Annual Statements Open main menu

MARATHON OIL CORP - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)

form10q2010qtr1.htm



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549


FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)
 
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010

OR

[   ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from _____ to _____


Commission file number 1-5153

Marathon Oil Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
25-0996816
State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
5555 San Felipe Road, Houston, TX  77056-2723
(Address of principal executive offices)

(713) 629-6600
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                          Yes x  No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
 
Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes x  No o

 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer   x
Accelerated filer                      o
Non-accelerated filer      o           (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 
Smaller reporting company  o           
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).                                    Yes x  No o

 
There were 709,668,991 shares of Marathon Oil Corporation common stock outstanding as of July 30, 2010.
 





 
 
 
 


MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
 
Form 10-Q
 
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010


   
 
Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
 
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
Item 2.
22
Item 3.
35
Item 4.
35
 
36
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
39
Item 1A.
39
Item 2.
41
Item 6.
42
 
43

 
Unless the context otherwise indicates, references in this Form 10-Q to “Marathon,” “we,” “our,” or “us” are references to Marathon Oil Corporation, including its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, and its ownership interests in equity method investees (corporate entities, partnerships, limited liability companies and other ventures over which Marathon exerts significant influence by virtue of its ownership interest).

1
 

 
Part I - Financial Information
 

MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
 
 

 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
 
 
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
(In millions, except per share data)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Revenues and other income:
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   Sales and other operating revenues (including consumer excise taxes)
  $ 18,417     $ 13,018     $ 34,266     $ 23,174  
   Sales to related parties
    32       21       52       41  
   Income from equity method investments
    101       62       206       109  
   Net gain on disposal of assets
    12       191       825       195  
   Other income
    12       25       45       77  
 
                               
             Total revenues and other income
    18,574       13,317       35,394       23,596  
Costs and expenses:
                               
   Cost of revenues (excludes items below)
    14,292       9,760       27,173       17,117  
   Purchases from related parties
    141       110       274       205  
   Consumer excise taxes
    1,308       1,226       2,520       2,400  
   Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    658       683       1,307       1,343  
   Long-lived asset impairments
    33       15       467       15  
   Selling, general and administrative expenses
    336       321       634       612  
   Other taxes
    110       96       225       198  
   Exploration expenses
    125       64       223       126  
 
                               
            Total costs and expenses
    17,003       12,275       32,823       22,016  
 
                               
Income from operations
    1,571       1,042       2,571       1,580  
 
                               
   Net interest and other financing costs
    (18 )     (12 )     (48 )     (28 )
   Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    (92 )     -       (92 )     -  
 
                               
 
                               
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    1,461       1,030       2,431       1,552  
 
                               
   Provision for income taxes
    752       702       1,265       959  
 
                               
Income from continuing operations
    709       328       1,166       593  
 
                               
Discontinued operations
    -       85       -       102  
 
                               
Net income
  $ 709     $ 413     $ 1,166     $ 695  
 
                               
Per Share Data
                               
 
                               
   Basic:
                               
 
                               
       Income from continuing operations
  $ 1.00     $ 0.46     $ 1.64     $ 0.84  
       Discontinued operations
  $ -     $ 0.12     $ -     $ 0.14  
       Net income per share
  $ 1.00     $ 0.58     $ 1.64     $ 0.98  
 
                               
   Diluted:
                               
 
                               
       Income from continuing operations
  $ 1.00     $ 0.46     $ 1.64     $ 0.84  
       Discontinued operations
  $ -     $ 0.12     $ -     $ 0.14  
       Net income per share
  $ 1.00     $ 0.58     $ 1.64     $ 0.98  
 
                               
   Dividends paid
  $ 0.25     $ 0.24     $ 0.49     $ 0.48  
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2
 

 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
June 30,
   
December 31,
 
(In millions, except per share data)
 
2010
   
2009
 
Assets
 
 
   
 
 
Current assets:
 
 
   
 
 
    Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 2,062     $ 2,057  
    Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $17 and $14
    4,974       4,677  
    Receivables from related parties
    54       60  
    Inventories
    3,586       3,622  
    Other current assets
    584       221  
 
               
            Total current assets
    11,260       10,637  
 
               
Equity method investments
    1,868       1,970  
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated depreciation,
               
   depletion and amortization of $18,310 and $17,185
    31,703       32,121  
Goodwill
    1,383       1,422  
Other noncurrent assets
    1,282       902  
 
               
            Total assets
  $ 47,496     $ 47,052  
Liabilities
               
Current liabilities:
               
    Accounts payable
  $ 6,790     $ 6,982  
    Payables to related parties
    42       64  
    Payroll and benefits payable
    312       399  
    Accrued taxes
    1,049       547  
    Deferred income taxes
    462       403  
    Other current liabilities
    546       566  
    Long-term debt due within one year
    101       96  
 
               
            Total current liabilities
    9,302       9,057  
 
               
Long-term debt
    7,829       8,436  
Deferred income taxes
    4,013       4,104  
Defined benefit postretirement plan obligations
    1,989       2,056  
Asset retirement obligations
    1,148       1,099  
Deferred credits and other liabilities
    374       390  
 
               
            Total liabilities
    24,655       25,142  
 
               
Commitments and contingencies
               
 
               
Stockholders’ Equity
               
Preferred stock – zero and 5 million shares issued, zero and 1 million shares
               
          outstanding (no par value, 26 million shares authorized)
    -       -  
Common stock:
               
     Issued – 770 million and 769 million shares (par value $1 per share,
               
          1.1 billion shares authorized)
    770       769  
     Securities exchangeable into common stock – zero and 5 million shares issued,
               
         zero and 1 million shares outstanding (no par value, 29 million authorized)
    -       -  
     Held in treasury, at cost – 61 million shares
    (2,687 )     (2,706 )
Additional paid-in capital
    6,754       6,738  
Retained earnings
    18,859       18,043  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (855 )     (934 )
 
               
            Total stockholders' equity
    22,841       21,910  
 
               
            Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
  $ 47,496     $ 47,052  
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
 
June 30,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
 
   
 
 
Operating activities:
 
 
   
 
 
Net income
  $ 1,166     $ 695  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
    Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    92       -  
    Discontinued operations
    -       (102 )
    Deferred income taxes
    (114 )     338  
    Depreciation, depletion and amortization
    1,307       1,343  
    Long-lived asset impairments
    467       15  
    Pension and other postretirement benefits, net
    101       73  
    Exploratory dry well costs and unproved property impairments
    111       33  
    Net gain on disposal of assets
    (825 )     (195 )
    Equity method investments, net
    (26 )     11  
    Changes in:
               
          Current receivables
    (280 )     (792 )
          Inventories
    (303 )     6  
          Current accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    381       449  
    All other operating, net
    50       102  
               Net cash provided by continuing operations
    2,127       1,976  
               Net cash provided by discontinued operations
    -       61  
               Net cash provided by operating activities
    2,127       2,037  
Investing activities:
               
   Additions to property, plant and equipment
    (2,505 )     (3,207 )
   Disposal of assets
    1,361       402  
   Trusteed funds - withdrawals
    -       16  
   Investments - loans and advances
    (17 )     (10 )
   Investments - repayments of loans and return of capital
    56       45  
   Investing activities of discontinued operations
    -       (66 )
   All other investing, net
    (37 )     (86 )
               Net cash used in investing activities
    (1,142 )     (2,906 )
Financing activities:
               
   Borrowings
    -       1,491  
   Debt issuance costs
    -       (11 )
   Debt repayments
    (625 )     (40 )
   Dividends paid
    (350 )     (340 )
   All other financing, net
    5       (1 )
               Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
    (970 )     1,099  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash:
               
     Continuing operations
    (10 )     (17 )
     Discontinued operations
    -       (2 )
                 Total effect of exchange rate changes on cash
    (10 )     (19 )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    5       211  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    2,057       1,285  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 2,062     $ 1,496  
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


 
 
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
 
 
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Net income
  $ 709     $ 413     $ 1,166     $ 695  
    Other comprehensive income (loss)
                               
 
                               
         Post-retirement and post-employment plans
                               
            Change in actuarial gain
    128       41       158       49  
             Income tax provision on post-retirement and post-employment plans
    (59 )     (22 )     (83 )     (31 )
                  Post-retirement and post-employment plans, net of tax
    69       19       75       18  
 
                               
         Derivative hedges
                               
            Net unrecognized gain
    1       30       3       3  
            Income tax benefit (provision) on derivatives
    -       (4 )     1       (7 )
                  Derivative hedges, net of tax
    1       26       4       (4 )
 
                               
         Foreign currency translation and other
                               
            Unrealized gain
    -       (1 )     -       1  
            Income tax provision on foreign currency translation and other
    -       1       -       -  
                  Foreign currency translation and other, net of tax
    -       -       -       1  
 
                               
Other comprehensive income (loss)
    70       45       79       15  
 
                               
Comprehensive income
  $ 779     $ 458     $ 1,245     $ 710  
 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1.      Basis of Presentation
 
These consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, these statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods reported.  All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise.  These consolidated financial statements, including notes, have been prepared in accordance with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.  Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to current year presentation.
 
 
These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Marathon Oil Corporation (“Marathon”) 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The results of operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
 

2.      Accounting Standards
 
Recently Adopted
 
 
Variable interest accounting standards were amended by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in June 2009.  The new accounting standards replace the existing quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity.  In addition, the concept of qualifying special-purpose entities has been eliminated.  Ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity are also required.  The amended variable interest accounting standard requires reconsideration for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lack the power from voting rights or similar rights to direct the activities of the entity.  Enhanced disclosures are required for any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity. Prospective application of this standard in the first quarter of 2010 did not have significant impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.  The required disclosures are presented in Note 3.
 
 
A standard to improve disclosures about fair value measurements was issued by the FASB in January 2010.  The additional disclosures required include: (1) the different classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value, (2) the significant inputs and techniques used to measure Level 2 and Level 3 assets and liabilities for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements, (3) the gross presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements for the rollforward of Level 3 activity, and (4) the transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2.  We adopted all aspects of this standard in the first quarter of 2010, including the gross presentation of the Level 3 activity rollforward, which could have been deferred until 2011.  This adoption did not have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.  The required disclosures are presented in Note 11.
 
Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosure standards were issued by the FASB in January 2010, which align the FASB’s reporting requirements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requirements.  Similar to the SEC requirements, the FASB requirements were effective for periods ending on or after December 31, 2009.  The SEC introduced a new definition of oil and gas producing activities which allows companies to include volumes in their reserve base from unconventional resources.  The FASB also addresses the impact of changes in the SEC’s rules and definitions on accounting for oil and gas producing activities.  Initial adoption did not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.  The effect on depreciation, depletion and amortization expense in the first quarter of 2010, as compared to prior periods, was not significant.


 
3.      Variable Interest Entities
 
The Athabasca Oil Sands Project (“AOSP”), in which we hold a 20 percent undivided interest, contracted with a wholly-owned subsidiary of a publicly traded Canadian limited partnership (“Corridor Pipeline”) to provide materials transportation capabilities among the Muskeg River mine, the Scotford upgrader and markets in Edmonton.  The contract, originally signed in 1999 by a company we acquired, allows each holder of an undivided interest in the AOSP to ship materials in accordance with its undivided interest.  Costs under this contract are accrued and recorded on a monthly basis, with a $1 million current liability recorded at June 30, 2010.  Under this agreement, the AOSP absorbs all of the operating and capital costs of the pipeline.  Currently, no third-party shippers use the pipeline.  Should shipments be suspended, by choice or due to force majeure, we are responsible for the portion of the payment related to our undivided interest for all remaining periods.  The contract expires in 2029; however, the shippers can extend its term perpetually.  This contract qualifies as a variable interest contractual arrangement and the Corridor Pipeline qualifies as a VIE.  We hold a variable interest but are not the primary beneficiary because our shipments are only 20 percent of


 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 


the total; therefore, the Corridor Pipeline is not consolidated by Marathon.  Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this VIE is the amount we expect to pay over the contract term, which was $838 million as of June 30, 2010.  The liability on our books related to this contract at any given time will reflect amounts due for the immediately previous month’s activity, which is substantially less than the maximum exposure over the contract term.  We have not provided financial assistance to Corridor Pipeline and we do not have any guarantees of such assistance in the future.
 
 

4.      Income per Common Share
 
Basic income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted income per share includes exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights, provided the effect is not antidilutive.
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
(In millions, except per share data)
 
Basic
   
Diluted
   
Basic
   
Diluted
 
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 709     $ 709     $ 328     $ 328  
Discontinued operations
    -       -       85       85  
Net income
  $ 709     $ 709     $ 413     $ 413  
                                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    710       710       709       709  
Effect of dilutive securities
    -       2       -       2  
 
                               
Weighted average common shares, including dilutive effect
    710       712       709       711  
                                 
Per share:
                               
    Income from continuing operations
  $ 1.00     $ 1.00     $ 0.46     $ 0.46  
    Discontinued operations
  $ -     $ -     $ 0.12     $ 0.12  
    Net income
  $ 1.00     $ 1.00     $ 0.58     $ 0.58  

   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
(In millions, except per share data)
 
Basic
   
Diluted
   
Basic
   
Diluted
 
               
Income from continuing operations
  $ 1,166     $ 1,166     $ 593     $ 593  
Discontinued operations
    -       -       102       102  
Net income
  $ 1,166     $ 1,166     $ 695     $ 695  
                                 
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    709       709       709       709  
Effect of dilutive securities
    -       2       -       2  
 
                               
 Weighted average common shares, including dilutive effect
    709       711       709       711  
                                 
Per share:
                               
    Income from continuing operations
  $ 1.64     $ 1.64     $ 0.84     $ 0.84  
    Discontinued operations
  $ -     $ -     $ 0.14     $ 0.14  
    Net income
  $ 1.64     $ 1.64     $ 0.98     $ 0.98  
 
The per share calculations above exclude 12 million stock options and stock appreciation rights for the second quarter and the first six months of 2010, as they were antidilutive.  Excluded in the second quarter and the first six months of 2009 were 8 million stock options and stock appreciation rights.
 



 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 

5.      Dispositions
 
Assets Held For Sale
 
 
In May 2010, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent to sell our RM&T segment's St. Paul Park, Minnesota,  refinery (including associated terminal, tankage and pipeline investments) and 166 Speedway SuperAmerica retail outlets, plus related inventories.  A final agreement is being negotiated and the sale is anticipated to close by year end 2010.  Based on the estimated fair value of the consideration at June 30, 2010, any gain to be recognized at closing is not expected to be significant.
 
 
As of June 30, 2010, the Minnesota assets and liabilities held for sale are reported in the consolidated balance sheet as follows:
 
(In millions)
     
Other current assets
  $ 329  
Other noncurrent assets
    494  
     Total assets
    823  
         
Deferred credits and other liabilities
    3  
     Total liabilities
  $ 3  
 
2010 Disposition
 
 
During the first quarter 2010, we closed the sale of a 20 percent outside-operated interest in our E&P segment’s Production Sharing Contract and Joint Operating Agreement in Block 32 offshore Angola.  We received net proceeds of $1.3 billion and recorded a pretax gain on the sale in the amount of $811 million.  We retained a 10 percent outside-operated interest in Block 32.
 
 
2009 Dispositions
 
 
In April 2009, we closed the sale of our operated properties in Ireland for net proceeds of $84 million, after adjusting for cash held by the sold subsidiary.  A $158 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded.  As a result of this sale, we terminated our pension plan in Ireland, incurring a charge of $18 million.  Activities related to our operated properties in Ireland had been reported in our Exploration and Production (E&P) segment.
 
 
On June 24, 2009 we entered into an agreement to sell the subsidiary holding our 19 percent outside-operated interest in the Corrib natural gas development offshore Ireland.  An initial $100 million payment was made at closing.  Additional fixed proceeds of $135 million will be received on the earlier of first commercial gas or December 31, 2012.  Including contingent consideration, the fair value of $311 million at June 30, 2009, was less than book value.  An impairment of $154 million was recognized in the second quarter of 2009 and reported as part of the loss on disposal of discontinued operations.
 
 
Existing guarantees of our subsidiaries’ performance issued to Irish government entities remain in place after the sales until the purchasers issue similar guarantees to replace them.  The guarantees, related to asset retirement obligations and natural gas production levels, have been indemnified by the purchasers.  The fair value of these guarantees is not significant.
 
 
In December 2009, we closed the sale of our operated fields offshore Gabon, receiving net proceeds of $269 million, after closing adjustments.  A $232 million pretax gain on this disposition was reported in discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2009.
 
 
Our Irish businesses and our Gabonese businesses, which had been reported in our E&P segment, have been reported as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.  Revenues, pretax income and the net pretax loss on these dispositions are shown on the table below.
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
(In millions)
2009
 
2009
 
Revenues applicable to discontinued operations
  $ 43     $ 121  
Pretax income from discontinued operations
    20       50  
Pretax loss on disposal of discontinued operations
  $ 14     $ 14  

 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 



 
In June 2009, we closed sales of a portion of our operated and all of our outside-operated Permian Basin producing assets in New Mexico and west Texas for net proceeds after closing adjustments of $293 million.  A $196 million pretax gain on the sale was recorded.
 


6.      Segment Information
 
We have four reportable operating segments.  Each of these segments is organized and managed based upon the nature of the products and services they offer.
 
 
 
1)
Exploration and Production (“E&P”) – explores for, produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis;
 
 
 
2)
Oil Sands Mining (“OSM”) – mines, extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in Alberta, Canada, and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil;
 
 
 
3)
Integrated Gas (“IG”) – markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas, such as liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) and methanol, on a worldwide basis; and
 
 
 
4)
Refining, Marketing and Transportation (“RM&T”) – refines, markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products, primarily in the Midwest, upper Great Plains, Gulf Coast and southeastern regions of the United States.
 
As discussed in Note 5, our Irish and Gabonese businesses were sold in 2009 and have been reported as discontinued operations.  Segment information for all presented periods of 2009 excludes amounts for these operations.

   
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
(In millions)
 
E&P
   
OSM
   
IG
   
RM&T
   
Total
 
                               
Revenues:
                             
    Customer
  $ 2,464     $ 158     $ 33     $ 15,762     $ 18,417  
    Intersegment (a)
    152       21       -       15       188  
    Related parties
    14       -       -       18       32  
        Segment revenues
    2,630       179       33       15,795       18,637  
    Elimination of intersegment revenues
    (152 )     (21 )     -       (15 )     (188 )
        Total revenues
  $ 2,478     $ 158     $ 33     $ 15,780     $ 18,449  
Segment income (loss)
  $ 432     $ (60 )   $ 24     $ 421     $ 817  
Income from equity method investments
    40       -       43       18       101  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (b)
    391       16       1       241       649  
Income tax provision (benefit)(c)
    624       (10 )     12       257       883  
Capital expenditures (b)(d)
    585       243       -       256       1,084  

   
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
 
(In millions)
 
E&P
   
OSM
   
IG
   
RM&T
   
Total
 
                               
Revenues:
                             
    Customer
  $ 1,830     $ 126     $ 7     $ 11,052     $ 13,015  
    Intersegment (a)
    123       29       -       8       160  
    Related parties
    14       -       -       7       21  
        Segment revenues
    1,967       155       7       11,067       13,196  
    Elimination of intersegment revenues
    (123 )     (29 )     -       (8 )     (160 )
    Gain on U.K. natural gas contracts(e)
    3       -       -       -       3  
        Total revenues
  $ 1,847     $ 126     $ 7     $ 11,059     $ 13,039  
Segment income
  $ 208     $ 2     $ 13     $ 165     $ 388  
Income from equity method investments
    26       -       28       8       62  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (b)
    484       34       1       157       676  
Income tax provision(c)
    435       -       2       104       541  
Capital expenditures (b)(d)
    609       281       1       713       1,604  


 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 

 
   
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
 
(In millions)
 
E&P
   
OSM
   
IG
   
RM&T
   
Total
 
                               
Revenues:
                             
    Customer
  $ 4,801     $ 305     $ 60     $ 29,100     $ 34,266  
    Intersegment (a)
    324       39       -       31       394  
    Related parties
    26       -       -       26       52  
        Segment revenues
    5,151       344       60       29,157       34,712  
    Elimination of intersegment revenues
    (324 )     (39 )     -       (31 )     (394 )
        Total revenues
  $ 4,827     $ 305     $ 60     $ 29,126     $ 34,318  
Segment income (loss)
  $ 934     $ (77 )   $ 68     $ 184     $ 1,109  
Income from equity method investments
    77       -       91       38       206  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (b)
    788       39       2       461       1,290  
Income tax provision (benefit)(c)
    1,162       (17 )     35       104       1,284  
Capital expenditures (b)(d)
    1,188       508       1       566       2,263  

   
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
 
(In millions)
 
E&P
   
OSM
   
IG
   
RM&T
   
Total
 
                               
Revenues:
                             
    Customer
  $ 3,136     $ 223     $ 18     $ 19,712     $ 23,089  
    Intersegment (a)
    242       54       -       17       313  
    Related parties
    29       -       -       12       41  
        Segment revenues
    3,407       277       18       19,741       23,443  
    Elimination of intersegment revenues
    (242 )     (54 )     -       (17 )     (313 )
    Gain on U.K. natural gas contracts(e)
    85       -       -       -       85  
        Total revenues
  $ 3,250     $ 223     $ 18     $ 19,724     $ 23,215  
Segment income (loss)
  $ 291     $ (22 )   $ 40     $ 324     $ 633  
Income from equity method investments
    37       -       70       2       109  
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (b)
    949       71       2       309       1,331  
Income tax provision (benefit)(c)
    613       (8 )     15       210       830  
Capital expenditures (b)(d)
    974       567       1       1,373       2,915  
 
Management believes intersegment transactions were conducted under terms comparable to those with unrelated parties.
 
(b)
Differences between segment totals and our financial statement totals represent amounts related to corporate administrative activities.
 
(c)
Differences between segment totals and our financial statement totals represent amounts related to corporate administrative activities and other unallocated items and are included in “Items not allocated to segments, net of income taxes” in the reconciliation below.
 
(d)
Includes accruals.
 
(e)
The U.K. natural gas contracts expired in September 2009.


 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 


The following reconciles segment income to net income as reported in the consolidated statements of income:
 
                         
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Segment income
  $ 817     $ 388     $ 1,109     $ 633  
Items not allocated to segments, net of income taxes:
                               
     Corporate and other unallocated items
    (62 )     (90 )     (72 )     (140 )
     Foreign currency remeasurement of income taxes
    37       (94 )     70       (66 )
     Gain on dispositions(a)
    -       122       449       122  
     Impairments(b)
    (26 )     -       (288 )     -  
     Loss on early extinguishment of debt(c)
    (57 )     -       (57 )     -  
     Deferred income taxes - tax legislation changes(d)
    -       -       (45 )     -  
     Gain on U.K. natural gas contracts
    -       2       -       44  
     Discontinued operations
    -       85       -       102  
          Net income
  $ 709     $ 413     $ 1,166     $ 695  
 
(a)
Additional information on these gains can be found in Note 5.
 
(b)
Impairments include those based upon fair value measurements discussed in Note 11 and a $15 million pretax writeoff of the remaining portion of the contingent proceeds from the sale of the Corrib natural gas development which was taken based upon new public information regarding the pipeline that would transport gas from the Corrib development.
 
(c)
Additional information on debt retired early can be found in Note 13.
 
(d)
A discussion of the tax legislation changes can be found in Note 8.

 
 The following reconciles total revenues to sales and other operating revenues (including consumer excise taxes) as reported in the consolidated statements of income:
 
                         
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
(In millions)
2010
   
2009
 
2010
 
2009
 
Total revenues
  $ 18,449     $ 13,039     $ 34,318     $ 23,215  
Less:  Sales to related parties
    32       21       52       41  
Sales and other operating revenues (including
                               
       consumer excise taxes)
  $ 18,417     $ 13,018     $ 34,266     $ 23,174  


 
7.      Defined Benefit Postretirement Plans
 
The following summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost:
 

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
  
 
Pension Benefits
   
Other Benefits
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Service cost
  $ 25     $ 37     $ 4     $ 4  
Interest cost
    42       42       9       9  
Expected return on plan assets
    (40 )     (40 )     -       -  
Amortization:
                               
    – prior service cost (credit)
    3       4       (1 )     (2 )
    – actuarial loss (gain)
    25       10       (1 )     (2 )
    – net settlement/curtailment loss(a)
    -       18       -       -  
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 55     $ 71     $ 11     $ 9  


 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 


   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
  
 
Pension Benefits
   
Other Benefits
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Service cost
  $ 54     $ 72     $ 9     $ 9  
Interest cost
    87       84       19       20  
Expected return on plan assets
    (80 )     (80 )     -       -  
Amortization:
                               
    – prior service cost (credit)
    6       7       (3 )     (3 )
    – actuarial loss (gain)
    50       16       (1 )     (2 )
    – net settlement/curtailment loss(a)
    -       18       -       -  
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 117     $ 117     $ 24     $ 24  
 
(a)   The curtailment and settlement is related to our discontinued operations in Ireland, as discussed in Note 5.  Pension expense related to Ireland was not material in any period presented.
 
 
During the first six months of 2010, we made contributions of $12 million to our funded pension plans.  We expect to make additional contributions up to an estimated $230 million to our funded pension plans over the remainder of 2010.  Current benefit payments related to unfunded pension and other postretirement benefit plans were $13 million and $18 million during the first six months of 2010.
 

8.      Income Taxes
 
The following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for the periods presented:
 
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
Statutory U.S. income tax rate
    35 %     35 %
Effects of foreign operations, including foreign tax credits
    16       26  
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax effects
    -       1  
Legislation change
    2       -  
Other
    (1 )     -  
        Effective income tax rate for continuing operations
    52 %     62 %

 
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (“HCERA”), (together, the “Acts”) were signed in to law in March 2010.  The “Acts” effectively change the tax treatment of federal subsidies paid to sponsors of retiree health benefit plans that provide prescription drug benefits that are at least actuarially equivalent to the corresponding benefits provided under Medicare Part D.  The federal subsidy paid to employers was introduced as part of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “MPDIMA”).  Under the MPDIMA, the federal subsidy does not reduce our income tax deduction for the costs of providing such prescription drug plans nor is it subject to income tax individually.  Beginning in 2013, under the Acts, our income tax deduction for the costs of providing Medicare Part D-equivalent prescription drug benefits to retirees will be reduced by the amount of the federal subsidy.  Such a change in the tax law must be recognized in earnings in the period enacted regardless of the effective date.  As a result, we have recorded a charge of $45 million in the first quarter of 2010 for the write-off of deferred tax assets to reflect the change in the tax treatment of the federal subsidy.
 
 
The effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic and functional sources of income, the relative magnitude of these sources of income, and foreign currency remeasurement effects.  The provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete, stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments.  The difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments and to individual items not allocated to segments is reported in the Corporate and other unallocated items line of the reconciliation shown in Note 6.
 


 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 


9.      Inventories
 
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market value.  The cost of inventories of crude oil, refined products and merchandise is determined primarily under the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method.
 

   
June 30,
   
December 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
 
Liquid hydrocarbons, natural gas and bitumen
  $ 1,393     $ 1,393  
Refined products and merchandise
    1,825       1,790  
Supplies and sundry items
    368       439  
        Inventories
  $ 3,586     $ 3,622  



10.           Property, Plant and Equipment

   
June 30,
   
December 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
 
E&P
 
 
   
 
 
     U.S.
  $ 6,044     $ 6,005  
     International
    4,935       5,522  
          Total E&P
    10,979       11,527  
OSM
    8,938       8,531  
IG
    35       34  
RM&T
    11,613       11,887  
Corporate
    138       142  
    Property, plant and equipment
  $ 31,703     $ 32,121  

 
Exploratory well costs capitalized greater than one year after completion of drilling were $158 million as of June 30, 2010, an increase of $8 million from December 31, 2009.
 
 
The offshore Gulf of Mexico Shenandoah appraisal well, located at Walker Ridge Block 52, was added to this category in the first quarter of 2010 at a cost of $28 million.  The Shenandoah costs were incurred primarily during 2009.  Appraisal drilling for the Shenandoah prospect is in our near-term plans.  The results of the appraisal well program will be used to evaluate the commercial viability of the project.
 
  A new, detailed study of the commerciality of the Gardenia well in Equatorial Guinea concluded that development of this area is now uncertain and therefore $20 million in costs associated with this well were written off in the first quarter of 2010.  The remaining $10 million of exploration well costs in Equatorial Guinea are associated with the Corona well which were incurred in 2004.  Efforts to develop these reserves continue and we are evaluating both a unitization with existing production facilities and stand-alone development.

 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
 

11.           Fair Value Measurements
 
Fair Values - Recurring
 
 
The following table presents assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 by fair value hierarchy level.
 

 
June 30, 2010
(In millions)
 
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Collateral
   
Total
Derivative instruments, assets
                           
     Commodity
$
184 
 
$
50 
 
$
 
$
   
240 
     Interest rate
 
   
30 
   
   
   
30 
     Foreign currency
 
   
   
   
   
          Derivative instruments, assets
 
184 
   
80 
   
   
   
271 
Derivative instruments, liabilities
                           
     Commodity
$
(160)
 
$
(1)
 
$
(4)
 
$
   
(165)
     Foreign currency
 
   
(1)
   
   
   
(1)
          Derivative instruments, liabilities
 
(160)
   
(2)
   
(4)
   
   
(166)

 
December 31, 2009
(In millions)
 
Level 1
 
 
Level 2
 
 
Level 3
 
 
Collateral
 
 
Total
Derivative instruments, assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Commodity
$
133 
 
$
11 
 
$
12 
 
$
63 
 
$
219 
     Interest rate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Foreign currency
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
          Derivative instruments, assets
 
133 
 
 
12 
 
 
21 
 
 
63 
 
 
229 
Derivative instruments, liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     Commodity
$
(125)
 
$
(12)
 
$
(10)
 
$
 
$
(147)
     Interest rate
 
 
 
 
 
(2)
 
 
 
 
(2)
          Derivative instruments, liabilities
 
(125)
 
 
(12)
 
 
(12)
 
 
 
 
(149)

 
Commodity derivatives in Level 1 are exchange-traded contracts for crude oil, natural gas, refined products and ethanol measured at fair value with a market approach using the close-of-day settlement price for the market.  Commodity derivatives, interest rate derivatives and foreign currency forwards in Level 2 are measured at fair value with a market approach using broker price quotes or prices obtained from third-party services such as Bloomberg L.P. or Platt’s, a Division of McGraw-Hill Corporation (“Platt’s”), which have been corroborated with data from active markets for similar assets and liabilities.  Collateral deposits related to both Level 1 and Level 2 commodity derivatives are in broker accounts covered by master netting agreements.
 
 
Commodity derivatives in Level 3 are measured at fair value with a market approach using prices obtained from third-party services such Platt’s and price assessments from other independent brokers.  The fair value of foreign currency options is measured using an option pricing model for which the inputs are obtained from a reporting service.  Since we are unable to independently verify information from the third-party service providers to active markets, all these measures are considered Level 3.
 
 
Interest rate derivatives, formerly in Level 3, are reported in Level 2 beginning second quarter because we now corroborate the interest rates used in the fair value measurement.
 


 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
 

The following is a reconciliation of the net beginning and ending balances recorded for derivative instruments classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
Beginning balance
  $ 8     $ 9     $ 9     $ (26 )
     Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
                               
          Included in net income
    20       (33 )     19       44  
          Included in other comprehensive income
    2       -       4       -  
     Transfers to Level 2
    (30 )     -       (30 )     -  
     Purchases
    -       -       2       -  
     Sales
    -       (23 )     -       (23 )
     Issuances
    -       -       -       (44 )
     Settlements
    (3 )     18       (7 )     20  
Ending balance
  $ (3 )   $ (29 )   $ (3 )   $ (29 )

 
Net income for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 included unrealized losses of $2 million and $4 million related to instruments held at June 30, 2010.  Net income for second quarter and first six months of 2009 included unrealized losses of $4 million and unrealized gains of $76 million related to instruments held on those dates.  See Note 12 for the income statement impacts of our derivative instruments.
 

 
Fair Values - Nonrecurring
 
 
The following tables show the values of assets, by major class, measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition.
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
2010 
   
2009 
(In millions)
 
Fair Value
   
Impairment
   
Fair Value
   
Impairment
Long-lived assets held for use
$
 
$
33 
 
$
 
$
15 
Long-lived assets held for sale
 
   
   
311 
   
154 
                       
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
   
2010 
   
2009 
(In millions)
 
Fair Value
   
Impairment
   
Fair Value
   
Impairment
Long-lived assets held for use
$
146 
 
$
467 
 
$
 
$
15 
Long-lived assets held for sale
 
   
   
311 
   
154 
 
In March 2010, we completed a reservoir study which resulted in a portion of our Powder River Basin field being removed from plans for future development in our E&P segment.  The field’s fair value was measured at $144 million, using an income approach based upon internal estimates of future production levels, prices and discount rate which are Level 3 inputs.  This resulted in an impairment of $423 million.
 
 
As a result of changing market conditions, a supply agreement with a major customer was revised in June 2010.  An impairment of $28 million was recorded in our RM&T segment for a plant that manufactures maleic anhydride.  The fair value was measured using a market approach based upon comparable area land values which are Level 3 inputs.
 
 
Several other long-lived assets held for use in our E&P segment were evaluated for impairment in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the comparable period of 2009 due to reduced drilling expectations, reduction of estimated reserves or declining natural gas prices. The fair values of the assets were measured using an income approach based upon internal estimates of future production levels, prices and discount rate, which are Level 3 inputs.
 
  The impairment charge recorded on assets held for sale in the second quarter of 2009 related to the sale of the Corrib natural gas development offshore Ireland and was based on a fair value of anticipated sale proceeds (see Note 5).

 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 


 
Fair value of anticipated sale proceeds includes (1) $100 million received at closing, (2) $135 million minimum amount due at the earlier of first gas or December 31, 2012, and (3) a range of contingent proceeds subject to the timing of first gas.  The fair value of the total proceeds was measured using an income method that incorporated a probability-weighted approach with respect to timing of first commercial gas and an associated sliding scale on the amount of corresponding consideration specified in the sales agreement:  the longer it takes to achieve first gas, the lower the amount of the consideration.  Because a portion of the proceeds is variable in timing and amount depending upon timing of first commercial gas, the inputs to the fair value calculation were classified as Level 3 inputs.
 
 
Fair Values - Reported
 
 
The following table summarizes financial instruments, excluding the derivative financial instruments, and their reported fair value by individual balance sheet line item at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
 
                         
   
June 30, 2010
   
December 31, 2009
 
   
Fair
   
Carrying
   
Fair
   
Carrying
 
(In millions)
 
Value
   
Amount
   
Value
   
Amount
 
Financial assets
                       
     Other current assets
  $ 23     $ 22     $ 23     $ 22  
     Other noncurrent assets
    575       411       671       499  
                                 
          Total financial assets  
    598       433       694       521  
                                 
Financial liabilities
                               
     Long-term debt, including current portion(a)
    8,308       7,565       8,754       8,190  
     Deferred credits and other liabilities
    73       74       71       73  
                                 
          Total financial liabilities  
  $ 8,381     $ 7,639     $ 8,825     $ 8,263  
 
Excludes capital leases.
 
Our current assets and liabilities accounts include financial instruments, the most significant of which are trade accounts receivables and payables.  We believe the carrying values of our current assets and liabilities approximate fair value, with the exception of the current portion of receivables from United States Steel Corporation (“United States Steel”), which is reported in other current assets above, and the current portion of our long-term debt, which is reported with long-term debt above.  Our fair value assessment incorporates a variety of considerations, including (1) the short-term duration of the instruments, (2) our investment-grade credit rating, and (3) our historical incurrence of and expected future insignificance of bad debt expense, which includes an evaluation of counterparty credit risk.
 
 
The current portion of receivables from United States Steel is reported in other current assets, and the long-term portion is included in other noncurrent assets.  The fair value of the receivables from United States Steel is measured using an income approach that discounts the future expected payments over the remaining term of the obligations.  Because this receivable is not publicly-traded and not easily transferable, a hypothetical market based upon United States Steel’s borrowing rate curve is assumed, and the majority of inputs to the calculation are Level 3.  The industrial revenue bonds are to be redeemed on or before January 1, 2012, the tenth anniversary of the USX Separation.
 
 
Restricted cash is included in other noncurrent assets.  The majority of our restricted cash represent cash accounts that earn interest; therefore, the balance approximates fair value.  Fair values of our remaining financial assets included in other noncurrent assets and of our financial liabilities included in deferred credits and other liabilities are measured using an income approach and most inputs are internally generated, which results in a Level 3 classification.  Estimated future cash flows are discounted using a rate deemed appropriate to obtain the fair value.
 
  Over 90 percent of our long-term debt instruments are publicly-traded. A market approach, based upon quotes from major financial institutions is used to measure the fair value of such debt.  Because these quotes cannot be independently verified to the market they are considered Level 3 inputs.  The fair value of our debt that is not publicly-traded is measured using an income approach.  The future debt service payments are discounted using the rate at which we currently expect to borrow.  All inputs to this calculation are Level 3.

 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
 

12.           Derivatives
 
 
For information regarding the fair value measurement of derivative instruments, see Note 11.  The following table presents the gross fair values of derivative instruments, excluding cash collateral, and where they appear on the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009.
 

   
June 30, 2010
   
(In millions)
 
Asset
   
Liability
   
Net Asset
 
Balance Sheet Location
Cash Flow Hedges
                   
     Foreign currency
  $ 1     $ -     $ 1  
Other current assets
Fair Value Hedges
                         
     Interest rate
    30       -       30  
Other noncurrent assets
Total Designated Hedges
    31       -       31    
                           
Not Designated as Hedges
                         
     Commodity
    234       161       73  
Other current assets
Total Not Designated as Hedges
    234       161       73    
                           
     Total
  $ 265     $ 161     $ 104    

   
June 30, 2010
   
(In millions)
 
Asset
   
Liability
   
Net Liability
 
Balance Sheet Location
Cash Flow Hedges
                   
     Foreign currency
  $ -     $ 1     $ 1  
Other current liabilities
Total Designated Hedges
    -       1       1    
                           
Not Designated as Hedges
                         
                           
     Commodity
    -       4       4  
Other current liabilities
                           
Total Not Designated as Hedges
    -       4       4    
     Total
  $ -     $ 5     $ 5    

   
December 31, 2009
   
(In millions)
 
Asset
   
Liability
   
Net Asset
 
Balance Sheet Location
Cash Flow Hedges
                   
     Foreign currency
  $ 2     $ -     $ 2  
Other current assets
Fair Value Hedges
                         
     Interest rate
    8       3       5  
Other noncurrent assets
Total Designated Hedges
    10       3       7    
                           
Not Designated as Hedges
                         
     Foreign currency
    1       -       1  
Other current assets
     Commodity
    116       104       12  
Other current assets
Total Not Designated as Hedges
    117       104       13    
                           
     Total
  $ 127     $ 107     $ 20    


 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
 

   
December 31, 2009
   
(In millions)
 
Asset
   
Liability
   
Net Liability
 
Balance Sheet Location
Cash Flow Hedges
                   
     Foreign currency
  $ -     $ -     $ -  
Other current liabilities
Fair Value Hedges
                         
     Commodity
    -       1       1  
Other current liabilities
Total Designated Hedges
    -       1       1    
                           
Not Designated as Hedges
                         
                           
     Commodity
    13       15       2  
Other current liabilities
                           
Total Not Designated as Hedges
    13       15       2    
     Total
  $ 13     $ 16     $ 3    

 
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
 
 
As of June 30, 2010, the following foreign currency forwards and options were designated as cash flow hedges.
 
(In millions)
Period
 
 
Notional Amount
Weighted Average Forward Rate
Foreign Currency Forwards:
 
 
 
 
 
 
    Dollar (Canada)
July 2010 - October 2010
 
$
50 
 
1.049 (a)
(a)
U.S. dollar to foreign currency.
 
 
 
(In millions)
Period
 
 
Notional Amount
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Foreign Currency Options:
 
 
 
 
 
 
    Dollar (Canada)
July 2010 - December 2010
 
$
96
1.040 (a)
(a)      U.S. dollar to foreign currency.


The following table summarizes the pretax effect of derivative instruments designated as hedges of cash flows in other comprehensive income.
 
Gain (Loss) in OCI
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(In millions)
2010
 
2009
 
2010
 
2009
 
Foreign currency
  $ 1     $ 30     $ 3     $ 18  
Interest rate
    -       -       -       (15 )

 
Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges
 
 
As of June 30, 2010, we had multiple interest rate swap agreements with a total notional amount of $1,450 million at a weighted-average, LIBOR-based, floating rate of 4.5 percent.
 


 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
 


 
The following table summarizes the pretax effect of derivative instruments designated as hedges of fair value in our consolidated statements of income.
 
   
Gain (Loss)
 
   
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
(In millions)
Income Statement Location
2010
 
2009
 
2010
 
2009
 
Derivative
                         
     Interest rate
Net interest and other financing costs
  $ 19     $ (29 )   $ 24     $ (29 )
Hedged Item
                                 
     Long-term debt
Net interest and other financing costs
  $ (19 )   $ 29     $ (24 )   $ 29  

 
Derivatives not Designated as Hedges
 
 
The largest portion of our June 30, 2010, open commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedges in our E&P and OSM segments are related to 2010 forecasted sales, as shown in the table below.
 

 
Term
Bbls per Day
Weighted Average Swap Price
Benchmark
Crude Oil
 
 
 
 
Canada
July 2010 - December 2010
25,000 
$82.56
West Texas Intermediate
 
 
 
 
 
 
Term
Mmbtu per Day(a)
Weighted Average Swap Price
Benchmark
Natural Gas
 
 
 
 
U.S. Lower 48
July 2010 - December 2010
80,000 
$5.39
CIG Rocky Mountains(b)
U.S. Lower 48
July 2010 - December 2010
30,000 
$5.59
NGPL Mid Continent(c)
 
(a)           Million British thermal units.
(b)           Colorado Interstate Gas Co. (“CIG”).
(c)           Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America (“NGPL”).

 
The table below summarizes open commodity derivative contracts of our RM&T segment at June 30, 2010 that are not designated as hedges.  These contracts enable us to effectively correlate our commodity price exposure to the relevant market indicators, thereby mitigating fixed price risk.
 

 
Position
Bbls per Day
Weighted Average Price
Benchmark
Crude Oil
 
 
 
 
     Exchange-traded
Long(a)
119,066 
$78.03
CME and IPE Crude(b) (c)
     Exchange-traded
Short(a)
(144,005)
$78.13
CME and IPE Crude(b) (c)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Position
Bbls per Day
Weighted Average Price
Benchmark
Refined Products
 
 
 
 
     Exchange-traded
Long(d)
12,373 
$2.10
CME Heating Oil and RBOB(b) (e)
     Exchange-traded
Short(d)
(7,323)
$2.12
CME Heating Oil and RBOB(b) (e)
 
(a)      92 percent of these contracts expire in the third quarter of 2010.
(b)      Chicago Mercantile Exchange (“CME”).
(c)      International Petroleum Exchange (“IPE”).
(d)      95 percent of these contracts expire in the third quarter of 2010.
(e)      Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen Blending (“RBOB”).


 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 


 
The following table summarizes the effect of all derivative instruments not designated as hedges in our consolidated statements of income.
 
   
Gain (Loss)
 
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(In millions)
Income Statement Location
2010
 
2009
 
2010
 
2009
 
Commodity
Sales and other operating revenues
  $ 81     $ (1 )   $ 129     $ 92  
Commodity
Cost of revenues
    73       17       44       (42 )
Commodity
Other income
    1       2       3       3  
      $ 155     $ 18     $ 176     $ 53  


13.           Debt
 
At June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings against our revolving credit facility and no commercial paper outstanding under our U.S. commercial paper program that is backed by the revolving credit facility.
 
 
 In April 2010, we repurchased $500 million in aggregate principal of our debt under two tender offers for the notes below, at a weighted average price equal to 117 percent of face value.
 

(In millions)
 
 
 
9.375% debentures due 2012
  $ 34  
9.125% debentures due 2013
    60  
6.000% Senior notes due 2017
    68  
5.900% Senior notes due 2018
    106  
7.500% debentures due 2019
    112  
9.375% debentures due 2022
    33  
8.500% debentures due 2023
    46  
8.125% debentures due 2023
    41  
   Total
  $ 500  

 
As a result of the tender offers, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of $92 million, including the transaction premium costs as well as the expensing of related deferred financing costs on the repurchased debt, in the second quarter of 2010.
 
 
In May 2010, United States Steel redeemed $89 million of certain industrial development and environmental improvement bonds for which we were liable.
 
 
14.           Stock-Based Compensation Plans
 
The following table presents a summary of stock option award and restricted stock award activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010:
 
   
Stock Options
   
Restricted Stock
 
   
Number of Shares
   
Weighted Average Exercise Price
   
Awards
   
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
 
 
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
    18,230,074     $ 35.01       1,441,499     $ 44.89  
  Granted (a)
    4,757,080       30.00       359,245       30.22  
  Options Exercised/Stock Vested
    (205,384 )     21.72       (203,860 )     50.96  
  Canceled
    (553,847 )     39.77       (103,258 )     40.58  
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
    22,227,923     $ 33.95       1,493,626     $ 40.83  
(a)    The weighted average grant date fair value of stock option awards granted was $9.12 per share.

 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
 
 

15.           Stockholders’ Equity
 
In conjunction with our acquisition of Western Oil Sands Inc. on October 18, 2007, Canadian residents were able to receive, at their election, cash, Marathon common stock or securities exchangeable into Marathon common stock (the “Exchangeable Shares”).  The Exchangeable Shares are shares of an indirect Canadian subsidiary of Marathon and were exchanged into Marathon stock based upon an exchange ratio that began at one-for-one and adjusted quarterly to reflect cash dividends.  The Exchangeable Shares were exchangeable at the option of the holder at any time and are automatically redeemable on October 18, 2011.  They could also be redeemed prior to their automatic redemption if certain conditions were met.  Those conditions were met and we filed notice of the proposed redemption in Canada on March 3, 2010.  On April 7, 2010, the remaining exchangeable shares were redeemed and the related preferred shares were eliminated in June 2010.
 

16.           Supplemental Cash Flow Information

   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
 
Net cash provided from operating activities:
           
     Interest paid (net of amounts capitalized)
  $ 53     $ -  
     Income taxes paid to taxing authorities
    845       1,050  
Commercial paper and revolving credit arrangements, net:
               
     Commercial paper - issuances
  $ -     $ 897  
                                     - repayments
    -       (897 )
          Total
  $ -     $ -  

 
The consolidated statements of cash flows exclude changes to the consolidated balance sheets that did not affect cash.  The following is a reconciliation of additions to property, plant and equipment to total capital expenditures.

 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(in millions)
 
2010
   
2009
 
Additions to property, plant and equipment
  $ 2,505     $ 3,207  
Change in capital accruals
    (228 )     (287 )
Discontinued operations
    -       66  
     Capital expenditures
  $ 2,277     $ 2,986  



17.           Commitments and Contingencies
 
We are the subject of, or party to, a number of pending or threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment.  The ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to our consolidated financial statements.  However, management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably.  Certain of our commitments are discussed below.
 
  Contractual commitments – At June 30, 2010, Marathon’s contract commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment were $2,610 million.



Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 
We are a global integrated energy company with operations in the U.S., Canada, Africa and Europe.  Our operations are organized into four reportable segments:
 
w
Exploration and Production (“E&P”) which explores for, produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis.
w
Oil Sands Mining (“OSM”) which mines, extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in Alberta, Canada, and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil.
w
Integrated Gas (“IG”) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas, such as liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) and methanol, on a worldwide basis.
w
Refining, Marketing & Transportation (“RM&T”) which refines, markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products, primarily in the Midwest, upper Great Plains, Gulf Coast and southeastern regions of the United States.
 
Certain sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business.  These statements typically contain words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “targets,” “plans,” “projects,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “would” or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain.  In accordance with “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements.  For additional risk factors affecting our business, see Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the update to Item 1A. Risk Factors later in this Form 10-Q.
 
 
Activities related to discontinued operations in Gabon and Ireland have been excluded from segment results and operating statistics in comparative periods.
 

 
Overview and Outlook
 

Gulf of Mexico Drilling Moratorium

 
On April 22, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon, a rig that was engaged in drilling operations in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, sank after an explosion and fire. The incident resulted in a significant oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. We have no ownership interest in those operations.
 
 
As a result of the incident, the U.S. Department of the Interior issued a drilling moratorium through November 30, 2010 to suspend the drilling of wells using subsea blowout preventers or operations using a floating facility.  As a result of the drilling moratorium, we suspended drilling an exploratory well on the Innsbruck prospect, located on Mississippi Canyon Block 993.  The future effects of the Deepwater Horizon incident or the drilling moratorium, including any new or additional laws or regulations that may be adopted in response, are not known at this time. Our current investment for unproved property and suspended well costs in the Gulf of Mexico is approximately $780 million.
 

 
Exploration and Production (“E&P”)
 
 
The budget for our 2010 global exploration program is $1 billion.  Our current plan is to drill two wells in the deepwater area of the Gulf of Mexico, as discussed below.  To the extent our current plans are impacted by the drilling moratorium or new or additional laws or regulations adopted in response to the Deepwater Horizon incident, we may make adjustments to projected funding levels.
 
 
  In the Gulf of Mexico, we commenced drilling an exploratory well on the Innsbruck prospect in April 2010.  As stated above, we suspended drilling, temporarily abandoning this well, and the rig was released without incurring any stand-by or penalty costs.  With the expected delivery of the Noble Jim Day rig in the fourth quarter of 2010, we intend to reestablish our Gulf of Mexico exploration and development programs upon expiration of the drilling moratorium unless new laws or regulations prohibit these activities or make them not viable financially.  The revised cost of the Innsbruck well is now estimated at $145 million.  We are the operator and hold an 85 percent working interest in the prospect.
 
 
In December 2009, we began drilling an exploratory well on the Flying Dutchman prospect, located on Green Canyon Block 511 in the Gulf of Mexico.  The Flying Dutchman reached its targeted total depth in early May 2010. The
 
 
22
 
 
 
well encountered hydrocarbon-bearing sands that require further technical evaluation.  During the second quarter of 2010, we expensed approximately $51 million for drilling costs incurred below the depth of the hydrocarbon-bearing sands and have approximately $95 million of exploratory well costs suspended as of June 30, 2010.  The results of the Flying Dutchman well will be evaluated along with additional potential drilling on Green Canyon Block 511 to determine overall commerciality, which could be impacted by any new or additional laws or regulations that may be adopted in response to the Gulf of Mexico incident described above.  We are the operator and have a 63 percent working interest in this prospect.
 
 
In Indonesia, the rig has arrived and we will begin drilling a deepwater well in the Pasangkayu block in the third quarter of 2010.  We are the operator and hold a 70 percent working interest in the Pasangkayu block.
 
 
During the second quarter 2010, we were awarded all five blocks bid in the Central Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale No. 213 conducted by the U.S. Department of the Interior, for a total of $24 million.  Four blocks are 100 percent Marathon, and the remaining block was bid with partners.
 
 
We continue to acquire additional onshore exploration licenses with shale gas potential in Poland, adding six through July 2010, bringing our total number of licenses to ten and increasing our total acreage position to approximately 2.1 million net acres.  We have a 100 percent interest and operate all ten blocks. We continue to pursue additional licenses and plan to begin geologic studies in Poland in 2010 followed by the acquisition of 2D seismic in 2011.
 
Production
 
Net liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas sales averaged 386 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (“mboepd”) during the second quarter and 374 mboepd during the first six months of 2010 compared to 428 and 411 mboepd during the second quarter and first six months of 2009. This decrease in sales volumes from the prior year was primarily the result of a planned turnaround in Equatorial Guinea, the sale of a portion of our Permian Basin assets in the second quarter of 2009 and normal production declines.
 
 
Our Droshky development in the Gulf of Mexico on Green Canyon Block 244 began production in mid-July, on time and under budget.  This major subsea project, which consists of four development wells tied back to a third-party platform, is expected to produce approximately 50,000 boepd, net of royalties, at its peak, consisting of approximately 45,000 bpd of liquid hydrocarbons and 30 million cubic feet per day (“mmcfd”) of natural gas. We hold a 100 percent operated working interest and an 81 percent net revenue interest in Droshky.
 
 
Our net liquid hydrocarbon sales in North Dakota from the Bakken Shale resource play have increased to 11 thousand barrels per day (“bpd”) in second quarter of 2010 compared to 8 mbpd in the same quarter of last year.  We added a fifth operated rig during the second quarter, with plans to add a sixth by the end of 2010.
 
 
In the second quarter of 2010, we commenced production at the Volund field offshore Norway which allows us to maintain full capacity on the Alvheim FPSO.  We hold a 65 percent operated interest in the Volund field.
 
 
Also offshore Norway in the first quarter of 2010, our partners announced the Marihone discovery, which is the first of five prospects near the Alvheim FPSO with tie back potential.  The Marihone oil discovery is located in license PL340 about 12 miles south of the Volund and Alvheim fields. We hold a 65 percent operated working interest in Marihone.
 
 
Divestitures
 
 
During the first quarter 2010, we closed the sale of a 20 percent outside-operated interest in the Production Sharing Contract and Joint Operating Agreement in Block 32 offshore Angola.  We received net proceeds of $1.3 billion and recorded a pretax gain on the sale in the amount of $811 million.  We retained a 10 percent outside-operated interest in Block 32.
 
 
The above discussions include forward-looking statements with respect to the timing and levels of future production, exploration budget, anticipated future drilling activity and the drilling moratorium.  While the drilling moratorium is scheduled to end on November 30, 2010, we cannot predict when it will end.  Some factors that could potentially affect these forward-looking statements include pricing, supply and demand for crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products, the amount of capital available for exploration and development, regulatory constraints, timing of commencing production from new wells, drilling rig availability, unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions, acts of war or terrorist acts and the governmental or military response, and other geological, operating and economic considerations.  The foregoing factors (among others) could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. The exploration budget is based on current expectations, estimates and projections and is not a guarantee of future performance. The foregoing forward-looking statements may be further affected by the inability to obtain or delay in obtaining necessary government and third-party approvals and permits.
 


Oil Sands Mining (“OSM”)

Our net synthetic crude oil sales were 20 thousand barrels per day (“mbpd”) in the second quarter and 22 mbpd in the first six months of 2010 compared to 30 mbpd and 31 mbpd in the periods of 2009, reflecting the impact of a planned turnaround at the mine and upgrader that began March 22, 2010 and halted production in April before a staged resumption of operations in May.  Our net share of total turnaround costs in the first six months of 2010 was $99 million.
 
The AOSP Expansion 1 is anticipated to begin a phased start-up of mining operations in the third quarter of 2010, and upgrader operations in late 2010 or early 2011.  Expansion 1 includes construction of mining and extraction facilities at the Jackpine mine, expansion of treatment facilities at the existing Muskeg River mine, expansion of the Scotford upgrader and development of related infrastructure. We hold a 20 percent working interest in the AOSP.
 
 
The above discussion includes forward-looking statements with respect to the start of operations of AOSP Expansion 1.  Factors that could affect the project are transportation logistics, availability of materials and labor, unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions, delays in obtaining or conditions imposed by necessary government and third-party approvals and other risks customarily associated with construction projects.
 
Integrated Gas (“IG”)
 
Our share of LNG sales worldwide totaled 6,556 metric tonnes per day (“mtpd”) for the second quarter of 2010 compared to 6,611 mtpd in the second quarter of 2009 and 6,176 mtpd in the first six months of 2010 compared to 6,690 mtpd in the first six months of 2009.  These LNG sales volumes include both consolidated sales volumes and our share of the sales volumes of equity method investees.  LNG sales from Alaska are conducted through a consolidated subsidiary.  LNG and methanol sales from Equatorial Guinea are conducted through equity method investees.
 

Refining, Marketing and Transportation (“RM&T”)
 
Our total refinery throughputs were 20 percent higher in the second quarter and 12 percent higher in the first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009.  Crude oil refined likewise increased 28 percent and 23 percent the same periods primarily related to the startup of the Garyville, Louisiana expansion, while other charge and blendstocks decreased 18 percent and 38 percent.  Due to the significant turnaround activity in the first quarter of 2010 along with the expected reduction in external charge and blendstocks requirements due to the Garyville refinery expansion, we have seen a reduction in our first half 2010 purchased charge and blendstocks volume.
 
 
We completed turnarounds at both the Garyville and Texas City, Texas, refineries in the first quarter of 2010 as well as a turnaround at our Catlettsburg, Kentucky refinery in the second quarter of 2010.  Such activity in 2010 compares to turnarounds at our Canton, Ohio; Robinson, Illinois; Catlettsburg and Garyville refineries in the first half of 2009.
 
The refinery units completed as part of the expansion at Garyville have now been fully integrated into the Garyville refinery and are operating as expected.  The 180,000 bpd expansion establishes the Garyville facility as the fourth-largest U.S. refinery with a rated crude oil capacity of 436,000 bpd.
 
 Ethanol volumes sold in blended gasoline increased to an average of 67 mbpd for the second quarter and 65 mbpd in the first six months of 2010 compared to 60 mbpd and 58 mbpd in the same periods of 2009. The future expansion or contraction of our ethanol blending program will be driven by the economics of ethanol supply and government regulations.
 
 
Second quarter 2010 Speedway SuperAmerica LLC (“SSA”) same store gasoline sales volume increased 5 percent when compared to the second quarter of 2009, while same store merchandise sales increased by 4 percent for the same period.  During the first quarter of 2010, Speedway was ranked the nation’s top retail gasoline brand for the second consecutive year, according to the 2010 EquiTrend® Brand Study conducted by Harris Interactive®.
 
 
As of June 30, 2010, the heavy oil upgrading and expansion project at our Detroit, Michigan, refinery was approximately 41 percent complete and on schedule for an expected completion in the second half of 2012.
 
 
In May 2010, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent to sell our RM&T segment's St. Paul Park, Minnesota,  refinery (including associated terminal, tankage and pipeline investments) and 166 Speedway SuperAmerica retail outlets, plus related inventories.  A final agreement is being negotiated and the sale is anticipated to close by year end 2010.
 
The above discussion includes forward-looking statements with respect to the Detroit refinery project and the sale of the Minnesota assets.  Factors that could affect the Detroit refinery project include transportation logistics, availability of materials and labor, unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions, delays in obtaining or conditions imposed by necessary government and third-party approvals, and other risks customarily associated with construction projects.  Some factors that could potentially affect the sale of Minnesota assets include completion of due diligence,
 
 
24
 
 
 
execution of a definitive agreement, buyer financing and customary closing conditions, including government and regulatory approvals.  These factors (among others) could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.


 
Market Conditions
 
Exploration and Production
 
Prevailing prices for the various qualities of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows.  Prices have been volatile in recent years.  The following table lists benchmark crude oil and natural gas price averages in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, when compared to the same periods in 2009.
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
Benchmark
 
2010 
 
 
2009 
 
 
2010 
 
 
2009 
 West Texas Intermediate ("WTI") crude oil (Dollars per barrel)
$
78.05 
 
$
59.79 
 
$
78.46 
 
$
51.68 
Brent crude oil (Dollars per barrel)
$
78.24 
 
$
59.13 
 
$
77.29 
 
$
51.68 
Henry Hub natural gas (Dollars per mmbtu)(a)
$
4.09 
 
$
3.51 
 
$
4.70 
 
$
4.21 
(a)
First-of-month price index per million British thermal units.

 
Our domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour, which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet WTI does.  Sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of its higher refining costs and lower refined product values.  Our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the Dated Brent crude oil benchmark.
 
 
A significant portion of our natural gas production in the lower 48 states of the U.S. is sold at bid-week prices, or first-of-month indices relative to our specific producing areas.  Our other major natural gas-producing region is Equatorial Guinea, where large portions of our natural gas sales is subject to term contracts, making realized prices in this area less volatile.  As we sell larger quantities of natural gas from these regions, to the extent that these fixed prices are lower than prevailing prices, our reported average natural gas prices realizations may decrease.
 
 
Oil Sands Mining
 
OSM segment revenues correlate with prevailing market prices for the various qualities of synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas oil we produce.  Roughly two-thirds of our normal output mix will track movements in WTI and one-third will track movements in the Canadian heavy sour crude oil market, primarily Western Canadian Select.  Output mix can be impacted by operational problems or planned unit outages at the mine or upgrader.  See Note 12 for the commodity derivatives contracts related to 2010 forecasted sales.
 
 
The operating cost structure of the oil sands mining operations is predominantly fixed, and therefore many of the costs incurred in times of full operation continue during production downtime.  Per unit costs are sensitive to production rate.  Key variable costs are natural gas and diesel fuel, which track commodity markets such as the Canadian AECO natural gas sales index and crude prices respectively.
 
 
The table below shows benchmark prices that impacted both our revenues and variable costs for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 and 2009:
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
Benchmark
 
2010 
   
2009 
   
2010 
   
2009 
WTI crude oil (Dollars per barrel)
$
78.05 
 
$
59.79 
 
$
78.46 
 
$
51.68 
Western Canadian Select (Dollars per barrel)(a)
$
63.95 
 
$
52.19 
 
$
66.81 
 
$
43.17 
AECO natural gas sales index (Canadian dollars per gigajoule)(b)
 
3.69 
   
3.28 
   
4.21 
   
3.76 
 
(a)  
Monthly pricing based upon average WTI adjusted for differentials unique to western Canada.
 
(b)  
Monthly average of Alberta Energy Company (“AECO”) day ahead index.
 
 
Integrated Gas
 
 
Our integrated gas operations include marketing and transportation of products manufactured from natural gas, such as LNG and methanol, primarily in the U.S., Europe and West Africa.
 
 
 
Our most significant LNG investment is our 60 percent ownership in a production facility in Equatorial Guinea, which sells LNG under a long-term contract at prices tied to Henry Hub natural gas prices.  In general, LNG delivered to the U.S. is tied to Henry Hub prices and will track with changes in U.S. natural gas prices, while LNG sold in Europe and Asia is indexed to crude oil prices and will track the movement of those prices.
 
 
We own a 45 percent interest in a methanol plant located in Equatorial Guinea through our investment in Atlantic Methanol Production Company LLC (“AMPCO”).  Methanol demand has a direct impact on AMPCO’s earnings.  Because global demand for methanol is rather limited, changes in the supply-demand balance can have a significant impact on sales prices.  AMPCO’s plant capacity is 1.1 million tonnes, or 3 percent of estimated 2009 world demand.
 
 
Refining, Marketing and Transportation
 
 
RM&T segment income depends largely on our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin, refinery throughputs and retail marketing gross margins for gasoline, distillates and merchandise.
 
 
Our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is the difference between the prices of refined products sold and the costs of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks refined, including the costs to transport these inputs to our refineries, the costs of purchased products and manufacturing expenses, including depreciation.  The crack spread is a measure of the difference between market prices for refined products and crude oil, commonly used by the industry as a proxy for the refining margin.  Crack spreads can fluctuate significantly, particularly when prices of refined products do not move in the same relationship as the cost of crude oil.  As a performance benchmark and a comparison with other industry participants, we calculate Midwest (Chicago) and U.S. Gulf Coast crack spreads that we feel most closely track our operations and slate of products.  Posted Light Louisiana Sweet (“LLS”) prices and a 6-3-2-1 ratio of products (6 barrels of crude oil refined into 3 barrels of gasoline, 2 barrels of distillate and 1 barrel of residual fuel) are used for the crack spread calculation.
 
 
Our refineries can process significant amounts of sour crude oil which typically can be purchased at a discount to sweet crude oil.  The amount of this discount, the sweet/sour differential, can vary significantly causing our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin to differ from the crack spreads which are based upon sweet crude.  In general, a larger sweet/sour differential will enhance our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin.
 
In addition to the market changes indicated by the crack spreads and sweet/sour differential, our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin is impacted by factors such as:
 
 
·  
the types of crude oil and other charge and blendstocks processed,
 
·  
the selling prices realized for refined products,
 
·  
the impact of commodity derivative instruments used to manage price risk,
 
·  
the cost of products purchased for resale, and
 
·  
changes in manufacturing costs, which include depreciation, energy used by our refineries and the level of maintenance costs.
 
 
  The following table lists calculated average crack spreads for the Midwest and Gulf Coast markets and the sweet/sour differential for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 and 2009:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars per barrel)
 
2010 
 
 
2009 
 
 
2010 
 
 
2009 
Chicago LLS 6-3-2-1 crack spread
$
 3.86 
 
$
 5.73 
 
$
 3.28 
 
$
 4.34 
U.S. Gulf Coast LLS 6-3-2-1 crack spread
$
 2.33 
 
$
 3.59 
 
$
 2.90 
 
$
 3.25 
Sweet/Sour differential(a)
$
8.78 
 
$
3.98 
 
$
7.03 
 
$
5.60 
 
(a)
Calculated using the following mix of crude types:  15% Arab Light, 20% Kuwait, 10% Maya, 15% Western Canadian Select and 40% Mars compared to WTI.

 
Even though the LLS 6-3-2-1 crack spread was lower in second quarter and first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009, we realized improved financial earnings from processing sour crude, due to the widening of the sweet/sour differential.  The benchmark sweet/sour differential widened 120 percent in the second quarter and 25 percent in the first six months of 2010 relative to the same periods of last year.  Due to the Garyville refinery expansion we were also able to process a higher volume of sour crude oil during the second quarter 2010.  Within our refining system, sour crude accounted for 56 percent of the 1,229 mbpd of crude oil processed in the second quarter of 2010 and 55 percent of the 1,117 mbpd of crude oil processed in the first six months of 2010 compared to 54 percent of the 959 mbpd of crude processed in the second quarter and 53 percent of the 905 mbpd of crude processed in the first six months in 2009.
 


 
Our retail marketing gross margin for gasoline and distillates, which is the difference between the ultimate price paid by consumers and the cost of refined products, including secondary transportation and consumer excise taxes, also impacts RM&T segment profitability. There are numerous factors including local competition, seasonal demand fluctuations, the available wholesale supply, the level of economic activity in our marketing areas and weather conditions that impact gasoline and distillate demand throughout the year.  The gross margin on merchandise sold at retail outlets has been historically less volatile.
 
 

 
Results of Operations
 
 
Consolidated Results of Operation
 
 
Consolidated net income for 2010 was 72 percent higher in second quarter and 68 percent higher in the first six months than in the same periods of 2009.  Our E&P and RM&T segments’ income increases in the second quarter were driven primarily by higher liquid hydrocarbon prices, refining and marketing gross margins and throughput.
 

Revenues are summarized by segment in the following table:
 
                         
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
E&P
  $ 2,630     $ 1,967     $ 5,151     $ 3,407  
OSM
    179       155       344       277  
IG
    33       7       60       18  
RM&T
    15,795       11,067       29,157       19,741  
                                 
    Segment revenues
    18,637       13,196       34,712       23,443  
Elimination of intersegment revenues
    (188 )     (160 )     (394 )     (313 )
Gain on U.K. natural gas contracts
    -       3       -       85  
    Total revenues
  $ 18,449     $ 13,039     $ 34,318     $ 23,215  
                                 
Items included in both revenues and costs:
                               
    Consumer excise taxes on petroleum products
                               
    and merchandise
  $ 1,308     $ 1,226     $ 2,520     $ 2,400  

 
E&P segment revenues increased $663 million in the second quarter and $1,744 million in the first six months of 2010 from the comparable prior-year periods.  The increases were primarily a result of higher liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas price realizations.  Liquid hydrocarbon realizations averaged $73.68 per barrel in the second quarter and $74.00 in the first six months of 2010 compared to $55.88 and $48.80 in the same periods of 2009, while natural gas realizations averaged $2.61 per mcf in the second quarter and $2.95 in the first six months of 2010 compared to $2.19 and $2.51 in the same periods of 2009.
 
 
Revenues in both 2010 periods include the impact of derivative instruments intended to mitigate price risk on future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas. A net pretax gain of $29 million was reported by the E&P segment in the second quarter of 2010, while there was a net pretax gain of $78 million in the first six months of 2010.
 
 
Net sales volumes during the quarter were 386 mboepd in 2010 and 428 mboepd in 2009.  Net sales volumes for the first six months of 2010 were 9 percent lower than the comparable prior-year period, primarily impacted by the sale of a portion of our Permian Basin assets in the second quarter of 2009, the planned turnaround in Equatorial Guinea, and normal production declines.  This decrease in sales volumes partially offsets the impact of liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas realization increases previously discussed.
 
 
For the second quarter and the first six months of 2009, gains of $3 million and $85 million related to natural gas sales contracts in the U.K. that are accounted for as derivative instruments were excluded for E&P segment revenues.  Those contracts expired in the third quarter of 2009.
 
 

 
The following tables report E&P segment realizations and sales volumes in greater detail for all periods.
 

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
   
2010 
 
2009 
 
2010 
 
2009 
                 
E&P Operating Statistics
               
     Net Liquid Hydrocarbon Sales (mbpd)
               
          United States
 
57 
 
64 
 
57 
 
65 
                 
          Europe
 
110 
 
112 
 
98 
 
92 
          Africa
 
79 
 
92 
 
81 
 
89 
               Total International
 
189 
 
204 
 
179 
 
181 
                    Worldwide Continuing Operations
 
246 
 
268 
 
236 
 
246 
                    Discontinued Operations(a)
 
 
 
 
                         Worldwide
 
246 
 
277 
 
236 
 
250 
                 
     Natural Gas Sales (mmcfd)
               
          United States
 
334 
 
365 
 
343 
 
395 
                 
          Europe(b)
 
104 
 
151 
 
106 
 
155 
          Africa
 
402 
 
439 
 
378 
 
436 
               Total International
 
506 
 
590 
 
484 
 
591 
                    Worldwide Continuing Operations
 
840 
 
955 
 
827 
 
986 
                    Discontinued Operations(a)
 
 
 
 
33 
                         Worldwide
 
840 
 
958 
 
827 
 
1,019 
                 
     Total Worldwide Sales (mboepd)
               
          Continuing Operations
 
386 
 
428 
 
374 
 
411 
          Discontinued Operations(a)
 
 
 
 
10 
                         Worldwide
 
386 
 
437 
 
374 
 
421 

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
E&P Operating Statistics
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
     Average Realizations (c)
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
        Liquid Hydrocarbons (per bbl)
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
           United States
  $ 68.01     $ 53.25     $ 70.25     $ 44.84  
                                 
           Europe
    79.66       60.91       79.36       55.71  
           Africa
    69.41       51.62       70.20       44.52  
              Total International
    75.37       56.70       75.20       50.22  
                   Worldwide Continuing Operations
    73.68       55.88       74.00       48.80  
                   Discontinued Operations
    -       43.01       -       43.05  
                         Worldwide
  $ 73.68     $ 55.49     $ 74.00     $ 48.70  
                                 
        Natural Gas (per mcf)
                               
           United States
  $ 4.41     $ 3.60     $ 4.96     $ 4.08  
                                 
           Europe
    5.92       4.43       6.05       4.90  
           Africa
    0.25       0.25       0.25       0.25  
              Total International
    1.41       1.32       1.52       1.47  
                   Worldwide Continuing Operations
    2.61       2.19       2.95       2.51  
                   Discontinued Operations
    -       7.49       -       8.54  
                         Worldwide
  $ 2.61     $ 2.21     $ 2.95     $ 2.71  
 
(a)
Our businesses in Ireland and Gabon were sold in 2009.  The 2009 values have been recast to reflect these businesses as discontinued operations.
 
(b)
Includes natural gas acquired for injection and subsequent resale of 16 mmcfd and 18 mmcfd for the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, and 21 mmcfd and 21 mmcfd for the first six months of 2010 and 2009.
 
(c)
Excludes gains and losses on derivative instruments and the unrealized effects of U.K. natural gas contracts that were accounted for as derivatives in 2009.
 



 
OSM segment revenues increased $24 million in the second quarter and $67 million in the first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009.  Revenues in both periods include the impact of derivative instruments intended to mitigate price risk relative to future sales of synthetic crude.  Derivative gains of $53 million and $43 million were included in segment revenues for the second quarter and first six months of 2010, but were not significant in 2009.
 
 
Excluding the derivative gains, segment revenues decreased in both periods of 2010, primarily due to lower sales volumes as both periods were impacted by a turnaround that commenced on March 22, 2010 that caused production to be completely shutdown in April with a staged resumption of operations in May. Net synthetic crude sales for the second quarter of 2010 were 20 mbpd at an average realized price of $65.11 per barrel compared to 30 mbpd at $55.02 in the same period last year.  For the six months period net synthetic crude sale of 22 mbpd at $69.94 in 2010 compared to 31 mbpd at $46.63 in 2009.
 
 
See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about derivative instruments.
 
 
RM&T segment revenues increased $4,728 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $9,416 million in the first six months of 2010 from the comparable periods of 2009.  Our refined product and liquid hydrocarbon selling prices were higher as illustrated by the spot benchmark prices in the following table and accounted for 61 percent of the quarterly and 76 percent of year-to-date overall revenue increase.  Refined product sales volumes increased 17 percent in the second quarter and 12 percent in the first six months of 2010, in part due to higher production from our expanded Garyville refinery.
 

   
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars per gallon)
 
2010 
   
2009 
   
2010 
   
2009 
Chicago Spot Unleaded regular gasoline
$
 2.11 
 
$
 1.74 
 
$
 2.07 
 
$
 1.49 
Chicago Spot Ultra-low sulfur diesel
 
 2.16 
   
 1.57 
   
 2.10 
   
 1.44 
USGC Spot Unleaded regular gasoline
 
 2.05 
   
 1.64 
   
 2.05 
   
 1.43 
USGC Spot Ultra-low sulfur diesel
$
 2.14 
 
$
 1.57 
 
$
 2.10 
 
$
 1.45 
 
Income from equity method investments increased $39 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $97 million in the first six months of 2010 from the comparable prior-year periods.  Higher commodity prices in 2010 compared to 2009 positively impacted the earnings of many of our equity method investees.
 
 
Net gain on disposal of assets in the first six months of 2010 primarily represents the sale of a 20 percent outside-operated undivided interest in our Production Sharing and Joint Operating Agreement in Block 32 offshore Angola.  During the first quarter of 2010, we recorded a gain of $811 million on the sale.  The net gain on disposal of assets in the first six months of 2009 primarily represents the sale of a portion of our operated and all of our outside-operated Permian Basin producing assets in New Mexico and west Texas.
 
 
Cost of revenues increased $4,532 million and $10,056 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the comparable periods of 2009.  In both periods, the increase was primarily the result of higher acquisition costs of crude oil, charge and blendstocks and purchased refined products in the RM&T segment.  Increased volumes of purchased crude oil also contributed to the increased costs.
 
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) decreased in second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the comparable prior-year periods.  Decreased DD&A related to the lower sales volumes in our E&P and OSM segments and a lower rate of DD&A per barrel on our domestic E&P assets.  We had a high DD&A rate in the second quarter of 2009, but reserves were added in the fourth quarter of 2009; thereby reducing the current DD&A per barrel.  Increased DD&A related to the Garyville expansion being put in to service at the end of 2009 mostly offset the impact of these decreases.  In addition, DD&A in the RM&T segment increased for the second quarter as a result of a $23 million charge to abandon partially completed MSAT II compliance equipment in favor of a more cost effective compliance approach.
 
 
Long-lived asset impairments in the second quarter of 2010 related primarily to our maleic anhydride plant.  In the first quarter of 2010 the impairments were primarily related to our Powder River Basin field.  See Note 11 for information about these impairments.
 
 
Exploration expenses were $125 million and $223 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010, including expenses related to dry wells of $57 million and $89 million.  Exploration expenses were $64 million and $126 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2009, including expenses related to dry wells of $8 million and $13 million.    The majority of dry well costs in 2010 relate to the partial writeoff of the previously discussed offshore Gulf of Mexico well on the Flying Dutchman prospect.
 
 
Provision for income taxes increased $50 million and $306 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the comparable periods of 2009 primarily due to the increase in pretax income.  The effective income tax rate decreased primarily as a result of favorable foreign currency remeasurement effects.  Such decrease was partially offset by an increase from legislation changes, see Note 8.  The effective tax rate is also influenced by a variety of factors
 
 
29
 
 
 
including the geographical and functional sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income.
 
 
The following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for the first six months of 2010 and 2009:
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
2010
   
2009
 
Statutory U.S. income tax rate
    35 %     35 %
Effects of foreign operations, including foreign tax credits
    16       26  
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax effects
    -       1  
Legislation change
    2       -  
Other
    (1 )     -  
        Effective income tax rate
    52 %     62 %
 
The provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete, stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments.  The difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments and to individual items not allocated to segments is reported in corporate and other unallocated items.
 
 
Discontinued operations reflect the 2009 disposal of our E&P businesses in Ireland and Gabon (see Note 5) and the historical results of those operations, net of tax, for all periods presented.
 
Segment Results
             
                         
Segment income (loss) is summarized in the following table:
 
                         
   
Three Months Ended June 30,
   
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
E&P
                       
    United States
  $ 25     $ (41 )   $ 134     $ (93 )
    International
    407       249       800       384  
            E&P segment
    432       208       934       291  
                                 
OSM
    (60 )     2       (77 )     (22 )
IG
    24       13       68       40  
RM&T
    421       165       184       324  
                                 
            Segment income
    817       388       1,109       633  
Items not allocated to segments, net of income taxes:
                               
     Corporate and other unallocated items
    (62 )     (90 )     (72 )     (140 )
     Foreign currency remeasurement of income taxes
    37       (94 )     70       (66 )
     Gain on dispositions
    -       122       449       122  
     Impairments
    (26 )     -       (288 )     -  
     Loss on early extinguishment of debt
    (57 )     -       (57 )     -  
     Deferred income taxes - tax legislation changes
    -       -       (45 )     -  
     Gain on U.K. natural gas contracts
    -       2       -       44  
     Discontinued operations
    -       85       -       102  
Net income
  $ 709     $ 413     $ 1,166     $ 695  

 
United States E&P income increased $66 million and $227 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009.  The income increase was primarily driven by realization increases in both periods as previously discussed.  DD&A reductions as result of the lower volumes and DD&A rates were partially offset by increased exploration expenses.
 
 
International E&P income increased $158 million and $416 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009.  The income increase is primarily due to revenue increases as previously discussed.  Liquid hydrocarbon realizations were up 33 percent and 50 percent for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009.
 


 
OSM segment income decreased $62 million and $55 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010.  After-tax derivative gains of $40 million and $32 million were included in income for the second quarter and first six months of 2009.  Derivative gains or losses in 2009 were not significant.  Exclusive of the derivative effects, the decline in OSM segment income reflects lower volumes sold and higher incremental costs, both primarily related to the previously discussed turnaround.  Improved realizations of 18 percent and 50 percent in the second quarter and first six months partially offset the impact of the turnaround on segment income.
 
 
IG segment income increased $11 million in the second quarter of 2010 and $28 million in the first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009.  The increase was primarily the result of higher price realizations in both periods of 2010 compared to 2009.
 
 
RM&T segment income increased by $256 million in the second quarter but decreased $140 million in first six months of 2010 compared to the same periods of 2009.  The increase for the quarter was primarily due to a higher refining and wholesale marketing gross margin, which averaged 13.37 cents per gallon in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 8.71 cents per gallon in the same quarter of 2009.  A wider sweet/sour crude differential coupled with an increase in sour crude throughput contributed to the increase in segment income.  These favorable impacts were partially offset by increased manufacturing expenses in the second quarter 2010 compared to the second quarter 2009 due to a combination of increased depreciation and energy expense associated with the additional Garyville refinery units.
 
 
The decrease in segment income in the six month period was primarily due to a lower refining and wholesale marketing gross margin, which averaged 4.71 cents per gallon in the first six months of 2010 compared to 8.33 cents per gallon in the comparable period of 2009.  Impacting the gross margin were higher manufacturing costs relating to a pretax increase of approximately $150 million in refining system turnaround costs and higher depreciation expense related to the Garyville expansion units.
 
 Our refining and wholesale marketing gross margin also included pretax derivative gains of $ 74 million and $51 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 compared to gains of $13 million and losses of $47 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2009.

 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Cash Flows and Liquidity
 
 
Cash Flows
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $2,127 million in the first six months of 2010, compared to $2,037 million in the first six months of 2009.
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities totaled $1,142 million in the first six months of 2010, compared to $2,906 million in the first six months of 2009. In the first quarter of 2010, we closed the sale of our 20 percent outside-operated undivided interest in the Production Sharing Contract and Joint Operating Agreement in Block 32 offshore Angola.  The related cash inflow was $1.3 billion.
 
 
In our E&P segment, exploration and development projects in 2010 are offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, on our Angola development and U.S. unconventional resource plays. The 2010 exploration and development budget of $1,023 million is 30 percent higher than 2009 spending.  With the completion of our Garyville refinery expansion at the end of 2009, we have reduced spending in our RM&T segment while keeping the expansion and upgrading of our Detroit, Michigan, refinery on track.  The AOSP Expansion 1 in our OSM segment continues into 2010, with the spending rate relatively unchanged from 2009 levels.
 
 For further information regarding capital expenditures by segment, see Supplemental Statistics.
 
 
Net cash used in financing activities was $970 million in the first six months of 2010, compared to net cash provided of $1,099 million in the first six months of 2009. Sources of cash in the first six months of 2009 included the issuance of $1.5 billion in senior notes, with the only significant use of cash being dividends.  Significant uses of cash in the first six months of 2010 included the repayment of $500 million aggregate principal value of debt at a weighted average price of 117 percent of face value under two tender offers in the second quarter of 2010 and dividends.
 
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
 
Our main sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, internally generated cash flow from operations and our $3.0 billion committed revolving credit facility.  Because of the alternatives available to us, including internally generated cash flow and access to capital markets, we believe that our short-term and long-term liquidity is adequate to fund not only our current operations, but also our near-term and long-term funding requirements including our capital spending programs, share repurchase program, dividend payments, defined benefit plan contributions, repayment of debt maturities and other amounts that may ultimately be paid in connection with contingencies.


 
Capital Resources
 
At June 30, 2010, we had no borrowings against our revolving credit facility and no commercial paper outstanding under our U.S. commercial paper program that is backed by the revolving credit facility.
 
 
On July 16, 2010, we filed a universal shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under which we, as a well-known seasoned issuer, have the ability to issue and sell various types of debt and equity securities.
 
Our cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio (total debt-minus-cash to total debt-plus-equity-minus-cash) was 20 percent at June 30, 2010, compared to 23 percent at December 31, 2009.  This includes $239 million of debt that is serviced by United States Steel.

   
June 30,
   
December 31,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
 
    Long-term debt due within one year
  $ 101     $ 96  
    Long-term debt
    7,829       8,436  
                 
            Total debt
  $ 7,930     $ 8,532  
                 
    Cash
  $ 2,062     $ 2,057  
    Trusteed funds from revenue bonds
  $ -     $ 16  
    Equity
  $ 22,841     $ 21,910  
    Calculation:
               
                 
    Total debt
  $ 7,930     $ 8,532  
    Minus cash
    2,062       2,057  
    Minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds
    -       16  
                 
            Total debt minus cash
  $ 5,868     $ 6,459  
                 
    Total debt
    7,930       8,532  
    Plus equity
    22,841       21,910  
    Minus cash
    2,062       2,057  
    Minus trusteed funds from revenue bonds
    -       16  
                 
            Total debt plus equity minus cash
  $ 28,709     $ 28,369  
                 
    Cash-adjusted debt-to-capital ratio
    20 %     23 %
                 

 
Capital Requirements
 
 
On July 28, 2010, our Board of Directors approved a 25 cents per share dividend, payable September 10, 2010 to stockholders of record at the close of business on August 18, 2010.  In April 2010, the dividend was increased from 24 cents per share to 25 cents per share, a 4 percent increase in our quarterly dividend.
 
 
We expect to make contributions of approximately $230 million to our funded pension plans in the last half of 2010.
 
 
Since January 2006, our Board of Directors has authorized a common share repurchase program totaling $5 billion.  As of March 31, 2010, we had repurchased 66 million common shares at a cost of $2,922 million.  We have not made any purchases under the program since August 2008.  Purchases under the program may be in either open market transactions, including block purchases, or in privately negotiated transactions.  This program may be changed based upon our financial condition or changes in market conditions and is subject to termination prior to completion.  The program’s authorization does not include specific price targets or timetables.  The timing of purchases under the program will be influenced by cash generated from operations, proceeds from potential asset sales, cash from available borrowings and market conditions.
 
 
Our opinions concerning liquidity and our ability to avail ourselves in the future of the financing options mentioned in the above forward-looking statements are based on currently available information. If this information proves to be inaccurate, future availability of financing may be adversely affected. Estimates may differ from actual results.  Factors that affect the availability of financing include our performance (as measured by various factors including cash provided from operating activities), the state of worldwide debt and equity markets, investor perceptions and expectations of past and future performance, the global financial climate, and, in particular, with respect to borrowings, the levels of our outstanding debt and credit ratings by rating agencies.  The forward-looking statements about our common stock
 
 
32
 
 
repurchase program are based on current expectations, estimates and projections and are not guarantees of future performance.  Actual results may differ materially from these expectations, estimates and projections and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and are difficult to predict.  Some factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are changes in prices of and demand for crude oil, natural gas and refined products, actions of competitors, disruptions or interruptions of our production, refining and mining operations due to unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions, acts of war or terrorist acts and the governmental or military response thereto, and other operating and economic considerations.
 
 
Contractual Cash Obligations
 
 
The table below provides aggregated information on our consolidated obligations to make future payments under existing contracts as of June 30, 2010:
 

 
 
 
   
 
      2011-       2013-    
Later
 
(In millions)
 
Total
   
2010
      2012       2014    
Years
 
Long-term debt (excludes interest)(a)
  $ 7,571     $ 34     $ 1,551     $ 984     $ 5,002  
Sale-leaseback financing(a)
    23       1       22       -       -  
Capital lease obligations(a)
    628       17       81       88       442  
Operating lease obligations(a)
    820       72       250       185       313  
Operating lease obligations under sublease(a)
    15       3       12       -       -  
Purchase obligations:
                                       
Crude oil, feedstock, refined product
    11,522       9,882       1,053       428       159  
     and ethanol contracts
                                       
Transportation and related contracts
    1,930       536       300       156       938  
Contracts to acquire property, plant and
    2,610       1,095       1,514       1       -  
     equipment
                                       
LNG terminal operating costs(b)
    136       6       25       25       80  
Service and materials contracts(c)
    2,000       243       510       328       919  
Unconditional purchase obligations(d)
    47       8       16       16       7  
Commitments for oil and gas exploration
    28       20       1       1       6  
     (non-capital)(e)
                                       
Total purchase obligations
    18,273       11,790       3,419       955       2,109  
Other long-term liabilities reported
                                       
   in the consolidated balance sheet(f)
    2,301       80       643       560       1,018  
Total contractual cash obligations(g)
  $ 29,631     $ 11,997     $ 5,978     $ 2,772     $ 8,884  

(a)
Includes debt and lease obligations assumed by United States Steel upon the USX Separation.
 
(b)
We have acquired the right to deliver 58 bcf of natural gas per year to the Elba Island LNG re-gasification terminal.  The agreement’s primary term ends in 2021.  Pursuant to this agreement, we are also committed to pay for a portion of the operating costs of the terminal.
 
(c)
Service and materials contracts include contracts to purchase services such as utilities, supplies and various other maintenance and operating services.
 
(d)
We are a part to a long-term transportation services agreement with Alliance Pipeline.  This agreement was used by Alliance Pipeline to secure its financing.
 
(e)
Commitments on oil and gas exploration (non-capital) include estimated costs related to contractually obligated exploratory work programs that are expensed immediately, such as geological and geophysical costs.
 
(f)
Primarily includes obligations for pension and other postretirement benefits including medical and life insurance, which we have estimated through 2019.  Also includes amounts for uncertain tax positions.
 
(g)
This table does not include the estimated discounted liability for dismantlement, abandonment and restoration costs of oil and gas properties.
 
 


 
Receivable from United States Steel
 
We remain obligated (primarily or contingently) for $257 million of certain debt and other financial arrangements for which United States Steel Corporation (“United States Steel”) has assumed responsibility for repayment (see the USX Separation in Item 1. of our 2009 Annual Report on 10-K).  United States Steel reported in its Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010 that it believes that its liquidity will be adequate to satisfy its obligations for the foreseeable future.

 
Environmental Matters
 
 
We have incurred and will continue to incur substantial capital, operating and maintenance, and remediation expenditures as a result of environmental laws and regulations.  If these expenditures, as with all costs, are not ultimately reflected in the prices of our products and services, our operating results will be adversely affected.  We believe that substantially all of our competitors must comply with similar environmental laws and regulations.  However, the specific impact on each competitor may vary depending on a number of factors, including the age and location of its operating facilities, marketing areas, production processes and whether it is also engaged in the petrochemical business or the marine transportation of crude oil, refined products and feedstocks.
 
 
We have finalized our strategic approach to comply with Mobile Source Air Toxics II (“MSAT II”) regulations relating to benzene content in refined products and updated the project cost estimates to comply with these requirements.  We now estimate that we may spend approximately $675 million over a four-year period that began in 2008, reduced from our previous projection of approximately $1 billion over a six-year period.  The overall cost reduction for MSAT II compliance is a result of lower costs for several projects along with our finalization of the most appropriate MSAT II compliance approach for our refineries.  Our actual MSAT II expenditures since inception have totaled $401 million through June 30, 2010, with $58 million in the second quarter of 2010.  We expect total year 2010 spending will be approximately $300 million.  The cost estimates are forward-looking statements and are subject to change as further work is completed in 2010.
 
 
There have been no other significant changes to our environmental matters subsequent to December 31, 2009.
 

 
Other Contingencies
 
 
We are the subject of, or a party to, a number of pending or threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment. The ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to us. However, we believe that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably to us. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.
 

 
Critical Accounting Estimates
 
 
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the respective reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
 
 
Certain accounting estimates are considered to be critical if (1) the nature of the estimates and assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change; and (2) the impact of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material.
 
 
There have been no other changes to our critical accounting estimates subsequent to December 31, 2009.
 



 
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
 
For a detailed discussion of our risk management strategies and our derivative instruments, see Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
 
Disclosures about how derivatives are reported in our consolidated financial statements and how the fair values of our derivative instruments are measured may be found in Note 11 and 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
 
Sensitivity analysis of the incremental effects on income from operations ("IFO") of hypothetical 10 percent and 25 percent increases and decreases in commodity prices on our open commodity derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010 is provided in the following table.
 
  

             
   
Incremental Change in IFO
from a Hypothetical Price
Increase of
   
Incremental Change in IFO
from a Hypothetical Price
Decrease of
 
(In millions)
    10 %     25 %     10 %     25 %
E&P Segment
                               
      Natural gas
  $ (8 )   $ (20 )   $ 8     $ 20  
OSM Segment
                               
      Crude oil
  $ (35 )   $ (88 )   $ 35     $ 88  
RM&T Segment
                               
      Crude oil
  $ (65 )   $ (166 )   $ 77     $ 194  
       Natural gas
    1       2       (1 )     (2 )
      Refined products
    16       41       (16 )     (41 )

 
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
 
 
An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  As of the end of the period covered by this report based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 

35
 

 
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
 
 
 

   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
(In millions)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
Segment Income (Loss)
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
     Exploration and Production
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
          United States
  $ 25     $ (41 )   $ 134     $ (93 )
          International
    407       249       800       384  
               E&P segment
    432       208       934       291  
     Oil Sands Mining
    (60 )     2       (77 )     (22 )
     Integrated Gas
    24       13       68       40  
     Refining, Marketing and Transportation
    421       165       184       324  
          Segment income
    817       388       1,109       633  
                                 
     Items not allocated to segments, net of income taxes
    (108 )     25       57       62  
          Net income
  $ 709     $ 413     $ 1,166     $ 695  
Capital Expenditures(a)
                               
     Exploration and Production
                               
          United States
  $ 412     $ 385     $ 870     $ 615  
          International
    173       224       318       359  
               E&P segment
    585       609       1,188       974  
     Oil Sands Mining
    243       281       508       567  
     Integrated Gas
    -       1       1       1  
     Refining, Marketing and Transportation
    256       713       566       1,373  
     Discontinued Operations(b)
    -       39       -       63  
     Corporate
    14       7       14       8  
               Total
  $ 1,098     $ 1,650     $ 2,277     $ 2,986  
Exploration Expenses
                               
     United States
  $ 112     $ 31     $ 158     $ 65  
     International
    13       33       65       61  
               Total
  $ 125     $ 64     $ 223     $ 126  
 
(a)
Capital expenditures include changes in accruals.
 
(b)
Our oil and gas businesses in Ireland (natural gas) and Gabon (liquid hydrocarbons) are treated as discontinued operations in all periods presented.

36
 

 
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
 
Supplemental Statistics (Unaudited)
 
 


   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
E&P Operating Statistics
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
     Net Liquid Hydrocarbon Sales (mbpd)
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
          United States
    57       64       57       65  
                                 
          Europe
    110       112       98       92  
          Africa
    79       92       81       89  
               Total International
    189       204       179       181  
                    Worldwide Continuing Operations
    246       268       236       246  
                    Discontinued Operations
    -       9       -       4  
                         Worldwide
    246       277       236       250  
     Net Natural Gas Sales (mmcfd)
                               
          United States
    334       365       343       395  
                                 
          Europe(c)
    104       151       106       155  
          Africa
    402       439       378       436  
               Total International
    506       590       484       591  
                    Worldwide Continuing Operations
    840       955       827       986  
                    Discontinued Operations
    -       3       -       33  
                         Worldwide
    840       958       827       1,019  
     Total Worldwide Sales (mboepd)
                               
          Continuing operations
    386       428       374       411  
          Discontinued operations
    -       9       -       10  
                         Worldwide
    386       437       374       421  
                                 
     Average Realizations (d)
                               
         Liquid Hydrocarbons (per bbl)
                               
             United States
  $ 68.01     $ 53.25     $ 70.25     $ 44.84  
                                 
             Europe
    79.66       60.91       79.36       55.71  
             Africa
    69.41       51.62       70.20       44.52  
                Total International
    75.37       56.70       75.20       50.22  
                  Worldwide Continuing Operations
    73.68       55.88       74.00       48.80  
                  Discontinued Operations
    -       43.01       -       43.05  
                        Worldwide
  $ 73.68     $ 55.49     $ 74.00     $ 48.70  
                                 
         Natural Gas (per mcf)
                               
             United States
  $ 4.41     $ 3.60     $ 4.96     $ 4.08  
                                 
             Europe
    5.92       4.43       6.05       4.90  
             Africa(e)
    0.25       0.25       0.25       0.25  
                Total International
    1.41       1.32       1.52       1.47  
                  Worldwide Continuing Operations
    2.61       2.19       2.95       2.51  
                  Discontinued Operations
    -       7.49       -       8.54  
                        Worldwide
  $ 2.61     $ 2.21     $ 2.95     $ 2.71  
                                 
 
(c)
Includes natural gas acquired for injection and subsequent resale of 16 mmcfd and 18 mmcfd in the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, and 21 mmcfd for the first six months of 2010 and 2009.
 
(d)
Excludes gains and losses on derivative instruments, including the unrealized effects of U.K. natural gas contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and expired in September 2009.
 
(e)
Primarily represents a fixed price under long-term contracts with Alba Plant LLC, Atlantic Methanol Production Company LLC (“AMPCO”) and Equatorial Guinea LNG Holdings Limited (“EGHoldings”), equity method investees.  We include our share of Alba Plant LLC’s income in our E&P segment and we include our share of AMPCO’s and EGHoldings’ income in our Integrated Gas segment.

37
 

 
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
 
Supplemental Statistics (Unaudited)
 


   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
June 30,
   
June 30,
 
(In millions, except as noted)
 
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
OSM Operating Statistics
 
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
 
    Net Synthetic Crude Sales (mbpd) (f)
    20       30       22       31  
    Synthetic Crude Average Realization (per bbl)(g)
  $ 65.11     $ 55.02     $ 69.94     $ 46.63  
                                 
IG Operating Statistics
                               
     Net Sales (mtpd) (h)
                               
         LNG
    6,556       6,611       6,176       6,690  
         Methanol
    1,135       1,362       1,147       1,258  
RM&T Operating Statistics
                               
     Refinery Runs (mbpd)
                               
         Crude oil refined
    1,229       959       1,117       905  
         Other charge and blend stocks
    164       199       130       210  
             Total
    1,393       1,158       1,247       1,115  
     Refined Product Yields (mbpd)
                               
         Gasoline
    753       659       665       638  
         Distillates
    428       319       368       314  
         Propane
    26       23       23       22  
         Feedstocks and special products
    96       73       106       62  
         Heavy fuel oil
    30       25       22       24  
         Asphalt
    81       75       79       70  
             Total
    1,414       1,174       1,263       1,130  
                                 
     Refined Products Sales Volumes (mbpd) (i)
    1,610       1,371       1,483       1,329  
     Refining and Wholesale Marketing Gross
                               
          Margin (per gallon) (j)
  $ 0.1337     $ 0.0871     $ 0.0471     $ 0.0833  
     Speedway SuperAmerica
                               
         Retail outlets
    1,596       1,611       -       -  
         Gasoline and distillate sales (millions of gallons)
    848       806       1,631       1,590  
         Gasoline and distillate gross margin (per gallon)
  $ 0.1328     $ 0.1051     $ 0.1264     $ 0.1059  
         Merchandise sales
  $ 832     $ 809     $ 1,563     $ 1,499  
         Merchandise gross margin
  $ 207     $ 192     $ 385     $ 370  
                                 
 
(f)
Includes blendstocks.
 
(g)
Excludes gains and losses on derivative instruments.
 
(h)
Includes both consolidated sales volumes and our share of the sales volumes of equity method investees.  LNG sales from Alaska are conducted through a consolidated subsidiary.  LNG and methanol sales from Equatorial Guinea are conducted through equity method investees.
 
(i)
Total average daily volumes of all refined product sales to wholesale, branded and retail (SSA) customers.
 
(j)
Sales revenue less cost of refinery inputs, purchased products and manufacturing expenses, including depreciation.
 
 



 
Part II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
 
We are the subject of, or a party to, a number of pending or threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment.  Certain of these matters are included below.  The ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in the aggregate, be material.  However, we believe that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably.
 
 
MTBE Litigation
 
 
The Town of Kouts, Indiana filed a lawsuit against us and other refining companies in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana alleging damages for MTBE contamination.  With these additional filings, we are a defendant, along with other refining companies, in five cases arising in four states alleging damages for MTBE contamination.   We expect additional lawsuits alleging such damages against us in the future, but likewise do not expect them to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations, financial positions, or cash flows.
 
 
 
 
Environmental Proceedings
 
 
During 2001, we entered into a New Source Review consent decree and settlement of alleged Clean Air Act (“CAA”) and other violations with the U.S. EPA covering all of our refineries. The settlement committed us to specific control technologies and implementation schedules for environmental expenditures and improvements to our refineries over approximately an eight-year period, which are now substantially complete. As part of this consent decree, we were required to conduct evaluations of refinery benzene waste air pollution programs (benzene waste “NESHAPS”).  Pursuant to a modification to our New Source Review consent decree, we have agreed with the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. EPA to pay a civil penalty of $408,000 and conduct supplemental environmental projects of approximately $1 million, as part of a settlement of an enforcement action for alleged CAA violations relating to benzene waste NESHAPS.  A modification to our New Source Review consent decree was finalized June 30, 2010 and the civil penalty amount has been paid.
 

 
Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
 
We are subject to various risks and uncertainties in the course of our business.  The discussion of such risks and uncertainties may be found under Item 1A. Risk Factors in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The following are updates to our risk factors.
 

Our offshore operations involve special risks that could negatively impact us.

Offshore exploration and development operations present technological challenges and operating risks because of the marine environment.  Activities in deepwater areas may pose incrementally greater risks because of water depths that limit intervention capability and the physical distance to oilfield service infrastructure and service providers.  Environmental remediation and other costs resulting from spills or releases may result in substantial liabilities and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and market value of our securities.

Restrictions on U.S. Gulf of Mexico deepwater operations and similar action by countries where we do business could have a significant impact on our operations.

As a result of the Deepwater Horizon incident, the U.S. Department of the Interior issued a drilling moratorium to suspend outer continental shelf subsea and floating facility operations through November 30, 2010.  Due to this drilling moratorium, we suspended drilling activity on one well in the Gulf of Mexico.  While this moratorium is scheduled to end on November 30, 2010, we cannot predict when it will end.  An extended moratorium on deepwater drilling activities in the Gulf of Mexico or changes in laws or regulations affecting our operations in these areas could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flow and market value of our securities.  In addition, other countries where we do business may make changes to their laws or regulations governing offshore operations, including deepwater areas, that could have a similar material adverse effect.


 
We will continue to incur substantial capital expenditures and operating costs as a result of compliance with, and changes in environmental health, safety and security laws and regulations, and, as a result, our profitability could be materially reduced.
 
We believe it is likely that the scientific and political attention to issues concerning the extent, causes of and responsibility for climate change will continue, with the potential for further regulations that could affect our operations. As an update to legislation and regulatory activity that impacts or could impact our operations:
 
·  
EPA issued a finding in 2009 that greenhouse gases contribute to air pollution that endangers public health and welfare.  Related to this endangerment finding, in April of 2010, the EPA finalized a greenhouse gas emission standard for mobile sources (cars and light duty vehicles).  The endangerment finding along with the mobile source standard and EPA’s determination that greenhouse gases are subject to regulation under the Clean Air Act, will lead to widespread regulation of stationary sources of greenhouse gas emissions.  As a result, the EPA has issued a so-called tailoring rule to limit the applicability of the EPA’s major permitting programs to larger sources of greenhouse gas emissions, such as our refineries and a few large production facilities.  Although legal challenges have been filed or are expected to be filed against these EPA actions, no court decisions are expected for about two years.
 
·  
Congress may continue to consider legislation in 2010 on greenhouse gas emissions, which may include a cap and trade system for stationary sources and a carbon fee on transportation fuels.
 
Although there may be adverse financial impact (including compliance costs, potential permitting delays and potential reduced demand for crude oil or certain refined products) associated with any legislation, regulation or other action, the extent and magnitude of that impact cannot be reliably or accurately estimated due to the fact that requirements have only recently been adopted and the present uncertainty regarding the additional measures and how they will be implemented.
 


Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 
 
 
 
   
 
column (a)
column (b)
column (c)
column (d)
 
 
 
Total Number of Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs (d)
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares that
May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs (d)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Number of
Average Price Paid
Period
Shares Purchased (a)(b)
per Share
 
 
 
   
04/01/10 – 04/30/10
 3,279 
$32.06
 
$2,080,366,711
05/01/10 – 05/31/10
 22,032 
$32.37
 
$2,080,366,711
06/01/10– 06/30/10
 63,558 (c)
$31.56
 
$2,080,366,711
      Total
 88,869 
$31.78
 - 
 
 
(a)  
41,404 shares of restricted stock were delivered by employees to Marathon, upon vesting, to satisfy tax withholding requirements.
 
(b)  
Under the terms of the transaction whereby we acquired the minority interest in Marathon Petroleum Company LLC and other businesses from Ashland Inc. (“Ashland”), Ashland shareholders have the right to receive 0.2364 shares of Marathon common stock for each share of Ashland common stock owned as of June 30, 2005 and cash in lieu of fractional based on a value of $52.17 per share.  In the second quarter of 2010, we acquired 2 shares due to acquisition share exchanges and Ashland share transfers pending at the closing of the transaction.
 
(c)  
47,463 shares were repurchased in open-market transactions to satisfy the requirements for dividend reinvestment under the Marathon Oil Corporation Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan (the “Dividend Reinvestment Plan”) by the administrator of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Shares needed to meet the requirements of the Dividend Reinvestment Plan are either purchased in the open market or issued directly by Marathon.
 
(d)  
We announced a share repurchase program in January 2006, and amended it several times in 2007 for a total authorized program of $5 billion.  As of June 30, 2010, 66 million split-adjusted common shares had been acquired at a cost of $2,922 million, which includes transaction fees and commissions that are not reported in the table above.  No shares have been repurchased under this program since August 2008.


Item 6.  Exhibits

 
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report:
 

Exhibit Number
 
 
 
Incorporated by Reference
 
Filed
Herewith
 
Furnished Herewith
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Exhibit
 
Filing Date
 
SEC File No.
 
 
3.1 
 
Certificate of Elimination of Special Voting Stock of Marathon Oil Corporation
 
8-K
 
3.1 
 
6/30/10
 
 
 
 
 
 
12.1 
 
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
31.1 
 
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14 and 15(d)-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
31.2 
 
Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14 and 15(d)-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
32.1 
 
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 
32.2 
 
Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
X
 
 


SIGNATURES

 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 

 

August 6, 2010
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
   
 
By: /s/ Michael K. Stewart
 
Michael K. Stewart
 
Vice President, Accounting and Controller

 
43