loanDepot, Inc. - Annual Report: 2021 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| ☒ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||||
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021
OR
| ☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | ||||
For the transition period from _____to _____
Commission File Number: 001-40003
loanDepot, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
| Delaware | 85-3948939 | |||||||||||||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |||||||||||||
26642 Towne Centre Drive, | Foothill Ranch, | California | 92610 | |||||||||||
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) | |||||||||||||
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (888) 337-6888
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Trading Symbol | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||||||||||||
| Class A Common Stock, $0.001 per value per share | LDI | The New York Stock Exchange | ||||||||||||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||
| Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☒ | |||||||||||||||||
| Emerging growth company | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of June 30, 2021 the aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.0001 par value (“common stock”), held by non-affiliates was $131,309,730 based on the closing price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on that date.
As of March 17, 2022, 43,594,694 shares of the registrant’s Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were outstanding. No shares of registrant’s Class B common stock were outstanding, 170,306,167 shares of registrant’s Class C common stock were outstanding and 97,026,671 shares of registrant’s Class D common stock were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for use in connection with its 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which is to be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2021, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
loanDepot, Inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
December 31, 2021
Table of Contents
| Page | ||||||||
| Item 1. | ||||||||
| Item 1A. | ||||||||
| Item 1B. | ||||||||
| Item 2. | ||||||||
| Item 3. | ||||||||
| Item 4. | ||||||||
| Item 5. | ||||||||
| Item 6. | ||||||||
| Item 7. | ||||||||
| Item 7A. | ||||||||
| Item 8. | ||||||||
| Item 9. | ||||||||
| Item 9A. | ||||||||
| Item 9B. | ||||||||
| Item 9C. | ||||||||
| Item 10. | ||||||||
| Item 11. | ||||||||
| Item 12. | ||||||||
| Item 13. | ||||||||
| Item 14. | ||||||||
| Item 15. | ||||||||
PART I.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, technology developments, financing and investment plans, dividend policy, competitive position, industry and regulatory environment, potential growth opportunities and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements include statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” "seek," “should,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions and the negatives of those terms.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this report. You should read this report with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are included in “Item 1A Risk Factors.”
Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
1
Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms
The acronyms, abbreviations, and terms listed below are used in various sections of this Form 10-K, including “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
| Agencies | GSEs, FHA, FHFA and certain other federal governmental authorities | ||||
ART | Artemis Management, LLC (direct wholly-owned subsidiary of LD Holdings) | ||||
| CFPB | Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | ||||
| ECOA | Equal Credit Opportunity Act | ||||
| Fannie Mae | Federal National Mortgage Association | ||||
| FASB | Financial Accounting Standards Board | ||||
| FHA | Federal Housing Administration | ||||
| FHFA | Federal Housing Finance Agency | ||||
| FIRREA | Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 | ||||
| Freddie Mac | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation | ||||
| GAAP | U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles | ||||
| Ginnie Mae | Government National Mortgage Association | ||||
| GSE | Government Sponsored Enterprises, namely Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac | ||||
| HOEPA | Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 | ||||
| HUD | Department of Housing and Urban Development | ||||
| IRLC | interest rate lock commitments | ||||
| LD Holdings | LD Holdings Group LLC | ||||
| LDLLC | loanDepot.com, LLC (direct wholly-owned subsidiary of LD Holdings) | ||||
| LDSS | LD Settlement Services, LLC (direct wholly-owned subsidiary of LD Holdings) | ||||
| LHFS | loans held for sale | ||||
| LTV | loan-to-value | ||||
| MBA | Mortgage Bankers Association | ||||
| MBS | mortgage-backed securities | ||||
| MCS | mello Credit Strategies, LLC (direct wholly-owned subsidiary of LD Holdings) | ||||
| Mello | mello Holdings, LLC (direct wholly-owned subsidiary of LD Holdings) | ||||
| MSR | mortgage servicing rights | ||||
| RESPA | Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act | ||||
| TBA MBS | to be announced mortgage-backed securities | ||||
| TILA | Truth in Lending Act | ||||
| UPB | unpaid principal balance | ||||
| VA | Department of Veterans Affairs | ||||
| VIE | Variable Interest Entity | ||||
Numerical figures included in this Form 10-K have been subject to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, numerical figures shown as totals in various tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them.
All references to years, unless otherwise noted or indicated by the context, refer to our fiscal years, which end on December 31.
2
Item 1. Business
Our Company
We are a customer-centric, technology-empowered residential mortgage platform with a widely recognized consumer brand. We launched our business in 2010 to disrupt the legacy mortgage industry and make obtaining a mortgage a positive experience for consumers. We have built a leading technology platform, designed around the consumer that has redefined the mortgage process. Our digital-first approach has allowed us to become one of the fastest-growing, at-scale mortgage originators in the United States of America (“U.S.”) We are the second largest retail-focused non-bank mortgage originator and the third largest overall retail originator, (based on data through December 31, 2021, published by Inside Mortgage Finance). For the year ended December 31, 2021, we generated $137.0 billion in originations (36% year-over-year growth), $3.7 billion in revenue, and $623.1 million in net income.
Consumer-facing industries continue to be disrupted by technological innovation. The mortgage industry is no different with consumers expecting increased levels of convenience and speed. The residential mortgage market in the U.S. is massive—with approximately $11.6 trillion of mortgages outstanding as of December 31, 2021which is forecasted to increase to $12.3 trillion by the end of 2022 (based on data from the MBA’s Mortgage Finance Forecast published on February 22, 2022). mello®, our proprietary end-to-end technology platform, combined with our differentiated data analytics capabilities and nationally recognized consumer brand, positions us to capitalize on the ongoing shift towards at-scale, digitally-enabled platforms.
Our innovative culture and contemporary consumer brand represent key differentiators for loanDepot. We have fostered an entrepreneurial mindset and relentlessly deliver an exceptional experience to our customers. Our guiding principle is to delight our customers by exceeding their expectations. Since the Company’s launch in 2010, we have invested over $1.4 billion in marketing and the promotion of our brand, and we believe there are significant barriers-to-entry in creating a brand comparable to ours. mello® drives streamlined customer experiences and operational efficiency throughout the entire lifecycle of a mortgage loan, including fully digital capabilities for customer acquisition, application, processing, and servicing. Our front-end interface is intuitive and user-friendly, driving high customer engagement and lower acquisition costs. mello® also powers our back-end technology, automating and streamlining numerous functions for our customers, team members and partners.
IPO and Reorganization
On February 11, 2021 we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) of 3,850,000 shares of Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at an offering price of $14.00 per share, pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-1. We are a publicly traded company whose Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “LDI.”
Prior to the IPO, we completed a reorganization by changing our equity structure to create a single class of LLC Units in LD Holdings (the “Reorganization”). Prior to the Reorganization, our capital structure consisted of different classes of membership interests held by certain members of LD Holdings (“Continuing LLC Members”). The LLC Units were then exchanged on a one-for-one basis for Class A holding units (“Holdco Units”) and Class C common stock. The Continuing LLC Members have the right to exchange one Holdco Unit and one share of Class B common stock or Class C common stock, as applicable, together for cash or one share of Class A common stock at our election, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, and reclassifications. In addition, as a result of the IPO and the Reorganization, our IPO sponsors, Parthenon Capital Partners (the “Parthenon Stockholders”) exchanged their equity interest in return for shares of our Class D common stock.
Unless otherwise noted or indicated by the context, the term the “Company,” “loanDepot,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refers (1) prior to the consummation of the IPO described above to LD Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries, and (2) after the IPO and Reorganization described above to loanDepot, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including LD Holdings.
mello® Platform
3
We built mello®, our disruptive, proprietary, and innovative technology platform, from the ground up to function across all aspects of our business, including lead generation, originations, data integration, processing, closing, and servicing. mello® creates a simple and intuitive user interface on the front-end while also integrating data from our vendors and internal data sources, providing our business with optimal efficiency. Through the use of machine learning algorithms, mello® applies intelligent logic-based underwriting parameters to automatically determine and validate loans and reduce cycle times.
Differentiated Contact Strategy—Lead Generation and Customer-Specific Matching
Our marketing technology applications are designed to process leads from a variety of sources and intelligently score and route leads at high volumes in real-time. Our models analyze the propensity that a lead will result in a funding dictating the optimal marketing spend to maximize profitability of a lead. Our proprietary systems utilize a rich customer dataset and advanced algorithms to determine the most optimal loan products to offer a customer before making contact, matching the customer with a compatible mortgage professional based on capacity as well as the mortgage professional’s state licenses, product expertise, and other attributes. Our proprietary marketing technology, along with our differentiated strategy, maximizes consumer engagement and provides a significant competitive advantage in converting leads and reducing staff cost.
Streamlined Data Integration & Connectivity
Receiving and efficiently utilizing various forms and sources of data is a key function of mello®. Through it, our proprietary technology is designed to seamlessly integrate with leading technology partners. This allows us to optimize execution with real-time access to customer, credit, interest rate market, property and other data required to price, sell, and underwrite mortgages. We employ automated document and intelligent character recognition technology to transform documents into flexible and functional data attributes. These functions allow us to eliminate processes that would otherwise require time intensive and inefficient tasks from our team members. Our technology platform is fully integrated with our sales team providing enhanced efficiency for our team while also streamlining our back-end operations and infrastructure.
Intelligent Loan Underwriting & Funding
Our centralized and logic-intensive loan underwriting system utilizes machine learning algorithms to drive efficiencies in validating loan attributes to their program guidelines. Our system automatically creates underwriting conditions based on the selected loan program and known borrower circumstances, and interprets verified source data to streamline decision-making. This functionality not only streamlines loans that contain all their required validations, it also allows us to identify issues more quickly and accelerates our ability to communicate with our customers to request additional information. Simultaneously to applying underwriting criteria to applications, our underwriting system also facilitates automated quality and compliance audits.
Retail and Partner Strategies
We leverage our brand, technology and data to serve customers across our two interconnected strategies: Retail and Partner. Our Retail strategy focuses on directly reaching consumers through a combination of digital and direct marketing through approximately 3,100 digitally-empowered licensed mortgage professionals. In our Partner strategy, we have established deep relationships with mortgage brokers, realtors, joint ventures with home builders, and other referral partners. These partnerships are valuable origination sources with lower customer acquisition costs. Our technology is a key component of the value proposition to these partner relationships, allowing us to integrate directly into our partners’ native systems. We maintain integrated referral relationships with several leading brands, including a partnership with one of the 10 largest U.S. retail banks by total assets. During the year ended December 31, 2021, our Retail strategy produced 79% of our origination volume, with our Partner strategy representing the remaining 21%. Purchase originations represented 29% of total originations in 2021 and refinance originations represented the remaining 71%. As interest rates increased during the latter half of 2021 we adjusted our marketing strategy to attract more purchase and cash-out refinance volume, which we believe to be less interest rate sensitive compared to rate/term refinance transactions. 61% of our 2021 originations were purchase and cash-out refinance transactions compared to 53% in 2020.
Our digital-first approach across our Retail and Partner strategies leverages the power of mello® to create a streamlined experience for consumers. Our predictive models route leads to the right loan officer at the right time to optimize the consumer’s experience and best serve their needs. Based on each consumer’s needs and preferences, leads are directed to in-
4
house or in-market loan officers, team members at our centralized operations locations, or our digital self-service platform. Our in-market loan officers are able to leverage their long-term relationships as well as our proprietary mello® platform and loanDepot brand, driving improved profitability per loan officer.
Retail
Consumer Direct: We launched our first channel, consumer direct, in 2010 and have invested in technology and marketing capabilities to create a highly efficient origination platform. Our consumer direct platform leverages our centralized operations centers and proprietary algorithms to provide customers with a rate quote within seconds. Many of our customers choose to complete the mortgage application process themselves and are able to do so digitally with minimal or no human interaction. While customers are capable of end-to-end application processes completely online, we offer real-time assistance from our sales force when needed. Our consumer direct channel utilizes a proprietary algorithm to match leads with the sales force member best-suited for the customer’s needs and ensures that the sales force member has the appropriate licenses needed to process the application. Regardless of whether a customer prefers to apply themselves or with someone guiding them along the way, our consumer direct channel facilitates a streamlined and user-friendly experience. Mortgages originated through our digital marketing and call center operations tend to be predominantly refinance focused.
In-Market Loan Officers: We launched our in-market loan officer channel through our acquisition of imortgage in October 2013 and grew the channel through our acquisition of Mortgage Master in January 2015. We originate loans in this channel through our dedicated in-market loan officers across the United States. Our loan officers are responsible for sourcing, engaging, and maintaining local customer relationships through real estate agents, builders, and other contacts. Our loan officers thrive within our network as our technology platform also serves as a prioritization and potential lead generation tool for customers in their geographies. Our in-market loan officer network cultivates originations that have allowed us to develop deep, long-term relationships. This network of local real estate professionals provides a steady stream of purchase originations for our platform and is highly complementary to our consumer direct channel, enabling us to satisfy customers both digitally, through our call center, or via in-person interactions.
Partner
Joint Ventures: We have established joint ventures with several industry partners, including national home builders and affinity partners. Our joint venture relationships serve to provide an integrated mortgage product for the benefit of our partners’ customers, lower acquisitions costs compared to the consumer direct channel and yield an attractive margin to the business. Our relationship with home builders in this channel helps to deliver a high percentage of purchase originations to our platform.
Integrated Referral Partners: Through integrated referral partners, we are able to source originations directly through our partner’s existing customer interactions and user interface. These integrated referral sources allow us to expand our reach and provide our services to our partners’ large customer bases. We maintain integrated referral relationships with several leading brands, including a partnership with one of the 10 largest U.S. retail banks by total assets.
Wholesale: After proving the value of our differentiated model in our Retail strategy, we expanded our services to an independent broker network. Our wholesale network utilizes the same infrastructure and technology that powers our Retail strategy to provide the same customer-centric approach to our independent broker’s customers. These broker partners leverage our platform to market products and assist customers throughout the loan application process. The wholesale channel operates as a business-to-business model providing industry-leading fulfillment services and trusts in our high quality of customer service. Applications submitted on behalf of a broker are uploaded to our underwriting system and processed with the same unrivaled efficiency that helped us gain an industry-leading net promoter score.
Products
We have a broad loan product suite including conventional agency-conforming loans, conventional prime jumbo loans, FHA & VA loans, and home equity loans.
i)Conventional Agency-Conforming loans: our conventional Agency-conforming loans meet the general underwriting guidelines established by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and may be modified through special arrangements we have with both GSEs.
5
ii)Conventional prime jumbo loans: comprised of our proprietary “Jumbo Advantage” product, and other white label products, these loans generally conform to the underwriting guidelines of the GSEs but exceed the maximum loan size allowed for single unit properties.
iii)FHA & VA loans: FHA loans are federal assistance residential mortgage loans that insure the lender against default on the loan. VA loans are federal assistance residential mortgage loans for eligible U.S. veterans and their surviving spouses that are guaranteed against default by the U.S. government.
iv)Home equity loans: we originate certain home equity loans that are designed to provide homeowners access to efficient capital by accessing the equity that borrowers have accumulated in their homes.
Ancillary Business
Settlement Services. LDSS is our captive title and escrow business, which we acquired in 2016. Title insurance is one of the most significant pieces of a real estate transaction, with vast potential to be digitized and better integrated with our lending operation.
Real Estate Services. mello Home Services, LLC is our indirect wholly-owned captive real estate referral business started in 2018. A large portion of our purchase-oriented customer leads have not yet selected a realtor, thus affording us the opportunity to provide a more integrated customer service between the two key home-buying functions, as well as capture ancillary revenue in a RESPA-compliant manner.
Insurance Services. melloInsurance Services, LLC is our indirect wholly-owned captive insurance broker formed in 2019 to sell homeowners and other consumer insurance policies to loanDepot’s customers. Our purchase mortgage customers typically do not have a homeowners insurance quote when they apply for a loan with us, presenting the opportunity to offer the product with high capture rates. We launched melloInsurance Services in the third quarter of 2020.
Marketing Strategy
Our national brand along with our expertise in digital marketing, big data, and marketing analytics, not only drives new customer acquisition, but also maximizes retention and customer lifetime value. We engage in targeted marketing strategies for our Retail and Partner channels,in addition to the convenience of our ancillary businesses, enhancing our customer acquisition effectiveness. We utilize online lead aggregators to acquire quality customer leads in bulk at attractive prices. Our organic digital marketing approach employ various digital strategies such as search engine optimization, pay-per-click, banner advertising and organic content to generate organic online leads. We employ targeted marketing strategies including direct mailing to broaden our reach of consumers. In situations where we have an existing customer relationship, we use data-driven marketing campaigns to generate new business from customers in our servicing portfolio. We are also able to leverage our mortgage professionals’ and partners’ existing and newly-developed relationships with customers and referral partners to generate origination volume.
We leverage these capabilities to “recapture” existing customers for subsequent refinance and purchase transactions. Our recapture rates are among the highest in the industry. Our preliminary organic refinance consumer direct recapture rate for the year ended December 31, 2021 was 72%. This highlights the efficacy of our marketing efforts and the strength of our customer relationships, which includes our growing servicing portfolio that reached a record level of $162.1 billion in unpaid principal balance serviced as of December 31, 2021. We define organic refinance consumer direct recapture rate as the total UPB of loans in our servicing book that are paid in full for purposes of refinancing the loan on the same property, with the Company acting as lender on both the existing and new loan,divided by the UPB of loans in our servicing book that paid in full for the purpose of refinancing the loan on the same property.
Servicing
Prior to 2012, we sold substantially all the MSRs associated with our residential mortgage loan products. In 2012, we began to retain a portion of this servicing in order to complement our origination business. Servicing consists of collecting loan payments, remitting principal and interest payments to investors, managing escrow funds for the payment of mortgage-related expenses, such as taxes and insurance, performing loss mitigation activities on behalf of investors and otherwise administering our mortgage loan servicing portfolio in compliance with state and federal regulations.
6
Since beginning to retain substantial balances of MSRs in 2012, our retention strategy has changed based on market conditions and internal financial policy. For the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 we have retained servicing rights on 87% and 89% of loans sold, respectively. We service loans on behalf of investors or owners of the underlying mortgages, and because we do not generally hold loans for investment purposes, our loss exposure is limited to investor guidelines regarding the servicing of delinquent loans.
As of December 31, 2021, we serviced $162.1 billion in UPB of residential mortgage loans for 524,992 of our customers. As of December 31, 2021, our servicing UPB was comprised of 79% conventional and 21% government; 86% of our owned MSR portfolio was associated with FICO scores above 680.
We have transitioned more of our servicing portfolio in-house. Our growing servicing portfolio and expanding in-house capabilities complement our loan origination strategy. We plan to continue to invest in our in-house servicing capabilities, leveraging our infrastructure and creating the scale necessary to increase contribution to earnings from this recurring, counter-cyclical business line. We expect to be fully transitioned to our in-house servicing of our portfolio by the middle of 2022.
In addition to fees we earn from servicing the loans, we also derive value from the ability to “recapture” the subsequent refinance or purchase mortgage business of borrowers in the servicing portfolio. The value of the recapture business is comprised of both the gain on sale revenue from the new origination and with significantly reduced marketing expenses compared to a non-recapture unit.
Risk Management
Our experienced, cycle-proven management team understands the importance of risk management to ensure business continuity over time, employing enterprise-wide risk management principles and policies to guide their decision making and business strategy. Our risk management objectives include ensuring an effective and scalable environment and resource and process optimization, anticipation and mitigation of emerging risks, consistent application of risk framework principles, maintaining satisfactory positions with regulatory agencies, investors, lenders and other critical counterparties, maintaining adequate capital to satisfy our internal, regulatory and agency requirements, holding adequate liquidity to fund our business through both normal and stressed environments, mitigating credit risk exposure, and managing towards attractive long-term risk-adjusted returns on capital.
As part of our risk management practices, we proactively hedge the interest rate risk on our MSR portfolio. Derivative instruments utilized by the Company primarily include forward sale contracts, put options on treasuries, and interest rate swap futures. Our dedicated capital markets team actively manages the pooling and sale of loans into the secondary market as well as hedging of the Company’s whole-loans, origination pipeline, and MSRs.
Liquidity is crucial to the overall success of our business and is primarily managed by our treasury and capital markets teams. We have historically maintained liquidity levels that are designed to allow us to fund our loan origination business, manage our day-to-day operations and protect us against foreseeable market risks. Our sources of liquidity include loan funding warehouse facilities, MSR and servicing advance facilities, off-balance sheet gestation facilities, as well as cash on hand. As of December 31, 2021, we had $419.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, along with $11.8 billion of loan funding capacity across 15 credit facilities, of which $7.5 billion was outstanding. Our $11.8 billion loan funding capacity was comprised of $7.8 billion with maturities staggered throughout 2022, $2.5 billion maturing in 2023 and $1.5 billion maturing in 2024. Of our $11.8 billion loan funding capacity, 22% of our facilities have original maturity dates of two years or longer, which reduces the risk of refinancing.
Regulatory Compliance
We operate within a complex area of the financial services industry, and our business requires a significant compliance and regulatory infrastructure. Since launching our business in 2010, we have developed an operating platform designed to meet the needs of today’s compliance and regulatory environment. We leverage our proprietary technology powered by mello® and automated systems which are designed to ensure that all processes operate in a compliant manner. We believe our use of innovative, purpose-built technology helps reduce errors and ensures standardized compliant processes.
7
We employ an in-house team of lawyers and other professionals dedicated to legal, regulatory and compliance related matters. Our compliance functions sit independently of our production operations from a reporting perspective, which allows for autonomy. However, our compliance department also works alongside the production areas of our organization on a day-to-day basis, which enables our compliance function and business units to collaborate and work more efficiently. We regularly and proactively engage with our regulators to stay ahead of regulatory trends. In addition, we utilize third-party verification and internal audit procedures to ensure compliance on fundamental issues. We view our infrastructure and culture of compliance to be a competitive advantage, as it enables us to leverage our platform and rapidly scale our business while minimizing, as much as possible, compliance risk.
Competition
As a technology-enabled platform that provides multiple mortgage loan and real estate services products, we compete with other lenders and market participants across a variety of industry segments, including banks and other “originate-to-hold” lenders, non-bank lenders, and other financial institutions, as well as traditional and technology-oriented platforms across the broader real estate and mortgage industry. With respect to our mortgage loan businesses, we face and may in the future face competition in such areas as loan product offerings, rates, fees and customer service. With respect to servicing, we face competition in areas such as fees, compliance capabilities and performance in reducing delinquencies. Increased competition from new and existing market participants can impact our ability to continue to grow our loan origination volume, and we may be forced to accept lower margins in order to continue to compete and keep our volume of activity consistent with past or projected levels.
We believe that the principal factors that generally determine competitive advantage within our market include:
•ease and quickness of the loan application, underwriting and approval processes;
•overall customer experience, including transparency throughout each step of the transaction;
•brand recognition and trust;
•product selection; and
•effectiveness of customer acquisition.
We believe we compete favorably on the basis of our proprietary technology, diversified customer acquisition model and origination channels, scale, brand, and broad suite of products. We have significantly increased our originations market share from 1.0% in 2014 to 3.4% for the year ended December 31, 20211 and our strong consumer brand and proprietary technology platform have positioned us to continue gaining additional share.
Supervision and Regulation
We describe below the material elements of the regulatory and supervisory framework applicable to us. Statutes, regulations and policies that affect mortgage lending and servicing are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies, and a change in them, including changes in how they are interpreted or implemented, could have a material effect on our business. The regulatory and supervisory framework applicable to originators, lenders and facilitators in the mortgage loan markets is generally intended to protect consumers and not investors in such companies.
Supervision and Enforcement
Because we are not a depository institution, we generally do not benefit from federal preemption of state mortgage lending, loan servicing or debt collection licensing and regulatory requirements. Accordingly, we must comply with state licensing requirements in all of the states in which we conduct business. We are licensed as a loan originator in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and also are licensed as a loan servicer and loan broker in a number of states and jurisdictions in which such licenses are required. We are also subject to an extensive framework of state laws in the jurisdictions in which we do business, and to periodic audits and examinations conducted by the state regulators to ensure compliance with those laws. From time to time, we receive requests from state regulators and other agencies for records, documents and information regarding our policies, procedures and practices related to our loan origination, loan facilitation, loan servicing and debt collection operations. State attorneys general, state licensing regulators, and state and local consumer protection offices have authority to investigate
1 Total market originations based on data as of February 2022, from the Mortgage Bankers Association.
8
consumer complaints and to commence investigations and other formal and informal proceedings regarding our operations and activities.
We are also subject to supervision and enforcement activity by federal government entities. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB was established in 2011 to ensure, among other things, that consumers receive clear and accurate disclosures regarding financial products and to protect consumers from hidden fees and unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices. The CFPB has broad supervisory and enforcement powers with regard to nonbanking companies, such as us, that engage in the origination and servicing of mortgage loans. As an approved originator and servicer of loans that are guaranteed by FHA and VA and loans that are sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, our operations also may be reviewed by these, and other, entities with whom we do business. We are also subject to oversight by the Federal Trade Commission, HUD and FHFA.
Federal, State and Local Regulation
Our business is highly regulated. Regulatory and legal requirements are subject to change and may become more restrictive, making our compliance more complex or expensive or otherwise restricting our ability to conduct our business as it is now conducted. Changes in these regulatory and legal requirements, including changes in their enforcement, could materially and adversely affect our business and our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. We are subject to extensive federal laws and regulations as well as to numerous state-specific laws and regulations. We are also subject to judicial and administrative decisions that impose requirements and restrictions on our business.
The U.S. federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations to which we are subject, among other things:
•limit certain practices related to loan officer compensation;
•impose licensing obligations and financial requirements on us;
•limit the interest rates, finance charges and other fees that we may charge or pay;
•regulate the use of credit reports and the reporting of credit information;
•impose underwriting requirements;
•mandate disclosures and notices to consumers;
•mandate maintenance and retention of loan records;
•mandate the collection and reporting of statistical data regarding applications for, originations of and purchases of mortgage loans;
•regulate any direct consumer marketing techniques and practices;
•require us to safeguard public and non-public information about our customers and regulate the sharing of such non-public personal information with third parties and affiliates;
•regulate our privacy and cybersecurity obligations;
•regulate our servicing practices, including but not limited to collection and foreclosure practices, the manner and timing for responding to consumer complaints, and the administration of escrow accounts;
•require us to take precautions against money-laundering and doing business with certain government-designated parties, such as suspected terrorists and parties engaged in narcotics trafficking;
•regulate the method by which appraisals are ordered and reviewed and our interaction with appraisers; and
•mandate the terms and conditions under which we must offer and approve loan modification programs for our servicing customers.
In particular, we are required to comply with:
•Title V of the GLBA and Regulation P, which requires initial and periodic communication with consumers on privacy matters and the maintenance of privacy regarding certain consumer data in our possession;
•the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), which regulates the timing and content of communications on debt collections;
•the TILA and Regulation Z, which, in conjunction with the RESPA under the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure Rule, require certain disclosures be made to mortgagors regarding terms of mortgage financing, including but not limited to information designed to promote consumer understanding of the cost of a loan, expressed in terms of an annual percentage rate, and other credit terms including the disclosure of the number, amount and due dates or periods of scheduled repayments; TILA and Regulation Z also include the rules on loan officer compensation, require special disclosures and treatment for certain high-cost loans, require certain disclosures in connection with the servicing, assumption or refinancing of mortgage loans, provide for consumers’ right to rescind loans under certain circumstances, contain rules with respect to the ordering and review of appraisals and interaction with appraisers, and
9
provide rules requiring a determination of the consumer’s ability to repay certain mortgage loans and providing either a safe harbor or rebuttable presumption of compliance for certain qualified mortgage loans;
•the FCRA and Regulation V, which collectively regulate the use and reporting of information related to the credit history of consumers and provides a national legal standard for lenders in sharing information with affiliates and certain third parties and in providing firm offers of credit to consumers;
•the ECOA and Regulation B, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of age, race and certain other characteristics in the extension of credit and requires that in certain circumstances, creditors provide appraisal-related disclosures and copies of appraisals to borrowers;
•the Homeowners Protection Act, which requires the cancellation of mortgage insurance once certain equity levels are reached;
•the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and Regulation C, which require public reporting of certain loan data;
•the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, sex, national origin, and certain other characteristics;
•the SCRA, which provides certain legal protections and relief to members of the military;
•RESPA and Regulation X, which governs the actions of servicers related to escrow accounts, transfers, and other customer communications, and prohibits certain practices, such as giving or accepting a fee, kickback, or anything of value in exchange for referrals of settlement service business;
•Regulation AB under the Securities Act, which requires registration, reporting and disclosure for MBS;
•the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act, commonly known as the SAFE Act, which is designed to enhance consumer protection and reduce fraud by requiring states to establish minimum standards for the licensing and registration of state licensed mortgage loan originators;
•the CCPA, which provides California consumers with new privacy rights and increases the privacy and security obligations of entities handling certain personal information of such consumers;
•the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which prohibits telemarketers, banks, debt collectors, and other companies from using an automatic dialer or robocalls to call people either at home or on their cell phones without their consent;
•Dodd-Frank Act provisions prohibiting unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices; and
•certain other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, which, as discussed elsewhere, is extensive in scope and authorizes the CFPB to engage in rulemaking activity and to enforce compliance with federal consumer financial laws, including TILA, RESPA, and the FDCPA.
In addition, various federal, state and local laws have been enacted that are designed to discourage predatory lending and servicing practices. HOEPA, which amended TILA, in particular prohibits inclusion of certain provisions in residential loans that have mortgage rates or origination costs in excess of prescribed levels and requires that borrowers be given certain disclosures prior to origination. The Dodd-Frank Act amended HOEPA to enhance its protections. Some states have enacted, or may enact, similar laws or regulations, which in some cases impose restrictions and requirements greater than those in HOEPA. Also, under the anti-predatory lending laws of some states, the origination of certain residential loans, including loans that are not classified as “high cost” loans under applicable law, must satisfy a net tangible benefits test with respect to the related borrower. This test may be highly subjective and open to interpretation. As a result, a court may determine that a residential loan, for example, does not meet the test even if the related originator reasonably believed that the test was satisfied. Failure of residential loan originators or servicers to comply with these laws, to the extent any of their residential loans are or become part of our mortgaged-related assets, could subject us, as a servicer or as an assignee or purchaser, in the case of acquired loans, to monetary penalties and could result in the borrowers rescinding the affected residential loans. Lawsuits have been brought in various states making claims against originators, servicers, assignees and purchasers of high cost loans for violations of state law. Named defendants in these cases have included numerous participants within the secondary mortgage market. If our loans are found to have been originated in violation of predatory or abusive lending laws, we could incur losses, which could materially and adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and business.
We are subject to compliance with the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (commonly known as the PATRIOT Act), which is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. law enforcement agencies and intelligence communities to work together to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts, and are required to establish anti-money laundering programs and file suspicious activity reports under the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970.
Some states have special rules that govern mortgage loan servicing practices, such as California’s Homeowner’s Bill or Rights. Failure to comply with these rules can result in delays or rescission of foreclosure, and subject the servicer to penalties and damages.
10
Other Laws
We are subject to various other laws, including employment laws related to hiring practices and termination of employees, health and safety laws, environmental laws and other federal, state and local laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate.
Human Capital
Our People As of December 31, 2021, we had 11,307 employees, all of whom are based in the United States. As of December 31, 2021, we also employed 2,226 full-time contractors. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we consider our employee relations to be good. As of December 31, 2021, our workforce was 54.5% female and 45.5% male, and the ethnicity of our workforce was 54.9% White, 18.8% Hispanic or Latino, 11.4% Black or African American, 9.8% Asian and 5.0% other (which includes American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and “Two or More Races”).
Diversity & Inclusion We achieve success by serving a diverse customer base and recruiting employees of all backgrounds and from across the globe. We believe diversity & inclusion to be essential to our success and remain committed to maintaining such a focus in our hiring and retention efforts. In order to successfully achieve these goals we have worked to educate employees and leadership on these essential topics. Our efforts include mandated harassment prevention training for employees and managers that meet the guidelines of various state requirements in which we operate. In addition, all newly hired or promoted managers are invited to manager sessions that incorporate a few of our core values including, ethics and integrity, taking care of our people, and excellence. As part of our Diversity strategy, we include a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Index on our employee engagement survey. Our team members currently respond 84% favorable, which exceeds the benchmark of 77% favorable. We are particularly proud that 88% of employees respond favorably to “All employees, regardless of their differences, are treated fairly,” compared to the benchmark of 73%.
Training and Development Our business relies on delighting our customers with a seamless mortgage experience. To do this successfully requires that our employees are armed with best-in-class training and development. We thoroughly support our people with a significant amount of ongoing education and proficiency resources. We also operate in highly regulated areas that are subject to licensing requirements, so we offer a robust onboarding training for existing mortgage professionals who join our team. Additionally, we have developed our own new-to-industry training programs that help us scale production roles at the speed of business needs. This is a complete program that escorts an employee from a starting point in lending to their career as a fully licensed professional.
Available Information
loanDepot files annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments of such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Any document loanDepot files may be inspected, without charge, at the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. Information related to the operation of the SEC's public reference room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, through our corporate website at www.investors.loandepot.com, loanDepot provides a hyperlink to a third-party SEC filing website which posts these filings as soon as reasonably practicable, where they can be reviewed without charge. The information found on our website is not a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any other report we file with or furnish to the SEC.
11
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our Class A Common Stock involves risk. You should carefully consider the following risks as well as the other information included in this annual report on Form 10-K and the information incorporated by reference herein before investing in our Class A Common Stock. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, the selected risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or those we currently view to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. In such a case, the trading price of the Class A Common Stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment in our Company. Certain statements below are forward-looking statements. See the information included under the heading "Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information" included elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Summary of Risk Factors
Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary, and other risks that we face, can be found below under the heading “Risk Factors” and should be carefully considered, together with other information in this Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC, before making an investment decision regarding our common stock:
•the COVID-19 pandemic;
•our recent rapid growth;
•our ability to continue to grow and scale our loan production volume;
•the market’s acceptance of our new products, services and enhancements;
•our ability to identify, implement and keep pace with innovation in IT, necessary and appropriate information technology system improvements;
•our ability to successfully promote our brand and retain customers;
•our ability to grow through acquisitions;
•our ability to successfully hedge changes in interest rates;
•our ability to maintain our relationships with our subservicers;
•our ability to build and manage a comprehensive mortgage servicing platform;
•challenges to the MERS system;
•errors in our management’s estimates and judgment decisions in connection with matters that are inherently uncertain, such as fair value determinations;
•the occurrence of a data breach or other failure of our cybersecurity;
•the outcome of legal proceedings to which we are a party;
•our home loan origination revenues are highly dependent on macroeconomic and U.S. residential real estate market conditions;
•changes in federal, state and local laws, as well as changes in regulatory enforcement policies and priorities;
•the multi-class structure of our common stock may adversely affect the trading market for our Class A Common Stock and will limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters;
•our status as a “controlled company” and ability to rely on exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements;
•certain provisions in our certificate of incorporation and our by-laws that may delay or prevent a change of control; and the requirements of being a public company may strain our resources, divert management’s attention and affect our ability to attract and retain qualified board members and officers.
Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic
12
The COVID-19 pandemic poses unique challenges to our business and the effects of the pandemic could adversely impact our ability to originate mortgages, our servicing operations, our liquidity and our employees.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had, and continues to have, a significant impact on the national economy and the communities in which we operate. While the full extent of the pandemic’s effect on the macroeconomic environment has yet to be fully determined and could continue for months or years, we expect that the pandemic and governmental programs created as a response to the pandemic, will continue to affect certain aspects of our business, including the origination of mortgages, our servicing operations, our liquidity and our employees. Although the impact of COVID-19 on our business has been immaterial so far, such effects, if they continue for a prolonged period, may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operation.
Our origination of mortgages business was immaterially impacted at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, future growth is uncertain. If the COVID-19 pandemic leads to a prolonged economic downturn with sustained high unemployment rates, we anticipate that the number of real estate transactions may decrease. Any such slowdown may materially impact the number and volume of mortgages we originate.
Our liquidity may be adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We fund substantially all of the mortgage loans we close through borrowings under our loan funding facilities. Given the broad impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial markets, our future ability to borrow money to fund our current and future loan production may be adversely impacted. Our mortgage origination liquidity could also be affected as our lenders reassess their exposure to the mortgage origination industry and either curtail access to uncommitted warehouse lines capacity or impose higher costs to access such capacity. Our liquidity may be further constrained as there may be less demand by investors to acquire our mortgage loans in the secondary market. Even if such demand exists, we may face a substantially higher repurchase risk as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic stemming from our clients’ inability to repay the underlying loans. Finally, the development and widespread availability of vaccines has permitted a limited return to the office which could be undermined by new vaccine-resistant COVID-19 variants.
To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business, operations, financial condition and operating results, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this section.
The federal and state executive, legislative and regulatory reaction to COVID-19 poses new and quickly evolving compliance obligations on our business, and we may experience unfavorable changes in existing or future regulations and laws adopted in response to COVID-19.
Due to the unprecedented pause of major sectors of the U.S. economy from COVID-19, numerous states and the federal government adopted measures requiring mortgage servicers to work with consumers negatively impacted by COVID-19. The CARES Act imposed several new compliance obligations on our mortgage servicing activities, including, but not limited to mandatory forbearance offerings, altered credit reporting obligations, and moratoriums on foreclosure actions. Many states have taken similar measures to provide mortgage payment and other relief to consumers. When consumers are delinquent on loan repayments, servicers of mortgage loans may still be contractually bound to advance monthly payments to investors, insurers and taxing authorities. Given the ongoing nature of the pandemic, consumers may still have difficulty making their mortgage payments, and we may experience increased obligations to advance monthly payments. While Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recently issued guidance limiting the number of payments a servicer must advance in the case of a forbearance, we expect that a borrower who has experienced a loss of employment or a reduction of income will not repay the forborne payments at the end of the forbearance period and may need to find another repayment option. Additionally, we may be prohibited from collecting certain servicing related fees, such as late fees, and initiating foreclosure proceedings.
At the outset of the pandemic, the expedient passage of the CARES Act, and related state and investor laws, regulations and requirements, increased the likelihood of unintended consequences stemming from these changes. An example of such unintended consequences is the liquidity pressure placed on mortgage servicers given our contractual obligation to continue to advance payments to investors on loans in forbearance where consumers are not making their typical monthly mortgage payments. Moreover, certain provisions of the laws, regulations and requirements are subject to interpretation given the existing ambiguities in the legislation, which creates regulatory and litigation risk.
Federal, state, and local executive, legislative and regulatory responses to the COVID-19 pandemic are still evolving, not consistent in scope or application, and subject to change without advance notice, including new forbearance initiatives, and
13
could otherwise revise or create new regulatory requirements that apply to us or increase regulatory enforcement and examination efforts at the loan origination and servicing sectors, impacting our business, operations and profitability.. Such efforts may impose additional compliance obligations, which may negatively impact our mortgage origination and servicing business. Any additional legal or regulatory responses to the COVID-19 pandemic may unfavorably restrict our business operations, alter our established business practices, and otherwise raise our compliance costs.
The current COVID-19 pandemic has increased the risk that mortgage loan servicers will be unable to foreclose upon delinquent borrowers in a timely manner.
On March 27, 2020 former President Trump signed the CARES Act into law. The law includes important, immediate protections for tenants and homeowners. In addition, states and local governments have enacted similar protections for tenants and homeowners. The law included an eviction moratorium that restricts lessors of “covered properties” from filing new eviction actions for non-payment of rent, and also prohibits charging fees, penalties, or other charges to the tenant related to such nonpayment of rent. The federal moratorium also provides that a lessor (of a covered property) may not evict a tenant after the moratorium expires except on 30 days’ notice—which may not be given until after the moratorium period. The eviction moratorium applies to “covered dwellings,” which includes those dwellings on or in “covered properties.” The federal moratorium defines a “covered property” as a property that has a federally backed mortgage loan; or has a federally backed multifamily mortgage loan. The federal eviction moratorium took effect on March 27, 2020 and expired 120 days later. State and local governments have also enacted their own moratoriums on evictions. Some of these moratoriums bar evictions during the “emergency period,” the definition of which can vary based on the city or county or have been extended under certain circumstances into 2022. The GSE’s and HUD have also extended their eviction moratoriums through the end of 2021, and further extensions are possible. Additionally, the law includes provisions restricting the ability of lenders to foreclose on properties for certain periods of time. To the extent that we have originated or are servicing mortgage loans for properties that are covered by any of these moratoriums, the owners of these properties may not be able to receive rent payments from tenants as expected, which may in turn cause these owners to delay or reduce their payments on their mortgage loans.
While the CFPB announced its flexible supervisory and enforcement approach during the COVID-19 pandemic on certain consumer communications required by the mortgage servicing rules, managing to the CFPB’s loss mitigation rules with mounting CARES Act forbearance requests may pose challenges. The intersection of the CFPB’s mortgage servicing rules and the COVID-19 pandemic is evolving and will pose new challenges to the servicing industry. The CFPB’s publication of COVID-19-related FAQs did not resolve potential conflicts between the CARES Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act with respect to reporting of consumer credit information mandated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. There are conflicting interpretations of the CARES Act amendment of the Fair Credit Reporting Act with regards to delinquent loans entering a forbearance.
Risks Related to our Growth Strategy
We have experienced rapid growth, which may be difficult to sustain and which may place significant demands on our operational, administrative and financial resources.
Our substantial growth in loan production and the servicing portfolio has caused, and if it continues will continue to cause, significant demands on our operational, legal, and accounting infrastructure, and will result in increased expenses. In addition, we are required to continuously develop our systems and infrastructure in response to the increasing sophistication of the lending markets and legal, accounting and regulatory developments relating to all of our existing and projected business activities. Our future growth will depend, among other things, on our ability to maintain an operating platform and management system sufficient to address our growth and will require us to incur significant additional expenses and to commit additional senior management and operational resources. As a result, we may face significant challenges in:
•securing funding to maintain our operations and future growth;
•maintaining and improving our loan retention and recapture rates;
•maintaining and scaling adequate financial, business and risk controls;
•implementing new or updated information and financial systems and procedures;
•training, managing and appropriately sizing our work force and other components of our business on a timely and cost-effective basis;
•increasing and maintaining the number of borrowers utilizing our products and services;
14
•increasing the volume of loans originated and facilitated through us;
•entering into new markets and introducing new products;
•continuing to develop, maintain and scale our platform;
•effectively using personnel and technology resources;
•maintaining the security of our platform, systems and infrastructure and the confidentiality of the information (including personally identifiable information) provided and utilized across our platform; and
•attracting, integrating and retaining an appropriate number of qualified employees.
We may not be able to manage our expanding operations effectively to support continued growth, and failure to do so could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and control our expenses.
We may not be able to continue to grow our loan production volume, which could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our loan originations, particularly our refinance mortgage loan volume, are dependent on interest rates and are expected to decline if interest rates increase, which we believe will increase throughout the course of 2022 as the Federal Reserve combats rising inflation. Our loan origination activities are also subject to overall market factors that can impact our ability to grow our loan production volume. For example, increased competition from new and existing market participants, slow growth in the level of new home purchase activity or reductions in the overall level of refinancing activity can impact our ability to continue to grow our loan origination volume, and we may be forced to accept lower margins in order to continue to compete and keep our volume of activity consistent with past or projected levels.
Our mortgage loan originations also depend on the referral-driven nature of the mortgage loan industry. The origination of purchase money mortgage loans is greatly influenced by traditional market participants in the home buying process such as real estate agents and builders. As a result, our ability to maintain existing, and secure new, relationships with such traditional market participants will influence our ability to grow our purchase money mortgage loan volume and, thus, our mobile and local retail originations business. Regulatory developments also limit our ability to enter into marketing services agreements with referral sources, which could adversely impact our ability to grow. In addition, our ability to convert leads into funded loans depends on the pricing that we will be able to offer relative to the pricing of our competitors and our ability to process, underwrite and close loans on a timely basis. Institutions that compete with us in this regard may have significantly greater access to capital or resources than we do, which may give them the benefit of a lower cost of operations.
If new products, services, enhancements or expansions do not achieve sufficient market acceptance or do not result in anticipated efficiencies and revenues, our financial results and competitive position could be harmed.
We have derived substantially all of our revenue from originating, selling and servicing traditional mortgage loans. Efforts to expand into new consumer products, such as insurance, real estate services, or other products consistent with our business purpose, may not succeed and may reduce expected revenue growth. Furthermore, we incur expenses and expend resources upfront to develop, acquire and market new products and platform enhancements to incorporate additional features, improve functionality or otherwise make our products more desirable to consumers. New products and services must achieve high levels of market acceptance in order for us to recoup our investment in developing and bringing them to market. If we are unable to grow our revenues or if our margins become compressed, then our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Recently launched and future products could fail to attain sufficient market acceptance for many reasons, including:
•our failure to predict market demand accurately or to supply products that meet market demand in a timely fashion;
•negative publicity about our products’ performance or effectiveness or our customer experience;
•our ability to obtain financing sources to support such products;
•regulatory hurdles;
•delays in releasing the new products to market; and
•the introduction or anticipated introduction of competing products by our competitors.
If our new and recently launched products do not achieve adequate acceptance in the market, our competitive position, revenue and operating results could be harmed. The adverse effect on our financial results may be particularly acute because of
15
the significant development, marketing, sales and other expenses we will have incurred in connection with the new products or enhancements before such products or enhancements generate sufficient revenue.
In addition, significantly expanding existing business activities or strategies may expose us to new or increased financial, regulatory, reputational and other risks. For example, we are actively increasing our in-house mortgage servicing capabilities, which includes heavily investing in employee recruiting and development, the implementation of new technologies and new control processes to manage the increased risk and regulatory requirements. We cannot be certain that we will be able to manage the associated costs, risks and compliance requirements of expanding our in-house mortgage servicing capabilities in accordance with our expectations. Such risks include a lack of experienced management-level personnel, increased administrative burden, increased logistical problems common to large, expansive operations, increased credit and liquidity risk and increased regulatory scrutiny. If our expansion efforts are not implemented effectively, any revenues we earn from any new or expanded business initiative or strategy may not be sufficient to offset the initial and ongoing costs of that initiative, which would result in a loss with respect to that initiative, strategy or acquisition.
The success and growth of our business will depend upon our ability to adapt to and implement technological changes.
We rely on our proprietary technology to make our platform available to clients, evaluate loan applicants, service loans, and enable greater operational efficiency. In addition, we may increasingly rely on technological innovation as we introduce new products, expand our current products into new markets and continue to streamline various loan-related and lending processes. The process of developing new technologies and products is complex, and if we are unable to successfully innovate and continue to deliver a superior client experience, the demand for our products and services may decrease our growth and operational costs may increase. Further, the failure of certain technological enhancements to reduce our cost of production could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.
All of our loan distribution channels are dependent upon technological advancement, such as our ability to process applications over the internet, accept electronic signatures, provide process status updates instantly and other conveniences expected by borrowers and counterparties. We must ensure that our technology facilitates a borrower experience that equals or exceeds the borrower experience provided by our competitors. Maintaining and improving this technology requires significant capital expenditures. To the extent we are dependent on any particular technology or technological solution, we may be harmed if such technology or technological solution becomes non-compliant with existing industry standards, fails to meet or exceed the capabilities of our competitors’ equivalent technologies or technological solutions, becomes increasingly expensive to service, retain and update, becomes subject to third-party claims of intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other violation, or malfunctions or functions in a way we did not anticipate that results in loan defects potentially requiring repurchase and increased operational expense. Additionally, new technologies and technological solutions are continually being released. As such, it is difficult to predict the problems we may encounter in improving our technologies’ functionality. We may not be able to successfully adopt new technology as critical systems and applications become obsolete and better ones become available. Additionally, if we fail to develop our technologies to respond to technological developments and changing borrower needs in a cost-effective manner, or fail to acquire, integrate or interface with third-party technologies effectively, we may experience disruptions in our operations, lose market share or incur substantial costs. As these requirements increase in the future, we will have to fully develop these technological capabilities to remain competitive and any failure to do so could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to promote and maintain our brands in a cost-effective manner, or if we experience negative publicity, we may lose market share and our revenue may decrease.
We believe that developing and maintaining awareness of our brands in a cost-effective manner is critical to attracting new and retaining existing consumers. Successful promotion of our brands will depend largely on the effectiveness of our marketing efforts and the experience of our consumers. Our efforts to build our brands have involved significant expense, and our future marketing efforts will require us to maintain or incur significant additional expense. These brand promotion activities may not result in increased revenue and, even if they do, any increases may not offset the expenses incurred. If we fail to successfully promote and maintain our brands or if we incur substantial expenses in an unsuccessful attempt to promote and maintain our brands, we may lose our existing consumers to our competitors or be unable to attract new consumers.
Additionally, reputational risk, or the risk to our business, results of operation and financial condition from negative public opinion, is inherent in our business. Negative public opinion can result from actual or alleged conduct by our employees or representatives in any number of activities, including lending and debt collection practices, marketing and promotion
16
practices, corporate governance and actions taken by government regulators and community organizations in response to those activities. Negative public opinion can also result from media coverage, whether accurate or not.
In recent years, consumer advocacy groups and some media reports have advocated governmental action to prohibit or place severe restrictions on non-bank lenders. If the negative characterization of independent mortgage loan originators becomes increasingly accepted by consumers, demand for any or all of our mortgage loan products could significantly decrease. Additionally, if the negative characterization of independent mortgage loan originators is accepted by legislators and regulators, we could become subject to more restrictive laws and regulations applicable to mortgage loan products.
In addition, our ability to attract and retain customers is highly dependent upon the external perceptions of our level of service, trustworthiness, business practices, financial condition and other subjective qualities. Negative perceptions or publicity regarding these matters—even if related to isolated incidents or to practices not specific to the origination or servicing of loans, such as debt collection—could erode trust and confidence and damage our reputation among existing and potential customers. In turn, this could decrease the demand for our products, increase regulatory scrutiny and detrimentally effect our business.
We may grow by making acquisitions, and we may not be able to identify or consummate acquisitions or otherwise manage our growth effectively.
Part of our growth strategy has included acquisitions, and we may acquire additional companies or businesses. We may not be successful in identifying origination platforms or businesses, or other businesses that meet our acquisition criteria in the future. In addition, even after a potential acquisition target has been identified, we may not be successful in completing or integrating the acquisition. We face significant competition for attractive acquisition opportunities from other well-capitalized companies, who may have greater financial resources and a greater access to debt and equity capital to secure and complete acquisitions than we do. As a result of such competition, we may be unable to acquire certain assets or businesses that we deem attractive or the purchase price may be significantly elevated or other terms may be substantially more onerous. Any delay or failure on our part to identify, negotiate, finance on favorable terms, consummate and integrate such acquisitions could impede our growth.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to manage our expanding operations effectively or that we will be able to continue to grow, and any failure to do so could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and control our expenses. Furthermore, we may be responsible for any legacy liabilities of businesses we acquire. The existence or amount of these liabilities may not be known at the time of acquisition and may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
We may not be able to retain loans from customers who refinance.
One of the focuses of our origination efforts is retention, which involves actively working with existing customers to refinance their mortgage loans with us instead of another residential mortgage originator of mortgage loans. Customers who refinance have no obligation to refinance their loans with us and may choose to refinance with a competitor. Additionally, we may elect not to refinance an existing customer’s mortgage loan due to a number of reasons, including the customer’s inability to meet our eligibility requirements. If customers refinance with a competitor, this decreases the profitability of our retained servicing portfolio because the original loan will be repaid prematurely, and we will not have an opportunity to earn further servicing fees after the original loan is repaid. Moreover, retention allows us to generate additional loan servicing more cost-effectively than MSRs acquired on the open market. If we are not successful in retaining our existing loans that are refinanced, our servicing portfolio will become increasingly subject to run-off, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow.
Risks Related to our Operations
Our hedging strategies may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with changes in interest rates.
Our profitability is directly affected by the level of, and changes in, interest rates. The market value of closed LHFS and IRLCs generally decline as interest rates rise and increase when interest rates fall. Changes in interest rates could also lead to increased prepayment rates, which could materially and adversely affect the value of our MSRs. Historically, the value of MSRs has increased when interest rates rise as higher interest rates lead to decreased prepayment rates and have decreased
17
when interest rates decline as lower interest rates lead to increased prepayment rates. As a result, large moves and substantial volatility in interest rates materially affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
We employ various economic hedging strategies that utilize derivative instruments to mitigate the interest rate and fall-out risks that are inherent in many of our assets, including our IRLCs, our LHFS and our MSRs. Our derivative instruments, which currently consist of IRLCs, forward sale contracts, interest rate swap futures, and put options on treasuries are accounted for as free-standing derivatives and are included on our consolidated balance sheet at fair market value. Our operating results may suffer because losses on derivatives we enter into may not be offset by changes in the fair value of the related hedged transaction.
Our hedging strategies may also require us to post cash or collateral margin to our hedging counterparties. The level of cash or collateral that is required to be posted is largely driven by the mark to market of our derivative instruments. The exchange of margin with our hedging counterparties could under certain market conditions, adversely affect our short-term liquidity position.
Some of our derivatives (forward sale contracts and to be announced mortgage-backed-securities, “TBA MBS”) are not traded on a regulated exchange with a central clearinghouse that determines the margin requirements and offers protection against a lack of performance by individual market participants. This exposes us to the risk that a counterparty may not be able to post margin or otherwise perform on the terms of the contract. This failure could adversely affect our liquidity position and have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Our hedging activities in the future may include entering into interest rate swaps and/or purchasing caps and floors. Our hedging decisions in the future will be determined in light of the facts and circumstances existing at the time and may differ from our current hedging strategy. Moreover, our hedging strategies may not be effective in mitigating the risks related to changes in interest rates and could affect our profitability and financial condition. Poorly designed strategies or improperly executed transactions could increase our risk and losses.
We rely on internal models to manage risk and to make business decisions. Our business could be adversely affected if those models fail to produce reliable and/or valid results.
We make significant use of business and financial models in connection with our proprietary technology to measure and monitor our risk exposures and to manage our business. For example, we use models to measure and monitor our exposures to interest rate, credit and other market risks. The information provided by these models is used in making business decisions relating to strategies, initiatives, transactions, pricing and products. If these models are ineffective at predicting future losses or are otherwise inadequate, we may incur unexpected losses or otherwise be adversely affected.
We build these models using historical data and assumptions about factors such as future mortgage loan demand, default rates, home price trends and other factors that may overstate or understate future experience. Our assumptions may be inaccurate and our models may not be as predictive as expected for many reasons, including the fact that they often involve matters that are beyond our control and difficult to predict, such as macroeconomic conditions, and that they often involve complex interactions between a number of variables and factors.
Our models could produce unreliable results for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to, the limitations of historical data to predict results due to unprecedented events or circumstances, invalid or incorrect assumptions underlying the models, the need for manual adjustments in response to rapid changes in economic conditions, incorrect coding of the models, incorrect data being used by the models, or inappropriate application of a model to products or events outside of the model’s intended use. In particular, models are less dependable when the economic environment is outside of historical experience, as was the case from 2008-2010 or during the present COVID-19 pandemic.
We continue to monitor the markets and make necessary adjustments to our models and apply appropriate management judgment in the interpretation and adjustment of the results produced by our models. This process takes into account updated information while maintaining controlled processes for model updates, including model development, testing, independent validation and implementation. As a result of the time and resources, including technical and staffing resources, that are required to perform these processes effectively, it may not be possible to replace existing models quickly enough to ensure that they will always properly account for the impacts of recent information and actions.
18
The geographic concentration of our loan originations may adversely affect our retail lending business, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
A substantial portion of our aggregate mortgage loan origination is secured by properties concentrated in the states of California, Florida, and Texas, and properties securing a substantial portion of our outstanding UPB of mortgage loan servicing rights portfolio are located in California, Florida, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and New York. During the global financial crisis of 2007-2008 (the “Financial Crisis”), the states of California and Florida experienced severe declines in property values and a disproportionately high rate of delinquencies and foreclosures relative to other states. To the extent that the states of California, Florida, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and New York experience weaker economic conditions or greater rates of decline in real estate values than the United States generally, the concentration of loans that we service in those states may decrease the value of our servicing rights and adversely affect our retail lending business. The impact of property value declines may increase in magnitude and it may continue for a long period of time. Additionally, if states in which we have greater concentrations of business were to change their licensing or other regulatory requirements to make our business cost-prohibitive, we may be required to stop doing business in those states or may be subject to a higher cost of doing business in those states, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be required to indemnify the purchasers of loans that we originate (including securitization trusts), or repurchase those loans, if those loans fail to meet certain criteria or characteristics or under other circumstances.
Our contracts with purchasers of mortgage loans that we originate, including the GSEs and other financial institutions that purchase mortgage loans for investor or private label securitization, and the agreements for securitization transactions for which we act as the securitizer, contain provisions that require us to indemnify the related securitization trust or the purchaser of the mortgage loans or to repurchase the mortgage loans under certain circumstances. We also pool FHA-insured and VA-guaranteed mortgage loans, which back securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae. While our contracts vary, they generally contain provisions that require us to indemnify these parties, or repurchase these mortgage loans, if:
•our representations and warranties concerning mortgage loan quality and mortgage loan characteristics are inaccurate or are otherwise breached and not remedied within any applicable cure period (usually 90 days or less) after we receive notice of the breach;
•we fail to secure adequate mortgage insurance within a certain period after closing of the applicable mortgage loan;
•a mortgage insurance provider denies coverage;
•if the borrower defaults on the on the loan payments within a contractually defined period (early payment default);
•if the borrower prepays the mortgage loan within a contractually defined period (early payoff); or
•the mortgage loans fail to comply with underwriting or regulatory requirements.
We believe that, as a result of the current market environment, many purchasers of mortgage loans are particularly aware of the conditions under which mortgage loan originators or sellers must indemnify them against losses related to purchased mortgage loans, or repurchase those mortgage loans, and would benefit from enforcing any repurchase remedies they may have.
Repurchased loans typically can only be resold at a discount to their repurchase price. They are also typically sold at a discount to the UPB. To recognize these potential indemnification and repurchase losses, we have recorded estimated loan repurchase reserves of $29.9 million and $33.6 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Our liability for repurchase losses is assessed quarterly. Although not all mortgage loans repurchased are in arrears or default, as a practical matter most have been. Factors that we consider in evaluating our reserve for such losses include default expectations, expected investor repurchase demands (influenced by, among other things, current and expected mortgage loan file requests and mortgage loan insurance rescission notices) and appeals success rates (where the investor rescinds the demand based on a cure of the defect or acknowledges that the mortgage loan satisfies the investor’s applicable representations and warranties), reimbursement by third-party originators and projected loss severity. Also, although we re-evaluate our reserves for repurchase losses each quarter, evaluations of that sort necessarily are estimates and there remains a risk that the reserves will not be adequate.
Additionally, if home values decrease, our realized mortgage loan losses from mortgage loan indemnifications and repurchases may increase. As such, our indemnification and repurchase costs may increase beyond our current expectations. If we are required to indemnify the GSEs or other purchasers against loan losses, or repurchase loans, that result in losses that exceed our reserve, this could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
19
Additionally, we may not be able to recover amounts from some third parties, such as brokers through our wholesale channel, from whom we may seek indemnification or against whom we may assert a loan repurchase demand in connection with a breach of a representation or warranty due to financial difficulties or otherwise. As a result, we are exposed to counterparty risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to our various contracts, including, without limitation, as a result of the rejection of an agreement or transaction in bankruptcy proceedings, which could result in substantial losses for which we may not have insurance coverage.
If the value of the collateral underlying certain of our loan funding facilities decreases, we could be required to satisfy a margin call, and an unanticipated margin call could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.
Certain of our loan funding and MSR-backed facilities are subject to margin calls based on the lender’s opinion of the value of the loan collateral securing such financing. In addition, certain of our hedges related to newly originated mortgages are also subject to margin calls. A margin call would require us to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings. A large, unanticipated margin call could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity. As a result of the change in the interest rate market due to stimulus, interest rate and inflation uncertainty, we have faced some margin calls on hedges and may face additional margin calls in the future. To date these calls have not been material, and we regularly stress test our positions, but if the interest rate market experiences significant volatility, we could face additional margin calls that could impact our liquidity.
Our servicing rights are highly volatile assets with continually changing values, and these changes in value, or inaccuracies in our estimates of their value, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The value of our servicing rights is based on the cash flows projected to result from the servicing of the related loans and continually fluctuates due to a number of factors. Our servicing portfolio is subject to “run off,” meaning that loans serviced by us (or our subservicer) may be prepaid prior to maturity, refinanced with a loan not serviced by us or liquidated through foreclosure, deed-in-lieu of foreclosure or other liquidation process or repaid through standard amortization of principal. As a result, our ability to maintain the size of our servicing portfolio depends on our ability to originate additional mortgages. In determining the value for our servicing rights and subservicing agreement, management makes certain assumptions, many of which are beyond our control, including, among other things:
•the speed of prepayment and repayment within the underlying pools of loans;
•projected and actual rates of delinquencies, defaults and liquidations;
•future interest rates and other market conditions;
•our cost to service the loans;
•ancillary fee income; and
•amounts of future servicing advances.
We use external, third-party valuations that utilize market participant data to value our servicing rights for purposes of financial reporting. We also benchmark these valuations to internal financial models. These models are complex and use asset-specific collateral data and market inputs for interest and discount rates. In addition, the modeling requirements of servicing rights are complex because of the high number of variables that drive cash flows associated with servicing rights. Even if the general accuracy of our valuation models is validated, valuations are highly dependent upon the reasonableness of the assumptions and the results of the models utilized in such valuations.
If loan delinquencies or prepayment speeds are higher than anticipated or other factors perform worse than modeled, the recorded value of our servicing rights would decrease, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
The failure of our subservicer to effectively service our portfolio of MSRs and mortgage loans and other loan products, or effectively transfer the servicing of our portfolio of MSRs, mortgage loans and other loan products, would materially and adversely affect us.
Although we have historically relied on our subservicer, Cenlar FSB (“Cenlar”), in March 2021, we started the process to move from an interim servicer to a full-service servicer. As of December 31, 2021, Cenlar subservices approximately 58% of our portfolio of MSRs and our mortgage loans, down from 100% as of December 31, 2020. For the duration that Cenlar subservices our mortgage loans, Cenlar’s ability to effectively service our portfolio of mortgage loans is critical to our success,
20
the requirement to execute initiatives and programs focused on keeping borrowers in their homes, or in the case of nonperforming loans, effectively liquidate properties in a timely, orderly and economically efficient manner. Notably, Cenlar recently entered into a consent order with its regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, regarding an alleged failure to establish effective controls and risk management practices related to its mortgage servicing and subservicing activities. There are a number of factors out of our control that can negatively impact Cenlar’s ability to effectively service our portfolio and to satisfy their contractual obligations to us. These include both intentional actions Cenlar takes in running their businesses such as management of staffing levels and the number of customers serviced, and the occurrence of external events, including, but not limited to regulatory changes, enforcement actions, and natural disasters that may negatively impact the performance of our subservicers. The failure of Cenlar to effectively service our portfolio of MSRs could result in ineligibility to sell loans to the Agencies, issue Agency MBS, and defaults and cross-defaults under our financing arrangements, all of which would adversely impact our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. Cenlar’s ability to effectively service our portfolio could also be impacted by the terms of its recent consent order. Finally, if we continue to engage or onboard a new subservicer for any of our operations, we may not have direct control over the performance of those operations and compliance with applicable rules and regulations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our transition to in-house servicing of loans may increase operational and compliance costs as we become directly responsible for complying with regulatory requirements.
Our transition from an outsourcing model to the servicing of loans in-house would mean that we are more directly responsible for complying with guidelines set forth by the Agencies. Failure to meet stipulations of servicing guidelines can result in the assessment of fines and loss of reimbursement of loan-related advances, expenses, interest and servicing fees. When the subservicing of a loan is transferred to the Company to be serviced in-house, the loan may have been previously serviced in a manner that will contribute towards our not meeting certain servicing guidelines. If not recovered from a prior servicer, such event could lead to the eventual realization of a loss to us. As we continue to decrease utilizing Cenlar as a subservicer, the increased regulatory scrutiny, potential operational disruptions, and executions risks associated with such a transition could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are required to make servicing advances that can be subject to delays in recovery or, to a lesser extent, may not be recoverable in certain circumstances, which could adversely affect our liquidity, business, financial condition and results of operations.
For mortgage loans, during any period in which a borrower is not making payments, we are required under most of our servicing agreements in respect of our servicing rights to advance our own funds to meet contractual principal and interest remittance requirements for investors, pay property taxes and insurance premiums, legal expenses and other protective advances. We also advance funds under these agreements to maintain, repair and market real estate properties on behalf of investors. As home values change, we may have to reconsider certain of the assumptions underlying our decisions to make advances. In addition, if a mortgage loan serviced by us is in default or becomes delinquent, the repayment to us of the advance may be delayed until the mortgage loan is repaid or refinanced or foreclosure or a liquidation occurs. If we receive requests for advances in excess of amounts that we are able to fund at that time, we may not be able to fund these advance requests, which could materially and adversely affect our mortgage loan servicing activities and our status as an approved servicer by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and result in our termination as an issuer and approved servicer by Ginnie Mae. A delay in our ability to collect an advance may adversely affect our liquidity, and our inability to be reimbursed for an advance could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. As our servicing portfolio continues to age, defaults might increase as the loans get older, which may increase our costs of servicing and could be detrimental to our business. Market disruptions such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the response by the CARES Act, and the GSEs, through which a temporary period of forbearance is being offered for customers unable to pay on certain mortgage loans as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic may also increase the number of defaults, delinquencies or forbearances related to the loans we service, increasing the advances we make for such loans. With specific regard to the COVID-19 pandemic, any regulatory or GSE-specific relief on servicing advance obligations provided to mortgage loan servicers has so far been limited to GSE-eligible mortgage loans, leaving out any non-GSE mortgage loan products such as jumbo mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2021, 0.6%, or $1.0 billion UPB, of our servicing portfolio was in active forbearance.
With delinquent VA guaranteed loans, the VA guarantee may not make us whole on losses or advances we may have made on the loan. If the VA determines the amount of the guarantee payment will be less than the cost of acquiring the property, it may elect to pay the VA guarantee and leave the property securing the loan with us (a “VA no-bid”). If we cannot
21
sell the property for a sufficient amount to cover amounts outstanding on the loan we will suffer a loss which may, on an aggregate basis and if the percentage of VA no-bids increases, have a detrimental impact on our business and financial condition.
In addition, for certain loans securitized in accordance with Ginnie Mae guidelines, we, as the servicer, have the unilateral right to repurchase any individual loan in a Ginnie Mae securitization pool if that loan meets defined criteria, including being delinquent greater than 90 days. Once we have the unilateral right to repurchase the delinquent loan, we have effectively regained control over the loan and we must recognize the loan on our balance sheet and recognize a corresponding financial liability. Any significant increase in required servicing advances or delinquent loan repurchases, could have a significant adverse impact on our cash flows, even if they are reimbursable, and could also have a detrimental effect on our business and financial condition.
Our counterparties may terminate our servicing rights, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The owners of the mortgage loans (including securitization trusts) for which we have retained servicing rights, may, under certain circumstances, terminate our right to service the mortgage loans. As is standard in the industry, under the terms of our master servicing agreements with the GSEs in respect of the servicing rights for mortgage loans that we retain, the GSEs have the right to terminate us as servicer of the mortgage loans we service on their behalf at any time (and, in certain instances, without the payment of any termination fee) and also have the right to cause us to sell the servicing rights to a third-party. In addition, failure to comply with servicing standards could result in termination of our agreements with the GSEs with little or no notice and without any compensation. Currently, a subservicer performs the servicing activities on the mortgage loans underlying our servicing rights portfolio. However, we are responsible to the GSEs that own the underlying loans for such activities. Consequently, in the event of a default by our subservicer, the GSE could terminate our servicing rights or require that our servicing rights be transferred to another subservicer.
Adverse actions by Ginnie Mae could materially and adversely impact our business, reputation, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations, including if Ginnie Mae were to terminate us as an issuer or servicer of Ginnie Mae loans or otherwise take action indicating that such a termination was planned. For example, such actions could make financing our business more difficult, including by making future financing more expensive or, if a lender were to allege a default under our debt agreements, could trigger cross-defaults under all our other material debt agreements. See “—Changes in GSE or Ginnie Mae selling and/or servicing guidelines could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.”
If we were to have our servicing rights terminated on a material portion of our servicing portfolio, the value of our servicing rights could be reduced or, potentially, eliminated entirely and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our servicing rights portfolio may experience unanticipated increased delinquencies and defaults as it ages, which may adversely affect our business and financial condition.
With respect to mortgage loans, the likelihood of delinquencies and defaults, and the associated risks to our business, including higher costs to service such mortgage loans and a greater risk that we may incur losses due to repurchase or indemnification demands, may change as mortgage loans season, or increase in age. Newly originated mortgage loans typically exhibit low delinquency and default rates as the changes in economic conditions, individual financial circumstances and other factors that drive borrower delinquency often do not appear for months or years. As a result, we expect the delinquency rate and defaults of the loans underlying the servicing rights portfolio to increase in future periods as the portfolio seasons, but we may not accurately predict the magnitude of this impact on our results of operations. In addition, it may be difficult to compare our business to our mortgage loan originator competitors. Such competitors may have better ability to model delinquency and default risk and may have a better ability than we do in establishing appropriate loss reserves based on their longer operating histories. Any inadequacy of our loss reserves established for delinquencies and defaults may result in future financial restatements or other adverse events.
We may incur increased costs and related losses if a borrower challenges the validity of a foreclosure action on a mortgage loan or if a court overturns a foreclosure, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
22
We may incur costs if we are required to, or if we elect to, execute or re-file documents or take other action in our capacity as a servicer in connection with pending or completed foreclosures on mortgage loans. We may incur litigation costs if the validity of a foreclosure action is challenged by a borrower. If a court overturns a foreclosure because of errors or deficiencies in the foreclosure process, we may have liability to a title insurer or the purchaser of the property sold in foreclosure. These costs and liabilities may not be legally or otherwise reimbursable to us, particularly to the extent they relate to securitized mortgage loans. In addition, if certain documents required for a foreclosure action are missing or defective, we could be obligated to cure the defect or repurchase the mortgage loan. A significant increase in litigation costs could adversely affect our liquidity, and our inability to be reimbursed for an advance could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also incur the aforementioned costs and liabilities to the extent that they may be incurred by our subservicer under certain circumstances.
We rely on joint ventures with industry partners through which we originate mortgage loans. If any of these joint ventures are terminated, our revenues could decline.
We are party to joint ventures, with partners such as home builders and real estate brokers, and the termination of any of these joint ventures (including as a result of one of our partners exiting the industry or the formation of a joint venture with another lender), or a decline in the activity of the building industry generally, could cause revenue from loans originated through these joint ventures to decline, which would negatively impact our business.
Challenges to the MERS System could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
MERSCORP, Inc. maintains an electronic registry, referred to as the MERS System, which tracks servicers, ownership of servicing rights and ownership of mortgage loans in the United States. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of MERSCORP, Inc., can serve as a nominee for the owner of a mortgage loan and in that role initiate foreclosures or become the mortgagee of record for the loan in local land records. We and/or our subservicer have in the past and may continue to use MERS as a nominee. The MERS System is widely used by participants in the mortgage finance industry.
Several legal challenges in the courts and by governmental authorities have been made disputing MERS’s legal standing to initiate foreclosures or act as nominee for lenders in mortgages and deeds of trust recorded in local land records. These challenges have focused public attention on MERS and on how mortgage loans are recorded in local land records. Although most legal decisions have accepted MERS as mortgagee, these challenges could result in delays and additional costs in commencing, prosecuting and completing foreclosure proceedings, conducting foreclosure sales of mortgaged properties and submitting proofs of claim in borrower bankruptcy cases.
Finally, borrowers are raising new challenges to the recording of mortgages in the name of MERS, including challenges questioning the ownership and enforceability of mortgage loans registered in MERS. Currently, MERS is the primary defendant in several class action lawsuits in various state jurisdictions, where the plaintiffs allege improper mortgage assignment and the failure to pay recording fees in violation of state recording statutes. The plaintiffs in such actions generally seek to compel defendants to record all assignments, restitution, compensatory and punitive damages, and appropriate attorneys’ fees and costs. An adverse decision in any jurisdiction may delay the foreclosure process in other jurisdictions.
We depend on the accuracy and completeness of information about borrowers and any misrepresented information could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In deciding whether to extend credit or to enter into other transactions with borrowers, we rely on information furnished to us by or on behalf of borrowers, including credit, identification, employment and other relevant information. Some of the information regarding borrowers provided to us is used to determine whether to lend to borrowers and the risk profiles of such borrowers. Such risk profiles are subsequently utilized by warehouse line counterparties who lend us capital to fund mortgage loans. We also may rely on representations of borrowers as to the accuracy and completeness of that information.
While we have a practice of seeking to independently verify some of the borrower information that we use in deciding whether to extend credit or to agree to a loan modification, including, depending on the program, employment, assets, income and credit score, not all borrower information is independently verified, and if any of the information that is independently verified (or any other information considered in the loan review process) is misrepresented and such misrepresentation is not
23
detected prior to loan funding, the value of the loan may be significantly lower than expected. Additionally, there is a risk that, following the date of the credit report that we obtain and review, a borrower may have become delinquent in the payment of an outstanding obligation, defaulted on a pre-existing debt obligation, taken on additional debt, lost his or her job or other sources of income; or sustained other adverse financial events. Whether a misrepresentation is made by the loan applicant, another third-party or one of our employees, we generally bear the risk of loss associated with the misrepresentation. We may not detect all misrepresented information in our mortgage loan originations or from service providers we engage to assist in the loan approval process. Any such misrepresented information could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are also subject to the risk of fraudulent activity associated with the origination of loans. The level of our fraud charge-offs and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if fraudulent activity were to significantly increase. High profile fraudulent activity or significant increases in fraudulent activity could lead to regulatory intervention, increased losses, and negatively impact our operating results, brand and reputation and lead us to take steps to reduce fraud risk, which could increase our costs.
Our underwriting guidelines may not be able to accurately predict the likelihood of defaults on some of the mortgage loans in our portfolio.
We originate and sell Agency-eligible and non-Agency-eligible residential mortgage loans. Agency-eligible loans are underwritten in accordance with guidelines defined by the Agencies, as well as additional requirements in some cases, designed to predict a borrower’s ability and willingness to repay. In spite of these standards, our underwriting guidelines may not always correlate with mortgage loan defaults. For example, FICO scores, which we obtain on a substantial majority of our loans, purport only to be a measurement of the relative degree of risk a borrower represents to a lender (i.e., that a borrower with a higher score is statistically expected to be less likely to default in payment than a borrower with a lower score). While we seek to consider these risks in our reserve assumptions and pricing, underwriting guidelines cannot predict two of the most common reasons for a default on a mortgage loan: loss of employment and serious medical illness. Any increase in default rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Our financial statements are based in part on assumptions and estimates made by our management, including those used in determining the fair values of a substantial portion of our assets. If the assumptions or estimates are subsequently proven incorrect or inaccurate, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
A substantial portion of our assets are recorded at fair value based upon significant estimates and assumptions with changes in fair value included in our consolidated results of operations. The determination of the fair value of our assets involves numerous estimates and assumptions made by our management. Such estimates and assumptions include, without limitation, estimates of future cash flows associated with our servicing rights and derivative assets based upon assumptions involving, among other things, discount rates, prepayment speeds, cost of servicing of the underlying serviced mortgage loans, pull-through rates and direct origination expenses. The use of different estimates or assumptions in connection with the valuation of these assets could produce materially different fair values, or our fair value estimates may not be realized in an actual sale or settlement, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Accounting rules for mortgage loan sales and securitizations, valuations of financial instruments and servicing rights, and other aspects of our operations are highly complex and involve significant judgment and assumptions. For example, we utilize certain assumptions and estimates in preparing our financial statements, including when determining the fair values of certain assets and liabilities and reserves related to mortgage loan representations and warranty claims and to litigation claims and assessments. These complexities and significant assumptions could lead to a delay in the preparation of financial information and also increase the risk of errors and restatements, as well as the cost of compliance. Changes in accounting interpretations or assumptions could impact our financial statements and our ability to timely prepare our financial statements. If the assumptions or estimates underlying our financial statements are incorrect, we may experience significant losses as the ultimate realization of value may be materially different than the amounts reflected in our consolidated statement of financial position as of any particular date, and there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
24
Reserves are established for mortgage loan representations and warranty claims when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. In light of the inherent uncertainties involved in loan repurchase claims related to representations and warranties, it is not always possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the amount of a probable loss, and we may estimate a range of possible loss for consideration in our estimates. The estimates are based upon currently available information and involve significant judgment taking into account the varying stages and inherent uncertainties of such repurchase and indemnification requests. Accordingly, our estimates may change from time to time and such changes may be material to our consolidated results of operations, and the ultimate settlement of such matters may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Reserves are established for pending or threatened litigation, claims or assessments when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. In light of the inherent uncertainties involved in litigation and other legal proceedings, it is not always possible to determine a reasonable estimate of the amount of a probable loss, and we may estimate a range of possible loss for consideration in its estimates. The estimates are based upon currently available information and involve significant judgment taking into account the varying stages and inherent uncertainties of such matters. Accordingly, our estimates may change from time to time and such changes may be material to our consolidated results of operations, and the ultimate settlement of such matters may have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
For additional information on the key areas for which assumptions and estimates are used in preparing our financial statements, see “Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—Critical accounting policies and estimates.”
Our reported financial results may be materially and adversely affected by future changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) is subject to standard setting or interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the United State Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results and could materially and adversely affect the transactions completed before the announcement of a change. A change in these principles or interpretations could also require us to alter our accounting systems in a manner that could increase our operating costs, impact the content of our financial statements and impact our ability to timely prepare our financial statements.
Our vendor relationships subject us to a variety of risks and the failure of third parties to provide various services that are important to our operations could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We have significant vendors that, among other things, provide us with financial, technology and other services to support our loan servicing and originations activities. In addition to our significant reliance on our subservicer, our servicing vendors help us provide escrow services, print vendor, loss mitigation, foreclosure and bankruptcy services, In the event that a vendor’s activities do not comply with the applicable servicing criteria, we could be exposed to liability as the servicer and it could negatively impact our relationships with our servicing customers or regulators, among others. In addition, if our current vendors were to stop providing services to us on acceptable terms, including as a result of one or more vendor bankruptcies due to poor economic conditions, we may be unable to procure alternatives from other vendors in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms, or at all. For example, many of our MSRs continue to be serviced by Cenlar, although such services may be significantly reduced in the future. If Cenlar fails to fulfill its contractual obligations to us, including through a failure to provide services to us and our borrowers at the required level to comply with federal, state, and investor requirements, our servicing business and operations would suffer. More generally, if a vendor fails to comply with applicable legal requirements on our behalf, or provide to us the services we are contractually owed, we may incur significant costs to resolve any such disruptions in service and this could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our risk management policies and procedures may not be effective.
Our risk management framework seeks to anticipate, mitigate, detect, measure and manage risk while balancing risk and return according to the Company’s risk appetite. We have established policies and procedures intended to identify, monitor and manage the types of risk to which we are subject, including market and interest rate risk, liquidity risk, cyber risk, regulatory and legal risk, reputational risk, operational risk, vendor risk, and counterparty risk. Although we have devoted
25
significant resources to develop our risk management policies and procedures and expect to continue to do so in the future, these policies and procedures, as well as our risk management techniques such as our hedging strategies, may not be fully effective. There may also be risks that exist, or that develop in the future, that we have not appropriately anticipated, identified or mitigated. As regulations and markets in which we operate continue to evolve, our risk management framework may not always keep sufficient pace with those changes. If our risk management framework does not effectively identify or mitigate our risks, we could suffer unexpected losses and could be materially adversely affected.
The loss of the services of our senior management could adversely affect our business.
The experience of our senior management, including Anthony Hsieh, our Chief Executive Officer, is a valuable asset to us. Our management team has significant experience in the residential mortgage loan production and servicing industry and the investment management industry, and, therefore, we are particularly dependent on retaining members of our management with such critical capabilities. If we are unable to do so, our ability to maintain relationships with counterparties and other third parties, operate, innovate and generate new business could be jeopardized, any of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We also depend on identifying, developing and retaining top talent to innovate and lead our businesses. In addition, our incentive compensation plans are intended to reward high-performing individuals for their contributions and provide incentives for them to remain with us. If the anticipated value of such incentives does not materialize because of volatility or lack of positive performance in our stock price, or if our total compensation package is not viewed as being competitive, our ability to attract and retain the personnel we need to operate could be adversely affected. The loss of a member of senior management requires the remaining executives to divert immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement. The inability to fill vacancies in our senior executive positions on a timely basis could adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy, which could negatively impact our results of operations. Furthermore, certain of our warehouse lines specify that a substantial change in the management responsibilities of Mr. Hsieh constitutes an event of default. We do not maintain key life insurance policies relating to our senior management. See “—Risks related to our business—The departure or change in the responsibilities of Anthony Hsieh, our Chief Executive Officer, and certain other changes in our ownership or in our board of directors may cause one or more events of default under our warehouse lines and other financing arrangements.”
Our business could suffer if we fail to attract and retain a highly skilled workforce.
Our future success will depend on our ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate, and retain highly qualified personnel for all areas of our organization, in particular skilled managers, loan officers and underwriters. Trained and experienced personnel are in high demand and may be in short supply in some areas. Companies with which we compete for experienced employees may have greater resources than we have and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment. In addition, we invest significant time and expense in training our employees, which may increase their value to competitors who may seek to recruit them. We may not be able to attract, develop, and maintain an adequate skilled workforce necessary to operate our business and labor expenses may increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of qualified personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain such personnel, we may not be able to take advantage of acquisitions and other growth opportunities that may be presented to us and this could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Cyberattacks, information or security breaches and technology disruptions or failures, including failure of internal operational or security systems or infrastructure, of ours or of our third-party vendors’ could damage our business operations and increase our costs, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The financial services industry as a whole is characterized by rapidly changing technologies and we are dependent on the security and efficacy of our infrastructure, computer and data management systems, as well as those of third parties with whom we interact. In the ordinary course of our business, we receive, process, retain, transmit and store proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data, including certain public and non-public personal information concerning employees and borrowers. Additionally, we enter into relationships with third-party vendors to assist with various aspects of our business, some of which require the exchange of personal employee or borrower information. We devote significant resources to maintain and regularly update our systems and processes that are designed to protect the security of our computer systems, software, networks and other technology assets against attempts by unauthorized parties to obtain access to confidential or sensitive information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems or cause other damage and we employ extensive layered security at all levels within our organization to help us detect malicious activity, both from within the organization and from external sources.
26
Despite our efforts to ensure the integrity of our systems, it is possible that we and our third-party vendors may not be able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches or unauthorized access of our information technology systems or the information technology systems of third-party vendors that receive, process, retain and transmit electronic information on our behalf. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper or illegal access to our systems and those of our third-party vendors, our data, our employees’ customers’ and loan applicants’ data or to disable, degrade or sabotage service are constantly evolving, and have become increasingly complex and sophisticated. Furthermore, such techniques change frequently and are often not recognized or detected until after they have been launched and security attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources, including third parties such as computer hackers, persons involved with organized crime or associated with external service providers, or foreign state or foreign state-supported actors. Those parties may also attempt to fraudulently induce employees, customers or other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or that of our borrowers. These risks may increase in the future as we continue to increase our reliance on the internet and use of web-based product offerings.
Cybersecurity risks have significantly increased in recent years. From time to time, we and our third-party vendors that collect, store, process, retain and transmit confidential or sensitive information, including borrower personal and transactional data or employee data (including service providers located offshore who conduct support services for us), are targeted by unauthorized parties using malicious code and viruses or otherwise attempting to breach the security of our or our vendors’ systems and data. We and our third-party vendors may in the future experience system disruptions and failures caused by software failure, fire, power loss, telecommunications failures, employee misconduct, human error, unauthorized intrusion, security breaches, acts of vandalism, traditional computer hackers, computer viruses and disabling devices, phishing attacks, malicious or destructive code, denial of service or information, natural disasters, health pandemics and other similar events, which may result in the unauthorized release, gathering, monitoring, misuse, loss or destruction of confidential, proprietary or other sensitive information of ours, our employees or customers, and otherwise interrupt or delay our ability to provide services to our customers. Developments in technological capabilities and the implementation of technology changes or upgrades could also result in a compromise or breach of the technology that we use to protect our employees’ and customers’ personal information and transaction data. Although we have established, and continue to establish on an ongoing basis, defenses to identify and mitigate cyberattacks, any loss, unauthorized access to, or misuse of confidential or personal information could disrupt our operations, damage our reputation, and expose us to claims from customers, financial institutions, regulators, employees and other persons, any of which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
A successful penetration, compromise, breach or circumvention of the security of our or our third-party vendors’ information technology systems through electronic, physical or other means, or a defect in the integrity of our or our third-party vendors’ systems or cybersecurity could cause serious negative consequences for our business, including significant disruption of our operations, misappropriation of our proprietary, confidential or sensitive information, including personal information of our borrowers or employees, damage to our computers or operating systems and to those of our borrowers and counterparties, and subject us to significant costs, litigation, disputes, reporting obligations, regulatory action, investigation, fines, penalties, remediation costs, damages and other liabilities. In addition, our remediation efforts may not be successful and we may not have adequate insurance to cover these losses. Any of the foregoing events could result in violations of applicable privacy and other laws, financial loss to us or to our borrowers, loss of confidence in our security measures, customer dissatisfaction, significant litigation exposure and harm to our reputation, and diversion of management attention, all of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face litigation and legal proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We are routinely and currently involved in legal proceedings concerning matters that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These legal proceedings range from actions involving a single plaintiff to class action lawsuits with potentially tens of thousands of class members. These actions and proceedings are generally based on alleged violations of consumer protection, employment, contract and other laws.
On December 24, 2020, we received a demand letter from one of the senior members of our operations team asserting, among other things, allegations of loan origination noncompliance and various employment related claims, including allegations of a hostile work environment and gender discrimination, with unspecified damages. The executive has since resigned her position with the Company. While the Company’s management does not believe these allegations have merit, it
27
could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources. For further details on this matter and other legal proceedings, see “Item 3 - Legal Proceedings” and “Note 22- Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Our business in general exposes us to both formal and informal periodic inquiries, from various state and federal agencies as part of those agencies’ oversight of the origination and sale of mortgage loans and servicing activities. See “—Risks related to our regulatory environment” below. An adverse result in governmental investigations or examinations or private lawsuits, including purported class action lawsuits, may adversely affect our financial results. In addition, a number of participants in our industry have been the subject of purported class action lawsuits and regulatory actions by state regulators, and other industry participants have been the subject of actions by state Attorneys General. Litigation and other proceedings may require that we pay settlement costs, legal fees, damages, penalties or other charges, any or all of which could adversely affect our financial results. In particular, legal proceedings brought under state consumer protection statutes may result in a separate fine for each violation of the statute, which, particularly in the case of class action lawsuits, could result in damages substantially in excess of the amounts we earned from the underlying activities and that could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial position and results of operations.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect the real estate industry generally and our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 disrupted the U.S. financial markets, including the real estate capital markets, and negatively impacted the U.S. economy in general. Any future terrorist attacks, the anticipation of any such attacks, the consequences of any military or other response by the United States and its allies, and other armed conflicts, such as the armed conflict involving Russia and Ukraine and related unrest, could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economy. The economic impact of these events could also adversely affect the credit quality of some of our loans and investments and the properties underlying our interests.
We may suffer losses as a result of the adverse impact of any future attacks and these losses may adversely impact our performance. A prolonged economic slowdown, recession or declining real estate values could impair the performance of our investments and harm our financial condition and results of operations, increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. We cannot predict the severity of the effect that potential future armed conflicts and terrorist attacks would have on us. Losses resulting from these types of events may not be fully insurable.
Flooding, severe storms, hurricanes, landslides, wildfires, mudslides, earthquakes or other natural disasters may affect the real estate industry generally and our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, areas of the United States may be affected by flooding, severe storms, hurricanes, landslides, wildfires, mudslides, earthquakes or other natural disasters. For instance, properties in California may be particularly susceptible to certain types of uninsurable hazards, such as earthquakes, floods, mudslides, wildfires and other natural disasters, properties in Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina may be particularly susceptible to certain types of uninsurable hazards, such as hurricanes, and properties located in Texas, North Carolina, South Carolina, Louisiana and Mississippi may be particularly susceptible to damage by flooding. The Agencies or investors may be unwilling to reimburse for losses experienced with the property disposition and associated losses on sales in connection with material natural disasters. Additionally, such material natural disasters could disrupt or displace members of our workforce, which would affect our ability to operate our business in the ordinary course.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
We may be unable to sufficiently obtain, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property and proprietary rights and we may encounter disputes from time to time relating to our use of the intellectual property of third parties.
We rely on a combination of trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets, domain names and confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions with employees and third parties to protect our intellectual property and proprietary
28
rights. As of December 31, 2021, we hold 31 registered United States trademarks and 23 United States trademark applications, including with respect to the name “loanDepot,” “mello” and other logos and various additional designs and word marks relating to the “loanDepot” name, as well as seven United States patent applications. Nonetheless, as new challenges with respect to intellectual property protection arise, we cannot assure you that these measures will be adequate to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights that we have secured, that we will be able to secure appropriate protections for all of our intellectual property and proprietary rights in the future, or that third parties will not misappropriate, infringe upon or otherwise violate our intellectual property or proprietary rights, particularly in foreign countries where laws or enforcement practices may not protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights as fully as in the United States. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, unauthorized third parties may attempt to disclose, obtain, duplicate, copy or use proprietary aspects of our technology, curricula, online resource material, and other intellectual property. Our management’s attention may be diverted by these attempts, and we may need to expend funds in litigation or other proceedings to protect our intellectual property proprietary rights against any infringement, misappropriation or violation. Furthermore, attempts to enforce our intellectual property rights against third parties could also provoke these third parties to assert their own intellectual property or other rights against us, or result in a holding that invalidates or narrows the scope of our rights, in whole or in part.
Confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions can also be difficult to enforce and, even if successfully enforced, may not be entirely effective. In addition, we cannot guarantee that we have entered into confidentiality agreements with all employees, partners, independent contractors or consultants that have or may have had access to our trade secrets or other proprietary information. Any of our issued or registered intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated, held unenforceable or circumvented in litigation or other proceedings, including re-examination, inter partes review, post-grant review, interference and derivation proceedings and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings), and such intellectual property rights may be lost or no longer provide us meaningful competitive advantages. Third parties may also independently develop products, services and technology similar or duplicative of our products and services.
Our success and ability to compete also depends in part on our ability to operate without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property or proprietary rights of third parties. We have encountered and may in the future encounter disputes from time to time over rights and obligations concerning intellectual property or proprietary rights of others, and we may not prevail in these disputes. Third parties may raise claims against us alleging an infringement, misappropriation or other violation of their intellectual property or proprietary rights. Some third-party intellectual property rights may be extremely broad, and it may not be possible for us to conduct our operations in such a way as to avoid all alleged infringements, misappropriations or other violations of such intellectual property rights. In addition, former employers of our current, former or future employees may assert claims that such employees have improperly disclosed to us the confidential or proprietary information of these former employers. The resolution of any such disputes or litigation is difficult to predict. Future litigation may also involve non-practicing entities or other intellectual property owners who have no relevant product offerings or revenue and against who our own intellectual property may therefore provide little or no deterrence or protection. Any such intellectual property claims could subject us to costly litigation and impose a significant strain on our financial resources and management personnel, regardless of whether such claim has merit. Such claims may also result in adverse judgements or settlement on unfavorable terms. Our insurance may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and we may be required to pay significant money damages, lose significant revenues, be prohibited from using the relevant systems, processes, technologies or other intellectual property, cease offering certain products or services, alter the content of our classes, or incur significant license, royalty or technology development expenses.
Our products and operations use software, hardware and services that may be difficult to replace or cause errors or failures of our products and disrupt our operations, which could adversely affect our business.
In addition to our proprietary technology, we license third-party software, utilize third-party hardware and depend on services from various third parties for use in our products and day-to-day operations. In the future, this software or these services may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Any loss of the right to use any of the software or services could result in decreased functionality of our products and operations until equivalent technology is either developed by us or, if available from another provider, is identified, obtained and integrated, which could adversely affect our business. In addition, any errors or defects in or failures of the software or services we rely on, whether maintained by us or by third parties, could result in errors or defects in our products or cause our products to fail or could disrupt our day-to-day operations, which could adversely affect our business and be costly to correct. Many of these providers attempt to impose limitations on their liability for such errors, defects or failures, and if enforceable, we may have additional liability to our clients or to other third
29
parties that could harm our reputation and increase our operating costs. We will need to maintain our relationships with third-party software and service providers and to obtain software and services from such providers that do not contain any errors or defects. Any failure to do so could adversely affect our ability to deliver effective products to our clients and loan applicants, as well as interrupt our day-to-day operations, which could adversely affect our business.
Risks Related to the Mortgage Industry
Our mortgage loan origination revenues are highly dependent on macroeconomic and U.S. residential real estate market conditions.
Our results of operations are materially affected by conditions in the mortgage loan and real estate markets, the financial markets and the economy generally. During the Financial Crisis for example, a decline in home prices led to an increase in delinquencies and defaults, which led to further home price declines and losses for creditors. This depressed mortgage loan origination activity and general access to credit. Post-Financial Crisis, the disruption in the capital markets and secondary mortgage markets has also reduced liquidity and investor demand for mortgage loans and MBS, while yield requirements for these products increased. Continuing concerns about inflation, rising interest rates, energy costs, geopolitical issues (including the potential for increased tensions between the United States and Russia resulting from armed conflict involving Russia and Ukraine and related unrest), political gridlock on United States federal budget matters including full or partial government shutdowns, trade wars, the COVID-19 Outbreak (and any future outbreaks of coronavirus or similar diseases) and the availability and cost of credit could contribute to increased volatility and diminished expectations for the economy and markets going forward. If present U.S. and global economic uncertainties persist, loan origination activity may become muted. Should any of these situations occur, our loan originations and revenue could decline and our business could be negatively impacted.
Our earnings may decrease because of changes in prevailing interest rates.
We believe interest rates will rise throughout 2022 as a result of Federal Reserve policies aimed at combating inflation. We generate a sizeable portion of our revenues from loans we make to clients that are used to refinance existing mortgage loans. Generally, the refinance market experiences significant fluctuations. As interest rates rise, refinancing volumes generally decrease as fewer consumers are incentivized to refinance their mortgages. This could adversely affect our revenues or require us to increase marketing expenditures in an attempt to maintain refinancing related origination volumes. Higher interest rates may also reduce demand for purchase mortgage loans as home ownership becomes more expensive and could also reduce demand for our home equity loans. Decreases in interest rates can also potentially adversely affect our business as the stream of servicing fees and correspondingly, the value of servicing rights, decreases as interest rates decrease.
For more information regarding how changes in interest rates may negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations, see “Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—Key factors influencing our results of operations” and “Item 7A. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk.”
The industries in which we operate are highly competitive, and are likely to become more competitive, and our inability to compete successfully or decreased margins resulting from increased competition could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We operate in highly competitive industries that could become even more competitive as a result of economic, legislative, regulatory and technological changes. With respect to our mortgage loan businesses, we face and may in the future face competition in such areas as loan product offerings, rates, fees and customer service. With respect to servicing, we face competition in areas such as fees, compliance capabilities and performance in reducing delinquencies.
Competition in originating loans comes from large commercial banks and savings institutions and other independent loan originators and servicers. These institutions may have significantly greater resources and access to capital than we do, which may give them the benefit of a lower cost of funds. Commercial banks and savings institutions may also have significantly greater access to potential customers given their deposit-taking and other banking functions. Also, some of these competitors are less reliant than we are on the sale of mortgage loans into the secondary markets to maintain their liquidity and may be able to participate in government programs that we are unable to participate in because we are not a state or federally chartered depository institution, all of which may place us at a competitive disadvantage. The advantages of our largest
30
competitors include, but are not limited to, their ability to hold new loan originations in an investment portfolio and their access to lower rate bank deposits as a source of liquidity.
Additionally, more restrictive loan underwriting standards have resulted in a more homogenous product offering, which has increased competition across the mortgage loan industry for loan originations. Furthermore, our existing and potential competitors may decide to modify their business models to compete more directly with our loan origination and servicing models.
In addition, technological advances and heightened e-commerce activities have increased consumers’ accessibility to products and services. This has intensified competition among banks and nonbanks in offering mortgage loans. We may be unable to compete successfully in our industries and this could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Increases in delinquencies and defaults may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The level of home prices and home price appreciation affects performance in the mortgage loan industry. For example, falling home prices between 2007 and 2011 across the United States resulted in higher LTV ratios, lower recoveries in foreclosure and an increase in loss severity above those that would have been realized had property values remained the same or continued to increase. There is a risk that housing prices decline, reducing borrower equity and incentive to repay. Additionally, adverse macroeconomic conditions may reduce borrowers’ ability to pay. Further, if rates rise borrowers with adjustable rate mortgage loans may face higher monthly payments as the interest rates on those mortgage loans adjust upward from their initial fixed rates or low introductory rates. All of these factors could potentially contribute to an increase in mortgage loan delinquencies and correspondingly, defaults and foreclosures.
Increased mortgage loan delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures may result in lower revenue for loans that we service for the Agencies, because we only collect servicing fees for performing loans. Additionally, while increased delinquencies generate higher ancillary fees, including late fees, these fees are not likely to be recoverable in the event that the related loan is liquidated. Also, increased mortgage loan defaults may ultimately reduce the number of mortgage loans that we service.
Increased mortgage loan delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures will also result in a higher cost to service those loans due to the increased time and effort required to collect payments from delinquent borrowers and to liquidate properties or otherwise resolve loan defaults if payment collection is unsuccessful, and only a portion of these increased costs are recoverable under our servicing agreements. Any loan level advances made on defaulted loans within the allowable levels provided by investors and insurers are recoverable either from the borrower in a reinstatement or the investors/insurers in a liquidation. Increased mortgage loan delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures may also result in an increase in our interest expense and affect our liquidity if we are required to borrow to fund an increase in our advancing obligations. Any additional cost to service these loans, including interest expense on loan level advances, are generally not recoverable and are considered a cost of doing business.
In addition, we are subject to risks of borrower defaults and bankruptcies in cases where we might be required to repurchase loans sold with recourse or under representations and warranties. In these cases, a borrower filing for bankruptcy during foreclosure could have the effect of staying the foreclosure and thereby delaying the foreclosure process, which may potentially result in a reduction or discharge of a borrower’s mortgage loan debt. Even if we are successful in directing a foreclosure on a mortgage loan that has been repurchased, the liquidation proceeds upon sale of the underlying real estate may not be sufficient to recover our cost basis in the loan, resulting in a loss to us. Furthermore, any costs or delays involved in the foreclosure of the mortgage loan or a liquidation of the underlying property will further reduce the net proceeds and, thus, increase the loss. If these risks materialize, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In the event we originate mortgage loans that we are unable to sell, we will bear the risk of loss of principal on such mortgage loans. An increase in delinquency rates could therefore adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Adverse developments in the secondary mortgage loan market, including the MBS market, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
31
We historically have relied on selling or securitizing our mortgage loans into the secondary market in order to generate liquidity to fund maturities of our indebtedness, the origination and warehousing of mortgage loans, the retention of servicing rights and for general working capital purposes. We bear the risk of being unable to sell or securitize our mortgage loans at advantageous times and prices or in a timely manner. Demand in the secondary market and our ability to complete the sale or securitization of our mortgage loans depends on a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including general economic conditions, general conditions in the banking system, the willingness of lenders to provide funding for mortgage loans, the willingness of investors to purchase mortgage loans and MBS and changes in regulatory requirements. If it is not possible or economical for us to complete the sale or securitization of certain of our LHFS, we may lack liquidity under our warehouse lines to continue to fund such mortgage loans and our revenues and margins on new loan originations would be materially and negatively impacted, which would materially and negatively impact our consolidated net revenue and net income and also have a material adverse effect on our overall business and our consolidated financial position. The severity of the impact would be most significant to the extent we were unable to sell conforming mortgage loans to the GSEs or securitize such loans pursuant to Agency-sponsored programs.
Any significant disruption or period of illiquidity in the general MBS market would directly affect our liquidity because no existing alternative secondary market would likely be able to accommodate on a timely basis the volume of loans that we typically sell in any given period. Accordingly, if the MBS market experiences a period of illiquidity, we might be prevented from selling the loans that we produce into the secondary market in a timely manner or at favorable prices, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Our Regulatory Environment
We operate in a highly regulated industry that is undergoing regulatory transformation which has created inherent uncertainty. Changing federal, state and local laws, as well as changing regulatory enforcement policies and priorities, may negatively impact the management of our business, results of operations and ability to compete.
We are required to comply with a wide array of federal, state and local laws and regulations that regulate, among other things, the manner in which we conduct our loan origination and servicing activities, the terms of our loans and the fees that we may charge, and the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer and other processing of personal information. A material or continued failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations could subject us to lawsuits or governmental actions and/ or damage our reputation, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Additionally, federal, state and local governments and regulatory agencies have recently proposed or enacted numerous new laws, regulations and rules related to mortgage loans. Federal and state regulators are also rigorously enforcing existing laws, regulations and rules and enhancing their supervisory expectations regarding the management of legal and regulatory compliance risks. Consumer finance regulation is constantly changing, and new laws or regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, could have a materially adverse impact on our ability to operate as we currently intend. See “—Regulatory agencies and consumer advocacy groups are becoming more aggressive in asserting claims that the practices of lenders and loan servicers result in a disparate impact on protected classes.”
These regulatory changes and uncertainties make our business planning more difficult and could result in changes to our business model and potentially adversely impact our result of operations. Ensuring compliance with new or changing laws and regulations also require increased expense and may create significant operational impact. Accordingly, uncertainty persists regarding the competitive impact of new laws or regulations. As compared to our competitors, we could be subject to more stringent state or local regulations, or could incur marginally greater compliance costs as a result of regulatory changes. In addition, our failure to comply (or to ensure that our agents and third-party service providers comply) with these laws or regulations may result in costly litigation or enforcement actions, the penalties for which could include but are not limited to: revocation of required licenses; fines and other monetary penalties; civil and criminal liability; substantially reduced payments by borrowers; modification of the original terms of loans, permanent forgiveness of debt, or inability to directly or indirectly collect all or a part of the principal of or interest on loans; delays in the foreclosure process and increased servicing advances; and increased repurchase and indemnification claims.
Proposals to change the statutes affecting financial services companies are frequently introduced in Congress, state legislatures and local governing bodies and, if enacted, may affect our operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. In addition, numerous federal, state and local regulators have the authority to pass or change regulations that could affect
32
our operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. We cannot determine whether any such legislative or regulatory proposals will be enacted and, if enacted, the ultimate impact that any such potential legislation or implementing regulations, or any such potential regulatory actions by federal or state regulators, would have upon our financial condition or results of operations.
With respect to state regulation, although we seek to comply with applicable state loan, loan broker, mortgage loan originator, servicing, debt collection and similar statutes in all U.S. jurisdictions, and with licensing or other requirements that we believe may be applicable to us, if we are found to not have complied with applicable laws, we could lose one or more of our licenses or authorizations or face other sanctions or penalties or be required to obtain a license in such jurisdiction, which may have an adverse effect on our ability to continue to originate mortgage loans, perform our servicing obligations or make our loan platform available to borrowers in particular states, which may adversely impact our business.
We depend on the programs of the Agencies. Discontinuation, or changes in the roles or practices, of these entities, without comparable private sector substitutes, could materially and negatively affect our results of operations and ability to compete.
We sell mortgage loans to various entities, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which include the mortgage loans in GSE-guaranteed securitizations. In addition, we pool FHA insured and VA guaranteed mortgage loans, which back securities guaranteed by Ginnie Mae. We derive material financial benefits from our relationships with the Agencies, as our ability to originate and sell mortgage loans under their programs reduces our credit exposure and mortgage loans inventory financing costs. In addition, we receive compensation for servicing loans on behalf of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae.
The future of the GSEs and the role of the Agencies in the U.S. mortgage markets are uncertain. In 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac experienced catastrophic credit losses and were placed in the conservatorship of the FHFA. As a result, housing finance reform continues to be an ongoing topic of discussion. The roles of the GSEs (including as insurers or guarantors of MBS) could be eliminated, or significantly reduced as a consequence of such proposed reforms. Elimination of the traditional roles of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or any changes to the nature or extent of the guarantees provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac or the fees, terms and guidelines that govern our selling and servicing relationships with them, such as increases in the guarantee fees we are required to pay, initiatives that increase the number of repurchase requests and/or the manner in which they are pursued, or possible limits on delivery volumes imposed upon us and other seller/servicers, could also materially and adversely affect our business, including our ability to sell and securitize loans through our loan production segment, and the performance, liquidity and market value of our investments. Moreover, any changes to the nature of the GSEs or their guarantee obligations could redefine what constitutes an Agency MBS and could have broad adverse implications for the market and our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
In September 2019, the U.S. Department of the Treasury released a proposal for reform, and, in October 2019, FHFA released a strategic plan regarding the conservatorships, which included a Scorecard that has Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac preparing for exiting conservatorship as one of its key objectives. Among other things, the Treasury recommendations include recapitalizing the GSEs, increasing private-sector competition with the GSEs, replacing GSE statutory affordable housing goals, changing mortgage underwriting requirements for GSE guarantees, revising the CFPB qualified mortgage regulations (for further discussion of these regulations, see “—Risks related to regulatory environment—The CFPB continues to be active in its monitoring of the loan origination and servicing sectors, and its rules increase our regulatory compliance burden and associated costs.”), and continuing to support the market for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages. Some of Treasury’s recommendations would require administrative action whereas others would require legislative action. In January 2021, consistent with those recommendations, the Trump administration’s Treasury and FHFA took steps to permit the GSEs to increase their capital levels. However, it is uncertain whether these or other 2019 recommendations will be enacted, particularly in light of the new administration’s priorities. If these recommendations are enacted, the future roles of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could be reduced (perhaps significantly) and the nature of their guarantee obligations could be considerably limited relative to historical measurements. In addition, various other proposals to generally reform the U.S. housing finance market have been offered by members of the U.S. Congress, and certain of these proposals seek to significantly reduce or eliminate over time the role of the GSEs in purchasing and guaranteeing mortgage loans. Any such proposals, if enacted, may have broad adverse implications for the MBS market and our business. It is possible that the adoption of any such proposals might lead to higher fees being charged by the GSEs or lower prices on our sales of mortgage loans to them.
The extent and timing of any reform regarding the GSEs and/or the home mortgage market are uncertain, which makes our business planning more difficult. Discontinuation, or significant changes in the roles or practices, of the Agencies, including changes to their guidelines and other proposed reforms, could require us to revise our business models, which could ultimately
33
negatively impact our results of operations. Significant uncertainty also persists regarding the competitive impact of proposals to eliminate the GSEs in favor of private sector models.
Changes in GSE or Ginnie Mae selling and/or servicing guidelines could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The Agencies require us to follow specific guidelines, which may be changed at any time. The Agencies have the ability to provide monetary incentives for loan servicers that perform well and to assess penalties for those that do not, including compensatory penalties against loan servicers in connection with the failure to meet specified timelines relating to delinquent loans and foreclosure proceedings and other breaches of servicing obligations. We generally cannot negotiate the terms of these guidelines or predict the penalties that the Agencies might impose for a failure to comply with those guidelines. Any failure by us to conform to these guidelines would materially adversely affect us. The Agencies, as well as their regulator FHFA, also have authority to approve or limit the number of loans that may be transferred to our servicing portfolio, which may impact our ability to grow our existing mortgage servicing operation.
We are required to follow specific guidelines that impact the way that we originate and service Agency loans, including guidelines with respect to:
•credit standards for mortgage loans;
•maintaining prepayment speeds commensurate with that of our peers;
•our staffing levels and other origination and servicing practices;
•the fees that we may charge to consumers or pass-through to the Agencies;
•our modification standards and procedures;
•unanticipated changes to pricing and guarantee fees;
•the amount of non-reimbursable advances; and
•internal controls such as data privacy and security, compliance, quality control and internal audit.
Our selling and servicing obligations under our contracts with the Agencies may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified by the Agencies from time to time without our specific consent. A significant modification to our selling and/or servicing obligations under our Agency contracts could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In particular, the nature of the GSEs’ guidelines for servicing delinquent mortgage loans that they own, or that back securities which they guarantee, can result in monetary incentives for servicers that perform well and penalties for those that do not. In addition, the FHFA has directed Fannie Mae to assess compensatory penalties against servicers in connection with the failure to meet specified timelines relating to delinquent loans and foreclosure proceedings and other breaches of servicing obligations. A significant change in these guidelines that has the effect of decreasing the fees we charge or requires us to expend additional resources in providing mortgage loan services could decrease our revenues or increase our costs, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to regulatory investigations and inquiries and may incur fines, penalties and increased costs that could negatively impact our future liquidity, financial position and results of operations or damage our reputation.
Federal and state agencies have broad enforcement powers over us and others in the loan origination and servicing industry, including powers to investigate our lending and servicing practices and broad discretion to deem particular practices unfair, deceptive, abusive or otherwise not in accordance with the law. See “Business— Supervision and regulation.” The continued focus of regulators on the practices of the loan origination and servicing industry have resulted and could continue to result in new enforcement actions that could directly or indirectly affect the manner in which we conduct our business and increase the costs of defending and settling any such matters, which could impact our reputation and/or results of operations.
In addition, the laws and regulations applicable to us are subject to administrative or judicial interpretation, but some of these laws and regulations have been enacted only recently and may not yet have been interpreted or may be interpreted infrequently. As a result of varied, infrequent, or unclear interpretations, ambiguities in these laws and regulations may leave uncertainty with respect to permitted or restricted conduct under them. Any ambiguity under a law to which we are subject may lead to regulatory investigations, governmental enforcement actions or private causes of action, such as class action lawsuits, with respect to our compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Provisions that by their terms, or as interpreted, apply to
34
lenders or servicers of loans may be construed in a manner that favors our borrowers and customers over loan originators and servicers. Furthermore, provisions of our loan agreements could be construed as unenforceable by a court.
The CFPB continues to be active in its monitoring of the loan origination and servicing sectors, and its rules increase our regulatory compliance burden and associated costs.
We are subject to the regulatory, supervisory and examination authority of the CFPB, which has oversight of federal and state non-depository lending and servicing institutions, including residential mortgage originators and loan servicers. The CFPB has rulemaking authority with respect to many of the federal consumer protection laws applicable to mortgage lenders and servicers, including TILA and RESPA and the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act. The CFPB has issued a number of regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act relating to loan origination and servicing activities, including ability-to-repay and “Qualified Mortgage” standards and other origination standards and practices as well as servicing requirements that address, among other things, periodic billing statements, certain notices and acknowledgments, prompt crediting of borrowers’ accounts for payments received, additional notice, review and timing requirements with respect to delinquent borrowers, loss mitigation, prompt investigation of complaints by borrowers, and lender-placed insurance notices. The CFPB has also amended provisions of HOEPA regarding the determination of high-cost mortgages, and of Regulation B, to implement additional requirements under the ECOA with respect to valuations, including appraisals and automated valuation models. The CFPB has also issued guidance to loan servicers to address potential risks to borrowers that may arise in connection with transfers of servicing. Additionally, through bulletins 2012-03 and 2016-02, the CFPB has increased the focus on lender liability and vendor management across the mortgage and settlement services industries, which may vary depending on the services being performed.
For example, the CFPB iteratively adopted rules over the course of several years regarding mortgage servicing practices that required us to make modifications and enhancements to our mortgage servicing processes and systems.
The CFPB’s examinations have increased, and will likely continue to increase, our administrative and compliance costs. They could also greatly influence the availability and cost of residential mortgage credit and increase servicing costs and risks. These increased costs of compliance, the effect of these rules on the lending industry and loan servicing, and any failure in our ability to comply with the new rules by their effective dates, could be detrimental to our business. The CFPB also issued guidelines on sending examiners to banks and other institutions that service and/or originate mortgages to assess whether consumers’ interests are protected. We are regulated by the CFPB and are subject to routine examinations.
The CFPB also has broad enforcement powers, and can order, among other things, rescission or reformation of contracts, the refund of moneys or the return of real property, restitution, disgorgement or compensation for unjust enrichment, the payment of damages or other monetary relief, public notifications regarding violations, limits on activities or functions, remediation of practices, external compliance monitoring and civil money penalties. The CFPB has been active in investigations and enforcement actions and, when necessary, has issued civil money penalties to parties the CFPB determines have violated the laws and regulations it enforces. Our failure to comply with the federal consumer protection laws, rules and regulations to which we are subject, whether actual or alleged, could expose us to enforcement actions or potential litigation liabilities.
In addition, the occurrence of one or more of the foregoing events or a determination by any court or regulatory agency that our policies and procedures do not comply with applicable law could impact our business operations. For example, if the violation is related to our servicing operations it could lead to downgrades by one or more rating agencies, a transfer of our servicing responsibilities, requirements to provide restitution, increased delinquencies on mortgage loans we service or any combination of these events. Such a determination could also require us to modify our servicing standards. The expense of complying with new or modified servicing standards may be substantial. Any such changes or revisions may have a material impact on our servicing operations, which could be detrimental to our business.
The federal government may seek significant monetary damages and penalties against mortgage loan lenders and servicers under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) and the False Claims Act (“FCA”) for making false statements and seeking reimbursement for ineligible costs and expenses.
During the Obama administration, the federal government initiated a number of actions against mortgage loan lenders and servicers alleging violations of FIRREA and the FCA. Some of the actions against lenders alleged that the lenders sold defective loans to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while representing that the loans complied with the GSE’s underwriting
35
guidelines. The federal government has also brought actions against lenders asserting that they submitted claims for FHA-insured loans that the lender falsely certified to HUD met FHA underwriting requirements that resulted in FHA paying out millions of dollars in insurance claims to cover the defaulted loans. See “Item 1. Business—Supervision and regulation—Supervision and enforcement” and the risk factor captioned “—We are subject to regulatory investigations and inquiries and may incur fines, penalties and increased costs that could negatively impact our future liquidity, financial position and results of operations or damage our reputation.” Because these actions carry the possibility for treble damages, many have resulted in settlements totaling in the hundreds of millions of dollars, as well as required lenders and servicers to make significant changes in their practices.
The Company’s FCA litigation-related risk may increase as a result of administration changes, legislative changes, and changes in FCA case law. In July 2021, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) rescinded Trump-administration DOJ memoranda restricting the DOJ’s use of agency guidance documents—such as agency manuals, policy statements, and opinion letters—to support civil and criminal enforcement actions. The rescission of such memoranda may give the DOJ more flexibility to pursue FCA actions premised on non-compliance with guidance documents (in addition to express contractual obligations, certification requirements, and formally enacted laws, rules, and regulations). Additionally, in July 2021, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators introduced legislation to amend the FCA. Among other things, the proposed legislation would reduce the burden on the United States to establish the materiality element of an FCA claim, heighten the burden on a defendant to rebut the materiality element of an FCA claim, increase certain FCA litigation costs for defendants in FCA qui tam litigation, and require a hearing before the DOJ’s dismissal of a qui tam relator’s FCA claim. It is uncertain whether these proposed changes will be enacted, but it is possible that the enactment of such changes will increase the risk of future FCA claims, increase the size of potential penalties arising from FCA enforcement actions, or increase the size of settlements entered into in connection with FCA claims. Finally, case law regarding the elements required to establish an FCA claim continues to evolve. It is possible that case law could make it easier for the DOJ or FCA qui tam plaintiffs to assert FCA claims or to advance new theories of FCA claims relating to our mortgage origination and servicing conduct.
Unlike our competitors that are depository institutions, we are subject to state licensing and operational requirements that result in substantial compliance costs.
Because we are not a federally chartered depository institution, we generally do not benefit from federal preemption of state mortgage loan origination, loan servicing or debt collection licensing and state and local regulatory requirements. We may also be subject to other licensing requirements applicable to one or more of our subsidiaries, such as title insurance, insurance production, or real estate brokerage licenses. We must comply with state licensing requirements and varying compliance requirements in all of the jurisdictions in which we operate, and we are sensitive to regulatory changes that may increase our costs through stricter licensing laws, disclosure laws or increased fees or that may impose conditions to licensing that we or our personnel are unable to meet. Further, due to not being a federally chartered depository institution, our reliance on warehouse lines for purposes of funding loans contains certain risks, such as limited access to backup liquidity as compared to federally charted depository institutions, and as illustrated in the mortgage loan crisis which resulted in warehouse lines lenders refusing to honor lines of credit for non-banks without a deposit base.
In all states in which we operate, a regulatory agency or agencies regulate and enforce laws relating to loan servicers, brokers and/or originators, as well as title insurers, insurance producers, and real estate brokers. These rules and regulations, which vary from state to state, generally provide for, but are not limited to: licensing as a loan servicer, lender or broker (including individual-level licensure for employees engaging in loan origination activities), loan modification or third-party debt default specialist (or a combination thereof); licensing as a title insurer, an insurance agency or producer, or as a real estate broker; requirements as to the form and content of contracts and other documentation; licensing of independent contractors with whom we contract; and employee hiring background checks. They also set forth restrictions on lending, brokering, servicing, collection insurance, and real estate practices, restrictions related to fees and charges, including loan interest rate limits, and disclosure and record-keeping requirements. They establish a variety of borrowers’ and consumers’ rights in the event of violations of such rules. Future state legislation and changes in existing laws and regulations may significantly increase our compliance costs or reduce the amount of ancillary fees, including late fees that we may charge to borrowers. This could make our business cost-prohibitive in the affected state or states and could materially affect our business. For example, the California state legislature on August 31, 2020 passed a bill that replaced California’s Department of Business Oversight with a new Department of Financial Protection and Innovation that is modeled after the CFPB. Governor Newsom signed the bill into law on September 25, 2020. While this bill does not directly apply to us because the bill contains an exemption for most existing licensees, this could establish a model for other states to create similar agencies that would supervise our residential lending and servicing activities.
36
In addition, we are subject to periodic examinations by state and other regulators in the jurisdictions in which we conduct business, which can result in increases in our administrative costs and refunds to borrowers or consumers of certain fees earned by us, and we may be required to pay substantial penalties imposed by those regulators due to compliance errors, or we may lose our license or our ability to do business in the jurisdiction otherwise may be impaired. Fines and penalties incurred in one jurisdiction may cause investigations or other actions by regulators in other jurisdictions.
We may not be able to maintain all currently requisite licenses and permits. In addition, the states that currently do not provide extensive regulation of our business may later choose to do so, and if such states so act, we may not be able to obtain or maintain all requisite licenses and permits, which could require us to modify or limit our activities in the relevant state(s). The failure to satisfy those and other regulatory requirements could result in a default under our warehouse lines, other financial arrangements and/or servicing agreements and thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to liability for potential violations of predatory lending laws, which could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and business.
Various U.S. federal, state and local laws have been enacted that are designed to discourage predatory lending practices. HOEPA amended TILA to prohibit inclusion of certain provisions in “high cost mortgage loans” that have interest rates or origination costs in excess of prescribed levels, and require that borrowers receiving such loans be given certain disclosures, in addition to the standard TILA mortgage loan disclosures, prior to origination. It also provides that an assignee of such a “high cost mortgage loan” is subject to all claims and any defense which the borrower could assert against the original creditor, which has severely constrained the secondary market for such loans. The Dodd-Frank Act amended HOEPA to enhance its protections. The amendments expanded the types of loans covered by HOEPA to include home-purchase loans and open-end, home-secured credit transactions (such as home equity lines of credit) which were previously exempt; added a new HOEPA threshold for what is considered a high-cost mortgage based on prepayment penalties; lowered the two existing thresholds based on a loan’s rate and points and fees so more loans will qualify as high-cost loans; and imposed additional restrictions on high-cost loans, such as prohibiting balloon payment features (with certain exceptions) regardless of the term. Some states have enacted, or may enact, similar laws or regulations, which in some cases impose restrictions and requirements greater than those in HOEPA. In addition, under the anti-predatory lending laws of some states, the origination of certain mortgage loans, including loans that are not classified as “high-cost” loans under applicable law, must satisfy a net tangible benefit test with respect to the related borrower. Such tests may be highly subjective and open to interpretation. As a result, a court may determine that a residential mortgage loan, for example, does not meet the test even if the related originator reasonably believed that the test was satisfied. If any of our mortgage loans are found to have been originated in violation of predatory or abusive lending laws, we could incur losses, which could adversely impact our results of operations, financial condition and business. If any of our mortgage loans are found to exceed high-cost thresholds under HOEPA or equivalent state laws, we may be unable to sell them on the secondary market and/or be required to repurchase them from our investors.
Regulatory agencies and consumer advocacy groups are becoming more aggressive in asserting claims that the practices of lenders and loan servicers result in a disparate impact on protected classes.
Antidiscrimination statutes, such as the Fair Housing Act and the ECOA, prohibit creditors from discriminating against loan applicants and borrowers based on certain characteristics, such as race, religion and national origin. Various federal regulatory agencies and departments, including the DOJ and CFPB, take the position that these laws apply not only to intentional discrimination, but also to neutral practices that have a disparate impact on a group that shares a characteristic that a creditor may not consider in making credit decisions relating to protected classes (i.e., creditor or servicing practices that have a disproportionate negative affect on a protected class of individuals).
These regulatory agencies, as well as consumer advocacy groups and plaintiffs’ attorneys, are focusing greater attention on “disparate impact” claims. In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that the “disparate impact” theory applies to cases brought under the Fair Housing Act, while emphasizing that a causal relationship must be shown between a specific policy of the defendant and a discriminatory result that is not justified by a legitimate objective of the defendant. Although it is still unclear whether the theory applies under ECOA, regulatory agencies and private plaintiffs can be expected to continue to apply it to both the Fair Housing Act and ECOA in the context of mortgage loan lending and servicing. To the extent that the “disparate impact” theory continues to apply, we may be faced with significant administrative burdens in attempting to comply and potential liability for failures to comply.
37
In addition to reputational harm, violations of the ECOA and the Fair Housing Act can result in actual damages, punitive damages, injunctive or equitable relief, attorneys’ fees and civil money penalties.
The Dodd-Frank Act prevents us from using arbitration agreements to protect against class actions on residential real estate loans.
At present, where permitted by applicable law, companies providing consumer products and services, frequently require their customers to agree to arbitrate any disputes on an individual basis rather than pursuing lawsuits, including class actions. Such agreements are binding in accordance with their terms as a matter of federal law, even where state law provides otherwise. Thus, arbitration agreements can serve as a vehicle for eliminating class action exposure.
Under the Dodd-Frank Act, arbitration agreements are not permitted for residential real estate loans. Accordingly, in the event of a purported violation of applicable law with respect to our real estate lending activities, we could be subject to class action liability.
In recent years, federal regulators and the DOJ have increased their focus on enforcing the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (“SCRA”) against loan owners and servicers. Similarly, state legislatures have taken steps to strengthen their own state-specific versions of the SCRA.
The SCRA provides relief to borrowers who enter active military service and to borrowers in reserve status who are called to active duty after the origination of their mortgage loan. The SCRA provides generally that a borrower who is covered by the SCRA may not be charged interest on a mortgage loan in excess of 6% per annum during the period of the borrower’s active duty along with other servicing related benefits. The DOJ and federal regulators have entered into significant settlements with a number of loan servicers alleging violations of the SCRA. Some of the settlements have alleged that the servicers did not correctly apply the SCRA’s 6% interest rate cap, while other settlements have alleged that servicers did not comply with the SCRA’s foreclosure and default judgment protections when seeking to foreclose upon a mortgage loan note or collect payment of a debt. Recent settlements indicate that the DOJ and federal regulators broadly interpret the scope of the substantive protections under the SCRA and are moving both to identify instances in which loan servicers have not complied with the SCRA. Alleged SCRA non-compliance has been a focal point of the National Mortgage Settlement by the DOJ as well as the Independent Foreclosure Review jointly supervised by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and several additional SCRA-related settlements continue to make this a significant area of scrutiny for both regulatory examinations and public enforcement actions.
In addition, most states have their own versions of the SCRA. In most instances these laws extend some or all of the substantive benefits of the federal SCRA to members of the state National Guard who are in state service, but certain states also provide greater substantive protections to National Guard members or individuals who are in federal military service. Recent years have seen states revise their laws to increase the potential benefits to individuals, and these changes pose additional compliance burdens on creditors as they seek to comply with both the federal and relevant state versions of the SCRA.
Privacy and information security are an increasing focus of regulators at the federal and state levels.
Privacy requirements under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) and Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) are within the regulatory and enforcement authority of the CFPB and are a standard part of CFPB examinations. Information security requirements under GLBA and FCRA are, for non-depository mortgage lenders, generally under the regulatory and enforcement authority of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). The FTC has taken several actions against financial institutions and other companies for failure to adequately safeguard personal information. State entities may also initiate actions for alleged violations of privacy or security requirements under state law.
We are also subject to a variety of other local, state, national and international laws, directives and regulations that apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer and other processing of personal information, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), which took effect on January 1, 2020 and provides California consumers with new privacy rights such as the right to request deletion of their data, the right to receive data on record for them and the right to know what categories of data are maintained about them, and increases the privacy and security obligations of entities handling certain personal information of such consumers. The CCPA allows consumers to submit verifiable consumer requests regarding their personal information and requires our business to implement procedures to comply with such requests. The California
38
Attorney General issued, and subsequently updated, proposed regulations to further define and clarify the CCPA. The impact of this law and its corresponding regulations, future enforcement activity and potential liability is unknown. Moreover, a new proposed privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act (“CPRA”) was approved by California voters in the November 3, 2020 election. The CPRA, which becomes effective on January 1, 2023, will significantly modify the CCPA, potentially resulting in further uncertainty and requiring us to incur additional costs and expenses in an effort to comply. While CCPA and CPRA contain exceptions for data subject to GLBA, and those exceptions cover the majority of our transactional data, these data protection and privacy law regimes continue to evolve and may result in ever-increasing public scrutiny and escalating levels of enforcement and sanctions and increased costs for compliance. Several additional states have enacted similar laws to the CCPA and we expect more states to follow. Furthermore, we also must comply with regulations in connection with doing business and offering loan products over the internet, including various state and federal e-signature rules mandating that certain disclosures be made, and certain steps be followed in order to obtain and authenticate e-signatures, with which we have limited experience.
Failure to comply with any of these laws could result in enforcement action against us, including fines, imprisonment of company officials and public censure, any of which could result in serious harm to our reputation, business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Subsequent changes to data protection and privacy laws could also impact how we process personal information, and therefore limit the effectiveness of our products or services or our ability to operate or expand our business, including limiting strategic partnerships that may involve the sharing of personal information.
The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and the FTC have increased their enforcement of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) and the Telemarketing Sales Rule.
The TCPA, Telemarketing Sales Rule and related laws and regulations govern, among other things, communications via telephone and text and the use of automatic telephone dialing systems (“ATDS”) and artificial and prerecorded voices. The FCC and the FTC have responsibility for regulating various aspects of these laws. These laws limit our ability to communicate with consumers and reduce the effectiveness of our marketing programs.
Subject to certain exemptions, the TCPA makes it unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is within the United States, to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any ATDS or an artificial or prerecorded voice to any cellular telephone number or other number for which the called party is charged. Under FCC rulings and regulations “prior express consent” must be in writing if the call contains an advertisement or constitutes telemarketing. Separately, the TCPA requires telemarketers to maintain an internal DNC list and a policy adhering to “do-not-call” registry requirements which, in part, mandate callers to refrain from making unsolicited marketing calls to consumers who have listed their numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, absent an inquiry or established business or personal relationship. Short message service and multimedia message service messages are also “calls” for the purpose of the TCPA and the FCC’s regulations implanting the statute. Many states have similar consumer protection laws regulating telemarketing.
The TCPA provides a private right of action under which a plaintiff, including a plaintiff in a class action, may recover actual monetary loss or $500 for each call or text made in violation of the prohibitions on calls made using an “artificial or pre-recorded voice” or ATDS. The TCPA authorizes a private right of action of “up to” $500 for each call or text made in violation of the DNC provisions of the TCPA beginning with the second violative call made in any 12 month period, unless the call is made as a result of a good faith error by a caller maintaining appropriate policies and procedures to comply with the statute. Under either provision a court may treble the amount of damages upon a finding of a “willful or knowing” violation. There is no statutory cap on maximum aggregate exposure (although some courts have applied in TCPA class actions constitutional limits on excessive penalties). An action may be brought by the FCC, a state attorney general, an individual, or a class of individuals. Like other companies that rely on telephone and text communications, we are regularly subject to putative, class action suits alleging violations of the TCPA. To date, no such class has been certified. If in the future we are found to have violated the TCPA, the amount of damages and potential liability could be extensive and adversely impact our business. Accordingly, were such a class certified or if we are unable to successfully defend such a suit, then TCPA damages could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Indebtedness
We rely on warehouse lines of credit and other sources of capital and liquidity to meet the financing requirements of our business.
39
Our ability to finance our operations and repay maturing obligations rests on our ability to borrow money and secure investors to purchase loans we originate or facilitate. We rely in particular on our warehouse lines of credit to fund our mortgage loan originations. We are generally required to renew our warehouse lines each year, which exposes us to refinancing, interest rate, and counterparty risks. As of December 31, 2021, we had fifteen warehouse lines which provide an aggregate available mortgage loan lending facility of $11.8 billion, and thirteen of our warehouse lines allow advances to fund loans at closing of the consumer’s mortgage loan. We rely on two such warehouse line providers for 30% of our aggregate available home lending facility. If any warehouse line provider ceased doing business with us, our business, operations, and results of operations could materially suffer. See “Item 7. Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations—Liquidity and capital resources—Warehouse Lines and Debt Obligations.” Our ability to extend or renew existing warehouse lines and obtain new warehouse lines is affected by a variety of factors including:
•limitations imposed on us under our warehouse lines and other debt agreements, including restrictive covenants and borrowing conditions, which limit our ability to raise additional debt and require that we maintain certain financial results, including minimum tangible net worth, minimum liquidity, minimum pre-tax net income, minimum debt service coverage ratio, and maximum total liabilities to tangible net worth ratio as well as require us to maintain committed warehouse lines with third-party lenders;
•changes in financial covenants mandated by warehouse line lenders, which we may not be able to achieve;
•any decrease in liquidity in the credit markets;
•potential valuation changes to our mortgage loans, servicing rights or other collateral;
•prevailing interest rates;
•the strength of the warehouse line lenders from whom we borrow, and the regulatory environment in which they operate, including proposed capital strengthening requirements;
•our ability to sell our products to the Agencies;
•warehouse line lenders seeking to reduce their exposure to residential loans due to other reasons, including a change in such lender’s strategic plan or lines of business; and
•accounting changes that may impact calculations of covenants in our warehouse lines and other debt agreements which result in our ability to continue to satisfy such covenants.
Warehouse lines may not be available to us with counterparties on acceptable terms or at all. While we believe that our current ability to access warehouse lines for our mortgage loan products has been enhanced due to our operating history, experience and performance under the warehouse line facilities, it is possible that this advantage will dissipate as new mortgage loan products are developed and introduced, as the cost and terms of credit with respect to those new mortgage loan products may prove to be less favorable than the terms we have for our current mortgage loan products, or the terms that our competitors may have on their new mortgage loan products.
Our access to and our ability to renew our existing warehouse lines could suffer in the event of: (i) the deterioration in the performance of the mortgage loans underlying the warehouse lines; (ii) our failure to maintain sufficient levels of eligible assets or credit enhancements; (iii) our inability to access the secondary market for mortgage loans (see “—We depend on the programs of the Agencies. Discontinuation, or changes in the roles or practices, of these entities, without comparable private sector substitutes, could materially and negatively affect our; results of operations and ability to compete.”) or (iv) termination of our role as servicer of the underlying mortgage loan assets in the event that (x) we default in the performance of our servicing obligations or (y) we declare bankruptcy or become insolvent.
An event of default, an adverse action by a regulatory authority or a general deterioration in the economy that constricts the availability of credit, similar to the market conditions in 2007 through 2010, may increase our cost of funds and make it difficult or impossible for us to renew existing warehouse lines or obtain new warehouse lines, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations, and would result in substantial diversion of our management’s attention.
Our existing indebtedness, including our warehouse lines and debt obligations also impose financial and non-financial covenants and restrictions on us that limit the amount of indebtedness that we may incur, impact our liquidity through minimum cash reserve requirements, and impact our flexibility to determine our operating policies and investment strategies. Certain of our warehouse lines contain financial covenants under which net income or net income before income taxes for the applicable measurement period must be $1.00 or more. If we default on one of our obligations under a warehouse line or breach our representations and warranties contained therein, the lender may be able to terminate the transaction, accelerate any amounts
40
outstanding, require us to prematurely repurchase the loans, and cease entering into any other repurchase transactions with us. Because our warehouse lines typically contain cross-default provisions, a default that occurs under any one agreement could allow the lenders under our other agreements and under our other debt obligations to also declare a default. Additional warehouse lines, bank credit facilities or other debt facilities that we may enter into in the future may contain additional covenants and restrictions. If we fail to meet or satisfy any of these covenants, we would be in default under these agreements, and our lenders could elect to declare outstanding amounts due and payable, terminate their commitments, require the posting of additional collateral and enforce their interests against existing collateral. Any losses that we incur on our warehouse lines could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Warehouse Lines and Debt Obligations” for more information about these and other financing arrangements. If we are unable to access such other sources of capital and liquidity, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be negatively impacted.
Our indebtedness and other financial obligations may limit our financial and operating activities and our ability to incur additional debt to fund future needs.
As of December 31, 2021, we had $9.1 billion of outstanding indebtedness, of which $7.5 billion was secured, short-term indebtedness under our warehouse lines, $542.9 million was secured debt obligations, and $1.1 billion was unsecured debt obligations. For more information regarding our financing arrangements, see “Item 7. Management discussion and analysis —Liquidity and capital resources—Warehouse Lines and Debt Obligation.” Subject to the limits contained in the applicable agreements governing our warehouse lines and other debt obligations, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments, or acquisitions, or for other purposes. If we do so, the risks related to our high level of debt could increase. Specifically, our high level of debt could have important consequences to the holders of our Class A Common Stock, including the following:
•require us to dedicate a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on indebtedness, including indebtedness we may incur in the future, thereby reducing the funds available for other purposes;
•limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate requirements, including our ability to obtain short-term credit, including renewing or replacing warehouse lines;
•increase our vulnerability to fluctuations in market interest rates, to the extent that the spread we earn between the interest we receive on our LHFS and the interest we pay under our indebtedness is reduced;
•increasing our cost of borrowing;
•place us at a competitive disadvantage to competitors with relatively less debt in economic downturns, adverse industry conditions or catastrophic external events; or
•reduce our flexibility in planning for, or responding to, changing business, industry and economic conditions.
In addition, our indebtedness could limit our ability to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms, or at all, to fund our day-to-day loan origination operations, future acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, general corporate and other purposes, any of which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. The agreements governing our outstanding indebtedness contain financial and other restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of such debt. Our liquidity needs could vary significantly and may be affected by general economic conditions, industry trends, performance and many other factors not within our control. Further, our warehouse lines are short-term debt that must to be renewed by our lenders on a regular basis, typically once a year.
Obligations under our indebtedness could have other important consequences. For example, our failure to comply with the restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness that limit our ability to incur liens, to incur debt and to sell assets, among other things, could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could harm our business or prospects and could result in our bankruptcy. In addition, if we defaulted on our obligations under any of our secured debt, our secured lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. Furthermore, if we default on our obligations under one debt agreement, it may trigger defaults under our other debt agreements which include cross-default provisions.
41
Although we have shifted away from using the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) to originate adjustable rate loans and have amended our variable-rate indebtedness to account for the adjustment from LIBOR, we may still be exposed to risks relating to the transition from LIBOR and the volatility of LIBOR.
In July 2017, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority announced that it intended to stop collecting LIBOR rates from banks after 2021. U.S. dollar LIBOR is expected to be replaced with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), a new index calculated by reference to short-term repurchase agreements for U.S. Treasury securities. We have transitioned originating adjustable rate loans away from LIBOR to SOFR and have amended our variable-rate indebtedness, removing LIBOR with a replacement rate or fallback language to ensure an orderly migration to a successor reference rate. Nonetheless, there is currently no definitive successor reference rate to LIBOR and we are unable to predict the effect of any changes to LIBOR, the establishment and success of any alternative reference rates, or any other reforms to LIBOR or any replacement of LIBOR that may be enacted in the U.S. or elsewhere. Such changes, reforms or replacements relating to LIBOR could have an adverse impact on the market for or value of any LIBOR-linked securities, loans, derivatives or other financial instruments or extensions of credit held by us. LIBOR-related changes could affect our overall results of operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure
We are a holding company with no operations of our own and, as such, we depend on our subsidiaries for cash to fund all of our operations and expenses, including future dividend payments, if any.
We are a holding company and will have no material assets other than our equity interest in LD Holdings, which is a holding company and will have no material assets other than its 99.99% equity interests in LDLLC, and 100% equity interests in ART, LDSS, and Mello (and indirect interests in other subsidiaries). We have no independent means of generating revenue. We intend to cause LDLLC (and the other subsidiaries, if practicable) to make distributions to LD Holdings, and LD Holdings to make distributions to its unitholders in an amount sufficient to cover all applicable taxes payable by them determined according to assumed rates, payments owing under the tax receivable agreement, and dividends, if any, declared by us. To the extent that we need funds, and LDLLC or LD Holdings are restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation or contract, or are otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.
We are a “controlled company” and, as a result, qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. You will therefore not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.
We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE corporate governance standards. Under these rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:
•the requirement that a majority of the board of directors consists of independent directors;
•the requirement that our director nominees be selected, or recommended for our board of directors’ selection by a nominating and governance committee comprised solely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the nomination process;
•the requirement that the compensation of our executive officers be determined, or recommended to our board of directors for determination, by a compensation committee comprised solely of independent directors; and
•the requirement for an annual performance evaluation of the nominating/corporate governance and compensation committees.
Although we currently have a majority of independent directors, we may rely on these exemptions. Each of our governance and nominating committee and compensation committee currently consists entirely of independent directors but such committees will not be subject to annual performance evaluations. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements.
The Parthenon Stockholders and the Continuing LLC Members control us and their interests may conflict with yours in the future.
42
The Parthenon Stockholders and the Continuing LLC Members own approximately 97.4% of the combined voting power of our Class A, Class B, Class C and Class D Common Stock. Accordingly, the Parthenon Stockholders and the Continuing LLC Members, if voting in the same manner, will be able to control the election and removal of our directors and thereby determine our corporate and management policies, including potential mergers or acquisitions, payment of dividends, assets sales, amendment of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws and other significant corporate transactions for so long as the Parthenon Stockholders and the Continuing LLC Members retain significant ownership of us. This concentration of ownership may delay or deter possible changes in control of our company, which may reduce the value of an investment in our common stock. So long as the Parthenon Stockholders and the Continuing LLC Members continue to own a significant amount of our combined voting power, even if such amount is less than 50%, they will continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively control our decisions.
In addition, the Continuing LLC Members owns 55.7% of the Holdco Units. Because they hold their ownership interest in our business through LD Holdings, rather than us, these existing unitholders may have conflicting interests with holders of our Class A Common Stock. For example, the Continuing LLC Members may have different tax positions from us which could influence their decisions regarding whether and when to dispose of assets, and whether and when to incur new or refinance existing indebtedness, especially in light of the existence of the tax receivable agreement. In addition, the structuring of future transactions may take into consideration these existing unitholders’ tax considerations even where no similar benefit would accrue to us. See Note 1- Description of Business, Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies “—Income Taxes” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Certain of our stockholders will have the right to engage or invest in the same or similar businesses as us.
In the ordinary course of its business activities, Parthenon Capital and its affiliates may engage in activities where its interests conflict with our interests or those of our stockholders. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that Parthenon Capital or any of its officers, directors, agents, stockholders, members, partners, affiliates and subsidiaries will have no duty to refrain from engaging directly or indirectly in the same or similar business activities or lines of business as us or any of our subsidiaries, even if the opportunity is one that we might reasonably have pursued or had the ability or desire to pursue if granted the opportunity to do so. No such person will be liable to us for breach of any fiduciary or other duty, as a director or officer or otherwise, by reason of the fact that such person, acting in good faith, pursues or acquires any such business opportunity, directs any such business opportunity to another person or fails to present any such business opportunity, or information regarding any such business opportunity, to us unless, in the case of any such person who is our director or officer, any such business opportunity is expressly offered to such director or officer solely in his or her capacity as our director or officer.
We will be required to pay, under the tax receivable agreement, the Parthenon Stockholders and certain Continuing LLC Members for certain tax benefits we may claim arising in connection with our purchase of Holdco Units and future exchanges of Holdco Units under the Holdings LLC Agreement, which payments could be substantial.
The Continuing LLC Members may from time to time cause LD Holdings to exchange an equal number of Holdco Units and Class B Common Stock for cash or Class A Common Stock of loanDepot, Inc. on a one-for-one basis at our election. In addition, we purchased Holdco Units from the Exchanging Members. As a result of these transactions, we expect to become entitled to certain tax basis adjustments reflecting the difference between the price we pay to acquire Holdco Units of LD Holdings and the proportionate share of LD Holdings’ tax basis allocable to such units at the time of the exchange. As a result, the amount of tax that we would otherwise be required to pay in the future may be reduced by the increase (for tax purposes) in depreciation and amortization deductions attributable to our interests in LD Holdings, although the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) may challenge all or part of that tax basis adjustment, and a court could sustain such a challenge.
We entered into a tax receivable agreement with the Parthenon Stockholders, Parthenon affiliates owning Holdco Units and certain of the Continuing LLC Members that provides for the payment by us to such parties or their permitted assignees of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local tax that we realize or are deemed to realize as a result of (i) the tax basis adjustments referred to above, (ii) any incremental tax basis adjustments attributable to payments made pursuant to the tax receivable agreement and (iii) any deemed interest deductions arising from payments made by us pursuant to the tax receivable agreement. While the actual amount of the adjusted tax basis, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under this agreement will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the basis of our
43
proportionate share of LD Holdings’ assets on the dates of exchanges, the timing of exchanges, the price of shares of our Class A Common Stock at the time of each exchange, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, the deductions and other
adjustments to taxable income to which LD Holdings is entitled, and the amount and timing of our income, we expect that during the anticipated term of the tax receivable agreement, the payments that we may make to the Parthenon Stockholders, Parthenon affiliates owning Holdco Units and certain of the Continuing LLC Members or their permitted assignees could be substantial. Payments under the tax receivable agreement may give rise to additional tax benefits and therefore to additional potential payments under the tax receivable agreement. In addition, the tax receivable agreement will provide for interest accrued from the due date (without extensions) of the corresponding tax return for the taxable year with respect to which the payment obligation arises to the date of payment under the agreement.
Further, upon consummation of our initial public offering, loanDepot, Inc. acquired a significant equity interest in LD Holdings from Parthenon Blocker after a series of transactions that resulted in Parthenon Blocker merging with and into loanDepot, Inc., with loanDepot, Inc. remaining as the surviving corporation. The Company did not realize any of the cash savings in U.S. federal, state and local tax described above regarding tax basis adjustments and deemed interest deductions in relation to any Class A Common Stock received by the Parthenon Stockholders in the Reorganization Transactions. The Parthenon Stockholders or their permitted assignees, however, are entitled to receive payments under the tax receivable agreement in respect of the cash tax savings, if any, that we realize or are deemed to realize as a result of future exchanges of Holdco Units and Class B or Class C Common Stock for cash or Class A Common Stock of loanDepot, Inc. There may be a material negative effect on our liquidity if, as a result of timing discrepancies or otherwise, (i) the payments under the tax receivable agreement exceed the actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement, and/or (ii) distributions to us by LD Holdings are not sufficient to permit us to make payments under the tax receivable agreement after it has paid its taxes and other obligations. For example, were the IRS to challenge a tax basis adjustment, or other deductions or adjustments to the taxable income of LD Holdings or its subsidiaries, none of the parties to the tax receivable agreement will reimburse us for any payments that may previously have been made under the tax receivable agreement, except that excess payments made to the Parthenon Stockholders, Parthenon affiliates owning Holdco Units and certain of the Continuing LLC Members or their permitted assignees will be netted against payments otherwise to be made, if any, after our determination of such excess. As a result, in certain circumstances we could make payments to the Parthenon Stockholders, Parthenon affiliates owning Holdco Units and certain of the Continuing LLC Members or their permitted assignees under the tax receivable agreement in excess of our ultimate cash tax savings. In addition, the payments under the tax receivable agreement are not conditioned upon any recipient’s continued ownership of interests in us or LD Holdings. The Parthenon Stockholders, Parthenon affiliates owning Holdco Units and certain of the Continuing LLC Members will receive payments under the tax receivable agreement until such time that they validly assign or otherwise transfer their rights to receive such payments.
In certain circumstances, including certain changes of control of the Company, payments by us under the tax receivable agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement.
The tax receivable agreement provides that (i) in the event that we materially breach any of our material obligations under the agreement, whether as a result of failure to make any payment, failure to honor any other material obligation required thereunder or by operation of law as a result of the rejection of the agreements in a bankruptcy or otherwise, (ii) if, at any time, we elect an early termination of the agreement, or (iii) upon certain changes of control of the Company our (or our successor’s) obligations under the agreements (with respect to all Holdco Units of LD Holdings, whether or not such units have been exchanged or acquired before or after such transaction) would accelerate and become payable in a lump sum amount equal to the present value of the anticipated future tax benefits calculated based on certain assumptions. These assumptions include the assumptions that (i) we (or our successor) will have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize the deductions arising from the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits subject to the tax receivable agreement, (ii) we (or our successor) will utilize any loss carryovers generated by the increased tax deductions and tax basis and other benefits in the earliest possible tax year, and (iii) LD Holdings and its subsidiaries will sell certain nonamortizable assets (and realize certain related tax benefits) no later than a specified date. As a result of the foregoing, if we materially breach a material obligation under the agreement, if we elect to terminate the agreement early, or if we undergo a change of control we would be required to make an immediate lump sum payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future tax savings, which payment may be made significantly in advance of the actual realization of such future tax savings. In these situations, our obligations under the tax receivable agreement could have a substantial negative impact on our liquidity. There can be no assurance that we will be able to fund or finance our obligations under the tax receivable agreement. Additionally, the obligation to make a lump sum payment on a change of control may deter potential acquirers, which could negatively affect our stockholders’ potential returns. See Note 1-
44
Description of Business, Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” for further information.
In certain circumstances, LD Holdings will be required to make distributions to us and the other holders of Holdco Units and the distributions that LD Holdings will be required to make may be substantial.
The holders of LD Holdings Units, including loanDepot, Inc., will incur U.S. federal, state and local income taxes on their proportionate share of any taxable income of LD Holdings. Net profits and net losses of LD Holdings will generally be allocated to the holders of Holdco Units (including loanDepot, Inc.) pro rata in accordance with their respective share of the net profits and net losses of LD Holdings. The Holdings LLC Agreement provides for cash distributions to each holder of Holdco Units (including LoanDepot Inc.), which we refer to as “tax distributions,” based on certain assumptions. LD Holdings may be required to make tax distributions that, in the aggregate, may exceed the amount of taxes that LD Holdings would have paid if it were taxed on its net income at the assumed rate.
Funds used by LD Holdings to satisfy its tax distribution obligations will not be available for reinvestment in our business. Moreover, the tax distributions that LD Holdings will be required to make may be substantial, and may exceed (as a percentage of LD Holdings’ income) the overall effective tax rate applicable to a similarly situated corporate taxpayer.
Tax distributions to us may exceed the sum of our tax liabilities to various taxing authorities and the amount we are required to pay under the tax receivable agreement. This may lead, under certain scenarios, to us having significant cash on hand in excess of our current operating needs. We will, in the sole discretion of our board of directors, use this cash to invest in our business, pay dividends to our stockholders or retain such cash for business exigencies in the future.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock and Public Company Status
The market price of our Class A Common Stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.
The market price of our Class A Common Stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our Class A Common Stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of shares of our Class A Common Stock in spite of our operating performance. In addition, our results of operations could be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors due to a number of potential factors, including variations in our quarterly or annual results of operations, additions or departures of key management personnel, changes in our earnings estimates (if provided) or failure to meet analysts’ earnings estimates, publication of research reports about our industry, litigation and government investigations, changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement thereof affecting our business, adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur or securities we may issue in the future, changes in market valuations of similar companies or speculation in the press or the investment community with respect to us or our industry, adverse announcements by us or others and developments affecting us, announcements by our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnership, joint ventures or capital commitments, actions by institutional stockholders, increases in market interest rates that may lead investors in our shares to demand a higher yield, and in response the market price of shares of our Class A Common Stock could decreases significantly. You may be unable to resell your shares of Class A Common Stock at or above your purchase price, or at all.
These broad market and industry factors may decrease the market price of our Class A Common Stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The stock market in general has from time to time experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, including in recent months. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.
The multi- class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with those stockholders who held our capital stock prior to the completion of our initial offering, including our directors, executive officers, Mr. Hsieh and his affiliates (the “Hsieh Stockholders”) and Parthenon Stockholders, who hold in the aggregate 97.4% of the voting power of our capital stock, which may limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters, including the election of directors and the approval of any change of control transaction.
45
Our Class C and Class D Common Stock have five votes per share, and our Class A Common Stock, has one vote per share. The holders of our outstanding Class C and Class D Common Stock hold 97.4% of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock. Because of the five-to-one voting ratio between our Class C and Class D Common Stock and the Class A Common Stock offered hereby, the holders of our Class C and Class D Common Stock collectively are expected to continue to control a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock and therefore will be able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval. Such rights and differential voting of the Parthenon Stockholders and Hsieh Stockholders shall cease five years from the date of our initial public offering. This concentrated control could limit or preclude your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other major corporate transaction requiring stockholder approval. In addition, this may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders.
The multi-class structure of our common stock may adversely affect the trading market for our Class A Common Stock.
Certain stock index providers, such as S&P Dow Jones, exclude companies with multiple classes of shares of common stock from being added to certain stock indices, including the S&P 500. In addition, several stockholder advisory firms and large institutional investors oppose the use of multiple class structures. As a result, the multi-class structure of our common stock may prevent the inclusion of our Class A Common Stock in such indices, may cause stockholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise seek to cause us to change our capital structure, and may result in large institutional investors not purchasing shares of our Class A Common Stock. Any exclusion from stock indices could result in a less active trading market for our Class A Common Stock. Any actions or publications by stockholder advisory firms or institutional investors critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could also adversely affect the value of our Class A Common Stock.
We will continue to incur costs and be subject to additional regulations and requirements as a result of becoming a public company, and our management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance matters, which could lower profits or make it more difficult to run our business.
As a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting, reporting and other expenses, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements and costs of recruiting and retaining non-executive directors. We also have incurred and will incur costs associated with compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and rules and regulations of the SEC, and various other costs of a public company. The expenses incurred by public companies generally for reporting and corporate governance purposes have been increasing, including increased legal and financial compliance costs and may make some activities more time-consuming and costly. Our management needs to devote a substantial amount of time to ensure that we comply with all of these requirements.
In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We have invested and intend to continue to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment has resulted and may continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
These laws and regulations also could make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as executive officers. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our Class A Common Stock, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.
46
Failure to comply with the requirements to design, implement and maintain effective internal controls could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.
As a public company, we have significant requirements for enhanced financial reporting and internal controls. The process of designing and implementing effective internal controls is a continuous effort that requires us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting obligations as a public company.
If we are unable to maintain appropriate internal financial reporting controls and procedures, it could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations on a timely basis, result in material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements and harm our operating results. In addition, we are required pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for the first fiscal year beginning after the effective date of our initial public offering. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in an internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) commencing the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC. Testing and maintaining internal controls may divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to our business. If either we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting or our independent registered public accounting firm is unable to provide us with an unqualified report, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline, and we may be subject to investigation or sanctions by the SEC.
Future offerings of debt or equity securities by us may adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock.
In the future, we may attempt to obtain financing or to further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of our Class A Common Stock or offering additional debt or other equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes, debt securities convertible into equity or shares of preferred stock. Future acquisitions could require substantial additional capital in excess of cash from operations. We would expect to obtain the capital required for acquisitions through a combination of additional issuances of equity, corporate indebtedness and/or cash from operations.
Issuing additional shares of our Class A Common Stock or other equity securities or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our Class A Common Stock or both. Upon liquidation, holders of such debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our Class A Common Stock. Debt securities convertible into equity could be subject to adjustments in the conversion ratio pursuant to which certain events may increase the number of equity securities issuable upon conversion. Preferred shares, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of our Class A Common Stock. Our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, which may adversely affect the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings.
Future sales, or the perception of future sales, of shares of our Class A Common Stock by existing stockholders could result in dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and cause the market price of our Class A Common Stock to decline.
The sale of substantial amounts of shares of our Class A Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, including sales by the Parthenon Stockholders and the Continuing LLC Members, could have an adverse effect on our stock price and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional stock. In the future, as we may attempt to obtain financing or to further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of our common stock. Issuing additional shares of our Class A Common Stock or other equity securities or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our Class A Common Stock or both. Issuing additional shares of our Class B Common Stock and Class C Common Stock, as applicable, when issued with corresponding Holdco Units, may also dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our Class A Common Stock or both. Additionally, further issuances of our Class D Common Stock, which is
47
convertible into shares of our Class A Common Stock, may also dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders.
We have a total of 36,466,936 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding. The Class A Common Stock is freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), except for any Class A Common Stock that may be held or acquired by our directors, executive officers and other affiliates (as that term is defined in the Securities Act), which will be restricted securities under the Securities Act. Restricted securities may be sold only in compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act. In addition, 273,551,252 shares of Class A Common Stock may be issued upon the exercise of the exchange and /or conversion rights described elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K (assuming all outstanding 172,729,168 Holdco Units together with an equal number of shares of Class B Common Stock or Class C Common Stock, as applicable, in addition to our all outstanding 100,822,084 Class D Common Stock are exchanged for shares of Class A Common Stock) all of which are held by our directors, executive officers and their affiliated entities, and are subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 under the Securities Act and various vesting agreements. These holders have registration rights that will permit them to sell the securities into the open market.
We filed one and may file more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares of our Class A Common Stock or securities convertible or exchangeable for shares of our Class A Common Stock issued pursuant to our 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Any such Form S-8 registration statements will automatically become effective upon filing. Accordingly, shares registered under such registration statements will be available for sale in the open market. The initial registration statement on Form S-8 covers shares of our Class A Common Stock. As restrictions on resale ended, the market price of our shares of Class A Common Stock could drop significantly if the holders of restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through future offerings or our shares of Class A Common Stock or other securities.
In addition, subject to certain limitations and exceptions, pursuant to certain provisions of the Holdings LLC Agreement, the Continuing LLC Members may exchange an equal number of Holdco Units and Class B Common Stock or Class C Common Stock, as applicable, for shares of our Class A Common Stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends and reclassifications.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes us to issue additional shares of Class A Common Stock and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to Class A Common Stock for the consideration and on the terms and conditions established by our board of directors in its sole discretion. In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) and the provisions of our certificate of incorporation, we may also issue preferred stock that has designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties that are different from, and may be senior to, those applicable to shares of Class A Common Stock. Similarly, the Holdings LLC Agreement permits LD Holdings to issue an unlimited number of additional limited liability company interests of LD Holdings with designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties that are different from, and may be senior to, those applicable to the Holdco Units, and which may be exchangeable for shares of our Class A Common Stock.
We cannot assure that we will pay any dividends on our Class A common stock.
Any payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board, which comprises a majority of independent directors. Although our Board has not adopted a written dividend policy, it has declared a regular cash dividend of $0.08 per share on our Class A common stock for each quarter of 2021 since the completion of our IPO. Nonetheless, our Board may determine not to declare any cash dividends in the future. Although our Board may elect to declare cash dividends on our Class A common stock, subject to our compliance with applicable law, and depending on, among other things, our financial condition, results of operations, projections, liquidity, earnings, legal requirements, and restrictions in our debt, there can be no assurance it will do so. In addition, our ability to pay dividends depends on our receipt of distributions from our operating subsidiaries, which may further restrict our ability to pay dividends as a result of the laws of their jurisdiction of organization, agreements of our subsidiaries or covenants under any indebtedness we or our subsidiaries incur. For more information about our dividends, see “Item. 7. Management Discussion and Analysis - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Dividends and Distributions.”
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about us or our business, the price of our Class A Common Stock and trading volume could decline.
48
The trading market for our Class A Common Stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our Class A Common Stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our Company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our Class A Common Stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline. In addition, if our operating results fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts, our stock price would likely decline.
The provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requiring exclusive forum in certain courts in the State of Delaware or the federal district courts of the United States for certain types of lawsuits may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against our directors and officers.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, or stockholders to us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us governed by the internal affairs doctrine will have to be brought only in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware lacks jurisdiction, any other state court of the State of Delaware, or if no state court of the State of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware), unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum. The foregoing provision will not apply to claims arising under the Securities Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or other federal securities laws for which there is exclusive federal or concurrent federal and state jurisdiction. Additionally, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States shall be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. Any person or entity purchasing or
otherwise acquiring or holding any interest in our common stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to
the forum selection provisions described in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. Although we believe these exclusive forum provisions benefit us by providing increased consistency in the application of Delaware law and federal securities laws in the types of lawsuits to which each applies, the exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or any of our directors, officers, or stockholders, which may discourage lawsuits with respect to such claims. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder as a result of our exclusive forum provisions. Further, in the event a court finds either exclusive forum provision contained in our certificate of incorporation to be unenforceable or inapplicable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control of us, which could adversely affect the price of our Class A Common Stock.
Certain provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions:
•authorize the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock;
•prohibit stockholder action by written consent, requiring all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders, if Parthenon Capital, Anthony Hsieh and their respective affiliates cease collectively to beneficially own more than 50% of our voting common stock;
•provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal our amended and restated bylaws;
•establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings;
49
•establish a classified board of directors, as a result of which our board of directors will be divided into three classes, with each class serving for staggered three-year terms, which prevents stockholders from electing an entirely new board of directors at an annual meeting;
•limit the ability of stockholders to remove directors;
•make it more difficult for a person who would be an “interested stockholder” to effect various business combinations with us for a three-year period;
•prohibit stockholders from calling special meetings of stockholders; and
•require the approval of holders of at least 66 2⁄3% of the outstanding shares of our voting common stock to amend the amended and restated bylaws and certain provisions of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation.
In addition, these provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our management or our board of directors. Stockholders who might desire to participate in these types of transactions may not have an opportunity to do so, even if the transaction is favorable to stockholders. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of stockholders to benefit from a change in control or change our management and board of directors and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Facilities and Real Estate
Our corporate headquarters are located at Towne Centre Plaza, 26632, 26642 and 26672 Towne Centre Drive, Foothill Ranch, California 92610, in a three building development totaling 144,398 square feet of leased office space. This location houses our corporate office, our largest sales and processing team, our support services, and operations, as well as our administrative offices.
We lease ten additional facilities: one in Lake Forest, California; two in Irvine, California one in Franklin, Tennessee; two in Scottsdale, Arizona one in Chandler, Arizona; one in Southfield, Michigan; and two in Plano, Texas. Our Lake Forest location is primarily operations, support services, and settlement services, our Irvine locations are primarily sales and operations, and technology, our Franklin and Southfield locations are primarily sales offices, our Arizona locations and our Walpole location houses some of our sales, processing and operations employees, and our Plano locations include employees from nearly all aspects of our business, including our servicing department. In addition, we lease over 240 licensed sales office locations, in most states across the United States.
None of our leases extend beyond 10 years and the financial commitments are immaterial to the scope of our operations.
Intellectual Property
As of December 31, 2021, we hold 31 registered United States trademarks and 23 United States trademark applications, including with respect to the name “loanDepot,” “mello” and other logos and various additional designs and word marks relating to the “loanDepot” name, as well as seven United States patent applications. We do not otherwise rely on any registered copyrights or other forms of registered intellectual property. Our other intellectual property rights consist of unregistered copyrights, trade secrets, proprietary know-how and technological innovations that we have developed to maintain our competitive position.
50
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we and certain of our subsidiaries are involved in various lawsuits in state or federal courts regarding violations of state or federal statutes, regulations or common law related to matters arising out of the ordinary course of business. We are not currently subject to any other material legal proceedings. See Note 22- Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
51
PART II.
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our Class A common stock has been listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “LDI” since February 11, 2021. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our stock. Our Class B common stock, Class C common stock, and Class D common stock are neither listed nor traded.
Holders
As of March 17, 2022, there were 34 stockholders of record of our Class A common stock. The actual number of stockholders is greater than this number of record holders and includes stockholders who are beneficial owners but whose shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees.
As of March 17, 2022, there were 0 stockholders of record of our Class B common stock.
As of March 17, 2022, there were 78 stockholders of record of our Class C common stock.
As of March 17, 2022, there were 4 stockholders of record of our Class D common stock.
Dividend Policy
We initiated a quarterly dividend in May 2021. Cash dividends are subject to the discretion of our board of directors and our compliance with applicable law, and depending on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, level of indebtedness, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, including the satisfaction of our obligations under the tax receivable agreement, restrictions in our debt agreements, business prospects and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. The payment, including timing and amount, of such quarterly dividends and any future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors.
Our ability to pay dividends depends on our receipt of cash dividends from our operating subsidiaries, which may further restrict our ability to pay dividends as a result of the laws of their jurisdiction of organization or agreements of our subsidiaries, including agreements governing our indebtedness. Future agreements may also limit our ability to pay dividends. Following our initial public offering, we receive a portion of any distributions made by LDLLC. Under the 10th LLC Agreement, loanDepot, Inc., through its ability to appoint the board of managers of LD Holdings, which will have the ability to appoint the board of managers of LDLLC, has the right to determine when distributions (other than tax distributions) will be made by LDLLC to LD Holdings and the amount of any such distributions. Under the Holdings LLC Agreement, the board of managers of LD Holdings has the right to determine when distributions (other than tax distributions) will be made to unitholders of LD Holdings and the amount of any such distributions. Any such distributions will be distributed to all holders of Holdco Units, including us, pro rata based on their holdings of Holdco Units. The cash received from such distributions will first be used by us to satisfy any tax liability and then to make any payments required under the tax receivable agreement to the Parthenon Stockholders, Parthenon affiliates owning Holdco Units and certain of the Continuing LLC Members or their permitted assignees.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See “Item 12. “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.”
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
52
Shares of the Company's Class B common stock or Class C common stock may each be converted, together with a corresponding Holdco Unit, as applicable, at any time and from time to time at the option of the holder of such share of Class B common stock or Class C common stock, as applicable, for one fully paid and non-assessable share of Class A common stock. Each share of the Company’s Class D common stock may be converted into one fully paid and non-assessable share of Class A common stock at any time at the option of the holder of such share of Class D common stock. There is no cash or other consideration paid by the holder converting such shares and, accordingly, there is no cash or other consideration received by the Company. The shares of Class A common stock issued by the Company in such conversions are exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.
On October 1, 2021, we issued to stockholders 312,911 shares of Class A common stock upon the conversion of the same number of shares of our Class C common stock and corresponding Holdco Units held by such stockholders.
On November 1, 2021, we issued to stockholders 1,730,531 shares of Class A common stock upon the conversion of the same number of shares of our Class C common stock and corresponding Holdco Units held by such stockholders.
On November 11, 2021, we issued to stockholders 14,156,560 shares of Class A common stock upon the conversion of the same number of shares of our Class D common stock and corresponding Holdco Units held by such stockholders.
On December 1, 2021, we issued to stockholders 2,263,379 shares of Class A common stock upon the conversion of the same number of shares of our Class C common stock and corresponding Holdco Units held by such stockholders.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
Item 6. [RESERVED]
53
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included under Part II. Item 8 of this report. The results of operations described below are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future periods. This discussion includes forward-looking information that involves risks and assumptions which could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s expectations. See our cautionary language at the beginning of this report under “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and for a more complete discussion of the factors that could affect our future results refer to Part I. “Item IA. Risk Factors”
Overview
loanDepot is a customer-centric and technology-enabled residential mortgage platform. We launched our business in 2010 to provide mortgage loan solutions to consumers who were dissatisfied with the services offered by banks and other traditional market participants. Since our inception, we have significantly expanded our origination platform both in terms of size and capabilities. Our primary sources of revenue are derived from the origination of conventional and government mortgage loans, servicing conventional and government mortgage loans, and providing a growing suite of ancillary services.
On February 11, 2021 we completed the IPO of 3,850,000 shares of Class A common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at an offering price of $14.00 per share, pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-1. We are a publicly traded company whose Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “LDI.”
A summary of our critical accounting policies and estimates is included in Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
Key Factors Influencing Our Results of Operations
Market and Economic Environment
The consumer lending market and the associated loan origination volumes for mortgage loans are influenced by interest rates and economic conditions. While borrower demand for consumer credit has typically remained strong in most economic environments, general market conditions, including the interest rate environment, unemployment rates, home price appreciation and consumer confidence may affect borrower willingness to seek financing and investor desire and ability to invest in loans. For example, a significant interest rate increase or rise in unemployment could cause potential borrowers to defer seeking financing as they wait for interest rates to stabilize or the general economic environment to improve. Additionally, if the economy weakens and actual or expected default rates increase, loan investors may postpone or reduce their investments in loan products.
The volume of mortgage loan originations associated with home purchases is generally less affected by interest rate fluctuations and more sensitive to broader economic factors as well as the overall strength of the economy and housing prices. Purchase mortgage loan origination volume can be subject to seasonal trends as home sales typically rise during the spring and summer seasons and decline in the fall and winter seasons. This is somewhat offset by purchase loan originations sourced from our joint ventures which experience their highest level of activity during November and December as home builders focus on completing and selling homes prior to year-end. Seasonality has less of an impact on mortgage loan refinancing volumes, which are primarily driven by fluctuations in mortgage loan interest rates.
Current Market Conditions:
Residential mortgages represent the largest segment of the broader United States consumer finance market. According to the MBA’s Mortgage Finance Forecast published February 22, 2022, there was approximately $11.6 trillion of residential mortgage debt outstanding in the United States at December 31, 2021 that is forecasted to increase to $12.3 trillion by the end of 2022. During 2021, annual one-to-four family residential mortgage origination volume remained elevated at $4.0 trillion, of this $2.3 trillion was comprised of refinance volume driven by lower interest rates. Annual one-to-four family residential mortgage origination volumes are expected to decrease by 34% to $2.6 trillion in 2022. The primary driver of this decrease is refinance volume, which is expected to decrease by $1.5 trillion during the year. Purchase volume however, is expected to
54
remain strong and increase by $127.0 billion over the prior year driven by continued strong housing fundamentals and home price appreciation.
Looking forward, we expect to continue our growth in market share driven by ongoing strength in the residential housing market supported by increasing homeowners’ equity creating demand for cash-out refinance transactions; decreasing number of borrowers experiencing distress, with lower delinquencies and fewer borrowers in forbearance; and a sharper focus on expansion of ancillary products and services from expanded customer engagement points that will result in additional revenue sources.
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
The financial markets demonstrated significant volatility due to the economic impacts of COVID-19 as interest rates fell to historic lows during 2020, which resulted in increased mortgage refinance originations and favorable margins during 2020. Our efficient and scalable platform enabled us to respond quickly to the increased market demand which resulted in increased loan originations throughout 2021. During 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic continued to bring some risk and uncertainty to the economy, including the risk of unemployment, borrower delinquency rates, increased servicing advances, the health and safety of our workers, and our overall profitability and liquidity. As a servicer, we are required to advance principal and interest to the investor for up to four months on GSE backed mortgages and longer on other government agency backed mortgages on behalf of clients who have entered into forbearance plans including those under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”). As of December 31, 2021, approximately 0.6%, or $1.0 billion UPB, of our servicing portfolio was in active forbearance. While these advance requirements may be somewhat higher levels of forbearance, we believe we are well-positioned in terms of our liquidity.
Fluctuations in Interest Rates
Our mortgage loan refinancing volumes (and to a lesser degree, our purchase volumes), balance sheets, and results of operations are influenced by changes in interest rates and how we effectively manage the related interest rate risk. As interest rates decline, mortgage loan refinance volumes tend to increase, while an increasing interest rate environment may cause a decrease in refinance volumes and purchase volumes. In addition, the majority of our assets are subject to interest rate risk, including LHFS, which consist of mortgage loans held on our consolidated balance sheets for a short period of time after origination until we are able to sell them, IRLCs, servicing rights and mandatory trades, forward sales contracts, interest rate swap futures and put options that we enter into to manage interest rate risk created by IRLCs and uncommitted LHFS. We refer to such mandatory trades, forward sales contracts, interest rate swap futures and put options collectively as “Hedging Instruments.” As interest rates increase, our LHFS and IRLCs generally decrease in value while our Hedging Instruments utilized to hedge against interest rate risk typically increase in value. Rising interest rates cause our expected mortgage loan servicing revenues to increase due to a decline in mortgage loan prepayments which extends the average life of our servicing portfolio and increases the value of our servicing rights. Conversely, as interest rates decline, our LHFS and IRLCs generally increase in value while our Hedging Instruments decrease in value. In a declining interest rate environment, borrowers tend to refinance their mortgage loans, which increases prepayment speed and causes our expected mortgage loan servicing revenues to decrease, which reduces the average life of our servicing portfolio and decreases the value of our servicing rights. The changes in fair value of our servicing rights are recorded as unrealized gains and losses in changes in fair value of servicing rights, net, in our consolidated statements of operations.
When interest rates rise, rate and term refinancings become less attractive to consumers after a historically long period of low interest rates. However, rising interest rates are also indicative of overall economic growth and inflation that should create more opportunities with respect to cash-out refinancings. In addition, inflation which may result from increases in asset prices and stronger economic growth (leading to higher consumer confidence) typically should generate more purchase-focused transactions requiring loans and greater opportunities for home equity loans, which we expect may offset, at least in part, any decline in rate and term refinancings in a rising interest rate environment.
Key Performance Indicators
We manage and assess the performance of our business by evaluating a variety of metrics. Selected key performance metrics include loan originations and sales and servicing metrics.
Loan Origination and Sales
55
Loan originations and sales by volume and units are a measure of how successful we are at growing sales of mortgage loan products and a metric used by management in an attempt to isolate how effectively we are performing. We believe that originations and sales are an indicator of our market penetration in mortgage loans and that this provides useful information because it allows investors to better assess the underlying growth rate of our core business. Loan originations and sales include brokered loan originations not funded by us. We enter into IRLCs to originate loans, at specified interest rates, with customers who have applied for a mortgage and meet certain credit and underwriting criteria. We believe the volume of our IRLCs is another measure of our growth in originations.
Gain on sale margin represents the total of (i) gain on origination and sale of loans, net, and (ii) origination income, net, divided by loan origination volume during period. Gain on the origination and sale of loans, net was adjusted to exclude the change in fair value of forward sale contracts, including pair-offs, hedging MSRs, which are now included in the change in fair value of servicing rights, net on the consolidated statements of operations. We determined that this change would more appropriately reflect the hedged item and better align with industry practices. Gain on origination and sale of loans, net and change in fair value of servicing rights, net, in the current and prior periods along with the related disclosures have been adjusted to reflect this reclassification.
Pull through weighted gain on sale margin represents the total of (i) gain on origination and sale of loans, net, and (ii) origination income, net, divided by the pull through weighted rate lock volume. Pull through weighted rate lock volume is the unpaid principal balance of loans subject to interest rate lock commitments, net of a pull-through factor for the loan funding probability.
Servicing Metrics
Servicing metrics include the unpaid principal balance of our servicing portfolio and servicing portfolio units, which represent the number of mortgage loan customers we service. We believe that the net additions to our portfolio and number of units are indicators of the growth of our mortgage loans serviced and our servicing income, but may be offset by sales of servicing rights.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| Financial statement data | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total revenue | $ | 3,724,704 | $ | 4,312,174 | $ | 1,337,131 | ||||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,058,187 | 2,296,816 | 1,304,460 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income | 623,146 | 2,013,110 | 34,420 | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per share of Class A and Class D common stock | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.87 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.87 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Non-GAAP financial measures(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted total revenue | $ | 3,739,182 | $ | 4,253,276 | $ | 1,345,624 | ||||||||||||||
| Adjusted net income | 555,576 | 1,486,137 | 34,535 | |||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | 869,368 | 2,084,905 | 123,451 | |||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted Diluted EPS | $ | 1.72 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
| Loan origination and sales | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Loan originations by channel: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Retail | $ | 108,708,990 | $ | 80,256,666 | $ | 32,700,837 | ||||||||||||||
| Partner | 28,291,757 | 20,503,485 | 12,623,189 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 137,000,747 | $ | 100,760,151 | $ | 45,324,026 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan originations by purpose: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase | $ | 39,321,538 | $ | 28,301,076 | $ | 18,513,555 | ||||||||||||||
| Refinance | 97,679,209 | 72,459,075 | 26,810,471 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 137,000,747 | $ | 100,760,151 | $ | 45,324,026 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan originations (units) | 392,737 | 297,450 | 152,588 | |||||||||||||||||
56
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts) | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||
| Licensed loan officers: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Retail | 3,102 | 2,385 | 2,040 | |||||||||||||||||
| Partner | 271 | 227 | 197 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | 3,373 | 2,612 | 2,237 | |||||||||||||||||
| Loans sold: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing-retained | $ | 117,934,385 | $ | 87,186,118 | $ | 20,360,739 | ||||||||||||||
| Servicing-released | 18,148,290 | 10,353,541 | 23,134,883 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 136,082,675 | $ | 97,539,659 | $ | 43,495,622 | ||||||||||||||
| Loans sold (units) | 392,213 | 289,512 | 148,426 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale margin | 2.61 | % | 4.13 | % | 2.77 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale margin - retail | 2.93 | 4.41 | 3.39 | |||||||||||||||||
| Gain on sale margin - partner | 1.38 | 3.06 | 1.16 | |||||||||||||||||
| Pull through weighted gain on sale margin | 3.07 | 3.65 | 2.76 | |||||||||||||||||
| IRLCs | $ | 166,263,478 | $ | 160,984,531 | $ | 75,262,459 | ||||||||||||||
| IRLCs (units) | 506,176 | 471,723 | 268,692 | |||||||||||||||||
| Pull through weighted lock volume | $ | 116,628,597 | $ | 114,205,923 | $ | 45,482,929 | ||||||||||||||
| Servicing metrics | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total servicing portfolio (unpaid principal balance) | $ | 162,112,965 | $ | 102,931,258 | $ | 36,336,126 | ||||||||||||||
| Total servicing portfolio (units) | 524,992 | 342,600 | 148,750 | |||||||||||||||||
| 60+ days delinquent ($) | $ | 1,510,261 | $ | 2,162,585 | $ | 383,272 | ||||||||||||||
| 60+ days delinquent (%) | 0.93 | % | 2.10 | % | 1.05 | % | ||||||||||||||
Servicing rights at fair value, net(2) | $ | 1,999,402 | $ | 1,124,302 | $ | 444,443 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average servicing fee (3) | 0.29 | % | 0.31 | % | 0.35 | % | ||||||||||||||
Multiple (3)(4) | 4.4x | 3.2x | 3.6x | |||||||||||||||||
(1)Refer to the section titled “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” for a discussion and reconciliation of our Non-GAAP financial measures.
(2)Amount represents the fair value of servicing rights, net of servicing liabilities, which are included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
(3)Agency only.
(4)Amounts represent the fair value of servicing rights, net, divided by the weighted average annualized servicing fee.
57
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our consolidated financial statement data for 2021 compared to 2020. A comparative discussion of results for 2020 compared to 2019 is provided in the "Results of Operations" section within the Company’s Annual Report of loanDepot, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
| Year Ended December 31, | Change $ | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| REVENUES: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income | $ | 44,021 | $ | 11,436 | $ | 32,585 | 284.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gain on origination and sale of loans, net | 3,213,351 | 3,905,986 | (692,635) | (17.7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Origination income, net | 362,257 | 258,807 | 103,450 | 40.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing fee income | 393,680 | 185,895 | 207,785 | 111.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of servicing rights, net | (445,862) | (144,348) | (301,514) | (208.9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other income | 157,257 | 94,398 | 62,859 | 66.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total net revenues | 3,724,704 | 4,312,174 | (587,470) | (13.6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Personnel expense | 1,929,752 | 1,531,371 | 398,381 | 26.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marketing and advertising expense | 467,590 | 264,337 | 203,253 | 76.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Direct origination expense | 193,264 | 124,754 | 68,510 | 54.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative expense | 214,965 | 171,712 | 43,253 | 25.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Occupancy expense | 38,443 | 39,262 | (819) | (2.1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 35,541 | 35,669 | (128) | (0.4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subservicing expense | 99,068 | 81,710 | 17,358 | 21.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other interest expense | 79,564 | 48,001 | 31,563 | 65.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,058,187 | 2,296,816 | 761,371 | 33.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 666,517 | 2,015,358 | (1,348,841) | (66.9) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense | 43,371 | 2,248 | 41,123 | 1,829.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | 623,146 | 2,013,110 | (1,389,964) | (69.0) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 509,622 | 2,013,110 | (1,503,488) | (74.7) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to loanDepot, Inc. | $ | 113,524 | $ | — | $ | 113,524 | N/M | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income was $623.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, a decrease of $1.4 billion, compared to $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020. The decrease between periods was primarily driven by higher expenses of $761.4 million that included higher personnel expense to support increased loan originations and marketing expense to grow brand awareness. Total originations were $137.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $100.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020, representing an increase of $36.2 billion or 36.0%. Of the total originations for the year ended December 31, 2021, our Retail and Partner Channels originated $108.7 billion and $28.3 billion, respectively, as compared to $80.3 billion and $20.5 billion, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Revenues
Net Interest Income (Expense). Net interest income is earned on LHFS offset by interest expense on amounts borrowed under warehouse lines to finance such loans until sold. The increase in net interest income reflects a $4.6 billion increase in the average balances of LHFS and a $4.2 billion increase in the average balance of warehouse lines. A reduction in cost of funds also contributed to the increase in net interest income.
Gain on Origination and Sale of Loans, Net. Gain on origination and sale of loans, net was comprised of the following components:
58
| Year Ended December 31, | Change $ | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Premium from loan sales | $ | 1,882,557 | $ | 3,178,213 | $ | (1,295,656) | (40.8) | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights | 1,610,596 | 986,050 | 624,546 | 63.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value (losses) gains on IRLC and LHFS | (571,137) | 704,721 | (1,275,858) | (181.0) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value gains (losses) from Hedging Instruments | 505,236 | (788,507) | 1,293,743 | 164.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Discount points, rebates and lender paid costs | (206,716) | (148,518) | (58,198) | (39.2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Provision for loan loss obligation for loans sold | (7,185) | (25,973) | 18,788 | 72.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 3,213,351 | $ | 3,905,986 | $ | (692,635) | (17.7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
•Premiums on loan sales represent the net premium or discount we receive or pay in excess of the loan principal amount and certain fees charged by investors upon sale of the loans. The decrease in premiums from loan sales was a result of margin compression. Gain on sale margin for 2021 was 2.61% compared to 4.13% for 2020.
•Servicing rights represent the fair value of servicing rights generated by loans sold on a servicing-retained basis. The increase of $624.5 million or 63.3% was driven by an increase in volume of servicing-retained loan sales to $117.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $87.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020.
•Fair value gains or losses on IRLC and LHFS represent the change in fair value of LHFS and IRLC, the decrease of $1.3 billion or 181.0% was primarily due to increasing interest rates and decreasing margins during the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to decreasing market rates during the year ended December 31, 2020, partially offset by the increase in volume between periods.
•Fair value gains or losses on Hedging Instruments represent the unrealized gains or losses on mandatory trades, forward sales contracts, interest rate swap futures, and put options hedging IRLCs and LHFS as well as realized gains or losses from pair-off settlements. Fair value gains on Hedging Instruments of $505.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 reflect increasing interest rates and volumes compared to fair value losses of $788.5 million and decreasing market rates for the year ended December 31, 2020.
•Discount points, rebates, and lender paid costs represent discount points collected, rebates paid to borrowers, and lender paid costs for the origination of loans (including broker fee compensation paid to independent wholesale brokers and brokerage fees paid to our joint ventures for referred loans). The increase of $58.2 million or 39.2% was primarily related to the increase in origination volumes between periods;
•Provision for loan loss obligation related to loans sold represents the provision to establish our estimated liability for loan losses that we may experience as a result of a breach of representation or warranty provided to the purchasers or insurers of loans that we have sold. The decrease of $18.8 million or 72.3% included an $8.0 million reversal during the first quarter of 2021 due to a decrease in estimated losses on repurchase requests and decreased severity of losses on repurchased loans.
Origination Income, Net. Origination income, net, reflects the fees that we earn, net of lender credits we pay, from originating loans. Origination income includes loan origination fees, processing fees, underwriting fees, and other fees collected from the borrower at the time of funding. Lender credits typically include rebates or concessions to borrowers for certain loan origination costs. The $103.5 million or 40.0%, increase in origination income was the result of increased loan originations.
Servicing Fee Income. Servicing fee income reflects contractual servicing fees and ancillary and other fees (including late charges) related to the servicing of mortgage loans. The increase of $207.8 million or 111.8% in servicing income between periods was the result of an increase of $71.9 billion in the average UPB of our servicing portfolio due to an increase in servicing-retained loan sales.
59
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights, Net. Change in fair value of servicing rights, net include (i) fair value gains or losses net of Hedging Instrument gains or losses; (ii) fallout and decay, which includes principal amortization and prepayments; and (iii) realized gains or losses on the sales of servicing rights. Change in fair value of servicing rights, net was a loss of $445.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and $144.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, the increase in loss was primarily due to an increase in fallout and decay of $221.1 million and a $73.4 million increase in fair value loss net of hedge.
Other Income. Other income includes our pro rata share of the net earnings from joint ventures and fee income from title, escrow and settlement services for mortgage loan transactions performed by LDSS. The increase of $62.9 million or 66.6% in other income between periods was primarily the result of an increase of $64.3 million in escrow and title fee income due to increased mortgage loan settlement services.
Expenses
Personnel Expense. Personnel expense reflects employee compensation related to salaries, commissions, incentive compensation, benefits, and other employee costs. The $398.4 million or 26.0% increase in personnel expense between periods was primarily the result of an increase of $191.5 million in commissions due to the increase in loan origination volumes, coupled with increases in salaries and benefits expense of $206.8 million due to the increase in headcount to support the increased loan origination volumes. As of December 31, 2021, we had 11,307 employees, as compared to 9,892 employees as of December 31, 2020, representing an increase of 14.3%.
Marketing and Advertising Expense. Marketing and advertising expense primarily reflects online advertising costs, including fees paid to search engines, television, print and radio, distribution partners, master service agreements with brokers, and desk rental agreements with realtors. The $203.3 million or 76.9% increase in marketing expense was primarily the result of acquired leads, partnerships with Major League Baseball and the Miami Marlins, and national television campaigns to increase brand awareness.
Direct Origination Expense. Direct origination expense reflects the unreimbursed portion of direct out-of-pocket expenses that we incur in the loan origination process, including underwriting, appraisal, credit report, loan document and other expenses paid to non-affiliates. The $68.5 million or 54.9% increase in direct origination expense was attributable to increased costs for underwriting, credit reports, appraisals, loan documents, and other loan origination costs associated with increased loan origination volumes during the period.
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense reflects professional fees, data processing expense, communications expense, and other operating expenses. The $43.3 million or 25.2% increase in general and administrative expense included a $31.2 million increase in professional and consulting services driven by production related processing and other services to support the 36.0% increase in loan originations and a $6.0 million increase in IPO related expenses.
Subservicing Expense. Subservicing expense reflects servicing costs as well as amounts that we pay to our subservicers to service our mortgage loan servicing portfolio. The $17.4 million or 21.2% increase in subservicing expense was the result of the $71.9 billion increase in our average servicing portfolio to $134.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $62.1 billion for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Other Interest Expense. The $31.6 million or 65.8% increase in other interest expense between periods was the result of a $649.0 million or 92.3% increase in average outstanding debt obligations primarily resulting from increases of $600.0 million in Senior Notes and $323.1 million in secured credit facilities. The increase in average outstanding debt obligations were partially offset by decreases in 30-day LIBOR between periods.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit). Income tax expense was $43.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The increase represents the Company’s share of net taxable income of LD Holdings following the IPO and Reorganization that was completed in February 2021.
60
BBalance Sheet Highlights
| December 31, | Change $ | Change % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 419,571 | $ | 284,224 | $ | 135,347 | 47.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for sale, at fair value | 8,136,817 | 6,955,424 | 1,181,393 | 17.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets, at fair value | 194,665 | 647,939 | (453,274) | (70.0) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights, at fair value | 2,006,712 | 1,127,866 | 878,846 | 77.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading securities, at fair value | 72,874 | — | 72,874 | N/M | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets | 11,812,313 | 10,893,228 | 919,085 | 8.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warehouse and other lines of credit | 7,457,199 | 6,577,429 | 879,770 | 13.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities, at fair value | 37,797 | 168,169 | (130,372) | (77.5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt obligations, net | 1,628,208 | 712,466 | 915,742 | 128.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities | 10,182,953 | 9,236,615 | 946,338 | 10.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total equity | 1,629,360 | 1,656,613 | (27,253) | (1.6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The $135.3 million or 47.6% increase in cash and cash equivalents included net proceeds from the bulk sale of MSRs and net proceeds from debt obligations, partially offset by dividends and distributions.
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value. Loans held for sale, at fair value, are primarily fixed and variable rate, 15- to 30-year term first-lien loans that are secured by residential property. The $1.2 billion or 17.0%. increase was primarily the result of originations totaling $137.0 billion, partially offset by $136.1 billion in sales.
Derivative Assets, at Fair Value. The $453.3 million or 70.0% decrease in derivative assets, at fair value was primarily the result of a $463.0 million decrease in fair value of IRLCs due to a reduction in volume as well as an increase in interest rates, partially offset by a $9.7 million increase in Hedging Instruments. At December 31, 2021, derivative assets included IRLCs with fair value of $184.4 million compared to $647.3 million at December 31, 2020.
Servicing Rights, at Fair Value. The $878.8 million or 77.9% increase in servicing rights, at fair value included $1.6 billion from servicing-retained loan sales and a $68.4 million increase in estimated fair value due to a decrease in prepayment speed assumptions from increased interest rates, partially offset by a $382.3 million decrease from the sale of $30.0 billion in UPB of servicing rights and a $421.6 million decrease from principal amortization and prepayments.
Trading Securities. Trading securities of $72.9 million as of December 31, 2021 are associated with our Mello Mortgage Capital Acceptance securitizations completed in 2021. We retained a five percent economic interest in the credit risk of the assets collateralizing the securitization pursuant to the U.S. credit risk retention rules.
Warehouse and Other Lines of Credit. The increase of $879.8 million or 13.4% in warehouse and other lines of credit was primarily the result of loan originations outpacing sales by $918.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2021.
Derivative Liabilities, at Fair Value. The decrease of $130.4 million or 77.5% in derivative liabilities, at fair value reflects a $133.8 million decrease in Hedging Instrument liabilities due to the rising rate environment during the year ended December 31, 2021, partially offset by a $3.5 million increase in interest rate lock liabilities.
Debt Obligations, net. The increase of $915.7 million or 128.5%, in debt obligations, net reflects the issuance of $600.0 million 2028 Senior Notes, $67.6 million Securities Financing, and a $248.0 million increase in the Original Secured Credit Facility.
Equity. Total equity was $1.6 billion and $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively. The decrease was attributed to dividends and distributions totaling $501.4 million, reductions to additional paid in capital of
61
$203.2 million for deferred tax liabilities and other tax adjustments associated with the IPO and reorganization, and the repurchase of treasury shares, at cost of $12.9 million to net settle and withhold tax on vested RSUs, partially offset by net income of $623.1 million and stock-based compensation of $67.1 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity
Our liquidity reflects our ability to meet our current obligations (including our operating expenses and, when applicable, the retirement of our debt and margin calls relating to our Hedging Instruments, warehouse lines and secured credit facilities), fund new originations and purchases, meet servicing requirements, and make investments as we identify them. We forecast the need to have adequate liquid funds available to operate and grow our business. As of December 31, 2021, unrestricted cash and cash equivalents were $419.6 million and committed and uncommitted available capacity under our warehouse lines was $4.3 billion.
We fund substantially all of the mortgage loans we close through borrowings under our warehouse lines. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial markets could continue to result in an increase in our liquidity demands. Our mortgage origination liquidity could also be affected as our lenders reassess their exposure to the mortgage origination industry and either curtail access to uncommitted mortgage warehouse financing capacity or impose higher costs to access such capacity. Our liquidity may be further constrained as there may be less demand by investors to acquire our mortgage loans in the secondary market. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we increased our cash position and total loan funding capacity with our current and new lending partners.
As a servicer, we are required to advance principal and interest to the investor for up to four months on GSE backed mortgages and longer on other government agency backed mortgages on behalf of clients who have entered a forbearance plan. As of December 31, 2021, approximately 0.6%, or $1.0 billion UPB, of our servicing portfolio was in active forbearance. While these advance requirements have decreased from the higher levels during 2020, the economic impact of COVID-19 could continue to result in additional advance requirements related to forbearance plans.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our primary sources of liquidity have been as follows: (i) funds obtained from our warehouse lines; (ii) proceeds from debt obligations; (iii) proceeds received from the sale and securitization of loans; (iv) proceeds from the sale of servicing rights; (v) loan fees from the origination of loans; (vi) servicing fees; (vii) title and escrow fees from settlement services; (viii) real estate referral fees; and (ix) interest income from LHFS.
Our primary uses of funds for liquidity have included the following: (i) funding mortgage loans; (ii) funding loan origination costs; (iii) payment of warehouse line haircuts required at loan origination; (iv) payment of interest expense on warehouse lines; (v) payment of interest expense under debt obligations; (vi) payment of operating expenses; (vii) repayment of warehouse lines; (viii) repayment of debt obligations; (ix) funding of servicing advances; (x) margin calls on warehouse lines or Hedging Instruments; (xi) payment of tax distributions to holders of Holdco Units; (xii) payments of cash dividends subject to the discretion of our board of directors, (xiii) repurchases of loans under representation and warranty breaches; (xiv) earnout payments from acquisitions; and (xv) costs relating to servicing and subservicing.
We rely on the secondary mortgage market as a source of long-term capital to support our mortgage lending operations. Approximately 87% of the mortgage loans that we originated during the year ended December 31, 2021 were sold in the secondary mortgage market to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or, in the case of MBS guaranteed by Ginnie Mae, are mortgage loans insured or guaranteed by the FHA or VA. We also sell loans to many private investors.
At this time, we believe that there are no material market trends that would affect our access to long-term or short-term borrowings sufficient to maintain our current operations, or that would likely cause us to cease to be in compliance with applicable covenants for our indebtedness or that would inhibit our ability to fund our loan operations and capital commitments for the next twelve months. However, should those trends change, we believe we could retain less or sell additional servicing rights, scale back growth or take other actions to mitigate any significant increase in demands on our liquidity.
62
Warehouse Lines and Debt Obligations
Warehouse lines are discussed in Note 12- Warehouse and Other Lines of Credit and debt obligations are discussed in Note 13- Debt Obligations of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”
We finance most of our loan originations on a short-term basis using our warehouse lines. Under our warehouse lines, we agree to transfer certain loans to our counterparties against the transfer of funds by them, with a simultaneous agreement by the counterparties to transfer the loans back to us at the date loans are sold, or on demand by us, against the transfer of funds from us. We do not recognize these transfers as sales for accounting purposes. On average, loans are repurchased within 16 days of funding. Our warehouse lines are short-term borrowings which mature in less than one year with the exception of our securitization facilities which have terms of two and three years. We utilize both committed and uncommitted loan funding facilities and we evaluate our needs under these facilities based on forecasted volume of loan originations and sales.
As of December 31, 2021, we maintained warehouse lines with fifteen counterparties, our borrowing capacity was $11.8 billion, of which $3.9 billion was committed. During 2021 our borrowing capacity under our warehouse lines increased by $3.7 billion from $8.1 billion at December 31, 2020, primarily due to the addition of four new facilities and a $1.0 billion increase in existing facilities, partially offset by the repayment of three facilities. Our $11.8 billion of capacity as of December 31, 2021 was comprised of $7.8 billion with maturities staggered throughout 2022, $2.5 billion maturing in 2023 and $1.5 billion maturing in 2024. As of December 31, 2021, we had $7.5 billion of borrowings outstanding and $4.3 billion of additional availability under our warehouse lines.
When we draw on the warehouse lines, we must pledge eligible loan collateral and make a capital investment, or “haircut,” upon financing the loans, which is generally determined by the type of collateral provided and the warehouse line terms. Our warehouse line providers require a haircut based on product types and the market value of the loans. The haircuts are normally recovered from sales proceeds. As of December 31, 2021, we had $122.4 million in restricted cash posted as additional collateral with our warehouse lenders and securitization facilities, as compared to $190.6 million as of December 31, 2020.
Interest on our warehouse lines varies by facility and depends on the type of loan that is being financed or the period of time that a loan is transferred to our warehouse line counterparty. As of December 31, 2021, interest expense under our warehouse lines was generally based on 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin and in some cases a minimum interest rate and certain commitment and utilization fees apply. Interest is generally payable monthly in arrears or on the repurchase date of a loan, and outstanding principal is payable upon receipt of loan sale proceeds or on the repurchase date of a loan. Outstanding principal related to a particular loan must also be repaid after the expiration of a contractual period of time or, if applicable, upon the occurrence of certain events of default with respect to the underlying loan.
Our warehouse lines require us to comply with various financial covenants including tangible net worth, liquidity, leverage ratios and net income. As of December 31, 2021, we were in compliance with all of our warehouse lending covenants. Although these financial covenants limit the amount of indebtedness that we may incur and affect our liquidity through minimum cash reserve requirements, we believe that these covenants currently provide us with sufficient flexibility to successfully operate our business and obtain the financing necessary to achieve that purpose.
In addition to our warehouse lines, we fund our balance sheet through our secured and unsecured debt obligations. The availability and cost of funds to us can vary depending on market conditions. From time to time, and subject to any applicable laws or regulations, we may take steps to reduce or repurchase our debt through redemptions, tender offers, cash purchases, prepayments, refinancing, exchange offers, open market or privately-negotiated transactions. The amount of debt, if any, that may be reduced or repurchased will depend on various factors, such as market conditions, trading levels of our debt, our cash positions, our compliance with debt covenants, and other considerations.
Secured debt obligations as of December 31, 2021 totaled $542.9 million net of $2.7 million of deferred financing costs, as compared to $221.2 million net of $2.4 million of deferred financing costs as of December 31, 2020. Secured debt obligations as of December 31, 2021 included our Original Secured Credit Facility, GMSR VFN, 2020-VF1 Notes, Securities Financing, and Term Notes. The Original Secured Credit Facility is secured by servicing rights and matures in June 2022. The GMSR VFN is secured by Ginnie Mae mortgage servicing rights and matures in November 2022. The 2020-VF1 Notes are
63
secured by loanDepot.com, LLC’s rights to reimbursement for advances made pursuant to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac requirements and mature in September 2022 (unless earlier redeemed in accordance with their terms). The Securities Financing is secured by the trading securities which represent our retained interest in the credit risk of the assets collateralizing certain securitization transactions. The Term Notes are secured by certain participation certificates relating to Ginnie Mae mortgage servicing rights pursuant to the terms of a base indenture and mature in October 2023. Our secured debt obligations require us to satisfy certain financial covenants and we were in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020.
Unsecured debt obligations as of December 31, 2021 totaled $1.1 billion net of $14.7 million of deferred financing costs, as compared to $491.3 million net of $8.7 million of deferred financing costs as of December 31, 2020. Unsecured debt obligations as of December 31, 2021 consisted of our Senior Notes. The increase in unsecured debt obligations was due to the issuance of the 2028 Senior Notes.
Dividends and Distributions
During the year ended December 31, 2021, we paid dividends and distributions of $463.3 million.
On April 21, 2021, we declared a special cash dividend on our Class A common stock and Class D common stock. LD Holdings,, a subsidiary of the Company declared a simultaneous special cash dividend on its units. The aggregate amount of the special dividend paid by the Company and LD Holdings is $200.0 million, or $0.612 per share or $0.615 per unit, as applicable (the “Special Dividend”). The Special Dividend was paid on May 18, 2021 to the Company’s stockholders and LD Holdings’ members of record as of the close of business on May 3, 2021.
On May 13, 2021, we declared a regular cash dividend of $0.08 per share on our Class A common stock and Class D common stock. The board of directors of LD Holdings authorized a simultaneous cash dividend on its units. The dividend was paid on July 16, 2021 to the Company's stockholders of record as of the close of business on July 1, 2021.
On September 23, 2021, we declared a regular cash dividend of $0.08 per share on our Class A common stock and Class D common stock. The board of directors of LD Holdings authorized a simultaneous cash dividend on its units. The dividend was paid on October 18, 2021 to the Company's stockholders of record as of the close of business on October 4, 2021.
On December 13, 2021, we declared a regular cash dividend of $0.08 per share on our Class A common stock and Class D common stock. The board of directors of LD Holdings authorized a simultaneous cash dividend on its units. The dividend was paid on January 18, 2022 to the Company's stockholders of record as of the close of business on January 3, 2022.
Cash dividends are subject to the discretion of our board of directors and our compliance with applicable law, and depend on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, level of indebtedness, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, including the satisfaction of our obligations under the TRA, restrictions in our debt agreements, business prospects and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
Our ability to pay dividends depends on our receipt of cash dividends from our operating subsidiaries, which may further restrict our ability to pay dividends as a result of the laws of their jurisdiction of organization or agreements of our subsidiaries, including agreements governing our indebtedness. Future agreements may also limit our ability to pay dividends.
64
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
Our estimated contractual obligations as of December 31, 2021 are as follows:
| Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | Total | Less than 1 Year | 1-3 years | 3-5 Years | More than 5 Years | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warehouse lines | $ | 7,457,199 | $ | 4,046,832 | $ | 3,410,367 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt obligations(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured credit facilities | 345,596 | 345,596 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Term Notes | 200,000 | — | 200,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Notes | 1,100,000 | — | — | 500,000 | 600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations(2) | 82,758 | 28,713 | 34,473 | 13,228 | 6,344 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Naming and promotional rights agreements | 119,107 | 15,840 | 44,889 | 30,378 | 28,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 9,304,660 | $ | 4,436,981 | $ | 3,689,729 | $ | 543,606 | $ | 634,344 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Amounts exclude $17.4 million in deferred financing costs at December 31, 2021.
(2) Represents lease obligations for office space under non-cancelable operation lease agreements.
In addition to the above contractual obligations, we also have interest rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts. Commitments to originate loans do not necessarily reflect future cash requirements as some commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon and, therefore, those commitments have been excluded from the table above. Refer to Note 7- Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for further discussion on derivatives.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2021, we were party to mortgage loan participation purchase and sale agreements, pursuant to which we have access to uncommitted facilities that provide liquidity for recently sold MBS up to the MBS settlement date. These facilities, which we refer to as gestation facilities, are a component of our financing strategy and are off-balance sheet arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect: (i) the reported amounts of our assets and liabilities; (ii) the disclosure of our contingent assets and liabilities at the end of each reporting period; and (iii) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each reporting period. We continually evaluate these judgments, estimates and assumptions based on our own historical experience, knowledge and assessment of current business and other conditions and our expectations regarding the future based on available information which together form our basis for making judgments about matters that are not readily apparent from other sources. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, our actual results could differ from those estimates. Some of our accounting policies require a higher degree of judgment than others in their application. Our accounting policies are described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.” At December 31, 2021, the most critical of these significant accounting policies were policies related to the fair value of loans held for sale, servicing rights, and derivative financial instruments. As of the date of this report, there have been no significant changes to the Company's critical accounting policies or estimates.
When reading our consolidated financial statements, you should consider our selection of critical accounting policies, the judgment and other uncertainties affecting the application of such policies and the sensitivity of reported results to changes in conditions and assumptions.
65
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2- Recent Accounting Pronouncements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for a discussion of recently issued accounting guidance.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To provide investors with information in addition to our results as determined by GAAP, we disclose Adjusted Total Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income as non-GAAP measures. We believe Adjusted Total Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income provide useful information to investors regarding our results of operations because each measure assists both investors and management in analyzing and benchmarking the performance and value of our business. They facilitate company-to-company operating performance comparisons by backing out potential differences caused by variations in hedging strategies, changes in valuations, capital structures (affecting net interest expense), taxation, the age and book depreciation of facilities (affecting relative depreciation expense) and the amortization of intangibles, which may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to operating performance, as well as certain historical cost (benefit) items which may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to operating performance. These measures are not financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered as a substitute for revenue, net income, or any other operating performance measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, and may not be comparable to a similarly titled measure reported by other companies.
We define “Adjusted Total Revenue” as total revenues, net of the change in fair value of mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) and the related hedging gains and losses. We define “Adjusted EBITDA” as earnings before interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs on non-funding debt, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, change in fair value of MSRs, net of the related hedging gains and losses, change in fair value of contingent consideration, stock compensation expense and management fees, and IPO related expense. We define “Adjusted Net Income” as tax-effected earnings before stock compensation expense and management fees, IPO expense, and the change in fair value of MSRs, net of the related hedging gains and losses, and the tax effects of those adjustments. Adjustments for income taxes are made to reflect LD Holdings historical results of operations on the basis that it was taxed as a corporation under the Internal Revenue Code, and therefore subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes. We exclude from each of these non-GAAP measures the change in fair value of MSRs and related hedging gains and losses as this represents a non-cash non-realized adjustment to our total revenues, reflecting changes in assumptions including discount rates and prepayment speed assumptions, mostly due to changes in market interest rates, which is not indicative of our performance or results of operations. We also exclude stock compensation expense, which is a non-cash expense, management fees and IPO expenses as management does not consider these costs to be indicative of our performance or results of operations. Adjusted EBITDA includes interest expense on funding facilities, which are recorded as a component of “net interest income (expense)”, as these expenses are a direct operating expense driven by loan origination volume. By contrast, interest and amortization expense on non-funding debt is a function of our capital structure and is therefore excluded from Adjusted EBITDA.
Adjusted Total Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA, and Adjusted Net Income have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under U.S. GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
•they do not reflect every cash expenditure, future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;
•Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payment on our debt;
•although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced or require improvements in the future, and Adjusted Total Revenue, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirement for such replacements or improvements; and
•they are not adjusted for all non-cash income or expense items that are reflected in our statements of cash flows.
Because of these limitations, Adjusted Total Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income are not intended as alternatives to total revenue, net income (loss), or net income attributable to the Company or as an indicator of our operating performance and should not be considered as measures of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth of our business or as measures of cash that will be available to us to meet our obligations. We compensate for these limitations by using Adjusted Total Revenue, Adjusted Net Income, and Adjusted EBITDA along with other comparative tools, together with
66
U.S. GAAP measurements, to assist in the evaluation of operating performance. See below for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to their most comparable U.S. GAAP measures.
Reconciliation of Total Revenue to Adjusted Total Revenue (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited): | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total net revenue | $ | 3,724,704 | $ | 4,312,174 | $ | 1,337,131 | ||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of servicing rights net, of hedging gains and losses(1) | 14,478 | (58,898) | 8,493 | |||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted total revenue | $ | 3,739,182 | $ | 4,253,276 | $ | 1,345,624 | ||||||||||||||
(1)Represents the change in the fair value of servicing rights attributable to changes in assumptions, net of hedging gains and losses.
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted Net Income (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited): | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to loanDepot, Inc. | $ | 113,524 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Net income from the pro forma conversion of Class C common shares to Class A common shares(1) | 509,622 | 2,013,110 | 34,420 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income | 623,146 | 2,013,110 | 34,420 | |||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to the provision for income taxes (2) | (132,502) | (516,485) | (8,860) | |||||||||||||||||
| Tax-effected net income | 490,644 | 1,496,625 | 25,560 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of servicing rights, net of hedging gains and losses (3) | 14,478 | (58,898) | 8,493 | |||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of contingent consideration | (77) | 32,650 | 2,374 | |||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation expense and management fees | 67,304 | 9,565 | 1,219 | |||||||||||||||||
| IPO expenses | 6,041 | 2,560 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Tax effect of adjustments (4) | (22,814) | 3,635 | (3,111) | |||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted net income | $ | 555,576 | $ | 1,486,137 | $ | 34,535 | ||||||||||||||
(1)Reflects net income to Class A common stock and Class D common stock from the pro forma exchange of Class C common stock.
(2)loanDepot, Inc. is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. Adjustments to the provision or benefit from income tax reflect the effective income tax rates below:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate | 21.00 | % | 21.00 | % | 21.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||
| State and local income taxes (net of federal benefit) | 5.00 | 4.74 | 4.74 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Effective income tax rate | 26.00 | % | 25.74 | % | 25.74 | % | |||||||||||||||||
(3)Represents the change in the fair value of servicing rights attributable to changes in assumptions, net of hedging gains and losses.
(4)Amounts represent the income tax effect of (a) change in fair value of servicing rights, net of hedging gains and losses, (b) change in fair value of contingent consideration (c) stock-based compensation expense and management fees, and (d) IPO expense at the aforementioned effective income tax rates.
67
Reconciliation of Adjusted Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding to Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (1) (Dollars in thousands except per share) (Unaudited) | Year Ended | |||||||
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||
| Net income attributable to loanDepot, Inc. | $ | 113,524 | ||||||
| Adjusted net income | 555,576 | |||||||
| Share Data: | ||||||||
| Diluted weighted average shares of Class A and Class D common stock outstanding | 129,998,894 | |||||||
Assumed pro forma conversion of Class C shares to Class A common stock (2) | 192,465,222 | |||||||
| Adjusted diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 322,464,116 | |||||||
| Diluted EPS | $ | 0.87 | ||||||
| Adjusted Diluted EPS | 1.72 | |||||||
(1)This non-GAAP measures was not applicable for the years ended December 31, 2020 or 2019 as the IPO and reorganization transaction had not yet occurred.
(2)Reflects the assumed pro forma conversion of all outstanding shares of Class C common stock to Class A common stock.
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited): | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | $ | 623,146 | $ | 2,013,110 | $ | 34,420 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense — non-funding debt (1) | 79,564 | 48,001 | 41,294 | |||||||||||||||||
| Income tax expense (benefit) | 43,371 | 2,248 | (1,749) | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 35,541 | 35,669 | 37,400 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of servicing rights, net of hedging gains and losses (2) | 14,478 | (58,898) | 8,493 | |||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value - contingent consideration | (77) | 32,650 | 2,374 | |||||||||||||||||
| Stock compensation expense and management fees | 67,304 | 9,565 | 1,219 | |||||||||||||||||
| IPO expenses | 6,041 | 2,560 | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 869,368 | $ | 2,084,905 | $ | 123,451 | ||||||||||||||
(1)Represents other interest expense, which include amortization of debt issuance costs, in the Company's consolidated statement of operations.
(2)Represents the change in the fair value of servicing rights attributable to changes in assumptions, net of hedging gains and losses.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to various risks which can affect our business, results and operations. The primary market risks to which we are exposed include interest rate risk, credit risk, prepayment risk and inflation risk.
We manage our interest rate risk and the price risk associated with changes in interest rates pursuant to the terms of an Interest Rate Risk Management Policy which (i) quantifies our interest rate risk exposure, (ii) lists the derivatives eligible for use as Hedging Instruments and (iii) establishes risk and liquidity tolerances.
Interest Rate Risk
Our principal market exposure is to interest rate risk as our business is subject to variability in results of operations due to fluctuations in interest rates. We anticipate that interest rates will remain our primary benchmark for market risk for the foreseeable future. Changes in interest rates affect our assets and liabilities measured at fair value, including LHFS, IRLCs, servicing rights and Hedging Instruments. In a declining interest rate environment, we would expect our results of operations to be positively impacted by higher loan origination volumes and loan margins. However, we would expect our results of
68
operations to be negatively impacted by higher actual and projected loan prepayments related to our loan servicing portfolio and a decrease in the value of our servicing rights. As interest rates decline, our LHFS and IRLCs generally increase in value while our Hedging Instruments utilized to hedge against interest rate risk decrease in value. In a rising interest rate environment, we would expect a negative impact on the results of operations of our production activities and a positive impact on the results of operations of our servicing activities (principally through an increase in the fair value of our servicing rights). As interest rates increase, our LHFS and IRLCs generally decrease in value while our Hedging Instruments typically increase in value. The interaction between the results of operations of our various activities is a core component of our overall interest rate risk strategy. See “—Sensitivity Analysis” for tabular analysis on the impact of changes in interest rates on our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
IRLCs represent an agreement to extend credit to a potential customer, whereby the interest rate on the loan is set prior to funding. Our LHFS, which are held in inventory awaiting sale into the secondary market, and our IRLCs, are subject to changes in interest rates from the date of the commitment through the sale of the loan into the secondary market. Accordingly, we are exposed to interest rate risk and related price risk during the period from the date of the lock commitment through (i) the lock commitment cancellation or expiration date, or (ii) the date of sale into the secondary mortgage market. The average term for outstanding interest rate lock commitments at December 31, 2021 was 47 days; and our average holding period of the loan from funding to sale was 22 days during the year ended December 31, 2021.
We manage the interest rate risk associated with our outstanding IRLCs, LHFS and servicing rights by entering into Hedging Instruments. Management expects these Hedging Instruments will experience changes in fair value opposite to changes in fair value of the IRLCs and LHFS, thereby reducing earnings volatility. We take into account various factors and strategies in determining the portion of IRLCs, LHFS and servicing rights that we want to economically hedge. Our expectation of how many of our IRLCs will ultimately close is a key factor in determining the notional amount of Hedging Instruments used in hedging the position. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our hedging strategies may not be successful in mitigating our risks associated with changes in interest rates.”
Credit Risk
We are subject to credit risk in connection with our loan sale transactions. While our contracts vary, we provide representations and warranties to purchasers and insurers of the mortgage loans sold that typically are in place for the life of the loan. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, we may be required to repurchase a mortgage loan or indemnify the purchaser, and any subsequent loss on the mortgage loan may be borne by us. The representations and warranties require adherence to applicable origination and underwriting guidelines (including those of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae), including but not limited to the validity of the lien securing the loan, property eligibility, borrower credit, income and asset requirements and compliance with applicable federal, state and local law.
We record a provision for losses relating to such representations and warranties as part of our loan sale transactions. The level of the liability for losses from representations and warranties is difficult to estimate and requires considerable management judgment. The level of loan repurchase losses is dependent on economic factors, trends in property values, investor repurchase demand strategies and other external conditions that may change over the lives of the underlying loans. We evaluate the adequacy of our liability for losses from representations and warranties based on our loss experience and our assessment of incurred losses relating to loans that we have previously sold and which remain outstanding at the balance sheet date. As our portfolio of loans sold subject to representations and warranties grows and as economic fundamentals change, such adjustments can be material. However, we believe that our current estimates adequately approximate the losses incurred on our sold loans subject to such representations and warranties.
Additionally, we are exposed to credit risk associated with our customers from our LHFS as well as credit risks related to our counterparties including our subservicer, Hedging Instrument counterparties and other significant vendors. Our ability to operate profitably is dependent on both our access to capital to finance our assets and our ability to profitably originate, sell and service loans. Our ability to hold loans pending sale and/or securitization depends, in part, on the availability to us of adequate financing lines of credit at suitable interest rates and favorable advance rates.
In general, we manage such risk by selecting only counterparties that we believe to be financially strong, dispersing the risk among multiple counterparties, placing contractual limits on the amount of unsecured credit extended to any single
69
counterparty and entering into netting agreements with the counterparties, as appropriate. During the year ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, we incurred no losses due to nonperformance by any of our counterparties.
Prepayment Risk
Prepayment risk is affected by interest rates (and their inherent risk) and borrowers’ actions relative to their underlying loans. To the extent that the actual prepayment speed on the loans underlying our servicing rights differs from what we projected when we initially recognized them and when we measured fair value as of the end of each reporting period, the carrying value of our investment in servicing rights will be affected. In general, an increase in prepayment expectations will decrease our estimates of the fair value of the servicing right, thereby reducing expected servicing income. We monitor the servicing portfolio to identify potential refinancings and the impact that would have on associated servicing rights.
Inflation Risk
Almost all of our assets and liabilities are interest rate sensitive in nature. As a result, interest rates and other factors will influence our performance more than inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Additionally, our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and our activities and balance sheets are measured with reference to historical cost and/or fair value without considering inflation.
Sensitivity Analysis
Our total market risk is influenced by various factors including market volatility and the liquidity of capital markets. There are certain limitations inherent in the sensitivity analysis presented, including (i) the necessity to conduct the analysis based on a single point in time, (ii) the inability to include or fully anticipate the complex market reactions that normally would arise from the market shifts modeled, (iii) the accuracy of various models and assumptions used, including prepayment forecasts and discount rates and (iv) the inability to include other factors that would affect our overall financial performance in such scenarios, including operational adjustments made by management to account for changing circumstances.
We used December 31, 2021 market rates on our instruments to perform the sensitivity analysis on our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value. The interest rate sensitivity analysis assumes instantaneous, parallel shifts in interest rate yield curves. These sensitivities are hypothetical and presented for illustrative purposes only. Changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in fair value may not be linear. The following tables summarize the estimated change in fair value of our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value as of December 31, 2021, given hypothetical parallel shifts in interest rates:
As of December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shift in interest rates | Down 75 bps | Down 50 bps | Down 25 bps | 0 | Up 25 bps | Up 50 bps | Up 75 bps | ||||||||||||||||
| ($ in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| LHFS | $ | 8,169,963 | $ | 8,181,783 | $ | 8,190,168 | $ | 8,136,817 | $ | 8,067,593 | $ | 8,051,797 | $ | 8,036,289 | |||||||||
| Servicing rights, net | 1,688,299 | 1,810,434 | 1,913,329 | 1,999,402 | 2,072,446 | 2,133,789 | 2,184,015 | ||||||||||||||||
| IRLCs, net | 252,017 | 275,431 | 291,241 | 180,620 | 38,866 | 7,821 | (22,444) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net derivative (liabilities) assets, excluding IRLCs | (121,519) | (141,182) | (147,793) | (23,752) | 139,384 | 195,600 | 249,202 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 9,988,760 | $ | 10,126,466 | $ | 10,246,945 | $ | 10,293,087 | $ | 10,318,289 | $ | 10,389,007 | $ | 10,447,062 | |||||||||
| Change in fair value (%): | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| LHFS | 0.4 | % | 0.6 | % | 0.7 | % | — | % | (0.9) | % | (1.0) | % | (1.2) | % | |||||||||
| Servicing rights, net | (15.6) | (9.5) | (4.3) | — | 3.7 | 6.7 | 9.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| IRLCs, net | 39.5 | 52.5 | 61.2 | — | (78.5) | (95.7) | (112.4) | ||||||||||||||||
| Net derivative (liabilities) assets, excluding IRLCs | (411.6) | (494.4) | (522.2) | — | 686.8 | 923.5 | 1,149.2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Total | (3.0) | (1.6) | (0.4) | — | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
70
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
LOANDEPOT, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2021
71
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of loanDepot, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of loanDepot, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2021 and 2020, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2021, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the account or disclosures to which it relates.
72
Valuation of Servicing Rights | ||||||||
Description of the Matter | The estimated fair value of the Company’s servicing rights totaled $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2021. As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of servicing rights. The key inputs used in the valuation of servicing rights include mortgage prepayment speeds, cost to service the loans and discount rates. Auditing management’s estimate of the fair value of servicing rights is complex due to the use of a valuation model and is subjective due to the high degree of judgment in management’s determination of mortgage prepayment speeds, cost to service the loans and discount rates, which are significant unobservable inputs used in the Company’s valuation model. | |||||||
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | To test the fair value of servicing rights, our audit procedures included, among others, testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the Company’s valuation model. We compared the fair value estimate developed by management to those from the third-party valuation firms utilized by management and evaluated the competency and objectivity of these firms. With the assistance of our internal valuation specialist, we evaluated whether the Company’s key inputs were supportable by comparing those inputs to industry data used by market participants, historical results, current market and economic trends, and independently developing a range of inputs. We utilized an internal valuation specialist to independently calculate a range of fair values for substantially all of the Company’s servicing rights and compared to management’s fair value estimate of servicing rights based on the Company’s valuation model. | |||||||
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2015.
Los Angeles, California
March 18, 2022
73
loanDepot, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 419,571 | $ | 284,224 | |||||||
| Restricted cash | 201,025 | 204,465 | |||||||||
| Accounts receivable, net | 56,183 | 138,122 | |||||||||
Loans held for sale, at fair value (includes $2,557,490 and $1,595,442 pledged to creditors in securitization trusts at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively) | 8,136,817 | 6,955,424 | |||||||||
| Derivative assets, at fair value | 194,665 | 647,939 | |||||||||
Servicing rights, at fair value (includes $400,678 and $300,465 pledged to creditors in securitization trusts at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively) | 2,006,712 | 1,127,866 | |||||||||
| Trading securities, at fair value | 72,874 | — | |||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | 104,262 | 85,002 | |||||||||
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 55,646 | 66,433 | |||||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 140,315 | 77,241 | |||||||||
| Loans eligible for repurchase | 363,373 | 1,246,158 | |||||||||
| Investments in joint ventures | 18,553 | 17,528 | |||||||||
| Goodwill and intangible assets, net | 42,317 | 42,826 | |||||||||
| Total assets | $ | 11,812,313 | $ | 10,893,228 | |||||||
| LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | |||||||||||
| Warehouse and other lines of credit | $ | 7,457,199 | $ | 6,577,429 | |||||||
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 624,444 | 446,370 | |||||||||
| Derivative liabilities, at fair value | 37,797 | 168,169 | |||||||||
| Liability for loans eligible for repurchase | 363,373 | 1,246,158 | |||||||||
| Operating lease liability | 71,932 | 86,023 | |||||||||
| Debt obligations, net | 1,628,208 | 712,466 | |||||||||
| Total liabilities | 10,182,953 | 9,236,615 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 22) | |||||||||||
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, 2,500,000,000 authorized, 38,060,302 issued as of December 31, 2021 | 38 | — | |||||||||
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value, 2,500,000,000 authorized, none issued as of December 31, 2021 | — | — | |||||||||
Class C common stock, $0.001 par value, 2,500,000,000 authorized, 172,729,168 issued as of December 31, 2021 | 173 | — | |||||||||
Class D common stock, $0.001 par value, 2,500,000,000 authorized, 100,822,084 issued as of December 31, 2021 | 101 | — | |||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 authorized, none issued as of December 31, 2021 | — | — | |||||||||
Treasury stock at cost, 1,593,366 shares as of December 31, 2021 | (12,852) | — | |||||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 565,073 | — | |||||||||
| Retained deficit | (28,976) | — | |||||||||
| Noncontrolling interest | 1,105,803 | 1,656,613 | |||||||||
| Total equity | 1,629,360 | 1,656,613 | |||||||||
| Total liabilities and equity | $ | 11,812,313 | $ | 10,893,228 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F- 74
loanDepot, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| REVENUES: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income | $ | 262,478 | $ | 142,879 | $ | 127,569 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | (218,457) | (131,443) | (130,344) | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) | 44,021 | 11,436 | (2,775) | |||||||||||||||||
| Gain on origination and sale of loans, net | 3,213,351 | 3,905,986 | 1,104,235 | |||||||||||||||||
| Origination income, net | 362,257 | 258,807 | 149,500 | |||||||||||||||||
| Servicing fee income | 393,680 | 185,895 | 118,418 | |||||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of servicing rights, net | (445,862) | (144,348) | (97,928) | |||||||||||||||||
| Other income | 157,257 | 94,398 | 65,681 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total net revenues | 3,724,704 | 4,312,174 | 1,337,131 | |||||||||||||||||
| EXPENSES: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Personnel expense | 1,929,752 | 1,531,371 | 765,256 | |||||||||||||||||
| Marketing and advertising expense | 467,590 | 264,337 | 187,880 | |||||||||||||||||
| Direct origination expense | 193,264 | 124,754 | 93,531 | |||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative expense | 214,965 | 171,712 | 100,493 | |||||||||||||||||
| Occupancy expense | 38,443 | 39,262 | 37,209 | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 35,541 | 35,669 | 37,400 | |||||||||||||||||
| Subservicing expense | 99,068 | 81,710 | 41,397 | |||||||||||||||||
| Other interest expense | 79,564 | 48,001 | 41,294 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total expenses | 3,058,187 | 2,296,816 | 1,304,460 | |||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes | 666,517 | 2,015,358 | 32,671 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 43,371 | 2,248 | (1,749) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income | 623,146 | 2,013,110 | 34,420 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest | 509,622 | 2,013,110 | 34,420 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to loanDepot, Inc. | $ | 113,524 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
| Earnings per share: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.87 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.87 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 129,998,894 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
| Diluted | 129,998,894 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F- 75
loanDepot, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands)
| Common stock issued | Common stock $ | Treasury Stock | Additional paid-in capital | Retained Earnings (Deficit) | Non-controlling Interests | Total Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Class A | Class C | Class D | Class A | Class C | Class D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | — | — | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 375,885 | $ | 375,885 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Redemptions | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (97,608) | (97,608) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (220) | (220) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,501 | 8,501 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (643,055) | (643,055) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,013,110 | 2,013,110 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | — | — | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,656,613 | $ | 1,656,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2020 | — | — | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,656,613 | $ | 1,656,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions prior to the reorganization | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (160,617) | (160,617) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation prior to the reorganization | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 338 | 338 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income prior to the reorganization | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 294,598 | 294,598 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred taxes and other tax adjustments associated with the reorganization and IPO | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (203,240) | — | — | (203,240) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effect of the reorganization | 2,215,687 | 181,789,329 | 121,368,600 | 2 | 182 | 121 | — | 740,629 | — | (740,934) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effect of the IPO | 3,850,000 | (2,394,000) | (1,456,000) | 4 | (2) | (2) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Effect of the Greenshoe | 577,500 | (359,100) | (218,400) | 1 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net issuance of common stock under stock-based compensation plans | 29,823,749 | (6,307,061) | (18,872,116) | 31 | (6) | (18) | (12,852) | (7) | — | — | (12,852) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Class A and Class D shareholders ($0.85 per share) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (45,690) | (64,273) | (109,963) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Class C shareholders ($0.86 per share) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (69,467) | (97,985) | (167,452) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation subsequent to the reorganization | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27,691 | — | 39,034 | 66,725 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions for taxes on behalf of shareholders, net | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (27,343) | (35,995) | (63,338) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income subsequent to the reorganization and IPO | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 113,524 | 215,024 | 328,548 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | 36,466,936 | 172,729,168 | 100,822,084 | $ | 38 | $ | 173 | $ | 101 | $ | (12,852) | $ | 565,073 | $ | (28,976) | $ | 1,105,803 | $ | 1,629,360 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F- 76
loanDepot, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 623,146 | $ | 2,013,110 | $ | 34,420 | |||||||||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net | |||||||||||||||||
| cash used in operating activities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense | 35,541 | 35,669 | 37,400 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | 12,633 | 7,068 | 5,572 | ||||||||||||||
| Amortization of operating lease right-of-use asset | 22,613 | 25,028 | 23,935 | ||||||||||||||
| Gain on origination and sale of loans | (3,633,452) | (3,565,492) | (1,034,851) | ||||||||||||||
| (Gain) loss on sale of servicing rights | (1,458) | 3,108 | (2,718) | ||||||||||||||
| Disposition of securities held for resale | — | — | 25,511 | ||||||||||||||
| Fair value change in trading securities | 836 | — | (426) | ||||||||||||||
| Provision for loss obligation on sold loans and servicing rights | 18,403 | 25,565 | 14,746 | ||||||||||||||
| Provision for deferred income taxes | 31,315 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Fair value change in derivative assets | 460,264 | (493,436) | (84,058) | ||||||||||||||
| Fair value change in derivative liabilities | (130,372) | 158,191 | (22,598) | ||||||||||||||
| Premium received (paid) on derivatives | 3,393 | (23,275) | 26,269 | ||||||||||||||
| Purchase of options contracts | (10,383) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Fair value change in loans held for sale | 104,715 | (185,885) | (13,996) | ||||||||||||||
| Fair value change in servicing rights | 353,225 | 296,310 | 136,502 | ||||||||||||||
| Stock-based compensation expense | 67,063 | 8,501 | 191 | ||||||||||||||
| Change in fair value of contingent consideration | — | 32,650 | 2,374 | ||||||||||||||
| Originations of loans | (136,606,028) | (100,535,715) | (44,947,450) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sales of loans | 138,027,936 | 100,163,631 | 44,300,254 | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from principal payments | 182,883 | 57,120 | 109,694 | ||||||||||||||
| Payments to investors for loan repurchases | (965,933) | (203,931) | (153,315) | ||||||||||||||
| Disbursements from joint ventures | 11,749 | 10,450 | 12,736 | ||||||||||||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||||||||||||
| Other changes in operating assets and liabilities | (73,774) | 140,620 | 32,428 | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash used in operating activities | (1,465,685) | (2,030,713) | (1,497,380) | ||||||||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment | (54,124) | (33,905) | (12,551) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of servicing rights | 349,528 | 6,773 | 153,491 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash flows received on trading securities | 2,268 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Investment in joint ventures | (1,115) | (750) | — | ||||||||||||||
| Return of capital from joint ventures | 221 | 213 | 150 | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities | 296,778 | (27,669) | 141,090 | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F- 77
loanDepot, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED
(Dollars in thousands)
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | |||||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from borrowings on warehouse lines of credit | 154,391,100 | 103,367,680 | 44,140,738 | ||||||||||||||
| Repayment of borrowings on warehouse lines of credit | (153,511,330) | (100,256,817) | (42,800,811) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from debt obligations | 1,401,782 | 927,693 | 238,600 | ||||||||||||||
| Payments on debt obligations | (479,778) | (800,000) | (195,740) | ||||||||||||||
| Payments of debt issuance costs | (21,185) | (17,675) | (4,238) | ||||||||||||||
| Payments for contingent consideration | — | (14,692) | (961) | ||||||||||||||
| Proceeds from financing lease transactions | — | — | 7,816 | ||||||||||||||
| Payments on financing lease obligation | (3,610) | (35,731) | (17,993) | ||||||||||||||
| Redemptions of noncontrolling interests | — | (97,608) | |||||||||||||||
| Payments for repurchase of noncontrolling interests | — | (220) | (5) | ||||||||||||||
| Treasury stock purchased to net settle and withhold taxes on vested shares | (12,852) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Dividends and shareholder distributions | (463,313) | (643,055) | (7,612) | ||||||||||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 1,300,814 | 2,429,575 | 1,359,794 | ||||||||||||||
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash | 131,907 | 371,193 | 3,504 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of the period | 488,689 | 117,496 | 113,992 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of the period | $ | 620,596 | $ | 488,689 | $ | 117,496 | |||||||||||
| SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | |||||||||||||||||
| Cash paid during the period for: | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest | $ | 270,471 | $ | 159,994 | $ | 159,749 | |||||||||||
| Income taxes | 3,329 | 447 | 4,036 | ||||||||||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities | |||||||||||||||||
| Trading securities retained in securitizations | 75,979 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Purchase of equipment under financing leases | 168 | 5,357 | 14,190 | ||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F- 78
loanDepot, Inc.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($ in thousands, unless otherwise indicated)
NOTE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
loanDepot, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on November 6, 2020 to facilitate the initial public offering (“IPO”) of its Class A common stock and related transactions in order to carry on the business of LD Holdings Group, LLC (“LD Holdings”) and its consolidated subsidiaries. loanDepot, Inc.’s common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on February 11, 2021 under the ticker symbol “LDI.” loanDepot, Inc. is a holding company and its sole material asset is its equity interest in LD Holdings. As of December 31, 2021 the consolidated subsidiaries of LD Holdings included loanDepot.com, LLC, (“LDLLC”), Artemis Management, LLC (“ART”), LD Settlement Services, LLC (“LDSS”), mello Holdings, LLC (“Mello”), and mello Credit Strategies LLC (“MCS”). Unless otherwise noted or indicated by the context, the term, the “Company,” refers (1) prior to the consummation of the IPO to LD Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries, and (2) after the IPO to loanDepot, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including LD Holdings.
The Company engages in the originating, financing, selling, and servicing of residential mortgage loans, and engages in title, escrow, and settlement services for mortgage loan transactions. The Company derives income primarily from gains on the origination and sale of loans to investors, income from loan servicing, and fees charged for settlement services related to the origination and sale of loans.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies used in preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) as codified in the Financial Accounting Standards Board's (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or the “Codification”).
ASC 250 requires that a change in the reporting entity or the consummation of a transaction accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of interests, i.e., a reorganization of entities under common control, be retrospectively applied to the financial statements of all prior periods when the financial statements are issued for a period that includes the date the change in reporting entity or the transaction occurred. Prior to the IPO, the Company completed a reorganization where LLC units in LD Holdings held by certain members (“Continuing LLC Members) were exchanged on a one-for-one basis for Class A holding units (“Holdco Units”) and Class C common stock. LD Holdings continues to be a holding company and has no material assets other than its equity interests in its direct subsidiaries consisting of a 99.99% ownership in LDLLC (the majority asset of the group), and 100% equity ownership in ART, LDSS, Mello, and MCS. As a result of the IPO and reorganization, loanDepot, Inc. became a holding company, its sole material asset is its equity interest in LD Holdings and as the sole managing member of LD Holdings, loanDepot, Inc. indirectly operates and controls all of LD Holdings’ business and affairs. The IPO and reorganization were considered transactions between entities under common control, therefore, the financial statements for the periods prior to the IPO and reorganization were adjusted to combine the previously separate entities for presentation. The financial results of LD Holdings and its subsidiaries are consolidated with loanDepot, Inc, and the consolidated net earnings or loss are allocated to the noncontrolling interest to reflect the entitlement of the Continuing LLC Members.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Company and consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. VIEs are entities that have a total equity investment at risk that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, whose equity investors at risk lack the ability to control the entity's activities, or is structured with non-substantive voting rights. The Company evaluates its associations with VIEs, both at inception and when there is a change in circumstance that requires reconsideration, to determine if the Company is the primary beneficiary and
79
consolidation is required. A primary beneficiary is defined as a variable interest holder that has a controlling financial interest. A controlling financial interest requires both: (a) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIEs’ economic performance, and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits of a VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company has not provided financial or other support during the periods presented to any VIE that it was not previously contractually required to provide. Other entities that the Company does not consolidate, but for which it has significant influence over operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the equity method. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain items in prior periods were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Financing lease obligations are included as part of accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Gain on the origination and sale of loans, net was adjusted to exclude the change in fair value of forward sale contracts, including pair offs hedging MSRs, which are now included in the change in fair value of servicing rights, net on the consolidated statements of operations. The Company determined that this change would more appropriately reflect the hedged item and better align with industry practice. Gain on origination and sale of loans, net and change in fair value of servicing rights, net, in the current and prior periods along with the related financial statement disclosures were adjusted to reflect this reclassification in reports beginning after the first quarter of 2021.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure through the date of this report and has not identified any recordable or disclosable events that were not already reported in these consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Management has made significant estimates in certain areas, including determining the fair value of loans held for sale, servicing rights, derivative assets and derivative liabilities, trading securities, awards granted under the incentive equity plan, and determining the loan loss obligation on sold loans. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Reportable Segments
The Company’s organizational structure is currently comprised of one operating segment. This determination is based on the organizational structure, which reflects how the chief operating decision maker evaluates the performance of the business. The Company’s chief operating decision maker evaluates the performance of our business that comprise our one segment based on the measurement of income before income taxes.
Fair Value
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (not in a forced transaction) between willing market participants at the measurement date. Financial instruments recorded at fair value on a recurring basis include the Company’s loans held for sale, derivative assets and derivative liabilities, and servicing rights.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized based on whether the inputs are observable in the market and the degree that the inputs are observable. The categorization of assets and liabilities measured at fair value within the
F- 80
valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy is prioritized into three levels (with Level 3 being the lowest) defined as follows:
•Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.
•Level 2 - Prices determined or determinable using other significant observable inputs. Observable inputs are inputs that other market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. These may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk and other inputs.
•Level 3 - Prices determined using significant unobservable inputs. In situations where quoted prices or observable inputs are unavailable (for example, when there is little or no market activity), unobservable inputs may be used. Unobservable inputs reflect the Company's own assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and are based on the best information available in the circumstances.
The fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value. The Company has elected the fair value option on loans held for sale (“LHFS”). Elections were made to mitigate income statement volatility caused by differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments with derivative financial instruments that are carried at fair value.
The following are methods and assumptions used to measure the Company’s financial instruments recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis.
Loans held for sale, at fair value- Management has elected to account for loans held for sale at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in current period income, to more timely reflect the Company's performance. LHFS are valued at the best execution value based on the underlying characteristics of the loan, which is either based off of the to be announced mortgage-backed securities (“TBA MBS”) prices market, or investor pricing, based on product, note rate and term, therefore LHFS are classified as Level 2. The most significant data inputs used in this valuation include, but are not limited to, loan type, underlying loan amount, note rate, loan program, and expected sale date of the loan. The valuations for LHFS are adjusted at the loan level to consider the servicing release premium and loan level pricing adjustments specific to each loan. Changes in the fair value of the LHFS are recorded in current earnings as a component of gain on origination and sale of loans, net.
Loans eligible for repurchase - Loans eligible for repurchase represents certain mortgage loans sold pursuant to Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) programs where the Company, as servicer, has the unilateral option to repurchase the loan if certain criteria are met, including if a loan is greater than 90 days delinquent. Regardless of whether the repurchase option has been exercised, the Company must recognize eligible loans as an asset with a corresponding repurchase liability in its consolidated balance sheets. These loans are government guaranteed. The carrying value of loans eligible for repurchase approximates the fair value.
Servicing rights, at fair value- The Company uses a discounted cash flow approach to estimate the fair value of servicing rights. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows. The inputs used in the Company's discounted cash flow model are based on market factors, which management believes are consistent with assumptions and data used by market participants valuing similar servicing rights. The key inputs used in the valuation of servicing rights include mortgage prepayment speeds, discount rates, costs to service the loan, and other inputs such as projected and actual rates of delinquencies, defaults and liquidations, ancillary fee income, and amounts of future servicing advances. These inputs can, and generally do, change from period to period as market conditions change. Servicing rights are classified as Level 3 as considerable judgment is required to estimate the fair values and the exercise of such judgment can significantly affect the Company's income.
F- 81
Derivative assets and liabilities, at fair value - Derivative assets and liabilities at fair value include interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”), forward sales contracts, interest rate swap futures, and put options on treasuries. Changes in fair value of derivatives hedging IRLCs and loans held for sale at fair value are included in gain on origination and sale of loans, net on the consolidated statements of operations. Changes in fair value of derivatives hedging mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are included in change in fair value of servicing rights, net on the consolidated statements of operations.
Interest rate lock commitments- The Company enters into IRLCs with prospective borrowers, which are commitments to originate loans at a specified interest rate. The IRLCs are recorded as a component of derivative assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets with changes in fair value being recorded in current earnings as a component of gain on origination and sale of loans, net. The Company estimates the fair value of the IRLCs based on quoted agency TBA MBS prices, its estimate of the fair value of the servicing rights it expects to receive in the sale of the loans, the probability that the mortgage loan will fund or be purchased (the “pull-through rate”), and estimated transformative costs. The pull-through rate is based on the Company’s own experience and is a significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of these instruments and results in the classification of these instruments as Level 3. Significant changes in the pull-through rate of the IRLCs, in isolation, could result in significant changes in fair value measurement.
Forward sale contracts - Mandatory trades are valued using available market pricing sources that reflect the commitments particular product, coupon, and settlement. These derivatives are classified as Level 2. Best efforts forward delivery commitments are valued using investor pricing considering the current base loan price. An anticipated loan funding probability is applied to value best efforts commitments hedging IRLCs, which results in the classification of these contracts as Level 3. The current base loan price and the anticipated loan funding probability are the most significant assumptions affecting the value of the best efforts commitments. The best efforts forward delivery commitments hedging LHFS are classified as Level 2; such contracts are transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 at the time the underlying loan is originated.
Put options on treasuries and interest rate swap futures - The Company also utilizes put options and treasury futures to hedge interest rate risk. These instruments are actively traded in a liquid market and classified as Level 1 inputs.
Trading securities, at fair value - Trading securities, at fair value represent retained interest in the credit risk of the assets collateralizing certain securitization transactions. The fair value is based on observable market data for similar securities obtained from sources independent of the Company and therefore classified as Level 2.
Warehouse lines - The Company’s warehouse lines of credit bear interest at a rate that is periodically adjusted based on a market index. The carrying value of warehouse lines of credit approximates fair value. The warehouse lines are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Debt obligations, net - Debt consists of secured debt facilities and unsecured Senior Notes. The Company’s secured credit facilities are highly liquid and short-term in nature and as a result, their carrying value approximated fair value. The secured credit facilities bear interest at a rate that is periodically adjusted based on a market index and are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Fair value of the Company’s Senior Notes are estimated using quoted market prices. The Senior Notes are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The unsecured term loan was classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, all amounts recorded in cash and cash equivalents represent cash held in banks, with the exception of insignificant amounts of petty cash held on hand.
Restricted Cash
F- 82
Cash balances that have restrictions as to the Company's ability to withdraw funds are considered restricted cash. Restricted cash is the result of the terms of the Company's warehouse lines of credit, debt obligations, and cash collateral associated with the Company’s derivative activities. In accordance with the terms of the warehouse lines of credit and debt obligations, the Company is required to maintain cash balances with the lender as additional collateral for the borrowings.
Loans Held for Sale, at Fair Value
Loans held for sale are accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in current period income. All changes in fair value, including changes arising from the passage of time, are recognized as a component of gain on origination and sale of loans, net.
Sale Recognition - The Company recognizes transfers of loans held for sale as sales when it surrenders control over the loans. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (i) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (ii) the transferee has the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (iii) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through either (a) an agreement that entitles and obligates the Company to repurchase or redeem them before their maturity or (b) the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets. If the sale criteria are not met, the transfer is recorded as a secured borrowing in which the assets remain on the balance sheet and the proceeds from the transaction are recognized as a liability.
Net interest income - Interest income on loans held for sale is recognized using their contractual interest rates. Interest income recognition is suspended for loans when they become 90 days delinquent, or when, in management's opinion, a full recovery of interest and principal becomes doubtful. Interest income recognition is resumed when the loan becomes contractually current. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income. Interest income on non-accrual loans is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash is received. Interest expense on warehouse and other lines of credit, debt obligations, and other types of borrowings is recognized using their contractual rates. Interest expense includes the amortization of expenses incurred in connection with financing activities over the term of the related borrowings.
Origination Income, net - Origination income, net, reflects the fees earned, net of lender credits paid from originating loans. Origination income includes loan origination fees, processing fees, underwriting fees and other fees collected from the borrower at the time of funding. Lender credits typically include rebates or concessions to borrowers for certain loan origination costs.
Loan Loss Obligations on Loans Sold
When the Company sells loans to investors, the risk of loss or default by the borrower is generally transferred to the investor. However, the Company is required by these investors to make certain representations relating to credit information, loan documentation and collateral. These representations and warranties may extend through the contractual life of the mortgage loan. Subsequent to the sale, if underwriting deficiencies, borrower fraud or documentation defects are discovered in individual mortgage loans, the Company may be obligated to repurchase the respective mortgage loan or indemnify the investors for any losses from borrower defaults if such deficiency or defect cannot be cured within the specified period following discovery.
In the case of early loan payoffs and early defaults on certain loans, the Company may be required to repay all or a portion of the premium initially paid by the investor on loans. The estimated obligation associated with early loan payoffs and early defaults is calculated based on historical loss experience.
F- 83
The obligation for losses related to the representations and warranties and other provisions discussed above is recorded based upon an estimate of losses. The liability for repurchase losses is assessed quarterly. Because the Company does not service all of the loans it sells, it does not maintain nor have access to the current balances and loan performance data with respect to all of the individual loans previously sold to investors. However, the Company uses industry-available prepayment data, historical and projected loss frequency and loss severity ratios, default expectations, and expected investor repurchase demands, to estimate its exposure to losses on loans previously sold. Given current general industry trends in mortgage loans as well as housing prices, market expectations around losses related to the Company's obligations could vary significantly from the obligation recorded as of the balance sheet dates. The Company records a provision for loan losses, included in gain on origination and sale of loans, net in the consolidated statements of operations, to establish the loan repurchase reserve for sold loans which is reflected in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
Securitizations
The Company is involved in several types of securitization and financing transactions that utilize special-purpose entities (SPEs). A SPE is an entity that is designed to fulfill a specified limited need of the sponsor. The Company’s principal use of SPEs is to obtain liquidity by securitizing certain of its financial and non-financial assets. SPEs involved in the Company’s securitization and other financing transactions are often considered VIEs.
Securitization transactions are accounted for either as sales or secured borrowings. The Company may retain economic interests in the securitized and sold assets, which are generally retained in the form of subordinated interests, residual interests, and/or servicing rights.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. The Company accounts for derivatives as free-standing derivatives and does not designate any derivative financial instruments for hedge accounting. All derivative financial instruments are recognized on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value with changes in the fair values being reported in current period earnings. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for purposes other than in support of its risk management activities. Certain derivatives, loan warehouse and repurchase agreements are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. In certain circumstances the Company may elect to present certain financial assets, liabilities subject to master netting arrangements in a net position on the consolidated balance sheets.
Interest rate lock commitments - The Company enters into IRLCs to originate loans held for sale, at specified interest rates, with customers who have applied for residential mortgage loans and meet certain credit and underwriting criteria. The Company is exposed to price risk related to its loans held for sale, IRLCs and servicing rights. The Company bears price risk from the time a commitment to originate a loan is made to a borrower or to purchase a loan from a third-party, to the time the loan is sold. During this period, the Company is exposed to losses if mortgage interest rates rise because the value of the IRLC or the loan held for sale decreases.
Forward sale contracts - The Company manages the price risk created by IRLCs and LHFS by entering into forward sale agreements to sell or buy specified residential mortgage loans at prices which are fixed as of the forward commitment date. Forward sale contracts also include pair offs hedging MSRs, IRLCs, and LHFS.
Put options on treasuries and interest rate swap futures - The Company is exposed to losses on servicing rights through changes in fair value if mortgage interest rates decline. The Company manages the risk created by servicing rights by hedging the fair value of servicing rights with interest rate swap futures and options on Treasury bond future contracts.
Servicing Rights
The value of the servicing rights is derived from the net positive cash flows associated with the servicing contracts. Servicing rights arise from contractual agreements between the Company and investors (or their agents) in mortgage securities and mortgage loans. Under these contracts, the Company performs loan servicing functions in exchange for fees and other
F- 84
remuneration. Servicing functions typically include, among other responsibilities, collecting and remitting loan payments; responding to borrower inquiries; accounting for principal and interest; holding custodial (impound) funds for payment of property taxes and insurance premiums; counseling delinquent mortgagors; and supervising the acquisition of real estate in settlement of loans and property disposition. The Company is required to make servicing advances on behalf of borrowers and investors to cover delinquent balances for property taxes, insurance premiums and other costs. Advances are made in accordance with servicing agreements and are recoverable upon collection from the borrower or foreclosure of the underlying loans. The Company periodically reviews the receivable for collectability and amounts are written-off when deemed uncollectible. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company had $81.1 million and $46.6 million, respectively, in outstanding servicing advances included in prepaid expenses and other assets.
When the Company sells a loan on a servicing-retained basis, it recognizes a servicing asset at fair value based on the present value of future cash flows generated by the servicing asset retained in the sale. The Company has made the election to carry its servicing rights at fair value. The Company recognizes sales of servicing rights to a purchaser as sales when (i) the Company has received approval from the investor, if required, (ii) the purchaser is currently approved as a servicer and is not at risk of losing approval status, (iii) if the portion of the sales price has been financed, an adequate nonrefundable down payment has been received and the note receivable from the purchaser provides full recourse to the purchaser, and (iv) any temporary servicing performed by the Company for a short period of time is compensated in accordance with a subservicing contract that provides adequate compensation. Additionally, the Company recognizes sales of servicing rights as sales if title passes, if substantially all risks and rewards of ownership have irrevocably passed to the purchaser and any protection provisions retained by the Company are minor and can be reasonably estimated. If a sale is recognized and only minor protection provisions exist, a liability is accrued for the estimated obligation associated with those provisions. The liability for servicing rights is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
Servicing Fee Income - The Company receives a servicing fee monthly on the remaining outstanding principal balances of the loans subject to the servicing contracts. Servicing fee income is recognized on an accrual basis and is recorded to servicing fee income. The servicing fees are collected from the monthly payments made by the mortgagors. The Company is contractually entitled to receive other remuneration including rights to various mortgagor-contracted fees such as late charges, collateral reconveyance charges and loan prepayment penalties, and the Company is generally entitled to retain the interest earned on funds held pending remittance related to its collection of mortgagor payments.
Subservicing Expense - The Company utilizes a sub-servicer to service a portion of its loan servicing portfolio and records the costs to subservicing expense.
Change in Fair Value of Servicing Rights, net - The Company is exposed to fair value risk related to its servicing rights. Servicing rights generally decline in fair value when market mortgage interest rates decrease. Decreasing market mortgage interest rates normally encourage increased mortgage refinancing activity. Increased refinancing activity reduces the life of the loans underlying the servicing rights, thereby reducing their value. Reductions in the value of these assets affect income primarily through change in fair value. Unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of servicing rights are recorded to change in fair value of servicing rights, net. Realized and unrealized hedging gains or losses used to hedge interest rate risk on servicing rights are recorded to change in fair value of servicing rights, net. Realized gains or losses from the sale of servicing rights are also included in change in fair value of servicing rights, net.
Accounts Receivable, net
Accounts receivable are assessed for collectibility and a reserve is established when amounts are outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms. The Company writes off accounts receivable when management deems them uncollectible.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method. Costs associated with internally developed software during the development stage, both internal expenses and those paid to third parties, are capitalized and amortized over three years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized over
F- 85
the lesser of the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the asset. Useful lives for purposes of computing depreciation are as follows:
| Years | |||||||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 2 | - | 15 | ||||||||
| Furniture and equipment | 5 | - | 7 | ||||||||
| Computer software | 3 | - | 5 | ||||||||
Expenditures that materially increase the asset life are capitalized, while ordinary maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. When assets are sold or retired, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gains or losses are included in earnings.
Leases
The Company determines if an arrangement contains a lease at contract inception and recognizes an operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and corresponding operating lease liability based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term, except leases with initial terms less than or equal to 12 months. While the operating leases may include options to extend the term, these options are not included when calculating the operating lease right-of-use asset and lease liability unless the Company is reasonably certain it will exercise such options. Most of the leases do not provide an implicit rate and, therefore, the Company determines the present value of lease payments by using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s lease agreements include both lease and non-lease components (such as common area maintenance), which are generally included in the lease and are accounted for together with the lease as a single lease component. Certain of the Company’s lease agreements permit it to sublease leased assets. Sublease income is included as a component of lease expense.
Operating lease ROU assets are regularly reviewed for impairment under the long-lived asset impairment guidance in ASC Subtopic 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment - Overall.
Loans Eligible for Repurchase
Loans eligible for repurchase represents certain mortgage loans sold pursuant to Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) programs where the Company, as servicer, has the unilateral option to repurchase the loan if certain criteria are met, including if a loan is greater than 90 days delinquent. Regardless of whether the repurchase option has been exercised, the Company must recognize eligible loans and a corresponding repurchase liability in its consolidated balance sheets. The terms of the Ginnie Mae MBS program allow, but do not require, the Company to repurchase mortgage loans when the borrower has made no payments for three consecutive months. As a result of this right, the Company records the loans in loans eligible for repurchase and records a corresponding liability in liability for loans eligible for repurchase on its consolidated balance sheets.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. Acquired intangible assets are recognized and reported separately from goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess cost of acquisition over the fair value of net assets acquired.
Intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated lives using the straight-line method. On an annual basis, during the fourth quarter, the Company evaluates whether there has been a change in the estimated useful life or if certain impairment indicators exist.
Goodwill must be allocated to reporting units and tested for impairment. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually and more frequently if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate there may be justification for conducting an interim test. Impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level. In testing goodwill for impairment, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. In making this assessment, the Company considers all relevant events and
F- 86
circumstances. These include, but are not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations and the reporting unit's overall financial performance. If the Company concludes, based on its qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is at least equal to its carrying amount, then the Company concludes that the goodwill of the reporting unit is not impaired and no further testing is performed. However, if the Company determines, based on its qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the Company will perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. At the Company’s option, it may, in any given period, bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to the quantitative approach. The quantitative assessment begins with a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss shall be recognized in an amount equal to the difference, limited to the total amount of goodwill for the reporting unit.
Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically assesses long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for recoverability when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. If management identifies an indicator of impairment, it assesses recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and the eventual disposal of the asset. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount is not recoverable and is measured as the excess of carrying value over fair value. No such impairment was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
Income Taxes
The Company’s provision for income taxes is made for current and deferred income tax on pretax net income adjusted for permanent and temporary differences based on enacted tax laws and applicable statutory tax rates. The Company accounts for interest and penalties associated with income tax obligations as a component of income tax expense.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates for the periods in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the change. Deferred tax assets are recorded in prepaid expenses and other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. Deferred tax liabilities are recorded in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
Following the IPO and Reorganization, the Company’s purchase of Holdco Units and any future exchanges of Holdco Units for cash or Class A Common Stock are expected to result in increases to the Company’s allocable tax basis in its assets. These increases in tax basis are expected to increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization deductions allocable to the Company, and therefore reduce the amount of tax that the Company would otherwise be required to pay in the future. As a result, the Company has entered into a Tax Receivable Agreement, (“TRA”) with Parthenon stockholders and certain Continuing LLC Members, whereby loanDepot, Inc. will be obligated to pay such parties or their permitted assignees, 85% of the amount of cash tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state, and local taxes that loanDepot, Inc. realizes, or is deemed to realize as a result of future tax benefits from increases in tax basis. The TRA liability is accounted for as a contingent liability within accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets with amounts accrued when deemed probable and estimable.
The Company evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions deemed to meet the more-likely than-not threshold of being sustained would be recorded as a tax benefit in the current period.
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective upon the completion of the IPO, the Company adopted the loanDepot, Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”). The 2021 Plan allows for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), and stock
F- 87
appreciation rights. There are currently only RSUs granted under the 2021 Plan. The Company uses the grant-date fair value of equity awards to determine the compensation cost associated with each award. Compensation cost for service-based equity awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Compensation cost for awards with only service conditions that have graded vesting schedules is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award such that compensation cost recognized at any date is at least equal to the portion of the grant-date value of the award that is vested at that date. Expense is reduced for actual forfeitures as they occur. The cost of stock-based compensation is recorded to personnel expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
Earnings per share
Basic net income per common share is calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each share of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (distributed earnings) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Distributed and undistributed earnings are allocated between common and participating security shareholders based on their respective rights to receive dividends. According to the Company’s certificate of incorporation, the holders of Class A common stock and Class D common stock are entitled to share equally, on a per share basis, in dividends and other distributions of cash, property or shares of stock of the Company as may be declared by the board of directors.
Diluted net income per common share is calculated using the more dilutive of either the treasury stock method or the two-class method. The dilutive calculation considers common stock issuable under the assumed conversion of Class C common stock to Class A common stock as well as restricted stock units granted under the Corporation’s stock plans using the treasury stock method, if dilutive.
Revenue Recognition
Direct title insurance premiums, escrow and sub escrow fees, and default and foreclosure service revenues are reported within other income in the consolidated statements of operations and are within the scope of ASC Topic 606. Direct title insurance premiums are based on a percentage of the gross title premiums charged by the title insurance provider and are recognized net as revenue when the Company is legally or contractually entitled to collect the premium. Revenue is recognized at the point-in-time upon the closing of the underlying real estate transaction as the earnings process is considered complete. Cash is typically collected at the closing of the underlying real estate transaction. Escrow and sub escrow fees are primarily associated with managing the closing of real estate transactions including the processing of funds on behalf of the transaction participants, gathering and recording the required closing documents, and providing other related activities. Escrow and sub escrow fees are recognized as revenue when the closing process is complete or when the Company is legally or contractually entitled to collect the fee. Revenue is primarily recognized at a point-in-time upon closing of the underlying real estate transaction or completion and billing of services. Cash is typically collected at the closing of the underlying real estate transaction. Default and foreclosure service revenues are associated with foreclosure title searches, tax searches, title updates, deed recordings and other related services. Fees vary by service and are recognized as revenue when the service is complete and billed or when the Company is entitled to collect the fee.
Marketing and Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred and principally represent online advertising costs, including fees paid to search engines, distribution partners, master service agreements with brokers, and desk rental agreements with realtors. Prepaid advertising expenses are capitalized and recognized during the period the expenses are incurred.
Concentration of Risk
The Company has concentrated its credit risk for cash by maintaining deposits in several financial institutions, which may at times exceed amounts covered by insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk related to cash.
Due to the nature of the mortgage lending industry, changes in interest rates may significantly impact revenue from originating mortgages and subsequent sales of loans to investors, which are the primary source of income for the Company.
F- 88
The Company originates mortgage loans on property located throughout the United States, with loans originated for property located in California totaling approximately 31% and 30% of total loan originations for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The Company sells mortgage loans to various third-party investors. Three investors accounted for 41%, 32%, and 14% of the Company’s loan sales for the year ended December 31, 2021 and 41%, 31%, and 18% for the year ended December 31, 2020. No other investors accounted for more than 5% of the loan sales for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The Company funds loans through warehouse lines of credit. As of December 31, 2021, 19% and 11% of the Company's warehouse lines were payable to two separate lenders.
NOTE 2 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2019, FASB issued ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The amendments in ASU 2019-12 simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period, and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. The new guidance also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. The guidance clarifies that single-member limited liability companies and similar disregarded entities that are not subject to income tax are not required to recognize an allocation of consolidated income tax expense in their separate financial statements, but they could elect to do so. This ASU was effective for public business entities for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2021 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting,” which provided optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the benefits of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. The amendments in ASU 2020-04 are elective and apply to all entities, subject to meeting certain criteria, that have contract, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 to clarify that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. This guidance is effective upon issuance and allows application to contract changes as early as January 1, 2020. The Company has added alternative base rate language, which may include the secured overnight financing rate ("SOFR") to agreements for its derivatives, warehouse and other lines of credit, and debt obligations that use LIBOR. The Company has applied the optional expedients under ASU 2020-04 and accounted for the contract modifications related to reference rate reform prospectively. There was no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements from adopting this standard.
NOTE 3 – FAIR VALUE
The Company's consolidated financial statements include assets and liabilities that are measured based on their estimated fair values. Refer to Note 1- Description of Business, Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for information on the fair value hierarchy, valuation methodologies, and key inputs used to measure financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, as well as methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value in their entirety on a recurring basis.
The following tables present the carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments included in the consolidated financial statements.
F- 89
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying Amount | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 419,571 | $ | 419,571 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash | 201,025 | 201,025 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for sale, at fair value | 8,136,817 | — | 8,136,817 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets, at fair value | 194,665 | 4,924 | 5,358 | 184,383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights, at fair value | 2,006,712 | — | — | 2,006,712 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trading securities, at fair value | 72,874 | — | 72,874 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans eligible for repurchase | 363,373 | — | 363,373 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warehouse and other lines of credit | $ | 7,457,199 | $ | — | $ | 7,457,199 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities, at fair value | 37,797 | 31,070 | 2,964 | 3,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights, at fair value | 7,310 | — | — | 7,310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured credit facilities | 343,759 | — | 345,596 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Term Notes | 199,133 | — | 200,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Notes | 1,085,316 | — | 1,057,977 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liability for loans eligible for repurchase | 363,373 | — | 363,373 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying Amount | Estimated Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 284,224 | $ | 284,224 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted cash | 204,465 | 204,465 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for sale, at fair value | 6,955,424 | — | 6,955,424 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets, at fair value | 647,939 | 483 | 107 | 647,349 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights, at fair value | 1,127,866 | — | — | 1,127,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans eligible for repurchase | 1,246,158 | — | 1,246,158 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warehouse and other lines of credit | $ | 6,577,429 | $ | — | $ | 6,577,429 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities, at fair value | 168,169 | 4,299 | 163,566 | 304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights, at fair value | 3,564 | — | — | 3,564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Debt obligations: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secured credit facilities | 22,571 | — | 23,593 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Term Notes | 198,640 | — | 200,000 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Senior Notes | 491,255 | 518,245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liability for loans eligible for repurchase | 1,246,158 | — | 1,246,158 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
F- 90
Financial Statement Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by fair value hierarchy as of the dates indicated.
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recurring Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities Using: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Fair Value Measurements | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value through net income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for sale | $ | — | $ | 8,136,817 | $ | — | $ | 8,136,817 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Trading Securities | — | 72,874 | — | 72,874 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments | — | — | 184,383 | 184,383 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | — | 5,358 | — | 5,358 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | 4,924 | — | — | 4,924 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights | — | — | 2,006,712 | 2,006,712 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets at fair value | $ | 4,924 | $ | 8,215,049 | $ | 2,191,095 | $ | 10,411,068 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3,763 | $ | 3,763 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | — | 2,964 | — | 2,964 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options on treasuries | 31,070 | — | — | 31,070 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights | — | — | 7,310 | 7,310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 31,070 | $ | 2,964 | $ | 11,073 | $ | 45,107 | ||||||||||||||||||
F- 91
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recurring Fair Value Measurements of Assets and Liabilities Using: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | Total Fair Value Measurements | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value through net income: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans held for sale | $ | — | $ | 6,955,424 | $ | — | $ | 6,955,424 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments | — | — | 647,349 | 647,349 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | — | 107 | — | 107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | 483 | — | — | 483 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights | — | — | 1,127,866 | 1,127,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets at fair value | $ | 483 | $ | 6,955,531 | $ | 1,775,215 | $ | 8,731,229 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 304 | $ | 304 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | — | 163,566 | — | 163,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options on treasuries | 4,299 | — | — | 4,299 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights | — | — | 3,564 | 3,564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 4,299 | $ | 163,566 | $ | 3,868 | $ | 171,733 | ||||||||||||||||||
The following presents the changes in the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| IRLCs, net | Servicing Rights, net | |||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 647,045 | $ | 1,124,302 | ||||||||||
| Total net gains or losses included in earnings (realized and unrealized) | 2,169,847 | 1,258,829 | ||||||||||||
| Sales and settlements | ||||||||||||||
| Sales | — | (383,729) | ||||||||||||
Settlements (1) | (1,969,541) | — | ||||||||||||
| Transfers of IRLCs to closed loans | (666,731) | — | ||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 180,620 | $ | 1,999,402 | ||||||||||
(1)Funded amount for IRLCs.
F- 92
| Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IRLCs, net | Servicing Rights, net | Contingent Consideration | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 128,208 | $ | 444,443 | $ | (2,374) | ||||||||||||||
| Total net gains or losses included in earnings (realized and unrealized) | 3,628,891 | 686,632 | (32,650) | |||||||||||||||||
| Sales and settlements | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales | — | (6,773) | — | |||||||||||||||||
Settlements (1)(2) | (2,460,225) | — | 34,835 | |||||||||||||||||
| Transfers of IRLCs to closed loans | (649,829) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Transfers from Level 3 (3) | — | — | 189 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 647,045 | $ | 1,124,302 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
(1)The $34.8 million settlement of contingent consideration included $14.7 million to satisfy the initial contingent consideration liability, the remaining $20.1 million was paid in accordance with an annual earnout computation.
(2)Funded amount for IRLCs.
(3)The $189,000 as of December 31, 2020 represents a fixed amount recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IRLCs, net | Servicing Rights, net | Contingent Consideration | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 60,466 | $ | 408,989 | $ | (961) | ||||||||||||||
| Total net gains or losses included in | ||||||||||||||||||||
| earnings (realized and unrealized) | 957,418 | 200,392 | (2,374) | |||||||||||||||||
| Sales and settlements | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sales | — | (164,938) | — | |||||||||||||||||
Settlements (1) | (655,644) | — | 961 | |||||||||||||||||
| Transfers of IRLCs to closed loans | (234,032) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 128,208 | $ | 444,443 | $ | (2,374) | ||||||||||||||
(1)Funded amount for IRLCs.
The following presents the gains and losses included in earnings relating to the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||
IRLCs, net (1) | Servicing Rights, net (2) | |||||||||||||
Total net (losses) gains included in earnings | $ | (466,425) | $ | 1,258,829 | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains relating to assets and liabilities still held at period end | $ | 180,620 | $ | 1,341,289 | ||||||||||
(1)Gains (losses) included in gain on origination and sale of loans, net.
(2)Includes $1.6 billion in gains included in gain on origination and sale of loans, net and $351.8 million in losses included in change in fair value of servicing rights, net, for the year ended December 31, 2021.
F- 93
| Year Ended December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||
IRLCs (1) | Servicing Rights, net (2) | |||||||||||||
Total net gains included in earnings | $ | 518,837 | $ | 686,632 | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains relating to assets and liabilities still held at period end | $ | 647,045 | $ | 860,212 | ||||||||||
(1)Gains (losses) included in gain on origination and sale of loans, net.
(2)Includes $986.1 million in gains included in gain on origination and sale of loans, net and $299.4 million in losses included in change in fair value of servicing rights, net, for the year ended December 31, 2020.
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||
IRLCs (1) | Servicing Rights, net (2) | Contingent Consideration (3) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net gains (losses) included in earnings | $ | 67,742 | $ | 200,392 | $ | (2,374) | ||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets and liabilities still held at period end | $ | 128,208 | $ | 229,979 | $ | (2,374) | ||||||||||||||
(1)Gains (losses) included in gain on origination and sale of loans, net.
(2)Includes $334.2 million in gains included in gain on origination and sale of loans, net and $133.8 million in losses included in change in fair value of servicing rights, net, for the year ended December 31, 2019.
(3)Gains (losses) included in general and administrative expense.
The following table presents quantitative information about the valuation techniques and unobservable inputs applied to Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unobservable Input | Range of inputs | Weighted Average (2) | Range of inputs | Weighted Average (2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IRLCs: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Pull-through rate | 0.3% | - | 99.3% | 74.2% | 2.8% | - | 99.9% | 70.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate(1) | 4.5% | - | 9.0% | 5.8% | 5.0% | - | 10.0% | 6.2% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prepayment rate(1) | 8.4% | - | 18.7% | 10.2% | 13.4% | - | 34.8% | 14.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost to service (per loan) | $70 | - | $114 | $82 | $71 | - | $139 | $89 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)The Company estimates the fair value of MSRs using an option-adjusted spread (“OAS”) model, which projects MSR cash flows over multiple interest rate scenarios in conjunction with the Company’s prepayment model, and then discounts these cash flows at risk-adjusted rates.
(2)Weighted average inputs are based on the committed amounts for IRLCs and the UPB of the underlying loans for servicing rights.
Financial Statement Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The Company did not have any material assets or liabilities that were recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
F- 94
Financial Statement Items Measured at Amortized Cost
Warehouse lines - The Company’s warehouse lines of credit bear interest at a rate that is periodically adjusted based on a market index. The carrying value of warehouse lines of credit approximates fair value.
Debt obligations, net - Debt consists of secured credit facilities, Term Notes, and Senior Notes. The Company’s secured credit facilities and Term Notes accrue interest at a stated rate of 30-day or 90-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin, they are highly liquid and short-term in nature and as a result, their carrying value approximated fair value as of December 31, 2021 and 2020. Fair value of the Company’s Senior Notes issued in October 2020 and March 2021 were estimated using the quoted market prices at December 31, 2021. The Senior Notes are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
NOTE 4 – BALANCE SHEET NETTING
Certain derivatives, loan warehouse and repurchase agreements are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. In certain circumstances the Company may elect to present certain financial assets, liabilities, and related collateral subject to master netting arrangements in a net position on the consolidated balance sheets.
The table below represents financial assets and liabilities that are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements categorized by financial instrument, together with corresponding financial instruments and corresponding collateral received or pledged. Warehouse lines and secured debt obligations were secured by sufficient collateral with fair value that exceeded the liability amount recorded on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross amounts recognized | Gross amounts offset in consolidated balance sheet | Net amounts presented in consolidated balance sheet | Gross amounts not offset in consolidated balance sheet | Net amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial instruments | Cash collateral | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | $ | 29,497 | $ | (24,139) | $ | 5,358 | $ | — | $ | (1,447) | $ | 3,911 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | 4,924 | — | 4,924 | — | — | 4,924 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 34,421 | $ | (24,139) | $ | 10,282 | $ | — | $ | (1,447) | $ | 8,835 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | $ | 27,103 | $ | (24,139) | $ | 2,964 | $ | — | $ | (1,736) | $ | 1,228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options on treasuries | 31,070 | — | 31,070 | — | — | 31,070 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warehouse lines of credit | 7,457,199 | — | 7,457,199 | (7,457,199) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured debt obligations (1) | 545,596 | — | 545,596 | (545,596) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | $ | 8,060,968 | $ | (24,139) | $ | 8,036,829 | $ | (8,002,795) | $ | (1,736) | $ | 32,298 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F- 95
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross amounts recognized | Gross amounts offset in consolidated balance sheet | Net amounts presented in consolidated balance sheet | Gross amounts not offset in consolidated balance sheet | Net amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Financial instruments | Cash collateral | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | $ | 71,029 | $ | (70,922) | $ | 107 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 107 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | 483 | — | 483 | — | — | 483 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Assets | $ | 71,512 | $ | (70,922) | $ | 590 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 590 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | $ | 234,488 | $ | (70,922) | $ | 163,566 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 163,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options on treasuries | 4,299 | — | 4,299 | — | — | 4,299 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Warehouse lines of credit | 6,577,429 | — | 6,577,429 | (6,577,429) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secured debt obligations (1) | 223,593 | — | 223,593 | (223,593) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | $ | 7,039,809 | $ | (70,922) | $ | 6,968,887 | $ | (6,801,022) | $ | — | $ | 167,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Secured debt obligations as of December 31, 2020 included the secured credit facilities and Term Notes.
The Company has entered into agreements with counterparties, which include netting arrangements whereby the counterparties are entitled to settle their positions on a net basis. In certain circumstances, the Company is required to provide certain counterparties financial instruments and cash collateral against derivative financial instruments, warehouse lines of credit or debt obligations. Cash collateral is held in margin accounts and included in restricted cash on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE 5 – LOANS HELD FOR SALE, AT FAIR VALUE
The following table represents the unpaid principal balance of LHFS by product type of loan as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Amount | % | Amount | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Conforming - fixed | $ | 4,881,222 | 61 | % | $ | 5,223,177 | 78 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Conforming - ARM | 351,408 | 4 | 260 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Government - fixed | 1,156,890 | 15 | 1,108,936 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Government - ARM | 10,906 | — | 45,243 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other - residential mortgage loans | 1,576,858 | 20 | 312,954 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans | 1,942 | — | 2,541 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7,979,226 | 100 | % | 6,693,111 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair value adjustment | 157,591 | 262,313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 8,136,817 | $ | 6,955,424 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
A summary of the changes in the balance of loans held for sale is as follows:
F- 96
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 6,955,424 | $ | 3,681,840 | ||||||||||
| Origination and purchase of loans | 136,606,028 | 100,535,715 | ||||||||||||
| Sales | (136,081,060) | (97,584,190) | ||||||||||||
| Repurchases | 944,023 | 193,294 | ||||||||||||
| Principal payments | (182,883) | (57,120) | ||||||||||||
Fair value (loss) gain | (104,715) | 185,885 | ||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 8,136,817 | $ | 6,955,424 | ||||||||||
Gain on origination and sale of loans, net is comprised of the following components:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Premium from loan sales | $ | 1,882,557 | $ | 3,178,213 | $ | 905,257 | ||||||||||||||
| Servicing rights | 1,610,596 | 986,050 | 334,176 | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains from derivative assets and liabilities | (308,200) | 288,325 | 95,578 | |||||||||||||||||
Realized gains (losses) from derivative assets and liabilities | 347,014 | (557,996) | (160,151) | |||||||||||||||||
| Discount points, rebates and lender paid costs | (206,716) | (148,518) | (75,948) | |||||||||||||||||
Mark to market (loss) gain on loans held for sale | (104,715) | 185,885 | 13,996 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan loss obligation for loans sold | (7,185) | (25,973) | (8,673) | |||||||||||||||||
| $ | 3,213,351 | $ | 3,905,986 | $ | 1,104,235 | |||||||||||||||
The Company had $28.8 million and $25.8 million of loans held for sale on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
NOTE 6 – SERVICING RIGHTS, AT FAIR VALUE
The outstanding principal balance of the servicing portfolio was comprised of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Conventional | $ | 127,270,097 | $ | 74,459,448 | ||||||||||
| Government | 34,842,868 | 28,471,810 | ||||||||||||
| Total servicing portfolio | $ | 162,112,965 | $ | 102,931,258 | ||||||||||
F- 97
A summary of the unpaid principal balance underlying servicing rights is as follows:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Current loans | $ | 160,302,966 | $ | 100,358,713 | ||||||||||
| Loans 30 - 89 days delinquent | 504,467 | 709,946 | ||||||||||||
| Loans 90 or more days delinquent or in foreclosure | 1,305,532 | 1,862,599 | ||||||||||||
Total servicing portfolio (1) | $ | 162,112,965 | $ | 102,931,258 | ||||||||||
(1)At December 31, 2021 and 2020, 0.6% and 2.4%, respectively, of the servicing portfolio was in forbearance as a result of payment relief efforts afforded to borrowers as a result of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and other regulatory guidance.
A summary of the changes in the balance of servicing rights, net of servicing rights liability is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 1,124,302 | $ | 444,443 | $ | 408,989 | ||||||||||||||
| Additions | 1,610,596 | 986,050 | 334,176 | |||||||||||||||||
| Sales proceeds, net | (382,271) | (9,881) | (162,220) | |||||||||||||||||
| Changes in fair value: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions | 68,399 | (95,764) | (51,086) | |||||||||||||||||
Other changes in fair value (1) | (421,624) | (200,546) | (85,416) | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 1,999,402 | $ | 1,124,302 | $ | 444,443 | ||||||||||||||
(1)Other changes in fair value includes fall out and decay from loan payoffs and principal amortization.
The following is a summary of the components of loan servicing fee income as reported in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Contractual servicing fees | $ | 382,501 | $ | 174,532 | $ | 98,325 | ||||||||||||||
| Late, ancillary and other fees | 11,179 | 11,363 | 20,093 | |||||||||||||||||
| Servicing fee income | $ | 393,680 | $ | 185,895 | $ | 118,418 | ||||||||||||||
The following is a summary of the components of changes in fair value of servicing rights, net as reported in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Changes in fair value: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Due to changes in valuation inputs or assumptions | $ | 68,399 | $ | (95,764) | $ | (51,086) | ||||||||||||||
Other changes in fair value (1) | (421,624) | (200,546) | (85,416) | |||||||||||||||||
Realized losses on sales of servicing rights | (9,759) | (2,701) | (4,018) | |||||||||||||||||
Net (losses) gains from derivatives hedging servicing rights | (82,878) | 154,663 | 42,592 | |||||||||||||||||
| Changes in fair value of servicing rights, net | $ | (445,862) | $ | (144,348) | $ | (97,928) | ||||||||||||||
(1) Other changes in fair value includes fall out and decay from loan payoffs and principal amortization.
F- 98
The table below illustrates hypothetical changes in fair values of servicing rights, caused by assumed immediate changes to key assumptions that are used to determine fair value.
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Fair Value of Servicing Rights, net | $ | 1,999,402 | $ | 1,124,302 | ||||||||||
| Change in Fair Value from adverse changes: | ||||||||||||||
| Discount Rate: | ||||||||||||||
| Increase 1% | (85,066) | (45,745) | ||||||||||||
| Increase 2% | (163,255) | (87,800) | ||||||||||||
| Cost of Servicing: | ||||||||||||||
| Increase 10% | (20,843) | (11,556) | ||||||||||||
| Increase 20% | (41,727) | (23,112) | ||||||||||||
| Prepayment Speed: | ||||||||||||||
| Increase 10% | (76,532) | (63,351) | ||||||||||||
| Increase 20% | (148,556) | (122,294) | ||||||||||||
Sensitivities are hypothetical changes in fair value and cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of changes in assumptions to changes in fair value may not be linear. Also, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption is calculated without changing any other assumption, whereas a change in one factor may result in changes to another. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that actual results would be consistent with the results of these estimates. As a result, actual future changes in servicing rights values may differ significantly from those displayed above.
NOTE 7 – DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
Derivatives instruments utilized by the Company primarily include interest rate lock commitments, forward sale contracts, MBS put options, put options on treasuries, and interest rate swap futures. Derivative financial instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities and are measured at fair value. The Company accounts for derivatives as free-standing derivatives and does not designate any derivative financial instruments for hedge accounting. All derivative financial instruments are recognized on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value with changes in the fair values being reported in current period earnings. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for purposes other than in support of its risk management activities. Refer to Note 1- Description of Business, Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3- Fair Value for further details on derivatives.
F- 99
The following summarizes the Company’s outstanding derivative instruments:
| Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notional | Balance Sheet Location | Asset | Liability | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2021: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments | $ | 11,530,721 | Derivative asset, at fair value | $ | 184,383 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments | 1,125,911 | Derivative liabilities, at fair value | — | 3,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | 19,482,705 | Derivative asset, at fair value | 5,358 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | 13,171,462 | Derivative liabilities, at fair value | — | 2,964 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options on treasuries | — | Derivative asset, at fair value | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options on treasuries | 16,980 | Derivative liabilities, at fair value | — | 31,070 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | 2,640 | Derivative asset, at fair value | 4,924 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | — | Derivative liabilities, at fair value | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total derivative financial instruments | $ | 194,665 | $ | 37,797 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notional | Balance Sheet Location | Asset | Liability | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2020: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments | $ | 31,365,494 | Derivative asset, at fair value | $ | 647,349 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments | 99,635 | Derivative liabilities, at fair value | — | 304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | 44,694 | Derivative asset, at fair value | 107 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | 54,397,834 | Derivative liabilities, at fair value | — | 163,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options on treasuries | — | Derivative asset, at fair value | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options on treasuries | 27,803 | Derivative liabilities, at fair value | — | 4,299 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | 2,350 | Derivative asset, at fair value | 483 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | — | Derivative liabilities, at fair value | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total derivative financial instruments | $ | 647,939 | $ | 168,169 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Because many of the Company’s current derivative agreements are not exchange-traded, the Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the agreements. The Company controls this risk through credit monitoring procedures including financial analysis, dollar limits and other monitoring procedures. The notional amount of the contracts does not represent the Company’s exposure to credit loss.
F- 100
The following summarizes the realized and unrealized net gains or losses on derivative financial instruments and the consolidated statements of operations line items where such gains and losses were included:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Derivative instrument | Statements of Operations Location | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate lock commitments, net | Gain on origination and sale of loans, net | $ | (466,425) | $ | 518,837 | $ | 67,742 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | Gain on origination and sale of loans, net | 540,811 | (748,245) | (130,328) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | Gain on origination and sale of loans, net | (111,300) | (13,151) | (1,401) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options | Gain on origination and sale of loans, net | 75,728 | (27,112) | (586) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forward sale contracts | Change in fair value of servicing rights, net | (89,127) | 140,173 | 21,618 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate swap futures | Change in fair value of servicing rights, net | 9,071 | 16,708 | 20,974 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Put options | Change in fair value of servicing rights, net | (2,822) | (2,218) | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total realized and unrealized losses on derivative financial instruments | $ | (44,064) | $ | (115,008) | $ | (21,981) | ||||||||||||||||||||
NOTE 8 – GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
Goodwill totaled $40.7 million at both December 31, 2021 and 2020. There were no changes in goodwill during the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
The Company's other intangible assets relate to its asset acquisition of iMortgage in October 2013, asset acquisition of Mortgage Master in January 2015, stock acquisition of CUSA in November 2016, and stock acquisition of ACT in June 2017. Intangible assets included trademarks with indefinite lives that totaled $0.1 million at both December 31, 2021 and 2020.
The following table presents the Company’s amortizing intangible assets, net:
| December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross carrying amount | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying amount | Weighted average life (years) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non compete agreements | $ | 2,130 | $ | (2,130) | $ | — | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Trademarks and trade name | 3,900 | (2,437) | 1,463 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Domain name | 30 | (19) | 11 | 3.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 6,060 | $ | (4,586) | $ | 1,474 | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gross carrying amount | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying amount | Weighted average life (years) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Non compete agreements | $ | 2,130 | $ | (2,112) | $ | 18 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||
| Trademarks and trade name | 3,900 | (1,950) | 1,950 | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Domain name | 30 | (15) | 15 | 4.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 6,060 | $ | (4,077) | $ | 1,983 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization expense for amortizing intangible assets, net was $0.5 million and $0.5 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The remaining weighted average amortization period for these assets is 36 months as of December 31, 2021. The following is a schedule of future estimated amortization expense:
F- 101
| Year ending December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 491 | ||||||
| 2023 | 491 | |||||||
| 2024 | 492 | |||||||
| Estimated amortization expense | $ | 1,474 | ||||||
The Company performs its annual assessment of possible impairment of goodwill and intangible assets as of December 31, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. Based on management's analysis, the Company concluded that, as of both December 31, 2021 and 2020, the fair value of goodwill and intangible assets exceeded their respective carrying values. Thus, no impairment was recorded for goodwill or intangible assets, net.
NOTE 9 – VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
The determination of whether the assets and liabilities of the VIEs are consolidated in the consolidated balance sheets or not consolidated in the consolidated balance sheets depends on the terms of the related transaction and the Company’s continuing involvement, if any, with the VIE. The Company is deemed the primary beneficiary and therefore consolidates VIEs for which it has both (a) the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, and (b) benefits, as defined, from the VIE. The Company determines whether it holds a significant variable interest in a VIE based on a consideration of both qualitative and quantitative factors regarding the nature, size, and form of its involvement with the VIE. The Company assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE on an ongoing basis. The Company did not provide any non-contractual financial support to VIEs for the year ended December 31, 2021 or December 31, 2020.
Consolidated VIEs
The Company is a holding company, its sole material asset is its equity interest in LD Holdings and as the sole managing member of LD Holdings, the Company indirectly operates and controls all of LD Holdings’ business and affairs. LD Holdings is considered a VIE and the financial results of LD Holdings and its subsidiaries are consolidated. A portion of net earnings or loss is allocated to noncontrolling interest to reflect the entitlement of the Continuing LLC Members.
The Company’s other consolidated VIEs currently include VIEs established for certain securitization activities. The Company executes private-label securitizations to finance mortgage loans and mortgage servicing rights. In executing a securitization transaction, the Company sells assets to the securitization trusts. The securitization facility is funded through the issuance of beneficial interests in the securitized assets. The beneficial interests take the form of either notes and/or trust certificates, which are sold to investors. These beneficial interests are collateralized by the transferred assets and entitle the investors to specified cash flows generated from the underlying assets. The Company’s economic exposure to loss from outstanding third-party financing related to other consolidated VIEs is limited to the carrying value of the consolidated VIE assets financed. The table below presents a summary of the carrying value and balance sheet classification of assets and liabilities in the Company’s other consolidated VIEs established for its securitization activities.
F- 102
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||||||||
| Loans held for sale, at fair value | $ | 2,557,490 | $ | 1,595,442 | ||||||||||
| Restricted cash | 100,494 | 170,413 | ||||||||||||
| Servicing rights, at fair value | 400,678 | 300,465 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 3,058,662 | $ | 2,066,320 | |||||||||||
| Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
| Warehouse and other lines of credit | $ | 2,600,000 | $ | 1,699,803 | ||||||||||
| Debt obligations, net | 214,133 | 213,640 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 2,814,133 | $ | 1,913,443 | |||||||||||
The Company’s exposure to these entities is primarily through its role as seller, servicer, and administrator of these entities. The Company has retained risks in the securitizations including customary representations and warranties. Additionally, the Company holds certain conditional repurchase options specific to securitizations that allow it to repurchase assets from the securitization entity. The Company, as seller, has an option to prepay and to redeem outstanding classes of issued notes at the Company’s discretion after a set time period has elapsed. The Company generally has discretion regarding when or if it will exercise these options, but would do so only when it was in the Company’s best interest. Servicing functions include, but are not limited to, general collection activity on current and noncurrent accounts, loss mitigation efforts including repossession and sale of collateral, as well as preparing and furnishing statements summarizing the asset and beneficial interest performance. These servicing responsibilities constitute the Company’s continued involvement in the transferred assets.
Non-Consolidated VIEs
The nature, purpose, and activities of non-consolidated VIEs currently encompass the Company’s investments in retained interests from securitizations and joint ventures. The table below presents a summary of the nonconsolidated VIEs for which the Company holds variable interests.
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying value | Maximum exposure to loss | Total assets in VIEs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained interests(1) | $ | 72,874 | $ | — | $ | 72,874 | $ | 1,424,857 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Investments in joint ventures | 18,553 | — | 18,553 | 20,783 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 91,427 | $ | — | $ | 91,427 | |||||||||||||||||||||
(1)Carrying value of retained interests is included within trading securities, at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets.
| December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying value | Maximum exposure to loss | Total assets in VIEs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Investments in joint ventures | $ | 17,528 | $ | — | $ | 17,528 | $ | 15,342 | ||||||||||||||||||
F- 103
Retained interests
During 2021, the Company completed the sale and securitization of non-owner occupied residential mortgage loans. Pursuant to the credit risk retention requirements, the Company, as sponsor, is required to retain at least a 5% economic interest in the credit risk of the assets collateralizing the securitization transactions. The retained interests represent a variable interest in the securitizations. The Company determined it was not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The Company’s continuing involvement is limited to customary servicing obligations as servicing administrator associated with retained servicing rights and the receipt of principal and interest associated with the retained interests. As of December 31, 2021, the remaining principal balance of loans transferred was $1.4 billion and no loans were 90 days or more past due.
Investments in joint ventures
The Company’s joint ventures include investments with home builders, real estate brokers, and commercial real estate companies to provide loan origination services and real estate settlement services to customers referred by the Company’s joint venture partners. The Company is generally not determined to be the primary beneficiary in its joint venture VIEs because it does not have the power, through voting rights or similar rights, to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE. The Company’s pro rata share of net earnings of joint ventures was $11.9 million, $10.4 million, and $12.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively and is included in other income in the consolidated statements of operations.
NOTE 10 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET
Accounts receivable, net consists of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Servicing sales, net | $ | 19,134 | $ | 1,063 | ||||||||||
| Loan sales | 7,551 | 3,833 | ||||||||||||
| Loan origination | 6,131 | 7,113 | ||||||||||||
| Loan principal and interest | 5,835 | 5,158 | ||||||||||||
| Margin call receivable | 1,740 | 91,920 | ||||||||||||
| Joint ventures | 2,160 | 4,195 | ||||||||||||
| Settlement services | 6,293 | 12,203 | ||||||||||||
| Servicing fee income | 6,527 | 6,692 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 812 | 5,945 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 56,183 | $ | 138,122 | |||||||||||
There was $0.9 million and $0.4 million in allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were $1.5 million, $0.5 million and $1.0 million of accounts receivable write-offs during the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
NOTE 11 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment, net consists of the following:
F- 104
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Furniture and equipment | $ | 146,456 | $ | 125,349 | ||||||||||
| Computer software | 20,254 | 19,031 | ||||||||||||
| Software development | 88,822 | 82,202 | ||||||||||||
| Leasehold improvements | 44,706 | 41,330 | ||||||||||||
| Work in progress | 40,565 | 18,647 | ||||||||||||
| Property and equipment | 340,803 | 286,559 | ||||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (236,541) | (201,557) | ||||||||||||
| Property and equipment, net | $ | 104,262 | $ | 85,002 | ||||||||||
The Company recorded $35.0 million, $35.2 million and $36.8 million of depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Capitalized computer software development costs consist of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Cost | $ | 88,822 | $ | 82,202 | ||||||||||
| Accumulated depreciation | (76,495) | (65,014) | ||||||||||||
| Software development, net | $ | 12,327 | $ | 17,188 | ||||||||||
The Company recorded $11.5 million, $11.5 million and $11.2 million of depreciation expense related to software development for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Future computer software development depreciation for the remaining years:
| Year ending December 31, | |||||
| 2022 | $ | 7,244 | |||
| 2023 | 4,520 | ||||
| 2024 and thereafter | 563 | ||||
| Total | $ | 12,327 | |||
NOTE 12 – WAREHOUSE AND OTHER LINES OF CREDIT
At December 31, 2021, the Company is a party to 15 lines of credit with lenders providing $11.8 billion of warehouse and revolving credit facilities. The warehouse and revolving credit facilities are used to fund, and are secured by, residential mortgage loans held for sale. Interest expense on warehouse and revolving lines of credit is recorded to interest expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
The warehouse and revolving lines of credit are repaid using proceeds from the sale of loans. The base interest rates on the Company’s warehouse lines bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. Some of the lines carry additional fees in the form of annual facility fees charged on the total line amount, commitment fees charged on the committed portion of the line and non-usage fees charged when monthly usage falls below a certain utilization percentage. The weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2021 totaled 1.91%. The Company’s warehouse lines are scheduled to expire through 2023 under or two year terms and all lines are subject to renewal based on an annual credit review conducted by the lender. The Company’s securitization facilities’ notes have to three year terms.
The base interest rates for all warehouse lines of credit are subject to increase based upon the characteristics of the underlying loans collateralizing the lines of credit, including, but not limited to product type and number of days held for
F- 105
sale. Certain warehouse line lenders require the Company to maintain cash accounts with minimum required balances at all times. As of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there was $8.0 million and $6.7 million, respectively, held in these accounts which are recorded as a component of restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets.
Under the terms of these warehouse lines, the Company is required to maintain various financial and other covenants. These financial covenants include, but are not limited to, maintaining (i) minimum tangible net worth, (ii) minimum liquidity, (iii) a minimum current ratio, (iv) a maximum distribution requirement, (v) a maximum leverage ratio, (vi) pre-tax net income requirements and (vii) a maximum warehouse capacity ratio. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with all warehouse lending related covenants.
Securitization Facilities
In May 2019, the Company issued notes through a securitization facility (“2019-1 Securitization Facility”) backed by a revolving warehouse line of credit. The 2019-1 Securitization Facility is secured by newly originated, first-lien, fixed rate or adjustable rate, residential mortgage loans which are originated in accordance with the criteria of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac for the purchase of mortgage loans or in accordance with the criteria of Ginnie Mae for the guarantee of securities backed by mortgage loans. The 2019-1 Securitization Facility issued $300.0 million in notes and certificates that bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. The 2019-1 Securitization Facility will terminate on the earlier of (i) the two-year anniversary of the initial purchase date, (ii) the Company exercising its right to optional prepayment in full and (iii) the date of the occurrence and continuance of an event of default. In May 2021, the Company repaid the notes and certificates of the 2019-1 Securitization Facility.
In October 2019, the Company issued notes through an additional securitization facility (“2019-2 Securitization Facility”) backed by a revolving warehouse line of credit. The 2019-2 Securitization Facility is secured by newly originated, first-lien, fixed rate or adjustable rate, residential mortgage loans which are originated in accordance with the criteria of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac for the purchase of mortgage loans or in accordance with the criteria of Ginnie Mae for the guarantee of securities backed by mortgage loans. The 2019-2 Securitization Facility issued $300.0 million in notes and certificates that bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. The 2019-2 Securitization Facility will terminate on the earlier of (i) the two-year anniversary of the initial purchase date, (ii) the Company exercising its right to optional prepayment in full and (iii) the date of the occurrence and continuance of an event of default. In October 2021, the Company repaid the notes and certificates of the 2019-2 Securitization Facility.
In October 2020, the Company issued notes through an additional securitization facility (“2020-1 Securitization Facility”) backed by a revolving warehouse line of credit. The 2020-1 Securitization Facility is secured by newly originated, first-lien, residential mortgage loans eligible for purchase by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the purchase of mortgage loans or in accordance with the criteria of Ginnie Mae for the guarantee of securities backed by mortgage loans. The 2020-1 Securitization Facility issued $600.0 million in notes and certificates that bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. The 2020-1 Securitization Facility will terminate on the earlier of (i) the two-year anniversary of the initial purchase date, (ii) the Company exercising its right to optional prepayment in full and (iii) the date of the occurrence and continuance of an event of default. In March 2022, the Company exercised its right to optional prepayment in full and terminated the 2020-1 Securitization Facility.
In December 2020, the Company issued notes through an additional securitization facility (“2020-2 Securitization Facility”) backed by a revolving warehouse line of credit. The 2020-2 Securitization Facility is secured by newly originated, first-lien, fixed rate residential mortgage loans eligible for purchase by the GSEs or in accordance with the criteria of Ginnie Mae for the guarantee of securities backed by mortgage loans. The 2020-2 Securitization Facility issued $500.0 million in notes and certificates that bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. The 2020-2 Securitization Facility will terminate on the earlier of (i) the three year anniversary of the initial purchase date, (ii) the Company exercising its right to optional prepayment in full and (iii) the date of the occurrence and continuance of an event of default.
In February 2021, the Company issued notes and a class of owner trust certificates through an additional securitization facility (“2021-1 Securitization Facility”) backed by a revolving warehouse line of credit. The 2021-1 Securitization Facility is secured by newly originated, first-lien, fixed-rate or adjustable-rate, residential mortgage loans which are originated in accordance with the criteria of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the purchase of mortgage loans or in accordance with the criteria of Ginnie Mae for the guarantee of securities backed by mortgage loans. The 2021-1 Securitization Facility issued
F- 106
$500.0 million in notes that bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. The 2021-1 Securitization Facility will terminate on the earlier of (i) the three-year anniversary of the initial purchase date, (ii) the Company exercising its right to optional prepayment in full and (iii) the date of the occurrence and continuance of an event of default.
In April 2021, the Company issued notes and a class of owner trust certificates through an additional securitization facility (“2021-2 Securitization Facility”) backed by a revolving warehouse line of credit. The 2021-2 Securitization Facility is secured by newly originated, first-lien, fixed-rate or adjustable-rate, residential mortgage loans which are originated in accordance with the criteria of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the purchase of mortgage loans or in accordance with the criteria of Ginnie Mae for the guarantee of securities backed by mortgage loans. The 2021-2 Securitization Facility issued $500.0 million in notes that bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. The 2021-2 Securitization Facility will terminate on the earlier of (i) the three-year anniversary of the initial purchase date, (ii) the Company exercising its right to optional prepayment in full and (iii) the date of the occurrence and continuance of an event of default.
In October 2021, the Company issued notes and a class of owner trust certificates through an additional securitization facility (“2021-3 Securitization Facility”) backed by a revolving warehouse line of credit. The 2021-3 Securitization Facility is secured by newly originated, first-lien, fixed-rate or adjustable-rate, residential mortgage loans which are originated in accordance with the criteria of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for the purchase of mortgage loans or in accordance with the criteria of Ginnie Mae for the guarantee of securities backed by mortgage loans. The 2021-3 Securitization Facility issued $500.0 million in notes that bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. The 2021-3 Securitization Facility will terminate on the earlier of (i) the three-year anniversary of the initial purchase date, (ii) the Company exercising its right to optional prepayment in full, and (iii) the date of the occurrence and continuance of an event of default.
F- 107
The following table presents information on warehouse borrowings and the outstanding balance as of December 31, 2021 and 2020:
| Outstanding Balance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Committed Amount | Uncommitted Amount | Total Facility Amount | Expiration Date | December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 1(1) | $ | 400,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 1,500,000 | 10/29/2022 | $ | 851,088 | $ | 1,665,005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 2(2) | — | 600,000 | 600,000 | 9/26/2022 | 295,743 | 226,891 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Facility 3 | — | 500,000 | 500,000 | 4/19/2022 | 459,018 | 206,863 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Facility 4 | — | 900,000 | 900,000 | 11/14/2022 | 266,230 | 335,096 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 5(2) | — | 200,000 | 200,000 | N/A | 391 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 6(2) | 100,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,100,000 | 10/10/2022 | 583,449 | 626,741 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 7(3) | 750,000 | 1,250,000 | 2,000,000 | 5/5/2023 | 1,410,367 | 919,068 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 8(4) | — | — | — | 5/14/2021 | — | 300,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 9(4) | — | — | — | 10/23/2021 | — | 299,803 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Facility 10 | — | 850,000 | 850,000 | N/A | 361,783 | 358,761 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 11(5) (6) | 600,000 | — | 600,000 | 10/25/2022 | 600,000 | 600,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 12(5) | 500,000 | — | 500,000 | 12/17/2023 | 500,000 | 500,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Facility 13 | — | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | 9/23/2022 | 263,516 | 259,247 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 14(4) | — | — | — | 2/10/2021 | — | 279,954 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 15(5) | 500,000 | — | 500,000 | 2/2/2024 | 500,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 16(5) | 500,000 | — | 500,000 | 4/23/2024 | 500,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Facility 17 | — | 500,000 | 500,000 | 9/22/2022 | 365,614 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility 18(5) | 500,000 | — | 500,000 | 10/21/2024 | 500,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 3,850,000 | $ | 7,900,000 | $ | 11,750,000 | $ | 7,457,199 | $ | 6,577,429 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1)The total facility is available both to fund loan originations and also provide liquidity under a gestation facility to finance recently sold MBS up to the MBS settlement date.
(2)In addition to the warehouse line, the lender provides a separate gestation facility to finance recently sold MBS up to the MBS settlement date.
(3)In addition to the outstanding balance secured by mortgage loans, the Company has $15.0 million outstanding to finance servicing rights included within debt obligations in the consolidated balance sheets.
(4)This facility expired.
(5)Securitization backed by a revolving warehouse facility to finance newly originated first-lien fixed and adjustable rate mortgage loans.
(6)This facility was prepaid and terminated in March 2022.
The following table presents certain information on warehouse borrowings:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum outstanding balance during the period | $ | 9,180,276 | $ | 7,037,828 | $ | 4,370,205 | ||||||||||||||
| Average balance outstanding during the period | 8,149,855 | 3,974,625 | 2,844,290 | |||||||||||||||||
| Collateral pledged (loans held for sale) | 7,815,347 | 6,752,909 | 3,553,504 | |||||||||||||||||
| Weighted average interest rate during the period | 2.21 | % | 2.54 | % | 3.83 | % | ||||||||||||||
F- 108
NOTE 13 – DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The following table shows the outstanding debt as of December 31, 2021 and 2020.
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Secured debt obligations, net: | ||||||||||||||
| Secured credit facilities: | ||||||||||||||
| MSR facilities | $ | 262,250 | $ | 15,000 | ||||||||||
| Securities financing facilities | 66,439 | — | ||||||||||||
| Servicing advance facilities | 15,070 | 7,571 | ||||||||||||
| Total secured credit facilities | 343,759 | 22,571 | ||||||||||||
| Term Notes | 199,133 | 198,640 | ||||||||||||
| Total secured debt obligations, net | 542,892 | 221,211 | ||||||||||||
| Unsecured debt obligations, net: | ||||||||||||||
| Senior Notes | 1,085,316 | 491,255 | ||||||||||||
| Total debt obligations, net | $ | 1,628,208 | $ | 712,466 | ||||||||||
Secured Credit Facilities
MSR Facilities
The Company entered into a $25.0 million revolving secured credit facility (the “Original Secured Credit Facility”) in October 2014 to finance servicing rights and for other working capital needs and general corporate purposes. The Company has entered into subsequent amendments with the lender to increase and decrease the size of the facility and extend the maturity date. The Original Secured Credit Facility is secured by servicing rights and accrues interest at a base rate per annum of 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. As of December 31, 2021, there was $248.0 million outstanding on the Original Secured Credit Facility with a maturity of June 2022. At December 31, 2021, capacity under the facility was $268.0 million and the Company had pledged $890.0 million in fair value of servicing rights as collateral to secure the outstanding advances. Advances for servicing rights are determined using a borrowing base formula calculated against the fair market value of the pledged servicing rights. As of December 31, 2021, there was $248.0 million in Original Secured Credit Facility outstanding. Under the Original Secured Credit Facility, the Company is required to satisfy certain financial covenants, including minimum tangible net worth, minimum liquidity, maximum leverage and debt service coverage. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
The Company amended one of its warehouse line facilities to provide a $50.0 million sub-limit to finance servicing rights and for other working capital needs and general corporate purposes (the “Second Secured Credit Facility”) in May 2015. In March 2021, we terminated the sub-limit on this facility.
The Company entered into a master repurchase agreement with one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, loanDepot GMSR Master Trust (“GMSR Trust”) in August 2017 to finance Ginnie Mae mortgage servicing rights (the “GNMA MSRs”) owned by the Company (the “GNMA MSR Facility”) pursuant to the terms of a base indenture (the “GNMA MSR Indenture”). The Company pledged participation certificates representing beneficial interests in GNMA MSRs to the GMSR Trust. The Company is party to an acknowledgment agreement with Ginnie Mae whereby we may, from time to time pursuant to the terms of any supplemental indenture, issue to institutional investors variable funding notes or one or more series of term notes, in each case secured by the participation certificates relating to the GNMA MSRs held by the GMSR Trust. In August 2017, the Company, through the GMSR Trust, issued a variable funding note (the “GMSR VFN”) in the initial amount of $65.0 million. The maximum amount of the GMSR VFN is $150.0 million. The GMSR VFN is secured by GNMA MSRs and bears interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin per annum. The Company has entered into
F- 109
subsequent agreements to amend certain terms of the GMSR VFN and extend the maturity date. As of December 31, 2021, there was $15.0 million in GMSR VFN outstanding. In October 2021, the maturity date was extended to November 2022. Under this facility, the Company is required to satisfy certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
In December 2021 the Company entered into a third secured credit facility agreement (the “Third Secured Credit Facility”) which provides $300.0 million in borrowing capacity, with an option to increase up to $500.0 million upon mutual consent, available to the Company that is secured by certain of the Company’s mortgage servicing rights under the servicing agreement and other collateral. At December 31, 2021, there was a zero outstanding balance on the Third Secured Credit Facility and $0.8 million in unamortized deferred financing costs.
Securities Financing Facilities
In June 2021, the Company entered into a master repurchase agreement to finance securities retained in a securitization ("Securities Financing"). During the second half of 2021, the Company entered into three additional master repurchase agreements for Securities Financing. The Securities Financing has an advance rate between 60% and 92% based on the class of security and accrues interest at a rate of 90-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin. The Securities Financing is secured by retained interests with a fair value of $72.9 million at December 31, 2021 that are recorded in trading securities, at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2021, there was $66.4 million in Securities Financing outstanding.
Servicing Advance Facilities
In September 2020, the Company, through its indirect-wholly owned subsidiary loanDepot Agency Advance Receivables Trust (the “Advance Receivables Trust”), entered into a variable funding note facility for the financing of servicing advance receivables with respect to residential mortgage loans serviced by it on behalf of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Pursuant to an indenture, the Advance Receivables Trust can issue up to $130.0 million in variable funding notes (the “2020-VF1 Notes”). The 2020-VF1 Notes accrue interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin per annum and mature in September 2022 (unless earlier redeemed in accordance with their terms). The 2020-VF1 Notes are secured by LDLLC's rights to reimbursement for advances made pursuant to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac requirements. At December 31, 2021, there was $16.2 million in 2020-VF1 Notes outstanding. Under this facility, the Company is required to satisfy certain financial covenants including minimum levels of tangible net worth and liquidity and maximum levels of consolidated leverage. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
In November 2021, the Company, through the GMSR Trust, amended and restated the GMSR VFN to issue two new series of variable funding notes for the financing of principal and interest advance receivables and servicing advance receivables with respect to residential mortgage loans serviced by it on behalf of Ginnie Mae. Pursuant to an indenture, the Company can issue up to $150.0 million in variable funding notes secured by principal and interest advance reimbursement amounts or servicing advance reimbursement amounts. The variable funding notes bear interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin per annum. As of December 31, 2021, there was no outstanding balance on the variable funding notes and $1.1 million in unamortized deferred financing costs.
Term Notes
In October 2018, the GMSR Trust was amended and restated for the purpose of issuing the Series 2018-GT1 Term Notes (“Term Notes”). The Term Notes accrue interest at 30-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin per annum and mature in October 2023 or, if extended pursuant to the terms of the related indenture supplement, October 2025 (unless earlier redeemed in accordance with their terms). At December 31, 2021, there was $200.0 million in Term Notes outstanding and $0.9 million in unamortized deferred financing costs. Under this facility, the Company is required to satisfy certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2021, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
Senior Notes
F- 110
In October 2020, the Company issued $500.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% senior unsecured notes due 2025, (the “2025 Senior Notes”). The 2025 Senior Notes will mature on November 1, 2025. Interest on the 2025 Senior Notes accrues at a rate of 6.50% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year. At any time prior to November 1, 2022, we may redeem some or all of the 2025 Senior Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2025 Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the date of redemption plus a make-whole premium. The Company may also redeem the 2025 Senior Notes at our option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after November 1, 2022 at various redemption prices. In addition, subject to certain conditions at any time prior to November 1, 2022, we may redeem up to 40% of the principal amount of the 2025 Senior Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 106.50% of the principal amount of the 2025 Senior Notes, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the date of redemption. At December 31, 2021, there was $500.0 million in 2025 Senior Notes outstanding and $6.8 million in unamortized deferred financing costs.
In March 2021, the Company issued $600.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.125% senior unsecured notes due 2028 (the “2028 Senior Notes” and together with the 2025 Senior Notes, the "Senior Notes"). The 2028 Senior Notes will mature on April 1, 2028. Interest on the 2028 Senior Notes accrues at a rate of 6.125% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year. At any time prior to April 1, 2024, we may redeem some or all of the 2028 Senior Notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2028 Senior Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the date of redemption plus a make-whole premium. The Company may also redeem the 2028 Senior Notes at our option, in whole or in part, at any time on or after April 1, 2024 at various redemption prices. In addition, subject to certain conditions at any time prior to April 1, 2024, we may redeem up to 40% of the principal amount of the 2028 Senior Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 106.125% of the principal amount of the 2028 Senior Notes, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the date of redemption. At December 31, 2021, there was $600.0 million in 2028 Senior Notes outstanding and $7.9 million in unamortized deferred financing costs.
Interest Expense
Interest expense on all outstanding debt obligations with variable rates is paid based on 30-day or 90-day LIBOR, or other alternative base rate such as SOFR, plus a margin ranging from 0.45% - 4.75%.
NOTE 14 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accounts payable and accrued expenses consist of the following:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Accrued compensation and benefits | $ | 154,154 | $ | 285,138 | ||||||||||
| Accounts payable | 136,619 | 110,618 | ||||||||||||
| Loan loss obligation for sold loans | 29,877 | 33,591 | ||||||||||||
| Accrued pricing adjustments on sold loans | 12,336 | 4,536 | ||||||||||||
| Deferred tax liability | 193,020 | — | ||||||||||||
| TRA liability | 32,865 | — | ||||||||||||
| Income tax payable | 12,821 | 1,712 | ||||||||||||
| Dividends and dividend equivalents payable | 38,057 | — | ||||||||||||
| Servicing rights, at fair value | 7,310 | 3,564 | ||||||||||||
| Financing lease obligations | — | 3,442 | ||||||||||||
| Other | 7,385 | 3,769 | ||||||||||||
| $ | 624,444 | $ | 446,370 | |||||||||||
NOTE 15 – INCOME TAXES
F- 111
The following table details the Company’s provision for income taxes:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Current | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal | $ | 8,936 | $ | 1,745 | $ | (1,809) | ||||||||||||||
| State | 3,120 | 581 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total current | 12,056 | 2,326 | (1,769) | |||||||||||||||||
| Deferred | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Federal | 26,623 | (82) | 18 | |||||||||||||||||
| State | 4,692 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total deferred | 31,315 | (78) | 20 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total provision (benefit) for income taxes | $ | 43,371 | $ | 2,248 | $ | (1,749) | ||||||||||||||
The following table is a reconciliation of the estimated provision for income taxes at statutory rates to the provision for income taxes at the Company’s effective tax rate:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| Federal income tax at statutory rate | 21.0 | % | 21.0 | % | 21.0 | % | |||||||||||
| State and local income taxes (net of federal benefit) | 0.9 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Non-controlling interests | (16.2) | (20.9) | (26.4) | ||||||||||||||
| Other, net | 0.8 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Total income tax expense (benefit) | 6.5 | % | 0.1 | % | (5.4) | % | |||||||||||
The Company’s income tax expense varies from the expense that would be expected based on statutory rates due principally to income passed through to noncontrolling interests. Prior to the IPO, income taxes for LD Holdings at the consolidated level were primarily federal, state, and local taxes for ACT, a C Corporation. Subsequent to the IPO, the Company became a C Corporation subject to federal, state, and local income taxes with respect to its share of net taxable income of LD Holdings.
F- 112
Temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
| December 31, | |||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | ||||||||||
| Deferred tax assets: | |||||||||||
| Accrued compensation | $ | — | $ | 35 | |||||||
| State taxes | 437 | — | |||||||||
| Acquired intangible assets | — | 14 | |||||||||
| Total deferred tax assets | 437 | 49 | |||||||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||||||
| Outside basis difference | 193,353 | — | |||||||||
| Depreciation | — | 1 | |||||||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | 193,353 | 1 | |||||||||
| Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets | $ | (192,916) | $ | 48 | |||||||
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, which will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. The deferred tax liability as of December 31, 2021 relates to temporary outside basis differences in the book basis as compared to the tax basis of loanDepot, Inc.’s investment in LD Holdings, net of tax benefits from future deductions for payments made under the TRA as a result of the offering transaction. Changes in tax laws and rates may affect recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities and the Company’s effective tax rate in the future. Deferred income taxes are measured using the applicable tax rates that are expected to apply in the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on the tax rates that have been enacted at the reporting date. The Company measured its deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 using the combined federal and state rate (less federal benefit) of 26%. The Company establishes a valuation allowance when it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In determining the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considered all negative and positive evidence. As of December 31, 2021, the Company did not have a valuation allowance on any deferred tax assets as the Company believes it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets.
Uncertain tax positions relate to various federal and state income tax matters. The income tax returns for 2017-2021 are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities. There was no interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||
| Beginning balance | $ | — | $ | 282 | $ | 1,655 | |||||||||||
| Increases related to positions taken during prior years | 540 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Increases related to positions taken during the current year | 114 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| Decreases due to a lapse of applicable statute of limitations | — | (282) | (1,373) | ||||||||||||||
| Ending balance | $ | 654 | $ | — | $ | 282 | |||||||||||
The Company recognized a TRA liability of $32.9 million as of December 31, 2021, which represents the Company’s estimate of the aggregate amount that it will pay under the TRA as a result of the offering transaction, refer to Note 22- Commitments and Contingencies, for further information on the TRA liability.
NOTE 16 – LEASES
F- 113
The Company entered into operating leases related to its corporate headquarters and support, sales, and processing offices which expire at various dates through 2028. The Company’s operating lease agreements have remaining terms ranging from less than one year to seven years. Certain of these operating lease agreements include options to extend the original term. The Company’s operating lease agreements do not require the Company to make variable lease payments.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Lease expense: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating leases | $ | 28,322 | $ | 30,350 | $ | 29,560 | ||||||||||||||
| Short-term leases | 747 | 688 | 430 | |||||||||||||||||
| Sublease income | (1,049) | (1,518) | (1,000) | |||||||||||||||||
| Lease expense included in occupancy expense | $ | 28,020 | $ | 29,520 | $ | 28,990 | ||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Other information: | ||||||||||||||
| Cash paid for operating leases | $ | 31,377 | $ | 29,394 | ||||||||||
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations: | ||||||||||||||
| New leases entered into during the year | 11,826 | 29,768 | ||||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | December 31, 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Period-end: | ||||||||||||||
| Operating leases: | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted average remaining lease term (years) | 3.8 | 4.2 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted average discount rate | 7.0 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year as of December 31, 2021:
| Amount | ||||||||
| Year ending December 31, | ||||||||
| 2022 | $ | 28,713 | ||||||
| 2023 | 19,905 | |||||||
| 2024 | 14,568 | |||||||
| 2025 | 8,562 | |||||||
| 2026 | 4,666 | |||||||
| Thereafter | 6,344 | |||||||
| Total operating lease payments | 82,758 | |||||||
| Less: Imputed interest | (10,826) | |||||||
| Operating lease liability | $ | 71,932 | ||||||
As of December 31, 2021, the Company has three operating leases that have not yet commenced with aggregate undiscounted required payments of $0.4 million.
F- 114
NOTE 17 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In conjunction with its joint ventures, the Company entered into agreements to provide services to the joint ventures for which it receives and pays fees. Services for which the Company earns fees comprise of loan processing and administrative services (legal, accounting, human resources, data processing and management information, assignment processing, post-closing, underwriting, facilities management, quality control, management consulting, risk management, promotions, public relations, advertising and compliance with credit agreements). The Company also originates eligible mortgage loans referred by its joint ventures for which the Company pays the joint ventures a broker fee.
Fees earned, costs incurred, and receivables from joint ventures were as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Loan processing and administrative services fee income | $ | 15,023 | $ | 14,483 | $ | 9,909 | ||||||||||||||
| Loan origination broker fees expense | 90,266 | 80,636 | 75,420 | |||||||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | |||||||||||||
| Receivables from joint ventures | $ | 1,855 | $ | 2,196 | ||||||||||
The Company paid management fees of $0.2 million, $1.0 million and $0.7 million to a shareholder of the Company during the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company employed certain individuals who provided services to a shareholder whose salaries totaled $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
The Company charters a private aircraft and a boat owned by North American Charters, Inc. (“NA Charters”) and JLSSAA LLC (“JLSSAA”), companies controlled by the Company’s CEO, which from time-to-time also leases the boat to third parties unaffiliated with us. The Company uses the charter services mainly for the purposes of business travel for our executive officers and directors. The Company incurred expenses to NA Charters and JLSSAA of $0.2 million, zero, and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019 respectively. These charges included only allocated costs based on business usage. The Company’s CEO pays for all unallocated expenses and any expenses related to his personal travel or mixed-use travel (travel in which a non-business passenger is also on the aircraft or boat).
NOTE 18 – EQUITY
As a result of the IPO and reorganization, the financial statements for the periods prior to the IPO were adjusted to combine the previously separate entities for presentation.
Prior to the IPO, the Company completed a reorganization by which it changed its equity structure to create a single class of LLC Units in LD Holdings. Prior to that transaction, the capital structure consisted of different classes of membership interests held by Continuing LLC Members. The LLC Units were then exchanged on a one-for-one basis for Holdco Units and Class C common stock. The Continuing LLC Members have the right to exchange one Holdco Unit and one share of Class B common stock or Class C common stock, as applicable, together for cash or one share of Class A common stock at the Company’s election, subject to customary conversion rate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends, and reclassifications. The Company consolidates the financial results of LD Holdings and reports noncontrolling interest related to the interests held by the Continuing LLC Members.
The noncontrolling interest of $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion as of December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, represented the economic interest in LD Holdings held by the Continuing LLC Members. The following table summarizes the ownership of LD Holdings as of December 31, 2021.
F- 115
| Holding Member Interests: | Holdco Units | Ownership Percentage | ||||||
| loanDepot, Inc. | 137,289,020 | 44.28% | ||||||
| Continuing LLC Members | 172,729,168 | 55.72% | ||||||
| Total | 310,018,188 | 100.00% | ||||||
NOTE 19 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The stock-based compensation expense recognized on all share-based awards was $67.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2021, there was $30.3 million of unrecognized compensation related to all unvested awards.
LDI Awards
Effective upon the completion of the IPO, the Company adopted the 2021 Plan. The 2021 Plan allows for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, and stock appreciation rights. The Company reserved a total of 16,250,000 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the 2021 Plan, which amount shall be increased on the first day of each fiscal year during the term of the 2021 Plan commencing with the 2022 fiscal year by (i) 2% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year, or (ii) a lesser amount determined by the Company's board of directors. There are currently only RSUs granted under the 2021 Plan. The following is a summary of RSU activity for the year ended December 31, 2021.
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 | |||||||||||
| Weighted Average | |||||||||||
| Grant Date | |||||||||||
| Shares | Fair Value | ||||||||||
| Unvested - beginning of period | — | $ | — | ||||||||
| Granted | 4,109,405 | 22.06 | |||||||||
| Vested | (2,269,355) | 26.22 | |||||||||
| Forfeited/Cancelled | (74,287) | 25.16 | |||||||||
| Unvested - end of period | 1,765,763 | 16.60 | |||||||||
Total compensation expense for the LDI awards was $64.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Unrecognized compensation expense related to these RSUs was $24.5 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.45 years.
Holdco Units
Prior to the IPO, the Company’s 2009 Incentive Equity Plan, 2012 Incentive Equity Plan, and 2015 Incentive Equity Plan (collectively, the “Plans”) provided for the granting of Class Z, Class Y, Class X, and Class W Common Units of LD Holdings to employees, managers, consultants, and advisors of the Company and its subsidiaries. Participants that received grants or purchased Class Z, Class Y, Class X, or Class W Common Units of LD Holdings pursuant to the Plans were required to become a party to the Limited Liability Company Agreement.
As part of the IPO and reorganization discussed in Note 1- Description of Business, Presentation, and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, any outstanding units were equitably adjusted and replaced with a single new class of LLC Units that were exchanged on a one-for-one basis for Holdco Units . No further awards will be granted under the Plans as both the Plans and LLC Agreement were terminated.
F- 116
The following table presents a summary of the changes in awards subsequent to the conversion into Holdco Units for the period ended December 31, 2021:
| Year Ended December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||
| Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||||||||||
| Unvested - beginning of period | 19,632,883 | $ | 0.50 | |||||||||||
| Vested | (6,184,267) | 0.52 | ||||||||||||
| Forfeited/Cancelled | (1,838,474) | 0.51 | ||||||||||||
| Unvested - end of period | 11,610,142 | 0.50 | ||||||||||||
The following table presents a summary of the changes in Class Z, Class Y, Class X, Class W and Class V Common Units for the period January 1, 2021 through February 10, 2021 and for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, prior to the conversion to Holdco Units .
| January 1, 2021 through February 10, 2021 | Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2020 | 2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | Shares | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unvested - beginning of period | 610,497,758 | $ | 0.016 | 100,679,480 | $ | 0.006 | 257,789,340 | $ | 0.030 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Granted | — | — | 1,228,708,539 | 0.016 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Vested | (12,656,379) | 0.016 | (623,673,773) | 0.016 | (89,639,924) | 0.004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forfeited/Cancelled | (3,552,286) | 0.016 | (95,216,488) | 0.008 | (67,469,936) | 0.008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unvested - end of period | 594,289,093 | 0.016 | 610,497,758 | 0.016 | 100,679,480 | 0.006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following assumptions were used for the grants during the year ended December 31, 2020:
| Risk-free interest rate | 0.30 | % | ||||||
| Expected life | 1.7 years | |||||||
| Expected volatility | 160.0 - 175.0% | |||||||
The risk-free interest rate was the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant based on the expected life of the unit grants. The expected life of the units granted represented the period of time the unit grants were expected to be outstanding. The expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of a public peer group of Companies’ stock price in the most recent period that was equal to the expected term of the unit grants that were being valued.
Total compensation expense associated with the Holdco Units was $2.8 million, $8.5 million, and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. There was an additional $6.4 million of compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 related to the modification of Class V Units for Class X Units based on the market value of those units at the modification date.
At December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested Holdco Units was $5.8 million and $9.5 million, respectively. This cost is expected to be recognized over the next 2.80 years.
F- 117
NOTE 20 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share of Class A common stock and Class D common stock is computed by dividing net income attributable to loanDepot, Inc. by the weighted-average number of shares of Class A common stock and Class D common stock, respectively, outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share of Class A common stock and Class D common stock is computed by dividing net income attributable to loanDepot, Inc. by the weighted-average number of shares of Class A common stock and Class D common stock respectively, outstanding adjusted to give effect to potentially dilutive securities.
Earnings per share information has not been presented for the years ended December 31, 2020 or December 31, 2019. The basic and diluted earnings per share period for the year ended December 31, 2021 represents the period after February 11, 2021, wherein the Company had outstanding Class A common stock and Class D common stock. There was no Class B common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2021.The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the period following the reorganization and IPO for Class A common stock and Class D common stock:
| Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
| December 31, 2021 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Class A | Class D | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Net income attributable to loanDepot, Inc. | $ | 13,998 | $ | 99,526 | $ | 113,524 | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares - basic | 16,029,314 | 113,969,580 | 129,998,894 | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per share - basic | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.87 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income allocated to common stockholders - diluted | $ | 13,998 | $ | 99,526 | $ | 113,524 | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted average shares - diluted | 16,029,314 | 113,969,580 | 129,998,894 | |||||||||||||||||
| Earnings per share - diluted | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.87 | ||||||||||||||
For the period from February 11, 2021 to December 31, 2021, 192,465,222 shares of Class C common stock were evaluated for the assumed exchange of noncontrolling interests and determined to be anti-dilutive, and thus were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
For the period from February 11, 2021 to December 31, 2021, 1,192,211 of RSUs were determined to be anti-dilutive, and thus excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.
NOTE 21 – EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
The Company’s employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution plan (“401(k) Plan”). The Company matches 50% of participant contributions, up to 6% of each participant’s total eligible gross compensation. Matching contributions totaled approximately $25.4 million, $18.4 million and $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
NOTE 22 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Escrow Services
In conducting its operations, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, LDSS and ACT, routinely hold customers' assets in escrow pending completion of real estate financing transactions. These amounts are maintained in segregated bank accounts and are offset with the related liabilities resulting in no amounts reported in the accompanying
F- 118
consolidated balance sheets. The balances held for the Company’s customers totaled $21.1 million and $377.3 million at December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is a defendant in or a party to a number of legal actions or proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for monetary damages are asserted against the Company. These matters include actions alleging improper lending practices, improper servicing, quiet title actions, improper foreclosure practices, violations of consumer protection laws, etc. and on account of consumer bankruptcies. In many of these actions, the Company may not be the real party of interest (because the Company is not the servicer of the loan or the holder of the note) but it may appear in the pleadings because it is in the chain of title to property over which there may be a dispute. Such matters are turned over to the servicer of the loan for those loans the Company does not service. In other cases, such as lien avoidance cases brought in bankruptcy, the Company is insured by title insurance and the case is turned over to the title insurer who tenders our defense. In some of these actions and proceedings, claims for monetary damages are asserted against the Company. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such legal actions and proceedings, the Company generally cannot predict what the eventual outcome of the pending matters will be, what the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be, or what the eventual loss related to each pending matter may be, if any.
The Company seeks to resolve all litigation and regulatory matters in the manner management believes is in the best interest of the Company and contests liability, allegations of wrongdoing and, where applicable, the amount of damages or scope of any penalties or other relief sought as appropriate in each pending matter. On at least a quarterly basis, the Company assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal and regulatory proceedings utilizing the latest information available. Any estimated loss is subject to significant judgment and is based upon currently available information, a variety of assumptions, and known and unknown uncertainties. Where available information indicates that it is probable a liability has been incurred and the Company can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss, an accrued liability is established. The actual costs of resolving these proceedings may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued.
During the second quarter of 2021, the Company settled, on an individual basis, a putative Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) class action for a nominal amount. The Company previously disclosed a second putative TCPA class action where (i) the Company filed dispositive motions to dismiss the claims, (ii) the court granted the Company’s motion to stay the matter pending the outcome of a circuit court’s decision in a TCPA matter in which the Company is not a party, and (iii) the Company has determined that the legal action will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.
On December 24, 2020, the Company received a demand letter from one of the senior members of its operations team alleging, among other things, loan origination noncompliance and various employment related claims, including hostile work environment and gender discrimination, with unspecified damages. The executive has since resigned her position with the Company. The parties participated in pre-litigation mediation in May 2021. The parties did not resolve the matter at mediation and a complaint was filed with the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange on September 21, 2021 and an amended complaint was filed on December 21, 2021. In response, on February 2, 2022 the Company filed a demurrer to the complaint with the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, for failing to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action while still vigorously denying the claims within the complaint. While the Company’s management does not believe these allegations have merit, defending such allegations could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources.
The ultimate outcome of the other legal proceedings is uncertain and the amount of any future potential loss is not considered probable or estimable. The Company will incur defense costs and other expenses in connection with these legal proceedings. If the final resolution of any legal proceedings is unfavorable, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and financial condition.
Based on the Company’s current understanding of these pending legal actions and proceedings, management does not believe that judgments or settlements arising from pending or threatened legal matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, operating results or cash flows of the Company. However,
F- 119
unfavorable resolution could affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the years in which they are resolved.
Compliance Matters
During the fourth quarter of 2019 an increase in mortgage originations resulted in an increase in title orders and loan settlements creating personnel and operational pressures within the Company. The Company increased staffing, adjusted schedules, and enhanced processes, but still experienced constraints in order to meet settlement timelines. Specifically, there was an increase in the number of days between receipt of funds from the originating lender and disbursement of those funds to pay off those loan transactions. In 2019, the Company initiated a review to refund consumers for any overage in per diem charges due to delays based on loan program and state property requirements. The Company established an accrual of $4.8 million as of December 31, 2019 for its estimate of the remaining refunds. As of January 2021, the Company had completed its review and processed refunds that totaled $4.2 million of which $3.9 million were completed throughout 2020 and the remaining $0.3 million in January 2021. As a result of this event and in order to prevent recurrence, the Company has decreased the number of states in which they accept orders in order to manage pipelines and routinely review key performance indicators along with pipeline estimates from their customers.
Regulatory Requirements
The Company is subject to various capital requirements by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”); lenders of the warehouse lines of credit; and secondary markets investors. Failure to maintain minimum capital requirements could result in the inability to participate in HUD-assisted mortgage insurance programs, to borrow funds from warehouse line lenders or to sell or service mortgage loans. As of December 31, 2021 and 2020, the Company was in compliance with its selling and servicing capital requirements.
Commitments to Extend Credit
The Company enters into IRLCs with customers who have applied for residential mortgage loans and meet certain credit and underwriting criteria. These commitments expose the Company to market risk if interest rates change and the loan is not economically hedged or committed to an investor. The Company is also exposed to credit loss if the loan is originated and not sold to an investor and the customer does not perform. The collateral upon extension of credit typically consists of a first deed of trust in the mortgagor’s residential property. Commitments to originate loans do not necessarily reflect future cash requirements as some commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon. Total commitments to originate loans as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 approximated $12.7 billion and $31.5 billion, respectively. These loan commitments are treated as derivatives and are carried at fair value, refer to Note 7- Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities for further information on derivatives.
Loan Loss Obligation for Sold Loans
When the Company sells mortgage loans, it makes customary representations and warranties to the purchasers about various characteristics of each loan such as the origination and underwriting guidelines, including but not limited to the validity of the lien securing the loan, property eligibility, borrower credit, income and asset requirements, and compliance with applicable federal, state and local law. The Company establishes a loan repurchase reserve for losses associated with repurchased loans if the Company breached a representation or warranty given to the loan purchaser. Additionally, the Company’s loan loss obligation for sold loans includes an estimate for losses associated with early payoffs and early payment defaults. There have been charge-offs associated with early payoffs, early payment defaults and losses related to representations, warranties and other provisions for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019.
F- 120
The activity related to the loan loss obligation for sold loans is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at beginning of period | $ | 33,591 | $ | 17,677 | $ | 18,301 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan loss obligations | 7,185 | 25,973 | 8,673 | |||||||||||||||||
| Charge-offs | (10,899) | (10,059) | (9,297) | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance at end of period | $ | 29,877 | $ | 33,591 | $ | 17,677 | ||||||||||||||
TRA Liability
As part of the IPO and reorganization, the Company has entered into a TRA with Parthenon Stockholders and certain Continuing LLC Members, whereby loanDepot, Inc. will be obligated to pay such parties or their permitted assignees, 85% of the amount of cash tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state, and local taxes that loanDepot, Inc. realizes, or is deemed to realize as a result of future tax benefits from increases in tax basis. The TRA liability is accounted for as a contingent liability with amounts accrued when deemed probable and estimable. The Company recognized a TRA liability of $32.9 million as of December 31, 2021, which represents the Company’s estimate of the aggregate amount that it will pay under the TRA as a result of the offering transaction. The amounts payable under the TRA will vary depending on a number of factors, such as the amount and timing of taxable income attributable to loanDepot, Inc.
NOTE 23– REGULATORY CAPITAL AND LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS
The Company, through certain subsidiaries, is required to maintain minimum net worth, liquidity and other financial requirements specified in certain of its selling and servicing agreements, including:
•Ginnie Mae single-family issuers. The eligibility requirements include net worth of $2.5 million plus 0.35% of outstanding Ginnie Mae single-family obligations and a liquidity requirement equal to the greater of $1.0 million or 0.10% of outstanding Ginnie Mae single-family securities.
•Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The eligibility requirements for seller/servicers include tangible net worth of $2.5 million plus 0.25% of the Company’s total single-family servicing portfolio, excluding loans subserviced for others and a liquidity requirement equal to 0.35% of the aggregate UPB serviced for the agencies plus 2.0% of total nonperforming agency servicing UPB in excess of 6%.
•HUD. The eligibility requirements include a minimum adjusted net worth of $1,000,000 plus 1% of the total volume in excess of $25.0 million of FHA Single Family Mortgages originated, underwritten, serviced, and/or purchased during the prior fiscal year, up to a maximum required adjusted net worth of $2.5 million
•Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae. The Company is also required to hold a ratio of Adjusted/Tangible Net Worth to Total Assets greater than 6%.
To the extent that these requirements are not met, the Company may be subject to a variety of regulatory actions which could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition. The most restrictive of the minimum net worth and capital thresholds require the Company to maintain a minimum adjusted net worth balance of $120.4 million as of December 31, 2021. The Company was in compliance with the net worth, liquidity and other financial requirements of its selling and servicing requirements as of December 31, 2021.
F- 121
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2021. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2021.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f). Management assessed, with participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as it relates to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as of December 31, 2021. The assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on management’s assessment, management determined that internal control over financial reporting is effective as it relates to the Company’s consolidated financial statements presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as of December 31, 2021.
The Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our independent public accounting firm due to a transition period established by the rules of the SEC for newly public companies.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
As required by Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act, management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the last quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that there have been no such changes during the last quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on Controls
Our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives as specified above. Management does not expect, however, that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, is based upon certain assumptions and can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives will be met. Further, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdictions that Prevent Inspections
122
Not Applicable.
PART III.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this Item 10 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement, or will be contained in an amendment to this Report, in either case to be filed by April 30, 2022, which is within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2021.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this Item 11 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement, or will be contained in an amendment to this Report, in either case to be filed by April 30, 2022, which is within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2021.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this Item 12 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement, or will be contained in an amendment to this Report, in either case to be filed by April 30, 2022, which is within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2021.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this Item 13 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement, or will be contained in an amendment to this Report, in either case to be filed by April 30, 2022, which is within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2021.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this Item 14 is hereby incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement, or will be contained in an amendment to this Report, in either case to be filed by April 30, 2022, which is within 120 days after the end of fiscal year 2021.
PART IV.
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are filed as a part of this report:
| Exhibit No. | Description | |||||||
| 1 | ||||||||
| 1.1 | ||||||||
| 3.1 | ||||||||
| 3.2 | ||||||||
| 4.1 | ||||||||
| 4.2 | ||||||||
123
124
| Exhibit No. | Description | |||||||
| 10.17+ | ||||||||
| 10.18+ | ||||||||
| 10.19+ | ||||||||
| 10.20 | Fourth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of LD Holdings, LLC, dated as of February 11, 2021, by and among LD Holdings Group LLC and the other parties thereto (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 16, 2021). | |||||||
10.21# | ||||||||
| 10.21.1 | ||||||||
| 10.21.2 | ||||||||
| 10.21.3 | ||||||||
| 10.21.4 | ||||||||
| 10.21.5 | ||||||||
| 10.21.6 | ||||||||
| 10.21.7 | ||||||||
| 10.21.8 | ||||||||
| 10.21.9 | ||||||||
| 10.21.10 | ||||||||
| 10.21.11 | ||||||||
| 10.21.12 | ||||||||
| 10.21.13 | ||||||||
125
| Exhibit No. | Description | |||||||
| 10.22 | ||||||||
| 10.23 | ||||||||
| 10.23.1 | ||||||||
| 10.23.2 | ||||||||
| 10.23.3 | ||||||||
| 10.23.4 | ||||||||
| 10.23.5 | ||||||||
| 10.23.6 | ||||||||
| 10.23.7 | ||||||||
10.24# | ||||||||
10.24.1# | ||||||||
10.24.2# | ||||||||
10.24.3# | ||||||||
10.24.4# | ||||||||
10.25# | Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of August 11, 2021, between UBS AG, by and through its branch office at 1285 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York, and loanDepot.com, LLC (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 17, 2021). | |||||||
| 10.26 | ||||||||
10.27# | ||||||||
126
127
128
| Exhibit No. | Description | |||||||
| 10.34.2 | ||||||||
| 10.34.3 | ||||||||
| 10.34.4 | ||||||||
| 10.34.5 | ||||||||
| 10.34.6 | ||||||||
| 10.34.7 | ||||||||
| 10.34.8 | ||||||||
| 10.34.9 | ||||||||
| 10.34.10 | ||||||||
| 10.34.11 | ||||||||
| 10.34.12 | ||||||||
| 10.34.13 | ||||||||
| 10.34.14 | ||||||||
| 10.34.15 | ||||||||
| 10.34.16 * | ||||||||
| 10.34.17 | ||||||||
| 10.35 | ||||||||
| 10.36.1 | ||||||||
129
| Exhibit No. | Description | |||||||
| 10.36.2 | ||||||||
| 10.36.3 | ||||||||
| 10.36.4 | ||||||||
| 10.36.5 | ||||||||
| 10.36.6 | ||||||||
| 10.36.7 | ||||||||
| 10.36.8 | ||||||||
| 10.36.9 | ||||||||
| 10.37 | ||||||||
| 10.38 | ||||||||
| 10.39 | ||||||||
| 10.40 | ||||||||
| 10.41 | ||||||||
| 10.42 | ||||||||
| 10.43 | ||||||||
| 10.44 | ||||||||
| 10.45 | ||||||||
| 10.46 | ||||||||
130
131
132
133
| Exhibit No. | Description | |||||||
| 101.CAL | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |||||||
| 101.DEF | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |||||||
| 101.LAB | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |||||||
| 101.PRE | Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |||||||
| 104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) | |||||||
* filed herewith
# Certain portions of this exhibit have been redacted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish supplementally an unredacted copy of the exhibit to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon its request.
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
134
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized as of March 18, 2022.
| LOANDEPOT, INC. | ||||||||
| By: | /s/ Anthony Hsieh | |||||||
| Name: | Anthony Hsieh | |||||||
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer | |||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities indicated as of March 18, 2022.
| Signature | Title | ||||||||||
| /s/ Anthony Hsieh | Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||||||||||
| Anthony Hsieh | (Principal Executive Officer) | ||||||||||
| /s/ Patrick Flanagan | Chief Financial Officer | ||||||||||
| Patrick Flanagan | (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||||||||
| /s/ Nicole Carrillo | Chief Accounting Officer | ||||||||||
| Nicole Carrillo | (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||||||||||
| /s/ John C. Dorman | Director | ||||||||||
| John C. Dorman | |||||||||||
| /s/ Dawn Lepore | Director | ||||||||||
| Dawn Lepore | |||||||||||
| /s/ Brian P. Golson | Director | ||||||||||
| Brian P. Golson | |||||||||||
| /s/ Andrew C. Dodson | Director | ||||||||||
| Andrew C. Dodson | |||||||||||
| /s/ Mike Linton | Director | ||||||||||
| Mike Linton | |||||||||||
| /s/ Pamela Hughes Patenaude | Director | ||||||||||
| Pamela Hughes Patenaude | |||||||||||
135