MAN AHL DIVERSIFIED I LP - Quarter Report: 2014 September (Form 10-Q)

Large Accelerated Filer

Accelerated Filer

Non-Accelerated Filer

Smaller reporting company

10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File number: 000-53043

Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)


Delaware		06-1496634
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

c/o Man Investments (USA) Corp.
452 5^th Avenue, 27^th Floor
New York, NY		10018
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(212) 649-6600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

Financial Statements.

Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.


STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (a)			3
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (b)			4
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (c)			5
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (c)			6
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)			7

(a)	At September 30, 2014 (unaudited) and December 31, 2013

(b)	For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited) and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)

(c)	For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION



	September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Investment in Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.	$	184,583,452		$	202,881,618
Due from Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.		2,831,929			12,263,503
Cash		471,302			115,000

Total assets	$	187,886,683		$	215,260,121

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
LIABILITIES:
Redemptions payable	$	2,117,189		$	11,208,131
Subscriptions received in advance		293,370			115,000
Management fees payable		452,798			521,567
Servicing fees payable		152,184			264,689
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		287,690			269,116

Total liabilities		3,303,231			12,378,503

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL:
General Partner—Class A Series 1 (186.37 unit equivalents outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013)		586,375			504,667
Limited Partners—Class A Series 1 (39,541.88 and 51,137.49 units outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)		124,407,992			138,471,344
Limited Partners—Class A Series 2 (5,270.66 and 6,110.49 units outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)		17,767,001			17,561,929
Limited Partners—Class B Series 1 (13,223.66 and 16,990.84 units outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)		41,604,848			46,008,333
Limited Partners—Class B Series 2 (64.44 and 116.68 units outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)		217,236			335,345

Total partners’ capital		184,583,452			202,881,618

Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	187,886,683		$	215,260,121

NET ASSET VALUE PER OUTSTANDING UNIT OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST—CLASS A Series 1	$	3,146.23		$	2,707.82

NET ASSET VALUE PER OUTSTANDING UNIT OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST—CLASS A Series 2	$	3,370.93		$	2,874.06

NET ASSET VALUE PER OUTSTANDING UNIT OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST—CLASS B Series 1	$	3,146.24		$	2,707.83

NET ASSET VALUE PER OUTSTANDING UNIT OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST—CLASS B Series 2	$	3,370.98	*	$	2,874.09

*	Difference in net asset value recalculation and net asset value stated is caused by rounding differences.

See	accompanying notes and attached financial statements of Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
NET INVESTMENT LOSS
ALLOCATED FROM MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.:
Interest income	$	50,050		$	108,348		$	151,651		$	212,089
Brokerage commissions		(112,117	)		(210,774	)		(523,954	)		(655,145	)
Other expenses		(65,289	)		(216,339	)		(172,770	)		(412,623	)

Net investment loss allocated from Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.		(127,356	)		(318,765	)		(545,073	)		(855,679	)

PARTNERSHIP EXPENSES:
Management fees		1,329,325			1,968,379			4,026,800			7,172,368
Servicing fees		446,783			998,671			1,436,632			3,645,387
Administration fees		106,423			104,418			316,686			337,533
Professional fees		50,867			60,000			144,200			170,000
Other expenses		38,678			39,980			106,954			126,915

Total partnership expenses		1,972,076			3,171,448			6,031,272			11,452,203

Net investment loss		(2,099,432	)		(3,490,213	)		(6,576,345	)		(12,307,882	)

REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON TRADING ACTIVITIES
ALLOCATED FROM MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.:
Net realized trading gains (losses) on closed contracts/agreements and foreign currency transactions		13,118,932			(11,013,653	)		34,009,943			(8,351,884	)
Net change in unrealized trading gains (losses) on open contracts/agreeements and translation of foreign currency		3,417,999			(3,875,264	)		(1,098,210	)		(11,009,497	)

Net gains (losses) on trading activities allocated from Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.		16,536,931			(14,888,917	)		32,911,733			(19,361,381	)

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	14,437,499		$	(18,379,130	)	$	26,335,388		$	(31,669,263	)

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER UNIT OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST (based on weighted average units outstanding during the period)
CLASS A Series 1	$	241.22		$	(180.53	)	$	400.91		$	(289.02	)

CLASS A Series 2	$	269.09		$	(182.11	)	$	470.64		$	(198.48	)

CLASS B Series 1	$	241.35		$	(180.53	)	$	400.27		$	(302.13	)

CLASS B Series 2	$	268.65		$	(179.93	)	$	372.65		$	442.74

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF UNITS OUTSTANDING DURING THE PERIOD
CLASS A Series 1		40,457.86			70,406.39			44,255.78			79,271.91

CLASS A Series 2		5,306.13			8,064.95			5,640.51			9,080.06

CLASS B Series 1		13,396.58			23,027.29			14,757.39			24,961.60

CLASS B Series 2		64.44			239.93			83.48			1,323.74

See accompanying notes and attached financial statements of Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 AND 2013


	CLASS A Series 1											CLASS A Series 2						CLASS B Series 1						CLASS B Series 2						TOTAL
	Limited						General					Limited						Limited						Limited
	Partners						Partner					Partners						Partners						Partners
	Amount			Units			Amount			Units		Amount			Units			Amount			Units			Amount			Units			Amount			Units
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
January 1, 2014	$	138,471,344			51,138		$	504,667			186	$	17,561,929			6,110		$	46,008,333			16,991		$	335,345			117		$	202,881,618			74,542
Subscriptions		1,095,100			389			—			—		—			—			521,163			188			—			—			1,616,263			577
Redemptions		(32,819,399	)		(11,985	)		—			—		(2,449,567	)		(839	)		(10,831,633	)		(3,955	)		(149,218	)		(53	)		(46,249,817	)		(16,832	)
Net Income		17,660,947			—			81,708			—		2,654,639			—			5,906,985			—			31,109			—			26,335,388			—

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
September 30, 2014	$	124,407,992			39,542		$	586,375			186	$	17,767,001			5,271		$	41,604,848			13,224		$	217,236			64		$	184,583,452			58,287

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
January 1, 2013	$	258,830,984			89,733		$	537,590			186	$	33,286,088			11,009		$	78,224,406			27,119		$	8,471,919			2,802		$	379,350,987			130,849
Subscriptions		6,459,076			2,197			—			—		3,000,000			1,037			2,841,638			986			—			—			12,300,714			4,220
Redemptions		(80,354,861	)		(28,640	)		—			—		(14,513,961	)		(4,676	)		(22,374,243	)		(8,132	)		(8,443,355	)		(2,575	)		(125,686,420	)		(44,023	)
Net income (loss)		(22,851,251	)		—			(60,292	)		—		(1,802,173	)		—			(7,541,618	)		—			586,071			—			(31,669,263	)		—

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
September 30, 2013	$	162,083,948			63,290		$	477,298			186	$	19,969,954			7,370		$	51,150,183			19,973		$	614,635			227		$	234,296,018			91,046

Units and dollars have been rounded to the nearest whole number.

See accompanying notes and attached financial statements of Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)


	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	26,335,388		$	(31,669,263	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Purchases of investments in Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.		(1,617,689	)		(12,301,249	)
Sales of investments in Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.		61,714,089			146,985,754
Net gain (loss) on trading activities and net investment loss allocated from investments in Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.		(32,366,660	)		20,217,060
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Management fees payable		(68,769	)		(368,707	)
Servicing fees payable		(112,505	)		(188,969	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		18,574			(34,952	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		53,902,428			122,639,674

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from subscriptions		1,794,633			12,030,873
Payments on redemptions		(55,340,759	)		(134,985,338	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(53,546,126	)		(122,954,465	)

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		356,302			(314,791	)
CASH—Beginning of period		115,000			961,791

CASH—End of period	$	471,302		$	647,000

See accompanying notes and attached financial statements of Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED I L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.’s (a Delaware Limited Partnership) (the “Partnership”) financial condition at September 30, 2014, and the results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. These financial statements present the results of interim periods and do not include all of the disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the year ended December 31, 2013. The December 31, 2013 information has been derived from the audited financial statements as of December 31, 2013.

1. ORGANIZATION OF THE PARTNERSHIP

The Partnership was organized in September 1997 under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, and commenced operations on April 3, 1998, for the purpose of engaging in the speculative trading of futures and forward contracts and related instruments. The Partnership is a “feeder” fund in a “master-feeder” structure, whereby the Partnership invests substantially all of its assets in Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P. (the “Trading Company”). Man Investments (USA) Corp. (the “General Partner”), a Delaware corporation, serves as the Partnership’s General Partner. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Man Group plc, a United Kingdom public limited company that is listed on the London Stock Exchange. The General Partner oversees the operations and management of the Partnership.

AHL Partners LLP (the “Advisor”), a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales, acts as trading advisor to the Partnership. The Advisor is an affiliate of the General Partner and a subsidiary of Man Group plc. The Advisor is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) as a commodity trading adviser and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”) in such capacities, in addition to registration with the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom. Prior to June 1, 2014, Man-AHL (USA) Limited acted as the Partnership’s trading advisor. The Advisor implements the same trading program and employs substantially the same personnel as did Man-AHL (USA) Limited.

Man Investments Holdings Limited, a United Kingdom holding company that is part of Man Group plc, is the sole shareholder of the Advisor, and Man Investments Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation that is part of Man Group plc, is the sole shareholder of the General Partner.

The Partnership’s units are distributed through the Partnership or other selling agents, including Man Investments Inc. (“MII”), an affiliate of the Advisor and General Partner. MII is a registered broker-dealer and a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”).

The Partnership filed a registration statement under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which became effective in March, 2008. The Partnership’s units are not, however, registered for sale through a public offering, and the General Partner does not intend to cause them to be so registered.

The Partnership offers two classes of units of limited partnership interests; Class A units are generally offered and Class B units are offered to retirement plan investors. Within Class A and Class B, units are issued in two separate series. They are Class A Series 1, Class A Series 2, Class B Series 1 and Class B Series 2. Except as described in Note 2 below in respect of fees, the classes of units are identical.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Partnership prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The General Partner has evaluated the structure, objectives and activities of the Partnership and the Trading Company and determined that they meet the characteristics of an investment company. As such, these financial statements have applied the guidance as set forth in Financial Standards Board Topic 946, Financial Services-Investment Companies. The following is a summary of the significant accounting and reporting policies used in preparing the financial statements.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities (and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities) at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Investment in Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P. — The Partnership’s investment in the Trading Company is valued at the fair value of the Partnership’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Trading Company. The fair value of the Partnership’s investment in the Trading Company approximates the carrying amounts presented in the statements of financial condition. The Partnership records its proportionate share of the Trading Company’s income, expenses, and realized and unrealized gains and losses. Investment transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis. In addition, the Partnership accrues its own expenses. The performance of the Partnership is directly affected by the performance of the Trading Company. Attached are the unaudited financial statements of the Trading Company, including the condensed schedules of investments, which are an integral part of these financial statements. Valuation of investments held by the Trading Company is discussed in the Trading Company’s notes to financial statements.

At September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Partnership owned 15,669.95 and 20,694.54 units, respectively, of the Trading Company. The Partnership’s aggregate ownership percentage of the Trading Company at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was 85.21% and 84.82%, respectively.

The Partnership is able to redeem its investment from the Trading Company on a monthly basis. As of September 30, 2014, the Partnership could redeem its investment without restriction at the month-end net asset value of the Trading Company.

Expenses — The Advisor earns a monthly management fee in an amount equal to 0.1667% (2% annually) of the Partnership’s month-end Net Asset Value, as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement (the “Agreement”). In addition, the General Partner earns a monthly general partner fee in an amount equal to 0.0833% (1% annually) of the month-end Net Asset Value of Class A Series 1 and Class B Series 1 units. The general partner fee is included in management fees in the statements of operations.

The Advisor also earns a monthly incentive fee equal to 20% of any Net New Appreciation, as defined in the Agreement, achieved by the Partnership. The incentive fee is retained by the Advisor even if subsequent losses are incurred; however, no subsequent incentive fees will be paid to the Advisor until any such trading losses are recouped by the Partnership. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, no incentive fees were earned by the Advisor.

The Partnership paid a monthly servicing fee to MII, in an amount equal to 0.1250% (1.5% annually) of the month-end Net Asset Value of Class A Series 1 and Class B Series 1 units. The Partnership also paid a monthly servicing fee to MII, in an amount equal to 0.1042% (1.25% annually) of the month-end Net Asset Value of Class A Series 2 and Class B Series 2 units. Effective February 1, 2014, the servicing fee to MII was reduced to 0.8333% (1.00% annually) of the month-end Net Asset Value of Class A Series 1 and Class B Series 1 units and to 0.0625% (0.75% annually) of the month-end Net Asset Value of Class A Series 2 and Class B Series 2 units. For all classes of units, MII serves as the placement agent for the Partnership.

Expenses are recognized on an accrual basis in the period in which they are incurred.

Derivative Contracts — The Partnership’s operating activities involve trading, indirectly through its investment in the Trading Company, in derivative contracts that involve varying degrees of market and credit risk. With respect to the Partnership’s investment in the Trading Company, the Partnership has limited liability, and, therefore, its maximum exposure to either market or credit loss is limited to the carrying value of its investment in the Trading Company, as set forth in the statements of financial condition.

Cash — Cash balances are held with Citibank N.A.

Subscriptions Received in Advance — Subscriptions received in advance are comprised of cash received prior to the statements of financial condition date for which units were issued on the first day of the following month. Subscriptions received in advance do not participate in the earnings of the Partnership until the related units are issued.

Net Income (Loss) Per Unit — Net income (loss) per unit of Class A Series 1, Class A Series 2, Class B Series 1, or Class B Series 2 partnership interest is equal to the net income (loss) per class divided by the weighted average number of units outstanding per class. Weighted average number of units outstanding is the average of the units outstanding for each day during the period.

Income Taxes — The Partnership is not subject to federal, state, or local income tax. Such taxes are the liabilities of the individual partners and the amounts thereof will vary depending on the individual situation of each partner. Accordingly, there is no provision for income taxes in the accompanying financial statements. Accounting Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes, defines how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the financial statements and is applied to all open tax years. The Partnership has evaluated tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are more-likely-than-not to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Based on this analysis of all significant tax jurisdictions and all open tax years subject to examination, there were no material tax positions not deemed to meet a more-likely-than-not-threshold. Therefore, no tax expense, including interest or penalties, was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013. To the extent that the Partnership records interest and penalties, they would be included in interest expense and other expenses, respectively, on the statements of operations.

3. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

The General Partner and each limited partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the number of units or unit equivalents held by each partner. However, no limited partner is liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of its capital subscription and net profits or losses, if any.

The Partnership’s units are continuously offered as of the first business day of each month at net asset value, as defined in the Agreement. Limited partners may redeem any or all of their units as of the end of any month at net asset value per unit on 10 days prior written notice to the General Partner. The Partnership will be dissolved on December 31, 2037, or upon the occurrence of certain events, as specified in the Agreement.

The General Partner is required to make and maintain a general partner investment in the Partnership in an aggregate amount equal to the lesser of 1.01% of the net aggregate capital subscriptions of all partners, or $500,000.

Distributions (other than redemptions of units), if any, are made on a pro-rata basis at the sole discretion of the General Partner. No distributions were declared or paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 or for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Under the terms of the Agreement, the Partnership is liable for all costs associated with executing its business strategy. These costs include, but are not limited to, expenses associated with operations of the Partnership, such as management and incentive fees and other operating expenses, such as legal, audit, and tax return preparation fees.

4. FINANCIAL GUARANTEES

The Partnership enters into administrative and other professional service contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Partnership’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is not known; however, the Partnership has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

5. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following represents the ratios to average limited partners’ capital and other supplemental information for the periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:


	For the three months ended September 30, 2014												For the three months ended September 30, 2013
	Class A			Class A			Class B			Class B			Class A			Class A			Class B			Class B
	Series 1			Series 2			Series 1			Series 2			Series 1			Series 2			Series 1			Series 2
Per unit operating performance:
Beginning net asset value	$	2,904.60		$	3,102.30		$	2,904.60		$	3,102.35		$	2,742.34		$	2,892.50		$	2,742.34		$	2,892.54

Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment loss		(36.23	)		(28.43	)		(36.23	)		(28.38	)		(35.39	)		(29.44	)		(35.60	)		(28.46	)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on trading activities		277.86			297.06			277.87			297.01			(145.98	)		(153.38	)		(145.76	)		(154.37	)

Total income (loss) from investment operations		241.63			268.63			241.64			268.63			(181.37	)		(182.82	)		(181.36	)		(182.83	)

Ending net asset value	$	3,146.23		$	3,370.93		$	3,146.24		$	3,370.98		$	2,560.97		$	2,709.69		$	2,560.98		$	2,709.71

Ratios to average partners’ capital:¹
Expenses other than incentive fees		4.87	%		3.60	%		4.87	%		3.59	%		5.44	%		4.33	%		5.47	%		4.18	%

Total expenses		4.87	%		3.60	%		4.87	%		3.59	%		5.44	%		4.33	%		5.47	%		4.18	%

Net investment loss		(4.76	)%		(3.49	)%		(4.76	)%		(3.48	)%		(5.28	)%		(4.16	)%		(5.31	)%		(4.02	)%

Total return:²
Total return before incentive fees		8.32	%		8.66	%		8.32	%		8.66	%		(6.61	)%		(6.32	)%		(6.61	)%		(6.32	)%

Total return after incentive fees		8.32	%		8.66	%		8.32	%		8.66	%		(6.61	)%		(6.32	)%		(6.61	)%		(6.32	)%


	For the nine months ended September 30, 2014												For the nine months ended September 30, 2013
	Class A			Class A			Class B			Class B			Class A			Class A			Class B			Class B
	Series 1			Series 2			Series 1			Series 2			Series 1			Series 2			Series 1			Series 2
Per unit operating performance:
Beginning net asset value	$	2,707.82		$	2,874.06		$	2,707.83		$	2,874.09		$	2,884.47		$	3,023.40		$	2,884.48		$	3,023.42

Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment loss		(104.39	)		(82.39	)		(104.45	)		(83.37	)		(111.35	)		(89.33	)		(111.17	)		(96.18	)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on trading activities		542.80			579.26			542.86			580.26			(212.15	)		(224.39	)		(212.33	)		(217.53	)

Total income (loss) from investment operations		438.41			496.87			438.41			496.89			(323.50	)		(313.72	)		(323.50	)		(313.71	)

Ending net asset value	$	3,146.23		$	3,370.93		$	3,146.24		$	3,370.98		$	2,560.97		$	2,709.69		$	2,560.98		$	2,709.71

Ratios to average partners’ capital:¹
Expenses other than incentive fees		5.07	%		3.78	%		5.08	%		3.86	%		5.32	%		4.08	%		5.32	%		4.28	%

Total expenses		5.07	%		3.78	%		5.08	%		3.86	%		5.32	%		4.08	%		5.32	%		4.28	%

Net investment loss		(4.96	)%		(3.67	)%		(4.97	)%		(3.75	)%		(5.23	)%		(3.99	)%		(5.23	)%		(4.21	)%

Total return:²
Total return before incentive fees		16.19	%		17.29	%		16.19	%		17.29	%		(11.22	)%		(10.38	)%		(11.22	)%		(10.38	)%

Total return after incentive fees		16.19	%		17.29	%		16.19	%		17.29	%		(11.22	)%		(10.38	)%		(11.22	)%		(10.38	)%

¹	Includes amounts allocated from the Trading Company. Ratios have been annualized.

²	Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized.

Financial highlights are calculated for limited partners taken as a whole for each series. An individual partner’s returns and ratios may vary from these returns and ratios based on the timing of capital transactions.

6. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Partnership accepts initial or additional subscriptions for limited partnership interests generally as of the first day of the month and redemption requests from limited partners as of the last business day of each calendar month. For the period subsequent to September 30, 2014 through the date of filing, limited partner subscriptions totaled $975,895, and limited partner redemptions totaled $1,629,784.

The General Partner has evaluated the impact of subsequent events on the Partnership through the date of filing these financial statements, and noted no subsequent events that require adjustment to or disclosure in these financial statements, except as noted above.

Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.

Financial Statements


STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION (a)			12
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (b)			15
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (c)			16
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (c)			17
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)			18

(a)	At September 30, 2014 (unaudited) and December 31, 2013

(b)	For the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited) and for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)

(c)	For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION


	September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Equity in trading accounts:
Net unrealized trading gains on open futures contracts	$	5,620,365		$	9,757,518
Net unrealized trading gains on open forward contracts		4,305,155			885,769
Net unrealized trading gains on open swap agreements		4,075,356			12,520,347
Premiums paid on credit default swap agreements		2,488,430			3,357,116
Due from brokers		25,963,044			43,649,109

Total equity in trading accounts		42,452,350			70,169,859
Cash and cash equivalents		180,160,903			200,653,548
Interest receivable		16,673			31,670

Total assets	$	222,629,926		$	270,855,077

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
LIABILITIES:
Net unrealized trading losses on open futures contracts	$	402,561		$	—
Net unrealized trading losses on open swap agreements		1,969,378			8,936,971
Premiums received on credit default swap agreements		—			5,175,526
Redemptions payable		3,507,407			17,453,462
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		128,273			103,473

Total liabilities		6,007,619			31,669,432

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL:
Limited Partners (18,389.84 and 24,397.67 units outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)		216,622,307			239,185,645

Total partners’ capital		216,622,307			239,185,645

Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	222,629,926		$	270,855,077

NET ASSET VALUE PER OUTSTANDING UNIT OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST	$	11,779.45	*	$	9,803.63

*	Difference in net asset value recalculation and net asset value stated is caused by rounding differences.

See	notes to financial statements.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS


	September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)						December 31, 2013
	Fair Value			Percent of Partners’ Capital			Fair Value			Percent of Partners’ Capital
FUTURES CONTRACTS - Long:
Agricultural	$	(187,049	)		(0.1	)%	$	(378,972	)		(0.2	)%
Currencies		814,778			0.4			(250,642	)		(0.1	)
Energy		(306,303	)		(0.1	)		180,567			0.1
Indices		(892,247	)		(0.4	)		7,850,513			3.3
Interest Rates		252,862			0.1			(1,418,192	)		(0.6	)
Metals		(1,849,395	)		(0.9	)		(18,266	)		(0.0	)

Total futures contracts - long		(2,167,354	)		(1.0	)		5,965,008			2.5

FUTURES CONTRACTS - Short:
Agricultural		5,203,553			2.4			1,409,672			0.6
Currencies		(24,342	)		(0.0	)		27,532			0.0
Energy		1,958,292			0.9			75,410			0.0
Indices		(139,815	)		(0.1	)		1,216,943			0.5
Interest Rates		(93,051	)		(0.0	)		609,658			0.3
Metals		480,521			0.2			453,295			0.2

Total futures contracts - short		7,385,158			3.4			3,792,510			1.6

NET UNREALIZED TRADING GAINS ON OPEN FUTURES CONTRACTS	$	5,217,804			2.4	%	$	9,757,518			4.1	%

FORWARD CONTRACTS - Long:
Australian dollars	$	(6,060,688	)		(2.8	)%	$	(639,768	)		(0.2	)%
British pounds		(958,888	)		(0.4	)		1,005,261			0.4
Euro		(3,836,524	)		(1.8	)		323,916			0.1
Gold bullion		(2,582	)		(0.0	)		5,336			0.0
Japanese yen		(3,785,448	)		(1.7	)		(1,521,183	)		(0.6	)
New Zealand dollars		(426,312	)		(0.2	)		(141,605	)		(0.1	)
Other		(9,767,030	)		(4.5	)		(184,265	)		(0.1	)

Total forward contracts - long		(24,837,472	)		(11.4	)		(1,152,308	)		(0.5	)

FORWARD CONTRACTS - Short:
Australian dollars		4,090,653			1.9			619,919			0.3
British pounds		715,521			0.3			(849,091	)		(0.3	)
Euro		6,949,121			3.2			(275,708	)		(0.1	)
Gold bullion		189,094			0.1			449,803			0.2
Japanese yen		5,266,644			2.4			2,678,558			1.1
New Zealand dollars		487,413			0.2			79,803			0.0
Other		11,444,181			5.3			(665,207	)		(0.3	)

Total forward contracts - short		29,142,627			13.4			2,038,077			0.9

NET UNREALIZED TRADING GAINS ON OPEN FORWARD CONTRACTS	$	4,305,155			2.0	%	$	885,769			0.4	%

SWAP AGREEMENTS - Long:
Credit default swaps - centrally cleared (upfront premiums received $7,419,877 and $20,241,913, respectively)	$	492,746			0.2	%	$	(26,328,625	)		(11.0	)%
Interest rate swaps		(9,482,672	)		(4.4	)		15,877,039			6.6

Total swap agreements - long		(8,989,926	)		(4.2	)		(10,451,586	)		(4.4	)

SWAP AGREEMENTS - Short:
Credit default swaps - centrally cleared (upfront premiums paid $9,908,307 and $18,423,503, respectively)		(2,049,361	)		(0.9	)		37,081,732			15.5
Interest rate swaps		13,145,265			6.1			(23,046,770	)		(9.6	)

Total swap agreements - short		11,095,904			5.2			14,034,962			5.9

NET UNREALIZED TRADING GAINS ON OPEN SWAP AGREEMENTS	$	2,105,978			1.0	%	$	3,583,376			1.5	%

NET UNREALIZED TRADING GAINS ON OPEN CONTRACTS/AGREEMENTS	$	11,628,937			5.4	%	$	14,226,663			6.0	%

See notes to financial statements.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

CONDENSED SCHEDULES OF INVESTMENTS (continued)

The following is a schedule of the investments in which the fair value of the investment is greater than 5% of partners’ capital.

As of September 30, 2014 (unaudited), there are no investments in which the fair value of the investment is greater than 5% of partners’ capital.

As of December 31, 2013:


Swap Agreements	Maturity Date Range		Fair Value		Percent of Partners’ Capital
Credit default swaps - centrally cleared - Short
iTraxx Crossover Index (upfront premiums paid $7,775,832)		6/20/18-12/20/18	$	15,365,485		6.4	%
iTraxx Europe Index (upfront premiums received $1,002,207)		6/20/18-12/20/18		14,842,610		6.2

See notes to financial statements.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
NET INVESTMENT INCOME:
Interest income	$	58,783		$	129,840		$	179,394		$	255,245

EXPENSES
Brokerage commissions		131,683			252,716			621,346			789,368
Interest expense - brokers		4,645			199,570			28,842			334,596
Administration fees		2,500			2,500			7,500			7,500
Professional fees		56,438			42,156			131,750			116,468
Other expenses		13,100			15,564			36,419			39,212

Total expenses		208,366			512,506			825,857			1,287,144

Net investment loss		(149,583	)		(382,666	)		(646,463	)		(1,031,899	)

NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON TRADING ACTIVITIES:
Net realized trading gains (losses) on closed contracts/agreements and foreign currency transactions		15,405,922			(13,186,781	)		40,355,627			(9,802,102	)
Net change in unrealized gains on translation of foreign currency		917,375			765,081			1,206,001			237,928
Net change in unrealized trading gains (losses) on open contracts/agreements		3,091,745			(5,420,805	)		(2,597,726	)		(13,268,667	)

Net gain (loss) on trading activities		19,415,042			(17,842,505	)		38,963,902			(22,832,841	)

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	19,265,459		$	(18,225,171	)	$	38,317,439		$	(23,864,740	)

NET GAIN (LOSS) PER UNIT OF PARTNERSHIP INTEREST (based on weighted average units outstanding during the period)	$	1,023.07		$	(527.78	)	$	1,825.12		$	(602.02	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF UNITS OUTSTANDING DURING THE PERIOD		18,831.03			34,531.44			20,994.53			39,641.18

See notes to financial statements.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL (UNAUDITED)

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 AND 2013


	Limited Partners						General Partner				Total
	Amount			Units			Amount		Units		Amount			Units
PARTNERS’ CAPITAL - January 1, 2014	$	239,185,645			24,398		$	—		—	$	239,185,645			24,398
Subscriptions		1,617,689			157			—		—		1,617,689			157
Redemptions		(62,498,466	)		(6,165	)		—		—		(62,498,466	)		(6,165	)
Net income		38,317,439			—			—		—		38,317,439			—

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL - September 30, 2014	$	216,622,307			18,390		$	—		—	$	216,622,307			18,390

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL - January 1, 2013	$	457,308,203			45,937		$	—		—	$	457,308,203			45,937
Subscriptions		13,434,920			1,335			—		—		13,434,920			1,335
Redemptions		(164,176,033	)		(16,411	)		—		—		(164,176,033	)		(16,411	)
Net loss		(23,864,740	)		—			—		—		(23,864,740	)		—

PARTNERS’ CAPITAL - September 30, 2013	$	282,702,350			30,861		$	—		—	$	282,702,350			30,861

Units and dollars have been rounded to the nearest whole number.

See notes to financial statements.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)


	For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	38,317,439		$	(23,864,740	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net change in unrealized trading (gains) losses on open contracts/agreements		2,597,726			13,268,667
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Due from brokers		17,686,065			19,637,002
Interest receivable		14,997			(22,418	)
Premiums paid on credit default swap agreements		868,686			(501,474	)
Premiums received on credit default swap agreements		(5,175,526	)		—
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		24,800			(2,210	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		54,334,187			8,514,827

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from subscriptions		1,617,689			13,434,920
Payments on redemptions		(76,444,521	)		(175,707,262	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(74,826,832	)		(162,272,342	)

NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(20,492,645	)		(153,757,515	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period		200,653,548			372,563,159

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period	$	180,160,903		$	218,805,644

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH ACTIVITY:
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST DURING THE PERIOD:	$	28,842		$	334,596

See notes to financial statements.

MAN-AHL DIVERSIFIED TRADING COMPANY L.P.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited financial statements, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P.’s (a Delaware Limited Partnership) (the “Trading Company”) financial condition at September 30, 2014, and the results of its operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. These financial statements present the results of interim periods and do not include all of the disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.’s annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2013. The December 31, 2013 information has been derived from the audited financial statements as of December 31, 2013.

1. ORGANIZATION OF THE TRADING COMPANY

The Trading Company was organized in November 1997 under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, and commenced operations on April 3, 1998, for the purpose of engaging in the speculative trading of futures and forward contracts and related instruments. Man Investments (USA) Corp. (the “General Partner”), a Delaware corporation, serves as the Trading Company’s general partner. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Man Group plc, a United Kingdom public limited company that is listed on the London Stock Exchange. The General Partner oversees the operations and management of the Trading Company.

The Trading Company was formed to serve as a trading vehicle for certain limited partnerships sponsored by the General Partner in a “master-feeder” structure. The limited partners, Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. and Man-AHL Diversified II L.P., are limited partnerships whose general partner is the General Partner.

AHL Partners LLP (the “Advisor”), a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales, acts as trading advisor to the Trading Company. The Advisor is an affiliate of the General Partner and a subsidiary of Man Group plc. The Advisor is registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) as a commodity trading adviser and is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”) in such capacities, in addition to registration with the Financial Conduct Authority in the United Kingdom. Prior to June 1, 2014, Man-AHL (USA) Limited acted as the Trading Company’s trading advisor. The Advisor implements the same trading program and employs substantially the same personnel as did Man-AHL (USA) Limited. The Trading Company has engaged Man Investments Limited, a company organized under the Laws of the United Kingdom, to manage the foreign currency forward trading component of the AHL Diversified Program, at no additional cost to the Trading Company. The personnel of Man Investments Limited responsible for implementing the foreign currency forward trading component of the AHL Diversified Program on behalf of the Trading Company are the same as those of the Advisor who implement the AHL Diversified Program.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Trading Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The General Partner has evaluated the structure, objectives and activities of the Trading Company and determined that it meets the characteristics of an investment company. As such, these financial statements have applied the guidance as set forth in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 946, Financial Services-Investment Companies. The following is a summary of the significant accounting and reporting policies used in preparing the financial statements.

Due from Brokers — Due from brokers consists of balances due from Credit Suisse (“CS”), JPMorgan Chase (“JPM”), Royal Bank of Scotland (“RBS”), Deutsche Bank (“DB”) and Bank of America Merrill Lynch (“ML”). In general, the brokers pay the Trading Company interest monthly, based on agreed upon rates, on the Trading Company’s average daily balance.

Amounts due from brokers include cash held at brokers and cash posted as collateral. The amount of cash restricted as collateral held and included in due from brokers on the statements of financial condition is $13,566,909 and $16,906,001 as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

Expenses — Expenses are recognized on an accrual basis in the period in which they are incurred.

Derivative Contracts — In the normal course of business, the Trading Company enters into derivative contracts (“derivatives”) for trading purposes. Derivatives traded by the Trading Company include futures and forward contracts and swap agreements. The Trading Company records derivatives at fair value. Futures contracts, which are traded on a national exchange, are valued at the close price as of the valuation day, or if no sale occurred on such day, at the close price on the most recent date on which a sale occurred. Forward contracts, which are not traded on a national exchange, are valued at fair value using independent pricing services, which use market observable inputs in their valuations. Swaps are contractual agreements between two parties to exchange streams of payments over time based on specified notional amounts. The Trading Company’s swap agreements consist of interest rate swaps and credit default swaps. Swap agreements are valued at fair value using independent pricing services, which use market observable inputs in their valuations.

Realized and unrealized changes in fair values are included in realized and unrealized gains and losses on contracts/agreements, respectively, on trading activities in the statements of operations. All trading activities are accounted for on a trade-date basis.

Foreign Currency — All assets and liabilities of the Trading Company denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar amounts at the mean between the bid and ask market rates for such currencies on the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of foreign investments are converted at the prevailing rate of exchange on the respective date of such transactions. The Trading Company does not isolate that portion of gains and losses on investments which is due to changes in foreign exchange rates from that which is due to changes in market prices of the investments. Such changes are included with the net realized and unrealized gains or losses on trading activities.

Cash and Cash Equivalents — Cash and cash equivalents include cash, short-term interest-bearing money market accounts, and bank time deposits with original maturities of 90 days or less, held with Citibank N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Bank of America and BNP Paribas.

Income Taxes — The Trading Company is treated as a partnership for tax purposes and therefore is not subject to federal, state, or local income tax. Such taxes are the liabilities of the individual partners and the amounts thereof will vary depending on the individual situation of each partner. Accordingly, there is no provision for income taxes in the accompanying financial statements. ASC 740, Income Taxes, defines how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented, and disclosed in the financial statements and is applied to all open tax years. The Trading Company has evaluated tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Trading Company’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are more likely than not to be sustained by the applicable tax authority. Based on this analysis of all significant tax jurisdictions and all open tax years subject to examination, there were no material tax positions not deemed to meet a more-likely-than-not-threshold. Therefore, no tax expense, including

interest or penalties, was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013. To the extent that the Trading Company records interest and penalties, they would be included in interest expense and other expenses, respectively, on the statements of operations.

Net Income (Loss) Per Unit — Net income (loss) per unit of partnership interest is equal to the net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of units outstanding. Weighted average number of units outstanding is the average of the units outstanding for each day during the period.

3. PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

The Advisor is the sole trading advisor to the Trading Company.

The General Partner and limited partners share in the profits and losses of the Trading Company in proportion to the number of units or unit equivalents held by each partner. However, no limited partner is liable for obligations of the Trading Company in excess of its capital contribution and net profits or losses, if any. The General Partner owned no direct interest in the Trading Company during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013.

Distributions (other than redemption of units), if any, are made on a pro-rata basis at the sole discretion of the General Partner.

Partner contributions occur as of the first day of any month at the opening net asset value. Limited partners may redeem any or all of their units as of the end of any month at net asset value per unit on 10 days prior written notice to the General Partner. The General Partner may suspend redemptions of units of the Trading Company if the Trading Company’s ability to withdraw capital from any investment is restricted. The Trading Company will be dissolved on December 31, 2037, or upon the occurrence of certain events, as specified in the Trading Company’s limited partnership agreement.

4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Trading Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value of the Trading Company’s assets and liabilities which qualify as financial instruments approximates the carrying amounts presented on the statements of financial condition.

The inputs used to determine the fair value of the Trading Company’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:

•

Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

•

Level 2 — investments with other significant observable inputs

•

Level 3 — investments with significant unobservable inputs, which may include the Trading Company’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments

Futures contracts are valued based on end of day quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized as Level 1 investments in the fair value hierarchy. Forward contracts and swap agreements are valued at fair value using independent pricing services, which use market observable inputs in their valuations, and are categorized as Level 2 investments in the fair value hierarchy. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Trading Company did not have any positions categorized as Level 3 investments in the fair value hierarchy.

The following is a summary categorization as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, of the Trading Company’s investments based on the level of inputs utilized in determining the value of such investments:


	Fair Value Measurements
	As of
Investments	September 30, 2014			Level 1			Level 2			Level 3
Assets
Futures contracts	$	11,415,759		$	11,415,759		$	—		$	—
Forward contracts		29,201,771			—			29,201,771			—
Swap agreements		21,464,888			—			21,464,888			—

Total Assets		62,082,418			11,415,759			50,666,659			—

Liabilities
Futures contracts		(6,197,955	)		(6,197,955	)		—			—
Forward contracts		(24,896,616	)		—			(24,896,616	)		—
Swap agreements		(19,358,910	)		—			(19,358,910	)		—

Total Liabilities		(50,453,481	)		(6,197,955	)		(44,255,526	)		—

Net Fair Value	$	11,628,937		$	5,217,804		$	6,411,133		$	—


	Fair Value Measurements
	As of
Investments	December 31, 2013			Level 1			Level 2			Level 3
Assets
Futures contracts	$	13,161,532		$	13,161,532		$	—		$	—
Forward contracts		8,431,935			—			8,431,935			—
Swap agreements		62,465,065			—			62,465,065			—

Total Assets		84,058,532			13,161,532			70,897,000			—

Liabilities
Futures contracts		(3,404,014	)		(3,404,014	)		—			—
Forward contracts		(7,546,166	)		—			(7,546,166	)		—
Swap agreements		(58,881,689	)		—			(58,881,689	)		—

Total Liabilities		(69,831,869	)		(3,404,014	)		(66,427,855	)		—

Net Fair Value	$	14,226,663		$	9,757,518		$	4,469,145		$	—

The Trading Company discloses the amounts of transfers and reasons for those transfers between Levels of the fair value hierarchy, based on the Levels assigned under the hierarchy at the reporting period end. There were no transfers between Levels as of September 30, 2014 based on the levels assigned at December 31, 2013.

5. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK

The Trading Company sought to achieve its investment objective by participation in the AHL Diversified Program directed on behalf of the Trading Company by the Advisor. The AHL Diversified Program is a price trend-following trading system, entirely quantitative in nature, and implements trading positions on the basis of statistical analyses of past price histories. The objective of the AHL Diversified Program is to deliver substantial capital growth for commensurate levels of volatility over the medium term, independent of the movement of the stock and bond markets, through the speculative trading, directly and indirectly, of physical commodities, futures contracts, spot and forward contracts, swaps and options on the foregoing, exchanges of futures for physical transactions and other investments on domestic and international exchanges and markets (including the interbank and over-the-counter markets (“OTC”)). The AHL Diversified Program trades globally in several market sectors, including, without limitation, currencies, bonds, energies, stock indices, interest rates, metals and agriculture.

All the strategies and systems of the AHL Diversified Program are designed to target defined volatility levels rather than returns, and the investment process is underpinned by computer-supported analytical instruments and disciplined real-time risk and management information systems. A proprietary risk measurement method similar to the industry standard “value-at-risk” helps ensure that the rule-based decisions that drive the investment process remain within pre-defined risk parameters. Margin-to-equity ratios are monitored daily, and the level of exposure in each market is quantifiable at any time and is adjusted in accordance with market volatility. Market correlation is closely monitored to prevent over-concentration of risk and ensure optimal portfolio weightings. Market liquidity is examined with the objective of ensuring that the Trading Company will be able to initiate and close out trades as indicated by AHL Diversified Program’s systems at market prices, while brokerage selection and trade execution are continually monitored with the objective of ensuring quality market access.

Futures contracts, forward contracts and swap agreements are recorded on the trade date. Upon entering into futures contracts, forward contracts and swap agreements, the Trading Company is required to deposit cash or collateral with the brokers. Gains or losses are realized when contracts are matured or closed. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts (the difference between contract trade price and fair value) are reported in the statements of financial condition.

Interest rate swaps relate to agreements taken out by the Trading Company with major brokers in which the Trading Company either receives or pays a floating rate of interest in return for paying or receiving, respectively, a fixed rate of interest, on the same notional amount for a specified period of time. The payment flows are usually netted against each other, with the difference being paid by one party to the other. Changes in the value of the interest rate swap agreements and amounts received or paid in connection with those changes, are recognized as unrealized trading gains (losses) on open contracts/agreements in the statements of operations. The risks related to trading in interest rate swaps include changes in market value and the possible inability of the counterparty to fulfill its obligations under the agreement.

The Trading Company may enter into credit default swap agreements to provide a measure of protection against the default of an issuer (as buyer of protection) and/or gain credit exposure to an issuer to which it is not otherwise exposed (as seller of protection). Credit default swaps are agreements in which one party pays fixed periodic payments to a counterparty in consideration for a guarantee from the counterparty to make a specific payment should a negative credit event take place (e.g. default, bankruptcy, debt restructuring, etc.). The Trading Company may either buy or sell (write) credit default swaps. As a buyer, upon the occurrence of a specified negative credit event, the Trading Company will either receive from the seller an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap and deliver the referenced security or underlying securities comprising an index or receive a net settlement of cash equal to the notional amount of the swap less the agreed upon recovery value of the security or underlying securities comprising an index. As a seller (writer), upon the occurrence of a specified negative credit event, the Trading Company will either pay the buyer an amount equal to the notional amount of the swap and take delivery of the referenced security or underlying securities comprising an index or pay a net settlement of cash equal to the notional amount of the swap less the agreed upon recovery value of the security or underlying securities comprising an index. In the event of default by the counterparty, the Trading Company may recover amounts paid under the agreement either partially or in total by offsetting any payables and/or receivables with collateral held or pledged. The counterparty risk for centrally-cleared credit default swap agreements is generally lower than for credit default swap agreements not centrally-cleared. However, there can be no assurance that the clearing organization, or its members, will satisfy its obligations to the Trading Company.

These periodic payments received or made under swap agreements by the Trading Company are included in net realized trading gains (losses) on closed contracts/agreements in the statements of operations. When the swap is terminated, the Trading Company will record a realized gain (loss) equal to the difference between the proceeds from (or cost of) the closing transaction and the Trading Company’s basis in the contract, if any. Swap transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and market risk in excess of the amounts recognized on the statements of financial condition. Such risks involve the possibility that there will be no liquid market for these agreements, that the counterparty or the clearing organization to the agreements may default on its obligation to perform or disagree as to the meaning of the contractual terms in the agreements, and that there may be unfavorable changes in interest rates and/or market values associated with these transactions.

As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the total fair value and notional amounts of credit default swaps on indices where the Trading Company is the seller is presented in the following table by contract terms:


	Fair Value and Notional Amounts by Contract Term
	September 30, 2014					December 31, 2013
	1-5 years					1-5 years
Credit spread (in basis points)	Fair Value			Notional Amount		Fair Value		Notional Amount
0-100	$	(1,140,126	)	$	231,310,000	$	19,549,532	$	1,558,937,500
101-250		—			—		12,453,749		158,044,500
251-350		(683,733	)		31,577,500		5,078,451		123,715,000
351-450		(225,502	)		10,000,000		—		—

Total	$	(2,049,361	)	$	272,887,500	$	37,081,732	$	1,840,697,000

The notional amount represents the maximum potential pay out that the Trading Company could be required to make if a credit event were to occur under each agreement. The credit spread of the underlying indices, derived from the fair value at September 30, 2014 of each credit default swap where the Trading Company is a seller, ranged between 63 basis points and 355 basis points. The credit spread of the underlying indices, derived from the fair value at December 31, 2013 of each credit default swap where the Trading Company is a seller, ranged between 54 basis points and 307 basis points. The credit spread is generally indicative of the status of the underlying risk of default by the applicable reference entity and is likely to be different than the contractual spread on the credit default swap. Higher credit spreads are indicative of a higher likelihood of performance by the Trading Company. As of September 30, 2014 the Trading Company posted cash collateral of $2,549,216, and as of December 31, 2013, the Trading Company posted cash collateral of $4,952,334, with respective counterparties of these agreements in the normal course of business. As of September 30, 2014, all open credit default swap agreements on selling protection have a maturity date of June 20, 2019. As of December 31, 2013, the maturity dates for open credit default swaps on selling protection ranged from June 20, 2018 through December 20, 2018.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2014, the Trading Company traded 136,837 exchange-traded futures contracts and settled 24,758 forward contracts and 1,761 swap agreements. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Trading Company traded 364,114 exchange-traded futures contracts and settled 59,370 forward contracts and 4,651 swap agreements. During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Trading Company traded 50,564 exchange-traded futures contracts and settled 11,589 forward contracts and 876 swap agreements. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Trading Company traded 144,343 exchange-traded futures contracts and settled 46,758 forward contracts and 3,778 swap agreements.

The Trading Company trades derivative financial instruments that involve varying degrees of market and credit risk. Market risks may arise from unfavorable changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, or the fair values of the instruments underlying the contracts. All contracts are stated at fair value, and changes in those values are reflected in the net change in unrealized trading gains (losses) on open contracts/agreements in the statements of operations. Credit risk arises from the potential inability of counterparties to perform in accordance with the terms of a contract. The credit risk for OTC derivative contracts is limited to the net unrealized gain plus any collateral posted net of unrealized losses or upfront fees posted, if any, for each counterparty for which a netting agreement exists and is included in the statements of financial condition. Upfront fees are listed on the statements of financial condition as net premiums paid/received on credit default swap agreements and are shown net by counterparty for which a netting agreement exists. Counterparty relationships are governed by various contracts. These contracts can be based on industry standard agreements, such as International Swap and Derivatives Association agreements for OTC contracts. These agreements set forth each party’s basic rights, responsibilities, and duties. These agreements also contain information regarding financial terms and conditions, as well as termination and events of default provisions. Certain agreements contain provisions that require the Trading Company to post additional collateral upon the occurrence of specific credit risk related events or upon notice from the counterparty. As the Trading Company’s trading strategies are dependent upon the existence of these agreements, the Trading Company’s counterparties usually have multiple specified events under which they can terminate individual transactions or the entire agreement. These are most commonly related to declines in assets under management and performance below certain thresholds during a specified period. It is not guaranteed that counterparties will move to terminate individual transactions or entire agreements if a “trigger event” were to occur; however, it is their right to do so, and such a move could severely impact the Trading Company’s portfolio. At September 30, 2014, the OTC contracts subject to such trigger events in a net liability position were the interest rate swaps and credit default swaps. The details of the net liability positions by counterparty are disclosed later in this note on the additional disclosures regarding the offsetting of derivative liabilities table. The ultimate amounts that may be required as payment to settle the derivative instruments in connection with the triggering of such credit contingency features as of September 30, 2014, may differ from the net liability amounts recorded as of September 30, 2014, and such differences can be material.

For exchange-traded futures contracts, the clearing organization functions as the central counterparty for each transaction and, therefore, bears the risk of delivery to and from counterparties, which mitigates the credit risk of these instruments.

For centrally cleared swaps, immediately following execution of the swap agreement, the swap agreement is novated to a central clearing counterparty (the “CCP”) and the Trading Company faces the CCP through a broker. Upon entering into a centrally cleared swap, the Trading Company is required to deposit initial margin with the broker in the form of cash in an amount that varies depending on the size and risk profile of the particular swap. With centrally cleared swaps, there is less counterparty credit risk since the exchange or clearinghouse stands between the buyer and seller of the swaps.

The following table presents the fair value of the Trading Company’s derivative instruments and statements of financial condition location:


	September 30, 2014
	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
Primary Risk Exposure	Statements of Financial Condition	Fair Value		Statements of Financial Condition	Fair Value
Open forward contracts	Gross unrealized trading gains on open forward contracts			Gross unrealized trading losses on open forward contracts
Currencies		$	28,286,754		$	(24,789,598	)
Metals			915,017			(107,018	)

Total open forward contracts			29,201,771			(24,896,616	)

Open futures contracts	Gross unrealized trading gains on open futures contracts			Gross unrealized trading losses on open futures contracts
Agricultural			6,280,628			(1,264,124	)
Currencies			1,038,699			(248,263	)
Energy			2,238,364			(586,375	)
Indices			748,731			(1,780,793	)
Interest rates			613,680			(453,869	)
Metals			495,657			(1,864,531	)

Total open futures contracts			11,415,759			(6,197,955	)

Open swap agreements	Gross unrealized trading gains on open swap agreements			Gross unrealized trading losses on open swap agreements
Credit			622,658			(2,179,273	)
Interest rates			20,842,230			(17,179,637	)

Total open swap agreements			21,464,888			(19,358,910	)

Total Derivatives		$	62,082,418		$	(50,453,481	)


	December 31, 2013
	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
Primary Risk Exposure	Statements of Financial Condition	Fair Value		Statements of Financial Condition	Fair Value
Open forward contracts	Gross unrealized trading gains on open forward contracts			Gross unrealized trading losses on open forward contracts
Currencies		$	7,958,109		$	(7,473,578	)
Metals			473,826			(72,588	)

Total open forward contracts			8,431,935			(7,546,166	)

Open futures contracts	Gross unrealized trading gains on open futures contracts			Gross unrealized trading losses on open futures contracts
Agricultural			1,981,983			(951,283	)
Currencies			35,616			(258,726	)
Energy			399,933			(143,956	)
Indices			9,124,763			(57,307	)
Interest rates			1,041,240			(1,849,774	)
Metals			577,997			(142,968	)

Total open futures contracts			13,161,532			(3,404,014	)

Open swap agreements	Gross unrealized trading gains on open swap agreements			Gross unrealized trading losses on open swap agreements
Credit			37,243,040			(26,489,933	)
Interest rates			25,222,025			(32,391,756	)

Total open swap agreements			62,465,065			(58,881,689	)

Total Derivatives		$	84,058,532		$	(69,831,869	)

The following table presents the impact of derivative instruments on the statements of operations:


		For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
		2014			2013			2014			2013
Location of loss or gain recognized in income on derivatives		Gain (Loss) on derivatives			Gain (Loss) on derivatives			Gain (Loss) on derivatives			Gain (Loss) on derivatives
Forward contracts
Currencies		$	6,911,880		$	(5,989,853	)	$	9,301,157		$	(1,011,330	)
Metals			(643,490	)		48,867			(2,025,977	)		4,905,379

	Net realized trading gains (losses) on closed contracts/agreements	$	6,268,390		$	(5,940,986	)	$	7,275,180		$	3,894,049

Currencies		$	2,796,663		$	(5,593,693	)	$	3,012,625		$	(11,634,471	)
Metals			1,830,282			(2,943,183	)		406,761			994,224

	Net change in unrealized trading gains (losses) on open contracts/agreements	$	4,626,945		$	(8,536,876	)	$	3,419,386		$	(10,640,247	)

Futures contracts
Agricultural		$	6,799,571		$	(159,319	)	$	8,520,136		$	667,152
Currencies			2,607,318			100,669			4,632,763			(362,981	)
Energy			3,078,321			484,464			(565,282	)		(9,562,063	)
Indices			(1,647,420	)		4,588,097			4,717,943			31,337,388
Interest rates			3,341,035			(9,979,517	)		12,956,239			(32,033,952	)
Metals			1,292,286			(377,355	)		(1,554,292	)		(909,456	)

	Net realized trading gains (losses) on closed contracts/agreements	$	15,471,111		$	(5,342,961	)	$	28,707,507		$	(10,863,912	)

Agricultural		$	2,838,922		$	1,480,495		$	3,985,804		$	1,802,760
Currencies			53,162			674,426			1,013,546			52,068
Energy			82,590			(400,307	)		1,396,012			(1,264,553	)
Indices			(3,225,395	)		(2,712,848	)		(10,099,518	)		(3,992,120	)
Interest rates			(2,696,179	)		4,445,967			968,345			1,603,357
Metals			(2,068,078	)		(2,399,562	)		(1,803,903	)		1,535,781

	Net change in unrealized trading gains (losses) on open contracts/agreements	$	(5,014,978	)	$	1,088,171		$	(4,539,714	)	$	(262,707	)

Swap agreements
Credit default swaps		$	(1,354,237	)	$	686,484		$	11,298,709		$	1,392,596
Interest rate swaps			(2,996,218	)		(63,266	)		(4,750,601	)		(173,231	)

	Net realized trading gains (losses) on closed contracts/agreements	$	(4,350,455	)	$	623,218		$	6,548,108		$	1,219,365

Credit default swaps		$	(787,884	)	$	237,614		$	(12,309,722	)	$	6,097,250
Interest rate swaps			4,267,662			1,790,286			10,832,324			(8,462,963	)

	Net change in unrealized trading gains (losses) on open contracts/agreements	$	3,479,778		$	2,027,900		$	(1,477,398	)	$	(2,365,713	)

Amounts in the table above exclude foreign exchange spot contracts.

As described above, the Trading Company may enter into netting agreements with its derivative contract counterparties whereby the Trading Company may, under certain circumstances, offset with the counterparty certain derivative financial instruments’ payables and/or receivables with collateral held and/or posted and create one single net payment. As of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Trading Company was subject to netting agreements that allowed for amounts owed between the Trading Company and its counterparty to be netted. The party that has the larger payable pays the excess of the larger amount over the smaller amount to the other party. The netting agreements do not apply to amounts owed to or from different counterparties. The following table provides additional disclosures regarding the offsetting of derivative assets presented in the statements of financial condition:


	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amount Offset in the Statements of Financial Condition			Net Amounts of Assets presented in the Statements of Financial Condition		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Financial Condition				Net Amount
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets							Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
As of September 30, 2014
Open futures contracts
Credit Suisse	$	2,703,384	$	(2,703,384	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
JPMorgan Chase		3,340,352		(1,052,435	)		2,287,917		—		—		2,287,917
Bank of America Merrill Lynch		5,372,023		(2,039,575	)		3,332,448		—		—		3,332,448

Total open futures contracts	$	11,415,759	$	(5,795,394	)	$	5,620,365	$	—	$	—	$	5,620,365

Open forward contracts
Deutsche Bank	$	13,721,098	$	(11,194,290	)	$	2,526,808	$	—	$	—	$	2,526,808
Royal Bank of Scotland		15,480,673		(13,702,326	)		1,778,347		—		—		1,778,347

Total open forward contracts	$	29,201,771	$	(24,896,616	)	$	4,305,155	$	—	$	—	$	4,305,155

Open swap agreements
Credit Suisse	$	330,476	$	(330,476	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
JPMorgan Chase		437,251		(437,251	)		—		—		—		—
Deutsche Bank		2,134,685		(1,563,183	)		571,502		—		—		571,502
Royal Bank of Scotland		18,562,476		(15,058,622	)		3,503,854		—		—		3,503,854

Total open swap agreements	$	21,464,888	$	(17,389,532	)	$	4,075,356	$	—	$	—	$	4,075,356

As of December 31, 2013
Open futures contracts
Credit Suisse	$	6,395,998	$	(1,480,381	)	$	4,915,617	$	—	$	—	$	4,915,617
JPMorgan Chase		5,281,158		(1,004,751	)		4,276,407		—		—		4,276,407
Bank of America Merrill Lynch		1,484,376		(918,882	)		565,494		—		—		565,494

Total open futures contracts	$	13,161,532	$	(3,404,014	)	$	9,757,518	$	—	$	—	$	9,757,518

Open forward contracts
Deutsche Bank	$	4,689,157	$	(4,241,771	)	$	447,386	$	—	$	—	$	447,386
Royal Bank of Scotland		3,742,778		(3,304,395	)		438,383		—		—		438,383

Total open forward contracts	$	8,431,935	$	(7,546,166	)	$	885,769	$	—	$	—	$	885,769

Open swap agreements
Credit Suisse	$	25,882,027	$	(13,361,680	)	$	12,520,347	$	—	$	—	$	12,520,347
JPMorgan Chase		11,361,013		(11,361,013	)		—		—		—		—
Royal Bank of Scotland		25,222,025		(25,222,025	)		—		—		—		—

Total open swap agreements	$	62,465,065	$	(49,944,718	)	$	12,520,347	$	—	$	—	$	12,520,347

The following table provides additional disclosures regarding the offsetting of derivative liabilities presented in the statements of financial condition:


	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amount Offset in the Statements of Financial Condition			Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented in the Statements of Financial Condition		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Financial Condition				Net Amount
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities							Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
As of September 30, 2014
Open futures contracts
Credit Suisse	$	3,105,945	$	(2,703,384	)	$	402,561	$	—	$	402,561	$	—
JPMorgan Chase		1,052,435		(1,052,435	)		—		—		—		—
Bank of America Merrill Lynch		2,039,575		(2,039,575	)		—		—		—		—

Total open futures contracts	$	6,197,955	$	(5,795,394	)	$	402,561	$	—	$	402,561	$	—

Open forward contracts
Deutsche Bank	$	11,194,290	$	(11,194,290	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Royal Bank of Scotland		13,702,326		(13,702,326	)		—		—		—		—

Total open forward contracts	$	24,896,616	$	(24,896,616	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Open swap agreements
Credit Suisse	$	1,384,188	$	(330,476	)	$	1,053,712	$	—	$	—	$	1,053,712
JPMorgan Chase		1,352,917		(437,251	)		915,666		—		915,666		—
Deutsche Bank		1,563,183		(1,563,183	)		—		—		—		—
Royal Bank of Scotland		15,058,622		(15,058,622	)		—		—		—		—

Total open swap agreements	$	19,358,910	$	(17,389,532	)	$	1,969,378	$	—	$	915,666	$	1,053,712

As of December 31, 2013
Open futures contracts
Credit Suisse	$	1,480,381	$	(1,480,381	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
JPMorgan Chase		1,004,751		(1,004,751	)		—		—		—		—
Bank of America Merrill Lynch		918,882		(918,882	)		—		—		—		—

Total open futures contracts	$	3,404,014	$	(3,404,014	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Open forward contracts
Deutsche Bank	$	4,241,771	$	(4,241,771	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Royal Bank of Scotland		3,304,395		(3,304,395	)		—		—		—		—

Total open forward contracts	$	7,546,166	$	(7,546,166	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Open swap agreements
Credit Suisse	$	13,361,680	$	(13,361,680	)	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
JPMorgan Chase		13,128,253		(11,361,013	)		1,767,240		—		1,767,240		—
Royal Bank of Scotland		32,391,756		(25,222,025	)		7,169,731		—		7,169,731		—

Total open swap agreements	$	58,881,689	$	(49,944,718	)	$	8,936,971	$	—	$	8,936,971	$	—

Only the amount of the collateral up to the net amount of liabilities presented on the statements of financial condition is disclosed above. The table below lists additional amounts of collateral pledged:


	Additional Collateral Pledged
As of September 30, 2014
Open futures contracts
Credit Suisse	$	10,615,132
Open swap agreements
JPMorgan Chase	$	1,633,550
As of December 31, 2013
Open swap agreements
JPMorgan Chase	$	2,140,326
Royal Bank of Scotland		5,828,704

6. FINANCIAL GUARANTEES

The Trading Company enters into administrative and other professional service contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The Trading Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is not known; however, the Trading Company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

7. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following represents the ratios to average partners’ capital and other supplemental information for the periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Per unit operating performance:
Beginning net asset value	$	10,754.84		$	9,691.97		$	9,803.63		$	9,955.05
Income (loss) from investment operations:
Net investment loss		(7.96	)		(11.29	)		(31.11	)		(26.55	)
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) on trading activities and translation of foreign currency		1,032.57			(520.15	)		2,006.93			(767.97	)

Total income (loss) from investment operations		1,024.61			(531.44	)		1,975.82			(794.52	)

Ending net asset value	$	11,779.45		$	9,160.53		$	11,779.45		$	9,160.53

Ratios to average partners’ capital¹:
Expenses		0.39	%		0.63	%		0.51	%		0.44	%

Net investment loss		(0.28	)%		(0.47	)%		(0.40	)%		(0.36	)%

Total return²		9.53	%		(5.48	)%		20.15	%		(7.98	)%

¹	Ratios have been annualized.

²	Total return is for the period indicated and has not been annualized.

Financial highlights are calculated for all partners taken as a whole. An individual partner’s returns and ratios may vary from these returns and ratios based on the timing of capital transactions.

8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Trading Company accepts initial or additional subscriptions for limited partnership interests generally as of the first day of the month and redemption requests from limited partners as of the last business day of each calendar month. For the period subsequent to September 30, 2014 through the date of filing, limited partner subscriptions totaled $975,895, and limited partner redemptions totaled $1,629,784.

The General Partner has evaluated the impact of subsequent events on the Trading Company through the date of filing these financial statements, and noted no subsequent events that require adjustment to or disclosure in these financial statements, except as noted above.

ITEM 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Introduction

Reference is made to Item 1, “Financial Statements.” The information contained therein is essential to, and should be read in conjunction with, the following analysis.

Operational Overview

Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a fund which engages in speculative trading of futures and forward contracts and related instruments through its investment in Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P. (the “Trading Company”) pursuant to the AHL Diversified Program, directed on behalf of the Trading Company by AHL Partners LLP (the “Advisor”). The Advisor implements the same trading program and employs substantively the same personnel as did Man-AHL (USA) Limited. The AHL Diversified Program is a price trend-following trading system, entirely quantitative in nature, and implements trading positions on the basis of statistical analyses of past price histories. The objective of the AHL Diversified Program is to deliver substantial capital growth for commensurate levels of volatility over the medium term, independent of the movement of the stock and bond markets, through the speculative trading, directly and indirectly, of physical commodities, futures contracts, spot and forward contracts, swaps and options on the foregoing, exchanges of futures for physical transactions and other investments on domestic and international exchanges and markets (including the interbank and over-the-counter markets). The AHL Diversified Program is proprietary and confidential, so that substantially the only information that can be furnished regarding the Partnership’s results of operations is contained in the performance record of its trading through the Trading Company. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results. Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of the Partnership (the “General Partner”) does believe, however, that there are certain market conditions, for example, markets with pronounced price trends, in which the Partnership has a greater likelihood of being profitable than in other market environments.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Units of limited partnership interests (“Units”) of the Partnership may be offered for sale as of the beginning, and may be redeemed as of the end, of each month.

The Partnership raises additional capital only through the sale of Units and capital is increased through trading profits (if any) and interest income. The Partnership does not engage in borrowing. The Partnership, not being an operating company, does not incur capital expenditures. It functions solely as a passive trading vehicle, investing the substantial majority of its assets in the Trading Company. Its remaining capital resources are used only as assets available to make further investments in the Trading Company and to pay Partnership level expenses. Accordingly, the amount of capital raised for the Partnership should not have a significant impact on its operations.

Partnership assets not invested in the Trading Company are maintained in cash and cash equivalents in bank accounts or accounts with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Citibank, N.A. and are readily available to the Partnership. The Partnership may redeem any part or all of its limited partnership interest in the Trading Company at any month-end at the net asset value per unit of the Trading Company. The Trading Company’s assets are generally held as cash or cash equivalents which are used to margin futures and provide collateral for forward contracts and swap agreements and are withdrawn, as necessary, to pay redemptions (to the Partnership and other investors in the Trading Company). Other than potential market-imposed limitations on liquidity, due, for example, to limited open interest in certain futures markets or to daily price fluctuation limits, which are inherent in the Trading Company’s futures trading, the Trading Company’s assets are highly liquid and are expected to remain so.

There have been no material changes with respect to the Partnership’s critical accounting policies, off-balance sheet arrangements or disclosure of contractual obligations as reported in the Partnership’s Form 10-K filed March 31, 2014.

Results of Operations

Due to the nature of the Partnership’s trading, the results of operations for the interim period presented should not be considered indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

Periods Ended September 30, 2014:


	30-September-14
Ending Equity	$	184,583,452

Nine months ended September 30, 2014:

Net assets decreased $18,298,166 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. This decrease was attributable to subscriptions in the amount of $1,616,263, redemptions in the amount of $46,249,817 and a net gain from operations of $26,335,388.

Management Fees of $4,026,800 and servicing fees of $1,436,632 were paid or accrued, and interest of $151,651 was earned or accrued on the Partnership’s cash and cash equivalent investments and broker balances, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

The Partnership’s other expenses paid or accrued for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $567,840.

Three months ended September 30, 2014:

Net assets increased $10,256,811 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. This increase was attributable to subscriptions in the amount of $619,977, redemptions in the amount of $4,800,665 and a net gain from operations of $14,437,499.

Management Fees of $1,329,325 and servicing fees of $446,783 were paid or accrued, and interest of $50,050 was earned or accrued on the Partnership’s cash and cash equivalent investments and broker balances, for the three months ended September 30, 2014.

The Partnership’s other expenses paid or accrued for the three months ended September 30, 2014 were $195,968.

The Partnership generated a modest profit in July with commodity trading in the agricultural markets and the Partnership’s long bond positions serving as the strongest contributors to growth. Although overall commodity trading performance was mixed, short positions in sugar and corn and long positions in live cattle proved profitable as weather conditions led to a drop in corn prices and increased demand raised cattle prices. Energy trading significantly reduced these gains, however, as initial long positions in oil suffered from lower prices because of the possibility of resumed oil exports from Libya and a perceived reduction of risk to oil facilities in Iraq. The Partnership’s subsequent short positions in energy similarly continued to produce losses as economic sanctions imposed on Russia by several European nations increased prices in a variety of markets. In the equity sector, the Partnership’s long positions initially started favorably with U.S. employment data beating expectations, but suffered losses towards the middle and end of July on account of comments from U.S. Federal Reserve Chair, Janet Yellen, concerning stretched valuations in certain credit markets as well as the Argentine debt default, which led to a selloff in global equities. Long bond exposure helped mitigate these losses, however, and led to a net positive for the month as investors sought security in safe haven assets and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) continued its accommodative policy.

August trading provided significantly improved gains for the Partnership with bonds, currencies and commodities all contributing to the Partnership’s profit. Short positions taken on the Euro against the U.S. dollar as well as a long exposure to US treasuries and Italian bonds were the highest performers due to a series of accommodative remarks made by central bankers throughout the month. The remarks of Janet Yellen and ECB President, Mario Draghi, had particularly strong impacts on the fixed income markets as they respectively noted that the U.S. labor market needed more time to recover before rates would rise and indicated a more active interventionist stance was likely forthcoming from the ECB in order to boost growth and prevent deflation in the EU. Consequently, the yields on German, French and Italian bonds dropped significantly and were accompanied by a contemporaneous drop in the Euro’s value as measured against the U.S. dollar and other currencies. The Partnership’s long bond exposure in the European markets and short Euro positions were well-timed to take advantage of these movements. With respect to commodities, trading in agriculturals provided another month of positive gains as short positions in soybean oil and sugar benefited from the continued slide of prices in both commodities.

The Partnership finished the third quarter in September with another month of positive, although more modest, returns. This result was achieved as significant gains in commodity, currency and energy trading were substantially offset by losses in the equity and bond markets. Both the equity and bond markets experienced notable volatility in September as global markets repositioned themselves to reflect diverging rates of economic growth between countries and varied strategies of central banks. Despite experiencing losses in both markets, the Partnership generated positive returns with currency trading. Short positions on the Japanese Yen and Euro were well-timed to take advantage of both currencies’ notable depreciation relative to the U.S. Dollar. The Partnership’s returns were further augmented by profitable commodity trading in the energy and agricultural sectors which, more than any other time since the financial crisis, appear to be driven by demand and supply fundamentals as opposed to global risk appetite.

Three months ended June 30, 2014:

The Partnership posted modest trading profits in April as positive performance in the bond, credit, agricultural and currency markets outdistanced losses from equity, energy and metals trading. The Partnership’s long positions in European and Canadian bonds proved particularly successful in connection with the European Central Bank’s (“ECB”) accommodative monetary policy relative to the U.S. Federal Reserve’s continued stimulus tapering. Holdings in Swedish interest rate swaps also benefitted from the renewed European confidence. Currency trading produced smaller gains, however, as the lack of substantial movement in the currency markets prevented the Partnership’s positions from realizing higher levels of return. Commodity trading similarly produced more modest returns as gains in long soybean and coffee contracts were offset by losses on short wheat positions. The bursting of a mini-tech bubble in April caused losses for the Partnership which held long positions in NASDAQ futures. Energy trading also produced losses as crude oil prices remained relatively range bound and an increase in European power prices made short positions in Germany and Scandinavia unprofitable.

The Partnership experienced a notable net trading gain in May with the fixed income, equity and currency markets serving as the strongest contributors to performance. With respect to fixed income trading, the Partnership benefitted the most from its long positions in U.S. and Australian bonds as low yields in the European bond market and expectations of additional ECB stimulus increased investor demand back to the U.S. and other bond markets. The continued low interest rate environment in both the U.S. and Europe had the additional effect of buoying equities in both markets, which in combination with the Partnership’s long stakes in U.S. and European equities, produced significant gains for the Partnership. Currency trading resulted in more moderate returns as the Partnership’s short position against emerging markets and long positions in the Indian Rupee and non-dollar crosses each produced small gains. Commodity and energy trading, in turn, produced small losses attributable to long positions in cotton and natural gas and the shorting of aluminum.

June provided another positive month of trading returns with the strongest performances achieved in the equity, bond and commodities markets. Both the U.S. and European equity markets saw sizeable gains on account of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s continuing support of monetary stimulus as expressed by Federal Reserve Chair, Janet Yellen, in her mid-month address. With the S&P 500 and the DAX index

both reaching their highest levels to date, the Partnership’s long positions in equities similarly produced noteworthy profits. Although a long stake in U.S. Treasuries did result in a loss, corresponding long positions in European bonds helped to offset these losses as the European bond markets rallied in light of the ECB’s continuing accommodative policy. Commodity trading also proved profitable as long positions in live cattle and short corn and wheat positions were well-timed to take advantage of record-high futures prices for cattle and the downward trend of corn and wheat prices which had spiked earlier on concerns over the cold weather impact on summer harvests. In contrast to these positive gains, the Partnership’s energy contract positioning provided mixed results following geopolitical developments in Iraq which raised concerns of the future delivery of crude oil from the region. Gains from longs in Brent and WTI crude were tempered by losses from shorts in the gasoil market. The instability in Iraq, moreover, had a negative impact on the Partnership’s metal trading. Prices of gold and silver both increased sharply over the news of the instability resulting in losses for the Partnership’s short gold and silver positions.

Three months ended March 31, 2014:

Poor performance in the equities markets resulted in a net trading loss in January as both the European and U.S. equity markets experienced declines. Jumps in credit premiums and a long exposure to industrial metals further contributed to these losses. On the positive side, renewed demand for developed market bonds brought noteworthy gains. Existing long positions in French and Italian bond futures, as well as Euro-bund and Canadian contracts, provided the most significant returns. Commodity trading also added positive returns as short positions in sugar and wheat benefitted from continued weak demand, a record Canadian wheat harvest, and increased sugar production from Brazil and Thailand.

In February, trading in the bond, commodity, and energy markets generated modest overall performance with long positions in Italian bond futures, soy beans, and natural gas contributing most to the positive returns. Long positions in Italian bonds were particularly profitable as demand increased for such bonds in spite of other key bond yields remaining relatively stagnant. On the commodity side, trading results were mixed. Although an unusually cold winter across the eastern half of North America made long exposure to natural gas profitable, short exposure to wheat and sugar offset these gains. A drought in Brazil increased the price of soft commodities such as sugar, and concerns of lower wheat production on account of the harsh U.S. winter drove up prices for wheat. Trading in the currency markets also provided mixed results. While short positions in the Russian Rouble provided positive gains in light of the political turmoil in Ukraine, a slightly weaker U.S. dollar caused losses for the Partnership’s positions in Brazilian real, Korean won and Malaysian ringgit.

Against a backdrop of increased volatility for equities, energies and rates, the Partnership sustained negative returns in March as losses in stocks and fixed income exposures outweighed gains in currency positions. Regarding equities, the Dax Index in Germany experienced sharp market reversals in light of lingering uncertainty from the Russian-Ukrainian political conflict. During this reversal, the Partnership cut positions at the time of sell-off yet did not participate in the return upward swing. Sharp reversals in both the Eurodollar and U.S. Treasury bond markets similarly resulted in negative returns which were offset by gains on long positions in French and Italian government bonds. The losses in the equity and bond markets were further tempered by the Partnership’s currency trading with respect to the Indian rupee and New Zealand dollar, which both yielded positive results.

Periods Ended September 30, 2013:


	30-September-13
Ending Equity	$	234,296,018

Nine months ended September 30, 2013:

Net assets decreased $145,054,969 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This decrease was attributable to subscriptions in the amount of $12,300,714, redemptions in the amount of $125,686,420 and a net loss from operations of $31,669,263.

Management Fees of $7,172,368 and servicing fees of $3,645,387 were paid or accrued, and interest of $212,089 was accrued on the Partnership’s cash and cash equivalent investments and broker balances, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The Partnership’s other expenses paid or accrued for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were $634,448.

Three months ended September 30, 2013:

Net assets decreased $58,502,202 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. This decrease was attributable to subscriptions in the amount of $4,278,715, redemptions in the amount of $44,401,787 and a net loss from operations of $18,379,130.

Management Fees of $1,968,379 and servicing fees of $998,671 were paid or accrued, and interest of $108,348 was accrued on the Partnership’s cash, cash equivalent investments and broker balances, for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

The Partnership’s other expenses paid or accrued for the three months ended September 30, 2013 were $204,398.

The Partnership generated a loss in July. Currency trading was a notable detractor in July. Long exposure to the U.S. dollar suffered as the likelihood of continuing accommodative monetary policy weighed on the U.S. dollar. The program’s metal holdings suffered on the short-side as well. Metals positions suffered on the short side as base metals rose as Chinese growth figures came in at around the expected level and as precious metal prices also finished higher. Oil prices lifted which benefitted long crude positions though performance was pegged back by losses on exposure to oil distillates. A positive contribution came from long exposure to equities. Gains were concentrated in U.S. and European stocks. However, agriculturals generated a loss. Short cocoa positions suffered as drier weather predictions in Africa threatened supply. Short coffee also detracted as frost forecasts in Brazil created upward price pressure and long soya holdings fell on reduced demand and strong crop reports.

The Partnership generated a loss in August. Gains were accrued in the early part of August with long exposure to risk assets. These gains were largely given back in the second week of August as news of increased industrial production in China hurt short exposure to base metals. Long exposure to U.S. and European stock indices suffered heavily as equities fell out of favor. Rising yields hurt long exposure to U.S. treasuries which was one of the largest negatives over the month. Losses within interest rates were concentrated in long Eurodollar positions as better-than-expected data raised Eurozone interest rate expectations. Negative attribution from industrial metals was compounded by short exposure to precious metals which also detracted as both gold and silver experienced noteworthy price jumps. Agricultural holdings were positive overall. Long exposure to soy beans was the standout trade as scorching Midwest temperatures threatened to damage the crop. Crude oil ended higher on Middle East tensions, resulting in a profit for long holdings and lifting energy sector returns.

The Partnership generated a loss in September. Gains that had been built up in September were eroded as the nearing U.S. budget deadline led to reversals in equity and bond markets. Currency trading was the most notable detractor. Long exposure to the U.S. dollar generally was a loss-making trade. Negative performance was particularly concentrated in dollar pairs against emerging-market currencies. Euro exposures also detracted slightly on both the long and short side. Bond holdings also hurt performance as short exposure to debt from commodity-focused economies suffered. Long holdings of Italian bonds delivered a loss with further destabilizing of the coalition government resulting in heavy selling of the country’s debt. Some performance was recovered via long German and French bonds as higher grade fixed income attracted safe haven inflows from investors. Short exposure to Eurodollar and Short Sterling lost out as more accommodative monetary policy in the U.S. lowered expectations for interest rates globally. Energy trading resulted in a loss as long exposure to oil detracted. Losses were mitigated slightly by a positive return from long equity holdings. However, this performance was reduced as stock markets reversed in the last week of September. Short corn was one of the most positive trades for September as prices plummeted on larger-than-expected stockpiles.

Three months ended June 30, 2013

The Partnership generated positive performance in April. A long exposure to fixed income assets added a large share of returns with European bonds, US Treasuries and Eurodollar contracts all delivering profits, although long exposure to Japanese bonds detracted slightly. Profits were added by a short allocation to both precious and base metals, although platinum and palladium gave back some performance. However, the agricultural sector detracted because of exposure to wheat and corn. Negative performance came from currencies as well. Short GBP positions caused a loss with the pound moving higher as the UK avoided triple-dip recession.

The Partnership generated a notable loss in May with a long exposure to fixed income assets being the primary driver of negative performance. US Treasuries were among the most notable losers. Further negative performance came from UK gilts and bonds from commodity focused economies. Long exposure to interest rate holdings also incurred a loss following a cut in Eurozone rates; Eurodollar significantly detracted with Euribor and Short Sterling contracts also ending May in negative territory. Currency trading delivered a loss as a rising greenback weighed on short US dollar versus a number of commodity-linked currency trades.

Stock trading was the largest positive contributor as long US and European holdings benefitted from the equity rally before returns were trimmed in the final week. Agricultural trading added a gain, primarily via long soybeans and short sugar positions. Energies were slightly negative with long natural gas adding a loss. Short electricity and coat contracts helped partially offset sector losses.

The Partnership posted a loss in June with long holdings of fixed income and equities being the primary negatives, particularly early in the month. US Treasuries were a significant detractor as yields jumped. European bonds were also loss-making, coming under pressure from the general sell-off in fixed income. Eurodollar, Euribor and Short Sterling contracts were all notable losers.

Equities detracted significantly; European indices were the biggest losers after US markets rebounded at the end of the month, helping long holdings recover some performance. Short metals added a notable gain as prices of both base and precious metals fell sharply over the period.

Three months ended March 31, 2013:

January began with noteworthy results from long equity exposure across all regions, but particularly in US and European indices. However, this was nullified by losses on long fixed income exposure, with US Treasuries, French bonds, Short Sterling and Eurodollar being the main detractors. Commodity allocations generated a gain, largely due to short electricity contracts as milder, wetter weather drove

prices down, but long exposure to oil and oil derivatives and short gold exposure also returned positive numbers. Short exposure to European and US credit default protection captured gains over the past months as the cost of default insurance fell. Currency trading also added positive returns largely by way of short exposure to Japanese Yen which fell 6% (on a trade-weighted basis) following the announcement of a stimulus and deflation control.

Commodity and currency trading were major factors in losses in February. Energy trading took a hit in February, with all positions contributing to the loss. Long positions in crude oil and its by-products was the main theme. The story was similar within the metals sector as long exposure to base metals suffered from the pull back in growth sensitive commodities over the month. Currency trading provided mixed performance. Short GBP positions performed well on the back of the UK rating downgrade and prospects for further quantitative easing. However, this was offset by losses from short USD positions as the dollar rose 3.3% on a trade weighted basis. On the positive side, long exposure to both bonds and short term interest rates performed positively over the month, reversing some of the sector’s losses from last month as markets returned to a more cautious state, following the overwhelmingly bullish nature of January. As such safe haven bonds (US Treasuries in particular) returned some of the larger gains, but with further returns coming from emerging market bonds as well. On the interest rate side, long positions in Eurodollar, Euribor and Short Sterling all contributed positive performances as there continued to be no immediate end in sight to the relaxed monetary policies of the major central banks.

Long exposure to rising stock markets generated good performance in March. US equities added the largest contribution with main European indices and Japanese stocks also performing. The only notable negative came from a long exposure to the Korean Kospi. Further positive returns were also added by long holdings of bonds. Yields on most European debt fell, benefitting the portfolio, as investor sought safety in light of Eurozone issues. A small portion of the gain was given back via Italian long dated bonds and US Treasuries. Currency trading had a positive month, due largely to a continuing short exposure to the US dollar. The credit sector detracted as short exposure to the rising cost of European default protection resulted in a loss. The allocation to commodities also delivered negative performance on the whole, driven predominantly by a long exposure to energy markets. Crude oil and its derivatives caused the most pain. AHL was positioned long at the start of the period and suffered as oil prices fell, but reduced this exposure and did not participate in some of the upward movement towards the end of the period.

ITEM 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Introduction

Past Results Are Not Necessarily Indicative of Future Performance

The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership’s main line of business.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of the Partnership’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Partnership’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Partnership can rapidly acquire and/or liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership’s past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership’s speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership’s experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification included in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership’s attempts to manage its market risk.

Materiality, as used in this section “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, optionality and multiplier features of the Partnership’s market sensitive instruments.

Quantifying the Partnership’s Trading Value at Risk

Quantitative Forward-Looking Statements

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

The Partnership’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the General Partner is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. Due to the Partnership’s mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the Partnership’s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s earnings (realized or unrealized) and cash flow (at least in the case of exchange-traded contracts in which profits and losses on open positions are settled daily through variation margin).

For regulatory purposes, exchange initial margin requirements have been used by the Partnership as the measure of its Value at Risk. For trading and internal risk monitoring purposes, a different approach based on simulated market movements is used. Initial margin requirements include a credit risk factor and a maintenance margin factor and thus overstate the maximum one-day loss reflected by the maintenance margin requirement by the amount of the credit risk factor used in setting initial margin requirements. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed 95-99% of the maximum one-day losses in the fair value of any given contract incurred during the time period over which historical price fluctuations are researched for purposes of establishing margin levels. The maintenance margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

In the case of market sensitive instruments that are not exchange traded (almost exclusively currencies in the case of the Partnership), dealers’ margins have been used as Value at Risk.

The fair value of the Partnership’s futures, forwards and swap positions does not have any optionality component. However, the General Partner may also trade commodity options on behalf of the Partnership. The Value at Risk associated with options would be reflected in the margin requirement attributable to the instrument underlying each option.

In quantifying the Partnership’s Value at Risk, 100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each market risk category has been assumed. Consequently, the margin requirements applicable to the open contracts have simply been aggregated to determine each trading category’s aggregate Value at Risk. The diversification effects resulting from the fact that the Partnership’s positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively correlated have not been reflected.

The Partnership’s Trading Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors

The following table indicates the amount of trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category as of the period ended September 30, 2014. As of September 30, 2014, the Partnership’s average capitalization was $178,442,358.


Quarter-Ended September 30, 2014
Market Sector	Average Value at Risk		% of Average Capitalization			Highest Value at Risk		Lowest Value at Risk
Agriculturals	$	3,130,673		1.75	%	$	3,505,989	$	2,755,357
Bonds	$	5,513,879		3.09	%	$	6,509,766	$	4,517,993
Credit	$	3,898,135		2.18	%	$	7,124,706	$	671,564
Currencies	$	5,105,580		2.86	%	$	5,369,137	$	4,842,023
Energies	$	3,077,043		1.72	%	$	3,305,440	$	2,848,646
Interest rates	$	6,394,265		3.59	%	$	9,186,362	$	3,602,167
Metals	$	2,127,594		1.19	%	$	2,707,026	$	1,548,161
Stock indices	$	9,157,176		5.14	%	$	11,240,974	$	7,073,379
Total	$	38,404,345		21.52	%	$	48,949,400	$	27,859,290

Average, highest and lowest Value at Risk amounts relate to the quarter-end amounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Average capitalization is the Partnership’s average quarter-end capitalization at the end of the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Material Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Partnership is typically many times the applicable initial or maintenance margin requirement (maintenance margin requirements generally ranging between approximately 1% and 10% of contract face value) as well as many times the capitalization of the Partnership. The magnitude of the Partnership’s open positions creates a “risk of ruin” not typically found in most other investment vehicles. Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions — unusual, but historically recurring from time to time — could cause the Partnership to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The foregoing Value at Risk table — as well as the past performance of the Partnership — gives no indication of this “risk of ruin.”

Non-Trading Risk

The Partnership has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as any market risk they represent) are immaterial.

The Partnership also has non-trading cash flow risk as a result of holding a substantial portion (over 80%) of its assets in deposits, an AAA—rated Money Market Fund and interest-bearing bank accounts. This cash is placed with highly rated counterparties with a priority placed on preservation of capital and reputation (i.e., appropriate level of credit risk, market risk and reputation risk) and liquidity (i.e., appropriate level of liquidity risk).

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s market risk exposures — except for (i) those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and (ii) the descriptions of how the General Partner manages the Partnership’s primary market risk exposures — constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act. The Partnership’s primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by the General Partner for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties,

contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Partnership. There can be no assurance that the Partnership’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Partnership.

The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Partnership as of September 30, 2014, by market sector.

Financial Instruments. Interest rate movements directly affect the price of the sovereign bond futures positions held by the Partnership and indirectly the value of its stock index and currency positions. Interest rate movements in one country as well as relative interest rate movements between countries may materially impact the Partnership’s profitability. The Partnership’s primary interest rate exposure is to interest rate fluctuations in the United States, Germany, the UK, Australia and Japan. However, the Partnership also may take positions in futures contracts on the government debt of smaller nations. The General Partner anticipates that G-7 interest rates, both long-term and short-term, will remain the primary market exposure of the Partnership for the foreseeable future.

Currencies. Exchange rate risk is the principal market exposure of the Partnership. The Partnership’s currency exposure is to exchange rate fluctuations, primarily fluctuations which disrupt the historical pricing relationships between different currencies and currency pairs. These fluctuations are influenced by interest rate changes as well as political and general economic conditions. The Partnership trades in a large number of currencies, including cross-rates — i.e., positions between two currencies other than the U.S. dollar. As of September 30, 2014 the Partnership’s primary currency exposures were in the U.S. dollar versus the Euro, UK Sterling, Brazilian Real, Mexican Peso and Singapore Dollar. The primary exposures in the currency crosses were in the Euro versus Australian Dollar, Euro versus UK Sterling, UK Sterling versus Australian Dollar, Euro versus Swedish Krona and Australian Dollar versus Yen.

Stock Indices. The Partnership’s primary equity exposure, through stock index futures, is to equity price risk in the G-7 countries. As of September 30, 2014, the Partnership’s primary exposures were in the Dax, Nikkei, Korean Kospi, S&P 500 and Hang Seng. The Partnership is primarily exposed to the risk of adverse price trends or static markets in the major U.S., European and Asian indices. (Static markets would not cause major market changes but could make it difficult for the Partnership to avoid numerous small losses.)

Metals. The AHL Diversified Program used for the Partnership trades precious and base metals. As of September 30, 2014, the Partnership’s primary metals market exposures were in aluminum, gold, silver, copper, nickel and zinc.

Agricultural. The Partnership’s primary commodities exposure is to agricultural price movements, which are often directly affected by severe or unexpected weather conditions. Wheat, coffee, soybeans, cotton and corn accounted for the substantial bulk of the Partnership’s commodities exposure as of September 30, 2014.

Energy. The Partnership’s primary energy market exposure is to gas and oil price movements, often resulting from political developments in the Middle East and economic conditions worldwide. Energy prices are volatile and substantial profits and losses have been and are expected to continue to be experienced in this market. As of September 30, 2014, the main exposures were in crude oil, heating oil, gasoline, natural gas and gas oil.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Non-Trading Risk Exposure

The following were the only non-trading risk exposures of the Partnership as of September 30, 2014.

Foreign Currency Balances. The Partnership’s primary foreign currency balances are in Euro, Australian dollar, British pounds, Swedish Krona and Japanese Yen. The Partnership controls the non-trading risk of these balances by regularly converting these balances back into U.S. dollars (no less frequently than twice a month).

Cash Positions. The Partnership’s only market exposure in instruments held other than for trading is in its cash portfolio. The Partnership holds only cash in deposits, an AAA rated Money Market Fund and interest-bearing bank accounts. This cash is placed with highly rated counterparties with a priority placed on preservation of capital and reputation (i.e. appropriate level of credit risk, market risk and reputation risk) and liquidity (i.e. appropriate level of liquidity risk) with durations no longer than 1 year.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Means of Managing Risk Exposure

Risk management is an essential component of AHL’s investment management process. AHL has put in place a risk management framework which is designed to identify, monitor and mitigate the portfolio, operational and outsourcing risks relevant to its operations. AHL’s risk management framework is part of, and is supported by, the overarching risk management framework of its parent company, Man Group plc. Key principles of AHL’s risk management framework include the segregation of functions and duties where material conflicts of interest may arise and having an appropriate degree of independent and senior management oversight of business activities. As part of this independent oversight, AHL’s activities are subject to regular review by an internal audit function.

The AHL Diversified Program employs a systematic, statistically based investment strategy that is designed to identify and capitalize on inefficiencies in markets around the world. The trading systems are quantitative and primarily directional in nature, meaning that investment decisions are entirely driven by mathematical models based on market trends and other historic relationships. Portfolio risk management consists primarily of monitoring risk measures and ensuring the systems remain within prescribed limits. The major risk monitoring measures and focus areas include value-at-risk, stress testing, implied volatility, leverage, margin-to-equity ratios and net exposures to sectors and different currencies.

Diversification is also a key feature of AHL’s risk management, as well as its investment, process. The AHL Diversified Program is diversified across over 100 markets covering a wide range of sectors including, without limitation, currencies, bonds, energies, stock indices, interest rates, metals and agriculturals. As well as emphasizing sector and market diversification, the AHL Diversified Program has been constructed to achieve diversification by combining various systems driven by powerful computerized trading algorithms, most of which work by sampling prices in real time and measuring price momentum and breakouts. Another important aspect of diversification is the fact that the various systems generate signals across different timeframes, ranging from two to three days to several months, which helps to reduce the risk of the AHL Diversified Program. In line with the principle of diversification, the approach to portfolio construction and asset allocation is premised on the importance of deploying investment capital across the full range of sectors and markets. Particular attention is paid to correlation of markets and sectors, expected returns, trading costs and market liquidity. Portfolios are regularly reviewed and, when necessary, adjusted to reflect changes in these factors. AHL also has a process for adjusting its market risk exposure in real time to reflect changes in the volatility, a measure of risk, of individual markets.

ITEM 4.

Controls and Procedures.

The General Partner, with the participation of the General Partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer with respect to the Partnership, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014. Based on such evaluation, the Partnership’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer with respect to the Partnership have concluded that the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

Risk of Loss. Investing in the Partnership is speculative and involves substantial risks. You should not invest unless you can afford to lose your entire investment.

General. The transactions in which the Advisor generally will engage on behalf of the Partnership involve significant risks. Growing competition may limit the Advisor’s ability to take advantage of trading opportunities in rapidly changing markets. No assurance can be given that investors will realize a profit on their investment. Moreover, investors may lose all or some of their investment. Because of the nature of the trading activities, the results of the Partnership’s operations may fluctuate from month to month and from period to period. Accordingly, investors should understand that the results of a particular period will not necessarily be indicative of results in future periods.

Model and Data Risk. The Advisor relies heavily on quantitative models (both proprietary models developed by the Advisor (or affiliates), and those supplied by third parties, collectively “Models”) and information and data both developed by the Advisor and those supplied by third parties (collectively, “Data”) rather than granting trade-by-trade discretion to the Advisor’s investment professionals. Models and Data are used to construct sets of transactions and investments, to value investments or potential investments (including, without limitation, for trading purposes and for purposes of determining the Net Asset Value of the Partnership), to provide risk management insights and to assist in hedging the Partnership’s investments. Models and Data are known to have errors, omissions, imperfections and malfunctions (collectively, “System Events”). System Events in third-party Models are generally entirely outside of the control of the Advisor.

The Advisor seeks to reduce the incidence and impact of System Events through a certain degree of internal testing and real-time monitoring, and the use of independent safeguards in the overall portfolio management system and often, with respect to proprietary models, in the software code itself. Despite such testing, monitoring and independent safeguards, System Events will result in, among other things, the execution of unanticipated trades, the failure to execute anticipated trades, delays to the execution of anticipated trades, the failure to properly allocate trades, the failure to properly gather and organize available data, the failure to take certain hedging or risk reducing actions and/or the taking of actions which increase certain risk(s)—all of which may have materially negative effects on the Partnership and/or its returns.

The investment strategies of the Partnership are highly reliant on the gathering, cleaning, culling and analysis of large amounts of Data. Accordingly, Models rely heavily on appropriate Data inputs. However, it is not possible or practicable to factor all relevant, available Data into forecasts and/or trading decisions of the Models. The Advisor will use its discretion to determine what Data to gather with respect to each investment strategy and what subset of that Data the Models take into account to produce forecasts which may have an impact on ultimate trading decisions. In addition, due to the automated nature of Data gathering, the volume and depth of Data available, the complexity and often manual nature of Data cleaning, and the fact that the substantial majority of Data comes from third-party sources, it is inevitable that not all desired and/or relevant Data will be available to, or processed by, the Advisor at all times. If incorrect Data is fed into even a well-founded Model, it may lead to a System Event subjecting the Partnership to loss. Further, even if Data is input correctly, “model prices” anticipated by the Data through the Models may differ substantially from market prices, especially for securities with complex characteristics, such as derivatives.

Where incorrect or incomplete Data is available, the Advisor may, and often will, continue to generate forecasts and make trading decisions based on the Data available to it. Additionally, the Advisor may determine that certain available Data, while potentially useful in generating forecasts and/or making trade decisions, is not cost effective to gather due to either the technology costs or third-party vendor costs and, in such cases, the Advisor will not utilize such Data. Limited Partners should be aware that there is no guarantee that any specific Data or type of Data will be utilized in generating forecasts or making trading decisions with respect to the Models, nor is there any guarantee that the Data actually utilized in generating forecasts or making trading decisions underlying the Models will be (i) the most accurate data available or (ii) free of errors. Limited Partners should assume that the Data set used in connection with the Models is limited and should understand that the foregoing risks associated with gathering, cleaning, culling and analysis of large amounts of Data are an inherent part of investing with a process-driven, systematic adviser such as the Advisor.

When Models and Data prove to be incorrect, misleading or incomplete, any decisions made in reliance thereon expose the Partnership to potential risks. For example, by relying on Models and Data, the Advisor may be induced to buy certain investments at prices that are too high, to sell certain other investments at prices that are too low, or to miss favorable opportunities altogether. Similarly, any hedging based on faulty Models and Data may prove to be unsuccessful and when determining the Net Asset Value of the Partnership, any valuations of the Partnership’s investments that are based on valuation Models may prove to be incorrect. In addition, Models may incorrectly forecast future behavior, leading to potential losses on a cash flow and/or a mark-to-market basis. Furthermore, in unforeseen or certain low-probability scenarios (often involving a market disruption of some kind), Models may produce unexpected results which may or may not be System Events.

Errors in Models and Data are often extremely difficult to detect, and, in the case of proprietary models and third-party models, the difficulty of detecting System Events may be exacerbated by the lack of design documents or specifications. Regardless of how difficult their detection appears in retrospect, some System Events will go undetected for long periods of time and some will never be detected. The degradation or impact caused by these System Events can compound over time. Finally, the Advisor will detect certain System Events that it chooses, in its sole discretion, not to address or fix, and the third party software will lead to System Events known to the Advisor that it chooses, in its sole discretion, not to address or fix. The Advisor believes that the testing and monitoring performed on its models and third party models will enable the Advisor to identify and address those System Events that a prudent person managing a process-driven, systematic and computerized investment program would identify and address by correcting the underlying issue(s) giving rise to the System Events or limiting the use of proprietary and third party models, generally or in a particular application. Limited Partners should assume that System Events and their ensuing risks and impact are an inherent part of investing with a process-driven, systematic Advisor such as the Advisor. Accordingly, the Advisor does not expect to disclose discovered System Events to the Partnership or to Limited Partners.

The Partnership will bear the risks associated with the reliance on Models and Data including that the Partnership will bear all losses related to System Events unless otherwise determined by the Advisor in accordance with its internal policies or as may be required by applicable law.

Trade Error Risk. The complex trading programs operated by the Advisor and the speed and volume of transactions invariably result in occasional trades being executed which, with the benefit of hindsight, were not required by the trading program. To the extent an error is caused by a counterparty, such as a broker, the Advisor generally attempts to recover any loss associated with such error from such counterparty. To the extent an error is caused by the Advisor, a formalized process is in place for the resolution of such errors. Given the volume, diversity and complexity of transactions executed by the Advisor on behalf of the Partnership, investors should assume that trading errors (and similar errors) will occur. If such errors result in gains to the Partnership, such gains will be retained by the Partnership. However, if such errors result in losses, they will be borne by the Advisor in accordance with its internal policies unless otherwise determined by the General Partner.

Markets Are Volatile and Difficult to Predict. Trading in futures is a speculative activity. Futures prices may be highly volatile. Market prices are difficult to predict and are influenced by many factors, including: changes in interest rates; governmental, agricultural, trade, fiscal, monetary and exchange control programs and policies; weather and climate conditions; changing supply and demand relationships; national and international political and economic events; and the changing philosophies and emotions of market participants. In addition, governments intervene in particular markets from time to time, both directly and by regulation, often with the intent to influence prices. The effects of government intervention may be particularly significant in the financial instrument and currency markets, and may cause such markets to move rapidly.

Trading Is Highly Leveraged. The low margin deposits normally required in futures trading permit an extremely high degree of leverage. A relatively small movement in the price of a futures contract may result in immediate and substantial loss or gain to a trader holding a position in such contract. For example, if at the time of purchase 10% of the price of a futures contract is deposited as margin, a 10% decrease in the price of the futures contract would, if the contract were then closed out, result in a total loss of the margin deposit before any deduction for brokerage commissions. Consequently, like other leveraged investments, a futures trade may result in losses in excess of the amount invested. Forward contracts involve similar leverage and also may require deposits of margin as collateral. Swaps and over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative instruments are also highly leveraged transactions.

Markets May Be Illiquid. At times, it may not be possible for the Advisor to obtain execution of a buy or sell order at the desired price or to liquidate an open position, either due to market conditions on exchanges or due to the operation of “daily price fluctuation limits” or “circuit breakers.” For example, most U.S. commodity exchanges limit fluctuations in most futures contract prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” During a single trading day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Futures contract prices occasionally have moved to the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading.

Even when futures prices have not moved to the daily limit, the Advisor might not be able to obtain execution of trades at favorable prices if little trading in the contracts which the Advisor wishes to trade is taking place. Also, an exchange or governmental authority may suspend or restrict trading on an exchange (or in particular futures traded on an exchange) or order the immediate settlement of a particular instrument.

Options trading may be restricted in the event that trading in the underlying instrument becomes restricted. Options trading also may be illiquid at times regardless of the condition of the market in the underlying instrument. In either event, it will be difficult for the Advisor to realize gains or limit losses on option positions by offsetting them or to change positions in the market.

Trading in OTC derivative instruments is conducted with individual counterparties rather than on organized exchanges. There have been periods during which forward contract dealers have refused to quote prices for forward contracts or have quoted prices with an unusually wide spread between the bid and asked price.

Speculative Position Limits May Restrict Futures Trading. Speculative position limits prescribe the maximum net long or short futures contract and options positions which any person or group may hold or control in particular futures contracts. All futures contracts and options on futures contracts traded on commodity exchanges located in the United States, with the exception of contracts on certain major non-U.S. currencies, are subject to speculative position limits established either by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) or the relevant exchange.

All trading accounts owned or managed by the Advisor and its principals will be combined for the purposes of speculative position limits. Such limits could adversely affect the profitability of the Trading Company and, consequently, of the Partnership. For example, the Advisor could be required to liquidate futures positions at an unfavorable time in order to comply with such limits. However, the Advisor does not believe that existing speculative position limits will materially adversely affect its ability to manage the Trading Company’s account.

Cash Flow. Futures contract gains and losses are marked-to-market daily for purposes of determining margin requirements. Option positions generally are not, although short option positions will require additional margin if the market moves against the position. Due to these differences in margin treatment between futures and options, there may be periods in which positions on both sides must be closed down prematurely due to short term cash flow needs. If this were to occur during an adverse move in a spread or straddle relationship, a substantial loss could occur.

Decisions Based on Trends and Technical Analysis. The trading decisions of the Advisor will be based in part on trading strategies which utilize mathematical analyses of technical factors relating to past market performance. The buy and sell signals generated by a technical, trend-following trading strategy are based upon a study of actual daily, weekly and monthly price fluctuations, volume variations and changes in open interest in the markets. The profitability of any technical, trend-following trading strategy depends upon the occurrence in the future of significant, sustained price moves in some of the markets traded. The Trading Company and, consequently, the Partnership may incur substantial trading losses:

•

during periods when markets are dominated by fundamental factors that are not reflected in the technical data analyzed by the program;

•

during prolonged periods without sustained moves in one or more of the markets traded; or

•

during “whip-saw” markets, in which potential price trends start to develop but reverse before actual trends are realized.

In the past there have been prolonged periods without sustained price moves in various markets. Presumably, such periods will recur. A series of volatile reverses in price trends may generate repeated entry and exit signals in trend-following systems, resulting in unprofitable transactions and increased brokerage commission expenses. Technical, trend-following trading systems are used by many other traders. At times, the use of such systems may:

•

result in traders attempting to initiate or liquidate substantial positions in a market at or about the same time;

•

alter historical trading patterns;

•

obscure developing price trends; or

•

affect the execution of trades.

Trading in OTC Markets Will Expose the Partnership to Risks Not Applicable to Trading on Organized Exchanges. The Partnership, through the Trading Company, may engage in OTC derivative transactions, such as: currency forward contracts traded in the interbank market; options on currency forward contracts; and swap transactions.

In general, there is much less governmental regulation and supervision of transactions in the OTC markets than of transactions entered into on organized exchanges. Most of the protections afforded to participants on U.S. and certain non-U.S. exchanges, such as daily price fluctuation limits and the performance guarantee of an exchange clearinghouse, will not be available in connection with OTC transactions. Consequently, the Partnership will be exposed to greater risk of loss through default than if it confined its trading to organized exchanges.

A portion of the Partnership’s assets may be traded in forward contracts. Such forward contracts are generally not traded on exchanges and are executed directly through forward contract dealers. However, certain forward currency exchange contracts are regulated as swaps by the CFTC and have begun being voluntarily traded on swap execution facilities. Some of these contracts may be required to be centrally

cleared by a regulated U.S. clearinghouse, and may be required to be traded on a regulated exchange in the future. There is no limitation on the daily price moves of forward contracts, and a dealer is not required to continue to make markets in such contracts. There have been periods during which forward contract dealers have refused to quote prices for forward contracts or have quoted prices with an unusually wide spread between the bid and asked price. Arrangements to trade forward contracts may therefore experience liquidity problems. The Partnership therefore will be subject to the risk of credit failure or the inability of or refusal of a forward contract dealer to perform with respect to its forward contracts.

When trading currency forward contracts, the Trading Company may hedge the foreign currencies in order to limit the Trading Company’s exposure to fluctuations in exchange rates. However, there is no guarantee that such hedging will be successful.

Enhanced Regulation of the OTC Derivatives Markets. The European Market Infrastructure Regulation (“EMIR”) seeks comprehensively to regulate the OTC derivatives market in Europe for the first time including, in particular, imposing mandatory central clearing, trade reporting and, for non-centrally cleared trades, risk management obligations on counterparties. Similarly, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Reform Act”), enacted in July 2010, includes provisions that substantially increase the regulation of the OTC derivatives markets for the first time. The Reform Act will require that a substantial portion of OTC derivatives must be executed in regulated markets and submitted for clearing to regulated clearinghouses. For example, certain interest rate swaps, including certain foreign exchange forwards defined as swaps by the CFTC, and credit default index swaps are required by the CFTC to be submitted for clearing if traded by US persons. These OTC trades submitted for clearing will be subject to minimum initial and variation margin requirements set by the relevant clearinghouse, as well as possible CFTC-mandated margin requirements. OTC derivative dealers also will be required to post margin to the clearinghouses through which they clear their customers’ trades instead of using such margin in their operations, as they are allowed to do for uncleared OTC trades. This will further increase the dealers’ costs, which costs may be passed through to other market participants in the form of higher fees and less favorable dealer marks. Although the Reform Act includes limited exemptions from the clearing and margin requirements for so-called “end-users”, the Partnership may not be able to rely on such exemptions. In addition, the OTC derivative dealers with which the Partnership executes the majority of its OTC derivatives will not be able to rely on the end-user exemptions under the Reform Act and therefore such dealers will be subject to clearing and margin requirements notwithstanding whether the Partnership is subject to such requirements. Taken together, these regulatory developments will increase the OTC derivative dealers’ costs, and these increased costs are expected to be passed through to other market participants in the form of higher upfront and mark-to-market margin, less favorable trade pricing, and possible new or increased fees.

The SEC or the CFTC may also require a substantial portion of derivatives transactions that are currently executed on a bilateral basis in the OTC markets to be executed through a regulated securities, futures, or swap exchange or execution facility. Certain CFTC-regulated derivatives trades are currently subject to these rules, although it is not yet clear when the parallel SEC requirements will go into effect. If the Trading Company decides to become a direct member of one or more of these exchanges or execution facilities, the Trading Company would be subject to all of the rules of the exchange or execution facility, which would bring additional risks and liabilities, and potential additional regulatory requirements. Similarly, under EMIR, European regulators may require a substantial proportion of such derivatives transactions to be brought on exchange and/or centrally cleared. Such requirements may make it more difficult and costly for investment funds, including the Partnership and/or the Trading Company, to enter into highly tailored or customized transactions. They may also render certain strategies in which the Partnership might otherwise engage impossible or so costly that they will no longer be economical to implement. They may also increase the overall costs for OTC derivative dealers, which are likely to be passed along, at least partially, to market participants in the form of higher fees or less advantageous dealer marks. The overall impact of EMIR and the Reform Act on the Partnership is highly uncertain and it is unclear how the OTC derivatives markets will adapt to these new regulatory regimes.

The “Volcker Rule” component of the Reform Act materially restricts proprietary speculative trading by banks, “bank holding companies” and other regulated entities. As a result, there has been a significant influx of new portfolio managers into private investment funds who had previously traded institutional proprietary accounts. Such influx can only increase the competition for the Partnership from other talented portfolio managers trading in the Partnership’s investment sector.

Exchanges for Physicals/Swaps/Risk. While not a regular practice for the Trading Company, it may in rare instances engage in transactions known as exchanges for physicals (“EFP”), exchanges for swaps (“EFS”), or exchanges for risk/over-the-counter derivatives (“EFR”). An EFP/EFS/EFR is a purchase or sale of a spot commodity/swap/derivative, as applicable, in conjunction with an offsetting sale or purchase of a corresponding futures contract involving the same or equivalent underlying commodity or instrument, without making an open and competitive trade for the futures contract on the exchange. EFPs, EFSs and EFRs are a permitted exception to the general requirement of the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended, that all futures contracts must be competitively executed on an exchange. They are permitted pursuant to the rules of the relevant exchanges, which vary from exchange to exchange. If the EFP, EFS or EFR does not comply with specific exchange requirements, particularly regarding possessing documentation evidencing possession of the underlying commodity or instrument, then the CFTC or the exchange may deem the transaction to be an illegal off-exchange futures contract. In addition, every EFP, EFS or EFR involves the transfer of an underlying commodity or entry into a swap or derivative on a bilateral basis, as applicable, with a counterparty in exchange for a related cleared futures contract. There is, therefore, counterparty credit risk if the counterparty or its clearing member on the futures leg fails to perform. Unlike other futures contracts that are deemed cleared by the clearinghouse upon trade matching or at the end of the business day, futures contracts arising out of EFPs, EFSs or EFRs may, under various clearinghouse rules, not be deemed accepted by the clearinghouse until the next business day.

Options on Futures Contracts Are More Volatile Than Futures Contracts. The Advisor may trade options on futures contracts. Options are speculative in nature and are highly leveraged. The purchaser of an option risks losing the entire purchase price of the option. The seller (writer) of an option risks losing the difference between the premium received for the option and the price of the underlying futures contract that the writer must purchase upon exercise of the option. Additionally, the seller and writer of the options lose any commissions and fees associated with such transactions. This could subject the writer to unlimited risk in the event of an increase in the price of the contract to be purchased or delivered. Successful trading of options on futures contracts requires a trader to accurately determine near-term market volatility because it often has an immediate impact on the price of outstanding options. Accurate determination of near-term volatility is more important to successful options trading than it is to long-term futures contract trading strategies because such volatility generally does not have as significant an effect on the prices of futures contracts.

Trading on Non-U.S. Exchanges and Markets Will Expose the Partnership to Risks Not Applicable to Trading on U.S. Exchanges and Markets. The Partnership, through the Trading Company, may engage in trading on non-U.S. exchanges and markets. The Partnership will be subject to the risk of fluctuations in the currency exchange rate between the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the possibility of exchange controls. Trading on such exchanges and markets generally involves other risks not applicable to trading on U.S. exchanges and markets.

For example, such exchanges and markets:

•

may not provide the same assurances of the integrity (financial and otherwise) of the marketplace and its participants as do U.S. exchanges and markets;

•

may exercise less regulatory oversight and supervision over transactions and participants in transactions;

•

may not afford all participants an equal opportunity to execute trades;

•

may be subject to a variety of political influences and the possibility of direct governmental intervention;

•

may have different clearance and settlement procedures for transactions than U.S. exchanges and markets. There have been times when settlement procedures have been unable to keep pace with the volume of transactions on certain exchanges and markets, making it difficult to conduct trades; and

•

may be “principals’ markets” in which performance is the responsibility only of the member with whom the trader has dealt (the counterparty) rather than the responsibility of an exchange or clearing association. Each transaction on such an exchange or market may subject the Partnership to the risk of the counterparty’s credit failure or inability or refusal to perform its obligations.

Institutional Risks. Institutions, such as the brokers, will have custody of the assets of the Partnership. These firms may encounter financial difficulties that impair the operating capabilities or the capital position of the Partnership, the Trading Company or the General Partner. The General Partner and Advisor will attempt to limit its transactions to well-capitalized and established brokers in an effort to mitigate such risks.

Counterparty Risk. The Partnership will be subject to the risk of the inability of counterparties to perform with respect to transactions, whether due to insolvency, bankruptcy or other causes, which could subject the Partnership to substantial losses. In an effort to mitigate such risks, the General Partner and Advisor will attempt to limit transactions to counterparties, which are established, well-capitalized and creditworthy.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a) Pursuant to the Partnership’s Limited Partnership Agreement, the Partnership may sell Units of Limited Partnership Interests (“Units”) as of the last business day of any calendar month or at such other times as the General Partner may determine. On July 31, 2014, August 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, the Partnership sold Class A Series 1 Units, exclusive of non-cash transfers, to existing and new Limited Partners in the amount of $0, $25,000 and $391,000, respectively. On July 31, 2014, August 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, the Partnership sold Class A Series 2 Units, exclusive of non-cash transfers, to existing and new Limited Partners in the amount of $0, $0 and $0, respectively. On July 31, 2014, August 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, the Partnership sold Class B Series 1 Units, exclusive of non-cash transfers, to existing and new Limited Partners in the amount of $147,000, $0 and $56,977, respectively. On July 31, 2014, August 31, 2014 and September 30, 2014, the Partnership sold Class B Series 2 Units, exclusive of non-cash transfers, to existing and new Limited Partners in the amount of $0, $0 and $0, respectively. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions in connection with the sales of the Units described above.

(b) Not applicable.

(c) Pursuant to the Partnership’s Limited Partnership Agreement, a Limited Partner may redeem some or all of its Units as of the last business day of each calendar month at the then current month-end Net Asset Value. The redemption of Units has no impact on the value of Units that remain outstanding, and Units are not reissued once redeemed. The following table summarizes the amount of Units redeemed, exclusive of non-cash transfers, during the three months ended September 30, 2014:


	Class A Units		Class A-2 Units		Class B Units		Class B-2 Units
Date of Redemption:	Amount Redeemed:		Amount Redeemed:		Amount Redeemed:		Amount Redeemed:
July 31, 2014	$	1,426,637	$	0	$	331,507	$	0
August 31, 2014	$	766,956	$	177,932	$	158,374	$	0
September 30, 2014	$	1,574,637	$	0	$	364,622	$	0
TOTAL	$	3,768,230	$	177,932	$	854,503	$	0

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information.

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

The following exhibits are included herewith:


Designation		Description

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

32.2		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer

The following exhibits are incorporated by reference herein from the exhibits of the same description and number filed on January 28, 2008 with the Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (Reg. No. 000-53043).


3.1		Certificate of Limited Partnership of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.

10.3		Form of Selling Agreement between Man Investments (USA) Corp. and Man Investments Inc.

The following exhibits is incorporated by reference herein from the exhibit of the same description and number filed on March 31, 2011, for the year ended December 31, 2010, with the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.


4.2		Sixth Amended Limited Partnership Agreement of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.

The following exhibit is incorporated by reference herein from the exhibit of the same description and number filed on August 13, 2014, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014, with the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


10.1		Form of Trading Advisor Agreement between Man-AHL Diversified Trading Company L.P., Man Investments (USA) Corp. and AHL Partners LLP

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on November 12, 2014.

Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.

(Registrant)

By: Man Investments (USA) Corp.

General Partner

By: /s/ Eric Burl

President and Chief Executive Officer

By: /s/ Shiraz Kajee

As Principal Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit Number		Description of Document

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

32.2		Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document