material costs and salaries. We anticipate a minor decrease in fiscal year 2009 in product development costs due to lower spending for materials.

Amortization of Intangibles:

Amortization expense from intangibles remained the same at approximately $16,000 per period in both of the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.

Other Income (Expense):

Interest expense was approximately $1.17 million in the nine months of fiscal 2009 versus interest expense of $48,000 in the nine months of fiscal 2008. Approximately $32,000 and $30,000 of interest for fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, is attributable to our equipment term loan, our capital equipment lease and our factoring secured note payable. The Debentures issued in August 1, 2008 accounted for $1.14 million of interest in the nine months ended March 31, 2009 representing interest at 8%, amortization on and write-off of the related debt issuance costs and debt discount, the value of common shares and warrants issued as incentive to participate in the debenture placement and to induce the conversion of the debentures and includes interest on the debentures of $97,633. The factoring interest expense was $16,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 and is included in the $32,000 above. There was no factoring interest in the first nine months of fiscal 2008 as the factoring agreement did not start until April 2008. The factoring agreement was terminated on August 1, 2008. Future interest expense on the remaining Debentures is expected to be approximately $44,000 per quarter. In future quarters combined amortization of both the debt issuance costs and debt discount is expected to average approximately $124,000 per quarter. Other income was approximately $16,000 in the nine months of fiscal 2009 and $74,000 in the nine months of fiscal 2008.

Net Loss:

As a result of the foregoing, net loss was approximately $3.5 million or $0.58 basic and diluted per share during nine months of fiscal 2009, compared with the nine months of fiscal 2008, in which we reported a net loss of $4.3 million or $0.81 basic and diluted per share. This represents an approximate $800,000 decrease in net loss. The net loss for the nine months includes the $1.14 million of interest expense related to the debentures as discussed above. Weighted-average shares outstanding increased in the nine months of fiscal 2009 compared to the nine months of fiscal 2008 primarily due to the issuance of shares related to the conversion of 25% of the debentures and prepayment of interest in common shares, representing the write off of debt discount and debt cost associated with in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon LightPath’s condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, inlcuding those related to revenue recognition, inventory reserves, allowance for trade receivables which is made up of reserves for bad debt, valuation of derivative financial instruments, and valuation of compensation expense on stock-based awards. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the

circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates given a change in conditions or assumptions that have been consistently applied.

Management has discussed the selection of critical accounting policies and estimates with our Board of Directors, and the Board of Directors has reviewed our disclosure relating to critical accounting policies and estimates in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008. The critical accounting policies used by management and the methodology for its estimates and assumptions are as follows:

Revenue recognition. Revenue is recognized from product sales when products are shipped to the customer, provided that the Company has received a valid purchase order, the price is fixed, title has transferred, collection of the associated receivable is reasonably assured, and there are no remaining significant obligations. Revenues from product development agreements are recognized as milestones are completed in accordance with the terms of the agreements and upon shipment of products, reports or designs to the customer.

Inventory valuation. Inventories, which consist principally of raw materials, work-in-process and finished lenses, isolators, collimators and assemblies are stated at the lower of cost or market, on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventory costs include materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. We have applied Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 151 – Inventory Costs (FAS 151) to our value of inventory. Fixed costs related to excess manufacturing capacity have been expensed in the period not capatilizied into inventory. Also unusual or abnormal costs, primarily relating to the start up of the China facility have been expensed. The inventory obsolensce reserve is calculated by reserving for items that have not been sold in two years or that have not been purchased in two years or of which we have more than a two year supply. We also reserve 50% for slow moving items within the last 12 months and 25% for low material usage in the last six months.

Allowance for Bad Debt. Allowance for bed debt is calculated by taking 100% of the total of invoices that are over 90 past due from due date and 10% of the total of invoices that are over 60 past due from due date.

Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company accounts for derivative instruments in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS No. 133”), and its related interpretations, and complies with SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 133”). SFAS No. 133 and SFAS No. 138 establish accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities.

Stock-based compensation. Stock based compensation is expensed according to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”). Stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period. The Company elected to use the modified prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and restricted shares beginning in the first quarter of adoption. For all unvested options outstanding as of July 1, 2005, and subsequently granted options, the previously measured but unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value at the original grant date, will be recognized on a straight-line basis in the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the remaining vesting period. We estimate the fair value of each stock option as of the date of

grant. We use the Black-Scholes pricing model. Most options granted under our Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan vest ratably over two to four years and generally have ten-year contract lives. The volatility rate is based on four-year historical trends in common stock closing prices and the expected term was calculated using the simplified method. The interest rate used is the U.S. Treasury interest rate for constant maturities. The likelihood of meeting targets for option grants that are performance based are evaluated each quarter. If it is determined that meeting the targets is likely then the compensation expense will be amortized over the remaining vesting period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. Management does not believe the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, results of operations and cash flows.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP 142-3”). This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). This FSP also adds certain disclosures to those already prescribed in SFAS No. 142. FSP 142-3 becomes effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning in the Company’s fiscal 2010.

The guidance for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of the effective date.

Item 4T. Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2009, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2009 in reporting on a timely basis information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act because of material weaknesses relating to internal controls as described in Item 9A (T) of the Company’s Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2008.

During the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Management has concluded that the material weaknesses in internal control relating to inventory costing and obsolescence as described in Item 9A(T) of the Company’s Form 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2008, have not been fully remediated. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, management made progress in preparing a remediation plan for certain aspects of the weaknesses reported, specifically concerning the inventory costing area. We are committed to finalizing our remediation action plan and implementing the necessary enhancements to our policies and procedures to fully remediate the material weaknesses discussed above. Some progress had been made on inventory controls, specifically the review and update of our standard costs. However, other aspects of the material weaknesses reported, especially with respect to internal control over inventory costing and reserve for obsolescence, are still in the remediation process and continue to constitute material weaknesses.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In July 2007 the Company raised gross proceeds of approximately $3,200,000 by way of the sale of newly issued common stock and warrants to certain institutional and private investors. Professional fees of $229,500 were paid to First Montauk for its role as exclusive placement agent and financial advisor, an attorney and escrow agent fees, netting the proceeds to the Company of $2,979,500. 800,000 shares of common stock were sold at $4.00 per share. The investors along with First Montauk and its principals, the placement agent, also received warrants which vest 100% on January 26, 2008 and can be exercised through January 26, 2013 for the future purchase of 320,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. 238,750 warrants are at $5.50 per share and 81,250 warrants are at $2.61 per share. If all of the warrants are ultimately exercised an additional $1,525,000 will be raised. Effective August 1, 2008, in conjunction with the convertible debenture agreement, the exercise price of half of the warrants issued to First Montauk and all of the warrants issued to the four investors that also participated in the August transaction, were reduced from $5.50 per share to $2.61 per share, this decreased the potential proceeds to be received upon exercise of such warrants by $234,813.

On September 24, 2007, the Company received a letter from one of the investors that purchased $500,000 of common stock issued in the offering demanding rescission of their investment and reimbursement to the investor for its expenses incurred in connection with transaction. The demand was based on the investor’s allegations that we failed to disclose facts material to the investor in making its investment decision. The alleged material omissions include facts that relate to the prospective termination of the employment of Kenneth J. Brizel, our then Chief Executive Officer and our financial condition, and alleged breaches of certain representations and warranties set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement executed with respect to the transaction. We believed there was no merit to the investor’s claims and rejected the demand.

The Company from time to time is involved in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. Management, after reviewing with legal counsel all of these actions and proceedings, believes that the aggregate losses, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed herewith as a part of this report.


Exhibit Number	Description	Notes


3.1.1	Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed June 15, 1992 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	1

3.1.2	Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed October 2, 1995 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	1


Exhibit Number	Description	Notes


3.1.3	Certificate of Designations of Class A common stock and Class E-1 common stock, Class E-2 common stock, and Class E-3 common stock of Registrant, filed November 9, 1995 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	1

3.1.4	Certificate of Designation of Series A Preferred Stock of Registrant, filed July 9, 1997 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	2

3.1.5	Certificate of Designation of Series B Stock of Registrant, filed October 2, 1997 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	3

3.1.6	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed November 12, 1997 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	3

3.1.7	Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of Registrant, filed February 6, 1998 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	4

3.1.8	Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series D Participating Preferred Stock of Registrant filed April 29, 1998 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	5

3.1.9	Certificate of Designation of Series F Preferred Stock of Registrant, filed November 2, 1999 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	6

3.1.10	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of Registrant, filed February 28, 2003 with the Secretary of State of Delaware	7

3.2	Bylaws of Registrant	1

4.1	Rights Agreement dated May 1, 1998, between Registrant and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, First	5

4.2	Amendment to Rights Agreement dated as of February 28, 2008, between LightPath Technologies, Inc. and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company	18

10.1	Directors Compensation Agreement with Amendment for Robert Ripp	8

10.2	Amended and Restated Omnibus Incentive Plan	9

10.3	Merger Agreement dated April 14, 2000 between Registrant and Horizon Photonics, Inc.	10

10.4	Merger Agreement dated August 9, 2000 between Registrant and Geltech, Inc.	11

10.5	Loan Agreement dated January 11, 2006 between Registrant and Regenmacher Holdings, Ltd.	12

10.6	Assured Supply Agreement dated October 24, 2005 between Registrant and Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp.	12

10.7	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 19, 2006, among LightPath Technologies, Inc., and the investors signatory thereto	13

10.8	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 19, 2006, among LightPath Technologies, Inc., and the investors signatory thereto	13

10.9	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of March 19, 2006, issued by LightPath Technologies, Inc., to certain investors	13

10.10	Change of Control Agreement dated February 14, 2007, between LightPath Technologies, Inc., and Kenneth Brizel, its CEO & President	14

10.11	Employee Agreement dated February 14, 2007, between LightPath Technologies, Inc., and Kenneth Brizel its CEO & President	14

10.12	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of July 26, 2007, among LightPath Technologies, Inc., and the investors signatory thereto	15


Exhibit Number	Description	Notes


10.13	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 26, 2007, among LightPath Technologies, Inc., and the investors signatory thereto	15

10.14	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of July 26, 2007, issued by LightPath Technologies, Inc., to certain investors	15

10.15	Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement dated as of September 18, 2007, between LightPath Technologies, Inc., and Kenneth Brizel	16

10.16	Joint Venture Contract dated January 7, 2008, between CDGM Glass Company, Ltd. and LightPath Technologies, Inc.	17

10.17	Form of Technology License Agreement between LightPath Technologies, Inc. and LightPath CDGM Glass Company, Ltd.	17

10.18	Form of Supply Agreement between CDGM Glass Company, Ltd. and LightPath CDGM Glass Company, Ltd.	17

10.19	Receivables Purchase and Security Agreement dated May 8, 2008 between LSQ Funding Group, LC. and LightPath Technologies, Inc.	19

10.20	Employee Letter Agreement dated June 12, 2008, between LightPath Technologies, Inc., and J. James Gaynor, its CEO & President	20

10.21	Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant dated as of August 1, 2008, issued by LightPath Technologies, Inc., to certain investors	21

10.22	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of August 1, 2008, by and among LightPath Technologies, Inc., and certain investors	21

10.23	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 1, 2008, by and among LightPath Technologies, Inc., and certain investors	21

10.24	Security Agreement dated as of August 1, 2008, by and among LightPath Technologies, Inc.	21

10.25	Form of Subsidiary Guarantee dated as of August 1, 2008, by Geltech Inc., and LightPath Optical Instrumentation (Shanghai), Ltd., in favor of certain investors	21

10.26	Form of 8% Senior Secured Convertible Debenture dated as of August 1, 2008, issued by LightPath Technologies, Inc. to certain investors	21

10.27	Termination of Joint Venture Contract, dated as of September 28, 2008 between CDGM Glass Company, Ltd. and LightPath Technologies, Inc.	22

10.28	First Amendment to the 8% Senior Secured, dated as of December 31, 2008	23

10.29	Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated LightPath Technologies, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan, dated as of December 30, 2008	24

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	*

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	*


Exhibit Number	Description	Notes


32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code	*

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code	*

Notes:

1. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No: 33-80119) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 7, 1995 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

2. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-KSB40 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 11, 1997 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

3. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 1997 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

4. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-47905) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 1998 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

5. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 28, 1998 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

6. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No: 333-94303) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 10, 2000 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

7. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 24, 2003 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

8. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2000 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

9. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Proxy Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2002 and is incorporated herein by reference.

10. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No: 333-37622) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 23, 2000 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

11. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 3, 2000 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

12. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2006 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

13. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 22, 2006, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

14. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2007, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto

15. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2007, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

16. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2007, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

17. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 17, 2008, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

18. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2008 and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

19. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2008, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

20. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2008, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

21. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2008, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

22. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 2008, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

23. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 6, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

24. This exhibit was filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2009, and is incorporated herein by reference thereto.

* Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


			LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Date: May 15, 2009			By: /s/ J. James Gaynor

			President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 15 2009			By: /s/ Dorothy M. Cipolla

			Chief Financial Officer