Logan Ridge Finance Corp. - Quarter Report: 2017 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2017
¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number |
Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter, address of principal executive office, telephone number and state or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization |
I.R.S. Employer Identification Number | ||
814-01022 |
Capitala Finance Corp. 4201 Congress St., Suite 360 Charlotte, North Carolina Telephone: (704) 376-5502 State of Incorporation: Maryland |
90-0945675 |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Capitala Finance Corp. | Yes x | No ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Capitala Finance Corp. | Yes ¨ | No ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” ,“smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
Capitala Finance Corp. | Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ | |
Emerging growth company | x |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Capitala Finance Corp. | Yes ¨ | No x |
The number of shares of Capitala Finance Corp.’s common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of May 5, 2017 was 15,888,656
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2 |
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
As of | ||||||||
March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Investments at fair value | ||||||||
Non-control/non-affiliate investments (amortized cost of $368,836 and $391,706, respectively) | $ | 364,260 | $ | 393,525 | ||||
Affiliate investments (amortized cost of $56,043 and $39,279, respectively) | 78,454 | 61,464 | ||||||
Control investments (amortized cost of $84,407 and $82,791, respectively) | 89,764 | 86,650 | ||||||
Total investments at fair value (amortized cost of $509,286 and $513,776, respectively) | 532,478 | 541,639 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 40,564 | 36,281 | ||||||
Interest and dividend receivable | 5,994 | 5,735 | ||||||
Trade settlement receivable | 990 | - | ||||||
Due from related parties | 143 | 182 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 441 | 506 | ||||||
Other assets | 67 | 72 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 580,677 | $ | 584,415 | ||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||
SBA debentures (net of deferred financing costs of $2,760 and $2,911, respectively) | $ | 167,940 | $ | 167,789 | ||||
Notes (net of deferred financing costs of $2,880 and $3,025, respectively) | 110,558 | 110,413 | ||||||
Credit Facility (net of deferred financing costs of $521 and $759, respectively) | 43,479 | 43,241 | ||||||
Due to related parties | - | 35 | ||||||
Management and incentive fee payable | 3,887 | 6,426 | ||||||
Interest and financing fees payable | 966 | 2,657 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 147 | 536 | ||||||
Written call option at fair value (proceeds of $0 and $20, respectively) | 4,221 | 2,736 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 331,198 | $ | 333,833 | ||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 2) | ||||||||
NET ASSETS | ||||||||
Common stock, par value $.01, 100,000,000 common shares authorized, 15,883,492 and 15,868,045 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively | $ | 159 | $ | 159 | ||||
Additional paid in capital | 240,391 | 240,184 | ||||||
Undistributed net investment income | 22,973 | 22,973 | ||||||
Accumulated net realized losses from investments | (33,035 | ) | (37,881 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments | 23,192 | 27,863 | ||||||
Net unrealized depreciation on written call option | (4,201 | ) | (2,716 | ) | ||||
Total net assets | $ | 249,479 | $ | 250,582 | ||||
Total liabilities and net assets | $ | 580,677 | $ | 584,415 | ||||
Net asset value per share | $ | 15.71 | $ | 15.79 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME | ||||||||
Interest and fee income: | ||||||||
Non-control/non-affiliate investments | $ | 9,638 | $ | 10,747 | ||||
Affiliate investments | 1,044 | 1,363 | ||||||
Control investments | 1,988 | 2,854 | ||||||
Total interest and fee income | 12,670 | 14,964 | ||||||
Payment-in-kind interest and dividend income: | ||||||||
Non-control/non-affiliate investments | 1,178 | 878 | ||||||
Affiliate investments | 231 | 95 | ||||||
Control investments | 246 | 231 | ||||||
Total payment-in-kind interest and dividend income | 1,655 | 1,204 | ||||||
Dividend income: | ||||||||
Non-control/non-affiliate investments | 168 | 205 | ||||||
Affiliate investments | 29 | 29 | ||||||
Control investments | 280 | 1,045 | ||||||
Total dividend income | 477 | 1,279 | ||||||
Interest income from cash and cash equivalents | 13 | 2 | ||||||
Total investment income | 14,815 | 17,449 | ||||||
EXPENSES | ||||||||
Interest and financing expenses | 4,653 | 5,023 | ||||||
Base management fee | 2,514 | 2,728 | ||||||
Incentive fees | 1,308 | 1,706 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 1,107 | 1,168 | ||||||
Expenses before incentive fee waiver | 9,582 | 10,625 | ||||||
Incentive fee waiver (See Note 6) | (958 | ) | (597 | ) | ||||
Total expenses, net of fee waivers | 8,624 | 10,028 | ||||||
NET INVESTMENT INCOME | 6,191 | 7,421 | ||||||
REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) ON INVESTMENTS AND WRITTEN CALL OPTION: | ||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investments: | ||||||||
Non-control/non-affiliate investments | 4,831 | - | ||||||
Affiliate investments | 15 | (2,262 | ) | |||||
Total realized gain (loss) from investments | 4,846 | (2,262 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | (4,671 | ) | (9,348 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized depreciation on written call option | (1,485 | ) | - | |||||
Net loss on investments and written call option | (1,310 | ) | (11,610 | ) | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | $ | 4,881 | $ | (4,189 | ) | |||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS PER SHARE RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS – BASIC AND DILUTED | $ | 0.31 | $ | (0.27 | ) | |||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED | 15,873,655 | 15,785,943 | ||||||
DISTRIBUTIONS PAID PER SHARE | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.47 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4 |
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Par Value | Additional Paid in Capital | Undistributed Net Investment Income | Accumulated Net Realized Losses | Net Unrealized Appreciation on Investments | Net Unrealized Depreciation on Written Call Option | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2015 | 15,777,345 | $ | 158 | $ | 239,104 | $ | 8,570 | $ | (1,299 | ) | $ | 22,269 | $ | - | $ | 268,802 | ||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | - | - | - | 7,421 | - | - | - | 7,421 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized loss from investments | - | - | - | - | (2,262 | ) | - | - | (2,262 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments | - | - | - | - | - | (9,348 | ) | - | (9,348 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan | 22,290 | - | 227 | - | - | - | - | 227 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | - | - | - | (7,421 | ) | - | - | - | (7,421 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, March 31, 2016 | 15,799,635 | $ | 158 | $ | 239,331 | $ | 8,570 | $ | (3,561 | ) | $ | 12,921 | $ | - | $ | 257,419 | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, December 31, 2016 | 15,868,045 | $ | 159 | $ | 240,184 | $ | 22,973 | $ | (37,881 | ) | $ | 27,863 | $ | (2,716 | ) | $ | 250,582 | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income | - | - | - | 6,191 | - | - | - | 6,191 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain from investments | - | - | - | - | 4,846 | - | - | 4,846 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized depreciation on investments | - | - | - | - | - | (4,671 | ) | - | (4,671 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized depreciation on written call option | - | - | - | - | - | - | (1,485 | ) | (1,485 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan | 15,447 | - | 207 | - | - | - | - | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | - | - | - | (6,191 | ) | - | - | - | (6,191 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE, March 31, 2017 | 15,883,492 | $ | 159 | $ | 240,391 | $ | 22,973 | $ | (33,035 | ) | $ | 23,192 | (4,201 | ) | $ | 249,479 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31 | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ | 4,881 | $ | (4,189 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | ||||||||
Purchase of investments | (21,708 | ) | (27,523 | ) | ||||
Repayments and sales of investments | 33,049 | 10,186 | ||||||
Net realized (gain) loss on investments | (4,846 | ) | 2,262 | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | 4,671 | 9,348 | ||||||
Payment-in-kind interest and dividends | (1,655 | ) | (1,204 | ) | ||||
Accretion of original issue discount on investments | (350 | ) | (354 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized depreciation on written call option | 1,485 | - | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing fees | 534 | 535 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||||||
Interest and dividend receivable | (259 | ) | (1,147 | ) | ||||
Trade settlement receivable | (990 | ) | - | |||||
Due from related parties | 39 | - | ||||||
Prepaid expenses | 65 | 117 | ||||||
Other assets | 5 | 29 | ||||||
Due to related parties | (35 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Management and incentive fee payable | (2,539 | ) | 681 | |||||
Interest and financing fees payable | (1,691 | ) | (1,837 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (389 | ) | (467 | ) | ||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | 10,267 | (13,565 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||||
Paydowns on SBA debentures | - | (2,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from Credit Facility | - | 3,000 | ||||||
Distributions paid to shareholders | (5,984 | ) | (7,194 | ) | ||||
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES | (5,984 | ) | (6,194 | ) | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 4,283 | (19,759 | ) | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period | 36,281 | 34,105 | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period | $ | 40,564 | $ | 14,346 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 5,582 | $ | 6,217 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS | ||||||||
Distributions paid through dividend reinvestment plan share issuances | $ | 207 | $ | 227 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6 |
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
(in thousands, except for units/shares)
March 31, 2017
(unaudited)
Company (4) , (5) | Industry | Type of Investment | Principal Amount | Cost | Fair Value | %
of Net Assets | ||||||||||||||
Non-control/non-affiliated investments - 146.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||
AAE Acquisition, LLC | Industrial Equipment Rental | Second Lien Debt (12% Cash, Due 3/31/18) | $ | 11,000 | $ | 11,000 | $ | 10,560 | 4.2 | % | ||||||||||
AAE Acquisition, LLC | Industrial Equipment Rental | Membership Units (14% fully diluted) | 17 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
11,017 | 10,560 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
American Clinical Solutions, LLC | Healthcare | First Lien Debt (10.5% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 9.5%, 1% Floor), Due 6/11/20) | 9,034 | 9,034 | 8,649 | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||
9,034 | 8,649 | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
American Exteriors, LLC | Replacement Window Manufacturer | First Lien Debt (10% PIK, Due 1/1/19) (1) (2) | 6,620 | 4,678 | 2,756 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||||
American Exteriors, LLC | Replacement Window Manufacturer | Common Stock Warrants (10% fully diluted) | - | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
4,678 | 2,756 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
AmeriMark Direct, LLC | Consumer Products | First Lien Debt (12.75% Cash, Due 9/8/21) | 19,550 | 19,072 | 19,550 | 7.8 | % | |||||||||||||
19,072 | 19,550 | 7.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
B&W Quality Growers, LLC | Farming | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, Due 7/23/20) | 6,000 | 5,996 | 6,000 | 2.4 | % | |||||||||||||
B&W Quality Growers, LLC | Farming | Membership Unit Warrants (91,739 Units) | 20 | 6,695 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
6,016 | 12,695 | 5.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
BigMouth, Inc. | Consumer Products | First Lien Debt (12.6% Cash, Due 11/14/21) (3) | 10,313 | 10,313 | 10,313 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||
BigMouth, Inc. | Consumer Products | Series A Preferred Stock (350,000 shares, 8% PIK) (6) | 361 | 602 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
10,674 | 10,915 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Bluestem Brands, Inc. | Online Merchandise Retailer | First Lien Debt (8.5% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 7.5%, 1% Floor), Due 11/7/20) | 4,217 | 4,115 | 4,115 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||
4,115 | 4,115 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Brunswick Bowling Products, Inc. | Bowling Products | First Lien Debt (8% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 6%, 2% Floor), Due 5/22/20) | 1,600 | 1,600 | 1,600 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Brunswick Bowling Products, Inc. | Bowling Products | First Lien Debt (16.25% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 14.25%, 2% Floor), Due 5/22/20) | 5,586 | 5,586 | 5,586 | 2.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Brunswick Bowling Products, Inc. | Bowling Products | Preferred Shares (2,966 shares, 8% PIK) (6) | 3,453 | 6,139 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
10,639 | 13,325 | 5.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Burke America Parts Group, LLC | Home Repair Parts Manufacturer | Membership Units (14 units) | 5 | 1,408 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
5 | 1,408 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. | Restaurant | Second Lien Debt (11% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 10%, 1% Floor), Due 8/23/23) | 5,000 | 4,862 | 4,862 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||
4,862 | 4,862 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Caregiver Services, Inc. | In-Home Healthcare Services | Common Stock (293,186 shares) | 258 | 62 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Caregiver Services, Inc. | In-Home Healthcare Services | Common Stock Warrants (655,908 units) (7) | 264 | 138 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
522 | 200 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Cedar Electronics Holding Corp. | Consumer Electronics | Subordinated Debt (12% Cash, Due 12/26/20) (13) | 21,550 | 21,550 | 20,245 | 8.1 | % | |||||||||||||
21,550 | 20,245 | 8.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Community Choice Financial, Inc. | Financial Services | First Lien Debt (18% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 17%, 1% Floor), Due 3/30/18) (1) (8) | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||
15,000 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Construction Partners, Inc. | Construction Services | Second Lien Debt (11.5% Cash, Due 6/12/20) | 9,500 | 9,500 | 9,500 | 3.8 | % | |||||||||||||
9,500 | 9,500 | 3.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate Visions, Inc. | Sales & Marketing Services | Subordinated Debt (9% Cash, 2% PIK, Due 11/29/21) | 16,349 | 16,349 | 15,056 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Corporate Visions, Inc. | Sales & Marketing Services | Common Stock (15,750 shares) | 1,575 | 666 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
17,924 | 15,722 | 6.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
CSM Bakery Solutions, LLC | Bakery Supplies Distributor | Second Lien Debt (8.76% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 7.75%, 1% Floor), Due 8/7/22) | 12,000 | 11,821 | 10,500 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||
11,821 | 10,500 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Currency Capital, LLC | Financial Services | First Lien Debt (11.81% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 11.00%, 0.50% Floor) Due 1/20/22) (8) | 16,000 | 16,000 | 16,000 | 6.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Currency Capital, LLC | Financial Services | Class A Preferred Units (2,000,000 units) | 2,000 | 2,000 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
18,000 | 18,000 | 7.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Flavors Holdings, Inc. | Food Product Manufacturer | First Lien Debt (6.90% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 5.75%, 1% Floor), Due 4/3/20) | 7,000 | 6,845 | 6,312 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Flavors Holdings, Inc. | Food Product Manufacturer | Second Lien Debt (11.15% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 10%, 1% Floor), Due 10/3/21) | 12,000 | 11,688 | 10,239 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||
18,533 | 16,551 | 6.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Immersive Media Tactical Solutions, LLC | Specialty Defense Contractor | Subordinated Debt (Due 12/9/19) (9) | 2,000 | 2,000 | 1,532 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
2,000 | 1,532 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Kelle's Transport Service, LLC | Transportation | First Lien Debt (14% Cash, Due 3/31/19) | 13,674 | 13,669 | 12,982 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Kelle's Transport Service, LLC | Transportation | Preferred Units (1,000 units) | 3,433 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Kelle's Transport Service, LLC | Transportation | Common Stock Warrants (15% fully diluted) | 22 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
17,124 | 12,982 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Medical Depot, Inc. | Medical Device Distributor | Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (740 shares)(12) | - | 136 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
- | 136 | 0.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Nielsen & Bainbridge, LLC | Home Décor Manufacturer | Second Lien Debt (10.5% Cash (6 month LIBOR + 9.25%, 1% Floor), Due 8/15/21) | 15,000 | 14,857 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||
14,857 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % |
7 |
Capitala Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
(in thousands, except for units/shares)
March 31, 2017
(unaudited)
Company (4) , (5) | Industry | Type of Investment | Principal Amount | Cost | Fair Value | %
of Net Assets | ||||||||||||||
Nth Degree, Inc. | Business Services | First Lien Debt (8% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 7%, 1% Floor), 1% PIK, Due 12/14/20) | 9,929 | 9,929 | 9,929 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Nth Degree, Inc. | Business Services | First Lien Debt (12.5% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 11.5%, 1% Floor), 2% PIK, Due 12/14/20) | 7,387 | 7,387 | 7,387 | 3.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Nth Degree, Inc. | Business Services | Preferred Stock (10% PIK dividend) (6) | 2,728 | 6,321 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
20,044 | 23,637 | 9.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Portrait Innovations, Inc. | Professional and Personal Digital Imaging | Subordinated Debt (12% Cash, Due 2/26/20) | 9,000 | 9,000 | 8,974 | 3.6 | % | |||||||||||||
9,000 | 8,974 | 3.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sequoia Healthcare Management, LLC | Healthcare Management | First Lien Debt (12% Cash, 4% PIK, Due 7/17/19) | 10,544 | 10,457 | 10,544 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||
10,457 | 10,544 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sierra Hamilton, LLC | Oil & Gas Engineering and Consulting Services | First Lien Debt (9% Cash (1 Month LIBOR + 8.00%, 1.00% Floor), Due 6/13/17) | 1,214 | 1,214 | 1,214 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||
Sierra Hamilton, LLC | Oil & Gas Engineering and Consulting Services | First Lien Debt (12.25% Cash, Due 12/15/18) (2) | 15,000 | 15,000 | 4,500 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||||
16,214 | 5,714 | 2.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sur La Table, Inc. | Retail | First Lien Debt (12% Cash, Due 7/28/20) | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||
15,000 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Taylor Precision Products, Inc. | Household Product Manufacturer | Series C Preferred Stock (379 shares) | 758 | 1,001 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
758 | 1,001 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Velum Global Credit Management, LLC | Financial Services | First Lien Debt (15% PIK, Due 12/31/17) (1) (8) | 10,954 | 10,954 | 10,954 | 4.4 | % | |||||||||||||
10,954 | 10,954 | 4.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Vintage Stock, Inc. | Specialty Retail | First Lien Debt (13.28% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 12.5%, 0.5% floor), 3% PIK, Due 11/3/21) | 21,693 | 21,693 | 21,693 | 8.7 | % | |||||||||||||
21,693 | 21,693 | 8.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Vology, Inc. | Information Technology | Subordinated Debt (15% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 14%, 1% Floor), 2% PIK Due 1/24/21) | 8,123 | 8,123 | 8,123 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||||
8,123 | 8,123 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Western Windows Systems, LLC | Building Products | First Lien Debt (11.7% Cash, Due 7/31/20) (3) | 10,500 | 10,500 | 10,500 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Western Windows Systems, LLC | Building Products | Membership Units (39,860 units) | 3,000 | 7,767 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
13,500 | 18,267 | 7.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Xirgo Technologies, LLC | Information Technology | Subordinated Debt (11.5% Cash, Due 3/1/22) | 15,750 | 15,750 | 15,750 | 6.4 | % | |||||||||||||
Xirgo Technologies, LLC | Information Technology | Membership Units (400,000 units) | 400 | 400 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
16,150 | 16,150 | 6.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sub Total Non-control/non-affiliated investments | $ | 368,836 | $ | 364,260 | 146.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Affiliate investments - 31.4% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Burgaflex Holdings, LLC | Automobile Part Manufacturer | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, Due 8/9/19) (10) | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,000 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||
Burgaflex Holdings, LLC | Automobile Part Manufacturer | Subordinated Debt (12% Cash, Due 8/9/19) (10) | 5,828 | 5,828 | 5,828 | 2.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Burgaflex Holdings, LLC | Automobile Part Manufacturer | Common Stock (1,253,198 shares) | 1,503 | 1,307 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
10,331 | 10,135 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
City Gear, LLC | Footwear Retail | Subordinated Debt (13% Cash, Due 9/28/17) (1) | 8,231 | 8,231 | 8,231 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||||
City Gear, LLC | Footwear Retail | Preferred Membership Units (2.78% fully diluted, 9% Cash Dividend) (6) | 1,269 | 1,269 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
City Gear, LLC | Footwear Retail | Membership Unit Warrants (11.38% fully diluted) | - | 9,760 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
9,500 | 19,260 | 7.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
GA Communications, Inc. | Advertising & Marketing Services | Series A-1 Preferred Stock (1,998 shares, 8% PIK dividend) (6) | 2,709 | 3,043 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
GA Communications, Inc. | Advertising & Marketing Services | Series B-1 Common Stock (200,000 shares) | 2 | 882 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
2,711 | 3,925 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
J&J Produce Holdings, Inc. | Produce Distribution | Subordinated Debt (13% Cash, Due 7/16/18) | 6,182 | 6,182 | 6,150 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||
J&J Produce Holdings, Inc. | Produce Distribution | Common Stock (8,182 shares) | 818 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
J&J Produce Holdings, Inc. | Produce Distribution | Common Stock Warrants (6,369 shares) | - | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
7,000 | 6,150 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
LJS Partners, LLC | QSR Franchisor | Common Stock (1,500,000 shares) | 1,525 | 8,581 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
1,525 | 8,581 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
MJC Holdings, LLC | Specialty Clothing | Series A Preferred Units (2,000,000 units) | 1,000 | 5,011 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | 5,011 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
MMI Holdings, LLC | Medical Device Distributor | First Lien Debt (12% Cash, Due 1/31/18) (1) | 2,600 | 2,600 | 2,600 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||
MMI Holdings, LLC | Medical Device Distributor | Subordinated Debt (6% Cash, Due 1/31/18) (1) | 400 | 388 | 400 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
MMI Holdings, LLC | Medical Device Distributor | Preferred Units (1,000 units, 6% PIK dividend) (6) | 1,307 | 1,454 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
MMI Holdings, LLC | Medical Device Distributor | Common Membership Units (45 units) | - | 201 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
4,295 | 4,655 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
MTI Holdings, LLC | Retail Display & Security Services | Membership Units (2,000,000 units) (12) | - | 537 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
- | 537 | 0.2 | % |
8 |
Capitala Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
(in thousands, except for units/shares)
March 31, 2017
(unaudited)
Company (4) , (5) | Industry | Type of Investment | Principal Amount | Cost | Fair Value | %
of Net Assets | ||||||||||||||
Source Capital Penray, LLC | Automotive Chemicals & Lubricants | Subordinated Debt (13% Cash, Due 4/8/19) (1) | 1,425 | 1,425 | 1,425 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Source Capital Penray, LLC | Automotive Chemicals & Lubricants | Membership Units (11.3% ownership) | 750 | 973 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
2,175 | 2,398 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
STX Healthcare Management Services, Inc. | Dental Practice Management | Common Stock (1,200,000 shares) (12) | - | 93 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
- | 93 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. Well Services, LLC | Oil & Gas Services | First Lien Debt (7% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 6%, 1% floor), Due 1/31/22) (14) | 1,311 | 1,311 | 1,311 | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||
U.S. Well Services, LLC | Oil & Gas Services | First Lien Debt (12% PIK (1 month LIBOR + 11%, 1% floor), Due 1/31/22) | 8,681 | 8,681 | 8,681 | 3.5 | % | |||||||||||||
U.S. Well Services, LLC | Oil & Gas Services | Class A Units (5,680,688 Units) | 6,260 | 6,260 | 2.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Well Services, LLC | Oil & Gas Services | Class B Units (2,076,298 Units) | 441 | 441 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
16,693 | 16,693 | 6.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
V12 Holdings, Inc. | Data Processing & Digital Marketing | Subordinated Debt (12) | 813 | 1,016 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
813 | 1,016 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sub Total Affiliate investments | $ | 56,043 | $ | 78,454 | 31.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Control investments- 36.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||
CableOrganizer Acquisition, LLC | Computer Supply Retail | First Lien Debt (12% Cash, 4% PIK, Due 5/24/18) | 12,001 | $ | 12,001 | $ | 12,001 | 4.9 | % | |||||||||||
CableOrganizer Acquisition, LLC | Computer Supply Retail | Common Stock (19.7% fully diluted ownership) | 1,394 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
CableOrganizer Acquisition, LLC | Computer Supply Retail | Common Stock Warrants (10% fully diluted ownership) | - | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
13,395 | 12,001 | 4.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Eastport Holdings, LLC | Business Services | Subordinated Debt (14.1% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 13%, 0.5% Floor), Due 4/29/20) | 16,500 | 14,169 | 16,500 | 6.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Eastport Holdings, LLC | Business Services | Membership Units (30.1% fully diluted) (11) | 4,733 | 18,148 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
18,902 | 34,648 | 13.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Micro Precision, LLC | Conglomerate | Subordinated Debt (10% Cash, Due 9/15/18) (1) | 1,862 | 1,862 | 1,862 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Micro Precision, LLC | Conglomerate | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, 4% PIK, Due 9/15/18) (1) | 4,029 | 4,029 | 4,029 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Micro Precision, LLC | Conglomerate | Series A Preferred Units (47 units) | 1,629 | 2,566 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
7,520 | 8,457 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Navis Holdings, Inc. | Textile Equipment Manufacturer | First Lien Debt (15% Cash, Due 10/30/20) (1) | 6,500 | 6,500 | 6,500 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Navis Holdings, Inc. | Textile Equipment Manufacturer | Class A Preferred Stock (1,000 shares, 10% Cash Dividend) (6) | 1,000 | 1,000 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Navis Holdings, Inc. | Textile Equipment Manufacturer | Common Stock (300,000 shares) | 1 | 5,486 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
7,501 | 12,986 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
On-Site Fuel Services, Inc. | Fuel Transportation Services | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, 4% PIK, Due 12/19/17) (1) (2) | 11,596 | 11,020 | 11,485 | 4.6 | % | |||||||||||||
On-Site Fuel Services, Inc. | Fuel Transportation Services | Series A Preferred Stock (32,782 shares) | 3,278 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
On-Site Fuel Services, Inc. | Fuel Transportation Services | Series B Preferred Stock (23,648 shares) | 2,365 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
On-Site Fuel Services, Inc. | Fuel Transportation Services | Common Stock (33,107 shares) | 33 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
16,696 | 11,485 | 4.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Print Direction, Inc. | Printing Services | First Lien Debt (10% Cash, 2% PIK, Due 2/24/19) | 17,403 | 17,403 | 10,187 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Print Direction, Inc. | Printing Services | Common Stock (18,543 shares) | 2,990 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Print Direction, Inc. | Printing Services | Common Stock Warrants (820 shares) | - | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
20,393 | 10,187 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sub Total Control investments | $ | 84,407 | $ | 89,764 | 36.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 213.4% | $ | 509,286 | $ | 532,478 | 213.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Derivatives - (1.7)% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Eastport Holdings, LLC | Business Services | Written Call Option (11) | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (4,221 | ) | (1.7 | )% | ||||||||||
TOTAL DERIVATIVES- (1.7)% | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (4,221 | ) | (1.7 | )% |
(1) The maturity date of the original investment has been extended.
(2) Non-accrual investment.
(3) The cash rate equals the approximate current yield on our last-out portion of the unitranche facility.
(4) All debt investments are income producing, unless otherwise noted. Equity and warrant investments are non-income producing, unless otherwise noted.
(5) Percentages are based on net assets of $249,479 as of March 31, 2017.
(6) The equity investment is income producing, based on rate disclosed.
(7) The equity investment has an exercisable put option.
(8) Indicates assets that the Company believes do not represent “qualifying assets” under Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of the Company's total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets. As of March 31, 2017, 7.2% of the Company's total assets were non-qualifying assets.
(9) Interest rate was amended to zero. The Company is entitled to receive earn-out payments of up to $2.4 million in satisfaction of the debt.
(10) In addition to the stated rate, the investment is paying 3% default interest.
(11) The Company has written a call option that enables CapitalSouth Partners Florida Sidecar Fund II, L.P. to purchase up to 31.25% of the Company's interest at a strike price of $1.5 million. As of March 31, 2017, the fair value of the written call option is approximately $4.2 million. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further detail on the written call option transaction.
(12) The investment has been exited. The residual value reflects estimated escrow to be settled post-closing.
(13) The Company has accrued 50% of contractual interest as the portfolio company is undergoing amendments to senior and subordinated loans outstanding.
(14) The investment has a $0.8 million unfunded commitment.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
9 |
Capitala Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
(in thousands, except for units/shares)
December 31, 2016
Company (4) , (5) | Industry | Type of Investment | Principal Amount | Cost | Fair Value | %
of Net Assets | ||||||||||||||
Non-control/non-affiliated investments - 157.1% | ||||||||||||||||||||
AAE Acquisition, LLC | Industrial Equipment Rental | Second Lien Debt (12% Cash, Due 3/31/18) | $ | 11,000 | $ | 11,000 | $ | 10,755 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||
AAE Acquisition, LLC | Industrial Equipment Rental | Membership Units (14% fully diluted) | 17 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
11,017 | 10,755 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
American Clinical Solutions, LLC | Healthcare | First Lien Debt (10.5% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 9.5%, 1% Floor), Due 6/11/20) (13) | 9,034 | 9,034 | 8,582 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||
9,034 | 8,582 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
American Exteriors, LLC | Replacement Window Manufacturer | First Lien Debt (10% PIK, Due 1/1/17) (1) (2) | 6,456 | 4,679 | 2,571 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||
American Exteriors, LLC | Replacement Window Manufacturer | Common Stock Warrants (10% fully diluted) | - | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
4,679 | 2,571 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
AmeriMark Direct, LLC | Consumer Products | First Lien Debt (12.75% Cash, Due 9/8/21) | 19,700 | 19,192 | 19,542 | 7.8 | % | |||||||||||||
19,192 | 19,542 | 7.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
B&W Quality Growers, LLC | Farming | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, Due 7/23/20) | 6,000 | 5,996 | 6,000 | 2.4 | % | |||||||||||||
B&W Quality Growers, LLC | Farming | Membership Unit Warrants (91,739 Units) | 20 | 5,779 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
6,016 | 11,779 | 4.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
BigMouth, Inc. | Consumer Products | First Lien Debt (12.6% Cash, Due 11/14/21) (3) | 10,313 | 10,313 | 10,313 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||
BigMouth, Inc. | Consumer Products | Series A Preferred Stock (350,000 shares, 8% PIK) (6) | 354 | 354 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
10,667 | 10,667 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Bluestem Brands, Inc. | Online Merchandise Retailer | First Lien Debt (8.5% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 7.5%, 1% Floor), Due 11/7/20) | 4,279 | 4,169 | 4,169 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||
4,169 | 4,169 | 1.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Brock Holdings III, Inc. | Industrial Specialty Services | Second Lien Debt (10% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 8.25%, 1.75% Floor), Due 3/16/18) | 5,000 | 4,935 | 4,750 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||
4,935 | 4,750 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Brunswick Bowling Products, Inc. | Bowling Products | First Lien Debt (8% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 6.0%, 2% Floor), Due 5/22/20) | 1,600 | 1,600 | 1,600 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Brunswick Bowling Products, Inc. | Bowling Products | First Lien Debt (16.25% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 14.25%, 2% Floor), Due 5/22/20) | 5,586 | 5,586 | 5,586 | 2.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Brunswick Bowling Products, Inc. | Bowling Products | Preferred Shares (2,966 shares, 8% PIK) (6) | 3,384 | 5,317 | 2.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
10,570 | 12,503 | 4.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Burke America Parts Group, LLC | Home Repair Parts Manufacturer | Membership Units (14 units) | 5 | 1,408 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
5 | 1,408 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
California Pizza Kitchen, Inc. | Restaurant | Second Lien Debt (11% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 10%, 1% Floor), Due 8/23/23) | 5,000 | 4,857 | 4,857 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||
4,857 | 4,857 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Caregiver Services, Inc. | In-Home Healthcare Services | Common Stock (293,186 shares) | 258 | 137 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Caregiver Services, Inc. | In-Home Healthcare Services | Common Stock Warrants (655,908 units) (7) | 264 | 309 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
522 | 446 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Cedar Electronics Holding Corp. | Consumer Electronics | Subordinated Debt (12% Cash, Due 12/26/20) | 21,550 | 21,550 | 20,818 | 8.3 | % | |||||||||||||
21,550 | 20,818 | 8.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Community Choice Financial, Inc. | Financial Services | First Lien Debt (18% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 17%, 1% Floor), Due 3/30/18) (1)(8) | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||
15,000 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Construction Partners, Inc. | Construction Services | Second Lien Debt (11.5% Cash, Due 6/12/20) | 9,500 | 9,500 | 9,500 | 3.8 | % | |||||||||||||
9,500 | 9,500 | 3.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate Visions, Inc. | Sales & Marketing Services | Subordinated Debt (9% Cash, 2% PIK, Due 11/29/21) | 16,267 | 16,267 | 15,648 | 6.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Corporate Visions, Inc. | Sales & Marketing Services | Common Stock (15,750 shares) | 1,575 | 728 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
17,842 | 16,376 | 6.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
CSM Bakery Solutions, LLC | Bakery Supplies Distributor | Second Lien Debt (8.75% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 7.75%, 1% Floor), Due 8/7/22) | 12,000 | 11,813 | 10,776 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||
11,813 | 10,776 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Emerging Markets Communications, LLC | Satellite Communications | Second Lien Debt (10.625% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 9.625%, 1% Floor), Due 7/1/22) | 5,000 | 4,946 | 5,000 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||||
4,946 | 5,000 | 2.0 | % |
10 |
Capitala Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
(in thousands, except for units/shares)
December 31, 2016
Company (4) , (5) | Industry | Type of Investment | Principal Amount | Cost | Fair Value | %
of Net Assets | ||||||||||||||
Flavors Holdings, Inc. | Food Product Manufacturer | First Lien Debt (6.75% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 5.75%, 1% Floor), Due 4/3/20) | 7,100 | 6,930 | 6,411 | 2.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Flavors Holdings, Inc. | Food Product Manufacturer | Second Lien Debt (11% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 10%, 1% Floor), Due 10/3/21) | 12,000 | 11,671 | 10,188 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||
18,601 | 16,599 | 6.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Group Cirque du Soleil, Inc. | Entertainment | Second Lien Debt (9.25% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 8.25%, 1% Floor), Due 7/8/23) (8) | 1,000 | 988 | 987 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||
988 | 987 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Immersive Media Tactical Solutions, LLC | Specialty Defense Contractor | Subordinated Debt (Due 12/9/19) (9) | 2,000 | 2,000 | 1,532 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
2,000 | 1,532 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Kelle's Transport Service, LLC | Transportation | First Lien Debt (14% Cash, Due 3/31/19) | 13,674 | 13,668 | 13,252 | 5.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Kelle's Transport Service, LLC | Transportation | Preferred Units (1,000 units, 10% PIK Dividend) (6) | 3,433 | 3,433 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Kelle's Transport Service, LLC | Transportation | Common Stock Warrants (15% fully diluted) | 22 | 171 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
17,123 | 16,856 | 6.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Medical Depot, Inc. | Medical Device Distributor | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, Due 9/27/20) (1) | 14,667 | 14,667 | 14,667 | 5.9 | % | |||||||||||||
Medical Depot, Inc. | Medical Device Distributor | Series C Convertible Preferred Stock (740 shares) | 1,333 | 6,440 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
16,000 | 21,107 | 8.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Nielsen & Bainbridge, LLC | Home Décor Manufacturer | Second Lien Debt (10.5% Cash (6 month LIBOR + 9.25%, 1% Floor), Due 8/15/21) | 15,000 | 14,849 | 14,670 | 5.9 | % | |||||||||||||
14,849 | 14,670 | 5.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Nth Degree, Inc. | Business Services | First Lien Debt (8.0% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 7%, 1% Floor), 1% PIK, Due 12/14/20) | 9,904 | 9,904 | 9,904 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Nth Degree, Inc. | Business Services | First Lien Debt (12.5% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 11.5%, 1% Floor), 2% PIK, Due 12/14/20) | 7,351 | 7,351 | 7,351 | 2.9 | % | |||||||||||||
Nth Degree, Inc. | Business Services | Preferred Stock (10% PIK dividend) (6) | 2,662 | 4,581 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
19,917 | 21,836 | 8.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Portrait Innovations, Inc. | Professional and Personal Digital Imaging | Subordinated Debt (12% Cash, Due 2/26/20) | 9,000 | 9,000 | 9,000 | 3.6 | % | |||||||||||||
9,000 | 9,000 | 3.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sequoia Healthcare Management, LLC | Healthcare Management | First Lien Debt (12% Cash, 4% PIK, Due 7/17/19) | 10,851 | 10,750 | 10,851 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||
10,750 | 10,851 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sierra Hamilton, LLC | Oil & Gas Engineering and Consulting Services | First Lien Debt (12.25% Cash, Due 12/15/18) (2) | 15,000 | 15,000 | 4,500 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||||
15,000 | 4,500 | 1.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sur La Table, Inc. | Retail | First Lien Debt (12% Cash, Due 7/28/20) | 15,000 | 15,000 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||
15,000 | 15,000 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Taylor Precision Products, Inc. | Household Product Manufacturer | Series C Preferred Stock (379 shares) | 758 | 1,001 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
758 | 1,001 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. Well Services, LLC | Oil & Gas Services | First Lien Debt (14.1% PIK (1 month LIBOR + 13.5%, 0.5% floor), Due 5/2/19) | 15,083 | 15,054 | 15,083 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||
15,054 | 15,083 | 6.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Velum Global Credit Management, LLC | Financial Services | First Lien Debt (15% PIK, Due 12/31/17) (1) (8) | 10,553 | 10,553 | 10,553 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||
10,553 | 10,553 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Vintage Stock, Inc. | Specialty Retail | First Lien Debt (13.1% Cash (1 month LIBOR + 12.5%, 0.5% floor), 3% PIK, Due 11/3/21) | 22,067 | 22,067 | 22,067 | 8.8 | % | |||||||||||||
22,067 | 22,067 | 8.8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Vology, Inc. | Information Technology | Subordinated Debt (15% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 14%, 1% Floor, 2% PIK), Due 1/24/21) | 8,082 | 8,082 | 8,082 | 3.2 | % | |||||||||||||
8,082 | 8,082 | 3.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Western Windows Systems, LLC | Building Products | First Lien Debt (11.7% Cash, Due 7/31/20) (3) | 10,500 | 10,500 | 10,500 | 4.2 | % | |||||||||||||
Western Windows Systems, LLC | Building Products | Membership Units (39,860 units) | 3,000 | 7,652 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
13,500 | 18,152 | 7.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Xirgo Technologies, LLC | Information Technology | Subordinated Debt (11.5% Cash, Due 3/1/22) | 15,750 | 15,750 | 15,750 | 6.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Xirgo Technologies, LLC | Information Technology | Membership Units (400,000 units) | 400 | 400 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
16,150 | 16,150 | 6.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sub Total Non-control/non-affiliated investments | $ | 391,706 | $ | 393,525 | 157.1 | % |
11 |
Capitala Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
(in thousands, except for units/shares)
December 31, 2016
Company (4) , (5) | Industry | Type of Investment | Principal Amount | Cost | Fair Value | %
of Net Assets | ||||||||||||||
Affiliate investments - 24.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Burgaflex Holdings, LLC | Automobile Part Manufacturer | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, Due 8/9/19) (10) | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 3,000 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||
Burgaflex Holdings, LLC | Automobile Part Manufacturer | Subordinated Debt (12% Cash, Due 8/9/19) (10) | 5,828 | 5,828 | 5,828 | 2.3 | % | |||||||||||||
Burgaflex Holdings, LLC | Automobile Part Manufacturer | Common Stock (1,253,198 shares) | 1,504 | 1,248 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
10,332 | 10,076 | 4.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
City Gear, LLC | Footwear Retail | Subordinated Debt (13% Cash, Due 9/28/17) (1) | 8,231 | 8,231 | 8,231 | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||||
City Gear, LLC | Footwear Retail | Preferred Membership Units (2.78% fully diluted, 9% Cash Dividend) (6) | 1,269 | 1,269 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
City Gear, LLC | Footwear Retail | Membership Unit Warrants (11.38% fully diluted) | - | 9,736 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
9,500 | 19,236 | 7.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
GA Communications, Inc. | Advertising & Marketing Services | Series A-1 Preferred Stock (1,998 shares, 8% PIK dividend) (6) | 2,648 | 2,864 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
GA Communications, Inc. | Advertising & Marketing Services | Series B-1 Common Stock (200,000 shares) | 2 | 1,046 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
2,650 | 3,910 | 1.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
J&J Produce Holdings, Inc. | Produce Distribution | Subordinated Debt (13% Cash, Due 7/16/18) | 6,182 | 6,182 | 6,182 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||
J&J Produce Holdings, Inc. | Produce Distribution | Common Stock (8,182 shares) | 818 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
J&J Produce Holdings, Inc. | Produce Distribution | Common Stock Warrants (6,369 shares) | - | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
7,000 | 6,182 | 2.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
LJS Partners, LLC | QSR Franchisor | Common Stock (1,500,000 shares) | 1,525 | 8,497 | 3.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
1,525 | 8,497 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
MJC Holdings, LLC | Specialty Clothing | Series A Preferred Units (2,000,000 units) | 1,000 | 5,011 | 2.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
1,000 | 5,011 | 2.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
MMI Holdings, LLC | Medical Device Distributor | First Lien Debt (12% Cash, Due 1/31/18) (1) | 2,600 | 2,600 | 2,600 | 1.0 | % | |||||||||||||
MMI Holdings, LLC | Medical Device Distributor | Subordinated Debt (6% Cash, Due 1/31/18) (1) | 400 | 388 | 400 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||
MMI Holdings, LLC | Medical Device Distributor | Preferred Units (1,000 units, 6% PIK dividend) (6) | 1,296 | 1,433 | 0.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
MMI Holdings, LLC | Medical Device Distributor | Common Membership Units (45 units) | - | 228 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
4,284 | 4,661 | 1.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
MTI Holdings, LLC | Retail Display & Security Services | Membership Units (2,000,000 units) (12) | - | 537 | 0.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
- | 537 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Source Capital Penray, LLC | Automotive Chemicals & Lubricants | Subordinated Debt (13% Cash, Due 4/8/19) (1) | 1,425 | 1,425 | 1,425 | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Source Capital Penray, LLC | Automotive Chemicals & Lubricants | Membership Units (11.3% ownership) | 750 | 805 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
2,175 | 2,230 | 0.9 | % | |||||||||||||||||
STX Healthcare Management Services, Inc. | Dental Practice Management | Common Stock (1,200,000 shares) (12) | - | 109 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
- | 109 | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
V12 Holdings, Inc. | Data Processing & Digital Marketing | Subordinated Debt (12) | 813 | 1,015 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
813 | 1,015 | 0.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sub Total Affiliate investments | $ | 39,279 | $ | 61,464 | 24.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Control investments- 34.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||
CableOrganizer Acquisition, LLC | Computer Supply Retail | First Lien Debt (12% Cash, 4% PIK, Due 5/24/18) | $ | 11,882 | $ | 11,882 | $ | 11,882 | 4.9 | % | ||||||||||
CableOrganizer Acquisition, LLC | Computer Supply Retail | Common Stock (19.7% fully diluted ownership) | 1,394 | 200 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
CableOrganizer Acquisition, LLC | Computer Supply Retail | Common Stock Warrants (10% fully diluted ownership) | - | 101 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
13,276 | 12,183 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Eastport Holdings, LLC | Business Services | Subordinated Debt (13.9% Cash (3 month LIBOR + 13%, 0.5% Floor), Due 4/29/20) | 16,500 | 13,982 | 16,500 | 6.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Eastport Holdings, LLC | Business Services | Membership Units (30.1% fully diluted) (11) | 4,733 | 13,395 | 5.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
18,715 | 29,895 | 12.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Micro Precision, LLC | Conglomerate | Subordinated Debt (10% Cash, Due 9/15/18) (1) | 1,862 | 1,862 | 1,862 | 0.8 | % | |||||||||||||
Micro Precision, LLC | Conglomerate | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, 4% PIK, Due 9/15/18) (1) | 3,989 | 3,989 | 3,989 | 1.6 | % | |||||||||||||
Micro Precision, LLC | Conglomerate | Series A Preferred Units (47 units) | 1,629 | 2,523 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
7,480 | 8,374 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Navis Holdings, Inc. | Textile Equipment Manufacturer | First Lien Debt (15% Cash, Due 10/30/20) (1) | 6,500 | 6,500 | 6,500 | 2.6 | % |
12 |
Capitala Finance Corp.
Consolidated Schedule of Investments
(in thousands, except for units/shares)
December 31, 2016
Company (4) , (5) | Industry | Type of Investment | Principal Amount | Cost | Fair Value | %
of Net Assets | ||||||||||||||
Navis Holdings, Inc. | Textile Equipment Manufacturer | Class A Preferred Stock (1,000 shares, 10% Cash Dividend) | 1,000 | 1,000 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Navis Holdings, Inc. | Textile Equipment Manufacturer | Common Stock (300,000 shares) | 1 | 5,634 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
7,501 | 13,134 | 5.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||
On-Site Fuel Services, Inc. | Fuel Transportation Services | Subordinated Debt (14% Cash, 4% PIK, Due 12/19/17) (1) (2) | 10,303 | 9,837 | 10,303 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||
On-Site Fuel Services, Inc. | Fuel Transportation Services | Series A Preferred Stock (32,782 shares) | 3,278 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
On-Site Fuel Services, Inc. | Fuel Transportation Services | Series B Preferred Stock (23,648 shares) | 2,365 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
On-Site Fuel Services, Inc. | Fuel Transportation Services | Common Stock (33,107 shares) | 33 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
15,513 | 10,303 | 4.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Print Direction, Inc. | Printing Services | First Lien Debt (10% Cash, 2% PIK, Due 2/24/19) | 17,316 | 17,316 | 12,761 | 5.1 | % | |||||||||||||
Print Direction, Inc. | Printing Services | Common Stock (18,543 shares) | 2,990 | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Print Direction, Inc. | Printing Services | Common Stock Warrants (820 shares) | - | - | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
20,306 | 12,761 | 5.1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Sub Total Control investments | $ | 82,791 | $ | 86,650 | 34.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS - 216.5% | $ | 513,776 | $ | 541,639 | 216.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Derivatives - (1.1)% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Eastport Holdings, LLC | Business Services | Written Call Option (11) | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (2,736 | ) | (1.1 | )% | ||||||||||
TOTAL DERIVATIVES- (1.1)% | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (2,736 | ) | (1.1 | )% |
(1) The maturity date of the original investment has been extended.
(2) Non-accrual investment.
(3) The cash rate equals the approximate current yield on our last-out portion of the unitranche facility.
(4) All debt investments are income producing, unless otherwise noted. Equity and warrant investments are non-income producing, unless otherwise noted.
(5) Percentages are based on net assets of $250,582 as of December 31, 2016.
(6) The equity investment is income producing, based on rate disclosed.
(7) The equity investment has an exercisable put option.
(8) Indicates assets that the Company believes do not represent “qualifying assets” under Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of the Company's total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets. As of December 31, 2016, 4.5% of the Company's total assets were non-qualifying assets.
(9) Interest rate was amended to zero. The Company is entitled to receive earn-out payments of up to $2.4 million in satisfaction of the debt.
(10) In addition to the stated rate, the investment is paying 3% default interest.
(11) The Company has written a call option that enables CapitalSouth Partners Florida Sidecar Fund II, L.P. to purchase up to 31.25% of the Company's interest at a strike price of $1.5 million. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of the written call option is approximately $2.7 million. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further detail on the written call option transaction.
(12) The investment has been exited. The residual value reflects estimated escrow to be settled post-closing.
(13) The portfolio company is currently being charged default interest rate of prime plus 10.5%.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
13 |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2017
(unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Capitala Finance Corp. (the “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our”) is an externally managed non-diversified closed-end management investment company incorporated in Maryland that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). The Company is an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and as such, is subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. The Company commenced operations on May 24, 2013 and completed its initial public offering (“IPO”) on September 30, 2013. The Company is managed by Capitala Investment Advisors, LLC (the “Investment Advisor”), an investment adviser that is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), and the Administrator provides the administrative services necessary for the Company to operate. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company has elected to be treated, and intends to comply with the requirements to continue to qualify annually, as a regulated investment company (“RIC”), under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
The Company was formed for the purpose of: (i) acquiring, through a series of transactions, an investment portfolio from the following entities: CapitalSouth Partners Fund I Limited Partnership (“Fund I”); CapitalSouth Partners Fund II Limited Partnership (“Fund II”); CapitalSouth Partners Fund III, L.P. (“Fund III Parent”); CapitalSouth Partners SBIC Fund III, L.P. (“Fund III”) and CapitalSouth Partners Florida Sidecar Fund I, L.P. (“Florida Sidecar” and, collectively with Fund I, Fund II, Fund III and Fund III Parent, the “Legacy Funds”); (ii) raising capital in the IPO and (iii) continuing and expanding the business of the Legacy Funds by making additional debt and equity investments in lower middle-market and traditional middle-market companies.
The Company’s investment objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. Both directly and through our subsidiaries that are licensed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) under the Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”) Act, the Company offers customized financing to business owners, management teams and financial sponsors for change of ownership transactions, recapitalizations, strategic acquisitions, business expansion and other growth initiatives. The Company invests in first lien, second lien, and subordinated loans, and, to a lesser extent, equity securities issued by lower middle-market companies and traditional middle-market companies.
On September 24, 2013, the Company acquired 100% of the limited partnership interests in Fund II, Fund III and Florida Sidecar and each of their respective general partners, as well as certain assets from Fund I and Fund III Parent, in exchange for an aggregate of 8,974,420 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Formation Transactions”). Fund II, Fund III and Florida Sidecar became the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. Fund II and Fund III retained their SBIC licenses, continued to hold their existing investments at the time of the IPO and have continued to make new investments. The IPO consisted of the sale of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $20.00 per share resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $74.25 million, after deducting underwriting fees and commissions totaling $4.0 million and offering expenses totaling $1.75 million. The other costs of the IPO were borne by the limited partners of the Legacy Funds.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The Company is considered an investment company as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 – Financial Services – Investment Companies (“ASC 946”). The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 6 and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying our annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries as described in the Formation Transactions above.
The Company’s financial statements as of March 31, 2017 are presented on a consolidated basis. The effects of all intercompany transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries (Fund II, Fund III, and Florida Sidecar) have been eliminated in consolidation. All financial data and information included in these consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis described above. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary for the fair presentation of financial results as of and for the periods presented.
14 |
The current period’s results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for the year. Additionally, the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on March 7, 2017.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The most significant estimates in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are investment valuation, revenue recognition, and income taxes.
Consolidation
As provided under Regulation S-X and ASC 946, the Company will generally not consolidate its investment in a company other than a substantially wholly owned investment company subsidiary or a controlled operating company whose business consists of providing services to the Company. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the results of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries in its consolidated financial statements. The Company did not consolidate its interest in Capitala Senior Liquid Loan Fund I, LLC (“CSLLF”) during the periods it was in existence because the investment was not considered a substantially wholly owned investment company subsidiary. Further, CSLLF was a joint venture for which shared power existed relating to the decisions that most significantly impacted the economic performance of the entity. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the Company’s investment in CSLLF.
Segments
In accordance with ASC Topic 280 — Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), the Company has determined that it has a single reporting segment and operating unit structure. While the Company invests in several industries and geographic locations, all investments share similar business and economic risks. As such, all investment activities have been aggregated into a single segment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers cash equivalents to be highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. The Company deposits its cash in financial institutions and, at times, such balances may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits.
Investment Classification
In accordance with the provisions of the 1940 Act, the Company classifies its investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are investments in those companies that the Company is deemed to “Control.” “Affiliate Investments” are investments in those companies that are “Affiliated Companies” of the Company, as defined in the 1940 Act, other than Control Investments. “Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments” are those investments that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments. Generally under the 1940 Act, the Company is deemed to control a company in which it has invested if the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities of such company and/or has greater than 50% representation on its board or has the power to exercise control over management or policies of such portfolio company. The Company is deemed to be an affiliate of a company in which the Company has invested if it owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities of such company.
Valuation of Investments
The Company applies fair value accounting to all of its financial instruments in accordance with the 1940 Act and ASC Topic 820 —Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework used to measure fair value and requires disclosures for fair value measurements. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized its financial instruments carried at fair value, based on the priority of the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as discussed in Note 4.
In determining fair value, the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) uses various valuation approaches, and engages a third-party valuation firm, which provides an independent valuation of certain investments. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, a fair value hierarchy for inputs is used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.
Observable inputs are those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Board. Unobservable inputs reflect the Board’s assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances.
15 |
The availability of valuation techniques and observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors including the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Those estimated values do not necessarily represent the amounts that may be ultimately realized due to the occurrence of future circumstances that cannot be reasonably determined. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, those estimated values may be materially higher or lower than the values that would have been used had a market for the securities existed. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Board in determining fair value is greatest for securities categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The Company uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many securities. This condition could cause a security to be reclassified to a lower level within the fair value hierarchy.
In estimating the fair value of portfolio investments, the Company starts with the cost basis of the investment, which includes original issue discount or premium and payment-in-kind (“PIK”) income, if any. The transaction price is typically the best estimate of fair value at inception. When evidence supports a subsequent change to the carrying value from the original transaction price, adjustments are made to reflect the expected fair values.
As a practical expedient, the Company used the net asset value (“NAV”) as the basis for the fair value of its investment in CSLLF for the periods held. CSLLF recorded its underlying investments at fair value on a daily basis utilizing pricing information from third-party sources.
The following valuation methodologies are utilized by the Company in estimating fair value and are summarized as follows:
Enterprise Value Waterfall Approach
The enterprise value waterfall approach determines an enterprise value based on earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiples of publicly traded companies that are considered similar to the subject portfolio company. The Company considers a variety of items in determining a reasonable pricing multiple, including, but not limited to, operating results, budgeted projections, growth, size, risk, profitability, leverage, management depth, diversification, market position, supplier or customer dependence, asset utilization, liquidity metrics, and access to capital markets. EBITDA of the portfolio company is adjusted for non-recurring items in order to reflect a normalized level of earnings that is representative of future earnings. In certain instances, the Company may also utilize revenue multiples to determine enterprise value. When available, the Company may assign a pricing multiple or value its equity investments based on the value of recent investment transactions in the subject portfolio company or offers to purchase the portfolio company. The enterprise value is adjusted for financial instruments with seniority to the Company’s ownership and for the effect of any instrument which may dilute the Company’s investment in the portfolio company. The adjusted enterprise value is then apportioned based on the seniority and privileges of the Company’s investments within the portfolio company.
The enterprise value waterfall approach is primarily utilized to value the Company’s equity securities, including warrants. However, the Company may utilize the enterprise value waterfall approach to value certain debt securities.
Income Approach
The income approach utilizes a discounted cash flow methodology in which the Company estimates fair value based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at a market rate of interest. The determination of a discount rate, or required rate of return, takes into account the portfolio company’s fundamentals and perceived credit risk. Because the majority of the Company’s portfolio companies do not have a public credit rating, determining a discount rate often involves assigning an implied credit rating based on the portfolio company’s operating metrics compared to average metrics of similar publicly rated debt. Operating metrics include, but are not limited to, EBITDA interest coverage, leverage ratio, return on capital, and debt to equity ratios. The implied credit rating is used to assign a base discount rate range based on publicly available yields on similarly rated debt securities. The Company may apply a premium to the discount rate utilized in determining fair value when performance metrics and other qualitative information indicate that there is an additional level of uncertainty about collectability of cash flows.
Asset Approach
The asset approach values an investment based on the value of the underlying collateral securing the investment. This approach is used when the Company has reason to believe that it will not collect all principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the debt agreement.
16 |
Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue recognition policies are as follows:
Interest income and paid-in-kind interest income: Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company has loans in the portfolio that contain a PIK provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at maturity, is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. PIK interest is not accrued if the Company does not expect the issuer to be able to pay all principal and interest when due.
Non-accrual investments: Generally, when interest and/or principal payments on a loan become 90 days or more past due, or when the Company otherwise does not expect the borrower to be able to service its debt and other obligations, the Company will place the loan on non-accrual status, and will generally cease recognizing interest income and PIK interest on that loan for financial reporting purposes. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment. The Company writes off any previously accrued and uncollected interest when it is determined that interest is no longer considered collectible. The Company may elect to cease accruing PIK interest and continue accruing interest income in cases where a loan is currently paying its interest income but, in management’s judgment, there is a reasonable likelihood of principal loss on the loan. Non-accrual loans are returned to accrual status when the borrower’s financial condition improves such that management believes current interest and principal payments are expected to be collected.
Gains and losses on investment sales and paydowns: Realized gains and losses on investments are recognized using the specific identification method.
Dividend income and paid-in-kind dividends: Dividend income is recognized on the date dividends are declared. The Company holds preferred equity investments in the portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind dividend (“PIK dividends”) provision. PIK dividends, which represent contractually deferred dividends added to the equity balance, are recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company will typically cease accrual of PIK dividends when the fair value of the equity investment is less than the cost basis of the investment or when it is otherwise determined by management that PIK dividends are unlikely to be collected. If management determines that a decline in fair value is temporary in nature and the PIK dividends are more likely than not to be collected, management may elect to continue accruing PIK dividends.
Original issue discount/premiums: Discounts/premiums received to par on loans purchased are capitalized and accreted or amortized into income over the life of the loan. Any remaining discount/premium is accreted or amortized into income upon prepayment of the loan.
Other income: Origination fees, amendment fees, consent fees, and other fees associated with investments in portfolio companies are recognized as income when the investment transaction closes (to the extent services are performed to earn such income). Prepayment penalties received by the Company for debt instruments repaid prior to maturity date are recorded as income upon receipt.
Loan Sales
The Company follows the guidance in ASC Topic 860 — Transfers and Servicing (“ASC 860”) when accounting for loan participations and partial loan sales as it relates to concluding on sales accounting treatment for such transactions. Based on the Company’s analysis of all loan participations and partial sales completed, the Company believes that all such transactions meet the criterion required by ASC 860 to qualify for sales accounting treatment.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses are paid as incurred. The Company’s administrative expenses include personnel and overhead expenses allocable to the Company paid by and reimbursed to the Administrator under an administration agreement between the Company and the Administrator (the “Administration Agreement”). Other operating expenses such as legal and audit fees, director fees, and director and officer insurance are generally paid directly by the Company.
Deferred Financing Fees
Costs incurred to issue the Company’s debt obligations are capitalized and are amortized over the term of the debt agreements under the effective interest method.
Commitments and Contingencies
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding unfunded commitments related to debt investments in existing portfolio companies of $0.8 million (U.S. Well Services, LLC) and $1.2 million (On-Site Fuel Services, Inc.), respectively.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may enter into contracts or agreements that contain indemnifications or warranties. Future events could occur that could lead to the execution of these provisions against the Company. Based on its history and experience, management believes that the likelihood of such an event is remote.
17 |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may directly or indirectly be a defendant or plaintiff in legal actions with respect to bankruptcy, insolvency or other types of proceedings. Such lawsuits may involve claims that could adversely affect the value of certain financial instruments owned by the Company or result in direct losses to the Company. In management’s opinion, no direct losses with respect to litigation contingencies were probable as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. Management is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of such claims will not materially affect the Company’s business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Furthermore, in management’s opinion, it is not possible to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses with respect to other litigation contingencies.
Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and intends to comply with the requirements to qualify annually thereafter, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, among other things, intends to make the requisite distributions to its stockholders which will relieve the Company from U.S. federal income taxes. Therefore, no provision has been recorded for U.S. federal income taxes.
In order to qualify as a RIC, among other requirements, the Company is required to timely distribute to its stockholders at least 90.0% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each fiscal tax year. The Company will be subject to a nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax of 4.0% on undistributed income if it does not distribute at least 98.0% of its ordinary income in any calendar year and 98.2% of its capital gain net income for each one-year period ending on October 31.
Depending on the level of taxable income earned in an excise tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next excise tax year and pay a 4.0% excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions for excise tax purposes, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned. Since the Company’s IPO, the Company has not accrued or paid excise tax.
In accordance with certain applicable U.S. Treasury regulations and private letter rulings issued by the Internal Revenue Service, a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC, subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders, which limitation must be at least 20.0% of the aggregate declared distribution. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash will receive a pro rata amount of cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in stock). In no event will any stockholder, electing to receive cash, receive less than 20.0% of his or her entire distribution in cash. If these and certain other requirements are met, for U.S federal income tax purposes, the amount of the dividend paid in stock will be equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of stock.
ASC Topic 740 — Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions deemed to meet a “more-likely-than-not” threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current period. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no uncertain tax positions.
The Company is required to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. De-recognition of a tax benefit previously recognized could result in the Company recording a tax liability that could negatively impact the Company’s net assets.
U.S. GAAP provides guidance on thresholds, measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition that is intended to provide better financial statement comparability among different entities.
The Company’s activities since commencement of operations remain subject to examination by U.S. federal, state, and local tax authorities. No interest expense or penalties have been assessed for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016. If the Company was required to recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits this would be recognized as income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Distributions
Distributions to common stockholders are recorded as payable on the declaration date. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board. Net capital gains, if any, are generally distributed at least annually, although we may decide to retain such capital gains for reinvestment.
18 |
The Company has adopted an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) for common stockholders. As a result, if the Company declares a cash dividend or other distribution, each stockholder that has not “opted out” of the DRIP will have its dividends automatically reinvested in additional shares of the Company’s common stock rather than receiving cash dividends. Stockholders who receive distributions in the form of shares of common stock will be subject to the same federal, state and local tax consequences as if they received cash distributions.
Company Investment Risk, Concentration of Credit Risk, and Liquidity Risk
The Investment Advisor has broad discretion in making investments for the Company. Investments will generally consist of debt and equity instruments that may be affected by business, financial market or legal uncertainties. Prices of investments may be volatile, and a variety of factors that are inherently difficult to predict, such as domestic or international economic and political developments, may significantly affect the results of the Company’s activities and the value of its investments. In addition, the value of the Company’s portfolio may fluctuate as the general level of interest rates fluctuate.
The value of the Company’s investments may be detrimentally affected to the extent, among other things, that a borrower defaults on its obligations, there is insufficient collateral and/or there are extensive legal and other costs incurred in collecting on a defaulted loan, observable secondary or primary market yields for similar instruments issued by comparable companies increase materially or risk premiums required in the market between smaller companies, such as our borrowers, and those for which market yields are observable increase materially.
The Investment Advisor may attempt to minimize this risk by maintaining low debt-to-liquidation values with each debt investment and the collateral underlying the debt investment.
The Company’s assets may, at any time, include securities and other financial instruments or obligations that are illiquid or thinly traded, making purchase or sale of such securities and financial instruments at desired prices or in desired quantities difficult. Furthermore, the sale of any such investments may be possible only at substantial discounts, and it may be extremely difficult to value any such investments accurately.
Note 3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 retains many current requirements for the classification and measurement of financial instruments; however, it significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. ASU 2016-01 also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted for public business entities. Management is currently evaluating the impact these changes will have on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Note 4. Investments and Fair Value Measurements
The Company’s investment objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. Both directly and through the Company’s subsidiaries that are licensed by the SBA under the SBIC Act, the Company offers customized financing to business owners, management teams and financial sponsors for change of ownership transactions, recapitalizations, strategic acquisitions, business expansion and other growth initiatives. The Company invests in first lien, second lien, and subordinated loans. Most of the Company’s debt investments are coupled with equity interests, whether in the form of detachable “penny” warrants or equity co-investments made pari-passu with our borrowers’ financial sponsors. As of March 31, 2017, our portfolio consisted of investments in 51 portfolio companies with a fair value of approximately $532.5 million.
Most of the Company’s debt investments are structured as first lien loans. First lien loans may contain some minimum amount of principal amortization, excess cash flow sweep feature, prepayment penalties, or any combination of the foregoing. First lien loans are secured by a first priority lien in existing and future assets of the borrower and may take the form of term loans or delayed draw facilities. In some cases, first lien loans may be subordinated, solely with respect to the payment of cash interest, to an asset based revolving credit facility.
The Company also invests in debt instruments structured as second lien loans. Second lien loans are loans which have a second priority security interest in all or substantially all of the borrower’s assets, and which are not subject to the blockage of cash interest payments to the Company at the first lien lender’s discretion.
In addition to first and second lien loans, the Company may also invest in subordinated loans. Subordinated loans typically have a second lien on all or substantially all of the borrower’s assets, and unlike second lien loans, may be subject to the interruption of cash interest payments upon certain events of default, at the discretion of the first lien lender.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company made approximately $21.7 million of investments and had approximately $33.0 million in repayments and sales resulting in net repayments and sales of approximately $11.3 million for the period. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company made approximately $27.5 million of investments and had approximately $10.2 million in repayments and sales of investments resulting in net investments of approximately $17.3 million for the period.
19 |
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company funded $1.2 million of previously committed capital to existing portfolio companies. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company funded $20.5 million of investments in portfolio companies for which it was not previously committed to fund. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company funded $2.8 million of previously committed capital to existing portfolio companies. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company funded $24.7 million of investments in portfolio companies for which it was not previously committed to fund. In addition to investing directly in portfolio companies, the Company may assist portfolio companies in securing financing from other sources by introducing portfolio companies to sponsors or by leading a syndicate of investors to provide the portfolio companies with financing. During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, the Company did not lead any syndicates and did not assist any portfolio companies in obtaining indirect financing.
On August 31, 2016, the Company sold a portion of 14 securities across 10 portfolio companies to CapitalSouth Partners Florida Sidecar Fund II, L.P. (“FSC II”), including granting an option to acquire a portion of the Company’s equity investment in Eastport Holdings, LLC (the “Written Call Option”), in exchange for 100% of the partnership interests in FSC II. Concurrent with the sale of these assets to FSC II, the Company received cash consideration of $47.6 million from an affiliated third-party purchaser in exchange for 100% of the partnership interests of FSC II. These assets were sold to FSC II at their June 30, 2016 fair market values, resulting in a net realized gain of $0.1 million. The Company’s Board pre-approved this transaction pursuant to Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act.
The Company collected and will periodically collect principal and interest payments related to certain of the securities purchased by FSC II. Such principal and interest payments will be remitted timely to FSC II based on its proportionate share of the security. FSC II does not have any recourse to the Company related to the non-payment of principal or interest by the underlying issuers of the securities.
The Written Call Option granted FSC II the right to purchase up to 31.25% of the Company’s equity investment in Eastport Holdings, LLC. The Written Call Option has a strike price of $1.5 million and a termination date of August 31, 2018. The fair value of the Written Call Option, which has been treated as a derivative liability and is recorded in the financial statement line item Written Call Option at fair value in our consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, was approximately $4.2 million as of March 31, 2017. For purposes of determining the fair value of the Written Call Option, the Company calculated the difference in the fair value of the underlying equity investment in Eastport Holdings, LLC and the strike price of the Written Call Option, or intrinsic value. The time value of the Written Call Option as of March 31, 2017 was determined to be insignificant. The Written Call Option is classified as a Level 3 financial instrument.
The composition of our investments as of March 31, 2017, at amortized cost and fair value were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Investments at Amortized Cost | Amortized Cost Percentage of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||
First Lien Debt | $ | 256,542 | 50.4 | % | $ | 235,864 | 44.3 | % | ||||||||
Second Lien Debt | 63,729 | 12.5 | 60,661 | 11.4 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt | 135,714 | 26.6 | 135,606 | 25.5 | ||||||||||||
Equity and Warrants | 53,301 | 10.5 | 100,347 | 18.8 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 509,286 | 100.0 | % | $ | 532,478 | 100.0 | % |
The composition of our investments as of December 31, 2016, at amortized cost and fair value were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Investments at Amortized Cost | Amortized Cost Percentage of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||
First Lien Debt | $ | 244,647 | 47.6 | % | $ | 226,578 | 41.8 | % | ||||||||
Second Lien Debt | 74,559 | 14.5 | 71,483 | 13.2 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt | 148,849 | 29.0 | 150,232 | 27.8 | ||||||||||||
Equity and Warrants | 45,721 | 8.9 | 93,346 | 17.2 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 513,776 | 100.0 | % | $ | 541,639 | 100.0 | % |
As noted above, the Company values all investments in accordance with ASC 820. ASC 820 requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value. As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
ASC 820 establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability of inputs used in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of investment and the characteristics specific to the investment. Investments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices generally will have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
20 |
Based on the observability of the inputs used in the valuation techniques, the Company is required to provide disclosures on fair value measurements according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the observability of the inputs used to determine fair values. Investments carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
• | Level 1 — Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. |
• | Level 2 — Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable. |
• | Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. |
In addition to using the above inputs in investment valuations, the Company continues to employ the valuation policy approved by the Board that is consistent with ASC 820 (see Note 2). Consistent with the Company’s valuation policy, the Company evaluates the source of inputs, including any markets in which its investments are trading, in determining fair value.
In estimating fair value of portfolio investments, the Company starts with the cost basis of the investment, which includes amortized original issue discount and PIK income, if any. The transaction price is typically the best estimate of fair value at inception. When evidence supports a subsequent change to the carrying value from the original transaction price, adjustments are made to reflect the expected fair values.
The following table presents the fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands), according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
First Lien Debt | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 235,864 | $ | 235,864 | ||||||||
Second Lien Debt | — | — | 60,661 | 60,661 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt | — | — | 135,606 | 135,606 | ||||||||||||
Equity and Warrants | — | — | 100,347 | 100,347 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 532,478 | $ | 532,478 |
The following table presents fair value measurements of the Written Call Option as of March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands), according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Written Call Option | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (4,221 | ) | $ | (4,221 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (4,221 | ) | $ | (4,221 | ) |
The following table presents fair value measurements of investments, by major class, as of December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands), according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
First Lien Debt | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 226,578 | $ | 226,578 | ||||||||
Second Lien Debt | — | — | 71,483 | 71,483 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt | — | — | 150,232 | 150,232 | ||||||||||||
Equity and Warrants | — | — | 93,346 | 93,346 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 541,639 | $ | 541,639 |
The following table presents fair value measurements of the Written Call Option as of December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands), according to the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value Measurements | ||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
Written Call Option | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (2,736 | ) | $ | (2,736 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (2,736 | ) | $ | (2,736 | ) |
21 |
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
First Lien Debt | Second Lien Debt | Subordinated Debt | Equity and Warrants | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2017 | $ | 226,578 | $ | 71,483 | $ | 150,232 | $ | 93,346 | $ | 541,639 | ||||||||||
Reclassifications | (6,701 | ) | — | — | 6,701 | — | ||||||||||||||
Repayments/sales | (1,273 | ) | (10,790 | ) | (14,667 | ) | (6,319 | ) | (33,049 | ) | ||||||||||
Purchases | 18,526 | — | 1,182 | 2,000 | 21,708 | |||||||||||||||
Payment in-kind interest and dividends accrued | 1,277 | — | 164 | 214 | 1,655 | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of original issue discount | 66 | 100 | 184 | — | 350 | |||||||||||||||
Realized gain (loss) from investments | — | (140 | ) | — | 4,986 | 4,846 | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (2,609 | ) | 8 | (1,489 | ) | (581 | ) | (4,671 | ) | |||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2017 | $ | 235,864 | $ | 60,661 | $ | 135,606 | $ | 100,347 | $ | 532,478 |
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the Written Call Option that use Level 3 inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
Written Call Option | ||||
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | (2,736 | ) | |
Net unrealized depreciation on Written Call Option | (1,485 | ) | ||
Balance as of March 31, 2017 | $ | (4,221 | ) |
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for investments that use Level 3 inputs for the three months ended March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
First Lien Debt | Second Lien Debt | Subordinated Debt | Equity and Warrants | Total(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance as of January 1, 2016 | $ | 199,843 | $ | 80,610 | $ | 194,485 | $ | 98,480 | $ | 573,418 | ||||||||||
Repayments/sales | (1,157 | ) | — | (2,699 | ) | (6,330 | ) | (10,186 | ) | |||||||||||
Purchases | 3,389 | — | 19,267 | 4,867 | 27,523 | |||||||||||||||
Payment in-kind interest and dividends accrued | 769 | — | 118 | 317 | 1,204 | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of original issue discount | 59 | 52 | 243 | — | 354 | |||||||||||||||
Realized gain (loss) from investments | — | — | (2,300 | ) | 38 | (2,262 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | (4,288 | ) | (113 | ) | (4,890 | ) | (424 | ) | (9,715 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance as of March 31, 2016 | $ | 198,615 | $ | 80,549 | $ | 204,224 | $ | 96,948 | $ | 580,336 |
(1) | Excludes our $18.5 million investment in CSLLF, measured at NAV. |
The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments held as of March 31, 2017 and 2016, was $(4.8) million and $(11.2) million, respectively, and is included in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments in the consolidated statements of operations.
22 |
The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of assets and (liabilities) as of March 31, 2017 were as follows:
Fair Value (in millions) | Valuation Approach | Unobservable Input | Range (Weighted Average) | |||||||
First lien debt | $ | 199.9 | Income | Required Rate of Return Leverage Ratio Adjusted EBITDA | 7.0% - 19.5% (14.0%) 2.0x - 6.8x (3.6x) $1.8 million - $134.6 million ($22.1 million) | |||||
First lien debt | $ | 36.0 | Enterprise Value Waterfall and Asset (1) | EBITDA Multiple Adjusted EBITDA Revenue Multiple Revenue | 5.0x – 5.5x (5.1x) $2.0 million - $3.5 million ($2.6 million) 0.3x – 0.3x (0.3x) $88.1 million - $88.1 million ($88.1 million) | |||||
Second lien debt | $ | 60.7 | Income | Required Rate of Return Leverage Ratio Adjusted EBITDA | 10.7% - 17.8% (13.5%) 0.4x – 12.5x (5.6x) $7.9 million - $145.0 million ($74.0 million) | |||||
Subordinated debt | $ | 98.8 | Income | Required Rate of Return Leverage Ratio Adjusted EBITDA | 11.5% – 19.2% (14.3%) 1.6x – 8.3x (5.2x) $1.7 million - $20.2 million ($11.7 million) | |||||
Subordinated debt | $ | 36.8 | Enterprise Value Waterfall and Asset (1) | EBITDA Multiple Adjusted EBITDA | 5.5x – 7.3x (6.3x) $1.8 million - $30.0 million ($16.5 million) | |||||
Equity shares and warrants | $ | 100.3 | Enterprise Value Waterfall | EBITDA Multiple Adjusted EBITDA | 5.0x – 15.0x (7.4x) $1.8 million - $48.6 million ($18.0 million) | |||||
Written Call Option | $ | (4.2 | ) | Enterprise Value Waterfall | EBITDA Multiple Adjusted EBITDA | 6.5x – 6.5x (6.5x) $30.0 million - $30.0 million ($30.0 million) |
(1) | $2.5 million in subordinated debt and $2.8 million in first lien debt were valued using the asset approach. |
The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of assets and (liabilities) as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Fair Value (in millions) | Valuation Approach | Unobservable Input | Range (Weighted Average) | |||||||
First lien debt | $ | 173.3 | Income | Required Rate of Return Leverage Ratio Adjusted EBITDA | 9.5% - 18.0% (14.2%) 2.0x – 6.4x (4.1x) $1.8 million - $166.0 million ($24.1million) | |||||
First lien debt | $ | 53.3 | Enterprise Value Waterfall and Asset(1) | EBITDA Multiple Adjusted EBITDA Revenue Multiple Revenue | 4.5x – 9.0x (6.3x) $2.5 million - $34.3 million ($13.1 million) 0.3x – 0.3x (0.3x) $88.1 million -$88.1 million ($88.1 million) | |||||
Second lien debt | $ | 71.5 | Income | Required Rate of Return Leverage Ratio Adjusted EBITDA | 10.0% - 17.3% (13.3%) 0.0x – 7.5x (5.0x) $8.1 million - $166.0 million ($76.5 million) | |||||
Subordinated debt | $ | 114.6 | Income | Required Rate of Return Leverage Ratio Adjusted EBITDA | 11.5% – 20.0% (13.6%) 1.5x – 6.7x (4.1x) 2.0 million - $63.7 million ($21.4 million) | |||||
Subordinated debt | $ | 35.6 | Enterprise Value Waterfall and Asset(1) | EBITDA Multiple Adjusted EBITDA | 5.0x – 8.7x (6.3x) $1.8 million – $27.6 million ($15.7 million) | |||||
Equity and warrants | $ | 93.3 | Enterprise Value Waterfall | EBITDA Multiple Adjusted EBITDA | 4.5x – 12.2x (7.6%) $1.8 million - $63.7 million ($17.5 million) | |||||
Written Call Option | $ | (2.7 | ) | Enterprise Value Waterfall | EBITDA Multiple Adjusted EBITDA | 6.25x – 6.25x (6.25x) $27.6 million - $27.6 million ($27.6 million) |
(1) | $2.5 million in subordinated debt and $2.6 million in first lien debt were valued using the asset approach |
The significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of the Company’s investments are required rate of return, adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA multiples, revenue, revenue multiples, and leverage ratios. Changes in any of these unobservable inputs could have a significant impact on the Company’s estimate of fair value. An increase (decrease) in the required rate of return or leverage will result in a lower (higher) estimate of fair value while an increase (decrease) in adjusted EBITDA, EBITDA multiples, revenue, or revenue multiples will result in a higher (lower) estimate of fair value.
Capitala Senior Liquid Loan Fund I, LLC
On March 24, 2015, the Company and Trinity Universal Insurance Company (“Trinity”), a subsidiary of Kemper Corporation (“Kemper”), entered into a limited liability company agreement to co-manage CSLLF. The purpose and design of the joint venture was to invest primarily in broadly syndicated senior secured loans to middle-market companies, which were purchased on the secondary market. Capitala and Trinity committed to provide $25.0 million of equity to CSLLF, with Capitala providing $20.0 million and Trinity providing $5.0 million, resulting in an 80%/20% economic ownership between the two parties. The board of directors and investment committee of CSLLF were split 50/50 between Trinity and Capitala, resulting in equal voting power between the two entities. In September 2016, the Company and Trinity elected to wind-down operations of CSLLF. During the fourth quarter of 2016, CSLLF sold all referenced assets underlying the total return swap (“TRS”) and declared final distributions, inclusive of dividends and return of capital. Because the TRS was wound down in a prior period, only comparative period disclosures are included herein. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, we received $0.5 million in dividend income from our equity interest in CSLLF.
23 |
On March 27, 2015, CSLLF entered into a TRS with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) that was indexed to a basket of senior secured loans purchased by CSLLF. CSLLF obtained the economic benefit of the loans underlying the TRS, including the net interest spread between the interest income generated by the underlying loans and the interest expense type payment under the TRS, the realized gain (loss) on liquidated loans, and the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the underlying loans.
The terms of the TRS were governed by an ISDA 2002 Master Agreement, the Schedule thereto, and Credit Support Annex to such Schedule, and the confirmation exchanged thereunder, between CSLLF and Bank of America, which collectively established the TRS, and are collectively referred to herein as the “TRS Agreement.” Pursuant to the terms of the TRS Agreement, CSLLF selected a portfolio of loans with a maximum market value (determined at the time each such loan becomes subject to the TRS) of $100.0 million, which was also referred to as the maximum notional amount of the TRS. Each individual loan, and the portfolio of loans taken as a whole, had to meet criteria described in the TRS Agreement. CSLLF received from Bank of America, a periodic payment on set dates that was based upon any coupons, both earned and accrued, generated by the loans underlying the TRS, subject to limitations described in the TRS Agreement as well as any fees associated with the loans included in the portfolio. CSLLF paid to Bank of America interest at a rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.25% per annum; the LIBOR option paid by CSLLF was determined on an asset by asset basis such that the tenor of the LIBOR option (1 month, 3 month, etc.) matched the tenor of the underlying reference asset. In addition, upon the termination of any loan subject to the TRS or any repayment of the underlying reference asset, CSLLF either received from Bank of America the appreciation in the value of such loan, or paid to Bank of America any depreciation in the value of such loan.
CSLLF was required to pay an unused facility fee of 1.25% on any amount of unused facility under the minimum facility amount of $70.0 million as outlined in the TRS Agreement. Such unused facility fees were not applied during the first 4 months and last 60 days of the term of the TRS. CSLLF also agreed to pay Bank of America customary fees and expenses in connection with the establishment and maintenance of the TRS.
CSLLF was required to initially cash collateralize a specified percentage of each loan (generally 20% to 35% of the market value of senior secured loans) included under the TRS in accordance with margin requirements described in the TRS Agreement. As of December 31, 2016, CSLLF has posted $0.0 million in collateral to Bank of America in relation to the TRS which is recorded on CSLLF’s statements of assets and liabilities as cash held as collateral on total return swap. CSLLF may be required to post additional collateral as a result of a decline in the mark-to-market value of the portfolio of loans subject to the TRS. The cash collateral represents CSLLF’s maximum credit exposure as of December 31, 2016.
In connection with the TRS, CSLLF has made customary representations and warranties and is required to comply with various covenants, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar transactions governed by an ISDA 2002 Master Agreement.
CSLLF’s receivable due on the TRS represents realized amounts from payments on underlying loans in the total return swap portfolio. At December 31, 2016, the receivable due on TRS was $0.1 million and is recorded on CSLLF’s statements of assets and liabilities below. CSLLF does not offset collateral posted in relation to the TRS with any unrealized appreciation or depreciation outstanding in the statements of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2016.
Transactions in TRS contracts during the three months ended March 31, 2016 resulted in $0.7 million in realized gains and $0.8 million in unrealized appreciation, which is recorded on CSLLF’s statements of operations below.
The following represents the volume of the CSLLF’s derivative transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended March 31,2016 | ||||
Average notional par amount of contract | $ | 78,203 |
Below is certain summarized financial information for CSLLF as of December 31, 2016 and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
As of December 31, 2016 | ||||
ASSETS | ||||
Receivable due on Total Return Swap | $ | 82 | ||
Total assets | $ | 82 | ||
LIABILITIES | ||||
Distribution payable | $ | 82 | ||
Total liabilities | $ | 82 | ||
NET ASSETS | ||||
Total net assets | $ | — | ||
Total liabilities and net assets | $ | 82 |
24 |
For the Three Months | ||||
Ended | ||||
March 31, 2016 | ||||
Administrative and legal expenses | $ | (30 | ) | |
Net operating loss | $ | (30 | ) | |
Net realized gain on Total Return Swap | $ | 726 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on Total Return Swap | 757 | |||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | $ | 1,453 |
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial Instruments Disclosed, But Not Carried, At Fair Value
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities disclosed, but not carried, at fair value as of March 31, 2017, and the level of each financial liability within the fair value hierarchy (dollars in thousands):
Carrying Value (1) | Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||
SBA debentures | $ | 170,700 | $ | 172,258 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 172,258 | ||||||||||
Notes | 113,438 | 115,207 | 115,207 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Credit Facility | 44,000 | 43,979 | — | — | 43,979 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 328,138 | $ | 331,444 | $ | 115,207 | $ | — | $ | 216,237 |
(1) | Carrying value equals the gross principal outstanding at period end. |
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Company’s financial liabilities disclosed, but not carried, at fair value as of December 31, 2016, and the level of each financial liability within the fair value hierarchy (dollars in thousands):
Carrying Value (1) | Fair Value | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||
SBA debentures | $ | 170,700 | $ | 175,581 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 175,581 | ||||||||||
Notes | 113,438 | 115,888 | 115,888 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Credit Facility | 44,000 | 43,927 | — | — | 43,927 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 328,138 | $ | 335,396 | $ | 115,888 | $ | — | $ | 219,508 |
(1) | Carrying value equals the gross principal outstanding at period end. |
The estimated fair value of the Company’s SBA debentures was based on future contractual cash payments discounted at market interest rates to borrow from the SBA as of the measurement date.
25 |
In June 2014, the Company issued $113.4 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.125% fixed-rate notes due 2021 (the “Notes”). The estimated fair value of the Notes was based on the closing price as of the measurement date as the Notes are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker “CLA.”
The estimated fair value of the Company’s Credit Facility was based on future contractual cash payments discounted at estimated market interest rates for similar debt.
Note 6. Agreements
On September 24, 2013, the Company entered into an investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”) with our Investment Advisor, which was initially approved by the Board on June 10, 2013. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with its terms, the Investment Advisory Agreement will remain in effect if approved annually by the Board or by a majority of our outstanding voting securities, including, in either case, by a majority of our non-interested directors. The Investment Advisory Agreement was most recently re-approved by the Board, including by a majority of our non-interested directors, at an in-person meeting, on August 4, 2016. Subject to the overall supervision of the Board, the Investment Advisor manages our day-to-day operations, and provides investment advisory and management services to us. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Investment Advisor:
• | determines the composition of our portfolio, the nature and timing of the changes to our portfolio and the manner of implementing such changes; |
• | identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments we make (including performing due diligence on our prospective portfolio companies); |
• | closes and monitors the investments we make; and |
• | provides us with other investment advisory, research and related services as we may from time to time require. |
The Investment Advisor’s services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as its services to us are not impaired.
The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, the Investment Advisor and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from the Company, for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of our Investment Advisor’s services under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as Investment Advisor for the Company.
Pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Company has agreed to pay the Investment Advisor a fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee.
The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.75% of the gross assets, which are the total assets reflected on the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities and includes any borrowings for investment purposes. Although the Company does not anticipate making significant investments in derivative financial instruments, the fair value of any such investments, which will not necessarily equal their notional value, will be included in the calculation of gross assets. For services rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears. The base management fee was initially calculated based on the value of the gross assets at the end of the first calendar quarter subsequent to the IPO, and thereafter based on the average value of the gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any share issuances or repurchases during the current calendar quarter.
The incentive fee consists of the following two parts:
The first part of the incentive fee is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose, pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the Administration Agreement to our Administrator, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-incentive fee net investment income does not include any realized capital gains, computed net of all realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-incentive fee net investment income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to a hurdle of 2.0% per quarter (8.0% annualized). The net investment income used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of the gross assets used to calculate the 1.75% base management fee. The Company pays the Investment Advisor an incentive fee with respect to the pre-incentive fee net investment income in each calendar quarter as follows:
26 |
• | no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which the pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the hurdle of 2.0%; |
• | 100% of the pre-incentive fee net investment income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle but is less than 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10.0% annualized). The Company refers to this portion of the pre-incentive fee net investment income (which exceeds the hurdle but is less than 2.5%) as the “catch-up.” The “catch-up” is meant to provide the Investment Advisor with 20% of the pre-incentive fee net investment income as if a hurdle did not apply if this net investment income exceeds 2.5% in any calendar quarter; and |
• | 20% of the amount of the pre-incentive fee net investment income, if any, that exceeds 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10.0% annualized) is payable to the Investment Advisor (once the hurdle is reached and the catch-up is achieved, 20% of all pre-incentive fee investment income thereafter is allocated to the Investment Advisor). |
As announced on January 4, 2016, the Investment Advisor has voluntarily agreed to waive all or such portion of the quarterly incentive fees earned by the Investment Advisor that would otherwise cause the Company’s quarterly net investment income to be less than the distribution payments declared by the Board. Quarterly incentive fees are earned by the Investment Advisor pursuant to the Investment Advisory Agreement. Incentive fees subject to the waiver cannot exceed the amount of incentive fees earned during the period, as calculated on a quarterly basis. The Investment Advisor will not be entitled to recoup any amount of incentive fees that it waives. The waiver was effective in the fourth quarter of 2015 and will continue unless otherwise publicly disclosed by the Company.
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and will equal 20% of our realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation on a cumulative basis, less the aggregate amount of any previously paid capital gain incentive fees with respect to each of the investments in our portfolio.
The Company will defer cash payment of the portion of any incentive fee otherwise earned by the Investment Advisor that would, when taken together with all other incentive fees paid to the Investment Advisor during the most recent 12 full calendar month period ending on or prior to the date such payment is to be made, exceed 20% of the sum of (a) the pre-incentive fee net investment income during such period, (b) the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation during such period and (c) the net realized capital gains or losses during such period. Any deferred incentive fees will be carried over for payment in subsequent calculation periods to the extent such payment is payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had incentive fees payable to the Investment Advisor of $3.9 million and $6.4 million
For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred $2.5 million and $2.7 million in base management fees, respectively. The Company incurred $1.3 million and $1.7 million in incentive fees related to pre-incentive fee net investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Investment Advisor waived incentive fees of $1.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
On September 24, 2013, the Company entered into the Administration Agreement pursuant to which the Administrator has agreed to furnish the Company with office facilities, equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities. The Administrator also performs, or oversees the performance of the required administrative services, which include, among other things, being responsible for the financial records that the Company is required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders. In addition, the Administrator assists in determining and publishing the net asset value, oversees the preparation and filing of the tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to the stockholders, and generally oversees the payment of the expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to the Company by others.
Payments under the Administration Agreement are equal to an amount based upon the allocable portion of the Administrator’s overhead in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, the fees and expenses associated with performing compliance functions and the allocable portion of the compensation of the chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, and their respective administrative support staff. Under the Administration Agreement, the Administrator will also provide on the Company’s behalf, managerial assistance to those portfolio companies that request such assistance. Unless terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, the Administration Agreement will remain in effect if approved annually by the Board. The Board most recently approved the renewal of the Administration Agreement on August 4, 2016. To the extent that the Administrator outsources any of its functions, the Company will pay the fees associated with such functions on a direct basis without any incremental profit to our Administrator. Stockholder approval is not required to amend the Administration Agreement.
For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we paid the Administrator $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the Company’s allocable portion of the Administrator’s overhead.
27 |
The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations, our Administrator and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of our Administrator’s services under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as Administrator for the Company.
Note 7. Related Party Transactions
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had the following receivables from (payables to) related parties relating to certain management fees, incentive fees, reimbursable expenses, and other payments owed to related parties (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||
CapitalSouth Corporation | $ | 143 | $ | 182 | ||||
CapitalSouth Partners Florida Sidecar Fund II, L.P. | — | (35 | ) | |||||
Capitala Investment Advisors, LLC | (3,887 | ) | (6,426 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (3,744 | ) | $ | (6,279 | ) |
These amounts are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of assets and liabilities under the captions, “Due from related parties”, “Management and incentive fee payable” and “Due to related parties.”
On August 31, 2016, the Company sold assets to FSC II in exchange for 100% of the partnership interests in FSC II. Concurrent with the sale of these assets to FSC II, the Company received cash consideration of $47.6 million from an affiliated third-party purchaser in exchange for 100% of the partnership interests of FSC II. The Company’s Board pre-approved this transaction pursuant to Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act. Capitala Advisors Corp., the Company’s administrator, also serves as the administrator to FSC II. See Note 4 for a further description of this transaction.
Note 8. Borrowings
SBA Debentures
The Company, through its two wholly owned subsidiaries, uses debenture leverage provided through the SBA to fund a portion of its investment portfolio. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company has $170.7 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. The Company has issued all SBA-guaranteed debentures that were permitted under each of the Legacy Funds’ respective SBIC licenses (as applicable), and there are no unused SBA debenture commitments remaining. SBA-guaranteed debentures are secured by a lien on all assets of Fund II and Fund III. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Fund II and Fund III had total assets of approximately $352.0 million and $349.4 million, respectively. On June 10, 2014, the Company received an exemptive order from the SEC exempting the Company, Fund II, and Fund III from certain provisions of the 1940 Act (including an exemptive order granting relief from the asset coverage requirements for certain indebtedness issued by Fund II and Fund III as SBICs) and from certain reporting requirements mandated by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to Fund II and Fund III. The Company intends to comply with the conditions of the order.
For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded $1.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in interest expense and annual charges and $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of amortization of deferred financing costs related to SBA-guaranteed debentures. The weighted average interest rate for all SBA-guaranteed debentures as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was 3.29%. In addition to the stated interest rate, the SBA also charges an annual fee on all SBA-guaranteed debentures issued, which is included in the Company’s interest expense. The weighted average annual fee for all SBA-guaranteed debentures as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 was 0.43%.
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s issued and outstanding SBA-guaranteed debentures mature as follows (dollars in thousands):
Fixed Maturity Date | Interest Rate | SBA Annual Charge | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||
March 1, 2019 | 4.620 | % | 0.941 | % | 5,000 | 5,000 | ||||||||||
September 1, 2020 | 3.215 | % | 0.285 | % | 19,000 | 19,000 | ||||||||||
March 1, 2021 | 4.084 | % | 0.515 | % | 15,700 | 15,700 | ||||||||||
March 1, 2021 | 4.084 | % | 0.285 | % | 46,000 | 46,000 | ||||||||||
March 1, 2022 | 2.766 | % | 0.285 | % | 10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||||||
March 1, 2022 | 2.766 | % | 0.515 | % | 50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||||||
March 1, 2023 | 2.351 | % | 0.515 | % | 25,000 | 25,000 | ||||||||||
$ | 170,700 | $ | 170,700 |
Notes
On June 16, 2014, the Company issued $113.4 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.125% fixed-rate notes due 2021 (the “Notes”). The Notes will mature on June 16, 2021, and may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at the Company’s option on or after June 16, 2017 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Interest was payable quarterly beginning September 16, 2014.
28 |
For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recorded $2.0 million of interest expense and $0.1 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Notes. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded $2.0 million of interest expense and $0.1 million of amortization of deferred financing costs related to the Notes.
Credit Facility
On October 17, 2014, the Company entered into a senior secured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with ING Capital, LLC, as administrative agent, arranger, and bookrunner, and the lenders party thereto. The Credit Facility currently provides for borrowings up to $120.0 million and may be increased up to $150.0 million pursuant to its “accordion” feature. The Credit Facility matures on October 17, 2018.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company’s election, at a rate per annum equal to (i) the one, two, three or six month LIBOR as applicable, plus 3.00% or (ii) 2.00% plus the highest of (A) a prime rate, (B) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5% and (C) three month LIBOR plus 1.0%. The Company’s ability to elect LIBOR indices with various tenors (e.g., one, two, three or six month LIBOR) on which the interest rates for borrowings under the Credit Facility are based, provides the company with increased flexibility to manage interest rate risks as compared to a borrowing arrangement that does not provide for such optionality. Once a particular LIBOR rate has been selected, the interest rate on the applicable amount borrowed will reset after the applicable tenor period and be based on the then applicable selected LIBOR rate (e.g., borrowings for which the Company has elected the one month LIBOR rate will reset on the one month anniversary of the period based on the then selected LIBOR rate). For any given borrowing under the Credit Facility, the Company intends to elect what it believes to be an appropriate LIBOR rate taking into account the Company’s needs at the time as well as the Company’s view of future interest rate movements. The Company will also pay an unused commitment fee at a rate of 2.50% per annum on the amount (if positive) by which 40% of the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility exceeds the outstanding amount of loans under the Credit Facility and 0.50% per annum on any remaining unused portion of the Credit Facility.
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had $44.0 million outstanding under the Credit Facility. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Company recorded $0.4 million of interest expense, $0.2 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, and $0.1 million of unused commitment fees related to the Credit Facility. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded $0.6 million of interest expense, $0.2 million of amortization of deferred financing costs, and $0.1 million of unused commitment fees related to the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility is secured by investments and cash held by Capitala Finance Corp., exclusive of assets held at our two SBIC subsidiaries. Assets pledged to secure the Credit Facility had a fair value of $227.6 million at March 31, 2017. As part of the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company may not make cash distributions with respect to any taxable year that exceed 110% (125% if the Company is not in default and its covered debt does not exceed 85% of the borrowing base) of the amounts required to be distributed to maintain eligibility as a RIC and to reduce our tax liability to zero for taxes imposed on our investment company taxable income and net capital gains.
Note 9. Directors Fees
Our independent directors receive an annual fee of $50,000. They also receive $5,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each board meeting, and also receive $5,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending each committee meeting. In addition, the chairman of the audit committee receives an annual fee of $10,000 and each chairman of any other committee receives an annual fee of $5,000 for their additional services, if any, in these capacities. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized director fee expense of $0.1 million. No compensation is expected to be paid to directors who are “interested persons” of the Company, as such term is defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
Note 10. Summarized Financial Information of Our Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
The Company holds a control interest, as defined by the 1940 Act, in five portfolio companies that are considered significant subsidiaries under the guidance in Regulation S-X, but are not consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Below is a brief description of each such portfolio company, along with summarized financial information as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.
Print Direction, Inc.
Print Direction, Inc., incorporated in Georgia on May 11, 2006, is a professional printing services firm serving customers, particularly fast food, retail, and other similar chains, throughout the U.S. Print Direction, Inc. also provides warehousing and distribution services for these customers. The income (loss) the Company generated from Print Direction, Inc., which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation), was $(2.1) million and $(0.5) million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
29 |
Navis Holdings, Inc.
Navis Holdings, Inc., incorporated in Delaware on December 21, 2010, designs and manufactures leading machinery for the global knit and woven finishing textile industries. The income the Company generated from Navis Holdings, Inc., which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) was $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
On-Site Fuel Service, Inc.
On-Site Fuel Service, Inc. is a 100% owned subsidiary of On-Site Fuel Holdings, Inc., which was incorporated in Delaware on December 19, 2011. On-Site Fuel Service, Inc. provides fueling services for commercial and government vehicle fleets throughout the southeast U.S. The income (loss) the Company generated from On-Site Fuel Service, Inc., which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation), was $0.0 million and $(1.0) million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC
CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that began operations on April 23, 2013, is a leading online provider of cable and wire management products. The income the Company generated from CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC, which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation), was $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
Eastport Holdings, LLC
Eastport Holdings, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company organized on November 1, 2011, is a holding company consisting of marketing and advertising companies located across the U.S. The income the Company generated from Eastport Holdings, LLC, which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation), was $1.7 million and $6.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
The summarized unaudited financial information of our unconsolidated subsidiaries was as follows (dollars in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet – Print Direction, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 2,379 | $ | 3,596 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 1,700 | 5,023 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 4,079 | $ | 8,619 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 4,100 | $ | 3,467 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 14,580 | 14,856 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 18,680 | $ | 18,323 | ||||
Total deficit | $ | (14,601 | ) | $ | (9,704 | ) |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations – Print Direction, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 2,730 | $ | 3,700 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 1,378 | 1,606 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,352 | $ | 2,094 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 2,667 | $ | 3,028 | ||||
Loss before income taxes | (1,315 | ) | (934 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit | (553 | ) | (392 | ) | ||||
Net loss | $ | (762 | ) | $ | (542 | ) |
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet - Navis Holdings, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 4,604 | $ | 5,006 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 3,080 | 3,448 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 7,684 | $ | 8,454 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 2,271 | $ | 2,458 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 7,001 | 7,017 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 9,272 | $ | 9,475 | ||||
Total deficit | $ | (1,588 | ) | $ | (1,021 | ) |
30 |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations - Navis Holdings, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 3,324 | $ | 2,655 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 2,047 | 1,537 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,277 | $ | 1,118 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 1,271 | $ | 1,216 | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 6 | (98 | ) | |||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | 3 | (37 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3 | $ | (61 | ) |
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet - On-Site Fuel Service, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 11,401 | $ | 12,151 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 20,144 | 17,644 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 31,545 | $ | 29,795 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 12,130 | $ | 17,911 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 27,233 | 17,929 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 39,363 | $ | 35,840 | ||||
Total deficit | $ | (7,818 | ) | $ | (6,045 | ) |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations - On-Site Fuel Service, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 36,894 | $ | 21,140 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 35,400 | 19,722 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,494 | $ | 1,418 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 3,268 | $ | 2,533 | ||||
Loss before income taxes | (1,774 | ) | (1,135 | ) | ||||
Income tax provision/(benefit) | — | — | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,774 | ) | $ | (1,135 | ) |
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet – CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 6,266 | $ | 5,837 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 9,821 | 11,402 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 16,087 | $ | 17,239 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 5,025 | $ | 4,437 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 12,003 | 12,134 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 17,028 | $ | 16,571 | ||||
Total equity (deficit) | $ | (941 | ) | $ | 668 |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations – CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 6,343 | $ | 5,314 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 4,491 | 3,462 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,852 | $ | 1,852 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 2,152 | $ | 2,119 | ||||
Loss before income taxes | (300 | ) | (267 | ) | ||||
Income tax provision/(benefit) | — | — | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (300 | ) | $ | (267 | ) |
31 |
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet – Eastport Holdings, LLC | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 102,152 | $ | 106,388 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 148,742 | 148,704 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 250,894 | $ | 255,092 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 154,337 | $ | 157,393 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 49,484 | 52,044 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 203,821 | $ | 209,437 | ||||
Total equity | $ | 47,073 | $ | 45,655 |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations – Eastport Holdings, LLC | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 148,561 | $ | 131,487 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 113,509 | 105,419 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 35,052 | $ | 26,068 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 33,836 | $ | 24,458 | ||||
Income before income taxes | 1,216 | 1,610 | ||||||
Income tax provision | 117 | 832 | ||||||
Net income | $ | 1,099 | $ | 778 |
Note 11. Earnings Per Share
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share (“ASC 260”), basic earnings per share is computed by dividing earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Other potentially dilutive common shares, and the related impact to earnings, are considered when calculating earnings per share on a diluted basis. As of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, there were no dilutive shares.
The following information sets forth the computation of the weighted average basic and diluted net increase (decrease) in net assets per share from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data):
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Basic and diluted | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | $ | 4,881 | $ | (4,189 | ) | |||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 15,873,655 | 15,785,943 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets per share from operations – basic and diluted | $ | 0.31 | $ | (0.27 | ) |
Note 12. Distributions
The Company’s distributions are recorded as payable on the declaration date. Shareholders have the option to receive payment of the distribution in cash, shares of common stock, or a combination of cash and common stock.
The following table summarizes the Company’s distribution declarations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data):
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Amount Per Share | Cash Distribution | DRIP Shares Issued | DRIP Share Value | ||||||||||||||
January 3, 2017 | January 20, 2017 | January 30, 2017 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 1,993 | 5,304 | $ | 70 | |||||||||||
January 3, 2017 | February 20, 2017 | February 27, 2017 | 0.13 | 1,993 | 5,195 | 70 | ||||||||||||||
January 3, 2017 | March 23, 2017 | March 30, 2017 | 0.13 | 1,998 | 4,948 | 67 | ||||||||||||||
Total Distributions Declared and Distributed | $ | 0.39 | $ | 5,984 | 15,447 | $ | 207 |
32 |
The following table summarizes the Company’s distribution declarations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data):
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Amount Per Share | Cash Distribution | DRIP Shares Issued | DRIP Share Value | ||||||||||||||
January 4, 2016 | January 22, 2016 | January 28, 2016 | $ | 0.1567 | $ | 2,392 | 8,135 | $ | 80 | |||||||||||
January 4, 2016 | February 19, 2016 | February 26, 2016 | 0.1567 | 2,405 | 7,076 | 70 | ||||||||||||||
January 4, 2016 | March 22, 2016 | March 30, 2016 | 0.1567 | 2,397 | 7,079 | 77 | ||||||||||||||
Total Distributions Declared and Distributed | $ | 0.47 | $ | 7,194 | 22,290 | $ | 227 |
Note 13. Financial Highlights
The following is a schedule of financial highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands, except share and per share data):
March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | |||||||
Per share data: | ||||||||
Net asset value at beginning of period | $ | 15.79 | $ | 17.04 | ||||
Net investment income (1) | 0.39 | 0.47 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments (1) | 0.31 | (0.14 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation on investments(1) | (0.29 | ) | (0.59 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized depreciation on Written Call Option(1) | (0.09 | ) | ||||||
Distributions declared from net investment income | (0.39 | ) | (0.47 | ) | ||||
Other (7) | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | ||||
Net asset value at end of period | $ | 15.71 | $ | 16.29 | ||||
Net assets at end of period | $ | 249,479 | $ | 257,419 | ||||
Shares outstanding at end of period | 15,883,492 | 15,799,635 | ||||||
Per share market value at end of period | $ | 14.36 | $ | 12.00 | ||||
Total return based on market value (2) | 11.23 | % | 3.90 | % | ||||
Ratio/Supplemental data: | ||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets (9) | 10.47 | % | 11.34 | % | ||||
Ratio of incentive fee, net of incentive fee waiver, to average net assets (6)(10) | 0.14 | % | 0.42 | % | ||||
Ratio of debt related expenses to average net assets (8) | 7.55 | % | 7.68 | % | ||||
Ratio of other operating expenses, to average net assets (8) | 5.87 | % | 5.96 | % | ||||
Ratio of total expenses, net of fee waivers to average net assets (6)(9) | 13.56 | % | 14.06 | % | ||||
Portfolio turnover rate (3) | 4.04 | % | 1.71 | % | ||||
Average debt outstanding (4) | $ | 328,138 | $ | 368,143 | ||||
Average debt outstanding per common share | $ | 20.67 | $ | 23.30 | ||||
Asset coverage ratio per unit (5) | $ | 2,585 | $ | 2,381 |
(1) | Based on daily weighted average balance of shares outstanding during the period. |
(2) | Total investment return is calculated assuming a purchase of common shares at the current market value on the first day and a sale at the current market value on the last day of the period reported. Dividends and distributions, if any, are assumed for purposes of this calculation to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Company’s DRIP. Total investment return does not reflect brokerage commissions. Total investment returns covering less than a full period are not annualized. |
(3) | Portfolio turnover rate is calculated using the lesser of year-to-date sales or year-to-date purchases over the average of the invested assets at fair value. Portfolio turnover rates that cover less than a full period are not annualized. |
(4) | Based on daily weighted average balance of debt outstanding during the period. |
(5) | Asset coverage per unit is the ratio of the carrying value of our total consolidated assets, less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to the aggregate amount of senior securities representing indebtedness. We have excluded our SBA-guaranteed debentures from the asset coverage calculation as of March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 pursuant to the exemptive relief granted by the SEC in June 2014 that permits us to exclude such debentures from the definition of senior securities in the 200% asset coverage ratio we are required to maintain under the 1940 Act. Asset coverage per unit is expressed in terms of dollar amounts per $1,000 of indebtedness. |
(6) | The ratio of waived incentive fees to average net assets was 0.38% and 0.23% for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016. |
(7) | Includes the impact of different share amounts used in calculating per share data as a result of calculating certain per share data based on weighted average shares outstanding during the period and certain per share data based on shares outstanding as of a period end or transaction date. |
33 |
(8) | Ratios are annualized. |
(9) | Ratios are annualized. Incentive fees, net of incentive fee waiver, included within the ratio are not annualized. |
(10) | Ratio is not annualized. |
Note 14. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements included herein. There have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would be required to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2017.
Distributions
On April 3, 2017, the Company’s Board declared normal monthly distributions for April, May, and June of 2017 as set forth below:
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Distributions per Share | |||||
April 3, 2017 | April 19, 2017 | April 27, 2017 | $ | 0.13 | ||||
April 3, 2017 | May 23, 2017 | May 29, 2017 | $ | 0.13 | ||||
April 3, 2017 | June 21, 2017 | June 29, 2017 | $ | 0.13 |
Portfolio Activity
On April 26, 2017, the Company received $15.0 million for its second lien debt investment in Nielsen & Bainbridge, LLC, repaid at par.
On May 1, 2017, the Company received $5.5 million for its equity investment in MJC Holdings, LLC, resulting in a realized gain of $4.5 million.
34 |
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Except as otherwise specified, references to “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”, refer to Capitala Finance Corp.
This Quarterly Report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company, our current and prospective portfolio investments, our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “may,” “continue,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “targets,” “projects,” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Some of the statements in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:
• | our future operating results; |
• | our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies; |
• | the impact of investments that we expect to make; |
• | our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties; |
• | the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest; |
• | the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives; |
• | our expected financings and investments; |
• | the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and |
• | the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies. |
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
• | an economic downturn could impair our portfolio companies’ ability to continue to operate or repay their borrowings, which could lead to the loss of some or all of our investments in such portfolio companies; |
• | a contraction of available credit and/or an inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending and investment activities; |
• | interest rate volatility could adversely affect our results, particularly if we use leverage as part of our investment strategy; and |
• | the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and levels of profitability and the availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law or U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rule or regulation.
35 |
OVERVIEW
We are a Maryland corporation that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as amended (the “1940 Act”). We are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and as such, are subject to reduced public company reporting requirements. Our investment objective is to generate both current income and capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. We are managed by Capitala Investment Advisors, LLC (the “Investment Advisor”), and Capitala Advisors Corp. (the “Administrator”) provides the administrative services necessary for us to operate.
We provide capital to lower and traditional middle-market companies in the United States, with a non-exclusive emphasis on the Southeast, Southwest and Mid-Atlantic regions. We invest primarily in companies with a history of earnings growth and positive cash flow, proven management teams, product or service with competitive advantages and industry-appropriate margins. We primarily invest in companies with between $4.5 million and $30 million in trailing twelve month earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”).
We invest in first lien, second lien, and subordinated loans. Most of our debt investments are coupled with equity interests, whether in the form of detachable “penny” warrants or equity co-investments made pari-passu with our borrowers’ financial sponsors.
As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we generally must invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets,” including securities of private or thinly traded public U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S. government securities and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. In addition, we are only allowed to borrow money such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after such borrowing, with certain limited exceptions. To maintain our regulated investment company (“RIC”) status, we must meet specified source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. To maintain our RIC tax treatment under subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, for the taxable year.
Corporate History
We commenced operations on May 24, 2013 and completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) on September 30, 2013. The Company was formed for the purpose of (i) acquiring, through a series of transactions, an investment portfolio from the following entities: CapitalSouth Partners Fund I Limited Partnership (“Fund I”); CapitalSouth Partners Fund II Limited Partnership (“Fund II”); CapitalSouth Partners Fund III, L.P. (“Fund III Parent”); CapitalSouth Partners SBIC Fund III, L.P. (“Fund III”) and CapitalSouth Partners Florida Sidecar Fund I, L.P. (“Florida Sidecar” and, collectively with Fund I, Fund II, Fund III and Fund III Parent, the “Legacy Funds”); (ii) raising capital in the IPO and (iii) continuing and expanding the business of the Legacy Funds by making additional debt and equity investments in lower middle-market and middle-market companies.
On September 24, 2013, the Company acquired 100% of the limited partnership interests in Fund II, Fund III and Florida Sidecar and each of their respective general partners, as well as certain assets from Fund I and Fund III Parent, in exchange for an aggregate of 8,974,420 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Formation Transactions”). Fund II, Fund III and Florida Sidecar became the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. Fund II and Fund III retained their SBIC licenses, and continued to hold their existing investments at the time of IPO and have continued to make new investments after the IPO. The IPO consisted of the sale of 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $20.00 per share resulting in net proceeds to the Company of $74.25 million, after deducting underwriting fees and commissions totaling $4.0 million and offering expenses totaling $1.75 million. The other costs of the IPO were borne by the limited partners of the Legacy Funds.
At the time of the Formation Transactions, our portfolio consisted of: (1) approximately $326.3 million in investments; (2) an aggregate of approximately $67.1 million in cash, interest receivable and other assets; and (3) liabilities of approximately $202.2 million of SBA-guaranteed debt payable. We have two SBIC-licensed subsidiaries that have elected to be regulated as BDCs under the 1940 Act.
Basis of Presentation
The Company is considered an investment company as defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 – Financial Services – Investment Companies (“ASC 946”).
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 6 and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying our annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been omitted. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries as described in the Formation Transactions above.
36 |
The Company’s financial statements as of March 31, 2017 are presented on a consolidated basis. The effects of all intercompany transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries (Fund II, Fund III, and Florida Sidecar) have been eliminated in consolidation. All financial data and information included in these consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis described above. In the opinion of management, the consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary for the fair presentation of financial results as of and for the periods presented.
The current period’s results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for the year. Additionally, the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on March 7, 2017.
Consolidation
As provided under Regulation S-X and ASC 946, the Company will generally not consolidate its investment in a company other than an investment company subsidiary or a controlled operating company whose business consists of providing services to the Company. Accordingly, the Company consolidated the results of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries in its consolidated financial statements. The Company did not consolidate its interest in Capitala Senior Liquid Loan Fund I, LLC (“CSLLF”) during the periods it was in existence because the investment was not considered a substantially wholly owned investment company subsidiary. Further, CSLLF was a joint venture for which shared power existed relating to the decisions that most significantly impacted the economic performance of the entity. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for description of the Company’s investment in CSLLF.
Revenues
We generate revenue primarily from the periodic cash interest we collect on our debt investments. In addition, most of our debt investments offer the opportunity to participate in a borrower’s equity performance through warrant participation, direct equity ownership or otherwise, which we expect to result in revenue in the form of dividends and/or capital gains. Further, we may generate revenue in the form of commitment, origination, amendment, structuring or diligence fees, monitoring fees, fees for providing managerial assistance and possibly consulting fees and performance-based fees. These fees will be recognized as they are earned.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses include the payment of investment advisory fees to our Investment Advisor, our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by our Administrator in performing its obligations under an administration agreement between us and the Administrator (the “Administration Agreement”) and other operating expenses as detailed below. Our investment advisory fee will compensate our Investment Advisor for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, closing, monitoring and servicing our investments. We will bear all other expenses of our operations and transactions, including (without limitation):
• | the cost of our organization; |
• | the cost of calculating our net asset value, including the cost of any third-party valuation services; |
• | the cost of effecting sales and repurchases of our shares and other securities; |
• | interest payable on debt, if any, to finance our investments; |
• | fees payable to third parties relating to, or associated with, making investments (such as legal, accounting, and travel expenses incurred in connection with making investments), including fees and expenses associated with performing due diligence reviews of prospective investments and advisory fees; |
• | transfer agent and custodial fees; |
• | fees and expenses associated with marketing efforts; |
• | costs associated with our reporting and compliance obligations under the 1940 Act, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, other applicable federal and state securities laws and ongoing stock exchange listing fees; |
• | federal, state and local taxes; |
• | independent directors’ fees and expenses; |
• | brokerage commissions; |
• | costs of proxy statements, stockholders’ reports and other communications with stockholders; |
37 |
• | fidelity bond, directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, errors and omissions liability insurance and other insurance premiums; |
• | direct costs and expenses of administration, including printing, mailing, telephone and staff; |
• | fees and expenses associated with independent audits and outside legal costs; and |
• | all other expenses incurred by either our Administrator or us in connection with administering our business, including payments under the Administration Agreement that will be based upon our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by our Administrator in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including rent, the fees and expenses associated with performing compliance functions, and our allocable portion of any costs of compensation and related expenses of our chief compliance officer and our chief financial officer and their respective administrative support staff. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
In the preparation of our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, we have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of U.S. GAAP. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. While all of these policies are important to understanding our financial statements, certain accounting policies and estimates are considered critical due to their impact on the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods covered by such financial statements. We have identified investment valuation, revenue recognition, and income taxes as our most critical accounting estimates. We continuously evaluate our estimates, including those related to the matters described below. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions we make, actual results could materially differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A discussion of our critical accounting policies follows.
Valuation of Investments
The Company applies fair value accounting to all of its financial instruments in accordance with the 1940 Act and ASC Topic 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework used to measure fair value and requires disclosures for fair value measurements. In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized its financial instruments carried at fair value, based on the priority of the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy as discussed in Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements.
In determining fair value, our board of directors (the “Board”) uses various valuation approaches, and engages a third-party independent valuation firm, which provides positive assurance on the investments it reviews. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, a fair value hierarchy for inputs is used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available.
Observable inputs are those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Board. Unobservable inputs reflect the Boards’ assumptions about the inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. The fair value hierarchy is categorized into three levels based on the inputs as follows:
Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Valuation adjustments and block discounts are not applied to Level 1 securities. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these securities does not entail a significant degree of judgment.
Level 2 — Valuations based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.
The availability of valuation techniques and observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors including the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Those estimated values do not necessarily represent the amounts that may be ultimately realized due to the occurrence of future circumstances that cannot be reasonably determined. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, those estimated values may be materially higher or lower than the values that would have been used had a market for the securities existed. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for securities categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. We use prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including periods of market dislocation. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many securities. This condition could cause a security to be reclassified to a lower level within the fair value hierarchy.
38 |
As a practical expedient, the Company used net asset value (“NAV”) as the basis for the fair value of its investment in CSLLF for the periods held. CSLLF recorded its underlying investments at fair value on a daily basis utilizing pricing information from third-party sources.
Valuation Techniques
Enterprise Value Waterfall Approach
The enterprise value waterfall approach determines an enterprise value based on EBITDA multiples of publicly traded companies that are considered similar to the subject portfolio company. The Company considers a variety of items in determining a reasonable pricing multiple, including, but not limited to, operating results, budgeted projections, growth, size, risk, profitability, leverage, management depth, diversification, market position, supplier or customer dependence, asset utilization, liquidity metrics, and access to capital markets. EBITDA of the portfolio company is adjusted for non-recurring items in order to reflect a normalized level of earnings that is representative of future earnings. In certain instances, the Company may also utilize revenue multiples to determine enterprise value. When available, the Company may assign a pricing multiple or value its equity investments based on the value of recent investment transactions in the subject portfolio company or offers to purchase the portfolio company. The enterprise value is adjusted for financial instruments with seniority to the Company’s ownership and for the effect of any instrument which may dilute the Company’s investment in the portfolio company. The adjusted enterprise value is then apportioned based on the seniority and privileges of the Company’s investments within the portfolio company.
The enterprise value waterfall approach is primarily utilized to value the Company’s equity securities, including warrants. However, the Company may utilize the enterprise value waterfall approach to value certain debt securities.
Income Approach
The income approach utilizes a discounted cash flow methodology in which the Company estimates fair value based on the present value of expected cash flows discounted at a market rate of interest. The determination of a discount rate, or required rate of return, takes into account the portfolio company’s fundamentals and perceived credit risk. Because the majority of the Company’s portfolio companies do not have a public credit rating, determining a discount rate often involves assigning an implied credit rating based on the portfolio company’s operating metrics compared to average metrics of similar publicly rated debt. Operating metrics include, but are not limited to, EBITDA, interest coverage, leverage ratio, return on capital, and debt to equity ratios. The implied credit rating is used to assign a base discount rate range based on publicly available yields on similarly rated debt securities. The Company may apply a premium to the discount rate utilized in determining fair value when performance metrics and other qualitative information indicate that there is an additional level of uncertainty about collectability of cash flows.
Asset Approach
The asset approach values an investment based on value or the underlying collateral securing the investment. This approach is used when the Company has reason to believe that it will not collect all principal and interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the debt agreement.
Revenue Recognition
The Company’s revenue recognition policies are as follows:
Interest income and paid-in-kind interest income: Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company has loans in the portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) provision. The PIK interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at maturity, is recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. PIK interest is not accrued if the Company does not expect the issuer to be able to pay all principal and interest when due.
Non-accrual investments: Generally, when interest and/or principal payments on a loan become 90 days or more past due, or when the Company otherwise does not expect the borrower to be able to service its debt and other obligations, the Company will place the loan on non-accrual status, and will generally cease recognizing interest income and PIK interest on that loan for financial reporting purposes. Interest payments received on non-accrual loans may be recognized as income or applied to principal depending upon management’s judgment. The Company writes off any previously accrued and uncollected cash interest when it is determined that interest is no longer considered collectible. The Company may elect to cease accruing PIK interest and continue accruing interest income in cases where a loan is currently paying its interest income but, in management’s judgment, there is a reasonable likelihood of principal loss on the loan. Non-accrual loans are returned to accrual status when the borrower’s financial condition improves such that management believes current interest and principal payments are expected to be collected.
Gains and losses on investment sales and paydowns: Realized gains and losses on investments are recognized using the specific identification method.
39 |
Dividend income and paid-in-kind dividends: Dividend income is recognized on the date dividends are declared. The Company holds preferred equity investments in the portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind dividend (“PIK dividends”) provision. PIK dividends, which represent contractually deferred dividends added to the equity balance, are recorded on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. The Company will typically cease accrual of PIK dividends when the fair value of the equity investment is less than the cost basis of the investment or when it is otherwise determined by management that PIK dividends are unlikely to be collected. If management determines that a decline in fair value is temporary in nature and the PIK dividends are more likely than not to be collected, management may elect to continue accruing PIK dividends.
Original issue discount/premiums: Discounts/premiums received to par on loans purchased are capitalized and accreted or amortized into income over the life of the loan. Any remaining discount/premium is accreted or amortized into income upon prepayment of the loan.
Other income: Origination fees (to the extent services are performed to earn such income), amendment fees, consent fees, and other fees associated with investments in portfolio companies are recognized as income when the investment transaction closes. Prepayment penalties received by the Company for debt instruments repaid prior to the maturity date are recorded as income upon receipt.
Income Taxes
Prior to the Formation Transactions, the Legacy Funds were treated as partnerships for U.S. federal, state and local income tax purposes and, therefore, no provision has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for federal, state or local income taxes. In accordance with the partnership tax law requirements, each partner would include their respective components of the Legacy Funds’ taxable profits or losses, as shown on their Schedule K-1 in their respective tax or information returns. The Legacy Funds are disregarded entities for tax purposes prior to and post the Formation Transactions.
The Company has elected to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and intends to comply with the requirement to qualify annually thereafter, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, among other things, intends to make the requisite distributions to its stockholders which will relieve the Company from U.S. federal income taxes. Therefore, no provision has been recorded for U.S. federal income taxes.
In order to qualify as a RIC, among other requirements, the Company is required to timely distribute to its stockholders at least 90.0% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each fiscal tax year. The Company will be subject to a nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax of 4.0% on undistributed income if it does not distribute at least 98.0% of its ordinary income in any calendar year and 98.2% of its capital gain net income for each one-year period ending on October 31.
Depending on the level of taxable income earned in an excise tax year, the Company may choose to carry forward taxable income in excess of current year dividend distributions into the next excise tax year and pay a 4.0% excise tax on such income, as required. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions for excise tax purposes, the Company accrues excise tax, if any, on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned. Since the Company’s IPO, the Company has not accrued or paid excise tax.
In accordance with certain applicable treasury regulations and private letter rulings issued by the Internal Revenue Service, a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC, subject to a limitation on the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders, which limitation must be at least 20.0% of the aggregate declared distribution. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash will receive a pro rata amount of cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in stock). In no event will any stockholder, electing to receive cash, receive less than 20.0% of his or her entire distribution in cash. If these and certain other requirements are met, for U.S federal income tax purposes, the amount of the dividend paid in stock will be equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of stock.
ASC Topic 740 — Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the consolidated financial statements. ASC 740 requires the evaluation of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions deemed to meet a “more-likely-than-not” threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current period. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no uncertain tax positions.
The Company is required to determine whether a tax position of the Company is more likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit to be recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. De-recognition of a tax benefit previously recognized could result in the Company recording a tax liability that could negatively impact the Company’s net assets.
40 |
U.S. GAAP provides guidance on thresholds, measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition that is intended to provide better financial statement comparability among different entities.
The Company has concluded that it was not necessary to record a liability for any such tax positions as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. However, the Company’s conclusions regarding this policy may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, ongoing analyses of, and changes to, tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof.
The Company’s activities from commencement of operations remain subject to examination by U.S. federal, state, and local tax authorities. No interest expense or penalties have been assessed as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. If the Company were required to recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits this would be recognized as income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Portfolio and Investment Activity
As of March 31, 2017, our portfolio consisted of investments in 51 portfolio companies with a fair value of approximately $532.5 million.
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we made approximately $21.7 million of investments and had approximately $33.0 million in repayments and sales of investments resulting in net repayments and sales of approximately $11.3 million for the period. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we made approximately $27.5 million of investments and had approximately $10.2 million in repayments and sales resulting in net investments of approximately $17.3 million for the period.
On August 31, 2016, we sold a portion of 14 securities across 10 portfolio companies to CapitalSouth Partners Florida Sidecar Fund II, L.P. (“FSC II”), including granting an option to acquire a portion of our equity investment in Eastport Holdings, LLC (the “Written Call Option”), in exchange for 100% of the partnership interests in FSC II. Concurrent with the sale of these assets to FSC II , we received cash consideration of $47.6 million from an affiliated third-party purchaser in exchange for 100% of the partnership interests of FSC II. These assets were sold to FSC II at their June 30, 2016 fair market values, resulting in net realized gain of $0.1 million. Our Board pre-approved this transaction pursuant to Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act.
The Company collected and will periodically collect principal and interest payments related to certain of the securities purchased by FSC II. Such principal and interest payments will be remitted timely to FSC II based on its proportionate share of the security. FSC II does not have any recourse to the Company related to the non-payment of principal or interest by the underlying issuers of the securities.
The Written Call Option granted FSC II the right to purchase up to 31.25% of our equity investment in Eastport Holdings, LLC. The Written Call Option has a strike price of $1.5 million and a termination date of August 31, 2018. The fair value of the Written Call Option, which has been treated as a derivative liability and is recorded in the financial statement line item Written Call Option at fair value in our consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, was approximately $4.2 million as of March 31, 2017. For purposes of determining the fair value of the Written Call Option, we calculated the difference in the fair value of the underlying equity investment in Eastport Holdings, LLC and the strike price of the Written Call Option, or intrinsic value. The time value of the Written Call Option as of March 31, 2017 was determined to be insignificant. The Written Call Option is classified as a Level 3 financial instrument.
As of March 31, 2017, our average portfolio company investment and our largest portfolio company investment at amortized cost and fair value was approximately $10.0 million and $10.4 million, and $21.7 million and $34.6 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2017, the Company had approximately $40.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2016, our average portfolio company investment and our largest portfolio company investment at amortized cost and fair value was approximately $9.7 million and $10.2 million, and $22.1 million and $29.9 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $36.3 million of cash and cash equivalents.
As of March 31, 2017, our debt investment portfolio, which represented 81.2% of our total portfolio, had a weighted average annualized yield of approximately 13.2%, exclusive of the impact of our non-accrual debt investments. As of March 31, 2017, 55.2% of our debt investment portfolio was bearing a fixed rate of interest. As of December 31, 2016, our debt investment portfolio, which represented 82.8% of our total portfolio, had a weighted average annualized yield of approximately 13.2%, exclusive of the impact of our non-accrual debt investments. As of December 31, 2016, 57.1% of our debt investment portfolio was bearing a fixed rate of interest.
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and the fair value of investments and cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2017 (dollars in thousands):
Investments at Amortized Cost | Amortized Cost Percentage of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||
First Lien Debt | $ | 256,542 | 46.7 | % | $ | 235,864 | 41.1 | % | ||||||||
Second Lien Debt | 63,729 | 11.6 | 60,661 | 10.6 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt | 135,714 | 24.7 | 135,606 | 23.7 | ||||||||||||
Equity and Warrants | 53,301 | 9.7 | 100,347 | 17.5 | ||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 40,564 | 7.3 | 40,564 | 7.1 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 549,850 | 100.0 | % | $ | 573,042 | 100.0 | % |
41 |
The following table summarizes the amortized cost and the fair value of investments and cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
Investments at Amortized Cost | Amortized Cost Percentage of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||
First Lien Debt | $ | 244,647 | 44.5 | % | $ | 226,578 | 39.2 | % | ||||||||
Second Lien Debt | 74,559 | 13.5 | 71,483 | 12.3 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt | 148,849 | 27.1 | 150,232 | 26.0 | ||||||||||||
Equity and Warrants | 45,721 | 8.3 | 93,346 | 16.2 | ||||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents | 36,281 | 6.6 | 36,281 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 550,057 | 100.0 | % | $ | 577,920 | 100.0 | % |
The following table shows the portfolio composition by industry grouping at fair value (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Investments at Fair Value | Percentage of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Percentage of Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||
Business Services | $ | 58,284 | 10.9 | % | $ | 51,731 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
Financial Services | 43,954 | 8.3 | 25,553 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Products | 30,465 | 5.7 | 30,209 | 5.6 | ||||||||||||
Information Technology | 24,273 | 4.6 | 24,232 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||
Specialty Retail | 21,693 | 4.1 | 22,067 | 4.1 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Electronics | 20,245 | 3.8 | 20,818 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||
Footwear Retail | 19,260 | 3.6 | 19,236 | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
Building Products | 18,267 | 3.4 | 18,152 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Oil & Gas Services | 16,693 | 3.1 | 15,083 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
Food Product Manufacturer | 16,552 | 3.1 | 16,599 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
Sales & Marketing Services | 15,722 | 3.0 | 16,376 | 3.0 | ||||||||||||
Home Décor Manufacturer | 15,000 | 2.8 | 14,670 | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
Retail | 15,000 | 2.8 | 15,000 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
Bowling Products | 13,325 | 2.5 | 12,503 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
Textile Equipment Manufacturer | 12,986 | 2.4 | 13,134 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||
Transportation | 12,982 | 2.4 | 16,856 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||
Farming | 12,695 | 2.4 | 11,779 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Computer Supply Retail | 12,001 | 2.3 | 12,183 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Fuel Transportation Services | 11,485 | 2.2 | 10,303 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
Industrial Equipment Rental | 10,560 | 2.0 | 10,755 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Healthcare Management | 10,544 | 2.0 | 10,851 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Bakery Supplies Distributor | 10,500 | 2.0 | 10,776 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Printing Services | 10,187 | 1.9 | 12,761 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||
Automobile Part Manufacturer | 10,135 | 1.9 | 10,076 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
Construction Services | 9,500 | 1.8 | 9,500 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
Professional and Personal Digital Imaging | 8,974 | 1.7 | 9,000 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
Healthcare | 8,649 | 1.6 | 8,582 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
QSR Franchisor | 8,581 | 1.6 | 8,497 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
Conglomerate | 8,457 | 1.6 | 8,374 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Produce Distribution | 6,150 | 1.2 | 6,182 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||
Oil & Gas Engineering and Consulting Services | 5,714 | 1.1 | 4,500 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Specialty Clothing | 5,011 | 0.9 | 5,011 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Restaurant | 4,862 | 0.9 | 4,857 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Medical Device Distributor | 4,791 | 0.9 | 25,768 | 4.8 | ||||||||||||
Online Merchandise Retailer | 4,115 | 0.8 | 4,169 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Advertising & Marketing Services | 3,925 | 0.7 | 3,910 | 0.7 | ||||||||||||
Replacement Window Manufacturer | 2,756 | 0.5 | 2,571 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Automotive Chemicals & Lubricants | 2,398 | 0.5 | 2,230 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Specialty Defense Contractor | 1,532 | 0.3 | 1,532 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Home Repair Parts Manufacturer | 1,408 | 0.3 | 1,408 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||
Data Processing & Digital Marketing | 1,016 | 0.2 | 1,015 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Household Product Manufacturer | 1,001 | 0.2 | 1,001 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Retail Display & Security Services | 537 | 0.1 | 537 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
In-Home Healthcare Services | 200 | 0.0 | 446 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Dental Practice Management | 93 | 0.0 | 109 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||
Satellite Communications | — | — | 5,000 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Industrial Specialty Services | — | — | 4,750 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
Entertainment | — | — | 987 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 532,478 | 100.0 | % | $ | 541,639 | 100.0 | % |
42 |
With the exception of the international investment holdings noted below, all investments made by the Company as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were made in portfolio companies located in the U.S. The geographic composition is determined by the location of the corporate headquarters of the portfolio company, which may not be indicative of the primary source of the portfolio company’s business. The following table shows the portfolio composition by geographic region at fair value as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Investments at Fair Value | Percentage of Total Portfolio | Investments at Fair Value | Percentage of Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||
South | $ | 255,747 | 48.0 | % | $ | 257,162 | 47.5 | % | ||||||||
Midwest | 118,743 | 22.3 | 118,682 | 21.9 | ||||||||||||
West | 99,414 | 18.7 | 85,642 | 15.8 | ||||||||||||
Northeast | 47,620 | 8.9 | 68,613 | 12.7 | ||||||||||||
International | 10,954 | 2.1 | 11,540 | 2.1 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 532,478 | 100.0 | % | $ | 541,639 | 100.0 | % |
In addition to various risk management tools, our Investment Advisor also uses an investment rating system to characterize and monitor our expected level of return on each investment in our portfolio.
As part of our valuation procedures, we risk rate all of our investments. In general, our investment rating system uses a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being the lowest probability of default and principal loss. Our internal rating is not an exact system, but it is used internally to estimate the probability of: (i) default on our debt securities and (ii) loss of our debt principal, in the event of a default. In general, our internal rating system may also assist our valuation team in its determination of the estimated fair value of equity securities or equity-like securities. Our internal risk rating system generally encompasses both qualitative and quantitative aspects of our portfolio companies.
Our internal investment rating system incorporates the following five categories:
Investment Rating |
Definition | |
1 | In general, the investment may be performing above our internal expectations. Full return of principal and interest is expected. Capital gain is expected. | |
2 | In general, the investment may be performing within our internal expectations, and potential risks to the applicable investment are considered to be neutral or favorable compared to any potential risks at the time of the original investment. All new investments are initially given this rating. | |
3 | In general, the investment may be performing below our internal expectations and therefore, investments in this category may require closer internal monitoring; however, the valuation team believes that no loss of investment return (interest and/or dividends) or principal is expected. The investment also may be out of compliance with certain financial covenants. | |
4 | In general, the investment may be performing below internal expectations and quantitative or qualitative risks may have increased substantially since the original investment. Loss of some or all principal is expected. | |
5 | In general, the investment may be performing substantially below our internal expectations and a number of quantitative or qualitative risks may have increased substantially since the original investment. Loss of some or all principal is expected. |
Our Investment Advisor will monitor and, when appropriate, change the investment ratings assigned to each investment in our portfolio. In connection with our valuation process, our Investment Advisor will review these investment ratings on a quarterly basis, and our Board will affirm such ratings. The investment rating of a particular investment should not, however, be deemed to be a guarantee of the investment’s future performance.
43 |
The following table shows the distribution of our investments on the 1 to 5 investment performance rating scale at fair value as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
As of March 31, 2017 | As of December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Investment Performance Rating | Investments at Fair Value | Percentage of Total Investments | Investments at Fair Value | Percentage of Total Investments | ||||||||||||
1 | $ | 171,219 | 32.2 | % | $ | 183,826 | 33.9 | % | ||||||||
2 | 213,213 | 40.0 | 215,058 | 39.7 | ||||||||||||
3 | 128,091 | 24.1 | 125,381 | 23.2 | ||||||||||||
4 | 19,955 | 3.7 | 17,374 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
5 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 532,478 | 100.0 | % | $ | 541,639 | 100.0 | % |
As of March 31, 2017, we had debt investments in 3 portfolio companies on non-accrual status with an amortized cost of $30.7 million and a fair value of $18.7 million, which represented 6.0% and 3.5% of the investment portfolio, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, we had debt investments in three portfolio companies on non-accrual status with amortized cost of $29.5 million and a fair value of $17.4 million, which represented 5.7% and 3.2% of the investment portfolio, respectively.
Capitala Senior Liquid Loan Fund I, LLC
On March 24, 2015, the Company and Trinity Universal Insurance Company (“Trinity”), a subsidiary of Kemper Corporation (“Kemper”), entered into a limited liability company agreement to co-manage CSLLF. The purpose and design of the joint venture was to invest primarily in broadly syndicated senior secured loans to middle-market companies, which were purchased on the secondary market. Capitala and Trinity committed to provide $25.0 million of equity to CSLLF, with Capitala providing $20.0 million and Trinity providing $5.0 million, resulting in an 80%/20% economic ownership between the two parties. The board of directors and investment committee of CSLLF were split 50/50 between Trinity and Capitala, resulting in equal voting power between the two entities. In September 2016, the Company and Trinity elected to wind-down operations of CSLLF. During the fourth quarter of 2016, CSLLF sold all referenced assets underlying the total return swap (“TRS”) and declared final distributions, inclusive of dividends and return of capital, in December 2016. Because the TRS was wound down in a prior period, only comparative period disclosures are included herein. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, we received 0.5 million in dividend income from our equity interest in CSLLF.
On March 27, 2015, CSLLF entered into a TRS with Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) that was indexed to a basket of senior secured loans purchased by CSLLF. CSLLF obtained the economic benefit of the loans underlying the TRS, including the net interest spread between the interest income generated by the underlying loans and the interest expense type payment under the TRS, the realized gain (loss) on liquidated loans, and the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the underlying loans.
The terms of the TRS were governed by an ISDA 2002 Master Agreement, the Schedule thereto, and Credit Support Annex to such Schedule, and the confirmation exchanged thereunder, between CSLLF and Bank of America, which collectively established the TRS, and are collectively referred to herein as the “TRS Agreement.” Pursuant to the terms of the TRS Agreement, CSLLF selected a portfolio of loans with a maximum market value (determined at the time each such loan becomes subject to the TRS) of $100.0 million, which was also referred to as the maximum notional amount of the TRS. Each individual loan, and the portfolio of loans taken as a whole, had to meet criteria described in the TRS Agreement. CSLLF received from Bank of America, a periodic payment on set dates that was based upon any coupons, both earned and accrued, generated by the loans underlying the TRS, subject to limitations described in the TRS Agreement as well as any fees associated with the loans included in the portfolio. CSLLF paid to Bank of America interest at a rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.25% per annum; the LIBOR option paid by CSLLF was determined on an asset by asset basis such that the tenor of the LIBOR option (1 month, 3 month, etc.) matched the tenor of the underlying reference asset. In addition, upon the termination of any loan subject to the TRS or any repayment of the underlying reference asset, CSLLF either received from Bank of America the appreciation in the value of such loan, or paid to Bank of America any depreciation in the value of such loan.
CSLLF was required to pay an unused facility fee of 1.25% on any amount of unused facility under the minimum facility amount of $70.0 million as outlined in the TRS Agreement. Such unused facility fees were not applied during the first 4 months and last 60 days of the term of the TRS. CSLLF also agreed to pay Bank of America customary fees and expenses in connection with the establishment and maintenance of the TRS.
CSLLF was required to initially cash collateralize a specified percentage of each loan (generally 20% to 35% of the market value of senior secured loans) included under the TRS in accordance with margin requirements described in the TRS Agreement. As of December 31, 2016, CSLLF has posted $0.0 million in collateral to Bank of America in relation to the TRS which is recorded on CSLLF’s statements of assets and liabilities as cash held as collateral on total return swap. CSLLF may be required to post additional collateral as a result of a decline in the mark-to-market value of the portfolio of loans subject to the TRS. The cash collateral represents CSLLF’s maximum credit exposure as of December 31, 2016.
In connection with the TRS, CSLLF has made customary representations and warranties and is required to comply with various covenants, reporting requirements and other customary requirements for similar transactions governed by an ISDA 2002 Master Agreement.
44 |
CSLLF’s receivable due on the TRS represents realized amounts from payments on underlying loans in the total return swap portfolio. At December 31, 2016, the receivable due on TRS was $0.1 million, respectively, and is recorded on CSLLF’s statements of assets and liabilities below. CSLLF does not offset collateral posted in relation to the TRS with any unrealized appreciation or depreciation outstanding in the statements of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2016.
Transactions in TRS contracts during the three months ended March 31, 2016 resulted in $0.7 million in realized gains and $0.8 million in unrealized appreciation, which is recorded on CSLLF’s statements of operations below.
The following represents the volume of the CSLLF’s derivative transactions during the three months ended March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 | ||||
Average notional par amount of contract | $ | 78,203 |
Below is certain summarized financial information for CSLLF as of December 31, 2016 and for the three months ended March 31, 2016 (dollars in thousands):
As of December 31, 2016 | ||||
ASSETS | ||||
Receivable due on Total Return Swap | $ | 82 | ||
Total assets | $ | 82 | ||
LIABILITIES | ||||
Distribution payable | $ | 82 | ||
Total liabilities | $ | 82 | ||
NET ASSETS | ||||
Total net assets | $ | — | ||
Total liabilities and net assets | $ | 82 |
For the Three Months Ended | ||||
March 31, 2016 | ||||
Administrative and legal expenses | $ | (30 | ) | |
Net operating loss | $ | (30 | ) | |
Net realized gain on Total Return Swap | $ | 726 | ||
Net unrealized appreciation on Total Return Swap | 757 | |||
NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS | $ | 1,453 |
Results of Operations
Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | |||||||
Total investment income | $ | 14,815 | $ | 17,449 | ||||
Total expenses, net of fee waivers | 8,624 | 10,028 | ||||||
Net investment income | 6,191 | 7,421 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) from investments | 4,846 | (2,262 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | (4,671 | ) | (9,348 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized depreciation on written call option | (1,485 | ) | — | |||||
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ | 4,881 | $ | (4,189 | ) |
45 |
Investment income
The composition of our investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | |||||||
Interest income | $ | 11,998 | $ | 14,099 | ||||
Fee Income | 672 | 865 | ||||||
Payment-in-kind interest and dividend income | 1,655 | 1,204 | ||||||
Dividend income | 477 | 1,279 | ||||||
Interest from cash and cash equivalents | 13 | 2 | ||||||
Total investment income | $ | 14,815 | $ | 17,449 |
The income reported as interest income and PIK interest and dividend income is generally based on the stated rates as disclosed in our consolidated schedule of investments. Accretion/(amortization) of discounts and premiums paid for purchased loans are included in interest income as an adjustment to yield. As a general rule, our interest income and PIK interest and dividend income is recurring in nature.
We also generate fee income primarily through origination fees charged for new investments, and secondarily via amendment fees, consent fees, prepayment penalties, and other fees. While the fee income is typically non-recurring for each investment, most of our new investments include an origination fee; as such, fee income is dependent upon our volume of directly originated investments and the fee structure associated with those investments.
We earn dividends on certain equity investments within our investment portfolio. As noted in our consolidated schedule of investments, some investments are scheduled to pay a periodic dividend, though these recurring dividends do not make up a significant portion of our total investment income. We may and have received more substantial one-time dividends from our equity investments as part of dividend recapitalizations.
For the three months ended March 31, 2017, total investment income decreased by $2.6 million, or 15.1%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. The period over period decline was driven primarily by a $2.1 million decline in interest income due to less average investments outstanding. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, fee income decreased $0.2 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, we generated $0.4 million in origination fees from new deployments and $0.3 million in non-origination fees. Comparatively, for the three months ended March 31, 2016, we generated $0.7 million in origination fees from new deployments and $0.2 million in non-origination fees. Dividend income decreased from $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016, to $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The decrease in dividend income was driven primarily by the wind-down of CSLLF which did not pay a dividend for the three months ended March 31, 2017, but paid a dividend of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016.
Operating expenses
The composition of our expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 was as follows (dollars in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | |||||||
Interest and financing expenses | $ | 4,653 | $ | 5,023 | ||||
Base management fees | 2,514 | 2,728 | ||||||
Incentive fees, net of incentive fee waiver | 350 | 1,109 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | 1,107 | 1,168 | ||||||
Total expenses, net of fee waivers | $ | 8,624 | $ | 10,028 |
For the three months ended March 31, 2017, operating expenses decreased $1.4 million, or 14.0%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease from the prior period was driven primarily from a $0.8 million decline in incentive fees, net of incentive fee waiver, a $0.4 million decline in interest and financing expenses due to lower outstanding borrowings during the period, and a $0.2 million decline in management fees due to less average assets outstanding during the period.
46 |
Net realized gains (losses) on sales of investments
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 we recognized $4.8 million and $(2.3) million, respectively, of net realized gains/(losses) on our portfolio investments.
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and on Written Call Option
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments reflects the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, we had net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments of $(4.7) million and $(9.3) million, respectively.
For the three months ended March 31, 2017, we had net unrealized depreciation on the Written Call Option of $(1.5) million. As previously noted, unrealized depreciation on the Written Call Option is based on the change in fair value of the underlying equity investment in Eastport Holdings, LLC less the strike price of the Written Call Option.
Changes in net assets resulting from operations
For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, we recorded a net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations of $4.9 million and $(4.2) million, respectively. Based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, our per share net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations was $0.31 and $(0.27), respectively.
Summarized Financial Information of Our Unconsolidated Subsidiaries
The Company holds a control interest, as defined by the 1940 Act, in five portfolio companies that are considered significant subsidiaries under the guidance in Regulation S-X, but are not consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Below is a brief description of each such portfolio company, along with summarized financial information as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.
Print Direction, Inc.
Print Direction, Inc., incorporated in Georgia on May 11, 2006, is a professional printing services firm serving customers, particularly fast food, retail, and other similar chains, throughout the U.S. Print Direction, Inc. also provides warehousing and distribution services for these customers. The income (loss) the Company generated from Print Direction, Inc., which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation), was $(2.1) million and $(0.5) million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
Navis Holdings, Inc.
Navis Holdings, Inc., incorporated in Delaware on December 21, 2010, designs and manufactures leading machinery for the global knit and woven finishing textile industries. The income the Company generated from Navis Holdings, Inc., which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) was $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
On-Site Fuel Service, Inc.
On-Site Fuel Service, Inc. is a 100% owned subsidiary of On-Site Fuel Holdings, Inc., which was incorporated in Delaware on December 19, 2011. On-Site Fuel Service, Inc. provides fueling services for commercial and government vehicle fleets throughout the southeast U.S. The income (loss) the Company generated from On-Site Fuel Service, Inc., which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation), was $0.0 million and $(1.0) million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC
CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that began operations on April 23, 2013, is a leading online provider of cable and wire management products. The income the Company generated from CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC, which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation), was $0.2 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
47 |
Eastport Holdings, LLC
Eastport Holdings, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company organized on November 1, 2011, is a holding company consisting of marketing and advertising companies located across the U.S. The income the Company generated from Eastport Holdings, LLC, which includes all interest, dividends, PIK interest and dividends, fees, and unrealized appreciation (depreciation), was $1.7 million and $6.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.
The summarized unaudited financial information of our unconsolidated subsidiaries was as follows (dollars in thousands):
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet – Print Direction, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 2,379 | $ | 3,596 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 1,700 | 5,023 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 4,079 | $ | 8,619 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 4,100 | $ | 3,467 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 14,580 | 14,856 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 18,680 | $ | 18,323 | ||||
Total deficit | $ | (14,601 | ) | $ | (9,704 | ) |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations – Print Direction, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 2,730 | $ | 3,700 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 1,378 | 1,606 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,352 | $ | 2,094 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 2,667 | $ | 3,028 | ||||
Loss before income taxes | (1,315 | ) | (934 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit | (553 | ) | (392 | ) | ||||
Net loss | $ | (762 | ) | $ | (542 | ) |
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet - Navis Holdings, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 4,604 | $ | 5,006 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 3,080 | 3,448 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 7,684 | $ | 8,454 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 2,271 | $ | 2,458 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 7,001 | 7,017 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 9,272 | $ | 9,475 | ||||
Total deficit | $ | (1,588 | ) | $ | (1,021 | ) |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations - Navis Holdings, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 3,324 | $ | 2,655 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 2,047 | 1,537 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,277 | $ | 1,118 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 1,271 | $ | 1,216 | ||||
Income (loss) before income taxes | 6 | (98 | ) | |||||
Income tax provision (benefit) | 3 | (37 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 3 | $ | (61 | ) |
48 |
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet - On-Site Fuel Service, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 11,401 | $ | 12,151 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 20,144 | 17,644 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 31,545 | $ | 29,795 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 12,130 | $ | 17,911 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 27,233 | 17,929 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 39,363 | $ | 35,840 | ||||
Total deficit | $ | (7,818 | ) | $ | (6,045 | ) |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations - On-Site Fuel Service, Inc. | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 36,894 | $ | 21,140 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 35,400 | 19,722 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,494 | $ | 1,418 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 3,268 | $ | 2,533 | ||||
Loss before income taxes | (1,774 | ) | (1,135 | ) | ||||
Income tax provision/(benefit) | — | — | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (1,774 | ) | $ | (1,135 | ) |
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet – CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 6,266 | $ | 5,837 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 9,821 | 11,402 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 16,087 | $ | 17,239 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 5,025 | $ | 4,437 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 12,003 | 12,134 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 17,028 | $ | 16,571 | ||||
Total equity | $ | (941 | ) | $ | 668 |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations – CableOrganizer Holdings, LLC | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 6,343 | $ | 5,314 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 4,491 | 3,462 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 1,852 | $ | 1,852 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 2,152 | $ | 2,119 | ||||
Loss before income taxes | (300 | ) | (267 | ) | ||||
Income tax provision/(benefit) | — | — | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (300 | ) | $ | (267 | ) |
As of | ||||||||
Balance Sheet – Eastport Holdings, LLC | March 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||
Current assets | $ | 102,152 | $ | 106,388 | ||||
Noncurrent assets | 148,742 | 148,704 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 250,894 | $ | 255,092 | ||||
Current liabilities | $ | 154,337 | $ | 157,393 | ||||
Noncurrent liabilities | 49,484 | 52,044 | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 203,821 | $ | 209,437 | ||||
Total equity | $ | 47,073 | $ | 45,655 |
49 |
For the three months ended | ||||||||
Statements of Operations – Eastport Holdings, LLC | March 31, 2017 | March 31, 2016 | ||||||
Net sales | $ | 148,561 | $ | 131,487 | ||||
Cost of goods sold | 113,509 | 105,419 | ||||||
Gross profit | $ | 35,052 | $ | 26,068 | ||||
Other expenses | $ | 33,836 | $ | 24,458 | ||||
Income before income taxes | 1,216 | 1,610 | ||||||
Income tax provision | 117 | 832 | ||||||
Net Income | $ | 1,099 | $ | 778 |
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
We use and intend to use existing cash primarily to originate investments in new and existing portfolio companies, pay distributions to our shareholders, and repay indebtedness.
On September 30, 2013, we issued 4,000,000 shares at $20.00 per share in our IPO, yielding net proceeds of $74.25 million. On June 16, 2014, we issued $113.4 million in aggregate principal amount of 7.125% fixed-rate notes (the “Notes”), yielding net proceeds of $109.1 million after underwriting costs. The Notes will mature on June 16, 2021, and may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option on or after June 17, 2017 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.125% per year payable quarterly on March 16, June 16, September 16, and December 16 of each year, beginning on September 16, 2014. The Notes are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “CLA” with a par value $25.00 per share.
On October 17, 2014, we entered into a senior secured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with ING Capital, LLC, as administrative agent, arranger, and bookrunner, and the lenders party thereto. The Credit Facility currently provides for borrowings up to $120.0 million and may be increased up to $150.0 million pursuant to its “accordion” feature. The Credit Facility matures on October 17, 2018. As of March 31, 2017, we had $44.0 million outstanding and $76.0 million available under the Credit Facility.
On April 13, 2015, we completed an underwritten offering of 3,500,000 shares of its common stock at a public offering price of $18.32 per share. The total proceeds received in the offering net of underwriting discounts and offering costs were approximately $61.7 million.
Including the net proceeds from our IPO on September 30, 2013, we have raised approximately $245.0 million in net proceeds from debt and equity offerings and obtained credit availability through our Credit Facility of $120.0 million through March 31, 2017.
As of March 31, 2017, Fund II had $26.2 million in regulatory capital and $20.7 million in SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding and Fund III had $75.0 million in regulatory capital and $150.0 million in SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. In addition to our existing SBA-guaranteed debentures, we may, if permitted by regulation, seek to issue additional SBA-guaranteed debentures as well as other forms of leverage and borrow funds to make investments. On June 10, 2014, we received an exemptive order from the SEC exempting us, Fund II and Fund III from certain provisions of the 1940 Act (including an exemptive order granting relief from the asset coverage requirements for certain indebtedness issued by Fund II and Fund III as SBICs) and from certain reporting requirements mandated by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to Fund II and Fund III. We intend to comply with the conditions of the order.
As of March 31, 2017, we had $40.6 million in cash and cash equivalents, and our net assets totaled $249.5 million.
Contractual obligations
We have entered into two contracts under which we have material future commitments: the Investment Advisory Agreement, pursuant to which the Investment Advisor serves as our investment adviser, and the Administration Agreement, pursuant to which our Administrator agrees to furnish us with certain administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations. Payments under the Investment Advisory Agreement in future periods will be equal to: (1) a percentage of the value of our gross assets; and (2) an incentive fee based on our performance. Payments under the Administration Agreement will occur on an ongoing basis as expenses are incurred on our behalf by our Administrator.
The Investment Advisory Agreement and the Administration Agreement are each terminable by either party without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other. If either of these agreements is terminated, the costs we incur under new agreements may increase. In addition, we will likely incur significant time and expense in locating alternative parties to provide the services we expect to receive under both our Investment Advisory Agreement and our Administration Agreement. Any new investment advisory agreement would also be subject to approval by our stockholders.
50 |
A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations as of March 31, 2017 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Contractual Obligations Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than 1 Year | 1 – 3 Years | 3 – 5 Years | More Than 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
SBA Debentures | $ | — | $ | 5,000 | $ | 140,700 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 170,700 | ||||||||||
Notes | — | — | 113,438 | — | 113,438 | |||||||||||||||
Credit Facility | — | 44,000 | — | — | 44,000 | |||||||||||||||
Total Contractual Obligations | $ | — | $ | 49,000 | $ | 254,138 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 328,138 |
Distributions
In order to qualify as a RIC and to avoid corporate-level U.S. federal income tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our net ordinary income and our net short-term capital gains in excess of net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis. Additionally, we must distribute an amount at least equal to the sum of 98% of our net ordinary income (during the calendar year) plus 98.2% of our net capital gain income (during each 12-month period ending on October 31) plus any net ordinary income and capital gain net income for preceding years that were not distributed during such years and on which we paid no U.S. federal income tax to avoid a U.S. federal excise tax. We made quarterly distributions to our stockholders for the first four full quarters subsequent to our IPO. To the extent we have income available, we have made and intend to make monthly distributions thereafter. Our monthly stockholder distributions, if any, will be determined by our Board on a quarterly basis. Any distribution to our stockholders will be declared out of assets legally available for distribution.
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of our distributions from time to time, and from time to time we may decrease the amount of our distributions. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the asset coverage requirements applicable to us as a BDC under the 1940 Act. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including the possible loss of our qualification as a RIC. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions.
To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a return of capital to our stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, the source of a distribution to our stockholders may be the original capital invested by the stockholder rather than our income or gains. Stockholders should read any written disclosure accompanying any stockholder distribution carefully and should not assume that the source of any distribution is our ordinary income or capital gains.
We have adopted an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a distribution, then stockholders’ cash distributions will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock unless a stockholder specifically “opts out” of our DRIP. If a stockholder opts out, that stockholder will receive cash distributions. Although distributions paid in the form of additional shares of our common stock will generally be subject to U.S. federal, state and local taxes in the same manner as cash distributions, stockholders participating in our DRIP will not receive any corresponding cash distributions with which to pay any such applicable taxes.
The following tables summarize our distributions declared from January 2, 2015 to March 31, 2017:
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Amount Per Share | |||||
January 3, 2017 | January 20, 2017 | January 30, 2017 | $ | 0.13 | ||||
January 3, 2017 | February 20, 2017 | February 27, 2017 | 0.13 | |||||
January 3, 2017 | March 23, 2017 | March 30, 2017 | 0.13 | |||||
Total Distributions Declared and Distributed | $ | 0.39 |
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Amount Per Share | |||||
January 4, 2016 | January 22, 2016 | January 28, 2016 | $ | 0.1567 | ||||
January 4, 2016 | February 19, 2016 | February 26, 2016 | 0.1567 | |||||
January 4, 2016 | March 22, 2016 | March 30, 2016 | 0.1567 | |||||
April 1, 2016 | April 22, 2016 | April 28, 2016 | 0.1567 | |||||
April 1, 2016 | May 23, 2016 | May 30, 2016 | 0.1567 | |||||
April 1, 2016 | June 21, 2016 | June 29, 2016 | 0.1567 | |||||
July 1, 2016 | July 22, 2016 | July 29, 2016 | 0.1567 | |||||
July 1, 2016 | August 22, 2016 | August 30, 2016 | 0.1567 | |||||
July 1, 2016 | September 22, 2016 | September 29, 2016 | 0.1567 | |||||
September 22, 2016 | October 21, 2016 | October 28, 2016 | 0.1300 | |||||
September 22, 2016 | November 21, 2016 | November 29, 2016 | 0.1300 | |||||
September 22, 2016 | December 21, 2016 | December 29, 2016 | 0.1300 | |||||
Total Distributions Declared and Distributed | $ | 1.80 |
51 |
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Amount Per Share | |||||
January 2, 2015 | January 22, 2015 | January 29, 2015 | $ | 0.1567 | ||||
January 2, 2015 | February 20, 2015 | February 26, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
January 2, 2015 | March 23, 2015 | March 30, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | March 23, 2015 (1) | March 30, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | April 23, 2015 (1) | April 29, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | May 21, 2015 (1) | May 28, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | June 22, 2015 (1) | June 29, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | July 23, 2015 (1) | July 30, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | August 21, 2015 (1) | August 28, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | September 23, 2015 (1) | September 29, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | October 23, 2015 (1) | October 29, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | November 20, 2015 (1) | November 27, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
February 26, 2015 | December 22, 2015 (1) | December 30, 2015 | 0.0500 | |||||
April 1, 2015 | April 23, 2015 | April 29, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
April 1, 2015 | May 21, 2015 | May 28, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
April 1, 2015 | June 22, 2015 | June 29, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
July 1, 2015 | July 23, 2015 | July 30, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
July 1, 2015 | August 21, 2015 | August 28, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
July 1, 2015 | September 23, 2015 | September 29, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
October 1, 2015 | October 23, 2015 | October 29, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
October 1, 2015 | November 20, 2015 | November 27, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
October 1, 2015 | December 22, 2015 | December 30, 2015 | 0.1567 | |||||
Total Distributions Declared and Distributed | $ | 2.38 |
(1) | On February 26, 2015, the Company’s Board declared a special distribution of $0.50 per share of the Company’s common stock, which was paid monthly over the remainder of 2015. |
Related Parties
We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with the Investment Advisor. Mr. Alala, our chief executive officer and chairman of our Board, is the managing partner and chief investment officer of the Investment Advisor, and Mr. Broyhill, a member of our Board, has an indirect controlling interest in the Investment Advisor.
In addition, an affiliate of the Investment Advisor also manages CapitalSouth Partners SBIC Fund IV, L.P. (“Fund IV”); a private investment limited partnership providing financing solutions to smaller and lower middle-market companies that had its first closing in March 2013 and obtained SBA approval for its SBIC license in April 2013. In addition to Fund IV, affiliates of the Investment Advisor may manage several affiliated funds whereby institutional limited partners in Fund IV have the opportunity to co-invest with Fund IV in portfolio investments. An affiliate of the Investment Advisor also manages Capitala Private Credit Fund V, L.P. (“Fund V”); a private investment limited partnership providing financing solutions to the lower middle-market and traditional middle-market. The Investment Advisor and its affiliates may also manage other funds in the future that may have investment mandates that are similar, in whole and in part, with ours. To the extent permitted by the 1940 Act and interpretation of the SEC staff, the Investment Advisor and its affiliates may determine that an investment is appropriate for us and for one or more of those other funds. In such event, depending on the availability of such investment and other appropriate factors, the Investment Advisor or its affiliates may determine that we should invest side-by-side with one or more other funds. Any such investments will be made only to the extent permitted by applicable law and interpretive positions of the SEC and its staff, and consistent with the Investment Advisor’s allocation procedures. We do not expect to make co-investments, or otherwise compete for investment opportunities, with Fund IV because its focus and investment strategy differ from our own. However, we do expect to make co-investments with Fund V given its similar investment strategy.
On September 10, 2015, we, Fund II, Fund III, Fund V, and the Investment Advisor filed an application for exemptive relief with the SEC to permit an investment fund and one or more other affiliated investment funds, including future affiliated investment funds, to participate in the same investment opportunities through a proposed co-investment program where such participation would otherwise be prohibited under the 1940 Act. On June 1, 2016, the SEC issued an order permitting this relief. This exemptive relief is subject to certain conditions designed to ensure that the participation by one investment fund in a co-investment transaction would not be on a basis different from or less advantageous than that of other affiliated investment funds.
On August 31, 2016, the Company sold assets to FSC II in exchange for 100% of the partnership interests in FSC II. Concurrent with the sale of these assets to FSC II, the Company received cash consideration of $47.6 million from an affiliated third-party purchaser in exchange for 100% of the partnership interests of FSC II. The Company’s Board pre-approved this transaction pursuant to Section 57(f) of the 1940 Act. Capitala Advisors Corp., the Company’s administrator, also serves as the administrator to FSC II.
52 |
We have entered into a license agreement with the Investment Advisor, pursuant to which the Investment Advisor has agreed to grant us a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Capitala.”We have entered into the Administration Agreement with our Administrator. Pursuant to the terms of the Administration Agreement, our Administrator provides us with the office facilities and administrative services necessary to conduct our day-to-day operations. Mr. Alala, our chief executive officer and chairman of our Board, is the chief executive officer, president and a director of our Administrator.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding unfunded commitments related to debt investments in existing portfolio companies of $0.8 million (U.S. Well Services, LLC) and $1.2 million (On-Site Fuel Services, Inc.), respectively.
We have no other off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Recent Developments
Distributions
On April 3, 2017 our Board declared the following distributions:
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Amount Per Share | |||||
April 3, 2017 | April 19, 2017 | April 27, 2017 | 0.13 | |||||
April 3, 2017 | May 23, 2017 | May 29, 2017 | 0.13 | |||||
April 3, 2017 | June 24, 2017 | June 29, 2017 | 0.13 | |||||
Total Distributions Declared and Distributed | $ | 0.39 |
Portfolio Activity
On April 26, 2017, the Company received $15.0 million for its second lien debt investment in Nielsen & Bainbridge, LLC, repaid at par.
On May 1, 2017, the Company received $5.5 million for its equity investment in MJC Holdings, LLC, resulting in a realized gain of $4.5 million.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. Changes in interest rates may affect both our cost of funding and our interest income from portfolio investments and cash and cash equivalents. We may hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, we did not engage in hedging activities.
As of March 31, 2017, we held 21 securities bearing a variable rate of interest. Our variable rate investments represent approximately 44.8% of the fair value of total interest earning investments. As of March 31, 2017, 55.7% of variable rate securities were yielding interest at a rate equal to the established interest rate floor and 44.3% of variable rate securities were yielding interest at a rate above its existing floor or were not subject to an interest rate floor. As of March 31, 2017, we had $44.0 million outstanding on our Credit Facility, which has a variable rate of interest at one month LIBOR + 300 basis points. As of March 31, 2017, all of our other interest paying liabilities, consisting of $170.7 million in SBA-guaranteed debentures and $113.4 million in notes payable, were bearing interest at a fixed rate.
Interest rate sensitivity refers to the change in earnings that may result from changes in the level of interest rates. Because we fund a portion of our investments with borrowings, our net investment income is affected by the difference between the rate at which we invest and the rate at which we borrow. As a result, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income.
Based on our March 31, 2017 consolidated statements of assets and liabilities, the following table shows the annual impact on net income (excluding the potential related incentive fee impact) of base rate changes in interest rates (considering interest rate floors for variable rate securities) assuming no changes in our investment and borrowing structure (dollars in thousands):
53 |
Basis Point Change | Increase (decrease) in interest income | (Increase) decrease in interest expense | Increase in net income | |||||||||
Up 300 basis points | $ | 6,218 | $ | (1,320 | ) | $ | 4,898 | |||||
Up 200 basis points | $ | 4,315 | $ | (880 | ) | $ | 3,435 | |||||
Up 100 basis points | $ | 2,220 | $ | (440 | ) | $ | 1,780 | |||||
Down 100 basis points | $ | (366 | ) | $ | 439 | $ | 73 | |||||
Down 200 basis points | — | — | — | |||||||||
Down 300 basis points | — | — | — |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
As of March 31, 2017 (the end of the period covered by this report), we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of such possible controls and procedures.
(b) | Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
Management has not identified any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first quarter of 2017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
54 |
None of us, our Investment Advisor or Administrator or any of the Legacy Funds, are currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us, or against our Investment Advisor or Administrator or any of the Legacy Funds. From time to time, we, our Investment Advisor or Administrator, or any of the Legacy Funds may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties are not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, there have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, we issued 15,447 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan. The issuances were not subject to the registration requirements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The cash paid for shares of common stock issued under our dividend reinvestment plan during the quarter ended March 31, 2017 was approximately $0.2 million. Other than the shares issued under our dividend reinvestment plan during the quarter ended March 31, 2017, we did not sell any unregistered equity securities.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
None.
55 |
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description of Document | |
3.1 | Articles of Amendment and Restatement (1) | |
3.2 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of CapitalSouth Partners Fund II Limited Partnership (2) | |
3.3 | Certificate of Limited Partnership of CapitalSouth Partners SBIC Fund III, L.P. (2) | |
3.4 | Bylaws (1) | |
3.5 | Form of Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of CapitalSouth Partners Fund II Limited Partnership (3) | |
3.6 | Form of Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of CapitalSouth Partners SBIC Fund III, L.P. (3) | |
4.1 | Form of Common Stock Certificate (1) | |
4.2 | Form of Base Indenture (4) | |
4.3 | Form of First Supplemental Indenture (4) | |
4.4 | Form of Global Note (included as Exhibit A to the Form of First Supplemental Indenture) (4) | |
10.1 | Form of Dividend Reinvestment Plan (1) | |
10.2 | Form of Investment Advisory Agreement by and between Registrant and Capitala Investment Advisors, LLC (1) | |
10.3 | Form of Custodian Agreement (1) | |
10.4 | Form of Administration Agreement by and between Registrant and Capitala Advisors Corp. (1) | |
10.5 | Form of Indemnification Agreement by and between Registrant and each of its directors (1) | |
10.6 | Form of Trademark License Agreement by and between Registrant and Capitala Investment Advisors, LLC (1) | |
10.7 | Form of Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement dated October 17, 2014, among Capitala Finance Corp., as Borrower, the lenders party thereto, and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent, arranger and bookrunner (5) | |
10.8 | Form of Guarantee, Pledge and Security Agreement dated October 17, 2014, among Capitala Finance Corp., as Borrower, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto, ING Capital LLC, as Revolving Administrative Agent for the Revolving Lenders and as Collateral Agent, and each Financing Agent and Designated Indebtedness Holder party thereto (5) | |
10.9 | Form of Incremental Assumption Agreement, dated January 6, 2015, relating to the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2014, among Capitala Finance Corp., as borrower, the lenders from time to time party thereto, and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent, arranger and bookrunner (6) | |
10.10 | Form of Incremental Assumption Agreement, dated August 19, 2015, relating to the Senior Secured Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2014, among Capitala Finance Corp., as borrower, the lenders from time party thereto, and ING Capital LLC, as administrative agent, arranger, and bookrunner (7) |
56 |
11.1 | Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements contained in this report) | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
(1) | Previously filed in connection with the Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Capitala Finance Corp.’s registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-188956) filed on September 9, 2013. | |
(2) | Previously filed in connection with Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Capitala Finance Corp.’s registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-188956) filed on September 16, 2013. | |
(3) | Previously filed in connection with Pre-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Capitala Finance Corp.’s registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-188956) filed on September 24, 2013. | |
(4) | Previously filed in connection with Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Capitala Finance Corp.’s registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-193374) filed on May 21, 2014. | |
(5) | Previously filed in connection with Capitala Finance Corp.’s report on Form 8-K filed on October 21, 2014. | |
(6) | Previously filed in connection with Capitala Finance Corp.’s report on Form 8-K filed on January 8, 2015. | |
(7) | Previously filed in connection with Capitala Finance Corp.’s report on Form 8-K filed on August 25, 2015. |
57 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 8, 2017 | By | /s/ Joseph B. Alala III |
Joseph B. Alala III | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||
Capitala Finance Corp. | ||
Date: May 8, 2017 | By | /s/ Stephen A. Arnall |
Stephen A. Arnall | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | ||
Capitala Finance Corp. |
58 |