LL Flooring Holdings, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2013 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 001-33767

Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(757) 259-4280

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

As of April 22, 2013, there were 27,468,928 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents

LUMBER LIQUIDATORS HOLDINGS, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the quarter ended March 31, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

3

Table of Contents

Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(in thousands, except share data and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

4

Table of Contents

Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Other Comprehensive Income

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

5

Table of Contents

Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

6

Table of Contents

Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(amounts in thousands, except share data and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

Lumber Liquidators Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hardwood flooring, and hardwood flooring enhancements and accessories, operating as a single business segment. The Company offers an extensive assortment of exotic and domestic hardwood species, engineered hardwoods and laminates direct to the consumer. The Company also features the renewable flooring products, bamboo and cork, and provides a wide selection of flooring enhancements and accessories, including moldings, noise-reducing underlay, adhesives and flooring tools. These products are primarily sold under the Company’s private label brands, including the premium Bellawood brand floors. The Company sells primarily to homeowners or to contractors on behalf of homeowners through a network of 284 store locations in primary or secondary metropolitan areas in 46 states and nine store locations in Canada at March 31, 2013. In addition to the store locations, the Company’s products may be ordered, and customer questions/concerns addressed, through both the call center in Toano, Virginia, and the website, www.lumberliquidators.com. The Company finishes the majority of the Bellawood products on its finishing line in Toano, Virginia, which along with the call center, corporate offices, and a distribution center, represent the “Corporate Headquarters.”

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q for interim financial reporting pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). While these statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim period, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. Therefore, the interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and other liabilities approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these items. Of these financial instruments, the cash equivalents are classified as Level 1 as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC 820 fair value hierarchy. The Company had cash equivalents of $170 at both March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

In 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100,000 of the Company’s common stock, and at March 31, 2013, the Company had $47,096 remaining under this authorization. Purchases under this program were as follows:

7

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share:

The following have been excluded from the computation of Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding—Diluted because the effect would be anti-dilutive:

As of March 31, 2013, the Company leased 29 of its locations, representing 9.9% of the total number of store leases in operation, and the Corporate Headquarters, which includes a store location, from entities controlled by the Company’s founder and current chairman of the Board (“Controlled Companies”). Rental expense related to Controlled Companies was as follows:

On May 21, 2012, Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and Central Purchasing, LLC (together, the “Plaintiffs”) filed an action, which was subsequently amended, in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, California against the Company and certain purported Company employees (the “State Court Action”). In the State Court Action, the Plaintiffs contended that they previously employed several individuals now working for the Company, and alleged, among other claims, the improper use and possession by the Company and/or its employees of trade secrets belonging to the Plaintiffs and unfair business practices. The Plaintiffs sought unspecified monetary damages, punitive damages, injunctive, equitable and other relief.

On December 18, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In that suit, in addition to the claims raised as in the State Court Action, the Plaintiffs alleged that the Company violated certain of the Plaintiffs’ copyrights. The Plaintiffs sought, among other things, a preliminary injunction precluding the Company from using the Plaintiffs’ purported confidential information and selling seven specific tool products. The Plaintiffs dismissed the State Court Action as it pertained to the Company but it remained pending as to the individual employees.

Though the Company strongly disputed the Plaintiffs’ contentions, the parties engaged in settlement processes, reaching a tentative understanding on certain matters in February 2013. As a result, the Company recorded an accrual of approximately $500 in the fourth quarter of 2012.

In April 2013, the parties reached a final agreement to settle these cases. Pursuant to that agreement, these matters will be dismissed with prejudice. No adjustment to the accrual was required.

On August 30, 2012, Jaroslaw Prusak, a purported customer (“Prusak”), filed a putative class action lawsuit, which was subsequently amended, against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Prusak alleges that the Company

8

Table of Contents

willfully violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act in connection with printed credit card receipts provided to its customers. Prusak, for himself and the putative class, seeks statutory damages of no less than $100 and no more than $1,000 per violation, punitive damages, attorney’s fees and costs, and other relief. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously. Given the uncertainty of litigation, the early stage of the case and the legal standards that must be met for, among other things, class certification and success on the merits, no outcome can be predicted at this time. Based upon the current status of the matter and information available, the Company does not, at this time, expect the outcome of this proceeding to have a material adverse effect on its results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

The Company is, from time to time, subject to claims and disputes arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, while the outcome of any such claims and disputes cannot be predicted with certainty, the ultimate liability of the Company in connection with these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

9

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes statements of our expectations, intentions, plans and beliefs that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. These statements, which involve risks and uncertainties, relate to matters such as sales growth, comparable store net sales, impact of cannibalization, price changes, earnings performance, stock-based compensation expense, margins, return on invested capital, strategic direction, the demand for our products, and store openings. We have used words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “thinks,” “estimates,” “seeks,” “predicts,” “could,” “projects,” “potential” and other similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions, in this report to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are made based on expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties, risks and factors relating to our operations and business environments, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include those listed in this report and in our other reports filed with the SEC including the Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” section of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the cautionary statements in this report and the documents incorporated by reference. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and we cannot predict those events or how they may affect us. There may also be other factors that we cannot anticipate or that are not described in this report that could cause results to differ materially from our expectations. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and we assume no obligation to update them after the date of this report as a result of new information, future events or subsequent developments, except as required by the federal securities laws.

This management discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in Part I, Item 1. “Financial Statements” of this quarterly report and the audited financial statements and notes and management discussion included in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Overview and Trends

Lumber Liquidators is the largest specialty retailer of hardwood flooring in North America. We believe we have achieved a reputation for offering great value, superior service and a broad selection of high-quality hardwood flooring products. We offer an extensive selection of premium hardwood flooring products under multiple proprietary brands at low prices designed to appeal to a diverse customer base. We believe that our vertically integrated business model enables us to offer a broad assortment of high-quality products to our customers at a lower cost than our competitors. At March 31, 2013, we sold our products through 293 Lumber Liquidators stores in 46 states in the U.S. and in Canada, a call center, websites and catalogs.

In 2013, we intend to aggressively pursue share in a wood flooring market we believe is poised for recovery after years of contraction. We expect to grow revenue and expand operating margin as we continue to implement our key strategic initiatives and strengthen our value proposition. We plan to continue to invest a portion of the benefits from these initiatives back into our business to yield long-term growth. These key strategic initiatives, which we began implementing in 2011 and 2012, include:

The wood flooring market in which we operate is highly fragmented, and dependent on home-related, large-ticket discretionary spending, itself influenced by a number of complex economic and demographic factors that may vary locally, regionally and nationally. In 2012, a number of these factors generally improved, though they remain at historically lower levels. In 2013, we expect continued overall improvement for the year, though marked by periodic volatility. We believe our customer is likely to remain cautious and price-sensitive.

10

Table of Contents

In 2012, we completed the initial design of an expanded store showroom to enhance the shopping experience for our customers. We refer to this showroom, coupled with an improved store warehouse design, as our “store of the future.” We expect all of our new stores in 2013 to feature the expanded showroom. In addition to the new stores, in 2013, we expect to remodel 20 to 25 existing stores, either in their current location or relocated within the primary trade area. In the first quarter of 2013, we opened five new store locations and remodeled six existing stores, all in the “store of the future” format.

Results of Operations

Net Sales

Net sales for the first quarter of 2013 increased $42.4 million, or 22.5%, over the first quarter of 2012 as net sales in comparable stores increased $28.5 million and net sales in non-comparable stores increased $13.9 million. Net sales increased primarily due to the following factors:

11

Table of Contents

Gross Profit and Gross Margin

We believe that the significant drivers of gross margin expansion and their estimated impact compared to the prior year are as follows:

12

Table of Contents

Operating Income and Operating Margin

The following table sets forth components of our SG&A expenses for the periods indicated, as a percentage of net sales.

Operating income for the first quarter ended March 31, 2013 increased $12.1 million, or 90.8%, over the first quarter of 2012 as operating margin expanded 390 basis points to 11.0%. The increase in operating income was driven by an increase in gross profit of $22.9 million, partially offset by an increase in SG&A expenses of $10.8 million. SG&A expenses were impacted by the following:

13

Table of Contents

Provision for Income Taxes

The effective tax rate was 38.4% and 38.6% in the first quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Net Income

Net income increased $7.6 million, or 92.5%, comparing the first quarter of 2013 to 2012.

Seasonality

Our net sales fluctuate slightly as a result of seasonal factors, and we adjust merchandise inventories in anticipation of those factors, causing variations in our build of merchandise inventories. Generally, we experience higher than average net sales in the spring and fall, when more home remodeling activities are taking place, and lower than average net sales in the winter months and during the hottest summer months. These seasonal fluctuations, however, are minimized to some extent by our national presence, as markets experience different seasonal characteristics.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity and capital requirements are for capital expenditures to maintain and grow our business, working capital and general corporate purposes. In addition, we periodically use available funds to repurchase shares of our common stock under our stock repurchase program. Our principal sources of liquidity are $72.7 million of cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2013, our cash flow from operations, and our $50.0 million of availability under our revolving credit facility. We believe that our cash flow from operations, together with our existing liquidity sources, will be sufficient to fund our operations and anticipated capital expenditures for the foreseeable future.

In 2013, we now expect capital expenditures to total between $17 million and $19 million. In addition to general capital requirements, we have or intend to:

Cash and Cash Equivalents

During the three months ended March 31, 2013, cash and cash equivalents increased $8.6 million to $72.7 million. The increase of cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to $11.1 million of net cash provided by operating activities and $4.6 million of proceeds received from stock option exercises, which were partially offset by the use of $4.3 million to repurchase common stock and $2.6 million for capital expenditures.

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, cash and cash equivalents decreased $0.2 million to $61.4 million. The decrease of cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to the use of $9.1 million to repurchase common stock and $3.2 million for capital expenditures which was partially offset by $10.3 million of net cash provided by operating activities and $1.6 million of proceeds received from stock option exercises.

14

Table of Contents

Merchandise Inventories

Merchandise inventories at March 31, 2013 increased $3.4 million from December 31, 2012, due to an increase in available for sale inventory of $11.8 million which was partially offset by a reduction in inbound in-transit inventory of $8.4 million. We consider merchandise inventories either “available for sale” or “inbound in-transit,” based on whether we have physically received and inspected the products at an individual store location, in our distribution centers or in another facility where we control and monitor inspection.

Merchandise inventories and available inventory per store in operation were as follows:

Available inventory per store at March 31, 2013 was higher than both December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2012 as we continued to build inventory to meet increased spring demand. We now expect available inventory per store at the end of the year between $605,000 and $625,000.

Inbound in-transit inventory was lower at March 31, 2013 than both December 31, 2012 and March 31, 2012 due primarily to the timing of certain international shipments.

Stock Repurchase Program

In 2012, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of our common stock. This stock repurchase program represents our commitment to return value to our shareholders, and expresses confidence in our proven store model. During the first quarter of 2013, we repurchased 70,600 shares of our common stock through open market purchases, using approximately $3.8 million in cash.

Cash Flows

Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $11.1 million and $10.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities increased primarily due to more profitable operations, partially offset by the impact of an earlier seasonal build in merchandise inventories, significantly impacting accounts payable.

Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $2.6 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. First quarter 2012 capital expenditures included approximately $0.8 million for improved technology at the point of sale and upgrades to distribution center forklifts that were not required in 2013.

Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and net cash used in financing activities was $7.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, primarily due to repurchases of common stock. Net cash provided by financing activities in both 2013 and 2012 also included proceeds received from stock option exercises.

Certain External Factors Impacting Our Business

Antidumping and Countervailing Duties Investigation. In October 2010, a conglomeration of domestic manufacturers of multilayered wood flooring filed a petition seeking the imposition of antidumping (“AD”) and countervailing duties (“CVD”) with the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) and the United States International Trade Commission (“ITC”) against imports of multilayered wood flooring from China. The DOC then made preliminary determinations regarding CVD and AD rates in March 2011 and May 2011, respectively.

15

Table of Contents

On October 12, 2011, the DOC announced its final determinations regarding the applicable rates in both the CVD and AD investigations. On November 9, 2011, the ITC made its final determination and concluded that imports of multilayered wood flooring from China materially injure, or threaten material injury to, the domestic industry. Thereafter, AD and CVD orders were issued at the final rates determined by the DOC.

A number of appeals have been filed by several parties challenging various aspects of the determinations made by both the ITC and DOC, including certain appeals that may impact the validity of the AD and CVD orders and the applicable rates. In one such appeal, on March 20, 2013, the Court of International Trade issued a remand order instructing the ITC to, among other things, reconsider its injury determination and further evaluate several economic factors used in its determinations. Additionally, the DOC is currently conducting annual reviews of the AD and CVD rates. As part of that review process, which is scheduled to be completed in 2014, such rates may be changed and applied retroactively to the DOC’s preliminary determinations in the original investigation. At this time, we are unable to determine the positive or negative impact, if any, that the various appeals and rate reviews may have on our business.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Critical accounting policies are those that we believe are both significant and that require us to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often because we need to estimate the effect of inherently uncertain matters. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experiences and various other factors that we believe to be appropriate under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates, and we might obtain different estimates if we used different assumptions or conditions. We have had no significant changes in our critical accounting policies and estimates since our last annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk.

We are exposed to interest rate risk through the investment of our cash and cash equivalents. We invest our cash in short-term investments with maturities of three months or less. Changes in interest rates affect the interest income we earn, and therefore impact our cash flows and results of operations. In addition, any future borrowings under our revolving credit agreement would be exposed to interest rate risk due to the variable rate of the facility.

We currently do not engage in any interest rate hedging activity and currently have no intention to do so in the foreseeable future. However, in the future, in an effort to mitigate losses associated with these risks, we may at times enter into derivative financial instruments, although we have not historically done so. We do not, and do not intend to, engage in the practice of trading derivative securities for profit.

Exchange Rate Risk.

The majority of our revenue, expense and capital purchasing activities are transacted in U.S. dollars. However, because a portion of our operations consists of activities outside of the U.S., we have transactions in or exposure to other currencies, including the Euro, Canadian dollar, Chinese yuan and Brazilian real.

We currently do not engage in any exchange rate hedging activity and currently have no intention to do so in the foreseeable future. However, in the future, in an effort to mitigate losses associated with these risks, we may at times engage in transactions involving various derivative instruments to hedge revenues, inventory purchases, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

16

Table of Contents

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

On May 21, 2012, Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. and Central Purchasing, LLC (together, the “Plaintiffs”) filed an action, which was subsequently amended, in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, California against us and certain purported employees of ours (the “State Court Action”). In the State Court Action, the Plaintiffs contended that they previously employed several individuals now working for us, and alleged, among other claims, the improper use and possession by us and/or our employees of trade secrets belonging to the Plaintiffs and unfair business practices. The Plaintiffs sought unspecified monetary damages, punitive damages, injunctive, equitable and other relief.

On December 18, 2012, the Plaintiffs filed suit against us in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In that suit, in addition to the claims raised as in the State Court Action, the Plaintiffs alleged that we violated certain of the Plaintiffs’ copyrights. The Plaintiffs sought, among other things, a preliminary injunction precluding us from using the Plaintiffs’ purported confidential information and selling seven specific tool products. The Plaintiffs dismissed the State Court Action as it pertained to us but it remained pending as to the individual employees.

Though we strongly disputed the Plaintiffs’ contentions, the parties engaged in settlement processes, reaching a tentative understanding on certain matters in February 2013. As a result, we recorded an accrual of approximately $0.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2012.

In April 2013, the parties reached a final agreement to settle these cases. Pursuant to that agreement, these matters will be dismissed with prejudice. No adjustment to the accrual was required.

On August 30, 2012, Jaroslaw Prusak, a purported customer (“Prusak”), filed a putative class action lawsuit, which was subsequently amended, against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Prusak alleges that we willfully violated the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act in connection with printed credit card receipts provided to our customers. Prusak, for himself and the putative class, seeks statutory damages of no less than $100 and no more than $1,000 per violation, punitive damages, attorney’s fees and costs, and other relief. We intend to defend this matter vigorously. Given the uncertainty of litigation, the early stage of the case and the legal standards that must be met for, among other things, class certification and success on the merits, no outcome can be predicted at this time. Based upon the current status of the matter and information available, we do not, at this time, expect the outcome of this proceeding to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. There have been no material changes to those risk factors since we filed our fiscal 2012 annual report on Form 10-K. The risks described in our annual report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table presents our share repurchase activity for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):

17

Table of Contents

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

The exhibits listed in the exhibit index following the signature page are furnished as part of this report.

18

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

19

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

20