Manitex International, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008

OR

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 001-32401

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

7402 W. 100^th Place, Bridgeview, Illinois 60455

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

(708) 430-7500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Veri-tek International, Corp.

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer  ¨    Accelerated Filer  ¨    Non-Accelerated Filer  ¨    Smaller reporting company  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, no par value, outstanding as of August 4, 2008 was 10,021,569.

1

Table of Contents

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FORM 10-Q INDEX

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item  1— Financial Statements

Manitex International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet

(In thousands, except for per share amounts)

3

Table of Contents

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

4

Table of Contents

Manitex International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Operations

(In thousands, except for per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

Manitex International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Manitex International, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1. Nature of Operations

On May 27, 2008, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Michigan Department of Labor & Economic Growth. The Certificate of Amendment was filed to change the name of the Company to Manitex International, Inc. (the “Company”) from Veri-Tek International, Corp. This name change was effective as of May 28, 2008. The Manitex International name was chosen in order to provide a clearer corporate identity to our customers and to the specialized lifting equipment industry by renaming the company after our largest and most well known material handling product line brand.

The Company is a leading provider of engineered lifting solutions. The Company designs, manufactures and distributes a diverse group of products that serve different functions and are used in a variety of industries. Through its Manitex subsidiary it markets a comprehensive line of boom trucks and sign cranes. Manitex’s boom trucks and crane products are primarily used for industrial projects, energy exploration and infrastructure development, including, roads, bridges and commercial construction. The Manitex Liftking subsidiary sells a complete line of rough terrain forklifts and special mission oriented vehicles, as well as other specialized carriers, heavy material handling transporters and steel mill equipment. Manitex Liftking’s rough terrain forklifts are used in both commercial and military applications. Specialty mission oriented vehicles and specialized carriers are designed and built to meet the Company’s unique customer needs and requirements. The Company’s specialized lifting equipment has met the particular needs of customers in various industries that include utility, ship building and steel mill industries.

Historically, the Company also designed, developed, and built specialty testing and assembly equipment for the automotive and heavy equipment industries that identifies defects through the use of signature analysis and in-process verification. Against the background of the operating losses generated in recent history by the Testing & Assembly Equipment segment operations based at Wixom, Michigan, the Company conducted a strategic review of these operations. On March 29, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a plan to sell our Testing & Assembly Equipment segment’s operating assets including its inventory, machinery, equipments and patents. As a result, our Testing & Assembly Equipment segment has been accounted for as a discontinued operation starting with the first quarter of 2007. On August 1, 2007, the assets used in connection with the Company’s diesel engine testing equipment were sold to EuroMaint Industry, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“EuroMaint”). As of August 31, 2007, all operations of the former Testing and Assembly Equipment segment had ceased. (See Note 5)

As result of discontinuing our former Testing and Assembly Equipment segment, the Company again operates in only a single business segment, Lifting Equipment. Accordingly, our financial statements no longer include segment information. The Company’s consolidated financial statements reflect the Testing and Assembly Equipment segment as a discontinued operation.

2. Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements, included herein, have been prepared by the Company without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to these rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements which are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2008, and results of its operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The consolidated balances as of December 31, 2007 were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting standards for interim financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations expected for the year.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2007 financial statements to conform to the 2008 presentation.

7

Table of Contents

3. Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition — For products shipped FOB destination, sales are recognized when the product reaches its FOB destination, or when the services are rendered, which represents the point when the risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the customer. For products shipped FOB shipping point, revenue is recognized when the product is shipped, as this is the point when title and risk of loss pass from us to our customers.

Customers may be invoiced prior to the time customers take physical possession. Revenue is recognized in such cases only when the customer has a fixed commitment to purchase the units, the units have been completed, tested and made available to the customer for pickup or delivery, and the customer has authorized in writing that we hold the units for pickup or delivery at a time specified by the customer. In such cases, the units are invoiced under our customary billing terms, title to the units and risks of ownership pass to the customer upon invoicing, the units are segregated from our inventory and identified as belonging to the customer and we have no further obligations under the order.

The Company establishes reserves for future warranty expense at the point when revenue is recognized by the Company and is based on percentage of revenues. The provision for estimated warranty claims is included in cost of sales.

Accrued Warranties — The Company’s products are typically sold with a warranty covering defects that arise during a fixed period of time. The specific warranty offered is a function of customer expectations and competitive forces. The liability is established using historical warranty claim experience. Historical warranty experience is, however, reviewed by management. The current provision may be adjusted to take into account unusual or non-recurring events in the past or anticipated changes in future warranty claims. Adjustments to the initial warranty accrual are recorded if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are necessary. Warranty reserves are reviewed to ensure critical assumptions are updated for known events that may impact the potential warranty liability.

Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial accounting and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.

In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income prior to the expiration of any net operating loss carryforwards. The Company could not conclude that it was more likely than not that its deferred tax asset would be realized in the future and accordingly has established a valuation allowance against all of its net deferred tax assets with the exception of certain state tax credits.

Litigation Claims — In determining whether liabilities should be recorded for pending litigation claims, the Company must assess the allegations and the likelihood that it will successfully defend itself. When the Company believes it is probable that it will not prevail in a particular matter, it will then make an estimate of the amount of liability based, in part, on advice of outside legal counsel.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Discontinued Operations — The consolidated financial statements present the Testing and Assembly Equipment Segment as a discontinued operation in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. (See Note 5)

Impairment of Long Lived Assets — In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the Company reviews its long-lived assets, including property and equipment, and other identifiable intangibles for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of the year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. To determine recoverability of its long-lived assets, the Company evaluates the probability that future undiscounted net cash flows, without interest charges, will be less than the carrying amount of the assets. Impairment is measured at fair value. The Company has recorded no losses on impairment of long-lived assets during the six months ended June 30, 2008 or twelve months ended December 31, 2007.

8

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Other Intangibles — As required by SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles,” the Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually in the fourth quarter of the year or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment using the required business valuation method, which is calculated as of a measurement date by determining the present value of debt-free, after-tax projected future cash flows, discounted at the weighted average cost of capital of a hypothetical third party buyer. The Company has recorded no losses on impairment of goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007.

Sale and Leaseback — In accordance with FASB 13, 66 and 98, the Company has recorded deferred revenue in relationship to the sale and leaseback of one of our operating facilities. As such, the gain on the sale of the land and building has been deferred and is being amortized on a straight line basis over the life of the lease.

Computation of EPS — Basic Earnings per Share (“EPS”) was computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

The number of shares related to options, warrants, restricted stock units and similar instruments included in diluted EPS (“EPS”) is based on the “Treasury Stock Method” prescribed in SFAS No. 128. This method assumes theoretical repurchase of shares using proceeds of the respective stock option or warrant exercise or in the case of restricted stock units the amount of deferred unearned compensation at a price equal to the issuer’s average stock price during the related earnings period. Accordingly, the number of shares includable in the calculation of EPS in respect of the stock options, warrants, restricted stock units and similar instruments is dependent on this average stock price and will increase as the average stock price increases.

Securities of a subsidiary that are convertible into its parent company’s common stock shall be considered among potential common shares of the parent company for the purposes of computing consolidated diluted EPS.

Stock Based Compensation — In accordance with SFAS No. 123R “Share Based Payments” share-based payments to employees, including grants of restricted stock units, are measured at fair value as of the date of grant and are expensed in the consolidated statement of operations over the service period (generally the vesting period).

Comprehensive Income — Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 130 “Reporting Comprehensive Income” requires reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income includes, in addition to net earnings, other items that are reported as direct adjustments to stockholder’s equity. Currently, the only comprehensive income adjustment required for the Company is a foreign currency translation adjustment, the result of consolidating its foreign subsidiary. Comprehensive income from continuing operations was $768 and $1,028 for the three months and $1,066 and $1,147 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Foreign Currency Translation — The financial statements of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries are translated using the current exchange rate for assets and liabilities and the weighted-average exchange rate for the year for income and expense items. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) as a component of stockholders’ equity.

The Company converts receivables and payables denominated in other than the Company’s functional currency at the exchange rate as of the balance sheet date. The resulting transaction exchange gains or losses, except for certain transactions gains or loss related to intercompany receivable and payables, are included in other income and expense. Transaction gains and losses related to intercompany receivables and payables not anticipated to be settled in the foreseeable future are excluded from the determination of net income and are recorded as a translation adjustment to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) as a component of stockholders’ equity.

Forward Currency Exchange Contracts — Beginning in September 2007, the Company entered into forward currency exchange contracts in relationship such that the exchange gains and losses on the assets and liabilities denominated in other than the reporting units’ functional currency would be offset by the changes in the market value of the forward currency exchange contracts it holds. In accordance with FAS No. 52, the Company records at the balance sheet date the forward currency exchange contracts at its market value with any associated gain or loss being recorded in current earnings. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses related to forward currency contracts are included in current earnings and are reflected in the Statement of Operations in the other income expense section on the line titled foreign currency transaction losses. The Company has recorded for the six months ended June 30, 2008 a realized loss of approximately $20 and unrealized loss of approximately $103 and for the three months ended June 30, 2008 a realized loss of $48 and an unrealized gain of $82 related to forward currency contracts.

9

Table of Contents

FAS No. 157 requires that assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis be categorized according to a three level hierarchies established in the opinion which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. Fair value of the forward currency contracts are determined on the last day of each reporting period using quoted prices in active markets, which are supplied to the Company by the foreign currency trading operation of its bank. Under FAS No. 157, items valued based on quoted prices in active markets are Level 1 items. The following is summary of items that the Company measures at fair value as of June 30, 2008:

Financial Instruments and Credit Risk Concentrations — Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, trade receivables and payables.

The Company maintains its cash balances and marketable securities at banks in Detroit, Michigan and Toronto, Canada. Accounts in the United States are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had uninsured balances of $898 and $469, respectively.

The Company purchases forward currency contracts in relationship so that gains and losses on its forward contracts offsets exchange gains and losses on its on the assets and liabilities denominated in other than the reporting units’ functional currency. Forward currency exchange contracts, if not offset by existing foreign currency positions, will result in the recognition of gains and losses which are not offset. At June 30, 2008, the Company had entered into a series of forward currency exchange contracts. The contracts obligate the Company to purchase approximately CDN $3,800 in total. The contracts which are in various amounts mature between July 2, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Under the contract, the Company will purchase Canadian dollars at exchange rates between .9558 and .9809. The Canadian to US dollar exchange rates was .9817 at June 30, 2008.

For the six months ended June 30, 2008 one customer accounted for 12% our accounts receivable. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 no single customer accounted for 10% or more of our accounts receivable.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company purchased 11% of total purchases from a single supplier. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company purchased 16% and 11% of total purchase from two suppliers, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company purchased 12% of total purchases from a single vendor.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, one customer accounted for 12% of the Company’s net revenue. One customer accounted for 15% of our net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and no single customer accounted for more than 10% of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2007

Statement of Cash Flows — Non-cash transactions that do not affect earnings are excluded from the statement of cash flows. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 there were two non-cash events. On May 2, 2008, the Company reached an agreement with a debt holders to exchange $1,072 of debt for common stock. The balance sheet affect of this transaction was to decrease long-term notes payable by $1,072 and to increase common stock by $1,072. (See note 7 and 15) During the quarter, the Company completed its analysis of inventory received in the Noble product line acquisition and determined the value of the inventory was $112 less than previously estimated. The balance sheet effect of this transaction was to decrease inventory by $112 and to increase goodwill by $112.

During the first quarter of 2007, it was agreed that the payable for certain inventory totaling $462 sold to the Company in the first quarter of 2007 and which was still inventory at March 31, 2007 would be offset against the receivable the Company has from GT Distribution. Additionally, a payable in the amount of $116 that the Company had to GT Distribution was offset against the receivable the Company had from GT Distribution. The Statement of Cash Flow for June 30, 2007 excludes the $578 decrease in the related party receivable, the $462 increase in inventory and the $116 decrease in accounts payable as these items are non-cash transactions.

Variable Interest Entities — In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. 46 (Revised), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“FIN No. 46R”). This pronouncement clarifies the application

10

Table of Contents

of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, and changes the criteria by which one Company includes another entity in its consolidated financial statements. This may occur when equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional financial subordinated support from other parties. Although the Company is not required to consolidate under FIN 46R; the Company has determined that it has a variable interest in a related entity, for which it is not the primary beneficiary.

The Company has a variable interest in the related entity primarily because of the common shareholder ownership between the Company and GT Distribution, LLC; the Company is exposed to risk in regards to its variable interest. The Company both purchases from and sells to GT Distribution. The Company’s exposure will vary in the future and is dependent on purchase from and sales to GT Distribution as well as payment made to or received from GT Distribution. The Company had a net receivable from GT Distribution or its subsidiaries of approximately $97 and $300 at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.

4. Noble Product Line Asset Acquisition

On July 31, 2007, Manitex International, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an asset purchase agreement with GT Distribution, LLC ( “GT Distribution”) pursuant to which GT Distribution transferred all of its rights and interest in the Noble forklift product line (the “Product Line”) to the Company in exchange for the discharge of obligations and trade payables of GT Distribution and certain of its subsidiaries totaling $4,219 and assumption by the Company of certain liabilities associated with the Product Line.

David J. Langevin, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has a significant ownership interest in GT Distribution. As a result, the Company received a fairness opinion from an independent financial advisor and the approval of a special independent committee of the Company’s board of directors prior entering into this transaction.

The Noble Product line production has been integrated into our two current production facilities which are located in Woodbridge, Ontario and Georgetown, Texas. The results for the Noble Product Line acquisition have been included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations from the date of the acquisition.

The purchase price of $4,219 has been allocated based on the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The purchase price has been allocated as follows (in thousands):

A reputation for superior product design, access to a preferred network of dealers and a leading presence in the lifting equipment industry resulted in the recognition of $787 of Goodwill.

During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company has completed it assessment of the inventory and determined that $112 of the inventory at date of acquisition was unusable. As a result, the purchase allocation was adjusted to decrease inventory by $112 and to increase goodwill by $112 to $787.

Proforma information is not being provided for the Noble Product Line, as it does not constitute an acquisition of a business, pursuant to applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Noble Product Line is being manufactured in the Company’s two existing manufacturing facilities located in Georgetown, Texas and Woodbridge, Ontario.

11

Table of Contents

5. Discontinued Operations

Against the background of operating losses generated in recent history by the Testing and Assembly Equipment segment operations based at Wixom, Michigan, the Company conducted a strategic review of these operations. On March 29, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a plan to sell our Testing and Assembly Equipment segment’s operating assets including its inventory, machinery and equipment and patents. As a result, our Testing and Assembly Equipment segment has been accounted for as a discontinued operation starting with the first quarter of 2007.

On July 5, 2007 the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with EuroMaint Industry, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“EuroMaint”). Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to sell and EuroMaint agreed to purchase certain assets of the Company used in connection with the Company’s diesel engine testing equipment business. EuroMaint also assumed and agreed to pay, perform and discharge when due certain obligations of the Company arising in connection with the operation of the Company’s diesel engine testing equipment business. In addition to the assumption of those certain assumed liabilities, EuroMaint agreed to pay to the Company the aggregate purchase price of $1,100. This transaction closed on August 1, 2007. In August 2007, the Company sold at auction all the remaining tangible assets of the Testing and Assembly Equipment segment, comprised of inventory and fixed assets. The Company recorded a gain of $209 on the sale of assets in the third quarter of 2007.

The following table sets forth the detail of balance sheet captions for discontinued operations as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

The following table sets forth the detail of the net income (loss) from discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007:

In 2007 the Company did not record a tax benefit attributable to losses from discontinued operations as the Company may not realize such loss in future years.

The estimated loss on sale is shown below:

During the three months ended June 30, 2008 the Company reversed the $200 ($186 net of income taxes of $14) reserve for termination of contracts, as management determined that it was not needed. In three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company reduced it reserve for employee termination costs by $76 as the Company determined that employee termination cost would be less than anticipated.

12

Table of Contents

At June 30, 2008 the only remaining asset of the discontinued Testing and Assembly Equipment segment are cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings totaling $40. EuroMaint is completing the project on which we have recorded earnings in excess of billings. Upon completion, the $40 will be billed to the customer.

6. Net Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution of warrants, restricted stock, exchangeable debt and convertible subsidiary stock. Details of the calculations are as follows:

7. Equity

Issuance of Common Stock and Warrants

QVM Note Exchanged for Common Stock

On May 2, 2008, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Michael Azar, David Langevin, Robert Skandalaris, Lubomir Litchev, Patrick Flynn, and Michael Hull (the “Holders”), and Michael Azar, as the

13

Table of Contents

“Holders’ Representative.” The Exchange Agreement was entered into in connection with a Non-Negotiable Subordinated Promissory Note (the “Note”), dated July 3, 2006, which was entered into in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the membership interests of Quantum Value Management, LLC in the amount of $1,072. Under the agreement the Company issued 211,074 shares of common stock and the note was cancelled. The terms of the Exchange Agreement also provide the Holders with “piggy-back” registration rights for the shares issued to them pursuant to the Exchange Agreement.

David Langevin is currently the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Due to the related-party aspect of this transaction, the Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement were approved by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

2007 Private Placement

On September 10, 2007, the Company closed a $9,000 private placement of its common stock (the “2007 Private Placement”) pursuant to the terms of a security purchase agreement entered into among the Company and certain institutional investors on August 30, 2007 (the “2007 Securities Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued 1,500,000 shares of its common stock. The Company also issued warrants (as described below) to the investment banker who acted as its exclusive placement agent for the 2007 Private Placement. In connection with the 2007 Private Placement, the Company incurred investment banking fees of $630 and legal fees and expenses of approximately $155. The Company’s net cash proceeds after fees and expenses were $8,215 with $7,983 and $231 being allocated to common stock and warrants, respectively.

In connection with the Private Placement, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 to register resale of shares issued in the Private Placement and the shares underlying the warrants. The registration statement was declared effective on October 15, 2007.

Stock Issuance

On June 30, 2008, the Company issued 1,155 shares of common stock to a former independent Director as compensation for past services.

On June 12, 2008, the Company issued 211,074 shares of common stock in exchange for the cancellation of its note issued in connection with the acquisition of the membership interests of Quantum Value Management, LLC.

On December 31, 2007, the Company issued in aggregate 3,465 shares of common stock to three independent Directors as restricted stock units issued under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Plan to these Directors vested on that day.

On July 30, 2007, Company issued 2,000 shares of common stock as a warrant holder exercised 1,000 Series A warrants and 1,000 Series B warrants. The exercise of warrants resulted in an increase in common stock of $12 of which approximately $8 represented cash received upon the exercise of the warrants and the balance of approximately $3 represent the value of the exercised warrants as determined upon issuance of the warrants on November 15, 2006. As a result of exercise, the $3 which was previously included in shareholders’ equity under the caption warrants is transferred to common stock.

On July 5, 2007, Company issued 246,000 shares of common stock as warrant holders exercised 246,000 Series B warrants. The exercise of warrants resulted in an increase in common stock of $1,463 of which approximately $1,046 represented cash received upon the exercise of the warrants and the balance of approximately $417 represent the value of the exercised warrants as determined upon issuance of the warrants on November 15, 2006. As a result of exercise, the $417 which was previously included in shareholders’ equity under the caption warrants is transferred to common stock.

On June 11, 2007, Company issued 198,000 shares of common stock as warrant holders exercised 99,000 Series A warrants and 99,000 Series B warrants. The exercise of warrants resulted in an increase in common stock of $1,161, of which approximately $822 represented cash received upon the exercise of the warrants and the balance of approximately $339 represent the value of the exercised warrants as determined upon issuance of the warrants on November 15, 2006. As a result of exercise, the $339 which was previously included in shareholders’ equity under the caption warrants is transferred to common stock.

Stock Warrants

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued. The Warrants will be exercisable on a cashless basis under certain circumstances, and are callable by the Company on a cashless basis under certain circumstances. Roth Capital Partners, LLC acted as exclusive placement agent for the 2007 Private Placement and received cash and 105,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock as a placement agent

14

Table of Contents

fee. The Warrants were issued the day after the closing of the 2007 Private Placement (September 11, 2007) and became exercisable after the sixth month anniversary of the issuance date of the Warrants until September 11, 2012. The warrant holder can purchase 105,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Warrants have an exercise price of $7.18 per share.

On June 18, 2007, the Company and Hayden Communications, Inc. (“Hayden”) entered into a contract under which Hayden will provide public and investor relation services to the Company for a period of one year. The contract provides for the issuance of 15,000 warrants to Hayden Communications, Inc. Each warrant allows Hayden to purchase one share of Company Common Stock for $7.08 per share. The warrants are exercisable beginning on June 15, 2008 and expire on June 15, 2011. The warrants are exercisable on a cashless basis under certain circumstances. The warrants and underlying common stock are not registered under federal or state securities laws and, therefore, may not be sold or transferred by Hayden in the absence of registration or an exemption therefrom.

At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had issued and outstanding warrants as follows:

No warrants were exercised during the three or six months end June 30, 2008

2004 Equity Incentive Plan

In 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and subsequently amended and restated the plan on September 13, 2007. The maximum number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plan is 350,000 shares. The total number of shares reserved for issuance may, however, may be adjusted to reflect certain corporate transactions or changes in our capital structure. Our employees and members of our board of directors who are not our employees or employees of our affiliates are eligible to participate in the plan. The plan is administered by a committee of our board comprised of members who are outside directors. The plan provides that the committee has the authority to, among other things, select plan participants, determine the type and amount of awards, determine award terms, fix all other conditions of any awards, interpret the plan and any plan awards. Under the plan, the committee can grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units, except Directors may not be granted stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance units. During any calendar year, participants are limited in the number of grants they may receive under the plan. In any year, an individual may not receive options for more than 15,000 shares, stock appreciate rights with respect to more than 20,000 shares, more than 20,000 shares of restricted stock and/or an award for more than 10,000 performance shares or restricted stock units or performance units. The plan requires that the exercise price for stock options and stock appreciation rights be not less than fair market value of our common stock on date of grant.

On November 12, 2007, the Company awarded under the Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan 55,615 and 10,500 restricted stock units to employees and to the independent Directors, respectively. No awards or grants were made under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan prior to November 12, 2007. The restricted stock units are subject to the same conditions as the restricted stock awards except the restricted stock units will not have voting rights and the common stock will not be issued until the vesting criteria are satisfied. The employee restricted stock units will vest 33%, 33% and 34% on October 1, 2008, October 1, 2009 and October 1, 2010, respectively. Units granted to Directors will vest 33%, 33% and 34% on December 31, 2007, December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The restricted stock units awarded were valued at $416 or $6.30 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

On April 15, 2008, the Company awarded under the Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan 4,000 restricted stock units to an employee. The employee restricted stock units will vest 33%, 33% and 34% on March 31, 2009, March 31, 2010, and March 31, 2011 respectively. The restricted stock units awarded were valued at $18 or $4.55 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant.

The value of the restricted stock units is being charged to compensation expense over the vesting period. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recognized compensation expense of $61 and $119 with an offsetting credit to paid in capital related to restricted stock units granted to the Company’s employees and Directors. During the three months and six months ended June 30, 2007 no restricted stock units were granted or became vested. As of June 30, 2008, there were 66,650 restricted stock units outstanding.

15

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2008, total deferred compensation related to restricted stock units was $223, additional compensation expense of $92, $97, $33 and $1 will be recognized in the remainder of 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

On June 30, 2008, the Company awarded 1,155 shares of common stock to a former independent Director for past services. The stock on date of grant was valued at $6 or $5.12 per share. The value of the stock issued was immediately recognized as compensation expense with an offsetting credit to common stock.

8. Minority Interest

On November 30, 2006, the Company issued 266,000 shares of stock in Manitex Liftking Canadian Subsidiary with a value of $1,024. These shares are exchangeable into 266,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. As of June 30, 2008, the shares had not yet been exchanged for Manitex International, Inc. Common Stock. Until the shares are exchanged, the value of the exchangeable shares is shown as a minority interest. The Company expects that the shares will be exchanged for Manitex International, Inc. Common Stock.

9. New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those years. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands the related disclosure requirements. On January 1, 2008, SFAS 157 was adopted by the Company. The adoption of the Statement did not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R)” (SFAS 158). This statement requires balance sheet recognition of the over funded or under funded status of pension and postretirement benefit plans. Under SFAS 158, actuarial gains and losses, prior service costs or credits, and any remaining transition assets or obligations that have not been recognized under previous accounting standards must be recognized in Accumulated Other Non-Shareowners’ Changes in Equity, net of tax effects, until they are amortized as a component of net periodic benefit cost. In addition, the measurement date, the date at which plan assets and the benefit obligation are measured, is required to be the company’s fiscal year end. SFAS 158 is effective for publicly-held companies for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006, except for the measurement date provisions, which are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, except for the measurement date provisions, which are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. The adoption of the Statement did not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS No. 159”) in February 2007. SFAS No. 159 permits a company to choose to measure many financial instruments and other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing a company with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. A company shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159. The adoption of the Statement did not have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 06-11, “Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 requires companies to recognize a realized income tax benefit associated with dividends or dividend equivalents paid on nonvested equity-classified employee share-based payment awards that are charged to retained earnings as an increase to additional paid-in capital. EITF 06-11 was adopted on January 1, 2008. The adoption of EITF 06-11 did not have a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“Statement No. 160”). Statement No. 160 requires (i) that noncontrolling (minority) interests be reported as a component of shareholders’ equity, (ii) that net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be separately identified in the consolidated statement of operations, (iii) that changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions, (iv) that any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a subsidiary be

16

Table of Contents

initially measured at fair value, and (v) that sufficient disclosures are provided that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. Statement No. 160 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008 and should be applied prospectively. However, the presentation and disclosure requirements of the statement shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented. We are currently assessing the impact SFAS No. 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R continues to require the purchase method of accounting to be applied to all business combinations, but it significantly changes the accounting for certain aspects of business combinations. Under SFAS 141R, an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS 141R will change the accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition related items including: (1) expensing acquisition related costs as incurred; (2) valuing noncontrolling interests at fair value at the acquisition date; and (3) expensing restructuring costs associated with an acquired business. SFAS 141R also includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. SFAS 141R is to be applied prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We expect SFAS 141R will have an impact on our accounting for future business combinations once adopted but the effect is dependent upon the acquisitions that are made in the future.

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – An Amendment of SFAS No. 133” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 seeks to improve financial reporting for derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures regarding the impact on financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. To achieve this increased transparency, SFAS 161 requires (1) the disclosure of the fair value of derivative instruments and gains and losses in a tabular format; (2) the disclosure of derivative features that are credit risk-related; and (3) cross-referencing within the footnotes. SFAS No. 161 will be effective for fiscal years that begin after November 15, 2008. We are in the process of evaluating the new disclosure requirements under SFAS 161.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets. This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R, and other GAAP. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is in the process of determining the impact of adopting this new accounting position on its consolidated financial position.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB statement No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP in the United States. Any effect of applying the provisions of this Statement shall be reported as a change in accounting principle in accordance with FASB statement No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 162, but does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will have an impact on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” This FSP provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data) to conform with the provisions in this FSP. Early application of this FSP is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of EITF 03-6-1, but does not expect the adoption of this pronouncement will have an impact on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

17

Table of Contents

10. Inventory

The components of inventory are as follows:

11. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $422 and $447for the three months and $835 and $963 for the six month ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company completed its analysis of inventory received in the Noble product line acquisition and determined the value of the inventory was $112 less than previously estimated. The balance sheet effect of this transaction was decrease inventory by $112 and to increase goodwill by $112.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the estimated purchase price allocation for Manitex Liftking was revised and resulted in a decrease in intangible assets of $547.

12. Accrued Warranties

The liability is established using historical warranty claim experience. Historical warranty experience is, however, reviewed by management. The current provision may be adjusted to take into account unusual or non-recurring events in the past or anticipated changes in future warranty claims. Adjustments to the initial warranty accrual are recorded if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are necessary. Warranty reserves are reviewed to ensure critical assumptions are updated for known events that may impact the potential warranty liability.

The following table summarizes the changes in product warranty liability:

13. Line of Credit and Debt

Revolving Credit Facility

At June 30, 2008, the Company had drawn $13,726 under a revolving credit facility. The Company is eligible to borrow up to $20,500, with interest at prime rate (prime was 5.00% at June 30, 2008) plus .25%. The maximum amount of borrowings is

18

Table of Contents

limited to the sum of 85% of eligible receivables, and the lesser of 65% of eligible inventory or $8,000 plus 1,500. On July 1, 2008 the $1,500 is reduced to $1,000 and is further reduced by $500 on the first day of each subsequent quarter. At June 30, 2008, the maximum the Company could borrow based on available collateral was capped at $16,721. The credit facility’s original maturity date was January 2, 2005. The maturity date was subsequently extended and the note is now due on April 1, 2010. The indebtedness is collateralized by substantially all of the Company assets. Additionally, certain shareholders or former shareholders of the Company have personally guaranteed $1,500 of the note. The facility contains customary limitations including, but not limited to, acquisitions, dividends, repurchase of the Company’s stock and capital expenditures. The loan agreement also requires the Company to have a minimum Tangible Effective Net Worth, as defined in the agreement and 1.2 to 1 Debt Service Coverage Ratio, as defined in the agreement.

Revolving Canadian Credit Facility

At June 30, 2008, the Company had drawn $2,724 (USD) under a revolving credit agreement with a bank. The Company is eligible to borrow up to $4,500 (CDN). The maximum amount outstanding is limited to the sum of 80% of eligible receivables and the lesser of 50% of eligible inventory or CDN $2,500. At June 30, 2008, the maximum the Company could borrow based on available collateral was CDN $4,500. The indebtedness is collateralized by substantially all of Manitex Liftking ULC’s assets. The Company can borrow in either U.S. or Canadian dollars. For the purposes of determining availability under the credit line, borrowings in U.S. dollars are converted to Canadian dollars based on the most favorable spot exchange rate determined by the bank to be available to it at the relevant time. Any borrowings under the facility in Canadian dollars bear interest at the Canadian prime rate (the Canadian prime was 4.75% at June 30, 2008) plus 1.5%. Any borrowings under the facility in U.S. dollars bear interest at the U.S. prime rate (prime was 5.00% at June 30, 2008) plus .25%. The credit facility has a maturity date of April 1, 2010.

Notes Payable—Bank

At June 30, 2008, the Company has a $160 note payable to a bank. The note dated January 9, 2008 had an original principal amount of $474 and an annual interest rate of 5.99%. Under the terms of the note the Company is required to make nine monthly payments of $54 commencing January 30, 2008. The proceeds from the note were used to pay annual premiums for certain insurance policies carried by the Company. The holder of the note has a security interest the insurance policies it financed and has the right upon default to cancel these policies and receive any unearned premiums.

Note Payable Issued to Acquire QVM

In connection with the acquisition of the membership interests of QVM, the Company issued a note payable to the former members of QVM for $1,072. The note matured on the earlier of July 2, 2009, upon a change in control as defined in the note or if the Company receives cash proceeds of at least $25,000 from the sale of its common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable for its common stock. Interest is payable on the first day of each calendar quarter, commencing on September 1, 2006. The Interest is computed using the prime rate announced by Comerica Bank at its Detroit office on the last business day immediately preceding the applicable interest payment date. In the event of default interest is accelerated and increase to prime plus 3%.

Under an agreement dated May 2, 2008, the Company issued 211,074 shares of the Company’s common stock to former Members of QVM and the note was cancelled. See Note 7 for additional details.

Note Payable Issued to Acquire Liftking Industries

In connection with the Liftking Industries’ Acquisition, the Company has a note payable to the seller for $2,200 (CDN) or $2,158 (US). The Note shall provide for interest at 1% over the prime rate of interest charged by Comerica Bank for Canadian dollar loans, calculated from the closing date and payable quarterly in arrears commencing April 1, 2007, and for principal payments of two hundred thousand dollars (CDN) quarterly commencing April 1, 2007, with the final installment of principal and interest thereon due December 31, 2011. The note payable is subject to a general security agreement which subordinates the seller’s security interest to the interest of the buyer’s senior secured credit facility, but shall otherwise rank ahead of the seller’s other secured creditors.

Note Payable—Bank

At June 30, 2008, the Company has a $2,133 note payable to a bank. The note payable to the bank was assumed in connection with the QVM acquisition. The note was due on September 10, 2006 .The maturity date has subsequently been extended and the note is now due on April 1, 2010. The note has an interest rate of prime plus 1% until maturity, whether by acceleration or otherwise, or until default, as defined in the agreement, and after that at a default rate of prime plus 4%. Until June 30, 2008 the Company was not required to make principal payments, but was required to make interest payments on the

19

Table of Contents

first day of each month. Commencing on July 1, 2008, the Company is also required to make monthly principal payments of $50 on the first day of each month. The bank has been granted security interest in substantially all the assets of the Company’s Manitex subsidiary. Until October 18, 2007, the former members of QVM guaranteed the note. On October 18, 2007, the bank released the former members of QVM from their guarantees.

Capital Leases

The Company has a twelve year lease which expires in April 2018 that provides for monthly initial lease payments of $68 for its Georgetown, Texas facility. The lease has been classified as a capital lease under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 13. The Company has also entered into several small equipment leases, with lease terms of three years or less that it has determined are required to be capitalized under the provisions of FASB Statement No. 13. The remaining minimum lease payments for these leases are approximately $2. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had total capital lease obligations of $4,546.

14. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings, including product liability and workers’ compensation matters which have arisen in the normal course of operations. The Company has product liability insurance with self insurance retention that range from $50 to $1,000. Certain cases are at a preliminary stage, and it is not possible to estimate the amount or timing of any cost to the Company. When it is probable that a loss has been incurred and possible to make a reasonable estimates of the Company’s liability with respect to such matters, a provision is recorded for the amount of such estimate or the minimum amount of a range of estimates when it is not possible to estimate the amount within the range that is most likely to occur. However, the Company does not believe that these contingencies, in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The reserve for legal settlements decreased $235 from $370 at December 31, 2007 to $135 at June 30, 2008. The change in the reserve is principally the result of making two settlement payments which totaled $227 during the first quarter 2008. At December 31, 2007, reserves to settle these two cases had been established for $227, as such there was no impact on earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2008 related to these two settlement payments. Except as noted above, there has been no material changes in amounts accrued for legal settlements.

It is reasonably possible that the “Estimated Reserve for Product Liability Claims” may change within the next 12 months. A change in estimate could occur if a case is settled for more or less than anticipated, or if additional information becomes known to the Company.

15. Transactions between the Company and Related Parties

In the course of conducting its business, the Company has entered into certain related party transactions. In April, 2006, prior to its acquisition by the Company, Manitex completed a sale and leaseback transaction of its Georgetown, Texas facility to an entity controlled by one of its affiliates, who was also a significant shareholder of the Company. The sale price was $5,000 and the proceeds of the transactions were used to reduce Manitex’s debt under its credit facility. The lease has a twelve year term and provides for an initial monthly rent of $67 which is adjusted annually by the lesser of the increase in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or 2%. The aforementioned CPI adjustment raised the monthly rent to $68 effective April 2007. Although the Company did not obtain an independent valuation of the property or the terms of the sale and leaseback transaction in connection with its acquisition of Manitex, it believes the terms of the lease are at least as favorable to the Company as they could have obtained from an unaffiliated third party.

The Company, through its Manitex and Manitex Liftking subsidiaries, purchases and sells parts to GT Distribution, Inc. (including its subsidiaries) (“GT”) and has made advances to GT Distribution in connection therewith. GT is owned in part by the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Although the Company does not independently verify the cost of such parts, it believes the terms of such purchases and sales were at least as favorable to the Company as terms that it could obtain from a third party. GT has three operating subsidiaries, BGI USA, Inc. (“BGI”), Crane & Machinery, Inc., and Schaeff Lift Truck, Inc. BGI is a distributor of assembly parts used to manufacture various lifting equipment. Crane & Machinery, Inc. distributes Terex and Manitex cranes, and services and sells replacement parts for most brands of light duty and rough terrain cranes. Schaeff Lift Truck, Inc. manufactures electric forklifts. Schaeff Lift Truck, Inc. has a 100% owned subsidiary domiciled in Bulgaria, SL Industries, Ltd.

20

Table of Contents

The following is a summary of the amounts attributable to certain related party transactions as described in the footnotes to the table, for the periods indicated:

As of June 30, 2007, the Company had a receivable of $4,219 from GT Distribution, net of amounts owed to Crane & Machinery, Inc. On July 31, 2007, the “Company entered into an asset purchase agreement with GT Distribution, LLC (“GT Distribution”) pursuant to which GT Distribution transferred all of its rights and interest in the Noble forklift product line (the “Product Line”) to the Company in exchange for the discharge of obligations and trade payables of GT Distribution and certain of its subsidiaries totaling $4,219 and assumption by the Company of certain liabilities associated with the Product Line. David J. Langevin, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has a significant ownership interest in GT Distribution. As a result, the Company received a fairness opinion from an independent financial advisor and the approval of a special independent committee of the Company’s board of directors prior entering into this transaction.

The receivable from GT Distribution was reduced from $4,722 to $4,144 during the quarter ended March 31, 2007, a decrease of $578. During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, GT Distribution sold inventory to the Company. During the first quarter of 2007, it was agreed that the payable for certain inventory totaling $462 sold to the Company in the first quarter of 2007 and which was still inventory at March 31, 2007 would be offset against the receivable the Company has from GT Distribution. Additionally, a payable in the amount of $116 that the Company had to GT Distribution was offset against the

21

Table of Contents

receivable the Company had from GT Distribution. The Statement of Cash Flow for June 30, 2007 excludes the $578 decrease in the related party receivable, the $462 increase in inventory and the $116 decrease in accounts payable as these items are non-cash transactions.

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had $442 outstanding accounts receivable from GT Distribution and $345 outstanding accounts payable due to GT. Additionally, the Company has a $30 outstanding accounts receivable from LiftMaster, Inc. as of June 30, 2008.

The Company had a note payable to the former members of QVM for $1,072 issued in connection with the acquisition of the membership interests of QVM. Upon the closing of such acquisition, Michael C. Azar, served as the Company’s Vice President and Secretary and David Langevin served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. In addition, three of the members of QVM, Michael Azar, David Langevin and Robert J. Skandalaris, owned 6.1%, 12.1% and 12.1%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding common stock at such time.

On May 2, 2008, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Michael Azar, David Langevin, Robert Skandalaris, Lubomir Litchev, Patrick Flynn, and Michael Hull (the “Holders”), and Michael Azar, as the “Holders’ Representative.” The Exchange Agreement was entered into in connection with a Non-Negotiable Subordinated Promissory Note (the “Note”), dated July 3, 2006, which was entered into in connection with the Company’s acquisition of the membership interests of Quantum Value Management, LLC in the amount of $1,072. Under the agreement the Company issued 211,074 shares of common stock ant the note was cancelled. The terms of the Exchange Agreement also provide the Holders with “piggy-back” registration rights for the shares issued to them pursuant to the Exchange Agreement.

David Langevin is currently the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Due to the related-party aspect of this transaction, the Exchange Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Exchange Agreement were approved by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Company has a note payable to the former owners of Liftking Industries, Inc. for $2,158 (US) issued in connection with the acquisition of Liftking Industries ULC. It was determined subsequent to the acquisition, that the note would be a related party transaction since Manitex Liftking’s President is a relative of the primary holder of the note.

16. Income Taxes

The Company’s provision for income taxes consists of U.S. and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date tax provision with the effective rate that the Company expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate, and if its estimated tax rate changes it will make a cumulative adjustment. The 2008 annual effective tax rate is estimated to be approximately 6.4% (which includes U.S., state and local and foreign taxes) based upon the Company’s anticipated earnings both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions.

For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $82 which consisted primarily of anticipated federal alternative minimum tax, current year state and local tax and foreign taxes. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded a tax provision of $195 which consisted primarily of anticipated federal alternative minimum tax, current year state and local tax and foreign taxes.

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $395 which consisted primarily of anticipated federal alternative minimum tax, current year state and local tax and foreign taxes offset by a discrete item related to the recognition of a deferred tax asset for the Texas Temporary Margin Tax Credit as a result of a resolution of an income tax examination. For six months ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded a tax provision of $214 which consisted primarily of anticipated federal alternative minimum tax, current year state and local tax and foreign taxes.

The Company adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007 and had no material unrecognized tax benefits as of the adoption date. The Company’s total unrecognized tax benefits as of June 30, 2008 were approximately $250 which, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective tax rate. As of June 30, 2008, the Company had accrued immaterial amounts for the potential payment of interest and penalties.

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements relating to future events and the future performance of the Company within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s expectations, beliefs, intentions or future strategies that are signified by the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” or similar language. Our actual results may differ materially from information contained in these forward looking-statements for many reasons, including those described below and in our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K in the section entitled “Item 1A. Risk Factors,”

22

Table of Contents

The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. We do not undertake, and expressly disclaim, any obligation to update this forward-looking information, except as required under applicable law.

OVERVIEW

The Company is a leading provider of engineered lifting solutions. The Company designs, manufactures and distributes a diverse group of products that serve different functions and are used in a variety of industries. Through its Manitex subsidiary it markets a comprehensive line of boom trucks and sign cranes. Manitex’s boom trucks and crane products are primarily used for industrial projects, energy exploration and infrastructure development, including, roads, bridges and commercial construction. The Manitex Liftking subsidiary sells a complete line of rough terrain forklifts and special mission oriented vehicles, as well as other specialized carriers, heavy material handling transporters and steel mill equipment. Manitex Liftking’s rough terrain forklifts are used in both commercial and military applications. Specialty mission oriented vehicles and specialized carriers are designed and built to meet the Company’s unique customer needs and requirements. The Company’s specialized lifting equipment has met the particular needs of customers in various industries that include utility, ship building and steel mill industries. All financial data is in millions, except for share data and where otherwise indicated.

Discontinued Operations

Historically, the Company also designed, developed, and built specialty testing and assembly equipment for the automotive and heavy equipment industries that identifies defects through the use of signature analysis and in-process verification. Against the background of the operating losses generated in recent history by this segment, the Company conducted a strategic review of these operations. On March 29, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a plan to sell our Testing & Assembly Equipment segment’s operating assets, which were based in Wixom, Michigan, including its inventory, machinery, equipments and patents. As a result, our Testing & Assembly Equipment segment has been accounted for as a discontinued operation starting with the first quarter of 2007 until its disposition.

On August 1, 2007, the assets used in connection with the Company’s diesel engine testing equipment were sold to EuroMaint Industry, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“EuroMaint”). Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company received $1.1 million plus EuroMaint assumed certain of the Company’s liabilities. As of August 31, 2007, all operations of the former Testing and Assembly Equipment segment had ceased. As a result of discontinuing our former Testing and Assembly Equipment segment, the Company again operates in only a single business segment, Lifting Equipment.

Summary of Recent Acquisitions

Effective July 3, 2006, the Company completed the purchase of Manitex, Inc. (“Manitex”) via an acquisition of all of the membership interests in Quantum Value Management, LLC (an entity owned by certain stockholders of the Company). On

23

Table of Contents

November 30, 2006, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Manitex Liftking, ULC, an Alberta unlimited liability corporation (“Manitex Liftking”), completed the acquisition (the “Liftking Acquisition”) of all of the operating assets of Liftking Industries, Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation (“Liftking”). As the result of these two acquisitions, the Company is a leading provider of engineered lifting solutions including boom truck cranes, rough terrain forklifts and special mission oriented vehicles. Through the Company’s Manitex subsidiary, it markets a comprehensive line of boom trucks and sign cranes. The Company’s boom trucks and crane products are primarily used for industrial projects, energy exploration and infrastructure development, including roads, bridges and commercial construction. Through the Company’s Manitex Liftking subsidiary, it sells a complete line of rough terrain forklifts and special mission oriented vehicles, as well as other specialized carriers, heavy material handling transporters and steel mill equipment. Manitex Liftking’s rough terrain forklifts are used in both commercial and military applications. On July 31, 2007, the Company completed the purchase of all the Noble Forklift Product Line assets (the “Product Line”) from GT Distribution, LLC (“GT Distribution”), a related party. The Noble product line, which is comprised of four rough terrain forklifts in several configurations, is being produced in our two current production facilities located in Woodbridge, Ontario and Georgetown, Texas. See Note 4 to the Company’s consolidated financial statement for further details regarding the Noble Product Line acquisition.

The financial results for these acquisitions are included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations from the date of the respective acquisition.

Factors Affecting Revenues and Gross Profit

The Company derives most of its revenue from purchase orders from dealers and distributors. The demand for the Company’s products depends upon the general economic conditions of the markets in which the Company competes. The Company’s sales depend in part upon its customers’ replacement or repair cycles. Adverse economic conditions, including a decrease in commodity prices, may cause customers to forego or postpone new purchases in favor of repairing existing machinery. Additionally, our Manitex Liftking subsidiary revenues are impacted by the timing of orders received for military forklifts and residential housing starts.

Gross profit varies from period to period. Factors that affect gross profit include product mix, production levels and cost of raw materials including the price of steel. Material prices have been increasing recently. Margins tend to increase when production is skewed towards larger capacity cranes, special mission oriented vehicles, specialized carriers and heavy material transporters.

Results of Operations

The following discussion considers:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2007

Net Income (loss) for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007

The Company reported net income of $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, consisting of net income from continuing operations of $0.7 million, and a gain on sale of discontinued operations of $0.2 million.

The Company reported a net income of $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, consisting of a net income from continuing operations of $0.5 million, a loss from discontinued operations of $(0.2) million and a reduction of $0.1 million in the reserve for employee severance.

Results of the continuing operations for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007

For the three months ended June 30, 2008, net income from continuing operations was $0.7 million, which consists of revenue of $26.5 million, cost of sales of $22.0 million, research and development costs of $0.2 million, SG&A costs excluding corporate expenses of $2.2 million, Corporate SG&A expenses of $0.8 million, net interest expense of $0.5 million other income of $0.1 million and income tax expense of $0.1 million.

For the three months ended June 30, 2007, net income from continuing operations was $0.5 million, which consists of revenue of $30.0 million, cost of sales of $24.1 million, research and development costs of $0.2 million, SG&A costs excluding corporate expenses of $2.4 million, Corporate SG&A expenses of $1.1 million, a foreign currency transaction loss of $0.5 million, interest expense of $1.0 other income of $0.1 million and income tax expense of $0.2 million.

24

Table of Contents

Net Revenues and Gross Profit – For the three months ended June 30, 2008, net revenues and gross profit were $26.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively. Gross profit as a percent of net revenue was 16.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. For the three months ended June 30, 2007 net revenues and gross profit were $30.0 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Gross profit as a percent of revenue was 19.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2007.

Net revenues decreased $3.5 million to $26.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $30.0 million for the comparable three month period in 2007. Approximately 75% of the decrease in revenues is due to a decrease in forklift/specialized carrier product line sales. The remaining decrease in revenues is attributed to a decrease in crane product line sales. The decrease in forklift/specialized carrier revenue is attributed to a decrease in military forklift and specialized carrier (transporter) sales offset by an increase in commercial forklift sales. The increase in commercial sales is largely driven by the introduction of Noble rough terrain forklift product line. The Noble rough terrain product line was acquired on July 31, 2007. The decrease in military and specialized carrier sales is attributable to timing of orders, which have historically fluctuated from period to period. The decrease in crane product line revenues is principally a decrease in chassis sales as more customers elected to supply their own chassis instead of having the Company purchase one for them.

Our gross profit as a percent of net sales decreased, declining 2.6% to 16.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from 19.4% for the comparable 2007 period. The modest decrease in crane product line gross profit percent is principally the result of higher material prices, which were largely offset by increases in the sale of cranes with higher lifting capacity (which have higher gross margins), a the benefit of sourcing materials from lower cost countries, a price increase that was instituted in mid year 2007 and an improvement in production efficiencies. The margin percent was also favorably impacted as more customers elected to supply their own chassis instead of having the Company purchase them. The markup on the chassis purchased by the Company is much lower than the margin on crane portion of the boom truck. A price increase for all new orders received on or after July 1^st has been implemented. The Company is, however, honoring old prices on its existing backlog. As such, a substantial benefit from the price increase will not occur until late this year or early next. The forklift/specialized carrier product line margin as percent of net revenue decreased due to a change in product mix and the negative impact of a stronger Canadian dollar had on our margins. Higher margin military and specialized carrier sales were down approximately 80% from the prior year. The margin percent on 2008 military sales was also lower than the prior year due to the impact of the stronger Canadian dollar. As indicated above the increase in commercial sales is largely attributed to Noble rough terrain forklifts sales. Noble product line margins are currently below our typical margin levels, due to inefficiencies experienced in incorporating this new line and because these sales generally do not reflect the Company’s recently announced price increase.

Selling, general and administrative expense – Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $3.0 million compared to $3.5 million for the comparable period in 2007. Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 are comprised of corporate expense of $0.8 million and $2.2 million related to operating companies. Selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended June 30, 2007 are comprised of corporate expense of $1.1 million and $2.4 million related to operating companies.

Selling, general and administrative expense, excluding corporate expenses, decreased $0.2 million to $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $2.4 million for the comparable three month period in 2007. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expense is due to modest variances both favorable and unfavorable on numerous lines items that net to a $0.2 million decrease.

Corporate expenses decreased $0.3 million to $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from the $1.1 million for the comparable 2007 three month period. The decrease is principally attributed to lower legal and consulting expenses. Legal expense were higher in 2007 as they were incurred in conjunction with the SEC review of the S-3 Registration Statement, which was filed on December 21, 2006 and declared effective on June 7, 2007. Consulting expenses were higher in 2007 as a consultant was assisting the Company in meeting its initial year Sarbanes Oxley obligations.

Operating income – Operating income from continuing operations of $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was equivalent to 4.6% of net revenues compared to an operating income of $2.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 or 6.9% of net revenues. The decrease in operating income as percent of net revenues is due principally to the decrease in the Company’s gross profit percent.

Interest expense – Interest expense was $0.5 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in interest is due to a decrease in outstanding debt and lower interest rates. Total debt outstanding decreased $12.9 million to $25.4 million at June 30, 2008 from $38.3 million at June 30, 2007. As indicated the Company also benefited from lower interest rates as a significant portion of our debt is indexed to the prime rate. The prime rate decreased from 8.25% at June 30, 2007 to 5.00% at June 30, 2008. Due to the improved financial strength of the Company our bank has agreed to further lower the interest rate on our domestic line of credit from prime plus 0.75% to prime plus 0.25%. and for the Canadian line from Canadian prime plus 2.0% to Canadian prime plus 1.5% for Canadian dollar borrowings.

25

Table of Contents

Foreign currency transaction loss – As a result of the currency losses incurred in the second quarter 2007, the Company investigated ways to mitigate future foreign currency risk. As a result, the Company began purchasing forward exchange contracts beginning in September of 2007. The Company endeavors to purchase forward currency exchange contracts such that the exchange gains and losses on the assets and liabilities denominated in other than the reporting units’ functional currency will be offset by the changes in the market value of the forward currency exchange contracts it holds. In accordance with FAS No. 52, the Company records at the balance sheet date the forward currency exchange contracts at their market value with any associated gain or loss being recorded in current earnings as a currency gain or loss. For the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company had a foreign currency transaction loss of $0.003 million which is net of forward currency contracts gains and losses

The foreign currency transaction loss for the three months ended June 30 2007 was $0.5 million. The foreign currency loss was driven by a historically unusual strengthening of the Canadian dollar during the three months ended June 30, 2007, when the U.S. to Canadian dollar exchange rate changed from .8674 to .9404. The Company had an acquisition note payable for $2.8 million to the former owner of Liftking Industries, which is denominated in Canadian dollars. The Company recorded a foreign exchange loss of $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 related to this note. Additionally during the three months ended June 30, 2007, Manitex Liftking, our Canadian subsidiary, had significant sales which were denominated in U.S. dollars and which on settlement generated a transaction loss of $0.3 million. Historically the USD / CDN$ exchange rate has not seen such volatility in a short time period and the Company had not taken any action to mitigate its foreign exchange exposures.

Income tax – The income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $0.1 million. The income tax expense for three months ended June 30, 2007 was $0.2 million. The 2008 effective tax rate differs from the federal statutory rate due to the current utilization of prior year losses for which no benefit was previously recognized. The fluctuation in income taxes is principally the result of change in effective tax rates which was 10.2% and 28.1% for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Net income from continuing operations – Net income from continuing operations increased $0.2 million to $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 for the reasons described above.

Discontinued operations of the Testing and Assembly Equipment segment for the three month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007

For the three months ended June 30, 2007 discontinued operations reported a net loss of $(0.2) million. The net loss from discontinued operations of $0.2 million comprised costs of sales of $0.5 million, operating expenses of $0.3 million offset by revenue of $0.6 million.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008 the Company reversed the $0.2 million reserve for termination of contracts, as it was determined that it was not needed. In three months ended June 30, 2007 it reduced it reserve for employee termination costs by $0.1 million as the Company determined that employee termination cost would be less than anticipated.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2007