M&F BANCORP INC /NC/ - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
Commission
file number 000-27307
North
Carolina
|
56-1980549
|
||||||||||||
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
||||||||||||
2634
Durham Chapel Hill Blvd., Durham, NC 27707-2800
|
|||||||||||||
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|||||||||||||
(919)
687-7800
|
|||||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the previous 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check One)
Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o No x
State the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date:
As of
April 29, 2010, there were 2,031,337 shares outstanding of the issuer’s common
stock, no par value.
M&F
BANCORP, INC
Table of
Contents
PART I......................................................................................................................................................................................................1
FINANCIAL INFORMATION .............................................................................................................................................................1
Item 1- Financial Statements .................................................................................................................................................................1
Item 2--Management’s Discussion and
Analysis..............................................................................................................................17
Item 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk ........................................................................................28
PART II ....................................................................................................................................................................................................28
OTHER INFORMATION.......................................................................................................................................................................28
Item 1 — Legal Proceedings..................................................................................................................................................................28
Item 1A – Risk Factors ...........................................................................................................................................................................28
Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds.........................................................................................28
Item 3 — Defaults Upon Senior Securities...........................................................................................................................................28
Item 4 — Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders.......................................................................................................28
Item 5 — Other Information ...................................................................................................................................................................28
Item 6 — Exhibits .....................................................................................................................................................................................28
|
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
PART
I
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1- Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
||||||
AS
OF
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||
ASSETS
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 39,924 | $ | 30,313 | ||
Investment
securities available for sale, at fair value
|
17,304 | 17,699 | ||||
Other
invested assets
|
1,061 | 1,061 | ||||
Loans,
net of unearned income and deferred fees
|
208,478 | 210,111 | ||||
Allowances
for loan losses
|
(3,749 | (3,564 | ) | |||
Loans,
net
|
204,729 | 206,547 | ||||
Interest
receivable
|
879 | 935 | ||||
Bank
premises and equipment, net
|
4,776 | 4,852 | ||||
Cash
surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
|
5,546 | 5,499 | ||||
Other
real estate owned
|
2,159 | 2,176 | ||||
Deferred
tax assets and taxes receivable, net
|
4,362 | 4,402 | ||||
Other
assets
|
961 | 897 | ||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 281,701 | $ | 274,381 | ||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||
Deposits
|
||||||
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
$ | 194,196 | $ | 186,791 | ||
Noninterest-bearing
deposits
|
43,847 | 38,016 | ||||
Total
deposits
|
238,043 | 224,807 | ||||
Other
borrowings
|
1,761 | 7,766 | ||||
Other
liabilities
|
5,325 | 5,253 | ||||
Total
liabilities
|
245,129 | 237,826 | ||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||
Common
stock, no par value 10,000,000 shares authorized as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009; 2,031,337 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009
|
8,732 | 8,732 | ||||
Series
A Preferred stock- $1,000 liquidation value per share, 11,735
shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009
|
11,720 | 11,719 | ||||
Retained
earnings
|
17,169 | 17,128 | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,049 | (1,024 | ) | |||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
36,572 | 36,555 | ||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 281,701 | $ | 274,381 | ||
See
notes to consolidated financial statements
|
1
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
||||||||
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 AND 2009
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands except per share data)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||
Loans,
including fees
|
$ | 3,139 | $ | 3,280 | ||||
Investment
securities, including dividends
|
||||||||
Taxable
|
113 | 220 | ||||||
Tax-exempt
|
81 | 126 | ||||||
Other
|
14 | 8 | ||||||
Total
interest income
|
3,347 | 3,634 | ||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||
Deposits
|
536 | 863 | ||||||
Borrowings
|
2 | 34 | ||||||
Total
interest expense
|
538 | 897 | ||||||
Net
interest income
|
2,809 | 2,737 | ||||||
Less
provision for loan losses
|
191 | 59 | ||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
2,618 | 2,678 | ||||||
Noninterest
income:
|
||||||||
Service
charges
|
439 | 423 | ||||||
Rental
income
|
61 | 69 | ||||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
48 | 48 | ||||||
Realized
gain on disposition of securities
|
16 | 62 | ||||||
Realized
gain on sale of real estate owned
|
14 | 1 | ||||||
Realized
loss on disposal of assets
|
(3 | ) | - | |||||
Other
income
|
(1 | ) | 1 | |||||
Total
noninterest income
|
574 | 604 | ||||||
Noninterest
expense:
|
||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
1,238 | 1,502 | ||||||
Occupancy
and equipment
|
395 | 488 | ||||||
Directors
fees
|
87 | 84 | ||||||
Marketing
|
38 | 41 | ||||||
Professional
fees
|
254 | 244 | ||||||
Information
technology
|
225 | 156 | ||||||
FDIC
deposit insurance
|
239 | 53 | ||||||
Other
|
435 | 310 | ||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
2,911 | 2,878 | ||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
281 | 404 | ||||||
Income
tax expense
|
59 | 98 | ||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 222 | $ | 306 | ||||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
146 | - | ||||||
Net
income available to common stockholders
|
$ | 76 | $ | 306 | ||||
Basic
and diluted earnings per share of common stock:
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Weighted
average shares of common stock outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
and diluted
|
2,031,337 | 2,031,337 | ||||||
Dividends
per share of common stock
|
$ | 0.0175 | $ | - | ||||
See
notes to consolidated financial statements
|
2
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
|
||||||||||||||||||
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 and 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||
of
|
Common
|
Preferred
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Shares
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Earnings
|
Loss
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2008
|
2,031,337 | $ | 8,732 | $ | - | $ | 16,972 | $ | (1,385 | ) | $ | 24,319 | ||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
306 | 306 | ||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
98 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
404 | |||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of March 31, 2009
|
2,031,337 | $ | 8,732 | $ | - | $ | 17,278 | $ | (1,287 | ) | $ | 24,723 | ||||||
Balances
as of December 31, 2009
|
2,031,337 | $ | 8,732 | $ | 11,719 | $ | 17,128 | $ | (1,024 | ) | $ | 36,555 | ||||||
Accretion
of preferred stock issuance costs
|
1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
222 | 222 | ||||||||||||||||
Other
comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
(25 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income, net of tax
|
197 | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared on preferred stock
|
(146 | ) | (146 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Dividends
declared on common stock ($0.0175 per share)
|
(35 | ) | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balances
as of March 31, 2010
|
2,031,337 | $ | 8,732 | $ | 11,720 | $ | 17,169 | $ | (1,049 | ) | $ | 36,572 | ||||||
See
notes to consolidated financial statements
|
3
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||||||
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 and 2009
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 222 | $ | 306 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
||||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
191 | 59 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
102 | 164 | ||||||
Loss
from disposals of bank premises and equipment
|
3 | - | ||||||
Amortization
of premiums/discounts on investments, net
|
5 | 6 | ||||||
Loan
purchase accounting amortization and accretion, net
|
43 | 43 | ||||||
Deferred
loan origination fees and costs, net
|
61 | 24 | ||||||
Gains
on disposition of available for sale securities
|
(16 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||
Increase
in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
(48 | ) | (48 | ) | ||||
(Gain)
loss on sale of other real estate owned
|
(14 | ) | - | |||||
Changes
in:
|
||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable and other assets
|
65 | 449 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
90 | (323 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
704 | 618 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Activity
in available-for-sale securities:
|
||||||||
Sales
|
- | 4,165 | ||||||
Maturities,
prepayments and calls
|
443 | 2,914 | ||||||
Principal
collections
|
922 | 1,348 | ||||||
Purchases
|
(1,000 | ) | (2,086 | ) | ||||
Net
decrease (increase) in loans
|
1,440 | (3,081 | ) | |||||
Purchases
of bank premises and equipment
|
(29 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of real estate owned
|
96 | - | ||||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
1,872 | 3,187 | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net
increase in deposits
|
13,236 | 6,557 | ||||||
Net
decrease from other borrowings
|
(6,005 | ) | (18,634 | ) | ||||
Cash
dividends
|
(196 | ) | - | |||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
7,035 | (12,077 | ) | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
9,611 | (8,272 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents as of the beginning of the period
|
30,313 | 13,776 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents as of the end of the period
|
$ | 39,924 | $ | 5,504 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 478 | $ | 820 | ||||
Income
taxes
|
5 | - | ||||||
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
4
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of
Presentation
The
Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts and transactions of
M&F Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned bank subsidiary,
Mechanics and Farmers Bank (the “Bank”). All significant inter-company accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Consolidated
Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial
statements and in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of
Regulation S-X. The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes are
unaudited except for the balance sheet and footnote information as of December
31, 2009, which were derived from the Company’s audited consolidated Annual
Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The
Consolidated Financial Statements included herein do not include all the
information and notes required by GAAP and should be read in conjunction with
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included in
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December
31, 2009.
In the
opinion of management, the interim financial statements include all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of
the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the Consolidated
Financial Statements. The unaudited operating results for the periods presented
may not be indicative of annual results.
Reclassification—Certain
amounts in the Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation. These
reclassifications have had no impact on reported amounts of net income,
shareholder’s equity or total assets.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860)
– Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Update
amends the Codification for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. The
amendments in this update improve financial reporting by eliminating the
exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from the consolidation
guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage
securitizations when a transferor has not surrendered control over the
transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require
enhanced disclosures about the risks that a transferor continues to be exposed
to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial
assets. Comparability and consistency in accounting for transferred
financial assets will also be improved through clarifications of the
requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that
are eligible for sale accounting. This update is effective at the
start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15,
2009. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or
results of operation.
In
January 2010, the FASB issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) entitled
“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)—Improving Disclosures about
Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 820”) which amends ASC 820-10. This
ASU requires new disclosures: (i) of significant transfers in and out
of Levels 1 and 2 with reasons for the transfers; and (ii) activity in Level 3
fair value measurements, including purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements
on a gross basis. In addition, the reporting entity should provide
fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities, and
disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value of
both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The ASU
includes conforming amendments to the guidance on employers’ disclosures about
postretirement benefit plan assets (ASC 715-20). These amendments
change the terminology from major categories of assets to classes of assets and
provide a cross reference to ASC 820-10 on how to determine appropriate class to
present fair value disclosures. This ASU is effective for interim and
annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of Level 3 fair
value measurements, which are effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010 and interim periods within those years. This ASU
requires additional disclosures which will not have an impact on the Company’s
results of operations or assets.
5
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
2.
|
Earnings
Per Share
|
Basic
earnings per share (“EPS”) computations are based upon the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the reporting periods. Diluted EPS
computations are based upon the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during each reporting period plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock
options. The Company had no options outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and 25,200
options outstanding as of March 31, 2009 all of which were anti-dilutive for the
three months ended March 31, 2009. The options and the option plan expired on
December 31, 2009. Basic and diluted earnings per share of common stock were
$0.04 and $0.15 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
3.
|
Loans
|
Loans are
made primarily to customers in the Company’s market areas within North Carolina
which include Raleigh, Durham, Charlotte, Winston-Salem, and
Greensboro. The Company’s loans, classified by type are as
follows:
(Unaudited)
|
March
31, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Amount
|
%
of Total
|
Amount
|
%
of Total
|
||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 8,415 | 4.04 | % | $ | 8,605 | 4.10 | % | ||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
18,191 | 8.73 | 16,987 | 8.08 | ||||||||||||
Consumer
|
5,660 | 2.71 | 5,891 | 2.80 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
134,540 | 64.54 | 135,249 | 64.37 | ||||||||||||
Consumer
real estate mortgage
|
41,016 | 19.67 | 42,706 | 20.33 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
656 | 0.31 | 673 | 0.32 | ||||||||||||
$ | 208,478 | 100.00 | % | $ | 210,111 | 100.00 | % |
Nonperforming
assets were as follows:
(Unaudited)
|
March
31
|
December
31
|
||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Loans
contractually past due 90 days or more and/or on nonaccrual
status
|
||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 1,350 | $ | 1,263 | ||||
Real
estate construction
|
717 | 681 | ||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
5,183 | 4,703 | ||||||
Consumer
real estate mortgage
|
2,468 | 2,352 | ||||||
Total
nonaccrual loans
|
9,718 | 8,999 | ||||||
Foreclosed
properties
|
2,159 | 2,176 | ||||||
Total
nonperforming assets
|
$ | 11,877 | $ | 11,175 | ||||
Nonperforming
assets to:
|
||||||||
Loans
outstanding at end of quarter
|
5.70 | % | 5.32 | % | ||||
Total
assets at end of quarter
|
4.22 | 4.07 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming assets
|
31.57 | 31.89 |
6
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
4.
|
Allowances
for Loan Losses
|
Allowances
for loan losses consisted of the following:
(Unaudited)
|
March
31, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Amount
|
Allowance
|
%
of Total
|
Amount
|
Allowance
|
%
of Total
|
||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 8,415 | $ | 577 | 0.28 | % | $ | 8,605 | $ | 515 | 0.25 | |||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
18,191 | 232 | 0.11 | 16,987 | 176 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
5,660 | 97 | 0.05 | 5,891 | 122 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
134,540 | 2,196 | 1.05 | 135,249 | 2,238 | 1.07 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
real estate mortgage
|
41,016 | 576 | 0.28 | 42,706 | 485 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
656 | 71 | 0.03 | 673 | 28 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 208,478 | $ | 3,749 | 1.80 | % | $ | 210,111 | $ | 3,564 | 1.70 |
The
activity in the allowance for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 is as
follows:
As
of and for the
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Average
amount of loans outstanding, net of unearned
income/expense
|
$ | 207,943 | $ | 208,672 | ||||
Amount
of loans outstanding at quarter end, net of unearned
income
|
208,478 | 210,111 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses:
|
||||||||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
$ | 3,564 | $ | 2,962 | ||||
Loans
charged-off:
|
||||||||
Consumer
real estate mortgage
|
4 | 1 | ||||||
Total
charge-offs
|
4 | 1 | ||||||
Recoveries
of loans previously charged-off:
|
||||||||
Commercial
|
- | 18 | ||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
1 | 1 | ||||||
Consumer
real estate mortgage
|
2 | 2 | ||||||
Total
recoveries
|
3 | 21 | ||||||
Net
loans charged off
|
1 | (20 | ) | |||||
Bounce
protection charge-offs (net)
|
5 | 9 | ||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
191 | 59 | ||||||
Balance
at end of year (1)
|
$ | 3,749 | $ | 3,032 |
7
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
The loans
classified as impaired and substandard with the respective allowance are shown
in the table below:
Impaired
and TDR Loans
|
Impaired
and TDR Loans
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
As
of March 31, 2010
|
As
of December 31, 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Amount
|
Allowance
|
Coverage
|
Amount
|
Allowance
|
Coverage
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired
loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 110 | $ | 75 | 68.18 | % | $ | 1,607 | $ | 35 | 2.18 | % | ||||||||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
1,835 | 65 | 3.54 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
real estate mortgage
|
1,329 | 48 | 3.61 | 1,605 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 3,274 | $ | 188 | 5.74 | % | $ | 3,212 | $ | 35 | 1.09 | % | ||||||||||||
TDRs
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 1,239 | $ | - | - | % | $ | 1,263 | $ | - | - | % | ||||||||||||
Real
estate construction
|
666 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
real estate
|
4,837 | - | - | 5,488 | 203 | 3.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
real estate mortgage
|
138 | - | - | 227 | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 6,880 | $ | - | - | % | $ | 6,978 | $ | 203 | 2.91 | % | ||||||||||||
5.
|
Common
Stock Dividends
|
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Board has declared dividends of
$0.0175 per share to be paid in April 2010 to shareholders of record as of April
2, 2010.
6.
|
Benefit
Plans
|
The
Company sponsors a non-contributory qualified defined benefit retirement
(pension) plan (the “Cash Balance Plan”) for substantially all full-time
employees. The Company also sponsors a non-qualified, unfunded supplemental
executive retirement plan (the “SERP Plan”) that provides benefits to certain
current and former executives. The Company has not made any contributions during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
The
Company provides post-retirement benefits to certain former executive
officers. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, the amount of this liability
was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and is reflected in Other
Liabilities.
The
components of the net periodic benefit cost reflected in salaries and employee
benefits expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are as
follows:
(Unaudited)
|
Cash
Balance Plan
|
SERP
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 34 | $ | 29 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 34 | $ | 29 | ||||||||||||
Interest
cost
|
63 | 63 | 28 | 28 | 91 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(53 | ) | (50 | ) | - | - | (53 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Amortization
of prior service costs
|
- | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization
of net loss
|
38 | 45 | - | - | 38 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net
periodic cost
|
$ | 82 | $ | 87 | $ | 29 | $ | 29 | $ | 111 | $ | 116 |
8
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
7.
|
Comprehensive
Income
|
Comprehensive
income includes net income and all other changes to the Company’s equity, with
the exception of transactions with stockholders. The Company’s other
comprehensive income and accumulated other comprehensive income are comprised of
unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt securities and
pension adjustments.
For
the Three Months Ended
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
March
31,
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 222 | $ | 306 | ||||
Items
of other comprehensive income, before tax:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
(losses) gains on securities available for sale, net of
taxes
|
(27 | ) | 222 | |||||
Reclassification
adjustments for gains
|
||||||||
included
in income before income tax expense
|
(16 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||
Other
comprehensive (loss) income before tax expense
|
(43 | ) | 160 | |||||
Less:
Changes in deferred income taxes related to change in
unrealized
|
||||||||
(loss)
gains on securities available for sale
|
(18 | ) | 62 | |||||
Other
comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes
|
(25 | ) | 98 | |||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$ | 197 | $ | 404 |
8.
|
Fair
Value Measurement
|
The
Company follows the “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures” topic of the ASC
which requires additional disclosures about the Company’s assets and liabilities
that are measured at fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy which
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three
levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted
prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that
the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date. This category
generally includes securities that are traded on an active exchange, such as the
New York Stock Exchange, and U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers
or brokers in active over-the-counter markets.
Level 2: Significant
other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for
similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market
data. Level 2 securities include U. S. Government agency obligations,
state and municipal bonds and mortgage-backed securities.
Level 3: Significant
unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
Level 3 category generally includes other real estate owned and impaired loans
when there is no observable market price or if it is impaired.
A
description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities
measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such
instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. While
management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and
consistent with other financial institutions, the use of different methodologies
or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments
could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting
date.
9
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
The fair
values of securities available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted
prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges, which is a Level 1
input, or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the
industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices
for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities, which is a Level 2
input.
The
Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from
time to time, a loan is considered impaired, and an allowance for loan losses is
established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and
principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan
agreement are considered impaired. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated
using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of
similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash
flows. Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the
fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy.
When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or
a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring
Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the
fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and
there is no observable market price, the Company classifies the impaired loan as
nonrecurring Level 3.
Other
real estate owned is reported at fair value less anticipated costs to sell. Fair
value is based on third party or internally developed appraisals which,
considering the assumptions in the valuation, are considered Level 3
inputs.
Assets
measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis, segregated by
fair value hierarchy level, are summarized below:
(Unaudited)
|
Quoted
Prices in
|
Significant
Other
|
Significant
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Active
Markets for
|
Observable
|
Unobservable
|
||||||||||||||
Identical
Assets
|
Inputs
|
Inputs
|
|||||||||||||||
Description
|
March
31, 2010
|
(Level
1)
|
(Level
2)
|
(Level
3)
|
|||||||||||||
Recurring:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Available
for sale securities
|
$ | 17,304 | $ | - | $ | 17,304 | $ | - | |||||||||
Other
invested assets
|
1,061 | - | 1,061 | - | |||||||||||||
Non-recurring:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Other
real estate owned
|
2,159 | - | - | 2,159 | |||||||||||||
Impaired
and TDR loans, net of allowance
|
9,966 | - | - | 9,966 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 30,490 | $ | - | $ | 18,365 | $ | 12,125 |
The
“Financial Instruments” topic of the ASC requires the disclosure of the
estimated fair value of certain financial instruments. These estimated fair
values as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, have been determined using
available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop estimates
of fair value. The estimates presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts
the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of alternative
market assumptions and estimation methodologies could have a material effect on
these estimates of fair value.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents: The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents
approximates fair value.
Other Invested
Assets: As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta
(“FHLB”) system, the Company is required to maintain an investment in capital
stock of the FHLB. The carrying value of the Company’s investment in FHLB stock
was $1.0 million as of March 31, 2010 and was classified as other invested
assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Because of membership
requirements to hold stock in this institution and restrictions on the Company’s
ability to sell such stock, this investment does not have a readily determinable
market value and is accounted for using the cost method.
10
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
Loans (other than impaired
loans): Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar
financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as
commercial, residential mortgage, and other consumer. Each loan
category is further segmented into groups by fixed and adjustable rate interest
terms and by performing and non-performing categories.
The fair
value of performing loans is typically calculated by discounting scheduled cash
flows through their estimated maturity, using estimated market discount rates
that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in each group of
loans. The estimate of maturity is based on contractual maturities
for loans within each group, or on the Company’s historical experience with
repayments for each loan classification, modified as required by an estimate of
the effect of current economic conditions.
For all
loans, assumptions regarding the characteristics and segregation of loans,
maturities, credit risk, cash flows, and discount rates are judgmentally
determined using specific borrower and other available information.
Accrued Interest Receivable
and Payable: The fair value of interest receivable and payable
is estimated to approximate the carrying amounts due to the relatively short
term of these instruments.
Deposits: The
fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as demand deposits,
checking accounts, savings and money market accounts, is equal to the carrying
amount. The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted
value of contractual cash flows, where the discount rate is estimated using the
market rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining
maturities.
Borrowings: The
fair value of borrowings is based on the discounted value of estimated cash
flows. The discounted rate is estimated using market rates currently
offered for similar advances or borrowings.
Off-Balance Sheet
Instruments: Since the majority of the Company’s off-balance
sheet instruments consist of non-fee-producing, variable rate commitments, the
Company has determined they do not have a distinguishable fair
value.
As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying amounts and associated
estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities of the Company are as
follows:
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
March
31, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 39,924 | $ | 39,924 | $ | 30,313 | $ | 30,313 | ||||||||
Marketable
securities
|
17,304 | 17,304 | 17,699 | 17,699 | ||||||||||||
Other
invested assets
|
1,061 | 1,061 | 1,061 | 1,061 | ||||||||||||
Loans,
net of allowances for loan losses
|
204,729 | 205,663 | 206,547 | 212,158 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest receivable
|
879 | 879 | 935 | 935 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 238,043 | $ | 233,305 | $ | 224,807 | $ | 228,506 | ||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
1,761 | 1,785 | 7,766 | 6,951 | ||||||||||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
249 | 249 | 188 | 188 |
11
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
9.
|
Investments
|
Investment
securities represent the second largest component of earning
assets. The Company’s securities portfolio consists primarily of the
following debt securities:
·
|
U.S.
government agencies
|
·
|
Government
sponsored mortgage-backed
securities
|
o
|
Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, and Ginnie Mae
|
·
|
Highly-rated
collateralized debt securities
|
·
|
Municipal
bonds
|
All of
the securities are classified as available for sale. The available
for sale classification allows flexibility in the management of interest rate
risk, liquidity, and loan portfolio growth. Securities available for
sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses (net of tax)
excluded from operations and reported in other comprehensive income. Interest
income includes amortization of purchase premium and accretion of purchase
discount. The amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts is determined
by using the level yield method. Securities are not acquired for purposes of
engaging in trading activities. Realized gains and losses from sales of
securities are determined using the specific identification method.
The
Company regularly reviews declines in the fair value of securities below their
costs for purposes of determining whether such declines are other-than-temporary
in nature. In estimating other-than-temporary losses, management considers
adverse changes in expected cash flows, the length of time and extent that fair
value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects
of the issuer, and whether it is more likely than not that the Company would be
required to sell the investments prior to maturity or recovery of cost. If the
Company determines that a decline in the fair value of a security below cost is
other-than-temporary, the carrying amount of the security is reduced by any
portion of the decline deemed to be credit related, with the corresponding
decline charged to earnings. The carrying amount of the security is also reduced
by any additional impairment deemed to be non-credit related, with the
corresponding decline charged to other comprehensive income. Securities
available for sale are carried at their fair value, and the mark-to-market
adjustment was a $0.5 million unrealized gain as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009. After considering applicable tax expense, the cumulative
mark-to-market adjustment increased stockholders’ equity by $0.3 million at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Future fluctuations in
stockholders’ equity will occur due to changes in the fair values of available
for sale securities.
On March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the recorded value of investments totaled $17.3
million and $17.7 million, respectively. Factors affecting the
decrease of the investment securities portfolio include loan growth, the
interest rates available for reinvesting maturing securities, and changes in the
interest rate yield curve. Other invested assets include FHLB stock
with a carrying value of $1.0 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009.
The
Company has reviewed the investment portfolio and does not believe any of the
declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. The Company
anticipates that substantially all of the book value of the investments will be
recovered over the life of any securities whose market value is below amortized
cost.
The
following table reflects the carrying value of the Company’s investment
securities at the dates indicated.
(Unaudited)
|
March
31, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||
US
government agencies
|
$ | 999 | $ | - | ||||
Government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||
Residential
|
8,363 | 9,244 | ||||||
Non-Government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||
Residential
|
282 | 307 | ||||||
Municipal
securities
|
||||||||
North
Carolina
|
4,044 | 4,517 | ||||||
Out
of state
|
3,616 | 3,631 | ||||||
$ | 17,304 | $ | 17,699 |
12
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
The
following table reflects the debt securities by contractual maturities as of
March 31, 2010. Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations with or
without call or prepayment penalties.
(Unaudited)
|
As
of March 31, 2010
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Fair
Value
|
Amortized
Cost
|
||||||
US
government agencies
|
||||||||
Due
within one year
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
999 | 1,000 | ||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
- | - | ||||||
Due
after ten years
|
- | - | ||||||
Total
US government agencies
|
$ | 999 | $ | 1,000 | ||||
Government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||
Residential
|
||||||||
Due
within one year
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
11 | 11 | ||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
600 | 567 | ||||||
Due
after ten years
|
7,752 | 7,436 | ||||||
Total
government sponsored MBS
|
$ | 8,363 | $ | 8,014 | ||||
Non-government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||
Residential
|
||||||||
Due
after ten years
|
$ | 282 | $ | 277 | ||||
Municipal
bonds
|
||||||||
North
Carolina
|
||||||||
Due
within one year
|
$ | 342 | $ | 340 | ||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
503 | 468 | ||||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
1,457 | 1,419 | ||||||
Due
after ten years
|
1,742 | 1,730 | ||||||
Total North Carolina municipal bonds
|
$ | 4,044 | $ | 3,957 | ||||
Out
of state
|
||||||||
Due
after one year through five years
|
$ | 856 | $ | 820 | ||||
Due
after five years through ten years
|
259 | 265 | ||||||
Due
after ten years
|
2,501 | 2,480 | ||||||
Total
out of state municipal bonds
|
$ | 3,616 | $ | 3,565 |
13
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
The
amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair values of investment
securities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
(Unaudited)
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
March
31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
US
government agencies
|
$ | 1,000 | $ | - | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 999 | |||||||
Government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
8,014 | 349 | - | 8,363 | ||||||||||||
Non-Government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
277 | 5 | - | 282 | ||||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
||||||||||||||||
North
Carolina
|
3,957 | 87 | - | 4,044 | ||||||||||||
Out
of state
|
3,565 | 57 | (6 | ) | 3,616 | |||||||||||
Total
at March 31, 2010
|
$ | 16,813 | $ | 498 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 17,304 | |||||||
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||
US
government agencies
|
||||||||||||||||
Government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | 8,887 | $ | 357 | $ | - | $ | 9,244 | ||||||||
Non-Government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
310 | - | (3 | ) | 307 | |||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
||||||||||||||||
North
Carolina
|
4,402 | 115 | - | 4,517 | ||||||||||||
Out
of state
|
3,566 | 71 | (6 | ) | 3,631 | |||||||||||
Total
at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 17,165 | $ | 543 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 17,699 |
As of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of securities with gross
unrealized losses by length of time that the individual securities have been in
an unrealized loss position is as follows:
(Unaudited)
|
Less
Than 12 Months
|
12
Months or Greater
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
||||||||||||||||||
March
31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
US
government agencies
|
$ | 999 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 999 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Out
of state
|
244 | (6 | ) | 244 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
at March 31, 2010
|
$ | 1,243 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 1,243 | $ | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Government
sponsored MBS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 307 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 307 | $ | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Municipal
securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Out
of state
|
244 | (6 | ) | 244 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
at December 31, 2009
|
$ | 244 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 307 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 551 | $ | (9 | ) |
14
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
10.
|
Commitments
and Contingent Liabilities
|
Commitments
to Extend Credit
In the
normal course of business, the Company has various commitments to extend credit,
which are not reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. As of March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had outstanding loan commitments
(including available lines of credit) of approximately $22.4 million and $24.7
million, respectively. Commitments under standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees amounted to approximately $0.2 million as of March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. These lines of credit, standby letters of credit, and
financial guarantees represent agreements whereby the Company commits to lend
funds to customers up to a predetermined maximum amount during a certain
period.
The
Company approves lines of credit to consumer customers through home equity and
consumer overdraft protection loans, all of which are included in the above
commitments to extend credit. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, in addition to actual advances made on such loans, the Company’s consumer
customers have available additional lines of credit on home equity and consumer
overdraft protection loans. Available amounts on home equity lines as
of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were approximately $2.3 million and $2.5
million, respectively. In addition, the available amounts on consumer overdraft
protection loans were $1.0 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009.
No
significant losses are anticipated as a result of these
transactions.
Fed
Funds Line
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company has available for use Federal Funds Lines (“Fed
Funds Lines”) aggregating $12.0 million from three correspondent
banks. The Fed Funds Lines are renewed annually. Interest
rates are stated as variable on a daily basis. The balance
outstanding under the Fed Funds Lines as of March 31, 2010 was $1.0 million,
which was repaid on April 1, 2010.
The
Company utilizes its Fed Funds Lines periodically. $2.0 million was
the maximum borrowed during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
As of
March 31, 2010, the Company has additional borrowing capacity at the FHLB of
$11.7 million.
Letters
of Credit
In
October 2009, the Company secured a $2.0 million letter of credit with FHLB to
use as collateral for public deposits. The letter of credit is
secured by the Company’s collateral with FHLB and is renewable
annually.
11.
|
Borrowings
|
The March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 borrowings, and accompanying maturities and
interest rates were:
(Unaudited)
|
March
31, 2010
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Amount
|
Maturity
Date
|
Rate
|
|||||||||
Fixed
Rate Note
|
$ | 761 | 2020 | 0.50 | ||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Amount
|
Maturity
Date
|
Rate
|
|||||||||
Daily
Rate Credit (1)
|
$ | 2,000 | 2010 | 0.36 | % | |||||||
Fixed
Rate Note
|
5,000 | 2013 | 0.32 | |||||||||
Fixed
Rate Note
|
766 | 2020 | 0.50 | |||||||||
$ | 7,766 | |||||||||||
(1)
Variable rate as of December 31, 2009
|
In
January 2010, the Company took advantage of an opportunity to repay the $5
million fixed rate note referenced in the above table, with no prepayment
penalty, and the Company repaid the Daily Rate Credit balance in
full. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 the Company had $1.0
million in Fed Funds Lines and a $0.8 million FHLB fixed rate note
outstanding. The Fed Funds Line was repaid on April 1,
2010.
15
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Notes To
Consolidated Financial Statements,
Continued
12.
|
Subsequent
Events
|
The
Company evaluated subsequent events through the date of issuance of the
financial statements and has determined there are no further adjustments or
disclosures required.
16
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Item
2--Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Overview
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis is provided to assist readers in understanding and
evaluating the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. The
following discussion is intended to provide a general overview of the Company’s
performance for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared with the same
period in 2009. Readers seeking a more in-depth discussion are invited to read
the more detailed discussions below, as well as the Consolidated Financial
Statements and related notes included under Item 1 of this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q. All information presented is consolidated data unless otherwise
specified.
Financial
Highlights for the Three Month Period Ended March 31, 2010
Net
income from operations decreased by $0.1 million for the quarter ended March 31,
2010 to $0.2 million from $0.3 million from the same period in
2009. Compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2009, net interest
income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 improved 2.63% or $0.1 million, and
the net interest margin for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 decreased 28 basis
points (“bp”). The provision for loan losses increased in the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 over the quarter ended March 31, 2009 largely due to an
additional allowance for impaired loans. Non-interest income
decreased 4.97%, mainly due to the gains on sales and calls of securities in
2009 versus no sales and only one call in 2010. Non-interest expense
increased 1.15%, and income tax expense decreased 39.80% in the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
17
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Selected
Financial Data:
(Unaudited)
|
As
of and for the Three Months ended March 31,
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||
Selected
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 39,924 | $ | 5,504 | ||||
Securities
|
17,304 | 27,245 | ||||||
Gross
loans
|
208,478 | 211,436 | ||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(3,749 | ) | (3,032 | ) | ||||
Total
Assets
|
281,701 | 259,625 | ||||||
Deposits
|
238,043 | 223,124 | ||||||
Borrowings
|
1,761 | 6,412 | ||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
36,572 | 24,723 | ||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||
Summary
of Operations
|
||||||||
Interest
income
|
$ | 3,347 | $ | 3,634 | ||||
Interest
expense
|
538 | 897 | ||||||
Net
interest income
|
2,809 | 2,737 | ||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
191 | 59 | ||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
2,618 | 2,678 | ||||||
Other
operating income
|
574 | 604 | ||||||
Other
operating expense
|
2,911 | 2,878 | ||||||
Pre-tax
net income
|
281 | 404 | ||||||
Income
tax expense
|
59 | 98 | ||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 222 | $ | 306 | ||||
Preferred
dividends
|
$ | 146 | $ | - | ||||
Per
Share Data (1)
|
||||||||
Net
income-basic and diluted
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | 0.15 | ||||
Common
stock dividends
|
$ | 35 | $ | - | ||||
Book
value per share of common stock (2)
|
$ | 12.23 | $ | 12.17 | ||||
Average
common shares outstanding
|
2,031,337 | 2,031,337 | ||||||
Selected
Ratios (1)
|
||||||||
Return
on average assets
|
0.11 | % | 0.46 | % | ||||
Return
on average stockholders' equity
|
0.83 | 4.94 | ||||||
Average
stockholders' equity to average total assets
|
12.99 | % | 9.38 | % | ||||
Net
interest margin (3)
|
4.64 | 4.60 | ||||||
(1)
available to common stockholders
|
||||||||
(2)
stockholders equity reduced for liquidation value of preferred
stock
|
||||||||
(3)
on a tax equivalent basis
|
18
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
statements represent expectations and beliefs of M&F Bancorp, Inc.
(hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) including but not limited to the
Company’s operations, performance, financial condition, growth or strategies.
These forward-looking statements are identified by words such as “expects”,
“anticipates”, “should”, “estimates”, “believes” and variations of these words
and other similar statements. For this purpose, any statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact may be
deemed to be forward-looking statements. Readers should not place undue reliance
on forward-looking statements as a number of important factors could cause
actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions,
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from current projections depending on a variety of important factors, including
without limitation:
•
|
the
Bank’s failure to satisfy the requirements of the Memorandum of
Understanding with the Commissioner of Banking of North Carolina and the
Regional Director of the FDIC’s Atlanta Regional Office (the
“MOU”);
|
|
•
|
the
effect of the requirements in the MOU and any further regulatory
actions;
|
|
•
|
regulatory
limitations or prohibitions with respect to the operations or activities
of the Company and/or the Bank;
|
|
•
|
revenues
are lower than expected;
|
•
|
credit
quality deterioration which could cause an increase in the provision for
credit losses;
|
•
|
competitive
pressure among depository institutions increases
significantly;
|
•
|
changes
in consumer spending, borrowings and savings
habits;
|
•
|
our
ability to successfully integrate acquired entities or to achieve expected
synergies and operating efficiencies within expected time-frames or at
all;
|
•
|
technological
changes and security and operations risks associated with the use of
technology;
|
•
|
the
cost of additional capital is more than
expected;
|
•
|
a
change in the interest rate environment reduces interest
margins;
|
•
|
asset/liability
repricing risks, ineffective hedging and liquidity
risks;
|
•
|
counterparty
risk;
|
•
|
general
economic conditions, particularly those affecting real estate values,
either nationally or in the market area in which we do or anticipate doing
business, are less favorable than
expected;
|
•
|
the
effects of the FDIC deposit insurance premiums and
assessments;
|
•
|
the
effects of and changes in monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including
the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve
Board;
|
•
|
volatility
in the credit or equity markets and its effect on the general
economy;
|
•
|
demand
for the products or services of the Company and the Bank, as well as their
ability to attract and retain qualified
people;
|
•
|
the
costs and effects of legal, accounting and regulatory developments and
compliance; and
|
•
|
regulatory
approvals for acquisitions cannot be obtained on the terms expected or on
the anticipated schedule.
|
19
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
The
Company cautions that the foregoing list of important factors is not exhaustive.
See also “Risk Factors” which begins on page 11 of the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009. The Company undertakes no
obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral,
that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The
following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and
results of operations are based on the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation
of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and
judgments regarding uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its
estimates, including those related to the allowance for loan losses, investment
and intangible asset values, income taxes, and contingencies and litigation. The
Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with
certainty, actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions, and the Company may be exposed to gains or losses
that could be material.
Management
believes that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid in
fully understanding and evaluating the Company’s reported financial results, and
they require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments,
resulting from the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are
inherently uncertain. Management has reviewed these critical accounting policies
and related disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors.
Loans — Loans are
reported at their outstanding principal balance, net of the allowance for loan
losses, and deferred loan origination fees and costs. Loan origination fees and
certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized over the life
of the related loan or commitment as an adjustment to yield, or taken directly
into income when the related loan is sold or commitment
expires.
Allowance for Loan Losses –
The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses
inherent in the loan portfolio based on ongoing quarterly assessments of the
estimated losses. The Company’s methodology for assessing the appropriateness of
the allowance consists of a specific component for identified problem loans, and
a formula component which addresses historical loan loss experience together
with other relevant risk factors affecting the portfolio.
The
specific component incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans as
required by the “Receivables” topic of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (“ASC”). These accounting standards prescribe the measurement
methods, income recognition and disclosures related to impaired loans. A loan is
recognized as impaired when it is probable that principal and/or interest are
not collectible in accordance with the loan’s contractual terms. A loan is not
deemed to be impaired if the Company expects to collect all amounts due
including interest accrued at the contractual rate during the period of delay.
Measurement of impairment can be based on the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s
observable market price or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is
collateral dependent. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires
material estimates that may be susceptible to significant change. If the fair
value of the impaired loan is less than the related recorded amount, a specific
valuation component is established within the allowance for loan losses or a
write-down is charged against the allowance for loan losses if the impairment is
considered to be permanent. Measurement of impairment does not apply to large
groups of smaller balance homogenous loans, unless specifically identified as
impaired and the estimated value of the underlying collateral does not support
the full balance, that are collectively evaluated for impairment such as the
Company’s portfolios of home equity loans, real estate mortgages, installment
and other loans. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an
integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s
allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize
additions to the allowance based on their judgments at the time of their
examinations.
The
formula component is calculated by first applying historical loss experience
factors to outstanding loans by type. This component is then adjusted to reflect
additional risk factors not addressed by historical loss experience. These
factors include the evaluation of then-existing economic and business conditions
affecting the key lending areas of the Company and other conditions, such as new
loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans
expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes
and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments that
existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were
believed to have had on the collectability of the loan portfolio. Senior
management reviews these conditions quarterly. Management’s evaluation of the
loss related to each of these conditions is quantified and reflected in the
formula component. The evaluations of the inherent loss with respect to these
conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty due to the subjective
nature of such evaluations and because they are not identified with specific
problem credits.
20
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Actual
losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. The Company’s
methodology permits adjustments to the allowance in the event that, in
management’s judgment, significant factors which affect the collectability of
the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date have changed.
Management
believes the allowance for loan losses is the best estimate of inherent losses
which have been incurred as of March 31, 2010. There is no assurance that the
Company will not be required to make future adjustments to the allowance in
response to changing economic conditions, particularly in the Company’s service
area, since the majority of the Company’s loans are collateralized by real
estate.
Loan Restructurings —
Loan restructurings are renegotiated loans for which concessions have
been granted to the borrower that the Company would not have otherwise granted.
Restructured loans are returned to accrual status when said loans have
demonstrated performance, generally evidenced by six months of payment
performance in accordance with the restructured terms, or by the presence of
other significant factors.
Investments – The Company
records an investment impairment charge when it believes an investment has
experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. Future adverse
changes in market conditions and associated market values of investments could
result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the
investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value,
thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.
Valuation Allowances – The
Company assesses the need to record a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred
tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The
Company considers anticipated future taxable income and ongoing prudent and
feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for the valuation. In
the event the Company were to determine that it would not be able to realize all
or part of its net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the
deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination
was made.
Other Real Estate Owned
(“OREO”) — Real estate properties acquired through loan foreclosure
are recorded at estimated fair value, net of estimated selling costs, at time of
foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Credit losses arising at the time of
foreclosure are charged against the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent
valuations are periodically performed by management and the carrying value is
adjusted by a charge to expense to reflect any subsequent declines in the
estimated fair value. Routine holding costs are charged to expense as
incurred.
Income Taxes — Income
tax expense is the total of the current year income tax due or refundable and
the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the
years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period the change is
enacted.
Executive
Overview
The
Company generated the majority of its interest and non-interest income in the
first three months of 2010 and 2009 from traditional lending and deposit banking
services. The Company continued to execute management’s strategy of targeting
commercial business, diversifying the customer base, and pursuing strategic
relationships for deposits.
21
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Impact
of Recent Developments on the Banking Industry
The
banking industry, including the Company, is operating in a challenging and
volatile economic environment. The effects of the downturn in the
housing market have adversely impacted credit markets, consumer confidence and
the broader economy. Although the Bank remains profitable, it has not been
immune from the impact of the current recession or the increased focus of
banking regulators upon capital and liquidity levels. A material
change in volatile funding, brokered deposits, or the balance sheet composition
would require receipt of non-objections from the federal and state regulators.
At its annual Strategic Planning session in September 2009, the Board of
Directors of the Bank directed management to limit material changes to the
balance sheet, and to focus on asset quality, liquidity, and managing the Bank
through the challenging economic environment. Subsequently, the Board
established higher liquidity targets which Management achieved by December 31,
2009. All of the Bank’s Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service®
(“CDARS”) brokered deposits are reciprocal, relationship-based
deposits.
On April
27, 2010, the Bank and the directors of the Bank signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (“MOU”), which will become effective upon the execution thereof by
the Commissioner of Banking of North Carolina and the Regional Director of the
FDIC’s Atlanta Regional Office, the supervisory authorities. The MOU requires
the Bank to:
·
|
Reduce
the balance of adversely classified assets, and develop specific plans and
proposals for the reduction and improvement of assets which are adversely
classified, and not extend further credit to borrowers whose loans are
adversely classified without prior consent of the supervisory
authorities;
|
·
|
Remain
well-capitalized;
|
·
|
Maintain
adequate liquidity;
|
·
|
Not
pay dividends to the holding company without prior consent of the
supervisory authorities; and
|
·
|
Obtain
the non-objection of the supervisory authorities before engaging in any
transactions that would change the composition of the Bank’s balance sheet
by more than 10%.
|
Management
believes that the Bank has already successfully addressed many of the areas in
the MOU, which is characterized by the supervisory authorities as an informal
action that is neither published nor made publicly available by the supervisory
authorities and is used when circumstances warrant a milder form of action
rather than a formal supervisory action. Management is committed to
continuing to actively address the items to achieve full compliance and
resolution.
Issuance
of Preferred Stock to the United States Treasury (the “Treasury”)under the
Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”)
In June
2009, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Treasury
pursuant to which, among other things, the Company sold to the Treasury for an
aggregate purchase price of $11.7 million, 11,735 shares of Series A Preferred
Stock, constituting 5.00% of the Company’s risk-weighted assets. As a condition
of the CPP, the Company is prohibited from paying any dividends on its common
stock unless all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on the Series A Preferred
Stock for all past dividend periods (including the latest completed dividend
period). Except with the Treasury’s prior approval, the Company is generally
prohibited from repurchasing its common stock until the earlier of June 2012 or
until the Treasury no longer owns any of the Series A Preferred Stock (the
“Restriction Period”). In addition, except with the Treasury’s prior approval,
during the Restriction Period, the Company is restricted from increasing its
quarterly cash dividend on its common stock above the last quarterly dividend
($0.05) declared prior to November 17, 2008.
22
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Financial
Condition
Total
assets increased 2.67%, or $7.3 million, to $281.7 million as of March 31, 2010
from $274.4 million as of December 31, 2009. Cash and cash equivalents increased
$9.6 million or 31.7%, to $39.9 million as of March 31, 2010, compared to $30.3
million as of December 31, 2009. Investment securities decreased $0.4
million from $17.7 million as of December 31, 2009 to $17.3 million as of March
31, 2010. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company
paid down debt by $6.0 million, decreased loans by $1.6 million, and deposits
increased by $13.2 million. All other assets comprised of interest
receivable, bank premises and equipment, bank-owned life insurance, other real
estate owned, income taxes, and other miscellaneous assets, decreased a net of
$0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
The
entire investment portfolio is classified as available-for-sale and is comprised
of investment-grade securities. Securities with a book value of $1.0 million
were purchased and $0.4 million were called during the three months ended March
31, 2010. Principal payments of $0.9 million were received during the
three month period.
Deposits
increased 5.89%, or $13.2 million, to $238.0 million as of March 31, 2010 from
$224.8 million as of December 31, 2009. The $13.2 million increase
was mainly due to an increase in CDARS deposits.
Total
stockholders’ equity was essentially unchanged at $36.6 million as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009. The net income before dividends of $0.2
million was mostly offset by preferred and common stock dividends and a small
other comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31,
2010. The Company recorded dividends totaling $0.2 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2010, which included a 5.00% preferred stock
dividend for the period from January 1, 2010 to March 31, 2010, and a dividend
to common stockholders, of $0.0175 per share.
Results
of Operations, Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
Net
income from operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased $0.1
million to $0.2 million from $0.3 million for the same period in 2009. For the
three months ended March 31, 2010 when compared to the same period in 2009,
interest income decreased 7.90%, or $0.3 million, and interest expense decreased
40.02%, or $0.4 million, resulting in an overall improvement in net interest
income of 2.63%, or $0.1 million.
Interest
income on loans decreased $0.1 million, in part due to the $0.7 million decrease
in average loans outstanding to $207.9 million from $208.7 million,
partially offset by a 25 bp decrease in yield to 6.04% from 6.29% for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Interest income
on securities decreased $0.2 million, when comparing the three months ended
March 31, 2010 with the same period in 2009, primarily due to the average
balances of the portfolio decreasing by $15.4 million.
Total
interest expense decreased 40.02%, or $0.4 million, for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, reflecting a 78 bp
decrease from 1.88% to 1.10% in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits.
The decrease in interest expense on borrowed funds of 94.12% during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 from the same period in 2009 was primarily due to
$9.0 million lower average balances for the three months ending March 31, 2010
of $0.8 million compared to $9.8 million for the same period in
2009. In addition, the average borrowing rate decreased from 1.38% in
the quarter ended March 31, 2009 to 1.01% in the quarter ended March 31,
2010. The Company has made a concerted effort to decrease the use of
borrowed funds while closely managing its liquidity in order to maximize its net
interest margin in 2010 and 2009.
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company increased its expense for
loan loss provision $0.1 million from the three months ended March 31, 2009,
primarily due to reserves for impaired loans. The provision for loan losses is
the result of management’s assessment of the Company’s delinquency ratios,
non-performing assets, charge-off history, and composition of loans in the
portfolio. Management performs a thorough review of the loan portfolio
quarterly, and an outside loan review firm reviews a substantial portion of the
loan portfolio semi-annually.
Non-interest
income decreased 4.80% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to
the same period in 2009, mainly due to the realized gains on sales and calls of
securities in 2009 with a much smaller gain realized on the calls of securities
in 2010.
23
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Non-interest
expense increased 1.15% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as compared to
the same period in 2009. During the three month period ending March
31, 2010 the following attributed to the increase:
|
·
|
The
Company maintained fewer employees resulting in a $0.3 million decrease in
salary and benefits expense
|
|
·
|
In
the first half of 2009, the Company had two additional branches, one of
which was leased, the expenses for which were included in occupancy and
equipment
|
|
·
|
The
costs of occupancy and equipment decreased $0.1
million
|
|
·
|
Information
technology expenses increased $0.1 million, due to higher processing
fees
|
|
·
|
FDIC
insurance expense increased $0.2
million
|
|
·
|
Other
miscellaneous expenses increased $0.1 million, with forms, franchise tax,
and sponsorships attributing to this increase, partially offset by a
decrease in the reserve for contingent off balance sheet
liabilities.
|
Average
Balances, Interest Earned or Paid, and Interest
Yields/Rates
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Average
Balance
|
Amount
Earned/Paid
|
Average
Rate
|
Average
Balance
|
Amount
Earned/Paid
|
Average
Rate
|
||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
receivable (1):
|
$ | 207,943 | $ | 3,139 | 6.04 | % | $ | 208,672 | $ | 3,280 | 6.29 | % | ||||||||||||
Taxable
securities
|
8,856 | 113 | 5.10 | 19,925 | 220 | 4.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nontaxable
securities(2)
|
7,824 | 81 | 6.74 | 12,173 | 126 | 6.74 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal
funds sold and other interest on short-term investments
|
39,600 | 14 | 0.14 | 3,198 | 8 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest earning assets
|
264,223 | 3,347 | 5.14 | % | 243,968 | 3,634 | 6.05 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
2,135 | 6,055 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
20,037 | 17,143 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for loan losses
|
(3,614 | ) | (2,973 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 282,781 | $ | 264,193 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities
and Equity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings
deposits
|
$ | 45,570 | $ | 36 | 0.32 | % | $ | 30,403 | $ | 25 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
27,913 | 24 | 0.34 | 48,687 | 132 | 1.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
120,843 | 476 | 1.58 | 104,283 | 704 | 2.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing deposits
|
194,326 | 536 | 1.10 | 183,373 | 861 | 1.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
793 | 2 | 1.01 | 9,837 | 34 | 1.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
195,119 | 538 | 1.10 | % | 193,210 | 895 | 1.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing
deposits
|
45,680 | 41,238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
5,249 | 4,960 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
246,048 | 239,408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders'
equity
|
36,733 | 24,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$ | 282,781 | $ | 264,193 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$ | 2,809 | $ | 2,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-taxable
securities
|
81 | 126 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
equivalent amount at 38.55% tax rate
|
31 | 49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
equivalent adjustment (3)
|
43 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
equivalent net interest income
|
$ | 2,852 | $ | 2,806 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread (4)
|
4.04 | % | 4.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin (5)
|
4.32 | % | 4.60 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1)
Loans receivable include nonaccrual loans for which accrual of interest
income has not been recorded.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(2)
The tax equivalent rate is computed using a blended federal and state tax
rate of 38.55%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(3)
The tax equivalent adjustment is computed using a blended tax rate of
38.55%.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4)
Net interest spread represents the difference between the average yield on
interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing
liabilities.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(5)
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average
interest-earning assets.
|
24
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Loan
Portfolio and Adequacy of the Allowances for Loan Losses
Allowance for Loan Losses –
The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses which management believes to
be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio based on
ongoing quarterly assessments of the estimated losses. The Company’s methodology
for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance consists of a specific
component for identified problem loans, and a formula component which addresses
historical loan loss experience together with other relevant risk factors
affecting the portfolio.
The
specific component incorporates the results of measuring impaired loans as
required by the “Receivables” topic of the ASC. These accounting standards
prescribe the measurement methods, income recognition and disclosures related to
impaired loans. A loan is recognized as impaired when it is probable that
principal and/or interest are not collectible in accordance with the loan’s
contractual terms. A loan is not deemed to be impaired if there is a short delay
in receipt of payment or if, during a longer period of delay, the Company
expects to collect all amounts due including interest accrued at the contractual
rate during the period of delay. Measurement of impairment can be based on the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective
interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the
collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. This evaluation is inherently
subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to
significant change. If the fair value of the impaired loan is less than the
related recorded amount, a specific valuation component is established within
the allowance for loan losses or a write-down is charged against the allowance
for loan losses if the impairment is considered to be permanent. Measurement of
impairment does not apply to large groups of smaller balance homogenous loans,
unless specifically identified as impaired and the estimated value of the
underlying collateral does not support the full balance, that are collectively
evaluated for impairment such as the Company’s portfolios of home equity loans,
real estate mortgages, and installment loans.
The
formula component uses the actual net loss/recovery history, by loan type, the
Company has incurred from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2010 on average loans
outstanding over the same period. This component is then adjusted to reflect
additional risk factors not addressed by historical loss experience. These
factors include the evaluation of existing economic and business conditions
affecting the key lending areas of the Company and other conditions, such as new
loan products, credit quality trends (including trends in nonperforming loans
expected to result from existing conditions), collateral values, loan volumes
and concentrations, specific industry conditions within portfolio segments that
existed as of the balance sheet date and the impact that such conditions were
believed to have had on the collectability of the loan portfolio. Senior
management reviews these conditions quarterly. Management’s evaluation of the
loss related to each of these conditions is quantified and reflected in the
formula component. The evaluations of the inherent loss with respect to these
conditions is subject to a higher degree of uncertainty due to the subjective
nature of such evaluations and because they are not identified with specific
problem credits. Management increased some qualitative factors in the
analysis for loan and losses to reflect the continued challenges in the current
economic environment.
Of the
non-homogenous classified loans that are not identified as impaired, 47.89% of
the classified loans, constituting 38.03% of the outstanding classified
balances, have a loan-to-value of less than 50.00% of the loan balance
outstanding. Of the non-homogenous classified loans that are not
identified as impaired, 47.18% of the loans are considered current (paid within
30 days of due date), constituting 48.56% of the classified loan balances
outstanding. Management believes that the low loan-to-values combined
with the payment status of these unimpaired classified loans, reduces the risk
of loss inherent in these classified loans. For any non-homogenous
classified loans that were not paid current (defined as less than 30 days past
due) at March 31, 2010, and which had a loan to value of more than 50.00%, an
additional qualitative factor was included in the allowance
calculation.
Actual
losses can vary significantly from the estimated amounts. The Company’s
methodology permits adjustments to the allowance in the event that, in
management’s judgment, significant factors which affect the collectability of
the loan portfolio as of the evaluation date have changed.
Management
believes the allowance for loan losses is the best estimate of probable losses
which have been incurred as of March 31, 2010. There is no assurance that the
Company will not be required to make future adjustments to the allowance in
response to changing economic conditions, particularly in the Company’s service
area, since the majority of the Company’s loans are collateralized by real
estate. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their
examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan
losses. Such agencies may require the Company to recognize additions to the
allowance based on their judgments at the time of their
examinations.
25
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
The
allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2010, was $3.7 million or 1.80% of
total loans outstanding, compared with 1.43% of total loans outstanding as of
March 31, 2009 and 1.70% as of December 31, 2009.
As of
March 31, 2010, loans totaling $10.2 million were classified as impaired, of
which $6.9 million were classified as Troubled Debt Restructurings
(“TDRs”). Of the Company’s nonperforming assets, 88.63% are secured
by real estate collateral, which management believes mitigates the Company’s
exposure to losses as compared to those loans that are unsecured or
collateralized with other types of assets. All impaired loans are
evaluated individually for inherent losses for which an allowance will be
recorded. If collateral and other factors support full repayment, or
if a direct write-down of the loan balance has been recorded, the allowance is
adjusted accordingly.
Consumer
real estate mortgage loans comprised 19.67% of the total loans outstanding at
March 31, 2010. The Company’s history of realized losses in consumer
real estate mortgages as compared to the average consumer real estate mortgages
outstanding from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2010 is 38
bp. As of March 31, 2010, 40.75% of the total loans outstanding
were to faith-based and non-profit organizations, in which the Company has
specialized lending experience. The Company’s history of realized losses during
April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2010 is a net recovery when compared to the
average loans outstanding in this unique market.
For
additional information regarding the allowances for loan losses for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Nonperforming
Assets
The ratio
of nonperforming assets to total assets is one indicator of the exposure to
credit risk. Nonperforming assets of the Company consist of non-accrual loans 90
days or more past due and foreclosed assets, which have been acquired as a
result of foreclosure or deed-in-lieu-of foreclosure. All foreclosed
assets are recorded at the estimated realizable value.
Non-accrual
loans increased from $4.9 million as of March 31, 2009 to $9.7 million as of
March 31, 2010, primarily due to TDR loans to three borrowers with combined loan
balances of $5.9 million. One of these borrowers, with a total loan
balance of $3.6 million at March 31, 2010 is making scheduled payments in
accordance with a repayment agreement.
Management
continues to monitor all non-accrual loan relationships to identify any
improvements or deterioration in borrowers’ cash flow and to maintain the value
of any underlying collateral. In addition, significant loans in non-accrual
status or in excess of 90 days delinquent for a period of one year or more are
required to have a new appraisal performed to reevaluate the underlying
collateral.
Management
considers the allowance for loan losses of $3.7 million as of March 31, 2010 to
be sufficient to cover the probable loan losses inherent in its loan
portfolio.
For
additional information regarding nonperforming assets as of March 31, 2010 and
2009, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity,
Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risks
The
objectives of the Company’s liquidity management policy include providing
adequate funds to meet the needs of depositors and borrowers at all times,
providing funds to meet the basic needs for on-going operations of the Company,
and to meet regulatory requirements. The liquidity ratio is the sum of cash,
overnight funds, and un-pledged, marketable U.S. Government and agency
securities divided by the sum of deposits and short-term borrowings (less the
full amount of pledged deposits). Management believes that core deposit
activity, available borrowing capacity from the FHLB of Atlanta, and Fed Funds
accommodations will be adequate to meet the short-term and long-term liquidity
needs of the Company. The Company had $0.7 million outstanding from
the FHLB as of March 31, 2010. The maximum outstanding balance from FHLB at any
time during the first quarter, 2010 , was $7.8 million, during the first quarter
2010. The Company participates in the Certificate of Deposit Account
Registry Service® (“CDARS”) program, which enables depositors to receive FDIC
insurance coverage for deposits otherwise exceeding the maximum insurable
amount. Through the CDARS program, deposits in excess of the maximum
insurable amount are placed with multiple participating financial
institutions. All of the Bank’s CDARS® brokered deposits are reciprocal,
relationship-based deposits.
26
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Capital
Resources
The Bank
is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by
supervisory authorities. Failure to satisfy minimum capital requirements may
result in certain mandatory and additional discretionary actions by regulators
that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements. As discussed under the section
heading, "Executive Overview - Impact of Recent Developments on the Banking
Industry" on page [22] of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, at its annual
Strategic Planning session in September 2009, the Board of Directors of the Bank
directed management to limit material changes to the balance sheet, and to focus
on asset quality, liquidity, and managing the Bank through the challenging
economic environment. Subsequently, the Board established higher
liquidity targets which Management achieved by December 31,
2009. Additionally, pursuant to the MOU, discussed under the section
heading, “Subsidiary Bank Corrective Resolutions” in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, the Bank is required to obtain the non-objection of the
supervisory authorities before engaging in any transactions that would
materially change the composition of the Bank’s balance sheet. Also,
the MOU requires the Bank to maintain a tier 1 leverage capital ratios of not
less than 8.00%, and a total risk based capital ratio of not less than
10.00%.
As of
March 31, 2010, the regulatory capital levels of the Company and Bank are as
indicated below:
March
31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For
Capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adequacy
|
To
Be Well
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
Actual
|
Purposes
|
Capitalized
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Company
|
$ | 36,857 | 15.80 | % | $ | 18,662 | 8.00 | % | $ | 23,328 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
The
Bank
|
33,468 | 14.41 | 18,574 | 8.00 | 23,218 | 10.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 (to risk weighted assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Company
|
$ | 33,933 | 14.55 | % | $ | 9,331 | 4.00 | % | $ | 13,997 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||
The
Bank
|
30,558 | 13.16 | 9,287 | 4.00 | 13,931 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 (to Average total assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Company
|
$ | 33,933 | 12.16 | % | $ | 11,164 | 4.00 | % | $ | 13,955 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
The
Bank
|
30,558 | 11.09 | 11,020 | 4.00 | 13,775 | 5.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
December
31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For
Capital
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adequacy
|
To
Be Well
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual
|
Purposes
|
Capitalized
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
Amount
|
Ratio
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
capital (to risk weighted assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Company
|
$ | 36,871 | 15.58 | % | $ | 18,934 | 8.00 | % | $ | 23,667 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
The
Bank
|
33,257 | 14.11 | 18,854 | 8.00 | 23,568 | 10.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 (to risk weighted assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Company
|
$ | 33,908 | 14.33 | % | $ | 9,467 | 4.00 | % | $ | 14,200 | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||||
The
Bank
|
30,306 | 12.86 | 9,427 | 4.00 | 14,141 | 6.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tier
1 (to Average total assets)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Company
|
$ | 33,908 | 13.00 | % | $ | 10,435 | 4.00 | % | $ | 13,044 | 5.00 | % | ||||||||||||
The
Bank
|
30,306 | 11.30 | 10,727 | 4.00 | 13,409 | 5.00 |
27
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
Item 3 —
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Not
applicable.
OTHER
INFORMATION
From time
to time, the Company becomes involved in legal proceedings occurring in the
ordinary course of business. Except as disclosed in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, under the section heading “Subsidiary Bank
Corrective Resolutions”, subject to the uncertainties inherent in any
litigation, management believes there currently are no pending or threatened
proceedings that are reasonably likely to result in a material effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations
Item 1A –
Risk Factors
To
smaller reporting companies
Not
applicable.
Not
applicable.
Not
applicable
Item 5 —
Other Information
On April 27, the Bank and the directors
of the Bank entered into an MOU with the supervisory authorities. See the
discussion in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, under the
section heading “Subsidiary Bank Corrective Resolutions”, which discussion is
incorporated herein by reference
Item 6 —
Exhibits
Exhibit
31(i)
|
Certification
of Kim D. Saunders.
|
|
Exhibit
31(ii)
|
Certification
of Lyn Hittle.
|
|
Exhibit
32
|
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
|
|
28
M&F
BANCORP, INC.
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
M&F
Bancorp, Inc.
|
|||||||
Date:
|
April
30, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/
Kim D. Saunders
|
||||
Kim
D. Saunders
|
|||||||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|||||||
Date:
|
April
30, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/
Lyn Hittle
|
||||
Lyn
Hittle
|
|||||||
Chief
Financial Officer
|
29