Annual Statements Open main menu

MARTEN TRANSPORT LTD - Quarter Report: 2005 September (Form 10-Q)

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

 

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the Quarter ended September 30, 2005

 

Commission File Number 0-15010

 

MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

 

39-1140809

(State of incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)

 

129 Marten Street, Mondovi, Wisconsin 54755

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

715-926-4216

(Registrant’s telephone number)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý   No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes ý   No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes o   No ý

 

The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, was 14,377,393 as of November 4, 2005.

 

 



 

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

 

MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

(In thousands, except share information)

 

2005

 

2004

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

768

 

$

 

Marketable securities

 

611

 

62

 

Receivables:

 

 

 

 

 

Trade, net

 

48,804

 

39,090

 

Other

 

10,753

 

8,372

 

Prepaid expenses and other

 

10,158

 

11,869

 

Deferred income taxes

 

4,549

 

5,856

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

75,643

 

65,249

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and equipment:

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue equipment, buildings and land, office equipment and other

 

330,453

 

302,765

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

(91,765

)

(87,067

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net property and equipment

 

238,688

 

215,698

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

7,509

 

7,127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

 

$

321,840

 

$

288,074

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Checks issued in excess of cash balances

 

$

 

$

2,849

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

22,867

 

16,871

 

Insurance and claims accruals

 

12,424

 

13,654

 

Current maturities of long-term debt

 

5,095

 

5,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

 

40,386

 

38,374

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, less current maturities

 

31,228

 

25,257

 

Deferred income taxes

 

63,642

 

56,522

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities

 

135,256

 

120,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share;
2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value per share;
48,000,000 shares authorized; 14,366,143 shares, at September 30, 2005, and 14,307,027 shares, at December 31, 2004, issued and outstanding

 

144

 

143

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

70,821

 

70,111

 

Retained earnings

 

115,619

 

97,667

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

 

186,584

 

167,921

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

$

321,840

 

$

288,074

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

1



 

MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months
Ended September 30,

 

(In thousands, except per share information)

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING REVENUE

 

$

119,081

 

$

97,892

 

$

334,787

 

$

274,329

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES (INCOME):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries, wages and benefits

 

31,994

 

27,527

 

92,606

 

78,224

 

Purchased transportation

 

21,375

 

20,314

 

62,016

 

57,963

 

Fuel and fuel taxes

 

29,644

 

18,789

 

76,264

 

50,261

 

Supplies and maintenance

 

7,336

 

6,579

 

20,796

 

18,681

 

Depreciation

 

9,447

 

8,256

 

27,782

 

24,180

 

Operating taxes and licenses

 

1,965

 

1,651

 

5,282

 

4,835

 

Insurance and claims

 

4,429

 

4,558

 

13,307

 

13,019

 

Communications and utilities

 

836

 

738

 

2,488

 

2,285

 

Gain on disposition of revenue equipment

 

(1,182

)

(544

)

(3,292

)

(1,722

)

Other

 

2,465

 

2,174

 

7,251

 

6,282

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

108,309

 

90,042

 

304,500

 

254,008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

10,772

 

7,850

 

30,287

 

20,321

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER EXPENSES (INCOME):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

549

 

512

 

1,690

 

1,539

 

Interest income

 

(430

)

(379

)

(1,216

)

(1,106

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

10,653

 

7,717

 

29,813

 

19,888

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

 

4,279

 

2,933

 

11,861

 

7,558

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INCOME

 

$

6,374

 

$

4,784

 

$

17,952

 

$

12,330

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.34

 

$

1.25

 

$

0.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.33

 

$

1.23

 

$

0.85

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

2



 

MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-In

 

Retained

 

Stockholders’

 

(In thousands)

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2003

 

13,760

 

$

138

 

$

64,265

 

$

80,131

 

$

144,534

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

12,330

 

12,330

 

Issuance of common stock from stock option exercises

 

386

 

3

 

2,248

 

 

2,251

 

Tax benefit of stock option exercises

 

 

 

1,824

 

 

1,824

 

Balance at September 30, 2004

 

14,146

 

141

 

68,337

 

92,461

 

160,939

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

5,206

 

5,206

 

Issuance of common stock from stock option exercises

 

161

 

2

 

986

 

 

988

 

Tax benefit of stock option exercises

 

 

 

788

 

 

788

 

Balance at December 31, 2004

 

14,307

 

143

 

70,111

 

97,667

 

167,921

 

Net income

 

 

 

 

17,952

 

17,952

 

Issuance of common stock from stock option exercises

 

59

 

1

 

422

 

 

423

 

Tax benefit of stock option exercises

 

 

 

288

 

 

288

 

Balance at September 30, 2005

 

14,366

 

$

144

 

$

70,821

 

$

115,619

 

$

186,584

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

3



 

MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Nine Months

 

 

 

Ended September 30,

 

(In thousands)

 

2005

 

2004

 

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

17,952

 

$

12,330

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation

 

27,782

 

24,180

 

Gain on disposition of revenue equipment

 

(3,292

)

(1,722

)

Deferred tax provision

 

8,427

 

2,429

 

Tax benefit of stock option exercises

 

288

 

1,824

 

Changes in other current operating items

 

(5,618

)

(3,816

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

45,539

 

35,225

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS USED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases of marketable securities

 

(30,703

)

(62,154

)

Sales of marketable securities

 

30,154

 

81,265

 

Revenue equipment additions

 

(68,333

)

(82,841

)

Proceeds from revenue equipment dispositions

 

24,212

 

25,317

 

Buildings and land, office equipment and other additions, net

 

(3,359

)

(854

)

Net change in other assets

 

(382

)

(1,104

)

Net cash used for investing activities

 

(48,411

)

(40,371

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

Borrowings under credit facility and long-term debt

 

80,152

 

15,000

 

Repayment of borrowings under credit facility and long-term debt

 

(74,086

)

(12,728

)

Issuance of common stock from stock option exercises

 

423

 

2,251

 

Change in net checks issued in excess of cash balances

 

(2,849

)

623

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

3,640

 

5,146

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET CHANGE IN CASH

 

768

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH:

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

End of period

 

$

768

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for:

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

1,684

 

$

1,555

 

Income taxes

 

$

1,192

 

$

3,555

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

4



 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005

(Unaudited)

 

(1)           Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial statements, and therefore do not include all information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, such statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to fairly present our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period do not necessarily indicate the results for the full year. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read with reference to the financial statements and notes to financial statements in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2005 and consolidated condensed statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 include the accounts of Marten Transport, Ltd. and its 45% owned affiliate, MW Logistics, LLC (“MWL”).  MWL is a third-party provider of logistics services to the transportation industry.  We have applied the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” as revised, to our investment in MWL effective March 31, 2004.  As a result, the accounts of MWL are included in our unaudited consolidated condensed balance sheet as of September 30, 2005, and in our consolidated condensed statement of operations beginning April 1, 2004.  All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Prior to April 1, 2004, we accounted for our investment in MWL using the equity method of accounting.  We recorded our share of the equity loss of MWL in the amount of $6,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

 

(2) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

 

We have adopted the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure.”  Statement No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”  As of September 30, 2005, we have two stock-based employee compensation plans. We account for these plans under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statement No. 123:

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months
Ended September 30,

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Net income, as reported

 

$

6,374

 

$

4,784

 

$

17,952

 

$

12,330

 

Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

 

(29

)

(40

)

(68

)

(119

)

Pro forma net income

 

$

6,345

 

$

4,744

 

$

17,884

 

$

12,211

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic-as reported

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.34

 

$

1.25

 

$

0.88

 

Basic-pro forma

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.34

 

$

1.25

 

$

0.87

 

Diluted-as reported

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.33

 

$

1.23

 

$

0.85

 

Diluted-pro forma

 

$

0.43

 

$

0.33

 

$

1.22

 

$

0.84

 

 

5



 

(3)           Earnings Per Common Share

 

Basic and diluted earnings per common share were computed as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months
Ended September 30,

 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

6,374

 

$

4,784

 

$

17,952

 

$

12,330

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share -
weighted-average shares

 

14,361

 

14,119

 

14,334

 

13,992

 

Effect of dilutive stock options

 

284

 

410

 

299

 

486

 

Diluted earnings per common share -
weighted-average shares and assumed conversions

 

14,645

 

14,529

 

14,633

 

14,478

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic earnings per common share

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.34

 

$

1.25

 

$

0.88

 

Diluted earnings per common share

 

$

0.44

 

$

0.33

 

$

1.23

 

$

0.85

 

 

All outstanding options were included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for all periods presented.

 

(4)           Long-Term Debt

 

In June 2005, we entered into an amendment to our unsecured committed credit facility.  This amendment reduced the number of banks subject to the agreement to one, adjusted our financial covenants and extended the maturity of the facility from April 2006 to April 2008.

 

(5)           Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

 

In May 2005, our stockholders approved an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation increasing the authorized number of shares of common stock from 23,000,000 shares to 48,000,000 shares.

 

(6)           2005 Stock Incentive Plan

 

In May 2005, our stockholders approved our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”).  Our Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Plan in March 2005 and approved amendments to the 2005 Plan in April 2005.  Under the 2005 Plan, all of our employees and any subsidiary employees, as well as all of our non-employee directors, consultants, advisors and independent contractors, may be granted stock-based awards, including incentive and non-statutory stock options and restricted stock awards, none of which have been awarded as of September 30, 2005.  The maximum number of shares of common stock that will be available for issuance under the 2005 Plan is approximately 1.9 million shares. The 2005 Plan replaces our 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”), which expired by its terms in March 2005.  Any awards issued under the 1995 Plan that remain outstanding will continue according to their terms.

 

(7)           Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.”  SFAS No. 123, as revised, requires entities to recognize the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees in the income statement.  The statement eliminates entities’ ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method of accounting in Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” which was permitted under SFAS No. 123, as originally issued.  In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred the

 

6



 

effective date of SFAS No. 123, as revised, to the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005.  Accordingly, we will recognize the grant-date fair value of stock options in our consolidated statements of operations beginning in our first quarter of 2006.  The average annual stock-based employee compensation expense, net of related tax effects, for 2002 through 2004 was $185,000.  Therefore, the adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position. However, the ultimate amount of increased compensation expense will be dependent upon whether we adopt SFAS No. 123, as revised, using the modified prospective or retrospective method, the number of option shares granted during the year, their timing and vesting period and the method used to calculate the fair value of the awards, among other factors.

 

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.”  The Interpretation clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligations” as used in SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity.  The Interpretation states that conditional obligations meet the definition of an asset retirement obligation in SFAS No. 143 and therefore should be recognized if their fair value can be reasonably estimated.  Interpretation No. 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005.  The adoption of Interpretation No. 47 is not expected to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position.

 

(8) Reclassifications

 

The purchases and sales of marketable securities, along with revenue equipment additions and proceeds from dispositions, in our 2004 consolidated condensed statement of cash flows have been reclassified to be consistent with the 2005 presentation.  These reclassifications do not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

 

7



 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

Overview

 

The primary source of our operating revenue is freight revenue, which we generate by transporting freight for our customers.  Generally, we are paid by the mile for our services.  We also derive freight revenue from loading and unloading activities, equipment detention and other accessorial services.  Our operating revenue also includes revenue from fuel surcharges and non-freight revenue, primarily logistics services.  The main factors that affect our freight revenue are the rate per mile we receive from our customers, the percentage of miles for which we are compensated and the number of miles we generate with our equipment. These factors relate, among other things, to the United States economy, inventory levels, the level of truck capacity in the temperature-sensitive market and specific customer demand.  We monitor our revenue production primarily through revenue per tractor per week. We also analyze our rate per total mile, non-revenue miles percentage, the miles per tractor we generate, our accessorial revenue and our other sources of operating revenue.

 

In discussing our results of operations, we have included in certain instances a discussion of freight revenue, which excludes fuel surcharge and non-freight revenue.  We do this because we believe that eliminating these sources of revenue provides a more consistent basis for comparing our results of operations from period to period.

 

Our operating results for the first nine months of 2005 reflect improved average freight revenue per total mile compared with the first nine months of 2004.  The improvement in asset productivity helped us overcome the continuing challenges of a tight driver market and high fuel prices.  In the first nine months of 2005, we increased our operating revenue 22.0% and our freight revenue 12.5% compared with the first nine months of 2004. We were able to increase our freight revenue by increasing our freight rates, the size of our fleet, our detention charges and our business with existing and new customers.  We increased our average operating revenue per tractor per week 13.4% in the first nine months of 2005.  Our average freight revenue per tractor per week increased 4.6%, due to an 8.1% improvement in average freight revenue per total mile, partially offset by a 3.3% decrease in average miles per tractor.  Our weighted average number of tractors increased 7.6% in the first nine months of 2005 over the first nine months of 2004.

 

Our profitability on the expense side is impacted by variable costs of transporting freight for our customers, fixed costs and expenses containing both fixed and variable components.  The variable costs include fuel expense, driver-related expenses, such as wages, benefits, training, and recruitment, and independent contractor costs, which are recorded under purchased transportation.  Expenses that have both fixed and variable components include maintenance and tire expense and our total cost of insurance and claims.  These expenses generally vary with the miles we travel, but also have a controllable component based on safety, fleet age, efficiency and other factors.  Our main fixed costs relate to the acquisition and financing of long-term assets, such as revenue equipment and operating terminals.  Although certain factors affecting our expenses are beyond our control, we monitor them closely and attempt to anticipate changes in these factors in managing our business.  For example, fuel prices fluctuated dramatically and quickly at various times during 2004 and the first nine months of 2005. We manage our exposure to changes in fuel prices primarily through fuel surcharge programs with our customers, as well as volume fuel purchasing arrangements with national fuel centers and bulk purchases of fuel at our terminals.  The transportation industry is currently experiencing substantial difficulty in attracting and retaining qualified drivers.  Effective January 1, 2005, we increased the amount paid to company drivers by 1 cent per mile and increased the incentives paid to independent contractors.  We also instituted a second pay increase of 2 cents per mile for company drivers effective April 1, 2005.  We continue to offer driver compensation that we believe ranks near the top of the industry.  Like other companies in our industry, our insurance costs have increased dramatically over the last few years.  In order to control increases in insurance premiums, we have increased our self-insured retention levels periodically during the last several years.  We are responsible for the first $1.0 million on each auto liability claim and as of June 1, 2005, we also are responsible for up to $1.0 million in the aggregate for all auto liability claims between $1.0 million and $2.0 million.  We are also responsible for the first $750,000 on each workers’ compensation claim.

 

8



 

Additionally, we operate in a highly competitive and regulated industry that is currently responding to significant regulatory changes regarding drivers’ hours-of-service.  The United States Department of Transportation, or DOT, adopted revised hours-of-service regulations effective in January 2004.  In response, we negotiated delay time charges with the majority of our customers.  In July 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated the new hours-of-service regulations in their entirety and remanded the matter to the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration, or FMCSA, for reconsideration.  In October 2004, the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2004 (Part V) extended the current hours-of-service regulations until the earlier of the FMCSA developing a revised set of regulations or September 30, 2005.  In August 2005, the FMCSA issued a revised set of regulations effective October 1, 2005.  We do not expect the current regulations to have a significant impact on our operations or financial results.  However, uncompensated shortfalls in our utilization due to compliance with the regulations could adversely impact our profitability.

 

By increasing our revenue and controlling our expenses, we improved our operating ratio (operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenue) to 91.0% in the first nine months of 2005 from 92.6% in the first nine months of 2004.  We increased our earnings per diluted share to $1.23 in the first nine months of 2005 from $0.85 in the first nine months of 2004.

 

Our business requires substantial, ongoing capital investments, particularly for new tractors and trailers. At September 30, 2005, we had approximately $36.3 million of long-term debt, including current maturities, and $186.6 million in stockholders’ equity.  In the first nine months of 2005, we spent approximately $44.1 million, net of trade-ins, to purchase 528 tractors and 594 trailers.  We also recognized a gain of $3.3 million on the disposition of used equipment in the first nine months of 2005.  We estimate that capital expenditures, net of trade-ins, will be approximately $40 million for the remainder of 2005, primarily for new revenue equipment.  This estimate may be impacted by the timing of tractor and trailer deliveries between 2005 and 2006.  Based on our current operating performance, the market for used trucks, our liquidity and our expectations concerning tractors manufactured in 2007, we have decided to accelerate our tractor fleet replacement during 2005 and 2006 to allow flexibility with purchasing tractors in 2007 when the next round of diesel emissions reduction directives of the Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, go into effect.  We expect to fund these capital expenditures with cash flows from operations and borrowings under our $45 million revolving credit facility.

 

9



 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain operating statistics regarding our revenue and operations:

 

 

 

Three Months
Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months
Ended September 30,

 

 

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For period:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average operating revenue per total mile

 

$

1.735

 

$

1.457

 

$

1.636

 

$

1.395

 

Average freight revenue per total mile (1)

 

$

1.436

 

$

1.319

 

$

1.392

 

$

1.288

 

Average miles per tractor(2)

 

28,729

 

29,663

 

85,469

 

88,380

 

Average operating revenue per tractor per week(2)

 

$

3,793

 

$

3,289

 

$

3,585

 

$

3,161

 

Average freight revenue per tractor per week(1) (2)

 

$

3,140

 

$

2,976

 

$

3,051

 

$

2,918

 

Total miles – company employed drivers (in thousands)

 

52,097

 

47,354

 

152,598

 

137,201

 

Total miles – independent contractors (in thousands)

 

16,533

 

19,817

 

52,080

 

59,490

 

 


(1)

 

Excludes revenue from fuel surcharges and non-freight revenue.

 

 

 

(2)

 

Includes tractors driven by both company-employed drivers and independent contractors. Independent contractors provided 502 and 589 tractors as of September 30, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

 

Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 to Three Months Ended September 30, 2004

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the components of our operating revenue and the dollar and percentage change for each component:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dollar

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

Change

 

 

 

Three Months

 

Three Months

 

Three Months

 

 

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005 vs. 2004

 

2005 vs. 2004

 

Freight revenue

 

$

98,575

 

$

88,582

 

$

9,993

 

11.3

%

Fuel surcharge revenue

 

15,690

 

6,770

 

8,920

 

131.8

 

Non-freight revenue

 

4,816

 

2,540

 

2,276

 

89.6

 

Operating revenue

 

$

119,081

 

$

97,892

 

$

21,189

 

21.6

%

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the dollar and percentage increase or decrease of the items in our unaudited consolidated condensed statements of operations, and those items as a percentage of operating revenue:

 

 

 

Dollar

 

Percentage

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

Change

 

Change

 

Operating Revenue

 

 

 

Three Months

 

Three Months

 

Three Months

 

 

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005 vs. 2004

 

2005 vs. 2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

Operating revenue

 

$

21,189

 

21.6

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

Operating expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries, wages and benefits

 

4,467

 

16.2

 

26.9

 

28.1

 

Purchased transportation

 

1,061

 

5.2

 

17.9

 

20.8

 

Fuel and fuel taxes

 

10,855

 

57.8

 

24.9

 

19.2

 

Supplies and maintenance

 

757

 

11.5

 

6.2

 

6.7

 

Depreciation

 

1,191

 

14.4

 

7.9

 

8.4

 

Operating taxes and licenses

 

314

 

19.0

 

1.7

 

1.7

 

Insurance and claims

 

(129

)

(2.8

)

3.7

 

4.7

 

Communications and utilities

 

98

 

13.3

 

0.7

 

0.8

 

Gain on disposition of revenue equipment

 

(638

)

(117.3

)

(1.0

)

(0.6

)

Other

 

291

 

13.4

 

2.1

 

2.2

 

Total operating expenses

 

18,267

 

20.3

 

91.0

 

92.0

 

Operating income

 

2,922

 

37.2

 

9.0

 

8.0

 

Other expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

37

 

7.2

 

0.5

 

0.5

 

Interest income

 

(51

)

(13.5

)

(0.4

)

(0.4

)

Income before income taxes

 

2,936

 

38.0

 

8.9

 

7.9

 

Provision for income taxes

 

1,346

 

45.9

 

3.6

 

3.0

 

Net income

 

$

1,590

 

33.2

%

5.4

%

4.9

%

 

Our operating revenue increased $21.2 million, or 21.6%, to $119.1 million in the 2005 period from $97.9 million in the 2004 period.  Freight revenue increased $10.0 million, or 11.3%, to $98.6 million in the 2005 period from $88.6 million in the 2004 period.  We were able to increase our freight revenue by increasing our freight rates, the size of our fleet, our detention charges and our business with existing and new customers.  Our fuel surcharge revenue increased $8.9 million, or 131.8%, to $15.7 million in the 2005 period from $6.8 million

 

10



 

in the 2004 period primarily due to significantly higher average fuel prices in the 2005 period more fully discussed below under “fuel and fuel taxes.”  The increase in non-freight revenue in the 2005 period resulted from increased logistics services provided by MWL, as well as the formation by the Company of a logistics division in March 2005.  Our average operating revenue per tractor per week increased 15.3% in the 2005 period from the 2004 period.  Our average freight revenue per tractor per week increased 5.5% in the 2005 period from the 2004 period, due to an 8.9% increase in average freight revenue per total mile partially offset by a 3.1% decrease in average miles per tractor.  Our weighted average number of tractors increased 5.5% in the 2005 period from the 2004 period.

 

Salaries, wages and benefits consist of compensation for our employees, including both driver and non-driver employees, employees’ health insurance, 401(k) plan contributions and other fringe benefits.  These expenses vary depending upon the ratio of company drivers to independent contractors, our efficiency, our experience with employees’ health insurance claims, changes in health care premiums and other factors. The increase in salaries, wages and benefits resulted primarily from an increase in the size of our company-owned fleet and increases in the amount paid to company drivers of 1 cent per mile effective January 1, 2005 and 2 cents per mile effective April 1, 2005.  This increase was partially offset by a decrease of $360,000 in compensation expensed for our non-driver employees under our incentive compensation program in the 2005 period.

 

Purchased transportation consists of payments to independent contractor providers of revenue equipment and to carriers for transportation services arranged by the Company.  This category will vary depending upon the ratio of company drivers versus independent contractors, the amount of fuel surcharges passed through to independent contractors and the amount paid to carriers by the Company.  Payments to carriers for transportation services arranged by the Company were $3.5 million in the 2005 period and $1.6 million in the 2004 period.  The amount of fuel surcharges passed through to independent contractors increased $1.6 million in the 2005 period.  Purchased transportation expense, excluding fuel surcharges passed through to independent contractors and carrier payments by the Company, decreased $2.5 million, or 14.6%, in the 2005 period from the 2004 period.  This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the number of independent contractor-owned tractors in our fleet, partially offset by an increase in incentives paid to independent contractors effective January 1, 2005.

 

Fuel and fuel taxes, which we refer to as fuel expense, net of fuel surcharge revenue of $15.7 million in the 2005 period and $6.8 million in the 2004 period, increased $1.9 million, or 16.1%, to $14.0 million in the 2005 period from $12.0 million in the 2004 period. Our fuel prices, which remain high based on historical standards, significantly increased to an average of $2.45 per gallon in the 2005 period from an average of $1.76 per gallon in the 2004 period. The elevated level of fuel prices is expected to continue for the remainder of 2005.  We have fuel surcharge provisions in substantially all of our transportation contracts and attempt to recover a portion of these increased expenses through fuel surcharges and higher rates.  We expect our fuel expense to increase in the future because we believe that government mandated emissions standards, which became effective October 1, 2002, have resulted in less fuel-efficient engines, and that more restrictive emissions standards that take effect in 2007 will result in further declines in engine efficiency.

 

Depreciation relates to owned tractors, trailers, communications units and terminal facilities. Gains or losses on dispositions of revenue equipment are set forth in a separate line item, rather than included in this category. The increase in depreciation was due to an increase in revenue equipment and the relative percentage of company-owned tractors to independent contractor-owned tractors in the 2005 period.  We expect our annual cost of tractor and trailer ownership will increase in future periods as a result of our accelerated tractor fleet replacement and higher prices of new equipment, which would result in greater depreciation over the useful life.

 

Insurance and claims consist of the costs of insurance premiums and the accruals we make for claims within our self-insured retention amounts, primarily for personal injury, property damage, physical damage to our equipment, cargo claims and workers’ compensation claims.  These expenses will vary primarily based upon the frequency and severity of our accident experience, our self-insured retention levels and the market for insurance.  The decrease in insurance and claims in the 2005 period was comprised of a $80,000 decrease in the cost of self-insured accident claims and a $49,000 decrease in insurance premiums.  We are responsible for the first $1.0 million on each auto liability claim and as of June 1, 2005, we also are responsible for up to $1.0 million

 

11



 

in the aggregate for all auto liability claims between $1.0 million and $2.0 million.  We are also responsible for the first $750,000 on each workers’ compensation claim.  Our significant self-insured retention and our risk on the first $1.0 million of auto liability claims in the $1.0 million to $2.0 million corridor expose us to the possibility of significant fluctuations in claims expense between periods depending on the frequency, severity and timing of claims and to adverse financial results if we incur large or numerous losses.  In the event of an uninsured claim above our insurance coverage, or an increase in the frequency or severity of claims within our self-insured retention, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

 

In the 2005 period, increases in the market value for used revenue equipment caused our gain on disposition of revenue equipment to increase to $1.2 million from $544,000 in the 2004 period.  Future gains or losses on disposition of revenue equipment are impacted by the market for used revenue equipment, which is beyond our control.

 

As a result of the foregoing factors, we improved our operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenue, or “operating ratio,” to 91.0% in the 2005 period from 92.0% in the 2004 period.  Our operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenue, with both amounts net of fuel surcharge revenue, improved to 89.6% in the 2005 period from 91.4% in the 2004 period.

 

Interest expense primarily consists of interest on our unsecured committed credit facility and senior unsecured notes.  These expenses are partially offset by interest income from the financing we provide to independent contractors under our tractor purchase program and from our investment in short-term marketable securities.  Net interest expense was consistent in the 2005 and 2004 periods.

 

Our effective income tax rate was 40.2% in the 2005 period compared with 38.0% in the 2004 period.  We expect our effective income tax rate to be in the range of 39% to 40% for the remainder of 2005.

 

As a result of the factors described above, net income increased 33.2%, to $6.4 million in the 2005 period from $4.8 million in the 2004 period. Net earnings per share increased to $0.44 per diluted share in the 2005 period from $0.33 per diluted share in the 2004 period.

 

12



 

Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the components of our operating revenue and the dollar and percentage change for each component:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dollar

 

Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change

 

Change

 

 

 

Nine Months

 

Nine Months

 

Nine Months

 

 

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005

 

2004

 

2005 vs. 2004

 

2005 vs. 2004

 

Freight revenue

 

$

284,934

 

$

253,296

 

$

31,638

 

12.5

%

Fuel surcharge revenue

 

38,059

 

16,406

 

21,653

 

132.0

 

Non-freight revenue

 

11,794

 

4,627

 

7,167

 

154.9

 

Operating revenue

 

$

334,787

 

$

274,329

 

$

60,458

 

22.0

%

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the dollar and percentage increase or decrease of the items in our unaudited consolidated condensed statements of operations, and those items as a percentage of operating revenue:

 

 

 

Dollar

 

Percentage

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

Change

 

Change

 

Operating Revenue

 

 

 

Nine Months

 

Nine Months

 

Nine Months

 

 

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2005 vs. 2004

 

2005 vs. 2004

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenue

 

$

60,458

 

22.0

%

100.0

%

100.0

%

Operating expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries, wages and benefits

 

14,382

 

18.4

 

27.7

 

28.5

 

Purchased transportation

 

4,053

 

7.0

 

18.5

 

21.1

 

Fuel and fuel taxes

 

26,003

 

51.7

 

22.8

 

18.3

 

Supplies and maintenance

 

2,115

 

11.3

 

6.2

 

6.8

 

Depreciation

 

3,602

 

14.9

 

8.3

 

8.8

 

Operating taxes and licenses

 

447

 

9.2

 

1.6

 

1.8

 

Insurance and claims

 

288

 

2.2

 

4.0

 

4.7

 

Communications and utilities

 

203

 

8.9

 

0.7

 

0.8

 

Gain on disposition of revenue equipment

 

(1,570

)

(91.2

)

(1.0

)

(0.6

)

Other

 

969

 

15.4

 

2.2

 

2.3

 

Total operating expenses

 

50,492

 

19.9

 

91.0

 

92.6

 

Operating income

 

9,966

 

49.0

 

9.0

 

7.4

 

Other expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

151

 

9.8

 

0.5

 

0.6

 

Interest income

 

(110

)

(9.9

)

(0.4

)

(0.4

)

Income before income taxes

 

9,925

 

49.9

 

8.9

 

7.2

 

Provision for income taxes

 

4,303

 

56.9

 

3.5

 

2.8

 

Net income

 

$

5,622

 

45.6

%

5.4

%

4.5

%

 

Our operating revenue increased $60.5 million, or 22.0%, to $334.8 million in the 2005 period from $274.3 million in the 2004 period.  Freight revenue increased $31.6 million, or 12.5%, to $284.9 million in the 2005 period from $253.3 million in the 2004 period.  We were able to increase our freight revenue by increasing our freight rates, the size of our fleet, our detention charges and our business with existing and new customers.  Our fuel surcharge revenue increased $21.7 million, or 132.0%, to $38.1 million in the 2005 period from $16.4 million in the 2004 period primarily due to significantly higher average fuel prices in the 2005 period.  The

 

13



 

increase in non-freight revenue in the 2005 period resulted from increased logistics services provided by MWL, as well as the formation by the Company of a logistics division in March 2005.  Our average operating revenue per tractor per week increased 13.4% in the 2005 period from the 2004 period.  Our average freight revenue per tractor per week increased 4.6% in the 2005 period from the 2004 period, due to an 8.1% increase in average freight revenue per total mile, partially offset by a 3.3% decrease in average miles per tractor.  Our weighted average number of tractors increased 7.6% in the 2005 period from the 2004 period.

 

The increase in salaries, wages and benefits resulted primarily from an increase in the size of our company-owned fleet and increases in the amount paid to company drivers of 1 cent per mile effective January 1, 2005 and 2 cents per mile effective April 1, 2005.  Additionally, our employees’ health insurance expense increased $643,000 in the 2005 period due to less favorable claims experience which increased our estimated costs of our self-insured medical claims from the 2004 period.  These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $880,000 in compensation expensed for our non-driver employees under our incentive compensation program in the 2005 period.

 

Purchased transportation expense increased $4.1 million, or 7.0%, in the 2005 period from the 2004 period.  This expense, excluding fuel surcharges passed through to independent contractors and carrier payments by the Company, decreased $5.3 million, or 10.6%, in the 2005 period from the 2004 period.  This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the number of independent contractor-owned tractors in our fleet, partially offset by a 1 cent per mile increase in the amount paid to independent contractors effective April 1, 2004 and an increase in incentives paid to independent contractors effective January 1, 2005.  Payments to carriers for transportation services arranged by the Company were $8.1 million in the 2005 period and $2.8 million in the 2004 period.  The amount of fuel surcharges passed through to independent contractors increased $4.1 million in the 2005 period.

 

Fuel and fuel taxes, which we refer to as fuel expense, net of fuel surcharge revenue of $38.1 million in the 2005 period and $16.4 million in the 2004 period, increased $4.4 million, or 12.9%, to $38.2 million in the 2005 period from $33.9 million in the 2004 period. Our fuel prices, which remain high based on historical standards, significantly increased to an average of $2.19 per gallon in the 2005 period from an average of $1.63 per gallon in the 2004 period.

 

The increase in depreciation was due to an increase in revenue equipment and the relative percentage of company-owned tractors to independent contractor-owned tractors in the 2005 period.

 

The increase in insurance and claims in the 2005 period was comprised of a $213,000 increase in the cost of self-insured accident claims and a $75,000 increase in insurance premiums.

 

In the 2005 period, increases in the market value for used revenue equipment caused our gain on disposition of revenue equipment to increase to $3.3 million from $1.7 million in the 2004 period.

 

As a result of the foregoing factors, we improved our operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenue, or “operating ratio,” to 91.0% in the 2005 period from 92.6% in the 2004 period.  Our operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenue, with both amounts net of fuel surcharge revenue, improved to 89.8% in the 2005 period from 92.1% in the 2004 period.

 

Our effective income tax rate was 39.8% in the 2005 period compared with 38.0% in the 2004 period.

 

As a result of the factors described above, net income increased 45.6%, to $18.0 million in the 2005 period from $12.3 million in the 2004 period. Net earnings per share increased to $1.23 per diluted share in the 2005 period from $0.85 per diluted share in the 2004 period.

 

14



 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our business requires substantial, ongoing capital investments, particularly for new tractors and trailers. Our primary sources of liquidity are funds provided by operations, our unsecured senior notes and our revolving credit facility. A portion of our tractor fleet is provided by independent contractors who own and operate their own equipment. We have no capital expenditure requirements relating to those drivers who own their tractors or obtain financing through third parties. However, to the extent we purchase tractors and extend financing to the independent contractors through our tractor purchase program, we have an associated capital expenditure requirement.

 

The table below reflects our net cash flows provided by operating activities, net cash flows used for investing activities and total long-term debt, including current maturities, for the periods indicated.

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

(In thousands)

 

2005

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash flows provided by operating activities

 

$

45,539

 

$

35,225

 

Net cash flows used for investing activities

 

48,411

 

40,371

 

Long-term debt, including current maturities, at September 30

 

36,323

 

30,129

 

 

In the first nine months of 2005, we spent approximately $44.1 million, net of trade-ins, to purchase 528 tractors and 594 trailers.  We also recognized a gain of $3.3 million on the disposition of used equipment in the first nine months of 2005.  We estimate that capital expenditures, net of trade-ins, will be approximately $40 million for the remainder of 2005, primarily for new revenue equipment.  This estimate may be impacted by the timing of tractor and trailer deliveries between 2005 and 2006.  Based on our current operating performance, the market for used trucks, our liquidity and our expectations concerning tractors manufactured in 2007, we have decided to accelerate our tractor fleet replacement during 2005 and 2006 to allow flexibility with purchasing tractors in 2007 when the next round of diesel emissions reduction directives of the EPA go into effect.  We expect to fund these capital expenditures with cash flows from operations and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.  We believe our sources of liquidity are adequate to meet our current and anticipated needs for at least the next twelve months.  Over the longer term, based upon anticipated cash flows, current borrowing availability and sources of financing we expect to be available to us, we do not anticipate any significant liquidity constraints in the foreseeable future.

 

We have outstanding Series A Senior Unsecured Notes with an aggregate principal balance of $14.3 million at September 30, 2005. These notes mature in October 2008, require annual principal payments of $3.57 million and bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.78%. We also have outstanding Series B Senior Unsecured Notes with an aggregate principal balance of $7.1 million at September 30, 2005. These notes mature in April 2010, require annual principal payments of $1.43 million and bear interest at a fixed rate of 8.57%.

 

We maintain an unsecured committed credit facility in the amount of $45.0 million.  We entered into an amendment to the credit facility in June 2005.  The amendment reduced the number of banks subject to the agreement to one, adjusted our financial covenants and extended the maturity of the facility from April 2006 to April 2008.  At September 30, 2005, the credit facility had an outstanding principal balance of $14.8 million, outstanding letters of credit of $4.2 million and remaining borrowing availability of $26.0 million. This facility bears interest at a variable rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate or the bank’s Prime Rate, in each case plus applicable margins.  The weighted average interest rate for the credit facility was 5.1% at September 30, 2005.

 

Our credit facility prohibits us from paying, in any fiscal year, dividends in excess of 25% of our net income from the prior fiscal year. The debt agreements discussed above also contain restrictive covenants which, among other matters, require us to maintain certain financial ratios, including debt-to-equity, cash flow

 

15



 

leverage, interest coverage and fixed charge coverage. We were in compliance with all of these covenants at September 30, 2005.

 

We had $10.2 million in direct financing receivables from independent contractors under our tractor purchase program as of September 30, 2005, compared with $10.3 million in receivables as of December 31, 2004. These receivables, which are collateralized by the tractors financed, are used to attract and retain qualified independent contractors. We deduct payments from the independent contractors’ settlements weekly and, as a result, have experienced minimal collection issues for these receivables.

 

The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2005.  We have entered into agreements to purchase $56.4 million of revenue equipment in the remainder of 2005, which is included in the following summary.  We also plan to purchase an additional $8.2 million and $38.5 million of revenue equipment in 2005 and 2006, respectively, for which we have not entered into binding agreements.

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

Remainder

 

2006

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of

 

and

 

and

 

 

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

2005

 

2007

 

2009

 

Thereafter

 

Total

 

Purchase obligations for revenue equipment

 

$

56,363

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

56,363

 

Long-term debt obligations

 

3,630

 

10,037

 

21,228

 

1,428

 

36,323

 

Operating lease obligations

 

49

 

264

 

49

 

 

362

 

Total

 

$

60,042

 

$

10,301

 

$

21,277

 

$

1,428

 

$

93,048

 

 

Related Parties

 

MWL, our 45% owned affiliate, is a third-party provider of logistics services to the transportation industry.  In the first nine months of 2005 and the first nine months of 2004, we received $16.0 million and $15.8 million, respectively, of our revenue from transportation services arranged by MWL. We have applied the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” as revised, to our investment in MWL effective March 31, 2004.  As a result, the accounts of MWL are included in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2005, and in our consolidated statement of operations beginning April 1, 2004. We accounted for our investment in MWL’s operating results using the equity method of accounting prior to April 1, 2004.

 

We purchase fuel and obtain tires and related services from Bauer Built, Incorporated, or BBI. Jerry M. Bauer, one of our directors, is the president and a stockholder of BBI.  We paid BBI $834,000 in the first nine months of 2005 and $676,000 in the first nine months of 2004 for fuel and tire services. In addition, we paid $1.2 million in the first nine months of 2005 and $935,000 in the first nine months of 2004 to tire manufacturers for tires that we purchased from the tire manufacturers but were provided by BBI.  BBI received commissions from the tire manufacturers related to these purchases.  Other than any benefit received from his ownership interest, Mr. Bauer receives no compensation or other benefits from our business with BBI.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We did not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements at September 30, 2005.

 

Inflation and Fuel Costs

 

Most of our operating expenses are inflation-sensitive, with inflation generally producing increased costs of operations. During 2004 and the first nine months of 2005, the most significant effects of inflation have been on revenue equipment prices, accident claims, health insurance and employee compensation. We attempt to limit the effects of inflation through increases in freight rates and cost control efforts.

 

16



 

In addition to inflation, fluctuations in fuel prices can affect our profitability. We require substantial amounts of fuel to operate our tractors and power the temperature-control units on our trailers. Substantially all of our contracts with customers contain fuel surcharge provisions. Although we historically have been able to pass through most long-term increases in fuel prices and taxes to customers in the form of surcharges and higher rates, increases usually are not fully recovered. Fuel prices were high throughout 2004 and significantly increased further in the first nine months of 2005, which has increased our cost of operating. The elevated level of fuel prices is expected to continue for the remainder of 2005.

 

Seasonality

 

Our tractor productivity generally decreases during the winter season because inclement weather impedes operations and some shippers reduce their shipments. At the same time, operating expenses generally increase, with fuel efficiency declining because of engine idling and harsh weather creating higher accident frequency, increased claims and more equipment repairs.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

We believe that the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

 

Insurance and Claims. We self-insure, in part, for losses relating to workers’ compensation, auto liability, general liability, cargo and property damage claims, along with employees’ health insurance with varying risk retention levels. We maintain insurance coverage for per-incident and total losses in excess of these risk retention levels in amounts we consider adequate based upon historical experience and our ongoing review. However, we could suffer a series of losses within our self-insured retention limits or losses over our policy limits, which could negatively affect our financial condition and operating results. We are responsible for the first $1.0 million on each auto liability claim and as of June 1, 2005, we also are responsible for up to $1.0 million in the aggregate for all auto liability claims between $1.0 million and $2.0 million.  We are also responsible for the first $750,000 on each workers’ compensation claim.  We have $4.2 million in letters of credit to guarantee settlement of claims under agreements with our insurance carriers and regulatory authorities. The insurance and claims accruals in our consolidated balance sheets were $12.4 million as of September 30, 2005, and $13.7 million as of December 31, 2004. We reserve currently for the estimated cost of the uninsured portion of pending claims. We periodically evaluate and adjust these reserves based on our evaluation of the nature and severity of outstanding individual claims and our estimate of future claims development based on historical claims development factors. We believe that our claims development factors have historically been reasonable, as indicated by the adequacy of our insurance and claims accruals compared to settled claims. Actual results could differ from these current estimates. If our claims settlement experience worsened causing our historical claims development factors to increase by 5%, our estimated outstanding loss reserves as of September 30, 2005 would have needed to increase by approximately $1.9 million.

 

Property and Equipment. The transportation industry requires significant capital investments. Our net property and equipment was $238.7 million as of September 30, 2005 and $215.7 million as of December 31, 2004. Our depreciation expense was $27.8 million for the first nine months of 2005 and $24.2 million for the first nine months of 2004. We compute depreciation of our property and equipment for financial reporting purposes based on the cost of each asset, reduced by its estimated salvage value, using the straight-line method over its estimated useful life. We determine and periodically evaluate our estimate of the projected salvage values and useful lives primarily by considering the market for used equipment, prior useful lives and changes in technology. We have not changed our policy regarding salvage values as a percentage of initial cost or useful lives of tractors and trailers within the last ten years. We believe that our policies and past estimates have been reasonable. Actual results could differ from these estimates.  A 5% decrease in estimated salvage values would have decreased our net property and equipment as of September 30, 2005 by approximately $5.1 million, or 2.1%.

 

Impairment of Assets. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted

 

17



 

cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less the costs to sell.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.”  SFAS No. 123, as revised, requires entities to recognize the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees in the income statement.  The statement eliminates entities’ ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value method of accounting in Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” which was permitted under SFAS No. 123, as originally issued.  In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 123, as revised, to the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005.  Accordingly, we will recognize the grant-date fair value of stock options in our consolidated statements of operations beginning in our first quarter of 2006.  The average annual stock-based employee compensation expense, net of related tax effects, for 2002 through 2004 was $185,000.  Therefore, the adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position. However, the ultimate amount of increased compensation expense will be dependent upon whether we adopt SFAS No. 123, as revised, using the modified prospective or retrospective method, the number of option shares granted during the year, their timing and vesting period and the method used to calculate the fair value of the awards, among other factors.

 

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations.”  The Interpretation clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligations” as used in SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity.  The Interpretation states that conditional obligations meet the definition of an asset retirement obligation in SFAS No. 143 and therefore should be recognized if their fair value can be reasonably estimated.  Interpretation No. 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005.  The adoption of Interpretation No. 47 is not expected to have a significant impact on our results of operations or financial position.

 

Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements. Such statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements not of historical fact may be considered forward-looking statements. Written words such as “may,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “goal” or “estimate,” or other variations of these or similar words, identify such statements. These statements by their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially, depending on a variety of factors and risks, including but not limited to those discussed below.

 

Our business is subject to general economic and business factors that are largely out of our control, any of which could have a materially adverse effect on our operating results.  Our business is dependent upon a number of factors that may have a materially adverse effect on the results of our operations, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include difficulty in attracting and retaining qualified drivers and independent contractors, significant increases or rapid fluctuations in fuel prices, excess capacity in the trucking industry, strikes or other work stoppages, surpluses in the market for used equipment, interest rates, fuel taxes, license and registration fees, insurance premiums and self-insurance levels.  We also are affected by recessionary economic cycles and downturns in customers’ business cycles, particularly in market segments and industries where we have a significant concentration of customers. Economic conditions may adversely affect our customers and their ability to pay for our services. It is not possible to predict the effects of actual or threatened armed conflicts or terrorist attacks and subsequent events on the economy or on consumer

 

18



 

confidence in the United States, or the impact, if any, on our future results of operations. In addition, our results of operations may be affected by seasonal factors.

 

We operate in a highly competitive and fragmented industry, and numerous competitive factors could impair our ability to maintain our current profitability.  We compete with many other truckload carriers that provide temperature-sensitive service of varying sizes and, to a lesser extent, with less-than-truckload carriers, railroads and other transportation companies, many of which have more equipment, a wider range of services and greater capital resources than we do or have other competitive advantages. In particular, several of the largest truckload carriers that offer primarily dry-van service also offer temperature-sensitive service, and these carriers could attempt to increase their business in the temperature-sensitive market. Many of our competitors periodically reduce their freight rates to gain business, especially during times of reduced growth rates in the economy, which may limit our ability to maintain or increase freight rates or maintain significant growth in our business. In addition, many customers reduce the number of carriers they use by selecting so-called “core carriers” as approved service providers, or conduct bids from multiple carriers for their shipping needs, and in some instances we may not be selected as a core carrier or to provide service under such bids.

 

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from our major customers, the loss of one or more of which could have a materially adverse effect on our business. A significant portion of our revenue is generated from our major customers. For the first nine months of 2005, our top 30 customers, based on revenue, accounted for approximately 76% of our revenue; our top ten customers accounted for approximately 51% of our revenue; our top five customers accounted for approximately 39% of our revenue; and our top two customers accounted for approximately 23% of our revenue. Generally, we enter into one-year contracts with our major customers, the majority of which do not contain any firm obligations to ship with us. We cannot assure you that, upon expiration of existing contracts, these customers will continue to use our services or that, if they do, they will continue at the same levels. In addition, our volumes and rates with our customers could decrease as a result of bid processes or other factors. A reduction in or termination of our services by one or more of our major customers could have a materially adverse effect on our business and operating results.

 

Ongoing insurance and claims expenses could significantly affect our earnings.  Our future insurance and claims expense might exceed historical levels, which could reduce our earnings. We self-insure for a portion of our claims exposure resulting from workers’ compensation, auto liability, general liability, cargo and property damage claims, as well as employees’ health insurance. We also are responsible for our legal expenses relating to such claims. We reserve currently for anticipated losses and expenses. We periodically evaluate and adjust our claims reserves to reflect our experience. However, ultimate results may differ from our estimates, which could result in losses over our reserved amounts.  We are responsible for the first $1.0 million on each auto liability claim and as of June 1, 2005, we also are responsible for up to $1.0 million in the aggregate for all auto liability claims between $1.0 million and $2.0 million.  We are also responsible for the first $750,000 on each workers’ compensation claim.  The number or severity of claims for which we are self-insured, or which fall within the $1.0 million to $2.0 million corridor, or the timing of such claims within a given period, could have a materially adverse effect on our operating results.

 

We maintain insurance above the amounts for which we self-insure with licensed insurance carriers. Although we believe the aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, it is possible that one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. Insurance carriers have raised premiums for many businesses, including trucking companies. As a result, our insurance and claims expense could increase, or we could raise our self-insured retention when our policies are renewed. If these expenses increase, or if we experience a claim in excess of our coverage limits, or we experience a claim for which coverage is not provided, results of our operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

 

Increases in compensation or difficulty in attracting drivers could affect our profitability and ability to grow.  From time-to-time, the transportation industry experiences substantial difficulty in attracting and retaining qualified drivers, including independent contractors.  Currently, competition for drivers is intense. Competition for drivers has increased and we have experienced greater difficulty in attracting sufficient numbers of qualified drivers.  In addition, due in part to current economic conditions, including the cost of fuel and insurance, the available pool of independent contractor drivers is smaller than it has been historically.

 

19



 

Accordingly, we may face difficulty in attracting and retaining drivers for all of our current tractors and for those we plan to add.  Additionally, we may face difficulty in increasing the number of our independent contractor drivers. In addition, our industry suffers from high turnover rates of drivers. Our turnover rate requires us to recruit a substantial number of drivers. Moreover, our turnover rate could increase. If we are unable to continue to attract drivers and contract with independent contractors, we could be required to adjust our driver compensation package or let trucks sit idle.  Effective January 1, 2005, we increased the amount paid to company drivers by 1 cent per mile and increased the incentives paid to independent contractors.  We also instituted a second pay increase of 2 cents per mile for company drivers effective April 1, 2005.  Our compensation of drivers and independent contractors is subject to market forces, and we may increase their compensation further in future periods.  An increase in our expenses or in the number of tractors without drivers could materially and adversely affect our growth and profitability.

 

Fluctuations in the price or availability of fuel may increase our cost of operation, which could materially and adversely affect our profitability.  We require large amounts of diesel fuel to operate our tractors and to power the temperature-control units on our trailers. Fuel is one of our largest operating expenses. Fuel prices tend to fluctuate, and prices and availability of all petroleum products are subject to political, economic and market factors that are beyond our control. We depend primarily on fuel surcharges, volume purchasing arrangements with truck stop chains and bulk purchases of fuel at our terminals to control our fuel expenses. There can be no assurance that we will be able to collect fuel surcharges or enter into successful hedges in the future. Fluctuations in fuel prices, or a shortage of diesel fuel, could adversely affect our results of operations.

 

Seasonality and the impact of weather can affect our profitability.  Our tractor productivity generally decreases during the winter season because inclement weather impedes operations and some shippers reduce their shipments. At the same time, operating expenses generally increase, with fuel efficiency declining because of engine idling and harsh weather creating higher accident frequency, increased claims and more equipment repairs.

 

We operate in a highly regulated industry and increased costs of compliance with, or liability for violation of, existing or future regulations could have a materially adverse effect on our business.  The DOT and various state and local agencies exercise broad powers over our business, generally governing such activities as authorization to engage in motor carrier operations, safety and insurance requirements. Our company drivers and independent contractors also must comply with the safety and fitness regulations promulgated by the DOT, including those relating to drug and alcohol testing and hours-of-service. The DOT adopted revised hours-of-service regulations effective in January 2004.  In response, we negotiated delay time charges with the majority of our customers.  The regulations did not have a significant impact on our operations or financial results for 2004 or the first nine months of 2005.   In July 2004, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated the new hours-of-service regulations in their entirety and remanded the matter to the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Administration, or FMCSA, for reconsideration.  In October 2004, the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2004 (Part V) extended the current hours of service regulations until the earlier of the FMCSA developing a revised set of regulations or September 30, 2005.  In August 2005, the FMCSA issued a revised set of regulations effective October 1, 2005.  We do not expect the current regulations to have a significant impact on our operations or financial results.  However, uncompensated shortfalls in our utilization due to compliance with the regulations could adversely impact our profitability.

 

The engines used in the majority of our tractors are subject to revised emissions control regulations, which may substantially increase our operating expenses.  The EPA adopted revised emissions control regulations, which require progressive reductions in exhaust emissions from diesel engines through 2007, for engines manufactured in October 2002, and thereafter. The revised regulations decrease the amount of emissions that can be released by truck engines and affect tractors produced after the effective date of the regulations. Compliance with these regulations has increased the cost of our new tractors, lowered fuel mileage and increased our operating expenses. Some manufacturers have significantly increased new equipment prices, in part to meet new engine design requirements imposed by the EPA, and eliminated or sharply reduced the price of repurchase commitments. These adverse effects combined with the uncertainty as to the reliability of the vehicles equipped with the newly designed diesel engines and the residual values that will be realized from the disposition of these vehicles could increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations. Furthermore, even more restrictive EPA engine design requirements will take effect in 2007.  Compliance with

 

20



 

the 2007 EPA standards is expected to result in further declines in fuel economy, and may result in further increases in the cost of new tractors.

 

Item 3.  Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

We are exposed to a variety of market risks, most importantly the effects of the price and availability of diesel fuel and changes in interest rates.

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

Our operations are heavily dependent upon the use of diesel fuel. The price and availability of diesel fuel can vary and are subject to political, economic and market factors that are beyond our control. Significant increases in diesel fuel costs could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Historically, we have been able to recover a portion of diesel fuel price increases from customers in the form of fuel surcharges.

 

We presently use fuel surcharges to address the risk of high fuel prices. Fuel surcharge programs are widely accepted among our customers, though they can vary somewhat from customer-to-customer. We believe fuel surcharges are effective at mitigating the risk of high fuel prices, although we do not recover the full amount of fuel price increases.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

Our market risk is also affected by changes in interest rates. We have historically maintained a combination of fixed rate and variable rate obligations to manage our interest rate exposure. Fixed rate obligations expose us to the risk that interest rates might fall. Variable rate obligations expose us to the risk that interest rates might rise. We did not have any interest rate swaps at September 30, 2005, although we may enter into such swaps in the future if we deem appropriate.

 

Our fixed rate obligations consist of amounts outstanding under our unsecured senior notes. The $14.3 million outstanding at September 30, 2005, under our Series A Senior Notes, bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.78%. The $7.1 million outstanding at September 30, 2005, under our Series B Senior Notes, bears interest at a fixed annual rate of 8.57%.  Based on such outstanding amounts, a one percentage point decline in interest rates would have the effect of increasing the premium we pay over market interest rates by approximately $214,000 annually.

 

Our variable rate obligations consist of borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Our revolving credit facility carries a variable interest rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate or the bank’s Prime Rate, in each case plus applicable margins. The weighted average interest rate for the facility was 5.1% at September 30, 2005. As of September 30, 2005, we had borrowed $14.8 million under the credit facility. Based on such outstanding amount, a one percentage point increase in interest rates would cost us $148,000 in additional gross interest cost on an annual basis.

 

21



 

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures.

 

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report.  This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.  Based upon that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2005.  There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  We intend to periodically evaluate our disclosure controls and procedures as required by the Exchange Act Rules.

 

22



 

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 6.    Exhibits.

 

Item No.

 

Item

 

Method of Filing

31.1

 

Certification pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Randolph L. Marten, the Registrant’s President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

 

Filed with this Report.

 

 

 

 

 

31.2

 

Certification pursuant to Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by Darrell D. Rubel, the Registrant’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

 

Filed with this Report.

 

 

 

 

 

32.1

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Filed with this Report.

 

23



 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

 

MARTEN TRANSPORT, LTD.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: November 9, 2005

By:

/s/Randolph L. Marten

 

 

 

Randolph L. Marten

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: November 9, 2005

By:

/s/ Darrell D. Rubel

 

 

 

Darrell D. Rubel

 

 

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

 

 

Officer and Treasurer

 

 

(Principal Financial Officer)

 

24