Luvu Brands, Inc. - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-K

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016

Commission file number:  000-53314

 Luvu Brands, Inc.

(Exact name of Company as specified in its charter)

2745 Bankers Industrial Drive, Atlanta, Georgia 30360

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Company's telephone number: (770) 246-6400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:  Common Stock, $.01 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ YES x NO

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.¨ YES  x NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  x  YES     ¨  NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)    x YES   ¨   NO

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨  YES  x  NO

The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non−affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the closing price of the common stock on December 31, 2015, the last trading day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $458,996.

The number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of the close of business on

September 26, 2016 was 71,452,596. 

Luvu Brands, Inc.

Index to Annual Report on Form 10-K

i 

 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) for Luvu Brands, Inc. (“Luvu Brands” the “Company” “we” “our” or “us”) may contain forward-looking statements, which include statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, and usually include words such as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plan," "believes," "predicts", "estimates" or similar expressions. In addition, any statement concerning future financial performance, ongoing business strategies or prospects and possible future actions are also forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations and projections about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and the accuracy of assumptions concerning the Company, the performance of the industry in which they do business and economic and market factors, among other things. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance.  You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, presentation or filing in which they are made. Except to the extent required by federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Our forward-looking statements in this report include, but are not limited to:

 These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us and our operations that are subject to change based on various important factors, some of which are beyond our control. The following factors, among others, could cause our financial performance to differ significantly from the goals, plans, objectives, intentions and expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements:

1

2

PART I.

ITEM 1.        Business

General

Luvu Brands, Inc., based in Atlanta, Georgia, was founded in 1999. Our vision is to build a distinctive family of brands by making products that people love and delivering a superior customer experience. At the heart of our Company is a passion for creativity, which is infused throughout all aspects of the business, from product development and packaging to selling, marketing and merchandising.

Luvu Brands, Inc. is a vertically integrated US-based manufacturer that has built several brands in the wellness, lifestyle and fashion seating categories. Our products are offered in innovative vacuum eco-compressed packaging for retail stores, mass merchants, drug and internet retailers worldwide.  All of the Company’s brands are headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia in a 140,000 square foot manufacturing facility that employs over 150 people. Making products that people love, bringing manufacturing back to the USA, sustainable manufacturing practices, and decreasing the overall impact on the environment are core to the Company’s operating principles.

The Company also manages, markets, and distributes its products directly to consumers through several websites that include:  liberator.com, theliberator.co.uk, jaxxliving.com, and avanacomfort.com. We reach additional consumers through a retail concept store located within our Atlanta factory.

Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to the “Company,” “Luvu Brands,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refers to Luvu Brands, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Our executive offices are located at 2745 Bankers Industrial Dr., Atlanta, GA 30360; our telephone number is +1-770-246-6400.  

Corporate History

The Company was incorporated in the State of Florida on February 25, 1999, under the name of WES Consulting, Inc. to provide consulting and commercial property management services. On October 19, 2009, the Company entered into a Merger and Recapitalization Agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) with Liberator, Inc. (f/k/a Remark Enterprises Inc.), a Nevada corporation (“Old Liberator”).  Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Old Liberator merged with and into the Company, with the Company surviving as the sole remaining entity (the “Merger”). On February 28, 2011, the Company name was changed from WES Consulting, Inc. to Liberator, Inc.

Effective November 5, 2015, the Company changed its corporate name from Liberator, Inc. to Luvu Brands, Inc. to reflect its broader offering of wellness and lifestyle products designed for mass market channels.

Overview of our Facilities and Operations

Since inception we have used a vertically integrated business model, with manufacturing, distribution, product development and marketing performed in-house. We believe this allows us to create new products with reduced lead times at a lower cost while enabling us to quickly respond to market and customer demands for our existing products. For our wholesale accounts, being able to fulfill large orders with shorter turnaround times allows us to capture business during December and February when wholesale customers make just-in-time holiday purchases.

3

Our 140,000 square foot facility on eight acres is located in a suburb of metro Atlanta, Georgia and includes manufacturing and distribution, sales and marketing, product development, customer service and administrative staff. All of the Liberator, Jaxx and Avana branded products are designed, produced and marketed from our facility in Atlanta, Georgia where we currently employ over 150 people. As of the date of this report, the Company employs 116 people in Production and Distribution, 3 people in Product Development, 15 people in Sales and Marketing, and 18 people in Administration. The Company’s employment levels may change seasonal based on current and anticipated order levels.

Our manufacturing operation has CAD controlled fabric cutting and foam contouring equipment and two state-of-the-art conveyor unit production sewing systems. Our in-house manufacturing capabilities have enabled us to achieve greater efficiencies and cost savings, as well as strict control over the entire manufacturing cycle including raw material procurement, finished goods production and logistics optimization. In addition to providing us with greater production flexibility, our in-house manufacturing provides us with the opportunity to improve fulfillment response time, reduces the risk of out-of-stock situations, limits finished goods obsolescence and improves overall operating margins.

In 2008, we implemented a state-of-the-art conveyor-based sewing system to manufacture sewn products at the lowest possible cost in the United States. Because all cutting, sewing, foam contouring, assembly and packaging are performed in-house, we believe we can exercise greater control over product quality and respond faster to changing customer demands, which gives us a competitive advantage over companies that utilize out-sourced sewing services. We can source raw materials from multiple domestic suppliers and we have supply contracts in place to produce our specialty fabrics under specific quality control and performance standards with just-in-time deliveries.

During fiscal 2015, we installed new equipment which increased the capacity of our foam repurposing operation. During fiscal 2016, we installed new equipment to increase our fabric cutting capabilities and our bead filling capabilities. All of these actions resulted in increased throughput and lower production costs in these operations.

All business activity of the Company is done through our wholly-owned subsidiary, OneUp Innovations, Inc. (“OneUp”). OneUp was organized in 2000 and began operations in 2002.

Business Strategy

Our goals are to achieve long-term growth and profitability and diversify our sales base. We plan to achieve these goals using the following strategies:

4

Products, Principal Markets and Methods of Distribution

Liberator Products

We developed a product category which we call “Liberator Bedroom Adventure Gear ”. These positioning props elevate, rock and create surfaces and textures that expand the sexual repertoire and make the act of love more exciting. Liberator Bedroom Adventure Gear combines functional design with sensuous textures that transform ordinary bedrooms into supportive landscapes for intimacy. Liberator products present angles, elevations, curves and motion that help people of all sizes, including those with back injuries and other medical conditions, find comfortable ways to connect intimately while assisting their stamina and performance.

 Liberator foam-based products (called “Liberator Shapes”) are manufactured in a variety of heights and widths to accommodate variations in the human body. They consist of differently shaped cushions and props that are available in an assortment of fabric colors and prints to add to the visual excitement. Each of the product profiles of the Liberator Shapes is unique, designed to introduce positions to the sexual experience that were previously difficult to achieve or impossible to achieve with standard pillows or cushions. Liberator Shapes are manufactured from structured polyurethane foam, cut at various angles, platforms and profiles. The foam base is encased in a tight, fluid resistant polyester shell, helping the cushions to maintain their shape.  The original offering of the Liberator Wedge® and Ramp®, sold as a set, continue to be our best-selling items. All of the Liberator Shapes are also available in our Black Label Series which includes blindfolds and snap-on Velcro cuffs.

We have also developed larger profile designs that are commonly referred to as “sex furniture”. Three of the sex furniture pieces are made from contoured urethane foam and covered in a variety of fabrics and colors. These items are marketed as the Esse®, Esse Stage®, and the Equus®.  Other larger designs include products based on shredded polyurethane foam encased in a wide range of fabric types and colors and sold under our Zeppelin® product offering. The Liberator larger profile designs can also be used as seating when not being used for relaxed interaction and creative intimacy.

We conduct our wholesale business for Liberator sexual wellness products through four primary channels: (1) adult and female friendly retailers, flash sites and specialty boutiques, (2) e-tailers who sell our products through adult, mass market, drug and other sites offering sexual wellness products, (3) mail order catalogers, and (4) wholesale distributors of adult / sexual wellness products. These wholesale accounts have approximately 950 retail locations and/or websites in the United States and Canada. We have a growing number of retailers who have added a dedicated Liberator exhibition concept to their merchandising space. We also sell our products in Europe through a Netherlands-based third-party fulfillment service.

5

All products sold under the Liberator brand provided 48% and 46% of our revenues for our fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 

Resale Products

Beginning in 2006, we began importing high-quality pleasure objects from around the world. These resale products (including Tenga products) provided 29% and 34% of our revenues in each of our fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Under OneUp, we also function as an exclusive resale distributor of the Tenga brand in North America. Tenga products are sold through the same wholesale and direct-to-consumer channels as branded Liberator products. Sales of Tenga products accounted for approximately 19% and 22% of net sales in the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and approximately 15% of the total gross profit in the year ended June 30, 2016 and 17% of the total gross profit in the year ended June 30, 2015.

Jaxx Casual Seating and Avana Comfort Products

The Company sells a line of contemporary casual seating under the Jaxx brand. Jaxx is an offshoot from Liberator manufacturing as it provides additional revenue from repurposing our polyurethane foam trim into shredded beanbag fill. The Jaxx product line and accessory products are sold through the following four wholesale channels: (1) beanbag e-tailers, (2) mass marketers, (3) mail order catalogers, and (4) retail furniture stores. The Avana product line is a unique collection of comfort products that aid in sleep, meditation, and massage. The Avana product line is sold through e-merchants, mail order catalogers and through our website under the URL www.avanacomfort.com. The Company also owns and manages a website under the URL www.JaxxLiving.com for direct to consumer sales of Jaxx products. Our Jaxx and Avana products (combined) provided 18% of our revenues in our fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 and 15% in our fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

The contemporary seating business is highly competitive. We believe we can compete effectively on the basis of product quality, design, customer service and price. We believe that our primary competitive advantages are consumer recognition of the Jaxx brand, as well as distribution through the multiple sales channels where consumers prefer to purchase.

Sales and Distribution

Our sales personnel are organized by geographic market and by customer type. In North America, we have sales personnel who routinely visit sexual wellness retailers to assist in product training, merchandising and stocking of selling areas. Through our in-house wholesale sales organization, we engage retailers directly and then either ship to them on a wholesale basis or provide fulfillment services by drop-shipping directly to their customers.

 In fiscal 2014, the Company adopted a new international sales strategy. In the European Union, the Company has shifted from a licensee model to a direct sales model with the addition of a US-based salesperson. This salesperson is responsible for wholesale sales, marketing operations and customer service in the European Union and other international markets. Total international sales represented approximately 2% of our total net sales in each of the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

As is customary in the sexual wellness and casual furniture industry, sales to customers are generally made pursuant to purchase orders, and we do not have long-term or exclusive contracts with any of our retail customers or wholesale distributors. We believe that our continuing relationships with our customers are based upon our ability to provide a wide selection and reliable source of sexual wellness and casual furniture products, combined with our expertise in marketing and new product introduction.

Internet Websites

Since 2002, our Liberator website located at www.Liberator.com has allowed our customers to purchase our Liberator merchandise over the Internet.  We design and operate our websites using an in-house technical and creative staff.

Our www.Liberator.com website is intended to be an entertainment and educational venue where consumers can watch product demonstration videos, videos on sexual wellness topics and humorous videos on the many facets of human sexuality.

Our www.JaxxLiving.com website offers contemporary indoor and outdoor seating to the young adult and children’s market.

Our www.AvanaComfort.com website blends rest, relaxation and health products in an offering that appeals to a broad range of consumers.

6

Our corporate website is www.luvubrands.com. There we make available copies of Luvu Brands documents, news releases and our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the “SEC”, including financial statements.

Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, the information that appears on our websites is not part of this annual report.

 Research and Development

As a consumer-driven innovation company, we use consumer and market research to better understand consumer needs. This research guides our product development and marketing teams in the design and delivery of our products and customer experience. Our product development expenses were $169,360 in the year ended June 30, 2016, and $124,674 in the year ended June 30, 2015.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials

We obtain all of the raw materials and components used to produce our products from outside sources. A number of components, including certain fabrics and zippers, are sourced from suppliers who currently serve as our sole or primary source of supply for these components. We believe we can obtain these raw materials and components from other sources of supply, although we could experience some short-term disruption in our ability to fulfill orders in the event of an unexpected loss of supply from one of the primary suppliers. We utilize dual sourcing on targeted components when effective.

Major Customers

Our ten largest customers (excluding our own e-commerce sites and retail store) accounted for approximately 37% of net sales for the year ended June 30, 2016 and 39% of net sales for the year ended June 30, 2015. Sales to (and through) Amazon accounted for 28% of our net sales during the year ended June 30, 2016 and 26% of our sales for the year ended June 30, 2015. The loss of, or a significant adverse change in our relationship with, any of our largest customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.  

Competition

We compete with other manufacturers, distributors and marketers of wellness, lifestyle and casual seating, both within and outside the U.S. The sexual wellness and furniture industries are highly fragmented and competition for the sale of such products comes from many sources. These products are sold primarily through retailers (independent retailers, drug store chains, and mass market retailers), distributors, and direct sales channels (internet marketing and mail order companies).

For Liberator products, we believe that our primary competitive advantage is consumer recognition of our brand. Due to the strength of our brand, we have no direct competition for the majority of our Liberator branded products. In fact, many e-commerce websites refer to Liberator as a product category and not as a discrete product. And since we sell through multiple sales channels, we provide consumers with the ability to shop for Liberator intimacy products in an environment or website that they are most comfortable in. We also believe that we differentiate ourselves from conventional sex toys based on our utility of design and overall customer satisfaction as it relates to enhanced intimacy.

For our Resale products, competition among retailers of adult products and web based marketers is high. Although we compete with retail, catalog, and internet businesses and now mass and drug retailers that sell sexual wellness products including vibrators, pleasure objects, accessories and similar merchandise, we believe that this opens new channels of distribution for our Liberator products and that we are able to compete favorably as our Liberator products are unique, are couple-centric, and are assistive devices for couples with sexual limitations and issues.

For the Liberator e-commerce website, other competitive factors include the effectiveness of our electronic customer mailing lists, maintaining natural search listing, advertising response rates, website design and functionality. The broad range of designs, color choice, fabrics and accessories that we offer helps to differentiate us and allows us to compete favorably against many other adult or sexual wellness websites. Liberator.com also competes against numerous mainstream websites, many of which have a greater volume of web traffic, greater financial strength and marketing resources.

7

We believe competition in our industries is based on, among other things, the ability to deliver the right product at the right time, product quality and safety, innovation, customer service and price. We believe we compete favorably with other companies because of our ability to provide a broad product offering for customers, our vertically-integrated manufacturing operation which allows us to quickly respond to customer demand, our commitment to quality and safety, and our commitment to minimizing our environmental impact.

Our future competitive position will likely depend on, but not be limited to, the following:

• the continued acceptance of our products by our customers and consumers;

• our ability to protect our proprietary rights in our patent and trademarks and the continued validity of such intellectual property;

• our ability to successfully expand our product offerings;

• our ability to maintain adequate inventory levels to meet our customers’ demands;

• our ability to expand;

• our ability to continue to manufacture high quality products at competitive prices;

• our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;

• the effect of any future governmental regulations on our products and business;

• the continued growth of the global sexual wellness industry; and

• our ability to respond to changes within the industry and consumer demand, financially and otherwise.

Government Regulation

We are subject to customs, truth-in-advertising and other laws, including consumer protection regulations that regulate the promotion and sale of merchandise and the operation of warehouse facilities. We monitor changes in these laws and believe that we are in material compliance with applicable laws.

Intellectual Property

The Liberator trademark is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark office and with the registries of many foreign countries. In addition we were issued approximately 20 other product name trademarks and trade names including: “Bedroom Adventure Gear”®, “Explore More”®, Ramp®, Wedge®, Stage®, Esse®, Zeppelin®, Hipster®, Wing®, Equus®, Jaxx® and Bonbon®. In August 2005, we were issued utility patent number US 6,925,669 “Support Cushion and System of Cushions.” We believe our trademarks and patent have significant value and we intend to continue to vigorously protect them against infringement.

Employees and Labor Relations

As of September 19, 2016, we had 150 employees (116 in production and warehouse operations, and 36 in sales, marketing and administrative operations).  Additional staffing is typically required to support the peak holiday period through Valentine’s Day.  None of our employees are represented by a union. We have had no labor-related work stoppages, and we believe our relationships with our employees are good.

8

Seasonality

Our business is seasonal and, as a result, revenues will vary from quarter to quarter. During the past three years, we have realized an average of approximately 28% of our annual revenues in our second quarter, which includes Christmas, and an average of approximately 27% of our revenues in the third quarter, which includes Valentine’s Day.

Financial Information about Our Business Segments and Geographic Areas

We conduct our business through two primary sales channels: Direct (consisting of our Internet websites and our Atlanta store) and Wholesale (consisting of our stocking reseller, drop-ship, contract manufacturing and distributor accounts). During our last two years, substantially all of our revenue was generated within North America, and all of our long-lived assets are located within the United States. The following is a summary of our revenues:

Net sales in the Other channel consists of shipping and handling fees derived from our Direct business.

Direct

The following is a summary of our Direct business net sales and the percentage relationship to total revenues:

Wholesale

The following is a summary of our net sales to Wholesale customers and the percentage relationship to total revenues:

As of June 30, 2016, the Company has over 1,000 active wholesale accounts, most of which are located in the United States.

Sales by Product Type

The following table represents the dollars and percentage of net sales by product type:

9

Liberator - Liberator products consist of items that are manufactured by us and are intended for sale in the sexual health and wellness market. Liberator products are sold to retailers and distributors as well as directly through our three e-commerce sites and single retail store. Net sales of Liberator products increased 13% during the year ended June 30, 2016, from the comparable year earlier period. This increase is primarily related to the ongoing success of our eco-compression packaging and higher sales of Liberator products to (and through) Amazon.com.

Jaxx and Avana - Jaxx products are contemporary seating products manufactured by us and sold under the Jaxx brand. Jaxx products are sold to e-merchants and retailers as well as directly through our e-commerce site. The Avana product line is a unique collection of comfort products that aid in sleep, meditation, and massage. The Avana product line is sold through e-merchants, mail order catalogers and through our e-commerce site. Net sales of Jaxx and Avana products (combined) increased 31% during the year ended June 30, 2016, compared to the prior year. This increase is primarily due to greater sales of Jaxx and Avana products to (and through) Amazon and other e-merchants.

Resale - Resale products are non-Liberator branded products (including Tenga) that we purchase from others at wholesale or distributor prices and resell through our sales channels to retailers, distributors, or through one of our e-commerce sites and single retail store. Sales of Resale products decreased 7% during the year ended June 30, 2016 from the prior year. The decrease is primarily the result of increased competition in the marketplace for those products and the resulting downward pricing pressure.

Other - Other products include sales from contract manufacturing and fulfillment services. Net sales during the year ended June 30, 2016 increased 7% compared to the prior year. This increase is due to an increase in the number of contract manufacturing projects during fiscal year 2016 from the prior fiscal year.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2. Properties

We are headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. Our mailing address is 2745 Bankers Industrial Drive, Atlanta, GA 30360. We lease a 140,000 square feet building on eight acres which we believe allows for expansion when needed. Our facility houses manufacturing, distribution and fulfillment, call center, in-house advertising and creative departments, product design group, administrative offices and a 2,500 square foot factory concept store. On July 23, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with its landlord to extend the facilities lease by five years. The previous ten year lease was to expire on December 31, 2015. The agreement amends the lease to expire on December 31, 2020. The lease amendment was effective August 1, 2014 and included a four-month rental abatement in the amount of $117,660. In exchange for the rental abatement, the Company has agreed to make improvements to the facility totaling $123,505 within six months of August 1, 2014. As of June 30, 2016, the Company has completed $65,224 of the leasehold improvements. In addition, the monthly rent on the facility decreased from the current rent of $33,139 to $29,415 per month, beginning on December 1, 2014. Beginning January 1, 2015, the monthly rent is on an escalating schedule with the final year of the lease at $35,123 per month. The rent expense under this lease for the 12 months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $352,479 and $350,082, respectively.

We believe our facilities are currently adequate for their intended purposes and are adequately maintained.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

As of the date of this annual report, there are no material pending legal or governmental proceedings relating to our company or properties to which we are a party, and to our knowledge there are no material proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers or affiliates are a party adverse to us or which have a material interest adverse to us.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

10

PART II.

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Markets Group on the OTCQB tier (“OTCQB”) under the symbol “LUVU.”  The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing bid quotations for our common stock as reported on the OTCQB.  The bid prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, do not include retail markups, markdowns, or commissions, and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions. The last sale price of our common stock, as reported on the OTCQB on September 23, 2016, was $0.02 per share.

Holders

As of September 25, 2016, we had approximately 81 stockholders of record of our common stock and approximately 450 beneficial holders.

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Transfer Online, Inc., 512 SE Salmon Street, Portland, OR 97214. Their telephone number is 503-227-2950.

  Dividend Policy

We have not paid dividends.  We plan to retain all earnings generated by our operations, if any, for use in our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to our shareholders in the foreseeable future. The payment of future dividends on the common stock and the rate of such dividends, if any, and when not restricted, will be determined by our board of directors in light of our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, and other factors. Additionally, under the terms of our credit facility, we are precluded from paying a dividend and we may in the future issue preferred stock and/or other securities that provides for preferences over holders of common stock in the payment of dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of June 30, 2016.

11

(1) Includes option awards outstanding under our 2009 Stock Option Plan and our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan.

(2) Includes shares remaining available for future issuance under our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data.

Not applicable to smaller reporting company.

12

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This discussion summarizes the significant factors affecting the results of operations and financial condition of the Company during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 and should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes thereto included elsewhere herein. Certain information contained in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are “forward-looking statements.”  Statements that are not historical in nature and which may be identified by the use of words like “expects,” “assumes,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “we believe,” “could be” and other words of similar meaning, are forward-looking statements.  These statements are based on management’s expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in this section because of various factors, including those set forth elsewhere herein. See “Forward-Looking Statements” included in this report.

Results of Operations

Overview

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements, expressed as a percentage of net sales.  The discussion that follows the table should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2016 Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2015

Net sales. The net sales increase of 8% in fiscal 2016 was driven primarily by a 17% increase in sales of manufactured branded consumer products (including Liberator, Jaxx and Avana), offset in part, by a 7% decrease in sales of distributed products. Sales through the Wholesale sales channel in fiscal 2016 increased 15% from the prior year while the Direct sales decreased 3% from the prior year. The Wholesale sales channel includes branded products and resale products sold to brick-and-mortar retailers, e-merchants like Amazon, Overstock, Brookstone and others, and, to a lesser degree, products sold to distributors. The Wholesale sales channel also includes contract manufacturing services which consists of specialty items that are manufactured in small quantities for certain customers, and which, to date, has not been a material part of our business. The Direct sales channel consists of consumer sales through our five websites and, to a lesser extent, our single retail store. The increase in sales through the Wholesale channel was due to greater sales of Liberator, Jaxx and Avana products through and to Amazon.

Gross profit. Gross profit, derived from net sales less the cost of product sales, includes the cost of materials, direct labor, manufacturing overhead and depreciation.  Total gross profit as a percentage of sales for the year ended June 30, 2016 increased to 25% from 24% in the prior year. Gross profit dollars increased to $4,228,000 from $3,756,000 in the prior year and represented a 14% increase. The improvement in gross profit was primarily due to higher sales of manufactured consumer products which have a higher average gross profit margin than products purchased for resale.

 Operating expenses. Excluding depreciation expense, total operating expenses for the year ended June 30, 2016 were 23% of net sales, or $3,856,000, compared to 23% of net sales, or $3,607,000, for the year ended June 30, 2015.  The 7% increase in operating expenses from the prior year was primarily due to higher salaries and benefits.

Other income (expense). Other income (expense) increased 14% from the prior year due to higher average borrowing balances and higher interest expense on those larger balances.

Income taxes. No expense or benefit from income taxes was recorded in the twelve months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. We do not expect any U.S. federal or state income taxes to be recorded for the current fiscal year because of available net operating loss carry-forwards.

13

We had a net loss from operations of ($312,000), or ($0.00) per diluted share, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2016 compared with a net loss from operations of ($474,000), or ($0.01) per diluted share, for the twelve months ended June 30, 2015.

Variability of Results

We have experienced significant quarterly fluctuations in operating results and anticipate that these fluctuations may continue in future periods. As described in previous paragraphs, operating results have fluctuated as a result of changes in sales levels to consumers and wholesalers, competition, costs associated with new product introductions, and increases in raw material costs. In addition, future operating results may fluctuate as a result of factors beyond our control such as foreign exchange fluctuation, changes in government regulations, and economic changes in the regions in which we operate and sell.  A portion of our operating expenses are relatively fixed and the timing of increases in expense levels is based in large part on forecasts of future sales. Therefore, if net sales are below expectations in any given period, the adverse impact on results of operations may be magnified by our inability to meaningfully adjust spending in certain areas, or the inability to adjust spending quickly enough, as in personnel and administrative costs, to compensate for a sales shortfall. We may also choose to reduce prices or increase spending in response to market conditions, and these decisions may have a material adverse effect on financial condition and results of operations.

  Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2016, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $544,772 compared to $492,448 in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2015.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of the net loss adjusted for certain non-cash items, including depreciation, amortization, stock-based compensation, loss on disposal of fixed assets, and the effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased from the prior year due to an increase in the June 30 inventory balance and a smaller increase in the accounts payable balance offset, in part, by the reduced loss

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities in the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was primarily for the purchase of production equipment, leasehold improvements and computer equipment.

Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities in the year ended June 30, 2016 was primarily due to increased borrowings from secured and unsecured notes payable and issuance of common stock, offset in part by repayment of existing credit obligations.

Cash used in financing activities in the year ended June 30, 2015 was primarily due to the repayment of short-term debt and repayment of the advances secured by our credit card receipts, offset in part by borrowing from the new credit card advance and other credit facilities.

14

Sufficiency of Liquidity

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern. We incurred a net loss of approximately $312,000 for the year ended June 30, 2016 and a net loss of approximately $474,000 for the year ended June 30, 2015. As of June 30, 2016, we have an accumulated deficit of $9.2 million and a working capital deficit of $2.4 million. This raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon our ability to meet our financing requirements, and the success of our future operations. Management believes that actions presently being taken to revise our operating and financial requirements provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

These actions include an ongoing initiative to increase sales, gross profits and our gross profit margin. To that end, at the end of fiscal 2015 we ordered new equipment to increase our fabric cutting capacity; this equipment was delivered and installed during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. We launched several new products during fiscal 2016 including the Zipline sofa, loveseat and chair, we expanded the Avana product line to include a broad range of top-of-bed comfort products, and we further reduced the shipping dimensions of many of our Liberator products. These actions have resulted in higher sales. At the beginning of fiscal 2017, we purchased new production equipment which should reduce our cost of goods sold. We also plan to continue to manage discretionary expense levels to be better aligned with current and expected revenue levels. We estimate that the operational and strategic growth plans we have identified will require approximately $250,000 of funding, of which we estimate will be provided by debt financing and, to a lesser extent, cash flow from operations as well as cash on hand.

Capital Resources

We expect total capital expenditures for fiscal 2017 to be under $250,000 and to be funded by equipment loans and, to a lesser extent, anticipated operating cash flows and borrowings under the line of credit with Advance Financial Corporation. This includes capital expenditures in support of our normal operations.

If our business plans and cost estimates are inaccurate and our operations require additional cash or if we deviate from our current plans, we could be required to seek additional debt financing for particular projects or for ongoing operational needs.  This indebtedness could harm our business if we are unable to obtain additional financing on reasonable terms.  In addition, any indebtedness we incur in the future could subject us to restrictive covenants limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to changes in, our business.  If we do not comply with such covenants, our lenders could accelerate repayment of our debt or restrict our access to further borrowings, which in turn could restrict our operating flexibility and endanger our ability to continue operations.

On May 24, 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, OneUp and OneUp’s wholly owned subsidiary, Foam Labs entered into a credit facility with a finance company, Advance Financial Corporation, to provide it with an asset based line of credit of up to $750,000 against 85% of eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the agreement) for the purpose of improving working capital.  On September 4, 2013, the credit agreement with Advance Financial Corporation was amended and restated to increase the asset based line of credit to $1,000,000 and include an Inventory Advance (as defined in the amended and restated receivable financing agreement) of up to the lesser of $300,000 or 75% of the eligible accounts receivable loan. In addition, the amended and restated agreement changed the interest calculation to prime rate plus 3% (as of June 30, 2016 the prime rate was 3.5%) and the Monthly Service Fee was changed to .5% per month. The term of the agreement is one year, renewable for additional one-year terms unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal at least 90 days prior to the end of the current financing period. The credit facility is secured by our accounts receivable and other rights to payment, general intangibles, inventory and equipment, and are subject to eligibility requirements for current accounts receivable. The Company’s CEO, Louis Friedman, has personally guaranteed the repayment of the loan obligation. In addition, the loan has a corporate guarantee from Luvu Brands, Inc.  At June 30, 2016, we had utilized $737,264 from our line of credit, compared to a utilization of $720,013 at June 30, 2015.  On June 30, 2016, we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions of this line of credit.

15

On October 1, 2015 the Company entered into an agreement with Power Up Lending Group, Ltd. (“Power Up”) whereby Power Up agreed to loan OneUp and Foam Labs a total of $100,000. Terms for this additional amount call for a repayment of $119,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $19,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This will be accomplished by Power Up withholding a fixed amount each business day of $566.67 from OneUp’s credit card receipts until full repayment is made. This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman

On February 22, 2016, the Company borrowed an additional $400,000 from Power Up. The loan is secured by OneUp’s and Foam Lab’s existing and future credit card collections. Terms of the loan call for a repayment of $448,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $48,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This will be accomplished by Power Up withholding a fixed amount each business day of $2,133 from OneUp’s credit card receipts until full repayment is made. This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

As of June 30, 2016, the principle amount of the two credit card advances was $230,798, net of a discount of $30,700.

Subsequent to June 30, 2016, the company borrowed an additional $150,000 from Power Up. Terms for this additional amount call for a repayment of $168,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $18,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This will be accomplished by Power Up withholding a fixed amount each business day of $800 from OneUp’s credit card receipts until full repayment is made. This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

On September 22, 2016, the company borrowed an additional $400,000 from Power Up. Terms for this additional amount call for a repayment of $452,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $52,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This will be accomplished by Power Up withholding a fixed amount each business day of $2,152 from OneUp’s credit card receipts until full repayment is made. The balance of the February 22, 2016 credit card loan was deducted from this loan and the Company received net proceeds from Power Up of approximately $270,000.This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not use off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or related parties, nor do we use other forms of off-balance sheet arrangements. Accordingly, our liquidity and capital resources are not subject to off-balance sheet risks from unconsolidated entities. As of June 30, 2016, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

We have entered into operating leases primarily for certain equipment and our facilities in the normal course of business. These arrangements are often referred to as a form of off-balance-sheet financing. Future minimum lease payments under our operating leases as of June 30, 2016 are detailed in the section entitled “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Inflation

During fiscal 2016, we experienced increases in various raw material costs and increases in labor costs and government mandated employee benefits. We believe these pricing pressures have not stabilized and will continue to increase throughout fiscal 2017, although there is no assurance this will occur. Inflation can harm our margins and profitability if we are unable to increase prices or cut costs enough to offset the effects of inflation in our cost base. Furthermore, if our customers reduce their levels of spending in response to increases in retail prices and/or we are unable to pass such cost increases to our customers, our revenues and our profit margins may decrease. 

Effect of Recently Issued Accounting Standards and Estimates

We do not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, will have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

16

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements included under Item 8 in this report have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and their accompanying notes. We have identified certain policies that we believe are important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. These policies require the application of significant judgment by our management. We base our estimates on our historical experience, industry standards, and various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. An adverse effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, and results of operations could occur if circumstances change that alter the various assumptions or conditions used in such estimates or assumptions. Our critical accounting policies include those listed below.  

Revenue Recognition 

To recognize revenue, four basic criteria must be met: 1) there is evidence that an arrangement exists; 2) delivery has occurred; 3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and 4) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue from sales transactions where the buyer has the right to return the product is recognized at the time of sale only if (1) the seller’s price to the buyer is substantially fixed or determinable at the date of sale; (2) the buyer has paid the seller, or the buyer is obligated to pay the seller and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product; (3) the buyer’s obligation to the seller would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product; (4) the buyer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from that provided by the seller; (5) the seller does not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer; and (6) the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated. We recognize revenue upon determination that all criteria for revenue recognition have been met. The criteria are usually met at the time title passes to the customer, which usually occurs upon shipment. Revenue from shipments where title passes upon delivery is deferred until the shipment has been delivered.

Net sales are comprised of the total product sales billed during the period plus amounts paid for shipping and handling, less the actual returns, customer allowances, and customer discounts.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect our estimate of current and past due receivable balances that may not be collected. The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon our assessment of the collectability of specific customer accounts, the aging of accounts receivable and our history of bad debts. We believe that the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate to cover anticipated losses in the receivable balance under current conditions. However, significant deterioration in the financial condition of our customers, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, could materially change these expectations and an additional allowance may be required.

Inventories

We value inventory at the lower of cost or market on an item-by-item basis and establish reserves equal to all or a portion of the related inventory to reflect situations in which the cost of the inventory is not expected to be recovered. This requires us to make estimates regarding the market value of our inventory, including an assessment for excess and obsolete inventory. Once we establish an inventory reserve amount in a fiscal period, the reduced inventory value is maintained until the inventory is sold or otherwise disposed of. In evaluating whether inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, management considers such factors as the amount of inventory on-hand, the estimated time required to sell such inventory, the foreseeable demand within a specified time horizon and current and expected market conditions. Based on this evaluation, we record adjustments to cost of goods sold to adjust inventory to its net realizable value. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly, either favorably or unfavorably, from actual requirements if future economic conditions, customer demand or other factors differ from expectations.   Finished goods and goods in process include a provision for manufacturing overhead, including depreciation.  

17

Accounting for Income Taxes

We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. We recognize deferred tax liabilities or assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. We regularly assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. We consider projected future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the amount of the valuation allowance necessary to offset our deferred tax assets that will not be recoverable. We have recorded and continue to carry a full valuation allowance against our gross deferred tax assets that will not reverse against deferred tax liabilities within the scheduled reversal period. If we determine in the future that it is more likely than not that we will realize all or a portion of our deferred tax assets, we will adjust our valuation allowance in the period we make the determination. We expect to provide a full valuation allowance on our future tax benefits until we can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates our ability to realize these assets. At June 30, 2016, we carried a valuation allowance of $2.8 million against our net deferred tax assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We assess the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An asset or asset group is considered impaired if its carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted future net cash flows the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If an asset or asset group is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value. If estimated fair value is less than the book value, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and an impairment loss is recognized.

In fiscal year 2015 and 2016, we did generate positive cash flows from operations. However, if our long-term future results do not continue to yield positive cash flows in excess of the carrying amount of our long-lived assets, we would anticipate possible future impairments of those assets.

Considerable management judgment is necessary in estimating future cash flows and other factors affecting the valuation of long-lived assets, including the operating and macroeconomic factors that may affect them. We use historical financial information, internal plans and projections and industry information in making such estimates.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Reconciliation of net loss from continuing operations to Adjusted EBITDA income from continuing operations for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: 

As used herein, Adjusted EBITDA represents income from continuing operations before interest income, interest expense, depreciation, amortization, loss on disposal of assets, and stock-based compensation expense. We have excluded the non-cash expenses and stock-based compensation expense as they do not reflect the cash-based operations of the Company. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure which is not required by or defined under GAAP. The presentation of this financial measure is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial measures prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP, including the net loss from continuing operations of the Company or net cash used in operating activities.

Management recognizes that non-GAAP financial measures have limitations in that they do not reflect all of the items associated with the Company’s net income or net loss from continuing operations as determined in accordance with GAAP, and are not a substitute for or a measure of the Company’s profitability or net earnings. Adjusted EBITDA is presented because we believe it is useful to investors as a measure of comparative operating performance and liquidity, and because it is less susceptible to variances in actual performance resulting from depreciation and amortization and non-cash charges for stock-based compensation expense and loss on disposal of assets.

18

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

  Not applicable for a smaller reporting company.

19

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

20

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of:

Luvu Brands, Inc. (formerly known as Liberator, Inc.)

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Luvu Brands, Inc. (formerly known as Liberator, Inc.) and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the two years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Luvu Brands, Inc. (formerly known as Liberator, Inc.) and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $312,000, a working capital deficiency of $2.4 million, and an accumulated deficit of $9.2 million. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Liggett & Webb, P.A.

LIGGETT & WEBB, P.A.

Certified Public Accountants

Boynton Beach, Florida

September 27, 2016

F-1 

Luvu Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of June 30, 2016 and 2015

 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Luvu Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Luvu Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit

For the years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2016

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Luvu Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Luvu Brands, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

 Luvu Brands, Inc. (the “Company” or Liberator) was incorporated in the State of Florida on February 25, 1999. References to the “Company” in these notes include the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, OneUp Innovations, Inc. (“OneUp”), and Foam Labs, Inc. (“Foam Labs”).

The Company is primarily a designer and manufacturer of various specialty furnishings for the sexual wellness, lifestyle and casual furniture and seating market.  The Company has also become an online retailer of products for the sexual wellness market.  All of the Company’s operations are located in the same facility in Atlanta, Georgia, including product development, sales, manufacturing and administration.  Sales are generated through internet and print advertisements.  We have a diversified customer base with only one customer accounting for 10% or more of consolidated net sales in the current and prior fiscal year and no particular concentration of credit risk in one economic sector.  Foreign operations and foreign net sales are not material. Our business is seasonal and as a result we experience higher sales in the second and third fiscal quarters.

NOTE 2. GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplates continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company incurred a net loss of approximately $312,000 and $474,000 for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively and as of June 30, 2016 the Company has an accumulated deficit of approximately $9.2 million and a working capital deficit of approximately $2.4 million. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company, which in turn is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its financing requirements, and the success of its future operations.  Management believes that actions presently being taken to revise the Company’s operating and financial requirements provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern.

These actions include an ongoing initiative to increase sales, gross profits and our gross profit margin. To that end, we continued to make improvements to our e-commerce sites during fiscal 2015 and 2016. We also installed new equipment during fiscal 2015 to increase the efficiency and capacity of our foam repurposing operation. At the end of fiscal 2015 we ordered new equipment to increase our fabric cutting capacity; this equipment was delivered and installed during the first quarter of fiscal 2016. At the end of fiscal 2016, we evaluated various options for increasing the throughput of our compressed foam products and during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, we purchased new equipment for installation during the second quarter of fiscal 2017. These actions should yield higher sales at a lower cost of goods sold. We also plan to continue to manage discretionary expense levels to be better aligned with current and expected revenue levels. We estimate that the operational and strategic growth plans we have identified will require approximately $250,000 of funding, of which we estimate will be provided by debt financing and, to a lesser extent, cash flow from operations as well as cash on hand.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations.  However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing these plans.  The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of our wholly owned operating subsidiaries, OneUp and Foam Labs. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

F-6

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Use of Estimates

 The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions in determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Significant estimates in these consolidated financial statements include estimates of: income taxes; tax valuation reserves; allowances for doubtful accounts; inventory valuation and reserves, share-based compensation; and useful lives for depreciation and amortization.  Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.   

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenues as goods are shipped to customers and title is transferred. The criteria for recognition of revenue are when persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists and both title and risk of loss have passed to the customer, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. Sales returns and allowances are estimated and recorded as a reduction to sales in the period in which sales are recorded.

The Company records product sales net of estimated product returns and discounts from the list prices for its products. The amounts of product returns and the discount amounts have not been material to date. The Company includes shipping and handling costs in cost of product sales.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects management's best estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the accounts receivable balance. The Company determines the allowance based on historical experience, specifically identified nonpaying accounts and other currently available evidence. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful accounts monthly with a focus on significant individual past due balances over 90 days. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its customers.

The following is a summary of Accounts Receivable as of June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015.

F-7

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Inventories and Inventory Reserves

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Market is defined as sales price less cost to dispose and a normal profit margin.  Inventory costs include materials, labor, depreciation and overhead. The company establishes reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, based on prevailing circumstances and judgment for consideration of current events, such as economic conditions, that may affect inventory. The reserve required to record inventory at lower of cost or market may be adjusted in response to changing conditions.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company maintains its cash accounts with banks located in Georgia. The total cash balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000 per bank. The Company had cash balances on deposit at June 30, 2016 and 2015 that exceeded the balance insured by the FDIC by $282,910 and $242,448, respectively. Accounts receivable are typically unsecured and are derived from revenue earned from customers primarily located in North America and Europe.

During 2016, we purchased 21% and 15% of total inventory purchases from two vendors.

During 2015, we purchased 27% and 13% of total inventory purchases from two vendors.

 As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, one of the Company’s customers (Amazon) represents 32% and 32% of the total accounts receivables, respectively. Sales to (and through) Amazon accounted for 28% of our net sales during the year ended June 30, 2016 and 26% of our sales for the year ended June 30, 2015.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

At June 30, 2016 and 2015, our financial instruments included cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, short-term debt, and other long-term debt.

The fair values of these financial instruments approximated their carrying values based on either their short maturity or current terms for similar instruments.

The Company measures the fair value of its assets and liabilities under the guidance of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures , which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements, but its provisions apply to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurement.

ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants based on the highest and best use of the asset or liability. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC 820 requires the Company to use valuation techniques to measure fair value that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized as follows:

· Level 1 : Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

· Level 2 : Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market-corroborated inputs; and

· Level 3 : Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would price the assets or liabilities.

F-8

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

A. Market approach - Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities .

B. Income approach - Uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectations about those future amounts, including present value techniques, option-pricing models and excess earnings method .

C. Cost approach - Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed in the period when the advertisements are first aired or distributed to the public. Prepaid advertising (included in prepaid expenses) was $19,946 at June 30, 2016 and $25,937 at June 30, 2015. Advertising expense for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $345,393 and $411,469, respectively.

 Research and Development

Research and development expenses for new products are expensed as they are incurred.  Expenses for new product development (included in general and administrative expense) totaled $169,500 for the year ended June 30, 2016 and $124,674 for the year ended June 30, 2015.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over estimated service lives for financial reporting purposes of 2-10 years.

Expenditures for major renewals and betterments which extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When properties are disposed of, the related costs and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts, and any gain or loss is recognized currently.

Operating Leases

On July 23, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with its landlord to extend the facilities lease by five years. The previous ten year lease was to expire on December 31, 2015. The agreement amends the lease to expire on December 31, 2020. The lease amendment was effective August 1, 2014 and included a four-month rental abatement in the amount of $117,660. In exchange for the rental abatement, the Company agreed to make improvements to the facility totaling $123,505 within six months of August 1, 2014. As of June 30, 2016, the Company has completed $65,224 of the leasehold improvements. In addition, the monthly rent on the facility decreased from the current rent of $33,139 to $29,415 per month, beginning on December 1, 2014. Beginning January 1, 2015, the monthly rent is on an escalating schedule with the final year of the lease at $35,123 per month. The rent expense under this lease for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $352,479 and $350,082, respectively.

The Company also leases certain equipment under operating leases, as more fully described in Note 15 - Commitments and Contingencies.

F-9

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Segment Information

We have identified three reportable sales channels:  Direct, Wholesale and Other.   Direct includes product sales through our two e-commerce sites and our single retail store. Wholesale includes Liberator branded products sold to distributors and retailers, non- Liberator products sold to retailers, and private label items sold to other resellers. The Wholesale category also includes contract manufacturing services, which consists of specialty items that are manufactured in small quantities for certain customers, and which, to date, has not been a material part of our business. Other consists principally of shipping and handling fees and costs derived from our Direct business and fulfillment service fees.

The following is a summary of sales results for the Direct, Wholesale, and Other channels. 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ ASU No. 2016-09 ”) . This ASU makes several modifications to Topic 718 related to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation, and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. ASU No. 2016-09 also clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The standard is effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this guidance when effective and is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU No. 2016-02”). The principle objective of ASU No. 2016-02 is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet. ASU No. 2016-02 continues to retain a distinction between finance and operating leases but requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term and a corresponding lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms greater than twelve months. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact this standard may have on its consolidated financial statements and the related disclosures.

F-10

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes”. This guidance simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent in the classified statement of financial position. This guidance is effective for the Company as of June 30, 2018 and is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements as the guidance only changes the classification of deferred income taxes.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date” , which defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year to December 15, 2017 for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after that date and permitted early adoption of the standard, but not before the original effective date The Company expects to adopt this guidance when effective and is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11,” Inventory: Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” , that requires inventory not measured using either the last in, first out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable cost of completion, disposal, and transportation.  The new standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and will be applied prospectively.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company is evaluating the impact that this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “ Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs ,” which requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the debt liability rather than as an asset. ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, an entity must apply the new guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements, and must provide certain disclosures about the change in accounting principle, including the nature of and reason for the change, the transition method, a description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted and the effect of the change on the financial statement line items (that is, debt issuance cost asset and the debt liability). The implementation of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

All other newly issued accounting pronouncements, but not yet effective, have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.

Net Loss Per Share

In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification No. 260 (“FASB ASC 260”), “Earnings Per Share”, basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares outstanding as of June 30, 2016 and 2015, which consist of options, warrants, and convertible notes, have been excluded from the diluted net loss per common share calculations because they are anti-dilutive.

The total potential anti-dilutive securities as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

F-11

NOTE 3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Income Taxes

We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. We recognize deferred tax liabilities or assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. We regularly assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. We consider projected future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the amount of the valuation allowance necessary to offset our deferred tax assets that will not be recoverable. We have recorded and continue to carry a full valuation allowance against our gross deferred tax assets that will not reverse against deferred tax liabilities within the scheduled reversal period. If we determine in the future that it is more likely than not that we will realize all or a portion of our deferred tax assets, we will adjust our valuation allowance in the period we make the determination. We expect to provide a full valuation allowance on our future tax benefits until we can sustain a level of profitability that demonstrates our ability to realize these assets. At June 30, 2016, we carried a valuation allowance of $2.8 million against our net deferred tax assets.

Stock Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation to employees in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. We measure the cost of each stock option and restricted stock award at its fair value on the grant date. Each award vests over the subsequent period during which the recipient is required to provide service in exchange for the award (the vesting period). The cost of each award is recognized as expense in the financial statements over the respective vesting period.

Stock Issued for Services to other than Employees

Common stock, stock options and common stock warrants issued to other than employees or directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value, as required by FASB ASC 505, which is measured as of the date required by FASB ASC 505, “Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees”. In accordance with FASB ASC 505, the stock options or common stock warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis of the market price of the underlying common stock on the “valuation date”, which for options and warrants related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to non-performance is the date of the contract, and for all other contracts is the vesting date. Expense related to the options and warrants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the period over which services are to be received or the vesting period. Where expense must be recognized prior to a valuation date, the expense is computed under the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the basis of the market price of the underlying common stock at the end of the period, and any subsequent changes in the market price of the underlying common stock up through the valuation date is reflected in the expense recorded in the subsequent period in which that change occurs.

NOTE 4. IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

We follow Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, regarding impairment of our other long-lived assets (property, plant and equipment). Our policy is to assess our long-lived assets for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of each year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable.

An impairment loss is recognized only if the carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable and is measured as the excess of its carrying value over its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is considered not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of long-lived asset.

Assets to be disposed of and related liabilities would be separately presented in the consolidated balance sheet. Assets to be disposed of would be reported at the lower of the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell and would not be depreciated.  There was no impairment as of June 30, 2016 or 2015.

F-12

NOTE 5. INVENTORIES

All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method of valuation.  The Company’s inventories consist of the following components at June 30, 2016 and 2015:  

NOTE 6. EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS, NET

Property and equipment at June 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense was $225,312 and $219,168 for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

NOTE 7. OTHER ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Other accrued liabilities at June 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:

F-13

NOTE 8. CURRENT AND LONG-TERM DEBT SUMMARY

Current and long-term debt at June 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:

F-14

NOTE 9. UNSECURED NOTES PAYABLE 

Unsecured notes payable at June 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:

F-15

NOTE 10. NOTES PAYABLE- RELATED PARTY

Related party notes payable at June 30, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:

NOTE 11. TERM NOTES PAYABLE - SHAREHOLDER

On September 5, 2014, the Company amended and restated its outstanding 3% Convertible Note in the original principal amount of $375,000 issued by the Company to Hope Capital, Inc. (“HCI”) on June 24, 2009, as amended (the “June 2009 Note”), and the 3% Convertible Note in the original principal amount of $250,000 issued by the Company to HCI on September 2, 2009, as amended (the “September 2009 Note”), the June 2009 Note and September 2009 Note collectively referred to as the “Original Notes”, to provide for a 3% unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $700,000 (the “Note”) to HCI. The Note is due on or before August 31, 2019 and bears interest at the rate of 3% per annum. Principal and interest payments under the Note shall be made on a monthly basis, starting on October 1, 2014 and continuing on the first day of each month thereafter for 60 monthly payments. The first 12 payments are $9,405.60 each and increase 15% each year, with 12 payments of $16,450.45 during year five. In the event the Company fails to make a monthly payment under the Note or the Company is subject to an bankruptcy event (as defined under the Note), subject to the Company’s ability to cure such default, HCI may convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, and any other sums due and payable under the Note into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.10 per share. Conversion is subject to HCI not being able to beneficially own more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock upon any conversion, subject to waiver by HCI. The Company has the right to prepay the Note, in whole or in part, subject to notice to HCI, without penalty. As of June 30, 2016 the principal balance under this Note was $522,324.

The principal payments required at maturity under the Company’s outstanding short term notes, secured line of credit, unsecured line of credit, credit cards loans, short term related party notes and term note payable at June 30, 2016 are as follows:

NOTE 12. CREDIT CARD ADVANCES

On April 24, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Power Up Lending Group, Ltd. (“Power Up”) whereby Power Up agreed to loan OneUp and Foam Labs a total of $400,000. The loan was secured by OneUp’s and Foam Lab’s existing and future credit card collections. Terms of the loan called for a repayment of $448,000, which included a one-time finance charge of $48,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This loan was repaid in full on February 18, 2016 and was guaranteed by the Company and personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman (see Note 16).

On October 1, 2015 the Company borrowed an additional $100,000 from Power Up. Terms for this additional amount call for a repayment of $119,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $19,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This will be accomplished by Power Up withholding a fixed amount each business day of $566.67 from OneUp’s credit card receipts until full repayment is made. This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman (see Note 16).

F-16

NOTE 12. CREDIT CARD ADVANCES (continued)

On February 22, 2016 the Company received another loan that calls for a repayment of $448,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $48,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman (see Note 16).

As of June 30, 2016, the principle amount of the credit card advances totaled $230,798, net of a discount of $30,700.

On August 4, 2016, the Company borrowed an additional amount of $150,000 from Power Up. The loan calls for a repayment of $168,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $18,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman (see Note 16).

On September 22, the Company borrowed an additional amount of $400,000 from Power Up. The loan calls for a repayment of $452,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $52,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. The balance of the February 22, 2016 credit card loan was deducted from this loan and the Company received net proceeds of approximately $270,000. This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman (see Note 16).

NOTE 13. LINE OF CREDIT

 On May 24, 2011, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, OneUp and OneUp’s wholly owned subsidiary, Foam Labs entered into a credit facility with a finance company, Advance Financial Corporation, to provide it with an asset based line of credit of up to $750,000 against 85% of eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the agreement) for the purpose of improving working capital.  The term of the agreement was one year, renewable for additional one-year terms unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal at least 90 days prior to the end of the current financing period. The credit facility was secured by our accounts receivable and other rights to payment, general intangibles, inventory and equipment, and are subject to eligibility requirements for current accounts receivable. Advances under the agreement were charged interest at a rate of 2.5% over the lenders Index Rate.  In addition there was a Monthly Service Fee (as defined in the agreement) of up to 1.25% per month.

On September 4, 2013, the credit agreement with Advance Financial Corporation was amended and restated to increase the asset based line of credit to $1,000,000 to include an Inventory Advance (as defined in the amended and restated receivable financing agreement) of up to the lesser of $300,000 or 75% of the eligible accounts receivable loan. In addition, the amended and restated agreement changed the interest calculation to prime rate plus 3% (as of June 30, 2016, the interest rate was 6.5%) and the Monthly Service Fee was changed to .5% per month.

On December 9, 2015, the credit agreement with Advance Financial Corporation was amended to increase the asset based line of credit to $1,200,000 to include an Inventory Advance (as defined in the amended and restated receivable financing agreement) of up to the lesser of $300,000 or 75% of the eligible accounts receivable loan. All other terms of the credit facility remain the same.

The Company’s CEO, Louis Friedman, has personally guaranteed the repayment of the facility.  In addition, Luvu Brands has provided its corporate guarantee of the credit facility (see Note 16).  On June 30, 2016, the balance owed under this line of credit was $737,264.  As of June 30, 2016, we were current and in compliance with all terms and conditions of this line of credit.

Management believes cash flows generated from operations, along with current cash and investments as well as borrowing capacity under the line of credit should be sufficient to finance capital requirements required by operations. If new business opportunities do arise, additional outside funding may be required.

F-17

NOTE 14. UNSECURED LINES OF CREDIT

The Company has drawn a cash advance on one unsecured lines of credit that is in the name of the Company and Louis S. Friedman (see Note 16). The terms of this unsecured line of credit calls for monthly payments of principal and interest, with interest at 8%. The aggregate amount owed on the unsecured line of credit was $ 27,188 at June 30, 2016 and $40,731 at June 30, 2015.

NOTE 15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Operating Leases

On July 23, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with its landlord to extend the facilities lease by five years. The previous ten year lease was to expire on December 31, 2015. The agreement amends the lease to expire on December 31, 2020. The lease amendment was effective August 1, 2014 and included a four month rental abatement in the amount of $117,660. In exchange for the rental abatement, the Company agreed to make improvements to the facility totaling $123,505 within six months of August 1, 2014. As of June 30, 2016, the Company has completed $65,224 of the leasehold improvements. In addition, the monthly rent on the facility decreased from the current rent of $33,139 to $29,415 per month, beginning on December 1, 2014. Beginning January 1, 2015, the monthly rent is on an escalating schedule with the final year of the lease at $35,123 per month. The rent expense under this lease for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $352,479 and $350,082, respectively.

The Company also leases certain postage equipment under an operating lease.  The monthly lease is $104 per month and expires January 2017.

The Company entered into an operating lease for certain material handling equipment in September 2010.  The monthly lease amount is $1,587 per month and expired in September 2015. Subsequent to September 2015, this operating lease was extended to September 2016 with the monthly lease amount at $1,602.

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases at June 30, 2016 are as follows:

 Capital Leases

The Company has acquired equipment under the provisions of long-term leases. For financial reporting purposes, minimum lease payments relating to the equipment have been capitalized. The leased properties under these capital leases have a total cost of $287,104. These assets are included in the fixed assets listed in Note 6 and include computers, software, furniture, and equipment. The capital leases have stated or imputed interest rates ranging from 7% to 21%.

The following is an analysis of the minimum future lease payments subsequent to the year ended June 30, 2016: 

F-18

NOTE 15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Equipment Notes Payable

The Company has acquired equipment under the provisions of long-term equipment notes. For financial reporting purposes, minimum note payments relating to the equipment have been capitalized. The equipment acquired with these equipment notes has a total cost of $283,218. These assets are included in the fixed assets listed in Note 6 - Equipment and Leasehold Improvements and include production equipment. The equipment notes have stated or imputed interest rates ranging from 10.5% to 11.3%.

The following is an analysis of the minimum future equipment note payable payments subsequent to June 30, 2016: 

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with Louis Friedman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $150,000 and eligibility to receive a bonus.  In certain termination situations, the Company is liable to pay severance compensation to Mr. Friedman for up to nine months at his current salary.

Legal Proceedings

As of the date of this Annual Report, there are no material pending legal or governmental proceedings relating to our company or properties to which we are a party, and to our knowledge there are no material proceedings to which any of our directors, executive officers or affiliates are a party adverse to us or which have a material interest adverse to us.

NOTE 16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has a subordinated note payable to the wife of the Company’s CEO (Louis Friedman) and majority shareholder in the amount of $76,000. Interest on the note during the year ended June 30, 2016 was accrued by the Company at the prevailing prime rate (which is currently 3.5%) and totaled $2,579. The accrued interest on the note as of June 30, 2016 was $17,570. This note is subordinate to all other credit facilities currently in place.

On October 30, 2010, Mr. Friedman, loaned the Company $40,000. Interest on the note during the year ended June 30, 2016 was accrued by the Company at the prevailing prime rate (which is currently 3.5%) and totaled $1,358. The accrued interest on the note as of June 30, 2016 was $3,302. This note is subordinate to all other credit facilities currently in place.

On January 3, 2011, an individual loaned the Company $300,000 with an interest rate of 20%. Interest on the loan is being paid monthly, with the principal due in full on January 3, 2012; extended to January 3, 2013; then extended to January 3, 2015; then extended to January 2, 2017 with the principle due on maturity (see Note 9). Mr. Friedman personally guaranteed the repayment of the loan obligation.

F-19

NOTE 16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)

The Company’s CEO, Louis Friedman, has personally guaranteed the repayment of the loan obligation to Advance Financial Corporation (see Note 13 – Line of Credit).  In addition, Luvu Brands has provided its corporate guarantees of the credit facility.  On June 30, 2016, the balance owed under this line of credit was $737,264.

On July 20, 2011, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to an individual for $100,000. Terms of the promissory note call for monthly interest payments of $1,667 (equal to interest at 20% per annum), with the principal amount due in full on July 31, 2012. On July 31, 2012, the note was extended to July 31, 2013 under the same terms. Prior to June 30, 2013, the note was extended to July 31, 2015 under the same terms. Subsequent to June 30, 2015, the note was extended to July 31, 2017 under the same terms (see Note 9). Repayment of the promissory note is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

On October 31, 2013, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to an individual for $100,000. Terms of the promissory note call for monthly interest payments of $1,667 (equal to interest at 20% per annum) beginning on November 30, 2013, with the principal amount due in full on or before October 31, 2014. Prior to October 31, 2014, the note was extended to October 31, 2015 under the same terms. Prior to October 31, 2015, the note was extended to October 31, 2017 under the same terms (see Note 9). Repayment of the promissory note is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

On May 1, 2012, an individual loaned the Company $200,000 with an interest rate of 20%. Interest on the loan is being paid monthly, with the principal due in full on May 1, 2013; then extended to May 1, 2015; then extended to May 1, 2017 with the principle due on maturity (see Note 9). Mr. Friedman personally guaranteed the repayment of the loan obligation.

The loans from Power Up Lending Group, Ltd. (see Note 12) are guaranteed by the Company (including OneUp and Foam Labs) and are personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman. Power Up Lending Group, Ltd. is controlled by Curt Kramer, who also controls Hope Capital. As last reported to us, Hope Capital, Inc. owns 7.5% of our common stock.

On August 26, 2014, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note for $400,000 to two individual shareholders. Proceeds from the promissory note were used to retire three other notes held by the two individual shareholders including the $250,000 note dated December 19, 2013 with a balance of $92,228; the $250,000 note dated January 20, 2014 with a balance of $111,874 and the $130,000 note dated April 4, 2014 with a balance of $87,899 (collectively the “Prior Notes”). The remaining balance, after paying the balance on the Prior Notes, of $107,999 was received in cash by the Company. Terms of the $400,000 note are 26 bi-weekly payments of principal and interest of $17,033 (see Note 9). At June 30, 2015, the principal balance of this note was $83,235 and was repaid in full on August 28, 2015.  

On April 11, 2016, the Company borrowed $300,000 from two individual shareholders with interest at 20% on an unsecured note payment, principal and interest paid bi-weekly with the final payment due April 7, 2017. The balance due on the $200,000 unsecured note payable due August 30, 2016 was paid in full and the Company received net proceeds of $218,329 after the repayment of the September 1, 2015 loan. At June 30, 2016, the principal balance of this note was $246,852. The loan is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

On June 29, 2016, the Company borrowed $300,000 from two individual shareholders with interest at 20% on an unsecured note payment, principal and interest paid bi-weekly with the final payment due June 30, 2017. The balance due on the $150,000 unsecured note payable due December 14, 2016 was paid in full and the Company received net proceeds of $227,049 after the repayment of the December 12, 2015 loan. At June 30, 2016, the principal balance of this note was $300,000. The loan is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

The Company has drawn a cash advance on one unsecured lines of credit that is in the name of the Company and Louis S. Friedman. The terms of this unsecured line of credit calls for monthly payments of principal and interest, with interest at 8%. The aggregate amount owed on the unsecured line of credit was $27,188 at June 30, 2016 and $40,731 at June 30, 2015. The loan is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

F-20

NOTE 16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)

On September 5, 2014, the Company amended and restated its outstanding 3% Convertible Note in the original principal amount of $375,000 issued by the Company to Hope Capital, Inc. (“HCI”) on June 24, 2009, as amended (the “June 2009 Note”), and the 3% Convertible Note in the original principal amount of $250,000 issued by the Company to HCI on September 2, 2009, as amended (the “September 2009 Note”), the June 2009 Note and September 2009 Note collectively referred to as the “Original Notes”, to provide for a 3% unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $700,000 (the “Note”) to HCI. The Note is due on or before August 31, 2019 and bears interest at the rate of 3% per annum. Principal and interest payments under the Note shall be made on a monthly basis, starting on October 1, 2014 and continuing on the first day of each month thereafter for 60 monthly payments. The first 12 payments are $9,405.60 each and increase 15% every year, with 12 payments of $16,450.45 during year five. In the event the Company fails to make a monthly payment under the Note or the Company is subject to an bankruptcy event (as defined under the Note), subject to the Company’s ability to cure such default, HCI may convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, and any other sums due and payable under the Note into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.10 per share. Conversion is subject to HCI not being able to beneficially own more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock upon any conversion, subject to waiver by HCI. The Company has the right to prepay the Note, in whole or in part, subject to notice to HCI, without penalty. At June 30, 2016, the principal balance under the Note was $522,324.

On November 6, 2015, the Company sold 750,000 shares of restricted common stock to the Company’s President and CEO, Louis Friedman, for $75,000. We relied upon the exemption from registration as set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the issuance of these securities as the transaction was by the issuer and did not involve any public offering.

NOTE 17. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Options 

 At June 30, 2016, the Company had the 2009 and 2015 Stock Option Plans (the “Plans”), which are shareholder-approved and under which 4,170,000 shares are reserved for issuance under the 2009 Plan until that Plan terminates on October 20, 2019 and 5,000,000 shares are reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan until that Plan terminates on August 31, 2025.

Under the Plans, eligible employees and certain independent consultants may be granted options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. The shares issuable under the Plan will either be shares of the Company’s authorized but previously unissued common stock or shares reacquired by the Company, including shares purchased on the open market. As of June 30, 2016, the number of shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan was 2,300,000. There are no shares available for issuance under the 2009 Plan, other than the 4,170,000 stock options that have already been granted.

All stock option grants made under the Plan were at exercise prices no less than the Company’s closing stock price on the date of grant.  Options under the Plan were determined by the board of directors in accordance with the provisions of the plan.  The terms of each option grant include vesting, exercise, and other conditions are set forth in a Stock Option Agreement evidencing each grant.  No option can have a life in excess of ten (10) years.  The Company records compensation expense for employee stock options based on the estimated fair value of the options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.  The model requires various assumptions, including a risk-free interest rate, the expected term of the options, the expected stock price volatility over the expected term of the options, and the expected dividend yield.  Compensation expense for employee stock options is recognized ratably over the vesting term.  The Company has no awards with market or performance conditions.

F-21

NOTE 17. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense by line item in the consolidated statements of operations, all relating to employee stock plans:

Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for each of the twelve month period ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is based on awards ultimately expected to vest.

 A summary of option activity under the Company’s stock plan for the year ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 is presented below:  

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before applicable income taxes and represents the excess amount over the exercise price optionees would have received if all options had been exercised on the last business day of the period indicated, based on the Company’s closing stock price of $.0183 for such day. 

 A summary of the Company’s non-vested options for the year ended June 30, 2016 is presented below:

The weighted average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during fiscal years 2016 and 2015 were $54,940 and $10,395, respectively.  The total grant-date fair values of stock options that vested during fiscal years 2016 and 2015 were $40,979 and $69,492, respectively.

F-22

NOTE 17. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

The following table summarizes the weighted average characteristics of outstanding stock options as of June 30, 2016:

The range of fair value assumptions related to options granted during the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows: 

As of June 30, 2016, total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to all unvested stock options was $62,412, which is expected to be expensed over a weighted average period of 3.4 years.

Share Purchase Warrants

As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no share purchase warrants outstanding.

Common Stock

The Company’s authorized common stock was 175,000,000 shares at June 30, 2016 and 2015.  Common shareholders are entitled to dividends if and when declared by the Company’s Board of Directors, subject to preferred stockholder dividend rights. At June 30, 2016, the Company had reserved the following shares of common stock for issuance:

On November 6, 2015, the Company sold 750,000 shares of restricted common stock to the Company’s President and CEO, Louis Friedman, for $75,000. We relied upon the exemption from registration as set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the issuance of these securities as the transaction was by the issuer and did not involve any public offering (see Note 16).

F-23

NOTE 17. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)

Preferred Stock

On February 18, 2011, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation, effective February 9, 2011, authorizing the issuance of preferred stock and the Company now has 10,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, par value $.0001 per share, of which 4,300,000 shares have been designated and issued as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into one share of common stock and has a liquidation preference of $.2325 ($1,000,000 in the aggregate). Liquidation payments to the preferred holders have priority and are made in preference to any payments to the holders of common stock. In addition, each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to the number of votes equal to the result of: (i) the number of shares of common stock of the Company issued and outstanding at the time of such vote multiplied by 1.01; divided by (ii) the total number of Series A Convertible Preferred Shares issued and outstanding at the time of such vote. At each meeting of shareholders of the Company with respect to any and all matters presented to the shareholders of the Company for their action or consideration, including the election of directors, holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Shares shall vote together with the holders of common shares as a single class.

NOTE 18. INCOME TAXES

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed by applying the effective U.S. federal income tax rate to the gross amounts of temporary differences and other tax attributes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities relating to state income taxes are not material. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As of June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company believed it was more likely than not that future tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets would not be realizable through generation of future taxable income; therefore, they were fully reserved.

The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 2016 and 2015 are approximately as follows:

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal and state income tax rates of 38% to pretax loss from operations for the years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 due to the following:

F-24

NOTE 18. INCOME TAXES (continued)

At June 30, 2016, the Company had net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards of approximately $7.2 million that may be offset against future taxable income. During 2016 and 2015, the total increase in the valuation allowance was $118,549 and $179,834, respectively. The Company’s ability to use its NOL carryforwards may be substantially limited due to ownership change limitations that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), as well as similar state provisions. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an “ownership change” as defined by Section 382 of the Code results from a transaction or series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50.0% of the outstanding stock of a company by certain stockholders or public groups.

The Company has not completed a study to assess whether an ownership change has occurred or whether there have been multiple ownership changes since the Company became a “loss corporation” under the definition of Section 382. If the Company has experienced an ownership change, utilization of the NOL carryforwards would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 of the Code, which is determined by first multiplying the value of the Company’s stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term, tax-exempt rate, and then could be subject to additional adjustments, as required. Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the NOL carryforwards before utilization. Further, until a study is completed and any limitation known, no positions related to limitations are being considered as an uncertain tax position or disclosed as an unrecognized tax benefit. Any carryforwards that expire prior to utilization as a result of such limitations will be removed from deferred tax assets with a corresponding reduction of the valuation allowance. Due to the existence of the valuation allowance, it is not expected that any possible limitation will have an impact on the results of operations or financial position of the Company.  The NOL carryforwards expire in the years 2025 through 2036.

The tax years that remain subject to examination by major taxing jurisdictions are those for the years ended June 30, 2010 through 2016.

NOTE 19. – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On August 4, 2016, the Company borrowed $150,000 from Power Up. The loan calls for a repayment of $168,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $18,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman (see Note 12).

On September 22, 2016, the company borrowed an additional $400,000 from Power Up. Terms for this additional amount call for a repayment of $452,000, which includes a one-time finance charge of $52,000, approximately ten months after the funding date. This will be accomplished by Power Up withholding a fixed amount each business day of $2,152 from OneUp’s credit card receipts until full repayment is made. The balance of the February 22, 2016 credit card loan was deducted from this loan and the Company received net proceeds from Power Up of approximately $270,000.This loan is guaranteed by the Company and is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman (see Note 12).

F-25

ITEM 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

There are no events required to be disclosed under this Item.

ITEM 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined to mean a company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.  Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on those evaluations, as of June 30, 2016, our CEO and CFO believe that:

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

(a)           Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.  Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

Because of its inherent limitations, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.  Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016. This assessment was based on the framework in 1992 Internal Control—Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our assessment, using those criteria, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2016.

21

This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to a permanent exemption of the SEC that permits the Company to provide only management’s report in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2016, has not been audited by our auditors or any other independent registered accounting firm.

(b)            Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) or Rule15d-15(d) promulgated under the Exchange Act that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.  Other Information

None.  

PART III.

ITEM 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

The following table sets forth the officers and directors of Luvu Brands, Inc. as of June 30, 2016.

All directors serve for one-year terms until their successors are elected or they are re-elected at the annual shareholders’ meeting.  Officers hold their positions at the pleasure of the board of directors.

There is no arrangement, agreement or understanding between any of the directors or officers and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was or is to be selected as a director or officer.  Also, there is no arrangement, agreement or understanding between management and non-management shareholders under which non-management shareholders may directly or indirectly participate in or influence the management of our affairs.

Directors are not presently compensated for their service on the board, other than the repayment of actual expenses incurred.  There are no present plans to compensate directors for their service on the board.

Background of Executive Officers and Directors

Louis S. Friedman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director.   Mr. Friedman has served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and director since our merger with Old Liberator in October 2009.  Prior to that, he served as Old Liberator’s Chief Executive Officer and a director since June 2009, when OneUp Innovations, Inc. merged with Old Liberator in June 2009.  Mr. Friedman founded OneUp in 2000. Before starting OneUp, Mr. Friedman was in business consulting, venture capital and private investing from 1990 to 2000.  Earlier in his career, Mr. Friedman was Executive Vice President of Chemtronics, Inc., until its sale to Morgan Crucible in 1990. As Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Friedman has relevant insight into our operations, our industry, and related risks as well as experience bringing consumer products to market.

Ronald Scott, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director.   Mr. Scott joined the Company in October 2009 in connection with our merger with Old Liberator.  Prior to that, he served as Old Liberator’s Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and a director since June 2009, when OneUp Innovations, Inc. merged with Old Liberator in June 2009.  Mr. Scott joined OneUp Innovations as a part-time consultant in July, 2006 and as a full-time consultant in October, 2007, serving as its Chief Financial Officer.  From 2004 to 2009, Mr. Scott was president of Impact Business Solutions, LLC, a consulting business that provides financial management services. Prior to Impact Business Solutions, and from 1990 to 2004, Mr. Scott was Executive Vice President - Finance and Administration and a member of the Board of Directors for Cyanotech Corporation, a NASDAQ-listed natural products company. Mr. Scott holds a B.S. degree in Finance and Management from San Jose State University and an M.B.A. degree with a concentration in Accounting from Santa Clara University. Mr. Scott has relevant operating experience with small, high growth companies and an in-depth understanding of generally accepted accounting principles, financial statements and SEC reporting requirements.

22

Leslie Vogelman, Treasurer.   Ms. Vogelman joined the Company in October 2009 in connection with our merger with Old Luvu Brands, Inc.  Prior to that, she served as Old Liberator’s Treasurer since June 2009, when OneUp Innovations, Inc. merged with Old Liberator in June 2009.  Ms. Vogelman joined OneUp at its inception in 2000 as Secretary and Treasurer.  Ms. Vogelman holds a B.A. from the State University of New York in Binghamton and an M.B.A. from Adelphi University.

The experience and background of each of the directors, as summarized above, were significant factors in their previously being nominated as directors of the Company.

Family Relationships

Louis Friedman, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, and Leslie Vogelman, our Treasurer, are husband and wife.

There are no other relationships between the officers or directors of the Company.

  Committees

As of June 30, 2016, we have not established an audit committee or any other committee of the board of directors and, therefore, the responsibilities of such committees have been conducted by our board of directors as a whole.

An audit committee’s primary functions are to: (i) serve as an independent and objective party to monitor our financial reporting process and internal control system; (ii) review and appraise the audit efforts of our independent accountants; (iii) evaluate our Annual financial performance as well as our compliance with laws and regulations; (iv) oversee management’s establishment and enforcement of financial policies and business practices; and (v) provide an open avenue of communication among the independent accountants, management and our board of directors.

We may, in the future, establish an audit committee and/or other committees of the board of directors.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

In general, an “audit committee financial expert” is an individual who:

 Our board of directors has determined that Ronald Scott, our Chief Financial Officer, is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the foregoing definition.

Diversity

While the Company does not have a policy regarding diversity of its board members, diversity is one of a number of factors that is typically taken into account in identifying board nominees.  We only have two members on our board of directors, but we hope to add more members for a diverse board in terms of previous business experience and educational and personal background of the members of our board.

23

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership, and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common shares and other equity securities on Forms 3, 4, and 5 respectively.  Executive officers, directors, and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.  Based on a review of the copies of such forms received by us, and to the best of our knowledge, there were no reports untimely filed during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.

Code of Ethics

We have not yet adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. We are currently working towards developing a formal Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which will apply to all of our employees, including our board of directors. When available, a copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics may, upon request made to us in writing at the following address, be made available without charge: 2745 Bankers Industrial Drive, Atlanta, Georgia, 30360.

ITEM 11.      Executive Compensation.

Summary Compensation Table

The following summary compensation table indicates the cash and non-cash compensation earned during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 by our named executive officers as defined in Item 402(a) of Regulation S-K (each an “NEO”).

24

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table summarizes information concerning each grant of an award made in our fiscal year ending June 30, 2016 to each of our NEOs:

 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table shows, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, certain information regarding outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end for our Named Executive Officers.

Employment Agreement

The Company has entered into an employment agreement with Louis Friedman, President and Chief Executive Officer. The agreement provides for an annual base salary of $150,000 and eligibility to receive a bonus, should the Company implement a bonus plan for executives.  Under the agreement, this executive employee may be terminated at any time with or without cause, or by reason of death or disability.  In certain termination situations, the Company is liable to pay severance compensation to this executive for up to 9 months.

Directors’ Compensation

For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, our directors did not receive any compensation in their capacity as a director.

25

ITEM 12.      Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table sets forth certain information known to us with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

 Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock held by them.

Applicable percentage ownership in the following table is based on 71,452,596 shares of common stock outstanding as of September 26, 2016.  

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of September 26, 2016, are deemed outstanding. Such shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise disclosed these persons’ address is c/o Luvu Brands, Inc., 2745 Bankers Industrial Drive, Atlanta, GA 30360.

26

ITEM 13.      Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Related Party Transactions

The Company’s CEO, Louis Friedman, has personally guaranteed the repayment of the loan obligation to Advance Financial Corporation.  In addition, Liberator has provided its corporate guarantees of the credit facility.  On June 30, 2016, the balance owed under this line of credit was $737,264.

The loans from Power Up Lending Group, Ltd. are guaranteed by the Company (including OneUp and Foam Labs) and are personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman. Power Up Lending Group, Ltd. is controlled by Curt Kramer, who also controls Hope Capital. As last reported to us, Hope Capital, Inc. owns 7.5% of our common stock.

The Company has a subordinated note payable to the wife of the Company’s CEO (Louis Friedman) and majority shareholder in the amount of $76,000. Interest on the note during the year ended June 30, 2016 was accrued by the Company at the prevailing prime rate (which is currently 3.5%) and totaled $2,579. The accrued interest on the note as of June 30, 2016 was $17,570. This note is subordinate to all other credit facilities currently in place.

On October 30, 2010, Mr. Friedman, loaned the Company $40,000. Interest on the loan is accrued by the Company at the prevailing prime rate (which was 3.5% on June 30, 2016) and totaled $1,358 for the year ended June 30, 2016. On February 21, 2014, one interest installment payment was made to Mr. Friedman in the amount of $4,184. The accrued interest on the note as of June 30, 2016 was $3,302. This note is subordinate to all other credit facilities currently in place.

On January 3, 2011, an individual loaned the Company $300,000 with an interest rate of 20%. Interest on the loan is being paid monthly, with the principal due in full on January 3, 2012; extended to January 3, 2013; then extended to January 3, 2015; then extended to January 4, 2016; then extended to January 2, 2017 with the principle due on maturity. Mr. Friedman personally guaranteed the repayment of the loan obligation.

On July 20, 2011, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to an individual for $100,000. Terms of the promissory note call for monthly interest payments of $1,667 (equal to interest at 20% per annum), with the principal amount due in full on July 31, 2012. On July 31, 2012, the note was extended to July 31, 2013 under the same terms. Prior to June 30, 2013, the note was extended to July 31, 2015 under the same terms. Prior to July 31, 2015, the note was extended to July 31, 2017 under the same terms. Repayment of the promissory note is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

On October 31, 2013, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note to an individual for $100,000. Terms of the promissory note call for monthly interest payments of $1,667 (equal to interest at 20% per annum) beginning on November 30, 2013, with the principal amount due in full on or before October 31, 2014. Prior to October 31, 2014, the note was extended to October 31, 2015 under the same terms. Prior to October 31, 2015, the note was extended to October 31, 2017 under the same terms. Repayment of the promissory note is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

27

On May 1, 2012, an individual loaned the Company $200,000 with an interest rate of 20%. Interest on the loan is being paid monthly, with the principal due in full on May 1, 2013; then extended to May 1, 2015; then extended to May 1, 2017 with the principle due on maturity. Mr. Friedman personally guaranteed the repayment of the loan obligation.

On August 26, 2014, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note for $400,000 to two individual shareholders. Proceeds from the promissory note were used to retire three other notes held by the two individual shareholders including the $250,000 note dated December 19, 2013 with a balance of $92,228; the $250,000 note dated January 20, 2014 with a balance of $111,874 and the $130,000 note dated April 4, 2014 with a balance of $87,899 (collectively the “Prior Notes”). The remaining balance, after paying the balance on the Prior Notes, of $107,999 was received in cash by the Company. Terms of the $400,000 note are 26 bi-weekly payments of principal and interest of $17,033. At June 30, 2015, the principal balance of this note as $83,235 and was repaid in full on August 28, 2015.

 On September 5, 2014, the Company amended and restated its outstanding 3% Convertible Note in the original principal amount of $375,000 issued by the Company to Hope Capital, Inc. (“HCI”) on June 24, 2009, as amended (the “June 2009 Note”), and the 3% Convertible Note in the original principal amount of $250,000 issued by the Company to HCI on September 2, 2009, as amended (the “September 2009 Note”), the June 2009 Note and September 2009 Note collectively referred to as the “Original Notes”, to provide for a 3% unsecured promissory note in the principal amount of $700,000 (the “Note”) to HCI. The Note is due on or before August 31, 2019 and bears interest at the rate of 3% per annum. Principal and interest payments under the Note shall be made on a monthly basis, starting on October 1, 2014 and continuing on the first day of each month thereafter for 60 monthly payments. The first 12 payments are $9,405.60 each and increase 15% every year, with 12 payments of $16,450.45 during year five. In the event the Company fails to make a monthly payment under the Note or the Company is subject to an bankruptcy event (as defined under the Note), subject to the Company’s ability to cure such default, HCI may convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, and any other sums due and payable under the Note into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to $0.10 per share. Conversion is subject to HCI not being able to beneficially own more than 9.99% of our outstanding common stock upon any conversion, subject to waiver by HCI. The Company has the right to prepay the Note, in whole or in part, subject to notice to HCI, without penalty. At June 30, 2016, the principal balance under the Note was $522,324.

On April 11, 2016, the Company borrowed $300,000 from two individual shareholders with interest at 20% on an unsecured note payment, principal and interest paid bi-weekly with the final payment due April 7, 2017. The balance due on the $200,000 unsecured note payable due August 30, 2016 was paid in full and the Company received net proceeds of $218,329 after the repayment of the September 1, 2015 loan. At June 30, 2016, the principal balance of this note was $246,852. The loan is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

On June 29, 2016, the Company borrowed $300,000 from two individual shareholders with interest at 20% on an unsecured note payment, principal and interest paid bi-weekly with the final payment due June 30, 2017. The balance due on the $150,000 unsecured note payable due December 14, 2016 was paid in full and the Company received net proceeds of $227,049 after the repayment of the December 12, 2015 loan. At June 30, 2016, the principal balance of this note was $300,000. The loan is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

The Company has drawn a cash advance on one unsecured line of credit that is in the name of the Company and Louis S. Friedman. The terms of this unsecured line of credit calls for a monthly payment of principal and interest, with interest at 8%. The aggregate amount owed on the unsecured line of credit was $27,188 at June 30, 2016 and $40,731 at June 30, 2015. The loan is personally guaranteed by the Company’s CEO and majority shareholder, Louis S. Friedman.

On November 6, 2015, the Company sold 750,000 shares of restricted common stock to the Company’s President and CEO, Louis Friedman, for $75,000. We relied upon the exemption from registration as set forth in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the issuance of these securities as the transaction was by the issuer and did not involve any public offering.

Director Independence

Our board of directors has determined that none of its current members qualifies as “independent” as the term is used in Item 407 of Regulation S-K as promulgated by the SEC or under Nasdaq’s Marketplace Rule 5605(a)(2).

28

ITEM 14.      Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

The aggregate fees billed by our principal accountant for each of the last two fiscal years for Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees are as follows:

Our board of directors reviews and approves audit and permissible non-audit services performed by its independent accountants, as well as the fees charged for such services.  In its review of non-audit service fees and its appointment of Liggett & Webb P.A. as our independent accountants, the Board considered whether the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining independence.  All of the services provided and fees charged by Liggett & Webb P.A. were approved by the Board.

29

PART IV.

 ITEM 15.      Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

Financial Statements; Schedules

Our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 begin on page F-1 of this annual report.  We are not required to file any financial statement schedules.

Exhibit Table