MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS INC - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
¨ |
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______ to _______.
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. |
(Name of small business issuer in its charter) |
Delaware |
|
000-28411 |
|
85-0460639 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(Commission File Number) |
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
The Chrysler Building, 405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10174
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Issuer's telephone number: (212) 541-2405
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer |
¨ |
Accelerated filer |
¨ |
Non-accelerated filer |
¨ |
Smaller reporting company |
x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the issuer as of June 30, 2016 was $21,652,045 based upon a closing price of $0.06 on June 30, 2016. For purposes of this computation, all executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders were deemed affiliates. Such a determination should not be construed as an admission that such 10% shareholders are affiliates.
As of March 30, 2017 there were 533,781,064 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
2 |
Forward Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains "forward-looking" statements including statements regarding our expectations of our future operations. For this purpose, any statements contained in this Form 10-K that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the foregoing, words such as "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," or "continue" or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of factors, many of which are not within our control. These factors include, but are not limited to, economic conditions generally and in the industries in which we may participate, competition within our chosen industry, including competition from much larger competitors, technological advances, our ability to obtain approval from the FDA or other governmental agencies and the failure by us to successfully develop business relationships. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject, among other things, to our successful completion of the research and development of our technologies; successful commercialization and mass production of, among other things, the advanced materials, the nanomedicine, successful protection of our licensed patents; and effective significant industry competition from various entities whose research and development, financial, sales and marketing and other capabilities far exceeds ours. In light of these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to announce publicly revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect the effect of events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this report. All written and oral forward-looking statements made subsequent to the date of this report and attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this section.
ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
OVERVIEW
COMPANY HISTORY
Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (the “Company” or “Manhattan Scientifics”), a Delaware corporation, was established on July 31, 1992 and has two operating wholly-owned subsidiaries: Metallicum, Inc., (“Metallicum”) and Imagion Biosystems, Inc. (f/k/a Senior Scientific LLC) (“Imagion”). Manhattan Scientifics is focused on technology transfer and commercialization of these transformative technologies.
In June 2008, we acquired Metallicum and its licensed patented technology. We entered into a stock purchase agreement with Metallicum to acquire all of the outstanding capital in exchange for 15,000,000 restricted shares of our common stock. An additional 15,000,000 shares of our common stock will be payable to Metallicum in the event of meeting certain milestones. At December 31, 2011, one milestone was met. Metallicum was granted an exclusive license by The Los Alamos National Laboratory on patents related to nanostructured metals. In September 2009, we entered into a technology transfer agreement and sale with Carpenter Technology Corporation, (“Carpenter”) wherein Carpenter was to fully develop, manufacture and market a new class of high strength metals. On February 11, 2015, the Company and Carpenter entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release pursuant to which the parties provided a full release of one another, Carpenter paid the Company $8,000,000, Carpenter transferred to the Company all intellectual and physical property that was part of the original agreement, Carpenter agreed to provide follow-on technical assistance and Carpenter provided a list of all customers and contacts.
On May 31, 2011, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization to acquire Senior Scientific. The total purchase price was 21,668,000 restricted shares of our common stock (less 7,667,000 shares previously issued pursuant to an option agreement). As a result of this acquisition, we own patented technologies that can use biosafe nanoparticles and sensitive magnetic sensors to detect and measure cancer cells in biopsies or in the human body with the potential to transform how cancer is detected and treated. On November 17, 2016, Senior Scientific merged with and into Imagion, a Nevada company. Following the merger, Imagion held all of the liabilities, obligations and assets of Senior Scientific and the Company continued as the sole equity holder of Imagion. On November 29, 2016, the Company announced a plan to have Imagion pursue an IPO and listing on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). During the two months ended February 28, 2017, Imagion raised a total of approximately $2.7 million from investors for 62 million shares of common stock. Manhattan Scientifics presently owns approximately 50.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of Imagion.
3 |
Table of Contents |
TWO BUSINESSES EXIST WITHIN MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS
Two nanotechnology businesses exist within Manhattan Scientifics Inc; both “units” are wholly-owned subsidiaries, both focused on nanotechnology applications in medicine.
The goal of the first business, Metallicum, is to demonstrate our business-model, a licensing model, given that we are an inventions commercialization company.
Manhattan’s second business is called Imagion, and is at the crossroads of biotechnology and nanotechnology.
Our novel bioimaging and nanomagnetic detection systems have been developed specifically to detect cancer and other diseases earlier and with higher specificity than is currently possible. We have developed proprietary hardware and software for the highly sensitive detection of nanomagnetic particles that can be linked to antibodies for the detection and treatment of cancer and other human diseases—all without the use of ionizing radiation or large magnetic fields.
Our novel technologies make possible the earlier detection of cancer in vivo, the ability to analyze biopsies with greater sensitivity and accuracy, the ability to monitor the therapeutic effectiveness of anticancer treatments—both in humans and in animal models—and allow us to detect cancer recurrence with significantly improved sensitivity. Please see: www.ImagionBiosystems.com
The technology was developed by Edward R. Flynn, PhD, founder and former chief scientist of Senior Scientific, which has merged with Imagion.
OUR DEVELOPMENT MODEL
Our goal has been to influence the future through the development of potentially life changing technologies. Our business model is to: (i) identify significant technologies, (ii) acquire them or the rights to them, (iii) secure the services of inventors, engineers or other staff who were instrumental in their creation, (iv) provide or contract for suitable work facilities, laboratories, and other aids where appropriate, (v) prototype the technologies to demonstrate "proof of principle" feasibility, (vi) secure patent and or other intellectual property protection, (vii) secure early customers for product trials where feasible and appropriate, and (viii) commercialize through licenses, sales or cooperative efforts with other manufacturing and distribution firms.
Since our technologies are still in their development phase, the need for operating and acquisition capital is a continuous concern requiring the ongoing efforts of our management. The Company’s success will depend in part on its ability to obtain patents and license rights, maintain trade secrets, and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others, both in the United States and other countries. There can be no assurance that patents issued to or licensed by the Company will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or that the rights granted thereunder will provide proprietary protection or competitive advantages to the Company.
We utilize the intellectual property sale/licensing model, and not a production model, though management is opportunistic and is open to explore all methods leading to commercializing our technologies. We intend to consider all appropriate avenues for the commercialization of our technologies.
DESCRIPTION OF TECHNOLOGIES
ADVANCED METALS
Our business model is based on licensing metals technology to metals manufacturers. Although competing commercial products are provided by existing specialty metals companies, the only competing processes for creating nanostructured metals are either limited or cannot be economically scaled. Metallicum does not yet face direct competition, but expects competition will emerge as the metal is commercialized.
In January 2009, we entered into a patent license agreement with Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the exclusive licensing use of certain technology relating to the manufacture and application of nanostructuring metals and alloys. Pursuant to such agreement we provided a non-refundable fee and 2,000,000 shares of our common stock with a fair market value of $33,000. Additionally, we are required to pay an annual license fee of $10,000 starting in February 2010 and royalties on future net sales.
4 |
Table of Contents |
The technology goal is to expected to trim thousands of pounds from airplanes and hundreds of pounds from cars without sacrificing structural strength or adding significant cost. The nanostructured metals also have wide implications for use in the medical device and prosthetics industries including dental implants, replacements for hips, shoulders, knees and cardio vascular stents. In December 2008, a manufacturing joint venture partner in Albuquerque, NM received U.S. Food and Drug Administration 510(k) clearance to market nanostructured titanium metal dental implants using our technology. This clearance positions us closer to our goal of commercializing our technology for nanostructured metals. We are in talks with many of the key manufacturers of dental implants and have signed material testing agreements with several manufacturers.
In September 2009, the Company entered into a contract with Carpenter to sell certain nanostructured metal technologies acquired from Metallicum, its wholly owned subsidiary, to Carpenter and to provide sub-license rights to Carpenter covering license agreements that the Company has from Los Alamos Laboratories. In January 2013, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with a party granting certain licensing rights to the Company's nanostructured metal technology. On February 11, 2015, the Company and Carpenter entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release pursuant to which the parties provided a full release of one another, Carpenter paid the Company $8,000,000, Carpenter transferred to the Company all intellectual and physical property that was part of the original agreement, Carpenter agreed to provide follow-on technical assistance and Carpenter provided a list of all customers and contacts. Following the return of the Company’s nanostructured metal technology, the Company has commenced exploring strategic alternatives for its Metallicum division. At this time we are exploring and working with partner companies in the fields of titanium dental implants, titanium and magnesium medical devices, high voltage aluminum conductors as well as oil and gas field applications.
NANOMEDICINE
Our subsidiary, Imagion, holds patented technologies that can use biosafe nanoparticles and sensitive magnetic sensors to detect and measure cancer cells in biopsies or in the human body. The technology is specific – i.e. it measures a particular type of cancer and does not generate false positive results from benign growths, calcifications, or other spurious signals that complicate current detection methods. It is also very sensitive – it can measure tumors that are 1000-times smaller than is possible with currently available techniques. This combination of features has the potential to transform how cancer is detected and treated.
We have invested approximately $7.5 million in the Imagion cancer project in the past three years. We continue to progress in advancing the technology toward commercialization.
We have implemented a nanoparticle production facility. Our magnetic relaxometry measurements are now performed with our own nanoparticles, and we have begun commercial sales of our nanoparticles to others.
|
· | Senior Scientific has joined both BIOCOM and NMBio as a corporate member, improving our access to and visibility within the general biopharmaceutical and New Mexico biotechnology communities. |
|
|
|
|
· | In early 2015 we hired a new President with senior managerial expertise in medical product commercialization and direct experience in cancer diagnostics. Additionally, in February 2016 we hired a Vice President of R&D with direct experience in developing nanoparticles for targeted delivery to cancer. |
|
|
|
|
· | We are continuing to fund the development a version of our technology using atomic magnetometer technology, which was originally funded by an NIH grant. We believe the atomic magnetometer-based instrument will improve performance and create larger market opportunities for this technology relative to our current SQUID-based platform. |
We expect to undertake the safety and toxicology studies necessary to show that our nanoparticles are safe for use in humans. Significant effort will be required to document the laboratory and manufacturing processes for nanoparticle production that the FDA are likely to require.
We believe that the constituent parts of the targeted nanoparticles have already been approved for injection in humans in other applications. Initial toxicology studies in cell cultures suggest that the combination of the parts into targeted nanoparticles is not toxic.
All of these programs are designed to validate our technology for the market, which will produce value for our shareholders. Our technology makes possible the detection of specific cancer cells. Physicians may then select a broad range for initial diagnosis, or a single type for monitoring therapy or detecting metastases. Small quantities of biosafe nanoparticles with attached targeting agents are introduced into the patient where they “stick” only to the targeted cancer cells. A weak magnetic field is applied to magnetize the particles, and sensitive magnetic detectors count the number of particles that have stuck to cancer cells. Due to the highly specialized nature of both the nanoparticles and our detection device, only those particles stuck to their targeted cells are detected, making the results highly specific, objective (the results depend only on the cells, not a human interpretation of an image), and sensitive (only a few thousand cells are required, instead of hundreds of millions for conventional techniques).
Our technology makes possible improvements across a wide range of cancer fighting areas: detection of cancers years earlier; noninvasive, specific diagnosis after conventional screening; earlier, faster discovery of drugs; precise, personalized monitoring of therapy; detection of metastases while still treatable; and accurate monitoring of new therapies. Our technology has been proven in animal models using human cancer cells, in human trials using bone marrow biopsy samples, and is the subject of over 20 patent applications and14 peer-reviewed publications. Our success will depend in part on its ability to obtain regulatory approvals required for human application of its technologies, both in the United States and other countries. There can be no assurance that such approvals will be obtained.
5 |
Table of Contents |
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY / RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
In 2008, we purchased Metallicum to acquire its licensed rights to patented technology. The technology is comprised of three US Patents (US Patent numbers 7152448, 6197129 and 6399215) for which Metallicum (subsequently, Manhattan) had been assigned an exclusive license rights by Los Alamos National Security LLC (LANL). Under the license rights, Metallicum had all rights, title and interest throughout the world in and to any and all inventions, original works of authorship, developments, concepts, know-how, and improvements on the patents or trade secrets whether or not patentable or registerable under copyright or similar laws. The purchase price paid for these licenses was $305,000, which represents its fair value. The Company obtained an exclusive license on two patents and a non-exclusive license on the third patent. The value attributable to license agreements is being amortized over the period of its estimated benefit period of 10 years.
On May 31, 2011, we acquired Senior Scientific, which subsequently merged with Imagion, and all of its intellectual property. Incident to the acquisition, we assigned certain of the intellectual property to Scientific Nanomedicine, Inc., a subsidiary formed solely for that purpose. The need for that subsidiary has passed, and we have assigned all the intellectual property to Senior Scientific, which merged with Imagion. Imagion’s. Senior Scientific’s patent estate includes the patents and applications in the following schedule. We continue to prosecute our patent applications and file new applications as the technology progresses.
Imagion IP schedule:
Title |
|
Application # |
|
Filing date |
|
Patent # |
|
Country |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Needle Biopsy |
|
60/549,501 |
|
1-Mar-2004 |
|
|
|
US |
Magnetic Needle Biopsy |
|
11/069,361 |
|
28-Feb-2005 |
|
7,309,316 |
|
US |
Biomagnetic Detection And Treatment Of Alzheimer's Disease |
|
60/866,095 |
|
16-Nov-2006 |
|
|
|
US |
Biomagnetic Detection And Treatment Of Alzheimer's Disease |
|
11/940,673 |
|
15-Nov-2007 |
|
8,060,179 |
|
US |
Magnetic Needle Biopsy |
|
11/957,988 |
|
17-Dec-2007 |
|
|
|
US |
Magnetic Needle Biopsy |
|
12/337,554 |
|
17-Dec-2008 |
|
8,118,754 |
|
US |
Leukemia Cell Detection Using A Novel Magnetic Needle And Nanoparticles |
|
61/248,775 |
|
5-Oct-2009 |
|
|
|
US |
Early Detection Of Breast Cancer Using Magnetic Nanoparticles And Ultra-Sensitive Magnetic Field Sensors |
|
61/259,011 |
|
6-Nov-2009 |
|
|
|
US |
Detection Of Breast Cancer In Tissue Incompatible With Other Methods, And At Levels Undetectable By Other Means |
|
61/308,897 |
|
27-Feb-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Apparatus And Method To Detect Ovarian Cancer In Tissue |
|
61/310,700 |
|
4-Mar-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Nonsurgical Determination Of Organ Transplant Acceptance |
|
61/314,370 |
|
16-Mar-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Method And System For In-Vivo Detection Of Hodgkin’s Lymphoma |
|
61/314,392 |
|
16-Mar-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Nanoparticles And Methods For Making, Characterizing, And Testing Nanoparticles, Suitable For Use In Magentic Field Relaxometry Applications |
|
61/329,076 |
|
28-Apr-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
High-Temperature Superconducting Quantum Interference Device Apparatus |
|
61/329,198 |
|
29-Apr-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Apparatus And Method To Detect Prostate Cancer In Tissue |
|
61/331,816 |
|
5-May-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Methods And Apparatuses For The Localization And Treatment Of Cancer |
|
61/352,782 |
|
8-Jun-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Methods And Apparatuses Using An Atomic Magnetometer To Detect Disease In Tissue |
|
61/361,998 |
|
7-Jul-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Methods And Apparatuses To Detect Cancer Metastasis Or Recurrence |
|
61/377,854 |
|
27-Aug-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Conjugated Nanoparticles As Contrast Agents |
|
61/386,961 |
|
27-Sep-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Detection, Imaging, And Quantitation Of Targeted Cells |
|
61/389,233 |
|
3-Oct-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Cell Detection Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
PCT/US2010/051417 |
|
5-Oct-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
PCT/US2010/055729 |
|
5-Nov-2010 |
|
|
|
US |
Biological Application Of Magnetic Relaxometry With Atomic Magnetometer And SQUID Sensors |
|
61/454,560 |
|
20-Mar-2011 |
|
|
|
US |
Nonsurgical Determination Of Organ Transplant Condition |
|
PCT/US2011/28746 |
|
16-Mar-2011 |
|
|
|
US |
Magnetic Relaxometry Methods And Apparatuses |
|
61/468,575 |
|
29-Mar-2011 |
|
|
|
US |
Methods And Apparatuses For The Localization And Treatment Of Cancer |
|
PCT/US2011/39349 |
|
7-Jun-2011 |
|
|
|
US |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
13/249,994 |
|
30-Sep-2011 |
|
|
|
US |
6 |
Table of Contents |
Magnetic Needle Biopsy |
|
13/399,733 |
|
17-Feb-2012 |
|
|
|
US |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
13/503674 |
|
24-Apr-2012 |
|
|
|
US |
Magnetic Relaxometry Using Brownian Randomization, Neel Relaxation, Or Combinations Thereof |
|
61/639,827 |
|
27-Apr-2012 |
|
|
|
US |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan | |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israel | |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada | |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Singapore | |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia | |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
EPO | ||
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
India | |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russia | |
Detection, Measurement, And Imaging Of Cells Such As Cancer And Other Biologic Substances Using Targeted Nanoparticles And Magnetic Properties Thereof |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Korea | |
Applications Of Magnetic Relaxometry In Ovarian Cancer Nanomedicine |
|
61/691,913 |
|
22-Aug-2012 |
|
|
|
US |
Method For Measuring The Viscosity Of A Fluid Using Magnetic Nanoparticles |
|
|
|
1-Mar-2011 |
|
|
|
US |
Magnetic Relaxometry Using Brownian Randomization, Neel Relaxation, Or Combinations Thereof |
|
61/639,827 |
|
27-Apr-2012 |
|
|
|
US |
Magnetic Relaxometry Using Magnetization And Measurement Fields |
|
61/715,791 |
|
18-Oct-2012 |
|
|
|
US |
Magnetically Transparent Stage For Rapid Positioning Of A Sample |
|
61929562 |
|
21-Jan-2014 |
|
|
|
US |
Methods and apparatuses related to instrumentation for magnetic relaxometry measurements |
|
62/014,634 |
|
19-Jun-2014 |
|
|
| |
Magnetic Relaxometry to Assess Disease via Circulating Markers |
|
62/072,293 |
|
29-Oct-2014 |
|
|
· | Confidential nanoparticle production, marker conjugation methods, and analysis techniques; and |
|
|
· | Analysis and data acquisition software copyrights |
Our ability to compete depends in part on the protection of and our ability to defend our proprietary technology and on the goodwill associated with our trade names, service marks and other proprietary rights. However, we do not know if current laws will provide us with sufficient enough protection that others will not develop technologies similar or superior to ours, or that third parties will not copy or otherwise obtain or use our technologies without our authorization.
The success of our business will depend, in part, to identify technology, obtain patents, protect and enforce patents once issued and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others. Our success will also depend on our ability to maintain exclusive rights to trade secrets and proprietary technology we own are currently developing and will develop. We can give no assurance that any issued patents will provide us with competitive advantages or will not be challenged by others, or that the patents of others will not restrict our ability to conduct business.
7 |
Table of Contents |
In addition, we rely on certain technology licensed with a perpetual term from the Los Alamos National Laboratory and may be required to license additional technologies in the future. We do not know if these third-party licenses will be available or will continue to be available to us on acceptable commercial terms or at all. The inability to enter into and maintain any of these licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of our operations.
Policing unauthorized use of our proprietary technology and other intellectual property rights could entail significant expense. In addition, we do not know if third parties will bring claims of copyright or trademark infringement against us or claim that our use of certain technologies violates a patent or other intellectual property. Any claims of infringement, with or without merit, could be time consuming and expensive to defend, result in costly litigation, divert management attention, require us to enter into costly royalty or licensing arrangements or prevent us from using important technologies or methods, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of our operations.
SALES AND MARKETING
Although our technologies presently are in the development stage, we are engaged in an early commercialization program intended to facilitate the transition from development to licensing, manufacturing and/or sale. This program consists of preliminary dialogues with potential strategic partners, investors, manufacturers, potential licensees and/or purchasers.
COMPETITION
As a result of our licensed technology, we do not have any direct competitors in our advanced materials operations. We may, however, face competition from leading researchers and manufacturers worldwide that develop competing technology.
With respect to our nanomedicine technology, our cancer detection technology will face competition primarily from companies such as Abbott Laboratories Inc., Cepheid Inc., Philips, GE Healthcare, Siemens, Gen-Probe Incorporated, MDxHealth SA, EpiGenomics AG, Roche Diagnostics and Sequenom, Inc.
Competitors may successfully challenge our licensed technology, produce similar products that do not infringe our licensed technology or produce products in countries where we have not applied for intellectual property protection. Many of these competitors may have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have. Furthermore, competitors may introduce new products that address our potential markets. Competition could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of our operations.
The markets in which we compete are highly competitive and constantly evolving. We believe that the principal competitive factors in our technology markets include without limitation:
|
· |
capitalization; |
|
· |
cost of product; |
|
· |
first to market with product in market segment; |
|
· |
strong intellectual portfolio; |
|
· |
product reliability; |
|
· |
strong customer base; and |
|
· |
strong manufacturing and supplier relationships. |
CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, three customers generated all of our revenue. We did not have any significant suppliers.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2016, we had one full-time employee in general management as well as 10 employees employed by Imagion and Metallicum. We do not expect any significant change in the total number of employees in the near future. Most of our research and development work has been performed by employees of our various research and development independent contractors (see below). We have historically indirectly funded the salaries of these individuals through our contract research and development payments to their employers. Although not technically our employees, we have considered these individuals to be an integral part of our research and development team. None of our employees or contractors is members of any union or collective bargaining organization. We consider our relationships with our employee and our independent contractor employees to be good.
As noted above, a significant portion of our research and development has been performed by independent contractors from whom we acquired or licensed certain technologies, and their various employees. Our independent contractors utilize a number of their own various employees to satisfy their research and development obligations to us, and their employees are considered to be part of our research and development team.
8 |
Table of Contents |
An investment in the Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information in this Report, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company and our business. If you decide to buy our securities, you should be able to afford a complete loss of your investment.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY DEVELOP AND COMMERCIALIZE OUR NEW TECHNOLOGIES WHICH WOULD RESULT IN CONTINUED LOSSES.
We are currently developing new technologies and a commercial product. We have generated our first revenues but we are unable to project when we will achieve regular profitability, if at all. As is the case with any new technology, we expect the development process to continue. We cannot assure that our resources will be able to develop and commercialize our technology fast enough to meet market requirements. We can also not assure that our technology will gain market acceptance and that we will be able to overcome obstacles, such as potential FDA approvals. The failure to successfully develop and commercialize the technologies would result in continued losses and may require us to curtail operations.
THE SUCCESS OF OUR BUSINESS MAY REQUIRE CONTINUED FUNDING. IF WE CANNOT RAISE THE MONEY WE NEED TO SUPPORT OUR OPERATIONS UNTIL WE EARN SIGNIFICANT REVENUES, WE MAY BE REQUIRED TO CURTAIL OR TO CEASE OUR OPERATIONS AND YOU COULD LOSE YOUR ENTIRE INVESTMENT.
Our ability to develop our business depends upon our receipt of money to continue our operations while we introduce our products and a market for them develops. If this funding is not received as needed, it is unlikely that we could continue our business, in which case you would lose your entire investment. Our ability to access the capital markets has been hindered generally by the general difficult economic climate, beginning in 2008, for small technology concept companies, without significant revenues or earnings.
To the extent that we need additional funding, we cannot assure you that such financing will be available to us when needed, on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we may be required to curtail the commercialization of our products and possibly cease our operations.
OUR ABILITY TO EFFECTUATE OUR BUSINESS MODEL MAY BE LIMITED, WHICH WOULD ADVERSELY EFFECT OUR BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS.
Our future performance will depend to a substantial degree upon our ability to effectuate and generate revenues from our licensing and royalty business model. As a result, we may continue to incur substantial operating losses until such time as we are able to generate revenues from the sale or license of our products. There can be no assurance that businesses and customers will adopt our technology and products, or that businesses and prospective customers will agree to pay for or license our products. In the event that we are not able to significantly increase the number of customers that purchase or license our products, or if we are unable to charge the necessary prices or license fees, our financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.
WE MAY FACE STRONG COMPETITION FROM LARGER, ESTABLISHED COMPANIES.
We likely will face intense competition from other companies, both globally and within the United States, in the development of haptics and fuel cell technologies, virtually all of which can be expected to have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger installed customer bases and significantly more financial resources and research and development facilities than Manhattan Scientifics. There can be no assurance that developments by our current or potential competitors will not render our proposed products obsolete.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OR WE COULD BECOME INVOLVED IN LITIGATION WITH OTHERS REGARDING OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. EITHER OF THESE EVENTS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR BUSINESS.
We rely on a combination of intellectual property law, nondisclosure, trade secret and other contractual and technical measures to protect our proprietary right. Our success will depend, in part, on our technology’s commercial viability and on the strength of our intellectual property rights. However, we cannot assure you that these provisions will be adequate to protect our intellectual property. In addition, the laws of certain foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States.
Although we believe that our intellectual property does not infringe upon the proprietary rights of third parties, competitors may claim that we have infringed on their products.
We could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves in suits brought against us for alleged infringement of another party’s intellectual property rights as well as in enforcing our rights against others, and if we are found to infringe, the manufacture, sale and use of our or our customers’ or partners’ products could be enjoined. Any claims against us, with or without merit, would likely be time-consuming, requiring our management team to dedicate substantial time to addressing the issues presented. Furthermore, the parties bringing claims may have greater resources than we do.
9 |
Table of Contents |
OUR MANAGEMENT IS ABLE TO EXERCISE SIGNIFICANT INFLUENCE OVER ALL MATTERS REQUIRING SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL.
Our existing directors and executive officers are the beneficial owners of approximately 18% of the outstanding shares of common stock, excluding stock options and warrants. As a result, our existing directors, executive officers, principal shareholders and their respective affiliates, if acting together, would be able to exercise significant influence over all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and the approval of significant corporate transactions. Such concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company.
THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK MAY DECREASE DUE TO FACTORS BEYOND OUR CONTROL.
The trading price of our common stock is subject to significant fluctuations in response to numerous factors, including without limitation:
|
· |
variations in anticipated or actual results of operations; |
|
· |
announcements of new products or technological innovations by us or our competitors; |
|
· |
changes in earnings estimates of operational results by analysts; |
|
· |
inability of market makers to combat short positions on the stock; |
|
· |
an overall downturn in the financial markets and stock markets; |
|
· |
the use of stock to pay employees and consultants if sufficient working capital is not available; |
|
· |
inability of the market to absorb large blocks of stock sold into the market; and |
|
· |
developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property. |
Moreover, the stock market from time-to-time has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, which have particularly affected the market prices for small technology companies without significant revenues. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. If our shareholders sell substantial amounts of their common stock in the public market, the price of our common stock could fall. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a price we deem appropriate.
WE HAVE NOT PAID CASH DIVIDENDS AND IT IS UNLIKELY THAT WE WILL PAY CASH DIVIDENDS IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
We plan to use all of our earnings, to the extent we have significant earnings, to fund our operations. We do not plan to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We cannot guarantee that we will, at any time, generate sufficient surplus cash that would be available for distribution as a dividend to the holders of our Common Stock. You should not expect to receive cash dividends on our Common Stock.
WE MAY NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPITAL TO RUN OUR OPERATIONS.
If we are unable to obtain further financing, it may jeopardize our ability to continue our operations. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity and/or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution to our shareholders and/or increased debt service commitments. If adequate funds are not available, we may be unable to sufficiently develop or maintain our existing operations.
WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO ISSUE ADDITIONAL SHARES OF OUR COMMON STOCK WITHOUT ASKING FOR SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL, WHICH COULD CAUSE YOUR INVESTMENT TO BE DILUTED.
Our Certificate of Incorporation currently authorizes the Board of Directors to issue up to 950,000,000 shares of Common Stock and 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The power of the Board of Directors to issue shares of Common Stock or warrants or options to purchase shares of Common Stock is generally not subject to shareholder approval. Accordingly, any additional issuance of our Common Stock may have the effect of further diluting your investment.
We require substantial working capital to fund our business. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-related or convertible debt securities, those securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our Common Stock. The issuance of additional Common Stock or securities convertible into Common Stock by our management will also have the effect of further diluting the proportionate equity interest and voting power of holders of our Common Stock.
10 |
Table of Contents |
LIMITED PUBLIC MARKET FOR OUR COMMON STOCK MAY AFFECT OUR SHAREHOLDERS' ABILITY TO SELL OUR COMMON STOCK.
Our Common Stock currently is quoted on the OTCQB, which is generally considered to be a less efficient market than national exchanges. Consequently, the liquidity of our securities could be impaired, not only in the number of securities which could be bought and sold, but also through SEC regulations, delays in the timing of transactions, difficulties in obtaining price quotations, reduction in security analysts' and the new media's coverage of us, if any, and lower prices for our securities than might otherwise be attained. This circumstance could have an adverse effect on the ability of an investor to sell any shares of our common stock as well as on the selling price for such shares. In addition, the market price of our common stock may be significantly affected by various additional factors, including, but not limited to, our business performance, and industry dynamics or changes in general economic conditions.
APPLICABILITY OF "PENNY STOCK RULES" TO BROKER-DEALER SALES OF OUR COMMON STOCK COULD HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON THE LIQUIDITY AND MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.
A penny stock is generally a stock that is not listed on national securities exchange and is quoted on the "pink sheets" or on the OTC Bulletin Board, has a price per share of less than $5.00 and is issued by a company with net tangible assets less than $5 million.
The penny stock trading rules impose additional duties and responsibilities upon broker-dealers and salespersons effecting purchase and sale transactions in Common Stock and other equity securities, including determination of the purchaser's investment suitability, delivery of certain information and disclosures to the purchaser, and receipt of a specific purchase agreement before effecting the purchase transaction.
Many broker-dealers will not affect transactions in penny stocks, except on an unsolicited basis, in order to avoid compliance with the penny stock trading rules. When our Common Stock is subject to the penny stock trading rules, such rules may materially limit or restrict the ability to resell our Common Stock, and the liquidity typically associated with other publicly traded equity securities may not exist.
ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES
Our principal executive office is at The Chrysler Building, 405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York, 10174. We lease approximately 300 square feet of office space on a month-to-month basis. The aggregate annual rent for this office space was $2,958 and $2,958 in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Since October 2016, we lease an approximately 3,000 square foot office at 331 Corporate Circle, Golden, CO 80401. The lease is for one year and is set to expire in September 2017. The aggregate annual rent for this space is $34,800.
We also lease approximately 7,480 square feet of office and laboratory space at 800 Bradbury Dr., Albuquerque, NM 87106 for an aggregate of $83,376 per year.
We believe our facilities are adequate for our current and planned business operations.
We are subject from time to time to litigation, claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2014, we were not a party to any material litigation, claim or suit whose outcome could have a material effect on our financial statements other than the litigation described above which was subsequently settled.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
11 |
Table of Contents |
We are currently trading on the OTCQB operated by www.otcmarkets.com. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated, the high and low per share bid information for our common stock for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as reported by www.otcmarkets.com. Such high and low bid information reflects inter-dealer quotes, without retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First Quarter |
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ | 0.06 |
|
|
$ | 0.04 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
$ | 0.02 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First Quarter |
|
$ | 0.11 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ | 0.11 |
|
|
$ | 0.04 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ | 0.11 |
|
|
$ | 0.06 |
|
As of March 30, 2017, there were 533,781,064 shares of common stock of the issuer issued and outstanding and approximately 643 record shareholders.
DIVIDENDS
We have never paid any cash dividends. We presently intend to reinvest earnings, if any, to fund the development and expansion of our business and, therefore, do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The declaration of cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, financial position, general economic conditions and other pertinent factors.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
During the past fiscal year, we have issued unregistered shares of common stock and options and warrants for the purchase of common stock in the following transactions in reliance on an exemption from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act:
On or about August 26, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a stock repurchase program, whereby the Company is authorized to purchase shares of its common stock with a value of up to $500,000 in open market transactions at the discretion of management. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repurchased 61,337 shares, for a total cost of $4,000.
12 |
Table of Contents |
During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, common shares totaling 3,617,485 that were held in treasury were cancelled and returned to authorized capital.
On March 21, 2016, we entered into an Advisory Board Agreement, pursuant to which stock options to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of the Company, with an exercise price of $0.05 per share with a 5-year life. The options vest in three equal installments, with the first portion of 1,000,000 immediately vested. The remaining 2,000,000 stock options vest at the achievement of milestones, which have not yet been established and for which there is no estimated time frame for vesting.
In June 2016, the Company awarded all members of the Company’s board of director’s stock options for 500,000 shares each for a total of 3,000,000 shares, with an exercise price of $0.06 per share with a 10 year life.
In June 2016, the Company granted employees of one of the Company’s subsidiaries stock options in the aggregate amount of 1,950,000 shares, with an exercise price of $0.08 per share with a 5 year life.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Incentive Plans
The 2000 Plan is administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors or, if no committee is appointed, then by the Board of Directors. The 2000 Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which, pursuant to Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, can only be granted to employees), non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, or stock bonuses. The committee, or the Board of Directors if there is no committee, determines the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term, which may be no more than ten years, terms and conditions of exercisability and methods of exercise. Options must vest within ten-years. Under the 2000 Plan, the exercise price may not be less than fair market value on the date of grant for the incentive stock options. The 2000 Plan also allows for the granting of Stock Appreciation Rights. No Stock Appreciation Rights have been granted. The number of shares under the 2000 Plan available for grant at December 31, 2016 was 18,869,763.
In November 2004, our Board of Directors adopted the 2004 Consultant Stock Plan (the "2004 Plan"). The purpose of this 2004 Consultant Stock Plan is to advance our interests by helping us obtain and retain the services of persons providing consulting services upon whose judgment, initiative, efforts and/or services we are substantially dependent, by offering to or providing those persons with incentives or inducements affording such persons an opportunity to become owners of our capital stock. We reserved 2,000,000 shares of our Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2004 Plan. We filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on November 26, 2004 to register the shares underlying the 2004 plan. The 2004 Plan is administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors or, if no committee is appointed, then by the Board of Directors. The committee or the Board of Directors if there is no committee, determines who is eligible to receive awards under the plan, grant awards and interpret the 2004 Plan. The number of shares under the 2004 Plan available for grant at December 31, 2016 was 500,000.
On May 9, 2005, our Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (the "2005 Plan"). The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are important to our success, by offering them an opportunity to participate in the our future performance through awards of Options, the right to purchase Common Stock and Stock Bonuses. We reserved 10,000,000 shares of our Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan is administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors or, if no committee is appointed, then by the Board of Directors. The committee, or the Board of Directors if there is no committee, determines who is eligible to receive awards under the plan, grant awards and interpret the 2005 Plan. We filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the SEC on June 8, 2005 to register the shares underlying the 2005 plan. The number of shares under the 2006 Plan available for grant at December 31, 2016 was -0-.
In January 2015, our Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Incentive Stock Plan (the "2015 Plan"). The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentive stock options (which, pursuant to Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, can only be granted to employees), non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, or stock bonuses. The committee, or the Board of Directors if there is no committee, determines the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term, which may be no more than ten years, terms and conditions of exercisability and methods of exercise. Options must vest within ten-years. Under the 2015 Plan, the exercise price may not be less than fair market value on the date of grant for the incentive stock options. The 2015 Plan also allows for the granting of Stock Appreciation Rights. No Stock Appreciation Rights have been granted. The number of shares under the 2015 Plan available for grant at December 31, 2016 was 4,000,000.
13 |
Table of Contents |
Set forth in the table below is information regarding awards made through compensation plans or arrangements through December 31, 2016.
Equity Compensation Plan Information | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Plan category |
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) |
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
| |||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
23,369,763 |
|
Total |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
23,369,763 |
|
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information is as follows:
|
|
Number of Options |
|
|
Exercise Price Per Share |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Number of Options Exercisable |
| ||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 |
|
|
40,480,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,480,000 |
| ||
Granted |
|
|
3,575,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
|
3,575,000 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,200,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200,000 | ) |
Expired |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 |
|
|
42,855,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,855,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
5,950,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.06 |
|
|
$ | 0.04 |
|
|
|
5,950,000 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 |
|
|
48,805,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,805,000 |
|
Exercise prices and weighted-average contractual lives of 48,805,000 stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
| ||||||||||||
Exercise Price |
|
|
Number Outstanding |
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Number Exercisable |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| ||||||
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
$ | 0.01 |
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.01 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
7.87 |
|
|
$ | 0.06 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.06 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
9,250,000 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
|
|
9,250,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
$ | 0.14 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.14 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
$ | 0.26 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.26 |
|
The fair value for options granted were determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
14 |
Table of Contents |
Warrants:
The Company issued the following warrants at the corresponding weighted average exercise price as of December 31, 2016.
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Weighted average Exercise Price |
| ||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 |
|
|
25,243,182 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
Issued/Vested |
|
|
3,700,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.11 |
|
Cancelled/Expired |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 |
|
|
28,943,182 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
Issued/Vested |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Exercised |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cancelled/Expired |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 |
|
|
28,943,182 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
Date |
|
Number of Warrants |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Life Remaining |
|
Number of Shares Exercisable |
| |||
April 2012 |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.8 year |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
January 2014 |
|
|
909,091 |
|
|
$ | 0.09 |
|
|
2.1 year |
|
|
909,091 |
|
February 2014 |
|
|
9,125,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
|
2.1years |
|
|
9,125,000 |
|
March 2014 |
|
|
909,091 |
|
|
$ | 0.09 |
|
|
2.2 years |
|
|
909,091 |
|
August 2014 |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
|
2.7 years |
|
|
800,000 |
|
November 2014 |
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.11 |
|
|
2.9 years |
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
March 2015 |
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.12 |
|
|
3.2 years |
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
July 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.5 years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
August 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.6 years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
September 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.7 years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
October 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.8 years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
28,943,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,943,182 |
|
The fair value for warrants granted were determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
15 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
As a Smaller Reporting Company, the Company is not required to include the disclosure under this Item 6. Selected Financial Data.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
OVERVIEW
The Company’s goal is to nurture visionary technologies into life changing success stories and Metallicum and Imagion are pursuing that goal.
Manhattan Scientifics, operates as a technology incubator that seeks to acquire, develop and commercialize life-enhancing technologies in various fields, with emphasis in the areas of nanotechnology. Nanotechnology is the use and manipulation of matter on an atomic and molecular scale. To achieve this goal, the Company continues to identify emerging technologies through strategic alliances with scientific laboratories, educational institutions, scientists and leaders in industry and government. The Company and its executives have a long standing relationship with Los Alamos Laboratories in New Mexico.
TWO BUSINESSES EXIST WITHIN MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS
Two nanotechnology businesses exist within Manhattan Scientifics; both “units” are wholly-owned subsidiaries, both focused on nanotechnology applications in medicine.
The goal of the first business, Metallicum, is to demonstrate our business-model, a licensing model, given that we are an inventions commercialization company.
Manhattan’s second business is called Imagion and is at the crossroads of biotechnology and nanotechnology.
Our novel bioimaging and nanomagnetic detection systems have been developed specifically to detect cancer and other diseases earlier and with higher specificity than is currently possible. We have developed proprietary hardware and software for the highly sensitive detection of nanomagnetic particles that can be linked to antibodies for the detection and treatment of cancer and other human diseases—all without the use of ionizing radiation or large magnetic fields.
Our novel technologies make possible the earlier detection of cancer in vivo, the ability to analyze biopsies with greater sensitivity and accuracy, the ability to monitor the therapeutic effectiveness of anticancer treatments—both in humans and in animal models—and allow us to detect cancer recurrence with significantly improved sensitivity. Please see: www.imagionbiosystems.com
The technology was developed by Edward R. Flynn, PhD, founder and former chief scientist of Imagion, which has merged with Imagion.
16 |
Table of Contents |
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
During the year ended December 31, 2016:
|
· | Patent offices in Japan and China have issued patents, owned by Imagion, covering the basic magnetic relaxometry measurement. These recently issued patents add to those already issued in Australia and the US; similar applications are still pending in several other countries of which we cannot provide any guarantee that such patents will be issued. The issued patents claim the apparatus used to make magnetic relaxometry measurements, and methods of making measurements using such an apparatus. |
|
|
|
|
· | Imagion executed a one-year Work for Others (WFO) agreement with the Los Alamos National Laboratories (“LANL”). Effective October 1, 2015 key LANL personnel at LANL with expertise in SQUID detectors and magnetic field physics will be allowed to work up to 50% of their time and use LANL resources to the benefit of the Company. The Company’s MRX™ technology, being developed for the early detection of cancer and other diseases, utilizes SQUID sensors to achieve orders of magnitude more sensitivity that conventional imaging modalities. |
|
|
|
|
· | In January 2016 Imagion established a Research Collaboration with The University of Michigan Medical School. The goal is to demonstrate the applicability of magnetic relaxometry in diagnosing and staging breast cancers. |
|
|
|
|
· | In February 2016 we delivered a Magnetic Relaxometry Detection System (MRX) system to the University of Michigan Medical School as part of our research collaboration agreement. |
|
|
|
|
· | In February 2016 Imagion announced that it had established a Research Collaboration with Weill Cornell Medicine. The goal is to investigate the use of molecular targeted nanoparticles to non-invasively detect and diagnose prostate cancers. |
|
|
|
|
· | In February 2016 Imagion hired Giulio F. Paciotti, Ph.D. as Vice President of Research and Development. Dr. Paciotti has more than 25 years in the fields of tumor biology and bio nanotechnology |
|
|
|
|
· | Metallicum completed its nano-metals test-bed facility in Golden, Colorado. The new facility will utilize the equipment acquired from Carpenter Technologies in 2015. The facility will be used to create sample product and transform lab scale materials processing directly into pilot scale production demonstrations for our present customer base. We have entered into Test and Evaluation Agreements with a dental implant company, a biomedical company/medical device development company and a wire/alloy developer & manufacturer and we are presently seeking other customers. There is no guarantee that Metallicum’s existing customers will agree to move forward with the pilot scale production or that we will successfully enter test agreements with additional customers. |
|
|
|
|
· | In July 2016 we announced that we signed a $500,000 Joint Development Agreement with General Cable (NYSE: BGC).The agreement calls for General Cable to finance all of the research and development of an improved Aluminum Conductor Alloy utilizing our proprietary ECAP-C nano structuring technology. |
|
|
|
|
· | On November 17, 2016, Senior Scientific merged with and into Imagion Biosystems, Inc., a Nevada company (“Imagion”). Following the merger, Imagion held all of the liabilities, obligations and assets of Senior Scientific and the Company continued as the sole equity holder of Imagion. |
|
|
|
|
· | On November 29, 2016, the Company announced a plan to have Imagion pursue an IPO and listing on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). During the two months ended February 28, 2017, Imagion raised a total of approximately $2.7 million from investors for 62 million shares of common stock. Manhattan Scientifics presently owns approximately 50.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of Imagion. |
17 |
Table of Contents |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
GROSS PROFIT. In the year ended December 31, 2016, we recorded $150,000 in revenue compared to $64,000 of revenue recognized for the year ended December 31, 2015. The material increase in revenue is primarily attributable to sales of sample product by our subsidiary company, Metallicum.
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE. General and administrative expenses consist of consultants, contractors, accounting, legal, travel, rent, telephone and other day-to-day operating expenses. General and administrative expenses were $3,198,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with $3,378,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. Research and development expenses consist of consultants and contractors. Research and development expenses were $3,335,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared with $2,937,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Research and development expenses increased due to the design, engineering and construction of the next generation instruments to be used for the MD Anderson Cancer Center; hiring of four professional individuals; continued expenses working with the University of New Mexico; and continued development on intellectual property related to our nano-technology.
OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSES). Other income and was $275,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016, which is attributable to $(488,000) in interest expense and the forgiveness of $763,000 of related party debt and interest accrued thereupon. In comparison, we realized other income of $14,263,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015, attributed primarily to a gain of $14,938,000 related to a 2015 Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Releases with Carpenter Technology Corporation, as discussed in Note 8 in the notes to financial statements, whereby we received $8,000,000 in cash and $6,938,000 in independently appraised physical assets as part of the overall consideration of the Settlement Agreement.
NET INCOME (LOSS). We incurred a net loss of $(6,108,000) for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to having earned net income of $8,012,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The income generated during 2015 is primarily attributable to the Carpenter Settlement Agreement and is not indicative of continuing operations.
LIQUIDITY AND PLAN OF OPERATIONS
Stockholders’ equity totaled $2,723,000 on December 31, 2016 and the working capital deficit was $(603,000) on such date.
We experienced a $4,296,000 net decrease in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2016, as a result of cash used in the pursuit of our operational objectives. Cash used by operating activities was $4,558,000, during the year ended December 31, 2016. During 2016, we used a significant amount of funds in the assembly and delivery of MRX instrumentation to two university research facilities: University of Michigan Medical School and Weill Cornell Medicine.
18 |
Table of Contents |
We had an increase of $2,836,000 in cash and cash equivalents for the year ended December 31, 2015, as a result of cash provided by our operating activities. For the year ended December 31, 2015, cash provided by operating activities was $3,415,000. Cash provided in operating activities was primarily as a result of cash received pursuant to the Carpenter Settlement Agreement, in the amount of $8,000,000. Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 totaled $255,000 related to purchase of equipment for our research and development. There was $324,000 of cash used in financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2015, related primarily to the August 2015 stock repurchase program.
Based upon current projections, our principal cash requirements for the next 12 months consists of (1) fixed expenses, including payroll, investor relations services, public relations services, bookkeeping services, consultant services, and rent; and (2) variable expenses, including technology research and development, milestone payments and intellectual property protection, and additional scientific consultants. As of December 31, 2016, we had $1,068,000 in cash. We believe our current cash position is not sufficient to maintain our operations for the next twelve months. Accordingly, we will need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing that we secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth and to respond to business challenges could be impaired, and our business may be harmed.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amount of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. A significant estimate includes the carrying value of our patents, fair value of our common stock, assumptions used in calculating the value of stock options, depreciation and amortization.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:
We assess the impairment of our long-lived assets periodically in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FAS") Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 10. Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable, we will compare undiscounted net cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets to the carrying amount of those assets. When these undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amounts of the assets, we will record impairment losses to write the asset down to fair value, measured by the discounted estimated net future cash flows expected to be generated from the assets. To date there has been no impairment.
19 |
Table of Contents |
License Agreements
In 2008, the Company obtained licenses to the rights of certain patents regarding nano-structured materials developed by another company as a result of the acquisition of Metallicum. The purchase price paid for these licenses was $305,000, which represents its fair value. The Company obtained an exclusive license on two patents and a non-exclusive license on the third patent. The value attributable to license agreements is being amortized over the period of its estimated benefit period of 10 years. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company may be required to pay royalties, as defined, to the licensors.
In 2009, the Company entered into a patent license agreement with Los Alamos National Security LLC for the exclusive use of certain technology relating to the manufacture and application of nanostructuring metals and alloys. The value attributable to license agreements is being amortized over the period of its estimated benefit period of 10 years. Under the terms of the agreement the Company is required to pay an annual license fee of $10,000 and, may be required to pay royalties, as defined, to the licensors.
On May 31, 2011, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization to acquire Senior Scientific. The total purchase price was 21,668,000 restricted shares of our common stock (less 7,667,000 shares previously issued pursuant to an option agreement. As a result of this acquisition, we own patented technologies that can use biosafe nanoparticles and sensitive magnetic sensors to detect and measure cancer cells in biopsies or in the human body with the potential to revolutionize how cancer is detected and treated.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when the four basic criteria of revenue recognition are met: (i) a contractual agreement exists; (ii) transfer of technology (intellectual property) has been completed or services have been rendered; (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Service revenue is recognized when specific milestones are reached or as service is provided if there are no discernable milestones.
Investments: Available-for-Sale Investments
Investments that we designate as available-for-sale are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We determine the cost of the investment sold based on the specific identification method. Our available-for-sale investments include Marketable equity securities. We acquire these equity investments for the promotion of business and strategic objectives. We record the realized gains or losses on the sale or exchange of marketable equity securities in gains (losses) on other equity investments, net.
Stock-Based Compensation:
The Company follows the provision of FASB ASC Topic 718 for the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards to employees, directors and non-employees. Additionally, the Company follows the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 “Share-Based Payment” (“SAB 107”), as amended by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110 (“SAB 110”), which provides supplemental application guidance based on the views of the SEC. The Company estimates the expected term, which represents the period of time from the grant date that the Company expects its stock options to remain outstanding, using the simplified method as permitted by SAB 107 and SAB 110. Under this method, the expected term is estimated as the mid-point between the time the options vest and their contractual terms. The Company continues to apply the simplified method because it does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected terms due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded and the limited number of its options which have so far vested and become eligible for exercise.
The estimated fair value of grants of stock options and warrants to our nonemployees is charged to expense, if applicable, in the financial statements. These options vest in the same manner as the employee options granted under each of the option plans as described above.
OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources and would be considered material to investors.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a Small Reporting Company, we are not required to provide the information under Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
20 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
F-1 |
Table of Contents |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and subsidiaries ("the Company") as of December 31, 2015 and the related consolidated statement of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2015 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
New York, NY
March 30, 2016
F-2 |
Table of Contents |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Manhattan Scientifics, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and the related statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. Manhattan Scientifics, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. as of December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has minimal revenues, has negative working capital at December 31, 2016, has incurred recurring losses and recurring negative cash flow from operating activities, and has an accumulated deficit which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ AMC Auditing
AMC Auditing
Las Vegas, Nevada
April 12, 2017
F-3 |
Table of Contents |
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ | 1,068,000 |
|
|
$ | 5,364,000 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,112,000 |
|
|
|
5,364,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
291,000 |
|
Assets received in settlement agreement – see Note 8 |
|
|
5,724,000 |
|
|
|
6,417,000 |
|
Intellectual property, net |
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
793,000 |
|
Other asset |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Total assets |
|
$ | 7,635,000 |
|
|
$ | 12,869,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
$ | 1,335,000 |
|
|
$ | 829,000 |
|
Accrued expenses — related parties |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Note payable to former officers |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Note payable to related party |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,714,000 |
|
|
|
1,289,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes payable, net |
|
|
2,139,000 |
|
|
|
1,928,000 |
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
2,139,000 |
|
|
|
1,928,000 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,854,000 |
|
|
|
3,217,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine equity Series D convertible preferred, authorized 105,671 shares, 105,671 and 105,671 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively |
|
|
1,058,000 |
|
|
|
1,058,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock $.001 par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred, authorized 1,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A convertible, redeemable, 10 percent cumulative, authorized 182,525, shares; issued and outstanding — none |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Series B convertible, authorized 250,000 shares; 49,999 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Series C convertible, redeemable, authorized 14,000 shares; issued and outstanding-none |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common, authorized 950,000,000 shares, 533,781,064 and 537,398,549 shares issued, and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
534,000 |
|
|
|
537,000 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
63,527,000 |
|
|
|
63,617,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 0 and 3,556,148, respectively |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(330,000 | ) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(61,338,000 | ) |
|
|
(55,230,000 | ) |
Total stockholders' equity |
|
|
2,723,000 |
|
|
|
8,594,000 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
$ | 7,635,000 |
|
|
$ | 12,869,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-4 |
Table of Contents |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| |||||
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Revenue |
|
$ | 150,000 |
|
|
$ | 64,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
|
3,198,000 |
|
|
|
3,378,000 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
3,335,000 |
|
|
|
2,937,000 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
6,533,000 |
|
|
|
6,315,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations before other income and expenses |
|
|
(6,383,000 | ) |
|
|
(6,251,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Settlement Agreement (see Note 8) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14,938,000 |
|
Gain on forgiveness of debt |
|
|
763,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest and other expenses |
|
|
(488,000 | ) |
|
|
(675,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(6,108,000 | ) |
|
|
8,012,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
|
(6,108,000 | ) |
|
|
8,012,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic) |
|
|
534,680,493 |
|
|
|
521,647,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per common share |
|
$ | (0.01 | ) |
|
$ | 0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding (diluted) |
|
|
534,680,493 |
|
|
|
593,445,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per common share |
|
$ | (0.01 | ) |
|
$ | 0.01 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-5 |
Table of Contents |
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) |
For The Years Ended December 31, 2016 And 2015 |
|
|
Preferred Stock $.001 Par Value Series B |
|
|
Common Stock $.001 Par Value |
|
|
Additional Paid-in |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Other Comprehensive |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Total |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2014 |
|
|
49,999 |
|
|
$ | - |
|
|
|
516,378,036 |
|
|
$ | 516,000 |
|
|
$ | 61,894,000 |
|
|
$ | - |
|
|
$ | - |
|
|
$ | (63,242,000 | ) |
|
$ | (832,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Issuance of shares for services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,875,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
511,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
516,000 |
|
Conversion of debt to shares of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,045,513 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
1,071,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,086,000 |
|
Stock repurchased as treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330,000 | ) |
Stock options issued for services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,000 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,012,000 |
|
|
|
8,012,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2015 |
|
|
49,999 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
537,398,549 |
|
|
$ | 537,000 |
|
|
$ | 63,617,000 |
|
|
$ | (330,000 | ) |
|
$ | 0 |
|
|
$ | (55,230,000 | ) |
|
$ | 8,594,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options issued for services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
Stock repurchased as treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 | ) |
Treasury stock cancelled and returned to authorized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,617,485 | ) |
|
|
(3,000 | ) |
|
|
(330,000 | ) |
|
|
333,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,108,000 | ) |
|
|
(6,108,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2016 |
|
|
49,999 |
|
|
$ | - |
|
|
|
533,781,064 |
|
|
$ | 534,000 |
|
|
$ | 63,527,000 |
|
|
$ | - |
|
|
$ | - |
|
|
$ | (61,338,000 | ) |
|
$ | 2,723,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-6 |
Table of Contents |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
|
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, |
| |||||
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
| ||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net (loss) income |
|
$ | (6,108,000 | ) |
|
$ | 8,012,000 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
447,000 |
|
Stock options issued/vested for services |
|
|
240,000 |
|
|
|
136,000 |
|
Debt discount and original issue discount accretion |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
502,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
995,000 |
|
|
|
793,000 |
|
Treasury stock cancelled and returned to authorized |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Gain on settlement agreement (see Note 8) |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(6,938,000 | ) |
Gain on forgiveness of debt |
|
|
(450,000 | ) |
|
|
-- |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(44,000 | ) |
|
|
-- |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
505,000 |
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
Accrued interest and expenses, related parties |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
(9,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
|
|
(4,558,000 | ) |
|
|
3,415,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed assets |
|
|
(13,000 | ) |
|
|
(255,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(13,000 | ) |
|
|
(255,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from note payable - related party |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Repurchase of common stock for treasury |
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
(330,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
(324,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(4,296,000 | ) |
|
|
2,836,000 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
5,364,000 |
|
|
|
2,528,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR |
|
$ | 1,068,000 |
|
|
$ | 5,364,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ | - |
|
|
$ | - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of debt to preferred stock by shareholder |
|
$ | - |
|
|
$ | 896,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-7 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS
Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly Grand Enterprises, Inc) (“Grand”) was established on July 31, 1992 and has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: Metallicum, Inc. (“Metallicum”), Senior Scientific LLC (“Senior Scientific”). On June 12, 2008, the Company acquired Metallicum, Inc, for 15,000,000 shares of Company’s common stock, Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., operates as a technology incubator that seeks to acquire, develop and commercialize life-enhancing technologies in various fields, with emphasis in the areas of nano-technologies and nano-medicine. In this capacity, the Company continues to identify emerging technologies through strategic alliances with scientific laboratories, educational institutions, and scientists and leaders in industry and government. The Company has a long standing relationship with Los Alamos Laboratories in New Mexico. During 2008, the Company refocused its efforts from the development of its fuel cell technologies to its current focus on the development of nanomaterials through the acquisition of Metallicum.
Metallicum is a nanotechnology start-up company located in Colorado. Metallicum Inc. has focused on the development and manufacture of nanostructured metals for medical implants and other applications. Metallicum intends to establish manufacturing partner relationships with major Fortune 500 metals companies and strategic partnering with significant customers in the medical device & prosthetics industries as well as in auto, truck, & aircraft manufacturing industries. Metallicum’s initial products include nanostructured bulk metals and alloys in the form of rod, bar, wire and foil. The Company conducts its operations primarily in the United States.
Manhattan Scientifics purchased Metallicum to acquire its licensed rights to patented technology. The technology is comprised of three US Patents (US Patent numbers 7152448, 6197129 and 6399215) for which Metallicum (subsequently, Manhattan) had been assigned an exclusive license rights by Los Alamos National Security LLC (LANL). Under the license rights, Metallicum had all rights, title and interest throughout the world in and to any and all inventions, original works of authorship, developments, concepts, know-how, and improvements on the patents or trade secrets whether or not patentable or registrable under copyright or similar laws.
In January 2009, the Company entered into a patent license agreement with Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the exclusive licensing use of certain technology relating to the manufacture and application of nanostructuring metals and alloys. Pursuant to such agreement the Company provided a non-refundable fee and 2,000,000 shares of common stock. Additionally, the Company is required to pay an annual license fee starting in February 2010 and royalties on future net sales.
In September 2009, the Company entered into a technology transfer agreement with Carpenter Technologies Corporation (“Carpenter”). Wherein Carpenter will fully develop, manufacture and market a new class of high strength metals under an exclusive technology transfer agreement from Manhattan Scientifics and the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The proprietary process will enable super-strength metals and alloys to make products that weigh far less than in the past and without significant cost premiums.
On May 31, 2011, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (“Nanomedicine Agreement”) by and among the Company, Scientific Nanomedicine, Inc. (“Nanomedicine”), Edward, R. Flynn (“Flynn”) and Edward R. Flynn and Maureen A. Flynn, as Co-Trustees of the Edward R. Flynn and Maureen A. Flynn Revocable Trust u/t/a dated 10/25/2006 (“Trust”); and entered into a Purchase Agreement (“Senior Scientific Agreement”) by and among the Company, Senior Scientific LLC, (“Senior Scientific”) and Flynn.
Under the Nanomedicine Agreement, the Company has agreed to purchase all of the common stock of Nanomedicine. The purchase price for the common stock of Nanomedicine is 21,667,000 restricted shares of the Company’s voting common stock (less 7,667,000 shares already issued) pursuant to the Acquisition Option Agreement, dated February 8, 2010, among the Company, Nanomedicine, Flynn and Senior Scientific. Nanomedicine holds the commercial rights to technology and intellectual property with respect to the early detection of diseases using nanotechnologies.
Under the Senior Scientific Agreement, the Company has agreed to purchase all of the membership interests of Senior Scientific. The purchase price for the membership interests of Senior Scientific is 1,000 restricted shares of the Company’s voting common stock. Senior Scientific operates a research laboratory in New Mexico.
On November 17, 2016, Senior Scientific merged with and into Imagion Biosystems, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Imagion”). Following the merger, Imagion held all of the liabilities, obligations and assets of Senior Scientific and the Company continued as the sole equity holder of Imagion. On November 29, 2016, the Company announced a plan to have Imagion pursue an IPO and listing on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). During the two months ended February 28, 2017, Imagion raised a total of approximately $2.7 million from investors for 62 million shares of common stock. Manhattan Scientifics presently owns approximately 50.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of Imagion.
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
Manhattan Scientifics success will depend in part on its ability to obtain patents and product license rights, maintain trade secrets, and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of others, both in the United States and other countries. There can be no assurance that patents issued to or licensed by the Company will not be challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, or that the rights granted thereunder will provide proprietary protection or competitive advantages to the Company.
On February 11, 2015, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Releases (the "Settlement Agreement") with Carpenter Technology Corporation related to the agreement discussed in Note 7, pursuant to which the parties settled and released each other from any and all liabilities and claims related to the Carpenter Agreements.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND RELATED MATTERS
BASIS OF CONSOLIDATION:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Manhattan Scientific, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Metallicum and Senior Scientific. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the operating activities of Metallicum and Senior Scientific for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
The fiscal year end of the Company is December 31.
GOING CONCERN:
As of December 31, 2016 the Company has cumulative losses totaling $(61,338,000) and negative working capital of $602,000. The Company had a net loss of $6,108,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Because of these conditions, the Company will require additional working capital to develop business operations. The Company intends to raise additional working capital through the continued licensing of its technology as well as to generate revenues for other services. The Company is also contemplating the spin-off of one of its subsidiaries. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to achieve the level of revenues adequate to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to support the Company’s working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated are insufficient, the Company will have to raise additional working capital. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to the Company. If adequate working capital is not available, the Company may not continue its operations.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
USE OF ESTIMATES:
The preparation of consolidated financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Management makes estimates that affect, carrying value of the Company’s patents, deferred income tax assets, estimated useful lives of property and equipment, useful lives of intangible assets, accrued expenses, fair value of equity instruments and reserves for any other commitments or contingencies. Any adjustments applied to estimates are recognized in the year in which such adjustments are determined.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents for the purposes of the statement of cash flows.
CASH CONCENTRATION:
The Company’s cash accounts are fully insured up to $250,000. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company had cash accounts exceeding insured amount totaling $750,000 and $4,750,000, respectively.
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and improvements are capitalized, and minor replacements, maintenance, and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. When property and equipment are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the results of operations for the respective period. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS:
The Company applies the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment, where applicable to all long lived assets. FASB ASC 360-10 addresses accounting and reporting for impairment and disposal of long-lived assets. The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10. FASB ASC 360-10 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost of disposal.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
License Agreements
In 2008, the Company obtained licenses to the rights of certain patents regarding nanostructured materials developed by another company as a result of the acquisition of Metallicum. The purchase price paid for these licenses was $305,000, which represented its fair value. The Company obtained an exclusive license on two patents and a non-exclusive license on the third patent. The value attributable to license agreements is being amortized over the period of its estimated benefit period of 10 years. At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, accumulated amortization was $255,000 and $225,000, respectively. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company may be required to pay royalties, as defined, to the licensors.
In 2009, the Company entered into a patent license agreement with Los Alamos National Security LLC for the exclusive use of certain technology relating to the manufacture and application of nanostructuring metals and alloys. The purchase price paid for this license agreement was $33,000 based on the fair market value of 2,000,000 shares of common stock issued. The value attributable to license agreements is being amortized over the period of its estimated benefit period of 10 years. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, accumulated amortization was $26,000 and $23,000, respectively. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is required to pay an annual license fee of $10,000 starting in February 2010 and, may be required to pay royalties, as defined, to the licensors.
In 2011, the Company acquired Scientific Nanomedicine, Inc., which holds the commercial rights to technology and intellectual property with respect to the early detection of diseases using nanotechnologies. The acquisition of Scientific Nanomedicine, Inc. has been accounted for as an asset purchase since this company had no tangible assets or liabilities and did not have the business inputs and outputs to be considered a business. The purchase price totaling $1,300,000 (fair value of 21,667,000 shares of common stocks issued) has been allocated to in process research and development and is being amortized over its estimated benefit period of 10 years. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, accumulated amortization was $726,000 and $596,000. We subsequently dissolved Scientific Nanomedicine and transferred all remaining assets to Senior Scientific LLC.
INCOME TAXES
The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach. This process involves calculating the temporary and permanent differences between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which would be recorded on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets in accordance with ASC 740, which established financial accounting and reporting standards for the effect of income taxes. The Company must assess the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent the Company believes that recovery is not likely, the Company must establish a valuation allowance. Changes in the Company’s valuation allowance in a period are recorded through the income tax provision on the consolidated statements of operations.
ASC 740-10 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attributes for financial statement disclosure of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.
F-10 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
Under ASC 740-10, the impact of an uncertain income tax position on the income tax return must be recognized at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. Additionally, ASC 740-10 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. As a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10, the Company recognized no material adjustment in the liability for unrecognized income tax benefits.
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
In accordance with FASB ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share,” the basic loss per share is computed by dividing the loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Basic net loss per share excludes the dilutive effect of stock options or warrants and convertible notes Diluted net earnings (loss) per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents, consisting of shares that might be issued upon exercise of common stock options and warrants. In periods where losses are reported, the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding excludes common stock equivalents, because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, 77,748,182 and 71,798,000 dilutive shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per common share.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT:
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and amounted to $3,335,000 and $2,937,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
INVESTMENTS:
Available-for-Sale Investments
Investments that the Company designates as available-for-sale are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company determines the cost of the investment sold based on the specific identification method. The Company’s available-for-sale investments include:
|
· | Marketable equity securities The Company acquires these equity investments for the promotion of business and strategic objectives. The Company records the realized gains or losses on the sale or exchange of marketable equity securities in gains (losses) on other equity investments, net. |
Non-Marketable and Other Equity Investments
The Company accounts for non-marketable and other equity investments under either the cost or equity method and includes them in other long-term assets. The non-marketable and other equity investments include:
|
· | Non-marketable cost method investments when the equity method does not apply. The Company records the realized gains or losses on the sale of non-marketable cost method investments in gains (losses) on other equity investments, net. |
REVENUE RECOGNITION:
To date the only revenue generated is from the sale of field technology developed by Metallicum related to the Company’s nanotechnology, services provided and sample materials (See Note 8).
Revenue is recognized when the four basic criteria of revenue recognition are met: (i) a contractual agreement exists; (ii) transfer of technology (intellectual property) has been completed or services have been rendered; (iii) the fee is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Service revenue is recognized when specific milestones are reached or as service is provided if there are no discernible milestones.
F-11
Table of Contents
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation based on the fair value of all option grants or stock issuances made to employees or directors on or after its implementation date (the beginning of fiscal 2006), as well as a portion of the fair value of each option and stock grant made to employees or directors prior to the implementation date that represents the unvested portion of these share-based awards as of such implementation date, to be recognized as an expense, as codified in ASC 718. The Company calculates stock option-based compensation by estimating the fair value of each option as of its date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. These amounts are expensed over the respective vesting periods of each award using the straight-line attribution method. Compensation expense is recognized only for those awards that are expected to vest, and as such, amounts have been reduced by estimated forfeitures. The Company has historically issued stock options and vested and non-vested stock grants to employees and outside directors whose only condition for vesting has been continued employment or service during the related vesting or restriction period.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, Pre Codification SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which provides a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The standard also expands disclosures about instruments measured at fair value and establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in active markets;
Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3 — Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable.
The Company designates cash equivalents (consisting of money market funds) and investments in securities of publicly traded companies as Level 1. The total amount of the Company’s investment classified as Level 3 is de minimis.
The fair value of the Company’s debt as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 approximated their fair value at those times.
Fair value of financial instruments: The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payables approximated fair value as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 because of the relative short term nature of these instruments. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, the fair value of the Company’s debt approximates carrying value.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.
F-12
Table of Contents
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
NOTE 3 – RELATED PARTY AND FORMER OFFICERS NOTES PAYABLE
The former Chief Operating Officer has a notes payable balance totaling $450,000 at December 31, 2015. The loan bears interest at 5.5% per annum and was initially due December 31, 2002 and have been mutually extended. Under the terms of the note extension dated December 12, 2007, the loan bears interest at 5% per annum and are now due. On December 31, 2016, the Company wrote off the entire $450,000 balance of the note payable and $312,500 of interest accrued, thereupon. The Company therefore recognized a gain on forgiveness of debt in the amount of $762,500.
On November 10, 2016, the Company, via Imagion, its wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a Note Purchase Agreement with Interim Investors, pursuant to which Imagion would issue promissory notes for any amounts borrowed under the Agreement. The Interim Investors may invest up to a total of $500,000 under the Note Purchase Agreement. The Note accrue interest at the rate of 8% per annum, provided, however, in the event of a default, interest shall accrue at 10% per annum. As of December 31, 2016, the Company borrowed a total of $275,000. Interest expense and accrued interest during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $2,000.
NOTE 4 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
From October 21, 2011 to April 26, 2012, the Company issued convertible notes for $600,000 (the "Convertible Notes") of which $200,000 was received on October 21, 2011, $100,000 was received on January 31, 2012 and $300,000 was received on April 26, 2012. Additionally, the note holder was issued warrants for 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.05 that expire on October 15, 2015 ("Warrants"). During September 2015, the Company and the holder mutually agreed to extend the expiration of the 6,000,000 warrants to October 15, 2018, the rest of the terms of the warrants remained the same. The incremental fair value for the modification of the warrants was valued at $190,000 and recorded to additional paid in capital. The conversion feature to the note payable has been accounted for as an original issue discount approximating $296,000 which has been fully accreted as of December 31, 2012. The warrant associated with the note has been accounted for as a debt discount with an approximate value of $296,000 which has been allocated to the note’s fully accreted value of $896,000 (original note amount plus original debt discount) on proportionate basis which amounted to $195,000. The warrant value of $252,000 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: 2 year term; volatility rate of 134% to 135%; and discount rate of 2.5%. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company has recorded an expense associated with original debt discount and expense associated with the debt discount (warrants) of $422,000. Accordingly, the carrying net value of this note at December 31, 2016, and 2015 was $0. In October 2015, the Company had issued 15,045,513 shares of common stock related to the conversion and extinguishment of the notes.
During 2014 and 2013, the Company issued convertible notes for $2,500,000 through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Senior Scientific, LLC. The convertible notes bear interest at 8%, mature four years from the date of issuance, and are convertible into either: (1) membership interests of Senior Scientific, LLC equal to the quotient of the principal due of the convertible notes divided by $2,500,000 multiplied by 18% of the total equity of Senior Scientific, LLC outstanding as of the date hereof; or (2) the number of shares of common stock of the Company equal to the quotient of the principal and interest payable due of the convertible notes divided by a conversion price of $0.055 per share. The Company may not prepay the convertible notes. In the event of a default and so long as the default exists, interest on the convertible notes will accrue at 10%. The Company must account for all accrued interest on the convertible notes on the first calendar day of each quarter. The conversion feature to the note payable has been accounted for as an original issue discount approximating $1,045,000 which $684,000 has been accreted as of December 31, 2016. The Company has recorded the accreted original issue discount as interest expense totaling $262,000 and $261,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Accordingly, the carrying net value of these notes at December 31, 2016 and 2015 totals $2,139,000 and $1,877,000, respectively, comprising of $2,500,000 (original face value) plus the unamortized debt discount of $360,000 at December 31, 2016, and unamortized original debt discount of $622,000 at December 31, 2015.
NOTE 5 – CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS
Preferred Stock
The Company has a total of 1,000,000 shares of authorized preferred shares which are segregated into four classes of preferred stock.
The Company has 182,525 authorized shares of convertible, redeemable, 10 percent cumulative, Class A, Preferred Stock with $0.001 par value. One Class A, Preferred share is convertible into 50 restricted common shares and will be entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such holder’s shares of Series A Preferred stock could be converted at the time of the vote. Class A, Preferred Stock is redeemable by the Company at $15 per share. Upon liquidation the holders of Series A Preferred stock will be entitled to be paid out of the assets available for distribution of the corporation an amount equal to $10 per share, before any payment will be made to the common shareholders. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, no shares of Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.
F-13 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
The Company has 250,000 authorized shares of Class B, Preferred Stock with $0.001 par value. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, 49,999 shares of Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding. Class B preferred shares are convertible at a rate of 1 Series B preferred share to 10 common shares.
The Company has 14,000 authorized shares of redeemable, convertible, Class C, Preferred Stock with $100 stated value. Class C, Preferred Stock is not entitled to receive dividends unless dividends are paid on common stock. Upon liquidation Class C, Preferred Stock shall be treated as if it were converted to common stock prior to liquidation. Class C, Preferred Stock is convertible at $100 divided by the 10 day average closing price of common stock. The Class C, Preferred Stock is redeemable by the Company at the stated value. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, no shares of Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.
On November 5, 2013, the Company entered into a Conversion Agreement with Marvin Maslow (the "Holder") pursuant to which the Company agreed to convert $1,057,608 of debt (the "Debt"), including principal and interest, currently owed to Holder into 105,761 shares of Series D Preferred Shares of the Company. The Debt has been outstanding since 2007.
The above transactions were approved by the Board of Directors of the Company. The Series D Preferred Stock does not pay dividends and does not have a liquidation preference. The Holder of the Series D Preferred Stock will be entitled to 20 votes for each share of common stock that the Series D Preferred Stock are convertible into. The Series D Preferred Stock has a conversion price of $0.055 (the “Conversion Price”) and a stated value of $10.00 (the “Stated Value”) per share. Each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the Holder, into such number of shares of common stock of the Company as determined by dividing Stated Value by the Conversion Price.
Holder may only convert the Series D Preferred Stock upon certain Convertible Promissory Notes, whether presently outstanding or to be issued, issued to three accredited investors (the "Note Investors") in accordance with those certain Convertible Note Purchase Agreements between the Company and the Note Investors dated April 3, 2013, have either (i) been converted in full or in part by the Note Investors into shares of common stock of the Company, (ii) the Note Investors have sold or assigned all or a part of their Convertible Promissory Notes to third parties, or (iii) the Note Investors have been paid in full or in part. The Holder will only be permitted to convert such number of Series D Preferred Stock equal to the pro rata amount of the Convertible Promissory Notes converted, assigned or paid. In the event the Note Investors agree in writing that these restrictions may be terminated, then the Holder will be entitled to convert the Series D Preferred Stock at the Holder’s election and the above restrictions will be null and void. Additionally, Holder may not convert the Series D Preferred Stock until the ten day average daily trading volume is greater than $20,000.
In the event the Holder terminates its consulting agreement or violates a non-compete covenant, then the Series D Preferred Shares shall be returned to the Company for cancellation and the Company shall be obligated on the Debt. As the Series D Preferred Stock is conditionally redeemable, the Company has recorded the Series D Preferred Stock as mezzanine equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
The Company has 447,804 and 447,804 undesignated blank check preferred stock, $0.001 par value, authorized as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. The preferred shares are to be issued in such series and to have such rights, preferences, and designation as determine by the Board of Directors of the Company.
Common Stock
The Company has a total of 950,000,000 shares of authorized common shares. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, 533,781,064 and 537,398,549 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.
Stock activity during 2016
On or about August 26, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a stock repurchase program, whereby the Company is authorized to purchase shares of its common stock with a value of up to $500,000 in open market transactions at the discretion of management. Through the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company repurchased a total of 3,617,485 shares for $333,952. As of March 31, 2016, the Board of Directions of the Company retired all 3,617,485 shares held in treasury.
Stock activity during 2015
In January 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to a party for services with a total value $90,000.
F-14 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
In March 2015, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock and warrant for 2,500,000 shares of common stock one of the Company’s directors for legal services rendered with a total value of $160,000.
In May 2015, the Company awarded 250,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for services rendered with a total value of $18,000 which such shares were issued in July 2015.
In May 2015, the Company issued 625,000 shares of common stock for satisfaction of an accrued liability for legal services previously rendered in 2014 with a total value of $69,000.
In June 2015, the Company awarded 3,000,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for services rendered with a total value of $180,000 which such shares were issued in July 2015.
In June 2015, the Company awarded all members of the Company’s board of director’s stock options for 500,000 shares each for a total of 3,000,000 shares, with an exercise price of $0.05 per share with a 10 year life. The stock options awarded totaled $137,000 which the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the compensation expense for the option grants using the following inputs: exercise price of $0.05 per share, risk free rate of 2.0%, volatility of 149% and zero dividends.
On August 7, 2015, holders of convertible notes payable in the aggregate of $896,000 elected to convert the entire balance of the convertible notes. As a result, the Company recorded a stock payable of $896,000 for the 10,285,714 shares of common stock owed to the convertible note holders and extinguish both the $600,000 face value of the convertible notes and $296,000 of original debt discount. In November 2015, the Company had issued 15,045,513 shares of common stock related to the stock payable.
On or about August 26, 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a stock repurchase program, whereby the Company is authorized to purchase shares of its common stock with a value of up to $500,000 in open market transactions at the discretion of management. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company repurchased 3,556,148 shares, for a total cost of $330,000. As of December 31, 2015, $164,000 was available to be repurchased under the authorized program. Treasury shares totaling 3,556,148 are being held in treasury until such time as they are reissued or retired, at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
On November 11, 2015, an option holder exercised his option to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock for total cash proceeds of $6,000.
F-15 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
Options
In 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (the "2000 Plan"). The 2000 Plan authorizes the issuance of options, right to purchase Common Stock and stock bonuses to officers, employees, directors and consultants. The Company reserved 30,000,000 shares of common Stock for awards to be made under the 2000 Plan.
On September 14, 2001, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8 to register 900,000 of these shares. On November 19, 2001, an additional 550,000 shares of common stock were registered for issuance under the 2000 Plan. On January 30, 2002, an additional 975,000 shares of common stock were registered for issuance under the 2000 Plan. On March 22, 2002, an additional 925,000 shares of common stock were registered for issuance under the 2000 Plan. On July 12, 2002, an additional 990,000 shares of common stock were registered for issuance under the 2000 Plan. On January 17, 2003, the Company registered an additional 8,000,000 of common stock for issuance under the 2000 Plan.
The 2000 Plan is administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors or, if no committee is appointed, then by the Board of Directors. The 2000 Plan allows for the issuance of incentive stock options (which, pursuant to Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, can only be granted to employees), non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, or stock bonuses. The committee, or the Board of Directors if there is no committee, determines the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term, which may be no more than ten years, terms and conditions of exercisability and methods of exercise. Options must vest within ten-years. Under the 2000 Plan, the exercise price may not be less than fair market value on the date of grant for the incentive stock options. The 2000 Plan also allows for the granting of Stock Appreciation Rights. No Stock Appreciation Rights have been granted. The number of shares under the 2000 Plan available for grant at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was 18,869,763 and 18,869,763.
In November 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2004 Consultant Stock Plan (the "2004 Plan"). The purpose of this 2004 Consultant Stock Plan is to advance the Company’s interests by helping the Company obtain and retain the services of persons providing consulting services upon whose judgment, initiative, efforts and/or services we are substantially dependent, by offering to or providing those persons with incentives or inducements affording such persons an opportunity to become owners of our capital stock. The Company reserved 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2004 Plan. A registration statement on Form S-8 was filed with the SEC on November 26, 2004 to register the shares underlying the 2004 plan. The 2004 Plan is administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors or, if no committee is appointed, then by the Board of Directors. The committee or the Board of Directors if there is no committee, determines who is eligible to receive awards under the plan, grant awards and interpret the 2004 Plan. The number of shares under the 2004 Plan available for grant at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was 500,000.
On May 9, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Equity Compensation Plan (the "2005 Plan"). The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentives to attract, retain and motivate eligible persons whose present and potential contributions are important to our success, by offering them an opportunity to participate in the Company’s future performance through awards of Options, the right to purchase Common Stock and Stock Bonuses. The Company reserved 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock for awards to be made under the 2005 Plan. The 2005 Plan is administered by a committee of two or more members of the Board of Directors or, if no committee is appointed, then by the Board of Directors. The committee or the Board of Directors if there is no committee, determines who is eligible to receive awards under the plan, grant awards and interpret the 2005 Plan. A registration statement on Form S-8 was filed with the SEC on June 8, 2005 to register the shares underlying the 2005 plan. The number of shares under the 2005 Plan available for grant at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was -0-.
In January 2015, our Board of Directors adopted the 2015 Incentive Stock Plan (the "2015 Plan"). The purpose of this Plan is to provide incentive stock options (which, pursuant to Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, can only be granted to employees), non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock awards, or stock bonuses. The committee, or the Board of Directors if there is no committee, determines the type of option granted, the exercise price, the option term, which may be no more than ten years, terms and conditions of exercisability and methods of exercise. Options must vest within ten-years. Under the 2015 Plan, the exercise price may not be less than fair market value on the date of grant for the incentive stock options. The 2015 Plan also allows for the granting of Stock Appreciation Rights. No Stock Appreciation Rights have been granted. The number of shares under the 2015 Plan available for grant at December 31, 2016 and 2015 was 4,000,000.
F-16 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
Set forth in the table below is information regarding awards made through compensation plans or arrangements through December 31, 2016, the most recently completed fiscal year.
At December 31, 2016, the 48,805,000 outstanding options had an aggregate intrinsic value of $1,959,000.
Equity Compensation Plan Information | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Plan category |
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) |
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
|
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
| |||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
23,369,763 |
|
Total |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
23,369,763 |
|
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information is as follows:
|
|
Number of Options |
|
|
Exercise Price Per Share |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Number of Options Exercisable |
| ||||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 |
|
|
40,480,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,480,000 |
| ||
Granted |
|
|
3,575,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
|
3,575,000 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,200,000 | ) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200,000 | ) |
Expired |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 |
|
|
42,855,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,855,000 |
|
Granted |
|
|
5,950,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.06 |
|
|
$ | 0.04 |
|
|
|
5,950,000 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 |
|
|
48,805,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,805,000 |
|
F-17 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
Exercise prices and weighted-average contractual lives of 48,805,000 stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
| |||||||||||||
Exercise Price |
|
|
Number Outstanding |
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Number Exercisable |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| ||||||
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
$ | 0.01 |
|
|
|
25,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.01 |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
|
7.87 |
|
|
$ | 0.06 |
|
|
|
2,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.06 |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
|
9,250,000 |
|
|
|
4.31 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
|
|
9,250,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
|
|
575,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
$ | 0.14 |
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.14 |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
|
|
$ | 0.26 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.26 |
|
The fair value of options granted were determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Warrants:
The Company issued the following warrants at the corresponding weighted average exercise price as of December 31, 2016.
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
Weighted average Exercise Price |
| ||
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014 |
|
|
25,243,182 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
Issued/Vested |
|
|
3,700,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.11 |
|
Cancelled/Expired |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015 |
|
|
28,943,182 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
Issued/Vested |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Exercised |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cancelled/Expired |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
| |
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 |
|
|
28,943,182 |
|
|
$ | 0.07 |
|
Date |
|
Number of Warrants |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Life Remaining |
|
Number of Shares Exercisable |
| |||
April 2012 |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.8 year |
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
January 2014 |
|
|
909,091 |
|
|
$ | 0.09 |
|
|
2.1 year |
|
|
909,091 |
|
February 2014 |
|
|
9,125,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
|
2.1years |
|
|
9,125,000 |
|
March 2014 |
|
|
909,091 |
|
|
$ | 0.09 |
|
|
2.2 years |
|
|
909,091 |
|
August 2014 |
|
|
800,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.08 |
|
|
2.7 years |
|
|
800,000 |
|
November 2014 |
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.11 |
|
|
2.9 years |
|
|
7,500,000 |
|
March 2015 |
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.12 |
|
|
3.2 years |
|
|
2,500,000 |
|
July 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.5 years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
August 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.6 years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
September 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.7 years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
October 2015 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ | 0.05 |
|
|
3.8 years |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,943,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,943,182 |
|
The fair value of warrants granted were determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
F-18 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes on the statements of operations consists of $-0- and $-0- for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Deferred tax assets are comprised of the following at December 31:
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
| ||
Net operating loss carryforward |
|
$ | 10,564,000 |
|
|
$ | 8,216,800 |
|
Temporary differences |
|
|
6,688,000 |
|
|
|
6,592,000 |
|
Less valuation allowance |
|
|
(17,252,000 | ) |
|
|
(14,808,800 | ) |
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Deferred taxes arise from temporary differences in the recognition of certain expenses for tax and financial reporting purposes. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, management determined that realization of these benefits is not assured and has provided a valuation allowance for the entire amount of such benefits. At December 31, 2016 and 2015, net operating loss carryforwards were approximately $43,347,000 and $37,239,000, respectively, for federal tax purposes that expire at various dates through 2031 and for state tax purposes expire through 2025.
Utilization of net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to substantial annual limitations due to the “change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state regulations. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of substantial net operating loss carryforwards before utilization.
For December 31, 2016 and 2015, the provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate (40% in 2016 and 2015) to income taxes as follows:
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
| ||
Tax benefit computed at 40% |
|
$ | 96,000 |
|
|
$ | 434,000 |
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
2,347,200 |
|
|
|
3,204,800 |
|
Change in carryovers and tax attributes |
|
|
(2,443,200 | ) |
|
|
(3,638,800 | ) |
Income tax provision |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS
Operating Leases
The Company’s principal executive offices in New York are leased on a month to month basis for $500 per month. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, rent expense was $6,000, and $6,000 respectively.
Litigation
The Company is subject from time to time to litigation, claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company was not party to any material litigation, claims or suit whose outcome could have material effect to the financial statements.
During February 2016, a former employer of one or our employees filed a suit in Circuit Court for Montgomery County against the former employee claiming breach of restrictive covenants of an employment agreement. The employee has defended themselves against the claim and the court has not enforced the terms of the agreement against our employee with the court ruling that the former employer has failed to show that it is likely to succeed on the merits of its claim.
F-19 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
License Agreement
As discussed in Note 1, the Company entered into a patent license agreement with Los Alamos National Security LLC for the exclusive use of certain technology relating to the manufacture and application of nanostructuring metals and alloys. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company may be required to pay royalties, as defined, to the licensors. The license rights also require the Company to meet certain milestones. Twelve months from the effective date of the license rights agreement Manhattan will initiate negotiations with at least five companies regarding manufacture and distribution of licensed products. Within twenty-four months Manhattan will establish capability for manufacturing a licensed product in New Mexico and within thirty-six months Manhattan will either manufacture a licensed product or close a sublicense agreement, or initiate a request for required government approval for a licensed product.
Metallicum, Inc.
In June 2008, the Company completed the purchase of Metallicum, Inc., a privately held research and development company of nano-structured materials, by acquiring all of the outstanding capital stock of Metallicum, Inc. for a total purchase price of $305,000. In connection with the Metallicum acquisition, the Company has agreed to pay additional consideration in future periods, based upon the attainment by the acquired entity of defined operating objectives. In accordance with FASB ASC 805, the Company does not accrue contingent consideration obligations prior to the attainment of the objectives. At December 31, 2016, maximum potential future consideration pursuant to such arrangements, to be resolved over the following years, is the potential issuance of 15 million restricted shares of the Company’s common stock having a current approximate value of $1,050,000. Any such payments would result in increases in intangible assets.
The required milestones for the issuance of these contingent shares are as follows:
|
1. |
Metallicum is granted an exclusive license by The Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) on patent numbers U.S.7152448, U.S.6399215 and U.S. 6197129 related to nanostructured materials. |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Metallicum sells nanostructured titanium to a partner or customer company which manufactures and sells in the United States a nonostructured titanium product which receives, if required, FDA approval. |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Metallicum, with purchaser’s cooperation, develops and submits U.S. patent applications to protect the current titanium nanostructuring technology for dental implants and additional medical device applications |
|
|
|
|
4. |
Metallicum secures commercial contracts for, in purchaser’s reasonable good faith judgment, material sales of nanostructured metal with at least two customers. |
Upon achieving milestones 1 and 2 Metallicum will receive 6,000,000 shares of common stock. Upon achieving each milestone 3, 4 and 5 Metallicum shareholders will receive 3,000,000 shares of common stock for each milestone reached. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has so far only achieved milestone 1.
Institut Straumann AG
In January 2013, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with a party granting certain licensing rights to the Company's nanostructured metal technology. Pursuant to the party is obligated to pay the Company in accordance with the following schedule: $180,000 during January 2013; $30,000 by June 1, 2013; $30,000 by December 31, 2013; $30,000 by December 1, 2014; and $30,000 upon commercial launch by the party or the latest December 1, 2015, which final payment has not been received. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded the receipt of $0 as revenue.
In November 2015, the Company entered into a Material Transfer Agreement with a party in the dental implant business, whereby the Company will apply its technology for use in sample materials the party provided to MSI. Pursuant to the Agreement, party is obligated to pay MSI in accordance with the following schedule: $30,000 within 7 days of execution of the Agreement; $14,000 within 7 days of delivery of the Material from the first iteration; and the final $14,000 within 7 days of delivery of the Material from the second iteration. Through the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, MSI earned $105,000 and $30,000, respectively, and recorded such amount as revenue.
F-20 |
Table of Contents |
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015
NOTE 8 – TECHNOLOGY SALE AND SUB-LICENSE AGREEMENT
On September 12, 2009, the Company entered into a contract with Carpenter Technology Corp. to sell certain nanostructured metal technologies acquired from Metallicum, Inc, its wholly owned subsidiary, to Carpenter and to provide sub-license rights to Carpenter covering license agreements that the Company has from Los Alamos Laboratories. The agreement has two distinct elements: a sale and services agreement and a sub-license agreement. The first element irrevocably transfers the field technology to Carpenter Technology Corporation and Carpenter many develop or use the technology for its own benefit. Carpenter agrees to pay a sales price of $600,000 and pay royalties for products developed using this technology. In addition, the Company can receive additional service income for assisting Carpenter in the production process. These additional services are elective and do not affect the sale of the technology. The second element of the agreement is a sub-license to Carpenter for patents (the LANL patents) that are licensed by the Company from Los Alamos Laboratories. The sub-license agreement obligates Carpenter to pay MSI a running royalty on the sales of products that require license to the LANL patents but does not have any upfront fee or annual minimum royalties.
The Company recognized the sales revenue upon transfer of the technology and the service income over the term of the agreement. The royalty income will be recognized as products are developed using the field technology or sub-license.
For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company earned $0 and $64,000, respectively, and recorded such amount as revenue. The amount received by the Company relates to services provided under the first element of the contract regarding additional services. The Company earned service income for time that a consultant to the Company, Dr. Lowe, made himself available to Carpenter in accordance with the Technology Transfer Agreement. The fees earned pursuant to the agreement with Carpenter are being proportionately recognized as revenue based upon the total fees to be collected over a 42 month period. The 42 month period is based on the time periods described in the Agreement (6 months after effective date), (12 months after effective date), and (each of the first 3 anniversaries of Annuity date where the “Annuity date” is the date of the latter of 18 months after the effective date or the date Manhattan Scientific fully satisfies its duties under of the Agreement).
In January 2013, the Company entered into a licensing agreement with a party granting certain licensing rights to the Company's nanostructured metal technology. As consideration: the Company received $180,000 in January 2013, and will receive $30,000 by June 1, 2013; $30,000 by December 31, 2013; $30,000 by December 1, 2014; and $30,000 upon commercial launch by the party or the latest December 1, 2015. For the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded the receipt of $0 as revenue.
NOTE 9 – SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASES
On February 11, 2015, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Releases (the "Settlement Agreement") with Carpenter Technology Corporation related to the agreement discussed in Note 8, pursuant to which the parties settled and released each other from any and all liabilities and claims related to the Carpenter Agreements.
Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement and as consideration for the full and final settlement and satisfaction of all claims that the Company has or could assert against Carpenter in connection with the Carpenter Agreements, Carpenter will: (1) pay the Company $8,000,000 within 10 days from the date of the Settlement Agreement; (2) transfer and/or assign to the Company all physical and intellectual property which was the subject matter of the Carpenter Agreements free and clear of all liens and encumbrances; (3) provide the Company with follow on technical assistance; and (4) provide the Company with a complete list of all customers and contacts for same related to the technology which was the subject matter of the Carpenter Agreements. In addition, under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, neither party may disparage the other and the Carpenter Agreements were terminated and rendered null and void. As of the date this filing, the Company has received the $8,000,000 portion of the Settlement Agreement, including the physical and intellectual property. The Company has obtained an independent valuation on the physical property, estimated at $6,938,000, as follows:
|
|
Appraised |
| |
|
|
Fair Value |
| |
Operating & spare dies for 2A |
|
$ | 24,000 |
|
Gen 2B die set |
|
|
35,000 |
|
Operating & spare dies for 2B |
|
|
65,000 |
|
Lube and colling skid for 2C |
|
|
40,000 |
|
Furnace 2C Cell |
|
|
97,000 |
|
ECAP 2 Machine |
|
|
675,000 |
|
ECAP 2A Machine |
|
|
675,000 |
|
ECAP 2B Machine |
|
|
1,825,000 |
|
EcAP 2C Machine |
|
|
3,502,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total appraised asset fair value |
|
$ | 6,938,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(520,000 | ) |
Appraised fair value, net |
|
$ | 6,418,000 |
|
F-21 |
Table of Contents |
The Company has recorded income on the appraised value of the physical property totaling $6,938,000 and $8,000,000 cash consideration received as a Gain on Settlement Agreement totaling $14,938,000. The Company has not obtained a valuation report with respect to the value of the intellectual property transferred in this transaction.
During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company changed the accounting treatment of the depreciable life of the transferred assets from a 5-year to a 10-year useful life. Its reason for doing so was that the appraiser of the assets estimated the useful life of the assets to be at least 10 years. The change in useful life is reflected on a retroactive basis, the cumulative effect of which resulted in a decrease in depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation of $520,000 during the year ended December 31, 2015. This also resulted in an increase in earnings per share (basic) of $0.01 during the year ended December 31, 2015.
NOTE 10 – IMAGION BIOSYSTEMS SPIN-OUT
On November 17, 2016, Senior Scientific, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into Imagion Biosystems, Inc., a Nevada company (“Imagion”). Following the merger, Imagion held all of the liabilities, obligations and assets of Senior Scientific and the Company continued as the sole equity holder of Imagion.
On November 22, 2016, Imagion issued a Promissory Note in the principal amount of $6,900,000 to the Company (the “Intercompany Note”) payable on the one year anniversary. The Intercompany Note does not accrue interest, provided, however, in the event of a default, interest shall accrue at 10% per annum. Upon the completion of the partial buyout and replacement of the Senior Notes (issued by Imagion during 2014 and 2013, as set forth in Note 4, above) held by the Senior Lenders, as set forth in the Spinout Approval, the Intercompany Note shall automatically be equal to $250,000 (the “Minimum Principal Balance”) plus $1. All obligations of Imagion to the Company under the Intercompany Note shall be subordinate to all obligations of Imagion under the Convertible Notes (together with any replacement notes issued therefor) issued by Imagion or its predecessor. Further, upon the approval of the registration statement for Imagion’s Initial Public Offering (the “Effective Date”), Imagion shall convert the principal and interest in excess of the Minimum Principal Balance for shares of Imagion’s common stock equal to the amount of shares that would cause the sum of (a) all shares of Imagion’s common stock issued to the Company prior to the Effective Date and (b) all shares of Imagion’s common stock issued to the Company upon conversion of the Intercompany Note, to equal 50.1% of Imagion’s total number of common shares issued or issuable on a fully diluted basis; provided, however, if the preceding sum is greater than 50.1% of Imagion’s total number of common shares issued or issuable on a fully diluted basis, the excess balance shall be converted into one share of Imagion’s common stock. Upon the completion of the Imagion’s Initial Public Offering, Imagion shall convert the Minimum Principal Balance and all other amounts due for interest for shares of Imagion’s common stock at a price per share equal to the price paid by investors in Imagion’s Initial Public Offering; provided, however, Imagion may, at its discretion, pay the Company the Minimum Principal Balance and all other amounts due in cash.
On November 1, 2016, the Company, Senior Scientific and the Senior Lenders entered into a Spinout Approval whereby the Senior Lenders approved the merger of Senior Scientific into Imagion. Further, the Senior Lenders have agreed that upon receipt of an aggregate payment of $2,000,000 by Imagion to the Senior Lenders, the Senior Notes shall be amended, restated and replaced by a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Replacement Notes”) in an amount equal to all amounts owed under the Senior Notes less $2,000,000. The Replacement Notes shall continue to be guaranteed by the Company and the collateral securing the Senior Notes. Further, the Senior Notes maturity date was extended to April 3, 2018.
NOTE 11 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management has evaluated subsequent events through the date these financial statement were available to be issued and there were no material subsequent events to disclose, except as described below.
On January 9, 2017, Imagion, MHTX and (the “Interim Investor #3”) entered into a Note Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Interim Investor #3 invested $65,000 in consideration of Promissory Notes issued by Imagion (the “Interim Imagion Note”) payable on the one year anniversary. The Interim Investor or other investors may invest up to a total of $500,000 under the Note Purchase Agreement. The Interim Imagion Note accrues interest at the rate of 8% per annum, provided, however, in the event of a default, interest shall accrue at 10% per annum. The Interim Imagion Note is subordinate to the Senior Notes. The Company, Imagion and the Interim Investor #3 also entered an Irrevocable Proxy as well as a Voting Agreement whereby the Company granted the Interim Investors a right to vote its Imagion shares to carry out the spinout plan and the parties agreed to vote their Imagion shares to provide for one director of Imagion to be appointed by the Company and four directors to be appointed by the Interim Investors. During January 2017, the amounts loaned were $65,000.
During the two months ended February 28, 2017, Imagion raised a total of approximately $2.7 million from investors for 62 million shares of common stock.
On February 2, 2017, Imagion repaid a total of $2 million of debt to three lenders and the remaining balance of $500,000 was renegotiated and replaced with three new convertible promissory notes. The notes bear interest at 8% per annum with default interest at 10% per annum. The notes are due in February 2019 with a balloon payment of principal and accrued interest. In addition, at the close of the initial public offering (“IPO”) the note will automatically convert into shares of common stock at the conversion price equal to the price per share paid by investors in the IPO and any accrued interest will be paid in cash.
F-22 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
None
ITEM 9T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our principal executive and principal financial officers have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a – 15(e) and 15d – 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act") that arc designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required under the SEC's rules and forms and that the information is gathered and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(t) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
1. | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; |
|
|
|
|
2. | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with the authorization of our management and directors; and |
|
|
|
|
3. | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015. Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting as a result of the identified material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below. In making this assessment, management used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company's internal control system, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication. and (v) monitoring.
21 |
Table of Contents |
Identified Material Weakness
A material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement or the financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
Management identified the following material weakness during its assessment of internal controls over financial reporting as or December 31, 2016:
Resources: As of December 31, 2016, we had one full-time employee in general management and no full-time employees with the requisite expertise in the key functional areas of finance and accounting. As a result, there is a lack of proper segregation of duties necessary to insure that all transactions are accounted for accurately and in a timely manner.
Written Policies & Procedures: We need to prepare written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting to establish a formal process to close our books monthly on an accrual basis and account for all transactions, including equity transactions, and prepare, review and submit SEC filings in a timely manner.
Audit Committee: We do not have, and are not required, to have an audit committee. An audit committee would improve oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures.
Management's Remediation Initiatives
We plan to prepare written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting to establish a formal process to close our books monthly on an accrual basis and account for all transactions, including equity transactions. We also plan to add an audit committee financial expert to our board and create an audit committee made up of our independent directors.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during this fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to have a materially affect, on our internal control over financial reporting.
On November 22, 2016, Larry H. Schatz, a member of the board of directors of Manhattan Scientifics, resigned from the board of directors.
Senior Scientific, a wholly owned subsidiary of Manhattan Scientifics, merged with and into Imagion on November 17, 2016. Following the merger, Imagion held all of the liabilities, obligations and assets of Senior Scientific and Manhattan Scientifics continued as the sole equity holder of Imagion. During the two months ended February 28, 2017, Imagion raised a total of approximately $2.7 million from investors for 62 million shares of common stock. Manhattan Scientifics presently owns approximately 50.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of Imagion.
On November 22, 2016, Imagion issued a Promissory Note in the principal amount of $6,900,000 to Manhattan Scientifics (the “Intercompany Note”) payable on the one year anniversary. The Intercompany Note does not accrue interest, provided, however, in the event of a default, interest shall accrue at 10% per annum. Upon the completion of the partial buyout and replacement of the Senior Notes (as defined below) held by the Senior Lenders (as defined below) as set forth in the Spinout Approval, the Intercompany Note shall automatically be equal to $250,000 (the “Minimum Principal Balance”) plus $1. All obligations of Imagion to Manhattan Scientifics under the Intercompany Note shall be subordinate to all obligations of Imagion under the Convertible Notes (together with any replacement notes issued therefor, the “Senior Notes”) issued by Imagion or its predecessor to Raymond A. Mason, William B. Jones, and Ferdinand J. Crovato Trust (together, the “Senior Lenders”). Further, upon the approval of the registration statement for Imagion’s Initial Public Offering (the “Effective Date”), Imagion shall convert the principal and interest in excess of the Minimum Principal Balance for shares of Imagion’s common stock equal to the amount of shares that would cause the sum of (a) all shares of Imagion’s common stock issued to Manhattan Scientifics prior to the Effective Date and (b) all shares of Imagion’s common stock issued to Manhattan Scientifics upon conversion of the Intercompany Note, to equal 50.1% of Imagion’s total number of common shares issued or issuable on a fully diluted basis; provided, however, if the preceding sum is greater than 50.1% of Imagion’s total number of common shares issued or issuable on a fully diluted basis, the excess balance shall be converted into one share of Imagion’s common stock. Upon the completion of the Imagion’s Initial Public Offering, Imagion shall convert the Minimum Principal Balance and all other amounts due for interest for shares of Imagion’s common stock at a price per share equal to the price paid by investors in Imagion’s Initial Public Offering; provided, however, Imagion may, at its discretion, pay Manhattan Scientifics the Minimum Principal Balance and all other amounts due in cash.
22 |
Table of Contents |
On November 1, 2016, Manhattan Scientifics, Senior Scientific and the Senior Lenders entered into a Spinout Approval whereby the Senior Lenders approved the merger of Senior Scientific into Imagion. Further, the Senior Lenders have agreed that upon receipt of an aggregate payment of $2,000,000 by Imagion to the Senior Lenders, the Senior Notes shall be amended, restated and replaced by a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Replacement Notes”) in an amount equal to all amounts owed under the Senior Notes less $2,000,000. The Replacement Notes shall continue to be guaranteed by Manhattan Scientifics and the collateral securing the Senior Notes. Further, the Senior Notes maturity date was extended to April 3, 2018.
On November 10, 2016, Imagion, Manhattan Scientifics and Robert Romeo Proulx and Tracey Jane Proulx Revocable Trust (the “Interim Investor”) entered into a Note Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Interim Investor invested $100,000 in consideration of Promissory Notes issued by Imagion (the “Interim Imagion Note”) payable on the one year anniversary. The Interim Investor or other investors may invest up to a total of $500,000 under the Note Purchase Agreement. The Interim Imagion Note accrues interest at the rate of 8% per annum, provided, however, in the event of a default, interest shall accrue at 10% per annum. The Interim Imagion Note is subordinate to the Senior Notes. Manhattan Scientifics, Imagion and the Interim Investor also entered an Irrevocable Proxy as well as a Voting Agreement whereby Manhattan Scientifics granted the Interim Investors a right to vote its Imagion shares to carry out the spinout plan and the parties agreed to vote their Imagion shares to provide for one director of Imagion to be appointed by Manhattan Scientifics and four directors to be appointed by the Interim Investors.
On February 16, 2017 (the “Dismissal Date”), Manhattan Scientifics advised RBSM LLP (the “Former Auditor”) that it was dismissed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The decision to dismiss the Former Auditor as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on February 16, 2017. The report of the Former Auditor on the Company’s financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and such reports were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and through the Dismissal Date, the Company has not had any disagreements with the Former Auditor on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the Former Auditor’s satisfaction, would have caused them to make reference thereto in their reports on the Company’s financial statements for such years. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015 and through the Dismissal Date, there were no reportable events, as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
On February 15, 2017 (the “Engagement Date”), the Company engaged AMC Auditing Inc. (“New Auditor”) as its independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. The decision to engage the New Auditor as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.
During the two most recent fiscal years and through the Engagement Date, the Company has not consulted with the New Auditor regarding either:
|
1. |
application of accounting principles to any specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report was provided to the Company nor oral advice was provided that the New Auditor concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or |
2. |
any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and the related instructions) or reportable event (as defined in Regulation S-K, Item 304(a)(1)(v)). |
23 |
Table of Contents |
The names, ages and biographical information of each of our directors and executive officers as of March 30, 2017 are set forth below. There are no existing family relationships between or among any of our executive officers or directors.
NAME |
|
AGE |
|
POSITION |
| ||||
Emmanuel Tsoupanarias |
|
64 |
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Leonard Friedman |
|
79 |
|
Secretary and Director |
Frank Georgiou |
|
66 |
|
Director |
Chris Theoharis |
|
64 |
|
Director |
Marvin Maslow |
|
79 |
|
Director |
Members of the Board serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified. Officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the Board. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or officers.
None of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:
|
· |
been convicted in a criminal proceeding and none of our directors or executive officers is subject to a pending criminal proceeding, |
|
· |
been subject to any order, judgment, or decree not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities or banking activities, or |
|
· |
been found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated. |
EMMANUEL TSOUPANARIAS has served as our chief executive officer and chairman of the Board since November 1, 2007. Mr. Tsoupanarias is the president, founder and editor of FuelCellsWorks.com, a weekly trade publication that has become the voice of the fuel cell industry. He is internationally recognized as an expert in fuel cell development. Prior to his tenure at FuelCellsWorks.com, Mr. Tsoupanarias was an executive in the power generation manufacturing sector. From 1992 to 2007 Mr. Tsoupanarias has served as a Project Manager in the power generation sector and from 2000 has served as a consultant in the fuel cell industry. His technical and engineering background and his 7-year tenure as the Company’s CEO qualify him for the Company’s Board.
LEONARD FRIEDMAN has served as a director since October 2007. Mr. Friedman is an honors graduate of Hunter College with a B.S. degree in economics and a minor in accounting. He is also a graduate of Brooklyn Law School. Mr. Friedman was a founder and partner in the law firm of Anes, Friedman, Leventhal & Rubin from which he retired in 2000. Until 2002, he was CEO of Fiasco of New York, Inc., a restaurant and real estate corporation that owned and operated eight restaurants in New York and California. Mr. Friedman’s legal knowledge, managerial experience and knowledge of the Company qualify him to serve on the Company’s Board.
FRANK GEORGIOU has served as a director since October 2007. Since 1993, Mr. Georgiou has been the President of Three Diamond Diner Corp., a private company that owns and operates the Mount Kisco Coach Diner. He is the former President of the Upper New York Pangregorian, a consortium of restaurant owners. Mr. Georgiou’s business experience as president of a private company is valuable to the Company’s Board.
24 |
Table of Contents |
CHRIS THEOHARIS has served as a director since October 2007. Since 2003, Mr. Theoharis has worked as a consultant, both advising companies on small business acquisitions and business practices in the retail industry. Mr. Theoharis has also served as a consultant to Maximum Quality Foods Inc. and Vested Business Brokers. Prior to his work in the consulting industry, he worked as a stockbroker and financial advisor for Morgan Stanley from 1996 to 2003, leaving Morgan Stanley as an Associate Vice President. Mr. Theoharis has also worked for a public accounting firm. He graduated from Adelphi University in 1970 with a B.B.A. in Accounting. Mr. Theoharis’s accounting and finance knowledge qualify him as a member of the Company’s Board.
MARVIN MASLOW served as the CEO of Manhattan Scientifics from January 1998 until November 2007. On March 13, 2015, Mr. Maslow was appointed as a director of the Company. From June 1990 through September 1996, Mr. Maslow served as chief executive officer of Projectavision, Inc., a company he co-founded to develop and market video projection technology. For more than 20 years, Mr. Maslow has been President of Normandie Capital Corp., a private investment and consulting company. Mr. Maslow is credited with the starting up and financing of more than 20 enterprises during his career. Mr. Maslow received an A.A.S. degree from the Rochester Institute of Technology in 1957 and an honorable discharge from the U.S. Army Signal Corps in 1963. Mr. Maslow serves as a paid consultant to the Company, attends board meetings and serves as a special advisor to the Board of Directors. He also serves as a Manager of the Company’s Senior Scientifics LLC subsidiary.
SECCTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock to file reports of ownership and change in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the exchange on which the common stock is listed for trading. Executive officers, directors and more than ten percent stockholders are required by regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports filed. Based solely on our review of copies of the Section 16(a) reports filed for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, we believe that our executive officers, directors and ten percent stockholders complied with all reporting requirements applicable to them.
CODE OF ETHICS
On March 31, 2005, we adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Company’s Code of Ethics can be viewed on our website at www.mhtx.com/code-of-ethics.htm or obtained free of charge by sending a written request to the attention of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Emmanuel Tsoupanarias at The Chrysler Building, 405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York, 10174.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire Board of Directors of the Company acts as the audit committee. The Board of Directors of the Company has determined that it does not have an "audit committee financial expert" as such term is defined in the rules adopted by the SEC requiring companies to disclose whether or not at least one member of the audit committee is an "audit committee financial expert." The Board of Directors believes that the aggregate technical, commercial and financial experience of its members, together with their knowledge of the Company, provides the Board with the ability to monitor and direct the goals of the Company and to protect the best interests of its shareholders. Four of the five members of the Board of Directors are "independent," as that term is defined in Section 10A(m) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the members' independence qualifies it to monitor the performance of management, the public disclosures by the Company of its financial condition and performance, the Company's internal accounting operations and its independent auditors. In addition, the Board of Directors is authorized to engage independent financial consultants, auditors and counsel whenever it believes it is necessary and appropriate.
25 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following tables set forth all compensation awarded by us to our executive officers for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. Other than the Employment Agreement entered into between the Company and Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, our CEO, we do not have employment agreements with any of our other officers.
Name |
|
Year |
|
Salary ($) |
|
|
Bonus ($) |
|
|
Stock Awards ($) |
|
|
Option Awards ($) |
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
|
|
Changes in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) |
|
|
All Other Compensation ($) |
|
|
Total ($) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Emmanuel Tsoupanarias |
|
2016 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
CEO and Chairman |
|
2015 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
173,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Proulx President of |
|
2016 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Imagion |
|
2015 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Prior to entering an Employment Agreement with the Company On March 28, 2013, Mr. Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, our Chief Executive Officer, did not have an employment agreement. His salary, was originally set at $100,000, was set by the Board of Directors in 2007. Pursuant to his Employment Agreement, Mr. Tsoupanarias shall receive an annual salary of $150,000 and additional cash incentive consideration as determined by the Board for a term of five years.
The independent members of the Company’s board of directors, acting as a compensation committee, reviewed the compensation policies and practices relating to the compensation provided to the Company’s employees to determine whether such policies and practices are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. Based on the review and the compensation paid by the Company to its only employee, the Company determined that any risks associated with the Company’s compensation practices were not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
On March 28, 2013, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, our CEO. The agreement is for a term of five years and Mr. Tsoupanarias shall receive an annual salary of $150,000 per year and additional cash incentive consideration as determined by the Board. In the event the employment agreement is terminated by the Company without cause, then the Mr. Tsoupanarias shall receive 50% of the base salary remaining on the term and all options and other securities he would have been entitled to for an additional three months shall vest.
Director Compensation
For the year ended December 31, 2016, for their service as directors, each of the directors received $10,000 in fees.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Our entire board currently acts as our compensation committee. Emmanuel Tsoupanarias is the sole executive officer of our company. No member of the compensation committee is employed by or serving as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our board.
26 |
Table of Contents |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS
Name |
|
Grant Date |
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Warrants (#) Exercisable |
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Warrants (#) Unexercisable (1) |
|
Warrant Exercise Price ($) |
|
Warrant Expiration Date |
|||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, Chairman and CEO |
|
08/5/2011 |
|
6,000,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.070 |
|
08/5/2021 |
||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Emmanuel Tsoupanarias, Chairman and CEO |
|
06/30/2014 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.140 |
|
06/30/2024 |
||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Larry Schatz, Former Director |
|
03/31/2014 |
|
2,000,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.055 |
|
03/31/2024 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Frank Georgiou, Director |
|
06/30/2014 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.140 |
|
06/30/2024 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Chris Theoharis, Director |
|
06/30/2014 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.140 |
|
06/30/2024 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Leonard Friedman, Director |
|
06/30/2014 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.140 |
|
06/30/2024 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Larry Schatz, Former Director |
|
06/30/2014 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.140 |
|
06/30/2024 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Marvin Maslow, Director |
|
06/30/2014 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.140 |
|
06/30/2024 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard Friedman, Director |
|
06/30/2015 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
06/30/2025 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Larry Schatz, Former Director |
|
06/30/2015 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
06/30/2025 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Marvin Maslow, Director |
|
06/30/2015 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
06/30/2025 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Saraklis, Inc. (Emmanuel Tsoupanarias) |
|
06/30/2015 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
06/30/2025 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Frank Georgiou, Director |
|
06/30/2015 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
06/30/2025 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Chris Theoharis, Director |
|
06/30/2015 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
06/30/2025 |
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leonard Friedman, Director |
|
06/30/2016 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
06/30/2026 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Larry Schatz, Former Director |
|
06/30/2016 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
06/30/2026 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Marvin Maslow, Director |
|
06/30/2016 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
06/30/2026 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Saraklis, Inc. (Emmanuel Tsoupanarias) |
|
06/30/2016 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
06/30/2026 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Frank Georgiou, Director |
|
06/30/2016 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
06/30/2026 |
||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Chris Theoharis, Director |
|
06/30/2016 |
|
500,000 |
|
- |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
06/30/2026 |
Grant of Plan Based Awards
No plan-based awards were made during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
27 |
Table of Contents |
The following table sets forth, as of March 30, 2017, the names, addresses and number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by (i) all persons known to us to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our executive officers, and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers as a group. Except as indicated, each beneficial owner listed exercises sole voting power and sole dispositive power over the shares beneficially owned. Share ownership in each case includes shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this Annual Report that would be required to be reported pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for purposes of computing the percentage of common stock owned by such person but not for purposes of computing the percentage owned by any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of the below-listed persons is our address, The Chrysler Building, 405 Lexington Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10174.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number of |
|
|
Percent of |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Emmanuel Tsoupanarias (2) |
|
|
17,700,106 |
|
|
|
3.3 | % |
Leonard C. Friedman (3) |
|
|
11,923,641 |
|
|
|
2.2 | % |
Frank Georgiou (4) |
|
|
23,937,075 |
|
|
|
4.5 | % |
Chris Theoharis (4) |
|
|
5,945,334 |
|
|
|
1.1 | % |
Marvin Maslow (5)(6) |
|
|
74,757,545 |
|
|
|
14.0 | % |
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (6 persons) |
|
|
145,263,701 |
|
|
|
27.2 | % |
Total |
|
|
145,263,701 |
|
|
|
27.2 | % |
____________
(1) | This tabular information is intended to conform to Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 relating to the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. The percent of class is based on 537,398,549 shares and, for each beneficial owner, gives effect to the exercise of warrants or options exercisable within 60 days of the date of this table owned, in each case, by the person or group whose percentage ownership is set forth herein. |
(2) | Includes 10,200,106 shares owned by Saraklis Inc. ("Saraklis"), a corporation controlled by Mr. Tsoupanarias, options for Saraklis to purchase 8,000,000 shares. |
(3) | Includes 2,500,000 shares owned in joint tenancy with his wife, options to purchase 1,500,000 shares. |
(4) | Includes options to purchase 1,500,000 shares. |
(5) | Includes 28,628,273 shares of Common Stock and options to purchase 26,500,000 shares. |
(6) | Includes 105,761 shares of Series D Preferred Stock on an as converted basis. The Series D Preferred Stock has a conversion price of $0.055 and a stated value of $10.00 per share. Each share of Series D Preferred Stock is convertible into such number of shares of common stock of the Company as determined by dividing stated value by the conversion price. |
28 |
Table of Contents |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
On November 10, 2016, Imagion, the Company and Robert Romeo Proulx and Tracey Jane Proulx Revocable Trust entered into a Note Purchase Agreement. The Interim Investor or other investors may invest up to a total of $500,000 under the Note Purchase Agreement. The Interim Imagion Note accrues interest at the rate of 8% per annum, provided, however, in the event of a default, interest shall accrue at 10% per annum. The Interim Imagion Note is subordinate to the Senior Notes. The Company, Imagion and the Interim Investor also entered an Irrevocable Proxy as well as a Voting Agreement whereby the Company granted the Interim Investors a right to vote its Imagion shares to carry out the spinout plan and the parties agreed to vote their Imagion shares to provide for one director of Imagion to be appointed by the Company and four directors to be appointed by the Interim Investors.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FEES
The following is a summary of the fees billed to us by our independent auditors for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
Fee Category |
|
Fiscal 2016 |
|
|
Fiscal 2015 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Audit and audit related fees |
|
$ | 60,000 |
|
|
$ | 55,000 |
|
Tax fees |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other fees |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total fees |
|
$ | 60,000 |
|
|
$ | 55,000 |
|
Audit Fees. Consists of aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our consolidated financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by our auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
Tax Fees. Consists of aggregate fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal and state tax compliance. There were no tax services provided in fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Other Fees. Consists of fees for products and services other than the services reported above. There were no management consulting services provided in fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
We do not currently have an Audit Committee. Our full Board of Directors considers whether the provision of these services is compatible with maintaining the auditor's independence, and has determined such services
BOARD OF DIRECTORS POLICY ON PRE-APPROVAL OF SERVICES OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors’ policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors on a case-by-case basis. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services.
29 |
Table of Contents |
(a) EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
| ||
2.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (1) |
2.2 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger (1) |
3.1 |
|
Certificate of Incorporation dated August 1, 1995 (12) |
3.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation dated January 8, 1998 (12) |
3.3 |
|
Bylaws (1) |
3.4 |
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated January 16, 2001 (12) |
3.5 |
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation dated August 8, 2007 (12) |
4.1 |
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series B Preferred Stock (12) |
4.2 |
|
Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series B Preferred Stock (12) |
4.3 |
|
Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series C Preferred Stock (12) |
4.4 |
|
Amended Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series C Preferred Stock (2) |
4.5 |
|
Form of Convertible Promissory Note issued April 3, 2013 (13) |
4.6 |
|
Certificate of Designation for the Series D Preferred Stock (14) |
4.7 |
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement entered by and between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. And the January 2014 Accredited Investor (15) |
4.8 |
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement entered by and between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and the February 2014 Accredited Investors (16) |
4.9 |
|
Form of Warrant (16) |
4.10 |
|
Form of Securities Purchase Agreement entered by and between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and the November 2014 Accredited Investor (17) |
4.11 |
|
Form of Warrant (17) |
4.12 |
|
Form of Subscription Agreement entered by and between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and the 2014 Accredited Investors (18) |
4.13 |
|
Form of Warrant (23) |
10.1 |
|
Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan (1) |
10.2 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., Projectavision, Inc., and Lancer Partners, L.P. (3) |
10.3 |
|
Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (5) |
10.4 |
|
2004 Consultant Stock Plan (6) |
10.5 |
|
Manhattan Scientifics 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (8) |
10.6 |
|
Technology Transfer Agreement by and between Carpenter Technology Corporation and Manhattan Scientifics, Inc, effective as of the 12th day of September 2009 (7) |
10.7 |
|
Acquisition Option Agreement by and among Senior Scientific LLC, Edward R. Flynn, Ph.D., Scientific Nanomedicine, Inc. and Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (10) |
10.8 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 12, 2008, among Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., Metallicum, Inc., and the shareholders of Metallicum (9) |
10.9 |
|
Settlement and Memorandum of Agreement among Marvin Maslow, Jack B. Harrod and Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (9) |
10.10 |
|
Patent License Agreement Between Los Alamos National Security, LLC and Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. (10) |
10.11 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization by and among the Company, Scientific Nanomedicine, Inc., Edward, R. Flynn and Edward R. Flynn and Maureen A. Flynn, as Co-Trustees of the Edward R. Flynn and Maureen A. Flynn Revocable Trust u/t/a dated 10/25/2006. (11) |
10.12 |
|
Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Senior Scientific LLC and Edward R. Flynn. (11) |
10.13 |
|
Consulting Agreement dated June 1, 2011 between Manhattan Scientifics Inc. and V. Gerald Grafe (12) |
10.14 |
|
Employment Agreement dated March 28, 2013 between Manhattan Scientifics Inc. and Emmanuel Tsoupanarias (12) |
10.15 |
|
Consulting Agreement between Normandie New Mexico Corp. and Manhattan Scientifics Inc. dated October 1, 2009 (12) |
10.16 |
|
Amendment to the Consulting Agreement between Normandie New Mexico Corp. and Manhattan Scientifics Inc. dated October 1, 2009 (12) |
10.17 |
|
Convertible Note Purchase Agreement between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and Senior Scientific, LLC and Raymond A. Mason, William B. Jones and the Ferdinand J. Crovato Trust dated April 3, 2013 (13) |
10.18 |
|
Guaranty and Security Agreement between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and Senior Scientific, LLC and Raymond A. Mason, William B. Jones and the Ferdinand J. Crovato Trust dated April 3, 2013 (13) |
10.19 |
|
Conversion Agreement by and between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and Marvin Maslow dated November 5, 2013 (14) |
10.20 |
|
Executive Employment Agreement between Senior Scientific, LLC and Robert R. Proulx dated January 12, 2015 (20) |
10.21 |
|
Settlement Agreement and Mutual General Releases by and between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation dated February 11, 2015 (22) |
10.22 |
|
Promissory Note issued to Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. By Imagion Biosystems, Inc. In the principal amount of $6,900,000 (with form of voting agreement) (27) |
10.23 |
|
Spinout Approval dated September 27, 2016 entered between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., Imagion Biosystems, Inc. and Raymond A. Mason, William B. Jones, and Ferdinand J. Crovato Trust (27) |
10.24 |
|
Form of Note Purchase Agreement by and between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc., Imagion Biosystems, Inc. and Interim Investor (27) |
10.25 |
|
Form of Promissory Note issued by Imagion Biosystems, Inc. to Interim Investor (27) |
10.26 |
|
Irrevocable Proxy entered between Manhattan Scientifics, Inc. and Imagion BioSystems, Inc. (27) |
14.1 |
|
Code of Ethics (9) |
16.1 |
|
Letter from L.L. Bradford & Company, LLC (21) |
21.1 |
|
List of Subsidiaries (12) |
30 |
Table of Contents |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d- 14(a) | |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d- 14(a) | |
|
||
|
||
99.1 |
|
Press Release dated December 30, 2014 (19) |
99.2 |
|
Letter to Shareholders (24) |
99.3 |
|
Shareholder letter dated May 7, 2015 (25) |
99.4 |
|
Press Release dated August 26, 2015 (26) |
EX-101.INS** |
|
XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT |
EX-101.SCH** |
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA DOCUMENT |
EX-101.CAL** |
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE |
EX-101.DEF** |
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE |
EX-101.LAB** |
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABELS LINKBASE |
EX-101.PRE** |
|
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE |
______________
(1) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 10-SB filed with the Commission on December 8, 1999. |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on August 14, 2000 for the period ended June 30, 2000. |
(3) | Incorporated by reference as Amendment No. 2 to the registrant's Form 10-SB filed with Commission on February 9, 2000. |
(4) | Reserved. |
(5) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's proxy statement filed on Schedule 14C filed with the Commission on December 26, 2000. |
(6) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's registration statement filed on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on November 26, 2004. |
(7) | Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 2 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2009 filed with the Commission on October 4, 2010. |
(8) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's registration statement in Form S-8 filed with the Commission on June 8, 2005. |
(9) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 9, 2010. |
(10) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Form 10-K/A filed with the Commission on March 25, 2011. |
(11) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 6, 2011. |
(12) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March 30, 2012. |
(13) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 9, 2013 |
(14) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 8, 2013 |
(15) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 31, 2014 |
(16) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 12, 2014 |
(17) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 18, 2014 |
(18) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 11, 2014 |
(19) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 5, 2015 |
(20) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 20, 2015 |
(21) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 9, 2015 |
(22) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 19, 2015 |
(23) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 19, 2015 |
(24) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 20, 2015 |
(25) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 7, 2015 |
(26) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 28, 2015 |
(27) | Incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 1, 2016 |
** |
** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
31 |
Table of Contents |
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 14th day of April 2017.
|
MANHATTAN SCIENTIFICS, INC. |
||
|
By: |
/s/ Emmanuel Tsoupanarias |
|
|
Emmanuel Tsoupanarias |
||
|
Chief Executive Officer |
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on April 14, 2017 on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.
Signature |
|
Title |
|
| |||
/s/ Emmanuel Tsoupanarias |
|
Chief Executive Officer, President, Chairman of the Board |
|
Emmanuel Tsoupanarias |
|
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer ) |
|
| |||
/s/ Leonard Friedman |
|
Secretary and Director |
|
Leonard Friedman |
| ||
| |||
/s/ Frank Georgiou |
|
Director |
|
Frank Georgiou |
| ||
| |||
/s/ Larry Schatz |
|
Director |
|
Larry Schatz |
| ||
| |||
/s/ Chris Theoharis |
|
Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
Chris Theoharis |
| ||
|
|
|
|
/s/ Marvin Maslow |
|
Director |
|
Marvin Maslow |
|
|
|
32 |