Manitex International, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2016 March (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016  

OR

For the transition period from                to               

Commission File Number: 001-32401

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(708) 430-7500

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.):    Yes  o    No  x

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, no par, outstanding at May 2, 2016 was 16,125,661

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FORM 10-Q INDEX

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1

PART 1—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1—Financial Statements

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

2

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

3

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

4

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

5

MANITEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

Note 1. Nature of Operations

The Company is a leading provider of engineered lifting solutions. The Company operates in three business segments: the Lifting Equipment segment, the ASV segment and the Equipment Distribution segment.

Lifting Equipment Segment

The Company is a leading provider of engineered lifting solutions. The Company designs, manufactures and distributes a diverse group of products that serve different functions and are used in a variety of industries. Through its Manitex, Inc. subsidiary it markets a comprehensive line of boom trucks, truck cranes and sign cranes. Manitex’s boom trucks and crane products are primarily used for industrial projects, energy exploration and infrastructure development, including, roads, bridges and commercial construction. Badger Equipment Company (“Badger”) is a manufacturer of specialized rough terrain cranes and material handling products. Badger primarily serves the needs of the construction, municipality and railroad industries.

PM Group S.p.A. (“PM”) is a leading Italian manufacturer of truck mounted hydraulic knuckle boom cranes with a 50-year history of technology and innovation, and a product range spanning more than 50 models. Its largest subsidiary, Oil & Steel, S.p.A (“O&S”), is a manufacturer of truck-mounted aerial platforms with a diverse product line and an international client base.

Manitex Liftking ULC (“Manitex Liftking” or “Liftking”) sells a complete line of rough terrain forklifts, a line of stand-up electric forklifts, cushioned tired forklifts with lifting capacities from 18 thousand to 40 thousand pounds and special mission oriented vehicles, as well as other specialized carriers, heavy material handling transporters and steel mill equipment. Manitex Liftking’s rough terrain forklifts are used in both commercial and military applications. Specialty mission oriented vehicles and specialized carriers are designed and built to meet the Company’s unique customer needs and requirements. The Company’s specialized lifting equipment has met the particular needs of customers in various industries that include utility, ship building and steel mill industries.

CVS Ferrari, srl (“CVS”) designs and manufactures a range of reach stackers and associated lifting equipment for the global container handling market, that are sold through a broad dealer network. The Valla product line offers a full range of precision pick and carry cranes from 2 to 90 tons, using electric, diesel, and hybrid power options. Its cranes offer wheeled or tracked and fixed or swing boom configurations, with special applications designed specifically to meet the needs of its customers.

Manitex Sabre, Inc.(“Sabre”) manufactures a comprehensive line of specialized mobile tanks for liquid and solid storage and containment solutions with capacities from 8,000 to 21,000 gallons. Its mobile tanks are sold to specialized independent tank rental companies and through the Company’s existing dealer network. The tanks are used in a variety of end markets such as petrochemical, waste management and oil and gas drilling.  On March 12, 2015, the Company acquired certain assets of Columbia Tank and merged its operations with Sabre.  

ASV Segment

A.S.V., LLC (“ASV”) manufactures a line of high quality compact track and skid steer loaders. The products are used in the site clearing, general construction, forestry, golf course maintenance and landscaping industries, with general construction being the largest market. The ASV products are distributed through the Terex distribution channels as well as through the Company and other independent dealers. The Company has 51% ownership interest in ASV.

Equipment Distribution Segment

The Equipment Distribution segment comprises the operations of Crane & Machinery (“C&M”), a division of Manitex International, North American Equipment, Inc. (“NAE”) and North American Distribution, Inc. (“NAD”).  The segment markets products used primarily for infrastructure development and commercial construction applications that include road and bridge construction, general contracting, roofing, scrap handling and sign construction and maintenance. C&M is a distributor of Terex rough terrain and truck cranes products and supplies repair parts for a wide variety of medium to heavy duty construction equipment and sells domestically and internationally, predominately to end users, including the rental market. It also provides crane equipment repair services in the Chicago area. The segment markets previously-owned construction and heavy equipment and trailers both domestically and internationally through NAE.  The segment purchase previously owned equipment of various ages and conditions and often refurbishes the equipment before resale.  The segment also sells Valla products through NAD.    

6

Discontinued Operations

Manitex Load King, LLC (“Load King”) manufactured specialized custom trailers and hauling systems typically used for transporting heavy equipment. Load King trailers served niche markets in the commercial construction, railroad, military and equipment rental industries through a dealer network.  Load King was sold on December 28, 2015 and is presented as a discontinued operation.

2. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements, included herein, have been prepared by the Company without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Pursuant to these rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals, except as otherwise disclosed) necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position as of March 31, 2016, and results of its operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The consolidated balances as of December 31, 2015 were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting standards for interim financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2015. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations expected for the year.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are stated at the amounts the Company’s customers are invoiced and do not bear interest. Accounts Receivable is reduced by an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. The Company’s estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts related to trade receivables includes evaluation of specific accounts where the Company has information that the customer may have an inability to meet its financial obligations. The Company had allowances for doubtful accounts of $580 and $240 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Inventory Valuation

Inventory consists of stock materials and equipment stated at the lower of cost (first in, first out) or market. All equipment classified as inventory is available for sale. The Company records excess and obsolete inventory reserves. The estimated reserve is based upon specific identification of excess or obsolete inventories. Selling, general and administrative expenses are expensed as incurred and are not capitalized as a component of inventory.

Accrued Warranties

Warranty costs are accrued at the time revenue is recognized. The Company’s products are typically sold with a warranty covering defects that arise during a fixed period of time. The specific warranty offered is a function of customer expectations and competitive forces. The Equipment Distribution segment does not accrue for warranty costs at the time of sales, as they are reimbursed by the manufacturers for any warranty that they provide to their customers.

A liability for estimated warranty claims is accrued at the time of sale. The liability is established using historical warranty claim experience. Historical warranty experience is, however, reviewed by management. The current provision may be adjusted to take into account unusual or non-recurring events in the past or anticipated changes in future warranty claims. Adjustments to the initial warranty accrual are recorded if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are necessary. Warranty reserves are reviewed to ensure critical assumptions are updated for known events that may impact the potential warranty liability.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue and related costs are recognized when title passes and risk of loss passes to our customers which generally occurs upon shipment depending upon the terms of the contract.  Under certain contracts with our customers title passes to the customers when the units are completed. The units are segregated from our inventory and identified as belonging to the customer, the customer is notified that the units are complete and awaiting pick up or delivery as specified by the customer before income is recognized. Additionally, the customer is requested to sign an “Invoice Authorization Form” which acknowledges the contract terms and acknowledges that the customer has economic ownership and control over the unit. It also acknowledges that we are going to invoice the unit per terms of the contract. The Company insures any custodial risk that it may retain.

7

For FOB contracts, customers may be invoiced prior to the time customers take physical possession. Revenue is recognized in such cases only when the customer has a fixed commitment to purchase the units, the units have been completed, tested and made available to the customer for pickup or delivery, and the customer has authorized in writing that we hold the units for pickup or delivery at a time specified by the customer. In such cases, the units are invoiced under our customary billing terms, title to the units and risks of ownership pass to the customer upon invoicing, the units are segregated from our inventory and identified as belonging to the customer and we have no further obligations under the order. The Company insures any custodial risk that it may retain.

In addition, our policy requires in all instances certain minimum criteria be met in order to recognize revenue, specifically:

Interest Rate Swap Contracts—The Company enters into derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate risk related to certain foreign term loans. Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value at the date the contract is entered into and are subsequently remeasured to their fair value at the end of each reporting period. The resulting gain or loss is recognized in current earnings immediately unless the derivative is designated and effective as a hedging instrument, in which case the effective portion of the gain or loss is recognized and is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedging instrument affects earnings (date of sale). As part of the acquisition of PM Group, which was acquired on January 15, 2015, the Company acquired interest rate swap contracts, which manage the exposure to interest rate risk related to term loans with certain financial institutions in Italy. These contracts have been determined not to be hedge instruments under ASC 815-10.

Litigation Claims

In determining whether liabilities should be recorded for pending litigation claims, the Company must assess the allegations and the likelihood that it will successfully defend itself. When the Company believes it is probable that it will not prevail in a particular matter, it will then make an estimate of the amount of liability based, in part, on the advice of legal counsel.

Income Taxes

The Company’s provision for income taxes consists of U.S. and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date tax provision with the effective rate that the Company expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate and records cumulative adjustments as necessary. The effective tax rate is based upon the Company’s anticipated earnings both in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions.

Comprehensive Income

Reporting “Comprehensive Income” requires reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income includes, in addition to net earnings, other items that are reported as direct adjustments to stockholder’s equity. Currently, the comprehensive income adjustment required for the Company has two components. First is a foreign currency translation adjustment, the result of consolidating its foreign subsidiaries. The second component is a derivative instrument fair market value adjustment (net of income taxes) related to forward currency contracts designated as a cash flow hedge.

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with guidance found in ASC 805, Business Combinations. The guidance requires consideration given, including contingent consideration, assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be valued at their fair market values at the acquisition date. The guidance further provides that: (1) in-process research and development will be recorded at fair value as an indefinite-lived intangible asset; (2) acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred, (3) restructuring costs associated with a business combination will generally be expensed subsequent to the acquisition date; and (4) changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense.

ASC 805 requires that any excess of purchase price over fair value of assets acquired, including identifiable intangibles and liabilities assumed be recognized as goodwill. In accordance with ASC 805, any excess of fair value of acquired net assets, including identifiable intangibles assets, over the acquisition consideration results in a bargain purchase gain. Prior to recording a gain, the

8

acquiring entity must reassess whether all acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been identified and recognized and perform re-measurements to verify that the consideration paid, assets acquired and liabilities assumed have been properly valued.

PM Group and Columbia Tank results are included in the Company’s results from their respective dates of acquisition of January 15, 2015 and March 12, 2015.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year’s consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year’s presentation.

In conjunction with the adoption of new accounting standards, certain debt issuance costs for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as well as certain amounts as of December 31, 2015, have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

PM historically grouped all operating expenses and did not classify them as either cost of sales or as selling, general and administrative expenses. For the quarter ending March 31, 2015, operating expenses were classified as either cost of sales or selling, general and administrative expense. This classification was based on the information that was available at the time. Subsequent to first quarter 2015, PM has refined the calculation and has determined that $1,710 of expense classified as selling, general and administrative expense should have been included in cost of sales in the first quarter of 2015.

For the quarter ended March 31, 2015 employee severance expense of $344 was included in other expense.  The aforementioned amounts have to been reclassified and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015.  For the quarter ended March 31, 2015 gains on interest rate swaps of $354 were included in other expense. The aforementioned amounts have to been reclassified and are included as a component of interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015.    

Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

Interest received and paid, income tax refunds received and income taxes paid and non-cash transactions for the periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

3. Acquisitions

PM Group

On July 21, 2014 Manitex International, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a series of agreements to acquire PM Group S.p.A, (“PM Group”), a manufacturer of truck mounted cranes based in San Cesario sul Panaro, Modena, Italy. On January 15, 2015, the Company’s acquisition of PM closed.

The fair value of the purchase consideration is shown below:

9

In accordance ASC 805, Business Combinations, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are valued based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The Company engaged a valuation expert and a tax advisor to provide guidance and assistance to management which was considered and in part relied upon in completing its purchase price allocation. The excess of the purchase price over the aggregate estimated fair value of net assets acquired was allocated to goodwill. The following table summarizes the revised allocation of the PM acquisition consideration to the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:

Purchase price allocation:

Contingent Liability . In accordance with ASC 805, the acquirer is to recognize the acquisition date fair value of contingent liability. The Company entered into an Option Agreement with one of the PM Group senior banks under which the bank will sell to the Company PM debt with a face value of €5,000. Under the Option Agreement, the bank shall receive €2,500 if PM has 2017 EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, of between €14,500 and €16,500, and €5,000 if 2017 EBITDA exceeds €16,500. If 2017 EBITDA, as defined in the agreement, is less than €14,500, the bank is to sell the debt to the Company for €0.001. Given the disparity between the EBITDA threshold and the Company’s projected financial results, it was determined that a Monte Carlo simulation analysis was appropriate to determine the fair value of contingent consideration. It was determined that the probability weighted average payment is €1,093 or $1,270. Based thereon, we determined the fair value of the contingent liability to be €1,093 or $1,270. This amount is included in other long-term liabilities in the above table.

Non-recourse PM debt : Under the transaction, PM remains obligated for the following debt:

Non-interest bearing debt . In connection with the acquisition, the Company assumed non-interest bearing debt of €10,289. The fair value of the non-interest bearing debt was determined to be €8,829 or $10,435. The fair value of the non-interest bearing debt was calculated to equal the present value of future debt payments discounted at a market rate of return commensurate with similar debt instruments with comparable levels of risk and marketability. A rate of 5.24% was determined to be the appropriate rate following an assessment of the risk inherent in the debt issued and the market rate for debt of this nature using corporate credit ratings.

The interest rate swap derivative was valued at its fair value, which is based on quotes from a financial institution.

10

Tangible assets and liabilities: The tangible assets and liabilities were valued at their respective carrying values by PM, except for certain adjustments necessary to state such amounts at their estimated fair values at the acquisition date. Significant fair market adjustments were made to decrease accounts receivable by $260, increase inventory by $911, decrease fixed assets by $4,699 and to decrease liabilities by $345.

Intangible assets: There are three fundamental methods applied to value intangible assets outlined in FASB ASC 820. These methods include the Cost Approach, the Market Approach, and the Income Approach. Each of these valuation approaches were considered in our estimation of value.

Trade names and trademarks, patented and unpatented technology: Valued using the Relief from Royalty method, a form of both the Market Approach and the Income Approach. Because the Company has established trade names and trademarks and has developed patented and unpatented technology, we estimated the benefit of ownership as the relief from the royalty expense that would need to be incurred in absence of ownership.

Customer relationships: Because there is a specific earnings stream that can be associated with customer relationships, we determined the fair value of these relationships based on the excess earnings method, a form of the Income Approach.

Goodwill: Goodwill represents the excess of total consideration paid and the fair value of net assets acquired. The recognition of goodwill of $30,173 reflects the inherent value in the PM reputation, which has been built since being founded in 1959 and the prospects for significant future earnings.

In calculating the Company’s deferred tax liabilities the fact that goodwill is not deductible was considered.

Acquisition transaction costs: Cost and expenses related to the acquisition have been expensed as incurred and recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company incurred fees of $194 for legal services, $750 for acquisition related bonus payments, $347 for accounting services in connection with the prior year audit of PM financial statements and $294 for other costs related to the acquisition.

The results of the acquired PM operations have been included in our consolidated statement of operations since the acquisition date. PM is included in the Lifting segment for segment reporting purposes.

Columbia Tanks

On March 12, 2015 the Company’s subsidiary, Manitex Sabre, entered into an inventory purchase agreement and an equipment purchase agreement with Columbia Tanks LLC, an Indiana company and J.F. Henry, the “Member”, for the purchase of inventory and used manufacturing equipment. In a separate agreement with F.H. Associates, the Company entered into a three year lease of a 99,000 square foot manufacturing facility at an annual rent commencing at $240 per annum and increasing to $270 and $300 for the second and third years, respectively.  The lease is renewable after three years at the Company’s option.

The fair value of the purchase consideration was $1,214 in total as shown below:

Seller Note . In connection with the inventory and equipment purchases, the Company issued two non-interest bearing notes for $450 and $390 that mature on August 31, 2016 and May 31, 2016, respectively. The fair value of Inventory Note and the Equipment Note was determined to be $436 and $378. The fair value of the notes was calculated to equal the present value of future debt payments discounted at a market rate of return commensurate with similar debt instruments with comparable levels of risk and marketability. A rate of 4.0% was determined to be the appropriate rate following an assessment of the risk inherent in the debt issued and the market rate for debt of this nature using corporate credit ratings.

Under the acquisition method of accounting, in accordance ASC 805, Business Combinations, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are valued based on their estimated fair values as of the date of the acquisition. The purchase price allocation is preliminary and is subject to final review of inventory, fixed assets and related intangibles.

11

The following table summarizes the allocation of the Columbia acquisition consideration to the fair value of the assets acquired:

Purchase price allocation:

Tangible and Intangible Assets and Liabilities: The tangible assets were valued at their respective purchase price. Management has determined that the amount paid to acquire the assets approximates the fair value of the assets acquired.

4. Financial Instruments—Forward Currency Exchange Contracts and Interest Rate Swap Contracts

The following tables set forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by ASC 820-10, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following is summary of items that the Company measures at fair value on a recurring basis except as noted:

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820-10 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

12

Fair value of the forward currency contracts are determined on the last day of each reporting period using observable inputs, which are supplied to the Company by the foreign currency trading operation of its bank and are Level 2 items.

5. Derivatives Financial Instruments

The Company’s risk management objective is to use the most efficient and effective methods available to us to minimize, eliminate, reduce or transfer the risks which are associated with fluctuation of exchange rates between the Canadian dollar, Euro, Chilean Peso and the U.S. dollar.

Forward Currency Contracts

When the Company’s Canadian subsidiary receives a significant new U.S. dollar order, management will evaluate different options that may be available to mitigate future currency exchange risks. The decision to hedge future sales is not automatic and is decided case by case. The Company will only use hedge instruments to hedge firm existing sales orders and not estimated exposure, when management determines that exchange risks exceeds desired risk tolerance levels. The forward currency contracts used to hedge future sales are designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815-10 provided certain criteria are met.

The Company enters into forward currency exchange contracts in relationship such that the exchange gains and losses on the assets and liabilities denominated in other than the reporting units’ functional currency would be offset by the changes in the market value of the forward currency exchange contracts it holds. The forward currency exchange contracts that the Company has to offset existing assets and liabilities denominated in other than the reporting units’ functional currency have been determined not to be considered a hedge under ASC 815-10. The Company records at the balance sheet date the forward currency exchange contracts at its market value with any associated gain or loss being recorded in current earnings. Both realized and unrealized gains and losses related to forward currency contracts are included in current earnings and are reflected in the Statement of Income in the other income expense section on the line titled foreign currency transaction gains (losses). Items denominated in other than a reporting units functional currency includes U.S. denominated accounts receivables and accounts payable held by our Canadian subsidiary and certain intercompany receivables due from the Company’s Canadian and Italian subsidiaries.

As required, forward currency contracts are recognized as an asset or liability at fair value on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (date of sale). Gains or losses on cash flow hedges when recognized into income are included in net revenues. Gains and losses on the derivative instruments representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. The Company expects minimal ineffectiveness as the Company has hedged only firm sales orders and has not hedged estimated exposures. As of March 31, 2016, the Company had no outstanding forward currency contracts that were in place to hedge future sales. Therefore, there are currently no unrealized pre-tax gains or losses which will be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings during the next 12 months.

At March 31, 2016, the Company had entered into two forward currency exchange contracts. The contracts obligates the Company to purchase approximately CDN $2,060. The first contract for CDN$125 matures on May 10, 2016. Under the contract, the Company will purchase Canadian dollars at an exchange rate of $0.7225.  The second contract for CDN$1,935 matures on May 26, 2016. Under the contract, the Company will purchase Canadian dollars at an exchange rate of $0.7752. The Canadian to US dollar exchange rates was $0.7700 at March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2016, the Company had forward currency contracts to sell Euros. The contracts obligate the Company to sell  €1,100 in total. The contracts, which are in various amounts, mature between April 29, 2016 and July 1, 2016. Under the contracts, the Company will sell Euros at exchange rates between $1.3670  and $1.4307. The Euro to US dollar exchange rate was 1.1390 at March 31, 2016.

The Company’s PM Group has an intercompany receivable denominated in Euros from its Chilean subsidiary. At March 31, 2016, the Company has entered into two forward contracts that mature on July 11, 2016.  The purpose of which is to mitigate the income effect related to this intercompany receivable that results with a change in exchange rate between the Euro and the Chilean peso. The first contract obligates the Company to purchase €2,096 at $1.0912. The second contract obliges the Company to sell 1,700,000 Chilean pesos at an exchange rate of 743.25 per U.S. dollar. These two contracts achieve the desired purpose as U.S. dollar amounts involved in the two forward contracts offset each other.

13

Interest Rate Swap Contracts

The Company uses financial instruments available on the market, including derivatives, solely to minimize its cost of borrowing and hedge the risk of interest rate and exchange rate fluctuation. In January 2009, prior to the January 15, 2015 acquisition date, PM Group entered into the following contract in order to hedge the interest rate risk related to its term loans with two financial institutions:

A contract signed by PM Group, for an original notional amount of € 20,000 (€ 20,000 at March 16, 2016), maturing on February 3, 2017 with interest payable every February 3 and August 3 each year. PM Group pays interest at a rate of 3.48% and receives from the counterparties interest at the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“Euribor”) for the period in question.

As of March 31, 2016, the Company had the following forward currency contracts and interest rate swaps:

The following table provides the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments that are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

Total derivatives NOT designated as a hedge instrument

The following tables provide the effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

The Counterparty to each of the currency exchange forward contracts is a major financial institution with credit ratings of investment grade or better and no collateral is required. Management continues to monitor counterparty risk and believes the risk of incurring losses on derivative contracts related to credit risk is unlikely.

14

6. Net Earnings (Loss) per Common Share

Basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution of convertible debt and restricted stock units. Details of the calculations are as follows:

There are 268,177 and 201,695 restricted stock units which are anti-dilutive and therefore not included in the average number of diluted shares shown above for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

7. Equity

Stock Issuance

Shares issued to Terex Corporation

On March 1, 2016, the Company issued 30,425 shares of common stock to the Terex Corporation as the Company elected to pay $150 of the final principal payment due March 1, 2016 in shares of the Company’s common stock. The share price for the transaction was $4.93 which was determined based upon the average closing price for the twenty trading days ending the day before the payment was due.  

15

Stock issued to employees and Directors

The Company issued shares of common stock to employees and Directors as restricted stock units issued under the Company’s 2004 Incentive Plan vested. Upon issuance entries were recorded to increase common stock and decrease paid in capital for the amounts shown below. The following is a summary of stock issuances that occurred during the period:

On March 13, 2015, the Company paid a portion of officers and employee 2014 bonuses in stock. This resulted in an issuance of 22,868 shares with an aggregate value of $212. Upon issuance, the Company’s common stock was increased by $212 and the bonus accrual was decreased by a corresponding amount.

Stock Repurchase

On January 1, 2016, the Company purchased 7,074 shares of Common Stock from certain employees at $5.95  per share the closing price on that date. The stock was purchased from the employees to satisfy employees’ withholding tax obligations related to stock issued on January 1, 2016.  Common stock was decreased by $42 , the value of the shares purchased.

2004 Equity Incentive Plan

In 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and subsequently amended and restated the plan on September 13, 2007 and May 28, 2009. The maximum number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plan is 917,046 shares. The total number of shares reserved for issuance however, can be adjusted to reflect certain corporate transactions or changes in the Company’s capital structure. The Company’s employees and members of the board of directors who are not our employees or employees of our affiliates are eligible to participate in the plan. The plan is administered by a committee of the board comprised of members who are outside directors. The plan provides that the committee has the authority to, among other things, select plan participants, determine the type and amount of awards, determine award terms, fix all other conditions of any awards, interpret the plan and any plan awards. Under the plan, the committee can grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and performance units, except Directors may not be granted stock appreciation rights, performance shares and performance units. During any calendar year, participants are limited in the number of grants they may receive under the plan. In any year, an individual may not receive options for more than 15,000 shares, stock appreciation rights with respect to more than 20,000 shares, more than 20,000 shares of restricted stock and/or an award for more than 10,000 performance shares or restricted stock units or performance units. The plan requires that the exercise price for stock options and stock appreciation rights be not less than fair market value of the Company’s common stock on date of grant.

The Company awarded under the Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Plan a total of 183,850 restricted stock units to employees and directors on January 4, 2016. The restricted stock units are subject to the same conditions as the restricted stock awards except the restricted stock units will not have voting rights and the common stock will not be issued until the vesting criteria are satisfied.

The following table contains information regarding restricted stock units:

On January 4, 2016, the Company granted an aggregate of 23,250  restricted stock units to five independent Directors pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan. Restricted stock units of 7,673, 7,673 and 7,904 vest on January 4, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

16

On January 4, 2016, the Company granted 160,600 restricted stock units to employees pursuant to the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.   Restricted stock units of 52,998, 52,998 and 54,604 vest on January 4, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively.

The value of the restricted stock is being charged to compensation expense over the vesting period. Compensation expense includes expense related to restricted stock units of $285 and $362 for the three months   March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additional compensation expense related to restricted stock units will be $847, $743 and $370 for the remainder of 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.

8. New Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Issued Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 outlines a new, single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. This new revenue recognition model provides a five-step analysis in determining when and how revenue is recognized. The new model will require revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration a company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, deferral of the effective date, which amends ASU 2014-09.  As a result, the effective date is the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this guidance will have on the determination or reporting of its financial results.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory,” (“ASU 2015-11”). ASU 2015-11 requires inventory be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value and options that currently exist for market value be eliminated. ASU 2015-11 defines net realizable value as estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. ASU 2015-11 should be applied prospectively. The Company is evaluating the impact adoption of this guidance will have on determination or reporting of its financial results.

In November 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17 (“ASU 2015-17”), Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. The amendments in ASU 2015-17 seek to simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. ASU 2015-17 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods, with early application permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company has not determined the full impact of implementation of this standard, but believes it will not be material to net income.  The Company believes that the main impact of adoption of the standard will be the reclassification of current deferred tax assets that will result in a reduction in deferred tax liabilities.   

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." The amendments in ASU 2016-01, among other things, require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables); and eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018. The Company is evaluating the impact the adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” (“ASU 2016-02”) requires lessees to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Consistent with current U.S. GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815),” (“ASU 2016-05”). ASU 2016-05 provides guidance clarifying that novation of a derivative contract (i.e. a change in counterparty) in a hedge accounting relationship does not, in and of itself, require designation of that hedge accounting relationship. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, with early adoption permitted. Adoption is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

17

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815),” (“ASU 2016-06”). ASU 2016-06 simplifies the embedded derivative analysis for debt instruments containing contingent call or put options by clarifying that an exercise contingency does not need to be evaluated to determine whether it relates to interest rates and credit risk in an embedded derivative analysis. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, with early adoption permitted. Adoption is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” (“ASU 2016-08”). ASU 2016-08 further clarifies principal and agent relationships within ASU 2014-09. Similar to ASU 2014-09, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 is intended to simplify several aspects of accounting for share-based payment awards. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2017, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” (“ASU 2016-10”).  The amendments in ASU 2016-10 are expected to reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance on identifying promised goods or services in contracts with customers and to improve the operability and understandability of licensing implementation guidance related to the entity's intellectual property.  Similar to ASU 2014-09, the effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017.  The Company is evaluating the impact that adoption of this new standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Except as noted above, the guidance issued by the FASB during the current year is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

9. Inventory

The components of inventory are as follows:

The Company has established reserves for obsolete and excess inventory of $2,075 and $1,724 as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

18

10. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $1,778 and $1,695 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Changes in goodwill for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are as follows:

11. Accrued Expenses

12. Accrued Warranty

The liability is established using historical warranty claim experience. Historical warranty experience is, however, reviewed by management. The current provision may be adjusted to take into account unusual or non-recurring events in the past or anticipated changes in future warranty claims. Adjustments to the initial warranty accrual are recorded if actual claim experience indicates that

19

adjustments are necessary. Warranty reserves are reviewed to ensure critical assumptions are updated for known events that may impact the potential warranty liability.

13. Credit Facilities and Debt

The Company together with its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries has a credit agreement (as amended, the“Credit Agreement”) with Comerica Bank (“Comerica”) and another lender who is a participant under the credit agreement.  The Credit Agreement provides the Company with (a) a Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility to the U.S. Borrowers (“U.S. Revolver”), and (b) Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility to the Canadian Borrower (“Canadian Revolver”). These two credit facilities each mature on August 19, 2018.

The Company is also required to comply with certain financial covenants as defined in the Credit Agreement including maintaining (1) a Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio of not less than 0.65 to 1.00 at December 31, 2015, 1.00 to 1.00 at March 31, 2016 and 1.20 to 1.00 at June 30, 2016 and each quarter thereafter, (2) a Maximum Senior Secured First Lien North American Debt to Consolidated North American EBITDA Ratio of not more than 7.50 to 1.00 at December 31, 2015, 10.00 to 1.00 at March 31, 2016 and 2.75 at June 30, 2016 and each quarter thereafter, and (3) a Maximum Consolidated North American Total Debt to Consolidated North American EBITDA Ratio of not more than 11.50 to 1.00 at December 31, 2015, 15.00 to 1.00 at March 31, 2016 and 3.75 to 1.00 at June 30, 2016 and each quarter thereafter.

The indebtedness is collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets, except for the assets of the ASV and PM as well as the Company’s equity interest in these two Companies.  The facility contains customary limitations including, but not limited to, limitations on acquisitions, dividends, repurchase of the Company’s stock and capital expenditures.

U.S. Revolver

At March 31, 2016 the Company had drawn $27,789 under the $35,000 U.S. Revolver. The U.S. Revolver bears interest, at the Company’s option at the base rate plus a spread or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread. The base rate is the greater of the bank’s prime rate, the federal funds rate plus 1.00% or the 30 day LIBOR rate Adjusted Daily plus 1.00%. For the U.S. Revolver the interest rate spread for Base Rate is between 1.75% and 3.0% and for LIBOR the spread is between 2.75% and 4.0% in each case with the spread being based on the consolidated total debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, for the preceding twelve months. The base rate and LIBOR spread is currently 3.0% and 4.0%, respectively. Funds borrowed under the LIBOR options can be borrowed for periods of one, two, three or six months.

The $35,000 U.S. Revolver is a secured financing facility under which borrowing availability is limited to existing collateral as defined in the agreement. The maximum amount available is limited to (1) the sum of 85% of eligible receivables, (2) the lesser of 85% of eligible bill and hold receivables or $10,000, (3) the lesser of 50% of eligible inventory or $26,500, (43) the lesser of 80% of used equipment purchased for resale or rent or $2,000 reduced by (5) outstanding standby letter or credits issued by the bank. At March 31, 2016, the maximum the Company could borrow based on available collateral was capped at $35,000.

Under the Credit Agreement, the banks are also paid an annual facility fee between 0.375% and 0.50% payable in quarterly installments.

The agreement permits the Company to issue unsecured guarantees of indebtedness owed by CVS Ferrari, srl to foreign banks in respect to working capital financing, not to exceed the lesser of $9,000 or the amount of such financing. Additionally the agreement allows the Company to make or allow to remain outstanding any investment (whether such investment shall be of the character of investment of shares of stock, evidence of indebtedness or other securities or otherwise) in, or any loans or advances to CVS or to any other wholly-owned foreign subsidiary in an amount not to exceed $7,500.

20

Term Loan

As of March 31, 2016 the Company has repaid the entire $14,000 borrowed on January 9, 2015 under the Term Loan.

Canadian Revolver

At March 31, 2016 the Company had drawn $6,930 under the Canadian Revolver. The Company is eligible to borrow up to $12,000. The maximum amount available is limited to the sum of (1) 90% of eligible insured receivables, (2) 85% of eligible receivables plus (3) the lesser of (i) 50% of eligible inventory including work in process inventory up to CDN$3,000 and (ii) CDN $10,500.  At March  31, 2016, the maximum the Company could borrow based on available collateral was $7,135. The indebtedness is collateralized by substantially all of Manitex Liftking ULC’s assets. The Company can borrow in either U.S. or Canadian dollars. For the Canadian Revolver, the interest rate spread for U.S. prime based borrowing is between 1.75% and 3.00% and for Canadian prime based borrowings the interest rate spread is between 2.75% and 4.00%, in each case with the spread being based on the Consolidated North American Total Debt to Consolidated North American EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, for the preceding twelve months.  Alternately, the Company can elect to borrow Canadian funds and choose to pay interest based on the Canadian Bankers’ Acceptance Rate plus a spread.  The loan interest rate spread for Bankers’ Acceptance Rate is between 2.75% and 4.0%.   As of March 31, 2016 the spread on the U.S. Prime based borrowing was 3.0%, Canadian Prime based borrowings was 4.0% and the Canadian’s Banker Acceptance borrowing was 4.00%.

Under the Credit Agreement, the banks are also paid 0.50% annual facility fee payable in quarterly installments.

Specialized Export Facility

The Canadian Revolving Credit facility contains an additional $3,000 Specialized Export Facility that matures on July 1, 2016. Borrowings under the Specialized Export Facility are guaranteed by the Company and Export Development Canada (“EDC”), a corporation established by an Act of Parliament of Canada. Under the Export Facility Liftking can borrow 90% of the total cost of material and labor incurred on export contracts which are subject to the EDC guarantee. The EDC guarantee, which expires on July 1, 2016, is issued under their export guarantee program and covers certain goods that are to be exported from Canada. At March 31, 2016, the maximum the Company could have borrowed based upon available collateral under the Specialized Export Facility was $3,000. Under this facility, the Company can borrow either Canadian or U.S. dollars.

Any borrowings under the facility in Canadian dollars currently bear interest of 3.2% which is based on the Canadian prime rate (the Canadian prime was 2.7% at March 31, 2016). Any borrowings under the facility in U.S. dollars bear interest at the U.S. prime rate (prime was 3.5% at March 31, 2016). Repayment of advances made under the Export Facility are due sixty days after shipment of the goods, or five business days after the borrower receives payment in full for the goods covered by the guarantee (the “Scheduled Payment Date”) or upon the termination of the EDC guarantee.

At March 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding borrowing in connection with the Specialized Export Facility of $2,392.

Notes Payable—Terex- ASV Acquisition

On December 19, 2014, the Company executed a note payable to Terex Corporation for $1,594. The note matures on December 19, 2016 and has an annual interest rate of 4.5%. Interest is payable semi-annually beginning on June 19, 2015. The note was issued in connection with acquisition of 51% interest in ASV from Terex Corporation. The note has an outstanding balance of $1,594 at March 31, 2016.

Columbia Notes

In connection with Columbia acquisition the Company issued two notes. At date of issuance, the notes had face amounts of $450 (“Inventory Note”) and $390 (“Equipment Note”), respectively and both are non-interest bearing. The Inventory Note matures on August 31, 2016 and requires the Company to make 18 monthly installment payments of $25. The Equipment Note matures on May 31, 2016 and requires the Company to make 14 monthly installment payments of $25 and a final payment of $40 on May 31, 2016.

On March 12, 2015, the date of issuance, the fair value of Inventory Note and the Equipment Note was determined to be $436 and $378, respectively. The fair value of the notes was calculated to equal the present value of future debt payments discounted at a market rate of return commensurate with similar debt instruments with comparable levels of risk and marketability. A rate of 4.0% was determined to be the appropriate rate following an assessment of the risk inherent in the debt issued and the market rate for debt of this

21

nature using corporate credit ratings. The difference between face amount of the promissory note and its fair value is being amortized over the life of the note and recorded as interest expense.

At March 31, 2016, the Inventory Note and the Equipment Note had balances of $124 and $65, respectively.

Note Payable—Bank

At March 31, 2016, the Company has a $512 note payable to a bank. The note dated January 5, 2016 had an original principal amount of $701 and an annual interest rate of 3.5%. Under the terms of the note the company is required to make eleven monthly payments of $65 commencing January 30, 2016. The proceeds from the note were used to pay annual premiums for certain insurance policies carried by the Company. The holder of the note has a security interest the insurance policies it financed and has the right upon default to cancel these policies and receive any unearned premiums.

CVS Debt

CVS Short-Term Working Capital Borrowings

At March 31, 2016, CVS had established demand credit facilities with twelve Italian banks. Under the facilities, CVS can borrow up to €375 ($427) on an unsecured basis and additional amounts as advances against orders, invoices and letter of credit with a total maximum facilities (including the unsecured portion) of €18,031 ($20,537). The Company has granted guarantees in respect to available credit facilities in the amount of €588 ($669).  The maximum amount outstanding is limited to 80% of the assigned accounts receivable if there is an invoice issued or 50% if there is an order/contract issued. The banks will evaluate each request to borrow individually and determine the allowable advance percentage and interest rate. In making its determination the bank considers the customer’s credit and location of the customer.

At March 31, 2016, the banks had advanced CVS €8,194 ($9,333) at variable interest rates which currently range from 2.25% to 6.25%.

At March 31, 2016, the Company has guaranteed €588 ($669) of CVS’s outstanding debt.

Notes Payable

At March 31, 2016, CVS has a €666 ($759) note payable to a bank. The note dated March 27, 2015 had an original principal amount of €1,000 ($1,139) and an annual interest rate of EURIBOR 3 month plus 140 basis points. Under the terms of the note CVS is required to make twelve quarterly principal and interest payments beginning on June 30, 2015 through March 31, 2018. The Company does not guarantee any of the borrowing.

At March 31, 2016, CVS has a €2,363 ($2,691) note payable to a bank. The note dated March 4, 2015 had an original principal amount of €2,363 ($2,691) and an annual interest rate of 0.50% on €2,127 ($2,423) and 3.65% on the balance of €236 ($269). Under the terms of the note CVS is required to make sixteen semi-annual principal payments beginning on December 31, 2016 thru June 30, 2024. CVS is also required to make nineteen semi-annual interest payments beginning on June 30, 2015 through June 30, 2024. The Company is guaranteeing €236 ($269) of the borrowing.

At March 31, 2016, CVS has a €919 ($1,046) note payable to a bank. The note dated October 20, 2015 had an original principal amount of €1,000 ($1,139) and an annual interest rate of 1.850%. Under the terms of the note CVS is required to make twelve quarterly principal and interest payments beginning on January 20, 2016, through October 20, 2018. The Company does not guarantee any of the borrowing.

Acquisition note—Valla

In connection with the acquisition of Valla, the Company executed a note payable.  At March 31, 2016, the note a balance of €79 ($90) and is payable on December 31, 2016.

ASV Loan Facilities

In connection with the ASV arrangement, ASV entered into two separate loan facilities on December 19, 2014, one with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMCB”), and the other with Garrison Loan Agency Services LLC (“Garrison”). These two facilities are for the exclusive use of ASV and restrict the transfer of cash outside of ASV.

22

Both loan facilities are secured by certain assets of ASV and by a pledge of the equity interest in ASV. Pursuant to an intercreditor agreement dated as of December 19, 2014 among JPMCB, Garrison and ASV (“ASV Intercreditor Agreement”), the parties have agreed that (i) JPMCB shall have a first-priority security interest in substantially all personal property of ASV and (ii) Garrison shall have a first priority security interest in (a) substantially all real property of ASV and (b) a pledge of 100% of the equity interest in ASV issued to Company and to Terex. ASV’s loans are solely obligations of ASV and have not been guaranteed by the Company and are not collateralized by any assets outside of ASV.

ASV Revolving Loan Facility with JPMCB

On December 19, 2014 ASV entered into a $35,000 revolving loan facility as amended with JPMCB (“JPMCB Credit Agreement”) as the administrative agent, which loan facility includes two sub-facilities: (i) a $1,000 as amended sub-facility for letters of credit, and (ii) a $7,500 sub-facility for loans to be guaranteed by the Export-Import Bank of the United States of America (“Ex-Im Bank Loans”). A portion of the JPMCB Credit Agreement was used to fund certain transaction costs and payments required by ASV under the ASV arrangement. The remainder of the loan amount will be available to ASV for its general working capital needs.

The $35,000 revolving loan facility is a secured financing facility under which borrowing availability is limited to existing collateral as defined in the agreement. The maximum amount available is limited to (1) the sum of 85% of eligible receivables, plus (2) the lesser of (i) 65% of eligible inventory valued at the lower of cost or market value or (ii) 85% of eligible inventory valued at the net orderly liquidation value, reduced by (3) (i) certain reserves determined by JPMCB, (ii) the amount of outstanding standby letters of credit issued under the JPMCB Credit Agreement and (iii) the amount of outstanding Ex-In Bank loans. The facility matures on December 19, 2019. At March 31, 2016, ASV had drawn $16,653 under the JPMCB Credit Agreement. The JPMCB Credit Agreement bears interest at ASV’s option at JPMCB’ prime rate plus a spread or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread. The interest rate spread for prime rate is between 0.50% and 1.00% and for LIBOR the spread is between 1.50% and 2.00% in each case with the spread being based on the aggregate amount of funds available for borrowing by ASV under the JPMCB Credit Agreement, as defined in the JPMCB Credit Agreement. The base rate and LIBOR spread is currently 1.00% and 2.00%, respectively. Funds borrowed under the LIBOR options can be borrowed for periods of one, two, three or six months. At March 31, 2016, the maximum ASV could borrow based on available collateral was capped at $20,821.

The indebtedness of ASV under the JPMCB Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of ASV’s assets, but subject to the terms of the ASV Intercreditor Agreement. The facility contains customary limitations including, but not limited to, limitations on additional indebtedness, acquisitions, and payment of dividends. ASV is also required to comply with certain financial covenants as defined in the JPMCB Credit Agreement including maintaining a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of not less than 1.10 to 1.0.

Under the JPMCB Credit Agreement, the banks are also paid a commitment fee payable in monthly installments equal to (i) the average daily amount of funds available but undrawn multiplied by (ii) an annual rate of 0.25%.

ASV Term Loan with Garrison

On December 19, 2014 ASV entered into a $40,000 term loan facility as amended with Garrison (“Garrison Credit Agreement”) as the administrative agent. A portion of the Garrison Credit Agreement was used to fund certain transaction costs and payments required by ASV under the ASV arrangement.

At March 31, 2016, ASV had a remaining principal balance of $33,500 (less $2,016 debt issuance cost, for a net debt of $31,484) under the Garrison Credit Agreement. The Garrison Credit Agreement bears interest, at a one-month adjusted LIBOR rate plus a spread of between 10.5% and 11.0%. The spread is based on the ratio of ASV’s total debt to its EBITDA, as defined in the Garrison Credit Agreement. The LIBOR spread is currently 11.0%. The interest rate for the period ending March 31, 2016 was 12.0%.  Debt issuance costs offset against the Garrison term note totaled $2,016 at March 31, 2016 (resulting in an effective rate of 12.8%).

ASV is obligated to make quarterly principal payments of $500 commencing on April 1, 2015. Additionally, ASV made a principal payment of $4,000 on March 15, 2016.  Any unpaid principal is due on maturity, which is December 19, 2019. Interest is payable monthly.

The indebtedness of ASV under the Garrison Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all of ASV assets, but subject to the terms of the ASV Intercreditor Agreement. The facility contains customary limitations including, but not limited to, limitations on additional indebtedness, acquisitions, and payment of dividends. ASV is also required to comply with certain financial covenants as defined in the Garrison Credit Agreement including maintaining (1) a Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage ratio of not less than 1.10 to 1.0 which shall step up to 1.50 to 1.00 by March 31, 2017, (2) a Leverage Ratio of 4.75 to 1.00, which shall step down to 2.50 to 1.00 by March 31, 2018 and (3) a limitation of $1,600 in capital expenditures in any fiscal year.

23

PM Group Short-Term Working Capital Borrowings

At March 31, 2016, PM Group had established demand credit and overdraft facilities with seven Italian banks and seven banks in South America. Under the facilities, PM Group can borrow up to approximately €24,889 ($28,349) for advances against invoices, and letter of credit and bank overdrafts. Interest on the Italian working capital facilities is charged at the 3-month or 6-month Euribor plus 200 basis points, while interest on overdraft facilities is charged at the 3 month Euribor plus 350 basis points. Interest on the South American facilities is charged at a flat rate of points for advances on invoices ranging from 8% - 20%.

At March 31, 2016, the Italian banks had advanced PM Group €18,542 ($21,119), at variable interest rates, which currently range from 1.51% to 1.76%. At March 31, 2016, the South American banks had advanced PM Group €188 ($214). Total short-term borrowings for PM Group were €18,730 ($21,333) at March 31, 2016.

PM Group Term Loans

At March 31, 2016, PM Group has a €13,766 ($15,679) term loan with two Italian banks, BPER and Unicredit. The term loan is split into three separate notes and is secured by PM Group’s common stock.  Debt issuance costs offset against these term loans totaled $1,286 at March 31, 2016.

The first note has an outstanding principal balance of €3,901 ($4,443), is charged interest at the 6-month Euribor plus 236 basis points, effective rate of 2.32% at March 31, 2016. The note is payable in semi-annual installments beginning June 2017 and ending December 2021. The second note has an outstanding principal balance of €4,865 ($5,541), is charged interest at the 6-month Euribor plus 286 basis points, effective rate of 2.82% at March 31, 2016. The note is payable in semi-annual installments beginning June 2017 and ending December 2021. The third note has an outstanding principal balance of €5,000 ($5,695) and is non-interest bearing. The note is payable in two semi-annual installments beginning June 2016 and ending December 2017 and a final balloon payment in December 2022. Accrued deferred interest on these notes through the date of acquisition at January 15, 2015, totaled €4,857 ($5,532) and is payable in semi-annual installments beginning June 2015 and ending December 2016. At March 31, 2016, the remaining deferred interest was €1,481 ($1,687) as the original amount was reduced when the payments of the installments were made.

An adjustment in the purchase accounting to value the non-interest bearing debt at its fair market value was made. At January 15, 2015 it was determined that the fair value of the debt was €1,460 or $1,663 less than the book value. This reduction is not reflected in the above descriptions of PM debt. This discount is being amortized over the life of the debt and being charged to interest expense. As of March 31, 2016 the remaining balance was €986 or $1,123 has been offset to the debt.

PM Group is subject to certain financial covenants as defined by the debt restructuring agreement with BPER and Unicredit including maintaining (1) Net debt to EBITDA, (2) Net Debt to equity, and (3) EBITDA to net financial charges ratios. The covenants are measured on a semi-annual basis.

At March 31, 2016 PM Group has unsecured borrowings with five Italian banks totaling €13,404 ($15,267). Interest on the unsecured notes is charged at the 3-month Euribor plus 250 basis points, effective rate of 2.37% at March 31, 2016. Principal payments are due on a semi-annual basis beginning June 2019 and ending December 2021. Accrued interest on these borrowings through the date of acquisition at January 15, 2015, totaled €741 ($844) and is payable in semi-annual installments beginning June 2019 and ending December 2019.

Autogru PM RO, a subsidiary of PM Group, fully repaid the former note payable and entered into two new note payables in October 2015 totaling €947 ($1,028). The first note is payable in 60 monthly principal installments of €8 ($9), plus interest at the 1-month Euribor plus 300 basis points, effective rate of 3.00% at March 31, 2016, maturing October 2020. At March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal balance of the note was €506 ($576). The second new note is payable in one instalment in October 2016 is charged interest at the 1-month Euribor plus 250 basis points, effective rate of 2.50% at March 31, 2016. At March 31, 2016, the outstanding principal balance of the note was €440 ($501).

PM has interest rate swaps with a fair market value at March 31, 2016 of €734 or $836 which has been included in debt.

24

Capital leases

Georgetown facility

The Company leases it Georgetown facility under a capital lease that expires on April 30, 2028.  The currently monthly rental payment is $62.  The lease has rent escalation provision pursuant to which rent is increased commencing on September 1, 2016, and each subsequent September 1 during the term of the lease by 3% per increase.  At March 31, 2016, the outstanding capital lease obligation is $5,374.

Winona facility

The Company had a five year lease which expired in July 10, 2014 that provides for monthly lease payments of $25 for its Winona, Minnesota facility. The Company has an option to purchase the facility for $500 by giving notice to the landlord of its intent to purchase the Facility. The Landlord must receive such notice at least three months prior to end of the Lease term. The purchase of the facility is expected to be completed during 2016. At March 31, 2016, the Company has outstanding capital lease obligation of $500, the amount of the purchase option.

Equipment

The Company has entered into a lease agreement with a bank pursuant to which the Company is permitted to borrow 100% of the cost of new equipment with 60  months repayment periods, respectively. At the conclusion of the lease period, for each piece of equipment the Company is required to purchase that piece of leased equipment for one dollar.

The equipment, which is acquired in ordinary course of the Company’s business, is available for sale and rental prior to sale.

Under the lease agreement the Company can elect to exercise an early buyout option at any time, and pay the bank the present value of the remaining rental payments discounted by a specified Index Rate established at the time of leasing. The early buyout option results in a prepayment penalty which progressively decreases during the term of the lease. Alternatively, the Company under the like-kind provisions in the agreement can elect to replace or substitute different equipment in place of equipment subject to the early buyout without incurring a penalty.

The following is a summary of amounts financed under equipment capital lease agreements: