Annual Statements Open main menu

Lightstone Value Plus REIT I, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)

Unassociated Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

OR

¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to

Commission file number 333-117367
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Maryland
 
20-1237795
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

1985 Cedar Bridge Avenue, Suite 1
   
Lakewood, New Jersey
 
08701
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 
(Zip Code)

(732) 367-0129
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 
Yes    ¨    No     þ

 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  
Yes  ¨     No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer   ¨
 
Accelerated filer   ¨
 
Non-accelerated filer    þ
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  ¨  No þ

As of November 5, 2010, there were approximately 32.0 million outstanding shares of common stock of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., including shares issued pursuant to the dividend reinvestment plan.  

 
 

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX
 
   
Page
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
     
Item 1.
Financial Statements
 
     
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009
3
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
4
     
 
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
5
     
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
6
     
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
     
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
32
     
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
50
     
Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures
51
     
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
 
     
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
52
     
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
53
     
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
53
     
Item 4.
Removed and Reserved
53
     
Item 5.
Other Information
53
     
Item 6.
Exhibits
53
 
 
 

 

 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, CONTINUED:
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED:

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
   
As of September 30,
2010
   
As of December 31,
2009
 
 
 
(unaudited)
       
Assets
           
Investment property:
           
Land
  $ 50,427,502     $ 50,702,303  
Building
    206,937,335       211,668,479  
Construction in progress
    66,471       284,952  
Gross investment property
    257,431,308       262,655,734  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (15,227,136 )     (15,570,596 )
Net investment property
    242,204,172       247,085,138  
Investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
    13,533,082       115,972,466  
Investment in affiliate, at cost
    2,256,330       7,658,337  
Cash and cash equivalents
    46,605,608       17,076,320  
Marketable securities, available for sale
    180,875,066       840,877  
Restricted marketable securities, available for sale
    31,831,186       -  
Restricted escrows
    8,805,821       5,882,766  
Tenant accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful account of $350,287 and $298,389, respectively)
    1,522,863       892,042  
Other accounts receivable
    5,419       23,182  
Acquired in-place lease intangibles, net
    452,481       641,487  
Acquired above market lease intangibles, net
    154,191       239,360  
Deferred intangible leasing costs, net
    289,924       406,275  
Deferred leasing costs (net of accumulated amortization of $348,097 and $353,331 respectively)
    1,449,586       1,137,052  
Deferred financing costs (net of accumulated amortization of $1,222,007 and $862,357 respectively)
    1,021,083       964,966  
Interest receivable from related parties
    1,084,286       1,886,449  
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    3,096,673       2,574,801  
Assets disposed of (See Note 9)
    -       26,282,358  
Total Assets
  $ 535,187,771     $ 429,563,876  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
               
Mortgage payable
  $ 200,173,531     $ 202,179,356  
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    4,436,833       3,154,371  
Due to sponsor
    2,617,776       1,349,730  
Loans due to affiliates (see Note 4)
    1,485,377       -  
Tenant allowances and deposits payable
    895,954       896,319  
Distributions payable
    8,794,164       5,557,670  
Prepaid rental revenues
    1,227,575       1,049,316  
Acquired below market lease intangibles, net
    434,686       663,414  
Deferred Gain on Disposition (See Note 3)
    32,175,788       -  
Liabilities disposed of (See Note 9)
    -       43,503,349  
Total Liabilities
    252,241,684       258,353,525  
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 18)
               
Stockholders' equity:
               
Company's Stockholders Equity:
               
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized,  none outstanding
    -       -  
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized, 31,812,431 and 31,528,353 shares issued and outstanding in 2010 and 2009, respectively
    318,124       315,283  
Additional paid-in-capital
    283,384,594       280,763,558  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    3,003,252       326,077  
Accumulated distributions in excess of net earnings
    (27,087,965 )     (149,702,633 )
Total Company's stockholder’s equity
    259,618,005       131,702,285  
Noncontrolling interests
    23,328,082       39,508,066  
Total Stockholders' Equity
    282,946,087       171,210,351  
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
  $ 535,187,771     $ 429,563,876  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
3

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, CONTINUED:  
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED:
 
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED) 

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
                         
Revenues:
                       
Rental income
  $ 7,212,254     $ 7,631,177     $ 21,622,879     $ 23,527,992  
Tenant recovery income
    1,223,665       1,191,293       3,584,746       3,424,925  
Total revenues
    8,435,919       8,822,470       25,207,625       26,952,917  
                                 
Expenses:
                               
Property operating expenses
    3,253,489       3,248,841       9,618,809       9,799,861  
Real estate taxes
    947,123       927,840       2,865,725       2,815,311  
Loss on long-lived assets
    -       18,928,968       1,423,678       18,928,968  
General and administrative costs
    1,931,768       1,830,625       7,193,340       5,528,582  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,921,700       2,410,574       4,801,290       6,716,175  
Total operating expenses
    8,054,080       27,346,848       25,902,842       43,788,897  
Operating income/(loss)
    381,839       (18,524,378 )     (695,217 )     (16,835,980 )
Other income, net
    364,518       105,892       729,756       377,812  
Interest income
    999,181       1,038,406       3,132,365       3,076,461  
Interest expense
    (3,062,169 )     (3,046,026 )     (9,035,294 )     (9,012,312 )
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities (See Note 3) 
    142,779,604       -       142,779,604       -  
Gain on sale of marketable securities
    -       1,187,620       66,756       343,724  
                                 
Other than temporary impairment - marketable securities
    -       -       -       (3,373,716 )
Loss from investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
    (7,838,207 )     (3,508,079 )     (11,554,683 )     (4,248,298 )
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations
    133,624,766       (22,746,565 )     125,423,287       (29,672,309 )
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations
    74       (26,572,505 )     16,845,727       (27,399,607 )
Net income/(loss)
    133,624,840       (49,319,070 )     142,269,014       (57,071,916 )
Less: net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
    (2,064,013 )     673,924       (2,190,503 )     767,040  
Net income/(loss) attributable to common shares
  $ 131,560,827     $ (48,645,146 )   $ 140,078,511     $ (56,304,876 )
                                 
Basic and diluted income/(loss) per common share:
                               
Continuing operations
  $ 4.13     $ (0.71 )   $ 3.88     $ (0.93 )
Discontinued operations
    -       (0.84 )     0.53       (0.87 )
Net income/(loss) per common share
  $ 4.13     $ (1.55 )   $ 4.41     $ (1.80 )
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
    31,818,482       31,297,445       31,757,597       31,204,618  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
4

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, CONTINUED:  
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED:
  
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPRESHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
 
   
Preferred Shares
   
Common Shares
         
  
   
Accumulated
   
Total
       
   
Number of
Shares
   
Amount
   
Number of
Shares
   
Amount
   
Additional Paid-In
Capital
   
Accumulated Other
 Comprehensive Income
   
Distributions in
Excess of Net Income
   
Noncontrolling
Interests
   
Total Equity
 
                                                                         
BALANCE, December 31, 2009
    -     $ -       31,528,353     $ 315,283     $ 280,763,558     $ 326,077     $ (149,702,633 )   $ 39,508,066     $ 171,210,351  
                                                                         
Comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Net income
    -       -       -       -       -       -       140,078,511       2,190,503       142,269,014  
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities
    -       -       -       -       -       2,809,875       -       43,869       2,853,744  
Reclassification adjustment for gain realized in net income
                                            (132,700             (2,100 )     (134,800
Total comprehensive income
                                                                    144,987,958  
                                                                         
Distributions declared
    -       -       -       -       -       -       (17,463,843 )     -       (17,463,843 )
                                                                         
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests
    -       -       -       -       -       -       -       (18,412,256 )     (18,412,256 )
Redemption and cancellation of shares
                    (182,470 )     (1,824 )     (1,822,879 )                     -       (1,824,703 )
Shares issued from distribution reinvestment program 
    -       -       466,548       4,665       4,466,357       -       -       -       4,471,022  
Other offering costs
    -       -       -       -       (22,442 )     -       -       -       (22,442 )
                                                                         
BALANCE, September 30, 2010
    -     $ -       31,812,431     $ 318,124     $ 283,384,594     $ 3,003,252     $ (27,087,965 )   $ 23,328,082     $ 282,946,087  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
5

 

 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, CONTINUED:
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED:
 
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
           
Net income/(loss)
  $ 142,269,014     $ (57,071,916 )
Less net (income)/loss - discontinued operations
    (16,845,727 )     27,399,607  
Net income/(loss) from continuing operations
    125,423,287       (29,672,309 )
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    4,484,299       6,288,236  
Gain on sale of marketable securities
    (66,756 )     (343,724 )
Gain on disposition of unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
    (142,779,604 )     -  
Realized loss on impairment of marketable securities
    -       3,373,716  
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    259,650       224,095  
Amortization of deferred leasing costs
    316,991       427,939  
Amortization of above and below-market lease intangibles
    (60,711 )     (286,641 )
Loss on long-lived assets
    1,423,678       18,928,968  
                 
Equity in loss from investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
    11,554,683       4,248,298  
Provision for bad debts
    232,549       509,736  
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets
    291,225       261,760  
Decrease/(increase) in tenant and other accounts receivable
    (845,607 )     1,282,498  
Increase/(decrease) in tenant allowance and security deposits payable
    (19,466 )     238,604  
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    3,785,919       (3,365,753 )
Decrease in due to Sponsor
    1,268,046       132,485  
Increase in prepaid rents
    178,259       298,444  
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities - continuing operations
    5,446,442       2,546,352  
Net cash provided by operating activities - discontinued operations
    1,168,806       351,912  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    6,615,248       2,898,264  
                 
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Purchase of investment property, net
    (1,433,083 )     (7,606,758 )
Purchase of marketable securities
    (150,000,000 )     -  
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
    428,556       12,166,886  
Proceeds from disposition of investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate
    204,430,391       -  
Redemption payments from investment in affiliate
    5,402,007       1,866,664  
Purchase of investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
    (2,486,981 )     (18,997,677 )
Funding of restricted escrows
    (1,033,785 )     663,468  
                 
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities - continuing operations
    55,307,105       (11,907,417 )
Net cash used in investing activities - discontinued operations
    (1,541,121 )     (343,273 )
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities
    53,765,984       (12,250,690 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Mortgage payments
    (2,005,826 )     (2,014,703 )
Payment of loan fees and expenses
    (315,767 )     (22,911 )
Proceeds from loans due to affiliates
    1,485,377       -  
Redemption and cancellation of common stock
    (1,824,703 )     (4,272,082 )
Proceeds from issuance of special general partnership units
    -       6,982,534  
Issuance of note receivable to noncontrolling interest
    -       (22,357,708 )
Payment of offering costs
    (22,442 )     -  
Distribution received from discontinued operations
    26,450       -  
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests
    (18,412,256 )     (3,200,003 )
Distributions paid to Company's common stockholders
    (9,756,327 )     (9,163,231 )
Net cash used in financing activities - continuing operations
    (30,825,494 )     (34,048,104 )
Net cash used in financing activities - discontinued operations
    (26,450 )     -  
Net cash used in financing activities
    (30,851,944 )     (34,048,104 )
                 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    29,529,288       (43,400,530 )
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    17,076,320       66,106,067  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 46,605,608     $ 22,705,537  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
6

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, CONTINUED:
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED:

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED
(UNAUDITED)

   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
           
Cash paid for interest
  $ 8,658,306     $ 10,633,573  
Distributions declared
  $ 17,463,843     $ 21,776,937  
Value of shares issued from distribution reinvestment program
  $ 4,471,022     $ 7,094,300  
Loan due to affiliate converted to a distribution from investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entity
  $ 2,816,724     $ -  
Marketable equity securities received in connection of disposal of investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
  $ 29,221,714     $ -  
Restricted marketable equity securities received in connection of disposal of investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
  $ 30,286,518     $ -  
Cash escrowed in connection of disposal of investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
    1,889,270       -  
Issuance of units in exchange for investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entity
  $ -     $ 78,988,411  
Issuance of equity for payment of acquisition fee obligations
  $ -     $ 6,878,087  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 
7

 


LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

1.
Organization

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (together with the Operating Partnership (as defined below), the “Company”, also referred to as “we” or “us” herein) was formed on June 8, 2004 and subsequently qualified as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) during the year ending December 31, 2006. The Company was formed primarily for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning commercial and residential real estate properties located throughout the United States and Puerto Rico.
 
The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust, or UPREIT, and substantially all of the Company’s current and future business is and will be conducted through Lightstone Value Plus REIT, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 12, 2004 (the “Operating Partnership”). The Company is managed by Lightstone Value Plus REIT, LLC (the “Advisor”), an affiliate of the Lightstone Group (the “Sponsor”), under the terms and conditions of an advisory agreement. The Sponsor and Advisor are owned and controlled by David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of the Company’s board of directors and its Chief Executive Officer.
 
As of September 30, 2010, on a collective basis, the Company (i) wholly owned 3 retail properties containing a total of approximately 0.6 million square feet of retail space, 15 industrial properties containing a total of approximately 1.3 million square feet of industrial space, 7 multi-family residential properties containing a total of 1,805 units, and 2 hotel hospitality properties containing a total of 290 rooms and (ii) owned interests in 1 office property containing a total of approximately 1.1 million square feet of office space and 2 development outlet center retail projects. All of its properties are located within the United States. As of September 30, 2010, the retail properties, the industrial properties, the multi-family residential properties and the office property were 84%, 61%, 89% and 79% occupied based on a weighted-average basis, respectively. Its hotel hospitality properties’ average revenue per available room was $28 and occupancy was 71% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
 
During the second quarter of2010, as a result of the Company previously defaulting on the debt related to two properties due to the properties no longer being economically beneficial to the Company, the lender foreclosed on these two properties. As a result of the foreclosure transactions, the debt associated with these two properties of $42.3 million was extinguished and the obligations were satisfied with the transfer of the properties’ assets and working capital and the Company no longer has any ownership interests in these two properties. The operating results of these two properties through their date of disposition have been classified as discontinued operations on a historical basis for all periods presented. The transactions resulted in a gain on debt extinguishment of $17.2 million which was recorded during the second quarter of 2010 and is included in discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (see Note 9). Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of these two properties are reclassified as assets and liabilities disposed of on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.
 
Beginning in June 2010, the Company decided to discontinue the monthly required debt service payments of $65,724 on a loan collateralized by an apartment property located in North Carolina, which represents 220 units of the 1,805 units owned in the multi-family segment. This loan has an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $9.1 million as of September 30, 2010. The Company determined that future debt service payments on this loan would no longer be economically beneficial to the Company based upon the current and expected future performance of the property associated with this loan. See Notes 10 and 11.
 
Additionally, on August 30, 2010, the Company completed the disposition of certain interests in investments in unconsolidated real estate entities. See Note 3.

2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Operating Partnership and its subsidiaries (over which the Company exercises financial and operating control). As of September 30, 2010, the Company had a 98.4% general partnership interest in the common units of the Operating Partnership. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.  

 
8

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of  the Company and related notes as contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The unaudited interim financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) and accruals necessary in the judgment of management for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and its Subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.

The unaudited consolidated statements of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year or any other period.

Reclassifications
 
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

New Accounting Pronouncements
  
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, which was primarily codified into Topic 810 in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”).  This standard requires ongoing assessments to determine whether an entity is a variable entity and requires qualitative analysis to determine whether an enterprise’s variable interest(s) give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. In addition, it requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This standard is effective for the fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2010 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”.  ASU No. 2010-06 amends ASC 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. This ASU became effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company has determined that all other recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows, or do not apply to its operations.

3.
Simon Transaction

On December 8, 2009, the Company, its Operating Partnership and Pro-DFJV Holdings LLC (“PRO”), a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours (collectively, the “LVP Parties”) entered into a definitive agreement (“the “Contribution Agreement”) with Simon Property Group, Inc. (“Simon Inc.”), a Delaware corporation, Simon Property Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Simon OP”), and Marco Capital Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (collectively, referred to herein as “Simon”) providing for the disposition of a substantial portion of our retail properties to Simon including our (i) St. Augustine outlet center (“St. Augustine”), which is wholly owned, (ii) 40.00% interests in its investment in Prime Outlets Acquisitions Company (“POAC”), which includes 18 operating outlet center properties (the “POAC Properties”) and two development projects, Livermore Valley Holdings, LLC (“Livermore”) and Grand Prairie Holdings, LLC (“Grand Prairie”), and (iii) 36.80% interests in its investment in Mill Run, LLC (“Mill Run”), which includes 2 operating outlet center properties (the “Mill Run Properties”).  On June 28, 2010, the Contribution Agreement was amended to remove the previously contemplated dispositions of St. Augustine and the Company’s 40.00% interests in both Livermore and Grand Prairie.  The transactions contemplated by the Contribution Agreement, as amended, are referred to herein as the “Simon Transaction”. Additionally, certain affiliates of our Sponsor were parties to the Contribution Agreement, pursuant to which they would dispose of their respective ownership interests in POAC and Mill Run and certain other outlet center properties, in which we had no ownership interest, to Simon. Furthermore, as a result of the aforementioned amendment to the Contribution Agreement, St. Augustine no longer met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and was reclassified to held for use effective as of June 28, 2010 (see Note 8).  The Company’s 40.00% and 36.80% interests in investments in POAC, including Grand Prairie and Livermore, and Mill Run, respectively, have been accounted for as investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities since their acquisition (see Note 4).

 
9

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

On August 30, 2010, the Simon Transaction was completed and, as a result, the LVP Parties received total consideration, before allocations to noncontrolling interests, of approximately $265.8 million (the “Aggregate Consideration Value”), after certain transaction expenses of approximately $9.6 million which was paid at closing.  The Aggregate Consideration Value consisted of approximately (i) $204.4 million in the form of cash, (ii) $1.9 million of escrowed cash (the “Escrowed Cash”) and (iii) $59.5 million in the form of equity interests (“Marco OP Units”).

The cash consideration of $204.4 million that the LVP Parties received in connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction was paid by Simon with the proceeds from a draw under a revolving credit facility (the “Simon Loan”) that Simon entered into contemporaneously with the signing of the Contribution Agreement. In connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction, the LVP Parties have provided guaranties of collection (the “Simon Loan Collection Guaranties”) with respect to the Simon Loan.  See Note 17.  The Escrowed Cash of $1.9 million is included in restricted escrows in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010.   The equity interests that the LVP Parties received in connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction consisted of 703,737 Marco OP Units that are exchangeable for a similar number of common operating partnership units (“Simon OP Units”) of Simon Property Group, L.P. (“Simon OP”) subject to various conditions as discussed below.   Subject to the various conditions, the Company may elect to exchange the Marco OP Units to Simon OP Units which must be immediately delivered to Simon in exchange for cash or similar number of shares of Simon common stock, based on the then current weighted-average 5-day closing price of Simon’s common stock (“Simon Stock”), at Simon’s election.

Although the Marco OP Units may be immediately exchanged into Simon OP Units, if upon their delivery to Simon, Simon elects to exchange them for a similar number of shares of Simon Stock rather than cash, the LVP Parties will be precluded from selling the Simon Stock for a 6-month period from the date of issuance.  Additionally, because the Company is required to indemnify Simon OP and Simon for any liabilities and obligations (the “TPA Obligations”) that should arise under certain tax protection agreements (the “POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements”) through March 1, 2012 (see Note 17), the Company was required to place 367,778 of the Marco OP Units (the “Escrowed Marco OP Units”) into an escrow account.

Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement, as amended, there is a period after closing, of up to 215 days, for the Aggregate Consideration Value to be finalized between the LVP Parties and Simon. The Escrowed Cash and The Escrowed Units are reserved for the final settlement of certain consideration adjustments (collectively, the “Final Consideration Adjustments”) related to net working capital reserves, including the true-up of debt assumption costs, certain indemnified liabilities  and specified transaction costs.  The Escrowed Marco OP Units may be used to cover any shortfalls resulting from the Final Consideration Adjustments not covered by the Escrowed Cash.  Remaining Escrowed Cash, if any, will be released on or about 215 days from the closing date.  Remaining Escrowed Marco Units, net of any amounts used to settle shortfalls resulting from the Final Consideration Adjustments and TPA Obligations, will be released to the Company on March 1, 2012.

The Escrowed Marco OP Units had an estimated fair value of $30.3 million as of the closing date of the Simon Transaction and are classified as restricted marketable securities, which are available for sale, in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010.   The 335,959 Marco OP Units which were not placed in an escrow had an estimated fair value of $29.2 million as of the closing date of the Simon Transaction and are classified as marketable securities, which are available for sale, in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010.  The estimated fair value of the Marco OP Units and the Escrowed Marco OP Units were based on the weighted-average closing price of Simon’s common stock for the 5-day period immediately prior to the closing date, discounted for certain factors, including the applicable various conditions.   See Note 6.

In connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction, the Company recognized a gain on disposition of approximately $142.8 million in the consolidated statements of operations during the third quarter of 2010.  The Company also deferred an additional $32.2 million of gain (the “Deferred Gain”) on the consolidated balance sheet consisting of the total of the (i) $1.9 million of Escrowed Cash and (ii) $30.3 million of Restricted Marco OP Units received as part of the Aggregate Consideration Value because realization of these items is subject to the Final Consideration Adjustments and the TPA Obligations.

At a meeting on May 13, 2010, the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) made the decision to distribute proceeds from the Simon Transaction to our shareholders in an amount equal to the estimated tax liability, if any, they would accrue as a result of the closing.  The Board further determined at that time, subject to change based on market conditions that may prevail when the Simon Transaction closes and the proceeds are received, to direct the reinvestment of the balance of the cash proceeds.  In reaching its determination, the board considered that, in the event all proceeds were distributed, the Company would need to substantially reduce or eliminate future distributions to shareholders. The Board concluded that reinvesting a significant portion of the proceeds will allow the Company to take advantage of the current real estate environment and is consistent with our shareholders’ original expectation of being invested in the Company’s common shares for a period of seven to ten years.


 
10

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

At a subsequent meeting on September 16, 2010, the Board determined no distributions to our shareholders were currently necessary because of the tax-free nature of the Simon Transaction and reaffirmed its decision to reinvestment the cash proceeds.

PRO’s portion of the aforementioned  $204.4 million of  net cash proceeds received from the closing of the Simon Transaction were approximately $73.6 million, which were distributed to its members (the “PRO Distributions”) during the third quarter of 2010 pursuant to its operating agreement.  See Note 14.

4.
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliated Real Estate Entities

The entities listed below are or were partially owned by the Company.  The Company accounts or accounted for these investments under the equity method of accounting as the Company exercises or exercised significant influence, but does not or did not control these entities. A summary of the Company’s investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities is as follows:

             
As of
 
Real Estate Entity
 
Date(s) Acquired
 
Ownership
%
   
September 30,
2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
Prime Outlets Acquistions Company ("POAC")(1)
 
March 30, 2009 & August 25, 2009
    40.00 %   $  -     $  84,291,011  
Mill Run LLC ("Mill Run")
 
June 26, 2008 & August 25, 2009
    36.80 %     -       29,809,641  
Livermore Valley Holdings, LLC ("Livermore")(1)
 
March 30, 2009 & August 25, 2009
    40.00 %     5,327,332       -  
Grand Prairie Holdings, LLC ("Grand Prairie")(1)
 
March 30, 2009 & August 25, 2009
    40.00 %     7,358,428       -  
1407 Broadway Mezz II, LLC ("1407 Broadway")
 
January 4, 2007
    49.00 %     847,322       1,871,814  
Total Investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
              $  13,533,082     $  115,972,466  

1.
In connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction on August 30, 2010, the Company retained its 40.00% ownership interests in both Grand Prairie and Livermore, which were previously owned by POAC and historically included in the Company’s 40.00% ownership interest in POAC.

On December 8, 2009, the Company entered into a Contribution Agreement with Simon to dispose of all its retail outlet center interests including St. Augustine, which is wholly owned, and its 40.00% and 36.80% interests in investments in both POAC and Mill Run, respectively, which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.  The terms of the Contribution Agreement were subsequently amended on June 28, 2010 providing for the Company to retain St. Augustine and its interests in certain development properties (Livermore and Grand Prairie) which were owned by POAC.  On August 30, 2010, the Company closed on the Simon Transaction pursuant to which it disposed of its interests in investments in POAC, except for its interests in investments in both Livermore and Grand Prairie which were retained, and Mill Run.  See Note 3 for additional information.

Prime Outlets Acquisitions Company

As previously discussed, on August 30, 2010, the Company disposed of its interests in investments in POAC, except for its interests in Livermore and Grand Prairie, two outlet center development projects (see below).  Prior to disposition, our Operating Partnership owned a 40.00% membership interest in POAC (the “POAC Interest”), of which a 25.00% and 15.00% membership interests were acquired on March 30, 2009 and August 25, 2009, respectively.  The POAC Interest was a non-managing interest, with certain consent rights with respect to major decisions. An affiliate of the Company’s Sponsor, was the majority owner and manager of POAC.  Profit and cash distributions were allocated in accordance with each investor’s ownership percentage.  Through the date of disposition, the Company accounted for this investment in accordance with the equity method of accounting, and its portion of POAC’s total indebtedness was not included in the Company’s investment.

During March 2010, the Company entered a demand grid note to borrow up to $20.0 million from POAC.  During the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, the Company received loan proceeds from POAC associated with this demand grid note in the amount of $2.0 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The loan bore interest at LIBOR plus 2.5%.  The principal and interest on this loan was due the earlier of February 28, 2020 or on demand.  On June 30, 2010, the principal balance of $2.8 million, together with accrued and unpaid interest of $16,724, was converted to be a distribution by POAC to the Company and was reflected as a reduction in the Company’s investment in POAC.

 
11

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

POAC Financial Information

The Company’s carrying value of its POAC Interest differed from its share of members’ equity reported in the condensed balance sheet of POAC due to the Company’s cost of its investments in excess of the historical net book values of POAC.  The Company’s additional basis allocated to depreciable assets was recognized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the appropriate assets through the date of disposition.

The following table represents the unaudited condensed income statement for POAC for the periods indicated:

   
For the Period
July 1, 2010 to
August 30, 2010
   
For the Three
Months Ended
September 30,
2009
   
For the Period
January 1, 2010 to
August 30, 2010
   
For the Period
March 30, 2009 to
September 30,
2009
 
Revenue
  $ 31,042,763     $ 46,375,573     $ 122,857,722     $ 91,929,258  
                                 
Property operating expenses
    31,672,270       24,392,778       73,290,776       45,426,139  
Depreciation and amortization
    6,071,792       10,130,790       25,076,385       20,752,928  
                                 
Operating income/(loss)
    (6,701,299 )     11,852,005       24,490,561       25,750,191  
                                 
Interest expense and other, net
    9,772,390       13,408,706       39,122,584       25,099,003  
Net income/(loss)
  $ (16,473,689 )   $ (1,556,701 )   $ (14,632,023 )   $ 651,188  
Company's share of net income/(loss)
  $ (6,589,476 )   $ (593,791 )   $ (5,852,809 )   $ (41,820 )
Additional depreciation and amortization expense (1)
    (2,047,619 )     (2,198,260 )     (8,655,287 )     (4,058,260 )
Company's loss from investment
  $ (8,637,095 )   $ (2,792,051 )   $ (14,508,096 )   $ (4,100,080 )

1.
Additional depreciation and amortization expense related to the amortization of the difference between the cost of the POAC Interest and the amount of the underlying equity in net assets of the POAC.

The following table represents the unaudited condensed balance sheet for POAC as of December 31, 2009:

   
As of
 
   
December 31, 2009
 
       
Real estate, at cost (net)
  $ 757,385,791  
Intangible assets
    11,384,965  
Cash and restricted cash
    44,891,427  
Other assets
    59,050,970  
Total assets
  $ 872,713,153  
         
Mortgage payable
  $ 1,183,285,466  
Other liabilities
    46,447,451  
Member capital
    (357,019,764 )
Total liabilities and members' capital
  $ 872,713,153  

Livermore Valley Holdings, LLC

Livermore was wholly owned by POAC through August 30, 2010 and, therefore, was historically included in the Company’s POAC Interest as discussed above.  In connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction, the Company retained its 40.00% interest in investment in Livermore in the amount of approximately $5.3 million.   Our Operating Partnership owns a 40.00% membership interest in Livermore (the “Livermore Interest”).  The Livermore Interest is a non-managing interest, with certain consent rights with respect to major decisions. An affiliate of the Company’s Sponsor, is the majority owner and manager of Livermore.  Contributions are allocated in accordance with each investor’s ownership percentage.  Profit and cash distributions, if any, will be allocated in accordance with each investor’s ownership percentage.

Livermore is an outlet center development project expected to be constructed in Livermore, CA and had no operating results through September 30, 2010 or debt outstanding as of September 30, 2010.  The Company accounts for its Livermore Interest in accordance with the equity method of accounting.

 
12

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

Livermore Financial Information

The following table represents the unaudited condensed balance sheet for Livermore as of September 30, 2010:

   
As of
 
   
September 30, 2010
 
       
Construction in progress
  $ 13,138,344  
Total assets
  $ 13,138,344  
         
Other liabilities
  $ 13  
Members' capital
    13,318,331  
Total liabilities and members' capital
  $ 13,318,344  

Grand Prairie Holdings, LLC

Grand Prairie was wholly owned by POAC through August 30, 2010 and, therefore, was historically included in the Company’s POAC Interest as discussed above.  In connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction, the Company retained its 40.00% interest in investment in Grand Prairie in the amount of approximately $4.7 million.   Our Operating Partnership owns a 40.00% membership interest in Grand Prairie (the “Grand Prairie Interest”).  The Grand Prairie Interest is a non-managing interest, with certain consent rights with respect to major decisions. An affiliate of the Company’s Sponsor, is the majority owner and manager of Grand Prairie.  Contributions are allocated in accordance with each investor’s ownership percentage.  Profit and cash distributions, if any, will be allocated in accordance with each investor’s ownership percentage.

Grand Prairie is an outlet center development project expected to be constructed on land it owns in Grand Prairie, Texas, and had no operating results through September 30, 2010 or debt outstanding as of September 30, 2010.  The Company made additional capital contributions of approximately $2.7 million to Grand Prairie during September 2010.  The Company accounts for its Grand Prairie Interest in accordance with the equity method of accounting.

Grand Prairie Financial Information

The following table represents the unaudited condensed balance sheet for Grand Prairie as of September 30, 2010:
   
As of
 
   
September 30, 2010
 
       
Construction in progress
  $ 18,564,640  
Other assets
    3,187  
Total assets
  $ 18,567,827  
         
Other liabilities
  $ 214,016  
Members' capital
    18,353,811  
Total liabilities and members' capital
  $ 18,567,827  
 
 
13

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

Mill Run, LLC

As previously discussed, on August 30, 2010, the Company disposed of its interests in investments in Mill Run.  Prior to disposition, our Operating Partnership owned a 36.80% membership interest in Mill Run (the “Mill Run Interest”), of which a 24.54% and 14.26% membership interests were acquired on June 26, 2008 and August 25, 2009, respectively.  The Mill Run Interest included Class A and B membership shares and was a non-managing interest, with consent rights with respect to certain major decisions. The Company’s Sponsor was the managing member and owned 55% of Mill Run.  Profit and cash distributions were to be allocated in accordance with each investor’s ownership percentage after consideration of Class B members adjusted capital balance.  Through the date of disposition, the Company accounted for this investment in accordance with the equity method of accounting, and its portion of Mill Run’s total indebtedness was not included in the Company’s investment.

Mill Run Financial Information

The Company’s carrying value of its Mill Run Interest differed from its share of member’s equity reported in the condensed balance sheet of Mill Run due to the Company’s cost of its investments in excess of the historical net book values of Mill Run.  The Company’s additional basis allocated to depreciable assets was recognized on a straight-line basis over the lives of the appropriate assets through the date of disposition.

The following table represents the unaudited condensed income statement for Mill Run for the periods indicated:

   
For the Period
from July 1, 2010
to August 30, 2010
   
Three Months
Ended September
30, 2009
   
For the Period
from January 1,
2010 to August 30,
2010
   
Nine Months
Ended September
30, 2009
 
Revenue
  $ 9,286,808     $ 12,183,648     $ 33,279,719     $ 33,715,221  
                                 
Property operating expenses
    2,265,484       3,672,029       8,561,211       10,646,386  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,651,483       4,395,825       6,664,898       9,125,513  
                                 
Operating income
    5,369,841       4,115,794       18,053,610       13,943,322  
                                 
Interest expense and other, net
    695,694       892,145       4,067,475       4,003,145  
Net income
  $ 4,674,147     $ 3,223,649     $ 13,986,135     $ 9,940,177  
Company's share of net income
  $ 1,720,086     $ 965,777     $ 5,146,898     $ 2,537,779  
Additional depreciation and amortization expense (1)
    (293,682 )     (740,813 )     (1,168,994 )     (1,374,617 )
Company's income from investment
  $ 1,426,404     $ 224,964     $ 3,977,904     $ 1,163,162  

1.
Additional depreciation and amortization expense relates to the amortization of the difference between the cost of the Mill Run Interest and the amount of the underlying equity in net assets of the Mill Run.


 
14

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

The following table represents the unaudited condensed balance sheet for Mill Run as of December 31, 2009:

   
As of
 
   
December 31, 2009
 
       
Real estate, at cost (net)
  $ 257,274,810  
Intangible assets
    644,421  
Cash and restricted cash
    6,410,480  
Other assets
    9,755,013  
Total assets
  $ 274,084,724  
         
Mortgage payable
  $ 265,195,763  
Other liabilities
    22,267,449  
Member capital
    (13,378,488 )
Total liabilities and members' capital
  $ 274,084,724  

1407 Broadway Mezz II, LLC
 
As of September 30, 2010, the Company has a 49.00% ownership in 1407 Broadway Mezz II, LLC (“1407 Broadway”).  As the Company has recorded this investment in accordance with the equity method of accounting, its portion of 1407 Broadway’s total indebtedness of $124.8 million as September 30, 2010 is not included in the Company’s investment.  Earnings for this investment are recognized in accordance with this investment agreement and where applicable, based upon an allocation of the investment’s net assets at book value as if the investment was hypothetically liquidated at the end of each reporting period.

During March 2010, the Company entered a demand grid note to borrow up to $20.0 million from 1407 Broadway.  During the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010, the Company has received aggregate loan proceeds from 1407 Broadway associated with this demand grid note in the amount of $0.5 million and $1.0 million, respectively.  The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 2.5%.  The principal and interest on this loan is due the earlier of February 28, 2020 or on demand.  As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding principal and interest of approximately $1.5 million is recorded in loans due to affiliates in the consolidated balance sheets.

1407 Broadway Financial Information
 
The following table represents the condensed income statement derived from unaudited financial statements for 1407 Broadway for the periods indicated:

   
For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
                         
Total revenue
  $ 9,297,401     $ 8,357,981     $ 26,643,446     $ 27,192,167  
Property operating expenses
    7,796,708       7,355,158       20,625,007       20,580,981  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,558,103       2,007,870       4,642,776       6,491,543  
Operating income/(loss)
    (57,410 )     (1,005,047 )     1,375,663       119,643  
Interest expense and other, net
    (1,223,236 )     (1,033,908 )     (3,466,461 )     (2,795,929 )
Net loss
  $ (1,280,646 )   $ (2,038,955 )   $ (2,090,798 )   $ (2,676,286 )
Company's share of net loss (49%)
  $ (627,517 )   $ (999,088 )   $ (1,024,491 )   $ (1,311,380 )
 
 
15

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

The following table represents the condensed balance sheet derived from unaudited financial statements for 1407 Broadway as of the dates indicated:

   
As of
   
As of
 
   
September 30, 2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
             
Real estate, at cost (net)
  $ 111,819,777     $ 111,803,186  
Intangible assets
    1,238,498       1,845,941  
Cash and restricted cash
    12,357,223       10,226,017  
Other assets
    12,960,377       11,887,040  
                 
Total assets
  $ 138,375,875     $ 135,762,184  
                 
Mortgage payable
  $ 124,778,185     $ 116,796,263  
Other liabilities
    11,878,770       15,156,202  
Members' capital
    1,718,920       3,809,719  
                 
Total liabilities and members' capital
  $ 138,375,875     $ 135,762,184  

5.
Investment in Affiliate, at Cost

Park Avenue Funding LLC

On April 16, 2008, the Company made a preferred equity contribution of $11,000,000 (the “Contribution”) to PAF-SUB LLC (“PAF”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Park Avenue Funding LLC (“Park Avenue”), in exchange for membership interests of PAF with certain rights and preferences described below (the “Preferred Units”). Park Avenue is a real estate lending company making loans, including first or second mortgages, mezzanine loans and collateral pledges of mortgages, to finance real estate transactions. Property types considered include multi-family, office, industrial, retail, self-storage, parking and land. Both PAF and Park Avenue are affiliates of our Sponsor.
 
PAF’s limited liability company agreement was amended on April 16, 2008 to create the Preferred Units and admit the Company as a member. The Preferred Units are entitled to a cumulative preferred distribution at the rate of 10% per annum, payable quarterly. In the event that PAF fails to pay such distribution when due, the preferred distribution rate will increase to 17% per annum. The Preferred Units are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at the option of the Company upon at least 180 days’ prior written notice (the “Redemption”). In addition, the Preferred Units are entitled to a liquidation preference senior to any distribution upon dissolution with respect to other equity interests of PAF in an amount equal to (x) the Contribution plus any accrued but unpaid distributions less (y) any Redemption payments.

In connection with the Contribution, the Company and Park Avenue entered into a guarantee agreement on April 16, 2008, whereby Park Avenue unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees payment of the Redemption amounts when due (the “Guarantee”). Also, Park Avenue agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the enforcement of the Guarantee.

The Company does not have any voting rights for this investment, and does not have significant influence over this investment. The Company accounts for this investment under the cost method. Total accrued distributions related to this investment totaled $18,803 and $65,945 at September 30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009, respectively, and are included in interest receivable from related parties in the consolidated balance sheets.   Through September 30, 2010, the Company received cumulative redemption payments from PAF of $8.7 million, of which $5.4 million was received during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  As of September 30, 2010, the Company’s investment in PAF is $2.3 million and is included in investment in affiliate, at cost in the consolidated balance sheets.  Subsequent to September 30, 2010, the Company received additional redemption payments aggregating $2.3 million and as a result, no longer has any remaining investment in PAF.

 
16

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

6.
Marketable Securities and Fair Value Measurements

Marketable Securities:

The following is a summary of the Company’s available for sale securities as of the dates indicated:

   
As of September 30, 2010
   
As of December 31, 2009
 
   
Adjusted Cost
   
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
   
Fair Value
   
Adjusted Cost
   
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
   
Fair Value
 
Equity Securities, primarily REITs
  $ 104,342     $ 120,374     $ 224,716     $ 466,142     $ 374,735     $ 840,877  
Marco OP Units
    29,221,714       1,427,826       30,649,540       -       -       -  
CMBS
    150,000,000       810       150,000,810       -       -       -  
Total
  $ 179,326,056     $ 1,549,010     $ 180,875,066     $ 466,142     $ 374,735     $ 840,877  

Restricted Marketable Securities:

The following is a summary of the Company’s restricted available for sale securities as of the dates indicated:

   
As of September 30, 2010
   
As of December 31, 2009
 
   
Adjusted Cost
   
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
   
Fair Value
   
Adjusted Cost
   
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
   
Fair Value
 
Marco OP Units
  $ 30,286,518     $ 1,544,668     $ 31,831,186     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Total
  $ 30,286,518     $ 1,544,668     $ 31,831,186     $ -     $ -     $ -  

In May 2010, the Company sold 20,000 shares of equity securities with an aggregate cost basis of $361,800 and received net proceeds of $428,556.  As a result of the sale, during the second quarter of 2010 the Company reclassified $134,800 of unrealized gain from accumulated other comprehensive income and recognized a realized gain of $66,756, which is included in gain on sale of marketable securities in the consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010

On August 30, 2010, the Company disposed of certain of its interests in investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities in connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction and received 367,778 of Escrowed Marco OP Units valued at $30.3 million and 335,959 Marco OP Units valued at $29.2 million. The Escrowed Marco OP Units and the Marco OP Units are classified as restricted marketable securities, available for sale, and marketable securities, available for sale, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010.  See Note 3.

On September 28, 2010, the Company utilized a portion of the net cash proceeds it received in connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction (see Note 3) to purchase $150.0 million of collateralized mortgage back securities (“CMBS”).  All of the CMBS were issued by various U.S. government-sponsored enterprises and, therefore, are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value:

 
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 
Level 2 Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
 
17

 
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

 
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Marketable securities, available for sale, measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of the dates indicated are as follows:

   
Fair Value Measurement Using
       
As of September 30, 2010
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Marketable Securities:
                       
Equity Securities, primarily REITs
  $ 224,716     $ -     $ -     $ 224,716  
Marco OP Units
    -       30,649,540       -       30,649,540  
CMBS
    -       150,000,810       -       150,000,810  
Total
  $ 224,716     $ 180,650,350     $ -     $ 180,875,066  
                                 
Restricted Marketable Securities:
                               
Marco OP Units
  $ -     $ 31,831,186     $ -     $ 31,831,186  
Total
  $ -     $ 31,831,186     $ -     $ 31,831,186  

   
Fair Value Measurement Using
       
As of December 31, 2009
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Marketable Securities:
                       
Equity Securities, primarily REITs
  $ 840,877     $ -     $ -     $ 840,877  
Total
  $ 840,877     $ -     $ -     $ 840,877  

The Company did not have any other significant financial assets or liabilities, which would require revised valuations that are recognized at fair value.

7.
Intangible Assets

The Company has intangible assets relating to above-market leases from property acquisitions, intangible assets related to leases in place at the time of acquisition, intangible assets related to leasing costs, and intangible liabilities relating to below-market leases from property acquisitions.
 
The following table sets forth the Company’s intangible assets/ (liabilities) as of the dates indicated:
 
   
As of September 30, 2010
   
As of December 31, 2009
 
   
Cost
   
Accumulated
Amortization
   
Net
   
Cost
   
Accumulated
Amortization
   
Net
 
                                     
Acquired in-place lease intangibles
  $ 1,677,943     $ (1,225,462 )   $ 452,481     $ 2,625,791     $ (1,984,304 )   $ 641,487  
                                                 
Acquired above market lease intangibles
    502,982       (348,791 )     154,191       1,026,821       (787,461 )     239,360  
                                                 
Deferred intangible leasing costs
    985,875       (695,951 )     289,924       1,354,295       (948,020 )     406,275  
                                                 
Acquired below market lease intangibles
    (1,329,571 )     894,885       (434,686 )     (3,012,740 )     2,349,326       (663,414 )

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company wrote off fully amortized acquired intangible assets of approximately $0.2 million and $1.3 million resulting in a reduction of cost and accumulated amortization of intangible assets at September 30, 2010 compared to the December 31, 2009.  There were no additions during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

 
18

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

The following table presents the projected amortization benefit of the acquired above market lease costs and the below market lease costs during the next five years and thereafter as of September 30, 2010:
 
Amortization expense/(benefit) of:
 
Remainder
of 2010
   
2011
   
2012
   
2013
   
2014
   
Thereafter
   
Total
 
                                                         
Acquired above market lease value
 
$
15,668
   
$
52,826
   
$
23,379
   
$
14,425
   
$
14,425
   
$
33,468
   
$
154,191
 
                                                         
Acquired below market lease value
   
(48,680
)
   
(125,832
)
   
(87,911
)
   
(86,625
)
   
(42,819
)
   
(42,819
)
   
(434,686
)
                                                         
Projected future net rental income increase
 
$
(33,012
)
 
$
(73,006
)
 
$
(64,532
)
 
$
(72,200
)
 
$
(28,394
)
 
$
(9,351
)
 
$
(280,495
)
 
Amortization benefit of acquired above and below market lease values included in total revenues in our consolidated statement of operations was $31,755 and $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The following table presents the projected amortization expense of the acquired in-place lease intangibles and acquired leasing costs during the next five years and thereafter as of September 30, 2010:
 
   
Remainder
                                     
Amortization expense of:
 
of 2010
   
2011
   
2012
   
2013
   
2014
   
Thereafter
   
Total
 
                                                         
Acquired in-place leases value
 
$
34,962
   
$
109,287
   
$
72,836
   
$
66,883
   
$
65,565
   
$
102,948
   
$
452,481
 
                                                         
Deferred intangible leasing costs value
   
24,445
   
$
76,368
   
$
46,358
   
$
41,219
     
38,922
   
$
62,612
     
289,924
 
                                                         
Projected future amortization expense
 
$
59,407
   
$
185,655
   
$
119,194
   
$
108,102
   
$
104,487
   
$
165,560
   
$
742,405
 
 
Actual total amortization expense included in depreciation and amortization expense in our consolidated statement of operations was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively and $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

8.
Assets and Liabilities Previously Classified as Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

On December 8, 2009, the Company entered into the Contribution Agreement providing for the disposition of a substantial portion of its retail properties to Simon including St. Augustine, which is wholly owned.  Because St. Augustine met the criteria for classification for held for sale, the Company reclassified St. Augustine’s related assets and liabilities from held for use to held for sale effective as of December 8, 2009 on the consolidated balance sheet and presented St. Augustine’s results from operations in discontinued operations in its consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented.  On June 28, 2010, the Contribution Agreement was amended to remove the previously contemplated disposition of St. Augustine.  See Note 3.  As a result of the aforementioned amendment to the Contribution Agreement, St. Augustine no longer met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and was reclassified to held for use effective as of June 28, 2010 as discussed below.

The St. Augustine assets and liabilities no longer met the criteria for classification as held for sale effective as of June 28, 2010 because management no longer had an active plan to market this outlet center for sale.  Therefore, the Company has reclassified the assets and liabilities related to St. Augustine from assets and liabilities back to held for use from held for sale on the consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented.  This reclassification from held for sale to held for use of St. Augustine resulted in an adjustment of $1.2 million to reduce St. Augustine’s assets’ balance to the lower of its carrying value, net of any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the assets been continuously classified as held and used or the fair value as of June 28, 2010.  The $1.2 million adjustment was included in loss on long-lived assets in the consolidated statements of operations during the second quarter of 2010 and is also included in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  St. Augustine’s results of operations for all periods presented have been reclassified from discontinued operations to the Company’s continuing operations.

 
19

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

9.
Assets and Liabilities Disposed of and Discontinued Operations

During the second quarter of 2010, the Company disposed of two properties within its multi-family segment.  During 2009, the Company had defaulted on the debt obligations related to these two properties due to the properties no longer being economically beneficial to the Company.  The lender foreclosed on these two properties during the second quarter of 2010 and, as a result of the foreclosure transactions, the debt obligations associated with these two properties of $42.3 million were extinguished and the obligations were satisfied upon the transfer of the properties’ assets and working capital.

  The operating results of these two properties have been classified as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented.  The foreclosure transactions resulted in a gain on debt extinguishment of $17.2 million during the second quarter of 2010 which is also included in discontinued operations.  During 2009, the Company recorded an asset impairment charge of $26.0 million associated with these properties.   No additional impairment charges were subsequently recorded as the net book values of the assets approximated their estimated fair market values, on a net aggregate basis, through the date of disposition.

The following summary presents the operating results of the two properties within the multi-family segment included in discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated.

   
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Revenue
  $  -     $  1,318,381     $  1,838,573     $  4,057,799  
                                 
Expenses:
                               
Property operating expense
    -       780,661       862,615       2,107,944  
Real estate taxes
    -       165,485       221,246       504,594  
Loss on long-lived assets
    -       26,031,832       -       26,031,832  
General and administrative costs
    -       60,897       17,912       289,662  
Depreciation and amortization
    -       283,763       204,449       851,834  
Total operating expense
    -       27,322,638       1,306,222       29,785,866  
                                 
Operating income/(loss)
    -       (26,004,257 )     532,351       (25,728,067 )
                                 
Other income/(loss)
    -       39,561       (27,666 )     132,662  
Interest income
    -       58       673       234  
Interest expense
    -       (607,867 )     (829,368 )     (1,804,436 )
Gain on debt extinguishment
    74       -       17,169,737       -  
Net income/(loss) from discontinued operations
  $  74     $  (26,572,505 )   $  16,845,727     $  (27,399,607 )
 
Cash flows generated from discontinued operations are presented separately on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

The following summary presents the major components of assets and liabilities disposed, of as the date indicated.

   
As of December 31, 2009
 
Net investment property
  $  25,514,161  
Intangible assets, net
    397,020  
Restricted escrows
    167,953  
Other assets
    203,224  
Total assets
  $  26,282,358  
         
Mortgage payable
  $  42,272,300  
Other liabilities
    1,231,049  
Total liabilities
  $  43,503,349  
 
 
20

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

10. 
Assets and Liabilities of Property Held as Collateral on Loan in Default Status

Beginning in June 2010, the Company decided to discontinue the monthly required debt service payments of $65,724 on a loan collateralized by an apartment property located in North Carolina that is within the Company’s multi-family segment.  This loan has an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $9.1 million as of September 30, 2010.  The Company determined that future debt service payments on this loan would no longer be economically beneficial to the Company based upon the current and expected future performance of the property associated with the loan.  In June 2010, the lender notified the Company that the Company is in default on this loan. The Company is in discussions with the lender regarding its default status and potential future remedies, which include transferring the property to the lender. As of September 30, 2010, the operating results of this property are included in continuing operations.  The Company during 2009 recorded an asset impairment charge of $4.3 million associated with this property.  During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, no additional impairment charge has been recorded as the net book values of the assets are slightly lower than the current estimated fair market value.

The following summary presents the operating results of the property that is collateral on the loan in default status within the multi-family segment, which are included in continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

   
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Revenue
  $  311,946     $  383,537     $  969,869     $  1,177,713  
                                 
Expenses:
                               
Property operating expense
    210,640       206,876       644,234       599,497  
Real estate taxes
    32,571       28,813       97,713       93,955  
Loss on long-lived assets
    (212,751 )     4,303,716       87,249       4,303,716  
General and administrative costs
    27,223       34,615       59,247       104,298  
Depreciation and amortization
    41,034       62,409       121,200       187,390  
Total operating expenses
    98,717       4,636,429       1,009,643       5,288,856  
                                 
Operating income/(loss)
    213,229       (4,252,892 )     (39,774 )     (4,111,143 )
                                 
Other income, net
    4,043       12,697       23,833       41,910  
Interest expense
    (130,155 )     (130,155 )     (386,319 )     (386,319 )
                                 
Net income/(loss)
  $  87,117     $  (4,370,350 )   $  (402,260 )   $  (4,455,552 )
 
The following summary presents the major components of the property within the multi-family segment that is collateral on the loan in default status, which is included in continuing operations as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

   
As of
 
   
September 30, 2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
Net investment property
  $  6,524,834     $  6,830,787  
Cash and cash equivalents
    75,691       77,197  
Restricted escrows
    291,494       6,801  
Other assets
    139,204       118,343  
Total assets
  $  7,031,223     $  7,033,128  
                 
Mortgage payable
  $  9,147,000     $  9,147,000  
Other liabilities
    502,991       144,711  
Total liabilities
  $  9,649,991     $  9,291,711  
 
 
21

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

11.
Mortgages Payable

Mortgages payable, totaling approximately $200.2 million at September 30, 2010 and $202.2 million at December 31, 2009 consists of the following:

         
Weighted Avg
Interest Rate
as of
             
Loan Amount as of
 
Property
 
Interest Rate
   
September 30,
2010
   
Maturity Date
 
Amount Due at
Maturity
   
September 30,
2010
   
December 31,
2009
 
                                   
St. Augustine
    6.09 %     6.09 %  
April 2016
  $ 23,747,523     $ 26,133,676     $ 26,400,159  
Southeastern Michigan Multi- Family Properties
    5.96 %     5.96 %  
July 2016
    38,138,605       40,725,000       40,725,000  
Oakview Plaza
    5.49 %     5.49 %  
January 2017
    25,583,137       27,500,000       27,500,000  
Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio
    5.83 %     5.83 %  
February 2017
    49,556,985       53,025,000       53,025,000  
Houston Extended Stay Hotels (Two Individual Loans)
 
LIBOR +
4.50
%     4.78 %  
April 2011
    9,008,750       9,271,250       10,193,750  
Brazos Crossing Power Center
 
Greater of
LIBOR
+ 3.50% or
6.75
%     6.75 %  
December 2011
    6,385,788       6,522,105       7,338,947  
Camden Multi-Family Properties - (Two Individual Loans)
    5.44 %     5.44 %  
December 2014
    26,334,204       27,849,500       27,849,500  
                                             
Subtotal mortgage obligations
            5.75 %       $ 178,754,992     $ 191,026,531     $ 193,032,356  
                                             
Camden Multi-Family Properties - (One Individual Loan)
    5.44 %     5.44 %  
Current
  $ 9,147,000     $ 9,147,000     $ 9,147,000  
                                             
Total mortgage obligations
            5.73 %       $ 187,901,992     $ 200,173,531     $ 202,179,356  
 
LIBOR at September 30, 2010 was 0.2563%. Each of the loans is secured by acquired real estate and is non-recourse to the Company, with the exception of the Houston Extended Stay Hotels loan which is 35% recourse to the Company.

The following table shows the mortgage payable maturing during the next five years and thereafter as of September 30, 2010 in the consolidated balance sheets:

Remainder of
2010 (1)
   
2011
   
2012
   
2013
   
2014
   
Thereafter
   
Total
 
                                                     
$
9,400,504    
$
16,559,012    
$
2,090,767    
$
2,370,084    
$
28,809,456    
$
140,943,708    
$
200,173,531
 

1)
 The amount due in the remainder of 2010 of $9.4 million includes the principal balance of $9.1 million associated with the loan within the Camden portfolio that is in default status.
 
Pursuant to the Company’s loan agreements, escrows in the amount of approximately $6.9 million were held in restricted escrow accounts at September 30, 2010. These escrows will be released in accordance with the loan agreements as payments of real estate taxes, insurance and capital improvement transactions, as required.  Our mortgage debt also contains clauses providing for prepayment penalties.

 
22

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
 
For the mortgage payable related to St. Augustine, Lightstone Holdings, LLC (“Guarantor”), a company wholly owned by the Sponsor, has guaranteed to the extent of a $27.2 million mortgage loan on the St. Augustine, the payment of losses that the lender may sustain as a result of fraud, misappropriation, misuse of loan proceeds or other acts of misconduct by the Company and/or its principals or affiliates.  Such losses are recourse to the Guarantor under the guaranty regardless of whether the lender has attempted to procure payment from the Company or any other party.  Further, in the event of the Company's voluntary bankruptcy, reorganization or insolvency, or the interference by the Company or its affiliates in any foreclosure proceedings or other remedy exercised by the lender, the Guarantor has guaranteed the payment of any unpaid loan amounts.  The Company has agreed, to the maximum extent permitted by its Charter, to indemnify Guarantor for any liability that it incurs under this guaranty.

In connection with the acquisition of the Hotels, the Houston Partnership along with ESD #5051 - Houston - Sugar Land, LLC and ESD #5050 - Houston - Katy Freeway, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiaries (the “Houston Borrowers”) secured a mortgage loan from Bank of America, N.A. in the principal amount of $12.85 million which matured on April 16, 2010 and during April 2010 has been amended and extended to mature April 16, 2011.  As part of the April 2010 amendment, the Company made a lump sum principal payment of $0.5 million. The amended mortgage loan bears interest on a daily basis expressed as a floating rate equal to the lesser of (i) the maximum non-usurious rate of interest allowed by applicable law or (ii) the British Bankers Association  Daily Floating Rate plus 450 basis points (4.50%) per annum rate and requires monthly installments of interest plus a principal payment of $43,750. The remaining principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and all other amounts payable there under will be due on April 16, 2011.  The mortgage loan is secured by the Hotels and 35% of the obligation is guaranteed by the Company.   In addition, the Company has entered into an interest rate cap agreement to cap the British Bankers Association Daily Rate at 1% until the maturity of the loan.

In December 2008, the Company converted its construction loan to fund and the development of the Brazos Crossing Power Center, in Lake Jackson, Texas Location to a term loan maturing on December 4, 2009 which has been amended and extended to mature December 4, 2011.  As part of the amendment to the mortgage, the Company made a lump sum principal payment of $0.7 million in February 2010.   The amended mortgage loan bears interest at the greater of 6.75% or  plus 350 basis points (3.50%) per annum rate and requires monthly installments of interest plus a principal payment of $9,737.  The loan is secured by acquired real estate.

On November 16, 2007, in connection with the acquisition of the Camden Properties, the Company through its wholly owned subsidiaries obtained from Fannie Mae five substantially similar fixed rate mortgages aggregating $79.3 million.  Of the $79.3 million, only three of the five original loans remain outstanding for an aggregate balance of $37.0 million (the “Loans”) as $42.3 million was extinguished as part of a foreclosure (see Note 8 for further discussion). The Loans have a 30 year amortization period, mature in 7 years, and bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.44% per annum. The Loans require monthly installments of interest only through December 2010 and monthly installments of principal and interest throughout the remainder of their stated terms. The Loans will mature on December 1, 2014.  Beginning in June 2010, the Company decided to discontinue its required monthly debt service payment of $65,724 on one of these three remaining loans, which has an outstanding principal balance of $9.1 million as of September 30, 2010.  The Company determined that future debt service payments on this loan would no longer be economically beneficial to the Company based upon the current and expected future performance of the property associated with this loan.   The Company is in discussions with the lender regarding its default status and potential future remedies, which include transferring the property to the lender. Through September 30, 2010, the Company has not recorded any potential prepayment penalties that it may be assessed by the lender as the Company believes that the payment of this potential liability is remote.

Certain of our debt agreements require the maintenance of certain ratios, including debt service coverage.  We have historically been and currently are in compliance with all of our debt covenants or have obtained waivers from our lenders, with the exception of (i) the debt service coverage ratio on the debt associated with the Hotels, which the Company did not meet for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and (ii) the debt service coverage ratios on the debt associated with the Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio, which the Company did not meet for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Under the terms of the loan agreement for the Hotels, the Company, once notified by the lender of noncompliance, has five days to cure by making a principal payment to bring the debt service coverage ratio to at least the minimum. As of the date of this filing, the Company has not been notified by the bank as per the loan agreement; however if the bank does notify the Company and does not provide a waiver, then the Company will be required to pay approximately $0.3 million as a lump sum principal payment to avoid default.  Under the terms of the loan agreement for the Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio, the lender may elect to retain all excess cash flow from the associated properties.  As of the date of this filing, the lender has taken no such action. Additionally, both of these affected loans are current with respect to regularly scheduled monthly debt service payments as of the date of this filing.

 
23

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

We expect to remain in compliance with all our other existing debt covenants; however, should circumstances arise that would constitute an event of default, the various lenders would have the ability to exercise various remedies under the applicable loan agreements, including the potential acceleration of the maturity of the outstanding debt.

12.
Distributions and Share Redemption Plan
 
Distributions

Since the period beginning February 1, 2006 through March 31, 2010, our Board declared a distribution for each three-month period, or quarter. These distributions were calculated based on stockholders of record each day during the applicable three-month period at a rate of $0.0019178 per day, which, if paid each day for a 365-day period, equaled a 7.0% annualized rate based on a share price of $10.00.

On July 28, 2010, our Board declared a distribution for the three-month period ending June 30, 2010. This distribution was calculated based on shareholders of record each day during the three-month period at a rate of $0.00109589 per day, and equaled a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, equaled a 4.0% annualized rate based on a share price of $10.00. The distribution was paid in cash on August 6, 2010 to shareholders of record during the three-month period ended June 30, 2010.

In addition, on July 28, 2010, our Board decided to temporarily suspend our distribution reinvestment program (the “DRIP”) pending final approval of the related registration statement (the “DRIP Registration Statement”) by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  Once the DRIP Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC, the Board intended to resume the DRIP and the Company would pay out any future quarterly distributions in the form of cash or shares issued under the DRIP, based upon the individual shareholder’s preference on record.

Furthermore, on July 28, 2010, our Board decided to temporarily lower the distribution rate pending the closing of the Simon Transaction (see Note 2 for further discussion).  Our Board also decided to meet as soon as a closing date for the Simon Transaction was set with the intention of declaring an additional distribution for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 equal to a 4% annualized rate (the “Additional Distribution”), which would be payable after the closing of the Simon Transaction.  The Additional Distribution would bring the aggregate total distributions for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to an amount equal to an 8% annualized rate, based on a share price of $10.00, which represents an increase over the prior quarterly distributions which were equal to an annualized rate of 7%.  The Simon Transaction closed on August 30, 2010 and our Board declared the Additional Distribution, which was paid in cash on October 15, 2010 to stockholders of record during the three-month period ended June 30, 2010.

On September 16, 2010, our Board declared a distribution for the three-month period ending September 30, 2010.  This distribution was calculated based on shareholders of record each day during the three-month period at a rate of $0.0019178 per day, and equaled a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, equaled a 7.0% annualized rate based on a share price of $10.00.   In addition, on October 26, 2010, DRIP Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC and the DRIP was reinstated by the Company.  The distribution was paid on October 29, 2010 to shareholders of record during the three-month period ended September 30, 2010.

The amount of distributions paid to our stockholders in the future will be determined by our Board and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of dividends, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.

Share Redemption Plans

Effective March 2, 2010, our Board voted to temporarily suspend future share redemptions under the share redemption plan (the “Share Redemption Plan”) pending completion of the Simon Transaction, at which time the Board would revisit this decision.  On August 30, 2010, the Simon Transaction closed and on September 16, 2010, our Board voted to reinstate effective October 1, 2010 future share redemptions, subject to certain restrictions, at a price of $9.00 per share under the Share Redemption Plan.

 
24

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

13.
Net Income/(Loss) Per Share
 
Basic net income/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income/(loss) attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period.  As of September 30, 2010, the Company has 36,000 options issued and outstanding, including an aggregate of 9,000 options granted to the independent directors of our Board at our annual meeting in September 2010.  Diluted net income/(loss) per share includes the  potentially dilutive effect, if any, which would occur if our outstanding options to purchase our common stock were exercised.  For all periods presented, the effect of these exercises was anti-dilutive and, therefore, dilutive net income/(loss) per share is equivalent to basic net income/(loss) per share.

14.
Noncontrolling Interests
 
The noncontrolling interests of the Company hold shares in the Operating Partnership.  These shares include SLP units, limited partner units, Series A Preferred Units and Common Units.

Distributions

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid aggregate distributions to noncontrolling interests of $15.0 million and $18.4 million, respectively.  These distributions to noncontrolling interests include the third quarter PRO Distribution of approximately $14.1 million discussed below.  As of September 30, 2010, distributions declared and not paid to noncontrolling interests were $2.3 million.

Note Receivable due from Noncontrolling Interests

In connection with the contribution of the Mill Run and POAC membership interests, the Company made loans to Arbor Mill Run JRM, LLC (“Arbor JRM”), Arbor National, LLC CJ (“Arbor CJ”), AR Prime Holding, LLC (“AR Prime”), Central Jersey, LLC (“TRAC”), Central Jersey Holdings II, LLC (“Central Jersey”), and JT Prime, LLC (“JT Prime”) (collectively, “Noncontrolling Interest Borrowers”) in the aggregate principal amount of $88.5 million (the “Noncontrolling Interest Loans”).  These loans are payable semi-annually and accrue interest at an annual rate of 4%. The loans mature through September 2017 and contain customary events of default and default remedies.  The loans require the Noncontrolling Interest Borrowers to prepay their respective loans in full upon redemption of the Series A Preferred Units by the Operating Partnership.  The loans are secured by the Series A Preferred Units and Common Units issued in connection with the respective contribution of the Mill Run and the POAC membership interests, as such these loans are classified as a reduction to noncontrolling interests in the consolidated balance sheets.

Accrued interest related to these loans totaled $1.1 million and $1.8 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and are included in interest receivable from related parties in the consolidated balance sheets.

Noncontrolling Interest of Subsidiary within the Operating Partnerships

On August 25, 2009, the Operating Partnership acquired an additional 15% membership interest in POAC and an additional 14.26% membership interest in Mill Run.  In connection with the transactions, the Advisor charged an acquisition fee equal to 2.75% of the acquisition price, which was approximately $6.9 million ($5.6 million related POAC and $1.3 million related to Mill Run, see Note 4).  On August 25, 2009, the Operating Partnership contributed its investments of the 15% membership interest in POAC and the 14.26% membership interest in Mill Run to the newly formed PRO-DFJV Holdings, LLC (“PRO”), a Delaware limited liability company,  in exchange for a 99.99% managing membership interest in PRO.  In addition, the Company contributed $2,900 cash for a 0.01% non- managing membership interest in PRO.  As the Operating Partnership is the managing member with control, PRO is consolidated into the results and financial position of the Company.   On September 15, 2009, the Advisor accepted, in lieu of a cash payment of $6.9 million for the acquisition fee, a 19.17% profit membership interest in PRO and assigned its rights to receive payment to the Sponsor, who assigned the same to David Lichtenstein.  Under the terms of the operating agreement of PRO, the 19.17% profit membership interest will not receive any distributions until the Company receive distributions equivalent to their capital contributions of approximately $29.0 million, then the 19.17% profit membership interest shall receive distributions to $6.9 million.  Any remaining distributions shall be split between the three members in proportion to their profit interests.

Of the net cash proceeds received from the closing of the Simon Transaction on August 30, 2010, PRO’s portion was approximately $73.6 million.  Pursuant to the its operating agreement, PRO Distributions of approximately $59.5 million and approximately $14.1 million were made to the Operating Partnership and to the noncontrolling interest (David Lichtenstein as a result of the above discussed assignmetn), respectively, during the third quarter of 2010.  See Note 3.

 
25

 


LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

15.
Related Party Transactions    

The Company has agreements with the Advisor and Lightstone Value Plus REIT Management LLC (the “Property Manager”) to pay certain fees in exchange for services performed by these entities and other affiliated entities. The Company’s ability to secure financing and subsequent real estate operations are dependent upon its Advisor, Property Manager and their affiliates to perform such services as provided in these agreements. 

The Company pursuant to the related party arrangements has recorded the following amounts for the periods indicated:

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
 
Acquisition fees
  $ -     $ 6,878,087     $ -     $ 16,656,847  
Asset management fees
    1,219,936       1,259,999       4,070,585       3,064,827  
Property management fees
    281,246       447,564       1,139,917       1,371,798  
Acquisition expenses reimbursed to Advisor
    -       -       -       902,753  
Development fees and leasing commissions
    13,488       (11,260 )     207,628       194,071  
Total
  $ 1,514,670     $ 8,574,390     $ 5,418,130     $ 22,190,296  

Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of our Sponsor, has purchased SLP units in the Operating Partnership. These SLP units, the purchase price of which will be repaid only after stockholders receive a stated preferred return and their net investment, will entitle Lightstone SLP, LLC to a portion of any regular distributions made by the Operating Partnership.

Since our inception through March 31, 2010, cumulative distributions declared to Lightstone SLP, LLC were $4.9 million, all of which had been paid as of April 2010. Such distributions, paid current at a 7% annualized rate of return to Lightstone SLP, LLC through March 31, 2010 and have been and will always be subordinated until stockholders receive a stated preferred return. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Operating Partnership did not declare a distribution related to the SLP units as the distribution to the stockholders was less than 7% for this period. However, distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC of $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively, were declared on August 30, 2010 and September 16, 2010 at a 8% and 7% annualized rate, respectively. Accordingly, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, distributions of $1.6 million were declared and distributions of $1.0 million were paid related to the SLP units and are part of noncontrolling interests. The distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010 were paid in October 2010.

See Notes 4, 5 and 14 for other related party transactions.

16.
Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of the mortgage payable as of September 30, 2010 was approximately $206.7 million compared to the book value of approximately $200.2 million. The fair value of the mortgage payable as of December 31, 2009 was approximately $235.3 million, which includes $42.3 million related debt classified as liabilities disposed of compared to the book value of approximately $244.5 million, including $42.3 related to debt classified as liabilities disposed of. The fair value of the mortgage payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market interest rate.


 
26

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

17.
Segment Information

The Company currently operates in four business segments as of September 30, 2010: (i) retail real estate, (ii) residential multi-family real estate, (iii) industrial real estate and (iv) hotel hospitality. The Company’s advisor and its affiliates provide leasing, property and facilities management, acquisition, development, construction and tenant-related services for its portfolio. The Company’s revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were exclusively derived from activities in the United States. No revenues from foreign countries were received or reported. The Company had no long-lived assets in foreign locations as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Company’s December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Unallocated assets, revenues and expenses relate to corporate related accounts.

The Company evaluates performance based upon net operating income from the combined properties in each real estate segment.

Selected results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and total assets as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 regarding the Company’s operating segments are as follows:

 
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
 
Retail
   
Multi-Family
   
Industrial
   
Hospitality
   
Unallocated
   
Total
 
                                   
Total revenues
$ 2,712,518     $ 3,198,154     $ 1,713,049     $ 812,198     $ -     $ 8,435,919  
                                               
Property operating expenses
  730,243       1,501,554       630,724       390,966       -       3,253,487  
Real estate taxes
  318,878       348,030       240,239       39,976       -       947,123  
General and administrative costs
  24,359       91,157       (3,070 )     11,527       1,807,795       1,931,768  
                                               
Net operating income/(loss)
  1,639,038       1,257,413       845,156       369,729       (1,807,795 )     2,303,541  
                                               
Depreciation and amortization
  842,453       421,830       529,828       127,589       -       1,921,700  
Operating income/(loss)
$ 796,585     $ 835,583     $ 315,328     $ 242,140     $ (1,807,795 )   $ 381,841  
                                               
As of September 30, 2010:
                                             
Total Assets
$ 99,639,778     $ 70,239,622     $ 71,418,276     $ 18,231,038     $ 275,659,057     $ 535,187,771  

 
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
 
 
Retail
   
Multi-Family
   
Industrial
   
Hospitality
   
Unallocated
   
Total
 
                                   
Total revenues
$ 2,716,180     $ 3,309,576     $ 1,972,123     $ 824,591     $ -     $ 8,822,470  
                                               
Property operating expenses
  783,074       1,564,660       429,430       471,290       387       3,248,841  
Real estate taxes
  304,095       322,258       249,318       52,169       -       927,840  
General and administrative costs
  (75,813 )     118,492       17,112       7,913       1,762,921       1,830,625  
                                               
Net operating income/(loss)
  1,704,824       1,304,166       1,276,263       293,219       (1,763,308 )     2,815,164  
                                               
Depreciation and amortization
  1,125,310       547,524       616,112       121,628       -       2,410,574  
Loss on long-lived assets
  2,002,465       17,164,317       (237,814 )     -       -       18,928,968  
                                               
Operating income/(loss)
$ (1,422,951 )   $ (16,407,675 )   $ 897,965     $ 171,591 $     $ (1,763,308 )   $ (18,524,378 )
                                               
As of December 31, 2009:
                                             
Total Assets
$ 101,842,972     $ 97,733,447     $ 72,032,250     $ 18,043,757     $ 139,911,450     $ 429,563,876  
 
 
27

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

Selected results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 regarding the Company’s operating segments are as follows:

   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
 
   
Retail
   
Multi-Family
   
Industrial
   
Hospitality
   
Unallocated
   
Total
 
                                                 
Total revenues
  $ 8,140,540     $ 9,642,549     $ 5,206,108     $ 2,218,428     $ -     $ 25,207,625  
                                                 
Property operating expenses
    2,169,881       4,591,722       1,663,722       1,193,484       -       9,618,809  
Real estate taxes
    939,968       1,061,090       692,898       171,769       -       2,865,725  
General and administrative costs
    53,738       243,264       29,275       11,470       6,855,593       7,193,340  
Net operating income/(loss)
    4,976,953       3,746,473       2,820,213       841,705       (6,855,593 )     5,529,751  
                                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    1,460,914       1,249,528       1,711,801       379,047       -       4,801,290  
Loss on long-lived assets
    1,193,233       300,000       (69,555 )     -       -       1,423,678  
Operating income/(loss)
  $ 2,322,806     $ 2,196,945     $ 1,177,967     $ 462,658     $ (6,855,593 )   $ (695,217 )

   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
 
   
Retail
   
Multi-Family
   
Industrial
   
Hospitality
   
Unallocated
   
Total
 
                                                 
Total revenues
  $ 8,286,105     $ 10,216,946     $ 5,669,103     $ 2,780,763     $ -     $ 26,952,917  
                                                 
Property operating expenses
    2,307,344       4,741,795       1,376,381       1,373,954       387       9,799,861  
Real estate taxes
    913,741       1,023,966       715,744       161,860       -       2,815,311  
General and administrative costs
    106,237       395,044       14,972       11,247       5,001,082       5,528,582  
Net operating income/(loss)
    4,958,783       4,056,141       3,562,006       1,233,702       (5,001,469 )     8,809,163  
                                                 
Depreciation and amortization
    2,967,080       1,511,256       1,881,238       355,771       830       6,716,175  
Loss on long-lived assets
    2,002,465       17,164,317       (237,814 )     -       -       18,928,968  
Operating income/(loss)
  $ (10,762 )   $ (14,619,432 )   $ 1,918,582     $ 877,931     $ (5,002,299 )   $ (16,835,980 )

18.
Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings 

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to legal proceedings, claims or disputes.

On March 29, 2006, Jonathan Gould, a former member of our Board of Directors and Senior Vice-President-Acquisitions, filed a lawsuit against us in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. The suit alleges, among other things, that Mr. Gould was insufficiently compensated for his services to us as director and officer. Mr. Gould sought damages of (i) up to $11,500,000 or (ii) a 2.5% ownership interest in all properties that we acquire and an option to acquire up to 5% of the membership interests of Lightstone SLP, LLC. We filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. After review of the motion to dismiss, counsel for Mr. Gould represented that Mr. Gould was dropping his claim for ownership interest in the properties we acquire and his claim for membership interests. Mr. Gould’s counsel represented that he would be suing only under theories of quantum merit and unjust enrichment seeking the value of work he performed.  Counsel for the Company made motion to dismiss Mr. Gould’s complaint, which was granted by Judge Sweeney.  Mr. Gould has filed an appeal of the decision dismissing his case, which is pending.   Management believes that this suit is frivolous and entirely without merit and intends to defend against these charges vigorously. The Company believes any unfavorable outcome on this matter will not have a material effect on the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 
 
28

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

On January 4, 2007, 1407 Broadway Real Estate LLC ("Office Owner"), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of 1407 Broadway, consummated the acquisition of a sub-leasehold interest (the "Sublease Interest") in an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the "Office Property"). 1407 Broadway is a joint venture between LVP 1407 Broadway LLC ("LVP LLC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, and Lightstone 1407 Manager LLC ("Manager"), which is wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer, and Shifra Lichtenstein, his wife.

The Sublease Interest was acquired pursuant to a Sale and Purchase of Leasehold Agreement with Gettinger Associates, L.P. ("Gettinger"). In July 2006, Abraham Kamber Company, as Sublessor under the sublease ("Sublessor"), served two notices of default on Gettinger (the "Default Notices"). The first alleged that Gettinger had failed to satisfy its obligations in performing certain renovations and the second asserted numerous defaults relating to Gettinger's purported failure to maintain the Office Property in compliance with its contractual obligations.

In response to the Default Notices, Gettinger commenced legal action and obtained an injunction that extends its time to cure any default, prohibits interference with its leasehold interest and prohibits Sublessor from terminating its sublease pending resolution of the litigation. A motion by Sublessor for partial summary judgment, alleging that certain work on the Office Property required its prior approval, was denied by the Supreme Court, New York County. Subsequently, by agreement of the parties, a stay was entered precluding the termination of the Sublease Interest pending a final decision on Sublessor's claim of defaults under the Sublease Interest. In addition, the parties stipulated to the intervention of Office Owner as a party to the proceedings. The parties have been directed to engage in and complete discovery. We consider the litigation to be without merit.
 
Prior to consummating the acquisition of the Sublease Interest, Office Owner received a letter from Sublessor indicating that Sublessor would consider such acquisition a default under the original sublease, which prohibits assignments of the Sublease Interest when there is an outstanding default there under. On February 16, 2007, Office Owner received a Notice to Cure from Sublessor stating the transfer of the Sublease Interest occurred in violation of the Sublease given Sublessor's position that Office Seller is in default. Office Owner will commence and vigorously pursue litigation in order to challenge the default, receive an injunction and toll the termination period provided for in the Sublease.

On September 4, 2007, Office Owner commenced a new action against Sublessor alleging a number claims, including the claims that Sublessor has breached the sublease and committed intentional torts against Office Owner by (among other things) issuing multiple groundless default notices, with the aim of prematurely terminating the sublease and depriving Office Owner of its valuable interest in the sublease.  The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that Office Owner has not defaulted under the sublease, damages for the losses Office Owner has incurred as a result of Sublessor’s wrongful conduct, and an injunction to prevent Sublessor from issuing further default notices without valid grounds or in bad faith.  The Company believes any unfavorable outcome on this matter will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

As of the date hereof, we are not a party to any other material pending legal proceedings.
 
 
29

 
 
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements

In connection with the contribution of the Mill Run Interest (see Note 4) and the POAC Interest (See Note 4), our Operating Partnership entered into the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements with each of Arbor JRM, Arbor CJ, AR Prime, TRAC, Central Jersey and JT Prime (collectively, the “Contributors”). Under the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements, our Operating Partnership is required to indemnify each of Arbor JRM, Arbor CJ, TRAC and Central Jersey with respect to the Mill Run Properties, and AR Prime and JT Prime, with respect to the POAC Properties, from June 26, 2008 for Arbor JRM, Arbor CJ and AR Prime and from August 25, 2009 for TRAC, Central Jersey and JT Prime to June 26, 2013 for, among other things, certain income tax liability that would result from the income or gain which Arbor JRM, Arbor CJ, TRAC, Central Jersey on the one hand, or AR Prime, JT Prime, on the other hand, would recognize upon the Operating Partnership’s failure to maintain the current level of debt encumbering the Mill Run Properties or the POAC Properties, respectively, or the sale or other disposition by the Operating Partnership of the Mill Run Properties, the Mill Run Interest, the POAC Properties, or the POAC Interest (each, an “Indemnifiable Event”). Under the terms of the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements, our Operating Partnership is indemnifying the Contributors for certain income tax liabilities based on income or gain which the Contributors are deemed to be required to include in their gross income for federal or state income tax purposes (assuming the Contributors are subject to tax at the highest regional, federal, state and local tax rates imposed on individuals residing in New York City) as a result of an Indemnifiable Event. This indemnity covers income taxes, interest and penalties and is required to be made on a "grossed up" basis that effectively results in the Contributors receiving the indemnity payment on a net, after-tax basis. The amount of the potential tax indemnity to the Contributors under the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements, including a gross-up for taxes on any such payment, using current tax rates, is estimated to be approximately $95.7 million. The Company has not recorded any liability in its consolidated balance sheets as the Company believes that the potential liability is remote as of September 30, 2010.

Each of the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements imposes certain restrictions upon our Operating Partnership relating to transactions involving the Mill Run Properties and the POAC Properties which could result in taxable income or gain to the Contributors. Our Operating Partnership may not dispose or transfer any Mill Run Property or any POAC Property without first proving that the Operating Partnership possesses the requisite liquidity, including the proceeds from any such transaction, to make any payments that would come due pursuant to the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreement. However, our Operating Partnership may take the following actions: (i) (A) as to the POAC Properties, commencing with the period one year and thirty-one days following the date of the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreement, our Operating Partnership can sell on an annual basis part or all of any of the POAC Properties with an aggregate value of ten percent (10%) or less of the total value of the POAC Properties as of the date of contribution (and any amounts of the ten percent (10%) value not sold can be applied to sales in future years); and (B) as to the Mill Run Properties either the same ten percent (10%) test as set forth above in (i)(A) with respect to the Mill Run Properties or the sale of the property known by Design Outlet Center; and (ii) our Operating Partnership can enter into a non-recognition transaction with either the consent of the Contributors or an opinion from an independent law or accounting firm stating that it is “more likely than not” that the transaction will not give rise to current taxable income or gain.
  
On August 30, 2010, the LVP Parties completed the Simon Transaction which included the disposition their interests in the POAC Properties and the Mill Run Properties and contemporaneously entered into the Simon Tax Matters Agreement. Additionally, the Company has been advised by an independent law firm that it is “more likely than not” that the Simon Transaction will not give rise to current taxable income or loss. Accordingly, the Company believes the Simon Transaction is a non-recognition transaction and not an Indemnifiable Event under the POAC/Mill Run TPA. See Note 3 and below for additional information.
   
Simon Tax Matters Agreements

In connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction (see Note 3), the LVP Parties entered into the Simon Tax Matters Agreement with Simon. Under the Simon Tax Matters Agreement, Simon generally may not engage in a transaction that could result in the recognition of the “built-in gain” with respect to POAC and Mill Run at the time of the closing for specified periods of up to eight years following the closing date.  Simon has a number of obligations with respect to the allocation of partnership liabilities to the LVP Parties.  For example, Simon agreed to maintain certain of the outstanding mortgage loans that are secured by POAC Properties and Mill Run Properties until their respective maturities, and the LVP Parties have provided and will continue to have the opportunity to provide guaranties of collection with respect to the Simon Loan (or indebtedness incurred to refinance the Simon Loan) for at least four years following the closing of the Simon Transaction. The LVP Parties were also given the opportunity to enter into agreements to make specified capital contributions to Simon OP in the event that it defaults on certain of its indebtedness. If Simon breach their obligations under the Simon Tax Matters Agreement, Simon will be required to indemnify the LVP Parties for certain taxes that they are deemed to incur, including taxes relating to the recognition of “built-in gains” with respect to POAC Properties and Mill Run Properties, and gains recognized as a result of a reduction in the allocation of partnership liabilities. These indemnification payments will be “grossed up” such that the amount of the payments will equal, on an after-tax basis, the tax liability deemed incurred because of the breach.

 
30

 

LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)

Simon generally is required to indemnify the LVP Parties and certain affiliates of the Lightstone Group for liabilities and obligations under the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements relating to the contributions of the Mill Run Interest and the POAC Interest (see POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements above) that are caused by Simon OP’s and Simon’s actions subsequent to the closing of the Simon Transaction (the “Indemnified Liabilities”). The Company and its operating partnership are required to indemnify Simon OP and Simon for all liabilities and obligations under the POAC/Mill Run Tax Protection Agreements other than the Indemnified Liabilities.

Simon Loan Collection Guaranties

In connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction (see Note 3), the LVP Parties have provided Simon Loan Collection Guaranties with respect to the Simon Loan in connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction.  See Note 3. Under the terms of the Simon Loan Collection Guaranties, the LVP Parties are obligated to make payments in respect of principal and interest on the Simon Loan after Simon OP has failed to make payments, the Simon Loan has been accelerated, and the lenders have failed to collect the full amount of the Simon Loan after exhausting other remedies. The Simon Loan Collection Guaranties by the LVP Parties are limited to a specified aggregate maximum of $201.1 million, with the maximum of each of the respective LVP Parties limited to an amount that is at least equal to its respective cash considerations.  The maximum amounts of the Simon Loan Collection Guaranties will be reduced to the extent of any payments of principal made by Simon OP or other cash proceeds recovered by the lenders.  In connection with completion of the Simon Transaction, the Company recorded a liability (the “Collection Guaranties Liability”) in the amount of $0.1 million, representing the estimated fair value of the Simon Loan Collection Guaranties as of the closing date, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010.

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to legal proceedings, claims or disputes.

19.
Subsequent Events

In October and November of 2010, the Company entered  into a hedge of its Marco OP Units.  The hedge transactions were executed with Morgan Stanley on 527,803 of the Marco Units (75% of the 703,737 total Marco OP Units).  The hedges were structured as a collar where a series of  puts were purchased at an average strike price of $90.32 per share and a series of calls were sold at an average strike price of $109.95 per share.  Morgan Stanley is restricted under the agreement from assigning its rights to this hedge to another counter party.

The collateral for hedge is the greater of (i) the number of shares hedged times Simon’s stock price or (ii) 150% of the value of the calls sold times 30% less the value of the puts purchased.  The initial collateral requirement was approximately $6.9 million and is subject to change based on changes in the share price of Simon Stock.  The hedge cost $5.6 million, or $10.70 per share, and expires in December 2013. The dividends, if any, on the hedged shares continue to accrue to the Company, however Morgan Stanley has the right to adjust the put strike price for any future increases in the dividend declared by Simon.
 
 
31

 
 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION, CONTINUED:  
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
 
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and the notes thereto. As used herein, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” refer to Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, and, as required by context, Lightstone Value Plus REIT, L.P. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, which we collectively refer to as “the Operating Partnership.”
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
Certain information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains, and other materials filed or to be filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, contain or will contain, forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, including, among others, statements regarding our possible or assumed future results of our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans and objectives, are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.

Such statements are based on assumptions and expectations which may not be realized and are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated. Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.

Risks and other factors that might cause differences, some of which could be material, include, but are not limited to, economic and market conditions, competition, tenant or joint venture partner(s) bankruptcies, changes in governmental, tax, real estate and zoning laws and regulations, failure to increase tenant occupancy and operating income, rejection of leases by tenants in bankruptcy, financing and development risks, construction and lease-up delays, cost overruns, the level and volatility of interest rates, the rate of revenue increases versus expense increases, the financial stability of various tenants and industries, the failure of the Company (defined herein) to make additional investments in real estate properties, the failure to upgrade our tenant mix, restrictions in current financing arrangements, the failure to fully recover tenant obligations for common area maintenance (“CAM”), insurance, taxes and other property expenses, the failure of the Company to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”), the failure to refinance debt at favorable terms and conditions, an increase in impairment charges, loss of key personnel, failure to achieve earnings/funds from operations targets or estimates, conflicts of interest with the Advisor, Sponsor  and their affiliates, failure of joint venture relationships, significant costs related to environmental issues as well as other risks listed from time to time in this Form 10-Q, our Form 10-K, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-117367), as the same may be amended and supplemented from time to time, and in the Company’s other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
 
We believe these forward-looking statements are reasonable; however, undue reliance should not be placed on any forward-looking statements, which are based on current expectations. All written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time unless required by law.
 
 
32

 
 
Overview

Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) has acquired and operates commercial, residential and hospitality properties, principally in the United States. Principally through the Lightstone Value Plus REIT, LP, (the “Operating Partnership”), our acquisitions have included both portfolios and individual properties. Our commercial holdings consist of retail (primarily multi-tenant shopping centers), lodging (primarily extended stay hotels), industrial and office properties and that our residential properties are principally comprised of ‘‘Class B’’ multi-family complexes.

We do not have employees. We entered into an advisory agreement dated April 22, 2005 with Lightstone Value Plus REIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, which we refer to as the “Advisor,” pursuant to which the Advisor supervises and manages our day-to-day operations and selects our real estate and real estate related investments, subject to oversight by our board of directors. We pay the Advisor fees for services related to the investment and management of our assets, and we reimburse the Advisor for certain expenses incurred on our behalf.

Current Environment

The slowdown in the economy coupled with continued job losses and/or lack of job growth leads us to be cautious regarding the expected performance of 2010 for our commercial as well as multi-family residential properties.  In addition, the effect of the current economic downturn is having an impact on many retailers nationwide, including tenants of our commercial properties.  There have been many national retail chains that have filed for bankruptcy.   In addition to those who have filed, or may file, bankruptcy, many retailers have announced store closings and a slowdown in their expansion plans. For multi-family residential properties, in general, evictions have increased and requests for rent reductions and abatements are becoming more frequent.

U.S. and global credit and equity markets have also undergone significant disruption, making it more difficult for many businesses to obtain financing on acceptable terms or at all. As a result of this disruption, in general there has been an increase in the costs associated with the borrowings and refinancing as well as limited availability of funds for refinancing.  If these conditions continue or worsen, our cost of borrowing may increase and it may be more difficult to refinance debt obligations as they come due in the ordinary course.  Our best course of action may be to work with existing lenders to renegotiate an interim extension until the credit markets improve.  See Note 11 of notes to consolidated financial statements for discussion of maturity dates of our debt obligations.

During the second quarter of 2010, as a result of the Company previously defaulting on the debt related to two properties due to the properties no longer being economically beneficial to the Company, the lender foreclosed on these two properties.  As a result of the foreclosure transactions, the debt associated with these two properties of $42.3 million was extinguished and the obligations were satisfied with the transfer of the properties’ assets and working capital and the Company no longer has any ownership interests in these two properties.  The operating results of these two properties through their date of disposition have been classified as discontinued operations on a historical basis for all periods presented.  The transactions resulted in a gain on debt extinguishment of $17.2 million which was recorded during the second quarter of 2010 and is included in discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (see Note 9).   Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of these two properties are reclassified as assets and liabilities disposed of on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009.

Beginning in June 2010, the Company decided to discontinue the monthly required debt service payments of $65,724 on a loan collateralized by an apartment property located in North Carolina, which represents 220 units of the 1,805 units owned in the multi-family segment.  This loan has an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $9.1 million as of September 30, 2010.  The Company determined that future debt service payments on this loan would no longer be economically beneficial to the Company based upon the current and expected future performance of the property associated with this loan.  See Notes 10 and 11.
 
 
33

 
 
As a result of the current environment and the direct impact it has had and continues to have on certain properties, during the second quarter of 2010, two of our properties within our multi-family residential segment were transferred back to the lender as part of foreclosure proceedings.    The foreclosure sales were completed on April 13, 2010 and May 18, 2010, respectively.  The transactions resulted in a gain on debt extinguishment of $17.2 million during the second quarter of 2010 which is included in discontinued operations.   In addition, beginning in June 2010, the Company decided to discontinue its required monthly debt service payment of $65,724 on one of the other properties in our multi-family residential portfolio, which has an outstanding principal balance of $9.1 million as of September 30, 2010.  The Company determined that future debt service payments on this loan would no longer be economically beneficial to the Company based upon the current and expected future performance of the property associated with this loan.   The Company is in discussions with the lender regarding its default status and potential future remedies, which include transferring the property to the lender. Through September 30, 2010, the Company has not recorded any potential prepayment penalties that it may be assessed by the lender as the Company believes that the payment of this potential liability is remote.  See Notes 9 and 10 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

Our operating results are impacted by the health of the North American economies.  Our business and financial performance, including collection of our accounts receivable, recoverability of assets including investments, may be adversely affected by current and future economic conditions, such as a reduction in the availability of credit, financial markets volatility, and recession.

We are not aware of any other material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, other than national economic conditions affecting real estate generally, that may be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either capital resources or the revenues or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of real estate and real estate related investments, other than those referred to in this Form 10-Q.

Simon Transaction

On December 8, 2009, the Company, its Operating Partnership and Pro-DFJV Holdings LLC (“PRO”), a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours (collectively, the “LVP Parties”) entered into a definitive agreement (“the “Contribution Agreement”) with Simon Property Group, Inc. (“Simon Inc.”), a Delaware corporation, Simon Property Group, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Simon OP”), and Marco Capital Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (collectively, referred to herein as “Simon”) providing for the disposition of a substantial portion of our retail properties to Simon including our (i) St. Augustine outlet center (“St. Augustine”), which is wholly owned, (ii) 40.00% interests in its investment in Prime Outlets Acquisitions Company (“POAC”), which includes 18 operating outlet center properties and two development projects, Livermore Valley Holdings, LLC (“Livermore”) and Grand Prairie Holdings, LLC (“Grand Prairie”), and (iii) 36.80% interests in its investment in Mill Run, LLC (“Mill Run”), which includes 2 operating outlet center properties. The terms of the Contribution Agreement were subsequently amended on June 28, 2010 providing for the Company to retain St. Augustine and its interests in certain development properties (Livermore and Grand Prairie) which were owned by POAC. Additionally, certain affiliates of our Sponsor were parties to the Contribution Agreement, pursuant to which they would dispose of their respective ownership interests in POAC and Mill Run and certain other outlet center properties, in which we had no ownership interest, to Simon. 
 
On August 30, 2010, the Simon Transaction closed pursuant to which the LVP Parties disposed their interests in investments in POAC, except for their interests in investments in both Livermore and Grand Prairie which were retained, and Mill Run.

See Note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements for additional information.
 
 
34

 
 
Portfolio Summary –

       
Year Built
   
Leasable Square
   
Percentage Occupied
as of
   
Annualized Revenues
based on rents at
 
   
Location
 
(Range of years built)
   
Feet
   
September 30, 2010
   
September 30, 2010
 
Wholly-Owned Real Estate Properties:
                           
                             
Retail
                           
St. Augustine Outlet Mall
 
St. Augustine, FL
 
1998
      337,720       80.4 %
$
 4.2 million
 
Oakview Power Center
 
Omaha, NE
 
1999 - 2005
      177,103       85.3 %
$
 2.1 million
 
Brazos Crossing Power Center
 
Lake Jackson, TX
 
2007-2008
      61,213       100.0 %
$
 0.8 million
 
       
Retail Total
      576,036       83.9 %      
                                   
Industrial
                                 
7 Flex/Office/Industrial Bldgs from the Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio
 
New Orleans, LA
 
1980-2000
      339,700       72.1 %
$
 2.9 million
 
4 Flex/Industrial Bldgs from the Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio
 
San Antonio, TX
 
1982-1986
      484,255       64.0 %
$
 1.6 million
 
3 Flex/Industrial Buildings from the Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio
 
Baton Rouge, LA
 
1985-1987
      182,792       92.0 %
$
 1.1 million
 
Sarasota Industrial Property
 
Sarasota, FL
 
1992
      276,987       22.1 %
$
 0.2 million
 
       
Industrial Total
      1,283,734       61.1 %      
                                     
Residential
                                 
Michigan Apt's (Four Multi-Family Apartment Buildings)
 
Southeast  MI
 
1965-1972
      1,017       88.0 %
$
 7.0 million
 
Southeast Apt's (Three Multi-Family Apartment Buildings)
 
Greensboro & Charlotte, NC
 
1980-1987
      788       90.1 %
$
 4.4 million
 
                                   
   
Residential Total
      1,805       88.9 %      

           
Year to Date
   
Percentage Occupied
for the Period Ended
   
Revenue per Available
Room through
 
   
Location
 
Year Built
 
Available Rooms
   
September 30, 2010
   
September 30, 2010
 
Wholly-Owned Hospitality Properties:
                         
Sugarland and Katy Highway Extended Stay Hotels
 
Houston, TX
 
1998
    52,671       71.4 %   $ 27.92  
 
           
Leasable Square
   
Percentage Occupied
as of
   
Annualized Revenues
based on rents at
 
   
Location
 
Year Built
 
Feet
   
September 30, 2010
   
September 30, 2010
 
Unconsolidated Affiliated Real Estate Entities-Office:
                         
1407 Broadway
 
New York, NY
 
1952
    1,114,695       78.6 %   $ 32.9 million  
 
 
35

 
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There were no material changes during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 to our critical accounting policies as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Results of Operations

The Company’s primary financial measure for evaluating each of its properties is net operating income (“NOI”).  NOI represents rental income less property operating expenses, real estate taxes and general and administrative expenses.  The Company believes that NOI is helpful to investors as a supplemental measure of the operating performance of a real estate company because it is a direct measure of the actual operating results of the company’s properties.

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 vs. September 30, 2009

Consolidated

Revenues
 
Total revenues decreased by $0.4 million to $8.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $8.8 million for the same period in 2009.  The decrease reflects declines in revenues in our industrial segment and multi-family residential segment of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively.   Revenues in both our retail segment and hotel hospitality segments remained relatively flat.  See “Segment Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009” for additional information on revenues by segment.
 
Property operating expenses
 
Property operating expenses remained relatively flat at $3.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $3.2 million for the same period in 2009.

Real estate taxes
 
Real estate taxes were relatively unchanged at $0.9 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2010 and the same period in 2009.

Loss on long-lived assets

For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company did not record any loss on long-lived assets.  For the same period in 2009, we recorded an aggregate loss on long-lived assets of approximately $44.9  million (of which approximately $18.9 million and $26.0 million are classified in continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, in our consolidated statements) consisting of impairment charges of (i) $43.2 million within our multi-family residential segment associated with the five properties in our Camden portfolio and (ii) $2.0 million within our retail segment associated with our Brazos Crossing power center; partially offset by a $0.2 million gain on disposal of assets.

The aforementioned $43.2 million impairment charge associated with the five properties in our Camden portfolio included impairment charges of (i) $26.0 million related to two properties which were subsequently disposed of through foreclosure during the second quarter of 2010 (see Note 8 of the notes to consolidated financial statements) and (ii) $4.3 million associated with one property that is collateral on a loan currently in default status (see Note 9 to the notes to consolidated financial statements).  The operating results of the two properties through the date of their disposition have been reclassified to discontinued operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented.  The operating results of the one property that is collateral on a loan currently in default status is included in our operating results from continuing operations in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative costs were relatively flat at $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2009.
 
 
36

 

Depreciation and Amortization
 
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $0.5 million to $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from $2.4 million during the same period in 2009.  The reduction in our depreciable asset base during the 2010 period resulted from the aforementioned impairment charges, excluding the impairment charges associated with disposed properties, substantially contributed to the decline.

Other income, net
 
Other income, net increased by $0.3 million to $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $0.1 million for the same period in 2009.  The increase in other income was primarily attributable to $0.2 million of unanticipated insurance settlement proceeds received during the third quarter of 2010 related to fire damage which previously occurred at one of our multi-family residential properties during the first quarter of 2010.

Interest income
 
Interest income was consistent at $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $1.0 million the same period in 2009.

 Interest expense
 
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, was relatively consistent at $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $3.0 million for the same period in 2009.

Gain on disposition of investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities

On August 30, 2010, the Company disposed of certain of its interests in investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities, and recognized a gain on disposition of approximately $142.8 million in the consolidated statements of operations during the third quarter of 2010.  See Notes 3 and 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.  The Company did not dispose of any of its interests in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities during 2009.

Gain/(loss) on sale of marketable securities

Gain/(loss) on sale of marketable securities was zero during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a $1.2 million gain for the same period in 2009 due to timing of sales of securities and the differences in adjusted cost basis compared to proceeds received upon sale.  We sold no marketable securities during the 2010 period.

Loss from investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities

This account represents our portion of the net income/(loss) associated with our interests in investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities which consists of our investments in POAC, Mill Run and 1407 Broadway Mezz II, LLC (“1407 Broadway”).  Our loss from investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities increased by $4.3 million to $7.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $3.5 million during the same period in 2009.

This increase was primarily due to a higher net allocated loss from POAC and Mill Run of approximately $5.3 million (which also reflects $9.6 million of Simon Transaction divestiture costs), partially offset by (i) a decrease in the allocated loss from 1407 Broadway of $0.4 million and (ii) $0.6 million less depreciation expense associated with the difference in our cost of the POAC and Mill investments in excess of their historical net book values.  Our equity earnings in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities were also significantly impacted by the timing of acquisitions and dispositions of our ownership interests in POAC and Mill Run during the 2009 and 2010 periods, respectively.  See Notes 3 and 4 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Noncontrolling interests

The net (income)/loss)allocated to noncontrolling interests relates to the interest in the Operating Partnership held by our Sponsor as well as common units held by our limited partners.
 
 
37

 
 
Segment Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009

Retail Segment

   
For the Three Months Ended
   
Variance
 
   
September 30,
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(unaudited)
             
Revenues
  $ 2,712,518     $ 2,716,180     $ (3,662 )     -0.1 %
NOI
    1,639,038       1,704,824       (65,786 )     -3.9 %
Average Occupancy Rate for period
    84.7 %     91.0 %             -6.9 %

Revenues were relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to same period in 2009.  The revenues for the 2010 period reflect a decrease in rental revenues of approximately $0.1 million, resulting primarily from our lower average occupancy rate, substantially offset by higher straight-line rental income of approximately $0.1 million.

NOI decreased slightly by approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.  This decrease was primarily because of higher bad debt expense of approximately $0.1 million.

Multi- Family Residential Segment

   
For the Three Months Ended
   
Variance
 
   
September 30,
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(unaudited)
             
Revenues
  $ 3,198,154     $ 3,309,756     $ (111,602 )     -3.4 %
NOI
    1,257,413       1,304,166       (46,753 )     -3.6 %
Average Occupancy Rate for period
    88.9 %     89.2 %             -0.3 %

Revenues decreased by approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.   This decline reflects the continued negative impact of the current economic environment which has (i) reduced our average occupancy rate resulting in lower rental revenues, (ii) led to us offering additional rent abatements to assist current tenants and attract new tenants and (iii) forced us to be less aggressive with respect to additional resident charges.

NOI declined by slightly by $46,753 during the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.  This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in revenues discussed above, partially offset by lower property operating expenses during the 2010 period.

Industrial Segment

   
For the Three Months Ended
   
Variance
 
   
September 30,
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(unaudited)
             
Revenues
  $ 1,713,049     $ 1,972,123     $ (259,074 )     -13.1 %
NOI
    845,156       1,276,263       (431,107 )     -33.8 %
Average Occupancy Rate for period
    61.3 %     64.3 %             -4.7 %

Revenue decreased by approximately $0.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three same period in 2009.  This decrease is attributable to the decline in our average occupancy rate due to turnover of small business tenants, which have been negatively impacted by the current economic environment.

NOI decreased by approximately $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.  This decrease reflects the revenues decline discussed above and higher property operating expenses of approximately $0.2 million.
 
 
38

 

Hotel Hospitality Segment

   
For the Three Months Ended
   
Variance
 
   
September 30,
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(unaudited)
             
Revenues
  $ 812,198     $ 824,591     $ (12,393 )     -1.5 %
NOI
    369,729       293,219       76,510       26.1 %
Average Occupancy Rate for period
    74.7 %     65.0 %             14.9 %
Average Revenue per Available Room for period
  $ 30.30     $ 30.90     $ (0.60 )     -1.9 %

Revenues were relatively flat for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to same period in 2009.  Although we experienced an increase in our average occupancy rate, the impact was mitigated by the decline in our average revenue per available room (“Rev PAR”).  The decline in Rev PAR is attributable to a higher percentage of rooms occupied under longer term stays, which typically earn a lower rate than short term stays.

NOI increased by approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.  This increase reflects lower property operating expenses attributable mainly to reduced payroll expense.

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 vs. September 30, 2009

Consolidated

Revenues
 
Total revenues decreased by $1.8 million to $25.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $27.0 million for the same period in, 2009.  The decrease reflects declines in revenues in our (i) retail segment of $0.1 million, (ii) multi-family residential segment of $0.6 million, (iii) industrial segment of $0.5 million and (iv) hotel hospitality segment of $0.6 million.  See “Segment Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009” for additional information on revenues by segment.

Property operating expenses
 
Property operating expenses remained relatively flat at $9.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $9.8 million for the same period in 2009.

Real estate taxes
 
Real estate taxes remained relatively flat at $2.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $2.8 million for the same period in 2009.

Loss on long-lived assets

The loss on long-lived assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $1.4 million primarily includes an impairment charge of $1.2 million recorded in connection with the transfer of St. Augustine from held for sale to held and used during the second quarter of 2010.  The adjustment recorded of $1.2 million was to bring St. Augustine’s assets balance to the lower of their carrying value net of any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the assets been continuously classified as held and used or the fair value on June 28, 2010.  See Note 8 of notes to consolidated financial statements.

For the same period in 2009, we recorded the previously discussed second quarter aggregate loss on long-lived assets of approximately $44.9 million (of which approximately $18.9 million and $26.0 million are classified in continuing operations and discontinued operations, respectively, in our consolidated statements).
 
 
39

 
 
General and administrative expenses

General and administrative costs increased by $1.7 million to $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $5.5 million for the same period in 2009.  The increase is due to the following:

 
·
an increase of $1.0 million in asset management fees resulting from higher average asset values during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 as a result of the acquisition of certain interests in investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities, POAC and Mill Run (collectively, the “2009 Acquisitions”) during 2009  (see Note 4 of the  notes to consolidated financial statements); and

 
·
an increase of $1.0 million in accounting, legal and consulting services due to additional audit fees incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 related to work performed on the aforementioned 2009 Acquisitions which were not part of the audit process for the most of the same period in 2009.

These increases were offset by a net decline of approximately $0.3 million for all other general and administrative costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.

Depreciation and amortization
 
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $1.9 million to $4.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $6.7 million for the same period in 2009 primarily due to a change in depreciation expense associated with St. Augustine.  During 2010, St. Augustine was initially classified as held for sale and on June 28, 2010 this property was reclassified to held and used (see Note 7 of notes to consolidated financial statements). The assets related to St. Augustine were not depreciated during the period January 1 through June 28, 2010 because St. Augustine was classified as held for sale.  The depreciation expense recorded for St. Augustine during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $1.2 million lower compared to the same period in 2009.   In addition, a reduction in the depreciable asset base as a result of the aforementioned impairment charges recorded during 2010 and 2009 periods in our multi-family and retail segments also contributed to the decline.

Other income, net
 
Other income, net increased by $0.3 million to $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $0.4 million for the same period in 2009.  The increase in other income was primarily attributable to $0.2 million of unanticipated insurance settlement proceeds received during the third quarter of 2010 related to fire damage which previously occurred at one of our multi-family residential properties during the first quarter of 2010.

Interest income
 
Interest income was relatively flat at $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $3.1 million for the same period in 2009.

 Interest expense
 
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, was relatively consistent at $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $9.0 million for the same period in 2009.

Gain on disposition of investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities

On August 30, 2010, the Company disposed of certain of its interests in investment in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities and recognized a gain on disposition of approximately $142.8 million in the consolidated statements of operations during the third quarter of 2010.  See Notes 3 and 4 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.  The Company did not dispose of any of its interests in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities during 2009.
 
 
40

 
 
Gain/(loss) on sale of marketable securities

Gain/(loss) on sale of marketable securities decreased by $0.2 million to a $0.1 million gain for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a $0.3 million gain for the same period in 2009 due to timing of sales of securities and the differences in adjusted cost basis compared to proceeds received upon sale.

Income/(loss) from investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities

This account represents our portion of the net income/(loss) associated with our interests in investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities which consists of our investments in POAC, Mill Run and 1407 Broadway.  Our loss from investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities increased by $7.4 million to $11.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $4.2 million during the same period in 2009.

This increase was primarily due to (i) a higher net allocated loss from POAC and Mill Run of approximately $3.1 million (which reflects $9.6 million of Simon Transaction divestiture costs) and (ii) $4.4 million more depreciation expense associated with the difference in our cost of the POAC and Mill investments in excess of their historical net book values, partially offset by a decrease in allocated loss from 1407 Broadway of $0.3 million.  Our equity earnings in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities were also significantly impacted by the timing of acquisitions and dispositions of our ownership interests in POAC and Mill Run during the 2009 and 2010 periods, respectively.  See Notes 3 and 4 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.

Noncontrolling interests

The loss allocated to noncontrolling interests relates to the interest in the Operating Partnership held by our Sponsor as well as common units held by our limited partners.

Segment Results of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 compared to September 30, 2009

Retail Segment

   
For the Nine Months Ended
   
Variance
 
   
September 30,
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(unaudited)
             
Revenues
  $ 8,140,540     $ 8,286,105     $ (145,565 )     -1.8 %
NOI
    4,976,953       4,958,783       18,170       0.4 %
Average Occupancy Rate for period
    87.1 %     89.9 %             -3.1 %

The decline in revenues of approximately $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to same period in 2009 was primarily due to in decline in specialty leasing income at one of our centers.

NOI improved slightly by $18,170 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.  This increase was primarily driven by lower salary and leasing-related expenses partially offset by the decline in revenues discussed above.
 
 
41

 

Multi-Family Residential Segment

   
For the Nine Months Ended
   
Variance
 
   
September 30,
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(unaudited)
             
Revenues
  $ 9,642,549     $ 10,216,946     $ (574,397 )     -5.6 %
NOI
    3,746,473       4,056,141       (309,668 )     -7.6 %
Average Occupancy Rate for period
    88.7 %     90.0 %             -1.4 %

Revenues decreased by approximately $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.   This decline reflects the continued negative impact of the current economic environment which has (i) reduced our average occupancy rate resulting in lower rental revenues of approximately $0.2 million, (ii) led to us offering an additional approximately $0.2 million of rent abatements to assist current tenants and attract new tenants and (iii) forced us to be less aggressive by approximately $0.1 million with respect to additional resident charges.

NOI decreased by approximately $0.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.  This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in revenues discussed above, partially offset by lower bad debt of approximately $0.2 million.

Industrial Segment

   
For the Nine Months Ended
   
Variance
 
   
September 30,
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(unaudited)
             
Revenues
  $ 5,206,108     $ 5,669,103     $ (462,995 )     -8.2 %
NOI
    2,820,213       3,562,006       (741,793 )     -20.8 %
Average Occupancy Rate for period
    62.1 %     65.8 %             -5.6 %

Revenue decreased by approximately $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three same period in 2009.  This decrease is attributable to the decline in our average occupancy rate due to turnover of small business tenants, which have been negatively impacted by the current economic environment.

NOI decreased by approximately $0.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.  This decrease reflects the revenues decline discussed above and higher property operating expenses of approximately $0.3 million associated with roof repair, painting and insurance premiums.

Hotel Hospitality Segment

   
For the Nine Months Ended 
   
Variance
 
   
September 30,
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
$
   
%
 
   
(unaudited)
             
Revenues
  $ 2,218,428     $ 2,780,763     $ (562,335 )     -20.2 %
NOI
    841,705       1,233,702       (391,997 )     -31.8 %
Average Occupancy Rate for period
    71.4 %     69.4 %             2.9 %
Average Revenue per Available Room for period
  $ 27.92     $ 34.55     $ (6.63 )     -19.2 %

Revenues decreased by approximately $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to same period in 2009.  Although we experienced an increase in our average occupancy rate, the impact was mitigated by the decline in our average Rev PAR.  The decline in Rev PAR is attributable to a higher percentage of rooms occupied under longer term stays, which typically earn a lower rate than short term stays.  Additionally, one of our hotels had a hot water maintenance issue during the 2010 period, which impacted its number of stays.
 
 
42

 
 
NOI decreased by approximately $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period in 2009.  This decrease reflects the decrease in revenues discussed above partially offset by lower property operating expenses mainly attributable to reduced payroll expense.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources   
 
Overview:
 
Rental revenue and borrowing are our principal source of funds to pay operating expenses, debt service, capital expenditures and dividends, excluding non-recurring capital expenditures.
 
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through working capital and proceeds from our dividend reinvestment plan and borrowings.   We believe that these cash resources will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, and we do not anticipate a need to raise funds from other than these sources within the next twelve months.

We currently have $200.2 million of outstanding mortgage debt.  We intend to limit our aggregate long-term permanent borrowings to 75% of the aggregate fair market value of all properties unless any excess borrowing is approved by a majority of the independent directors and is disclosed to our stockholders. We may also incur short-term indebtedness, having a maturity of two years or less.

Our charter provides that the aggregate amount of borrowing, both secured and unsecured, may not exceed 300% of net assets in the absence of a satisfactory showing that a higher level is appropriate, the approval of our board of directors and disclosure to stockholders. Net assets means our total assets, other than intangibles, at cost before deducting depreciation or other non-cash reserves less our total liabilities, calculated at least quarterly on a basis consistently applied. Any excess in borrowing over such 300% of net assets level must be approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to our stockholders in our next quarterly report to stockholders, along with justification for such excess. As of September 30, 2010, our total borrowings represented 67.0% of net assets.
 
Our borrowings consist of single-property mortgages as well as mortgages cross-collateralized by a pool of properties.   We typically have obtained level payment financing, meaning that the amount of debt service payable would be substantially the same each year.  As such, most of the mortgages on our properties provide for a so-called “balloon” payment and are at a fixed interest rate.

Any future properties that we may acquire may be funded through a combination of borrowings and the proceeds received from the disposition of certain of our retail assets (see Note 3 of notes to consolidated financial statements).  These borrowings may consist of single-property mortgages as well as mortgages cross-collateralized by a pool of properties. Such mortgages may be put in place either at the time we acquire a property or subsequent to our purchasing a property for cash. In addition, we may acquire properties that are subject to existing indebtedness where we choose to assume the existing mortgages. Generally, though not exclusively, we intend to seek to encumber our properties with debt, which will be on a non-recourse basis. This means that a lender’s rights on default will generally be limited to foreclosing on the property. However, we may, at our discretion, secure recourse financing or provide a guarantee to lenders if we believe this may result in more favorable terms. When we give a guaranty for a property owning entity, we will be responsible to the lender for the satisfaction of the indebtedness if it is not paid by the property owning entity.
 
We may also obtain lines of credit to be used to acquire properties. These lines of credit will be at prevailing market terms and will be repaid from offering proceeds, proceeds from the sale or refinancing of properties, working capital or permanent financing. Our Sponsor or its affiliates may guarantee the lines of credit although they will not be obligated to do so. We may draw upon the lines of credit to acquire properties pending our receipt of proceeds from our initial public offering. We expect that such properties may be purchased by our Sponsor’s affiliates on our behalf, in our name, in order to minimize the imposition of a transfer tax upon a transfer of such properties to us.

In addition to meeting working capital needs and distributions to our stockholders, our capital resources are used to make certain payments to our Advisor and our Property Manager, included payments related to asset acquisition fees and asset management fees, the reimbursement of acquisition related expenses to our Advisor and property management fees. We also reimburse our Advisor and its affiliates for actual expenses it incurs for administrative and other services provided to us. Additionally, the Operating Partnership may be required to make distributions to Lightstone SLP, LLC, an affiliate of the Advisor.
 
 
43

 

The following table represents the fees incurred associated with the payments to our Advisor, our Dealer Manager, and our Property Manager for the periods indicated:

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(unaudited)
   
(unaudited)
 
Acquisition fees
  $ -     $ 6,878,087     $ -     $ 16,656,847  
Asset management fees
    1,219,936       1,259,999       4,070,585       3,064,827  
Property management fees
    281,246       447,564       1,139,917       1,371,798  
Acquisition expenses reimbursed to Advisor
    -       -       -       902,753  
Development fees and leasing commissions
    13,488       (11,260 )     207,628       194,071  
Total
  $ 1,514,670     $ 8,574,390     $ 5,418,130     $ 22,190,296  
 
As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately $46.6 million of cash and cash equivalents on hand and $180.9 million of marketable securities.

    Summary of Cash Flows
 
The following summary discussion of our cash flows is based on the consolidated statements of cash flows and is not meant to be an all-inclusive discussion of the changes in our cash flows for the periods presented below:

   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
(unaudited)
 
Cash flows provided by operating activities
  $ 6,615,248     $ 2,898,264  
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
    53,765,984       (12,250,690 )
Cash flows used in financing activities
    (30,851,944 )     (34,048,104 )
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
    29,529,288       (43,400,530 )
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
    17,076,320       66,106,067  
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
  $ 46,605,608     $ 22,705,537  

Our principal sources of cash flow are derived from the operation of our rental properties as well as loan proceeds and distributions received from affiliates. We intend that our properties will provide a relatively consistent stream of cash flow that provides us with resources to fund operating expenses, debt service and quarterly dividends.

Our principal demands for liquidity are (i) our property operating expenses, (ii) real estate taxes, (iii) insurance costs, (iv) leasing costs and related tenant improvements, (v) capital expenditures, (vi) acquisition and development activities, (vii) debt service and (viii) distributions to our stockholders and noncontrolling interests. The principal sources of funding for our operations are operating cash flows and proceeds from (i) the disposition of properties or interests in properties, (ii) the issuance of equity and debt securities and (iii) the placement of mortgage loans.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, net cash provided by operating activities was $$6.6 million, net cash provided by investing activities was $53.8 million and net cash used in financing activities was $30.9 million, resulting in an increase in our cash and cash equivalent investing to $46.6 million as of September 30, 2010 from $17.1 million as of December 31, 2009.

Operating activities

Net cash flows provided by operating activities of $6.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 consists of the following:

 
·
net income of approximately $1.9 million, after adjustment for non-cash items and discontinued operations; and

 
·
cash inflows of approximately $4.7 million associated with the net changes in operating assets and liabilities (primarily attributable to the positive cash effect of increases in (i) accounts payable and accrued expenses of $3.7 million), (ii) due to Sponsor of $1.3 million, (iii) prepaid expenses and other assets of $0.3 million and (iv) prepaid rent of $0.2 million, partially offset by the negative cash effect of an increase in tenant accounts receivable of $0.8 million).
 
 
44

 

Investing activities

The net cash provided by investing activities of $53.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 consists of the following:

 
·
cash proceeds of $204.4 million from the disposition of certain of our interests in investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities (see Note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements);

 
·
redemption payments received of $5.4 million related to our investment in affiliate, at cost (see Note 5 of the notes to consolidated financial statements);

 
·
proceeds from the sale of marketable securities of $0.4 million;

 
·
the purchase of $150.0 million of collateralized mortgage obligations (see Note 6 of  the notes to consolidated financial statements;

 
·
capital contributions of $2.5 million to investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities (see Note 4 of the notes to consolidated financial statements;

 
·
capital expenditures of $1.4 million related to our properties; and

 
·
additional funding of restricted escrows of $2.5 million (including $1.5 million of escrows returned to the lender in connection with certain second quarter foreclosure transactions which are classified as discontinued operations).

Financing activities

The net cash used in financing activities of approximately $30.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily related to the following:

 
·
distributions to our common shareholders of $9.8 million;

 
·
distributions to our noncontrolling interests of $18.4 million,(including a $14.1 million distribution related to the disposition of certain of our investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities) (see Notes 3 and 14 of the notes to consolidated financial statements);

 
·
common share redemptions of $1.8 million made pursuant to our share redemption program;

 
·
debt principal payments $2.0 million, including a lump sum principal payment of $0.7 million made in connection with the refinancing of one of our retail properties;

 
·
loan fees and expenses paid of $0.3 million; and

 
·
$1.5 million of proceeds received under a demand grid loan from 1407 Broadway, we also received $2.8 million of proceeds under a demand grid loan from POAC but it was converted to a distribution from our investment in POAC on June 30, 2010 (see note 4 of notes to consolidated financial statements ) .

We anticipate that adequate cash will be available to fund our operating and administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations, and the payment of dividends in accordance with REIT requirements in both the short and long-term.    We believe our current financial condition is sound, however due to the current economic conditions and the continued weakness in, and unpredictability of, the capital and credit markets, we can give no assurance that affordable access to capital will exist when our debt maturities occur.  
 
 
45

 

Contractual Obligations 
 
The following is a summary of our contractual obligations outstanding over the next five years and thereafter as of September 30, 2010.

Contractual
Obligations
 
Remainder of
2010
   
2011
   
2012
   
2013
   
2014
   
Thereafter
   
Total
 
                                           
Mortgage Payable 1
  $ 9,400,504     $ 16,559,012     $ 2,090,767     $ 2,370,084     $ 28,809,456     $ 140,943,708     $ 200,173,531  
                                                         
Interest Payments2
    2,785,543       10,783,140       10,190,593       10,029,118       9,886,252       15,163,525       58,838,171  
                                                         
Total Contractual Obligations
  $ 12,186,047     $ 27,342,152     $ 12,281,360     $ 12,399,202     $ 38,695,708     $ 156,107,233     $ 259,011,702  

1)
The amount due in 2010 of $9.4 million includes the principal balance of $9.1 million associated with the loan within the Camden portfolio that is in default status (see Notes 10 and 11 of notes to consolidated financial statements).

2)
These amounts represent future interest payments related to mortgage payable obligations based on the fixed and variable interest rates specified in the associated debt agreements.  All variable rate debt agreements are based on the one-month rate.  For purposes of calculating future interest amounts on variable interest rate debt the one-month rate as of September 30, 2010 was used.

Certain of our debt agreements require the maintenance of certain ratios, including debt service coverage.  We have historically been and currently are in compliance with all of our debt covenants or have obtained waivers from our lenders, with the exception of (i) the debt service coverage ratio on the debt associated with our hotels (the “Hotels”), which the Company did not meet for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and the quarter ended September 30, 2010 and (ii) the debt service coverage ratios on the debt associated with the Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio, which the Company did not meet for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Under the terms of the loan agreement for the Hotels, the Company, once notified by the lender of noncompliance, has five days to cure by making a principal payment to bring the debt service coverage ratio to at least the minimum.  As of the date of this filing, the Company has not been notified by the bank as per the loan agreement; however if the bank does notify the Company and does not provide a waiver, then the Company will be required to pay approximately $0.3 million as a lump sum principal payment to avoid default.  Under the terms of the loan agreement for the Gulf Coast Industrial Portfolio, the lender may elect to retain all excess cash flow from the associated properties.  As of the date of this filing, the lender has taken no such action.  Additionally, both of these affected loans are current with respect to regularly scheduled monthly debt service payments as of the date of this filing..

We expect to remain in compliance with all our other existing debt covenants; however, should circumstances arise that would constitute an event of default, the various lenders would have the ability to exercise various remedies under the applicable loan agreements, including the potential acceleration of the maturity of the outstanding debt.

See Note 11 of notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our indebtedness.  See Note 10 of notes to consolidate financial statement for discussion of the loan within the Camden portfolio which is in default as a result of nonpayment of debt service.  The principal balance of this loan of $9.1 million has been accelerated and is due immediately.  We have reflected these loans as payments due in 2010 based upon the default status.

Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
 
In addition to measurements defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), our management also focuses on funds from operations (“FFO”) and modified funds from operations (“MFFO”) to measure our performance.   FFO is generally considered to be an appropriate supplemental non-GAAP measure of the performance of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”).  FFO is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc (“NAREIT”) as net earnings before depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, gains or losses on dispositions of real estate, (including such non-FFO items reported in discontinued operations).   Notwithstanding the widespread reporting of FFO, changes in accounting and reporting rules under GAAP that were adopted after NAREIT’s definition of FFO have prompted a significant increase in the magnitude of non-operating items included in FFO.  For example, acquisition expenses, acquisition fees and financing fees, which we intend to fund from the proceeds of this offering and which we do not view as an expense of operating a property, are now deducted as expenses in the determination of GAAP net income.  As a result, we intend to consider a modified FFO, or MFFO, when assessing our operating performance.  We intend to explain all modifications to FFO and to reconcile MFFO to FFO and FFO to GAAP net income when presenting MFFO information.
 
 
46

 
 
Our MFFO is FFO excluding straight-line rental revenue, the net amortization of above-market and below market leases, other than temporary impairment of marketable securities, gain/loss on sale of marketable securities, impairment charges on long-lived assets, gain on debt extinguishment and acquisition-related costs expensed.  Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time.  Since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, many industry investors and analysts have considered the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting alone to be insufficient. 
 
Accordingly, we believe that FFO is helpful to stockholders and our management as a measure of operating performance because it excludes depreciation and amortization, gains and losses from property dispositions, and extraordinary items, and as a result, when compared year over year, reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which is not immediately apparent from net income.  We believe that MFFO is helpful to stockholders and our management as a measure of operating performance because it excludes charges that management considers more reflective of investing activities or non-operating valuation changes.  By providing FFO and MFFO, we present information that reflects how our management analyzes our long-term operating activities.  We believe fluctuations in MFFO are indicative of changes in operating activities and provide comparability in evaluating our performance over time and as compared to other real estate companies that may not be affected by impairments or acquisition activities. 
 
Below is a reconciliation of net income/(loss) to FFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

   
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
                         
Net income/(loss)
  $ 133,624,840     $ (49,319,070 )   $ 142,269,014     $ (57,071,916 )
Adjustments:
                               
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets
    1,921,700       2,410,574       4,801,290       6,716,175  
Equity in depreciation and amortization for unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
    6,141,234       8,287,673       24,582,477       16,700,083  
(Gain)/loss on long-lived assets on disposal
    -       (237,808 )     230,445       (237,808 )
Gain on disposal of investment property for unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities
    (142,779,604 )     (10,186 )     (142,783,910 )     (19,700 )
Discontinued Operations:
                               
Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets
    -       283,763       204,449       851,834  
                                 
FFO
  $ (1,091,830 )   $ (38,585,054 )   $ 29,303,765     $ (33,061,332 )
                                 
Less: FFO attributable to noncontrolling interests
    16,798       527,116       (456,674 )     487,287  
                                 
FFO  attributable to Company's common share
  $ (1,075,032 )   $ (38,057,938 )   $ 28,847,091     $ (32,574,045 )
                                 
FFO per common share, basic and diluted
  $ (0.03 )   $ (1.22 )   $ 0.91     $ (1.04 )
                                 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic and diluted
    31,818,482       31,297,445       31,757,597       31,204,618  
 
 
47

 

Below is the reconciliation of MFFO for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

   
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
   
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
                         
FFO
  $ (1,091,830 )   $ (38,585,054 )   $ 29,303,765     $ (33,061,332 )
Adjustments:
                               
Noncash Adjustments:
                               
Amortization of above and below market leases (1)
    (93,256 )     (101,666 )     (195,531 )     (316,725 )
Straight-line rent adjustment (2)
    (668,929 )     (245,655 )     (2,128,445 )     (655,383 )
Loss on long-lived assests
    -       45,198,614       1,193,233       45,198,614  
Gain on debt extinguishment
    (74 )     -       (17,169,736 )     -  
(Gain)/loss on sale of marketable securities
    -       (1,187,624 )     (66,756 )     (343,725 )
Other than temporary impairment - marketable securities
    -       -       -       3,373,716  
Total non cash adjustments
    (762,259 )     43,663,669       (18,367,235 )     47,256,497  
Other adjustments:
                               
Acquisition/divestiture costs expensed (3)
    10,470,846       1,279,774       12,226,845       1,432,282  
                                 
MFFO
  $ 8,616,757     $ 6,358,389     $ 23,163,375     $ 15,627,447  
                                 
Less: MFFO attributable to noncontrolling interests
    (132,570 )     (86,854 )     (359,163 )     (176,654 )
                                 
MFFO  attributable to Company's common share
  $ 8,484,187     $ 6,271,535     $ 22,804,212     $ 15,450,793  

1)
Amortization of above and below market leases includes amortization for wholly owned subsidiaries in continuing operations as well as amortization from unconsolidated entities.

2)
Straight-line rent adjustment includes straight-line rent for wholly owned subsidiaries in continuing operations as well as straight-line rent from unconsolidated entities.

3)
Acquisitions/divestiture costs expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 represents divestiture costs from unconsolidated entities.  In connection with the closing of the Simon Transaction (see Note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements) approximately $9.6 million of divestiture costs are included in the Company’s loss on investments on unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities during the third quarter of 2010.

Sources of Distribution

 Since the period beginning February 1, 2006 through March 31, 2010, our Board declared a distribution for each three-month period, or quarter. These distributions were calculated based on stockholders of record each day during the applicable three-month period at a rate of $0.0019178 per day, which, if paid each day for a 365-day period, equaled a 7.0% annualized rate based on a share price of $10.00.

On July 28, 2010, our Board declared a distribution for the three-month period ending June 30, 2010. This distribution was calculated based on shareholders of record each day during the three-month period at a rate of $0.00109589 per day, and equaled a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, equaled a 4.0% annualized rate based on a share price of $10.00. The distribution was paid in cash on August 6, 2010 to shareholders of record during the three-month period ended June 30, 2010.

In addition, on July 28, 2010, our Board decided to temporarily suspend our distribution reinvestment program (the “DRIP”) pending final approval of the related registration statement (the “DRIP Registration Statement”) by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  Once the DRIP Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC, the Board intended to resume the DRIP and the Company would pay out any future quarterly distributions in the form of cash or shares issued under the DRIP, based upon the individual shareholder’s preference on record.
 
 
48

 

Furthermore, on July 28, 2010, our Board decided to temporarily lower the distribution rate pending the closing of the Simon Transaction (see Note 2 of the notes to financial statements for further discussion).  Our Board also decided to meet as soon as a closing date for the Simon Transaction was set with the intention of declaring an additional distribution for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 equal to a 4% annualized rate (the “Additional Distribution”), which would be payable after the closing of the Simon Transaction.  The Additional Distribution would bring the aggregate total distributions for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to an amount equal to an 8% annualized rate, based on a share price of $10.00, which represents an increase over the prior quarterly distributions which were equal to an annualized rate of 7%.  The Simon Transaction closed on August 30, 2010 and our Board declared the Additional Distribution, which was paid in cash on October 15, 2010 to stockholders of record during the three-month period ended June 30, 2010.

On September 16, 2010, our Board declared a distribution for the three-month period ending September 30, 2010.  This distribution was calculated based on shareholders of record each day during the three-month period at a rate of $0.0019178 per day, and equaled a daily amount that, if paid each day for a 365-day period, equaled a 7.0% annualized rate based on a share price of $10.00.   In addition, on October 26, 2010, DRIP Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC and the DRIP was reinstated by the Company.  The distribution was paid on October 29, 2010 to shareholders of record during the three-month period ended September 30, 2010.

The amount of distributions paid to our stockholders in the future will be determined by our Board and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for payment of dividends, our financial condition, capital expenditure requirements and annual distribution requirements needed to maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.

The following table provides a summary of the quarterly distributions declared and the source of distribution based upon cash flows provided by operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

   
Year to Date
   
Quarter ended
   
Quarter ended
   
Quarter ended
 
   
September 30, 2010
   
September 30, 2010
   
June 30, 2010
   
March 31, 2010
 
                         
Distribution period:
          Q3 2010       Q2 2010       Q1 2010  
                               
Date(s) distribution declared
       
September 16, 2010
   
July 28 and
August 30, 2010, 2010
   
March 2, 2010
 
                               
Date(s) distribution paid
       
October 29, 2010
   
August 6 and
October 15, 2010
   
March 30, 2010
 
                               
Distributions Paid
  $ 13,442,831     $ 3,756,062     $ 6,353,866     $ 3,332,903  
Distributions Reinvested
    4,020,012       1,892,530       -       2,127,482  
Total Distributions
  $ 17,462,843     $ 5,648,592     $ 6,353,866     $ 5,460,385  
                                 
Source of distributions
                               
Cash flows used in operations
  $ 6,615,248     $ 5,452,208     $ (74,995 )   $ 1,238,035  
Proceeds from investment in affiliates and excess cash
    8,720,113       196,384       6,428,861       2,094,868  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    2,127,482       -       -       2,127,482  
Total Sources
  $ 17,462,843     $ 5,648,592     $ 6,353,866     $ 5,460,385  
 
 
49

 

The following table provides a summary of the quarterly distributions declared and the source of distribution based upon cash flows provided by operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009

   
Year to Date
   
Quarter ended
   
Quarter ended
   
Quarter ended
 
   
September 30, 2009
   
September 30, 2009
   
June 30, 2009
   
March 31, 2009
 
                         
Distribution period:
          Q3 2009       Q2 2009       Q1 2009  
                               
Date distribution declared
       
September 17, 2009
   
May 13, 2009
   
March 30, 2009
 
                               
Date distribution paid
       
October 15, 2009
   
July 15, 2009
   
April 15, 2009
 
                               
Distributions Paid
  $ 9,255,027     $ 3,151,937     $ 3,050,200     $ 3,052,890  
Distributions Reinvested
    7,074,324       2,367,469       2,394,520       2,312,335  
Total Distributions
  $ 16,329,351     $ 5,519,406     $ 5,444,720     $ 5,365,225  
                                 
Source of distributions
                               
Cash flows used in operations
  $ 2,898,264     $ 1,169,895     $ 1,006,312     $ 722,057  
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    13,431,087       4,349,511       4,438,408       4,643,168  
Total Sources
  $ 16,329,351     $ 5,519,406     $ 5,444,720     $ 5,365,225  

The cash flows provided operations include an adjustment to remove the income from investments in unconsolidated affiliated real estate entities as any cash distributions from these investments are recorded through cash flows from investing activities.

Management also evaluates the source of distribution funding based upon MFFO.   Based upon MFFO for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 100% of our distributions to our common stockholders will be or were funded from MFFO.

Based upon MFFO, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 100% and 95%, respectively, of our distributions to our common stockholders were funded or will be funded from MFFO.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”, which was primarily codified into Topic 810 in the Accounting standards Codification (“ASC”).  This standard requires ongoing assessments to determine whether an entity is a variable entity and requires qualitative analysis to determine whether an enterprise’s variable interest(s) give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. In addition, it requires enhanced disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This standard is effective for the fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2010 and the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”.  ASU No. 2010-06 amends ASC 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. This ASU became effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company has determined that all other recently issued accounting pronouncements will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows, or do not apply to its operations.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
 
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. In pursuing our business plan, we expect that the primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate risk.
 
 
50

 

We may be exposed to the effects of interest rate changes primarily as a result of borrowings used to maintain liquidity and fund the expansion and refinancing of our real estate investment portfolio and operations. Our interest rate risk management objectives will be to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower overall borrowing costs while taking into account variable interest rate risk. To achieve our objectives, we may borrow at fixed rates or variable rates. We may also enter into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes. As of September 30, 2010, we had one interest rate cap outstanding with an insignificant intrinsic value.

As of September 30, 2010, we held various marketable securities of approximately $180.9 million, which are available for sale for general investment return purposes (see Note 6 of the notes to consolidated financial statements).  We regularly review the market prices of these investments for impairment purposes.  As of September 30, 2010, a hypothetical adverse 10% movement in market values would result in a hypothetical loss in fair value of approximately by approximately $18.1 million.

The following table shows the mortgage payable obligations maturing during the next five years and thereafter as of September 30, 2010:
 
   
Remainder of
2010 (1)
   
2011
   
2012
   
2013
   
2014
   
Thereafter
   
Total
 
                                                         
Mortgage Payable
  $ 9,400,504     $ 16,559,012     $ 2,090,767     $ 2,370,084     $ 28,809,456     $ 140,943,708     $ 200,173,531  
 
1)
In addition, the amount due in the remainder of 2010 of $9.4 million includes the principal balance of $9.1 million associated with a loan within the Camden portfolio that is in default status (see Note 9 and 10 of notes to consolidated financial statements).

As of September 30, 2010, approximately $15.8 million, or 8%, of our debt are variable rate instruments and our interest expense associated with these instruments is, therefore, subject to changes in market interest rates.  However, approximately $6.5 million of our total outstanding variable-rate indebtedness was subject to a floor rate of 6.75% as of September 30, 2010.  Based on rates as of September 30, 2010, a 1% adverse movement (increase in LIBOR) would increase our annual interest expense by approximately $0.1 million.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of the mortgage payable as of September 30, 2010 was approximately $206.7 million compared to the book value of approximately $200.2 million. The fair value of the mortgage payable as of December 31, 2009 was approximately $235.3 million, which includes $42.3 million related debt classified as liabilities  disposed of compared to the book value of approximately $244.5 million, including $42.3 related to debt classified as liabilities disposed of. The fair value of the mortgage payable was determined by discounting the future contractual interest and principal payments by a market interest rate.

 In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our real estate and real estate related investments is subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees, which may affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary. As of September 30, 2010, the only off-balance sheet arrangements we had outstanding was an interest rate cap with an insignificant intrinsic value.

 We cannot predict the effect of adverse changes in interest rates on our debt and, therefore, our exposure to market risk, nor can we provide any assurance that long-term debt will be available at advantageous pricing. Consequently, future results may differ materially from the estimated adverse changes discussed above.

ITEM 4 (T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
 
As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required.
 
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses identified in the evaluation, and therefore, no corrective actions were taken.
 
 
51

 
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION:
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to legal proceedings, claims or disputes.

On March 29, 2006, Jonathan Gould, a former member of our Board of Directors and Senior Vice-President-Acquisitions, filed a lawsuit against us in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. The suit alleges, among other things, that Mr. Gould was insufficiently compensated for his services to us as director and officer. Mr. Gould sought damages of (i) up to $11,500,000 or (ii) a 2.5% ownership interest in all properties that we acquire and an option to acquire up to 5% of the membership interests of Lightstone SLP, LLC. We filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. After review of the motion to dismiss, counsel for Mr. Gould represented that Mr. Gould was dropping his claim for ownership interest in the properties we acquire and his claim for membership interests. Mr. Gould’s counsel represented that he would be suing only under theories of quantum merit and unjust enrichment seeking the value of work he performed.  Management believes that this suit is frivolous and entirely without merit and intends to defend against these charges vigorously. The Company believes any unfavorable outcome on this matter will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

On January 4, 2007, 1407 Broadway Real Estate LLC ("Office Owner"), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of 1407 Broadway Mezz II LLC ("1407 Broadway "), consummated the acquisition of a sub-leasehold interest (the "Sublease Interest") in an office building located at 1407 Broadway, New York, New York (the "Office Property"). 1407 Broadway is a joint venture between LVP 1407 Broadway LLC ("LVP LLC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership, and Lightstone 1407 Manager LLC ("Manager"), which is wholly owned by David Lichtenstein, the Chairman of our Board of Directors and our Chief Executive Officer, and Shifra Lichtenstein, his wife.
 
 The Sublease Interest was acquired pursuant to a Sale and Purchase of Leasehold Agreement with Gettinger Associates, L.P. ("Gettinger"). In July 2006, Abraham Kamber Company, as Sublessor under the sublease ("Sublessor"), served two notices of default on Gettinger (the "Default Notices"). The first alleged that Gettinger had failed to satisfy its obligations in performing certain renovations and the second asserted numerous defaults relating to Gettinger's purported failure to maintain the Office Property in compliance with its contractual obligations.

In response to the Default Notices, Gettinger commenced legal action and obtained an injunction that extends its time to cure any default, prohibits interference with its leasehold interest and prohibits Sublessor from terminating its sublease pending resolution of the litigation. A motion by Sublessor for partial summary judgment, alleging that certain work on the Office Property required its prior approval, was denied by the Supreme Court, New York County. Subsequently, by agreement of the parties, a stay was entered precluding the termination of the Sublease Interest pending a final decision on Sublessor's claim of defaults under the Sublease Interest. In addition, the parties stipulated to the intervention of Office Owner as a party to the proceedings. The parties have been directed to engage in and complete discovery. We consider the litigation to be without merit.
 
Prior to consummating the acquisition of the Sublease Interest, Office Owner received a letter from Sublessor indicating that Sublessor would consider such acquisition a default under the original sublease, which prohibits assignments of the Sublease Interest when there is an outstanding default there under. On February 16, 2007, Office Owner received a Notice to Cure from Sublessor stating the transfer of the Sublease Interest occurred in violation of the Sublease given Sublessor's position that Office Seller is in default. Office Owner will commence and vigorously pursue litigation in order to challenge the default, receive an injunction and toll the termination period provided for in the Sublease.

On September 4, 2007, Office Owner commenced a new action against Sublessor alleging a number claims, including the claims that Sublessor has breached the sublease and committed intentional torts against Office Owner by (among other things) issuing multiple groundless default notices, with the aim of prematurely terminating the sublease and depriving Office Owner of its valuable interest in the sublease.  The complaint seeks a declaratory judgment that Office Owner has not defaulted under the sublease, damages for the losses Office Owner has incurred as a result of Sublessor’s wrongful conduct, and an injunction to prevent Sublessor from issuing further default notices without valid grounds or in bad faith.  The Company believes any unfavorable outcome on this matter will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

As of the date hereof, we are not a party to any other material pending legal proceedings.
 
 
52

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
During the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, and we did not repurchase any shares.

Effective March 2, 2010, our board of directors (the “Board”) voted to temporarily suspend future share redemptions under the share redemption plan (the “Share Redemption Plan”) pending completion of a previously announced transaction relating to the disposition of certain retail outlet assets to Simon Property Group, Inc. and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Simon”).  On August 30, 2010, the transaction with Simon closed and on September 16, 2010, the Company’s Board voted to reinstate effective October 1, 2010 future share redemptions, subject to certain restrictions, at a price of $9.00 per share under the Share Redemption Plan.

In addition, on July 28, 2010, the Board temporarily suspended the distribution reinvestment program (the Dividend Reinvestment Program”) pending final approval of the registration statement by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  On October 26, 2010, the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC and the Dividend Reinvestment Program was reinstated by the Company.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number
 
 
Description
     
31.1*
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
31.2*
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15 d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.
32.1*
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551 this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be “filed.”
32.2*
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Pursuant to SEC Release 34-47551 this Exhibit is furnished to the SEC and shall not be deemed to be “filed.”
 
*Filed herewith
 
 
53

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 
LIGHTSTONE VALUE PLUS REAL ESTATE
INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.
   
Date: November 15, 2010
By:  
/s/ David Lichtenstein
 
David Lichtenstein
 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
Date: November 15, 2010
By:  
/s/ Donna Brandin
 
Donna Brandin
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and
 
Accounting Officer)
 
 
54