LiveOne, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2014 January (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2014

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________________ TO _______________________

Commission file number 333-167219

LOTON, CORP

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada		90-0657263
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification Number)

4751 Wilshire Blvd., 3 ^rd Floor

Los Angeles, California 90010

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)

(310) 601-2500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former address and telephone, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant is required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether each registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer ¨		Non-accelerated filer ¨		Smaller reporting company x
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No ¨

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the last practicable date: 8,895,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of March 5, 2014.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 2014

		Page

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.		F-1

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.		3

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.		7

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.		7

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.		8

Item 1A. Risk Factors.		8

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.		8

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.		8

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.		8

Item 5. Other Information.		8

Item 6. Exhibits.		9

	2

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Loton, Corp.

January 31, 2014 and 2013

Index to the Financial Statements

Contents		Page(s)

Balance Sheets at January 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and April 30, 2013		F-2

Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended January 31, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)		F-3

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Interim Period Ended January 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and for the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2013		F-4

Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended January 31, 2014 and 2013 (Unaudited)		F-5

Notes to the Financial Statements (Unaudited)		F-6

	F- 1

Loton, Corp

Balance Sheets

	January 31, 2014		April 30, 2013
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	350,158	$	1,956
Prepaid acquisition costs		154,878		3,939
Prepaid management service - related party		150,000		60,000

Total Current Assets		655,036		65,895

OFFICE EQUIPMENT:
Office equipment		8,018		5,854
Accumulated depreciation		(2,476)		(1,368)

Office Equipment, net		5,542		4,486

Total Assets	$	660,578	$	70,381

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	285,868	$	72,040
Accrued interest on notes payable - related party		38,675		17,408
Notes payable - related party		500,000		300,000
Payroll liabilities		42		36
Advances from related party		11,776		35,123

Total Current Liabilities		836,361		424,607

NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Non-current management service obligation - related party		777,784		527,782

Total Non-current Liabilities		777,784		527,782

Total Liabilities		1,614,145		952,389

STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT:
Preferred stock par value $0.001: 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding		-		-
Common stock par value $0.001: 75,000,000 shares authorized, 7,847,083 and 6,265,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		7,847		6,265
Additional paid-in capital		3,186,568		1,385,421

Accumulated deficit		(4,147,982)		(2,273,694)

Total Stockholders' Deficit		(953,567)		(882,008)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$	660,578	$	70,381

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

	F- 2

Loton, Corp

Statements of Operations

	For the Three Months		For the Three Months		For the Nine Months		For the Nine Months
	Ended		Ended		Ended		Ended
	January 31, 2014		January 31, 2013		January 31, 2014		January 31, 2013
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

Revenue	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Operating Expenses
Consulting fees		386,750		242,180		627,003		295,490
Management services - related party		180,216		180,216		540,648		540,648
Professional fees		180,342		6,387		326,522		62,626
Payroll expenses		25,967		-		68,010		-
Travel expenses		47,392		41,963		108,601		76,432
General and administrative expenses		34,082		(421)		132,237		4,944

Total operating expenses		854,749		470,325		1,803,021		980,140

Loss from Operations		(854,749)		(470,325)		(1,803,021)		(980,140)

Other (Income) Expense
Impairment of notes receivable		-		-		50,000		-
Interest expense		7,562		4,537		21,267		13,019

Other (income) expense, net		7,562		4,537		71,267		13,019

Loss before Income Tax Provision		(862,311)		(474,862)		(1,874,288)		(993,159)

Income Tax Provision		-		-		-		-

Net Loss	$	(862,311)	$	(474,862)	$	(1,874,288)	$	(993,159)

Net Loss Per Common Share:
- basic and diluted	$	(0.11)	$	(0.08)	$	(0.26)	$	(0.18)

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
- basic and diluted		7,541,432		5,841,720		7,292,737		5,545,445

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

	F- 3

Loton, Corp

Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

For the Interim Period Ended January 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and for the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2013 (Audited)

	Common Stock Par Value $0.001				Additional				Total
	Number of				Paid-in		Accumulated		Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit		Equity (Deficit)

Balance, April 30, 2012		5,370,000	$	5,370	$	443,788	$	(749,135)	$	(299,977)

Amortization of warrants issued to related party for services received						27,528				27,528

Issuance of common shares for cash at $1.00 per share		375,000		375		374,625				375,000

Issuance of common shares for cash at $1.00 per share		200,000		200		199,800				200,000

Issuance of common shares for cash at $1.00 per share		50,000		50		49,950				50,000

Issuance of stock option to purchase 250,000 common shares to a Director for services on January 29, 2013						170,000				170,000

Restricted common shares granted to Directors for future services valued at $1.00 per share on January 29, 2013		100,000		100		99,900				100,000

Restricted common shares granted to Directors for future services valued at $1.00 per share on January 29, 2013						(100,000)				(100,000)

Restricted common shares granted to Directors for future services valued at $1.00 per share on January 29, 2013		100,000		100		99,900				100,000

Restricted common shares granted to Directors for future services valued at $1.00 per share on January 29, 2013						(100,000)				(100,000)

Amortization of deferred director services						50,000				50,000

Issuance of common stock to Advisory member and consultants for two years services on January 29, 2013 earned during the period		70,000		70		69,930				70,000

Net loss								(1,524,559)		(1,524,559)

Balance, April 30, 2013		6,265,000		6,265		1,385,421		(2,273,694)		(882,008)

Amortization of warrants issued to related party for services received						20,646				20,646

Amortization of deferred director services						100,000				100,000

Issuances of common shares for cash at $1.00 per share		1,250,000		1,250		1,248,750				1,250,000

Former director's 50,000 vested shares forfeited at par		(50,000)		(50)		50				-

Former director's 50,000 unvested shares forfeited at par		(50,000)		(50)		50				-

Issuance of common stock to Advisory member and consultants for two years services on January 29, 2013 and earned during the period		210,000		210		209,790				210,000

Issuance of common stock to Advisory member for one year service in October and December 2013 earned during the period		183,333		183		183,150				183,333

Issuance of common stock to Advisory member and consultants for one year service in October and November 2013 earned during the period		38,750		39		38,711				38,750

Net loss								(1,874,288)		(1,874,288)

Balance, January 31, 2014		7,847,083	$	7,847	$	3,186,568	$	(4,147,982)	$	(953,567)

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

	F- 4

Loton, Corp

Statements of Cash Flows

	For the Nine Months		For the Nine Months
	Ended		Ended
	January 31, 2014		January 31, 2013
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(1,874,288)	$	(993,159)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Impairment of notes receivable		50,000		-
Depreciation expense		1,108		2,377
Equity based compensation		552,729		190,646
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(240,939)		(5,691)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		213,828		24,660
Accrued interest on notes payable - related party		21,267		13,019
Payroll liabilities		6		-
Non-current management service obligation - related party		250,002		250,002

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(1,026,287)		(518,146)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Notes receivable		(50,000)		-
Purchases of office equipment		(2,164)		(11,424)

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(52,164)		(11,424)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayments to related party		(23,347)		(44,619)
Proceeds from note payable - related party		200,000		150,000
Proceeds from sale of common stock		1,250,000		575,000

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		1,426,653		680,381

NET CHANGE IN CASH		348,202		150,811

Cash at beginning of the period		1,956		49,689

Cash at end of the period	$	350,158	$	200,500

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid	$	-	$	-
Income tax paid	$	-	$	-

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

	F- 5

Loton, Corp

January 31, 2014 and 2013

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Organization and Operations

Loton Corp

Loton, Corp (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 28, 2009. The Company intended to provide 3D rendering, animation and architectural visualization services to architects, builders, advertising agencies, interior designers, home renovators, home owners and various sectors which have need of 3D visualization in North America.

Change in Control

On September 9, 2011, Trinad Capital Master Fund, a Cayman Island exempted company (“Trinad”), entered into and consummated (the “Closing”) a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Alex Kuznetsov, a shareholder and the sole director and executive officer of Loton, Corp, a Nevada corporation. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Mr. Kuznetsov sold Trinad an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”), which represented approximately 80% of the then issued and outstanding Common Stock of the Company. In consideration for the purchase of the Shares, Trinad paid an aggregate amount of $311,615.

The Company is currently inactive and is seeking a suitable candidate for a business combination.

Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on July 29, 2013.

Fiscal Year End

The Company elected April 30th as its fiscal year ending date.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

	F- 6

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business;

(ii)

Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events;

(iii)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors;

(iv)

Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of equity instruments: Management estimates expected term of share options and similar instruments, expected volatility of the Company’s common shares and the method used to estimate it, expected annual rate of quarterly dividends, and risk free rate(s) to value share options and similar instruments.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification are described below:

Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and payroll liabilities approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

	F- 7

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include office equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events. The impairment charges, if any, are included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Office Equipment

Office equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of office equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the assets estimated useful life of five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement of office equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Notes Receivable

Notes receivable are recorded at cost, net of accumulated impairment. Interest income is recorded when collectability is reasonably assured.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

	F- 8

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for its stock based compensation in which the Company obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions under the recognition and measurement principles of the fair value recognition provisions of section 718-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum ("PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

⋅

Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method , i.e., expected term = ((vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

⋅

Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

⋅

Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

	F- 9

⋅

Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s daily treasury yield curve rates in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The fair value of share options and similar instruments is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

⋅

Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments will be used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

⋅

Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of the Company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

⋅

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to nonemployees in exchange for goods or services. Section 505-50-30 provides guidance on the determination of the measurement date for transactions that are within the scope of this Subtopic.

	F- 10

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a share option and similar instrument that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Income Tax Provision

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Uncertain Tax Positions

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the interim period ended January 31, 2014 or 2013.

Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.

	F- 11

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:

	Potentially Outstanding Dilutive
	Common Shares
	For the interim	For the interim
	period ended	period ended
	January 31,	January 31,
	2014	2013

On September 23, 2011, a warrant issued to Trinad Management LLC as compensation to purchase 1,125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.15 per share expiring ten (10) years from date of issuance	1,125,000	1,125,000

On January 29, 2013, an option issued to a former Director as compensation to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.75 per share expiring seven (7) years from date of issuance which was forfeited on November 29, 2013	-	250,000

Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	1,125,000	1,375,000

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

	F- 12

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, " Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income." The ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued ASU No. 2013-04, " Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date." This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, " Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity ." This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. The guidance outlines the events when cumulative translation adjustments should be released into net income and is intended by FASB to eliminate some disparity in current accounting practice. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The amendments require an entity to prepare its financial statements using the liquidation basis of accounting when liquidation is imminent. Liquidation is imminent when the likelihood is remote that the entity will return from liquidation and either (a) a plan for liquidation is approved by the person or persons with the authority to make such a plan effective and the likelihood is remote that the execution of the plan will be blocked by other parties or (b) a plan for liquidation is being imposed by other forces (for example, involuntary bankruptcy). If a plan for liquidation was specified in the entity’s governing documents from the entity’s inception (for example, limited-life entities), the entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting only if the approved plan for liquidation differs from the plan for liquidation that was specified at the entity’s inception. The amendments require financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting to present relevant information about an entity’s expected resources in liquidation by measuring and presenting assets at the amount of the expected cash proceeds from liquidation. The entity should include in its presentation of assets any items it had not previously recognized under U.S. GAAP but that it expects to either sell in liquidation or use in settling liabilities (for example, trademarks). The amendments are effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entities should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. Early adoption is permitted.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at January 31, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the interim period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is seeking a suitable candidate for a business combination; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support the Company’s daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to find a suitable candidate and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to find a suitable candidate and in its ability to raise additional funds.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

	F- 13

Note 4 – Valuation and Depreciation of Office Equipment

(i)

Impairment

The Company completed the annual impairment test of office equipment and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of office equipment substantially exceeded their carrying values at April 30, 2013.

(ii)

Depreciation Expense

Depreciation expense was $1,108 and $2,377 for the interim periods ended January 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Note 5 – Notes Receivable

On March 25, 2013, the Company purchased $100,000 of secured convertible notes (the “Note”) maturing on March 25, 2015 with interest payable annually at a rate of 6% per annum. On September 17, 2013, the maturity date of the Note was extended to September 17, 2015.

On September 17, 2013, the Company purchased $50,000 of secured convertible notes maturing on September 17, 2015 with interest payable annually at a rate of 6% per annum.

Impairment

On April 30, 2013, the Company completed the annual impairment test of its notes receivable and determined that there was a $100,000 impairment when, based on current information and events, collectability of the note was not reasonably assured.

On October 31, 2013, the Company determined that there was a $50,000 impairment of the current note receivable when, based on current information and events, collectability of the note was not reasonably assured.

Note 6 – Related Party Transactions

Related Parties

Related parties with whom the Company had transactions are:

Related Parties		Relationship

Trinad Capital Master Fund		Majority stockholder

Trinad Management, LLC		An entity owned and controlled by majority stockholder

JJAT Corp.		An entity owned and controlled by majority stockholder

Reimbursement Agreement

The Company advanced funds for expenses of JJAT Corp., an affiliate principally owned by a director and majority stockholder of the Company totaling $154,878 during the nine months ended January 31, 2014. The Company and JJAT Corp. entered into a Reimbursement Agreement dated January 29, 2014 whereby JJAT Corp. is required to repay the Company for advances of funds for expenses made by the Company on JJAT Corp’s behalf. The amount is included in Prepaid acquisition costs in the accompanying financial statements.

Advances from Stockholders

From time to time, stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purposes. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

	F- 14

Notes Payable - Related Party

Notes payable – related party consisted of the following:

	January 31, 2014		April 30, 2013

On April 2, 2012, the Company signed a promissory note with the Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $150,000, with interest at 6% per annum, with principal due on April 1, 2013; the maturity date was subsequently extended to November 1, 2014.	$	150,000	$	150,000

On June 21, 2012, the Company signed a promissory note with the Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $150,000, with interest at 6% per annum, with principal due on June 20, 2013; the maturity date was subsequently extended to November 1, 2014.		150,000		150,000

On May 13, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with the Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $10,000, with interest at 6% per annum, with principal due on May 13, 2014.		10,000		-

On May 23, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with the Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $50,000, with interest at 6% per annum, with principal due on May 23, 2014.		50,000		-

On June 17, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with the Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $100,000, with interest at 6% per annum, with principal due on June 17, 2014.		100,000		-

On July 2, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with the Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $10,000, with interest at 6% per annum, with principal due on July 2, 2014.		10,000		-

On July 3, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with the Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $30,000, with interest at 6% per annum, with principal due on July 3, 2014.		30,000		-

	$	500,000	$	300,000

Management Services from a Related Party

On September 23, 2011, the Company entered into a Management Agreement (“Management Agreement”) with Trinad Management, LLC (“Trinad LLC”). Pursuant to the Management Agreement, Trinad LLC has agreed to provide certain management services to the Company for a period of three (3) years expiring September 22, 2014, including, without limitation, the sourcing, structuring and negotiation of a potential business combination transaction involving the Company. Under the Management Agreement the Company will compensate Trinad LLC for its services with (i) a fee equal to $2,080,000, with $90,000 payable in advance of each consecutive three-month calendar period during the term of the Agreement and with $1,000,000 due at the end of the three (3) year term unless the Management Agreement is otherwise terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, and (ii) issuance of a Warrant to purchase 1,125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share (“Warrant”). The Company valued the warrant granted, using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

Expected life (years)	10

Expected volatility	118.18	%

Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends	0.00	%

Risk-free interest rate	1.84	%

The expected life is based on the expiration term of the warrants. As a thinly traded public entity, it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price. The Company selected five (5) comparable public companies listed on NYSE Amex or NASDAQ Capital Market within computer data service industry which the Company plans to engage in to calculate the expected volatility. The Company calculated those five (5) comparable companies’ historical volatility over the expected life of the options or warrants and averaged them as its expected volatility. Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends is based on the Company’s dividend history and anticipated dividend policy. The risk-free interest rate is based on a yield curve of U.S. treasury interest rates on the date of valuation based on the contractual life of the warrant.

The fair value of the warrant granted, estimated on the date of grant, was $82,575 and is being amortized over the period of service of three (3) years.

	F- 15

The Company (i)(a) recorded $30,000 per month for the $1,080,000 portion of the management services to be paid on a quarterly basis, accrued (i)(b) $27,778 per month for the $1,000,000 portion of the management services, due at the end of the three (3) year term; and (ii) recorded amortization of $2,294 per month for the fair value of the warrant portion of the management services issued on September 23, 2011 in connection with the Management Agreement, or $60,072 of management services per month in aggregate.

The management services from the related party were as follows:

	For the Interim		For the Interim
	Period Ended		Period Ended
	January 31,		January 31,
	2014		2013

(i) (a) Management services billed or accrued on a quarterly basis	$	270,000	$	270,000

(i) (b) Long-term management services due at the end of the term accrued		250,002		250,002

(ii) Amortization of the fair value of the warrant issued		20,646		20,646

	$	540,648	$	540,648

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Shares Authorized

Upon formation, the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Seventy Five Million (75,000,000) shares which shall be common stock, par value $.001 per share.

Sale of Common Stock or Equity Units

In September 2012, the Company issued 275,000 shares of its common stock to unrelated third parties at $1.00 per share, or $275,000 in cash.

On November 15, 2012, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 100,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000.

On December 13, 2012, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 200,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000.

On February 6, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 50,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $50,000.

On August 28, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 250,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000.

On September 19, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 300,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000.

On October 7, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 400,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $400,000.

On October 30, 2013, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 300,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $300,000.

	F- 16

Issuance of Common Stock for Obtaining Employee Services

Authorization of Stock Grants to Directors and Directors/Consultants

Jay Krigsman

On January 29, 2013, the Company granted Jay Krigsman 100,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in conjunction with his appointment to the Company's board of directors. These restricted shares vested on January 29, 2014, with a two (2) year lock-up period after vesting. These restricted shares were valued at $1.00 per share, the most recent PPM price, or $100,000 on the date of grant and were amortized over the vesting period, or $25,000 per quarter as directors' fees. For the nine months ended January 31, 2014 the Company recognized $75,000 as directors' fees.

Andrew Schleimer

On January 29, 2013, the Company granted Andrew Schleimer 100,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in conjunction with his appointment to the Company's board of directors. These restricted shares were to be vested in one (1) year, with a two (2) year lock-up period after vesting. These restricted shares were valued at $1.00 per share, the most recent PPM price, or $100,000 on the date of grant and were being amortized over the vesting period, or $25,000 per quarter as directors' fees. For the nine months ended January 31, 2014 the Company recognized $25,000 as directors' fees (see below).

In addition, on January 29, 2013, the Company awarded Mr. Schleimer an option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock exercisable at $0.75 per share expiring seven (7) years from the date of grant in conjunction with his future consulting services for a period of one (1) year, which vested upon grant. The fair value of the share option granted, estimated on the date of grant, was $170,000 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company recorded the entire amount of $170,000 as consulting fees on the date of grant as the option was fully vested.

On August 21, 2013, Mr. Schleimer resigned from the Company's board of directors and effective as of August 31, 2013 as a consultant to the Company. Upon Mr. Schleimer's resignation, 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock were forfeited. In accordance with the terms of the Company’s option agreement, Mr. Schleimer’s option expired on November 29, 2013, ninety (90) days after he resigned as a consultant to the Company. For financial reporting purposes, the Company (a) recognized $50,000 in director's compensation for the vested shares; (b) reversed $50,000 in deferred compensation for the unvested shares; and (c) recorded 50,000 vested shares as forfeited using the treasury method, by debiting Common Stock and crediting Additional Paid in Capital at par value of $0.001 per share or $50.

Issuance of Common Stock to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

Advisory Board Agreements

On January 29, 2013, the Company entered into an Advisory Board Agreement (“Advisory Agreement”) with four (4) individuals. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Advisory Board Members agreed to provide advisory service to the Board and officers of the Company on various business matters for one (1) year in exchange for 100,000 shares each or 400,000 shares in aggregate of the restricted common stock of the Company. The restricted shares will vest after two (2) years, and are subject to a lock-up period of two (2) years after vesting. These restricted shares were valued at $1.00 per share or $400,000 in aggregate on the date of grant and are being amortized over the service period, or $50,000 per quarter as consulting fees. For the nine months ended January 31, 2014, the Company recognized $150,000 as consulting fees.

During the interim period ended January 31, 2014, the Company entered into Advisory Agreements with seven (7) individuals. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreements, the Advisory Board Members agreed to provide advisory service to the Board and officers of the Company on various business matters for one (1) year in exchange for 100,000 shares each or 700,000 shares in aggregate of restricted common stock of the Company. The restricted shares will vest after one (1) year, and are subject to a lock-up period of one (1) year after vesting. These restricted shares were valued at $1.00 per share or $700,000 in aggregate on the date of grant and are being amortized over the service period, or $175,000 per quarter as consulting fees. For the nine months ended January 31, 2014, the Company recognized $183,333 as consulting fees.

Authorization of Stock Grants to Consultants

On January 29, 2013, the Company entered into five (5) Consulting Services Agreements (“Consulting Agreements”) with five (5) consultants. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreements, the Company agreed to issue a total of 160,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to consultants for services to be performed for one (1) year. These shares will vest in two (2) years, and are subject to a lock-up period of two (2) years after vesting. These restricted shares were valued at $1.00 per share or $160,000 on the date of grant and are being amortized over the service period, or $20,000 per quarter as consulting fees. For the nine months ended January 31, 2014, the Company recognized $60,000 as consulting fees.

	F- 17

During the interim period ended January 31, 2014, the Company entered into six (6) Consulting Services Agreements (“Consulting Agreements”) with six (6) consultants. Pursuant to the Consulting Agreements, the Company agreed to issue a total of 290,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to the consultants for services to be performed for one (1) year. These shares will vest in two (2) years, and are subject to a lock-up period of two (2) years after vesting. These restricted shares were valued at $1.00 per share or $290,000 on the date of grant and are being amortized over the service period, or $36,250 per quarter as consulting fees. For the nine months ended January 31, 2014, the Company recognized $38,750 as consulting fees.

Warrants

(i) Warrants Issued in September 2011

On September 23, 2011, pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Company issued Trinad LLC a Warrant to purchase 1,125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share expiring ten (10) years from the date of issuance.

Summary of Warrant Activities

The table below summarizes the Company’s warrant activities:

			Exercise				Fair Value at		Aggregate
	Number of		Price Range		Weighted Average		Date of		Intrinsic
		Warrant Shares	Per Share		Exercise Price		Issuance		Value

Balance, April 30, 2013		1,125,000	$	0.15	$	0.15	$	82,575	$	-

Granted		-		-		-		-		-

Canceled for cashless exercise		(-)		-		-		-		-

Exercised (Cashless)		(-)		-		-		-		-

Exercised		(-)		-		-		-		-

Expired		-		-		-		-		-

Balance, January 31, 2014		1,125,000	$	0.15	$	0.15	$	82,575		-

Amortized, January 31, 2014		875,000		0.15		0.15		64,232		-

Unamortized, January 31, 2014		250,000	$	0.15	$	0.15	$	18,343		-

The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable warrants as of January 31, 2014:

		Warrants Outstanding						Warrants Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices		Number Outstanding		Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable		Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price

$	0.15		1,125,000		7.65	$	0.15		1,125,000		7.65	$	0.15

$	0.15		1,125,000		7.65	$	0.15		1,125,000		7.65	$	0.15

Note 8 – Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The management of the Company determined that there were reportable subsequent event(s) to be disclosed as follows.

On February 25, 2014, the Company entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent to acquire KOKO, a premiere multimedia and lifestyle brand and one of London’s iconic live music venues. The Company has a ninety day period to enter into a definitive Acquisition Agreement. Additional details of the transaction will be disclosed upon execution of a definitive agreement.

On February 26, 2014, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 200,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000.

	F- 18

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Quarterly Report”) are “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Our plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “if,” “estimates,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements are based on various factors and were derived using numerous assumptions. Although we believe that our assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, particularly in view of the current state of our operations, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a statement by us or any other person that our objectives and plans will be achieved. In addition, the forward-looking statements contained herein represent our estimate only as of the date of this filing and should not be relied upon as representing our estimate as of any subsequent date. While we may elect to update these forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we specifically disclaim any obligation to do so to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking statements.

References to “Company,” “we” or “us” refer to Loton, Corp, unless the context requires otherwise.

Description of Business

Loton, Corp was incorporated in the State of Nevada on December 28, 2009 to provide 3D rendering, animation and architectural visualization services using advanced computer technology to produce photo realistic 3D rendering, walk-through animation and 360 degree panorama.

On September 9, 2011, Trinad Capital Master Fund, a Cayman Island exempted company, (“Trinad”), entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Alex Kuznetsov, a shareholder and the sole director and executive officer of the Company (the “Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement, Mr. Kuznetsov sold to Trinad an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock $.001 par value per share, representing 80% of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of the Company as of October 31, 2011 (the “Closing”). Trinad paid $311,615 for the shares. The managing member of Trinad Management, LLC, the investment manager of Trinad, is Robert S. Ellin. In accordance with the Purchase Agreement, effective upon the closing (a) Alex Kuznetsov resigned as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and sole director, (b) Robert S. Ellin was appointed as the sole director of the Board to serve until the next annual stockholders meeting and until his successor is duly elected and qualified, and (c) Robert S. Ellin was appointed President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Ellin became the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary on April 26, 2012. In addition, on April 26, 2012, Jay Krigsman was appointed as a director of the Board to serve until the next annual stockholders meeting and until his successor is duly elected and qualified.

At present, the Company has no sources of revenue and we are an inactive company. The Company is currently considered to be a blank check company. The SEC defines those companies as any development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, within the meaning of Section 3(a)(51) and Rule 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies. Under SEC Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, the Company also qualifies as a shell company because it has no or nominal assets (other than cash) and no or nominal operations. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of blank check companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination. The Company intends to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as it is subject to those requirements.

Our principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. The Company will not restrict our potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.

	3

The Company currently does not engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. During the next twelve months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

(i)

filing Exchange Act reports, and

(ii)

investigating, analyzing and consummating an acquisition.

We believe we will be able to meet these costs through use of funds in our treasury, through deferral of fees by certain service providers and additional amounts, as necessary, to be loaned to or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors. However, we cannot assure you that this will be the case or that the Company will be able to secure any additional funding as needed. Currently, our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Our ability to continue as a going concern is also dependent on our ability to find a suitable target company and enter into a possible reverse merger transaction with or other acquisition of such company. Management’s plan includes obtaining additional funds by equity financings and/or related party loans or advances; however there is no assurance of additional funding being available.

The Company may consider acquiring a business which has recently commenced operations, is a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, is seeking to develop a new product or service, or is an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in need of additional capital. In the alternative, a business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial additional capital but which desires to establish a public trading market for its shares while avoiding, among other things, the time delays, significant expense, and loss of voting control which may occur in a public offering.

Any target business that is selected may be a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stages of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. In that event, we will be subject to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition, we may effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, and, although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, there can be no assurance that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risks. Our management anticipates that it will likely be able to effect only one business combination, due primarily to our limited financing and the dilution of interest for present and prospective stockholders, which is likely to occur if our management offers a substantial interest in our Company to a target business in order to acquire it. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in us, because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another.

The Company anticipates that the selection of a business combination will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries, and shortages of available capital, our management believes that there are numerous firms seeking even the limited additional capital which we will have and/or the perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation include, among other things, facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be obtained, providing liquidity for the principals of and investors in a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, and offering greater flexibility in structuring acquisitions, joint ventures and the like through the issuance of stock. Potentially available business combinations may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.

Management Agreement

On September 23, 2011, the Company entered into a Management Agreement (“Management Agreement”) with Trinad Management, LLC (“Trinad Management”). Pursuant to the Management Agreement, Trinad has agreed to provide certain management services to the Company for a period of three (3) years, including without limitation the sourcing, structuring and negotiation of a potential business combination transaction involving the Company. Under the Management Agreement the Company will compensate Trinad Management for its services with (i) a fee equal to $2,080,000, with $90,000 payable in advance of each consecutive three-month period during the term of the Agreement and with $1,000,000 due at the end of the 3 year term unless the Management Agreement is otherwise terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, and (ii) issuance of a Warrant to purchase 1,125,000 shares of the Company common stock at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. The warrant may be exercised in whole or in part by Trinad Management at any time for a period of ten (10) years.

	4

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of January 31, 2014, the Company had total current assets of $655,036 comprised of cash, prepaid management fees and prepaid expenses in comparison with that of $65,895 comprised of cash and prepaid expenses as of April 30, 2013. The Company had total current liabilities of $836,361 comprised primarily of notes payable of $500,000 due investors, accounts payable of $285,868 and accrued expenses of $38,675, and an advance from our Chief Executive Officer of $11,776 as of January 31, 2014 in comparison with current liabilities of $424,607 as of April 30, 2013, comprised primarily of notes payable of $300,000 due investors, accounts payable of $72,040, accrued expenses of $17,408 and an advance from our Chief Executive Officer of $35,123 as of April 30, 2013.

On November 8, 2011, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with an investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 250,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $250,000.

On December 27, 2011, the Company entered into a second securities purchase agreement with the same investor pursuant to which the Company issued the investor 150,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $150,000.

On September 11 and September 20, 2012, the Company entered into two separate securities purchase agreements with two accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 275,000 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $275,000.

On December 13, 2012, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 200,000 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $200,000.

On February 6, 2013, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with an accredited investor, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 50,000 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $50,000.

On April 2, 2012, the Company signed a promissory note with Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $150,000, with interest at 6% per annum, and principal due on April 1, 2013, and the maturity date of the note was subsequently extended to November 1, 2014.

On May 13, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $10,000, with interest at 6% per annum, and principal due on May 13, 2014.

On June 21, 2012, the Company signed a promissory note with Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $150,000, with interest at 6% per annum, and principal due on June 20, 2013, and the maturity date of the note was subsequently extended to November 1, 2014.

On May 23, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $50,000, with interest at 6% per annum, and principal due on May 23, 2014.

On June 17, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with the Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $100,000, with interest at 6% per annum, with principal due on June 17, 2014.

On July 2, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $10,000, with interest at 6% per annum, and principal due on July 2, 2014.

	5

On July 3, 2013, the Company signed a promissory note with Trinad Capital Master Fund for the amount of $30,000, with interest at 6% per annum, and principal due on July 3, 2014.

The total aggregate accrued interest on the promissory notes with Trinad Capital Master Fund set forth above was $31,113 as of October 31, 2013.

All proceeds from capital raised from investors and promissory notes to date has been and is being used for general administrative and operational purposes in the Company’s efforts to find a suitable target or merger candidate, to continue operations, and for the filing of Exchange Act reports. The Company has nominal assets and has generated no revenues since inception. The Company is dependent upon the receipt of capital investment or other financing to fund its ongoing operations and to execute its business plan of seeking a combination with a private operating company. If continued funding and capital resources are unavailable on reasonable terms, the Company may not be able to implement its plan of operations. The Company can provide no assurance that it can continue to satisfy its cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

We have no lines of credit or other bank financing arrangements. Generally, we have financed operations to date through the proceeds of the private placement of equity and debt instruments. In connection with our business plan, management anticipates additional increases in operating expenses and capital expenditures. We intend to finance these expenses with further issuances of securities and debt issuances. Thereafter, we expect we will need to raise additional capital and generate revenues to meet long-term operating requirements. Additional issuances of equity or convertible debt securities will result in dilution to our current shareholders. Further, such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to our common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to take advantage of prospective new business endeavors or opportunities, which could significantly and materially restrict our business operations. We will have to raise additional funds in the next twelve months in order to sustain and expand our operations. We currently do not have a specific plan of how we will obtain such funding.

Results of Operations

No revenue has been generated by the Company from December 28, 2009 (Inception) through January 31, 2014. It is unlikely the Company will have any significant revenues unless it is able to effect an acquisition or merger with an operating company, of which there can be no assurance. These circumstances may hinder the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s plan of operation for the next twelve months is to continue its efforts to locate suitable acquisition candidates.

For the nine months ended January 31, 2014, the Company had a net loss of $1,842,395, including consulting fees and professional fees, management fees and salaries of $1,562,183, travel expenses of $108,601, general and administrative expenses of $132,237 and an impairment loss on notes receivable of $50,000.

For the nine months ended January 31, 2013, the Company had a net loss of $993,159, including consulting fees and professional fees, management fees and salaries of $898,764, travel expenses of $76,432 and general administrative expenses of $4,944.

For the three months ended January 31, 2014, the Company had a net loss of $862,311, including consulting fees and professional fees, management fees and salaries of $773,275, travel expenses of $47,392 and general and administrative expenses of $34,082.

For the three months ended January 31, 2013, the Company had a net loss of $474,862, including consulting fees and professional fees, management fees and salaries of $428,783, travel expenses of $41,963 and general administrative expenses of $(421).

For the period from December 28, 2009 (Inception) through January 31, 2014, the Company had a deficit accumulated of $4,147,982, including consulting fees, professional fees and general administrative expenses incurred in relation to the formation of the Company, the filing of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, the filing of the Company’s periodic reports, management services fees and travel expenses.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Going Concern

Our financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have a history of recurring losses that are likely to continue in the future. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. We may be required to cease operations which could result in our stockholders losing all or almost all of their investment.

	6

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of January 31, 2014, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective for the period ended January 31, 2014 for the reasons discussed below.

The following two material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting existed on January 31, 2014:

(i) We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us for the quarter ended January 31, 2014. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

(ii) We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures, and concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of such internal control that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

	7

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

There are no material legal proceedings to which we are a party, or of which any of our property is subject, and we are not aware of any threatened legal proceedings against us.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

	8

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.		Description

10.1		Reimbursement Agreement, effective as of January 29, 2014, between JJAT Corp. and the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 6, 2014 and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

	9

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	LOTON, CORP

Date: March 12, 2014	By:	/s/ Robert Ellin
		Robert Ellin
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

	By:	/s/ Barry Regenstein
		Barry Regenstein
		Interim Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

	10