LISATA THERAPEUTICS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
June 30, 2010
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the Transition Period from
__________________ to
_________________________
Commission File Number
0-10909
NEOSTEM, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified
in its charter)
DELAWARE
|
22-2343568
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
420 LEXINGTON AVE, SUITE
450
NEW YORK, NEW
YORK
|
10170
|
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
(zip
code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including
area code: 212-584-4180
(Former name, former address and former
fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes o No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o (Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting
company
x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
Yes o No x
57,001,543 SHARES, $.001 PAR VALUE, AS OF
August 16, 2010
(Indicate the number of shares
outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date)
INDEX
Page No.
|
||
Part I - Financial
Information:
|
||
Item 1.
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited):
|
3
|
Consolidated Balance
Sheets At June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009
|
3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and
2009
|
4
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
|
5
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
6-28
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
29-38
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
|
39
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and
Procedures
|
39
|
Part II - Other
Information:
|
||
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
41
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
41
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
43
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
|
44
|
Item 4.
|
Removed and
Reserved
|
44
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
44
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
44
|
Signatures
|
45
|
2
Item 1. Consolidated Financial
Statements
NEOSTEM, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Unaudited)
June 30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
Assets
|
||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$ | 10,958,776 | $ | 7,159,369 | ||||
Short term
investment
|
293,971 | 287,333 | ||||||
Restricted
cash
|
4,096,265 | 4,714,610 | ||||||
Account receivable trade, less
allowance for doubtful accounts
|
6,013,818 | 5,725,241 | ||||||
of $303,269 and $273,600,
respectively
|
||||||||
Inventories
|
16,381,569 | 12,979,008 | ||||||
Prepaids and other current
assets
|
1,015,426 | 933,657 | ||||||
Total current
assets
|
38,759,825 | 31,799,218 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment,
net
|
30,192,149 | 21,271,405 | ||||||
Land use rights,
net
|
4,659,014 | 4,698,567 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
34,425,728 | 34,425,728 | ||||||
Intangible assets,
net
|
||||||||
Lease
rights
|
460,462 | 633,136 | ||||||
Customer list,
net
|
14,312,808 | 15,079,567 | ||||||
Other intangible assets,
net
|
719,803 | 747,288 | ||||||
Total intangible assets,
net
|
15,493,073 | 16,459,991 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
317,842 | 238,941 | ||||||
$ | 123,847,631 | $ | 108,893,850 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 9,350,135 | $ | 8,263,718 | ||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
4,993,129 | 2,965,525 | ||||||
Bank loans
|
- | 2,197,500 | ||||||
Notes
payable
|
10,902,298 | 9,793,712 | ||||||
Unearned
revenues
|
1,432,527 | 2,273,105 | ||||||
Total current
liabilities
|
26,678,089 | 25,493,560 | ||||||
Long-term
liabilities
|
||||||||
Deferred tax
liability
|
4,319,504 | 4,440,748 | ||||||
Unearned
revenues
|
203,704 | - | ||||||
Amount due related
party
|
7,855,238 | 7,234,291 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||||
Convertible Redeemable Series C
Preferred stock;
|
- | 13,720,048 | ||||||
8,177,512 shares designated,
liquidation value $12.50 per share;
|
||||||||
zero and 8,177,512 shares issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2010
|
||||||||
and December 31,
2009
|
||||||||
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Shareholders'
Equity
|
||||||||
Preferred stock; authorized,
20,000,000 shares
|
- | - | ||||||
Series B convertible redeemable
preferred stock
|
100 | 100 | ||||||
liquidation value, 1 share of
common stock, $.01 par value;
|
||||||||
825,000 shares designated; issued
and outstanding,
|
||||||||
10,000 shares at June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009
|
||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value,
authorized 500,000,000 shares
|
56,675 | 37,193 | ||||||
issued and outstanding, 56,675,496
at June 30, 2010
|
||||||||
and 37,193,491 shares at December
31, 2009
|
||||||||
Additional paid-in
capital
|
129,485,735 | 95,709,491 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(81,839,591 | ) | (71,699,191 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
income/(loss)
|
99,755 | (67,917 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders'
equity
|
47,802,674 | 23,979,676 | ||||||
Noncontrolling
interests
|
36,988,422 | 34,025,527 | ||||||
Total
equity
|
84,791,096 | 58,005,203 | ||||||
$ | 123,847,631 | $ | 108,893,850 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements
3
NEOSTEM, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Statement of
Operations
|
||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June
30,
|
Six Months Ended June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 19,407,523 | $ | 31,600 | $ | 35,240,702 | $ | 76,738 | ||||||||
Cost of
revenues
|
12,911,800 | 15,750 | 23,763,418 | 39,300 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
6,495,723 | 15,850 | 11,477,284 | 37,438 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general, and
administrative
|
7,865,477 | 4,199,903 | 14,154,965 | 5,823,812 | ||||||||||||
Research and
development
|
2,133,172 | 515,264 | 3,433,542 | 769,892 | ||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(3,502,926 | ) | (4,699,317 | ) | (6,111,223 | ) | (6,556,266 | ) | ||||||||
Other income
(expense):
|
||||||||||||||||
Other income/(expense),
net
|
149,571 | 12,389 | (14,502 | ) | 12,694 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(6,198 | ) | (4,437 | ) | (14,717 | ) | (15,036 | ) | ||||||||
143,373 | 7,952 | (29,219 | ) | (2,342 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss from operations before
provision for income taxes and noncontrolling
interests
|
(3,359,553 | ) | (4,691,365 | ) | (6,140,442 | ) | (6,558,608 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for income
taxes
|
402,259 | - | 905,203 | - | ||||||||||||
Net loss
|
(3,761,812 | ) | (4,691,365 | ) | (7,045,645 | ) | (6,558,608 | ) | ||||||||
Less - income from operations
attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
1,611,501 | - | 2,940,154 | - | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to
controlling interests
|
(5,373,313 | ) | (4,691,365 | ) | (9,985,799 | ) | (6,558,608 | ) | ||||||||
Preferred
dividends
|
53,771 | 251,727 | 153,469 | 251,727 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders
|
$ | (5,427,084 | ) | $ | (4,943,092 | ) | $ | (10,139,268 | ) | $ | (6,810,335 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted loss per
share
|
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.62 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.86 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
48,771,930 | 7,970,469 | 44,419,456 | 7,887,318 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements
4
NEOSTEM, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months
Ended
|
||||||||
June 30,
|
||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (7,045,645 | ) | $ | (6,558,608 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in
|
||||||||
operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Common stock, stock options and
warrants issued
|
||||||||
as payment for compensation and
services rendered
|
4,339,693 | 1,758,574 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of
intangible assets and prepaid land use rights
|
1,465,220 | 60,009 | ||||||
Loss on short term
investments
|
34,717 | - | ||||||
Bad debt
expense
|
28,176 | - | ||||||
Deferred tax
liability
|
(121,244 | ) | - | |||||
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
(78,895 | ) | (153,794 | ) | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(286,184 | ) | (31,816 | ) | ||||
Inventories
|
(3,331,720 | ) | - | |||||
Unearned
revenues
|
(647,749 | ) | 112,557 | |||||
Other
assets
|
(78,900 | ) | - | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
2,258,073 | (408,122 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
(3,464,458 | ) | (5,221,200 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
||||||||
Restricted cash released as
collateral for bank loan
|
639,944 | - | ||||||
Purchase of short term
investments
|
(2,430,388 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of short term investments | 2,390,602 | - | ||||||
Acquisition of property and
equipment
|
(8,634,298 | ) | (80,947 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(8,034,140 | ) | (80,947 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
||||||||
Net proceeds from the exercise of
warrants
|
2,493,750 | - | ||||||
Net proceeds from the exercise of
options
|
140,100 | - | ||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of
capital stock
|
13,565,504 | - | ||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of
convertible redeemable preferred stock and warrants
|
- | 15,669,220 | ||||||
Amounts due from a related
party
|
375,135 | (375,000 | ) | |||||
Payment of
dividends
|
(222,922 | ) | - | |||||
Repayment of bank
loan
|
(2,209,500 | ) | - | |||||
Repayment of notes
payable
|
(9,988,213 | ) | (1,245,955 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from notes
payable
|
11,046,833 | 1,284,753 | ||||||
Repayment of capitalized lease
obligations
|
- | (12,126 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
15,200,687 | 15,320,892 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rates/changes on cash and cash equivalents | 97,318 | - | ||||||
Net increase in cash and cash
equivalents
|
3,799,407 | 10,018,745 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
7,159,369 | 430,786 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of year
|
$ | 10,958,776 | $ | 10,449,531 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash
Flow Information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid during the period
for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 207,500 | $ | 15,036 | ||||
Income
Taxes
|
999,800 | - | ||||||
Supplemental Schedule of non-cash
investing activities
|
||||||||
Acquisition of property and
equipment
|
$ | 418,000 | - | |||||
Capitalized interest
|
|
205,345 | - | |||||
Supplemental Schedule of non-cash
financing activities
|
||||||||
Financing costs for capital stock
raises
|
463,400 | - | ||||||
Conversion of Convertible Redeemable Series C Preferred stock | 13,720,048 | - |
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements
5
NEOSTEM, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 – The
Company
NeoStem, Inc. (“NeoStem” or the
“Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in September
1980 under the name Fidelity Medical Services, Inc. The Company’s
corporate headquarters is located at 420 Lexington Avenue, Suite 450, New York,
NY 10170, its telephone number is (212) 584-4180 and its website address is
www.neostem.com.
In 2009, through the Company’s expansion
efforts within China and with the acquisition of a controlling interest in
Suzhou Erye Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd. (“Erye”), the Company transitioned into
a multi-dimensional international biopharmaceutical company with product and
service revenues, global research and development capabilities and operations in
three distinct business units: (i) U.S. adult stem cells, (ii) China adult stem
cells, and (iii) China pharmaceuticals, primarily antibiotics. These business
units are expected to provide platforms for the accelerated development and
commercialization of innovative technologies and products in both the U.S. and
China.
In the U.S., the Company is a leading
provider of adult stem cell collection, processing and storage services enabling
healthy individuals to donate and store their stem cells for personal
therapeutic use. Similar to the banking of cord blood, pre-donating cells at a
younger age helps to ensure a supply of one’s own stem cells should they be
needed for future medical treatment. The Company’s current network of U.S. adult
stem cell collection centers is focused primarily on the Southern California and
Northeast markets. During 2010, the Company has begun to enter into new
agreements for collection centers with the goal of expanding its coverage to ten
centers by the end of 2010. Each collection center agreement is effectively a
license that grants a physician practice the right to participate in the
Company’s stem cell collection network and access to its stem cell banking
technology, which includes its know-how, trade secrets, copy rights and other
intellectual property rights owned by the Company and utilized in connection
with the delivery of stem cell collection services. The Company’s
stem cell banking technology is proprietary and the subject of pending patent
applications. The terms of NeoStem’s collection center agreements are
substantially similar. NeoStem grants to each physician practice serving as a
collection center a non-exclusive license to use its trademarks and intellectual
property but otherwise retains all rights thereto, and each collection center is
bound by confidentiality obligations to NeoStem and non-competition provisions.
NeoStem provides adult stem cell processing and storage services, as well as
expertise and certain business, management and administrative services of a
non-clinical nature in support of each physician practice serving as a
collection center. In each case, the physician practice agrees that NeoStem will
be its exclusive provider of adult stem cell processing and storage, management
and other specified services. The agreements also make clear that since NeoStem
is not licensed to practice medicine, NeoStem cannot and does not participate in
clinical care or clinical decision making, both of which are exclusively the
responsibility of the collection center (i.e., the responsibility of the
physician or the medical practice). The agreements provide for the
payment to NeoStem by the collection center of specified fees that typically
include upfront licensing fees and license maintenance fees. As part
of the licensing program, NeoStem also provides marketing and administrative
support services. NeoStem does not have any equity or other ownership interest
in any of the physician medical practices that serve as collection
centers. Each of the agreements is for a multi-year period, depending
on the particular center, and typically has an automatic renewal provision for
consecutive one year periods at the end of the initial term that also permits
either party to terminate prior to renewal. The agreements may also relate to a
territory from which patients seek collection services. The agreements contain
insurance obligations and indemnification provisions, limitations on liability,
non-compete provisions and other standard provisions. Generally, the agreements
may be terminated by either party with prior written notice in the event of an
uncured material breach by the other party and may be terminated by either party
in the event of the other party’s bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or other
similar circumstances, or, depending on the agreement, certain other specified
occurrences.
In 2009, the Company began several
China-based, adult stem cell initiatives including: (i) creating a separate
China-based stem cell collection and banking operation, (ii) constructing a stem
cell research and development laboratory and processing facility in Beijing,
(iii) establishing relationships with hospitals to provide stem cell-based
therapies, and (iv) obtaining product licenses covering several adult stem cell
therapeutics focused on regenerative medicine. In 2010, the Company, through an
exclusive collaborator, began offering stem cell banking services and certain
stem cell therapies to patients in Taiwan.
The cornerstone of the Company’s China
pharmaceuticals business is the 51% ownership interest it acquired in Erye in
October 2009. On October 30, 2009, China Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.
(“CBH”) merged with and into CBH Acquisition LLC (“Merger Sub”), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of NeoStem, with Merger Sub as the surviving entity (the
“Merger”). As a result of the Merger, NeoStem acquired CBH’s 51% ownership
interest in Erye, a Sino-foreign joint venture with limited liability organized
under the laws of the People’s Republic of China. Erye was founded
more than 50 years ago and represents an established, vertically-integrated
pharmaceutical business. Historically, Erye has concentrated its efforts on the
manufacturing and distribution of generic antibiotic products and has received
more than 160 production certificates from the State Food and Drug
Administration of China (“SFDA”), covering both antibiotic prescription drugs
and active pharmaceutical intermediates.
The
results of operations for Erye are included in our consolidated results of
operations beginning on October 30, 2009. The results of operations
for periods prior to October 30, 2009 reflect NeoStem as a stand-alone
entity.
6
Note 2 – Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies
Principles of
Consolidation: The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NeoStem, Inc. (a
Delaware corporation) and its wholly owned and partially owned subsidiaries and
affiliates as listed below:
Entity
|
Percentage of Ownership
|
Location
|
||
NeoStem,
Inc.
|
Parent Company
|
United States of
America
|
||
NeoStem Therapies,
Inc.
|
100%
|
United States of
America
|
||
Stem Cell Technologies,
Inc.
|
100%
|
United States of
America
|
||
NeoStem (China)
Inc.
|
100%
|
People’s Republic of
China
|
||
Qingdao Niao Bio-Technology
Ltd.*
|
*
|
People’s Republic of
China
|
||
Beijing Ruijiao Bio-Technology
Ltd.*
|
*
|
People’s Republic of
China
|
||
China Biopharmaceuticals Holdings,
Inc. (Merger Sub)
|
100%
|
United States of
America
|
||
Suzhou Erye Pharmaceuticals
Company Ltd.
|
51% owned by Merger
Sub
|
People’s Republic of
China
|
* Because certain regulations in the
People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) currently restrict or prohibit foreign
entities from holding certain licenses and controlling certain businesses in
China, the Company created a wholly foreign-owned entity, or WFOE, NeoStem
(China), to implement its expansion initiatives in China. To comply with China’s
foreign investment regulations with respect to stem cell-related activities,
these business initiatives in China are conducted via two Chinese domestic
entities, Qingdao Niao Bio-Technology Ltd., or Qingdao Niao, and Beijing
Ruijieao Bio-Technology Ltd., or Beijing Ruijieao, that are controlled by the
WFOE through various contractual arrangements and under the principles of
consolidation the Company consolidates 100% of their
operations.
Basis of
Presentation: The
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010, the consolidated statements of
operations for the three amd six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, and the
consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009 and related
disclosures contained in the accompanying notes are unaudited. The consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 is derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements included in the annual report filed on Form
10-K with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as adjusted –
see Note 4. The consolidated financial statements are presented on the basis of
accounting principles that are generally accepted in the United States of
America for interim financial information and in accordance with the
instructions of the SEC on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all the information and notes required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for a complete set
of financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which
include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 and the results of operations and
cash flows for the periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 have been made. The
results for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2010 or for any other period. The
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes for the year
ended December 31, 2010 included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Certain reclassifications have been made
to prior year amounts to conform to the current year
presentation. In
particular, the Company reclassified short term investments at December 31, 2009
of $287,333 from Prepaid and other current assets to Short term
investments.
Use of
Estimates: The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Accordingly, actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Cash
Equivalents: Short-term
cash investments, which have a maturity of ninety days or less when purchased,
are considered cash equivalents.
Concentration of
Risks: For
the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, two major suppliers provided
approximately 23% of
Erye’s purchases of raw materials with each supplier individually accounting
for 13% and
10%, respectively. As of
June 30, 2010, the total
accounts payable to the two major suppliers was 24% of the total accounts
payable.
7
Foreign Exchange
Risk: Since 2005, the PRC government has followed a policy of
establishing the value of the Renminbi on a basket of certain foreign currencies
and as a result the value of the Renminbi has fluctuated within a narrow and
managed band. However, the Chinese government has come under increasing U.S. and
international pressure to revalue the Renminbi or to permit it to trade in a
wider band, which many observers believe would lead to substantial appreciation
of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other major currencies. On June 19,
2010, the central bank of China announced that it will gradually modify its
monetary policy and make the Renminbi’s exchange rate more flexible and allow
the Renminbi to appreciate in value in line with its economic strength.
There can be no assurance that the Renminbi will be stable against the
U.S. dollar.
Economic and
Political Risks: The Company faces a number of risks and
challenges since a significant amount of its assets are located in China and its
revenues are derived primarily from its operations in China. China is a
developing country with a young economic market system overshadowed by the
state. Its political and economic systems are very different from the more
developed countries and are still in the stage of change. China also faces many
social, economic and political challenges that may produce major shocks and
instabilities and even crises, in both its domestic arena and its relationship
with other countries, including but not limited to the United States. Such
shocks, instabilities and crises may in turn significantly and negatively affect
the Company’s performance.
Approximately
70% of Erye’s sales are derived from products that use penicillin or
cephalosporin as the key active ingredient. These products are manufactured on 2
of the 8 production lines in Erye’s manufacturing facility. Any issues or
incidents that might disrupt the manufacturing of products requiring penicillin
or cephalosporin could have a material impact on the operating results of
Erye.
Restricted
Cash:
Restricted
cash represents cash required to be deposited with banks in China as collateral
for the balance of bank notes payable and are subject to withdrawal restrictions
according to the agreement with the bank. The required deposit rate is
approximately 30-50% of the notes payable balance.
Accounts
Receivable: Accounts
receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for
doubtful receivables. The Company applies judgment in connection with
establishing the allowance for doubtful accounts. Specifically, the Company
analyzes the aging of accounts receivable balances, historical bad debts,
customer concentration and credit-worthiness, current economic trends and
changes in the Company’s customer payment terms. Significant changes in customer
concentrations or payment terms, deterioration of customer credit-worthiness or
weakening economic trends could have a significant impact on the collectability
of the receivables and the Company’s operating results. If the financial
condition of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be
required. Management regularly reviews the aging of receivables and changes in
payment trends by its customers, and records a reserve when it believes
collection of amounts due are at risk.
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of
cost or market using the first-in, first-out basis. The Company reviews its
inventory periodically and will reduce inventory to its net realizable value
depending on certain factors, such as product demand, remaining shelf life,
future marketing plans, obsolescence and slow-moving
inventories.
June 30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 7,020.6 | $ | 6,338.8 | ||||
Work in
process
|
3,151.7 | 666.7 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
6,209.3 | 5,973.5 | ||||||
Total
inventory
|
$ | 16,381.6 | $ | 12,979.0 |
Property and
Equipment: The cost of
property and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the
related assets of 3 to 30 years. The cost of computer software programs are
amortized over their estimated useful lives of five years. Depreciation is
computed on the straight-line method. Repairs and maintenance expenditures that
do not extend original asset lives are charged to expense as
incurred.
8
June 30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Building and
Improvements
|
$ | 1,620.3 | $ | - | ||||
Machinery and
Equipment
|
7,964.2 | 3,289.3 | ||||||
Lab
Equipment
|
1,049.3 | 704.2 | ||||||
Furniture and
Fixtures
|
322.2 | 273.2 | ||||||
Vehicles
|
264.0 | 75.3 | ||||||
Software
|
92.5 | 81.7 | ||||||
Leasehold
Improvements
|
63.4 | 58.4 | ||||||
Construction in
Progress
|
19,583.3 | 17,075.1 | ||||||
30,959.2 | 21,557.2 | |||||||
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
(767.1 | ) | (285.8 | ) | ||||
Total fixed
assets
|
$ | 30,192.1 | $ | 21,271.4 |
The Company’s results included
depreciation expense of approximately $217,500 and $21,041 for the three months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively,
and $476,900 and $41,799 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Construction-In-Progress: Construction-in-progress represents the
costs incurred in connection with the construction of buildings or new additions
to the Company’s plant facilities. Interest incurred during the period of
construction, if material, is capitalized. Construction-in-progress is not
depreciated until the assets are completed and placed into
service.
Erye is constructing a new factory
and is in the process of relocating to the new facility as
the project is completed. Construction in progress is related to this
production facility and is being built in accordance with the PRC’s Good
Manufacturing Practices (“GMP”) Standard. The Company expects that the
construction will be completed in 2011, however, certain elements of the project
have been completed and put into service in 2010. The estimated
additional cost to complete construction will be approximately $6 million. No depreciation is provided
for construction-in-progress until such time the assets are completed and placed
into service.
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had
construction-in-progress which amounted to $19,583,294 and $17,075,057, respectively. As of June
30, 2010 and December
31, 2009, the Company had
capitalized interest as part of construction-in-progress which amounted to
$765,200 and
$526,900,
respectively.
Income
Taxes: The Company
recognizes (a) the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year
and (b) deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of
events that have been recognized in an enterprise’s financial statement or tax
returns. The Company continues to evaluate the accounting for uncertainty in tax
positions. The guidance requires companies to recognize in their
financial statements the impact of a tax position if the position is more likely
than not of being sustained on audit. The position ascertained inherently
requires judgment and estimates by management. For
the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, management
does not believe the Company has any material uncertain tax positions that
would require it to measure and reflect the potential lack of
sustainability of a position on audit in its financial statements. The Company
will continue to evaluate its uncertain tax positions in future periods to
determine if measurement and recognition in its financial statements is
necessary. The Company does not believe there will be any material
changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next
12 months.
9
Comprehensive Income
(Loss): The accumulated
other comprehensive income/(loss) balance at June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009 in the amount of
$99,755 and
$(67,917), respectively, is
comprised entirely of cumulative losses resulting from foreign currency
translation. Comprehensive loss for the three and
six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 was as follows (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended June
30,
|
Six Months Ended June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (3,761.8 | ) | $ | (4,691.4 | ) | $ | (7,045.6 | ) | $ | (6,558.6 | ) | ||||
Other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
|
154.5 | - | 167.7 | - | ||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive
income
|
154.5 | - | 167.7 | - | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
(3,607.3 | ) | (4,691.4 | ) | (6,877.9 | ) | (6,558.6 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable
to the non-controlling interest
|
1,687.2 | - | 3,022.3 | - | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to
NeoStem
|
$ | (5,294.5 | ) | $ | (4,691.4 | ) | $ | (9,900.2 | ) | $ | (6,558.6 | ) |
Goodwill: Goodwill represents the excess of the
purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business
combination. The Company reviews recorded goodwill for potential impairment
annually or upon the occurrence of an impairment indicator. The Company performs
its annual impairment test as of December 31 each year. See
Note 4.
Prepaid Land Use
Rights:
According to Chinese
law, the government owns all the land in China. Companies or individuals are
authorized to possess and use the land only through land use rights granted by
the Chinese government. Prepaid land use rights are recognized ratably over the
lease term of 50 years.
Intangible
Asset - patent rights: Accounting standards
require purchased intangible assets other than goodwill to be amortized over
their useful lives unless those lives are determined to be indefinite. Purchased
intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization.
Definite-lived intangible assets, which consist of patents and rights associated
primarily with the VSEL™
Technology
which constitutes the principal assets acquired in the acquisition of Stem Cell
Technologies, Inc., have been assigned a useful life and are amortized on a
straight-line basis over a period of nineteen years.
Intangible asset –
product rights - approved Drugs: The Company obtained various official
registration certificates or official approvals for clinical trials representing
patented pharmaceutical formulas. No amortization is recorded when the Company
intends to and has the ability to sell the patent or formulas within two months;
otherwise the patent costs will be subject to amortization over its estimated
useful life which is generally fifteen years. Such costs comprise purchase costs
of patented pharmaceutical formulas and costs incurred for patent application.
Product rights are accounted for on an individual basis.
Impairment of
Long-lived Assets: The Company reviews
long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used for
impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset exceeds the fair value of the
asset. If other events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of an asset that the Company expects to hold and use may not be
recoverable, the Company will estimate the undiscounted future cash flows
expected to result from the use of the asset or its eventual disposition, and
recognize an impairment loss. The impairment loss, if determined to be
necessary, would be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the
assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Accounting for
Share-Based Payment Expense: The Company records share-based payment
expense at fair value. The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes
valuation method for determination of share-based payment
expense. The Company accounts for share-based payment transactions
with non-employees in which services are received in exchange for the equity
instruments based upon the fair value of the equity instruments
issued. Generally, the Company recognizes the fair value of
share-based payment expense in net income on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period. See Note 9. For those awards
that contain performance conditions, expense is generally recognized when the
performance condition is deemed probable of occurring.
Earnings Per
Share : Basic
(loss)/earnings per share is based on the weighted effect of all common shares
issued and outstanding, and is calculated by dividing net (loss)/income
available to common shareholders by the weighted average shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted (loss)/earnings per share, which is calculated by
dividing net (loss)/income available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation
plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming conversion of all
potentially dilutive securities outstanding, is not presented as such
potentially dilutive securities are anti-dilutive in all periods presented. For
the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, the Company
incurred net losses and therefore no common stock equivalents were utilized in
the calculation of earnings per share. At June 30,
2010 and 2009, the Company
excluded the following potentially dilutive securites:
|
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
||||||
Stock
Options
|
11,842,214 | 2,565,800 | ||||||
Warrants
|
18,027,028 | 18,262,204 | ||||||
Series D Convertible Redeemable
Preferred Stock
|
- | 12,932,510 |
10
Revenue
Recognition: The
Company recognizes revenue from pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical intermediary
products sales when title has passed, the risks and rewards of ownership have
been transferred to the customer, the fee is fixed and determinable, and the
collection of the related receivable is probable which is generally at the time
of delivery. The Company initiated the collection and banking of
autologous adult stem cells in the fourth quarter of 2006. The Company
recognizes revenue related to the collection and cryopreservation of autologous
adult stem cells when the cryopreservation process is completed which is
generally twenty four hours after cells have been collected. Revenue related to
advance payments of storage fees is recognized ratably over the period covered
by the advanced payments. The Company earns revenue, in the form of license
fees, from physicians seeking to establish autologous adult stem cell collection
centers. These license fees are typically billed upon signing of the collection
center agreement and qualification of the physician by the Company’s
credentialing committee and at various times during the term of license
agreement based on the terms of the specific agreement. During the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, the Company modified its revenue recognition policy relative to
these license fees to recognize such fees as revenues ratably over the
appropriate period of time to which the revenue element relates. Previously
these license fees were recognized in full when agreements were signed and the
physician had been qualified by the Company’s credentialing committee. This
modification in revenue recognition policy did not have a material impact on the
results of operations. The Company also receives licensing fees from a licensee
for use of its technology and knowledge to operate an adult stem cell banking
operation in China, which licensing fees are recognized as revenues ratably over
the appropriate period of time to which the revenue element relates. In
addition, the Company earns royalties for the use of its name and scientific
information in connection with its License and Referral Agreement with
Promethean Corporation (see “Related Party Transactions” below), which royalties
are recognized as revenue when they are received.
Revenues for the three and
six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were comprised of the
following (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June
30,
|
Six Months Ended June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||||||
Prescription Drugs and
intermediary pharmaceutical products
|
$ | 19,351.3 | $ | - | $ | 35,122.5 | $ | - | ||||||||
Stem cell
revenues
|
21.7 | 14.0 | 66.4 | 58.6 | ||||||||||||
Other
revenues
|
34.5 | 17.6 | 51.8 | 18.1 | ||||||||||||
$ | 19,407.5 | $ | 31.6 | $ | 35,240.7 | $ | 76.7 |
Fair Value
Measurements: Fair value of
financial assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported are
defined as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in
the principal market at the measurement date (exit price). The
Company is required to classify fair value measurements in one of the following
categories:
Level 1 inputs which are defined as
quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement
date.
Level 2 inputs which are defined as
inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for
the assets or liabilities, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 inputs are defined as
unobservable inputs for the assets or liabilities. Financial assets
and liabilities are classified based on the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires
judgment, and may effect the valuation of the fair value of assets and
liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy
levels.
11
The Company determined the fair value of
funds invested in short term investments, which are considered trading
securities, to be level 1 inputs measured by quoted prices of the
securities in active markets. The Company determined the fair value of funds
invested in money market funds to be level 2 inputs, which does not entail
material subjectivity because the methodology employed does not necessitate
significant judgment, and the pricing inputs are observed from actively quoted
markets. The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy
the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair
value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009 (in
thousands):
June 30,
2010
|
||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using Fair
Value Hierarchy
|
||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||
Money Market
Funds
|
- | $ | 1.2 | - | ||||||||
Short term
investments
|
$ | 294.0 | - | - | ||||||||
December 31,
2009
|
||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using Fair
Value Hierarchy
|
||||||||||||
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
||||||||||
Money Market
Funds
|
- | $ | 1,031.0 | - | ||||||||
Short term
investments
|
$ | 287.3 | - | - |
Some of the Company’s financial
instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are recorded
at amounts that approximate fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature,
such as cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, and notes payable.
Foreign Currency
Translation: As the Company’s Chinese pharmaceutical
business is a self-contained and integrated entity, and the Company’s Chinese
stem cell business’ future cash flow is expected to be sufficient to service its
additional financing requirements, the Chinese subsidiaries’ functional currency
is the Renminbi (“RMB”), and the Company’s reporting currency is the US
dollar. Results of foreign operations are translated at the average
exchange rates during the period, and assets and liabilities are translated at
the unified exchange rate as quoted by the People’s Bank of China at the end of
each reporting period. Cash flows are also translated at average translation
rates for the period, therefore, amounts reported on the consolidated statement
of cash flows will not necessarily agree with changes in the corresponding
balances on the consolidated balance sheet.
This quotation of the exchange rates
does not imply free convertibility of RMB to other foreign currencies. All
foreign exchange transactions continue to take place either through the People’s
Bank of China or other banks authorized to buy and sell foreign currencies at
the exchange rate quoted by the People’s Bank of China.
Translation adjustments resulting from
this process are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and
amounted to $99,755 and
$(67,917) as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Assets and liabilities
at June 30, 2010 were
translated at 6.809
RMB to 1 US dollar and at December 31, 2009 assets and liabilities were
translated at 6.835
RMB to 1 US dollar. The average translation rates applied to income statement
accounts and the statement of cash flows for the three
and six months
ended June 30, 2010 were 6.833 and 6.835 RMB to 1 US dollar,
respectively. Since the CBH acquisition closed in October 2009 and
significant China-based stem cell operations began after June 30,
2009, there was no translation
required for the income statement accounts and the statement of cash flows for
the three and six months ended June 30,
2009.
Research and
Development Costs: Research and development
(“R&D”) expenses include salaries, benefits, and other headcount related
costs, clinical trial and related clinical manufacturing costs, contract and
other outside service fees including sponsored research agreements, and
facilities and overhead costs. The Company expenses the costs associated with
research and development activities when incurred.
Shipping and
Handling Costs: Shipping and handling costs are
included in selling, general and administrative expense and were $121,103 and $269,395 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $0 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Statutory
Reserves: Pursuant to laws
applicable to entities incorporated in the PRC, the PRC subsidiaries are
prohibited from distributing their statutory capital and are required to
appropriate from PRC GAAP profit after tax to other non-distributable reserve
funds. These reserve funds include one or more of the following: (i) a general
reserve, (ii) an enterprise expansion fund and (iii) a staff bonus and welfare
fund. Subject to certain cumulative limits (i.e., 50% of the registered capital of
the relevant company), the general reserve fund requires
annual appropriation at 10% of after tax profit (as determined under accounting
principles generally accepted in the PRC at each year-end); the appropriation to
the other funds are at the discretion of the subsidiaries.
12
The general reserve is used to offset
extraordinary losses. Subject to approval by the relevant
authorities, a subsidiary may, upon a resolution
passed by the shareholders, convert the general reserve into registered capital provided that the remaining general
reserve after the
conversion shall be at least 25% of the registered capital of the subsidiary
before the capital increase as a result of the conversion. The staff welfare and bonus reserve is
used for the collective welfare of the employees of the subsidiary. The
enterprise expansion reserve is for the expansion of the subsidiary’s operations
and can also be converted to registered capital upon a resolution passed by the
shareholders subject to approval by the relevant
authorities. These reserves represent appropriations of the retained earnings
determined in accordance with Chinese law, and are not distributable as cash
dividends to the parent company, NeoStem. Statutory reserves are
$1,180,990 and
$1,126,300 as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Relevant PRC statutory laws and
regulations permit payment of dividends by the Company’s PRC subsidiaries only
out of their accumulated earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC
accounting standards and regulations. As a result of these PRC laws and
regulations, the Company’s PRC subsidiaries are restricted in their ability to
transfer a portion of their net assets either in the form of dividends, loans or
advances. The restricted amount was $214,300 at June 30, 2010.
Note 3 – Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (the “FASB’) issued an amendment to the accounting and
disclosure requirements for transfers of financial assets, which was effective
January 1, 2010. The amendment eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial
assets and requires enhanced disclosures to provide financial statement users
with greater transparency about transfers of financial assets, including
securitization transactions, and an entity’s continuing involvement in and
exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The
adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB amended the
existing accounting and disclosure guidance for the consolidation of variable
interest entities, which was effective January 1, 2010. The amended
guidance requires enhanced disclosures intended to provide users of financial
statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement
in a variable interest entity. The adoption of this standard did not
have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an
Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, which addresses the
accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account
for products or services separately rather than as a combined unit and modifies
the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the
separately identified deliverables. The ASU significantly expands the disclosure
requirements for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The ASU will be
effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after
June 15, 2010, and may be applied retrospectively for all periods presented
or prospectively to arrangements entered into or materially modified after the
adoption date. Early adoption is permitted, provided that the guidance is
retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. The Company will
not early adopt this ASU.
In January 2010, the FASB amended
the existing disclosure guidance on fair value measurements, which was effective
January 1, 2010, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances,
and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements, which is effective January 1, 2011. Among other things, the
updated guidance requires additional disclosure for the amounts of significant
transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements and requires certain
Level 3 disclosures on a gross basis. Additionally, the updates amend existing
guidance to require a greater level of disaggregated information and more robust
disclosures about valuation techniques and inputs to fair value measurements.
Since the amended guidance requires only additional disclosures, the adoption of
the provisions effective January 1, 2010 did not, and for the provisions
effective in 2011 will not, impact the Company’s financial position or results
of operations.
In March
2010, the FASB ratified the EITF final consensus on Issue No. 08-9, “Milestone
Method of Revenue Recognition.” The guidance in this consensus allows the
milestone method as an acceptable revenue recognition methodology when an
arrangement includes substantive milestones. The guidance provides a definition
of substantive milestone and should be applied regardless of whether the
arrangement includes single or multiple deliverables or units of accounting. The
scope of this consensus is limited to the transactions involving milestones
relating to research and development deliverables. The guidance includes
enhanced disclosure requirements about each arrangement, individual milestones
and related contingent consideration, information about substantive milestones
and factors considered in the determination. The consensus is effective
prospectively to milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within
those years, after June 15, 2010. Early application and retrospective
application are permitted. The Company will not early adopt this EITF. The
Company is evaluating the effect this standard will have upon
adoption.
In April
2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-13
“Compensation – Stock Compensation”, which addresses the accounting for stock
options when denominating the exercise price of a share-based payment award in
the currency of the market in which the underlying equity security trades. A
share based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of
market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades
shall not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market,
performance, or service condition. Therefore such an award shall not be
classified as a liability if it otherwise qualifies for equity classification.
This standard is effective in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15,
2010. The Company is evaluating the effect this standard will have upon
adoption.
13
Note 4 –
Acquisitions
On October 30, 2009, NeoStem
consummated the Merger pursuant to which CBH was merged with and into Merger
Sub, a wholly-owned subsidiary of NeoStem, with Merger Sub as the surviving
entity in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
November 2, 2008, as amended (“Merger Agreement”) by and between NeoStem, Merger
Sub, CBH and China Biopharmaceuticals Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBH
(“CBC”). As a result of the Merger, NeoStem acquired CBH’s 51%
ownership interest in Erye, a Sino-foreign joint venture with limited liability
organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China. Erye
specializes in the production and sales of pharmaceutical products, as well as
chemicals used in pharmaceutical products. Erye, which was founded more
than 50 years ago, currently manufactures and has received more than 160
production certifications from the SFDA covering both antibiotic prescription
drugs and active pharmaceutical intermediaries. Suzhou Erye
Economy and Trading Co. Ltd. (“EET”) owns the remaining 49% ownership interest
in Erye. The Company and EET have negotiated a revised joint venture
agreement, which has been approved in principle by the PRC governmental
authorities.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger
Agreement, NeoStem issued an aggregate of 13,750,167 shares of its common stock,
with a fair value of $20,762,800, and 8,177,512 shares of Series C Convertible
Preferred Stock, with a fair value of $13,720,000, in exchange for outstanding
CBH securities. In addition, the Company issued Class E warrants to
purchase 1,603,191 shares of NeoStem Common Stock, with a fair value of
$590,800, to replace warrants issued by CBH.
The fair value of the identifiable net
assets acquired in the Merger was $34,904,200. The fair value of the equity
issued as consideration by NeoStem was $35,073,600 and the fair value of the
noncontrolling interests of Erye was $33,698,200. The goodwill that has been
created by this acquisition is reflective of the values and opportunities of
expanded access to healthcare in the People’s Republic of China, the designation
of certain antibiotics as essential medicines in China, and that a majority of
Erye’s antibiotics are on the central or provincial governments’ drug
formularies. Due to the structure of the transaction, none of the goodwill is
expected to be tax deductible.
The summary of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed on October 30, 2009 is as follows (in
thousands):
Cash & Restricted
Cash
|
$ | 4,451.2 | ||
Accounts
Receivable
|
6,199.5 | |||
Inventories
|
12,469.0 | |||
Other Current
Asset
|
2,925.2 | |||
Property, Plant &
Equipment
|
18,922.6 | |||
Intangibles and land use
rights
|
20,905.9 | |||
Goodwill
|
33,867.6 | |||
Accounts
Payable
|
$ | 6,256.8 | ||
Other
Liabilities
|
2,895.3 | |||
Deferred Tax
Liability
|
4,720.8 | |||
Notes
Payable
|
9,618.1 | |||
Amounts due Related
Party
|
7,478.1 |
The total cost of the acquisition has
been allocated to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed based upon
their estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition. The
estimated purchase price allocation is subject to revision based on additional
valuation work that is being conducted. The final allocation is
pending the receipt of this valuation work and the completion of the Company’s
internal review, which is expected during fiscal 2010.
A preliminary allocation of the
consideration transferred to the net assets of CBH was made as of the Merger
date. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company continued to review its
preliminary allocation of the purchase price associated with the Merger and made
the following retrospective adjustments as of the Merger
date:
The Company determined that finished
goods inventory acquired in connection with the merger was incorrectly valued
and should have been increased by approximately $1,917,000 to step-up such
inventory to fair value at the Merger date. Such finished goods
inventory has been sold through by December 31, 2009. Therefore, at
December 31, 2009, there is no effect on the reported balance of inventories in
the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company determined that the fair
value of the acquired customer list intangible asset was incorrectly valued by
approximately $1,700,000 due to the inclusion of future tax benefits that will
not be realized for local Chinese tax purposes in the Company’s estimates of
future cash flows used to value this intangible asset.
The Company determined that it had
incorrectly accounted for the book/tax basis differences that arose in recording
the fair value of the net assets acquired in connection with the
Merger. Such increases to fair value, while deductible for book
purposes, are not deductible for local Chinese tax purposes but require
recognition of the impact such non-deductibility will have on future tax
expense. Specifically, the Company did not establish at the Merger
date deferred tax liabilities of approximately $4,720,800 for such book/tax
basis differences.
14
The Company evaluated the materiality of
these errors from both a qualitative and quantitative perspective and concluded
that these errors were immaterial to the consolidated financial statements taken
as a whole for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. The effect of
these immaterial errors and related retrospective adjustments at December 31,
2009 and for the year then ended are summarized as follows (in thousands, except
share and per share amounts):
As Previously
Reported |
Adjustment
|
As Adjusted
|
||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||
Current
Assets
|
$ | 31,799.2 | $ | - | $ | 31,799.2 | ||||||
Property, plant and
equipment, net
|
21,299.4 | (28.0 | ) | 21,271.4 | ||||||||
Intangible
Assets
|
||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
29,862.1 | 4,563.6 | 34,425.7 | |||||||||
Land use rights,
net
|
4,698.6 | - | 4,698.6 | |||||||||
Lease
rights
|
633.2 | - | 633.2 | |||||||||
Customer list,
net
|
16,756.1 | (1,676.5 | ) | 15,079.6 | ||||||||
Other
intanbilbles
|
747.3 | - | 747.3 | |||||||||
Other
assets
|
238.9 | - | 238.9 | |||||||||
$ | 106,034.8 | $ | 2,859.1 | $ | 108,893.9 | |||||||
Liabilities and
Equity
|
||||||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
$ | 25,493.6 | $ | - | $ | 25,493.6 | ||||||
Deferred tax
liability
|
- | 4,440.7 | 4,440.7 | |||||||||
Amount due related
party
|
7,234.3 | - | 7,234.3 | |||||||||
Convertible redeemable
Series C preferred stock
|
13,720.0 | - | 13,720.0 | |||||||||
Preferred stock Series B
convertible, redeemable
|
0.1 | - | 0.1 | |||||||||
Common
stock
|
37.2 | - | 37.2 | |||||||||
Additional paid in
capital
|
95,709.5 | - | 95,709.5 | |||||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(70,878.8 | ) | (820.3 | ) | (71,699.1 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
(67.9 | ) | - | (67.9 | ) | |||||||
Noncontrolling
interests
|
34,786.8 | (761.3 | ) | 34,025.5 | ||||||||
Total
equity
|
59,586.9 | (1,581.6 | ) | 58,005.3 | ||||||||
$ | 106,034.8 | $ | 2,859.1 | $ | 108,893.9 |
15
Consolidated Statement of
Operations
|
As Previously
Reported |
Adjustment
|
As Adjusted
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 11,565.1 | $ | - | $ | 11,565.1 | ||||||
Cost of
revenues
|
7,587.2 | 1,917.0 | 9,504.2 | |||||||||
Gross
profit
|
3,977.9 | (1,917.0 | ) | 2,060.9 | ||||||||
Research and
development
|
4,318.8 | - | 4,318.8 | |||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative
|
23,459.6 | (28.4 | ) | 23,431.2 | ||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(23,800.5 | ) | (1,888.6 | ) | (25,689.1 | ) | ||||||
Other income
(expense):
|
||||||||||||
Other income/(expense),
net
|
(1.4 | ) | - | (1.4 | ) | |||||||
Interest
expense
|
(37.8 | ) | - | (37.8 | ) | |||||||
(39.2 | ) | - | (39.2 | ) | ||||||||
Loss from operations before
provision for income taxes and non-controlling
interests
|
(23,839.7 | ) | (1,888.6 | ) | (25,728.3 | ) | ||||||
Provision for income
taxes
|
344.2 | (280.0 | ) | 64.2 | ||||||||
Net loss
|
(24,183.9 | ) | (1,608.6 | ) | (25,792.5 | ) | ||||||
Less - Income from operations
attributable to non-controlling interests
|
1,088.6 | (788.2 | ) | 300.4 | ||||||||
Net Loss attributable to
controlling Interests
|
(25,272.5 | ) | (820.4 | ) | (26,092.9 | ) | ||||||
Preferred
dividends
|
5,612.0 | - | 5,612.0 | |||||||||
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders
|
$ | (30,884.5 | ) | $ | (820.4 | ) | $ | (31,704.9 | ) | |||
Basic and diluted loss per
share
|
$ | (2.37 | ) | $ | (2.44 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
13,019,518 | 13,019,518 |
Consolidated Statement of
Equity
|
As Previously
Reported |
Adjustment
|
As Adjusted
|
|||||||||
Preferred stock Series B
convertible, redeemable
|
$ | 0.1 | $ | - | $ | 0.1 | ||||||
Common
stock
|
37.2 | - | 37.2 | |||||||||
Additional paid in
capital
|
95,709.5 | - | 95,709.5 | |||||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(70,878.8 | ) | (820.3 | ) | (71,699.1 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
|
(67.9 | ) | - | (67.9 | ) | |||||||
Noncontrolling
interests
|
34,786.8 | (761.3 | ) | 34,025.5 | ||||||||
Total
equity
|
$ | 59,586.9 | $ | (1,581.6 | ) | $ | 58,005.3 |
16
Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flow
|
As Previously
Reported |
Adjustment
|
As Adjusted
|
|||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (24,183.9 | ) | $ | (1,608.6 | ) | $ | (25,792.5 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Common Stock, stock options and
warrants issued
|
||||||||||||
as payment for compensation,
services rendered and interest expense
|
12,324.0 | - | 12,324.0 | |||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
577.0 | (28.4 | ) | 548.6 | ||||||||
Bad debt
expense
|
(90.2 | ) | - | (90.2 | ) | |||||||
Deferred tax
liability
|
- | (280.0 | ) | (280.0 | ) | |||||||
Realization of step-up in basis of
inventory received at date of acquisition
|
- | 1,917.0 | 1,917.0 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
1,796.7 | - | 1,796.7 | |||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
571.7 | - | 571.7 | |||||||||
Inventory
|
(2,427.1 | ) | - | (2,427.1 | ) | |||||||
Other
assets
|
(238.9 | ) | - | (238.9 | ) | |||||||
Unearned
revenues
|
1,991.8 | - | 1,991.8 | |||||||||
Payments to related
party
|
(243.8 | ) | - | (243.8 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable, accrued
expenses
|
||||||||||||
and other current
liabilities
|
1,274.7 | - | 1,274.7 | |||||||||
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
(8,648.0 | ) | - | (8,648.0 | ) | |||||||
Cash received in connection with
acquisition of technology
|
- | |||||||||||
Cash associated with
Merger
|
696.5 | - | 696.5 | |||||||||
Acquisition of property and
equipment
|
(2,387.6 | ) | - | (2,387.6 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
(1,691.1 | ) | - | (1,691.1 | ) | |||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of
Series D Preferred Stock
|
15,669.2 | - | 15,669.2 | |||||||||
Proceeds from bank
loan
|
2,197.5 | - | 2,197.5 | |||||||||
Restricted cash pledged as
collateral for bank loan
|
(959.9 | ) | - | (959.9 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from notes
payable
|
2,918.3 | - | 2,918.3 | |||||||||
Payment of capitalized lease
obligations
|
(14.7 | ) | - | (14.7 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sale of convertible
debentures
|
(2,742.7 | ) | - | (2,742.7 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
17,067.7 | - | 17,067.7 | |||||||||
Net increase in
cash
|
6,728.6 | - | 6,728.6 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of year
|
430.8 | - | 430.8 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end
of year
|
$ | 7,159.4 | $ | - | $ | 7,159.4 |
17
Presented below is the unaudited
proforma information as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of
the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 along with a comparison
to the reported results for the three and six ended June 30,
2010 (in thousands, except
share and per share amounts):
Three Months Ended June
30,
|
Six Months Ended June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
(As
Reported)
|
(Proforma)
|
(As
Reported)
|
(Proforma)
|
|||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 19,407.5 | $ | 15,420.8 | $ | 35,240.7 | $ | 28,111.6 | ||||||||
Cost of
revenues
|
12,747.9 | 10,141.5 | 23,599.5 | 18,865.0 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
6,659.6 | 5,279.3 | 11,641.2 | 9,246.6 | ||||||||||||
Research and
development
|
2,133.2 | 777.5 | 3,433.5 | 1,042.6 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative
|
8,029.4 | 5,703.9 | 14,318.9 | 9,050.5 | ||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(3,503.0 | ) | (1,202.1 | ) | (6,111.2 | ) | (846.5 | ) | ||||||||
Other income/(expense),
net
|
143.4 | 41.2 | (29.2 | ) | (14.7 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss from operations before
provision for income taxes and noncontrolling
interests
|
(3,359.5 | ) | (1,160.9 | ) | (6,140.4 | ) | (861.2 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for income
taxes
|
402.3 | 452.6 | 905.2 | 862.3 | ||||||||||||
Net loss
|
(3,761.9 | ) | (1,613.5 | ) | (7,045.6 | ) | (1,723.5 | ) | ||||||||
Less - income from operations
attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
1,611.4 | 1,508.1 | 2,940.2 | 2,428.6 | ||||||||||||
Preferred
dividends
|
53.8 | 251.7 | 153.5 | 251.7 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to common
shareholders
|
$ | (5,427.1 | ) | $ | (3,377.3 | ) | $ | (10,139.3 | ) | $ | (4,403.8 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
48,771,930 | 21,840,823 | 44,419,456 | 21,923,974 | ||||||||||||
Net loss per
share
|
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.20 | ) |
The unaudited supplemental pro forma
financial information should not be considered indicative of the results that
would have occurred if the Merger had been consummated on January 1, 2009, nor
are they indicative of future results.
Note 5 – Intangible
Asset
At June 30, 2010, the Company’s intangible assets
consisted of patent applications and rights associated with the VSEL ™
Technology which constitutes the principal assets acquired in the acquisition of
Stem Cells Technologies, Inc., patent rights owned by Erye, a lease right
between Erye and EET (the 49% shareholder of Erye) for the use of Erye’s current
manufacturing plant in Suzhou and Erye’s customer list.
As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company’s intangible assets and
related accumulated amortization consisted of the following (in
thousands):
June 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Life
|
Gross
|
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net
|
Gross
|
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets obtained in the
CBH acquisition
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease
rights
|
2 | $ | 690.7 | $ | (230.2 | ) | $ | 460.5 | $ | 690.7 | $ | (57.6 | ) | $ | 633.1 | |||||||||||||
Customer
list
|
10 | 15,335.1 | (1,022.3 | ) | 14,312.8 | 15,335.1 | (255.6 | ) | 15,079.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
Patents
|
5 | 150.3 | (11.5 | ) | 138.8 | 150.3 | (2.7 | ) | 147.6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets obtained in the
Stem Cell Technologies, Inc. Acquisition
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||
VSEL patent
rights
|
19 | 669.0 | (88.0 | ) | 581.0 | 672.8 | (73.1 | ) | 599.7 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Intangible
Assets
|
$ | 16,845.1 | $ | (1,352.0 | ) | $ | 15,493.1 | $ | 16,848.9 | $ | (389.0 | ) | $ | 16,459.9 |
Estimated amortization expense for the
five years subsequent to June 30, 2010 is as follows (in
thousands):
Years Ending December
31,
|
||||
2010
|
$ | 966.0 | ||
2011
|
1,872.8 | |||
2012
|
1,585.1 | |||
2013
|
1,585.1 | |||
2014
|
1,585.1 | |||
Thereafter
|
7,899.0 |
18
The remaining weighted-average
amortization period as of December 31, 2009 is 8 years.
Note 6– Accrued
Liabilities
Accrued liabilities are as follows (in
thousands):
June 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
|||||||
Income taxes
payable
|
$ | 1,901.3 | $ | 1,842.0 | ||||
Patent infringement | 743.6 | - | ||||||
VAT payable
|
586.5 | - | ||||||
Salaries and related
taxes
|
206.3 | 531.6 | ||||||
Professional
fees
|
242.3 | 116.8 | ||||||
Franchise
taxes
|
18.0 | 139.0 | ||||||
Collection
cost
|
84.9 | 85.2 | ||||||
Dividends
payable
|
- | 69.4 | ||||||
Rent
expense
|
73.7 | 69.1 | ||||||
Warrant
liability
|
30.6 | 36.0 | ||||||
Benefits
Payable
|
78.0 | - | ||||||
Security
deposits
|
250.9 | - | ||||||
Freight
insurance
|
76.0 | - | ||||||
Accrued construction
costs
|
418.1 | - | ||||||
Other
|
282.9 | 76.4 | ||||||
$ | 4,993.1 | $ | 2,965.5 |
Note 7 – Notes Payable and Bank
Loan
In
December 2009, in order to facilitate working capital requirements in
China, NeoStem (China) issued a promissory note to the Bank of Rizhao Qingdao
Branch in the amount of 4,400,000 RMB (approximately $645,480). The note bears
an interest rate of 4.05%. The note was repaid in the second quarter of 2010.
The loan was collateralized by cash in a restricted bank account totaling
5,189,400 RMB (approximately $759,200) and these funds were returned when the
note was repaid. In addition, in January 2010 NeoStem (China) entered into a
pledge agreement with the bank pledging all of its interest in its Variable
Interest Entities (“VIEs”) as additional collateral for the loan.
On May
25, 2010 NeoStem (China) issued a promissory note to the Bank of Rizhao Qingdao
Branch in the amount of 3,600,000 RMB (approximately $530,300) due November 25,
2010 and bearing interest at 4.86% per annum. The loan is collateralized
by cash in a restricted bank account totaling 4,074,500 RMB (approximately
$600,200). In addition, in May 2010 NeoStem (China) entered into a pledge
agreement with the bank pledging all of its interest in its VIEs as additional
collateral for the loan.
The Company’s subsidiary Erye
has 69,749,400 RMB
(approximately $10,274,100)
of notes payables as of June 30, 2010. Notes are payables to the banks who
issue bank notes to Erye’s creditors. Notes payable are interest free and
usually mature after a three to six month period. In order to issue
notes payable on behalf of Erye, the banks required collateral, such as cash
deposits which were approximately 30%-50% of notes to be issued, or properties
owned by Erye. Restricted cash put up for collateral for the balance of notes
payable at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, amounted
to 23,743,500
RMB (approximately $3,496,100) and 26,999,300 RMB (approximately
$3,955,400),
respectively. At June 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009 the restricted cash
amounted to 33.1% and
40.4% of the notes payable
Erye issued, and the remainder of the notes payable is collateralized by
pledging the land use right Erye owns, which amounts to approximately
$1,907,200
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The
Company has financed certain insurance polices and has notes payable at June 30,
2010 in the amount of $97,900 related to these policies. These notes require
monthly payments and mature in less than one year.
In December 2009, Erye obtained a loan of 15,000,000 RMB
(approximately $2,209,500) from the Industrial and Commercial Bank with an
interest rate of 4.86% and was due in June 2010. In April 2010, this loan was
paid in full.
Note 8 – Convertible Redeemable Series C
Preferred Stock
On October 30, 2009, pursuant to the
terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company issued 8,177,512 shares of Series C
Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”) to RimAsia Capital
Partners, L.P. (“RimAsia”) in exchange for certain outstanding CBH
securities.
19
On May 17, 2010, RimAsia at its
option, converted its 8,177,512 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into
9,086,124 shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion rate of 0.90
shares of Series C Preferred Stock for 1.0 share of the Company’s common
stock. Following this
conversion, there are no shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding and
RimAsia will not be entitled to receive any dividends on such shares, to receive
notices or to vote such shares or to exercise or to enjoy any other powers,
preferences or rights in respect thereof; provided however that RimAsia was
entitled to receive a cash payment of $153,469 which is equal to the dividends
accrued but unpaid through from January 1, 2010 to May 17, 2010. This payment
was made on May 25, 2010.
Note 9 – Shareholders’
Equity
Common Stock:
The authorized common stock of the
Company is 500 million shares, par value $0.001 per share.
On February 18, 2010, the Company
completed a public offering of its common stock, selling 5,750,000 shares priced
at $1.35 per share. The Company received approximately $6,821,600 in net
proceeds from the offering, after underwriting discounts, commissions and
expenses, of approximately $940,000 of which approximately $463,000 was unpaid
as of June 30, 2010.
Effective March 15, 2010, RimAsia
exercised a warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of restricted Common
Stock. This warrant was issued to RimAsia in a private
placement completed by the Company in September 2008. The exercise
price was $1.75 per share, resulting in proceeds to the Company of $1,750,000. In connection
therewith, the Company modified certain terms of RimAsia’s Series D Warrant to
purchase 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock. See Note 9 – Shareholders’
Equity - Warrants.
On
May 17, 2010, RimAsia, the holder of 8,177,512 shares of Series C Preferred
Stock issued by the Company in connection with the Merger, at its option,
converted its 8,177,512 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into 9,086,124 shares
of the Company's common stock at a conversion rate of 0.90 shares of Series C
Preferred Stock for 1.0 share of the Company’s common stock.
On May
19, 2010, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with
Commerce Court Small Cap Value Fund, Ltd., which provides that, subject to
certain terms and conditions, Commerce Court is committed to purchase up to
$20,000,000 worth of shares of the Company’s common stock over a term of
approximately 24 months. The Purchase Agreement provides that at the
Company’s discretion, it may present Commerce Court with draw down notices under
this $20 million equity line of credit arrangement from time to time, to
purchase the Company’s Common Stock, provided certain price requirements are met
and limited to 2.5% of the Company’s market capitalization at the time of such
draw down, which may be waived or modified. The per share purchase
price for these shares will equal the daily volume weighted average price of the
Company’s common stock on each date during the draw down period on which shares
are purchased, less a discount of 5.0%. The Purchase Agreement also
provides that the Company in its sole discretion may grant Commerce Court the
right to exercise one or more options to purchase additional shares of Common
Stock during each draw down period at a price which would be based on a discount
calculated in the same manner as it is calculated in the draw down notice. The
issuance of shares of common stock to Commerce Court pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement, and the sale of those shares from time to time by Commerce Court to
the public, are covered by an effective registration statement on Form S-3 filed
with the SEC.
On May
27, 2010, the Company presented Commerce Court with a Draw Down
Notice. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the shares were offered
at a discount price to Commerce Court mutually agreed upon by the parties under
the Purchase Agreement equal to 95.0% of the daily volume weighted average price
of the common stock during the Pricing Period or a 5%
discount. Pursuant to the Draw Down Notice, the Company also granted
Commerce Court the right to exercise one or more options to purchase additional
shares of common stock during the Pricing Period, based on the trading price of
the common stock. The
Company settled with Commerce Court on the purchase of 685,226 shares of common
stock under the terms of the Draw Down Notice and the Purchase Agreement at an
aggregate purchase price of $1.8 million, or approximately $2.63 per share,
on June 7, 2010. The Company and Commerce Court agreed to waive the
minimum threshold price of $3.00 per share set forth in the Purchase
Agreement. The Company received net proceeds from the sale of these shares
of approximately $1.7 million after deducting its offering
expenses.
On June
1, 2010, Fullbright exercised a warrant to purchase 400,000 shares of restricted
Common Stock. This
warrant was issued to Fullbright in a private placement of securities by the
Company in November 2008. The exercise price was $1.75 per share,
resulting in proceeds to the Company of $700,000.
On June
25, 2010, the Company entered into definitive securities purchase agreements
with investors in a registered direct public offering offering, pursuant to
which such investors agreed to purchase, and the Company agreed to sell, an
aggregate of 2,325,582 Units, consisting of an aggregate of 2,325,582 shares of
common stock and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 581,394 shares of common
stock. The offering closed on June 30, 2010 with gross proceeds of
$5.0 million. Each Unit was priced at $2.15 and consisted of one
share of common stock and a warrant which will allow the investor to purchase
0.25 shares of common stock at a per share price of $2.75. The
warrants may be called by the Company in the event that the common stock trades
over $4.50 per share for 10 consecutive trading days. Subject to
certain ownership limitations, the warrants will be exercisable on the date of
the closing and will expire 2 years thereafter. The number of shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and the exercise price of
the warrants are adjustable in the event of stock dividends, splits,
recapitalizations, reclassifications, combinations or exchanges of shares,
reorganizations, liquidations, consolidation, acquisition of the Company
(whether through merger or acquisition of substantially all the assets or stock
of the Company) or similar events. The issuance of the securities in
this offering was registered on a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with
the SEC. Rodman & Renshaw LLC acted as the Company’s placement
agent in this offering and received a total payment of $340,000 in fees and
expenses and Placement Agent Warrants to purchase up to 93,023 shares of our
Common Stock at an exercise price of $2.6875 per share expiring May 10,
2015. The Placement Agent Warrants are not covered by the Form
S-3. The net proceeds to the Company from such offering, after
deducting the Placement Agent’s fees and expenses, the Company’s estimated
offering expenses, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the
warrants issued in the offering were approximately $4.6
million.
20
Warrants:
The Company has issued common stock
purchase warrants from time to time to investors in private placements and
public offerings, and to certain vendors, underwriters, placement agents and
consultants of the Company. A total of 18,027,028 shares of common stock are reserved for
issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants as of June 30,
2010 at prices ranging
from $0.50 to $6.50 and expiring through April
2017.
During
the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010 the Company issued warrants
for services as follows ($ in thousands):
Number of
Common
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
Purchase
|
Value of Common
Stock
|
Common Stock
Purchase
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
Issued
|
Purchase Warrants
Issued
|
Warrant Expense
Recognized
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Three
Months
|
Six Months
|
Three
Months
|
Six Months
|
Three
Months
|
Six Months
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||||
6/30/2010
|
6/30/2010
|
6/30/2010
|
6/30/2010
|
6/30/2010
|
6/30/2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Warrants issued for investor
relations services
|
- | 200,000 | $ | - | $ | 242.7 | $ | 65.7 | $ | 192.1 | ||||||||||||||
Warrants issued for consulting
services
|
50,000 | 325,000 | $ | 392.7 | $ | 392.7 | $ | 324.9 | $ | 324.9 | ||||||||||||||
Warrants issued for legal
services
|
25,000 | 77,000 | $ | 46.4 | $ | 104.0 | $ | 6.6 | $ | 47.6 |
On March 15, 2010, the Company and
RimAsia, an affiliate of the Company, made certain agreements with respect to
outstanding warrants. RimAsia exercised its warrant to purchase
1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at a per share
exercise price of $1.75, which was issued to RimAsia in a private placement
completed by the Company in September 2008 (the “September 2008
Warrant”). This exercise resulted in proceeds to the Company totaling
$1,750,000. The condition for such exercise was that the Company would
modify certain terms of RimAsia’s warrant to purchase 4,000,000 shares of Common
Stock, issued to RimAsia in a private placement completed by the Company in
April 2009 (the “Series D Warrant”). The Series D
Warrant was amended to provide for (i) a three (3) year extension of
the Termination Date from September 1, 2013 to September 1, 2016, and (ii) an
increase in the average closing price that triggers the Company’s redemption
option under the Series D Warrant from $3.50 to $5.00. The change in
terms resulted in a charge to other expense totaling approximately
$188,000.
Warrant activity is as
follows:
Number
of
Shares |
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Term (years) |
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value |
|||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
19,838,802 | $ | 3.00 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
1,276,417 | 2.25 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(1,425,000 | ) | 1.72 | |||||||||||||
Expired
|
(1,663,191 | ) | 6.35 | |||||||||||||
Cancelled
|
- | |||||||||||||||
Balance
at June 30, 2010
|
18,027,028 | $ | 2.73 | $ | 4.2 | $ | 968,247 |
21
At June 30, 2010 the outstanding warrants by range
of exercise prices are as follows:
Weighted
Average
|
||||||||||||
Number
Outstanding
|
Remaining
|
Number
Exercisable
|
||||||||||
Exercise
Price
|
June 30,
2010
|
Contractual Life
(years)
|
June 30,
2010
|
|||||||||
$0.50 to
$1.01
|
699,000 | 0.8 | 678,841 | |||||||||
$1.01 to
$1.99
|
1,442,709 | 1.7 | 1,366,709 | |||||||||
$1.99 to
$2.53
|
13,277,512 | 2.5 | 13,152,512 | |||||||||
$2.53 to
$5.99
|
929,928 | 3.2 | 929,928 | |||||||||
$5.99 to
$6.50
|
1,677,879 | 6.1 | 1,677,879 | |||||||||
18,027,028 | 2.7 | 17,805,869 |
Options:
The
Company’s 2003 Equity Participation Plan (the “2003 Equity Plan”) permits the
grant of share options and shares to its employees, directors, consultants and
advisors for up to 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock as stock-based
compensation. The 2009 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2009 Equity
Plan”) makes up to 13,750,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company available
for issuance to employees, consultants, advisors and directors of the Company
and its subsidiaries pursuant to incentive or non-statutory stock options,
restricted and unrestricted stock awards and stock appreciation
rights.
All stock
options under the 2003 Equity Plan and the 2009 Equity Plan are generally
granted at the fair market value of the Common Stock at the grant
date. Stock options vest either on the date of grant, ratably over a
period determined at time of grant, or upon the accomplishment of specified
business milestones, and generally expire 10 years from the grant
date.
The 2009
Equity Plan was originally adopted by the shareholders of the Company on May 8,
2009. On October 29, 2009, the shareholders of the Company approved
an amendment to the 2009 Equity Plan to increase the number of shares of common
stock available for issuance thereunder from 3,800,000 to
9,750,000. At the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company
held on June 2, 2010, the shareholders approved an amendment to increase this
number to 13,750,000.
The 2003
Equity Plan and the 2009 Equity Plan are sometimes collectively referred to as
the Company’s “U.S. Equity Plan.”
The
Company’s 2009 Non-U.S. Based Equity Compensation Plan (“Non-U.S. Plan”) makes
up to 8,700,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company available for
issuance. Persons eligible to receive restricted and unrestricted
stock awards, warrants (option-like equity grants), stock appreciation rights or
other awards under the Non-U.S. Plan are those service providers to the Company
and its subsidiaries and affiliates providing services outside of the United
States, including employees and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries
and affiliates, who, in the opinion of the Compensation Committee, are in a
position to contribute to the Company’s success. Warrants vest
either on the date of grant, ratably over a period determined at time of grant,
or upon the accomplishment of specified business milestones, and generally
expire 10 years from the grant date.
The
Non-U.S. Plan was originally adopted by the shareholders of the Company on
October 29, 2009. At the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company held
on June 2, 2010, the shareholders approved an amendment to increase the number
of shares of common stock authorized for issuance thereunder from 4,700,000 to
8,700,000.
The Company’s results include
share-based compensation expense of $1,843,721 and $1,338,617 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively and $3,529,355
and $1,398,387 for
the six month periods
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Options vesting on the accomplishment of business
milestones will not be recognized for compensation purposes until such
milestones are deemed probable of accomplishment. At June 30,
2010 there were options to
purchase 1,706,075
shares outstanding that will vest upon the accomplishment of business milestones
and will be accounted for as an operating expense when such business
milestones are deemed probable of accomplishment.
The weighted average estimated fair
value of stock options granted in the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 was $1.85 and $1.83, respectively. The fair value of
options at the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. The expected volatility is based upon historical volatility of
the Company’s stock and other contributing factors. The expected term is based
upon observation of actual time elapsed between date of grant and exercise of
options for all employees.
22
The range of assumptions made in
calculating the fair values of options are as follows (the same assumptions were
used for warrants, the term for the warrant is based on the life of the
warrant):
Three Months
Ended
|
Six Months
Ended
|
|||||||
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
|||||
Expected term (in
years)
|
5 to 10
|
10
|
5 to 10
|
10
|
||||
Expected
volatility
|
95% - 100%
|
195% to
217%
|
95% - 124%
|
195% to
217%
|
||||
Expected dividend
yield
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
||||
Risk-free interest
rate
|
1.78% -
3.58%
|
3.35% to
3.81%
|
1.78% -
3.80%
|
3.35% to
3.81%
|
Stock option activity under the U.S.
Equity Plan is as follows:
Number of
Shares |
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual Term |
Average
Intrinsic Value |
|||||||||||||
Balance at December 31,
2009
|
8,340,574 | $ | 1.93 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
790,000 | $ | 1.98 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(90,000 | ) | $ | 1.56 | ||||||||||||
Expired
|
- | |||||||||||||||
Cancelled
|
(98,360 | ) | $ | 1.61 | ||||||||||||
Balance at June 30,
2010
|
8,942,214 | $ | 1.89 | 8.6 | $ | 600,000 | ||||||||||
Vested and Exercisable at June 30,
2010
|
4,549,764 | $ | 310,345 |
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
|
Number
Exercisable
|
||||
June 30,
2010
|
Remaining Contractual
Term
|
June 30,
2010
|
||||
Exercise
Price
|
||||||
$ 0.71 to
$ 1.89
|
3,861,000
|
9.02
|
1,855,000
|
|||
$ 1.89 to
$ 1.96
|
3,123,664
|
7.65
|
2,313,880
|
|||
$ 1.96 to
$ 4.96
|
1,906,200
|
9.41
|
329,534
|
|||
$ 4.96 to
$7.01
|
27,250
|
5.09
|
27,250
|
|||
$7.01 to
$15.00
|
24,100
|
4.45
|
24,100
|
|||
8,942,214
|
4,549,764
|
Stock option activity under the Non U.S.
Equity Plan is as follows:
Number of
Shares |
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual Term |
Average
Intrinsic Value |
|||||||||||||
Balance at December 31,
2009
|
1,650,000 | $ | 2.04 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
1,250,000 | $ | 2.26 | |||||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | |||||||||||||||
Expired
|
- | |||||||||||||||
Cancelled
|
- | |||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30,
2010
|
2,900,000 | $ | 2.13 | 9.6 | $ | - | ||||||||||
Vested and Exercisable at June 30,
2010
|
300,000 | $ | - |
23
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
|
Number
Exercisable
|
||||
June 30,
2010
|
Remaining Contractual
Term
|
June 30,
2010
|
||||
Exercise
Price
|
||||||
$ 2.04 to
$ 2.10
|
1,650,000
|
9.33
|
150,000
|
|||
$ 2.10 to
$ 2.17
|
650,000
|
9.95
|
150,000
|
|||
$ 2.17 to
$ 2.36
|
600,000
|
9.97
|
-
|
|||
2,900,000
|
300,000
|
The total fair value of shares vested
during the three and six months ended June 30,
2010 was
$1,051,225 and
1,451,840,
respectively.
The number of remaining shares
authorized to be issued under the various equity plans are as
follows:
US Equity
Plan
|
Non US Equity
Plan
|
|||||||
Shares Authorized for Issuance
under 2003 Equity Plan
|
2,500,000 | - | ||||||
Shares Authorized for Issuance
under 2009 Equity Plan
|
13,750,000 | - | ||||||
Shares Authorized for Issuance
under Non US Equity Plan
|
- | 8,700,000 | ||||||
16,250,000 | 8,700,000 | |||||||
Outstanding Options - US Equity
Plan
|
(8,942,214 | ) | - | |||||
Outstanding Options - Non US
Equity Plan
|
- | (2,900,000 | ) | |||||
Common shares issued under the
option plans
|
(2,224,737 | ) | (875,000 | ) | ||||
Total common shares remaining to
be issued under the Option Plans
|
5,083,049 | 4,925,000 |
Options are usually granted at an
exercise price at least equal to the fair value of the Common Stock at the grant
date and may be granted to employees, directors, consultants and advisors of the
Company and its subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2010, there was approximately
$9,835,533 of total
unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock option awards of which
$6,310,861 of unrecognized
compensation expense is related to stock options that vest over a weighted
average life of 1.2
years. The balance of unrecognized compensation costs, $3,524,673, is related to stock options that vest
based on the accomplishment of business milestones as to which expense is
generally recognized when such milestone is probable.
Note 10 – Income
Taxes
The Tax Reform Act of 1986 enacted a
complex set of rules limiting the utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards to offset future taxable income following a corporate ownership
change. The Company’s ability to utilize its NOL carryforwards is limited
following a change in ownership in excess of fifty percentage points during any
three-year period.
Since the year 2000, the Company has had
several changes in ownership which has resulted in a limitation on the Company’s
ability to apply net operating losses to future taxable
income. Approximately $7,000,000 of net operating losses had expired
due to these limitations. At December 31, 2009, the Company had net operating
loss carryforwards of approximately $26,450,000 applicable to future Federal
income taxes. The tax loss carryforwards are subject to annual limitations and
expire at various dates through 2029. The Company has recorded a full valuation
allowance against its net deferred tax asset because of the uncertainty that the
utilization of the net operating loss will be
realized.
The Company determined that a book/tax
basis difference exists in recording the fair value of the intangible assets
acquired in connection with the Merger. Increasing the value of the
acquired asset to fair value, while deductible for book purposes, are not
deductible for local Chinese tax purposes but require recognition of the impact
such non-deductibility will have on future tax expense. Specifically,
the Company established as of the Merger date deferred tax liabilities of
approximately $4,720,800 for such book/tax basis difference. This deferred tax
liability will be recognized ratably as amortization of certain intangible
assets occurs.
Note 11 – Segment
Information
Historically, the Company’s operations
have been conducted in only one geographical segment and since March 31, 2007
the Company had realized revenue only from one industry segment, the banking of
adult autologous stem cells. In June 2009, the Company established NeoStem
(China), Inc. (“NeoStem China” or the “WFOE”) as a wholly foreign owned
subsidiary of the Company. The WFOE is domiciled in Qingdao and under its scope
of business approved by the Chinese regulatory authorities, the WFOE may engage
in the research & development, transfer and technological consultation
service of bio-technology, regenerative medical technology and anti-aging
technology (excluding the development or application of human stem cell, gene
diagnosis and treatment technologies); consultation of economic information;
import, export and wholesaling of machinery and equipments (the import and
export do not involve the goods specifically stipulated in/by state-operated
trade, import & export quota license, export quota bidding, export permit,
etc.). In furtherance of complying with PRC’s foreign investment prohibition on
stem cell research and development, clinical trials and related activities, the
Company conducts its current business in the PRC via two domestic variable
interest entities. On October 30, 2009, in connection with the Merger, the
Company acquired CBH’s 51% ownership interest in Erye which specializes in
research and development, production and sales of pharmaceutical products, as
well as chemicals used in pharmaceutical products. As a result the Company
now operates in the United States and China.
24
The Company’s segment data is as follows
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended June
30,
|
Six Months Ended June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
||||||||||||||||
Stem Cell
Revenues
|
$ | 21.7 | $ | 14.0 | $ | 66.4 | $ | 58.6 | ||||||||
Other
Revenues
|
16.1 | 17.6 | 30.1 | 18.1 | ||||||||||||
China
|
||||||||||||||||
Prescription drugs and
intermediary pharmaceutical products
|
19,351.3 | - | 35,122.5 | - | ||||||||||||
Other
Revenues
|
18.4 | - | 21.7 | - | ||||||||||||
$ | 19,407.5 | $ | 31.6 | $ | 35,240.7 | $ | 76.7 | |||||||||
Income/(loss) from
operations:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ | (5,429.7 | ) | $ | (3,694.1 | ) | $ | (9,888.3 | ) | $ | (5,417.9 | ) | ||||
China
|
1,926.8 | (1,005.3 | ) | 3,777.1 | (1,138.4 | ) | ||||||||||
$ | (3,502.9 | ) | $ | (4,699.4 | ) | $ | (6,111.2 | ) | $ | (6,556.3 | ) | |||||
Total
Assets
|
June 30,
2010
|
December 31,
2009
|
||||||||||||||
United
States
|
10,775.9 | 6,930.2 | ||||||||||||||
China
|
113,071.7 | 101,963.7 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 123,847.6 | $ | 108,893.9 |
Note 12 – Related Party
Transactions
On April 30, 2009, the Company entered
into a License and Referral Agreement with Promethean Corporation (“Promethean”)
through its subsidiary Ceres Living, Inc. (“Ceres”) to use certain Company marks
and publications in connection with certain sales and marketing activities
relating to its nutritional supplement known as AIO Premium Cellular (the
“Product”); and in connection with the license, Ceres will pay to the Company or
the Stem for Life Foundation specified fees for each unit
of the Product sold; and Ceres shall engage in a referral service with respect
to the Company’s adult stem cell collection and storage activities. Ceres will
receive a specified fee from the Company for each client referred who completes
and pays for a stem cell collection. The term of the agreement is three years
with each party having the right to renew annually, thereafter. The Stem for
Life Foundation is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization of which the Company’s
CEO, and Vice President and General Counsel, are directors and the President and
Secretary, respectively, and of which the Company participated in the
founding. The CEO of Promethean is in an exclusive relationship with
the CEO of the Company. The Company has earned $4,865 and $8,750 in royalties in
connection with this agreement during the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, respectively. The royalty payments were not material in
2009. Additionally Promethean has been responsible for referral of
certain clients for our stem cell collection business and receives a commission
of 10% for such referrals. Through June 30, 2010 these
commissions were not significant.
At June 30, 2010, Erye owed EET, 49% shareholder of
Erye, $7,855,200. Included in the amount owed
to EET are:
·
|
Dividends paid and loaned back to
Erye amounting to $7,734,200 and accrued interest of
$349,400, the
interest rate on this loan is 5.31%. Erye received an
interest payment of approximately $192,700 in February
2010.
|
·
|
Advances to EET of
$617,600;
and
|
·
|
A non interest bearing loan from
EET of $389,100 due
2011.
|
On May
11, 2010, the Company entered into a one-year consulting agreement with RimAsia
whereby RimAsia will act as an advisor to the Company in connection with the
Company exploring and pursuing various pharmaceutical and biotech ventures in
China. RimAsia does not receive compensation under this
agreement. In connection with the consulting agreement, RimAsia has
entered into a confidentiality agreement, whereby RimAsia agrees that neither it
nor its representatives will disclose NeoStem material and shall only use such
material for the purpose of providing the services under the consulting
agreement. NeoStem retains all ownership rights in such material as
well as material prepared for it pursuant to the consulting
agreement.
25
Note 13 – Commitments and
Contingencies
On May 26, 2006, the Company entered
into an employment agreement with Dr. Robin L. Smith, pursuant to which
agreement, as amended to date, Dr. Smith serves as the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company.
Effective as of September 27, 2009, Dr.
Smith’s annual base salary is $332,750, increased by 10% annually on that
date. On July 29, 2009, the Company amended the terms of its
employment agreement with Dr. Smith by means of a letter agreement to extend the
term of Dr. Smith’s employment to December 31, 2011 and subject to the
consummation of the Merger with CBH (which Merger was consummated on October 30,
2009), award Dr. Smith a $275,000 cash bonus for 2009 and comparable minimum
annual bonuses for 2010 and 2011. The Company maintains key-man life
insurance on Dr. Smith in the amount of $3,000,000. As of October 29,
2009, the Compensation Committee approved the reimbursement to Dr. Smith of
premiums, up to $4,000 annually, for disability insurance covering Dr.
Smith. The Company has also agreed to pay membership and annual fees
for a club in New York of Dr. Smith’s choice for business entertaining and
meetings, and a car allowance equal to $1,000 per month.
Per Dr. Smith’s January 26, 2007 letter
agreement with the Company, upon termination of Dr. Smith’s employment by the
Company without cause or by Dr. Smith with good reason, the Company shall pay to
Dr. Smith her base salary at the time of termination for the two year period
following such termination. Dr. Smith’s September 27, 2007
letter agreement provides that such payment of severance can be made instead in
12 equal monthly installments beginning the date of termination. In
addition, per Dr. Smith’s May 26, 2006 employment agreement, upon termination of
Dr. Smith’s employment by the Company without cause or by Dr. Smith for good
reason, Dr. Smith is entitled to: (i) a pro-rata bonus based on the annual bonus
received for the prior year; (ii) COBRA payments for a one year period; and
(iii) have all vested, options as well as all options that would have vested
during the 12-month period following the date of termination, become fully
vested and remain exercisable for a maximum of 48 months (but in no event longer
than the original term of exercise.) Upon termination of Dr. Smith’s employment
by the Company for cause or by Dr. Smith without good reason, Dr. Smith is
entitled to: (i) the payment of all amounts due for services rendered under the
agreement up until the termination date; and (ii) have all vested options remain
exercisable for a period of ninety days (all stock options which have not vested
shall be forfeited.) Upon termination for death or disability, Dr.
Smith (or her estate) is entitled to: (i) the payment of all amounts due for
services rendered under the agreement until the termination date; (ii) family
COBRA payments for the applicable term; and (iii) have all vested options,
remain exercisable for a maximum of 48 months (but in no event longer than the
original term of exercise).
Per Dr. Smith’s May 26, 2006 employment
agreement, upon a change in control of the Company, options held by Dr. Smith
shall be governed by the terms of applicable agreements and equity compensation
plans, but in any event at least 75% of Dr. Smith’s then unvested options shall
become immediately vested and exercisable upon a change in control. Further, in
the event Dr. Smith voluntarily terminates her employment without good reason
following a change in control, Dr. Smith shall be entitled to: (i) the payment
of base salary for one year; (ii) a pro-rata bonus based on the annual bonus
received for the prior year; (iii) COBRA payments for a one year period; and
(iv) have all vested options, as well as all options which would have vested
during the 12-month period following the date of termination, become fully
vested and remain exercisable for a maximum of 48 months (but in no event longer
than the original term of exercise).
On January 26, 2007, the Company entered
into an employment agreement with Catherine M. Vaczy pursuant to which
agreement, as amended to date, Ms. Vaczy continues to serve as the Company’s
Vice President and General Counsel.
Ms. Vaczy’s January 26, 2007 employment
agreement, as amended on January 9, 2008 and August 29, 2008, or the Original
Agreement, expired by its terms on December 31, 2008. However, effective July 8,
2009, the Company entered into another letter agreement, or the Extension, with
Ms. Vaczy pursuant to which the Original Agreement was extended, subject to
certain different and additional terms. The Extension provides that Ms. Vaczy’s
base salary during the one-year term will be $182,500. The Extension
additionally provides for (i) a 25,000 share stock award upon execution under
the 2009 Plan where the Company also pays the associated payroll taxes; and (ii)
a $5,000 cash bonus upon each of two milestone objectives established by the
Board of Directors (one of which was met in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the
other in the first quarter of 2010). Pursuant to the Original Agreement, as
extended and otherwise amended to date, Ms. Vaczy was also entitled to payment
of certain perquisites and/or reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by her
in connection with the performance of her duties and obligations under the
letter agreement (including a car allowance equal to $1,000 per month), and to
participate in any incentive and employee benefit plans or programs which may be
offered by the Company and in all other plans in which the Company executives
participate.
As of October 29, 2009, the Compensation
Committee of the Board (i) awarded Ms. Vaczy a $50,000 cash bonus, 50% of which
was payable currently and the remaining 50% payable upon the achievement of a
business milestone (which was achieved in February 2010), (ii) increased Ms.
Vaczy’s salary from $182,500 to $191,000 effective as of November 1, 2009, and
(iii) approved the payment of dues to a private club of Ms. Vaczy’s choosing for
business entertaining and meetings (not to exceed $6,000
annually).
26
In the event Ms. Vaczy’s employment is
terminated prior to the end of the term, for any reason, earned but unpaid cash
compensation and unreimbursed expenses due as of the date of such termination
would be payable in full. In addition, in the event Ms. Vaczy’s employment is
terminated prior to the end of the term for any reason other than by the Company
with cause or Ms. Vaczy without good reason, Ms. Vaczy or her executor of her
last will or the duly authorized administrator of her estate, as applicable,
would be entitled to receive certain specified severance payments, paid in
accordance with the Company’s standard payroll practices for
executives. In no event would such payments exceed the remaining
salary payments in the term. Any severance payments set forth in the
Original Agreement to which Ms. Vaczy may become entitled shall be based on Ms.
Vaczy’s then salary for a three month and not an annual
period. In the event her employment is terminated prior to the
end of the term by the Company without cause or by Ms. Vaczy for good reason,
all options granted by the Company will immediately vest and become exercisable
in accordance with their terms. Any options provided for in the
Extension, as well as other options granted or to be granted to Ms. Vaczy, shall
remain exercisable despite any termination of employment for a period of not
less than two years from the date of termination of
employment.
See Note
14 – Subsequent Events, for information on an employment agreement extension
entered into with Ms. Vaczy in July 2010 providing for certain different and
additional employment terms.
On October 29, 2009, the Compensation
Committee adopted that certain Additional Compensation Plan providing that
contingent cash bonuses, in the total amount of $200,806, would be payable upon
the occurrence of a “Cash Flow Event” which occurred in the first quarter of
2010. Of such amounts, two members of the Company’s Board of
Directors, one former member of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company’s
CEO, CFO and General Counsel participated in a total of $134,232 of such
amount.
Pursuant to the terms of the Director
Compensation Plan adopted on November 4, 2009, as amended, each non-employee
director of the Company, including directors who are employees of partially
owned joint ventures, are entitled to quarterly cash compensation equal to
$15,000, payable in arrears. Based on the current Board structure,
this will equal approximately $360,000 annually.
As of October 2, 2009, the Company
entered into indemnification agreements with its Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer, General Counsel, certain other employees and each of its
directors pursuant to which the Company has agreed to indemnify such party to
the full extent permitted by law, subject to certain exceptions, if such party
becomes subject to an action because such party is the Company’s director,
officer, employee, agent or fiduciary.
In November 2007, the Company entered
into an acquisition agreement with UTEK Corporation ("UTEK") and Stem Cell
Technologies, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of UTEK ("SCTI"), pursuant to
which the Company acquired all the issued and outstanding common stock of SCTI
in a stock-for-stock exchange. SCTI contains an exclusive, worldwide license to
a technology developed by researchers at the University of Louisville to
identify and isolate rare stem cells from adult human bone marrow, called very
small embryonic like stem cells. Concurrent with the SCTI acquisition, NeoStem
entered into a sponsored research agreement (“SRA”) with the University of
Louisville under which NeoStem has been supporting further research in the
laboratory of Mariusz Ratajczak, M.D., Ph.D. a co-inventor of the VSEL™
technology and head of the Stem Cell Biology Program at the James Brown Cancer
Center at the University of Louisville. The SRA, which has been periodically
amended, called for payments in 2008 of $50,000, 2009 of $65,337, and 2010 of
$86,068, of which $43,034 has been paid. An additional aggregate of
$95,128 is payable in 2011 until December 31, 2011, the end of the
term.
Under a License Agreement entered into
with the University of Louisville Research Foundation (“ULRF”) in November 2007,
SCTI agreed to engage in a diligent program to develop the VSEL technology.
Certain license fees and royalties are to be paid to ULRF from SCTI, and SCTI is
responsible for all payments for patent filings and related applications.
Portions of the license may be converted to a non-exclusive license if SCTI does
not diligently develop the VSEL™ technology or terminated entirely if SCTI
chooses to not pay for the filing and maintenance of any patents thereunder.
Under the License Agreement, which has an initial term of 20 years, the Company
has paid to date approximately $117,000 consisting of various up-front fees,
including $22,000 in connection with its May 2010 amendment, and is required to
pay under the license certain other future fees including: (i) a specified
non-refundable annual license maintenance fee upon issuance of the licensed
patent in the United States; (ii) a specified royalty on net sales; (iii)
specified milestone payments; and (iv) specified payments in the event of
sublicensing. The License Agreement also contains certain provisions
relating to "stacking," permitting SCTI to pay royalties to ULRF at a reduced
rate in the event it is required to also pay royalties to third parties
exceeding a specified threshold for other technology in furtherance of the
exercise of its patent rights or the manufacture of products using the VSEL
technology.
As of December 31, 2009, the Company,
NeoStem (China) , Inc., its subsidiary and Progenitor Cell Therapy, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("PCT”), entered into an Agreement (the
“Agreement”) whereby NeoStem and NeoStem China engaged PCT to perform the
services necessary to construct in Beijing, China a facility consisting of a
clean room for adult stem cell clinical trial processing and other stem cell
collections which will have the processing capacity on an annual basis
sufficient for at least 10,000 samples, research and development laboratory
space, collection and stem cell storage area and offices, together with the
furnishings and equipment and (2) the installation of quality control systems
consisting of materials management, equipment maintenance and calibration,
environmental monitoring and compliance and adult stem cell processing and
preservation which comply with cGMP standards and regulatory
standards that would be applicable in the United States under GTP standards, as
well as all regulatory requirement applicable to the program under the laws of
the People's Republic of China. The aggregate cost of the program,
including the phase 1 equipment purchases, is expected to be approximately $3
million. The project is anticipated to take until the end of 2010 to
complete. PCT has agreed to provide at least 90 days of support
services to NeoStem for an additional fee after completion of the project, which
is renewable at NeoStem's request for an additional 90 days.
27
In connection with the issuance to
investors and service providers of many of the shares of the Company’s common
stock and warrants to purchase common stock previously disclosed and described
herein, the Company granted the holders registration rights providing for the
registration of such shares of common stock and shares of common stock
underlying warrants on a registration statement to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission so as to permit the resale of those
shares. Certain of the registration rights agreements provided for
penalties for failure to file or failure to obtain an effective registration
statement. With respect to satisfying its obligations to the holders
of these registration rights, the Company is in various
positions. The Company filed a registration statement as required for
some of the holders, but to date, the Company has not had such registration
statement declared effective. As to some holders, the Company has not
yet satisfied its obligation to file. Certain holders with
outstanding registration rights have waived their registration
rights. No holder has yet asserted any claim against the Company with
respect to a failure to satisfy any registration obligations. Were
someone to assert a claim against the Company for breach of registration
obligations, the Company believes it has several defenses that would result in
relieving it from some or any liability, although no assurances can be
given. The Company also notes that damage claims may be limited, as
(i) all shares of Common Stock as to which registration rights attached are
currently salable under Rule 144 of the Securities Act and (ii) during much of
the relevant periods the warrants with registration rights generally have been
out of the money. Accordingly, were holders to assert claims against
the Company based on breach of the Company’s obligation to register, the Company
believes that the Company’s maximum exposure from non-related parties would not
be material.
Xiangbei Welman Pharmaceutical Co.,
Ltd. v Suzhou Erye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Hunan Weichu Pharmacy Co.,
Ltd. involves a patent infringement dispute with respect to a particular
antibiotics complex manufactured by Erye (the “Product”). The
Changsha Intermediate People’s Court in Hunan Province, PRC in the foregoing
case rendered a judgment on May 13, 2010 against Erye as follows: (i) awarding
plaintiff Xiangbei Welman damages and costs of approximately 5 million RMB
(approximately $750,000) against Erye which was fully accrued for at June 30,
2010; and (ii) enjoining Erye from manufacturing, marketing and selling the
Product. The Product represented less than 2% of Erye’s sales in
2009. Erye has appealed the court judgment, and is also engaged in
settlement negotiations.
A related
but separate lawsuit entitled Xiangbei Welman Pharmaceutical Co.,
Ltd. v Suzhou Erye Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Hunan Weichu Pharmacy Co.,
Ltd., involves a copyright infringement dispute with respect to package
inserts of the same Product. The Changsha Intermediate People’s Court
in Hunan Province, PRC rendered a decision on August 3, 2010 against Erye,
dismissing its appeal from a lower court’s judgment made by the People’s Court
of Yuelu District, Changsha City, which (i) enjoins Erye from copying and using
the package inserts for the Product and selling the drugs with the aforesaid
package inserts; and (ii) awarding Welman economic losses of approximately
50,000 RMB (approximately $7,500) against Erye. Erye has decided to
appeal the court judgment, and is also engaged in settlement
negotiations.
Note 14 – Subsequent
Events
The
following are the subsequent events that management believes materially effect
the financial position or results of operations or are otherwise informative to
the reader of these financial statements.
On July
7, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement pursuant to which a
consultant was retained to assist the Company in providing sponsorship of the
Company’s securities in the public markets and to perform investor relations
services for a three month term. In consideration for providing
services under this agreement, the Company issued to the consultant 150,000
shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of $262,500, to vest as to
one-third on each of the first, second and third one-month anniversaries of the
effective date of the agreement.
On July
7, 2010, pursuant to a letter agreement (the “Employment Agreement Extension”)
entered into with Catherine M. Vaczy, Esq., the Company’s Vice President and
General Counsel, the Company extended Ms. Vaczy’s employment agreement dated
January 26, 2007, as amended on January 9, 2008 and August 29, 2008 and
reinstated and extended on July 8, 2009 for a one year term (as so amended and
extended, the “Original Employment Agreement”). The Employment
Agreement Extension was effective as of July 7, 2010 (the “Effective Date”) and
continues through December 31, 2011 (as extended, the “Term”). The
Employment Agreement Extension provides that during the Term, Ms. Vaczy shall
receive (i) a base salary of $211,000 per annum which will be increased by ten
percent (10%) on the one year anniversary of the Effective Date; (ii) a bonus of
$50,000, half of which is payable upon the Effective Date and half of which is
payable upon achievement of a business milestone; (iii) a minimum bonus of
$60,000 during the second year of the Term; (iv) an option (the
“Option”) on the Effective Date under the Company’s 2009 Plan to purchase
350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which shall vest and become
exercisable as to 100,000 shares on the one year anniversary of the Effective
Date, 50,000 shares on December 31, 2011, and as to the remaining 200,000 shares
upon the achievement of specified business milestones, the per share exercise
price of the Option equal to the closing price of the common stock on the
Effective Date and the Option subject to all the terms and conditions of the
2009 Plan; (v) the costs of personal stem cell collection; and (vi) business
club dues not to exceed $5,000 annually. Except as set forth in the
Employment Agreement Extension, the terms of the Original Employment Agreement
remain unchanged.
28
On July
7, 2010, the vesting of options to purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of
common stock at $2.04 per share, previously granted under the 2009 Plan to Robin
L. Smith, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, effective October 29, 2009,
which were originally scheduled to vest as to 250,000 shares on July 8, 2011 and
as to 250,000 shares upon the achievement of a business milestone, was
accelerated to July 7, 2010 as authorized by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors.
On July
27, 2010, consistent with the Company’s previously disclosed intention to
provide support for its charitable foundation, The Stem for Life Foundation (the
“Foundation”), which promotes public awareness, funds research and development
and subsidizes stem cell collection and storage programs, the Company issued to
the Foundation of 150,000 shares of restricted common stock with a fair value of
$298,500. The issuance of such securities was subject to the approval
of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the NYSE
Amex. On July 2, 2010, the Company also contributed $75,000 to Stem
for Life.
In July
2010, the Company was awarded a $700,000 contract from the U.S. Army Medical
Research and Materiel Command, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research
Center. This contract is for the purpose of evaluating the use of topically
applied bone marrow-derived adult mesenchymal stem cells for rapid wound
healing. The Company previously announced that this funding was included in the
Department of Defense FY09 Appropriations Bill and will begin receiving funds to
initiate the program in 2010.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Any statements not of current or historical fact may
be considered forward-looking statements. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as
a result of various factors, including those discussed under the heading
“Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” at the end of this item
and under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report. The following
discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report and in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.
The Merger
As previously reported, on November 2,
2008 we entered into the Merger Agreement with CBH. On October 30, 2009, the
Merger was consummated, the effect of which was our acquisition of CBH’s 51%
ownership interest in Erye. In connection with the Merger we established a
wholly owned subsidiary through which we acquired our interest in
Erye. The results of operations for Erye are included in our
consolidated results of operations beginning on October 30,
2009. Accordingly the year over year comparisons reflect NeoStem as a
stand-alone entity for 2009 and the combined results for Erye and NeoStem
for 2010.
Erye was founded more than 50 years ago
and represents an established, vertically-integrated pharmaceutical business,
focused primarily on antibiotics. Suzhou Erye Economy and Trading Co. Ltd., or
EET, owns the remaining 49% ownership interest in Erye. We and EET have
negotiated a revised joint venture agreement or the Joint Venture Agreement and
will govern our ownership of Erye.
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Joint Venture Agreement, dividend distributions to EET and Merger Sub will
be made in proportion to their respective ownership interests in Erye; provided,
however, that for the three-year period commencing on the first day of the first
fiscal quarter after the Joint Venture Agreement becomes effective distributions
will be made as follows: (i) the 49% of undistributed profits (after tax) of the
joint venture due EET will be distributed to EET and lent back to Erye to help
finance costs in connection with their construction of and relocation to a new
facility; and (ii) of the net profit (after tax) of the joint venture due Merger
Sub, 45% will be provided to Erye as part of the new facility construction fund
and will be characterized as paid-in capital for Merger Sub’s 51% interest in
Erye, and 6% will be distributed to Merger Sub directly. As of June 30,
2010 distributions totaling
approximately $7,201,600 had been deferred and EET has received and
lent back approximately $7,734,300.
29
The Overview
In 2009, through our expansion efforts
within China and with the acquisition of a controlling interest in Suzhou Erye
Pharmaceuticals Ltd., or Erye, we transitioned into a multi-dimensional
international biopharmaceutical company with product and service revenues,
global research and development capabilities and operations in three distinct
business units: (i) U.S. adult stem cells, (ii) China adult stem cells, and
(iii) China pharmaceuticals. These business units are expected to provide
platforms for the accelerated development and commercialization of innovative
technologies and products in both the U.S. and China.
•
|
U.S. adult stem cells — We will
continue to focus on growing our stem cell collection, processing and
storage business and expanding our research and development activities for
diagnostic and therapeutic
applications.
|
•
|
China adult stem cells — We are in
the process of launching several stem cell-focused initiatives which
include therapeutic applications, as well as related collection,
processing and storage.
|
•
|
China pharmaceuticals — Our
ownership interest in Erye, a leading antibiotics producer in China,
positions us to take advantage of China’s growth in healthcare spending
through Erye’s existing pharmaceutical product portfolio, as well as from
products we may develop or
license.
|
Results of
Operations
Three
and Six Months
Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Three
and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Revenue
Three
Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, total revenues were $19,407,500
compared to $31,600 for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Revenues for
the three months
ended June 30, 2010 were comprised of $19,351,300 of
pharmaceutical product sales and $56,200 related to stem cell collections,
license fees, royalties and other revenue. The pharmaceutical product sales
represent sales generated by Erye. The stem cell revenues generated
in the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were derived from a
combination of revenues from the collection of autologous adult stem cells and
license fees collected from collection centers in our collection center network.
For the three months
ended June 30, 2010, we
earned $21,700 from the collection and storage of autologous adult stem cells,
and $16,100 of license fees, and $18,400 of other revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, we earned $14,000 from the collection
and storage of autologous adult stem cells and $17,600 from license fees. The
increase in stem cell collection and storage revenue in 2010 compared to 2009
was due primarily to our efforts on recruiting clients into our network stem
cell collection centers. Cost of Sales for the three months ended June 30,
2010 is comprised of Cost of
Goods sold of $12,894,900 related to the sale of our pharmaceutical
products, and $16,900 of direct costs related to the cost of collecting
autologous stem cells from clients.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, total revenues were
$35,240,702 compared to $76,700 for
the six months ended
June 30, 2009. Revenues for
the six months
ended June 30, 2010 were comprised of $35,122,500 of
pharmaceutical product sales and $118,200 related to stem cell collections,
license fees, royalties and other revenue. The pharmaceutical product sales
represent sales generated by Erye. The stem cell revenues generated
in the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were derived from a
combination of revenues from the collection of autologous adult stem cells and
license fees collected from collection centers in our collection center network.
For the six months
ended June 30, 2010, we
earned $66,400 from the collection and storage of autologous adult stem cells,
$30,100 of license fees and $21,700 of other revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, we earned $58,600 from the collection
and storage of autologous adult stem cells and $18,100 from license fees. The
increase in stem cell collection and storage revenue in 2010 compared to 2009
was due primarily to our efforts on recruiting clients into the existing network
in the Northeast and Southern California. Cost of Sales for
the six months
ended June 30, 2010 is comprised of Cost of Goods sold
of $23,721,200 related to the sale of our pharmaceutical products, and $42,200
of direct costs related to the cost of collecting autologous stem cells from
clients.
30
Gross margin for
the six months
ended June 30, 2010 totaled $ 11,477,300 of which 99% is attributable
to the sale of pharmaceutical products and the balance is attributable to our
stem cell collection operations.
Operating Expenses
Three
Months
Ended June 30, 2010 Compared
to the Three Months Ended
June 30, 2009
For the three months ended June 30,
2010 operating expenses
totaled $9,989,600 compared to $4,715,200 for
the three months ended
June 30, 2009, representing an increase of $5,274,000 or 112%.
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, our selling, general, and
administrative expenses were $7,856,500 compared to $4,199,900 for
the three months ended June 30,
2009, representing an
increase of $3,665,800, which was the result
of:
·
|
Our efforts to establish a stem
cell operation in China to provide advanced therapies, related processing
and storage, as well as research and development capabilities totaled $1,741,100, an increase of $
587,900. Such expenses included
expenditures for the rental of laboratory space, legal expenses associated
with establishing our subsidiary company and related operations in China,
consultants retained to support our implementation and introduction of
advanced therapies in China, recruiting fees for identifying senior
managers for our operation in China and travel. In addition these
operating expenses reflect charges resulting from issuing various equity
instruments to incentivize staff members and consultants totaling
$746,500.
|
·
|
Administrative expenses increased
by approximately $1,105,600. Approximately $846,700 of this increased
operating expense was the result of the Merger and the attendant operating
expenses of the Erye operation. The Company’s US administrative operating
expenses increased by $258,800. The use of equity instruments to
incentivize staff, compensate directors and pay for services totaled
$749,100, a decrease of $582,500 over the three months ended June 30,
2009. Salaries and wages
increased by $166,800 as the result of increased staffing levels,
contractual salary increases, and bonus payments during the period. Other
staff related cost including travel and entertainment and operating
expenses increased $80,300 as result of our expanded operations in China.
Professional fees, including legal and accounting fees increased by
$390,300 as the result of our expanded operations in China.
Rent and other facility costs increased by $24,300 as a result of an
increase in the cost of leasing of office space in New York and insurance
expense increased $49,000. Compensation expenses under the Directors cash
compensation plan adopted by the Board of Directors in the first quarter
of 2009 increased administrative expense by $110,200. The balance of the
increase in administrative expense was the result of offsetting changes
from a variety of activities.
Included in selling, general and
administrative expense is a charge for $740,700 as the result of a
judgment on May 13, 2010 against Erye in connection with a patent dispute
concern an antibiotic product that has accounted for less than 2% of Erye
sales in the past. (See Commitments and Contingencies for a more detailed
discussion).
|
·
|
As a result of completing the
Merger with CBH, our activities associated with the Merger ended thus
reducing the use of our attorney, accountant and other professional
services and reducing our operating costs by $550,600 over
2009.
|
·
|
Sales and marketing expenses
increased by $1,782,000 over the three months ended June 30,
2009. Approximately $575,600
of this increased operating expense was related to the sales and marketing
efforts of Erye and $383,400 related to amortization of intangible assets
acquired in the Merger. The use of equity instruments to
incentivize staff and pay for services totaled $339,500, an increase of
$127,600 over three months ended June 30,
2009, and marketing and
consulting fees increased approximately $583,200 in connection with developing
new strategies and efforts to increase our collection network
and market penetration and our US sales and marketing costs also
increased by approximately $112,200 due to increases in staff
costs and other operating
expenses.
|
31
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, our research and development expenses
totaled $2,133,200 compared to $515,300 for the three months ended June 30, 2009, representing an increase of
$1,617,900, which was the result of:
The use of equity instruments to
incentivize research staff totaled $597,400, an increase of $497,900 over
the three months ended
June 30, 2009. Research
related to our VSEL™ technology increased operating expenses
by $753,700. Our acquisition of Erye added $369,400 of research and development
expense to our operating expenses. The balance of the increase in research and
development expense is related to costs associated with our wound healing
research.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared
to the Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009
For the six months ended June 30,
2010 operating expenses
totaled $17,588,500 compared to $6,593,700 for
the six months ended
June 30, 2009, representing an increase of $10,994,800 or 167%.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our selling, general,
and administrative expenses were $14,155,000 compared to $5,823,800 for
the six months ended
June 30, 2009, representing
an increase of $8,331,200, which was the result
of:
·
|
Our efforts to establish a stem
cell operation in China to provide advanced therapies, related processing
and storage, as well as research and development capabilities totaled $2,932,900, an increase of
$1,794,500. Such expenses included
expenditures for the rental of laboratory space, legal expenses associated
with establishing our subsidiary company and related operations in China,
consultants retained to support our implementation and introduction of
advanced therapies in China, recruiting fees for identifying senior
managers for our operation in China and travel. In addition these
operating expenses reflect charges resulting from issuing various equity
instruments to incentivize staff members and consultants totaling
$1,298,000.
|
·
|
Administrative expenses increased
by approximately $3,882,100. Approximately $1,579,000 of this increased
operating expense was the result of the Merger and the attendant operating
expenses of the Erye operation. The Company’s US administrative operating
expenses increased by $2,303,100. The use of equity instruments to
incentivize staff, compensate directors and pay for services totaled
$1,616,300, an increase of $333,000 over six months ended June 30,
2009. Salaries and wages
increased by $707,600 as the result of increased staffing levels,
contractual salary increases, bonus payments and tax payments and tax
withholdings we paid on behalf of certain executive and other staff
members. Professional fees, including legal and accounting fees
increased by $528,800 as the result of our expanded operations in China.
Investor relations services increased by $150,300, including fees for
preparing documents for various SEC filings and increased communications
with shareholders and investors. Other staff related cost
including travel and entertainment and operating expenses increased
$137,200 as result of our expanded operations in China, rent increased by
$76,900 as a result of an increase in the cost of leasing of office space
in New York, and franchise taxes increased $111,200. Compensation
expense under the Directors cash compensation plan adopted by the Board of
Directors in the first quarter of 2009 increased administrative expense by
$186,300, insurance increased $99,000 and the balance of the
changes in administrative expense resulted from increases and decreases in
other operating activities.
Included in selling, general and
administrative expense is a charge for $740,700 as the result of a
judgment on May 13, 2010 against Erye in connection with a patent dispute
concern an antibiotic product that has accounted for less than 2% of Erye
sales in the past. (See Commitments and Contingencies for a more detailed
discussion).
|
·
|
As a result of completing the
Merger with CBH, our activities associated with the Merger ended thus
reducing the use of our attorney, accountant and other professional
services and reducing our operating costs by $835,100 over the same period in 2009.
|
32
·
|
Sales and marketing expenses
increased by $2,748,900 over six months ended June 30,
2009. Approximately
$1,099,400 of this increased operating expense was related to the sales
and marketing efforts of Erye and $766,800 related to amortization of
intangible assets acquired in the Merger. The use of equity
instruments to incentivize staff and pay for services totaled $495,600, an
increase of $242,000 over six months ended June 30,
2009, and marketing and
consulting fees increased approximately $524,000 in connection with
developing new strategies and efforts to increase our
collection network and market penetration. Our US sales and marketing
costs also increased by approximately $116,600 due to increases
in staff costs and other operating
expenses.
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, our research and development expenses
totaled $3,433,500 compared to $769,900 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, representing an increase of
$2,663,600, which was the result of:
The use of equity instruments to
incentivize research staff totaled $741,200, an increase of $604,400 over
the six months ended
June 30, 2009. Research
related to our VSEL™ technology increased operating expenses
by $1,572,900. Our acquisition of Erye added $487,400 of research and
development expense to our operating expenses. The balance of the increase in
research and development expense is related to costs associated with our wound
healing research.
Dividends on Convertible Redeemable
Series C Preferred Stock.
In connection with the Merger, the
Company issued 8,177,512 shares of Convertible Redeemable Series C Preferred
Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”) which called for an annual dividend of
5% based on the stated value of the preferred stock. For the three
and six months
ended June 30, 2010 we recorded a dividend of $53,800
and $153,500 , respectively, as the prorated dividend due. On
May 17, 2010, RimAsia Capital Partners LP ("RimAsia"), converted its
8,177,512 shares of Series C Preferred Stock into 9,086,124 shares of the
Company's common stock. Following this conversion,
there are no shares of Series C Preferred Stock outstanding and RimAsia will not
be entitled to receive any dividends on such shares, to receive notices or to
vote such shares or to exercise or to enjoy any other powers, preferences or
rights in respect thereof; provided however that RimAsia was entitled to receive
a cash payment of $153,469 which is equal to the dividends accrued but unpaid
from January 1, 2010 through May 17, 2010. This payment was made
on May 25, 2010.
Noncontrolling
Interests
When the Company acquired China
Biopharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. it acquired a 51% interest in Erye
Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (“Erye”). In preparing our financial
statements the full operations of Erye are reflected in these results as of
October 30, 2009. We account for the 49% minority shareholder share of Erye’s
net income with a charge to Noncontrolling Interests. For the three
and six months
ended June 30, 2010 Erye’s minority shareholders’
share of net income totaled $1,611,500 and $2,940,200,
respectively.
Other Income and
Expense
For the three
and six months
ended June 30, 2010 the Company incurred interest
expense of approximately $139,700 and $252,900 respectively primarily related to
a loan to Erye from its minority shareholder, of which $133,500 and $238,200 was
capitalized for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, respectively as part of the
cost of construction of Erye’s new manufacturing plant. In accordance with the
Joint Venture Agreement that governs the operation of Erye the minority
shareholder has agreed to loan back to Erye dividends it is entitled to for
three years starting in 2008, to help fund the construction of the new
manufacturing facility. At June 30, 2010 these loans totaled $7,855,200.
The loan calls for interest to accrue at a rate of 5%
annually.
For the three months ended June 30, 2010
the Company recognized other income of $149,600 in connection with the
extinguishment of certain liabilities that Erye determined were no longer
payable, and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 the Company
recognized $14,500 of other expenses that were the result of interest income and
other income credits offset by expenses related to the restructuring of the
term of certain warrants issued to RimAsia of approximately
$188,000.
33
Provision for taxes
The provision for taxes of $402,300 and
$905,200 represents income taxes due on income of Erye for the three
and six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively
and is net of utilization of the deferred tax liability associated with
amortization of intangible assets acquired in the merger of $60,600 and $121,200
for the respective periods.
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
At June 30, 2010 we had a cash balance of $10,958,800, working capital of $12,082,000 and stockholders’ equity of
$47,802,700. During the six months
ended June 30, 2010 we invested approximately $8.6 million into the
business, specifically in property and equipment related to our expansion into
China, while reducing cash used in operating activities by $2.6 million compared
to the first six months of 2009.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we met our immediate cash requirements
through existing cash balances, public offerings of our common stock which
raised approximately $13.6 million, the exercise of warrants and
options which raised approximately $2.6 million, the issuance of notes payable
for our operations in China and the use of equity and equity-linked instruments
to pay for services and compensation.
We incurred a net loss attributable to
common shareholders of $5,427,100 and $10,139,300 for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, respectively. The following
chart represents the net funds provided by or used in operating, financing and
investment activities for each period indicated (in
thousands):
The Six Months
Ended
|
||||||||
(in $000)
|
June 30,
2010
|
June 30,
2009
|
||||||
Cash (used) in operating
activities
|
$ | (3,464.4 | ) | $ | (5,221.2 | ) | ||
Cash (used) in investing
activities
|
(8,034.1 | ) | (80.9 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by financing
activities
|
15,200.7 | 15,320.9 |
Operating Activities
Our cash used for operating activities
in the six months
ended June 30, 2010 totaled $3,464,500, which is the sum of (i) our net loss,
adjusted for non-cash expenses totaling $5,804,900 which includes, principally, common
stock, common stock options and common stock purchase warrants issued for
services rendered in the amount of $4,339,700 and depreciation and amortization of
$1,465,200; (ii) cash retained in the operation
as the result of increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$2,258,100; and (iii) a decrease in cash resulting from a
reduction in advance payments and unearned revenue from customers and licensees
of $647,700, an increase in accounts receivable of $286,200, cash used for prepaids and payments of
other assets of $157,800 and increases in inventory of
$3,331,700.
Under a License Agreement entered into
with the University of Louisville Research Foundation (“ULRF”) in November 2007,
SCTI agreed to engage in a diligent program to develop the VSEL™ technology.
Certain license fees and royalties are to be paid to ULRF from SCTI, and SCTI is
responsible for all payments for patent filings and related applications.
Portions of the license may be converted to a non-exclusive license if SCTI does
not diligently develop the VSEL™ technology or terminated entirely if SCTI
chooses to not pay for the filing and maintenance of any patents thereunder.
Under the License Agreement, which has an initial term of 20 years, the Company
has paid to date approximately $117,000 consisting of various up-front fees,
including $22,000 in connection with its May 2010 amendment, and is required to
pay under the license certain other future fees including: (i) a specified
non-refundable annual license maintenance fee upon issuance of the licensed
patent in the United States; (ii) a specified royalty on net sales; (iii)
specified milestone payments; and (iv) specified payments in the event of
sublicensing. The License Agreement also contains certain provisions
relating to "stacking," permitting SCTI to pay royalties to ULRF at a reduced
rate in the event it is required to also pay royalties to third parties
exceeding a specified threshold for other technology in furtherance of the
exercise of its patent rights or the manufacture of products using the VSEL™
technology.
Investing
Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2010 we spent
approximately $8.6 million for property and equipment.
Erye is building a new production facility and during the six months ended June 30,
2010 $8.2 million was spent on
construction. This plant is expected to be fully operational in 2011.
In March 2010 we initiated construction of our stem cell laboratory in Beijing
and to date we have invested $770,000. The balance of our capital
expenditures was spent on equipping our laboratory in Boston and other Company
stem cell operations in China. The new
production facility will increase Erye’s production capacity and should enable
Erye to respond to expected increases in demand for pharmaceutical products in
China.
Idle cash
in our Erye subsidiary of approximately $2.4 million was invested on short term
investments and proceeds from these investments of approximately $2.4 million
was used for various operating and financing activities in the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
34
Financing Activities
In December 2009, in order to facilitate
working capital requirements, in local currency, in China, NeoStem (China)
issued a promissory note to the Bank of Rizhao Qingdao Branch in the amount of
4,400,000 RMB (approximately $645,500). The note, bearing an interest rate of
4.05%, was due on June 21, 2010 and paid in full in April 2010. On May
25, 2010 NeoStem (China) issued a promissory note to the Bank of Rizhao Qingdao
Branch in the amount of 3,600,000 RMB (approximately $527,400) due November 25,
2010 and bearing interest at 4.86% per annum. The loan is collateralized
by cash in a restricted bank account totaling 4,074,500 RMB (approximately
$600,200). In addition, in May 2010 NeoStem (China) entered into a pledge
agreement with the bank pledging all of its interest in its VIEs as additional
collateral for the loan.
The Company’s subsidiary Erye has
69,749,400 RMB (approximately $10,274,000) of notes payables as
of June 30, 2010 and 62,457,000 RMB (approximately
$9,150,000) of notes payable as of December 31, 2009. Notes are payable to the banks who
issue bank notes to Erye’s creditors. Notes payable are interest free and
usually mature after a three to six months period. In order to issue
notes payable on behalf of Erye, the banks required collateral, such as cash
deposits which were approximately 30%-50% of the value of notes to be issued, or
properties owned by Erye. At June 30, 2010, 23,734,500 RMB (approximately
$3,496,100) of restricted cash was put up for collateral for the balance of
notes payable which was approximately 34% of the notes payable the Company
issued, and the remaining of the notes payable is collateralized by pledging the
land use right the Company owns. The use of notes payable to pay
creditors is a feature of the money and banking system of China and we expect
these types of notes to be a continuing feature of Erye’s capital
structure.
On February 18, 2010 the Company
completed a public offering of its common stock, selling 5,750,000 shares priced
at $1.35 per share. The Company received approximately $6,822,000 in net
proceeds from the offering, after underwriting discounts, commissions and other
expenses, of approximately $940,000 of which 463,000 was
unpaid.
On March 15, 2010, the Company and
RimAsia made certain agreements with respect to outstanding
warrants. RimAsia exercised its warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares
of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“ Common Stock ”),
exercisable at a per share exercise price of $1.75, which was issued
to RimAsia in a private placement completed by the Company in September
2008. This exercise resulted in proceeds to the Company totaling
$1,750,000. The condition for such exercise was that the Company
would modify certain terms of RimAsia’s warrant to purchase 4,000,000 shares of
Common Stock, issued to RimAsia in a private placement completed by the Company
in April 2009 (the “Series D Warrant”). The Series D
Warrant was amended to provide for (i) a three (3) year
extension of the Termination Date (as defined in the Series D Warrant) from
September 1, 2013 to September 1, 2016 and (ii) an increase in the average
closing price that triggers the Company’s redemption option under the Series D
Warrant from $3.50 to $5.00.
On May
19, 2010, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with
Commerce Court Small Cap Value Fund, Ltd., which provides that, subject to
certain terms and conditions, Commerce Court is committed to purchase up to
$20,000,000 worth of shares of the Company’s common stock over a term of
approximately 24 months. The Purchase Agreement provides that at the
Company’s discretion, it may present Commerce Court with draw down notices under
this $20 million equity line of credit arrangement from time to time, to
purchase the Company’s Common Stock, provided certain price requirements are met
and limited to 2.5% of the Company’s market capitalization at the time of such
draw down. The per share purchase price for these shares will equal
the daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock on each
date during the draw down period on which shares are purchased, less a discount
of 5.0%. The Purchase Agreement also provides that the Company in its sole
discretion may grant Commerce Court the right to exercise one or more options to
purchase additional shares of Common Stock during each draw down period at a
price which would be based on a discount calculated in the same manner as it is
calculated in the draw down notice. The issuance of shares of common stock to
Commerce Court pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, and the sale of those shares
from time to time by Commerce Court to the public, are covered by an effective
registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC.
On May
27, 2010, the Company presented Commerce Court with a Draw Down
Notice. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the shares were offered
at a discount price to Commerce Court mutually agreed upon by the parties under
the Purchase Agreement equal to 95.0% of the daily volume weighted average price
of the common stock during the Pricing Period or a 5%
discount. Pursuant to the Draw Down Notice, the Company also granted
Commerce Court the right to exercise one or more options to purchase additional
shares of common stock during the Pricing Period, based on the trading price of
the common stock. The Company settled with Commerce Court on the purchase of
685,226 shares of common stock under the terms of the Draw Down Notice and the
Purchase Agreement at an aggregate purchase price of $1.8 million,
or approximately $2.63 per share, on June 7, 2010. The Company and
Commerce Court agreed to waive the minimum threshold price of $3.00 per share
set forth in the Purchase Agreement. The Company received net proceeds
from the sale of these shares of approximately $1.7 million after deducting its
offering expenses.
Effective
June 1, 2010, Fullbright exercised a warrant to purchase 400,000 shares of
restricted Common Stock. This
warrant was issued to Fullbright in a private placement of securities by the
Company in November 2008. The exercise price was $1.75 per share,
resulting in proceeds to the Company of $700,000.
On June
25, 2010, the Company entered into definitive securities purchase agreements
with investors in a public offering, pursuant to which such investors agreed to
purchase, and the Company agreed to sell, an aggregate of 2,325,582 Units,
consisting of an aggregate of 2,325,582 shares of Common Stock and warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 581,394 shares of Common Stock. The offering
closed on June 30, 2010 with gross proceeds of $5.0 million. Each
Unit was priced at $2.15 and consisted of one share of common stock and a
warrant which will allow the investor to purchase 0.25 shares of common stock at
a per share price of $2.75. The warrants may be called by the Company
in the event that the common stock trades over $4.50 per share for 10
consecutive trading days. Subject to certain ownership limitations,
the warrants were exercisable on the date of the closing and will expire 2 years
thereafter. The number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrants and the exercise price of the warrants are adjustable
in the event of stock dividends, splits, recapitalizations, reclassifications,
combinations or exchanges of shares, reorganizations, liquidations,
consolidation, acquisition of the Company (whether through merger or acquisition
of substantially all the assets or stock of the Company) or similar
events. The net proceeds to the Company from such offering, after
deducting the Placement Agent’s fees and expenses, the Company’s estimated
offering expenses, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the
warrants issued in the offering were approximately $4.55
million.
35
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Joint Venture Agreement, dividend distributions to EET and Merger Sub will
be made in proportion to their respective ownership interests in Erye; provided,
however, that for the three-year period commencing on the first day of the first
fiscal quarter after the Joint Venture Agreement becomes effective distributions
will be made as follows: (i) the 49% of undistributed profits (after tax) of the
joint venture due EET will be distributed to EET and lent back to Erye to help
finance costs in connection with their construction of and relocation to a new
facility; and (ii) of the net profit (after tax) of the joint venture due Merger
Sub, 45% will be provided to Erye as part of the new facility construction fund
and will be characterized as paid-in capital for Merger Sub’s 51% interest in
Erye, and 6% will be distributed to Merger Sub directly. At June 30,
2010 these loans totaled $7,702,800 plus accrued interest of $227,500. The loan
calls for interest to accrue at rate of 5% annually. In addition,
during the second quarter EET received an interest payment of approximately
$192,000.
Liquidity and Capital Requirements
Outlook
With our acquisition of a controlling
interest in Erye and expansion into China, we have transitioned from being a
one-dimensional U.S. service provider with nominal revenues to being a
multi-dimensional international biopharmaceutical company with current revenues
and operations in three distinct business units — U.S. adult stem cells, China
adult stem cells and China pharmaceuticals. The following is an overview of our
collective liquidity and capital requirements.
Erye is constructing a new
pharmaceutical manufacturing facility and began transferring its operations in
January 2010. The relocation will continue as the new production
lines are completed and receive cGMP certification through 2011. The new
facility is estimated to cost approximately $30 million, of which approximately
$24 million has been incurred through June 30, 2010. Construction has been and
will continue to be self-funded by Erye and EET, the holder of the minority
joint venture interest in Erye. We have agreed for a period of three years to
reinvest in Erye approximately 90% of the net earnings we would be entitled to
receive under the Joint Venture Agreement by reason of our 51% interest in
Erye.
We are also engaged in other initiatives
to expand our operations into China including with respect to technology
licensing, establishment of stem cell processing and storage capabilities and
research and clinical development. In June 2009 we established NeoStem (China)
as our wholly foreign-owned subsidiary. To comply with PRC’s foreign investment
regulations regarding stem cell research and development, clinical trials and
related activities, we conduct our current stem cell business in the PRC through
two domestic variable interest entities. We have incurred and expect to continue
to incur substantial expenses in connection with our China
activities. In order to implement the establishment of the Beijing
Facility, as of December 31, 2009, our Company, our WFOE subsidiary
NeoStem (China), and PCT entered into the PCT Agreement, whereby NeoStem and
NeoStem (China) engaged PCT to perform the services necessary (1) to construct
the Beijing Facility, consisting of a clean room for adult stem cell clinical
trial processing and other stem cell collections which will have the processing
capacity on an annual basis sufficient for at least 10,000 samples, research and
development laboratory space, collection and stem cell storage area and offices,
together with the furnishings and equipment, and (2) to effect the installation
of quality control systems consisting of materials management, equipment
maintenance and calibration, environmental monitoring and compliance and adult
stem cell processing and preservation which comply with cGMP standards and
regulatory standards that would be applicable in the United States under GTP
standards, as well as all regulatory requirements applicable to the program
under the laws of the PRC. The aggregate cost of the program,
including the Phase 1 equipment purchases, is expected to be approximately
$3,000,000. The project commenced on April 1, 2010, and is anticipated to take
approximately seven months to complete. We have the option to terminate the PCT
Agreement without cause upon providing no less than 60 days written notice to
PCT, subject to our obligation to pay for any services performed up to the date
of termination and certain costs and expenses incurred by
PCT.
We expect to rely partly on dividends
paid to us by the WFOE under the contracts with the VIEs, and under the Joint
Venture Agreement, attributable to our 51% ownership interest in Erye, to meet
our future cash needs. However, there can be no assurance that the WFOE in China
will receive payments uninterrupted or at all as arranged under the contracts
with the VIEs. In addition, pursuant to the Joint Venture Agreement that governs
the ownership and management of Erye, for the next three years: (i) 49% of
undistributed profits (after tax) will be distributed to EET and loaned back to
Erye for use in connection with its construction of the new Erye facility; (ii)
45% of the net profit after tax will be provided to Erye as part of the new
facility construction fund, which will be characterized as paid-in capital for
our 51% interest in Erye; and (iii) only 6% of the net profit will be
distributed to us directly for our operating expenses.
36
The payment of dividends by entities
organized under PRC law to non-PRC entities is subject to limitations.
Regulations in the PRC currently permit payment of dividends by our WFOE and
Erye only out of accumulated distributable earnings, if any, as determined in
accordance with accounting standards and regulations in China. Moreover, our
WFOE and Erye are required to appropriate from PRC GAAP profit after tax to
other non-distributable reserve funds. These reserve funds include one or more
of the following: (i) a general reserve, (ii) an enterprise expansion fund and
(iii) a staff bonus and welfare fund. Subject to certain cumulative
limits (i.e., 50% of the
registered capital of the
relevant
company), the general
reserve fund requires annual appropriation at 10% of after tax profit (as
determined under accounting principles generally accepted in the PRC at each
year-end); the appropriation to the other funds are at the discretion of WFOE
and Erye. In addition, if Erye incurs debt on its own behalf in the future, the
instruments governing the debt may restrict Erye’s or the joint venture’s
ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us. This may diminish
the cash flow we receive from Erye’s operations, which would have a material
adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Our interests in China will be subject
to China’s rules and regulations on currency conversion. In particular, the
initial capitalization and operating expenses of the two VIEs are funded by our
WFOE. In China, the State Administration for Foreign Exchange, or the SAFE,
regulates the conversion of the Chinese Renminbi into foreign currencies.
Currently, foreign investment enterprises are required to apply to the SAFE for
Foreign Exchange Registration Certificates, or IC Cards of Enterprises with
Foreign Investment. Foreign investment enterprises holding such registration
certificates, which must be renewed annually, are allowed to open foreign
currency accounts including a “basic account” and “capital account.” Currency
translation within the scope of the “basic account,” such as remittance of
foreign currencies for payment of dividends, can be effected without requiring
the approval of the SAFE. However, conversion of currency in the “capital
account,” including capital items such as direct investments, loans, and
securities, require approval of the SAFE. According to the Notice
of the General Affairs Department of the State Administration of Foreign
Exchange on the Relevant Operating Issues Concerning the Improvement of the
Administration of Payment and Settlement of Foreign Currency Capital of
Foreign-invested Enterprises promulgated on August 29,
2008, or the SAFE Notice 142, to apply to a bank for settlement of foreign
currency capital, a foreign invested enterprise shall submit the documents
certifying the uses of the RMB funds from the settlement of foreign currency
capital and a detailed checklist on use of the RMB funds from the last
settlement of foreign currency capital. It is stipulated that only if the funds
for the settlement of foreign currency capital are of an amount not more than
US$50,000 and are to be used for enterprise reserve, the above documents may be
exempted by the bank. This SAFE Notice 142, along with the recent practice of
Chinese banks of restricting foreign currency conversion for fear of “hot money”
going into China, have limited and may continue to limit our ability to channel
funds to the two VIE entities for their operation. We are exploring options with
our PRC counsels and banking institutions in China as to acceptable methods of
funding the operation of the two VIEs, including advances from Erye, but there
can be no assurance that acceptable funding alternatives will be
identified.
Neither Erye nor our other expansion
activities into China are expected to generate sufficient excess cash flow to
support our platform business or our initiatives in China in the near
term.
Although the Company does not have
immediate plans to raise capital, we believe that we will need to raise
additional capital to fund the development of advanced stem cell technologies
and therapies in the U.S. and China, including the VSEL™ technology licensed from the University
of Louisville and other regenerative technologies. We currently expect to fund
our operating activities in the near term through the use of existing cash
balances and moving forward through the use of a current equity line or other
capital raising transaction, potential additional warrant and option exercises,
the 6% of net profits to which we are entitled from Erye, and, ultimately, the
growth of our revenue generating activities in China. In addition, we will
continue to seek grants for scientific and clinical studies from the National
Institutes of Health and other governmental agencies and foundations, but there
can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such
grants. We also review acquisition opportunities for revenue
generating businesses around which we could consider raising
capital. At June 30, 2010, we had a cash balance of approximately
$10.9 million. The trading volume of our common stock, coupled with
our history of operating losses and liquidity problems, may make it difficult
for us to raise capital on acceptable terms or at all. The demand for the equity
and debt of small cap biopharmaceutical companies like ours is dependent upon
many factors, including the general state of the financial markets. During times
of extreme market volatility, capital may not be available on favorable terms,
if at all. Our inability to obtain such additional capital on acceptable terms
could materially and adversely affect our business operations and ability to
continue as a going concern.
37
The following table reflects a summary
of NeoStem’s contractual cash obligations as of June 30, 2010 (in
thousands):
Total
|
Less than 1
Year
|
1- 3 Years
|
3-5 Years
|
More than 5
Years
|
||||||||||||||||
Employment
Agreements
|
$ | 4,231.7 | $ | 2,252.0 | $ | 1,979.7 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Facility
Leases
|
2,170.2 | 958.5 | 1,211.7 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
License
Fees
|
180.1 | 30.1 | 90.0 | 60.0 | - | |||||||||||||||
Sponsored Research Agreement with
the University of Louisville
|
138.2 | 86.1 | 52.1 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Consulting
Agreements
|
1,339.4 | 1,017.4 | 322.0 | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Design & Construction of
Laboratory
|
1,828.6 | 1,828.6 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Director
Fees
|
180.0 | 180.0 | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
$ | 10,068.2 | $ | 6,352.7 | $ | 3,655.5 | $ | 60.0 | $ | - |
SEASONALITY
NeoStem does not believe that its
operations are seasonal in nature.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS
NeoStem does not have any off-balance
sheet arrangements.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking” statements as well as
historical information. Such forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially
different from anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. When used in this report, statements
that are not statements of current or historical fact may be deemed to be
forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “plan,”
“intend,” “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “could,” “anticipate,” “estimate,”
or “continue” or similar expressions or other variations or comparable
terminology are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
Additionally, statements concerning our ability to successfully develop the
adult stem cell business at home and abroad, the future of regenerative medicine
and the role of adult stem cells in that future, the future use of adult stem
cells as a treatment option and the role of VSELTM
technology in that future, and the potential revenue growth of such business are
forward-looking statements. Our future operating results are dependent upon many
factors, and our further development is highly dependent on future medical and
research developments and market acceptance, which is outside its control.
Forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors,
including, without limitation, (i) our ability to manage the business despite
continuing operating losses and cash outflows; (ii) our ability to obtain
sufficient capital or a strategic business arrangement to fund our operations
and expansion plans, including meeting our financial obligations under various
licensing and other strategic arrangements and the successful commercialization
of the relevant technology; (iii) our ability to build the management and human
resources and infrastructure necessary to support the growth of the business;
(iv) competitive factors and developments beyond our control; (v) scientific and
medical developments beyond our control; (vi) our inability to obtain
appropriate governmental licenses or any other adverse effect or limitations
caused by government regulation of the business; (vii) whether any of our
current or future patent applications result in issued patents and our ability
to obtain and maintain other rights to technology required or desirable for the
conduct of our business; (viii) whether any potential strategic benefits of
various licensing transactions will be realized and whether any potential
benefits from the acquisition of these new licensed technologies will be
realized; (ix) whether we can obtain the consents we may require to sublicensing
arrangements from technology licensors in connection with technology
development; (x) our ability to maintain our NYSE Amex listing; (xi) factors
regarding our business in China and, generally, regarding doing business in
China, including through our variable interest entity structure; and (xii) the
other factors discussed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2009 under the heading “Part I — Item 1A. Risk Factors”
and in other periodic Company filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. The Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission are available for review at www.sec.gov under
“Search for Company Filings.”
All
forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their
entirety by these and other factors. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
hereof. With respect to these forward-looking statements, we claim
the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements
and from historical results, due to the uncertainties and factors described
above, as well as others that we do not anticipate at this
time. Except as required by law, the Company undertakes no obligation
to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
38
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND
QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Not applicable to smaller reporting
companies.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are
the Company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or
submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange
Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the
reports that the Company files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not
all misstatements may be detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and the breakdowns can
occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be
circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the control. Controls and procedures can
only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have
been met.
As of the end of the Company's quarter
ended June 30, 2010 covered by this report, the
Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company's
management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on that
evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that due to the material weaknesses discussed below the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, at the reasonable
assurance level, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the
Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the SEC's rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
CBH, which was acquired by the Company
on October 30, 2009, previously identified the material weaknesses identified
below. Because the acquisition was completed in the fourth quarter of
2009, the Company has not had sufficient time to remediate the material
weaknesses previously identified by CBH. However, since the filing
date of the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 the Company has made additional progress in remediating the material
weaknesses previously identified by CBH.
Prior to the Merger, in its assessment
of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, CBH
identified in substance the material weaknesses set forth below. As
of September 30, 2009, CBH reported that such material weaknesses had not been
remediated and continued to exist.
1. Insufficient U.S. GAAP qualified
accounting and finance personnel.
As the U.S. GAAP closing process related
to non-routine transactions and estimates, CBH did not have sufficient US GAAP
qualified accounting and finance personnel necessary to close its books at its
subsidiaries in China. CBH's subsidiaries in China did not maintain
books and records in accordance with US GAAP and had to make adjusting entries
to prepare and report financial statements in accordance with US
GAAP. Because the accounting personnel were not familiar with US GAAP
non-routine transactions and estimates were not properly accounted for under US
GAAP. This material weakness resulted in adjustments to several significant
accounts and disclosures and contributed to other material weaknesses described
below.
2. Lack of Internal Audit
System.
CBH did not have an internal audit
department and therefore was unable to effectively prevent and detect
control lapses and errors in the accounting of certain key
areas like revenue recognition, purchase
approvals, inter-company
transactions, cash receipt and
cash disbursement authorizations, inventory
safeguard and proper accumulation for cost of products, in
accordance with the appropriate costing method used by CBH.
3. Financial Statement Closing
Process.
CBH's controls over the financial
statement close process related to account reconciliation and analyses,
including bank accounts, certain long-lived assets and accrued liabilities, were
not effective. As a result, a large volume of adjustments were necessary to
completely and accurately present the financial statements in accordance with US
GAAP.
39
As of June 30, 2010, the Company was unable to conclude that
the above material weaknesses previously reported by CBH had been fully
remediated.
Since the acquisition of CBH in the
fourth quarter of 2009, the Company has been in the process of implementing the
following remediation plans.
While the Company has sufficient US GAAP
qualified accounting and financial personnel at the parent level, the accounting
and financial accounting personnel at Company’s subsidiary, Erye, continue to
need additional training on US GAAP. The Company is seeking to
remediate this by deploying its finance and accounting personnel to Erye to
account for non-routine, complex transactions at the Erye level and to assist
with Erye’s closing processes from time to time and use the services of another
accounting firm for this role as well as to provide additional training on US
GAAP to Erye’s personnel so they can do the accounting for Erye without
significant participation from the Company’s finance and accounting
personnel.
The Company does not believe its size
warrants an internal audit staff. The Company engaged a public accounting firm
to provide internal audit services in 2010, including to review and assess key
risk areas such as revenue recognition, purchase approvals, inter-company
transactions, cash receipt and cash disbursement authorizations, inventory
safeguard and proper accumulation for cost of products as well as complex,
non-routine transactions and will participate in the closing
processes.
The parent Company’s Chief Financial
Officer and Vice President of Finance, each of whom is US GAAP qualified, are
participating in the quarterly financial statement closing process at the Erye
subsidiary. The Company has established a process whereby the accounting
reconciliation and analyses prepared by Erye as part of the financial statement
closing process are reviewed by the parent Company’s Chief Financial Officer and
its Vice President of Finance.
In addition, the Company believes that
the oversight provided by its audit committee, which, unlike CBH's audit
committee, is comprised of three independent and financially sophisticated
members, at least one of whom qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert”
as defined in applicable SEC rules, will support and further the remediation
steps set forth above.
(b) Changes in Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the
Company's internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15, that occurred during the Company's last fiscal quarter
to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
reporting, except that during the last fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 we
extended the parent company internal controls to our new operations in China and
these changes continued in the three months ended June 30,
2010.
40
NEOSTEM, INC.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
There are no material changes to the
disclosures provided in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
We are a company with a limited
operating history and have incurred substantial losses and negative cash flow
from operations in the past, and we expect to continue to incur losses and
negative cash flow for the near term.
We are a company with a limited
operating history, limited capital, and limited sources of revenue. Since our
inception in 1980, we have incurred net losses of approximately $81.8 million
through June 30, 2010. We incurred net losses
attributable to common shareholders of approximately $10.1 million for
the six month period
ended June 30, 2010,
approximately $25.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and approximately $9.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008,
and we expect to incur additional operating losses and negative cash flow in the
future. The revenues from our adult stem cell collection, processing and storage
business are not sufficient to cover costs attributable to that business. We
expect to incur losses and negative cash flow for the foreseeable future as a
result of our activities under license and sponsored research agreements
relating to our VSEL TM technology and other research and
development efforts to advance stem cell and other therapeutics, both in the
U.S. and China. We also expect to continue to incur significant
expenses related to sales, marketing, general and administrative and product
research and development in connection with the development of our
business.
Although Erye, a Chinese pharmaceutical
company in which we recently acquired a 51% interest, had revenue of $35.2
million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and $11.6 million in revenue
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (this reflects Erye’s operations for the
two months ended December 31, 2009 since the merger was effective October 30,
2009), it has only a limited history of earnings. Moreover, Erye is expected to
incur significant expenses in the near term due to: (1) costs related to
stabilizing and streamlining its operations; (2) costs related to the relocation
of its production operations to a new facility currently under construction; (3)
research and development costs related to new drug projects; and (4) costs
related to expanding its existing sales network for new drug distribution.
Pursuant to the current joint venture agreement that governs the ownership and
management of Erye, or the Joint Venture Agreement, which has been approved in
principle by PRC governmental authorities, for the next three years (i) 49% of
undistributed profits, after tax, will be distributed to Suzhou Erye Economy and
Trading Co. Ltd., or EET, which owns the remaining 49% of Erye, and loaned back
to Erye for use in connection with its construction of the new Erye facility;
(ii) 45% of the net profit after tax will be provided to Erye as part of the new
facility construction fund, which will be characterized as paid-in capital for
our 51% interest in Erye; and (iii) only 6% of the net profit will be
distributed to us directly for our operating expenses. As a result,
we will not be able to supplement our cash flow fully from the operations and
income expected to be generated by Erye.
We will need substantial additional
capital to continue operations and additional capital may not be available on
acceptable terms, or at all.
We will require substantial additional
capital to fund our business plan, including additional research and development
activities related to our adult stem cell technologies and drug development
efforts, and to support marketing efforts in the U.S. and China. Our actual cash
requirements may differ materially from those currently
estimated.
At June 30, 2010, we had a cash balance of $10.9
million. The trading volume of our common stock, coupled with our
history of operating losses and liquidity problems, may make it difficult for us
to raise capital on acceptable terms or at all. The demand for the equity and
debt of small cap biopharmaceutical companies like ours is dependent upon many
factors, including the general state of the financial markets. As demonstrated
over the last year, during times of extreme market volatility, capital may not
be available on favorable terms, if at all. Our inability to obtain such
additional capital on acceptable terms could materially and adversely affect our
business operations and ability to continue as a going
concern.
41
We have a significant number of
securities convertible into, or allowing the purchase of our common stock.
Investors could be subject to increased dilution. Also, the issuance of
additional shares as a result of such conversion or purchase, or their
subsequent sale, could adversely affect the price of our common
stock.
Investors in our company will be subject
to increased dilution upon conversion of our preferred stock and upon the
exercise of outstanding stock options and warrants. There
were 57,001,543 shares
of our common stock outstanding as of August 16, 2010. As of that date, preferred
stock outstanding could be converted into 10,000 shares of our common stock and
stock options and warrants outstanding that are exercisable represented an
additional 30,720,242
shares of our common stock that could be issued in the future. Most
of the outstanding shares of our common stock, as well as the vast majority of
the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our outstanding options
and warrants, are not restricted from trading or have the contractual right to
be registered.
Any significant increase in the number
of shares offered for sale could cause the supply of our common stock available
for purchase in the market to exceed the purchase demand for our common stock.
Such supply in excess of demand could cause the market price of our common stock
to decline.
Actual and beneficial ownership of large
quantities of our common stock by our executive officers, directors, and other
substantial stockholders, may substantially reduce the influence of other
stockholders.
As of August 16, 2010, our executive officers, directors, and
5%-or-more stockholders collectively beneficially
owned 45,430,148
shares of our common stock. These beneficial holdings
represent 64.9% of our
common stock on a fully-diluted basis. As a result, such persons may have the
ability to exercise enhanced control over the approval process for actions that
require stockholder approval, including: the election of our directors and the
approval of mergers, sales of assets or other significant corporate transactions
or other matters submitted for stockholder approval. Because of the beneficial
ownership position of these persons and entities, other stockholders may have
less influence over matters submitted for stockholder approval. Furthermore, at
certain times the interests of our substantial stockholders may conflict with
the interests of our other stockholders.
Some of our directors and officers have
positions of responsibility with other entities, and therefore have loyalties
and fiduciary obligations to both our company and such other entities. These
dual positions subject such persons to conflicts of interest in related party
transactions which may cause such related party transactions to have
consequences to our company that are less favorable than those which
our Company could have attained in comparable transactions with unaffiliated
entities.
Eric H.C. Wei, a member of our Board of
Directors, is also the Managing Partner of RimAsia Capital Partners, L.P., or
RimAsia. RimAsia, a substantial stockholder of our company, beneficially owns
43.3% of our common stock
as of August 16, 2010. Shi
Mingsheng (who became a director of our company in March 2010) and Madam Zhang
Jian (the General Manager of Erye and the Company’s Vice President of
Pharmaceutical Operations), together with certain other persons, have shared
voting and dispositive power over the shares of our common stock held by
Fullbright Finance Limited, or Fullbright. Fullbright is a substantial
stockholder of our company, beneficially owning 8.3% of our common stock as of
August 16, 2010. These
relationships create, or, at a minimum, appear to create potential conflicts of
interest when members of our company’s senior management are faced with
decisions that could have different implications for our company and the other
entities with which our directors or officers are
associated.
Although the Company has established
procedures designed to ensure that material related party transactions are fair
to the Company, no assurance can be given as to how potentially conflicted board
members or officers will evaluate their fiduciary duties to the Company and to
other entities that they may owe fiduciary duties, respectively, or how such
individuals will act in such circumstances. Furthermore, the appearance of
conflicts, even if such conflicts ultimately do not harm the Company, might
adversely affect the public’s perception of our business, as well as its
relationship with its existing customers, licensors, licensees and service
providers and its ability to enter into new relationships in the
future.
Erye’s
success is dependent upon its ability to establish and maintain its intellectual
property rights.
In the
PRC, there has been substantial litigation in the pharmaceutical industry with
respect to the manufacturing, use and sale of new products. These lawsuits
relate to the validity and infringement of patents or proprietary rights of
third parties. Erye has been and in the future may be required to commence or
defend against charges relating to the infringement of patent or proprietary
rights. Any such litigation could: (i) require Erye to incur substantial
expense, even if it is insured or successful in the litigation; (ii) require
Erye to divert significant time and effort of its technical and management
personnel; (iii) result in the loss of its rights to develop or make certain
products; and (iv) require Erye to pay substantial monetary damages or royalties
in order to license proprietary rights from third parties. Erye
recently was a party to a patent and copyright infringement dispute with respect
to a particular antibiotics complex it manufactured (representing less than 2%
of Erye’s sales in 2009), as a result of which a judgment was rendered against
Erye in the approximate amount of 5 million RMB (approximately $750,000)
and enjoining it from manufacturing, marketing and selling this product. Erye is
appealing the judgment and is also engaged in settlement
negotiations. See Note 13, Commitments and Contingencies, to the
unaudited financial statements.
42
Erye's
production will be concentrated in two production lines and Erye will be
operating in a new facility.
Erye
recently passed the government inspection by the State Food and Drug
Administration (“SFDA”) in China to manufacture penicillin powder for injection
and cephalosporin powder for injection at its new manufacturing facility which
provides 50% greater manufacturing capacity than its existing
plant. The two production lines recently approved accounted for over
70% of Erye's product sales in 2009. More recently, these two
production lines became fully operational. These production lines, coupled
with the approval of the lines earlier in 2010 for solvent crystallization
sterile penicillin and freeze dried raw sterile penicillin, is allowing Erye to
relocate over 90% of its 2009 sales to the new
facility. Any interruptions in production with respect to those lines
once they are operational at the new facility will have a material adverse
effect on Erye's business and ours. There are inherent problems in
commencing operations at any new production facility. If Erye
encounters operational difficulties in commencing production at its new
facility, it could have a material adverse effect on Erye's business and
ours.
Fluctuations
in the value of the Renminbi relative to the U.S. dollar could affect our
operating results.
We
prepare our financial statements in U.S. dollars, while our underlying
businesses operate in two currencies, U.S. dollars and Chinese Renminbi. It is
anticipated that our Chinese operations will conduct their operations primarily
in Renminbi and our U.S. operations will conduct their operations in dollars. At
the present time we do not expect to have significant cross currency
transactions that will be at risk to foreign currency exchange rates.
Nevertheless, the conversion of financial information using a functional
currency of Renminbi will be subject to risks related to foreign currency
exchange rate fluctuations. The value of Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and
other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes
in China’s political and economic conditions and supply and demand in local
markets. As we have significant operations in China, and will rely principally
on revenues earned in China, any significant revaluation of the Renminbi could
materially and adversely affect our financial results. For example, to the
extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars we receive from an offering of our
securities into Renminbi for our operations, appreciation of the Renminbi
against the U.S. dollar could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Beginning
in July of 2005, the PRC government changed its policy of pegging the value of
Renminbi to the U.S. dollar. Under the new policy, the value of the Renminbi has
fluctuated within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign
currencies. However, the Chinese government has come under increasing U.S. and
international pressure to revalue the Renminbi or to permit it to trade in a
wider band, which many observers believe would lead to substantial appreciation
of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other major currencies. There can be
no assurance that Renminbi will be stable against the U.S. dollar. On June
19, 2010 the central bank of China announced that it will gradually modify its
monetary policy and make the Renminbi’s exchange rate more flexible and allow
the Renminbi to appreciate in value in line with its economic strength.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Effective
May 26, 2010, the Company issued 25,000 shares of restricted common stock to an
investor pursuant to the exercise of a warrant issued in a private placement of
securities by the Company in May 2008. The exercise price was $1.75
per share, resulting in proceeds to the Company of $43,750.
Effective
June 1, 2010, the Company issued 400,000 shares of restricted common stock to
Fullbright Finance Limited (“Fullbright”), pursuant to the exercise of a warrant
issued to Fullbright in a private placement of securities by the Company in
November 2008. The exercise price was $1.75 per share, resulting in
proceeds to the Company totaling $700,000.
Effective
as of June 18, 2010, the Company issued to a law firm providing legal services
to the Company with respect to obtaining funding from various agencies of the
State of New Jersey and Federal Government among other things, a five year
warrant to purchase 25,000 shares of restricted common stock at a per share
exercise price of $2.52, vesting in its entirety on December 31,
2010.
Effective
as of June 29, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant to
act as a special strategic advisor from June 29, 2010 through September 30,
2010. In consideration for providing services under this agreement,
in addition to certain specified cash consideration, the Company agreed to issue
to the consultant 50,000 shares of restricted common stock, to vest in their
entirety on September 30, 2010; and a five year warrant to purchase 50,000
shares of restricted common stock at a per share exercise price equal to $1.82,
vesting in its entirety on September 30, 2010.
Effective
as of June 30, 2010, the Company issued warrants to Rodman & Renshaw, LLC to
purchase up to 93,023 shares of restricted common stock at a per share exercise
price of $2.6875 (with certain rights of cashless exercise) expiring May 10,
2015. These warrants were issued pursuant to the terms of a
June 24, 2010 placement agent agreement under which Rodman & Renshaw, LLC
acted as placement agent and whereby the Company completed a
registered direct transaction under a registration statement filed with the SEC
which closed on June 30, 2010 and in which the Company sold 2,325,582 units at a
purchase price of $2.15 per unit (for aggregate gross proceeds of $5
million). The warrants issued to the placement agent were not covered
by the registration statement.
43
The offer
and sale by the Company of the securities described above were made in reliance
upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), for transactions by an issuer
not involving a public offering. The offer and sale of such
securities were made without general solicitation or advertising to “accredited
investors” as such term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated
under the Securities Act.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR
SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4. REMOVED AND
RESERVED
ITEM 5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit
|
Description
|
Reference
|
1(a)
|
Placement
Agent Agreement, dated June 24, 2010, between NeoStem, Inc. and Rodman
& Renshaw, LLC (1)
|
1.1
|
4(a)
|
Form
of Common Stock Purchase Warrant for June 2010 (1)
|
4.1
|
4(b)
|
Form
of Placement Agent Warrant for June 2010 (1)
|
4.2
|
10(a)
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement dated June 25, 2010 (1)
|
10.1
|
10(b)
|
Common
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2010, by and between
NeoStem, Inc. and Commerce Court Small Cap Value Fund, Ltd.
(2)
|
10.1
|
10(c)
|
Amendment
No. 2 dated April 29, 2010 to Exclusive License Agreement dated November
12, 2007 between Stem Cell Technologies, Inc. and the University of
Louisville Research Foundation, Inc.*
|
10.1
|
10(d)
|
English
translations of Supplemental Lease Agreement (Assignment) dated as of
February 20, 2010 among NeoStem (China), Inc., Qingdao Niao Bio-Technology
Company and Beijing Zhongguancun Life Science Park Development Co., Ltd.
and related House Lease Agreement dated May 12, 2009 between Qingdao Niao
Bio-Technology Company and Beijing Zhongguancun Life Science Park
Development Co., Ltd.*
|
10.2
|
10(e)
|
Confidentiality
Agreement dated as of April 30, 2010 between NeoStem, Inc. and Enhance
BioMedical Holdings Limited*
|
10.3
|
10(f)
|
Consulting
Agreement dated as of May 11, 2010 between NeoStem, Inc. and RimAsia
Capital Partners, LP*
|
10.4
|
10(g)
|
Form
of Stock Option Grant Agreement under NeoStem, Inc. 2009 Equity
Compensation Plan *
|
10.5
|
10(h)
|
Form
of Grant Agreement under NeoStem, Inc. 2009 Non-U.S. Based Equity
Compensation Plan*
|
10.6
|
10(i)
|
Amendment
No. 1 dated June 9, 2010 to Employment Agreement dated August 17, 2009
between NeoStem, Inc. and Anthony Salerno(3)
|
10.1
|
10(j)
|
Offer
Letter dated June 9, 2010 between NeoStem, Inc. and Madam Zhang
Jian(3)
|
10.2
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.*
|
31.1
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.*
|
31.2
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.**
|
32.1
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.**
|
32.2
|
(1)
|
Filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2010 as an
exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated June 25, 2010, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference
|
|
(2)
|
Filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 19, 2010 as an exhibit,
numbered as indicated above, to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated May
19, 2010, which exhibit is incorporated here by reference
|
|
(3)
|
Filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 11, 2010 as an
exhibit, numbered as indicated above, to our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated June 9, 2010, which exhibit is incorporated here by
reference
|
|
*
|
Filed
herewith
|
|
**
|
Furnished
herewith
|
44
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
NEOSTEM, INC.
(Registrant)
|
||
By:
|
/s/ Robin Smith
M.D.
|
|
Robin Smith M.D., Chief Executive
Officer
|
||
Date: August 16,
2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Larry A.
May
|
|
Larry A. May, Chief Financial
Officer
|
||
Date: August 16,
2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Christopher C.
Duignan
|
|
Christopher C. Duignan,
Chief Accounting Officer
|
||
Date: August 16,
2010
|
45